Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | ARIMONT Pascal ( EPP) | MARQUES Pedro ( S&D), BIJOUX Stéphane ( Renew), ROPĖ Bronis ( Verts/ALE), CONTE Rosanna ( ID), KRUK Elżbieta ( ECR), KIZILYÜREK Niyazi ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Responsible Committee | REGI | ARIMONT Pascal ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AFET | CASTALDO Fabio Massimo ( EFDD) | Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK ( ECR) |
Former Committee Opinion | DEVE | THEOCHAROUS Eleni ( ECR) | Mireille D'ORNANO ( ENF), Cécile Kashetu KYENGE ( S&D), Louis MICHEL ( ALDE), Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY ( GUE/NGL), Joachim ZELLER ( PPE) |
Former Committee Opinion | CULT | MIZZI Marlene ( S&D) | Nikolaos CHOUNTIS ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | CONT | KOHN Arndt ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 178-p1, TFEU 209-p1, TFEU 212, TFEU 349-p1sub1-as1
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 178-p1, TFEU 209-p1, TFEU 212, TFEU 349-p1sub1-as1Subjects
- 3.20.15.06 Maritime or inland transport agreements and cooperation
- 4.70.05 Regional cooperation, cross-border cooperation
- 4.70.06 Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories
- 4.70.07 European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
- 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
- 6.40.04.02 Relations with Russian Federation
- 6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy
- 8.20.04 Pre-accession and partnership
Events
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution approving the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments.
The proposed regulation is part of the legislative package on cohesion policy for the period 2021-2027. It lays down specific provisions relating to the ‘European territorial cooperation’ objective (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the external financing instruments where one or more Member States and their regions, as well as one or more Member States and third countries and their regions, cooperate across borders.
Support objectives
As regards support from the Union's external financing instruments (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III) and the Instrument for Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation (NDICI) to Interreg programmes, the Regulation sets out additional specific objectives and rules for the integration of these funds into Interreg programmes. It also provides for the possibility for OCTs to participate in Interreg programmes.
As regards support from Interreg funds (the ERDF and the Union's external financing instruments) for Interreg programmes, the regulation defines the specific objectives of Interreg, the eligibility criteria for Member States, third countries, partner countries, OCTs and their regions, the financial resources and the criteria for their distribution
Interreg strands
Four Interreg strands will be supported: (1) cross-border cooperation, (2) transnational cooperation, (3) interregional cooperation and (4) cooperation involving the outermost regions. For cross-border cooperation, regions should in principle be located along land or sea borders separated by up to 150 km of sea.
The geographical coverage is defined in detail for each strand. The Regulation empowers the Commission to adopt implementing acts establishing the list of areas covered by the Interreg programme to be supported.
Interreg specific objectives and thematic concentration
In addition to the specific objectives of the ERDF, under Interreg programmes, the ERDF and, where appropriate, the Union's external financing instruments may also support the specific Interreg objectives ‘better cooperation governance’ and ‘a safer and more secure Europe’.
At least 60 % of resources allocated for cross-border, transnational and outermost regions’ cooperation should go to a maximum of three policy objectives, one of which has to be ‘a greener, low-carbon Europe’.
Resources and co-financing rates
The ERDF resources allocated to Interreg amount to EUR 8 050 000 000 at 2018 prices out of the total resources available for budgetary commitments from the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund for the programming period 2021-2027.
The resources are allocated as follows:
- 72.2% (i.e. a total of EUR 5 812 790 000) for land and maritime cross-border cooperation;
- 18.2% (i.e. a total of EUR 1 466 000 000) for transnational cooperation;
- 6.1% (i.e. a total of EUR 490 000 000) for interregional cooperation;
- 3.5% (i.e. a total of EUR 281 210 000) for cooperation involving the outermost regions.
The co-financing rate for each Interreg programme is up to 80 %, but it can reach up to 85% for outermost regions' cooperation.
Small project funds
The Council position ensures that small projects can be successfully implemented by simplifying the arrangements for their implementation and by incorporating clear rules on their governance. It also includes a flexible support package for technical assistance, tailored to the needs of each type of programme.
To ensure a consistent monitoring of performance, the agreement adapts the CPR rules to Interreg programmes and refines the common set of output indicators, while adding a common set of results indicators.
Specific rules for indirect management
The proposed Regulation provides for the possibility that Interreg programmes under cooperation with the outermost regions may be implemented under indirect management. Specific rules are set out on how to implement these programmes in whole or in part under indirect management.
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments.
The position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure has amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose
The regulation would establish rules for the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Interreg) to encourage cooperation between Member States and their regions within the Union and between Member States and third countries, partner countries, other territories or adjacent overseas countries and territories (OCTs) or regional integration and cooperation organisations, or groups of third countries forming part of a regional organisation.
Under the Interreg objective, support would be provided by the ERDF and, where appropriate, by the Union's external financing instruments for the following four strands: 1) cross-border cooperation between adjacent regions, 2) transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, 3) cooperation involving the outermost regions and 4) interregional cooperation.
Members deleted the Commission's proposal to introduce a new strand 5 ("interregional investment in innovation").
The transnational and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation through actions promoting integrated territorial development linked to the priorities of the Union's cohesion policy, in full respect of the principle of subsidiarity.
The various strands of Interreg should contribute to the achievement of the sustainable development objectives (SDOs) described in the Sustainable Development Programme for 2030 adopted in September 2015.
Resources and co-financing rates
Parliament proposed that the resources allocated to the Interreg objective should amount to EUR 11 165 910 000 at 2018 prices from the total resources available for ERDF, ESF+ and Cohesion Fund budget commitments for the 2021-2027 programming period.
An amount of EUR 10,195,910,000 (91.31%) of these resources would be allocated as follows:
- EUR 7 500 000 000 000 (67.16%) for cross-border cooperation (strand 1);
- EUR 1,973,600,880 (17.68%) for transnational cooperation (strand 2);
- EUR 357 309 120 (3.2%) for cooperation involving the outermost regions (strand 3);
- EUR 365 000 000 000 (3.27%) for interregional cooperation (strand 4).
An amount of EUR 970,000,000,000 (8.69%) of the resources would be allocated to a new initiative on interregional investment in innovation that should be used to support thematic platforms for intelligent specialisation in areas such as energy, industrial modernisation, circular economy, social innovation, environment or agri-food and to help bring together actors in intelligent specialisation strategies.
Members proposed increasing the co-financing rate from 70% to 80%.
Thematic focus
Under the amended text:
- up to 15% of ERDF allocations and, where appropriate, EU external financing instruments for priorities other than those relating to technical assistance for each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3 would be allocated to the specific Interreg objective 'better Interreg governance' and up to 10% could be allocated to the specific Interreg external objective 'a safer and more secure Europe';
- where an Interreg programme under strand 1 or 2 supports a macro-regional strategy or a strategy for a sea basin, at least 80% of the ERDF allocations should contribute to the achievement of the objectives of this strategy.
Small Project Fund
Parliament clarified the rules governing funds for small-scale projects, which are an important and effective instrument for removing border and cross-border obstacles. It proposed that the total contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, from an external EU funding instrument to one or more funds for small projects under an Interreg programme should not exceed 20% of the total allocation for the Interreg programme and should amount, under an Interreg cross-border cooperation programme, to at least 3% of the total allocation.
Payments and pre-financing
Members believe that the rules on pre-financing should take due account of the specificities of European territorial cooperation, which is why they have provided for greater pre-financing, particularly at the beginning of the financing period.
State aid
Parliament stressed that, in the light of experience, support for European territorial cooperation projects should have only limited repercussions on competition and trade between Member States. Therefore, the Commission should be able to declare that this aid is compatible with the internal market and that funding provided to support European territorial cooperation projects can be block exempted.
Indicators
The proposal introduces specific Interreg indicators to measure the results and European added value of cooperation programmes. However, Parliament considered that it might be necessary, if necessary, to adapt the indicators, or to leave more room for manoeuvre in the programmes to define the system of indicators during the discussions.
Simplification
The provisions on the preparation, approval and amendment of Interreg programmes as well as on territorial development, selection of operations, monitoring and evaluation, programme authorities, audit of operations and transparency and communication should be adapted to the specificities of Interreg programmes and remain simple and clear to avoid over-regulation and additional administrative burden for Member States and beneficiaries.
The European Parliament adopted by 570 votes to 80, with 25 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments.
The matter was referred back to the competent committee for interinstitutional negotiations.
The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following issues:
Subject matter
This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States and their regions inside the Union and between Member States, their regions and third countries, partner countries, other territories or overseas countries and territories ('OCTs'), or regional integration and cooperation organisations, or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation, respectively.
Under the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Interreg), support would be provided by the ERDF and, where appropriate, by the Union's external financing instruments for the following four components: (1) cross-border cooperation between adjacent regions; (2) transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation; (3) cooperation involving the outermost regions and (4) interregional cooperation.
Members deleted the proposal to introduce a new strand 5 (‘interregional innovation investments’).
The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, in full respect of subsidiarity.
Resources and co-financing rates
Members proposed that the resources allocated to the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Interreg) amount to EUR 11 165 910 000 at 2018 prices from the total resources available for ERDF, ESF+ and Cohesion Fund budget commitments for the 2021-2027 programming period.
An amount of EUR 10 195 910 000 (91.31 %) of these resources should be allocated as follows:
- EUR 7 500 000 000 000 (67.16 %) for cross-border cooperation (strand 1);
- EUR 1 973 600 880 (17.68 %) for transnational cooperation (strand 2);
- EUR 357 309 120 (3.2 %) for cooperation involving the outermost regions (strand 3);
- EUR 365 000 000 000 (3.27 %) for interregional cooperation (strand 4).
An amount of EUR 970 000 000 000 (8.69 %) of the resources would be allocated to a new initiative on interregional innovation investments which should be used to support thematic platforms for smart specialisation in areas such as energy, industrial modernisation, circular economy, social innovation, environment or agri-food and to help bring together actors in smart specialisation strategies.
Members proposed to increase the co-financing rate from 70% to 80%.
Thematic concentration
Under the amended text:
- up to 15% of ERDF allocations of the external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance to each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3, up to 15% shall be allocated on the Interreg-specific objective of 'a better Interreg governance' and up to 10 % may be allocated on the Interregspecific objective of 'a safer and more secure Europe';
- where a component 1 or 2 Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy or a sea-basin strategy, at least 80% the ERDF and, where applicable, part of the external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall contribute to the objectives of that strategy.
Small Project Fund
Members clarified the rules governing funds for small-scale projects, which are an important and successful instrument for eliminating border and cross-border obstacles. They proposed that the total contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, from an external EU funding instrument to one or more funds for small projects under an Interreg programme should not exceed 20% of the total allocation for the Interreg programme and should amount, under an Interreg cross-border cooperation programme, to at least 3% of the total envelope.
Payments and pre-financing
Members considered that the rules on pre-financing should take due account of the specificities of European territorial cooperation, which is why they have provided for greater pre-financing, particularly at the beginning of the financing period.
State aid
Members stressed that in the light of experience gained, aid for European Territorial Cooperation projects should only have limited effects on competition and trade between Member States, and thus the Commission should be able to declare that such aid is compatible with the internal market and that financing provided in support of ETC projects is able to be block-exempted.
Indicators
The proposal introduces specific Interreg indicators to measure the results and European added value of cooperation programmes. However, Members considered that it might be necessary to adapt the indicators, or to leave more room for manoeuvre in the programmes to define the system of indicators during the discussions.
Simplification
Provisions on the preparation, approval and amendment of Interreg programmes as well as on territorial development, on the selection of operations, on monitoring and evaluation, on the programme authorities, on audit of operations, and on transparency and communication should be adapted to the specificities of Interreg programmes and should be kept simple and clear in order to avoid gold-plating and additional administrative burdens for Member States and beneficiaries.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted the report by Pascal ARIMONT (EPP, BE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Development, exercising their prerogatives as associated committees in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave their opinions on the report.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.
Subject matter
This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States and their regions inside the Union and between Member States, their regions and third countries, partner countries, other territories or overseas countries and territories ('OCTs'), or regional integration and cooperation organisations, or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation, respectively.
Under the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Interreg), support would be provided by the ERDF and, where appropriate, by the Union's external financing instruments for the following four components: (1) cross-border cooperation between adjacent regions; (2) transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation; (3) cooperation involving the outermost regions and (4) interregional cooperation.
Members deleted the proposal to introduce a new strand 5 (‘interregional innovation investments’).
The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, in full respect of subsidiarity.
Resources and co-financing rates
Members proposed that the resources allocated to the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Interreg) amount to EUR 11 165 910 000 at 2018 prices from the total resources available for ERDF, ESF+ and Cohesion Fund budget commitments for the 2021-2027 programming period.
An amount of EUR 10 195 910 000 (91.31 %) of these resources should be allocated as follows:
- EUR 7 500 000 000 000 (67.16 %) for cross-border cooperation (strand 1);
- EUR 1 973 600 880 (17.68 %) for transnational cooperation (strand 2);
- EUR 357 309 120 (3.2 %) for cooperation involving the outermost regions (strand 3);
- EUR 365 000 000 000 (3.27 %) for interregional cooperation (strand 4).
An amount of EUR 970 000 000 000 (8.69 %) of the resources would be allocated to a new initiative on interregional innovation investments.
Members proposed to increase the co-financing rate from 70% to 80% .
Thematic concentration
Under the amended text:
- up to 15% of ERDF allocations of the external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance to each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3, up to15 % shall be allocated on the Interreg-specific objective of 'a better Interreg governance' and up to 10 % may be allocated on the Interregspecific objective of 'a safer and more secure Europe';
- where a component 1 or 2 Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy or a sea-basin strategy, at least 80 % the ERDF and, where applicable, part of the external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall contribute to the objectives of that strategy.
Small Project Fund
Members proposed that the total contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, from an external EU funding instrument to one or more funds for small projects under an Interreg programme should not exceed 20% of the total allocation for the Interreg programme and should amount, under an Interreg cross-border cooperation programme, to at least 3% of the total envelope.
