Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP) | MOLNÁR Csaba ( S&D), KOVAŘÍK Ondřej ( Renew), SCOTT CATO Molly ( Verts/ALE), JURZYCA Eugen ( ECR), PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Responsible Committee | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113Events
PURPOSE: to improve the exchange of information on cross-border payments in order to combat VAT fraud in e-commerce.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Regulation (EU) 2020/283 amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud.
CONTENT: this Regulation, together with Council Directive (EU) 2020/284 , completes the VAT regulatory framework for e-commerce that entered into force in January 2021, which introduced new VAT obligations for online marketplaces and simplified rules on compliance with VAT obligations for online businesses.
The Regulation introduces amendments to the regulation on administrative cooperation in the field of VAT. The amendments set out details of how national tax authorities shall cooperate in this area in order to detect VAT fraud and monitor compliance with VAT obligations.
In concrete terms, the Regulation provides for the establishment of a central electronic system for payment information (CESOP), to which Member States shall transmit information on the payments they collect and which they may store at national level.
For each beneficiary, CESOP shall store, aggregate and analyse all relevant VAT information on payments transmitted by Member States.
CESOP shall:
- allow for a full overview of payments received by payees from payers located in the Member States and make available to the Eurofisc liaison officials the result of specific analyses of information;
- be able to recognise multiple records of the same payment, for example the same payment could be reported both from the bank and the card issuer of a given payer, to clean the information received from the Member States, for example by removing duplicates and correcting errors in data;
- allow Eurofisc liaison officials to cross-check payment information with the VAT information they hold, to make enquiries for the purpose of an investigation into suspected VAT fraud or in order to detect VAT fraud and to add supplementary information.
CESOP shall retain the information transmitted for a maximum period of 5 years from the end of the year in which the information was transmitted to it. Access to CESOP shall only be granted to Eurofisc liaison officials who have a personal user identification for CESOP.
The Commission shall ensure the development, maintenance, hosting and technical management of a central electronic system for payment information (CESOP) for the purposes of investigating suspected cases of VAT fraud or detecting VAT fraud.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 22.3.2020.
APPLICATION: from 1 January 2024.
The European Parliament adopted by 591 votes to 18, with 86 abstentions, under the consultation procedure, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud.
The European Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to amendments.
Deepening transnational cooperation to combat VAT fraud
Parliament recalled that the existence of significant differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0.6% to 35.5%, underlined the need to deepen transnational cooperation to better combat VAT fraud, in the context of e-commerce in particular, but also in a more general context (including carousel fraud). Indeed, according to the Commission, the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected, in the Union amounted to EUR 137 billion in 2017, representing EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union.
More effective fight against VAT fraud
Parliament proposed that:
- all Member States should take measures in order to reduce the percentage of late replies and improve the quality of requests for information;
- the new central electronic system for payment information ("CESOP") should keep the information for a maximum period of five years (rather than three years) from the end of the year in which the information was transferred to the system;
- the Commission should be able to conduct visits to the Member States in order to evaluate how cooperation arrangements on cross-border VAT fraud between Member States work;
- Member States and the Commission should set up a common system for collecting statistics on intra-Community VAT fraud and publish national estimates of VAT revenue losses resulting from such fraud as well as estimates for the Union as a whole;
- Eurofisc's annual report should examine whether the resources devoted to Eurofisc are adequate and sufficient to improve cooperation between Member States and fight efficiently against VAT fraud;
- Eurofisc's annual report should assess whether the resources allocated to it are adequate and sufficient to improve cooperation between Member States; it should, inter alia, specify the number of officials authorised to be present in the offices of the administrative services of another Member State or the number of qualified human resources staff present in the administrative offices and involved in administrative enquiries and simultaneous controls;
- lastly, information exchanged on payments to combat VAT fraud should also be used in the implementation of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Strategy for fighting against VAT fraud
Parliament stated that this strategy should evolve in parallel with the increasing modernisation and digitalisation of the economy while rendering the VAT system as simple as possible for businesses and citizens. Member States should therefore continue to invest in technology-led tax collection, notably by automatically linking corporate cash registers and sales systems to VAT returns.
In addition, tax authorities should continue their efforts towards closer cooperation and exchange of best practices, including through the Tax Administration EU Summit (TADEUS), a network of Member States’ heads of tax administrations that seeks better coordination at strategic level between tax administrations.
Tax authorities should work towards an effective communication and interoperability between all databases regarding fiscal matters at Union level. Blockchain technology could also be used in order to better protect personal data and improve the online exchange of information between tax authorities.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, under a special legislative procedure (consultation of Parliament), the report by Lídia PEREIRA (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud.
As a reminder, the proposal concerns the mandatory transmission and exchange of information on VAT payments between VAT administrations. It lays down rules for the harmonised collection by Member States of recorded data made available electronically by payment service providers. Furthermore, it sets up a new central electronic system for the storage of the payment information and for the further processing of this information by anti-fraud officials in the Member States within the Eurofisc framework.
