Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | ŠUICA Dubravka ( PPE), BALAS Guillaume ( S&D), KRUPA Urszula ( ECR), BEARDER Catherine ( ALDE), HÄUSLING Martin ( Verts/ALE), PEDICINI Piernicola ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety on the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes. The resolution notes that several cannabinoids which make up the cannabis plant, can help reduce certain symptoms affecting patients – such as chronic pain, inflammation or bacterial infections – and can stimulate bone growth. There is evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids may be effective in increasing appetite and decreasing weight loss associated with HIV/AIDS, in alleviating symptoms of mental disorders such as psychosis or Tourette syndrome, and in alleviating symptoms of epilepsy, as well as Alzheimer’s, arthritis, asthma, cancer, and Crohn’s disease.
Parliament pointed out that EU Member States differ widely in their approach to legislation on cannabis for medical purposes, such as on the maximum allowed levels of THC and CBD concentrations, which can lead to difficulties for countries applying a more prudent approach. Whilst the policy landscape for medical cannabis is evolving in the EU and worldwide, misunderstandings still exist even among national administrations regarding the different uses of cannabis, with the legalisation on cannabis for recreational use often being confused with the need to provide legal access to cannabis for medical purposes to all patients in need.
The resolution called on the Commission and the Member States to address the regulatory, financial and cultural barriers that weigh on scientific research into the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes and on research into cannabis in general. It considered that research on the potential benefits of medicines derived from cannabis has been underfunded and should be properly addressed under the forthcoming Ninth Framework Programme, with a view to exploring, inter alia, the possible uses of THC, CBD and other cannabinoids for medical treatment, including lessons drawn from the experience of off-label prescribing of cannabis.
Member States were asked to allow doctors to make free use of their professional judgement in prescribing regulatory-approved cannabis-based medicines to patients with relevant conditions, and to allow pharmacists to lawfully honour those prescriptions.
Parliament invited the Commission to:
- work with national authorities to provide a legal definition of medical cannabis, and to draw a clear distinction between cannabis-based medicines approved by the EMA or other regulatory agencies, medical cannabis not supported by clinical trials, and other applications of cannabis (e.g. recreational or industrial) ;
- develop a comprehensive strategy to ensure the highest standards for independent research, development, authorisation, marketing and pharmacovigilance and to avoid the abuse of products derived from cannabis;
- establish a network which would bring together the EMA, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), responsible national authorities and patient organisations, civil society, social partners, consumer organisations, healthcare professionals and NGOs, along with other relevant stakeholders, in order to ensure effective implementation of the strategy for cannabis-based medicines;
- work with Member States to improve equal access to cannabis-based medicines and to ensure that, where allowed, medicines which are effective in treating specific conditions are covered by health insurance schemes in the same way as other medicines.
- work with Member States to ensure that safe and controlled cannabis used for medicinal purposes can only be in the form of cannabis-derived products that have gone through clinical trials, regulatory assessment and approval;
- ensure that research into, and use of, medical cannabis in the Union does not in any way favour criminal drugs networks or lead to their expansion;
The resolution called on Member States to:
- reconsider their relevant legislation on the use of cannabis-based medicines when scientific research proves that the same positive effect cannot be achieved by using ordinary medicines that do not have addictive effects;
- provide a safe and equal choice for patients between different types of cannabis-based medicine, while ensuring that patients are accompanied by specialised medical professionals during their treatment;
- ensure sufficient availability of cannabis-based medicines that cater for actual needs, either by means of production in accordance with their national medical standards or perhaps through imports that comply with their national requirements for cannabis-based medicines;
- provide medical professionals with proper medical training and to encourage increased knowledge on medical cannabis based on independent and wide-ranging research.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)327
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0113/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B8-0001/2019
- Motion for a resolution: B8-0071/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE625.379
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE625.379
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B8-0001/2019
- Motion for a resolution: B8-0071/2019
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)327
Activities
- Urszula KRUPA
Plenary Speeches (2)Institutional Motions (1)Oral Questions (1)