Technical assistance
The percentage of ERDF and EU external financing instruments to be reimbursed under technical assistance would be as follows:
- for Interreg internal cross-border cooperation programmes supported by the ERDF: 7%;
- for Interreg programmes under components 2, 3 and 4, both for the ERDF and, where applicable, for the Union's external financing instruments: 8 %.
Payments and pre-financing
Members considered that the rules on pre-financing should take due account of the specificities of European territorial cooperation, which is why they have provided for greater pre-financing, particularly at the beginning of the financing period.
State aid
Members stressed that in the light of experience gained, aid for European Territorial Cooperation projects should only have limited effects on competition and trade between Member States, and thus the Commission should be able to declare that such aid is compatible with the internal market and that financing provided in support of ETC projects is able to be block-exempted.
PURPOSE: to lay down the specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments for the period 2021-2017.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: in order to simplify the legislative structure and ensure clarity of the applicable provisions in the field of cohesion, the common provisions regulation ( CPR ) lays down common rules and specific rules for the Funds. So goes for the Regulation covering both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund intervening under ‘Investment for jobs and growth’ and, for the ERDF, under the ‘European territorial cooperation’ goal (Interreg).
As part of a major simplification effort, the Commission now proposes to adopt specific provisions in relation to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) where one or more Member States cooperate across borders with regard to effective programming.
The Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) actively promotes territorial cooperation. The added value is obvious: actions for reconciliation and confidence-building in the Western Balkans, actions to overcome geographical and psychological obstacles and to establish good neighbourly relations.
The 13 ENPI ( European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument ) CBC programmes implemented during the 2007-2013 period covered nine EU land borders, three sea basins and one sea crossing. The programmes involved 34 countries, 19 EU Member States and 12 of the 16 neighbourhood partner countries plus Norway, Russia and Turkey
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States inside the Union and between Member States and adjacent third countries, partner countries, other territories or overseas countries and territories (OCTs) respectively.
· With regard to support from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance ( IPA III ), the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) and the funding for all the OCTs for the period 2021 to 2027, the proposal defines additional specific objectives as well as the integration of those funds into Interreg programmes , the criteria for third countries, partner countries and OCTs and their regions to be eligible and certain specific implementation rules.
· With regard to support from the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union (the Interreg funds) to Interreg programmes, this proposed Regulation defines the Interreg-specific objectives as well as the organisation, the criteria for Member States, third countries, partner countries and OCTs and their regions to be eligible, the financial resources, and the criteria for their allocation.
European territorial cooperation (Interreg) objective strands : support shall be provided by the ERDF and, where appropriate, by the Union's external financing instruments for the following five components : (i) cross-border; (ii) transnational and maritime; (iii) outermost regions; (iv) interregional cooperation and; (v) the new interregional innovation investments.
Geographical coverage : the cross-border cooperation component shall focus on NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land borders with third countries or partner countries, while cross-border cooperation along maritime borders shall be integrated into the broader ‘transnational and maritime cooperation’ component.
The Commission stresses that access to public services such as hospitals and universities is generally more difficult in border regions. Moreover, navigating between different administrative and legal systems is still often complex and costly. The proposal therefore aims to help cross-border cooperation programmes to focus on institutional cooperation, solving border problems and investment in common services of public interest .
Transnational cooperation shall cover larger territories on the mainland of the Union, whereas maritime cooperation shall cover territories around sea-basins and integrate cross-border cooperation on maritime borders during the programming period 2014-2020.
A specific outermost regions’ component shall be established in order to enable outermost regions to cooperate with their neighbouring countries and territories in the most effective and simple way.
The list of Interreg programmes to receive financial support shall be set out in an implementing act adopted by the European Commission.
Specific objectives : taking into account the special features of Interreg, two Interreg-specific objectives are set out: (i) 'better Interreg governance'; and (ii) 'a safer and more secure Europe', The proposed Regulation also sets out specific percentages for thematic concentration.
Programming, monitoring, eligibility : the proposal: (i) clarifies the rules governing funds for small projects that offer real added value and play an important role in building trust between citizens and institutions; (ii) ensures consistent monitoring of performance by refining the common set of performance indicators; (iii) establishes a clear hierarchy between the EU eligibility rules, the specific rules for Interreg programmes and, finally, the national eligibility rules.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implications. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR 8.43 billion of the global resources available for budgetary commitment from the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund for the 2021-2027 programming period. The resources shall be allocated as follows:
52.7% (EUR 4.44 billion in total) for cross-border cooperation (component 1); 31.4% (EUR 2.65 billion in total) for transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation (component 2); 3.2% (EUR 270.1 million in total) for outermost regions’ cooperation (component 3); 1.2% (EUR 100 million in total) for interregional cooperation (component 4); 11.5 % (a total of EUR 970 million) for interregional innovation investments (component 5).
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2021/1059
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 231 30.06.2021, p. 0094
- Draft final act: 00049/2021/LEX
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T9-0300/2021
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A9-0205/2021
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A9-0205/2021
- Committee draft report: PE693.556
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2021)0289
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Council position: 05488/2021
- Council position published: 05488/1/2021
- Committee letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: PE689.787
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at early 2nd reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE663.009
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at early 2nd reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE689.787
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE663.009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)437
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0238/2019
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0021/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0470/2018
- Committee opinion: PE627.593
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3595/2018
- Committee opinion: PE628.552
- Committee opinion: PE627.880
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
- Committee opinion: PE625.467
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.537
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.538
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2789/2018
- Committee draft report: PE626.663
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0282
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0283
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0374
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0282
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0283
- Committee draft report: PE626.663
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2789/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.537
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.538
- Committee opinion: PE625.467
- Committee opinion: PE627.880
- Committee opinion: PE628.552
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3595/2018
- Committee opinion: PE627.593
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)437
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE663.009
- Committee letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: PE689.787
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2021)0289 EUR-Lex
- Council position: 05488/2021
- Committee draft report: PE693.556
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A9-0205/2021
- Draft final act: 00049/2021/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
- Contribution: COM(2018)0374
Activities
- Marianne THYSSEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Arndt KOHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matthijs van MILTENBURG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim ZELLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont - Am 201 #
A8-0470/2018 - Pascal Arimont - Proposition de la Commission #
Amendments | Dossier |
1032 |
2018/0199(COD)
2018/09/12
CULT
133 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 Community-led local development ('CLLD') under point (b) of Article [22] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] may be implemented in Interreg programmes, provided that the relevant local action groups are composed of representatives of public and private local socio-economic interests, in which no single interest group controls the decision-making, and of
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 That document shall also set out the lead partner's obligations with regard to recoveries pursuant to Article 50. Those obligations shall be defined by the monitoring committee. However, a lead partner located in a different Member State
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Operations selected under components 1, 2 and 3 shall involve actors from a
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 For Interreg operations under component 3 Interreg programmes, the partners from outermost regions and
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Any beneficiary in a Member State
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 However, Member States
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 1. The Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where the rules of procedure of the monitoring committee establish a rotating chair, the monitoring committee may be chaired by a representative of a
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed by the Member States and,
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The composition of the monitoring committee shall take into account the number of participating Member States
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to the eligibility rules laid down in Articles [57 to 62] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Articles [4 and 6] of Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] or in this Chapter, including in acts adopted thereunder, the participating Member
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 3 3. For matters not covered by the eligibility rules laid down in Articles [57 to 62] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Articles [4 and 6] of Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] and this Chapter, including in acts adopted thereunder or in rules established in accordance with paragraph 4, the national rules of the Member State and, where applicable, of the
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. The participating Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component 2B or under component 1 where the latter covers long borders with heterogeneous development challenges and needs, Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 6 6. Where the managing authority identifies an intermediate body under an Interreg programme in accordance with Article [65(3)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the intermediate body shall carry out those tasks in more than one participating Member State or, where applicable,
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The managing authority, after consultation with the Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 1. Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission shall pay a pre- financing based on the total support from each Interreg fund, as set out in the decision approving each Interreg programme under Article 18, subject to
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 2. Where the lead partner does not succeed in securing repayment from other partners or where the managing authority does not succeed in securing repayment from the lead or sole partner, the Member State,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 3 3. Once the Member State
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 4 4. Where a Member State
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 8 – title Participation of
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 Chapters I to VII and Chapter X shall apply to the participation of
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The national authority or a body equivalent to the Interreg programme communication officer as provided for in Article 35(1), shall support the managing authority and partners in the respective
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 2. Component 2 and 4 Interreg programmes combining contributions from the ERDF and from one or more external financing instrument of the Union shall be implemented under shared management both in the Member States and
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) under shared management both in the Member States and in any participating
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) under shared management only in the Member States and in any participating
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) under indirect management both in the Member States and in any participating
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By way of derogation from Article [57(2)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] expenditure shall be eligible for a contribution from external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 However, expenditure for technical assistance managed by programme authorities located in a Member State shall be eligible as of 1 January 2021, even when paid for actions implemented in favour of
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 1. In order to implement an Interreg programme in a
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) when the
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Where an Interreg programme involves more than one
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) shall sign, on the same date, an implementing agreement with each
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – title Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where a
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where the Member State signs the financing agreement pursuant to point (a) of Article 58(4), in a separate implementing agreement signed either between the Member State hosting the managing authority and the
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 An implementing agreement under paragraph 1 shall at least contain the elements concerning the
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 4 4. Where a programme or action co- financed by one or more external financing instrument is implemented by
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union. Under that Article and the second and third paragraphs of Article 174 of the TFEU, the ERDF is to contribute to reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and to reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions,
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Based on the experience with cross- border and transnational cooperation during the programming period 2014-2020 in outermost regions, where the combination of both components within a single programme per cooperation area has not brought about sufficient simplification for programme authorities and beneficiaries, a specific outermost regions’ component should be established in order to enable outermost regions to cooperate with the
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 29 #
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) For the most efficient use of the support from the ERDF
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) It is necessary to clarify the rules governing small project funds which have been implemented since Interreg has existed, but have never been covered by specific provisions. As also set out in the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32 , such small project funds play an important role in building up trust between citizens and institutions, offer great European added value and contribute considerably to the overall objective of cross-border cooperation programmes by overcoming border obstacles and integrating border areas and their citizens. They should favour in particular cultural, artistic and citizen-orientated cross-border initiatives. In order to simplify the management of the financing of small projects by the final recipients, who are often not used to applying for Union funds, the use of simplified cost options and of lump sums should be made obligatory below a certain threshold.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) A clear chain of financial liability in respect of recovery for irregularities should be established from sole or other partners via the lead partner and the managing authority to the Commission. Provision should be made for liability of Member States
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to apply a mostly common set of rules both in the participating Member States and
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Although Interreg programmes with the participation of
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to foster cooperation between Member States and between Member States and
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States inside the Union and between Member States and adjacent
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 3 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 4 4. With regard to support from the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union (jointly referred to as ‘the Interreg funds’) to Interreg programmes, this Regulation defines the Interreg-specific objectives as well as the organisation, the criteria for Member States
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For the purpose of this Regulation, where provisions of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] refer to a 'Member State', this shall be construed as meaning 'the Member State hosting the managing authority' and where provisions refer to 'Each Member State' or 'Member States', this shall be construed as meaning 'the Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land border regions of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3);
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point i Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point ii Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point iii Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation over larger transnational territories or around sea- basins, involving national, regional and local programme partners in Member States
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) outermost regions' cooperation among themselves and with their neighbouring
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land borders
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The outermost regions' Interreg programmes may cover
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Component 4 Interreg programmes may cover the whole or part of the
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. On the basis of the information provided by Member States pursuant to Article 9(5), the Commission shall
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) improving access to and the quality of education, training and lifelong learning across borders with a view to increasing the educational attainment and skills levels, in particular linguistic skills, thereof as to be recognised across borders;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) improving access to and the quality of education, training, mobility and lifelong learning across borders with a view to increasing the educational attainment and skills levels thereof as to be recognised across borders;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) improving access to and the quality of education, training and lifelong learning across borders with a view to
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) promoting and supporting the creation of cross-border partnerships between educational, cultural, artistic, creative, audiovisual and research institutions in order to promote mutual understanding and dialogue in border regions, enhancing linguistic diversity and the role of educational and cultural policies and polices and the cultural, creative, artistic and audiovisual sectors as the driving force behind social innovation.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) improving access to culture and cultural services across borders;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d (d) improving accessibility, effectiveness
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion, also of migrants, and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities and combating discrimination across borders.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e)
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point c Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union shall also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective 'a safer and more secure Europe', in particular by actions in the fields of border crossing management and mobility and migration management, including the protection of legal migrants
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. The participating Member States
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The participating
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit an Interreg programme to the Commission by [date of entry into force plus nine months;] on behalf of all participating Member States and
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The participating Member States and
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, in the case of Interreg programmes involving outermost regions and
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases and in agreement with the Commission, in order to increase the efficiency of programme implementation and to achieve larger-scale operations, the Member State concerned may decide to transfer to Interreg programmes up to
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point g – introductory part (g) a financing plan containing the following tables (without any division per participating Member State
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point a – point i Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point a – point ii Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) set out the apportionment of liabilities among the participating Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States and, where applicable,
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 5 source: 627.778
2018/10/03
REGI
723 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the positive experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg, on the one hand, and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth25, in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation or agrifood.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component sh
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the best practices and experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, circular economy, industrial modernisation or agrifood. Finally, integrated territorial development focusing on functional urban areas or urban
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the four traditional interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the European Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation or agrifood. Finally, integrated territorial development focusing on functional urban areas or urban areas should be concentrated within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal and in one accompanying instrument, the ‘European Urban Initiative”. The two programmes under the interregional cooperation component
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Stresses that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) is not yet being fully exploited, which could be due partly to regional and local authorities’ reservations, and partly to their fear of a transfer of competences and an ongoing lack of awareness of their respective competences; calls for any other possible causes of this situation to be swiftly identified and addressed; calls on the Commission to put forward measures to overcome the obstacles hindering effective application of this instrument in the context of the new ‘interregional’ component.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) Referring to the European Parliament resolution of 13 September 2016 on ‘Cohesion Policy and Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation’ (RIS3) (2015/2278(INI), it is necessary to continue efforts to encourage a change of mentality and to promote innovative policy approaches to boost intra-regional, inter-regional, extra- regional, cross-border and transnational collaboration, including through macro- regions, by means of existing tools such as INTERREG, in order to continue boosting European added value in the strategies
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Objective criteria for designating eligible regions and areas should be established. To that end, the identification of eligible regions and areas at European Union level should be based on the common system of
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27, NDICI28 and OCTP29, should support programmes under cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation. The support from the ERDF and from the external financing instruments of the Union should be based on reciprocity and proportionality. However, for IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, the ERDF support should be complemented by at least equivalent amounts under IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, subject to a maximum amount set out in the respective legal act
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27, NDICI28 and OCTP29, should support programmes under cross-border
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development and enlargement policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27, NDICI28 and OCTP29, should support programmes under cross- border cooperation, transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation. The support from the ERDF and from the external financing instruments of the Union should be based on reciprocity and proportionality. However, for IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, the ERDF support should be complemented by at least equivalent amounts under IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, subject to a maximum amount set
