Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP) | MOLNÁR Csaba ( S&D), KOVAŘÍK Ondřej ( Renew), SCOTT CATO Molly ( Verts/ALE), JURZYCA Eugen ( ECR), PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Responsible Committee | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113Events
PURPOSE: to facilitate the detection of tax fraud in cross-border e-commerce transactions.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2020/284 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards introducing certain requirements for payment service providers.
CONTENT: VAT fraud is a problem common to all Member States, but not every Member State has the information necessary to ensure the correct application of VAT rules in cross-border e-commerce or to combat fraud in this area.
This Directive, together with Council Regulation (EU) 2020/283 , completes the VAT regulatory framework for e-commerce that entered into force in January 2021, which introduced new VAT obligations for online marketplaces and simplified VAT compliance rules for online businesses.
New record keeping requirements
The Directive introduces amendments to the VAT Directive requiring payment service providers to keep records of cross-border payments relating to e-commerce. This information shall then be made available to national tax authorities under strict conditions, including data protection, to enable the competent authorities of the Member States to carry out checks on supplies of goods and services which are deemed to take place in a Member State.
The requirements shall only apply to payment services provided in respect of cross-border payments. It shall apply to payment service providers where, in the course of a calendar quarter, a payment service provider provides payment services corresponding to more than 25 cross-border payments to the same payee.
Records shall be kept in electronic format by the payment service provider for a period of 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the payment was made.
Information to be retained
The information to be retained by the payment service providers is to be collected by and exchanged between the Member States in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 which lays down the rules for administrative cooperation and exchange of information in order to combat VAT fraud.
The Directive specifies that payment service providers shall keep records of any VAT number or tax identification number of the payee, where applicable. In addition, they shall retain information relating to the payment transaction itself, such as the amount, currency, date, origin of payment and indication of any refunds of payment.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 22.3.2020.
TRANSPOSITION: by 31.12.2023 at the latest.
APPLICATION: from 1.1.2024.
The European Parliament adopted by 590 votes to 19, with 81 abstentions, under the consultation procedure, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of certain requirements for payment service providers.
The European Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to amendments.
Deepening transnational cooperation to combat VAT fraud
Parliament recalled that the existence of significant differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0.6% to 35.5%, underlined the need to deepen transnational cooperation to better combat VAT fraud, in the context of e-commerce in particular, but also in a more general context (including carousel fraud). Indeed, according to the Commission, the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected, in the Union amounted to EUR 137 billion in 2017, representing EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union.
New record keeping requirements
The proposed Directive requires payment service providers to retain, for each calendar quarter, sufficiently detailed records of beneficiaries and payment transactions corresponding to the payment services they provide, in order to assist Member States fight e-commerce VAT fraud.
Parliament proposed that this obligation shall apply when a payment service provider executes more than 25 payment transactions to the same payee in the course of a calendar quarter or executes a transfer of funds with a monetary value of at least EUR 2500 in a single payment transaction.
In addition, records shall be kept in electronic format by the payment service provider for a period of three years (instead of the proposed two years) from the end of the year during which the payment transaction was executed.
The payer's place of establishment shall be considered to be in the Member State that corresponds to the IBAN of the payer's payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and the payer’s location.
The record keeping and reporting obligation should also arise in cases where a payment service provider receives funds or acquires payment transactions on behalf of the payee and not only where a payment service provider transfers funds or issues payments instruments for the payer.
Virtual currencies exchange platforms
By 31 December 2022, the Commission shall present a report on the need to include virtual currencies exchange platforms in the scope of the Directive. That report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Strategy for fighting against VAT fraud
Parliament stated that this strategy should evolve in parallel with the increasing modernisation and digitalisation of the economy while rendering the VAT system as simple as possible for businesses and citizens. Member States should therefore continue to invest in technology-led tax collection, notably by automatically linking corporate cash registers and sales systems to VAT returns.
In addition, tax authorities should continue their efforts towards closer cooperation and exchange of best practices.
