Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | LOPE FONTAGNÉ Verónica ( PPE), SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | NEUSER Norbert ( S&D) | Nirj DEVA ( ECR), Mireille D'ORNANO ( ENF), Maurice PONGA ( PPE), Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 608 votes to 13, with 31 abstentions, a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision denouncing the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros.
The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Comoros provides for its denunciation by one of the parties in the event of serious circumstances, such as non-compliance with the commitments entered into by the parties with regard to fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing .
The first fisheries agreement between the EEC and the Comoros dates back to 1988 and whereas the fleets of EEC/EU Member States have since then been given access to fishing opportunities under a series of implementing protocols.
The Comoros was notified on 1 October 2015 of the possibility of its being identified as a non-cooperating third country for failure to exert adequate control of vessels registered under the Comorian flag.
Having been identified as a non-cooperating country in May 2017 and listed as such in July 2017 by the EU, which issued a ‘red card’, the country has still failed to take the corrective measures needed to resolve the problems identified and to combat IUU fishing.
Parliament regretted that the Comoros has failed to take the corrective measures needed to resolve the problems identified and to combat IUU fishing, despite being warned by the EU.
While recalling that the Comoros should meet its obligations under international law with respect to the supervision and control of vessels flying its flag, Members considered that the Comoros should remain engaged with the EU and seize this opportunity to put in place the measures necessary to improve its ability to address illegal fishing.
Parliament agreed with the Commission and the Council on the need to apply the measures referred to in the IUU Regulation for the denunciation of any standing bilateral fisheries agreement with the Comoros, in the event of failure to comply with undertakings made by it with regard to combating IUU fishing. It maintained, however, that such denunciation must not mark the end of cooperation between the EU and the Comoros in the fisheries sector . It stated that it was necessary to find ways of helping countries, in particular small island developing states, of which the Comoros is one, so as to enable them to alter their marine management policies.
The Commission is urged to seek to ensure that this relationship can be reactivated as soon as possible and for investment and technical assistance to be promoted in the following areas:
fisheries administration and governance system, legislation, institutional machinery, capacity-building for human resources (fishers, scientists, inspectors and others), and enhancement of the commercial and cultural value of traditional Comorian gear and fish;
monitoring and scientific capacities, coastal protection capacity, and capacities for inspection, surveillance, and quality control; setting up facilities for refrigerating, distributing, and processing fish; construction and upgrading of landing and security infrastructure at ports and harbours; renewal of the Comorian small-scale fleet to improve safety, its ability to remain at sea, and fishing capacity.
Members called for the inclusion of a clause whereby, should the Comoros remedy its shortcomings, the procedure would be stopped and the red card withdrawn , thus enabling the EU fleet to return. They called on the Commission and Council to keep Parliament fully informed without delay of such developments as might occur in this process.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted an own-initiative report by João FERREIRA (GUE/NGL, PT) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision denouncing the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros.
As a reminder, the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Comoros provides for its denunciation by one of the parties in the event of serious circumstances, such as non-compliance with the commitments entered into by the parties with regard to fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing .
The first fisheries agreement between the EEC and the Comoros dates back to 1988 and whereas the fleets of EEC/EU Member States have since then been given access to fishing opportunities under a series of implementing protocols.
The Comoros was notified on 1 October 2015 of the possibility of its being identified as a non-cooperating third country for failure to exert adequate control of vessels registered under the Comorian flag.
Having been identified as a non-cooperating country in May 2017 and listed as such in July 2017 by the EU, which issued a ‘red card’, the country has still failed to take the corrective measures needed to resolve the problems identified and to combat IUU fishing.
Members regretted that the Comoros has failed to take the corrective measures needed to resolve the problems identified and to combat IUU fishing, despite being warned by the EU. They took the view that the Comoros should remain engaged with the EU and seize this opportunity to put in place the measures necessary to improve its ability to address illegal fishing.
Members agreed with the Commission and the Council on the need to apply the measures referred to in the IUU Regulation for the denunciation of any standing bilateral fisheries agreement with the Comoros, which provides for termination of the agreement in the event of failure to comply with undertakings made by it with regard to combating IUU fishing. They maintained, however, that such denunciation must not mark the end of cooperation between the EU and the Comoros in the fisheries sector .