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27 , NDICI28 and OCTP29 , should support programmes under cross-border cooperation,
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27 , NDICI28 and OCTP29 , should support programmes under cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation and
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the European Union, IPA27 , NDICI28 and OCTP29 , should support programmes under cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation. The support from the ERDF and from the external financing instruments of the European Union should be based on reciprocity and proportionality. However, for IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, the ERDF support should be complemented by at least equivalent
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) appropriate consideration should be paid to regions becoming new external borders of the European Union to ensure the adequate continuity of on-going cooperation programmes.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Particular attention should be paid to regions becoming new external borders of the European Union to ensure the adequate continuity of on-going cooperation programmes.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) IPA III assistance should mainly focus on assisting the IPA beneficiaries to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality, tolerance, social inclusion and non-discrimination as well as regional and local development. IPA assistance should continue to support the efforts of the IPA beneficiaries to advance regional, macro-regional and cross-border cooperation as well as territorial development, including through the implementation of Union macro- regional strategies. In addition, IPA assistance should address security, migration and border management, ensuring access to international protection, sharing relevant information, enhancing border control and pursuing common efforts in the fight against irregular
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) With regard to NDICI assistance, the European Union should develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) With regard to NDICI assistance, the Union should develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Border regions, especially those with lower population density, tend to face worse conditions for social and economic development and generally perform less well economically than other regions within the Member States, and their full economic potential is untapped. Physical and/or geographical barriers also contribute to restricting economic, social and territorial cohesion between border regions, both within and outside the EU, particularly in the case of island and mountain regions.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In view of the specific situation of island and outmost regions of the Union, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the conditions under which those regions may have access to structural funds. Consequently, certain provisions of this Regulation should be adapted to the specificities of the island and outermost regions in order to simplify and foster cooperation with their neighbors, while taking into account the Communication from the Commission 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'31. _________________ 31 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions', - COM(2017) 623 final, 24.10.2017.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In view of the specific situation of outmost regions of the Union, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the improvement of conditions under which those regions may have access to structural funds. Consequently, certain provisions of this Regulation should be adapted to the specificities of the outermost regions in
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In view of the specific situation of outmost regions of the European Union, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the conditions under which those regions may have access to structural funds. Consequently, certain provisions of this Regulation should be adapted to the specificities of the outermost regions in order to simplify and foster cooperation with their neighbors, while taking into account the Communication from the Commission 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'31 . _________________ 31 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Within the context of the unique and specific circumstances on the island of Ireland, and with a view to supporting North-South cooperation under the Good Friday Agreement, a new 'PEACE PLUS' cross-border programme sh
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18 a) The European Parliament addressed the issue of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union in its resolutions: of 5 April 2017 on negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union, of 3 October 2017 on the state of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom, of 13 December 2017 on the state of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom and of 14 March 2018 on the framework of the future EU-UK relationships.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add two Interreg-specific objectives: one to support an Interreg-specific objective strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing legal and administrative cooperation, in particular where linked to implementation of the Border Regions Communication, intensify cooperation between citizens
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add two Interreg-specific objectives, one to support an Interreg-specific objective strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing legal and administrative cooperation, in particular where linked to implementation of the Border Regions Communication
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add two Interreg-specific objectives, one to support an Interreg-specific objective strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing legal and administrative cooperation, in particular where linked to implementation of the Border Regions Communication, intensify cooperation between citizens and institutions and the development and coordination of existing or future macro- regional and sea-
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The major part of the Union support should be concentrated on a limited number of policy objectives in order to maximise the impact of Interreg. Synergies and complementarities between the components of INTERREG should be strengthened.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The major part of the Union support should be concentrated on a limited number of policy objectives in order to maximise the impact of Interreg and achievement of the proposed objectives by the deadline laid down.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) A significant proportion of EU support should be designed to enhance the use of existing innovative tools which contribute to the ongoing modernisation and deepening of cross-border cooperation, such as Border Focal Point, reinforced SOLVIT, as well as the Single Digital Gateway, aimed at organising expertise and advice on cross-border regional aspects, and to continue to develop new ones.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The provisions on the criteria for operations to be considered as genuinely joint and cooperative, on the partnership within an Interreg operation and on the obligations of the lead partner as set out during the programme period 2014-2020 should on be continued. However, Interreg partners, with the exception of external cross-border cooperation, should cooperate in all four dimensions (development, implementation, staffing and financing) and, under outermost regions’ cooperation, in three out of four, as it should be simpler to combine support from the ERDF and external financing instruments from the
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The provisions on the criteria for operations to be considered as genuinely joint and cooperative, on the partnership within an Interreg operation and on the obligations of the lead partner as set out during the programme period 2014-2020 should on be continued.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The provisions on the criteria for operations to be considered as genuinely joint and cooperative, on the partnership within an Interreg operation and on the obligations of the lead partner as set out during the programme period 2014-2020 should on be continued. However, Interreg partners should cooperate in a
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22 a) Under cross-border cooperation programmes, people-to-people(P2P) and small-scale projects are an important and successful instrument for eliminating border obstacles, fostering contacts between people locally and, in so doing, bringing border regions and their citizens closer together. P2P projects and small- scale projects are carried out in many areas such as, inter alia, culture, sport, tourism, general education and vocational training, the economy, science, environmental protection and ecology, health care, transport and small-scale infrastructure projects, administrative cooperation and public-relations work. As also set forth in the Committee of the Regions’ opinion ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32, P2P projects and small-scale projects have high European added value and make a considerable contribution towards realising the overall objective of cross- border cooperation programmes
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) It is necessary to clarify the rules governing small project funds which have been implemented since Interreg has existed, but have never been covered by specific provisions. As also set out in the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32 , such small project funds play an important role in building up trust between citizens and institutions, offer great European added value and contribute considerably to the overall objective of cross-border cooperation programmes by overcoming border obstacles and integrating border areas and their citizens. The beneficiary of a small project fund should be a legal body in Interreg programme area or an EGTC. In order to simplify the management of the financing of small projects by the final recipients, who are often not used to applying for Union funds, the use of simplified cost options and of lump sums should be made obligatory below a certain threshold. _________________ 32 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) It is necessary to clarify the rules governing small project funds which have been implemented since Interreg has existed, but have never been covered by specific provisions. As also set out in the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32, such small project funds play an important role in building up trust between citizens and institutions, offer great European added value and contribute considerably to the overall objective of cross-border cooperation programmes by overcoming border obstacles, local and regional development and integrating border areas and their citizens. In order to simplify the management of the financing of small projects by the final recipients, who are often not used to applying for Union funds, the use of simplified cost options and of lump sums should be made obligatory below a certain threshold. _________________ 32 Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small- scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’ of 12 July 2017 (OJ C 342, 12.10.2017, p. 38).
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) It is necessary to clarify the rules governing small project funds which have been implemented since Interreg has existed, but have never been covered by specific provisions. As also set out in the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions ‘People-to-people and small-scale projects in cross-border cooperation programmes’32 , such small project funds play an important role in building up trust between citizens and European institutions
Amendment 154 #
(24) Due to the involvement of more than one Member State, and the resulting higher administrative costs, including for regional points of contact (or ‘antennae’), which function as important points of contact for those proposing and implementing projects, and therefore as a direct line to the joint secretariats or the relevant authorities, but in particular in respect of controls and translation, the ceiling for technical assistance expenditure should be higher than that under the Investment for jobs and growth goal. In order to offset the higher administrative costs, Member States should be encouraged to reduce the administrative burden with regard to the implementation of joint projects wherever possible. In addition, Interreg programmes with limited Union support or external cross-border cooperation programmes should receive a certain minimum amount for technical assistance to ensure sufficient funding for effective technical assistance activities.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Based on the experience during the programming period 2014 -2020, the system introducing a clear hierarchy of rules on eligibility of expenditure should be continued while maintaining the principle of rules on eligibility of expenditure to be established at Union level or for Interreg programme as a whole
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) It is necessary to underline that Member States may not introduce additional rules which complicate the access to funds for the beneficiaries.
Amendment 157 #
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Member States should
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Member States should
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Member States should be encouraged to assign the functions of the managing authority to an EGTC or to make such a grouping, like other cross-border legal bodies, responsible for managing a sub-programme, an integrated territorial investment or one or more small project funds, or to act as sole partner. Where this is done, those EGTCs should not be considered to be beneficiaries of that programme.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Member States should be encouraged to assign the functions of the managing authority to
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In order to continue the payment chain established for the programming period 2014-2020, i.e. from the Commission to the lead partner via the certifying authority, that payment chain should be continued under the accounting function. The Union support should be paid to the lead partner, unless this would result in double fees for conversion into euro and back into another currency or vice versa between the lead partner and the other partners. If not otherwise specified, the lead partner should ensure that the other partners receive the total amount of the contribution from the respective Union fund in full and within agreed timeframe among all partners and following the same procedure applied for lead partner.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) A clear chain of financial liability in respect of recovery for irregularities should be established from sole or other partners via the lead partner and the managing authority to the Commission. Provision should be made for liability of Member States, third countries, partner countries or Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs), where obtaining recovery from the sole or other or lead partner is not successful, meaning that the Member State reimburses the managing authority. Consequently, under Interreg programmes there is no scope for irrecoverable amounts on the level of beneficiaries. It is, however, necessary to clarify the rules, should a Member State, third country, partner country or OCT not reimburse the managing authority. The obligations of the lead partner for recovery should also be clarified.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) It is appropriate to encourage financial discipline. At the same time, arrangements for de-commitment of budgetary commitments should take into account of the complexity of Interreg programmes and their implementation.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Although Interreg programmes with the participation of third countries, partner countries or OCTs should be implemented under shared management, outermost regions’ cooperation may be implemented under shared or indirect management. Specific rules should be set out how to implement those programmes as a whole or partially under
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 a (new) (33a) In the current multiannual financial framework (MFFP), 95% of funds from the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) and the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) are earmarked for the central corridors of the TEN-T, while small projects relating to the overall network and to interventions connected with the TEN-T network, although essential for solving specific problems and for developing border connections and economies, are often not eligible for co-financing or national financing. It is therefore essential for them to be reviewed in the context of the new cross-border and transnational components.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In order to supplement or amend
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend the Annex on the template for Interreg programmes. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equal participation in
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) (36 a) Promoting European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) is a major priority of EU cohesion policy. Experience shows that in most cases public support granted to ETC projects does not involve State aid at all. In the cases involving State aid, the aid amounts involved are generally relatively small. As a result they can be considered having in general only a limited impact on competition and trade between Member States. This is why they should benefit from a favourable treatment under state aid rules. Under the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), support for SMEs in connection with the costs of ETC projects is already exempted from reporting requirements. Special provisions for regional aid for investments by undertakings of all sizes are also included in the Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 and in the regional aid section of the GBER. In the last years the Commission has gained significant experience in relation to aid measures aimed at the promotion of ETC projects. A further extension of the scope of aid measures allowed under the General Block Exemption Regulation could therefore be considered.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) (36 a) For many years, promoting European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) has been a major priority of EU cohesion policy. Under the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), support for SMEs in connection with the costs of ETC projects is already exempted from reporting requirements. Special provisions for regional aid for investments by undertakings of all sizes are also included in the Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 and in the regional aid section of the GBER.As aid for ETC projects have only a limited impact on competition and trade between Member States, and aid granted to SMEs in this context already benefits from a notification exemption, this exemption should be extended to all State aid granted in the context of European territorial cooperation projects to exempt them from reporting requirements under Article 108(3) TFEU.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) (36 a) For many years, promoting European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) has been a major priority of EU cohesion policy. Under the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), support for SMEs in connection with the costs of ETC projects is already exempted from reporting requirements. Special provisions for regional aid for investments by undertakings of all sizes are also included in the Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 and in the regional aid section of the GBER. As aid for ETC projects would be compatible with the internal market and would have only a limited impact on competition and trade between Member States, it should be exempted from aid control arrangements and should not be subject to the reporting requirements under Article 108(3) TFEU.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States inside the Union and between Member States and
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States inside the Union and between Member States and
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) with a view to fostering cooperation between Member States and their regions inside the Union and between Member States, their regions and adjacent third countries, partner countries, other territories or overseas countries and territories ('OCTs') respectively.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. With regard to support from the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the European Union (jointly referred to as ‘the Interreg funds’) to Interreg programmes, this Regulation defines the Interreg-specific objectives as well as the organisation, the criteria for Member States, third countries, partner countries and OCTs and their regions to be eligible, the financial resources, and the criteria for their allocation.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) (-1) Overseas countries and territories (OCTs): overseas countries and territories associated with an EU Member State that is subject to the provisions stipulated in the fourth part of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and listed in Annex II to the Treaty.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) 'partner country' means an IPA beneficiary or a country or territory covered by the 'Neighbourhood geographic area’ listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) [NDICI] and the Russian Federation, and which receives support from the external financing instruments of the European Union;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) 'cross-border legal body' means a legal body established under the laws of one of the participating countries in an Interreg programme provided that it is set up by territorial authorities or other bodies from at least two participating countries or Euroregions.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Regional cooperation organisations: a group of States or regions in the same geographical area that aim to cooperate closely on issues of common interest.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purpose of this Regulation, where provisions of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] refer to 'the Funds' as listed in [point (a) of Article 1(1)] of that Regulation or to the 'ERDF', this shall be construed as also covering the respective external financing instrument of the European Union.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg), the ERDF and, where applicable, external financing instruments of the European Union shall support the following components:
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part (1) cross-border cooperation between adjacent regions to promote integrated and uniform regional development (component 1):
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land and maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land and maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land and maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land and maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land or maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) a a) internal cross-border maritime cooperation between adjacent maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3);
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land or maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land or maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point iii a (new) (iii a) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages between partners throughout the Union;
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) b a) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following: (i) IPA beneficiaries; or (ii) partner countries supported by NDICI; or iii) the Russian Federation, for the purpose of enabling its participation in cross-border cooperation also supported by NDICI;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) transnational cooperation over larger transnational territories or around sea-basins, involving national, regional and local programme partners in Member States, third countries
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) outermost regions' cooperation among themselves and with their neighbouring third or partner countries or OCTs, or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation, or several thereof, to facilitate their regional integration in their neighbourhood ('component 3');
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) outermost regions' cooperation among themselves and with their
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) outermost regions' cooperation among themselves and with their neighbouring third or partner countries or OCTs, or several thereof, to facilitate their regional integration and uniform development in their neighbourhood ('component 3');
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point ii Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point ii Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii a) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii a) The setting-up, functioning and use of the European Cross-Border Mechanism as referred to in regulation (EU) [new European Cross-Border Mechanism];
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) (b a) exchange of experiences and building up capacities between partners throughout the Union with a view to: (i) the implementation of Investment for jobs and growth goal programmes, in particular with regard to interregional and transnational actions with beneficiaries located in at least one other Member State; (ii) the identification and dissemination of good practices with a view to their transfer principally to operational programmes under the Investment for growth and jobs goal; (iii) the exchange of experiences concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of best practice on sustainable urban development, including linkages between urban and rural areas.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) (b a) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) (b a) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) (ba) by promoting the implementation of common interregional development projects.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b b (new) (b b) interregional innovation investments through the commercialisation and scaling up of interregional innovation projects having the potential to encourage the development of European value chains.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) interregional innovation
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) (5) interregional innovation investments
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) interregional innovation investments which bring together researchers, businesses, public authorities and civil society on smart specialisation strategies at national or regional level and have the potential to encourage the development of European value chains through the commercialisation and scaling up of interregional innovation projects
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) interregional innovation investments through the commercialisation and scaling up of interregional innovation projects having the potential to encourage the development of European value chains, based on Smart Specialisation Strategies, including investments promoting social innovation with a clear European added value ('component 5').
