Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | HETMAN Krzysztof ( PPE) | PICULA Tonino ( S&D), FLACK John ( ECR), MIHAYLOVA Iskra ( ALDE), ROPĖ Bronis ( Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | ZAGORAKIS Theodoros ( PPE) | Nikolaos CHOUNTIS ( GUE/NGL), Morten MESSERSCHMIDT ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 594 votes to 58, with 35 abstentions, a resolution entitled ‘Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions’.
Internal border regions of the European Union represent as much as 40% of its territory and are home to 150 million of Europeans. They also generate a quarter of Europe’s GDP. Despite these facts, the border regions are facing persistent obstacles, which hamper their growth and development and, as a result, they perform worse economically than regions situated deeper within the Member States.
Members welcomed the document presented by the Commission as a valuable insight into the current challenges. They stressed the importance of applying and disseminating best practices and success stories and carrying out a similar analysis with regard to the Union's external border regions.
Targeting the persistent obstacles : the problems and challenges faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region, Parliament encouraged tailor-made, integrated and place-based approaches , such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD).
The Commission and the Member States were invited to:
maximise their efforts and step up cooperation to remove barriers to access to public services and to promote and establish the use of egovernment , especially when related to health services, transport, construction of vital physical infrastructure, education, culture, sport, communications, labour mobility, the environment, as well as regulation, cross-border commerce and business development; step up efforts to overcome obstacles related to the recognition of diplomas and qualifications obtained after retraining, health care, transport and access to information on job vacancies and on social security and tax systems by strengthening skills; allocate more funds and sufficient flexibility for regional and local authorities in border regions to better coordinate neighbouring national legal and administrative systems in order to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers; promote convergence by better aligning relevant legal provisions on the adoption and enforcement of labour and commercial law , as well as on taxation, procurement and social protection systems, according to the difficulties posed by cross-border areas; one-stop shops could enable employees and enterprises to meet their obligations and fully exercise their rights; take better account of the difficulties of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by examining the possibility of providing them with additional support; dedicate an adequate budget to the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) axis, to be dedicated to filling the missing links in sustainable transport infrastructure in border regions; improve access to health care services on both sides of borders so as to allow full use of health care facilities and cross-border intervention by emergency and rescue services; improve cooperation and coordination in internal water management to avoid natural disasters such as floods.
Enhancing cooperation and trust : Parliament called for more coordination and dialogue, more effective exchange of information and more exchange of best practice between authorities, especially at local and regional level. It urged the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation and provide funding for cooperation structures in order to ensure adequate functional and financial autonomy of respective local and regional authorities.
The resolution stressed the importance of:
introducing the teaching of the languages of neighbouring countries into the curriculum from primary school onwards and to encourage the adoption of a multilingual approach at all administrative levels; facilitating mutual recognition of qualifications, diplomas, training and professional qualifications from neighbouring regions; adopting measures to combat all forms of discrimination within border regions and remove obstacles to the employment of vulnerable persons and their integration into society; creating electronic portals for cross-border business initiatives; using Interreg programmes and promote the exchange of best practice between local and regional authorities in border areas in the framework of refugee integration; ensuring effective cooperation in the field of cross-border provision of emergency services , such as healthcare, policing and fire services; exploring the possibilities of enhancing cooperation and overcoming barriers to regional development at the external borders with neighbouring regions, in particular, with regions of those countries preparing for EU accession taking account - by making aid available to them - of the EU regions most affected by the consequences of Brexit .
Exploiting EU tools for better coherence : Members welcomed the contribution of European territorial cooperation programmes to removing obstacles at borders, but believed that significant improvements can still be made in this area. They therefore strongly supported the continuation of European territorial cooperation and the increase of the budget allocated to it in the next programming period (2021-2027).
At the same time, the report stressed the need to simplify programmes and to better exploit the potential offered by the EU’s macro-regional strategies.
Lastly, Members welcomed the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the creation of a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Krzysztof HETMAN (EPP, PL) entitled ‘Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions’.
Internal border regions of the European Union represent as much as 40% of its territory and are home to 150 million of Europeans. They also generate a quarter of Europe’s GDP. Despite these facts, the border regions are facing persistent obstacles, which hamper their growth and development and, as a result, they perform worse economically than regions situated deeper within the Member States.
Members welcomed the document presented by the Commission as a valuable insight into the challenges and obstacles faced by the internal EU border regions and appreciate the proposed solutions. They stressed the importance of applying and disseminating best practices and success stories and carrying out a similar analysis with regard to the Union's external border regions.
Targeting the persistent obstacles : while arguing for a tailor-made approach for each border region, Members acknowledged the shared development potential of cross-border regions in general. They encouraged tailor-made, integrated and place-based approaches , such as Community-Led Local Development (CLLD).
The Commission and the Member States were invited to:
maximise their efforts and step up cooperation to remove barriers to access to public services and to promote and establish the use of egovernment, especially when related to health services, transport, construction of vital physical infrastructure, education, culture, sport, communications, labour mobility, the environment, as well as regulation, cross-border commerce and business development; step up efforts to strengthen skills and allow for greater powers, funds and sufficient flexibility for regional and local authorities in border regions to better coordinate neighbouring national legal and administrative systems in order to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers; better align relevant legal provisions on the adoption and enforcement of labour and commercial law , as well as on taxation, procurement and social protection systems, according to the difficulties posed by cross-border areas; one-stop shops could enable employees and enterprises to meet their obligations and fully exercise their rights; take better account of the difficulties of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by examining the possibility of providing them with additional support; dedicate an adequate budget to the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) axis, to be dedicated to filling the missing links in sustainable transport infrastructure in border regions; improve access to health care services on both sides of borders so as to allow full use of health care facilities and cross-border intervention by emergency and rescue services; improve cooperation and coordination in internal water management to avoid natural disasters such as floods.
