Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | ROZIÈRE Virginie ( S&D) | SZEJNFELD Adam ( PPE), DALTON Daniel ( ECR), SELIMOVIC Jasenko ( ALDE), IWASZKIEWICZ Robert Jarosław ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | DANTI Nicola ( S&D) | Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ ( PPE), Joachim STARBATTY ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 492 votes to 33, with 17 abstentions, a resolution on strengthening the competitiveness of the internal market by developing the EU Customs Union and its governance.
Members recalled that the Customs Union, which is 50 years old this year, is a cornerstone of the EU and is one of the world’s largest trading blocs. EU imports and exports totalled EUR 3 700 billion in 2017 and customs duties collected make up 15 % of the EU budget.
The implementation of the Union Customs Code (UCC) is essential to safeguard EU own resources, in particular customs duties, and national fiscal interests, but also to safeguard European consumers and fair competition in the internal market.
Need for an efficient Customs Union
Parliament stressed that a fully functional Customs Union is essential to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU and its negotiating position for the conclusion of new trade agreements. An efficient EU Customs Union helps to facilitate legal trade and to reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders.
The resolution stressed the importance of:
- ensuring effective controls - in particular by encouraging cooperation with customs authorities in third countries - and to avoid any unjustified obstacles to legal trade;
- addressing the current divergences between the levels of control and their quality, as well as between customs procedures and sanctions policies at the points of entry into the Customs Union;
- establishing uniform customs procedures within the Union based on a reformed IT infrastructure;
- intensifying work on the creation of an integrated one-stop European electronic environment for customs.
Digitisation of customs procedures
Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to develop a more efficient, cost-effective and streamlined approach to the management of IT systems for customs authorities. Given the delays in this area, it called for a more precise and realistic estimate of the time and resources that will be needed, and of the scope of the individual IT projects that will help to digitise customs procedures.
Deploring the fact that the implementation of the new IT systems for the Customs Union has suffered a series of delays, resulting in the request by the Commission to Parliament and the Council for an extension of the transitional period beyond the deadline of 2020 laid down in the UCC, the Commission and the Council must, as a matter of the utmost priority, ensure that the customs code is implemented and customs procedures digitised within the new deadline.
The Commission is called on to:
- update the timetable of its UCC work programme to take account of the extension to the transitional period proposed by it;
- update its multiannual strategic plan by sequencing projects throughout the transition period so as to avoid, as far as possible, the concentration of deployments at the end of the period, and by establishing binding milestones, including for Member States;
- not to modify the statutory and technical specifications that have now been adopted for the 17 IT tools related to the Customs Code with major implications in terms of financial and human resources;
- continuously evaluate the Customs 2020 programme and address the weaknesses identified;
- further develop a tool on the performance of the Customs Union that will eventually allow its performance to be systematically assessed against its strategic objectives in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and uniformity.
Governance, reports and funding for the Customs programme
Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to step up their efforts and expand the resources deployed so as to ensure full application of the customs code adopted in 2013 and of uniform customs procedures throughout the EU. It called on the Commission, in that connection, to submit an action plan that might usefully be based on a peer review of customs practices, on the exchange of good practices, on stepped-up cooperation between customs services and on a sufficiently resourced training programme.
The Commission and the Member States are called on to step up their efforts to better cope with the increase in the volume of low-value goods imported into the Union, which increases each year from 10% to 15%.
Taking note of the funding effort made under the EU budget, increasing the allocation for the next Customs programme for 2021-2027 to EUR 842 844 000 at 2018 prices, Member States were called on to provide the necessary human and financial resources for deployment of the national components, on which the introduction of the European electronic customs system is dependent.
The Commission is called on to propose a more effective governance structure for the conduct of customs IT projects and their updates.
Brexit
Recalling that the United Kingdom will become a third country after withdrawal from the EU, thus altering the EU’s external borders, the Brexit process should not impact negatively on the development and governance of EU Customs. Members stressed that, following the withdrawal of the UK there must be no loopholes in the customs system – including at the external borders of the EU – that would pave the way for illicit trade or the evasion of public-law debts provided for under EU law.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the own-initiative report by Virginie ROZIÈRE (S&D, FR) on strengthening the competitiveness of the internal market by developing the EU Customs Union and its governance.
