Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D), FITTO Raffaele ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE), Péter NIEDERMÜLLER ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Police College (CEPOL) for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1352 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (before 1 July 2016: European Police College) (CEPOL) for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament recalled that a number of staff brought a legal claim against the College disputing the conditions in which the relocation was carried out and its financial impact on their income. Parliament noted that an amicable settlement has been reached with some members of staff and the payments were made to this end in 2015 and 2016. Some members of staff appealed the court judgement, which is expected in 2018.
As a consequence of the College’s relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary, and due to the significantly lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries in the new location, the number of resignations has increased. Parliament noted that a number of mitigating actions have been implemented. However, the low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary, and that as a result, the geographical balance of staff is not ensured.
Parliament also noted with concern that for the time being the College does not have sufficient information to allow a thorough preparation for carrying out future activities after Brexit. The Commission and the College are called on to update the discharge authority on Brexit-related risk management.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) in regard to the implementation of the agency’s budget for the 2016 financial year and to approve the closure of the accounts for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2016 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular , Parliament adopted by 554 votes to 126 with 9 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
College’s financial statements: the final budget of the European Police College for the financial year 2016 was EUR 10 291 700, representing an increase of 17.34 % compared to 2015 due to the grant agreement with the Commission on the EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership. The entire budget of the College derives from the Union budget. Budget and financial management: the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95.95 % , representing an increase of 0.44 % compared to 2015. Following the signature of the grant agreement with the Commission in 2005 on EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership, a budget of EUR 2 490 504 was agreed, out of which a second instalment of EUR 1 243 891 became available for commitments and payments. 89 % of the available credits have been committed and 48 % of the available credits have been paid. It should be noted that a number of staff brought a legal claim against the College disputing the conditions in which the relocation was carried out and its financial impact on their income. An amicable settlement has been reached with some members of staff and the payments were made to this end in 2015 and 2016. Commitments and carry-overs: Members observed that a total of EUR 1 477 288 was carried over to 2017, amounting to 17 % of the overall 2016 budget . The level of carryovers of committed appropriations was high for expenditure for support activities at EUR 140 055, i.e. 30 % (compared to EUR 212 456, i.e. 49 %, in 2015). These carry-overs mainly refer to IT consulting and IT related goods and services ordered late in the year. Members noted that carry-overs are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Staff policy: Members noted with satisfaction the gender balance achieved by the posts occupied in 2016, since the ratio is 50 % female to 50 % male. However, the gender balance ratio of 69 % to 31 % in the management board. They highlighted that, as a consequence of the College’s relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary , and due to the significantly lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries in the new location, the number of resignations has increased. Although a number of mitigating actions have been implemented, the low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary, and that as a result, the geographical balance of staff is not ensured . In 2016, 30% of all College staff were Hungarian, which is a disproportionate number. Conflicts of interest: the declarations of interest of senior management and of the Management Board Members have been published on the College’s website. Members called on the College to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken to publish the declarations of interest on the conflicts of interest and the confidentiality of external remunerated experts . They noted with satisfaction that rules on fraud reporting and the protection of whistleblowers are embedded in the College’s anti-fraud strategy.
Members also made a series of observations regarding transfers, procurement, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.
On performance , Members noted with satisfaction that for the sixth year in a row the outreach of the College has increased , resulting in the College training 18 009 law enforcement professionals in 2016 compared to 12 992 in 2015, representing an increase of over 38 %.
Members noted that the five-year external evaluation of the College (2011-2015) was completed by the external evaluator in January 2016. It was concluded that the College is efficient. However, there is a clear need for a significant reinforcement of the College with both human and financial resources and improve the online visibility of the College.
Lastly, Members noted with concern that for the time being the College does not have sufficient information to allow a thorough preparation for carrying out future activities after Brexit.
Brexit will limit the College’s access to United Kingdom law enforcement expertise and its ability to organise training with United Kingdom officials. These aspects might negatively impact the development of common practices, information exchange and ultimately cross-border cooperation on fighting and prevention of crime. Members recommended that measures be implemented to maintain - at the least - the current level of cooperation.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (before 1 July 2016: European Police College) (CEPOL) for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the College’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
College’s financial statements : the final budget of the European Police College for the financial year 2016 was EUR 10 291 700, representing an increase of 17.34 % compared to 2015 due to the grant agreement with the Commission on the EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership. The entire budget of the College derives from the Union budget. Budget and financial management : the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95.95 %, representing an increase of 0.44 % compared to 2015. Following the signature of the grant agreement with the Commission in 2005 on EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership, a budget of EUR 2 490 504 was agreed, out of which a second instalment of EUR 1 243 891 became available for commitments and payments. 89 % of the available credits have been committed and 48 % of the available credits have been paid. It should be noted that a number of staff brought a legal claim against the College disputing the conditions in which the relocation was carried out and its financial impact on their income. An amicable settlement has been reached with some members of staff and the payments were made to this end in 2015 and 2016. Commitments and carry-overs : Members observed that a total of EUR 1 477 288 was carried over to 2017, amounting to 17 % of the overall 2016 budget. The level of carryovers of committed appropriations was high for expenditure for support activities at EUR 140 055, i.e. 30 % (compared to EUR 212 456, i.e. 49 %, in 2015). These carry-overs mainly refer to IT consulting and IT related goods and services ordered late in the year. Members noted that carry-overs are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Staff policy : Members noted with satisfaction the gender balance achieved by the posts occupied in 2016, since the ratio is 50 % female to 50 % male. However, the gender balance ratio of 69 % to 31 % in the management board. The report highlighted that, as a consequence of the College’s relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary, and due to the significantly lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries in the new location, the number of resignations has increased . Although a number of mitigating actions have been implemented, the low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary, and that as a result, the geographical balance of staff is not ensured . In 2016, 30% of all College staff were Hungarian, which is a disproportionate number.