- Guillaume BALAS
Plenary Speeches (1)Institutional Motions (1)Oral Questions (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Pilar AYUSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław HOC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dobromir SOŚNIERZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
B8-0071/2019 - Am 12/1 13/02/2019 17:30:26.000 #
B8-0071/2019 - Am 12/2 13/02/2019 17:30:38.000 #
FR | ?? | CY | EE | LT | FI | LU | IE | NL | EL | LV | MT | ES | CZ | HR | SI | PT | DK | HU | BE | IT | BG | AT | SE | SK | RO | GB | DE | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
64
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
8
|
23
|
13
|
5
|
5
|
44
|
19
|
10
|
7
|
16
|
12
|
10
|
17
|
56
|
13
|
18
|
13
|
12
|
25
|
57
|
76
|
46
|
|
GUE/NGL |
39
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
France EFDDFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom EFDDFor (6)Against (1)Abstain (6) |
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
2
|
2
|
Finland ALDEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
Spain ALDEFor (7)Against (1) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEFor (3)Against (2) |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||
ENF |
33
|
3
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
France Verts/ALEFor (5)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (2) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (3) |
|||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
1
|
Greece NI |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Poland NIAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
Germany ECRFor (2)Against (3) |
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
|||||||||||||
S&D |
148
|
France S&DFor (7)Against (2)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (6) |
3
|
3
|
Italy S&DFor (8)Against (17) |
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
5
|
3
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (9)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (1)Against (15) |
Germany S&DAgainst (22)
Arndt KOHN,
Arne LIETZ,
Babette WINTER,
Birgit SIPPEL,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Gabriele PREUSS,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Ismail ERTUG,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
|
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
||||
PPE |
169
|
14
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Netherlands PPE |
1
|
3
|
3
|
Spain PPEAgainst (13)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
5
|
4
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
3
|
Italy PPEAgainst (7) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
5
|
3
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
12
|
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
B8-0071/2019 - Am 14S 13/02/2019 17:31:57.000 #
B8-0071/2019 - Am 11 13/02/2019 17:33:48.000 #
FR | EE | CY | LT | ?? | CZ | FI | BE | LU | SI | IT | IE | NL | DK | MT | HR | LV | EL | PT | ES | HU | AT | SE | SK | RO | BG | GB | DE | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
65
|
4
|
2
|
8
|
1
|
19
|
11
|
18
|
6
|
7
|
57
|
8
|
23
|
11
|
5
|
10
|
6
|
13
|
16
|
45
|
10
|
17
|
13
|
12
|
25
|
13
|
56
|
74
|
45
|
|
Verts/ALE |
45
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
2
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (10) |
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
41
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
|||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (5) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
Spain ALDEFor (6)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
France EFDDAbstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom EFDD |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Greece NI |
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
S&D |
144
|
France S&DFor (7)Against (2)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (12)Against (12)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (2) |
Austria S&DFor (1)Against (3) |
5
|
3
|
Romania S&DFor (5)Against (6) |
1
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (10) |
Germany S&DFor (7)Against (15) |
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
Poland ECRFor (1)Against (14) |
|||||||||||||
PPE |
172
|
France PPEAgainst (12)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
3
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
Italy PPEAgainst (7) |
4
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
Spain PPEAgainst (13)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
5
|
3
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
12
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (26)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Amendments | Dossier |
84 |
2018/2775(RSP)
2018/08/17
ENVI
84 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Recital A A. whereas the Cannabis plant is made of more than 480 compounds which include more than 100 cannabinoids constituted of both psychoactive and non- psychoactive compounds. Many of the compounds constituting the Cannabis plant are unique to Cannabis
Amendment 10 #
Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas “cannabis-based medicines” are medicinal products, based on THC, on CBD and/or on other cannabinoids, supported by clinical trials and approved by a regulator, either EMA or other national regulatory agencies;
Amendment 11 #
