Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | LANGE Bernd ( S&D) | HÜBNER Danuta Maria ( EPP), SCHREINEMACHER Liesje ( Renew), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE), BUCHHEIT Markus ( ID), BOURGEOIS Geert ( ECR), SCHOLZ Helmut ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 459 votes to 145 with 66 abstentions, a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the allocation to the United States of a share in the tariff rate quota for high quality beef referred to in the revised memorandum of understanding regarding the importation of beef from animals not treated with certain growth-promoting hormones and increased duties applied by the United States to certain products of the European Union (2014).
A positive example of a negotiated solution between the European Union and the United States
Parliament welcomed this agreement with the US on the allocation of a share in the TRQ for high-quality beef as a solution to a longstanding trade dispute, as it sets a positive example of a negotiated solution between the EU and the US.
This agreement is to be seen in the light of the de-escalation of the trade tensions between the EU and the US agreed in the Joint US-EU Statement of 25 July 2018.
The resolution noted that the agreement does not affect current levels of market access for beef to the EU market and that the overall EU market access quota of non-hormone-treated beef must not be increased. It acknowledged that the agreement should not affect the technical characteristics of the quota, including the quality and traceability of products and that it does not affect the EU’s ban on imports of beef from animals treated with certain growth hormones.
In parallel to this resolution, Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which it gave its consent to the conclusion of the agreement.
Alleviate trade tensions
Member supported the Commission in its efforts to find a fair and balanced solution in order to dilute current trade tensions, including through this agreement while stressing the importance of setting this agreement apart from other ongoing trade negotiations between the US and the EU in which the agricultural sector should not be included.
Parliament recalled that the US, invoking national security concerns, imposed in March 2018 additional tariffs on imports of steel and aluminium, and is threatening to apply similar tariffs against the imports of motor vehicles and automotive parts from the EU.
The US imposed on 18 October 2019, in retaliation for illegal EU subsidies granted to the aircraft manufacturer Airbus, tariffs on USD 7.5 billion worth of EU imports, jeopardizing most of the EU agricultural sectors with tariff of 25 % rather than the industrial one, including aircraft with tariff of 10 %.
Members regretted the fact that the US has so far refused to work with the EU on a fair and balanced solution for our respective aircraft industries in the context of the long-standing Airbus/Boeing dispute. They also called on the US to start negotiations to resolve it.
While expressing its concern about the measures taken by the US which affect the European aviation sector and numerous agri-food products, Parliament called on the Commission to put in place support measures for European producers.
It also called on the US to revoke its unilateral additional tariffs on steel and aluminium, and olives, and to withdraw its threat to impose additional tariffs on cars and car parts.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)56
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0076/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0037/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0037/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.149
- Committee draft report: PE642.862
- Committee draft report: PE642.862
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE643.149
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0037/2019
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)56
Votes
A9-0037/2019 - Bernd Lange - Am 3 #
A9-0037/2019 - Bernd Lange - Am 4 #
A9-0037/2019 - Bernd Lange - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
38 |
2019/0142M(NLE)
2019/11/12
INTA
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 3 July 2018 on climate diplomacy,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes this agreement with the US on the allocation of a share in the TRQ for high-quality beef as a solution to a longstanding trade dispute,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and acknowledges the fact that
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and acknowledges the fact that
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and acknowledges the fact that
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 b (new) - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2019 on “climate change – a European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy in accordance with the Paris Agreement”,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and acknowledges the fact that
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the agreement reached, which makes it possible to retain this TRQ in the future, remains beneficial for the other WTO Members able to avail themselves of it; insists, therefore, that this decision should under no circumstances lead to tariff compensation by the EU vis-à-vis the WTO Members in question in their trade relations with the EU, including when negotiating bilateral trade agreements;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that in the interest of European farmers, and regardless of this shift in quota allocation, the overall EU market access quota of 45 000 tons TRQ of non-hormone-treated beef may not be increased.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the agreement does not affect current levels of market access for beef to the EU market and that it should in no way weaken the technical characteristics of the quota, both in terms of product quality and traceability, so as to ensure a high level of protection for Europeans;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the agreement does not affect current levels of market access for beef to the EU market and that it allows for the continued imposition of a ban on imports into the EU of beef from animals treated with certain growth-promoting hormones;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the agreement does not affect current levels of market access for beef to the EU market; warns against utilising agriculture as an adjustment variable to trade deals and to appease economic partners;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to prepare with the upmost attention the implementation, as from 28 January 2022, of the ban on imports of meat from animals treated with antimicrobial medicinal products used for the purpose of promoting growth or increase yield, as foreseen by Article 107 of Regulation 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products, in order to avoid any new conflict in the WTO and potential new tariff rate quota to settle such conflicts;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of finding negotiated solutions, such as this
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Supports the Commission in its efforts to and stresses the importance of finding negotiated solutions
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of finding negotiated solutions, such as this agreement, to dilute trade tensions between
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU and the US have the largest bilateral trade and investment relationship, enjoy the most integrated economic relationship in the world, and share important values and political and economic
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of setting this agreement apart from other ongoing trade negotiations between the US and the EU in which the agricultural sector should not be included;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the US to work with the EU on a fair and balanced solution for our respective aircraft industries in order to prevent the mutual imposition of countermeasures as a result of the longstanding Airbus/Boeing dispute; is concerned about the measures taken by the US which affect the European aviation sector and numerous agri-food products; calls on the Commission to put in place support measures for European producers;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the US to work with the EU on a fair and balanced solution for our respective aircraft industries
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Deplores the fact that the US has commenced the process of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement; recalls that EU trade policy must contribute to the promotion and implementation of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the US to revoke the additional tariffs on steel and aluminium, and olives, and to withdraw its threat to impose additional tariffs on cars and car parts; underlines that the full revocation of the threat to impose additional tariffs on cars and car parts at the date imposed by the US President for a final decision, i.e. mid November, is the condition for the European Parliament to agree on proceeding with the ratification;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the US, based on the WTO arbitration decision circulated on 2 October 2019
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the US on October 18th 2019, based on the WTO arbitration decision circulated on 2 October 20198
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the European Parliament has repeatedly encouraged the EU to consider ways to further raise the level of ambition of the Paris Agreement and to mainstream climate ambition into all EU policies, including trade policy [and] urges the Commission to ensure that all trade agreements signed by the EU are fully compatible with the Paris Agreement, notably by means of a mandatory fundamental climate change clause;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas unequal requirements concerning environmental protection, measures to tackle the climate crisis, or the use of antibiotics and plant protection products, and the associated lack of protection of the European market, result in a worrying distortion of competition for European agriculture;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the heavy environmental footprints of the beef cattle production in the United States, notwithstanding the trade-related adverse environmental impact raises concerns as its sustainability;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
source: 643.149
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/5/group |
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green LeftNew
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE642.862New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-642862_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.149New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-643149_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0037_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0037_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/4 |
|
commission |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE642.862
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE643.149
|
docs/2 |
|
events |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Procedure completed |
docs/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|