Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D), MARIAS Notis ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | FERBER Markus ( PPE) | Jens ROHDE ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Railway Agency (ERA) for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1400 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency (now European Union Agency for Railways) for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Railway Agency for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament acknowledged that it is not in the Agency’s power to decide to centralise all the Agency’s operations into one location . The Agency’s double seat was decided by the Council. Parliament pointed out that the reduction of costs might be facilitated by a comprehensive seat agreement with the host Member State — which would also have the effect of clarifying the conditions under which the Agency and its staff operate — ending a situation in which the costs of operations are likely to be higher than necessary. The Council is called on to reconsider its previous decision and opt instead for centralising all the Agency’s operations into one location.
Parliament welcomed the adoption of the Agency Regulation , which entered into force on 15 June 2016. By the end of the transitional period (16 June 2019), this expected strategic change will transform the Agency from a mere policy preparation and dissemination role into an authority working directly for the industry as regards authorisations for safety certifications and rolling stock. This transition is expected to deliver huge benefits in terms of reduced costs.
Lastly, Parliament noted that the 2016 risk assessment exercise highlighted new risks, as compared to 2015, related to the late and inconsistent transposition of the 4the Railway Package legislation, to the obsolescence of ERTMS change management tools, to railway noise reduction, to delays in the reduction of national rules and to data management.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Railways in regard to the implementation of the agency’s budget for the 2016 financial year and to approve the closure of the accounts for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2016 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular , Parliament adopted by 552 votes to 133 with 9 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements: the final budget of the European Union Agency for Railways for the financial year 2016 was EUR 27 545 879, representing an increase of 4.56 % compared to 2015. The budget of the agency derives mainly from the Union budget. Follow-up of 2014 and 2015 discharges: single location: it was stressed that it is likely that costs would be reduced if all operations were centralised in one location as opposed to the current double seat Lille/Valenciennes. The Council is called to reconsider its previous decision regarding the double seat and opt instead for centralising all the agency’s operations into one location. Budget and financial management: budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.20 %,representing an increase of 0.10 % compared to 2015 and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 91.57 %, representing an increase of 1.79 % compared to 2015. Members welcomed that with the provisions of the new Agency Regulation that entered into force in June 2016, the agency is authorised to charge fees for some of its new competences. Commitments and carry-overs: the level of the carry‐overs were below the indicative ceilings used by the Court to assess the budget execution for all budgetary titles.
Members also made a series of observations regarding staff policy, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, procurement and internal audits and controls. They deplored the significant gender imbalance in the senior management level and the management board of the agency while welcoming the training organised to increase the awareness of the staff about harassment. As regards conflicts of interest, they emphasised the need to establish an independent body with sufficient budgetary resources to support whistleblowers wishing to disclose information on possible irregularities negatively impacting on the Union’s financial interests, while ensuring their confidentiality is protected.
Overall, they welcomed the adoption of the Agency Regulation, which entered into force on 15 June 2016. By the end of the transitional period (16 June 2019), this expected strategic change will transform the agency’s role from one of mere policy preparation and dissemination into an authority working directly for the industry as regards authorisations for safety certifications and rolling stock. This transition is expected to deliver huge benefits in terms of reduced costs.
Members recalled the European Parliament's position in budgetary procedure for recovering total amounts relocated from the Connecting Europe Facility to the European Fund for Strategic Investments.
Funding for the completion of the single European rail area should be safeguarded also with a view to modernising and expanding rail infrastructures in the outlying regions of the Union. The deployment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) should be brought forward in order to further implement common technical standards and maximise the benefits in terms of interoperability.
Lastly, Members noted that the 2016 risk assessment exercise highlighted new risks , as compared to 2015, related to the late and inconsistent transposition of the 4th Railway Package legislation, to the obsolescence of European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS) change management tools, to railway noise reduction, to delays in the reduction of national rules and to data management.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency (now European Union Agency for Railways) for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the agency’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Agency’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : Members noted that the final budget of the European Union Agency for Railways for the financial year 2016 was EUR 27 545 879, representing an increase of 4.56 % compared to 2015. The budget of the Agency derives mainly from the Union budget. Follow-up of 2014 and 2015 discharges : single location : it was stressed that it is likely that costs would be reduced if all operations were centralised in one location as opposed to the actual double seat Lille/Valenciennes. The Council is called to reconsider its previous decision regarding the double seat and opt instead for centralising all the Agency’s operations into one location. Budget and financial management : budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.20 %, representing an increase of 0.10 % compared to 2015 and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 91.57 %, representing an increase of 1.79 % compared to 2015. Members welcomed that with the provisions of the new Agency Regulation that entered into force in June 2016, the Agency is authorised to charge fees for some of its new competences. Commitments and carry-overs : the level of the carry‐overs were below the indicative ceilings used by the Court to assess the budget execution for all budgetary titles.