The report noted that the Customs Union, which is 50 years old this year, is a cornerstone of the EU and is one of the world’s largest trading blocs. EU imports and exports totalled EUR 3 700 billion in 2017 and customs duties collected make up 15 % of the EU budget.
The implementation of the Union Customs Code (UCC) is essential to safeguard EU own resources, in particular customs duties, and national fiscal interests, but also to safeguard European consumers and fair competition in the internal market.
Generalities
Members stressed that a fully functional Customs Union is essential to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU and its negotiating position for the conclusion of new trade agreements. An efficient EU Customs Union helps to facilitate legal trade and to reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders.
The report noted that the current divergences in the level and quality of controls, customs procedures and sanctions policies at the EU’s points of entry into the Customs Union often result in distortion of trade flows, feeding the problem of ‘forum shopping’ and putting at risk the integrity of the single market. In this context, Members strongly requested that the Commission and the Member States address this issue.
Members also encouraged the Commission to step up its efforts to create an integrated EU customs one-stop shop that would help businesses submit all the necessary information and documents in one place and are thus able to meet all the regulatory requirements for the import, export and transit of goods.
Digitisation of customs procedures
Members called on the Commission and the Member States to develop a more efficient, cost-effective and streamlined approach to the management of IT systems for customs authorities. Given the delays in this area, they called for a more precise and realistic estimate of the time and resources that will be needed, and of the scope of the individual IT projects that will help to digitise customs procedures.
Deploring the fact that the implementation of the new IT systems for the Customs Union has suffered a series of delays, resulting in the request by the Commission to Parliament and the Council for an extension of the transitional period beyond the deadline of 2020 laid down in the UCC, the Commission and the Council must, as a matter of the utmost priority, ensure that the customs code is implemented and customs procedures digitised within the new deadline.
The Commission is called on to:
- update its multiannual strategic plan by sequencing projects throughout the transition period so as to avoid the concentration of deployments at the end of the period, and by establishing binding milestones, including for Member States;
- report regularly and transparently on the conduct of the multiannual strategic work plan and on the setting-up of the customs electronic systems, so as not to repeat the mistakes of the previous programming, and to inform about any possible future delays while not doing so at a moment’s notice or without proper corrective actions;
- continuously evaluate the Customs 2020 programme and to respond to the shortcomings identified, in particular the under-utilisation of the teams of experts set up under this programme, and to make it possible to increase cooperation between customs services.
Governance, reports and funding for the Customs programme
Members called on the Commission and Member States to step up their efforts and expand the resources deployed so as to ensure full application of the customs code adopted in 2013 and of uniform customs procedures throughout the EU. They called on the Commission, in that connection, to submit an action plan that might usefully be based on a peer review of customs practices, on the exchange of good practices, on stepped-up cooperation between customs services and on a sufficiently resourced training programme.
Taking note of the funding effort made under the EU budget, increasing the allocation for the next Customs programme for 2021-2027 to EUR 842 844 000 at 2018 prices, Member States were called on to provide the necessary human and financial resources for deployment of the national components, on which the introduction of the European electronic customs system is dependent.
The Commission is called on to propose a more effective governance structure for the conduct of customs IT projects and their updates.
Members stressed that the ‘Customs 2021-2027’ programme, by supporting Member States’ customs authorities, will help not only to increase EU budget revenues, but also to guarantee product safety, the protection of European consumers and a level playing field for EU businesses.