Enhancing cooperation and trust : Members called for more coordination and dialogue, more effective exchange of information and more exchange of best practice between authorities, especially at local and regional level. They urged the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation and provide funding for cooperation structures in order to ensure adequate functional and financial autonomy of respective local and regional authorities.
The report stressed the importance of:
encouraging the adoption of a multilingual approach at all administrative levels; facilitating mutual recognition of qualifications, diplomas, training and professional qualifications from neighbouring regions; adopting measures to combat all forms of discrimination within border regions and remove obstacles to the employment of vulnerable persons and their integration into society; creating electronic portals for cross-border business initiatives; using Interreg programmes and promote the exchange of best practice between local and regional authorities in border areas in the framework of refugee integration; ensuring effective cooperation in the field of cross-border provision of emergency services, such as healthcare, policing and fire services; taking account - by making aid available to them - of the EU regions most affected by the consequences of Brexit.
Exploiting EU tools for better coherence : Members welcomed the contribution of European territorial cooperation programmes to removing obstacles at borders, but believed that significant improvements can still be made in this area. They therefore strongly supported the continuation of European territorial cooperation and the increase of the budget allocated to it in the next programming period (2021-2027).
At the same time, the report stressed the need to simplify programmes , to ensure that European territorial cooperation is more consistent with the European Union's overall objectives and to increase the flexibility of the programmes.
Lastly, Members welcomed the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the creation of a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context.
PURPOSE: to propose measures and issue recommendations that make it easier for internal land border regions to cooperate, contribute to reducing hurdles and help border citizens and businesses use the full potential of these regions.
BACKGROUND: EU internal border regions contribute significantly to the socio-economic wealth of Europe. They are geographic areas where European integration processes are experienced in everyday life by individuals, businesses and public authorities.
The European Union (EU) and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) count 40 internal land borders. The EU's internal border regions cover 40% of the Union's territory , represent 30% of the population (150 million people), produce 30% of the Union's GDP and see nearly 2 million commuters pass through, including 1.3 million cross-border workers who represent 0.6% of the Union's working population as a whole.
Since 1990, Interreg funding has supported cross-border cooperation programmes along EU border regions including those with EFTA countries. Interreg has made a genuine difference to border regions and has contributed to their transformation. This work continues today, with just under EUR 6 billion from the EU budget earmarked for the Interreg 2014-2020 cross-border programmes.
However, evidence gathered by the Commission demonstrates that border regions generally perform less well economically than other regions within a Member State . Access to public services such as hospitals and universities is generally lower in border regions. Navigating between different administrative and legal systems is often still complex and costly.
The Commission considers it necessary to act at EU level , in cooperation with Member States, regions and other stakeholders to better exploit the potential of border regions. It suggests that the resolution of border problems be placed at the heart of cross-border cooperation programmes in the future.
A recent study on the economic impact of border obstacles on GDP and employment levels in internal land border regions suggests if only 20% of the existing obstacles were removed, border regions would still gain 2% in GDP. The estimated impact on jobs is equally important, with potential for over 1 million jobs.
CONTENT: this Communication highlights ways in which the EU and its Member States can reduce the complexity, length and costs of cross-border interaction and promote the pooling of services along internal borders.
The Commission advocates the implementation of 10 measures which will be facilitated by the creation of a " border focal point " within the Commission whose role will include ensuring that future key actions by the Commission take into account cross-border regional aspects and share experiences and good practices with stakeholders.
Deepening cooperation and exchanges : the Commission urges Member States and regions to establish a regular dialogue on border issues. It will set up an EU-wide professional online network where legal and administrative border issues and solutions can be presented and discussed between border stakeholders. Improving the legislative process : in its Better Regulation package adopted in 2015, the Commission proposed measures to ensure that territorial aspects are factored into policy options. Enabling cross-border public administration : the Commission will urge its ongoing and future e-government projects to engage border stakeholders in order to deliver cross-border public services that meet the needs of individuals and businesses. Providing reliable and understandable information and assistance : it is essential to have access to reliable and available information and problem-solving services on the living or working on the other side of the border. Once adopted, the proposed Regulation on the establishment of a "single digital gateway" shall contribute to this. Supporting cross-border employment : the positive effects of tools such as the European network of employment services (EURES), the rules on the coordination of social security systems, the EU Employment and Social Innovation Programme (EaSI) and the European Social Fund have not reached their full potential in border regions. Member States and regional authorities shall strengthen cooperation between public employment services in border regions. Promoting border multi-lingualism : Member States, regions and municipalities are urged to use life-long learning opportunities to step up efforts to promote bilingualism in border regions. Facilitating cross-border accessibility : lacking, insufficient or low-quality public transport services are still a reality for many citizens in border regions. A Commission study of missing rail links along internal borders will be available in 2018. Member States, regions and municipalities are therefore urged to step up their efforts to provide individuals with better quality, more integrated public transport services. Promoting greater pooling of health care facilities : a comprehensive mapping of cross-border health cooperation across the EU by the Commission will identify good practices and analyse future challenges. The communication mentions in this context the institutionalised agreement establishing seven organised cross-border health care zones on the Franco-Belgian border has been used by more than 20 000 patients who have received health care closer to their residence in the neighbouring country. Considering the legal and financial framework for cross-border cooperation : a number of Member States are considering the merits of a new instrument that would allow, on a voluntary basis and in agreement with the competent authorities, the regulation of a Member State to apply in the neighbouring Member State for a specific project or action of limited duration implemented in a border region at the initiative of local and/or regional authorities. A dialogue should start on how future funding programmes could contribute to solving cross-border problems. Demonstrate cross-border interaction to inform decision-making : Member States, under the coordination of the Statistical Office of the European Union, shall seek innovative methods of data collection that lend themselves to cross-border analysis.