The committee recommends that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.
Better tackle VAT fraud
Members stressed the need for more transnational cooperation in order to better combat VAT e-commerce fraud in particular, as well as VAT fraud more generally (including carousel fraud).
The report recalled that according to the Commission, the VAT gap (the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected) in the Union amounted to EUR 137.5 billion in 2017, representing a loss of 11.2 % of the total expected VAT revenue and EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union. There are, however, big differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0.6% up to 35.5%.
The main purpose of the proposed amendments is to ensure that the fight against VAT fraud is more effective. According to Members:
- all Member States should take measures in order to reduce the percentage of late replies and improve the quality of requests for information;
- the new central electronic system for payment information ("CESOP") should keep the information for a maximum period of five years (rather than three years) from the end of the year in which the information was transferred to the system;
- the Commission should be able to conduct visits to the Member States in order to evaluate how cooperation arrangements on cross-border VAT fraud between Member States work;
- Member States and the Commission should set up a common system for collecting statistics on intra-Community VAT fraud and publish national estimates of VAT revenue losses resulting from such fraud as well as estimates for the Union as a whole;
- Eurofisc's annual report should examine whether the resources devoted to Eurofisc are adequate and sufficient to improve cooperation between Member States and fight efficiently against VAT fraud;
- lastly, information exchanged on payments to combat VAT fraud should also be used in the implementation of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Strategy for fighting against VAT fraud
Members stated that this strategy should evolve in parallel with the increasing modernisation and digitalisation of the economy while rendering the VAT system as simple as possible for businesses and citizens. Member States should therefore continue to invest in technology-led tax collection, notably by automatically linking corporate cash registers and sales systems to VAT returns.
In addition, tax authorities should continue their efforts towards closer cooperation and exchange of best practices.
Tax authorities should work towards an effective communication and interoperability between all databases regarding fiscal matters at Union level. Blockchain technology could also be used in order to better protect personal data and improve the online exchange of information between tax authorities.
PURPOSE: to improve the exchange of information on cross-border payments in order to combat VAT fraud in electronic commerce.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: this proposal is part of the package of legislation on the mandatory transmission and exchange of VAT-relevant payment information. It is part of the EU's broader agenda to tackle VAT fraud and improve VAT collection of internet sales .
E-commerce VAT fraud is a common problem for all Member States. Member States alone do not have the information necessary to ensure that the e-commerce VAT rules are correctly applied and to tackle e-commerce VAT fraud.
The exchange of payment data between tax authorities is crucial to combat fraud effectively.
The Commission considers that new tools are necessary for tax authorities to tackle cross-border e-commerce VAT fraud in an effective way.
CONTENT: the proposal seeks to amend Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation and fighting fraud in the field of value added tax. This is because the proposal lays down rules for the Member States to collect in a harmonised way the records made electronically available by the payment service providers pursuant to the VAT Directive.
In concrete terms, the proposal:
- sets up a new central electronic system for the storage of the payment information and for the further processing of this information by anti-fraud officials in the Member States within the Eurofisc framework. The new central electronic system for payment information (CESOP) would be developed by the Commission;
- introduces the obligation for Member States to collect recorded data made available electronically from payment service providers in accordance with the VAT Directive. The competent authorities of the Member States should forward to CESOP, on a quarterly basis, the information they collect from payment service providers established in their own territory. A common electronic format for the collection of such data should be adopted by means of implementing acts.
CESOP will correct formal mistakes in the transmitted information (cleansing) and aggregate the overall payment information transferred by the competent authorities of the Member States per payee (recipient of the funds). Then it will analyse the information (e.g. matching payment information with VAT information available to Eurofisc officials) and will allow Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials to have a complete overview of the payments received by given payees. The information shall be stored in CESOP for two years.
The information on incoming payments will allow Member States to detect domestic suppliers selling goods and services abroad without fulfilling their VAT obligations.
Information on outgoing payments will allow the detection of suppliers established abroad (either in another Member State or outside the Union) that should pay VAT in a given Member State.
The Commission would bear the costs for the development and maintenance of CESOP as well as the costs of maintaining the connection between CESOP and Member States’ national systems, while the Member States would bear the costs of all necessary developments to their national electronic system.