Brexit
Recalling that the United Kingdom will become a third country after withdrawal from the EU, thus altering the EU’s external borders, the Brexit process should not impact negatively on the development and governance of EU Customs. Members stressed that, following the withdrawal of the UK there must be no loopholes in the customs system – including at the external borders of the EU – that would pave the way for illicit trade or the evasion of public-law debts provided for under EU law.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)327
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0133/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0059/2019
- Committee opinion: PE629.518
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE627.794
- Committee draft report: PE629.492
- Committee draft report: PE629.492
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE627.794
- Committee opinion: PE629.518
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)327
Activities
- Virginie ROZIÈRE
- Tim AKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jasenko SELIMOVIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0059/2019 - Virginie Rozière - Résolution 14/02/2019 12:33:11.000 #
DE | IT | FR | ES | PL | RO | GB | AT | NL | CZ | BE | BG | FI | PT | SE | HR | DK | SK | HU | LT | SI | LV | IE | LU | MT | EE | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
66
|
48
|
61
|
37
|
38
|
23
|
51
|
18
|
24
|
18
|
16
|
14
|
12
|
18
|
11
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
9
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
5
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
|
PPE |
157
|
Germany PPEFor (26)Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Markus FERBER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
Italy PPEFor (6) |
Poland PPEFor (16)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
1
|
5
|
Netherlands PPE |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
3
|
Portugal PPEFor (6) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
Slovakia PPE |
5
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
||||
S&D |
125
|
Germany S&DFor (12) |
Italy S&DFor (22)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
2
|
10
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (15) |
Austria S&D |
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||
ALDE |
55
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||
ECR |
53
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
14
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
40
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
4
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
36
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
Spain GUE/NGLFor (6)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||
NI |
12
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
31
|
1
|
Italy ENF |
12
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
32
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (12) |
France EFDDAgainst (5) |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
1
|
Amendments | Dossier |
90 |
2018/2109(INI)
2018/11/30
IMCO
70 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas smuggling and other forms of illegal and illicit trade in goods have a negative impact on the functioning of the single market and make the playing field uneven for competing businesses – to the detriment, in particular, of small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas EU imports and exports totalled EUR 3 700 billion in 2017 and customs duties collected make up 15 % of the EU budget, and whereas an important step must be taken towards strengthening the sovereignty of EU Member States by paying over any customs revenue to the Member States concerned;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas implementation of the Union Customs Code (UCC)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas implementation of the Union Customs Code (UCC) is essential to safeguard EU own resources, in particular customs duties, and national fiscal interests, but also to safeguard European consumers and fair competition and on the internal market;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the necessary balance that customs authorities must strike between the facilitation of legitimate trade and their customs controls designed to protect the security of the Union and its citizens as well as its financial and commercial interests, and emphasising in this respect the key role played by the status of authorised economic operator
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the UCC stipulates that the electronic systems needed for its application must be deployed by 31 December 2020, and digitisation of customs procedures was
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the digitalisation of customs is a work in progress, more than 98% of the customs declarations are today electronic and the following areas of customs are now handled through electronic systems: transit(NCTS), export control (ECS); security data (ICS), risk management (CRMS),Economic Operators Registration and Identification Number (EORI),authorisations (CDS), Authorised Economic Operators (AEO), Binding Tariff Information (EBTI), quota and tariff (QUOTA), autonomous tariff suspensions, the combined nomenclature (TARIC), surveillance of import and export (SURV2)and Registered Exporter System for certificates of origin (REX);
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the objective of the customs programme proposed under the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 is to support the activities of, and cooperation between, the Member States’ customs authorities;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU poses a challenge to the proper functioning of the customs union;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas implementation of key electronic systems necessary for the full implementation of the UCC will be delayed and deferred until after 31 December 2020;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) – having regard to the resolution of the European Parliament of 1 January 2017 on tackling the challenges of the Union Customs Code implementation (2016/3024 (RSP))
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas particular attention should be paid to the standardisation of customs information and processes;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas the governance of the Customs 2020 programme and hence of customs IT work is shared between the Commission, the Member States and representatives of commercial interests in a multitude of decision-making structures that have a lasting negative impact on its effectiveness and the management of IT projects;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E c (new) Ec. whereas it is necessary, following the end of the on-going Customs 2020 programme and a cost-benefit assessment of the various possible options, to overhaul the governance of the Customs programmes;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the work carried out every day by Member State customs authorities and by the Commission, which
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the work carried out every day by Member State customs authorities and by the Commission, which endeavour to shield the internal market against unfair competition in the form of counterfeit and dumped products, to facilitate trade and cut back on administrative formalities, to collect receipts for national budgets and the EU budget, and to protect populations against terrorist, health-related, environmental and other threats;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that, if the customs union is to function properly, customs legislation must be applied in a uniform way by the Member States, in particular in areas such as undervaluation, mis- reporting of the origin of goods and their incorrect classification;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that, while the EU is more than just an economic area, the Customs Union is undeniably a success in that it enables firms established in the EU to sell their goods and invest throughout the EU, with no internal borders