The Commission will take action still in 2017 and in the coming years. The Border Focal Point will soon become operational so that the proposed actions can be implemented swiftly.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)829
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0327/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0266/2018
- Committee opinion: PE620.999
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE622.062
- Committee draft report: PE620.924
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0534
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE620.924
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE622.062
- Committee opinion: PE620.999
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)829
Activities
- Aleksander GABELIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0266/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman - Vote unique 11/09/2018 12:45:28.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
208 |
2018/2054(INI)
2018/05/23
REGI
137 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 17 April 2018 on strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 7th report of the European Commission1a
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas mass departures from border regions, especially on the part of young people and skilled labour, illustrates the lack of economic opportunities in such regions and even more makes them less attractive in terms of employment and economic development;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Awaits the Commission’s position on internal maritime as well as external border regions; reiterates, in this context, that the features of and the challenges faced by all border regions are common to some extent, while requiring a
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Regrets that as a result of the British exit from the EU, the Irish border region faces the prospect of no longer being an internal EU border; believes it is desirable that the entire border region in Ireland should continue to be able to benefit from EU general cohesion policy and EU-supported cross-border schemes and co-operation, in order to protect existing progress, and to prevent a hardening of the border; fears that an end to these programmes in the north of Ireland would endanger border communities, cross-community relations, and therefore the peace process;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that future cohesion policy must provide adequate support to the European regions most exposed to the consequences of the UK's exit from the European Union, in particular those that will, as a result, find themselves situated on external EU (sea or land) borders;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States to ensure genuine cooperation in the field of cross-border provision of emergency services such as healthcare, in order to ensure that patients’ rights are respected, as provided for in the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive, police cooperation and fire brigades intervention;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States to ensure genuine cooperation in the field of cross-border healthcare, in order to ensure that patients’ rights are respected, as provided for in the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive as well as the availability and quality of services increased;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibilities of enhancing cooperation and overcoming barriers to regional development at the external borders with neighbouring regions, in particular, with regions of those countries preparing for EU accession;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Calls for a better access to finance for border regions to enable investments in the local energy transition, including energy efficiency, decentralised distribution of energy and circular economy;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13 b. Underlines the importance of learning from and further using the potential of success stories of some border regions;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, in spite of the efforts already undertaken, obstacles – mainly administrative and legal barriers – still persist and hamper
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes, and in particular cross- border cooperation programmes, in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective in the next programming period, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post- 2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries and to facilitate more investment in infrastructure projects through cross-border cooperation programmes;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries and calls on authorities in cross-border regions to make more intensive use of the support provided through these programmes;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the very important and positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the economic and social development and cohesion of border regions; including maritime and external border regions, calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post- 2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget, particularly for the cross-border component; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes while making them more flexible and reduc
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget in the next programming period; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Reminds the Commission that in order to assess effectively the impacts of ETC programmes on growth in border regions appropriate measurement indicators must be in place; the conclusion from the 2007-2013 programming period was that there were considerable deficiencies in this area1a which makes an objective assessment of the benefits of ETC programmes impossible; _________________ 1aEuropean Territorial Cooperation, Work Package 11, Ex-post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2007-2013, focusing on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF), p. 119
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, in spite of the efforts already undertaken, obstacles – mainly administrative, linguistic and legal barriers – still persist and hamper growth and cohesion in the border regions;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Believes that border regions with particular challenges should receive tailor-made support (e.g. greater synergies between ERDF, ESF and EGF) for developing and implementing long-term strategies based on economic diversification andre-skilling and retraining policies for laid-off workers;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Encourages the Commission to enhance the use of existing innovative tools, which contribute to the ongoing modernisation of cross-border cooperation, such as Border Focal Point, reinforced SOLVIT, as well as the Single Digital Gateway, aimed at organising expertise and advice on cross-border regional aspects, and to further develop new ones; calls on the Commission and Member States to make public administrations digital by default insofar as possible to ensure end-to-end digital public services to citizens and businesses in border regions;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Encourages the Commission to enhance the use of existing innovative tools, which contribute to the ongoing modernisation and deepening of cross- border cooperation, such as Border Focal Point, reinforced SOLVIT, as well as the Single Digital Gateway, aimed at organising expertise and advice on cross- border regional aspects, and to further develop new ones;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls on the Commission to put forward a new legislative proposal for a European cross-border convention (ECBC), which would allow, in the case of a territorially circumscribed cross- border infrastructure or service (e.g. a hospital or tramline), to apply the national normative framework and/or the standards of just one of the two or several countries concerned.