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land and maritime borders with third countries or partner countries taking into account the continuity of the existing program areas from period 2014-2020.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land and maritime borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land and maritime borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land or maritime borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land and maritime borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the European Union along all internal and external land borders with third countries or partner countries.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over the sea by
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over or under the sea by a fixed link shall also be supported under cross-border cooperation.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over the sea by a f
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over the sea
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all land and maritime borders between Member States and partner countries eligible under IPA III or NDICI.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all land and maritime borders between Member States and partner countries eligible under IPA III or NDICI.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all land or maritime borders between Member States and partner countries eligible under IPA III or NDICI.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all land or maritime borders between Member States and partner countries eligible under IPA III or NDICI.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title 5 Geographical coverage for transnational cooperation
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational
Amendment 245 #
1. For transnational cooperation
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational
Amendment 247 #
1. For transnational
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the Union covering contiguous functional areas, which should be defined under Article 2 of the CPR, taking into account, where applicable, macro-regional strategies or sea basin strategies.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the Union
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the Union covering contiguous functional areas, taking into account
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the European Union covering contiguous functional areas, taking into account, where applicable, macro-regional strategies or sea basin strategies.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Transnational cooperation
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Transnational cooperation
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Transnational cooperation
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Transnational cooperation and
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) regions in Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, until a final Brexit deal has been reached and as well as Liechtenstein, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The regions, third countries
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Given the unique and special status of Northern Ireland, specific funding streams shall be retained after the United Kingdom leaves the European Union.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The outermost regions' Interreg programmes may cover
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – title 7 Geographical coverage for interregional cooperation
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme or for interregional innovation investments under component 5, the entire territory of the Union shall be supported by the ERDF. Third countries may participate, provided they make a funding contribution.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme or for interregional innovation investments under component 5, the entire territory of the Union shall be supported by the ERDF, including the outermost regions.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme or for interregional innovation investments under component 5,
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Component 4 Interreg programmes may cover the whole or part of the third countries, partner countries, other territories or OCTs referred to in Articles 4, 5 and 6, whether or not they are supported by the external financing instruments of the European Union.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Component 5 may include regions in: a) Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, as well as Liechtenstein, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino b) Greenland c) the Faeroe Islands d) regions of partner countries under IPA III or NDICI. e) The regions, third countries or partner countries listed in paragraph 2 shall be regions at NUTS 2 level or equivalent.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 For the purposes of Articles 4, 5 and 6, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the list of Interreg programme areas to receive support, broken down for each component and each Interreg programme. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the a
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall also contain a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions of the Union taken into account for the ERDF allocation for cross-border cooperation at all both land and maritime internal borders and those external borders covered by the external financing instruments of the Union as well as a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions taken into account for allocation purposes under component 2B referred to in point (a) of Article 9(3).
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall also contain a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions of the Union taken into account for the ERDF allocation for cross-border cooperation at all internal land and maritime borders and those external borders covered by the external financing instruments of the Union as well as a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions taken into account for allocation purposes under component 2B referred to in point (a) of Article 9(3).
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall also contain a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions of the European Union taken into account for the ERDF allocation for cross-border cooperation at all internal borders and those external borders covered by the external financing instruments of the European Union as well as a list specifying those NUTS level 3 regions taken into account for allocation purposes under component 2B referred to in point (a) of Article 9(3).
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Regions of third or partner countries or territories outside the European Union which do not receive support
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg)
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The resources referred to in paragraph 1, for components 1 to 4, shall be allocated as follows:
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The resources referred to in paragraph 1, for components 1 to 4, shall be allocated as follows:
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) 75
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) 5
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) 52.7 % (i.e., a total of EUR
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) 5
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) 31.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) 3
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) 3
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) 3.2 % (i.e., a total of EUR
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) 3.2 % (i.e., a total of EUR
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) 1
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) 1
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part The allocation of resources by Member State, covering cross-border and transnational cooperation, and including the contribution from the ERDF to the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, is determined as the weighted sum of the share of the population of border regions and of the share of the total population of each Member State. The weight is determined by the respective shares of the cross-border and transnational strands. The shares of the cross border and transnational cooperation components are 77,9 % and 22,1 %. Population size in the following regions shall be used as the criterion for the breakdown by Member State:
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part The allocation of resources per Member State, which covers cross-border and transnational cooperation, and includes the contribution from the ERDF to the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, shall be determined by the weighted sum of the share of the population of border regions and of the share of the total population of each Member State. The weighting shall be as follows: cross-border component (77.9%), transnational component (22.1%). Population size in the following regions shall be used as the criterion for the breakdown by Member State:
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) NUTS level 3 regions for component 1
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) NUTS level 3 regions for component 1
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) NUTS level 2 regions for component
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) NUTS level 2 and 3 regions for component 3.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State may transfer up to
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State may transfer up to
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Investments co-financed by the ERDF shall be qualified as eligible investments for the application of the flexibility clause and shall be excluded from the assessment of the Member States’ fiscal position under either Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 and Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Support from the ERDF shall be granted to individual external cross-border Interreg programmes
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Support from the ERDF shall be granted to individual external cross-border Interreg programmes provided that at least equivalent amounts are provided by IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC under the relevant strategic programming document. That
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Support from the ERDF shall be granted to individual external cross-border Interreg programmes provided that at least equivalent amounts are provided by IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC under the relevant strategic programming document. That
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) (d) ERDF amount allocated to the programme by the Member States can be used for the benefit of the programme after the decision of the Programme Monitoring Committee and the relevant Member State.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Where the Commission has included a specific financial allocation to assist partner countries or regions under
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. On the basis of the information provided by Member States pursuant to Article 9(5), the Commission shall, adopt an implementing act setting out a list of all Interreg programmes and indicating per programme the global amount of the total support from the ERDF and, where applicable, the total support from external financing instruments of the Union. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the a
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. That implementing act shall also contain a list of the amounts transferred pursuant to Article 9(5) broken down by Member State and by external financing instrument of the European Union.
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. In 2022 and 2023, the annual contribution from the ERDF to external cross-border Interreg programmes, for which no programme has been submitted to the Commission by 31 March of the respective years, and which has not been re-allocated to another programme submitted under the same category of external cross-border Interreg programmes, shall be allocated: (A) to the internal cross-
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) In duly justified cases, where the Interreg programme cannot be implemented as planned due to serious problems in relations between the participating countries.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) in duly justified cases, where the Interreg programme cannot be implemented as planned due to serious problems in relations between the participating countries
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) In duly justified cases, where the Interreg programme cannot be implemented as planned due to serious problems in relations between the participating countries.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) In justified cases, where the Interreg programme cannot be implemented as planned due to serious problems in relations between the participating countries.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 With regard to a component 2 Interreg programme already approved by the Commission, the participation of a partner country or of
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) that the Interreg programme be discontinued in total, in particular where
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) that the Interreg programme continue without the participation of that partner country or of
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 7
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 7
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 70 %, unless, with regard to external cross-border or component 3 Interreg programmes, a higher percentage is fixed in Regulations (EU) [IPA III], [NDICI] or Council Decision (EU) [OCTP] respectively or in any act adopted thereunder; national co-financing should therefore be kept outside the calculation of the Stability Pact to make the implementation of each programme truly efficient and effective and in order to ensure that the principle of additionality is genuinely complied with.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF, within its scope as set out in Article [4] of Regulation (EU) [new ERDF], and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the European Union shall contribute to the policy objectives set out in Article [4(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] through joint actions under Interreg programmes.
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. In the case of the PEACE PLUS programme, where it is acting in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF, as a specific objective under policy objective 4, shall also contribute to promoting social, economic and regional stability and cooperation in the regions concerned, in particular through actions to promote cohesion between communities. A separate priority shall support that specific objective.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. In addition to the specific objectives for the ERDF as set out in Article [2] of Regulation (EU) [new ERDF], the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the European Union may also contribute to the specific objectives under PO 4 as follows:
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Under components 1, 2, and 3, the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the European Union may also support the Interreg- specific objective 'a better Interreg governance', in particular by the following actions:
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) under component 1
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) under component 1
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) under component 1 and 2
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) under component 1 and 2
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point i (i) enhance the institutional capacity of all local public authorities, in particular those mandated to manage a specific
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii ii. enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii (ii) enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens, civil society actors and institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii (ii) enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens, civil society actors and institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii a (new) ii a) the eGovernment actions planned for the 2016-2020 period as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, recognising the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border regions;
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii a (new) (ii a) build up mutual trust, in particular by encouraging people-to-people actions.
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) under component 1, 2 and 3 Interreg programmes: enhance institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders to implement macro-regional strategies and sea-basin strategies; with respect to the subsidiarity of Member States.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) under component 1, 2 and 3 Interreg programmes: enhance institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders to implement the existing EU macro-regional strategies and sea-basin strategies;
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the European Union shall also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. At least 60% of the ERDF and, where applicable, of the external financing instruments of the European Union allocated under priorities other than for technical assistance to each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3, shall be allocated on a maximum of three of the policy objectives set out in Article [4(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR].
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. An additional 1
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. An additional 15% of the ERDF and, where applicable, of the external financing instruments of the European Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance to each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3, shall be allocated on the Interreg- specific objective of 'a better Interreg governance' or on the external Interreg- specific objective of
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where a component 1 or 2
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where a component 2A Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy, at least 80% of the total ERDF and, where applicable, of the total external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall be programmed on the objectives of that strategy.
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where a component 2A Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy,
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where a component 2A Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy, the total ERDF and, where applicable, the total external financing instruments of the European Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall be programmed on the objectives of that strategy.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Where a component 2B Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy or sea-basin strategy, a
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Where a component 2B Interreg programme supports a macro-regional strategy or sea-basin strategy, at least 70% of the total ERDF and, where applicable, of the external financing instruments of the European Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall be allocated on the objectives of that strategy.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 5 5. For component 4 Interreg programmes, the total ERDF and, where applicable, of the external financing instruments of the European Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance shall be allocated on the Interreg-specific objective 'a better Interreg governance'.
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 a (new) Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall be implemented through Interreg programmes under shared management with the exception of component 3, which may be implemented as a whole or partially under indirect management after a prior agreement between the Member states and regions concerned, and of component 5 which shall be implemented under direct or indirect management.
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall be implemented through Interreg programmes under shared management with the exception of component 3, which may be implemented as a whole or partially under indirect
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall be implemented through Interreg programmes under shared management with the exception of component 3, which may be implemented as a whole or partially under indirect management after consulting stakeholders, and of component 5 which shall be implemented under direct or indirect management.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. The participating Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. The participating Member States shall prepare an Interreg programme in cooperation with the programme partners referred to in Article [6] of Regulation (EU) [the new CPR]
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The participating Member States shall prepare an Interreg programme in cooperation with the programme partners referred to in Article [6] of Regulation (EU) [the new CPR] of all participating Member States.
