Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | HERBST Niclas ( EPP) | HRISTOV Ivo ( S&D), GADE Søren ( Renew), KELLER Ska ( Verts/ALE), RAFALSKA Elżbieta ( ECR), HAZEKAMP Anja ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 22 against, with 77 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU)
2016/1139 as regards the introduction of capacity limits for Eastern Baltic cod, data collection and control measures in the Baltic Sea, and Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 as regards permanent cessation for fleets fishing for Eastern Baltic cod.
The proposed regulation aims to provide financial support to fishermen affected by the closure of the Eastern Baltic cod fishery to permanently decommission their fishing vessels.
Parliament adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure by amending the Commission proposal as follows.
Reduction of fishing capacity for Eastern Baltic cod, Western Baltic cod and Western Baltic herring
Under the amended text, Member States which have adopted an action plan in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy for fleet segments which include fishing vessels that have targeted the three stocks concerned could implement measures for the permanent cessation of fishing activities in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 on the European Fund for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (EFAMF).
Support for measures for the permanent cessation should be granted only if the action plan sets out specific fishing capacity reduction targets for fishing vessels with fishing opportunities for one or more of the three stocks concerned.
The fishing capacity ceiling of a Member State implementing permanent cessation measures should decrease by an amount equal to the fishing capacity corresponding to the fishing vessels that are withdrawn with public aid.
Member States implementing the permanent cessation measures should communicate to the Commission the yearly average or the years 2015 to 2019 of the total fishing capacity of all fishing vessels with an allocation of fishing opportunities for any of the three stocks concerned. Moreover, Member States should also communicate to the Commission the total amount of fishing capacity withdrawn for fishing vessels with an allocation of fishing opportunities for any of the three stocks concerned.
Control of catches
Given the serious condition of the three stocks concerned, the amended text foresees that Member States should enhance monitoring and control of vessels with by-catch quota for Eastern Baltic cod or with fishing opportunities for Western Baltic cod or Western Baltic herring. Furthermore, the threshold quantity as of which a fishing vessel is required to send prior notification of landing and to land its catch in a specific place should be reduced to 250 kilograms for Eastern Baltic cod and Western Baltic cod.
PURPOSE: to provide financial support to fishermen affected by the closure of the Eastern Baltic cod fishery to permanently decommission their fishing vessels.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Baltic Sea ecosystem has been fragile for decades. However, it was only in 2019 that the scientists warned about the impact of environmental conditions on Eastern Baltic cod. This situation is leading to a steep decline in this species and even in the total absence of fishing activities, the Eastern Baltic cod stock is not expected to recover until 2024.
Therefore given the above situation, this year, acting upon the best available scientific advice and in accordance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and the Multiannual Plan for the Baltic Sea established by Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Commission adopted first emergency measures in July 2019 prohibiting the fishing of Eastern Baltic cod until year-end; and secondly, the Council decided in October 2019 on necessary and unprecedented fishing restrictions for 2020.
Commission analysis shows that the fleet segments with the highest dependency on Eastern Baltic cod encompass more than 300 vessels, mainly trawlers and netters in Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, and to a lesser extent Denmark. These fleet segments are of significant socioeconomic importance, representing between roughly 20% and 50% of the respective national fleet in Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, expressed in full-time equivalents. Of these, only a minority seem resilient enough to survive a short-term – but not a medium or long-term – closure.
The Commission has therefore concluded that urgent measures are needed in this sector. Support for the permanent cessation of activities through ship scrapping has been granted until the end of 2017 under the European Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Fund (EAMF) established by Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council . This proposal would reintroduce this measure, under new and strict conditions, for the Eastern Baltic cod fleet until the end of the current FEAMP period (2014-2020).
CONTENT: the proposal to amend Regulations (EU) 2016/1139 and (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council provides the following:
Financial assistance of the EMFF
The proposal aims to allow Member States affected by the exceptional situation of Eastern Baltic cod to grant financial support for achieving and maintaining a balance between the fleet capacity and the fishing opportunities by making financial support for permanent cessation of fishing activities through scrapping eligible under the EMFF 2014-2022.