Recital E E. whereas EU countries differ widely in their legislation with respect to cannabis for medicinal purposes, as well as allowed quantities of medicinal cannabis and maximum levels of THC and CBD concentrations; which can lead to difficulties for countries applying a more prudent approach;
Amendment 12 #
Recital E E. whereas EU countries differ widely in their
Amendment 13 #
Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas there is mounting public debate about cannabis policy, but no scientific evaluation of the impact of current legislation;
Amendment 14 #
Recital F Amendment 15 #
Recital G G. whereas the policy landscape for medical cannabis and general attitude to cannabis is evolving both in the EU and worldwide; whereas there is still misunderstanding around the different uses of cannabis even among national administrations, often confusing the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use with the necessity to provide safe and legal access to cannabis for medical purposes to all patients in need;
Amendment 16 #
Recital G G. whereas the policy landscape for medical cannabis
Amendment 17 #
Recital G G. whereas the policy landscape for medical cannabis and
Amendment 18 #
Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the use of cannabis in general may have an addictive effect and is responsible for significant social and health problems; whereas, therefore, addiction prevention and monitoring and control of illegal practices remain necessary, especially where medical cannabis is to be used more widely;
Amendment 19 #
Recital J J. whereas a review of existing scientific literature on the subject of medical cannabis provides conclusive or substantial evidence that cannabis and cannabinoids have therapeutic effects such as in the treatment of chronic pain in adults (e.g. in cancer diseases), as antiemetics
Amendment 2 #
Recital B B. whereas D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are the most known cannabinoids identified in cannabis. THC constitutes the main psychoactive and addictive constituent of cannabis, whilst CBD does not have intoxicating or addictive properties;
Amendment 20 #
Recital J J. whereas a review of existing scientific literature on the subject of
Amendment 21 #
Recital K K. whereas there
Amendment 22 #
Recital K K. whereas there is limited evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids are effective for increasing appetite and decreasing weight loss associated with HIV/AIDS,
Amendment 23 #
Recital K K. whereas there is limited evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids are effective for increasing appetite and decreasing weight loss associated with HIV/AIDS,
Amendment 24 #
Recital K K. whereas there is limited evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids are effective for increasing appetite and decreasing weight loss associated with HIV/AIDS, improving clinician-measured multiple sclerosis spasticity symptoms, improving symptoms of Tourette syndrome, improving symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder
Amendment 25 #
Recital K K. whereas there is limited evidence that cannabis or cannabinoids are effective for increasing appetite and decreasing weight loss associated with HIV/AIDS, improving clinician-measured multiple sclerosis spasticity symptoms, improving symptoms of Tourette syndrome, improving symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and drug-resistant epilepsy;
Amendment 26 #
Recital K K. whereas there is
Amendment 27 #
Recital L L. whereas the medical potentialities of cannabis, as well as the long-term risks, have not been sufficiently proven by scientific research yet; whereas official data about research and research funding on medical cannabis remain scant. Research on medical cannabis has received no direct support during the current research programme in the EU and there is little coordination about research projects on medical cannabis in Member States;
Amendment 28 #
Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas the global market for medicinal cannabis in 2015 reached $11, 4 billion, and in 2025, it is expected to reach $52, 8 billion. The market for cannabidiol (CBD) products for medicines, food and supplements is expected to grow by 700% by 2020, reaching $2,1billion in total. In Greece, 10 millions € in the pharmaceutical cannabis sector are expected as a surplus from the decriminalisation of cannabis for medicinal use in the near future. While it is estimated that 7,000 new jobs will be created and 2000 in the countryside for plant cultivation.
Amendment 29 #
Recital N N. whereas there is no uniform standardisation system for the labelling of the drugs that contain THC
Amendment 3 #
Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the cannabis plant constitutes of a numerous other cannabinoids such as Cannabichromene, Cannabinol, Cannabidiolic Acid, Cannabigerol and Tetrahydrocannabivarin, which can have neuroprotective effects, can contribute to the decrease of certain symptoms affecting patients such as chronic pain, inflammation, bacterial infections and stimulate bone growth.
Amendment 30 #
Recital N N. whereas there is no uniform standardisation system for the marking and labelling of the drugs that contain THC and CBD;
Amendment 31 #
Recital N a (new) Na. whereas, the decriminalization of cannabis in many countries, has reduced both the black market and criminal activities. Bearing also in mind, that patients end up in prison for possession of a small amount of cannabis for medicinal use. As a consequence national judicial authorities are overburdened by such cases.