Members also made a series of observations regarding staff policy, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, procurement and internal audits and controls.
Overall, they welcomed the adoption of the Agency Regulation, which entered into force on 15 June 2016. By the end of the transitional period (16 June 2019), this expected strategic change will transform the Agency from a mere policy preparation and dissemination role into an authority working directly for the industry as regards authorisations for safety certifications and rolling stock. This transition is expected to deliver huge benefits in terms of reduced costs .
Members recalled the European Parliament's position in budgetary procedure for recovering total amounts relocated from the Connecting Europe Facility to the European Fund for Strategic Investments. Funding for the completion of the single European rail area should be safeguarded also with a view to modernising and expanding rail infrastructures in the outlying regions of the Union. The deployment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) should be brought forward in order to further implement common technical standards and maximise the benefits in terms of interoperability.
Lastly, Members noted that the 2016 risk assessment exercise highlighted new risks, as compared to 2015, related to the late and inconsistent transposition of the 4th Railway Package legislation, to the obsolescence of European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS) change management tools, to railway noise reduction, to delays in the reduction of national rules and to data management.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the European Railway Agency (ERA) , as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
No comments were made by the Council as regards the accounts.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Railway Agency (ERA) for the year 2016, together with the Agency’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Railway Agency ( ERA ). In brief, the Agency’s task is to enhance the level of interoperability of railway systems and to develop a common approach to safety in order to contribute to creating a more competitive European railway sector with a high level of safety.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Agency, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The Court did not make any particular comment on the Agency’s budgetary management.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Agency’s key figures in 2016 :
Budget : EUR 27.5 million. Staff : 155 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Railway Agency (ERA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Railway Agency (ERA), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ERA .
The European Railway Agency : the Agency, which is located in Lille-Valenciennes (FR), was created by Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Its aim is to enhance the level of interoperability of railway systems and develop a common approach to safety in order to contribute to creating a more competitive European railway sector with a high level of safety.
As regards the Agency’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 28 million; made: EUR 28 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 30 million; made : EUR 28 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the ERA .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Railway Agency (ERA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Railway Agency (ERA), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ERA .
The European Railway Agency : the Agency, which is located in Lille-Valenciennes (FR), was created by Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Its aim is to enhance the level of interoperability of railway systems and develop a common approach to safety in order to contribute to creating a more competitive European railway sector with a high level of safety.
As regards the Agency’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 28 million; made: EUR 28 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 30 million; made : EUR 28 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the ERA .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0154/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0079/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.260
- Committee opinion: PE613.308
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.452
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0166
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0032/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0166 N8-0032/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.452
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.308
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.260
Votes
A8-0079/2018 - Bart Staes - résolution 18/04/2018 13:01:49.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
26 |
2017/2162(DEC)
2018/01/26
TRAN
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the target of 95 % for the execution of payment within the set deadline of 30 days has not been reached; notes that the reasons for the delays in payment remain the same as in 2015, i.e. delays in processing invoices by the Agency´s staff, shortage of cash and disagreement with suppliers on the content of the invoices; asks the Agency to adopt remedial actions in order to reach the 95 % target within a reasonable period;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, in 2016, the Agency continued the implementation of the action plan defined in the Agency Antifraud Strategy, by organising tailor made training sessions on fraud prevention; welcomes that a comprehensive revision of the Agency's rules on Conflict of Interest (Col) has been carried out in 2017; further notes that, within the framework of the policy on conflict of interest for the Administrative Board (AB), the Agency published the CVs and the declaration of interest of AB Members; notes, however, that some CVs and declarations of interest are missing; requests that CVs and declarations of interests are published without delay after the appointment of AB Members;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, in 2016, the Agency continued the implementation of the action plan defined in the Agency Antifraud
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that corrective actions related to the Court’s comments of 2013 regarding the double location of the Agency in Lille and Valenciennes have not yet been implemented;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that corrective actions related to the Court’s comments of 2013 regarding the double location of the Agency in Lille and Valenciennes have not yet been implemented; further