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 b (new) – having regard to the Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of the Union Customs and on the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts pursuant to Article 284 thereunder (COM(2018) 039 final)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that a fully functional Customs Union is essential to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU when negotiating trade agreements; Emphasises that an efficient EU Customs Union should facilitate trade and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, as well as ensure effective controls, inter alia by fostering cooperation between European and third countries’ customs authorities;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that honest legal businesses should not be penalised as a result of the criminal activities of fraudulent operators; takes the view, therefore, that checks carried out by Member States’ customs authorities should not cause an undue hindrance to legitimate trade, a consideration which is important for the development of competitive businesses and of the EU as a whole;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that creating seamless customs processes across the Union based on the IT infrastructure reform is pivotal; Considers that reaping the potential of digitisation will enable the exchange of information and the payment of duties to become more transparent and accessible, in particular for third countries’ operators;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to simplify customs rules and procedures in order to keep bureaucratic and financial burdens to a minimum, in particular for SMEs, while fully preserving the security of EU trade with third countries;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Notes that current divergent level and quality of controls, customs procedures and sanction policies, at EU points of entry into the Customs Union, often results in distortion of trade flows, feeding the problem of ‘forum shopping’ and putting at risk the integrity of the Single Market; in that context, strongly requests that the Commission and the Member States address this issue;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to create an integrated EU customs one-stop-shop that would help businesses submit all the right information and documents in one place, so that they can meet all the regulatory requirements for the import, export and transit of goods;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Recalls that the United Kingdom will become a third country after withdrawal from the EU, thus altering EU’s external borders and highlights that the Brexit process shouldn’t negatively impact on the development of EU Customs and its governance;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 – paragraph –3 a (new) –3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a more efficient, cost-effective and streamlined approach to the management of IT systems for customs authorities; calls, in particular, for a more precise and realistic estimate for the time and resources that will be needed, and the scope of the individual IT projects that will help to digitise customs procedures;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Regrets deeply the request by the Commission to the Parliament and the Council for an extension to the transitional period, and regrets the fact that the Commission has provided incomplete information in support of a further extension, particularly in the light of what comes within its remit and that of Member States, as a result of which Parliament cannot exercise its budgetary and political oversight in an appropriate manner;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Regrets
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that the modernisation of customs processes, based on the development of new Information Technology (IT) systems, has enabled the improved exchange of information between actors, a more effective registration of the arrival, transit and exit of goods, a centralised customs clearance and harmonised customs controls throughout the customs territory of the Union, thereby reducing administrative costs, red tape, error fraud in customs declarations and harmful port-shopping, as well as has enhanced economic activity and growth, and increased the safety and security of the EU citizens;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Deplores that the implementation of the new IT systems for the Customs Union suffered a series of delays, so that some of the key systems will not be available at the 2020 deadline set in the UCC. Underlines that the delays are due to several factors, in particular: changing project scope, insufficient resources allocated by the EU and Member States, and a lengthy decision-making process due to the multi-layered governance structure;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Expresses its strong disappointment after taking stock of the conclusion of the report of the Court of Auditors no 26/2018 “A series of delays in Customs IT systems: what went wrong?” which states that there is a risk that the rescheduled deadlines will also not be met and that the UCC deadline could be further extended beyond 2025, and urges therefore the Commission and the Member States to do their outmost in order to avoid such a situation;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that, while 75 % of the European components of the IT systems needed to implement the UCC ought to be ready in December 2020, that does not necessarily mean that 75 % of the IT systems will be ready by then, since 25 % of the IT systems is made up of national components, for which Member States are responsible and delays have been identified;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that, even in the event of significant delays in the implementation of individual IT projects, the systems to be rolled out should be subject to comprehensive security tests so that any possible issues do not jeopardise the goods checks carried out by the Member States’ customs authorities, since a dysfunctional IT system in this field is almost worse than no system at all;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that implementation of the customs code and digitisation of the customs procedures it establishes must be priorities shared by the Commission and Council; considers that, in that connection, setting up the IT architecture requires the development and deployment of 17 IT tools with major financial and human implications; considers it imperative, therefore, that there
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to update the timetable for its UCC work programme to take account of the extension to the transitional period that it has proposed (COM(2018)0085) and as adopted by Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to update its UCC work programme to take account of the extension to the transitional period that it has proposed (COM(2018)0085) and as adopted by Parliament and the Council; calls on Parliament and the Council to work to ensure the prompt adoption of a decision on that extension while making it subject to the conditions needed for successful deployment of the customs IT architecture; points out, as the European Court of Auditors has done, that