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Underlines the importance of the Commission collecting information on cross-border interaction for a better and more informed decision making process in cooperation with the member states, regions and municipalities, by supporting and financing pilot-projects, programmes, studies, analysis and territorial research;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Believes that cohesion policy should be more geared towards investment in people as border regions’ economies can be boosted by an effective mix of investments in innovation, human capital, good governance and institutional capacity;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Regrets that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation is not being fully exploited,
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Regrets that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation is not being fully exploited, which could be due partly to regional and local authorities’ reservations, and partly to their unfounded fear of a transfer of competences and due to still existing lack of awareness and respective competences;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Regrets that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation is not being fully exploited
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, in spite of the efforts already undertaken, obstacles – mainly administrative and legal barriers – still persist and hamper growth and cohesion
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Regrets that the potential of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation is not being fully exploited,
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Urges that consideration be given to the experiences of the numerous Euroregions that exist and are operating across internal and external border regions of the EU in order to further the opportunities for economic and social development and the quality of life of citizens living in border regions;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Calls for assessment of the work of Euroregions in the field of regional cooperation and their relation to the initiatives and work of EU border regions in order to coordinate and optimise the results of their work in this field;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls for better use to be made of the potential that EU macro-regional strategies can offer to border regions;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Underlines that the Territorial Impact Assessment contributes to a better understanding of the spatial impact of policies; calls on the Commission to consider a Territorial Impact Assessment ultimately being made compulsory before any EU legislative initiative that may include territorial elements is proposed;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Underlines that the Territorial Impact Assessment contributes to a better understanding of the spatial impact of policies; calls on the Commission to consider
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Awaits the prospective proposal for a regulation from the Commission on a cross-border cooperation management tool, in order to assess its usefulness for the
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Co
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the removal of only 20 % of the existing obstacles in the border regions would bring about an increase in their GDP by 2 %, or around EUR 91 billion, which would translate into approximately one million new jobs; highlights that territorial cooperation including cross-border cooperation have been widely acknowledged as bringing genuine and visible added value to, in particular, European citizens living along internal borders.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas it is estimated6a that the removal of only 20 % of the existing obstacles in the border regions would bring about an increase in their GDP by 2 %, or around EUR 91 billion, which would translate into approximately one million new jobs; _________________ 6a COM(2017)0534
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas physical and/or geographical barriers also contribute to restricting economic, social and territorial cohesion between border regions, both within and outside the EU, particularly in the case of mountain regions;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the total number of cross- border workers and students active in another EU country is approximately
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas in current MFF 95% of TEN-T-CEF funds go to the core corridors of the TEN-T, whilst small projects on the comprehensive network and interventions linking up with the TEN-T network, although essential to solving specific problems and to the development of cross-border connections and economies, are often not eligible for co-financing, or for national financing;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas several challenges faced by the external border regions of the EU, especially the outermost regions, would also merit a stance being adopted by the Commission;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 a (new) - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2018 on the framework of the future EU-UK relationship;2a _________________ 2a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0069
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas as a result of the British exit from the EU, the Irish border region faces the possibility of no longer being an internal EU border region; whereas the north of Ireland in particular is a region that has benefitted greatly from the EU's cohesion policy, contributing decisively to the Irish peace process and to cross- community reconciliation;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions’ which, as the result of two years of research and dialogue, provides a valuable insight into the challenges and obstacles faced by the internal EU border regions; in this context, underlines the importance of using and publicizing the good practices, as is done by this Commission communication;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions’ which, as the result of two years of research and dialogue, provides a valuable insight into the challenges and obstacles faced by the internal EU border regions and urges it to be followed by the similar analysis as it regards external EU border regions;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services, in line with their development, is crucial for the 150 million-
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services, is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, and to promote and establish the use of e-government, especially when related to health services, transport, education, labour mobility, as well as regulation and business development;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport, education, labour mobility, as well as regulation, cross- border commerce and business development;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport, education, culture, sport, labour mobility, as well as regulation and business development;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) - having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 8 February 2017 entitled 'Missing transport links in border regions' (CDR 4294/2016),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal, linguistic and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport, education, labour mobility, as well as regulation and business development;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission urgently to address the problems arising from the existence of physical and geographical barriers between border regions;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the problems faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region, and from Member State to Member State, and depend on the individual characteristics of a given region as well as the legal system of the Member States concerned, which makes an individual approach in tackling these obstacles a necessity; therefore encourages tailor- made approach, integrated and place- based approaches, such as the Community-Led Local Development (CLLD);
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the problems faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region and depend on the individual characteristics of a given region, which makes an individual approach in tackling these obstacles a necessity; acknowledges the shared development potential of cross- border regions in general;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the problems and challenges faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region and depend on the individual characteristics of a given region, which makes
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the problems faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region or between Member States and depend on the individual characteristics of a given region, which makes an individual approach in tackling these obstacles a necessity;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the problems faced by the border regions are common to some extent, but also vary from region to region and depend on the
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the differing legal and institutional frameworks of the Member States can lead to legal uncertainty in the border regions, which results in an increase in the time needed and the cost of implementing the projects, and constitutes an additional obstacle for citizens, institutions and enterprises in the border regions; stresses, therefore, that greater complementarity and willingness to tackle barriers between the Member States, or at least at border region level, is desirable;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the differing legal frameworks of the Member States can lead to legal uncertainty in the border regions, which results in an increase in the time needed and the cost of the projects, and constitutes an additional obstacle for citizens and enterprises in the border regions, frequently hindering or even halting good ideas; stresses, therefore, that greater complementarity between the Member States, or at least at border region level, is desirable;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the differing legal frameworks of the Member States can lead to legal uncertainty in the border regions, which results in an increase in the time needed and the cost of the projects, and constitutes an additional obstacle for citizens and enterprises in the border regions; stresses, therefore, that greater complementarity and interoperability between the Member States,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) count 40 internal EU borders, and these regions represent 40 % of the Union’s territory and close to 30 % of the EU’s population;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the differing legal frameworks of the Member States can lead to legal uncertainty in the border regions, which results in an increase in the time needed and the cost of the projects, and constitutes an additional obstacle for citizens and enterprises in the border regions; stresses, therefore, that