Tax authorities should work towards an effective communication and interoperability between all databases regarding fiscal matters at Union level. Blockchain technology could also be used in order to better protect personal data and improve the online exchange of information between tax authorities.
Prosecuting fraudsters
Parliament stressed the need to adopt an ambitious mandate for the European Public Prosecutor's Office in cooperation with national judicial authorities in order to ensure the efficient prosecution of fraudsters in national courts. Organised cross-border VAT fraud shall be duly prosecuted and fraudsters shall be punished.
Transposition and application
Members proposed that the transposition date shall be set at 31 December 2023 (instead of 2021) and that the provisions shall apply from 1 January 2024 (instead of 2022).
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, under a special legislative procedure (consultation of Parliament), the report by Lídia PEREIRA (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards introducing certain requirements for payment service providers.
As a reminder, this proposal complements the current VAT regulatory framework as recently modified by the VAT E-commerce Directive in the context of the Commission’s Digital Single Market Strategy. Furthermore, this initiative strengthens the administrative cooperation framework to better tackle e-commerce VAT fraud and restore fair competition.
The committee recommends that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.
Better tackle VAT fraud
Members stressed the need for more transnational cooperation in order to better combat VAT e-commerce fraud in particular, as well as VAT fraud more generally (including carousel fraud).
The report recalled that according to the Commission, the VAT gap (the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected) in the Union amounted to EUR 137.5 billion in 2017, representing a loss of 11.2 % of the total expected VAT revenue and EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union. There are, however, big differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0.6% up to 35.5%.
Virtual currencies exchange platforms
Given that payments are executed only in a limited number of cases through virtual currencies exchange platforms, such platforms are not considered to be payment services providers as defined in Directive (EU) 2015/236 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The risk of VAT fraud, although currently limited, does however exist. The Commission shall therefore evaluate within three years whether virtual currencies exchange platforms should be included in the scope of this Directive.
New record keeping requirements
The proposed Directive requires payment service providers to retain, for each calendar quarter, sufficiently detailed records of beneficiaries and payment transactions corresponding to the payment services they provide, in order to assist Member States fight e-commerce VAT fraud.
Members proposed that this obligation shall apply when a payment service provider executes more than 25 payment transactions to the same payee in the course of a calendar quarter or executes a transfer of funds with a monetary value of at least EUR 2500 in a single payment transaction.
In addition, records shall be kept in electronic format by the payment service provider for a period of three years (instead of the proposed two years) from the end of the year during which the payment transaction was executed.
The payer's place of establishment shall be considered to be in the Member State that corresponds to the IBAN of the payer's payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and the payer’s location.
The record keeping and reporting obligation should also arise in cases where a payment service provider receives funds or acquires payment transactions on behalf of the payee and not only where a payment service provider transfers funds or issues payments instruments for the payer.
It is necessary to adopt an ambitious mandate for the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) in collaboration with national judicial authorities in order to ensure the efficient prosecution of fraudsters before the national courts. Organised cross-border VAT fraud should be duly prosecuted and the fraudsters should be penalised.
Strategy for fighting against VAT fraud
Members stated that this strategy should evolve in parallel with the increasing modernisation and digitalisation of the economy while rendering the VAT system as simple as possible for businesses and citizens. Member States should therefore continue to invest in technology-led tax collection, notably by automatically linking corporate cash registers and sales systems to VAT returns.
In addition, tax authorities should continue their efforts towards closer cooperation and exchange of best practices.
Tax authorities should work towards an effective communication and interoperability between all databases regarding fiscal matters at Union level. Blockchain technology could also be used in order to better protect personal data and improve the online exchange of information between tax authorities.
PURPOSE: to solve the problem of VAT fraud in e-commerce by strengthening cooperation between tax authorities and payment service providers.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: this proposal is part of the package of legislation on the mandatory transmission and exchange of VAT-relevant payment information. It is part of the EU's broader agenda to tackle VAT fraud and improve VAT collection of internet sales .