The Commission is urged to seek to ensure that this relationship can be reactivated as soon as possible and for investment and technical assistance to be promoted in the following areas:
fisheries administration and governance system, legislation, institutional machinery, capacity-building for human resources (fishers, scientists, inspectors and others), and enhancement of the commercial and cultural value of traditional Comorian gear and fish;
monitoring and scientific capacities, coastal protection capacity, and capacities for inspection, surveillance, and quality control; setting up facilities for refrigerating, distributing, and processing fish; construction and upgrading of landing and security infrastructure at ports and harbours; renewal of the Comorian small-scale fleet to improve safety, its ability to remain at sea, and fishing capacity.
Members called for the inclusion of a clause whereby, should the Comoros remedy its shortcomings, the procedure would be stopped and the red card withdrawn , thus enabling the EU fleet to return.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0083/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0055/2018
- Committee opinion: PE615.505
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.899
- Committee draft report: PE615.458
- Committee draft report: PE615.458
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.899
- Committee opinion: PE615.505
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366
Activities
Votes
A8-0055/2018 - João Ferreira - Vote unique 15/03/2018 12:11:42.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
37 |
2017/2266(INI)
2018/01/30
DEVE
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing affecting coastal areas in the Comoros has detrimental effects on local fisheries and biodiversity, threatening the income and livelihoods of small-scale fishers
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers it necessary to support artisanal fishing, which in some developing countries is the only activity and the only source of income for the majority of the coastal population;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that developing countries are particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing due to their limited capacity for control and surveillance of their waters, which further destabilises the management of their fisheries; highlights that IUU fishing deprives developing countries of revenue and food, particularly when these activities take place in the same fishing grounds where small-scale local fishers operate;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that developing countries are particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing due to their limited capacity for control and surveillance of their waters, which further destabilises the management of their fisheries, and thus contributes in a vicious circle to the development of IUU fishing;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the EU's zero tolerance policy towards illegal fishing worldwide;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Congratulates those developing countries that have incorporated the concepts of the FAO Blue Growth Initiative in the measures and action plans drawn up at national level and those States that have ratified the MREP agreement to put in place a legal scheme to eliminate 'ports of convenience' and increase the penalties imposed on those practising IUU fishing;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that according to the sectoral support provided for under the Protocol to the FPA
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that in addition to the Comorian administration’s lack of capacity to tackle IUU fishing, the Commission reported a lack of governance/insufficient political will from the Comorian national authorities; stresses the importance of combating IUU fishing through a strong political commitment and concrete measures to ensure maritime safety and security;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that in addition to the Comorian administration’s lack of capacity to tackle IUU fishing, the Commission reported a lack of governance/insufficient political will from the Comorian national authorities to cooperate;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for a strengthening the capacity of developing countries in administrative matters, but also in resource mapping and evaluation; calls, furthermore, for measures to help them draw up reliable and objective statistics, contributing to the formulation of policies and strategies in the economic sphere and as regards monitoring and the protection of legal fishing;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas maritime resources are not unlimited; whereas the African continent loses billions of dollars each year to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recalls that many SIDS and LDCs need financial and technical assistance to create and implement national and regional strategies for the sustainability, preservation and protection of their fisheries industries;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses that the fight against flags of convenience also ensures decent living and working conditions for crews, thus combating human rights abuses and violations;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to pursue its political and fisheries sectoral dialogue with the Comorian authorities, a dialogue which should be respectful and effective, taking into account both the objectives of the IUU Regulation and the difficult economic and social conditions of the Comoros, leading to the fulfilment by the latter of the provisions under the IUU Regulation and, ultimately, to the removal of this country from the list of non- cooperating countries; calls, in the meantime, for the assistance received by the Comoros under other EU financial instruments to be reoriented so that the population does not pay the cost of this state of affairs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Is convinced that the fight against IUU fishing requires a multilateral approach and greatly depends on a coherent response at international level, including from flag states, coastal states, port states and market states; takes the view that this response should be based on the uniform application of international law and regulations on IUU fishing and on an extensive and accurate exchange of information; calls on the international community to take similar measures to those adopted by the EU to close markets to IUU-caught fish