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Takes note that attractiveness of cross-border areas for life and investment heavily depend on quality of life, availability of public and commercial services for citizens and for businesses, as well as quality of transportation – the conditions which could be met and maintained only in close co-operation of national, regional and local authorities as well as businesses on both sides of the border;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers and flexibility for regional authorities in border regions to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers; stresses that these problems are even more complex for cross-border workers to non-EU countries, and calls therefore on the Commission to explore the possibility of concluding comprehensive agreements to protect the rights of these workers with all the third countries concerned;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers and flexibility for regional authorities in border regions to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers; underlines in this context the importance of the dissemination and use of the best practices all over the EU;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications obtained after lengthy retraining, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers and sufficient flexibility
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers, funds and flexibility for regional and local authorities in border regions to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the special situation of cross-border workers, who are most seriously affected by the challenges present in the border regions, including, in particular, the recognition of diplomas and other qualifications, healthcare, transport and access to information on job vacancies, social security and taxation systems; calls, in this context, on the Member States to step up their efforts to overcome these obstacles and allow for greater powers and flexibility for local and regional authorities in border regions to improve the quality of life of cross-border workers;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Underlines, however that in absence of adequate supply of jobs or other economic opportunities as well as in case of low level of salaries, the well- educated workforce tends to migrate to regions where such opportunities are in adequate supply thus making situation in remote border areas even more challenging – this is tendency very well seen within the Common Market;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops to enable workers and companies to fulfill their obligations and to realize their rights to full extent as requested by the legislative system of the member state where they provide their services;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops, while guaranteeing funding for existing cooperation structures;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to the adoption of labour and commercial law, taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States and the regions to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more legal coherence and flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops, or by better using existing ones;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Expresses disappointment that the Commission’s communication did not include a specific assessment of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), including extra support which can be provided to them; believes that SMEs face particular challenges when it comes to cross-border interaction which includes, but is not limited to, those related to language, administrative capacity, cultural differences and legal divergence; meeting this challenge is particularly important as SMEs employ 67%of those in the EU’s non-financial business sectors, and create 57% of value added generation1a; _________________ 1aAnnual Report on European SMEs 2016/2017, p6
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that in cross-border regions, especially those with lower density of population, transport services are still insufficiently developed
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; emphasizes the benefits further development of waterways can deliver for local and regional economies; reminds that some existing railway infrastructure falls in disuse due to the lack of support from national level; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the European Union and its immediate neighbours forming part of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) have 40 internal land borders;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities; calls for a CEF axis, with an adequate budget, to be dedicated to filling the missing links in transport infrastructure in border regions;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed and coordinated in the border regions, which hampers cross-
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities and calls on cross- border regional authorities to propose ways of bridging existing gaps in transport networks;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities; stresses the need to tackle transport bottlenecks, which hamper economic activities, such as transport, tourism and citizens' travel;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, partly because of missing links, which hampers cross-
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that transport, particularly public transport services, are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross-
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out that cross-border transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross-
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Regrets that different and complex procedures of prior authorisation of healthcare services and their payments/reimbursements, administrative burdens for patients in dealing with cross- border consultations with specialists, incompatibilities in the use of technology and in the sharing of patients' data as well as lack of unified accessible information, not only limit accessibility from both sides of the border and therefore hamper the full use of the health care facilities, but also impede emergency and rescue services in carrying out their cross-border interventions.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Emphasizes the role EU border regions can have concerning the environment and preservation of it as environmental pollution and natural disasters are often cross-border; in this context supports the cross-border projects on environmental protection for EU external border regions as these regions often face environmental challenges caused by different environmental standards and legal regulation in the EU neighbouring countries; calls also for better cooperation and coordination in internal water management to prevent natural disasters such as floods;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Underlines that creating additional cross-border transportation infrastructure, while being costly and environmentally challenging, might not always be a single best solution and therefore underlines the potential for boosting cross-border transportation links provided by soft measures, such as better coordination of public transportation schedules, inclusive planning and tailor- made innovations of cross-border local and regional authorities having grated sufficient autonomy to pursue common goals;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas border regions mostly face worse conditions for social and economic development and generally perform less well economically than other regions within the Member States;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Takes note of frequently insufficient availability of funding in cross-borders regions and therefore calls for reflection on improvement of rules regulating private-public partnerships and co-funding in the cross-border regions, allowing to attract more and diverse capital;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders, including civil society, are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation; and also calls for the Member States to ensure adequate functional and financial autonomy of respective local and regional authorities;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation and provide funding for cooperation structures;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities, particularly at local and regional level; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders, from local to national level, are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the importance of
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the importance of education, and, in particular, the opportunities to step up efforts to promote multilingualism in border regions; emphasizes the potential of schools and local mass media in these endeavours;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas border regions, especially those with lower density of population, generally perform less well economically than other regions within the Member States;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the importance of education and culture, and, in particular, the opportunities to step up efforts to promote multilingualism and intercultural dialogue in border regions;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Emphasize the importance of small-scale and cross-border projects in bringing people together and in that way opening new potentials for local development;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the eGovernment Action Plan 2016-202013 as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, and recognises the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border regions; notes that the interoperability of existing e-government systems is needed at the national, regional and local administrative levels; is, however, concerned by the patchy implementation of the plan in some Member States; is also concerned about the low level of online services available for foreign entrepreneurs to start doing business in another country; notes that ongoing and future e- government projects should also seek to engage border stakeholders from neighbouring third countries to ensure the interoperability of digital systems across borders; believes that such cooperation will facilitate cross-border transactions by avoiding administrative duplication and keeping verification steps for users and businesses at a minimum; _________________ 13 Commission communication of 19 April 2016 entitled ‘EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020 – Accelerating the digital transformation of government’ (COM(2016)0179).
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the eGovernment Action Plan 2016-202013 as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, and recognises the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border regions; is, however, concerned by the patchy implementation of the plan in some Member States; is also concerned about the low level of online services available for foreign entrepreneurs to start doing business in another country and therefore calls for Member States to take measures in order to facilitate access, including linguistic tools, to their digital services for the potential users from the neighbouring areas; _________________ 13 Commission communication of 19 April 2016 entitled ‘EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020 – Accelerating the digital transformation of government’ (COM(2016)0179).
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the eGovernment Action Plan 2016-202013 as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, and recognises the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border regions; is, however, concerned by the patchy implementation of the plan in some Member States; is also concerned about the low level of online services available for foreign entrepreneurs to start doing business in another country; urges member states' and regional/local authorities to step up their efforts on e-government projects that will positively impact the life and work of border citizens; _________________ 13 Commission communication of 19 April 2016 entitled ‘EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020 – Accelerating the digital transformation of government’ (COM(2016)0179).