E-commerce VAT fraud is a common problem for all Member States. Member States alone do not have the information necessary to ensure that the e-commerce VAT rules are correctly applied and to tackle e-commerce VAT fraud.
The exchange of payment data between tax authorities is not always possible due to legal limitations, which makes existing administrative cooperation tools relatively ineffective with regard to VAT fraud in e-commerce.
For payment providers, the adoption of a single centralised EU-wide system of collecting VAT-relevant payment data would reduce the risks and costs of reporting the same information in multiple formats, in every EU Member State.
In recent years, more than 90 % of online purchases by European customers were made through credit transfers, direct debits and card payments, i.e. through an intermediary involved in the transaction (a payment service provider), and this is a trend that will continue in the future.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment attached to the present proposal identified three main cases of crossborder e-commerce VAT fraud: (i) intra-EU supplies of goods and services, (ii) imports of goods from businesses established in a third country or third territory (i.e. a country or territory outside the EU) to consumers in the Member States, and (iii) supplies of services from businesses established in a third country to consumers in the Member States.
It is estimated that Member States suffer VAT losses on cross-border supplies of goods amounting to EUR 5 billion per year.
The impact assessment showed that a central repository (to be developed by the Commission) was the option that best addressed the objective of fighting e-commerce VAT fraud. The exchange of information through a central repository would also better reduce market distortion.
CONTENT: this proposal complements the current VAT regulatory framework as recently modified by the VAT E-commerce Directive in the context of the Commission’s Digital Single Market Strategy. Furthermore, this initiative strengthens the administrative cooperation framework to better tackle e-commerce VAT fraud and restore fair competition.
New record keeping requirements
Under the new provisions, Member States shall ensure that payment service providers keep sufficiently detailed records of the payees and of the payment transactions in relation to payment services they execute for each calendar quarter to enable the competent authorities of the Member States to carry out controls of the supplies of goods and services which are deemed to take place in a Member State.
The requirement shall apply in circumstances where both of the following conditions are met:
- where funds are transferred by a payment service provider from a payer located in one Member State to a payee located in another Member State, in a third territory or in a third country;
- in respect of the transfer of funds, where a payment service provider executes more than 25 payment transactions to the same payee in the course of a calendar quarter.
The records shall be kept in electronic format by the payment service provider for a period of two years from the end of the year during which the payment transaction was executed.
Information to be kept
The proposal specifies that payment service providers must keep records of any VAT or tax identification number of the payee, if applicable. In addition, they must keep information on the payment transaction itself, such as the amount, currency, date, origin of the payment and indication of any payment refund.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: it is expected that the investment costs of the Commission and of the tax authorities will be outweighed by the increase in VAT revenues collected.
The costs of this initiative will be spread among several years starting in 2019. The first part of these costs (until 2020) will be covered by existing allocations in the current Fiscalis 2020 programme. The majority of the costs will nevertheless take place after the year 2020.
