Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | HAYES Brian ( PPE) | POCHE Miroslav ( S&D), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), DLABAJOVÁ Martina ( ALDE), TARAND Indrek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | FERBER Markus ( PPE) | Jens ROHDE ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Shift2Rail (S2R) Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1457 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament noted that even though the Commission's research anti-fraud strategy is mandatory for the Joint Undertaking, at the end of 2016, the Joint Undertaking had not yet performed a specific anti-fraud risk assessment, nor had it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy. However, in 2017, the Joint Undertaking took the first steps towards establishing its own anti-fraud action plan, i.e. an anti-fraud awareness session for Joint Undertaking staff organised by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and an anti-fraud risk assessment. This plan will be followed by an impact assessment establishing the key objectives relating to mitigation of identifiable weaknesses (in the 4th quarter of 2017) and an evaluation of the anti-fraud strategy and the action plan by June 2018.
Parliament called on the Commission to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings.
Lastly, Parliament insisted on the importance of the cooperation between the Joint Undertaking and the Union Agency for Railways (ERA) and welcomed the involvement of ERA in meetings of the Joint Undertaking governing board. The Joint Undertaking should provide more concrete information on the main achievements of this cooperation in its annual activity report.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016 and approve the closure of the accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors finds that the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 as well as the results of its operations and cash flows, Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 144, with 6 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge:
Budget and financial management : the final 2016 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 50 200 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 52 300 000. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 94 % and 82 % respectively which represent a low level especially for payment appropriations. Most of the payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016 were pre-financing payments for Horizon 2020 projects selected under the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals.
Out of the EUR 350 million of contributions to be made by the industry members to the operational activities and administrative costs of the Joint Undertaking, by the end of 2016, i.e. four months after the Joint Undertaking had launched its first Horizon 2020 projects, the members had reported in-kind contributions of EUR 4.5 million for operational activities, of which EUR 3 million had been certified. The governing board had validated cash contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s administrative costs of EUR 3.2 million.
By the end of 2016, the total contributions from industry members amounted to EUR 62.7 million, compared to the Union’s cash contribution of EUR 48.5 million.
Other observations : the resolution also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal control systems.
Members regretted that at the end of 2016, the Joint Undertaking had not yet performed a specific anti-fraud risk assessment, nor had it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy.
Highlighting that the objectives of the Joint Undertaking are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system, Members stressed that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market.
On funding , the resolution also stressed that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals.
Members insisted on the importance of the cooperation between the Joint Undertaking and the Union Agency for Railways (ERA).
During the first months since it became autonomous, the Joint Undertaking started some exploratory work to consider how to make use of activities planned in other Union programmes and funds , in relation to the railway sector, in particular EFSI, Regional and Cohesion fund. The Joint Undertaking intends to further develop this activity. Members stressed that the necessity of complementary financing using the relevant funding instruments is key to build a competitive railway system in the future.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Brian HAYES (EPP, IE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2016, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the joint undertaking’s accounts .
They made, however, a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted. They may be summarised as follows:
Budget and financial management : Members noted that the final 2016 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 50 200 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 52 300 000. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 94 % and 82 % respectively which represent a low level especially for payment appropriations. Most of the payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016 were pre-financing payments for Horizon 2020 projects selected under the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals.
Other observations : the report also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal control systems.
Members regretted that at the end of 2016, the Joint Undertaking had not yet performed a specific anti-fraud risk assessment, nor had it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy.
Highlighting that the objectives of the Joint Undertaking are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system, Members stressed that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market.
On funding , Members also stressed that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals.
They insisted on the importance of the cooperation between the Joint Undertaking and the Union Agency for Railways (ERA).
During the first months since it became autonomous, the Joint Undertaking started some exploratory work to consider how to make use of activities planned in other Union programmes and funds, in relation to the railway sector, in particular EFSI, Regional and Cohesion fund. The Joint Undertaking intends to further develop this activity. Members stressed that the necessity of complementary financing using the relevant funding instruments is key to build a competitive railway system in the future.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016, accompanied by the Joint Undertaking's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Joint Undertaking's Financial Rules, and that the underlying transactions for 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the following observations were made:
anti-fraud : the Council urged the Joint Undertaking to perform a specific anti-fraud risk assessment and to establish an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy; project funding : the Council called on the Joint Undertaking to pay due attention to the financial risk associated with the completion of projects and to avoid the high concentration of total project funding to a single coordinating partner; procurement : the Council also invited the Joint Undertaking to introduce a methodology to systematically assess the needs and costs of contracts in its procurement procedures.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016, together with the Joint Undertaking’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (public-private partnership in the rail sector). As a reminder, the Shift2Rail (S2R) Joint Undertaking, located in Brussels, was set up in June 2014 for a period of 10 years and started working autonomously on 24 May 2016. As the Joint Undertaking began autonomous operations in 2016, this year’s accounts are the first set of S2R financial statements audited by the ECA. Its objectives are to achieve a single European railway area; enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system; ensure a modal shift from road transport; and to maintain the European rail industry’s leading position in the global market.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the S2R, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Joint Undertaking’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the provisions of its financial rules and the rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are, in all material respects, legal and regular.
The audit also revealed the following points:
budgetary and financial management : the final 2016 budget included commitment appropriations of EUR 50.2 million and payment appropriations of EUR 52.3 million. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 94 % and 82 % respectively. Most of the payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016 were pre-financing payments for Horizon 2020 projects selected under the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals; internal controls : the S2R Joint Undertaking set up an action plan for the implementation of its internal control framework, which takes into account the results of a risk assessment completed by the Commission’s Internal Audit Service in December 2016; anti-fraud strategy : although the Commission’s research anti-fraud strategy is mandatory for the S2R JU, the Court noted that at the end of 2016, the JU had not yet performed a specific anti-fraud risk assessment, nor had it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy.
