Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ERTUG Ismail ( S&D) | SALINI Massimiliano ( PPE), DEMESMAEKER Mark ( ECR), MEISSNER Gesine ( ALDE), TAYLOR Keith ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | SCHALDEMOSE Christel ( S&D) | Mark DEMESMAEKER ( ECR), Stefan ECK ( GUE/NGL), Andrzej GRZYB ( PPE), Carolina PUNSET ( ALDE), Davor ŠKRLEC ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław ( ECR) | Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA ( GUE/NGL), Barbara KAPPEL ( ENF), Florent MARCELLESI ( Verts/ALE), Martina WERNER ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | VAN MILTENBURG Matthijs ( ALDE) | Daniel DALTON ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 215 votes to 47, with 36 abstentions, a resolution on in response to the Commission communication on the deployment of infrastructure for alternative fuels in the European Union: time to act.
Transport is the only major economic sector in the EU where greenhouse gas emissions have increased since 1990. It is responsible for 23% of CO2-emissions, and this share is still growing. Road transport represents almost 75% of all energy used in transport and causes almost 73% of transport’s GHG emissions.
Members welcomed the Commission communication on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and highlighted that further coordination and cooperation at EU level is needed in order to decarbonise the transport sector by 2050. They underlined the opportunities for industry, technology and employment presented by the deployment of alternative fuels and the corresponding infrastructure.
Stepping up efforts : Parliament called on the Commission to bring forward a revision of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and to focus on its proper implementation, taking into account that only 8 of 25 Member States have so far fully implemented it.
The Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort, ambition and available funding between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels falls short of being comprehensive and evenly distributed.
The Commission is invited to:
replace the system of NFPs with more efficient instruments, including concrete, binding and enforceable targets , to formulate sustainability criteria; take into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, allow Member States flexibility in determining how to reach the targets, and pursue the goal of having a trans-European infrastructure network for all alternative fuels that is accessible, compatible and interoperable; create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels ensuring technology neutrality; assess the feasibility of life-cycle assessments for all alternative fuels, batteries and powertrain solutions; complement the climate-related goals of Directive 2014/94/EC with additional clean air measures following the fitness check of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives.
Improved batteries : Members stressed the importance of the technological advances that are already under way or in the pipeline in the fields of batteries, hydrogen and energy storage. New infrastructure must be adaptable to changes, both in terms of volumes and in terms of technologies. They stressed, for example, that a massive increase in the number of electric vehicles coupled with an increase in the range of those vehicles to 400 km will have an impact on the deployment density of the network of charging stations, as well as on the type of charging required.
Parliament supported electrified roads that allow electric vehicles to charge as they drive stating that this may be a solution to reducing battery size and, consequently, the prices of new vehicles.
Stressing the importance of sustainable urban planning, Members suggested focusing efforts on the deployment of specific infrastructure for alternative fuels for public and collective transport services, such as buses, trams, trains, shared cars, taxis and mini vans.
Members welcomed the Commission's initiative for a European alliance for sustainable batteries and supported the establishment of a European production of battery cells based on next generation technologies.
Clean Mobility Fund : the Commission's effort to provide additional start-up funding of EUR 800 million to support the development of alternative fuel infrastructure was welcomed.
However, Members expressed doubt that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 2025.
The Commission is urged to increase the initial funding , to support not only the deployment but also the operation of such infrastructure.
Taxation : Members noted that taxation has a major impact on the price competitiveness of alternative fuels. They called on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of low-carbon and carbon-free alternative fuels and to remove present disparities in energy taxation between different transport modes.
An alternative industrial policy : Parliament expressed regret that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, with only 19 Battery Electric Vehicles and 25 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles available in 2017 compared to 417 models with internal combustion engines, and called on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard. It emphasised the connection between the availability of alternatively fuelled vehicles, the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and consumer demand for these technologies and highlighted, in this regard, that moving towards alternative fuels and powertrains could help the industry to be globally competitive and keep high-quality jobs in Europe.
Lastly, Parliament called for the deployment of multi-energy stations so as to avoid the creation of various different distribution networks for each type of power supply. Most charging of electric vehicles will occur at home or at work, complemented by charging at public and semi-public places such as supermarkets, train stations or airports. In this regard, a greater focus on smart charging solutions is needed, grid stability must be ensured and self-consumption enabled.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Ismail ERTUG (S&D, DE) in response to the Commission communication on the deployment of infrastructure for alternative fuels in the European Union: time to act.
Transport is the only major economic sector in the EU where greenhouse gas emissions have increased since 1990. It is responsible for 23% of CO2-emissions, and this share is still growing. Road transport represents almost 75% of all energy used in transport and causes almost 73% of transport’s GHG emissions. 94% of Europe’s transport sector is depending on oil, 90% of which have to be imported, including from some countries with an unstable political situation.
In order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to be fully decarbonised with zero net emissions by 2050 at the latest. A shift to alternative fuels can help achieve this goal, although conventional fuels will still be needed for the foreseeable future until such time as demand can be met in full by alternative fuels.
Deficits of existing directive : Members called on the Commission to bring forward a revision of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and to focus on its proper implementation, taking into account that only 8 of 25 Member States have so far fully implemented it.
The Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort, ambition and available funding between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels falls short of being comprehensive and evenly distributed.
The Commission is invited to:
replace the system of NFPs with more efficient instruments, including concrete, binding and enforceable targets , to formulate sustainability criteria; take into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, allow Member States flexibility in determining how to reach the targets, and pursue the goal of having a trans-European infrastructure network for all alternative fuels that is accessible, compatible and interoperable; create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels ensuring technology neutrality; assess the feasibility of life-cycle assessments for all alternative fuels, batteries and powertrain solutions; complement the climate-related goals of Directive 2014/94/EC with additional clean air measures following the fitness check of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives.
Improved batteries : Members stressed the importance of the technological advances that are already under way or in the pipeline in the fields of batteries, hydrogen and energy storage. New infrastructure must be adaptable to changes, both in terms of volumes and in terms of technologies. They stressed, for example, that a massive increase in the number of electric vehicles coupled with an increase in the range of those vehicles to 400 km will have an impact on the deployment density of the network of charging stations, as well as on the type of charging required.
The report supported electrified roads that allow electric vehicles to charge as they drive stating that this may be a solution to reducing battery size and, consequently, the prices of new vehicles.
Members called on the Commission and Member States to particularly turn their attention to the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure for collective and public transport services , such as buses, trams, trains, shared cars, taxis and mini vans, as well as for bicycles, scooters and motorcycles.
Financing alternative fuels infrastructure : the Commission’s effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million as start-up financing to support the uptake of alternative fuels infrastructure has been welcomed. However, Members expressed doubt that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 2025.
The Commission is urged to increase the initial funding , to support not only the deployment but also the operation of such infrastructure.
Taxation : Members noted that taxation has a major impact on the price competitiveness of alternative fuels. They called on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of low-carbon and carbon-free alternative fuels and to remove present disparities in energy taxation between different transport modes.
An alternative industrial policy : Members expressed regret t hat progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, with only 19 Battery Electric Vehicles and 25 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles available in 2017 compared to 417 models with internal combustion engines, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard. They emphasised the connection between the availability of alternatively fuelled vehicles, the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and consumer demand for these technologies and highlighted, in this regard, that moving towards alternative fuels and powertrains could help the industry to be globally competitive and keep high-quality jobs in Europe.
Lastly, the report called for the deployment of multi-energy stations so as to avoid the creation of various different distribution networks for each type of power supply. Most charging of electric vehicles will occur at home or at work, complemented by charging at public and semi-public places such as supermarkets, train stations or airports. In this regard, a greater focus on smart charging solutions is needed, grid stability must be ensured and self-consumption enabled.
PURPOSE: to present an action plan to achieve the widest possible use of alternative fuels.
BACKGROUND: by 2025, the EU should have completed basic charging and refuelling infrastructure, ensuring full coverage of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) core network corridors. The future deployment of infrastructure will require significant public and private investment .
With the agreement of Paris on climate change in force, it is necessary to accelerate the transition to a modern low-carbon economy. In order for the EU to make a successful transition to low-emission or zero-emission mobility, the Commission believes that an integrated approach is required. This requires a common policy framework for vehicles, infrastructure, electricity grids, economic incentives and digital services at EU, national, regional and local levels.
