BETA


2018/0095(NLE) EU/Singapore Investment Protection Agreement

Progress: Awaiting final decision

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA MARTIN David (icon: S&D S&D) KELLY Seán (icon: PPE PPE), KAMALL Syed (icon: ECR ECR), TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon (icon: ALDE ALDE), JADOT Yannick (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a

Events

2019/02/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/02/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 436 votes to 203, with 30 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.

Parliament gave its consent to conclusion of the agreement. It also adopted a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion of the agreement.

Documents
2019/02/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by David MARTIN (S&D, UK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament give its consent to conclusion of the agreement.

The agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.

It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS).

However, regrettably, the agreement still misses provisions on investors’ obligations which should be strengthened according to Members.

Documents
2019/01/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/11/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/10/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/09/18
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2018/09/18
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to approve the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council can adopt the act only if the European Parliament has approved it.

BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council decision, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore has been signed.

The fast-growing Southeast Asian economies, with their 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.

Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest trade partner , accounting for just under a third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services and about two-thirds of investment between the two regions.

CONTENT: the Council's draft decision aims at approving, on behalf of the Union, the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. The Agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.

In accordance with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the IPA:

ensures that EU investors and their investments in Singapore will be granted fair and equitable treatment and not be discriminated against compared to Singaporean investments that are in like situations; protects EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation , unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism and sets up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system, consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner

The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA include institutional provisions that lay down a structure for implementing bodies to continuously monitor the implementation, operation and impact of the agreements. The agreements are an integral part of the overall bilateral relation between the EU and Singapore as governed by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), and the structures mentioned will form part of a common institutional framework with the PCA.

Documents
2018/05/16
   EP - MARTIN David (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2018/04/18
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2018/04/18
   EP - Preparatory document
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

BACKGROUND: the dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.

At the same time, a total EUR 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of EUR 116 billion (2016).

Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10 000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim.

On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. On 12 September 2011, the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty.

On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop.

From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in the IPA.

CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.

Main aim of the IPA : it aims to:

enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore; bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment; protect EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives; set up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system , consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner.

In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured the following:

liberalisation of services : the FTA includes the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses; procurement : it also lays down new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers; trade barriers : the FTA removes technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore. Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore; GI protection : a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register has been proposed; sustainable development : the FTA includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring; dispute mechanism : a swift dispute resolution mechanisms is proposed through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator.

Committee : the institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of EUR 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore. The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures . The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of EUR 200 000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal.

Documents

Votes

A8-0054/2019 - David Martin - Vote: procédure d'approbation 13/02/2019 12:10:54.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: +: 436, -: 203, 0: 30
PL GB ES RO DE BG SK HR FI CZ HU DK PT LT MT NL LV BE LU EE SE SI EL IE CY ?? AT IT FR
Total
46
63
50
28
84
16
12
11
12
19
13
12
20
10
6
25
8
18
6
4
16
8
15
7
2
1
18
66
71
icon: PPE PPE
195

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
5
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
167

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
7 2018/0095(NLE)
2018/11/12 INTA 7 amendments...
source: 630.487

