Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D), MACOVEI Monica ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | Petr JEŽEK ( ALDE), Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE), Péter NIEDERMÜLLER ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Police Office (Europol) for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1424 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office (Europol) for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Police Office for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament noted that on 1 May 2017 the management board adopted rules for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in respect of its members, including in relation to their declarations of interests. However, it noted with regret that Europol's approach has been to declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Europol should report back to the discharge authority if management board members have actually published their declarations of interests by the set deadline.
Parliament noted that, according to Europol, there are substantial financial and operational risks due to the Brexit. It called on Europol to remain proactive in identifying and addressing those risks and to keep the discharge authority fully informed of the future impact of Brexit on Europol.
Europol is urged to publish its annual reviews in time for future discharge procedures in order to allow the discharge authority to perform its work in a fully informed manner.
Lastly, noting the ever-increasing demand for Europol’s services from Member States, Parliament regretted the fact that the tight ICT resources available have resulted in a re-prioritisation of core systems development activities, project delays and have also triggered an exploration of further outsourcing possibilities with the increased risks that that implies.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Police Office (Europol) in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2016, and to approve the closure of the accounts for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2016 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular , Parliament adopted by 559 votes to 122 with 16 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financial statements of Europol : the final budget of the European Police Office for the financial year 2016 was EUR 104 274 784, representing an increase of 9.27 % compared to 2015. This increase was due to new or additional tasks that expanded the mandate of Europol. Budget and financial management : the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a high budget implementation rate of 99.75 %. The payment appropriations execution rate was 90.98 %, indicating an increase of 1.98 % compared to 2015; Commitments and carry-overs : the carry-overs of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure reached EUR 3.5 million (39 %), compared to EUR 4.2 million (41 %) in 2015. Members noted that these carry-overs mainly concerned Europol’s headquarters, which were only invoiced by the host state in 2017 (EUR 2 million). These carry-overs may be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Members also made a series of observations regarding procurement and staff policy, internal audits and controls. They deeply regretted that having regard to the total number of posts occupied on 31 December 2016, gender balance has not been achieved since the ratio is more than two to one – 32.4 % female to 67.6 % male. On the other hand, they noted with satisfaction that Europol has established a network of 10 confidential counsellors as a part of the policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing psychological and sexual harassment.
They stressed the need to establish an independent body with sufficient budgetary resources to help whistleblowers to disclose information about possible irregularities affecting the Union's financial interests, while protecting their confidentiality.
Parliament welcomed the establishment of the European Counter Terrorism Centre and the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, including the on-the-spot deployment of staff to perform over 4 800 secondary security checks in migration hotspots by the end of 2016.
Lastly, Members noted that, according to Europol, there are substantial financial and operational risks due to the Brexit. Europol was called on to remain proactive in identifying and addressing those risks and to keep the discharge authority fully informed of the future impact of Brexit on Europol.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office (Europol) for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation discharge in respect of the implementation of the Europol’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Office for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of Europol’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financial statements of Europol : Members noted that the final budget of the European Police Office for the financial year 2016 was EUR 104 274 784, representing an increase of 9.27 % compared to 2015. This increase was due to new or additional tasks which expanded the mandate of Europol.
Commitments and carry-overs : Members took note of the carry-overs of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure reached EUR 3.5 million (39 %), compared to EUR 4.2 million (41 %) in 2015. They noted that these carry-overs mainly concerned Europol’s headquarters, which were only invoiced by the host state in 2017 (EUR 2 million). These carry-overs may be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Members also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, procurement and staff policy, internal audits and controls. It deeply regretted that having regard to the total number of posts occupied on 31 December 2016, gender balance has not been achieved since the ratio is more than two to one – 32.4 % female to 67.6 % male.
They report welcomed the establishment of the European Counter Terrorism Centre and the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, including the on-the-spot deployment of staff to perform over 4 800 secondary security checks in migration hotspots by the end of 2016.