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Customs Union, which is 50 years old this year, is a cornerstone of the EU - one of the world’s largest trading blocs - and whereas a fully operational Customs Union is essential for
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to update its multiannual strategic plan by sequencing projects throughout the transition period to avoid as much as possible the concentration of deployments at the end of the period and by establishing binding milestones, including for Member States;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission not to modify the statutory and technical specifications that have now been adopted for the 17 IT tools
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reminds that, according to the Court of Auditors, the Commission was aware of the delays but chose not to include this information in its official reporting, which prevented the stakeholders (such as the European Parliament, other EU institutions not represented in the governance structure of Customs 2020 as well as interested companies and citizens) from being fully informed of the risk of delays in real time; calls therefore on the Commission to regularly report on the progress made as regards to the setting-up of the customs electronic systems and inform about any possible future delays;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to report regularly and transparently on the conduct of the multiannual strategic work plan so as not to repeat the mistakes of the previous programming and to avoid asking for a further extension of the transition period at a moment’s notice;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Invites the Commission to continuously evaluate the Customs 2020 programme and to respond to the shortcomings identified, in particular by under-utilising the teams of experts set up under this programme and making it possible to increase cooperation between customs services;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Takes note of and welcomes the Commission’s work in developing a tool on the performance of the Customs Union which will eventually enable the performance of the Customs Union to be systematically assessed against its strategic objectives in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and uniformity;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Suggests to the Commission that this tool should also assess the performance of customs controls in terms of digitisation potential and dataflows in order to create even more effective risk- based controls while optimising the burden on customs authorities;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underlines that continuous policy monitoring, analysis and assessment of possible impacts are essential parts of governance of the Customs Union, reminds in that respect that The Customs Union Performance tool operates by assessing the functioning of the Customs Union, on the basis of Key Performance Indicators in a range of areas such as protection of financial interests, ensuring the safety and security of EU citizens and assessing the importance of customs in contributing to the growth and competiveness of the EU, calls on the Member States to support the work in order to develop further this tool;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Invites the Commission to pursue reflection together with the European Parliament and the Council on the creation of a one-stop shop bringing together in one place customs and tax procedures linked to international trade, insists on the necessary caution to be adopted on the subject, which must not interfere with the priority of implementing digitised customs procedures foreseen in the UCC at the end of the transitional period;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Customs Union, which is 50 years old this year, is a cornerstone of the EU - one of the world’s largest trading blocs - and whereas a fully operational Customs Union is essential for the proper functioning of the single market, in the interests of both EU businesses and EU citizens, but also for the credibility of the EU, putting it in a strong position in negotiations on trade agreements with third countries;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Recalls that the Commission is developing work on an EU Customs Single Window environment that would permit an economic operator to submit data required for a wide range of regulatory purposes (e.g. veterinary, sanitary, environmental, etc.) in a standardised format to multiple recipients and via harmonised access points; calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue this important work;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Believes that the cooperation between operational services on the ground, including between tax and customs administrations, could enable scarce resources to be used more efficiently;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes note of the funding effort made under the EU budget, increasing the allocation for the next Customs programme, for 2021-2027, to EUR 950 million; calls
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes note of the funding effort made under the EU budget, increasing the allocation for the next Customs programme, for 2021-2027, to EUR
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Highlights that customs nowadays have to deal with a phenomenal increase in the volume of goods being bought online outside the EU in terms of controls and collection of the applicable duties, in particular as the volume of low value goods imported into the EU is growing each year by 10-15%; calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts in order to better tackle this challenge;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Invites the Commission to propose, at the end and only at the end of the implementation of the 17 UCC-related IT systems of the Customs 2020 programme, a more effective governance structure for the conduct of customs IT projects and their updates, stresses the importance, in view of the economic, fiscal and security challenges represented by the customs IT system, that the solution adopted fully preserves European sovereignty;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the ‘Customs 2021- 2027’ programme, by supporting Member States’ customs authorities, will help not only to increase EU budget revenues, but also to guarantee product safety, the protection of European consumers and a level playing field for EU businesses;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU does not have an adverse effect on the functioning of the customs union, in particular by thoroughly preparing the legal, technical and IT measures to be taken in the event of the UK’s departure from the customs union;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Stresses that the uncertainty surrounding the UK’s departure from the EU is a major challenge for European businesses; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to give stakeholders comprehensive information about the repercussions of the UK’s in the area of customs and certain kinds of indirect taxes – VAT and excise duties;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Member States’ customs authorities apply more than 60 legal acts outside the customs area, which relate, inter alia, to consumer protection, product safety, the protection of public health, the protection of the environment, intellectual property rights and cash movements;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Stresses that, following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, there must be no loopholes in the customs system – including at the external borders of the EU – that would pave the way for illicit trade or the evasion of public-law debts provided for under EU law;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the customs union must function properly if consumer trust in goods entering the single market is to be maintained;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas overly complex customs rules and procedures and differences in the way they are applied by the Member States’ customs authorities can, in many cases, create an excessive burden for business entities, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises;