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the eGovernment Action Plan 2016-202013 as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, and recognises the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border regions; is, however, concerned by the patchy implementation of the plan in some Member States; is also concerned about the low level of online services available for foreign entrepreneurs to start doing business in another country;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the eGovernment Action Plan 2016-202013 as a tool to achieve an efficient and inclusive public administration, and recognises the particular value of this plan for simplification measures in the border
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Stresses that all border regions have to play a decisive role in tackling climate change challenges, in coordinated actions with their surrounding regions;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10 b. Points out that the climate change has a serious effect on the border regions including but not limited to the need to search for a common cross-border tailor- made solutions to such natural disasters as forest fires and floods;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10 c. Underlines the potential of cross- border cooperation and especially sparser inhabited cross-border areas in such fields as renewable energy, circular economy and environment protection and calls to make better use of existing opportunities;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas border regions generally perform less well economically than other regions within the Member States and their full economic potential is untapped;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 d (new) 10 d. Emphasize the potential of the less inhabited border areas to develop sustainable and green economy thus making an added value to the local development in opening new green jobs;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that some border regions face serious migration challenges
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that some border regions face serious migration challenges, and encourages the measured use of Interreg programmes, as well as the exchange of good practices between local and regional authorities in the border areas, in the framework of the integration of refugees under international protection; underlines the need for support and coordination at European level, as well as the need for national governments to support local and regional authorities in addressing these challenges;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that some border regions face serious migration challenges, and encourages the measured use of Interreg programmes, as well as the exchange of good practices between local and regional authorities in the border areas, in the framework of the integration of refugees under international protection, while respecting the sovereignty of the Member States; underlines the need for national governments to support local and regional authorities in addressing these challenges;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that some internal and external border regions face serious migration challenges, and encourages the measured use of Interreg programmes, as well as the exchange of good practices between local and regional authorities in the border areas, in the framework of the integration of refugees under international protection; underlines the need for national governments to support local and regional authorities in addressing these challenges;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that some border regions face serious migration challenges, and encourages the
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Underlines the importance of sport as a tool for facilitating the integration of communities living in border regions and calls on the Member States and the European Commission to allocate appropriate economic resources in territorial cooperation programmes to finance local sport infrastructure;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Considers that the role of the EU macro-regional strategies in addressing challenges related to the border regions should be further enhanced;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Awaits the Commission’s position on internal maritime as well as external border regions; calls for additional support for cross-border projects of EU external border regions with the border regions of the neighboring countries, in particular regions of those third countries that are involved into the EU integration process; reiterates, in this context, that the features of and the challenges faced by all border regions are common to some extent, while requiring a differentiated approach;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Awaits the Commission’s position on internal maritime as well as external border regions; reiterates, in this context, that the features of and the challenges faced by all border regions are common to some extent, while requiring a differentiated approach; stresses the need to give special attention and adequate support to outermost regions along the external borders of the EU;
source: 622.062
2018/05/24
CULT
71 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 (new) -1. Recognises the challenges faced by border regions and stresses that socioeconomic disparities, including cultural and language differences, between different border regions can hinder integration, restrict interaction and scale down opportunities for people and businesses on both sides of the border;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out the complexities of the current framework on cross-border cooperation programmes as well as the structural difficulties and administrative burdens that potential beneficiaries encounter during the preparation of these projects; welcomes, in this regard, the simplification measures put forward for the post-2020 period and considers them as an important step to simplify and improve the implementation and accessibility of cross-border cooperation programmes;
Amendment 11 #
1a. Recalls the importance of culture and cultural heritage in relation to the economic prosperity of cities and regions and, therefore, calls on the Member States to adopt all the necessary measures to effectively safeguard and promote their tangible and intangible cultural heritage and to use in this regard all the available tools of the cohesion policy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for a new information strategy on cross-border and regional cooperation in order to get closer to inhabitants of these regions, to increase their awareness of the opportunities that the EU cross-border programmes bring, and thus to contribute to change attitudes towards more open regional and cross- border mindedness;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasizes the importance of sport for the economic and social development of cross-border regions, as demonstrated by the numerous territorial cooperation projects that used sport as a tool for social and cultural integration;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Encourages young people to act, participate and be involved in all aspects of regional and cross-border society development; Supports youth cross-border ideas and activities such as creating platforms for exchange of ideas and good practice, raising awareness and exchanging information on cross-border cooperation and spreading information through social and other media to improve youth participation and possibilities in cross-border project;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the need of a more substantial economic commitment to the promotion of cross-border sports activities and in particular for the construction of small-scale infrastructures for grass-roots sports;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to consider culture and education as a horizontal priority for the next generation of programmes of the cohesion policy;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Strongly supports cross-border projects and programmes in improving youth education, employability, inclusion and participation of young people in society by tackling social problems that young people face in border regions, such as unemployment and radicalisation; Requires more systematic cooperation across border regions to improve employment, education, training, culture, sport and other social policies for young people;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are still an important obstacle to cross-border cooperation, especially in border areas without a longstanding tradition of cooperation; notes that the language is an important factor enhancing trust and helping to mitigate sociocultural difficulties; believes that a more targeted use of ESI funds can support the systematic promotion of multilingualism in education and training in border regions, from early childhood education onwards;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 a (new) -1a. Emphasises that the EU has contributed positively to the development of border regions and that future funding programmes should continue in the most effective and efficient manner, focusing on areas of particular high European added value ensuring that solving border difficulties is at the heart of cross-border cooperation programmes;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are still an important obstacle to cross-border cooperation, especially in border areas without a longstanding tradition of cooperation; believes that a more targeted use of ESI funds can support the systematic promotion of multilingualism in education and training in border regions, from early childhood education onwards, as well as increased funding for language technologies in border regions, as this can vastly improve communication;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are still an important obstacle to cross-border cooperation, especially in border areas without a longstanding tradition of cooperation; believes that a more targeted use of ESI funds can support the systematic promotion, also through the organization of sporting and cultural events, of multilingualism in education and training in border regions, from early childhood education onwards;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are still an important obstacle to cross-border cooperation, especially in border areas without a longstanding tradition