Lastly, they noted that, according to Europol, there are substantial financial and operational risks due to the Brexit . Europol is called on to remain proactive in identifying and addressing those risks and to keep the discharge authority fully informed of the future impact of Brexit on Europol.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the European Police Office (Europol), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of Europol for the financial year 2016, accompanied by Europol's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of Europol in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, Europol's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of Europol's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the following observation was made:
financial programming : the Council called on Europol to continue improving its financial programming in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the next financial year in line with the budgetary principle of annuality.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Police Office (Europol) for the year 2016, together with Europol’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Police Office ( Europol ). To recall, the Office seeks to provide support and strengthen action by the Member States' police authorities and other law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Office, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016; and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Office’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of Europol, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court noted that as in previous years carry-overs of committed appropriations have been high for administrative expenditure at EUR 3.5 million. They mainly concern 2016 expenditure for the Office’s headquarters which will only be invoiced by the Host State in 2017 (EUR 2 million).
Europol’s reply :
budgetary management : Europol takes note of the ECA’s comment and will continue its efforts to ensure efficient and compliant budget implementation, especially concerning carry-forwards in relation to administrative expenditure. Due to the work regarding Europol’s headquarters being performed under the authority of the Host State as an external party, the handling of building-related costs is expected to spread across financial years also in future.
The Court of Auditors’ report also contained a summary of Europol’s key figures in 2016 :
Budget : EUR 104 million (in payment appropriations). Staff : 737 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police Office (EUROPOL) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police Office (EUROPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EUROPOL .
EUROPOL : the European Police Office (the Office), which is located in The Hague (NL), was established by Council Decision 2009/371/JHA . Europol’s mission is to support the Member States in preventing and combating all forms of serious international and organised crime and terrorism. It works closely with law enforcement agencies in the 28 EU Member States and in other non-EU partner states.
As regards the accounts , the revenue of Europol was almost fully covered by the Community subsidy, amounting to EUR 102.27 million in 2016.
The commitment implementation rate at the end of December was 99.8%, which is similar to the rate at the same time last year and above the target of 95%. The payment rate was 91%, which is 2% higher than last year and above the target of 90%. The carry forward from 2016 to 2017 amounts to EUR 8.9 million.
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 122 million; made: EUR 115 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 133 million; paid: EUR 112 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to EUROPOL’s consolidated annual activity report .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police Office (EUROPOL) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police Office (EUROPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EUROPOL .
EUROPOL : the European Police Office (the Office), which is located in The Hague (NL), was established by Council Decision 2009/371/JHA . Europol’s mission is to support the Member States in preventing and combating all forms of serious international and organised crime and terrorism. It works closely with law enforcement agencies in the 28 EU Member States and in other non-EU partner states.
As regards the accounts , the revenue of Europol was almost fully covered by the Community subsidy, amounting to EUR 102.27 million in 2016.
The commitment implementation rate at the end of December was 99.8%, which is similar to the rate at the same time last year and above the target of 95%. The payment rate was 91%, which is 2% higher than last year and above the target of 90%. The carry forward from 2016 to 2017 amounts to EUR 8.9 million.
