Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) | NOVAKOV Andrey ( PPE), FLACK John ( ECR), PAET Urmas ( ALDE), REINTKE Terry ( Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | CONT | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 51, with 65 abstentions, a resolution on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland.
The important role of cohesion policy : underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Parliament welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027 .
It pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which:
EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million).
Post 2020 : funding is considered "neutral" in Northern Ireland and Members expressed concern that the end of these programmes may endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process.
Without prejudice to the negotiations between the Union and the United Kingdom, Parliament considered it essential that Northern Ireland be able to participate in certain special Union programmes beyond 2020 , such as the PEACE programme and the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland. It also requested, in the context of the post-2020 MFF, that all relevant financial instruments be implemented to enable the objectives of cohesion policy to be pursued.
Parliament noted the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027. It also took note of the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A , for the post-2020 period.
In addition, Members considered that it is essential that the people of Northern Ireland, and in particular young people, should continue to have access to economic, social and cultural exchanges across Europe, particularly to the Erasmus+ programme .
Lastly, Parliament stressed that good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland.
Underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Members welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027.
They pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which:
EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million).
The committee believed that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland are of key importance for sustaining the peace process , as they foster cross-community trust-building measures, and measures for a peaceful coexistence. The funding is seen as ‘neutral money’ in Northern Ireland and the committee feared that an end to these programmes would endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process;
In addition to the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027, Members noted the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A, for the post-2020 period with the Northern Ireland Executive, the Irish Government and the EU, in addition to its engagement to honour commitments to PEACE and Interreg under the current MFF.
Members went on to stress that the Northern Irish reconciliation process is a positive example for other areas in the EU which have experienced conflict, and good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.
Lastly, Members felt that more must be done to inform the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the economic development of the region.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)829
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0323/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0240/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE622.106
- Committee opinion: PE620.996
- Committee draft report: PE620.793
- Committee draft report: PE620.793
- Committee opinion: PE620.996
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE622.106
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)829
Activities
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim ZELLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0240/2018 - Derek Vaughan - Vote unique 11/09/2018 12:44:07.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
58 |
2017/2225(INI)
2018/04/30
CONT
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital B B.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas following the creation of the first PEACE programme in 1995, more than EUR 1,5 billion has been spent with the dual aim of promoting cohesion between communities involved in the conflict in Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland, as well as economic and social stability;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Acknowledges the significant role that EU Cohesion Policy has had on sustaining peace in Northern Ireland and in facilitating cross community reconciliation to happen.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the fact that management and control systems in the regions are functioning properly and that EU financial assistance is therefore being spent effectively; stresses nevertheless that in addition to compliance, the underlying objectives of the PEACE programme must always be taken into account when assessing the performance of this programme;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is unable to anticipate what solution will be found for Northern Ireland post 2020
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is convinced that it would be in the interests of the U
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Emphasises that 85% of funding for the PEACE and INTERREG programmes comes from the EU and stresses that projects funded by the programmes could be jeopardised if EU funding is discontinued.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the UK government’s proposal in August 2017 to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV for the post-2020 period with the Northern Ireland Executive and the Irish Government1a; highlights the positive response set out in the Joint Report of December 2017, in which both the negotiators of the European Union and the UK government agreed to examine possibilities for future support of the PEACE and INTERREG funding programmes1b; notes moreover, the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of these programmes in its proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework1c; _________________ 1aNorthern Ireland and Ireland: position paper, Paragraph 17, August 2017. 1bJoint report from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on progress during phase 1 of negotiations under Article 50 TEU on the United Kingdom’s orderly withdrawal from the European Union, paragraph 55, December 2017. 1cCommission Communication on the state of progress of the negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, Page 9, December 2017.