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes the results of the annual benchmarking exercise focusing on the efficiency of internal resources showing a decrease of the percentage of staff assigned to administrative tasks (from 23 % to 18 %) and an increase in the percentage of staff assigned to operational task (from 65 % to 70 %), while the staff assigned to control and financial tasks was around 12 %; regrets, however, that the evolution of percentage is mainly due to a correction in the assignment of staff into the various categories;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the Agency’s strategic role in improving the competitiveness of rail with other modes of transport and helping to develop an efficiently operating single European rail area without borders by reducing administrative and technical barriers, by encouraging market entry and ensuring non-discrimination, by spending public money more efficiently on public rail transport services and by ensuring better governance of the infrastructure; welcomes the focused programme on the cleaning-up of national rules in order to reduce the impact or eliminate the existing barriers between Member States;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Highlights the Agency's role in ensuring the safety and interoperability of the European rail system, revitalising the rail sector and improving the quality of rail transport services; supports the
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Highlights the Agency's role in ensuring the safety and interoperability of European rail system in order to contribute to creating a more competitive European railway sector; supports the Commission’s vision of a European railway system that leads the world on safety performance;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the Agency's role in the follow-up of the development, testing and implementation of European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS), as well as in evaluating the specific ERTMS projects; welcomes the start of negotiations between the EU and Switzerland within the framework of the Agreement on the Carriage of Goods and Passengers by Rail and Road with a view to Switzerland's participation in the European Union Agency for railways; stresses that, as the Agency receives greater responsibilities, it will need to be given the necessary financial, material and human resources to perform
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls the European Parliament's position in budgetary procedure for recovering total amounts relocated from the Connecting Europe Facility to the European Fund for Strategic Investments; stresses that funding for the completion of the single European rail area should be safeguarded with a view to modernising and expanding rail infrastructures in the outlying regions of the Union also; stresses further that the deployment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) should be brought forward in order to further implement common technical standards and maximise the benefits in terms of interoperability;
source: 616.817
2018/03/02
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Railways discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Expresses the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistle-blowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Takes note
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 6 Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets however that the Agency does not use the input indicators to further improve the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and recommends that this should change;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes with satisfaction that the Agency is now certified ISO 9001;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the adoption of the Agency Regulation, which entered into force on 15 June 2016; notes with satisfaction that by the end of the transitional period (16 June 2019), this expected strategic change will transform the Agency from a mere policy preparation and dissemination role into an authority working directly for the industry as regards authorisations for safety certifications and rolling stock; acknowledges from the Agency that this transition is expected to deliver huge benefits in terms of reduced costs;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Railway Agency (now European Union Agency for Railways)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that it is not in the Agency’s power to decide to centralize all the Agency’s operations into one location; recalls that when it was created in 2004, the Agency’s double seat (Lille/Valenciennes) was decided by the Council; takes note of the analysis made by the Agency on the budgetary impact of having a double seat and of its recommendation to keep that double seat; calls on the Council to reconsider its previous decision and opt instead for centralising all the Agency’s operations into one location;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that it is not in the Agency’s power to decide to centralize all the Agency’s operations into one location; recalls that when it was created in 2004, the Agency’s double seat (Lille/Valenciennes) was decided by the Council; takes note of the Court’s remark about the possible savings that could be achieved with a single location solution; notes, however, the analysis made by the Agency on the budgetary impact of having a double seat and of its recommendation to keep that double seat;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes with concern that 62 % of its staff is male and 38 % is female; re
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes with regret that 62 % of its staff is male and 38 % is female, an almost two to one imbalance; recalls that, regarding the gender balance in the management and Executive Boards, the members are proposed and appointed by the Member States but recommends that this issue should nevertheless be addresses as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the work-life balance should be part of the staff policy of the Agency; stresses that the budget spent on well-being activities amounts to EUR 228,7 per staff and a staff away day was organised in 2016; observes that the average number of sick leave per staff is 3,2 days, well below the average in most other agencies;
source: 618.260
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-26T00:00:00New
2017-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.452New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613452_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.308&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-613308_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.260New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618260_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0079&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0079_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0154New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0154_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10804New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-10-03T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-10-03T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10804
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/date |
2017-09-14T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|