Members also made a series of observations regarding transfers, procurement, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.
On performance , Members stated that in 2016 the College’s training portfolio encompassed 174 training activities, of which 87 residential activities and 87 webinars, 492 exchanges in the frame of the European Police Exchange Programme, 27 online modules, one online course. They noted with satisfaction that for the sixth year in a row the outreach of the College has increased, resulting in the College training 18 009 law enforcement professionals in 2016 compared to 12 992 in 2015, representing an increase of over 38 %.
Members noted that the five-year external evaluation of the College (2011-2015) was completed by the external evaluator in January 2016. It was concluded that the College is efficient. However, there is a clear need for a significant reinforcement of the College with both human and financial resources.
Lastly, Members noted with concern that for the time being the College does not have sufficient information to allow a thorough preparation for carrying out future activities after Brexit . Brexit will limit the College’s access to United Kingdom law enforcement expertise and its ability to organise training with United Kingdom officials. These aspects might negatively impact the development of common practices, information exchange and ultimately cross-border cooperation on fighting and prevention of crime. Members recommended that measures be implemented to maintain - at the least - the current level of cooperation.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the European Police College (CEPOL) , as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Agency's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Agency's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The Council made the following observations:
recruitment : while noting the high staff turnover in the Agency and acknowledging that the relocation of the Agency from the United Kingdom can have an influence in the attractiveness of the Agency as a workplace, the Council stressed the importance of recruiting staff on as wide a geographical basis as possible. It encouraged the Agency to continue implementing staff retention measures; financial programming : the Agency is called on to continue improving its financial programming in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the next financial year to the minimum strictly necessary, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2016, together with the Agency’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training ( CEPOL ). The Agency’s task is to function as a network and to bring together the national police training institutes in the Member States to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police agents.
Statement of Assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the College, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the College’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : the Court considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the College, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court noted that the carry-overs of committed appropriations were high for expenditure for support activities at EUR 140 055. They mainly refer to IT consulting and IT related goods and services ordered late in the year; staff policy : it also noted a high staff turnover which may impact business continuity and the Agency’s ability to implement the activities foreseen in its work programme. In 2016, 11 staff members left the Agency, while 21 were recruited. The low number of applications, particularly from Member States other than the host state, puts at risk the Agency’s ability to recruit suitable candidates. Possible reasons for the limited number of applications from other Member States are the salary correction coefficient applied for the host state (69 %) and competition with another EU body located in Budapest.
CEPOL’s reply :
budgetary management : the Agency took note of the Court’s comments on the carry-over rate for support activities. CEPOL further improved its budget management and commits to maintain compliance with the budgetary principle of annuality provided in the Financial Regulation; staff policy : the Agency has taken note of the Court’s comments as regards the move to Hungary. The low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient, does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary, therefore the geographical balance cannot be always ensured during the recruitment process. CEPOL will continue to implement staff retention and business continuity measures, however as long as the Agency cannot positively amend the grades, the staff turnover may keep its high trend .
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report also contained a summary of the College’s key figures in 2016 :
Budget : EUR 10.3 million. Staff : 41 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL).
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police College (CEPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including CEPOL .
CEPOL : CEPOL which is located in Budapest (HU) since October 2014 was established by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . It supports, develops, implements and coordinates training for law enforcement officials, while putting particular emphasis on the protection of human rights in the context of law enforcement, in particular in the areas of prevention of and fight against serious crime affecting two or more Member States and terrorism.
As regards CEPOL’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 10 million; made: EUR 9 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 11 million; made : EUR 9 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of CEPOL .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL).
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police College (CEPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including CEPOL .
CEPOL : CEPOL which is located in Budapest (HU) since October 2014 was established by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . It supports, develops, implements and coordinates training for law enforcement officials, while putting particular emphasis on the protection of human rights in the context of law enforcement, in particular in the areas of prevention of and fight against serious crime affecting two or more Member States and terrorism.