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Is convinced that the fight against IUU fishing greatly depends on a coherent response at international level, including from flag states, coastal states, port states and market states; takes the view that this response should be based on the uniform application of international law and regulations on IUU fishing and on an extensive and accurate exchange of information; calls therefore on the international community to take similar measures to those adopted by the EU to close markets to IUU-caught fish.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas, according to the FAO, illegal fishing accounts for some 26 million tonnes of fish per year or more than 15% of the total world catch; whereas illegal overfishing undermines the regeneration of fish stocks, threatens biodiversity, the marine ecosystem and food security and causes significant economic losses;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas the sustainable management of marine ecosystems is crucial in limiting the harmful effects of climate change; whereas the COP21 has emphasised the urgency of reversing the trend of overproduction;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B d (new) Bd. whereas the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs incorporated, for the first time, a goal related to the conservation and sustainable use of seas and marine resources (Goal 14);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B e (new) Be. whereas the FAO Blue Growth Initiative aims, inter alia, to eliminate overfishing and IUU fishing;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that IUU fishing is a major economic and environmental problem worldwide, threatening the sustainability of fish stocks and food security, and the biodiversity of the world’s oceans; stresses that IUU fishing also undermines fisheries management efforts and constitutes unfair competition for fishers, in particular from artisanal fleets, and others who operate in accordance with the law, with serious social and economic repercussions; notes that high levels of IUU fishing tend to be more frequent in countries with weak governance;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that the sustainability of fish stocks is a problem that needs to be addressed globally; underlines the obligation of the international community to assist developing countries to meet this challenge;
source: 616.881
2018/02/01
PECH
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the EU should in future treat large and small countries in the same way, ensuring that when they fish illegally and thus harm developing countries, large countries will not go unpunished;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Notes the other consequences referred to in Article 38(8) of the IUU Regulation, concerning prohibitions on chartering, reflagging and private agreements, among others;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the inclusion of a clause whereby, should the Comoros remedy its shortcomings, the procedure would be stopped and the red card withdrawn, thus enabling the EU fleet to return;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission to take the appropriate steps to bring about a return to normal by improving the effectiveness of measures to combat IUU fishing and letting the EU fleet go back to the fishing zone once the terms of a new protocol have been renegotiated;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the EU should in future impose sanctions on countries implicated in slavery at sea;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the first fisheries agreement between the EEC and the Comoros dates back to 1988
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the previous protocol to the fisheries agreement with the Comoros expired on 30 December 2016 and whereas it was not renewed, because the Comoros had failed to give any undertaking to combat IUU fishing;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the EU is firmly committed to combating illegal fishing and any form of business stemming from it, and that commitment is set out in the EU regulation to prevent, deter, and eliminate illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas combating IUU fishing does not depend solely on identifying non- cooperating third countries, but, on the contrary, requires that ways be found to remedy situations brought to light; whereas unless it receives outside assistance, the Comoros will be unable to improve its marine management policies for fishery resources in particular, including as regards landing conditions, monitoring and surveillance capacity, scientific development, and the technical training of fishers and observers;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Comoros has failed to take the corrective measures needed to resolve the problems identified and to combat IUU fishing, despite being warned by the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Deplores the fact that, in almost 30 years of fisheries agreements between the EU and the Comoros
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Maintains that combating IUU fishing must not hinge entirely on identifying non-cooperating third countries and that, in order truly to fight illegal fishing in all its forms, it is necessary to find ways of helping, in particular for small island developing States, of which the Comoros is one, to enable them to alter their marine management policies;
source: 616.899
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.458New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-615458_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.899New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-616899_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.505&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-615505_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180314&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0055&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0055_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0083New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0083_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/8/11655New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 105-p2
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 99-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/type |
Old
INI - Own-initiative procedureNew
|
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-03-13T00:00:00New
2018-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p2New
Rules of Procedure EP 99-p2 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|