CONTENT: the Commission's action plan sets out measures to complement and better implement national policy frameworks (NPFs) under Directive 2014/94/EU on alternative fuels infrastructure .
Current situation and needs : although the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure has recently intensified, the EU now needs to accelerate deployment in two areas: first, in the core network and the overall TEN-T network.
The level of ambition between different Member States varies significantly . For example, only two Member State provide more than 100 recharging points for electric vehicles per 100 000 city inhabitants.
Analysis of the NPFs under Directive 2014/94/EU results in the following estimates of infrastructure investment needs by Member States, including the TEN-T core network corridors:
electricity : up to EUR 904 million by 2020; compressed natural gas (CNG): up to EUR 357 million by 2020 and up to EUR 600 million by 2025 for road vehicles running on CNG; liquefied natural gas (LNG): up to EUR 257 million by 2025 for road vehicles operating on LNG. For LNG for waterborne transport, up to EUR 945 million in the TEN-T Core Network Corridor seaports by 2025 and up to EUR 1 billion in the TEN-T Core Network Corridor inland ports by 2030; hydrogen : up to EUR 707 million by 2025.
Overall, the analysis of the situation shows that the NPFs combined do not add up to a conclusive picture that provides the long-term market certainty that is needed.
By 6 November 2017, only 8 out of 25 NPFs fully meet the NPF requirements.
The actions proposed in the framework of the plan revolve around the following objectives:
Accelerate the completion and implementation of national policy frameworks : the Commission will support the exchange of information and mutual learning on the implementation of national policy frameworks, starting in March 2018 with a group of experts, then from the end of autumn 2018 with annual policy conferences. It will consider how to best reflect priorities of NPFs in the allocation of EU project funding and in European Semester reporting.
Investment support : the Commission will organise roadshows in Member States starting in November 2017 to review in a comprehensive way the ambition of the NPFs and the investment needs for low and zero emission mobility as well as assess the opportunities offered by different EU funding and financial instruments.
As a result, an additional EU financial support of up to EUR 800 million from CEF and NER300 is being made available with this action plan for investments into alternative fuels infrastructure
Enabling actions in urban areas : many European cities and regions are frontrunners in the transition to low and zero emission mobility. The Commission will also look into and adapt, where feasible, funding for alternative fuels in urban nodes, including for fleet solutions, by the end of 2017.
Increasing consumer buy-in : users must be able to use the entire transport network in a simple and seamless way.
Greater collaboration between public and private actors is needed. This implies access to reliable and timely information on the location and availability of charging points or refuelling points. Interoperable and easy-to-use payment services will also have a major impact.
In the end all parts of the necessary infrastructure need to be digitally connected (i.e. remotely and in real time for charging stations).
Integrating electric vehicles into the electricity system : Member States should:
adopt a legislative framework to fully meet demand and enable smart charging; encourage the deployment of charging points and pre-wiring of parking spaces in residential and non-residential buildings; ensure that smart charging technologies such as smart meters are rolled out and that already adopted and upcoming smart charging standards for electric vehicles are being applied.
Electro-mobility related needs will be taken into account in the context of Horizon 2020 programming as well as in the context of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) process and other stakeholder fora.
The Commission concluded that the assessment of NPFs under the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive shows that there is a lot to learn from the positive experiences of some Member States.
Serious cross-border and cross-sector collaboration of all public and private stakeholders is needed. The lock-in of technologies and markets needs to be prevented. For markets to grow, alternative fuels infrastructures and their services need to be open, transparent and interoperable.
The Commission stands ready to support this process through both means of non-legislative and legislative action.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)4
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0438/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0297/2018
- Committee opinion: PE620.875
- Committee opinion: PE622.172
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE623.725
- Committee opinion: PE619.168
- Committee draft report: PE621.006
- Contribution: COM(2017)0652
- Contribution: COM(2017)0652
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0652
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE621.006
- Committee opinion: PE619.168
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE623.725
- Committee opinion: PE622.172
- Committee opinion: PE620.875
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)4
- Contribution: COM(2017)0652
- Contribution: COM(2017)0652
Activities
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0297/2018 - Ismail Ertug - Résolution 25/10/2018 13:48:53.000 #
DE | ES | IT | RO | FR | BE | CZ | PT | PL | SK | LT | SE | LU | BG | NL | HR | FI | HU | EE | AT | IE | MT | SI | LV | EL | ?? | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
41
|
25
|
21
|
19
|
40
|
16
|
13
|
11
|
21
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
13
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
26
|
|
PPE |
81
|
Germany PPEFor (19) |
4
|
4
|
Romania PPEFor (7) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
S&D |
81
|
Germany S&DFor (10) |
11
|
Romania S&DFor (8) |
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (8) |
||||||||
ALDE |
29
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Belgium ALDE |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (3)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
20
|
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
30
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Poland ECR |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECR |
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
17
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (7) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
12
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
22
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
A8-0297/2018 - Ismail Ertug - Résolution #
DE | ES | IT | RO | FR | BE | CZ | PT | PL | SK | LT | SE | LU | BG | NL | HR | FI | HU | EE | AT | IE | MT | SI | LV | EL | ?? | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
41
|
25
|
21
|
19
|
40
|
16
|
13
|
11
|
21
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
13
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
26
|
|
PPE |
81
|
Germany PPEFor (19) |
4
|
4
|
Romania PPEFor (7) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
S&D |
80
|
Germany S&DFor (10) |
11
|
Romania S&DFor (8) |
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (8) |
||||||||
ALDE |
30
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Belgium ALDE |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (3)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
20
|
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
30
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Poland ECR |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECR |
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
17
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (7) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
12
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
22
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Amendments | Dossier |
300 |
2018/2023(INI)
2018/04/26
IMCO
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for a
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for a more harmonised EU approach given the Member States current varying commitment to alternative fuels infrastructures, in order to ensure interoperability of payment services, transparent consumer information and cross-border continuity; urges greater collaboration between public and private actors in this respect;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for a more harmonised EU approach, in order to ensure interoperability of payment services and recharging points, transparent consumer information and cross-border continuity; urges greater collaboration between public and private actors in this respect;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the need to strengthen the consumer dimension; points out that due to a lack of common technical standards across the EU it is difficult for users of alternative fuels to fully use the available infrastructure when travelling in the EU and thus encourages the move towards interoperability also with a view to increase consumer confidence;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that the availability and accessibility of charging and refuelling infrastructure, both in public and private facilities, are crucial for increasing consumer acceptance towards alternative-fuels vehicles;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Welcomes the benefits of conversion to alternative fuels as long as these remain environmentally beneficial and thus points out that fuel conversion systems must ensure that emissions do not increase as a result of conversion; underlines that consumers should dispose of the necessary information in this respect and be aware that liability in a given conversion situation may not be clear, creating potential for confusion or dispute over which the manufacturer is responsible for repair;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of timely, easily understandable and transparent information to consumers; notes the relevance of the planned price comparison between alternative and conventional fuels; requests that this information be collected and processed by an open data platform; highlights the special role that smart infrastructure can play in this respect so as to guarantee remotely controlled recharging points while at the same time ensuring compliance to data protection standards;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of timely, easily understandable, available, accessible and transparent information to consumers; notes the relevance of the planned price comparison between alternative and conventional fuels which has been identified as a significant obstacle to adoption by consumers; requests that this information be collected and processed by an open data platform;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of accurate, timely, easily understandable and transparent information to consumers; notes in this respect the relevance of the planned price comparison as well as external costs between alternative and conventional fuels; requests that this information be collected and processed by an open data platform;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes that the consumers see real limitations in terms of long journeys, particularly in rural areas, and this creates a major barrier to success; notes that the high cost of transition in rural areas is a significant prohibitive factor in achieving deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and, therefore, must be taken into account as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure; stresses also the benefits of low-carbon innovations to the EU’s global competitive position and calls for the EU to become a global leader on decarbonisation whilst maintaining a technology neutral approach; urges the Member States and industry, furthermore, to demonstrate an enhanced level of ambition and to speed up its implementation, including by developing efficient, complete and coherent national policy frameworks;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Appreciates the coordination at EU level; encourages the Commission to assess in the course of 2018 whether interoperability of payment services can be best advanced by