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In the preparation of the Interreg programmes, covering macro-regional or seabasin strategies, the Member States and the programme partners shall take into account the thematic priorities of the relevant macro-regional and sea basins strategies and consult the relevant actors. An ex ante mechanism may be set up to ensure all actors at macro-region and sea basin level, ETC programme authorities, regions and countries are brought together at the start of the programming period to decide jointly on the priorities for each programme. Those priorities shall be aligned with macro-regional or sea basin strategies’ Action Plans wherever relevant.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit an Interreg programme to the Commission by [date of entry into force plus nine months;] on behalf of all participating Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit an Interreg programme to the Commission by [date of entry into force plus
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit an Interreg programme to the Commission by [date of entry into force plus
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing instrument of the Union shall be submitted by the Member State hosting the prospective managing authority no later than
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing instrument of the Union shall be submitted by the Member State hosting the prospective managing authority no later than
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing instrument of the Union shall be submitted
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases and in agreement with the Commission, in order to increase the efficiency of programme implementation and to achieve larger-scale operations, the Member State concerned may decide to transfer to Interreg programmes up to [x]% of the amount of the ERDF allocated to the corresponding programme under the Investment for jobs and growth goal for the same region. The amount transferred shall constitute a separate priority or separate priorities. Sufficient flexibility in the objectives and programmes setting up on regions' need in the participating countries shall be preserved.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases and in agreement with the Commission, in order to increase the efficiency of programme implementation and to achieve larger-scale operations, the Member State concerned may decide to transfer to Interreg programmes up to
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases and in agreement with the Commission, in order to increase the efficiency of programme implementation and to achieve larger-scale operations, the Member State concerned may decide to transfer to Interreg programmes up to
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b – introductory part (b) a summary of the main joint challenges, particularly taking into account:
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i (i) economic, social, and territorial disparities, environmental challenges;
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b – point ii (ii) joint investment needs and complementarity with other forms of support, assessment of the potential for synergies and mobilising different sources of funding;
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b – point ii (ii) joint investment needs, economic growth and investment potential and complementarity with other forms of support;
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b – point iv a (new) (iv a) the actions to address the specific needs of geographical areas which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps as referred in article 174 TFEU;
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point c c) a justification for the selected policy objectives and Interreg-specific objectives, corresponding priorities, specific objectives and
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point i (i) the related types of actions, including a list of planned operations of strategic importance, and their expected contribution to th
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point i (i) the related types of actions, including a list of planned operations of strategic importance, and their expected contribution to those specific objectives
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point i (i) the related types of actions, including a list of planned operations of
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point i (i) the related types of actions, including a list of planned operations of strategic importance, and their expected contribution to those specific objectives and to macro-regional strategies and sea- basin strategies, where appropriate, respectively the set of criteria and the corresponding transparent selection criteria for such operation;
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point iii Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point v Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point g – point i (i) a table specifying the total financial allocation for the ERDF and, where relevant, for each external financing instrument of the European Union for the whole programming period and by year;
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point g – point ii (ii) a table specifying the total financial allocation for each priority by the ERDF and, where relevant, by each external financing instrument of the European Union by priority and the national co- financing and whether the national co- financing is made up of public and private co-financing;
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point h (h) the actions taken to involve the relevant programme partners referred to in Article [6] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] of all participating Member States in the preparation of the Interreg programme, and the role of those programme partners in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of that programme;
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point a – introductory part (a) with regard to the tables referred to in point (g) and as concerns the support from external financing instruments of the European Union, those funds shall be set out as follows:
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point a – point iii (iii) for component 2 Interreg programmes supported by OCTP concerning split per financing instrument (
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point b Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 – point b Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall assess with full transparency each Interreg programme and its compliance with Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] and this Regulation and, in the case of support from an external financing instrument of the European Union and where relevant, its consistency with the multi-annual strategy document under Article 10(1) or the relevant strategic programming framework under the respective basic act of one or more of those instruments.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States and, where applicable, third or partner countries or OCTs shall provide to the Commission all necessary additional information and, where appropriate, review the Interreg programme taking into account the observations made by the Commission.
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States and, where applicable, third or partner countries
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving each Interreg programme no later than
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State hosting the managing authority may, following consultation with the local and regional authorities and in compliance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], submit a motivated request for an amendment of an Interreg programme together with the amended programme, setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State hosting the managing authority may submit a motivated request for an amendment of an Interreg programme together with the amended programme, after consulting local and regional authorities in accordance with Article 6 on partnership and multi-level governance in the common provisions, setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State hosting the managing authority may submit a motivated request for an amendment of an Interreg programme together with the amended programme, and after consultation of the regional and local authorities and in accordance with Article 6 of the CPR, setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State hosting the managing authority may submit a motivated request for an amendment of an Interreg programme together with the amended programme, and after consultation of the local and regional authorities and in accordance with Article 6 of the CPR, setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the compliance of the amendment with Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] and this Regulation and may make observations within
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the compliance of the amendment with Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] and this Regulation and may make observations within
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall approve the amendment of a Interreg programme no later than
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall approve the amendment of a Interreg programme no
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The M
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to
Amendment 473 #
The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to 5% of the initial allocation of a priority and no more than 3% of the programme budget to another priority of the same Interreg programme
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to 5% of the initial allocation of a priority and no more than 3% of the programme budget to another priority of the same Interreg programme, after consultation of the local and regional authorities and in accordance of the Article 6 of the CPR.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 That monitoring committee may set up one or, in particular in the case of sub-
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where all or part of an operation is implemented outside the programme area [inside or outside the Union], the selection of that operation shall require the explicit approval
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where all or part of an operation is implemented outside the programme area [inside or outside the Union], the selection of that operation shall require the explicit approval by the
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For the selection of operations, the monitoring committee or, where applicable, the steering committee shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory and transparent, ensure gender equality and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention of Human Rights and the principle of sustainable development and of the European Union policy on the environment in accordance with Article 11 and Article 191(1) of the TFEU.
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The criteria and procedures shall ensure the prioritisation of operations to be selected with a view to maximise the contribution of European Union funding to the achievement of the objectives of the Interreg programme and to implementing the cooperation dimension of operations under Interreg programmes, as set out in Article 23(1) and (4).
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The managing authority shall
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The managing authority shall consult the Commission and may take its comments into account prior to the initial submission of the selection criteria to the monitoring committee or, where applicable, the steering committee. The same shall apply for any subsequent changes to those criteria.
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4.
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) ensure that selected operations do not conflict with the corresponding strategies established under Article 10(1) or established for one or more of the external financing instruments of the European Union;
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point d Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point d d) verify that the beneficiary has the necessary financial resources and mechanisms to cover operation
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point e Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point e Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point f Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point i Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point j Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 That document shall also set out the lead partner's obligations with regard to
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Operations selected under components 1, 2 and 3 shall involve actors from at least two participating countries or OCTs, at least one of which shall be a beneficiary from a Member State.
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. An Interreg operation may be implemented in a single country or OCT, provided that the impact on and the benefits for the programme area are identified in the operation application.
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Partners shall cooperate in the development, implementation, staffing and financing of Interreg operations. An effort shall be made to limit the number of partners for each Interreg operation to no more than ten.
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Partners shall cooperate in the development
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Partners shall cooperate in the development, implementation, staffing and/or financing of Interreg operations.
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 For Interreg operations under component 3 Interreg programmes, the partners from outermost regions and third countries, partner countries or OCTs shall be required
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 For Interreg operations under component 3 Interreg programmes, the partners from outermost regions and third countries, partner countries or OCTs shall be required to cooperate only in t
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 For Interreg operations under component 3 Interreg programmes, the partners from outermost regions and third countries, partner countries or OCTs shall be required to cooperate only in t
Amendment 510 #
For Interreg operations under component 3 Interreg programmes, the partners from outermost regions and third countries, partner countries or OCTs shall be required to cooperate only in t
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 A cross-border legal body or an EGTC may be the sole partner of an Interreg operation under component 1, 2 and 3 Interreg programmes, provided that the members thereof involve partners from at least two participating countries or OCTs.
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 The cross-border legal body or EGTC shall have members from at least three participating countries or OCTs under component 4 Interreg programmes.
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The total contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the European Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed EUR 20 000 000 or 15% of the total allocation of the Interreg programme, whichever is lower.
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The final recipients within a small project fund shall receive support from the ERDF or, where applicable the external financing instruments of the European Union through the beneficiary and implement the small projects within that small project fund (‘small project’).
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiar
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund shall be a
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund shall be a cross-border legal body
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund shall be a cross-border legal body or an EGTC, including legal bodies in the outermost regions.
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund shall be a cross-border legal body, a Euroregion or an EGTC.
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 5 5. Staff and other direct costs corresponding to the cost categories in Articles 39 to 42, as well as indirect costs generated at the level of the beneficiary for the management of the small project fund or funds, shall not exceed
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union. Under that Article and the second and third paragraphs of Article 174 of the TFEU, the ERDF is to contribute to reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and to reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions, among which particular attention is to be paid to
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 5 5. Staff and indirect costs generated at the level of the beneficiary for the management of the small project fund shall not exceed
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 Where the public contribution to a small project does not exceed EUR 100 000, the contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union shall take the form of unit costs or lump sums or include flat rates
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 Where the public contribution to a small project does not exceed EUR 100 000, the contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the European Union shall take the form of unit costs or lump sums or include flat rates, except for projects for which the support constitutes State aid.
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 6 – point 1 (new) (1) 7. The threshold of EUR 200 000 which is set out in art. 48(1) [new CPR] and point b of art. 48(2) [new CPR] should be applied for a small project.
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. The threshold of EUR 200 000 which is set out in art. 48(1) [new CPR] and point b of art. 48(2) [new CPR] should be applied for a small project.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. If not otherwise specified in the arrangements laid down pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 1 the lead partner shall ensure that the other partners receive the total amount of the contribution from the respective Union fund
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. If not otherwise specified in the arrangements laid down pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 1 the lead partner shall ensure that the other partners receive the total amount of the contribution from the respective European Union fund as quickly as possible and in full. No amount shall be deducted or withheld and no specific charge or other charge with equivalent effect shall be levied that would reduce that amount for the other partners.
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Any beneficiary in a Member State
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. Technical assistance to each Interreg programme shall mainly be reimbursed as
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. Technical assistance to each Interreg programme shall be reimbursed as a flat rate by applying the percentages set out in paragraph 2 for 2021 and 2022 to the yearly instalments of the pre- financing pursuant to points (a) and (b) of Article 49(2) and then to the eligible expenditure included in each payment application pursuant to [points (a) or (c) of Article 85(3)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] as appropriate for subsequent years.
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. Technical assistance to each Interreg programme shall be reimbursed as a flat rate by applying the percentages set out in paragraph 2 to the yearly instalments of the pre-financing pursuant to points (a) and (b) of Article 49(2) for 2021 and 2022 as well as to the eligible expenditure included in each payment application pursuant to [points (a) or (c) of Article 85(3)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] as appropriate.
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. Technical assistance to each Interreg programme
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) for internal cross-border cooperation Interreg programmes supported by the ERDF:
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) for component 2, 3 and 4 Interreg programmes, both for the ERDF and, where applicable, for the external financing instruments of the Union:
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point c c) for component 2
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) for component 2, 3 and 4 Interreg programmes, both for the ERDF and, where applicable, for the external financing instruments of the European Union: 7%.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union. Under that Article and the second and third paragraphs of Article 174 of the TFEU, the ERDF is to contribute to reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and to reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions, among which particular attention is to be paid to certain categories of regions, among which cross-border regions or regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density, island, cross-border and mountain regions are explicitly listed.
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) ca. for component 3 of Interreg programmes, both for the ERDF and, where applicable, for the external financing instruments of the Union: 10%.
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 1. The Member States and, where applicable, the third countries, partner countries
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The monitoring committee shall be chaired by: (a) a representative of the Member State hosting the managing authority or of the managing authority
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 3 Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 3 3. Each member of the monitoring committee sh
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Each monitoring committee shall adopt its rules of procedure during its first meeting on the basis of a template prepared by the Commission in the light of positive experience, in order to simplify and harmonise the procedure of adopting the Rules of Procedure.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union. Under that Article and the second and third paragraphs of Article 174 of the TFEU, the ERDF is to contribute to reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and to reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions, among which particular attention is to be paid to certain categories of regions
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 6 6. The managing authority shall publish the rules of procedures of the monitoring committee and all the summary of data and information shared with the monitoring committee on the website referred to in Article 35(2).
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 6 6. The managing authority shall publish the rules of procedures of the monitoring committee and all
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 6 6. The managing authority shall publish the rules of procedures of the monitoring committee and all the d
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed by the Member States and,
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed by the Member States and, where applicable, by the third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in that programme and shall
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed by the Member States and, where applicable, by the third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in that programme and shall ensure a balanced representation of the relevant authorities
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The monitoring committee shall also include representatives of regions and local governments as well as other bodies jointly set up in the whole programme area or covering a part thereof, including EGTCs.
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. The managing authority shall publish a list of
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 3 3. Representatives of the Commission
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Representatives of bodies established throughout the area of the programme or which cover a part of it, including EGTCs, may participate in the work of the monitoring committee in their consultative capacity.
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations, including any changes thereto
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations, including any changes thereto,
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations, including any changes thereto, after
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) the MC shall approve the document setting out the conditions for support to small project fund set up according to Article 24 (3);
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Project application and implementation rules of the programme;
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Regulation (EU) [new CPR] of the European Parliament and of the Council21 sets out provisions common to the ERDF and certain other funds and Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] of the European Parliament and of the Council22 sets out provisions concerning the specific objectives and the scope of the ERDF support. It is now necessary to adopt specific provisions in relation to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) where one or more Member States and their regions cooperate across borders with regard to effective programming including provisions on technical assistance, monitoring, evaluation, communication,
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A review m
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The review
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. At the request of the Commission, the managing authority shall, within
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme by 31
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme by 31 January, 31 Ma
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme by 31 January, 31 Ma
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme quarterly (by 31 January, 31 Ma
Amendment 588 #
Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme by 31 January, 31 Ma
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The first transmission shall be due by 31
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). The principles on multi-level governance and partnership should be taken into account, and place-based approaches should be strengthened as well as the principle of non- discrimination.
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the values of output and result indicators for selected Interreg operations and values achieved by finalized Interreg operations.
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the values of output and result indicators for selected Interreg operations and values achieved by finalized Interreg operations.
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the values of output and result indicators for selected Interreg operations and values achieved by finalized Interreg operations.
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the values of output and result indicators for selected Interreg finalized operations and values achieved by Interreg operations.
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. Common output and common result indicators, as
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Where necessary and in cases duly justified by the managing authority, programme-specific output and result indicators shall be used in addition to the indicators which were selected in line with the first subparagraph of this article.
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority shall carry out evaluations of each Interreg programme, no more than once a year. Each evaluation shall assess the programme’s effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value with the aim to improve the quality of the design and implementation of the respective Interreg programme.
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority shall carry out evaluations of each Interreg programme.