of cooperation; believes that a more targeted use of ESI funds can support the systematic promotion of multilingualism and European language diversity in education and training in border regions, from early childhood education onwards;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that cross-border cooperation between education and training institutions should be reinforced by facilitating cross-border school visits and extracurricular activities for children from a very young age in order to provide children with a unique opportunity, that goes beyond the class room, to have a direct contact and a first-hand experience with the diversity of cultures, languages and history of their neighbours;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out, however, that the Member States remain responsible for their education policies and that, secondly, the promotion of multilingualism depends on how far individual Member States can afford to develop education systems of this kind while ensuring genuinely equal access for their citizens, whatever their social and economic situation;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that some border areas share a common language that is not an official EU language; believes that increased levels of funding for teaching and promoting lesser-used cross-border languages would strengthen cooperation, increase mobility across borders and enrich the cultural diversity and heritage of those areas;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border partnerships between education and training institutions in border regions in order to promote the mobility of students, teachers, trainers and administrative staff, as well as doctoral candidates and researchers; underlines that the use of multilingualism within such cross-border partnerships can prepare graduates to enter the employment market on both sides of the border; urges the Member States to facilitate and encourage the mutual recognition and better understanding of diplomas and professional qualifications between neighbouring regions; Importance must also be given to Regional Minority Languages (RMLs) which are always at risk of endangerment if strong linguistic policies are not put in place. European- level funding should continue toward the preservation and support of regional minority languages;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 b (new) -1b. Stipulates that cohesion policy should continue to support vulnerable and marginalised people, addressing growing inequalities and building solidarity through investments in education, training and culture, by paying particular attention to cross-border cooperation programmes focused on the existing cultural, territorial and administrative obstacles and future challenges in those regions;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates that bringing together key players from the research community, business, higher education, public authorities and civil society is essential; Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border partnerships between education and training institutions in border regions in order to promote the mobility of students, teachers, trainers and administrative staff, as well as doctoral candidates and researchers; underlines that the use of multilingualism within such
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border and interregional partnerships
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border partnerships between education and training institutions in border regions in order to promote the mobility of students, teachers, trainers and administrative staff, as well as doctoral candidates and researchers; underlines that the use of multilingualism within such cross-border partnerships can prepare graduates to enter the employment market on both sides of the border;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border partnerships between education and training institutions in border regions in order to promote the mobility of students, teachers, trainers and administrative staff, as well as doctoral candidates and researchers; underlines that the use of multilingualism within such cross-border partnerships can prepare
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Member States to facilitate cross-border partnerships between education and training institutions in border regions in order to promote the mobility of students, teachers, trainers and administrative staff, as well as doctoral candidates and researchers; underlines that the use of multilingualism within such cross-border partnerships can
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the Commission to facilitate cross-border initiatives and different types of exchanges, intercultural and educational activities aimed at better awareness of citizens about legislative and administrative requirements in border regions as well as at improvement of cooperation between local administrations, cultural and educational institutions;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Deplores the fact that cross-border flows are often one-way traffic, benefiting countries with high wage levels and low unemployment rates; points out that this situation might have a long-term impact on the Member States' socio-economic equilibrium and growth potential, since they could be deprived of their lifeblood; maintains that any European mobility programme aimed at border regions has to be matched by incentives to return;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the Member States to facilitate and encourage the mutual recognition and better understanding of certificates, diplomas, vocational training and professional qualifications between neighbouring regions; encourages therefore the inclusion of specific skills in the curriculum with the objective of increasing the chances for employment across the border;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Encourages pooling of joint public services and efforts in neighbouring border regions to develop a series of targeted interventions to support low skilled or low-qualified adults in border regions and to help them improve their literacy, numeracy and digital skills by acquiring a broader set of competences and higher qualifications;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that because of the influx of cross-border workers, some authorities might be called upon to shoulder an additional administrative burden and incur new expenditure arising out of, say, transport infrastructure needs and that, in this particular case, fair and even-handed financing solutions should be worked out between Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 c (new) -1c. Emphasises that EU borders comprise both land and maritime borders to be taken into account; Hence encourages the Commission to look at the challenges faced by maritime border regions in order to allow for a holistic analysis of the obstacles faced by all border regions, as well as the potential cooperation and growth of all borders regions;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Encourages cross-border cooperation and programmes for dual vocational training among different border regions; Is of the opinion that better cross-border cooperation and investment in skills in border regions will help improve the existing skills gap, reduce poverty, unemployment and social exclusion and will help tackle skill shortages and the brain drain in those peripheral areas;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Believes that multiculturalism is particularly relevant for border regions; Strongly encourages cross-border cultural cooperation within and between border regions by enhancing the collaboration between creative people and the cultural actors, such as artists and representatives of cultural organizations, administrations and networks in specific cross-border and trans-European projects;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border and interregional cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) can help to create socio-economic value, growth and jobs (also via clustering of enterprises), while also building bridges, increasing mutual understanding, answering common challenges, reinforcing cultural diplomacy and forging a European consciousness through joint initiatives on cultural heritage-related projects; stresses on the importance of CCIs in the economy and job creation, in promoting and preserving cultural diversity, in strengthening social cohesion, in playing a key role in reindustrializing Europe and triggering innovation spill-overs in many other sectors, from manufacturing to education or social inclusion;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates that mobility of artists and culture professionals has become invaluable in the promotion of Europe’s cultural and social progress and development of regional, national and European cultural heritage; Is of the opinion that a strong cross-
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs), focusing especially on micro-enterprises and SMEs (also via clustering of enterprises), can help to create socio-economic value, growth and jobs
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) can help to create socio-economic value
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) can help to create socio-economic value, growth and jobs (also via clustering of enterprises),
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs), including NGOs and small associations, can help to create socio-economic value, growth and jobs (also via clustering of enterprises), while also building bridges, increasing mutual understanding and forging a European consciousness through joint initiatives on cultural heritage-related projects;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that a strong cross- border cooperation in the area of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) can help to create socio-economic value, growth and jobs (also via clustering of enterprises), while also building bridges, increasing mutual understanding and forging a European
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the importance of cross- border, including macroregional and interregional, cooperation programmes in funding educational, cultural,