Amendment 32 #
Recital O O. whereas there is little or no
Amendment 33 #
Recital O O. whereas there is little or no educational training on the impact of medical products containing THC and CBD in EU countries for medical staff - medical students, medical doctors and pharmacists, psychiatrists, as well as social campaigns for young people and women who have motherhood in their perspective;
Amendment 34 #
Recital O O. whereas
Amendment 35 #
Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas there is no intra-EU regulation concerning the placing of cannabis-based drugs on the market;
Amendment 36 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 37 #
Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for the Commission and national authorities to draw a clear distinction between
Amendment 38 #
Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for the Commission and national authorities to draw a clear distinction between
Amendment 39 #
Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for the Commission and national authorities to draw a clear distinction between
Amendment 4 #
Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas, according to the World Health Organisation1 a, cannabis use in general has an adverse impact on cognitive development, including associative neurological processes, memory and psychomotor functions, and has chronic harmful effects on the psychological health of users and other aspects of their health; _________________ 1a http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/facts /cannabis/en/
Amendment 40 #
Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for the Commission and national authorities to draw a clear distinction between medical cannabis and other applications of cannabis, many of which are illegal and possibly harmful to health;
Amendment 41 #
Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for the Commission and national authorities to d
Amendment 42 #
Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the issue of all the hemp-derived products present on the EU market which are bought without prescription, but often considered as having medical properties and/or treated as substitutes for medicines; further calls on the Commission and the Member States to work together with EFSA in this respect to guarantee comsumers’ and patients’ safety, starting from ensuring an accurate and clear labelling of these products and their content;
Amendment 43 #
Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasizes that all possible use of medical cannabis must be based on scientific research which proves the functioning of the product and which shows that the same positive effect cannot be achieved by using ordinary medicines that do not have addictive effects;
Amendment 44 #
Paragraph 2 2. Considers that research on
Amendment 45 #
Paragraph 2 2. Considers that research on
Amendment 46 #
Paragraph 2 2. Considers that research on medical cannabis has been underfunded and should be properly addressed under the next Framework Programme 9 to explore the possible uses of THC, CBD, and other cannabinoids for medical treatment, as well as their effects on the human body, including lessons drawn from the experience of off-label prescribing of cannabis;
Amendment 47 #
Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 48 #
Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to address the regulatory
Amendment 49 #
Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to address the regulatory and financial barriers which weigh on
Amendment 5 #
Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 50 #
Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to determine the priority areas for research on cannabis for medicinal and recreational3a purposes in agreement with competent authorities and drawing on pioneering research in other countries and focusing in those areas which may have the greatest added-value; _________________ 3aResearch in the field of recreational cannabis can also be useful for the use and applications of medical cannabis
Amendment 51 #
Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to determine the priority areas for research on
Amendment 52 #
Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the need to preventively exclude minors and other vulnerable groups that are susceptible to addiction from any form of such research and other research;
Amendment 53 #
Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to embark on more research and stimulate innovation with regards to projects related to the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes.
Amendment 54 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy to ensure the highest standards for the research, development, authorisation, marketing, pharmacovigilance and avoidance of abuse for cannabis-based medicines;
Amendment 55 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy to ensure the highest standards for the independent research, development, authorisation, marketing, pharmacovigilance and avoidance of abuse for cannabis-based medicines; emphasises the need for standardisation and unification of products containing Cannabis-based medicines;
Amendment 56 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy to ensure the highest standards for the research, development, authorisation, marketing, pharmacovigilance and avoidance of abuse
Amendment 57 #
Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to create a department on cannabis for therapeutic use to have a place to centralize regulatory proposals and be the point of observation, advice, information, exchange and study for everything related which would serve as a reference to all countries equally in the European Union.