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 122 million; made: EUR 115 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 133 million; paid: EUR 112 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to EUROPOL’s consolidated annual activity report .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0162/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0109/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.268
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.648
- Committee draft report: PE613.454
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0223
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0040/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0223 N8-0040/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.454
- Committee opinion: PE613.648
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.268
Votes
A8-0109/2018 - Bart Staes - décision 18/04/2018 13:04:13.000 #
A8-0109/2018 - Bart Staes - résolution 18/04/2018 13:05:26.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
43 |
2017/2169(DEC)
2018/01/19
LIBE
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Regrets that, as of 18 January 2018, neither the Europol Review 2016 nor the Europol Consolidated Annual Activity Report 2016 were made publicly available, thus hampering the ability of the co-legislators to perform their work on the 2016 discharge procedure in a fully informed manner;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the commitment of Europol to address in a timely fashion the single critical recommendation and the twenty-six very important recommendations identified as part of the internal audits conducted on operational support provided by the European Cybercrime Centre to Member States as well as on the implementation by Europol of internal control standards; welcomes the adoption and implementation of the Europol Anti-Fraud Strategy 2017-2018;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the commitment of Europol to address in a timely fashion the single critical recommendation and the twenty-six very important recommendations identified as part of the internal audits conducted on operational support provided by the European Cybercrime Centre to Member States as well as on the implementation by Europol of internal control standards
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that in 2016 Europol’s ICT network architecture was updated and that the network hosting the core business data and systems was
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Highlights that Europol’s new legal framework provides for additional measures in terms of providing the discharge authority with dedicated information about its work, including sensitive operational matters;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Highlights that Europol’s new legal framework provides for additional measures in terms of providing the discharge authority with dedicated information about its work, including sensitive operational matters;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Highlights that Europol’s new legal framework provides for additional measures in terms of providing the discharge authority with dedicated information about its work, including sensitive operational matters;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Highlights that Europol’s new legal framework provides for additional measures in terms of providing the discharge authority with dedicated information about its work, including sensitive operational matters by adopting a more flexible and modern data management system; regrets, however, that the publication of declarations of interest of the members of Europol’s management board is still pending;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the relatively high level of carry-overs of committed appropriations for Title II (administrative expenditure) at EUR 4,2 million, i.e. 41 %; acknowledges that it is due to the nature of the administrative arrangements between Europol and its host state regarding building works; notes that Europol received an Internal Security Fund emergency assistance grant of EUR 1,5 million in 2016 with a view to deploying experts (guest officers) to hotspots to conduct secondary security checks, for which the expenditure was audited and assessed as eligible in accordance with the grant agreement;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Welcomes the publication of the Europol Consolidated Activity Annual Report for 2016; regrets, however, that, despite previous recommendations, the publication by Europol of the European Court of Auditors' Report is still pending; notes that whistleblowing rules are available to Europol employees on Europol's intranet; regrets that the publication of whistleblowing rules is still pending; reiterates the importance of transparency in upholding citizens' trust in the Union and its institutions;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the relatively high level of carry-overs of committed appropriations for Title II (administrative expenditure) at EUR
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes th
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the 10 % staff and budget increases of Europol in 2016 following the decision to entrust Europol with new tasks;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the 10 % staff and budget increases of Europol in 2016 following the decision to entrust Europol with new tasks;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the 1
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges the ever-increasing demand for Europol’s services from Member States;
source: 616.702
2018/03/02
CONT
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation discharge in respect of the implementation of the Europol’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the Europol’s staff spent an average of 1,2 % of the working days in 2016 on sick leave; observes
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes with satisfaction that the Europol’s staff spent an average of only 1,2 % of the working days in 2016 on sick leave; observes with some concern that the number of days spent per member of staff on wellbeing activities in 2016 was less than one day; notes that Europol did not name different wellbeing activities put in place in 2016, as requested by Parliament, but reported on the costs spent per staff on the medical provider and related costs; calls on Europol to report on the sick leave overview counted in days and introduce additional wellbeing activities for its staff and invites the whole staff to take part in it;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the Internal Audit Function carried out a review of the implementation of the Internal Control Standards in Europol in the first semester of 2016; notes that Europol prepared an action plan to address 15 out of the 40 recommendations by the end of 2016