Joint Undertaking’s reply : only in 2017 did the S2R Joint Undertaking make the first steps to establish its own anti-fraud action plan. This will be followed by an impact assessment establishing the key objectives to mitigate the main weaknesses found and an evaluation of the anti-fraud strategy and the action plan (June 2018).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the S2R JU , with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the S2R JU .
The Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking : the S2R JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 and aims to contribute to the achievement of the Single European Railway Area, to a faster and less costly transition to a more attractive, user-friendly sustainable European rail system. It is set up for a period until 31.12.2024.
As regards the JU’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the annual activity report 2016 of the S2R ).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the S2R JU , with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the S2R JU .
The Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking : the S2R JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 and aims to contribute to the achievement of the Single European Railway Area, to a faster and less costly transition to a more attractive, user-friendly sustainable European rail system. It is set up for a period until 31.12.2024.
As regards the JU’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the annual activity report 2016 of the S2R ).
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0173/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0076/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.283
- Committee opinion: PE613.310
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05943/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.434
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 426 12.12.2017, p. 0064
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0049/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 426 12.12.2017, p. 0064 N8-0049/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.434
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05943/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.310
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.283
Votes
A8-0076/2018 - Brian Hayes - résolution 18/04/2018 13:11:08.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
18 |
2017/2186(DEC)
2018/01/26
TRAN
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that, in 2016, the operational costs (Title 3) represented 87,8 % of the overall S2R JU budget including the expected un-used appropriations not required in the year (Title 4); further notes that, for the operational budget, the S2R JU attained a rate of implementation of 100 % for the commitment appropriations and a rate of payment appropriations of 86,6 %
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Underlines that research and innovation projects should be followed by a higher Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in the demonstration and implementation phase; stresses that the necessity of complementary financing using the relevant funding instruments is key to build a competitive railway system in the future.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the S2R JU has set up a risk management policy but has not yet performed a specific anti-fraud assessment, nor has it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy; notes also that, since only pre- financing of projects has been paid in 2016, no ex-post controls have been carried out; encourages the S2R JU to adopt, as soon as possible, an ex-post control strategy; asks the S2R JU to provide details on the risk management system, and in particular on how to avoid conflicts of interest;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is concerned that in its procedure for the procurement services, S2R JU sets a maximum contract budget, which does not seem to be based on a cost estimation process and a reasonable market price reference system; asks the S2R JU to put in place appropriate cost estimation processes before launching procurement procedures in order to ensure the cost-effectiveness of its multi-annual service contracts, as experience shows that most of the bids received were close to the maximum budget;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is concerned that in its procedure for the procurement services, S2R JU sets a maximum contract budget, which does not seem to be based on a cost estimation process and a reasonable market price reference system; asks the S2R JU to put in place appropriate cost estimation processes before launching procurement procedures
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that the S2R Joint Undertaking should operate in an open and transparent manner, providing all relevant information available in a timely manner to the competent authorities, establishing a mechanism for consultation with all stakeholders using the goods and services of the railway sector, and ensuring the adequate promotion of its activities, including information and awareness-raising activities aimed at the wider public. The rules of procedure of the bodies of the S2R Joint Undertaking should be made publicly available.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Notes that, in order to achieve its objectives and to ensure the equitable participation of other undertakings, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and other investors, and with a view to modernising the integrated European railway sector, the S2R Joint Undertaking should provide an EU contribution to its activities through open and transparent procedures, mainly in the form of grants to members, e.g. in the form of public procurement contracts or grants awarded following open and transparent calls for tenders;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the importance of research and innovation in the rail sector in order to achieve a significant reduction of the life-cycle cost of the railway transport system and to achieve significant increases in capacity of the railway transport system, in reliability and punctuality, as well as in order to remove the remaining technical obstacles to interoperability and to reduce the negative externalities linked to transport; highlights also that the objectives of the S2R JU are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recalls that research and innovation is not an isolated process using a simple rule for process management; stresses therefore that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market; highlights that changes in the Regulation establishing the S2R JU 1a and in its Statutes will be very important for the next S2R JU development in order to improve its efficiency; stresses, in particular that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals. _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, OJ L 177, 17.6.2014, p.9.
source: 616.818
2018/03/01
CONT
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that the maximum Union contribution to the activities of the S2R Joint Undertaking is EUR 450 000 000, to be paid from Horizon 2020; notes that the industry members of the Joint Undertaking are to contribute resources of at least EUR 470 000 000, consisting of at least EUR 350 000 000 for in-kind and cash contributions to the operational activities and administrative costs of the Joint Undertaking and at least EUR 120 000 000 of in-kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s additional activities;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the final 2016 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 50 200 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 52 300 000;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls the Joint undertaking to inform in written the discharge authority about the development of both projects as a part of the discharge follow up; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls on the JU to provide before the end of 2018 the clear reasons why it decided to take such risk; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recognises the need for the Joint Undertaking to communicate with Union citizens, through the Union institutions, concerning the significant research and collaboration that it is undertaking, stresses the importance of highlighting the real improvements achieved as a consequence of its work, which are an important part of its mandate, as well as the fact that it works with other joint undertakings in promoting public awareness of the benefits of their work. Notes in this respect that also many of the private partners of the JU S2R are endowed with capacities to communicate directly with Union citizens and should be encouraged to participate in such an effort.
source: 618.283
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-19T00:00:00New
2017-06-18T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.434New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613434_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.310&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-613310_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.283New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618283_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0076&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0076_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0173New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0173_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10878New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2017-10-03T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-10-03T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-09-20T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-09-20T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10878
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|