source: 627.794
2018/12/10
INTA
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly welcomes the ratification of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) by the EU and recalls the importance of its full implementation by all WTO signatories in order to simplify and modernise export and import processes worldwide; encourages the Commission to share its best practices in the WTO TFA Committee in order to promote the coordinated implementation of modern procedures with EU trading partners; calls on the Commission to continue working closely with the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing existing gaps in customs control systems;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the current divergent levels of controls and their quality, and of customs procedures
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the current divergent levels of controls and their quality, and of customs procedures and sanctions policies at points of entry into the customs union, often result in the distortion of trade flows, feeding the problem of ‘forum shopping’ and putting at risk the integrity of the single market;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the current divergent levels of controls and their quality, and of customs procedures and sanctions policies at points of entry into the customs union, often result in the distortion of trade flows, feeding the problem of ‘forum shopping’ and putting at risk the integrity of the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the current divergent levels of controls and their quality
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that efficient and harmonised customs controls on goods entering the EU make it possible to enhance consumer safety and tackle counterfeiting and unfair competition; encourages the Commission to set targets and develop performance indicators for customs authorities;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that within the EaP policy the EU associated countries that have made substantial progress in implementing AA/DCFTA-related reforms could eventually join the Customs Union which would facilitate trade between EaP associated countries and the EU, reduce administrative costs and foster economic growth;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Feels that better coordination is needed between the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), customs authorities and market surveillance authorities, in order not only to combat counterfeiting, but also to curb the trade in illegal products that infringe intellectual property laws in the EU;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reminds that the UK will continue to participate in the EU Customs Union during the transition period; recalls the fact that the United Kingdom will become a third country after withdrawal from the EU, thus altering the EU’s external borders; stresses that the Brexit process should not negatively impact on the development or governance of EU customs
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly welcomes the ratification of the Trade Facilitation Agreement by the EU
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the fact that the United Kingdom will become a third country after withdrawal from the EU, thus altering the EU’s external borders; stresses that the Brexit process should not negatively impact on the development or governance of EU customs union.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the fact that globalisation is increasingly connecting economic operators across different countries and enhancing the complexity of value chains; Stresses that a fully functional customs union is essential in order to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU when negotiating trade agreements; emphasises, in that context, that an efficient EU customs union should facilitate trade and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders as well as ensuring effective controls, to guarantee that products that enter our market are fully compliant with the rules and meet our standards, inter alia by fostering cooperation between the customs authorities of Member States and third countries;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that a fully functional
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that a fully functional customs union is essential in order to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU when negotiating trade agreements; emphasises that an efficient EU customs union should facilitate trade and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, in particular SMEs as well as ensuring effective controls, inter alia by fostering cooperation between the customs authorities of Member States and third countries;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that creating seamless customs processes across the Union through the reform of IT infrastructure is pivotal; strongly urges the Commission to implement without further delay the IT systems needed for the IT customs infrastructure; considers that digitalisation has
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that creating seamless customs processes across the Union through the reform of IT infrastructure is pivotal; considers that digitalisation is key to the modernisation of customs processes and has to the potential to make the exchange of information and the payment of duties more transparent and accessible, in particular for operators in third countries; Calls for the swift implementation by all parties for the new IT systems for the Customs Union before the new extended deadline of 2025; Underlines that the European Parliament will not extend the deadline further;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that creating seamless customs processes across the Union through the reform of
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that the harmonisation of training for customs agents in Europe will contribute to the effective implementation of the Union Customs Code and customs controls;
source: 631.984
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-629492_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-627794_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-629518_EN.html
|
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.492
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.794
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.518&secondRef=02
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0059&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0059_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0133New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0133_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/8/13379New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2018-06-19T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2018-05-09T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-06-19T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/date |
2018-05-09T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 052New
Rules of Procedure EP 52 |
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|