Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D), MARIAS Notis ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE), Péter NIEDERMÜLLER ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1427 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament noted that the Agency recognises the financial risks due to Brexit as the potential loss of financial resources could impact the Agency's operational activities. It noted that the Agency could possibly reduce the impact of this financial loss due to the fact that its operational research activities will not include the United Kingdom. However, the financial loss is expected to be higher than the savings from the limitation of research activities.
Parliament also noted that the Agency recognises the operational risks due to Brexit and the resulting potential loss of competition as a number of operational related contractors are based in the United Kingdom and loss of skilful British national staff members. It called on the Agency to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimise any negative operational or financial impact that may occur.
Lastly, Parliament welcomed the fact that the Agency continued its research on the situation of Roma in the Union.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Un ion Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) in regard to the implementation of the agency’s budget for the 2016 financial year and to approve the closure of the accounts for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2016 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular , Parliament adopted by 551 votes to 136 with 5 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : the final budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2016 was EUR 21 603 000, approximately the same amount as in 2015. Budget and financial management : Members noted with satisfaction that budget monitoring efforts in the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 100 % , which is the same rate as the previous year, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 73.21 %, representing an increase of 1.59 % compared to the previous year. Commitments and carry-overs : the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2017 for operating expenditure was again very high at EUR 5.2 million (68 %), compared to EUR 5.7 million (70 %) for the previous year. These carry-overs mainly reflect the nature of activities of the Agency which involve financing studies that span over many months, often beyond year-end. Carry-overs are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Members also made a series of observations regarding, transfers, procurement and staff policy and internal audits and controls.
The report noted that 49.3 % of the Agency’s temporary agents are female and 50.7 % are male. Members regretted, however, the significant imbalance in the Agency’s six senior management positions, with a ratio of one woman to five men. The Agency is called on to aim for a more gender-balanced staff composition at the level of senior posts.
With regard to preventing conflicts of interest, Members emphasised the need to establish an independent body with sufficient budgetary resources to support whistleblowers wishing to disclose information on possible irregularities negatively impacting on the Union’s financial interests, while ensuring their confidentiality is protected.
In addition, Members noted that the Agency recognises the financial risks due to Brexit as the potential loss of financial resources could impact the Agency's operational activities. The Agency also noted the operational risks due to Brexit and the resulting potential loss of competition as a number of operational related contractors are based in the United Kingdom and loss of skilful British national staff members. The Agency is called to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimise any negative operational or financial impact that may occur.
Lastly, Members welcomed the fact that the Agency continued its research on the situation of the Roma in the Union.
Enfin, les députés se sont félicités que l'Agence poursuive ses recherches sur la situation des Roms dans l'Union.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Agency’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : the final budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2016 was EUR 21 603 000, approximately the same amount as in 2015. Budget and financial management : Members noted with satisfaction that budget monitoring efforts in the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 100 %, which is the same rate as the previous year, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 73.21 %, representing an increase of 1.59 % compared to the previous year. Commitments and carry-overs : the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2017 for operating expenditure was again very high at EUR 5.2 million (68 %), compared to EUR 5.7 million (70 %) for the previous year. These carry-overs mainly reflect the nature of activities of the Agency which involve financing studies that span over many months, often beyond year-end. Carry-overs are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Members also made a series of observations regarding, transfers, procurement and staff policy and internal audits and controls.
The report noted that 49.3 % of the Agency’s temporary agents are female and 50.7 % are male. Members regretted, however, the significant imbalance in the Agency’s six senior management positions, with a ratio of one woman to five men. The Agency is called on to aim for a more gender-balanced staff composition at the level of senior posts.
In addition, Members noted that the Agency recognises the financial risks due to Brexit as the potential loss of financial resources could impact the Agency's operational activities. The Agency also noted the operational risks due to Brexit and the resulting potential loss of competition as a number of operational related contractors are based in the United Kingdom and loss of skilful British national staff members. The Agency is called to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimise any negative operational or financial impact that may occur.
Lastly, Members welcomed the fact that the Agency continued its research on the situation of Roma in the Union.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that the Agency's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Agency's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the following observations were made:
financial programming : the Council acknowledged the multiannual nature of the Agency's procurement of studies spanning over several years and its reply to the Court's suggestion to use differentiated appropriations to address the high level of commitments carried over. It, nevertheless, called on the Agency to continue monitoring its budget implementation in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the following financial year and the amount cancelled at the end of the following year to the minimum strictly necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) for the financial year 2016, together with the Agency’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Fundamental Rights Agency ( FRA ). In brief, the objective of the Agency is to provide the relevant authorities of the Union and its Member States with assistance and expertise when implementing Union law relating to fundamental rights.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Agency, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management and the internal controls of the Agency, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court stated that carry-overs of committed appropriations were high regarding operating expenditure at EUR 5.2 million, i.e. 68 % (2015: EUR 5.7 million, i.e. 70 %). They mainly reflect the nature of the activities which involve financing studies that span over several months, often beyond year-end. The Agency may consider introducing differentiated budget appropriations to better reflect the multi annual nature of operations and inevitable delays between the signature of contracts, deliveries and payments; internal controls : the Court stated that formal (sub-)delegations from authorising officers (by delegation) were not always consistent with the authorisation rights for transactions in the ABAC workflow system.