Amendment 58 #
Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 59 #
Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of close cooperation and coordination with the World Health Organisation (WHO) in connection with further EU steps in the field of medical cannabis;
Amendment 6 #
Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 60 #
Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a network which would bring together both EMA and the EMCDDA as well as responsible national authorities and patient organisations, civil society, social partners, consumer organisations, healthcare professionals and NGOs together with other relevant stakeholders to ensure an effective implementation of the strategy for cannabis-based medicines;
Amendment 61 #
Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to
Amendment 62 #
Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to encourage increased knowledge among medical professionals gained from independent and wide-ranging research regarding the use of such cannabis-based medicines and
Amendment 63 #
Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to encourage increased knowledge among medical professionals, in the context of preliminary and on-going training, regarding the use of such cannabis-based medicine and consider allowing doctors to freely use their professional judgement to prescribe cannabis and cannabis-based medicines to patients with relevant conditions, and allow pharmacists to lawfully honour those prescriptions; highlights the need for training and access to literature for medical staff - medical students, medical doctors and pharmacists;
Amendment 64 #
Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to encourage increased knowledge among medical professionals regarding the use of such cannabis-based medicine and
Amendment 65 #
Paragraph 7 7. Calls on Member States to encourage increased knowledge among medical professionals regarding the use of such cannabis-based medicine and
Amendment 66 #
Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to work with Member States to improve equal access to
Amendment 67 #
Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to work with Member States to improve equal access to
Amendment 68 #
Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Emphasises that to ensure that patients have access to the right therapy, which is case specific and caters towards their individual needs as patients with single or multiple disorders, it is essential to ensure that patients are provided with comprehensive information about the full spectrum profiles of the plant strains used within the medication provided. Such information would empower patients and medical practitioners to prescribe medication which takes into consideration the holistic needs to the patient and corresponding therapy;
Amendment 69 #
Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Member States to reconsider their relevant legislation on the use of cannabis-based medicines when scientific research proves that the same positive effect cannot be achieved by using ordinary medicines that do not have addictive effects;
Amendment 7 #
Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 70 #
Paragraph 9 Amendment 71 #
Paragraph 9 Amendment 72 #
Paragraph 9 9. Calls on Member States to secure sufficient availability of safe and controlled cannabis for medicinal purposes to cater for the actual needs; be it by local production in Member States or by imports complying with the national requirements for cannabis-based medicines;
Amendment 73 #
Paragraph 9 9. Calls on Member States to secure sufficient availability of
Amendment 74 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to work with Member States to ensure safe and controlled cannabis used for medicinal purposes can only be from cannabis derived products that have been through clinical trials, regulatory assessment and approval,
Amendment 75 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Urges the Commission to ensure that research into, and use of, medical cannabis in the Union does not in any way favour criminal drugs networks or cause them to expand;
Amendment 76 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Calls on the Member States to develop a mechanism prohibiting the re- export of cannabis-based medicines in order to prevent their use as narcotic, psychotropic substances;
Amendment 77 #
Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 78 #
Paragraph 10 10. Underlines how a comprehensive and evidence based regulation of medical cannabis
Amendment 79 #
Paragraph 10 10. Underlines how a comprehensive regulation of medic
Amendment 8 #
Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 80 #
Paragraph 10 10. Underlines how a comprehensive regulation of medical cannabis would translate in additional resources for public authorities, would limit the black market
Amendment 81 #
Paragraph 10 10. Underlines how a comprehensive regulation of medical cannabis would translate in additional resources for public authorities, would limit the black market for medical cannabis consumption, would ensure product quality and accurate labelling to help in control of points of sale, would limit the access of this substance to minors and would give a legal and safe access to patients for its medicinal use - with
Amendment 82 #
Paragraph 10 10. Underlines how a comprehensive regulation of
Amendment 83 #
Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that strict prevention of addiction among minors and vulnerable groups must always form part of every regulatory framework;
Amendment 84 #
Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Stresses the need for strictly harmonised uniform regulation throughout the Union and in all Member States in order to prevent undesirable cannabis tourism for recreational purposes and the associated cross-border crime, smuggling and nuisance;
Amendment 9 #
Recital C C. whereas
source: 625.379
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/rapporteur/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-625379_EN.html
|
events/0/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.379
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0071_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0071_EN.html |
events/0/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0071&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0071_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0113New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0113_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/1 |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|