These Member States would have the possibility to redirect available appropriations for storage aid and Integrated Maritime Policy inside the financial envelope of each Member State to the permanent cessation of fishing activities with a view to reinforce the need to scrap vessels, while at the same time not negatively impacting the achievements of other CFP objectives and the implementation of the EMFF.
Aid for the permanent cessation of fishing activities shall only be granted for the scrapping of fishing vessels. It shall not be granted for the retroffiting of fishing vessels for activities other than commercial fishing, such as recreational fishing, that have a detrimental impact on the ecosystem.
Reduction capacity
According to ICES advice, approximately 70% of the cod landings in subdivisions 24-28 were taken by trawlers with a BACOMA with a 120 mm escape window or T90, and 15% of the cod landings were taken by gillnetters with mesh sizes between 110 mm and 156 mm.
Under this proposal, the Member State capacity level of these two fleet segments shall be capped at levels of active vessels in the most recent years before the application of emergency measures, i.e. 2017 and 2018, and shall be reduced when vessels are withdrawn with public aid, with the aim of rebuilding the stock of Eastern Baltic cod.
Monitoring of cod catches
Given the serious condition of the Eastern Baltic cod stock additional measures to control the fisheries catching Eastern Baltic cod should be introduced. The threshold quantity as of which a fishing vessel is required to land its catch in a specific place should be reduced to 250kg. Masters of fishing vessels having quotas for cod and fishing in areas where Eastern Baltic cod is present are to ensure that their fishing activity can be monitored at any time by the national competent authorities.
From 2020 onwards, vessels fishing for cod in the Eastern Baltic shall be equipped with a satellite-based vessel monitoring system (VMS) or other equivalent electronic monitoring system. In order to improve data collection, the observer coverage shall reach at least 20% for vessels catching Eastern Baltic cod.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2020/1781
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 400 30.11.2020, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00041/2020/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0300/2020
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE658.813
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2020)005908
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2020)005908
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE658.813
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0093/2020
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0093/2020
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE646.964
- Committee draft report: PE644.735
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2019)0564
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE644.735
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE646.964
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0093/2020
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2020)005908
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE658.813
- Draft final act: 00041/2020/LEX
Votes
A9-0093/2020 - Niclas Herbst - Am 20 #
Amendments | Dossier |
26 |
2019/0246(COD)
2020/01/31
PECH
26 amendments...
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 commits to implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to ensure that negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are minimised. The plan is to be coherent with Union environmental legislation, in particular with the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020 as set out in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council4. It is essential that the plan contributes to having a healthy stock, which is then linked to sustainable fishing. _________________ 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 establishing a multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2187/2005 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 (OJ L 191, 15.7.2016, p. 1). 4Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Those high nutrient inputs result inter alia from insufficiently implemented directives such as Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The declining condition of Eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) has been linked to that situation. According to ICES, the stock suffers from an unsustainably low biomass due to a combination of declining recruitment, environmental factors and changes in the ecosystem (oxygen depletion, increased temperatures, pollution, etc.) leading to a high natural mortality (about three times the fishing mortality), and an excessive fishing mortality given the status of the stock. The biomass of commercial sized cod is presently at the lowest level observed since the 1950s. Moreover, ICES estimates that the spawning stock biomass will remain below the sustainability reference point in the medium-term (2024) even with no fishing at all. In its stock advice for 2020 ICES therefore advises zero catches.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The declining condition of Eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) has been linked to that situation. According to ICES, the stock suffers from an unsustainably low biomass due to a combination of declining recruitment, environmental factors, low availability of prey species, and changes in the ecosystem leading to a high natural mortality (about three times the fishing mortality), and an excessive fishing mortality given the status of the stock. The biomass of commercial sized cod is presently at the lowest level observed since the 1950s. Moreover, ICES estimates that the spawning stock biomass will remain below the sustainability reference point in the medium-term (2024) even with no fishing at all. In its stock advice for 2020 ICES therefore advises zero catches.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Fisheries management in the Baltic Sea also suffers from an imbalance between active fleet segments and available fishing opportunities as set out in the Commission Communication of 7 June 2019 on the State of Play of the Common Fisheries Policy and Consultation on the Fishing Opportunities for 2020.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Based on the stock assessment for Eastern Baltic cod, the Commission adopted Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/12485