The safeguards laid down under Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 and the European framework on data protection will apply to the exchange of payment information under the present proposal.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2020/283
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 062 02.03.2020, p. 0001
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)23
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0091/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0047/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.162
- Committee draft report: PE641.419
- Contribution: COM(2018)0813
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0487
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0488
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0813
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0487
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0488
- Committee draft report: PE641.419
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.162
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)23
- Contribution: COM(2018)0813
Activities
- Dita CHARANZOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Othmar KARAS
- Zbigniew KUŹMIUK
- Emmanuel MAUREL
- Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan ŠTEFANEC
- Ernest URTASUN
- Gunnar BECK
- Ivan Vilibor SINČIĆ
- Barbara THALER
- Eugen JURZYCA
- Tudor CIUHODARU
- Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ
- Marek BELKA
- Henrik OVERGAARD NIELSEN
- Mikuláš PEKSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A9-0047/2019 - Lídia Pereira - Vote unique #
Amendments | Dossier |
17 |
2018/0413(CNS)
2019/11/14
ECON
17 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) A central electronic information system ‘CESOP’ where Member States transmit payment information they store at national level, would achieve the objective of fighting e-commerce VAT fraud more effectively. This system should aggregate, in relation to individual payees, all VAT relevant information regarding payment transactions transmitted by Member States
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The exchange of payment data between tax authorities is crucial to combat fraud effectively. Only the Eurofisc liaison officials should process the payment information and only with the objective of fighting VAT fraud. That information should not be used for other purposes than the ones established by this Regulation, such as for commercial purposes, but should also be applied in the implementation of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. _________________ 1aDirective (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73).
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Given the low number of Member States publishing estimates of VAT losses due to intra-community fraud, having comparable data on intra-Community VAT fraud would contribute to better targeted cooperation between Member States. Therefore, the Commission, together with the Member States, should develop a common statistical approach to quantify and analyse VAT fraud.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) It is necessary and proportionate that payment service providers retain records of the information in relation to payment transactions for a
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) It is necessary and proportionate that payment service providers retain records of the information in relation to payment transactions for a t
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Each Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials should be able to access and analyse the information in relation to the payment transactions for the purpose of fighting VAT fraud. Duly accredited persons of the Commission should access the information
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Chapter II – Section 2 – Article 12a (new) (1 a) in Section 2 of CHAPTER II, the following Article is added: "Article 12a All Member States shall implement a set of operational targets for reducing the percentage of late replies and improving the quality of requests for information and shall inform the Commission about those targets."
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24c – paragraph 2 2. CESOP shall retain the information referred to in points (a)
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24c – paragraph 2 2. CESOP shall retain the information referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 for a maximum period of t
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Chapter X – Article 36 – paragraph 2 – introductory part (2 a) in Article 36(2), the introductory part is replaced by the following: "2. The liaison officials of the Member States participating in
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24d The Commission shall grant access to information stored in CESOP to Eurofisc liaison officials, who hold a user identifier for CESOP, where the information is required for the purpose of investigations into suspected VAT fraud or to detect VAT fraud.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 37 – subparagraph 1a (new) The annual report shall at
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Chapter XIII – Article 49a (new) (3 a) in CHAPTER XIII, the following Article is added: "Article 49a Member States and the Commission shall establish a common system of collecting statistics on intra-Community VAT fraud and shall publish national estimates of VAT losses resulting from that fraud, as well as estimates for the Union as a whole. The Commission shall adopt by means of implementing acts the practical arrangements for such statistical system. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 58(2)."
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Chapter XIV – Article 50 – paragraph 1 a (new) (3 a) in Article 50 of CHAPTER XIV, the following paragraph is inserted: "1a. When a Member State provides wider information to a third country than that provided for under Chapters II and III of this Regulation, that Member State may not refuse to provide that information to any other Member State requesting cooperation or having an interest to receive it."
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) According to the 2019 Final Report in the context of the ‘Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States’ prepared for the Commission, the VAT gap, that is the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the amount actually collected, in the Union amounted to EUR 137,5 billion in 2017, representing a loss of 11,2% of the total expected VAT revenue and EUR 267 of lost revenue per person in the Union. There are, however, big differences between Member States, with VAT gaps ranging from 0,6% up to 35,5%. This proves the need for more transnational cooperation to better fight against VAT e-commerce fraud in particular, but more generally VAT fraud (including carousel fraud).
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) VAT fraud is often linked with organised crime and a very small number of those organised networks can be responsible for billions of euro in cross- border VAT fraud, affecting not only revenue collection in Member States but also having a negative impact on the Union’s own resources. Therefore, Member States have a shared responsibility for the protection of the VAT revenue of all Member States.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) It is necessary to adopt an ambitious mandate for the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) in collaboration with national judicial authorities in order to ensure the efficient prosecution of fraudsters before the national courts because any organised cross-border VAT fraud scheme should be duly prosecuted and the fraudsters should be sanctioned.
source: 643.162
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=43437&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4/group |
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green LeftNew
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.419New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-641419_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.162New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-643162_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2019-12-16-TOC_EN.html |
events/7/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
events/10/summary |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.419New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.419 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.162New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.162 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0047_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0047_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191216&type=CRE |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2019-0091_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2019-0091_EN.html |
council |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/4 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.419
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.162
|
docs/4 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/3/date |
Old
2019-11-12T00:00:00New
2019-11-13T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|