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and the Member States to step up financial support for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure; stresses that a closer cooperation among all relevant stakeholders, especially the car industries and the Commission, should take place in order to achieve the decarbonisation goals; notes the relevance of priority- setting in the next MFF; calls on the Member States to acknowledge the positive effects of fiscal incentives, in order to assure the infrastructure for alternative fuels from the consumers perspective also.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and the Member States to step up financial support for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure; notes the relevance of priority-setting in the next MFF; calls on the Member States to acknowledge the positive effects of fiscal incentives for the market up-take of alternative fuel vehicles, as demonstrated by the practice in the Netherlands and Norway.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and the Member States to step up financial support for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and the Member States to phase-out direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels and step up financial support for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure; notes the relevance of priority-setting in the next MFF; calls on the Member States to a
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and the Member States to step up financial support for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure; notes the relevance of priority-setting in the next MFF; calls on the Member States to acknowledge the positive effects of fiscal incentives, grant schemes and public-private partnerships.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on Member States to invest more in the installation of publicly accessible recharging points for electric vehicles.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Asks all the Member States to cooperate more closely, particularly within the Sustainable Transport Forum, with a view to establishing and implementing ambitious national action plans and ensuring cross-border continuity.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Stresses that with the growing ambitions to decarbonise the transport sector, to ensure the continued movement and operation of vehicles across the Union, it is essential to focus on the quality of alternative fuels and conformity assessment systems for these fuels by introducing uniform requirements for all Member States of the Union.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure; stresses also the benefits of low-carbon innovations to the EU’s global competitive position and energy security; calls for the EU to become a global leader on decarbonisation; urges the Member States and industry, furthermore, to demonstrate an enhanced level of ambition and to speed up its implementation, including by developing efficient, complete and coherent national policy frameworks;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Supports a technologically neutral approach, with a particular focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions; states that the roll-out of digitally connected alternative fuel infrastructure should be regarded in conjunction with the actual number of alternative fuel vehicles.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Asks European vehicle manufacturers to bring more electric vehicles onto the market in order to raise their profile in the medium-to-long term, thus encouraging public and private investment in them.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to take into account the geographical difference of the electricity recharging infrastructure and support and stimulate Member States in investing in the infrastructure needed for the recharging of the vehicles.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Encourages the Commission to take advantage of the synergies between European transport, energy and digitalization policies for instance in relation to smart charging and Intelligent Transport Systems.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to provide for a harmonised consumer information strategy on the need to use alternative fuels, data on the recharging points in the Member States and the methods of payment.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and the Commission's willingness to take an integrated approach in this area; stresses also the benefits of low-carbon innovations to the EU’s global competitive position and calls for the EU to become a global leader on decarbonisation of the transport sector; urges the Member States and industry, furthermore, to demonstrate an enhanced level of ambition and to speed up its implementation, including by developing efficient, complete and coherent national policy frameworks;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure; stresses also the benefits of low-carbon innovations to the EU’s global competitive position and calls for the EU to become a global leader on decarbonisation; urges the Member States and industry, furthermore, to demonstrate an enhanced level of ambition and to speed up its implementation, including by developing efficient, complete and coherent national policy frameworks in order to ensure the necessary stability for investments from both public and private sources;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Finds it regrettable that certain Member States are not more ambitious and that their national policy frameworks are weak; calls on those Member States which are lagging furthest behind to accelerate the transition to a system of clean, low-emissions mobility and to step up the deployment of the interoperable recharging and refuelling infrastructure on which use of the new fuels depends;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reminds that in order to comply with the Paris Agreement objectives, greenhouse gas emissions from transport sector will need to be near zero by 2050; highlights therefore that the sustainability of the alternative-fuel based vehicles depends highly on the use of renewable energy sources;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Appreciates the technology neutral approach taken in the Action Plan which is crucial for the development of a market based alternative fuels infrastructure that includes different technologies and that can a guarantee choice for consumers;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Stresses the correlation between the availability of infrastructure for alternative fuels across the EU and the consumers' acceptance of new mobility systems; notes, for this reason, that it is important to deploy a sufficient coverage that can meet consumers needs;
source: 621.041
2018/06/12
ENVI
84 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of and further funding for sufficient alternative fuels infrastructure and fast and ultra-fast charging solutions along the TEN-T Core and Comprehensive networks, including in urban and rural areas, by further developing and implementing ambitious and coherent national policy frameworks; underlines that the availability and accessibility of private and public charging and refuelling infrastructures are crucial for increasing the consumer acceptance towards alternative fuels vehicles; believes that priority should be given to the most emission neutral solutions seen from a full vehicle life-cycle perspective;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of and further funding for sufficient alternative fuels infrastructure and fast and ultra-fast charging solutions along the TEN-T Core and Comprehensive networks, including in urban and rural areas, by further developing and implementing national policy frameworks; believes that priority should be given to the most emission neutral solutions seen from a full vehicle life-cycle perspective, taking account of the principle of energy neutrality;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of and further funding for sufficient alternative fuels infrastructure and fast and ultra-fast
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges Member States to
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of and further funding
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the Member States to give due regard to the principles enshrined in TEN-T Core and Comprehensive networks as wells as Common European transport policy when drafting their national policy frameworks.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges those Member States whose national strategic frameworks are predominantly concentrated on natural gas to reconsider this choice, which is at odds with the electromobility-oriented scenario that is emerging in Europe and which, ultimately, does not help to accelerate the reduction of emissions in the transport sector in the long run; calls on those Member States to redirect their national strategic frameworks towards electricity produced from renewable sources, synthetic methane from electricity, biogas and biomethane;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the importance of sustainable urban planning, shifting from private use to shared and public use of transport, and of investing in the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure in public transport services, in particular for the uptake of electric buses which represented only 10% of all new buses purchased in Europe in 2017;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for priority to be given to fast and ultra-fast charging solutions in rings, parking spaces and main streets in densely populated urban areas; believes that to this extent, the cooperation and coordination of local authorities, power distribution companies and private investors should be reinforced;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and highlights that further coordination at EU level is needed; notes, however, that this coordination should also extend to EU policy-making vis-à-vis major trade deals such as TTIP, CETA etc., which, by their very nature, will inevitably lead to a leap in road transport and a simultaneous leap in environmental damage;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls for the competent authorities to allow the distribution system operators to own, develop, manage or operate recharging points if the development of publicly accessible and private recharging points for electric vehicles is not deemed enough and if there is a risk of targets not being met;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Supports electrified roads that allow electric vehicles to charge as they drive; Calls for their wider development at least along the TEN-T Core and Comprehensive network roads; believes that electrified roads could be a solution to reduce the size of batteries, and consequently the price of new vehicles;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the level of ambition and the degree of fulfilment of national policy frameworks differ profoundly between Member States
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the level of ambition and the degree of fulfilment of national policy frameworks differ profoundly between Member States; in order to reach sustainable transport in the EU more integrated and transparent approach is needed. Notes that regular progress reporting would be beneficial to the attainment of the overall goal.