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Eastern Baltic cod is also caught by fishermen from third countries, which has an impact on the stock of the species as well.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The fishing fleets so far dependent on Eastern Baltic cod do not have the possibility to fish for other stocks as an alternative. It is estimated that offsetting the economic losses caused by the Eastern Baltic cod closure would require additional catches of around 20,000 tonnes in alternative species. However, the Council also agreed
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The fishing fleets so far dependent on Eastern Baltic cod do not have the possibility to fish for other stocks as an alternative. It is estimated that offsetting
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Commission analysis shows that the fleet segments with the highest dependency on Eastern Baltic cod encompass more than 300 vessels, mainly trawlers and netters in Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, and to a lesser extent, Denmark and Germany. These fleet segments are of significant socioeconomic importance, representing between roughly 20% and 50% of the respective national fleet in Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, expressed in full-time equivalents. Only a minority seem resilient enough to survive a short-
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the serious condition of the Eastern Baltic cod stock additional measures to control the fisheries catching Eastern Baltic cod should be introduced. The threshold quantity as of which a fishing vessel is required to land its catch in a specific place should be reduced to 2
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) ICES issued an analytical assessment of Eastern Baltic cod but was not in a position to provide fishing mortality ranges and various reference points because of a lack of required data. Therefore, data collection is to be improved
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) ICES issued an analytical assessment of Eastern Baltic cod but was not in a position to provide fishing mortality ranges and various reference points because of a lack of required data. Therefore, data collection is to be improved by ensuring that the observer coverage at sea of vessels catching Eastern Baltic cod is at least
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In order to mitigate the
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) In order to mitigate the adverse economic effects caused by the exceptional
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Given the fragile ecosystem in the Baltic Sea, support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities should not be granted for the retrofitting of fishing vessels for other activities than commercial fishing, such as recreational fishing
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Given the fragile ecosystem in the Baltic Sea, support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities should not be granted for the retrofitting of fishing vessels for any other activit
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) Given the cultural and multi- generational characteristics of the coastal fishing profession, alternatives to the scrapping of vessels that would allow fishermen to remain in the profession should be provided.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 states that the EFPR can support investments that contribute to the diversification of fishermen’s incomes through the development of complementary activities.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) Compensation for the permanent cessation of vessels’ activities will not be attractive to operators if it is deducted from the temporary cessation compensation paid in the past pursuant to Article 25(5) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014. Such a deduction would not make sense because services have been provided in the past for the temporary cessation of vessels’ activities, while compensation for permanent cessation of activities concerns future benefits.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In view of the bad economic situation of Union fishing vessels with a significant dependence on Eastern Baltic cod and the need to ensure the availability
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 Article 14 – point a (a) 2
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 Article 14b – paragraph 1 Union vessels with an allocation of fishing opportunities for cod in ICES subdivisions 22-24 and 24-32 shall be subject to at least
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 Article 34 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1a (new) 1a. In Article 34(2) the following subparagraph is added: “By way of derogation from points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph, in the case of Eastern Baltic cod the minimum number of active days at sea referred to in those points may be 75 days per year.”.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 Article 34 – paragraph 4 c a (new) 4ca. Support granted to ship-owners under Article 33 shall not be deducted from support received by ship-owners under this Article in respect of the same vessel.
source: 646.964
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2020-10-12T00:00:00New
2020-10-11T00:00:00 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2020)646129New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)646129 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE644.735New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-644735_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.964New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-646964_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/8 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/4 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/9 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/pech/lcag/2020/09-30/PECH_LA(2020)005908_EN.pdf
|
events/7 |
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE644.735New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE644.735 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.964New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.964 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/0/docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.964
|
docs/1 |
|
links |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
otherinst |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|