The budgetary implications have been estimated to a one-off cost of EUR 11.8 million for setting-up the system , and an annual running cost of EUR 4.5 million once the system is fully operational. It was estimated that these running costs would only start in 2022 once the system is operational. Their impact on the budget was calculated over a five year period for a total (including the one-off cost) of EUR 34.3 million to set-up and run the system until 2027.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2020/284
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 062 02.03.2020, p. 0007
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)23
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0090/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0048/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.160
- Committee draft report: PE641.418
- Contribution: COM(2018)0812
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0487
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0488
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0812
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0487
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0488
- Committee draft report: PE641.418
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.160
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)23
- Contribution: COM(2018)0812
Activities
- Mikuláš PEKSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A9-0048/2019 - Lídia Pereira - Vote unique #
Amendments | Dossier |
37 |
2018/0412(CNS)
2019/11/14
ECON
37 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) It is necessary to adopt an ambitious mandate for the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) in collaboration with national judicial authorities in order to ensure the efficient prosecution of fraudsters before the national courts because any organised cross-border VAT fraud scheme should be duly prosecuted and the fraudsters should be sanctioned.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) According to the 2019 Final Report in the context of the ‘Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States' prepared for the Commission, the VAT gap in Member States varies from 0,6% in Cyprus to 35,5% in Romania, which is a 50-fold difference.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) From information already held by payment service providers, they are able to identify the location of the payee and the payer in relation to the payment services they execute, based on an identifier of an individual payment account in a Member State used by that payer or payee or other identifier of the payer or payee and their location.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , it is important that the obligation on a payment service provider, to retain and provide information in relation to a cross-border payment transaction, should be proportionate and should only be what is necessary for Member States to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Furthermore, the only information relating to the payer that should be retained is where the payer is located. With regard to information relating to the payee and the payment transaction itself, payment service providers should only be required to retain and transmit to tax authorities information which is necessary for tax authorities to detect possible fraudsters and to carry out VAT controls. Therefore, payment service providers should only be required to retain records on cross-border payment transactions which are likely to indicate economic activities. The introduction of a ceiling based either on the number of payments received by a payee over the course of a calendar quarter or on a minimum amount per payment would give a reliable indication that those payments were received as part of an economic activity, thereby excluding payments for non-
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , it is important that the obligation on a payment service provider, to retain and provide information in relation to a cross-border payment transaction, should be proportionate and should only be what is necessary for Member States to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Furthermore, the only information relating to the payer that should be retained is where the payer is located. With regard to information relating to the payee and the payment transaction itself, payment service providers should only be required to retain and transmit to tax authorities information which is necessary for tax authorities to detect possible fraudsters and to carry out VAT controls. Therefore, payment service providers should only be required to retain records on cross-border payment transactions which are likely to indicate economic activities. The introduction of a ceiling based on the number of payments received by a payee over the course of a calendar quarter would give a reliable indication that those payments were received as part of an economic activity, thereby excluding payments for non- commercial reasons. Where such a ceiling is reached, the accounting obligation of the payment service provider would be triggered. In order to bring a balance between administrative obligations for service providers and better collection of VAT by Member States, payment service providers shall have a possibility to provide data in a form already easily available to them, i.e. either for each transaction individually or at an aggregate level. _________________ 46Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L119, 04.05.2016, p.1).
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , it is important that the obligation on a payment service provider, to retain and provide information in relation to a cross-border payment transaction, should be proportionate and should only be what is necessary for Member States to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Furthermore, the only information relating to the payer that should be retained is where the payer is located. With regard to information relating to the payee and the payment transaction itself, payment service providers should only be required to retain and transmit to tax authorities information which is necessary for tax authorities to detect possible fraudsters and to carry out VAT controls. Therefore, payment service providers should only be required to retain
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) When a transaction from a payer to a payee involves intermediary payment service providers, the reporting and record keeping obligation shall apply only to a final service provider.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Due to the significant volume of information and its sensitivity in terms of the protection of personal data, it is necessary and proportionate that payment service providers retain records of the information in relation to cross-border payment transactions for a
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Due to the significant volume of information and its sensitivity in terms of the protection of personal data, it is necessary and proportionate that payment service providers retain records of the information in relation to cross-border payment transactions for a t