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2018-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7979%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07979/2018
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
events/1/date
Old
2018-09-17T00:00:00
New
2018-09-18T00:00:00
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • INTA/8/12825
procedure/instrument
Decision
procedure/legal_basis
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 207
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 218-p6a
procedure/stage_reached
Awaiting final decision
procedure/subtype
Consent by Parliament
procedure/type
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • INTA/8/12825
procedure/instrument
Decision
procedure/legal_basis
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 207
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 218-p6a
procedure/stage_reached
Awaiting final decision
procedure/subtype
Consent by Parliament
procedure/type
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-02-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
links/Research document/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628256
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)628256
committees/0/shadows/3
name
MINEUR Anne-Marie
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1
date
2018-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7979%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07979/2018
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
docs/2
date
2018-10-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE627.720
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2018-10-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE627.720
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2018-11-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE630.487
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-627720_EN.html
docs/4
date
2018-11-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE630.487
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-630487_EN.html
events/1/date
Old
2018-09-18T00:00:00
New
2018-09-17T00:00:00
events/2/body
EP
events/3/body
EP
events/7/body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.720
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.487
events/2
date
2018-10-22T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2
date
2018-10-22T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2019-01-24T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2019-01-24T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.html
events/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2019-02-13T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32126&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2019-02-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0090_EN.html title: T8-0090/2019
summary
events/7
date
2019-02-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0090_EN.html title: T8-0090/2019
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/0/body
EP
events/0
date
2018-04-18T00:00:00
type
Preparatory document
docs
summary
events/0
date
2018-04-18T00:00:00
type
Initial legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0054&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0090
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0090_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
activities
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0194/COM_COM(2018)0194_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0194 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52018PC0194:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2019-01-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2019-02-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: S&D name: MARTIN David
docs
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0195/COM_COM(2018)0195_EN.docx title: COM(2018)0195 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0195 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2018-09-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7980%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07980/2018 type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2018-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.720 title: PE627.720 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.487 title: PE630.487 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 type: Initial legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0194/COM_COM(2018)0194_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0194 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0194 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: the dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China. At the same time, a total EUR 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of EUR 116 billion (2016). Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10 000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim. On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. On 12 September 2011, the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty. On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop. From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in the IPA. CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part. Main aim of the IPA : it aims to: enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore; bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment; protect EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives; set up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system , consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner. In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured the following: liberalisation of services : the FTA includes the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses; procurement : it also lays down new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers; trade barriers : the FTA removes technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore. Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore; GI protection : a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register has been proposed; sustainable development : the FTA includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring; dispute mechanism : a swift dispute resolution mechanisms is proposed through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator. Committee : the institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of EUR 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore. The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures . The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of EUR 200 000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal.
  • date: 2018-09-18T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7979%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07979/2018 summary: PURPOSE: to approve the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council can adopt the act only if the European Parliament has approved it. BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council decision, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore has been signed. The fast-growing Southeast Asian economies, with their 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China. Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest trade partner , accounting for just under a third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services and about two-thirds of investment between the two regions. CONTENT: the Council's draft decision aims at approving, on behalf of the Union, the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. The Agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment. In accordance with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the IPA: ensures that EU investors and their investments in Singapore will be granted fair and equitable treatment and not be discriminated against compared to Singaporean investments that are in like situations; protects EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation , unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism and sets up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system, consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA include institutional provisions that lay down a structure for implementing bodies to continuously monitor the implementation, operation and impact of the agreements. The agreements are an integral part of the overall bilateral relation between the EU and Singapore as governed by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), and the structures mentioned will form part of a common institutional framework with the PCA.
  • date: 2018-10-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0054&language=EN title: A8-0054/2019 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by David MARTIN (S&D, UK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. The committee recommended that the European Parliament give its consent to conclusion of the agreement. The agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment. It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). However, regrettably, the agreement still misses provisions on investors’ obligations which should be strengthened according to Members.
  • date: 2019-02-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0090 title: T8-0090/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 436 votes to 203, with 30 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. Parliament gave its consent to conclusion of the agreement. It also adopted a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion of the agreement.
links/Research document
title
Briefing
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628256
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • INTA/8/12825
procedure/instrument
Decision
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting final decision
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
  • 6.20.06 Foreign direct investment (FDI)
New
6.20.03
Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
6.20.06
Foreign direct investment (FDI)
procedure/summary
  • Accompanying procedure
activities/1
date
2019-01-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2019-02-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: MARTIN David
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: KELLY Seán
  • group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed
  • group: ALDE name: TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
procedure/summary
  • Accompanying procedure
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.

    PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

    BACKGROUND: the dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.

    At the same time, a total EUR 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of EUR 116 billion (2016). 

    Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10 000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim.

    On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. On 12 September 2011, the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty.

    On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop.

    From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in the IPA. 

    CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.

    Main aim of the IPA: it aims to:

    • enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore;
    • bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment;
    • protect EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment;
    • offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives;
    • set up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system, consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner.

    In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured the following:

    • liberalisation of services: the FTA includes the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses;
    • procurement: it also lays down new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers;
    • trade barriers: the FTA removes technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore. Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore;
    • GI protection: a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register has been proposed;
    • sustainable development: the FTA includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring;
    • dispute mechanism: a swift dispute resolution mechanisms is proposed through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator.

    Committee: the institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues. It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of EUR 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore. The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures. The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of EUR 200 000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal.

activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0194/COM_COM(2018)0194_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52018PC0194:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2018)0194 body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
links
other
    procedure
    geographical_area
    Singapore
    reference
    2018/0095(NLE)
    title
    EU/Singapore Investment Protection Agreement
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Consent by Parliament
    type
    NLE - Non-legislative enactments
    subject