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the level of ambition and the degree of fulfilment of national policy frameworks differ profoundly between Member States; stresses that these policy frameworks are essential for the purpose of attracting private partners to finance charging infrastructure;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the level of ambition and the degree of fulfilment of national policy frameworks differ profoundly between Member States, especially regarding the charging infrastructure of electric vehicles;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that Member States should be set concrete, binding and enforceable targets for the distribution network for alternative fuels that reflect both the actual and the planned market penetration of vehicles running on such fuels;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Regrets that fuels of fossil origin, such as natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas, are still considered as alternative fuels under Directive 2014/94/EU, thus undermining the Union's objective of decarbonising the transport sector by the mid-century;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and highlights that further coordination at EU level is needed to enable the EU to compete internationally with regard to knowledge, technology and market share;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to conduct a detailed analysis of the various national policy frameworks and to take account of successful national and regional measures in its recommendations to the other Member States;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to speed up the development of alternative fuels infrastructure in urban and suburban areas, where vehicles are used most of the time;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to come forward with sustainability criteria for hydrogen and synthetic fuels, based on lifecycle emissions that take into account the upstream emissions of electricity production required for all production processes and their impact on water demand and land use;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Encourages Member States to step up the provision of charging points for electric vehicles that are accessible to the public in urban and suburban areas;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Believes that the development of electric vehicle charging infrastructure should be encouraged as a matter of priority wherever air quality is poor and that information on measures taken or planned to encourage electro-mobility should be reported in the plans for air quality;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls for continuous investments in research and innovation in order to further combine renewable energy sources and sustainable modes of transport, with the aim to attain net zero- emission mobility by the mid-century;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive private charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric vehicles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve sufficient coverage. Notes that increased dissemination of information, namely that privates sectors' involvement is critical to achieving the outlined targets;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive private charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric vehicles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve sufficient coverage; emphasizes in this regard the need to install sufficient charging infrastructure in both new and existing buildings;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that electric vehicle owners most frequently charge their vehicles at home or at work. Underlines the need for comprehensive private charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric vehicles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve sufficient coverage;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive private charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and highlights that further coordination at EU level is needed
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive and interoperable private charging infrastructure without any subscription obligation allowing charging of electric vehicles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve sufficient coverage;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive private and shared public charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric vehicles and bicycles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve sufficient coverage;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need for comprehensive private charging infrastructure allowing charging of electric vehicles at home and in the workplace, taking into account the need for both public and private investments to achieve
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes with concern that in 2017 there were only 19 Battery Electric Vehicles and 25 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles available for purchase in Europe, compared to over 417 vehicle models available to European customers with petrol and diesel internal combustion engines1a. _________________ 1aAvailability and Affordability of ZEVs Interim Report, Element Energy, October 2017
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that the promotion of all- electric is incompatible with the technological neutrality that is expected and risks making Member States dangerously dependent upon China with regard to rare earths;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that, without an adequate distribution network, the use of alternative fuels cannot be increased; stresses the need for distribution obligations in order to reduce uncertainty about the extent of the infrastructure;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the need to impose quotas for charging stations to be installed in the specifications of motorway service stations, where the latter are granted to private operators;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on Commission for the development of a Regulation on roaming on alternative fuels infrastructure publicly accessible, at least in the TEN-T network;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes that the national plans, submitted to the Commission as part of the implementation of the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive, show that the current level of recharging points available in the Union is sufficient for the number of EVs on the road – based on the European Commission's recommendation of one recharging point for every 10 EVs.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Encourages the installation of 'on demand' charging points in public areas to allow access to charging for households without private car parks;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Notes too that national plans for rollout of public charging infrastructures by 2020 EU-wide are also expected to keep pace with the anticipated growth in the number of vehicles. There will also be sufficient fast chargers alongside the principal highway routes with at least one fast recharger every 40km.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Encourages the authorities to provide support to fully or partially meet the cost of installing charging stations in the car parks and garages of collective buildings;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses that from 2020 onwards there will need to be significant further investment, beyond existing plans, to match the number of EVs expected to be on the road. EU funding will be important particularly in less developed markets.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that more emphasis on smart charging solutions is needed;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that more emphasis on smart charging solutions is needed; notes that this can be achieved by ensuring that requirements in private and shared public charging infrastructure go further than the minimum provisions outlined in the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1 ;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that more emphasis on smart charging solutions is needed; notes that this can be achieved by ensuring that requirements in private and shared public charging infrastructure go further than the minimum provisions outlined in the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1 and meet international standards; _________________ 1 OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that more emphasis on smart charging solutions is needed; notes that this can be achieved by ensuring that requirements in private and shared public charging infrastructure go further than the minimum provisions outlined in the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1; _________________ 1 OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Given that it is not possible for all users to charge electric vehicles at home, it is necessary to come up with integrated solutions for residential and non- residential buildings and combine charging facilities with other existing infrastructure, such as lampposts;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that growth in the market for electric vehicles will increase demand for electricity on the grid, however according to the EEA, an 80% electrified fleet in 2050 results in, on average, only a 10% increase in electricity demand in the EU.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and highlights that further coordination at EU level
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes that in urban areas charging infrastructure should be made available for all types of vehicles, including for shared vehicles, electric vans, electric bikes and motorised two wheelers;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the provision of increased incentives for the development of shore-side electricity supply at both in-land and maritime ports
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. E
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the provision of increased incentives for the development of shore-side electricity supply at both in-land and maritime ports and emphasises the improvements to be gained from shore-side electricity in regards to CO2 emissions and improved air quality. Notes that complimentary national regulations will be needed to ensure that berthed ships are obliged to use any clean on-shore power available;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the provision of increased incentives for the development of shore-side electricity supply at both in-land and maritime ports in view of the advantages of river and maritime transport for the future and emphasises the improvements to be gained from shore- side electricity in regards to CO2 emissions and improved air quality;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages both the provision of increased financial support and the creation of policy-based incentives for the development of shore-side electricity supply at both in-land and maritime ports and emphasises the improvements to be gained from shore-side electricity in regards to CO2 emissions and improved air quality;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the provision of increased incentives for the development of shore-side electricity supply at both in-land and maritime ports and emphasises the
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that cruise ships use a heavy fuel that emits 3 500 times more fine particles than car diesel and that a study published in 2015 by the University of Rostock (Germany) found that emissions from shipping are responsible for approximately 60 000 premature deaths per year in the European Union;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets that the progress of deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard, taking into account all varieties of alternative fuels, including biogas produced from agricultural and industrial residues.
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of alternative fuels and to remove burdensome taxation on electricity used to generate alternative fuels, including power-to-gas as storage for intermittent renewable energies;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Encourages the provision of clean power supply at airports (for use in stationary airplanes as well as for mobile equipment at airports) in order to reduce kerosene consumption, improve air quality, reduce climate change impact and noise pollution;
Amendment 71 #
6a. Notes that one cruise ship with an auxiliary load of 4.6MW is likely to burn more than 700 litres of fuel per hour, exceeding the equivalent of 688 lorries running their engines.
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles, including binding sales targets for zero and low emission vehicles. Recognizes that the challenges associated with transition towards sustainable transport are created throughout the supply chain. Therefore, stresses the need for dialogue and concerted effort between all stakeholders.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles, including binding sales targets for zero and low emission vehicles; considers that this is necessary in order to create investment security for a domestic market for alternatively fuelled vehicles and accelerate the deployment of sufficient infrastructure.
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles, including b
Amendment 79 #
7.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) This roadmap should outline the common policy framework and common goals for all Member States, as the cooperation between Member States must be strengthened at regional and local levels.
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Hopes that for the post-2020 period the EU will adopt ambitious targets for the sale of zero and low emission vehicles on the basis of a binding mandate for manufacturers, so that a decisive impetus can be given to decarbonising transport in Europe, supporting the offer of these vehicles, whose sales rates are currently only marginal and which do not translate into net benefits for society as a whole;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Encourages Member States to increase the deployment of charging infrastructure for public transport, as well as stimulate the demand for alternatively fuelled bus systems and other electric public transport vehicles with priority given to the most emissions neutral systems seen from a full vehicle life-cycle perspective.