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority shall carry out evaluations of each Interreg programme. Each evaluation shall assess the programme’s effectiveness, efficiency, relevance
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 4 Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 5 Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 3. Article [44(2) to (
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) providing on the partner's professional website, where such a website exists, a short description of the Interreg operation, proportionate to the level of support provided by an Interreg fund, including its aims and results, and highlighting the financial support from the European Union;
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) publicly displaying public plaques or billboards as soon as the physical implementation of an Interreg operation involving physical investment or the purchase of equipment starts, the total cost of which exceeds EUR
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) for Interreg operations not falling under point (c), publicly displaying at least one printed
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) for operations of strategic importance and operations whose total cost exceed EUR
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The term 'Interreg' shall be used next to the emblem of the European Union in accordance with Article [42] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR].
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 5 5. For small project funds and financial instruments, the beneficiary shall ensure that final recipients comply with the
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 6 6. Where the beneficiary does not comply with its obligations under Article [42] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] or paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article,
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels and to reduce existing disparities, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg).
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 6 6. Where the beneficiary does not comply with its obligations under Article [42] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] or paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, the
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 6 6. Where the beneficiary does not comply with its obligations under Article [42] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] or
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 1. All or part of an Interreg operation may be implemented outside of a Member State, including outside the European Union, provided that the Interreg operation contributes to the objectives of the respective Interreg programme.
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 However, where an Interreg programme selects operations based on calls for
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 However, where an Interreg programme selects operations based on calls for proposals, those additional rules shall be adopted before
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 5 – point a (a)
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 6 6. As regards staff costs related to individuals who, according to the employment document, work on an hourly basis, such costs shall be eligible applying the number of hours actually worked on the operation to the hourly rate agreed in the employment document based on a working time registration system. If not yet included in the agreed hourly rate, salary costs as referred to under38.2.b may be added to that hourly rate, in line with applicable national legislation.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation,
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Office and administrative costs shall be limited to the following elements
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Office and administrative costs shall be composed but not limited to the following elements:
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) insurance and taxes related to the buildings where the staff is located and to the equipment of the office (e.g. fire, theft insurances); the office and administration costs of an operation must be calculated using a fixed rate that is no more than 15% of the staff costs for that operation;
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new) (l a) (m) Or if any adjustments needs to be made to adapt the premises, or purchase any equipment for those with both visible or invisible disabilities.
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new) (l a) as a flat rate in accordance with Article [49] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR]
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new) (n) or any other cost that is proven to be required in order to ensure the effective running of the project.
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new) Office and administrative costs may be reimbursed as a flat rate in accordance with Article [49] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR];
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 4. Direct payment of expenditure for costs under this Article by an employee of the beneficiary shall be supported by a proof of reimbursement by the beneficiary to that employee. This cost category may be used for travel of operation staff and other stakeholders for the purpose of implementation and promotion of Interreg operation and Programme.
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 5 5. Travel and accommodation costs of an operation may be calculated at a flat rate of up to 15 % of the direct costs
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 5 5. Travel and accommodation costs of an operation may be calculated at a flat rate
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – introductory part External expertise and service costs shall be composed but not limited to the following services and expertise provided by a public or private law body or a natural person other than the beneficiary (including all partners) of the operation:
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) travel and accommodation for external experts
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Costs for equipment purchased, rented or leased by the beneficiary of the operation other than those covered by Article 39 shall be composed but not limited to the following:
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) purchase of land in accordance with [point (
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i (new) i) works
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. The managing authority and the audit authority shall, in principal, be located in the same Member State.
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. The managing authority and the audit authority
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme may identify an EGTC or relevant body at national level as managing authority of that programme.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component 2B or under component 3 or under component 1 where the latter covers long borders with heterogenous development challenges and needs, Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme may define sub- programme areas.
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component 2
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions laid down in Articles [66], [68] and [69] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] with the exception of the task of selecting operations referred to in point (a) of Article 66(1) and Article 67
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions laid down in Articles [66], [68] and [69] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] with the exception of the task of selecting operations referred to in point (a) of Article 66(1) and Article 67
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions laid down in Articles [66], [68] and [69] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] with the exception of the task of selecting operations referred to in point (a) of Article 66(1) and Article 67
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation,
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The managing authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions laid down in Articles [66], [68] and [69] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] with the exception of the task of selecting operations referred to in point (a) of Article 66(1) and Article 67 and of payments to beneficiaries referred to in point (b) of Article 68(1). Those functions, with the exception of the management checks pursuant to point (a) of Article 68(1), shall be carried out in the whole of the territory covered by that programme, subject to derogations set out under Chapter VIII of this Regulation.
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Where the managing authority does not carry out verification under point(a) of Article 68 (1) of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] throughout the whole programme area, each Member State shall designate the body or person responsible for carrying out such verification in relation to beneficiaries on its territory.
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. By way of derogation from article 87 of Regulation [new CPR], the Commission shall reimburse as interim payments 100% of the amounts included in the payment application, which results from applying the cofinancing rate of the programme to the total eligible expenditure or to the public contribution, as appropriate.
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Where the managing authority does not carry out verification under point(a) of Article 68 (1) of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] throughout the whole programme area, each Member State shall designate the body or person responsible for carrying out such verification in relation to beneficiaries on its territory.
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. By way of derogation from article 92 of Regulation [new CPR], Interreg programmes are not subject to the annual clearance of accounts. Accounts are cleared at the end of the period, on the basis of the final performance report.
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The managing authority, after consultation with the Member States and, where applicable, any third countries, partner countries or OCTs participating in the
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 3. By way of derogation from [point (c) of Article 70(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], expenditure paid in another currency shall be converted into euro by each partner using the monthly accounting exchange rate of the Commission in the month during which that expenditure was submitted for verification to the managing authority or the audit in accordance with [point (a) of Article 68(1)] of that Regulation. The method chosen shall be set out in the cooperation programme and shall be applicable to all beneficiaries. The use of the conversion rate as set by the programme shall be verified by the managing authority or by the controller in the Member State or third country in which the beneficiary is located.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation,
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 3. By way of derogation from [point (c) of Article 70(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], expenditure paid in another currency shall be converted into euro by each partner using the monthly accounting exchange rate of the Commission in the month during which that expenditure was submitted for verification to the managing authority or the controllers in accordance with [point (a) of Article 68(1)] of that Regulation. The method chosen shall be set out in the cooperation programme and shall be applicable to all beneficiaries. The use of the conversion rate as set by the programme shall be verified by the managing authority or by the controller in the Member State or third country in which the beneficiary is located.
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 3. By way of derogation from [point (c) of Article 70(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], expenditure paid in another currency shall be converted into euro by each partner using the monthly accounting exchange rate of the Commission in the month during which that expenditure was submitted for verification to the managing authority or the controllers in accordance with [point (a) of Article 68(1)] of that Regulation. The method chosen shall be set out in the cooperation programme and shall be applicable to all beneficiaries. The use of the conversion rate as set by the programme shall be verified by the managing authority or by the controller in the Member State or third country in which the beneficiary is located.
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 3. By way of derogation from [point (c) of Article 70(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], expenditure paid in another currency shall be converted into euro by each partner using the monthly accounting exchange rate of the Commission in the month during which that expenditure was submitted for verification to the managing authority or the controllers in accordance with [point (a) of Article 68(1)] of that Regulation.
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) The method chosen shall be set out in the cooperation programme and shall be applicable to all beneficiaries. The use of the conversion rate as set by the programme shall be verified by the managing authority or by the controller in the Member State or third country in which the beneficiary is located.
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The audit authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions provided for in this Article and in Article 48 in the whole of the territory covered by the auditors that Interreg programme, subject to the derogations set out in Chapter VIII.
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 However, a participating Member State may specify when the audit authority is to be accompanied by
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 However, a participating Member State may specify when the audit authority is to
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 However, a participating Member State may specify when the audit authority is to be accompanied by
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 9 9. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the audit strategy, the annual control report and the audit opinion, to coordinate their audit plans and methods and to exchange views on issues relating to the improvement of management and control systems. The Managing Authority will also be invited.
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 9 9. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the audit strategy, the annual control report and the audit opinion, to coordinate their audit plans and methods and to exchange views on issues relating to the improvement of management and control systems. The Managing Authority will also be invited.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The internal border regions generate a quarter of the EU’s GDP and account for 40% of the EU’s territory, with 150 million European residents. However, there are obstacles that hinder their growth, such as legal and administrative barriers that translate into legal uncertainty (for instance, problems concerning social security and recognition of degree or qualifications requirements) for border workers or inadequate transport networks.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 9 9. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the audit strategy, the annual control report and the audit opinion, to coordinate their audit plans and methods and to exchange views on issues relating to the improvement of management and control systems. The Managing Authority will also be invited.
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 9 9. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the audit strategy, the annual control report and the audit opinion, to coordinate their audit plans and methods and to exchange views on issues relating to the improvement of management and control systems
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 7 7. Where the global extrapolated error rate referred to in paragraph 6 is above
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 8 8. Where the global residual error rate referred to in paragraph 7 is above
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission shall pay an annual pre-
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Investments co-financed by ERDF should be deemed exempt from deficit and debt calculations in order to improve the investment capacity of the Member States.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas
Amendment 70 #
(4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication').
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new) f a) 2027-2029: 3%
Amendment 718 #
(f a) 2027: 1%
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where external
Amendment 721 #
The total amount paid as pre-financing shall be reimbursed to the Commission if no payment application under the cross- border Interreg programme is sent within
Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The total amount paid as pre-financing shall be reimbursed to the Commission if no payment application under the cross- border Interreg programme is sent within
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 a (new) Article 50 a Decommitment By way of derogation from Article 99.1 of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the Commission shall decommit any amount in an Interreg programme which has not been used for pre-financing in accordance with Article 49 or for which a payment application has not been submitted by 26 December of the third calendar year following the year of the budget commitments of the years 2021 to 2026.
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 8 – title Participation of third countries or partner countries
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 Chapters I to VII and Chapter X shall apply to the participation of third countries, partner countries
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3. Third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme shall
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3. Third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme shall delegate staff to the joint secretariat
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3. Third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3. Third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 3. Third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The national authority or a body equivalent to the Interreg programme communication officer as provided for in Article 35(1),
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 2. Component 2 and 4 Interreg programmes combining contributions from the ERDF and from one or more external financing instrument of the European Union shall be implemented under shared management both in the Member States and in any participating third country or partner country or, with regard to component 3, in any OCT, whether or not that OCT receives support under one or more external financing instruments of the European Union.
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 2. Component 2 and 4 Interreg programmes combining contributions from the ERDF and from one or more external financing instrument of the Union shall be implemented under shared management both in the Member States and in any participating third country
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a) under shared management both in the Member States and in any participating third country or OCT or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation;
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b b) under shared management only in the Member States and in any participating third country or OCT, or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation, with regard to ERDF expenditure outside the Union for one or
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) under shared management only in the Member States and in any participating third country or OCT with regard to ERDF expenditure outside the European Union for one or more operations, whereas the contributions from one or more external financing instruments of the European Union are managed under indirect management;
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c c) under indirect management both in the Member States and in any participating third country or OCT or group of third countries forming part of a regional organisation.
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Where all or part of a component 3 Interreg programme is implemented under indirect management, a prior agreement between Member States and regions concerned is needed and Article 60 shall apply.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the internal border regions
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By way of derogation from Article [57(2)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] expenditure shall be eligible for a contribution from external financing instruments of the Union if it has been incurred by a partner or the private partner of PPP operations in the preparation and implementation of Interreg operations from 1 January 2021
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By way of derogation from Article [57(2)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] expenditure shall be eligible for a contribution from external financing instruments of the Union if it has been incurred by a partner or the private partner of PPP operations
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By
Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By way of derogation from Article [57(2)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] expenditure shall be eligible for a contribution from external financing instruments of the European Union if it has been incurred by a partner or the private partner of PPP operations in the preparation and implementation of Interreg operations from 1 January 2021 and paid after the date when the financing agreement with the respective third country, partner country or OCT was concluded.
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Where an Interreg programme selects operations based on calls for proposals, such calls may include applications for a contribution from external financing instruments of the European Union, even when launched before the relevant financing agreement was signed, and operations may already be selected before such dates.
Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 3. Where the selection of one or more large infrastructure projects is on the agenda of a monitoring committee or, where applicable, steering committee meeting, the managing authority shall transmit a concept note for each such project to the Commission at the latest two months before the date of the meeting. The concept note shall be a maximum of
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). C
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where the beneficiary is a contracting authority or a contracting entity within the meaning of the European Union law applicable to public procurement
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 The Commission decisions approving Interreg programmes also supported by an external financing instrument of the European Union shall meet the requirements necessary to constitute financing decisions in terms of Article [110(2)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [FR- Omnibus].
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 1. In order to implement an Interreg programme in a third country, partner country or OCT, in accordance with Article [112(4)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [FR- Omnibus], a financing agreement shall be concluded between the Commission representing the European Union and each participating third country, partner country or OCT represented in accordance with its national legal framework.
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) All of the required procedures shall be completed within 10 months after the financial agreement has entered in to force, otherwise the financial agreement shall be abolished.
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) when the third or partner country or OCT has completed the procedure required for ratification under its national legal framework and informed the Commission with full transparency.
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Where an Interreg programme involves more than one third country, partner country or OCT, at least one financing agreement shall be signed by both parties before that date. The other third countries, partner countries or OCTs may sign their respective financing agreements at the latest
Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Where an Interreg programme involves more than one third country, partner country or OCT, at least one financing agreement shall be signed by both parties before that date. The other third countries, partner countries or OCTs may sign their respective financing agreements at the latest
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Where an Interreg programme involves more than one third country, partner country or OCT, at least one financing agreement shall be signed by both parties before that date. The other third countries, partner countries or OCTs may sign their respective financing agreements at the latest
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 6 6. Where the Member State hosting the managing authority of the Interreg programme decides to sign the financing agreement pursuant to point (a) of paragraph 4, that financing agreement shall be considered a tool to implement the European Union budget in accordance with the Financial Regulation and not an international agreement as referred to in Articles 216 to 219 of the TFEU.
Amendment 759 #
1. Where a third country, partner country or OCT transfers to the Managing Authority a financial contribution to the Interreg programme other than its co- financing of the European Union support to the Interreg programme, the rules concerning that financial contribution shall be contained in the following document:
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication').
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 2 For the purposes of point (b)(i) of the first subparagraph, sections of the implementing agreement may, where applicable, cover both the transferred financial contribution and the European Union support to the Interreg programme.