The Agency’s replies :
budgetary management : the Agency stated it has already assessed the possibility of using differentiated appropriations and concluded that, since the operational projects do not have a lifespan of more than 2 years, there is very little added value in using them; internal controls : the FRA replied by stating that in 2015 and 2016, as a result of organisational changes within the Agency, the Authorising Officer sub-delegations were updated. Due to a transcription error, all delegations, both old and current, were considered valid by the ABAC financial system. The error was corrected and measures have been put in place to ensure that ABAC only reflects currently valid delegations.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Agency’s activities in 2016 :
Budget : EUR 21.6 million (in payment appropriations).
Staff : 105 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cashflows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).
Fundamental Rights Agency : the Agency, which is located in Vienna (AT), was established by Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 and aims to provide the relevant authorities of the Union and its Member States with assistance and expertise when implementing Union law relating to fundamental rights. Its task is to collect information as well as providing expert advice to the institutions on a range of issues.
As regards the Agency’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 22 million; made: EUR 22 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 28 million; made : EUR 22 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the FRA’s 2016 annual report .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cashflows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).
Fundamental Rights Agency : the Agency, which is located in Vienna (AT), was established by Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 and aims to provide the relevant authorities of the Union and its Member States with assistance and expertise when implementing Union law relating to fundamental rights. Its task is to collect information as well as providing expert advice to the institutions on a range of issues.
As regards the Agency’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 22 million; made: EUR 22 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 28 million; made : EUR 22 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the FRA’s 2016 annual report .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0163/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0093/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.269
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.651
- Committee draft report: PE613.449
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0228
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0041/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0228 N8-0041/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.449
- Committee opinion: PE613.651
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.269
Votes
A8-0093/2018 - Bart Staes - résolution 18/04/2018 13:05:46.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
21 |
2017/2149(DEC)
2018/01/19
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets the fact that the Agency’s mandate still limits its role as regards the support for fundamental rights; stresses that the Agency should be able to offer opinions on legislative proposals and informative documents on its own initiative and that its remit should extend to all areas of rights protected under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including issues of judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters; recommends the inclusion of the those thematic areas in the new multiannual financial framework;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes with concern
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Court of Auditors identified that formal delegations and sub- delegations from authorising officers were not always consistent with the corresponding authorisation rights for transactions in the Agency’s financial systems; notes the immediate correction of the error by the Agency
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that, as in 2015, carry-overs of committed appropriations were too high for Title III (operating expenditure) at EUR 5,2 million
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, as in 2015, carry-overs of committed appropriations were high for Title III (operating expenditure) at EUR 5,2 million, i.e. 68 %; acknowledges that this
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes, in line with the Agency’s strategic priority to develop targeted responses to fundamental rights emergencies, the publication by the Agency of monthly reports on the situation in the Member States most affected by the refugee crises and the work of the expert staff deployed to Greece to assist Union and local actors on the ground with fundamental rights expertise;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Welcomes the fact that the Agency continued its research on the situation of Roma in the Union; welcomes, in particular, in this regard the publication of the Second Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey gathering information on almost 34 000 persons living in Roma households in nine Member States, derived from nearly 8 000 face-to-face interviews with Roma;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 source: 616.704
2018/03/02
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Director of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that, according to the Court’s report, the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2017 for Title III (operating expenditure) was again very high at EUR 5 200 000 (68 %), compared to EUR 5 700 000 (70 %) for the previous year; acknowledges that, according to the Court, these carry-overs mainly reflect the nature of activities of the Agency which involve financing studies that span over many months, often beyond year-end;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that 49,3 % of the Agency’s temporary agents are female and 50,7 % are male; regrets, however, the significant imbalance in the Agency’s six senior management positions, with a ratio of one woman to five men; calls on the Agency to
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Observes
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that in 2016 the Agency received 20 requests for access to documents and that it granted full access to 22 documents, partial access to 120 documents and refused access to 68 documents due to “Protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual” and “Protection of commercial interests”; expects that the Agency, when deciding on limiting the access to documents due to the protection of commercial interests, also considers with
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Notes that the Agency recognises the operational risks due to Brexit as potential loss of competition as a number of operational related contractors are based in the United Kingdom and a loss of skilful British national staff members; calls on the Agency to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimize any negative operational or financial impact that may occur;
source: 618.269
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-26T00:00:00New
2017-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.449New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613449_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.651&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-613651_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.269New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618269_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0093&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0093_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0163New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0163_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10777New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 248 03.10.2018, p. 0332New
OJ L 248 03.10.2018, p. 0332 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/4/docs/1/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-04-16T00:00:00New
2018-04-18T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10777
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/date |
2017-09-14T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|