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges moderate use of palm oil so as to take into account environmental issues by excluding imports of palm oil from outside the European Union for the benefit of alternative fuels made in the EU from European raw materials;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Encourages local and regional public authorities to make greater use of existing co-financing possibilities for sustainable urban mobility under the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in order to complete the infrastructure for the charging and refuelling of vehicles with zero and low emissions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers it important that the objective should be zero-emission transport and the abandonment of fossil fuels by 2030;
source: 623.702
2018/06/15
TRAN
131 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the International Code of Safety for Ships using Gases and other Low flash point Fuels ( IGF Code), along with the proposed amendments to make the Code mandatory under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), addressing the challenges posed by the adoption of alternative fuels at regulatory level in the shipping sector and aiming at minimising the risk to the ships, their crew and the environment, having regard to the nature of the fuels involved;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas transport is the only major economic sector in the European Union where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have increased since 1990, in particular as a result of the desired increase in the trade in goods between the Member States of the Union; whereas it is responsible for 23 % of CO2 emissions, and this share is still growing; whereas road transport accounts for almost 75 % of all energy used in transport and causes almost 73 % of the transport sector’s greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 10 % and 90 % coming from industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, energy and fuel producers and other interested parties;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 10 % and 90 % coming from industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, energy and fuel producers, the managers of regular road passenger transport services and other interested parties; suggests that, by contributing to the fund, companies or consortia should be granted preferential access to grants and loans provided by the CEF, EIB and EC IPE; requests that financial resources from the fund should be awarded according to the criteria of feasibility, European added value, the achievement of deployment goals and cohesion policy; asks that the INEA, which already oversees the CEF, become the responsible agency;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 10 % and 90 % coming from industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, energy and fuel producers and other interested parties; suggests that, by contributing to the fund, companies or consortia should be granted preferential access to grants and loans provided by the CEF, EIB and EC IPE; requests that financial resources from the fund should be awarded according to the
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 10 % and 90 % coming from industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, energy and fuel producers and other interested parties; suggests that, by contributing to the fund, companies or consortia should be granted preferential access to grants and loans provided by the CEF, EIB and EC IPE; requests that financial resources from the fund should be awarded according to the criteria of feasibility, climate targets, European added value, the achievement of deployment goals and cohesion policy; asks that the INEA, which already oversees the CEF, become the responsible agency;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 1
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co-
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers it important that the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) can finance the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of alternative fuels, including land side electric charging of ships that cannot compete with energy generation by dirty combustion engines on board which is exempted from taxation and to remove burdensome taxation on electricity used to generate alternative fuels, including power- to-gas as storage for intermittent renewable energies; calls on the Commission to include such an exemption for ports in the Energy Taxation Directive;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas transport is the only major economic sector in the European Union where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have increased since 1990; whereas it is responsible for 23 % of CO2 emissions, and this share is still growing; whereas
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of alternative fuels
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on Member States to review
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on Member States to review their energy taxation frameworks in order to facilitate and incentivise the uptake of alternative fuels and to remove
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to support the decarbonisation of the maritime sector with a clear focus on innovation, digitization and adaptation of ports and ships; calls on the Commission, together with the Member States and their regions, to establish a common 'LNG blue corridors project for islands' in the maritime sector, in particular for the outermost regions, including TEN-T network ports, in order to establish the necessary LNG infrastructures, link this network to the TEN-T core network and adapt ships to cleaner fuels, in order to comply more closely with the NFPs;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses the importance of timely, easily understandable and transparent information to consumers; notes the relevance of the planned price comparison between alternative and conventional fuels; requests that this information be collected and processed by an open data platform;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard; recognises the need for policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards in 2025 and 2030 for new light and heavy-duty vehicles, including strong incentives such as a bonus-malus system for zero and low emission vehicles;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard; recognises the need for policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards in 2025 and 2030 for new light and heavy-duty vehicles, including sales targets for zero and low emission vehicles.
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard; recognizes at the same time that this requires greater public and, above all, private investment and calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide the necessary incentives;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) C a. whereas shipping accounts for over 80% of world trade by volume and 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to air pollution close to coastal areas and ports; taking into consideration its large contribution to the worldwide transport market, the gradual adoption of alternative fuels by shipping would have a significant positive effect on the environment
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard, taking into account all the various alternative fuels, such as biogas from agricultural and industrial residues;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that progress regarding the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the availability of alternatively powered vehicles is too slow, and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard, while urging the Member States to provide incentives for users of alternative-fuel vehicles;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Suggests that the aim of moving towards transport infrastructure that is based on alternative fuels paves the way for experimentation in industrial planning at EU level, with a view to helping the car industry and the other industries associated with it adjust more quickly to tackle the challenges posed by global competition;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Underlines the correlation between the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure across the European Union and the consumers' acceptance of low and zero-emissions vehicles; therefore, calls for an important roll-out of refuelling and recharging points that would stimulate consumers' demand for alternatively-powered vehicles;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Deplores that the lack of sufficient vision, planning and investment in alternative decarbonised and more sustainable mobility options by the European car industry during the last 30 years has lead to a cul-de-sac in terms of their development and rather than leading to a diversification of their industry;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the accelerating trend of the mass production of vehicles using alternative fuels will not only reduce the cost of these vehicles, but will also ensure much better amortisation of the costs of the infrastructure put in place for their use;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls for the deployment of multi- energy stations to be promoted so as to avoid the creation of multiple different networks for each type of power supply; stresses that the deployment of such stations will be both cheaper and more efficient;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Stresses that, as regards electricity, the improvement of battery performance should lead to the development of rapid- charging stations, and that it will therefore be advisable to avoid increasing the number of slow-charging stations, particularly in urban areas, where users will probably prefer to slow-charge at home;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative for a European Battery Alliance and strongly supports the establishment of European battery cell production focussing on next-generation technology; calls on the Commission to extend the initiative to other powertrains such as fuel cells
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative for a sustainable European Battery Alliance
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the projected increase in the movements and volume of goods transported by 2030 will have consequences for both climate and energy consumption, as well as an impact on infrastructure;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Stresses the importance of streamlining and exchanging best practices, especially with guidance from the Sustainable Transport Forum, which was established by the Commission and should be seen as the core coordination instrument for reporting on the progress made by the National Policy Frameworks;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines the importance of safeguarding the position of employees in the automotive industry in making the transition to sustainable use of alternative fuels;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, in order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, in order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to be fully decarbonised with zero net emissions by 2050 at the latest; whereas a shift to alternative fuels can help achieve this, although conventional fuels will still be needed for the foreseeable future, until such time as demand can be met in full by alternative fuels;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, in order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to be
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative fuels and powertrains is the best means to decarbonise the existing and future vehicle fleet; whereas the overall effect will be even greater when combined with increased vehicle efficiency, use of public transport and bikes, the development of shared mobility and improvements to the overall efficiency of transport systems through C-ITS systems and automation and digitalisation technology; whereas urban and spatial planning can support and complement the technological efforts and, at the same time, help with the deployment of charging infrastructures for alternative-fuel vehicles;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative fuels and powertrains is the best means to decarbonise the existing and future vehicle fleet; whereas the overall effect will be even greater when combined with increased vehicle efficiency, use of public transport and bikes, the development of shared mobility and improvements to the overall efficiency of transport systems through C-ITS systems and automation and digitalisation technology; whereas urban and spatial planning can support and complement the technological efforts; whereas the will to develop short supply chains is essential for dealing with the problem comprehensively;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative fuels and powertrains, taking into account the whole life cycle of vehicles, is the best means to decarbonise the existing and future vehicle fleet; whereas the overall effect will be even greater when combined with increased vehicle efficiency, use of public transport and bikes, the development of shared mobility and improvements to the
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative sustainable fuels and powertrains is the best means to decarbonise the existing and future vehicle fleet in a sustainable manner; whereas the overall effect will be even greater when combined with increased vehicle efficiency, use of public transport and bikes, the development of shared mobility and improvements to the overall efficiency of transport systems through C-ITS systems and automation and digitalisation technology; whereas urban and spatial planning can support and complement the technological efforts;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas switching to alternative fuels and powertrains is the
Amendment 23 #