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. By way of derogation from Article 99of the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, the rules regarding decommitment with regard to cross border component of NDICI are fixed in the Regulation [NDICI] or in Council Decision (EU) [OCTP], respectively or in any act adopted thereunder
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 With regard to the PEACE PLUS programme, the financial contribution to European Union activities from the United Kingdom in the form of external assigned revenue as referred to in [point (e) of Article 21(2)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [FR-Omnibus] shall make part of the budget appropriations for Heading 2 'Cohesion and Values', sub-ceiling 'Economic, social and territorial cohesion'.
Amendment 763 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 It shall be signed before the beginning of the implementation of the programme thus allowing the Special EU Programmes Body to apply all the European Union legislation necessary for the implementation of the programme.
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 a (new) Article 59 a By way of derogation from Article 99 of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, the rules regarding decommitment with regard to cross border component of NDICI are fixed in the Regulation [NDICI] or in Council Decision (EU) [OCTP], respectively or in any act adopted thereunder.
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 a (new) Article 59 a By way of derogation from Article 99 of the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, the rules regarding decommitment with regard to cross border component of NDICI are fixed in the Regulation [NDICI] or in Council Decision (EU) [OCTP] ,respectively or in any act adopted thereunder.
Amendment 766 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 1. Where, after consulting stakeholders, part or all of a component 3 Interreg programme is implemented under indirect management pursuant to point (b) or (c) respectively of Article 53(3), implementation tasks shall be entrusted to one of the bodies listed in point [(c) of the first subparagraph of Article 62(1)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [FR-Omnibus], in particular to such a body located in the participating Member State, including the managing authority of the Interreg programme concerned.
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 At the initiative of the Commission, the ERDF
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). Consequently, the cross- border component should
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 At the initiative of the Commission, the ERDF may support interregional innovation investments, as set out in point 5 of Article 3, bringing together researchers, businesses, civil society and
Amendment 771 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 At the initiative of the Commission, the ERDF may support interregional innovation investments, as set out in point 5 of Article 3, bringing together researchers, businesses, civil society and public administrations involved in smart specialisation strategies and social innovation strategies established at national or regional levels.
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 a (new) Article 62a State aid Aid which is granted by a State, or which uses State resources, and is allocated to Interreg programmes shall be deemed compatible with the internal market.
Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 a (new) Article 62 a Exemption from reporting requirements under Article 108(3) TFEU State aid granted to ETC projects is subject to a block exemption and is not subject to the notification requirement of Article 108(3) TFEU
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 a (new) Article 62 a Exemption from reporting requirements under Article 108(3) TFEU Aid for ETC projects may be exempted from aid control arrangements and may be exempted from reporting requirements under Article 108(3) TFEU.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between competent authorities at national, local and/or regional level in one or more Member States and one or more countries or other territories outside the Union. Covering internal and external cross-border cooperation under this Regulation should result in a major simplification and streamlining of applicable provisions for the programme authorities in the Member States and for the partner authorities and beneficiaries outside the Union compared to the programming period 2014-2020.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between one or more Member States or their regions, and one or more countries or regions, or other territories outside the Union. Covering internal and external cross-border cooperation under this Regulation should result in a major simplification and streamlining of applicable provisions for the programme authorities in the Member States and for the partner authorities and beneficiaries outside the Union compared to the programming period 2014 -2020.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between one or more Member States and one or more countries or other territories outside the European Union. Covering internal and external cross-border cooperation under this Regulation should result in a major simplification and streamlining of applicable provisions for the programme authorities in the Member States and for the partner authorities and beneficiaries outside the European Union compared to the programming period 2014-2020.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated and uniformed territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, and should also include maritime cross- border cooperation. Transnational cooperation should cover larger territories on the mainland of the Union, whereas maritime cooperation should cover territories around sea-basins and integrate cross-border cooperation on maritime borders during the programming period 2014 -2020. Maximum flexibility should be given to continue implementing previous maritime cross-border cooperation within a larger maritime cooperation framework, in particular by defining the territory covered, the specific objectives for such cooperation, the requirements for a project partnership and the setting-up of sub-programmes and specific steering committees. When defining the scope of transnational and maritime cooperation, it is necessary to consider the areas of the existing EU macro-regional strategies.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, and should also include maritime cross-border cooperation. Transnational cooperation should cover larger territories on the mainland of the
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Based on the experience with cross- border and transnational cooperation during the programming period 2014-2020 in outermost regions, where the combination of both components within a single programme per cooperation area has not brought about sufficient simplification for programme authorities and beneficiaries, a specific additional outermost regions’ component should be established in order to enable outermost regions to cooperate with th
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Based on the experience with cross- border and transnational cooperation during the programming period 2014 -2020 in outermost regions, where the combination of both components within a single programme per cooperation area has not brought about sufficient simplification for programme authorities and
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Based on the experience in cross- border and transnational cooperation during the 2014-2020 programming period in island regions, where simplification by the authorities responsible for the programmes and for the beneficiaries did not produce the expected results, a specific component should be set up for these regions because of their special situation as islands, which was formally recognised in Parliament’s Resolution of 4 February 2016.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the positive experience with the
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the positive experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth’25, in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation or agrifood and to help those involved in smart specialisation strategies to cluster together, in order to scale up innovation and bring innovative products and processes to the European market. Finally, integrated territorial development focusing on functional urban areas or urban areas should be concentrated within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal and in one accompanying instrument, the ‘European Urban Initiative”. The two programmes under the interregional cooperation component should cover the whole Union and should also be open for the participation of third countries.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014 -2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore
source: 628.537
2018/10/17
AFET
92 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where all or part of an operation is implemented outside the programme area [inside or outside the Union], the selection of that operation shall require the explicit approval by the
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For the selection of operations, the monitoring committee or, where applicable, the steering committee shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory and transparent, ensure gender equality and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention of Human Rights and the principle of sustainable development and of the European Union policy on the environment in accordance with Article 11 and Article
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point e Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new) (ja) Ensure that selected operations apply criteria and procedures which are non-discriminatory, ensure gender equality and take account of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention of Human Rights and the principle of sustainable development and of the European Union policy on the environment in accordance with Article 11 and Article 191(1) of the TFEU.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The beneficiary of a small project fund shall be a cross-border legal body
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The threshold of EUR 200 000 which is set out in art. 48 (1) (new CPR) and point b of art. 48 (2) (new CPR) should be applied for a small project.
Amendment 108 #
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 3 Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed by the Member States and, where applicable, by the third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in that programme and shall ensure a balanced representation of the relevant authorities
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the MC shall approve the document setting out the conditions for support to small project fund set up according to Article 24 (3);
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Project application and implementation rules of the programme;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The review may be carried out in writing, either at the request of the Commission or on the basis of a reasoned initiative of at least one-third of the EU Member States.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for the respective Interreg programme by 31 January, 31 Ma
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 6 6. Where the beneficiary does not comply with its obligations under Article [42] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] or paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, the
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 However, where an Interreg programme selects operations based on calls for proposals, those additional rules shall be adopted before
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to an Interreg programme under component 2B or under component 1, or under component 3 where the latter covers long borders with heterogenous development challenges and needs, Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme may define sub- programme areas.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Where the managing authority does not carry out verification under point (a) of Article 68 (1) of Regulation (EU) (new CPR) throughout the whole programme area, each Member State shall designate the body or person responsible for carrying out such verification in relation to beneficiaries on its territory.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 176 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') provides that the European Regional Development Fund ('ERDF') is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union. Under that Article and the second and third paragraphs of Article 174 of the TFEU, the ERDF is to contribute to reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and to reducing the backwardness of the least favoured regions, among which particular attention is to be paid to certain categories of regions, among which
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Regulation (EU) [new CPR] of the European Parliament and of the Council21 sets out provisions common to the ERDF and certain other funds and Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] of the European
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to foster prosperity and support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg).
Amendment 47 #
(4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the land and maritime border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). C
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). Consequently, the cross- border component should
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication').
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between one or more Member States
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The cross-border cooperation component should also involve cooperation between one or more Member States and one or more third countries
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities, and should also include maritime cross-border cooperation where geographical configuration allows. Transnational cooperation should cover larger territories on the mainland of the Union, whereas maritime cooperation should cover territories around sea-basins and integrate cross-border cooperation on maritime borders during the programming period 2014-2020. Maximum flexibility should be given to continue implementing previous maritime cross-border cooperation within a larger maritime cooperation framework, in particular by defining the territory covered, the specific objectives for such cooperation, the requirements for a project partnership and the setting-up of sub-programmes and specific steering committees.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the positive experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg, on the one hand, and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020,
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006. of the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is necessary to continue supporting or, as appropriate, to establish cooperation in all its dimensions with the Union's neighbouring third countries, as such cooperation is an important regional development policy tool and should benefit the regions of the Member States which border third countries. To that effect, the ERDF and the external financing instruments of the Union, IPA27, NDICI28 and OCTP29, should support programmes under cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation, while constantly bearing in mind the interests of the neighbouring Member States. The support from the ERDF and from the external financing instruments of the Union should be based on reciprocity and proportionality. However, for IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, the ERDF support should be complemented by at least equivalent amounts under IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC, subject to a maximum amount set out in the respective legal act, that is to say, up to 3 % of the financial envelope under IPA III and up to 4 % of the financial envelope of the Neighbourhood geographic programme under Article 4(2)(a) of the NDICI. _________________ 27 Regulation (EU) XXX establishing the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (OJ L xx, p. y). 28 Regulation (EU) XXX establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (OJ L xx, p. y).
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) With regard to NDICI assistance, the European Union should develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Due to the involvement of more than one Member State and one or more third countries, and the resulting higher administrative costs, in particular in respect of controls and translation, the ceiling for technical assistance expenditure should be higher than that under the Investment for jobs and growth goal. In order to offset the higher administrative costs, Member States should be encouraged to reduce the administrative burden with regard to the implementation of joint projects wherever possible. In addition, Interreg programmes with limited Union support or external cross-border cooperation programmes should receive a certain minimum amount for technical assistance to ensure sufficient funding for effective technical assistance activities.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the adoption or amendment of Interreg programmes,
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation,
Amendment 65 #
(a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land and maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) (aa) internal maritime cross-border cooperation between maritime border regions of two or more adjacent Member States or between adjacent maritime border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3);
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land and maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages between partners throughout the Union;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) (ba) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following: (i) IPA beneficiaries; or (ii) partner countries supported by NDICI; or (iii) the Russian Federation, for the purpose of enabling its participation in cross-border cooperation also supported by NDICI;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) interregional innovation investments through the commercialisation and scaling up of interregional innovation projects
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Regions on maritime borders which are connected over the sea by a fixed economic, social, cultural, historical and environmental links shall also be supported under cross-border cooperation.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Internal cross-border cooperation Interreg programmes will pay attention to the mountainous border areas and specially will be given to rural areas;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the regions to be supported by the ERDF shall be the NUTS level 2 regions of the Union
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. For any component 4 Interreg programme
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg)
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The resources referred to in
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) 75
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State may transfer up to
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall adopt a
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 With regard to Interreg programmes supported by the ERDF and the NDICI, that
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Support from the ERDF shall be granted to individual external cross-border Interreg programmes provided that at least equivalent amounts are provided by IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC under the relevant strategic programming document. That
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 70 %, unless, with regard to external cross-border or component 3 Interreg programmes, a higher percentage is fixed in Regulations (EU) [IPA III], [NDICI] or Council Decision (EU) [OCTP] respectively or in any act adopted thereunder
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) improve cultural cooperation by increasing cooperation in cultural and educational matters between cross-border areas that share the same cultural and linguistic heritage.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii (ii) enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens, civil society actors and institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) enhance the security of the EU, including military mobility;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point c (c) under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes supported by the Interreg funds, in addition to points (a) and (b): building up mutual trust, in particular by encouraging people- to-people actions, by enhancing sustainable democracy and by supporting independent media and civil society actors and their role in reforming processes and democratic transitions;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. An additional 1
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall be implemented through Interreg programmes under shared management with the exception of component 3, which may be implemented as a whole or partially under indirect
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1.