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) Several payment service providers may be involved in one single payment from a payer to a payee. That single payment may give rise to several transfers of funds between the different payment service providers. It is necessary that all payment service providers involved in a given payment, unless a specific exclusion is applicable, have a record keeping and reporting obligation. Those records and reports should be proportionate and contain information on the payment from the initial payer to the final payee and not on the intermediate transfers of funds between the payment service providers.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 b (new) (8 b) The record keeping and reporting obligation should also arise in cases where a payment service provider receives funds or acquires payment transactions on behalf of the payee and not only where a payment service provider transfers funds or issues payments instruments for the payer.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 c (new) (8 c) Obligations stipulated in this Directive should not apply to payment service providers falling outside the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/2366. Therefore, when the payment service providers of the payee are not located in a Member State, the payer’s payment service providers should keep records and report the information on the cross-border payment. Conversely, in order for the record keeping and reporting obligation to be proportionate, when both the payer’s and the payee’s payment service providers are located in a Member State, only the payee’s payment service providers should keep records of that information. For the purposes of the record keeping and reporting obligation, a payment service provider should be considered to be located in a Member State when his BIC or unique business identifier refers to that Member State.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Title IV – Chapter 1 – Article 16 (-1) in Chapter 1 of Title IV, Article 16 is amended as follows: "Article 16 The application by a taxable person of goods forming part of his business assets for his private use or for that of his staff, or their disposal free of charge or, more generally, their application for purposes other than those of his business, shall be treated as a supply of goods for consideration, where the VAT on those goods or the component parts thereof was wholly or partly deductible.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Title IX – Chapter 7 – Article 148 – points (e), (f), (g) (-1 a) in Chapter 7 of Title IX, points (e), (f) and (g) of Article 148 are deleted.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243a – point 3 a (new) (3 a) ‘cross-border payment‘ means a payment when the payer is located in one Member State and the payee is located in another Member State, in a third territory or in a third country;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that payment service providers keep sufficiently detailed records of the payees and of the payment transactions in relation
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 2 – introductory phrase 2. The requirement
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (b) in respect of the transfer of funds referred to in point (a), where a payment service provider executes more than 25 payment transactions to the same payee in the course of a calendar quarter or executes transactions of a monetary value of minimum EUR 2500 in one payment transaction.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b (b) in respect to
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b 3. The re
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a (a) be kept by the payment service provider in electronic format for a period of
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a (a) be kept by the payment service provider in electronic format for a period of t
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243b – paragraph 3a (new) Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the IBAN of the payer’s payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and his location;
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the IBAN of the payer’s payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and his location;
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where none of the identifiers referred to in subparagraph (a) is applicable, the BIC or any other business identifier code that unambiguously identifies the payment service provider acting on behalf of the payer, as well as the location of that payment service provider.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase 1. The records kept by the payment service providers related to cross-border payment transaction, in accordance with Article 243b, shall contain any of the following information available to payment service provider:
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase 1. The records kept by the payment service providers, in accordance with Article 243b, with regards to cross border payments, shall contain the following information:
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/112/EC Article 243d – paragraph 1 – point h (h) any executed payment refunds for payment transactions referred to in point (g), if available;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Title XV – Chapter 2a – Article 404 a (new) (1 a) in Chapter 2a of Title XV, the following Article is inserted: "Article 404a By 31 December 2021, the Commission shall, on the basis of information obtained from the Member States, present to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the operation of Section 2a of Chapter 4 of Title XI, in particular as regards the need to include virtual currencies exchange platforms in the scope of that Section. The Commission shall regularly present such reports to the European Parliament and to the Council. These reports shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by legislative proposals."
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) According to the 2019 Final Report in the context of the ‘Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States’ prepared for the Commission, the VAT gap, that is the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected, in the Union amounted to EUR 137,5 billion in 2017, representing a loss of 11,2% of the total expected VAT revenue and EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union. There are, however, big differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0,6% up to 35,5%. This proves the need for more transnational cooperation to better fight against VAT e-commerce fraud in particular, but more generally VAT fraud (including carousel fraud).
source: 643.160
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=43434&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4/group |
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green LeftNew
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.418New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-641418_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.160New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-643160_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2019-12-16-TOC_EN.html |
events/7/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
events/10/summary |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.418New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.418 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.160New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.160 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0048_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0048_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRE |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2019-0090_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2019-0090_EN.html |
council |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/4 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.418
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.160
|
docs/4 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/3/date |
Old
2019-11-12T00:00:00New
2019-11-13T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|