E a. whereas decarbonisation of road transport via carbon-free alternative fuels will require different fuels for different vehicle segments, meaning that no solution should be excluded;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the price disadvantages of alternative-fuel vehicles compared to regular internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still one of the main barriers to customers’ purchasing decisions, together with the inadequate deployment of charging infrastructures for alternative- fuel vehicles throughout the EU; whereas, in this context, buyers’ premiums, tax exemptions and non-fiscal incentives have proven to accelerate market uptake and should reflect the GHG performance of different alternative fuels;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the lack of binding targets for the sale of cleaner vehicles by car dealerships and the price disadvantages of
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the price disadvantages of alternative-fuel vehicles compared to regular internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still one of the main barriers to customers’ purchasing decisions; whereas, in this context, buyers’ premiums, tax exemptions and non-fiscal incentives have proven to accelerate market uptake and should reflect the GHG and pollutant emissions performance of different alternative fuels;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the price disadvantages of alternative-fuel vehicles compared to regular internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still one of the main barriers to customers’ purchasing decisions; whereas, in this context, buyers’ premiums, tax exemptions and non-fiscal incentives have proven to accelerate market uptake and should reflect the GHG performance of different alternative fuels;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas a number of European cities exceed the air quality limits laid down in EU legislation owing to excessively high levels of pollution emitted by road traffic, and whereas the promotion of alternative fuels can make an equally important contribution in improving both the urban environment and people’s health;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas shifting towards alternative fuels and powertrains represents an opportunity for European industry rather
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas mobility is a basic need and the backbone of our societies and economies, and should be clean, reliable and affordable; whereas, in this context, clean technologies offer huge opportunities and benefits for society, having a significant impact on health and on the environment, as well as on the automotive industry, energy suppliers, utilities, and grid operators;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas shifting towards alternative fuels and powertrains represents an opportunity for European industry
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas shifting towards alternative fuels and powertrains represents an opportunity
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the recast of the
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the recast of the Directive on emission standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles will hopefully set ambitious reduction targets and incentivise low and zero- emission vehicles, whilst preserving a technology neutral approach, thus leading the way to a decarbonised European vehicle fleet, which will require the deployment of an adequate infrastructure network for alternative fuels;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the recast of the Directive on emission standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles will hopefully set ambitious reduction targets and incentivise low and zero- emission vehicles, thus leading the way to a
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas 94 % of Europe’s transport
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) I a. whereas lithium-ion cells, a key component of electric vehicles batteries, are nearly all made outside of the European Union, mainly in Asia;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J Amendment 38 #
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas according to Directive 2014/94/EU, alternative fuels still encompass fuels of fossil origin, thus contradicting the goal of decarbonisation and the phasing out of fossil fuels; whereas priority should be assigned to low and zero emission solutions over the entire life cycle of a vehicle;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas mobility is a basic need and the backbone of our societies and economies, and should be clean, reliable
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas according to Directive 2014/94/EU, alternative fuels still encompass fuels of fossil origin, thus contradicting the goal of decarbonisation
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas according to Directive 2014/94/EU, alternative fuels still encompass some fuels of fossil origin,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the energy and transport sectors need to be coupled more closely together in order to allow for deep decarbonisation in mobility; whereas two energy carriers – electricity and hydrogen – allow for zero-emission mobility while integrating renewable energy sources (RES); whereas with the energy sector progressively shifting towards using RES only, storage for excess energy in periods of low demand has to be provided; whereas Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and Fuel
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the energy and transport sectors need to be coupled more closely together in order to allow for deep decarbonisation in mobility; whereas
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas smart, robust electricity grids, the better integration of power and gas grids via power-to-gas, access to the grid for charging service providers and private charging points and the roll-out of Hydrogen Refuelling Stations are key to electromobility; whereas with BEV and FCEV smart and controlled charging can help balance grids, but there is still a lack of regulatory, tax and technical frameworks;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the TEN-T networks constitute the main transport networks in the European Union; whereas focussing on deploying alternative fuels infrastructure and pursuing the goal established in the communication to provide full coverage of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) core network corridors with charging points by 2025 should be a key priority; whereas this target should be complemented by also taking into account urban and rural areas, where customers'experience shows that the potential for the uptake of clean vehicles is higher; whereas conveying funds to projects that, although not yet financially viable, show thinner market gaps, represents an efficient way of using public funds to allow increased financial sustainability of the charging infrastructure business, allowing for a faster decarbonisationof the transport sector;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the TEN-T networks constitute the main transport networks in the European Union; whereas focussing on deploying alternative fuels infrastructure and pursuing the goal established in the communication to provide full coverage of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) core network corridors with charging points by 2025 should be a key priority; whereas this target should be complemented by also taking into account urban and rural areas; whereas, at the same time, particular consideration must be given to conditions in rural areas, where the deployment of such infrastructure can often be difficult for structural and economic reasons;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the TEN-T networks constitute the main transport networks in the European Union; whereas focussing on deploying alternative fuels infrastructure
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the TEN-T networks constitute the main transport networks in the European Union; whereas focussing on deploying alternative fuels infrastructure and pursuing the goal established in the communication to provide full coverage of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) core network corridors with charging points by 2025 should be a key priority; whereas this target should be complemented by also taking into account the private context and urban and rural areas;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the TEN-T networks constitute the main transport networks in the European Union; whereas focussing on deploying alternative fuels infrastructure and pursuing the goal established in the communication to provide full coverage of all the trans-European transport network
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas mobility is a basic need and the backbone of our societies and
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas because road passenger transport serves areas that are more sparsely populated and less easy to access, it has a public service function, and is therefore a key part of the infrastructure and modernisation of each and every Member State;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the projected increase in journeys and in the volumes transported up to 2030 to be taken into account in order to calculate the scale and appropriately equip the new infrastructure; stresses the importance of the technological advances that are already under way or in the pipeline in the fields of batteries, hydrogen and energy storage, and stresses the need to take account of these advances in the strategic choices that are to be made; notes that new infrastructure must be adaptable to changes, both in terms of volumes and in terms of technologies; stresses, for example, that a massive increase in the number of electric vehicles coupled with an increase in the range of those vehicles to 400 km will have an impact on the deployment density of the network of charging stations, as well as on the type of charging required;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the Action Plan on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure and highlights that further coordination at EU level is needed; urges the Member States and industry to demonstrate an enhanced level of ambition and to speed up its implementation;
Amendment 53 #
2. Calls, however, on the Commission to bring forward a revision of Directive 2014/94/EU within the shortest possible timeframe in order to fill the gaps in alternative fuels infrastructure throughout the European Union, while maintaining the current definition of alternative fuels as listed in Article 2 of the Directive 2014/94/EU, in order to provide a stable and consistent legislative framework for investments;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls, however, on the Commission to
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that, with around 95% of road vehicles still conventionally fuelled, including renewable biofuels blends, the number of vehicles and vessels running on alternative energies in the EU is too low; highlights that persistent problems, notably a lack of infrastructure for recharging and refuelling vehicles and vessels, insufficient smart grid development and difficulties for consumers to easily use the infrastructure, continue to create market barriers to the use of vehicles and vessels running on alternative energies; underlines that for the EU to successfully make the transition to low and zero emission mobility, an integrated approach, which requires a common policy framework for vehicles, infrastructures, electricity grids, economic incentives and digital services working across EU, national, regional and local levels, is needed;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to replace NFPs with mandatory objectives such as those put forward in the 2013 proposal, while also taking into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, as well as the goal of having a trans- European infrastructure network for all alternative fuels; emphasises the potential for symbiosis between the public and private sectors in bringing about a shift towards that infrastructure, and suggests that cooperation contracts or agreements should be facilitated for the construction of such infrastructure among public authorities, the energy industry, the car industry and large-scale retail management, hotels, airports, ports, railway stations, urban and suburban transport networks, sports stadiums, cultural venues, major hospitals and major supermarkets;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to replace NFPs with mandatory objectives such as those put forward in the 2013 proposal, while also taking into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, as well as the goal of having a trans- European infrastructure network for all alternative fuels; points out that the infrastructure shall be equipped with the necessary technical and communication devices to manage the charging process, enabling effective and efficient charging and all the environmental and socio- economic benefits that it entails;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the decarbonisation of transport will strengthen Europe’s energy security and independence vis-à-vis imported energy and fossil fuels, and will therefore require a swift and substantial change in the type of energy, fuels and powertrains used, as well as an increase in energy efficiency, by deploying the most efficient technologies, making the transition to multimodal transport and changing mobility behaviour;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to replace NFPs with m
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to replace NFPs with mandatory objectives such as those put forward in the 2013 proposal, while also taking into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, as well as the goal of having an evenly distributed trans-