source: 628.682
2018/10/23
CONT
41 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). In the case of Ireland post- Brexit, and though one side of the border will then technically be outside the Union, such support should still be in place to support communities on both sides of the border.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Objective and transparent criteria for designating eligible regions and areas should be established. To that end, the identification of eligible regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 . _________________ 26 Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) IPA III assistance should mainly focus on assisting the IPA beneficiaries to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality, tolerance, social inclusion and non-discrimination. IPA assistance should continue to support the efforts of the IPA beneficiaries to advance regional, macro-regional and cross-border cooperation as well as territorial development, including through the implementation of Union macro- regional strategies. In addition, IPA assistance should address security, migration and border management, ensuring access to international protection, sharing relevant information, enhancing border control and pursuing common efforts in the fight against
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Within the context of the unique and specific circumstances on the island of Ireland, and with a view to supporting continued North-South cooperation under the Good Friday Agreement post-Brexit, a new 'PEACE PLUS' cross-border programme should continue and build on the work of previous programmes between the border counties of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Taking into account its practical importance, it is necessary to ensure that, where the programme is acting in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF should also contribute to promoting social, economic and regional stability in the regions concerned, in particular through actions to promote cohesion between communities. Given the specificities of the programme it should be managed in an integrated manner with the United Kingdom contribution being integrated into the programme as external assigned revenue. Furthermore, certain rules on the selection of operations in this Regulation should not apply to that programme in relation to operations in support of peace and reconciliation.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) Provisions on the preparation, approval and amendment of Interreg programmes as well as on territorial development, on the selection of operations, on monitoring and evaluation, on the programme authorities, on audit of operations, and on transparency and communication should be adapted to the specificities of Interreg programmes compared to the provisions set out in Regulation (EU) [new CPR]. These specific provisions shall be kept simple and clear in order to avoid gold-plating and additional administrative burden for Member States and beneficiaries.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016, there is a need to evaluate the Funds on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016, there is a need to evaluate the Funds on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on Member States and beneficiaries. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Funds on the ground.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Based on experience during the programming period 2014-2020, the system introducing a clear hierarchy of rules on eligibility of expenditure should be continued while maintaining the principle of rules on eligibility of expenditure to be established at Union level or for Interreg programme as a whole to avoid any possible contradictions or inconsistencies between different Regulations and between Regulations and national rules. Additional rules adopted by one Member State which would only apply to the beneficiaries in that Member State should be
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Pursuant to Article [63(9)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [FR-Omnibus] sector-specific rules are to take account of the needs of European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) programmes, as regards
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) A clear chain of financial liability in respect of recovery for irregularities should be established from sole or other partners via the lead partner and the managing authority to the Commission. Provision should be made for liability of Member States, third countries, partner countries or Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs), where obtaining recovery from the sole or other or lead partner is not successful, meaning that the Member State reimburses the managing authority. Consequently, under Interreg programmes there is no scope for irrecoverable amounts on the level of beneficiaries. It is
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Although Interreg programmes with the participation of third countries, partner countries or OCTs should be implemented under shared management, outermost regions’ cooperation may be implemented under indirect management. Specific rules should be set out on how to implement those programmes as a whole or partially under indirect management.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the adoption or amendment of Interreg programmes, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. However, where applicable, external cross-
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 6 6. Where a third country or partner country contributing to an Interreg programme with national resources, which does not constitute the national cofinancing of support from the ERDF or from an external financing instrument of the Union, reduces that contribution during the implementation of the Interreg programme, either globally or with regard to joint operations already selected and having received the document provided for in Article 22(6), the participating Member State or Member States shall request one of the options set out in the second subparagraph of paragraph 4.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF, within its scope as set out in Article [4] of Regulation (EU) [new ERDF], and
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 (5) Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union shall also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective 'a safer and more secure Europe', in particular by actions in the fields of border crossing management
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union shall also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective 'a safer and more secure Europe', in particular by actions in the fields of border crossing management and mobility and migration management
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. An additional 15% of the ERDF and, where applicable, of the external financing instruments of the Union allocations under priorities other than for technical assistance to each Interreg programme under components 1, 2 and 3, shall be allocated on the Interreg-specific objective of 'a better Interreg governance'
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall assess each Interreg programme and its compliance with Regulation (EU) [new CPR], Regulation (EU) [new ERDF] and this Regulation
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The composition of the monitoring committee of each Interreg programme shall be agreed in an open and transparent manner by the Member States and, where applicable, by the third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in that programme and shall ensure a balanced representation of the relevant authorities, intermediate bodies and representatives of the programme partners referred to in Article [6] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] from Member States, third countries, partner countries and OCTs.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A review
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Apart from the review, the Member State should: (a) organise an annual review meeting with the Commission and to examine the performance of the Interreg programme according to Article 36 of the [new CPR]; (b) carry out a mid-term review to provide a fully-fledged adjustment of Interreg programme based on programme performance, while also providing an opportunity to take account of new challenges and relevant CSRs issued in 2024 according to the Article 14 of the [new CPR].
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The transmission of data shall be carried out using existing data-reporting systems insofar as they have proven to be reliable during the previous programming period.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – title Indicators
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In compliance with its reporting requirement pursuant to Article [38(3)(e)(i)] of the Financial Regulation, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council information on performance and results in accordance with the indicators, by reporting on both progress and shortfalls and by ensuring a clear link between spending and performance;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) publicly displaying public plaques or billboards as soon as the physical implementation of an Interreg operation involving physical investment or the purchase of equipment starts, the total cost of which exceeds EUR
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) for Interreg operations not falling under point (c), publicly displaying at least one printed or electronic display of a minimum size A
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) for operations of strategic importance and operations whose total cost exceed EUR
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 5 5. For small project funds and financial instruments, the beneficiary shall ensure that final recipients comply with the requirements set out in point (c) and (d) of
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Subject to being fully vouched and to complying with all Union Labour laws and rights, staff costs shall consist of gross employment costs of staff employed by the Interreg partner in one of the following ways:
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Office and administrative costs shall be limited to the following elements and must all be fully vouched:
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Travel and accommodation costs shall be limited to the following elements, and must all be fully vouched:
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – introductory part External expertise and service costs shall be limited to the following services and expertise provided by a public or private law body or a natural person other than the beneficiary of the operation, and must all be fully vouched:
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Costs for equipment purchased, rented or leased by the beneficiary of the operation other than those covered by Article 39 shall
Amendment 51 #
(ca) The cost is fully vouched.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Costs for infrastructure and works shall be limited to the following, and fully vouched:
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 1. Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries and OCTs participating in an Interreg programme shall agree on
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new) The Commission shall set out the type of data and the criteria based on which the samples for its audit operations are formed as well as the methodology for the extrapolation of the error rate in an Annex to be adopted by delegated act in accordance with Article 62 of this Regulation.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 6 6. Following its assessment of the results of audits of operations selected pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall calculate a global extrapolated error rate with regard to the Interreg programmes included in the population from which the common sample was selected, for the purposes of its own assurance process. This 'global extrapolated error rate' shall be adjusted only on a proportional basis for any corrections that occurred in the sample;
source: 628.715
2018/10/29
DEVE
43 amendments...
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, in a context where economic disparities between territories are tending to increase, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg).
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to support the harmonious development of the Union's territory at different levels, the ERDF should support cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation, maritime cooperation, outermost regions’ cooperation and interregional cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). The principles on multi-level governance and partnership should be taken into account, and place-based approaches should be strengthened as well as the principle of non- discrimination.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the untapped growth potential in border areas as evidenced in the Communication of the Commission 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions’23 ('Border Regions Communication'). Consequently, the cross- border component should
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The cross-border cooperation component should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions, and to exploit the un
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation component should aim to strengthen cooperation by means of actions conducive to integrated territorial development linked to the Union's cohesion policy priorities
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Based on the experience with cross- border and transnational cooperation during the programming period 2014-2020 in outermost regions, where the combination of both components within a single programme per cooperation area has not brought about sufficient simplification for programme authorities and beneficiaries, a specific outermost regions’ component should be established in order to enable outermost regions to cooperate with their neighbouring countries and territories in the most effective and simple way
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Based on the experience with the interregional cooperation programmes under Interreg and the lack of such cooperation within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal during the programming period 2014-2020, the interregional cooperation component should focus more specifically on boosting the effectiveness of cohesion policy. That component should therefore be limited to two programmes, one to enable all kind of experience, innovative approaches and capacity building for programmes under both goals and to promote European groupings of territorial cooperation ('EGTCs') set up or to be set up pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and one to improve the analysis of development trends. Project-based cooperation throughout the Union should be integrated into the new component on interregional innovation investments and closely linked to the implementation of the Communication from the Commission 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth'25 , in particular to support thematic smart specialisation platforms on fields such as energy, industrial modernisation, circular economy or agrifood. Finally, integrated territorial development focusing on functional urban areas or urban areas should be concentrated within programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal and in one accompanying instrument, the ‘European Urban Initiative”. The two programmes under the interregional cooperation component should cover the whole Union and should also be open for the participation of third countries. _________________ 24 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19). 25 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 'Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth' - COM(2017) 376 final, 18.7.2017.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) IPA III assistance should mainly focus on assisting the IPA beneficiaries to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) IPA III assistance should mainly focus on assisting the IPA beneficiaries to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality, tolerance, social inclusion and non-discrimination. IPA assistance should continue to support the efforts of the IPA beneficiaries to advance regional, macro-regional and cross-border cooperation as well as territorial development, including through the implementation of Union macro- regional strategies. In addition, IPA assistance should address security, migration and border management, ensuring safe access to international protection, sharing relevant information, enhancing border control and pursuing common efforts in the fight against irregular migration and migrant smuggling.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) With regard to NDICI assistance, the Union should develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the Union and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on cooperation. This Regulation and the NDICI should therefore support the internal and external aspects of relevant macro-regional strategies with the primary objective of eradicating poverty; they will also be contributing to sustainable development. Those initiatives are strategically important and offer meaningful political frameworks for deepening relations with and among partner countries, based on the principles of mutual accountability, shared ownership and responsibility.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In view of the specific situation of the outermost regions of the Union, regions that are particularly vulnerable given their exposure to various climate- related and other natural hazards, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the conditions under which those regions may have access to structural funds. Consequently, certain provisions of this Regulation should be adapted to the specificities of the outermost regions in order to simplify and foster cooperation with their neighbours, while taking into account the Communication from the Commission 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions'31. _________________ 31 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU's outermost regions', - COM(2017) 623 final, 24.10.2017.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is necessary to set out the resources allocated to each of the different components of Interreg, including each Member State's share of the global amounts for the cross-border cooperation, the transnational cooperation and maritime cooperation, the outermost regions’ cooperation and the interregional cooperation, the potential available to Member States concerning flexibility between those components.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should add two Interreg-specific objectives, one to support an Interreg-specific objective strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing legal and administrative cooperation, in particular where linked to implementation of the Border Regions Communication, intensify cooperation between citizens, civil society organizations, non-state actors and institutions and the development and coordination of macro-regional and sea- basin strategies, and one to address specific external cooperation issues such as safety, security, border crossing management and migration, access to international protection, eradication of poverty, climate change, disaster risk reduction and resilience.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The provisions on the criteria for operations to be considered as genuinely joint and cooperative, on the partnership within an Interreg operation and on the obligations of the lead partner as set out during the programme period 2014-2020 should on be continued. However, Interreg partners should cooperate in a
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Member States may not introduce additional rules which complicate the access to funds for the beneficiaries.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) It is appropriate to encourage financial discipline. At the same time, arrangements for de-commitment of budgetary commitments should take into account of the complexity of Interreg programmes and their implementation.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) Based on the experience during the programming period 2014-2020 with large infrastructure projects within cross-border cooperation programmes under the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the procedures should be simplified.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) internal cross-border cooperation between adjacent land or maritime border regions of two or more Member States or between adjacent land border regions of at least one Member State and one or more third countries listed in Article 4(3); or
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – introductory part (b) external cross-border cooperation, between adjacent land or maritime border regions of at least one Member State and of one or more of the following:
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – introductory part (a) exchange of experiences, innovative approaches, good practices and capacity building in relation to:
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. For external cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported by IPA III or NDICI shall be NUTS level 3 regions of the respective partner country or, in the absence of NUTS classification, equivalent areas along all
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) enhancing the effectiveness of labour markets and improving access to quality employment across borders, especially for young people;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion, gender equality, respect of the rights of minorities and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities and combating every form of discrimination across borders.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) promoting social inclusion and tackling poverty, including by enhancing equal opportunities, equality between men and women, and combating discrimination across borders.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii (ii) enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens, civil society actors and institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii (ii) enhance efficient public administration by promoting legal and administrative cooperation and cooperation between citizens, civil society and institutions, in particular, with a view to resolving legal and other obstacles in border regions;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point c (c) under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes supported by the Interreg funds, in addition to points (a) and (b): building up mutual trust, in particular by encouraging people- to-people actions, by enhancing sustainable democracy and
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union shall also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective 'a safer and more secure Europe', in particular by actions in the fields of border crossing management and mobility and migration management, in
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. An additional 1
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For the selection of operations, the monitoring committee or, where applicable, the steering committee shall establish and apply criteria and procedures which are public, objective, non- discriminatory and transparent, ensure
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The contribution from the ERDF or, where applicable, an external financing instrument of the Union, to a small project fund within an Interreg programme shall not exceed
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 a (new) Article 50 a Decommitments By way of derogation from Article 99.1 of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the Commission shall decommit any amount in an Interreg programme which has not been used for pre-financing in accordance with Article 49 or for which a payment application has not been submitted by 26 December of the third calendar year following the year of the budget commitments of the years 2021 to 2026.
source: 629.634
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32001&j=0&l=en
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/21 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/12 |
|
events/12/date |
Old
2020-12-18T00:00:00New
2020-12-17T00:00:00 |
events/13 |
|
events/16 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628228New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)628228 |
docs/18 |
|
events/15/summary |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/1/2021New
05488/2021 |
events/17 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/2021New
05488/1/2021 |
docs/18 |
|
events/15 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 2nd readingNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/14/docs |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/1/2021New
05488/2021 |
events/14 |
|
events/15 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/2021New
05488/1/2021 |
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/1/2021New
05488/2021 |
docs/17 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/2021New
05488/1/2021 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/1/2021New
05488/2021 |
events/13 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/12 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/15/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/2021New
05488/1/2021 |
docs/16 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/13 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/1/2021New
05488/2021 |
events/13/docs/0/title |
Old
05488/2021New
05488/1/2021 |
docs/13/docs/1 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
REGI/9/01377
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
REGI/8/13448
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting Parliament 2nd reading |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-627593_EN.html
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/4/body |
EP
|
events/7/body |
EP
|
events/9/body |
EP
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-626663_EN.html
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-628537_EN.html
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-628538_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-625467_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-627880_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-628552_EN.html
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/12/docs |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.663
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.537
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.538
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.467&secondRef=02
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.880&secondRef=03
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.552&secondRef=02
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.593&secondRef=03
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/12 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
24922
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124812
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2789)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3595)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.467&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.467&secondRef=02 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.880&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.880&secondRef=03 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.552&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.552&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.593&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.593&secondRef=03 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.663New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.663 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.537New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.537 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.538New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.538 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.467&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.467&secondRef=02 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.880&secondRef=03New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.880&secondRef=03 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.552&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.552&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.593&secondRef=03New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.593&secondRef=03 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0470_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0470_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190115&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190115&type=CRE |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0021_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0021_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0238_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0238_EN.html |
events/11/body |
EP
|
events/11 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/12/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2018-0470&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0470_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0021New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0021_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0238New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0238_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0470&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2018-0470&language=EN |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0021New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0021 |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0238New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0238 |
docs/12 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/8/13448New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 59-p4
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-06-11T00:00:00New
2018-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament |
committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Foreign AffairsNew
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) |
committees/0/date |
2018-07-10T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3/date |
2018-07-03T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/committee_full |
Old
DevelopmentNew
Development (Associated committee) |
committees/4/date |
2018-08-10T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/8/committee |
Old
REGINew
PECH |
committees/8/committee_full |
Old
Regional DevelopmentNew
Fisheries |
committees/8/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/9 |
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
REGI/8/13448
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|