source: 621.114
2018/05/16
REGI
50 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the UK Government’s Position Paper on the Future of Cohesion Policy, published on 11 April 2018,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the important contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived urban and rural areas, tackling climate change, and of building cross-
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the important and positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived urban and rural areas and of building cross- community and cross-border contacts in the context of the peace process; notes in particular that assistance to deprived urban and rural areas often takes the form of support for new economic development that promote the knowledge economy, such as the Science Parks in Belfast and Derry/Londonderry;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland, including the Northern Ireland Peace Programme, are of key importance for the continuing peace process, as they foster reconciliation, inter-community and cross- border contacts; notes that cross- community and cross-
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland, including the Northern Ireland Peace Programme, are of key importance for the continuing peace process, as they foster
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Welcomes the important progress which has been made in Northern Ireland under the PEACE programme and acknowledges the work of all parties in helping to achieve this since the Troubles came to an end;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Welcomes the UK Government’s stated intention to protect the Good Friday Agreement in all its parts; believes that the functioning of the Good Friday Agreement should not be impacted by the final withdrawal agreement;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Sees that cross-community trust- building measures and measures for a peaceful coexistence, such as shared spaces and support networks, have played a key role in the peace process, as shared spaces allow the two communities in Northern Ireland to come together for joint activities, thereby helping to heal the divide;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Sees that cross-community trust- building measures, such as shared spaces and support networks, have played a key role in the peace process, as shared spaces allow the two communities in Northern Ireland to come together for joint activities and develop mutual trust and respect, thereby helping to heal the divide;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Sees that cross-community trust- building measures, such as shared spaces and support networks, have played a key role in the peace process, as shared spaces allow the
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new) - having regard to the UK Government’s Position Paper on Northern Ireland and Ireland, published on 16 August 2017 in light of the UK’s intended withdrawal from the European Union,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Sees that cross-community trust- building measures, such as shared spaces and support networks, have played a key role in the peace process, as shared spaces allow the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Emphasizes the importance of the Community-Led Local Development and the bottom-up approach, which encourages all communities to take ownership of projects, thus enhancing the peace process;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes the attachment of all stakeholders in Northern Ireland to the continuance of EU cohesion policy goals in the region; stresses, in that regard, the importance of coordinated multilevel governance and the partnership principle;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is if the opinion, nevertheless, that more could be done to increase general awareness of the impact of EU funding in Northern Ireland, in particular by informing the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the general economic development of the region and promoting examples of best practice, with an emphasis on projects carried out at cross- border level;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is if the opinion, nevertheless, that more could be done to increase general awareness and visibility of the impact of EU funding in Northern Ireland, in particular by informing the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the general economic development of the region;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is if the opinion, nevertheless, that more
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to continue to participate in the EU’s general cohesion funds if possible, as that would benefit economic and social development, particularly in disadvantaged and rural areas; urges, furthermore, in the context of the post-2020 MFF, that all possible financial instruments be explored for enabling the continuation of the objectives of cohesion policy in re- enforcing the conditions for the development of prosperity and the continuation of peace;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to continue to participate in the EU’s general cohesion funds if possible, as that would benefit economic and social development, particularly in disadvantaged and rural areas, and would help to reduce the gaps by comparison with other EU regions;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas EU cohesion policy in Northern Ireland operates through various instruments, including the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Regional Development, the
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to continue to participate in the EU’s general cohesion funds if possible, as that would benefit economic and social development, particularly in disadvantaged
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it desirable that, post- 2020, Northern Ireland should be able to continue to participate in the EU’s general cohesion funds
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that negotiations between the UK Government and the European Union, under the process laid out in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, is ongoing; respects the sovereignty of these negotiating parties while fully supporting an outcome that is committed to peace, reconciliation and cross-border programmes;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. C
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that, post-2020, EU- supported cross-border and
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that, post-2020, EU- supported territorial cooperation programmes, especially cross-border and inter-
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that, post-2020, EU
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Welcomes the UK Government’s stated aim of continuing funding for PEACE IV for the rest of the current programme through to 2020, and its desire to explore a future programme post-2020 in partnership with the Northern Ireland Executive, the Irish Government and the EU;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas it is clear that Northern Ireland is a region that has benefited greatly from the EU’s cohesion policy; welcomes the commitment to future funding in the Commission's draft MFF for 2021-2027.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Welcomes the UK Government’s stated intention of looking favourably on future support for Interreg VA post-2020;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Supports the UK Government in wanting to secure the role of both the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB) and the North South Ministerial Council; notes that Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 1299/2013 may need to be amended to allow the SEUPB to continue acting as a managing authority in potential future programmes;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that it is important that the EU should continue to reach out to both communities in Northern Ireland post-2020 by playing an active role in the administration of cohesion and cross- community funding in Northern Ireland, thereby helping them to overcome their divisions;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that it is important that the EU should continue to reach out to
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that it is important that the EU should continue to reach out to
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that it is important that the EU should continue to reach out to both communities in Northern Ireland post-2020 by playing an active role in the administration of
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to promote the Northern Irish experience with cohesion funding as an example of how the EU wants to address inter-community conflicts; stresses in that regard the Northern Irish reconciliation process as a positive example for other post-conflict areas in the EU;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to promote the Northern Irish experience with cohesion funding, especially with the PEACE Programme, as an example of how the EU wants to address inter- community conflicts;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to promote the Northern Irish experience with cohesion funding as an example of how the EU wants to address
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. believes that the good practices of the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model for overcoming mistrust between conflicting communities and achieving lasting peace in other parts of Europe, especially in the Western Balkans;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas it is clear that Northern Ireland is a region that has benefited greatly from the EU’s cohesion policy and the EU perspective ;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that it is essential that the people of Northern Ireland, and in particular young people, should continue to have access to economic, social and cultural exchanges across Europe, particularly to the Erasmus+ programme;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EU cohesion policy, particularly through the Peace Programme, has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland and supports the reconciliation of the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EU cohesion policy, particularly through the Peace Programme, has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland and supports
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the success of EU cohesion funding partly derives from the fact that it is seen as ‘neutral money’, i.e. not directly linked to the interests of
source: 622.106
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.793New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-620793_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.996&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-620996_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.106New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-622106_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0240&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0240_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0323New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0323_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/8/11295New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2017-10-26T00:00:00New
2018-09-11T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
committees/0/date |
2017-12-07T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-09-07T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052New
Rules of Procedure EP 52 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|