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) Believes that the development of cross- border cultural cooperation makes an essential contribution to the sustainable development of cross-border territories impacting economy, social cohesion and environment; calls on the Commission together with Member States to work out common strategic approach for development and support of Cultural and Creative Industries, bridging CCI with society and economy in order to promote smart, sustainable growth in EU border regions.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the excessive barriers for cultural and creative industries in accessing financing due to their nature and size (CCIs are predominantly micro- businesses and SMEs), as well as the difficulties arising due to oftentimes poorer economic performance of some border regions; reiterates its view that it is of outmost importance to develop cultural, creative and entrepreneurial skills in order to overcome these structural deficiencies;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that regions have a proved capacity in developing cross- border cooperation in the sector of the cultural and creative industries (CCIs) and notes the positive effects of smart specialisation; asks the Commission and the Member States to maintain and strengthen the policies in this field and to use effectively the funding available under EU programmes and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs);
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that cohesion policy can contribute positively to the creation of new ideas and possibilities of cooperation between museums, orchestras, cross- border radio and TV projects in border regions by addressing the legal and financial difficulties which artists have with their common cross-border projects;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Strongly supports cross-border cultural projects and cooperation between European Capitals of Culture and border regions throughout Europe in order to establish a chain of cultural ‘welding points’ and to generate a new dimension of European cultural networks where new practices of cultural diversity are being developed and integrated in the realization of concrete European projects;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Regrets that cultural and leisure activities often fail to attract people from different border regions in neighbouring countries, despite the fact that people living in those areas share similar interests and are in close proximity to one another; supports the EU regional portals created in several border regions to provide people with access to information about cultural and leisure activities and encourages the promotion of similar portals across all border regions;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that border regions, thanks to the existence of long- established contacts
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that border regions, thanks to the existence of long- established contacts between cultural institutions across borders, can create favourable conditions for artistic and cultural mobility and can therefore be vital for thematic tourism and help promote Europe as a cultural destination
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that border regions, thanks to the existence of long- established contacts between cultural institutions across borders, can create favourable conditions for artistic and cultural mobility and can therefore be vital for thematic tourism
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the importance of cross- border cooperation programmes in funding educational, cultural, sporting and other activities whose European added value of cross-border synergies brings citizens closer and fosters mutual trust in border regions; stresses, in this regard, the large number of INTERREG projects devoted to culture, which proves that there is a strong desire among border regions to invest in joint
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that border regions, thanks to the existence of long- established contacts between cultural institutions across borders, can create favourable conditions for artistic and cultural mobility and can therefore be vital for thematic tourism
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that border regions, thanks to the existence of long- established contacts between cultural institutions across borders, can create favourable conditions for artistic and cultural mobility, without infringing the Member States' laws, including their tax provisions, and can therefore be vital for thematic tourism and help promote Europe as a tourist destination and a place to explore.
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that education and cultural exchanges across borders promotes intercultural dialogue, mutual understanding, conflict resolution and peace building particularly in post- conflict border regions, highlights in this context the risks posed by Brexit for people-to-people exchanges and mobility of students, learners, artists and cultural operators in the border regions between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages various measures aimed at combating all forms of discrimination in border regions and at breaking down barriers for vulnerable people in finding employment and becoming integrated into society; Supports in this regard promotion and development of social enterprises in border regions as a source of job creation, in particular for vulnerable groups of people, such as young unemployed and disabled people;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Strongly believes that media and communication have the potential to strengthen EU border regions through the creative sector. Digital platforms have the ability to promote inclusion and protect the cultural diversity of these border regions. Cinema, television, creative documentaries as well as other digital content, are platforms which can be used to support the heritage and unique traits of EU border regions;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Strongly encourages Member States and regional authorities to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border cultural and educational activities and issues and to strengthen the exchange of best practices in these areas, through the creation of a designated portal and website;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the need to address specific challenges related to artistic and cultural mobility – social security, taxation (avoiding double taxation of artists and cultural professionals), provision of information on mobility opportunities (mobility grants, residency programmes, etc.)
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that sports tourism is an increasingly important sector of the European economy; therefore calls for the allocation of financial resources to the construction of sports infrastructures with a view to promoting tourism through sport;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that cross-border cooperation, a major EU policy objective, has helped to mitigate the adverse effects of internal borders and can lead to improvements in cross-border achievements in education and culture;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Supports apprenticeships measures and multi-stakeholder platforms in border regions aimed at improving the quality, supply and image of apprenticeships and promoting border mobility among young apprentices; Is of the opinion that bringing together relevant stakeholders to create cross- border opportunities for apprenticeships, traineeships, internships will improve competition, education, skills and the labour markets in those regions and in particular, encourages creating internships opportunities in regional and local institutions involved in cross-border and international cooperation;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the importance of cross- border cooperation programmes in funding educational, cultural, sporting and other activities whose European added value brings citizens closer
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes the serious migration challenges that some border regions face; to that end, encourages the effective use of the funding available for EU cross- border programmes, as well as the exchange of good practices between local and regional authorities in the border areas, in the framework of the integration of refugees under international protection; underlines the need for national governments to support local and regional authorities in addressing these challenges;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on Member States and regional authorities to collaborate in the identification and removal of any legal or administrative barriers that inhibit cross- border educational or cultural activities, inter alia through the harmonisation of the relevant regulatory frameworks;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the importance of cross- border cooperation programmes in funding educational, cultural, sporting and other activities whose European added value brings citizens closer and fosters mutual trust in border regions; stresses, in this regard, the large number of INTERREG projects devoted to culture, which proves that there is a strong desire among border regions to invest in joint cultural projects; reiterates, therefore, its view that EU financial support for these initiatives should be further strengthened in the next MFF and also by drawing more extensively and effectively on potential synergies between EU policies, for instance by combining the use of structural funding with the EFSI;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the importance of cross-
source: 622.224
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-620924_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-622062_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-620999_EN.html
|
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.924
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.062
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.999&secondRef=02
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0266&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0266_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0327New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0327_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/8/12576New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
committees/6/shadows/1 |
|
committees/6/shadows/2 |
|
committees/6/shadows/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
REGI/8/12576
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 052New
Rules of Procedure EP 52 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|