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes with satisfaction that 83 % of all audit recommendations by the Court, the Internal Audit Service (IAS), the Europol Joint Supervisory Body, the Commission’s data protection officer, and the Internal Audit Function, graded as “critical” or “very important”, were addressed in 2016, but notes also that 17% of the recommendations, graded as "outstanding", is still a substantial number;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that 83 % of all audit recommendations by the Court, the Internal Audit Service (IAS), the Europol Joint Supervisory Body, the Commission’s data protection officer, and the Internal Audit Function, graded as “critical” or “very important”, were addressed in 2016, representing an increase of 12% compared to 2015;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that in 2016 Europol received 107 requests for access to documents (related to 138 documents) and that Europol granted full access to 39 documents, partial access was granted to 20 documents and access was refused to 79 documents; calls on Europol to be as open as possible in addressing those requests, bearing in mind the legal constraints but also the duty to openness and transparency;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that Europol launched an additional ‘ethics package’ communication campaign in October 2017 to raise awareness among all Europol staff and seconded national experts about the updated versions of the Europol’s Code of Conduct and guidance documentation on the handling of gifts, conflicts of interest and whistleblowing; notes with satisfaction that the guidance on whistleblowing underlines that Europol commits itself to protect the identity of whistleblowers; welcomes the publication of the guidance on whistleblowing arrangements on the Europol website; asks Europol to provide details on whistleblowing cases in 2016, if any, and how they were handled;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Expresses the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistleblowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation discharge in respect of the implementation of the Europol’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes with satisfaction that
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Notes with satisfaction that Europol continued to cooperate with a number of international partners as well as other Union agencies and bodies, and in particular, in view to the migration crisis, Europol further strengthened its cooperation with Frontex;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that, according to Europol’s answers, there are substantial financial and operational risks due to the Brexit; calls on Europol to keep the discharge authority fully informed of the future impact of the Brexit on Europol and to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimize any negative operational or financial impact that may occur;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that, according to Europol’s answers, there are substantial financial and operational risks due to
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of Europol for the financial year
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that, according to the Court’s report, the carry-overs of committed appropriations for Title II (administrative expenditure) were high at EUR 3 500 000 (39 %), compared to EUR 4 200 000 (41 %) in 2015; notes that these carry-overs mainly concerned the Europol’s headquarters, which will only be invoiced by the host state in 2017 (EUR 2 000 000); acknowledges the fact that Europol will continue its efforts to ensure efficient and compliant budget implementation, in particular concerning carry-overs in relation to administrative expenditure; notes that due to the work regarding the Europol’s headquarters performed under the authority of the host state as an external party, the handling of building-related costs is also expected to spread across financial years in future; notes that this is due to the inherent administrative set-up whereby Europol receives the related invoices after the host state has liaised with contractors at national level;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that a total number of 48 transfers were made for a total amount of almost EUR 4 960 000 (4,9 % of the budget); notes furthermore that some transfers were necessary to take into account differences between the planning and the implementation of the budget due to urgent situations in certain crime areas, for instance activities related to the hotspots; notes that transfers done in order to temporarily cover grant expenditure under the regular budget, due to the late cashing of the pre-financing amount of the grant agreement, were then reversed when the pre-financing was received;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that contracts with a value not exceeding EUR 15 000 can be awarded without any publication; notes that this is in line with the Europol's current legal obligations; calls for Europol to advertise all its contracts; highlights that transparent public procurement is key in upholding citizens' trust in the Union and its institutions;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Deeply regrets that,having regard to the number of all posts occupied on 31 December 2016, gender balance has not been achieved since the ratio is more than two to one - 32,4 % female to 67,6 % male - and that, even more alarming, female staff represented only 14 % in senior specialist / senior analyst positions and that moreover, with the worst ratio of all, the percentage of female staff in business manager and equivalent or higher positions was only 6,1 % (two members of staff); calls on Europol to be more proactive, and to take the gender balance issue into account as a matter of urgency when recruiting new staff and to inform the discharge authority during the next discharge procedure of the progress made at the end of 2017;
source: 618.268
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-26T00:00:00New
2017-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.454New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613454_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.648&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-613648_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.268New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618268_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0109&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0109_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0162New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0162_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10819New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 248 03.10.2018, p. 0326New
OJ L 248 03.10.2018, p. 0326 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
2016 discharge: European Police Office (Europol)New
2016 discharge: European Police Office (Europol) |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/4/docs/1/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-04-16T00:00:00New
2018-04-18T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
EPPNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
EPPNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
EPP |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
EPP |
procedure/title |
Old
2016 discharge: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)New
2016 discharge: European Police Office (Europol) |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-10-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10819
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/date |
2017-09-14T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|