As regards CEPOL’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 10 million; made: EUR 9 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 11 million; made : EUR 9 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of CEPOL .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0138/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0098/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.236
- Committee opinion: PE613.654
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.463
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0047
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0014/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0047 N8-0014/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.463
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.654
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.236
Votes
A8-0098/2018 - Bart Staes - résolution 18/04/2018 12:54:26.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
29 |
2017/2163(DEC)
2018/01/19
LIBE
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that 2016 was the first full year of implementation of the ‘EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership project’;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes the total of 1.788 participants attended the Agency’s residential courses, webinars and exchanges in the area of fundamental rights reported in the Consolidated Annual Report 2016; encourages CEPOL to continue implementation of trainings in these areas;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls upon the College to adopt and implement without delay a clear and solid whistleblowing strategy and rules against "revolving doors" in line with the Union Staff Regulation;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Calls upon the College to implement without delay its aims to increase its online visibility and to further improve its website in order to make it even more relevant to its stakeholders and to better support CEPOL's work; recommends the College to better report effects of its activities, in particular on the security of the Union; recognizes the efforts of CEPOL in this direction;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Supports the intention of CEPOL to continue implementation of trainings and webinars to provide law enforcement officials with up-to-date information and best practice on identifying and investigating hate crimes and different forms of gender-based violence and to raise awareness about the challenges experienced by vulnerable social groups;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the budget and the staff of CEPOL increased by about 22% in 2016; notes in that context that carry-overs of committed appropriations were
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the high staff turnover of CEPOL after its relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the outreach of CEPOL has significantly increased in 2016 with
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Agrees with
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 source: 616.699
2018/03/02
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that with regards to external remunerated experts, the College publishes on its website, as part of the annual list of contractors, the expert contracts awarded by the College; notes, however, that the declarations on conflicts of interest and confidentiality for the remunerated experts are not published on the website - this lapse needs to be rectified; acknowledges that the College will revisit its arrangements on the publication of such declarations; calls on the College to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the College does not publish minutes of management meetings;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Expresses the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistle-blowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Notes that in November and December 2016 the Internal Audit Service audited the College on ‘Training Needs Assessment, Planning and Budgeting’ with focus on the core business activities; notes, moreover, that the draft audit report of March 2017 concludes that while the audit did not result in the identification of any critical or very important issues, the Internal Audit Service considers that there is room for improvement in the utilisation of the Justice and Home Affairs Training Matrix to avoid overlap with training courses organised by other justice and home affairs agencies - this issue should be addressed as soon as possible;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes with concern - given the fast-reducing time-line - from the College’s answers that for the time being the College does not have sufficient information to allow a thorough preparation for carrying out future activities after Brexit; notes that Brexit will limit the College’s access to the United Kingdom law enforcement expertise and ability to organise training with United Kingdom officials; notes that these aspects might negatively impact the development of common practices, information exchange and ultimately cross-
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges with approval that, at year-end, the College had paid 91 % of all its financial commitments on time, thereby exceeding the objective of 85 % of all payments being paid within the legally set timeframe; notes with satisfaction that no interest was charged by suppliers for late payments;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes with concern that a number of staff members brought a legal claim against the College disputing the conditions in which the relocation was carried out and its financial impact on their income; notes that an amicable settlement has been reached with some staff members and the payments were made to this end in 2015 and 2016; notes furthermore that some staff appealed the court judgement, which is expected in 2018; calls on the College to report to the Discharge Authority on the outcome of the appeal;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Observes that partly due to the lower correction coefficient applied in Hungary (69 % in 2016), the staff turnover is high, the geographical balance of staff is shifting and the College is employing more and more Hungarian staff members (approximately 30 % of all staff was from the host Member State in 2016); notes furthermore that it has an impact on staff cost, which led to the decision to transfer unused funds from Title 1 to Title 3 allowing the implementation of additional operational activities;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes with satisfaction the gender balance achieved by the posts occupied in 2016, since the ratio is 50 % female to 50 % male; notes, however, the gender balance ratio of 69 % to 31 % in the Management Board;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Observes that, as a consequence of the relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary, due to the significantly lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries in the new location, the number of resignations has increased; notes that a number of mitigating actions have been implemented; notes, however, that the low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient, does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary; therefore, the geographical balance is not always ensured; notes from the Court’s report that the high staff turnover may impact business continuity and the Agency’s ability to implement the activities foreseen in its work programme; expresses its concerns regarding the rule of law in Hungary and, in that regard, regarding the quality of the College in the long-term; emphasizes to take into account the efficiency when (re)locating agencies in Member States; stresses that the College, along with another judicial agency, should be located in The Netherlands;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Observes that, as a consequence of the relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary, due to the significantly lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries in the new location, the number of resignations has increased; notes that a number of mitigating actions have been implemented; notes, however, that the low grading of posts combined with low correction coefficient, does not encourage foreigners (especially from West and Northern Europe) to move to Hungary; therefore, the geographical balance is not always ensured; notes with concern from the Court’s report that the high staff turnover may impact business continuity and the Agency’s ability to implement the activities foreseen in its work programme and points out this problem needs to be addressed;
source: 618.236
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-26T00:00:00New
2017-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.463New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613463_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.654&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-613654_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.236New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618236_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0098&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0098_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0138New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0138_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10806New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10806
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/date |
2017-09-14T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|