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the Commission’s evaluation of the National Framework Plans (NFPs) reveals differing levels of effort and ambition between Member States and that the deployment of alternative fuels is falling short; calls therefore on the Commission to replace NFPs with mandatory objectives such as those put forward in the 2013 proposal, while also taking into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, as well as the goal of having a compatible trans-
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to review Directive 1999/94/EC on consumer information on cars; takes the view that such a review should aim to substantially improve the information consumers receive about fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and pollutant emissions, and to make it possible to compare the efficiency of and emissions from traditional and alternative fuel technologies for transport under real-life conditions;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on Member States to support policies that stimulate the offer of alternatively fuelled light and heavy-duty vehicles, such as ambitious emissions standards to be reached by 2025 and 2030 for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles, including binding sales targets for zero and low emission vehicles;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the decarbonisation of transport will improve air quality and strengthen Europe’s energy security and independence vis-à-vis imported energy and fossil fuels, and will therefore require a swift and substantial
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. calls on the Commission, Member States and the industry to restrict their expectations for the success of the ongoing research and development of second generation batteries, as the dependence on the outcome is mounting, but at the same time, the final outcome and timing is still uncertain and a more realistic approach is needed;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and broadening of the Directive’s scope to shift it from deployment along the TEN-T core network to also covering the TEN-T comprehensive urban and regional nodes and the infrastructure for public fleets; recognises that with expected market uptake of Zero Emission vehicles this is needed before 2025 for the core network and by 2030 latest for the comprehensive network;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and a broadening of the
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and broadening of the Directive’s scope to shift it from deployment along the TEN-T network to also covering urban and regional nodes and the infrastructure for public fleets; calls on the Commission to extend the CEF's scope in this regard and increase its funding;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and broadening of the Directive’s scope to shift it from deployment along the TEN-T network to also covering urban and regional nodes and the infrastructure for public fleets so as to attain the widest possible geographical coverage;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and broadening of the Directive’s scope to shift it from deployment along the TEN-T network to also covering urban and regional nodes and the infrastructure for public fleets and heavy goods vehicles;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to conduct a detailed analysis of the various national policy frameworks and to take account of successful national and regional measures in its recommendations to the other Member States;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on all Member States to develop their national policy frameworks; stresses that these frameworks are essential for the purpose of attracting private partners to finance charging infrastructure projects;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the decarbonisation of transport will strengthen Europe’s energy security and independence vis-à-vis imported energy and fossil fuels, and will therefore require a swift and substantial change in the type of energy, fuels and powertrains used, as well as an increase in energy efficiency, by deploying the most efficient and advanced technologies and changing mobility behaviour;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to adopt a technology neutral approach in deploying an alternative energy infrastructure, so as not to hamper progress in this field and to create a level playing field between
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels,
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels,
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels, thus
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to create an energy-neutral level playing field between the different alternative fuels, thus making hydrogen infrastructure mandatory with deployment requirements equal to those for CNG, but adjusting these deployment requirements in accordance with their contribution to decarbonisation;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. calls on the Commission to complement the climate related goals of Directive 2014/94/EC with additional clean air measures following the fitness check of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives1a; _________________ 1a 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Draws attention to the importance of sustainable public procurement of alternatively powered vehicles as a driver of demand for alternative fuels and alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to consider the entire range of alternative fuels solutions and to take into account their affordability in the process of decarbonisation of the transport sector;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the Commission’s effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million as start-up financing to support the uptake of alternative fuels infrastructure which should be focused on supporting especially public transport and its need for alternative fuel infrastructure, as well as revised maintenance workshops and procedures; doubts, however, that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 20253 ; _________________ 3 COM(2017)0652.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the decarbonisation of transport
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the Commission’s effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million as start-up financing to support the uptake of alternative fuels infrastructure; doubts, however, that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 20253 ;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the Commission’s effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million as start-up financing to support the uptake of alternative fuels infrastructure; doubts, however, that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 20253;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the Commission’s effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million as start-up financing to support the uptake of alternative fuels infrastructure; doubts, however, that the leverage will be sufficient given the projected need for EUR 5.2 billion up to 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion of overall investment up to 20253; recalls, in this connection, the importance of easy access to refuelling and recharging points; _________________ 3 COM(2017)0652.
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of and further funding for sufficient alternative fuels infrastructure and fast and ultra-fast charging solutions along the TEN-T core and comprehensive networks, including in urban and rural areas, by further developing and implementing national policy frameworks; believes that priority should be given to the most emission neutral solutions seen from a full vehicle lifecycle perspective;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines the importance of sustainable urban planning, shifting from private use to shared and public use of transport and calling on the Commission and Member States to particularly turn their attention to the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure for collective and public transport services, such as buses, trams, trains, shared cars, taxis, minivans, as well as for bicycles, scooters and motorcycles;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Suggests that EFSI 2 should be used as much as possible in support of the initial deployment of alternative fuel infrastructure; stresses that the use of this financing mechanism is particularly appropriate for this type of infrastructure, which will bring a return on investment as soon as the increase in the use of alternative fuels makes it possible to reach a certain volume of production;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Recalls that financing alternative fuels infrastructure is not only a task for public authorities but also for the industry which has an interest in the uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Suggests
source: 623.725
2018/06/19
ITRE
51 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas Member States have adopted their national policy frameworks, which were assessed by the Commission in its recent communication COM(2017)0652, noting that only 8 out of 25 Member States fully meet the NPF requirements set out in Directive 2014/94/EU, and that 2 Member States failed to submit their NPF by 16 November 2016 as provided for in article 3 of Directive2014/94/EU;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that although currently more than 65 % of battery electric vehicles and plug-
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that a
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that although more than 65 % of battery electric vehicles and plug- in hybrid electric vehicles are produced outside the Union and new mobility will lead to a shift in skills, it is crucial to ensure the momentum to boost our industry and create new clean energy jobs in Europe as well as to reduce the CO2 emissions in the Transport sector; calls on the Member States to accelerate the uptake of research related to electro-mobility by making full use of EU funds; calls, therefore, for adequate and ambitious EU funding under the next multiannual financial framework to address potential gaps;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that although more than 65 % of battery electric vehicles and plug- in hybrid electric vehicles are produced outside the Union and new mobility will lead to a shift in skills, it is crucial to ensure the momentum to boost our industry and create new jobs in Europe; calls on the Member States to accelerate the uptake of research related to sustainable electro- mobility by making full use of EU funds; calls, therefore, for adequate and ambitious EU funding under the next multiannual financial framework at national, regional and local level to address potential funding gaps;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that although more than 65 % of battery electric vehicles and plug- in hybrid electric vehicles are produced outside the Union and new mobility will lead to a shift in skills, it is crucial to ensure the momentum to boost our industry and create new quality jobs in Europe; calls on the Member States to accelerate the uptake of research related to electro- mobility by making full use of EU funds; calls, therefore, for adequate and ambitious EU funding under the next multiannual financial framework to address potential
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the aforementioned Commission communication on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, notes, however, that the National Framework Plans (NFPs) do not add up to a sufficient deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure for the projected uptake of alternative-fuel mobility by 2025; therefore calls upon the Commission to require Member States to include in their NPFs mandatory minimum targets, while also taking into account the projected and realised uptake of alternative-fuel vehicles and their technological progress, as well as with a view to realising a trans-European infrastructure network for alternative fuels;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that electrification is a necessary step in decarbonising the EU’s transport sector and meeting Europe’s climate goals. Stresses the importance of focusing on combining the most effective measures available in order to meet the EU targets, as several low-emission options are available, such as electricity, advanced biofuels, hydrogen and LNG.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the availability and accessibility of private and public charging and refuelling infrastructures are crucial for increasing the consumer acceptance towards all alternative fuels vehicles; believes that priority should be given to the most emission neutral solutions seen from a full vehicle life- cycle perspective;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on all stakeholders to carefully promote electric vehicles, considering the availability and the production circumstances of critical battery construction materials, such as cobalt and lithium.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas in order to be consistent with the objectives of sustainability, batteries should be produced with the minimum environmental impact inside and outside the Union, especially regarding the process of extraction of raw materials used for the building of the batteries.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Urges the EU to decarbonise the transport sector and to meet its targets of a 14 % share of renewable energy in transport by 2030 through the development of sustainability criteria for fuels, based on life-cycle emissions that take into account i.e. the impact of production, as well as the upstream emissions from electricity and manufacturing processes and their impacts on water demand, land use, the environment and the wider community. Additionally, calls on the Commission to come forward with ambitious collection and recycling targets for automotive and industrial batteries and strengthen collection and recycling systems during the upcoming revision of Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators. This is to ensure that the value of critical raw materials used in automotive and industrial batteries is kept within the economy, in line with the circular economy principles. The Commission should also come forward with a ‘Green batteries’ label for automotive and industrial batteries with 100% renewable energy based production that possess high power and high energy density, fast charging rates, low environmental impact and high recyclability.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines that the Commission's evaluation sees an additional investment need of EUR 5.2 billion by 2020 and an additional EUR 16-22 billion by 2025; welcomes the Commission's effort to provide an additional EUR 800 million through European funding; highlights, however, that additional support instruments at Union and Member State level are needed to mobilise appropriate public and private investment;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines that Europe has the potential to become a forerunner in clean transport and lead this global shift. Notes that the clean energy transition offers plenty of new growth opportunities for the industry and strengthens the energy security of Europe;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines the importance of maintaining the technology neutral approach;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to address the projected investment shortfall; calls for the fund to be co-financed between the public and private sector with the European Union and Member States contributing 10% and industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, energy produces, charging point operators and other interested partners contributing 90% of the total size of the fund; recommends that contributing parties shall have preferential access to financing provided through CEF, the EIB and the EC IPE;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses the importance of global and European climate targets; calls for policy frameworks that are technology- neutral.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Underlines that although more than 65 % of battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are produced outside the Union and new mobility will lead to a shift in skills, it is crucial to ensure the momentum to boost our industry and create new jobs in Europe; notes that it is crucial to boost our battery industry by creating sustainable battery cell manufacturing in Europe and ensure a full EU-based value chain; calls on the Member States to accelerate the uptake of research related to electro-mobility by making full use of EU funds; calls, therefore, for adequate and ambitious EU funding under the next multiannual financial framework to address potential gaps; notes that EU funding should be allocated through existing financial instruments.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Notes with concern that the level of ambition of Member States differs greatly; urges Member States to ensure the rapid deployment of sufficient alternative fuels infrastructure, especially along TEN-T Core and Comprehensive networks and urban areas at the first stage; calls upon Member States to develop and adjust their national policy frameworks to this end and scale up implementation efforts where goals are sufficiently ambitious;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure the stability of local grids and to mitigate a future energy consumption peak and thus a de facto potential increase in energy prices; stresses, therefore, the crucial need to develop and invest in smart charging technologies, including smart grids; feels, furthermore, that targeted subsidies should be allocated to the development of alternative fuels and of transport, filling and loading infrastructure; underlines that although smart charging will go hand in hand with self-
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the transport sector is Europe’s main source of carbon emissions and the only sector in which emissions are still rising;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure the stability of local grids and to mitigate a future energy consumption peak and thus a de facto potential increase in energy prices; stresses, therefore, the crucial need to develop and invest in smart charging technologies, including smart grids; underlines that although smart charging will go hand in hand with self- consumption and active consumers, security of supply is essential and smart charging technologies can contribute to a successful energy transition;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure better cross border flows of electricity and thereby improve the stability of local grids and to mitigate a future energy consumption peak and thus a de facto potential increase in energy prices; stresses, therefore, the crucial need to develop and invest in smart charging technologies, including smart grids; underlines that although smart charging will go hand in hand with self-
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure the stability of local grids and to mitigate a future energy consumption peak and thus a de facto potential increase in energy prices; stresses, therefore, the crucial need to develop and invest in smart charging technologies, including smart grids, but also with sufficient capacities; underlines that although smart charging will go hand in hand with self-
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure the stability of local grids and to mitigate a future energy consumption peak and thus a de facto potential increase in energy prices; stresses, therefore, the crucial need to develop and invest in smart charging technologies, including smart grids; underlines that although smart charging should respect sustainable criteria and will go hand in hand with self- consumption and active consumers, security of supply is essential;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on transmission system operators and distribution system operators to ensure the stability of local grids and to mitigate
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of ensuring fair access
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of ensuring fair access for electricity providers to recharging points in order to avoid a monopoly situation; calls on the Commission to promote open access for all relevant actors, including local authorities, municipal enterprises to the market to ensure that consumers have a free choice of energy suppliers
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of ensuring fair access for electricity providers to recharging points in order to avoid a monopoly situation; calls on the Commission to promote open access for all relevant actors to the market to ensure that consumers have a free choice of energy suppliers and energy sources; stresses that Member States should be encouraged to adopt those transport planning solutions that are the least damaging to the environment;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of public supervision for ensuring
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of ensuring fair access for electricity providers to recharging points in order to avoid a monopoly situation; calls on the Commission to promote open access for all relevant actors to the market and to encourage initiatives for the deployment of recharging points to ensure that consumers have a free choice of energy suppliers and energy sources;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the decarbonisation of transport in the EU should follow the principle of technological neutrality, thus ensuring a level playing field for the various low emission technologies for clean mobility and encouraging a competitive environment and further innovation in this area;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of ensuring fair access for electricity providers to recharging points in order to avoid a monopoly situation; calls on the Commission to promote open access for all relevant actors, including actors from other Member States, to the market to ensure that consumers have a free choice of energy suppliers and energy sources;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the solutions for the infrastructure should be market-based. The distribution station network of different fuels and the recharging points accessible to the public required for electric vehicles must be mainly built on market terms.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the importance of sustainable urban planning, shifting from private use to shared and public use of transport, and of investing in the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure in public transport services;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that urban areas and TEN-T network should be a priority for the infrastructure for alternative fuels.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that although digital opportunities will arise from further developments in electro-mobility such as smart grids, e-payment or connectivity with other associated services, new challenges will result from smart charging and data exchange
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages close cooperation between public authorities, the private sector and national promotional banks in projects related to the build-up of alternative fuel infrastructure with particular attention to TEN-T projects in non-urban areas where additional efforts are needed to stimulate private investment;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the importance of maintaining a harmoni
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets that fuels of fossil origin, such as natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas, are still considered as alternative fuels under Directive 2014/94/EU, thus undermining the Union’s objective of decarbonising the transport sector by the mid-century; Calls on the Commission to come forward with sustainability criteria for hydrogen and synthetic fuels, based on lifecycle emissions that take into account the upstream emissions of electricity production required for all production processes and their impact on water demand and land use;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls the European Commission to review the definition of alternative fuels. It is scientifically proven that, due to methane emissions, some alternative fuels, such as natural gas and biogas, have little or no environmental benefits and therefore do not represent a sustainable solution in a medium and long-term perspective. Therefore, natural gas and biogas, shall not be considered as clean fuels.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages partnerships between the public and private sectors to capitalize on the potential of the transport sector, especially the core network corridors of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T), focusing on better cross-border interconnectivity and creating a interoperable basic infrastructure in the EU by 2025;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas further coordination at EU level is needed in order to ensure the deployment of an adequate infrastructure network for alternative fuels in view of the full decarbonisation of the transport sector by 2050;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets that progress regarding the availability of alternatively powered vehicles, in particular busses, is slow and calls on manufacturers to step up efforts in this regard;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. In order to be consistent with the objectives of sustainability, batteries should be produced with the minimum environmental impacts inside and outside the Union, especially regarding the process of extraction of material used for the building of the batteries. The greenhouse gas emissions during all the production process should be taking into account. The Commission should come forward, in line with the revision of Directive 2006/66/EC, with ambitious objectives of recyclability of batteries.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas major European automakers have recently pledged to bring a greater number of battery-electric vehicles into the market by 2020 15;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas the objectives and the implementation of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles varies significantly from one Member State to another;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas the majority of Member States have not set targets for CNG vehicles;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital A f (new) Af. whereas the deployment of refuelling infrastructure for hydrogen- powered fuel cell electric vehicles is optional under Directive 2014/94/EU;
source: 623.804
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE621.006New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-621006_EN.html |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE619.168&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-619168_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.725New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-623725_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.172&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-622172_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.875&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-620875_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181025&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-10-25-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0297&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0297_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0438New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0438_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/12191New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-02-08T00:00:00New
2018-09-24T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/date |
Old
2018-10-09T00:00:00New
2018-10-22T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/2/date |
2018-03-09T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/shadows/1 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052New
Rules of Procedure EP 52 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|