BETA


2019/2184(INI) Improving development effectiveness and efficiency of aid

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE TOBÉ Tomas (icon: EPP EPP) MAJORINO Pierfrancesco (icon: S&D S&D), BIJOUX Stéphane (icon: Renew Renew), MARQUARDT Erik (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ZIMNIOK Bernhard (icon: ID ID), KEMPA Beata (icon: ECR ECR), URBÁN CRESPO Miguel (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2021/06/02
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2020/11/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2020/11/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2020/11/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 331 votes to 294, with 72 abstentions, a resolution on improving development effectiveness and the efficiency of aid.

The EU is the world’s biggest donor of official development assistance (ODA), to a total of EUR 74.4 billion in 2018 representing almost 57 % of all ODA worldwide. It is committed to promoting effective development cooperation geared towards ending all forms of poverty and inequality.

The context for development cooperation has changed over the years, with the emergence of new global challenges such as climate change, migration, food insecurity, geopolitical rivalry, terrorism and violent extremism, and outbreaks of infectious diseases such as COVID-19.

The EU should take the lead in using the principles of aid effectiveness and aid efficiency to secure real impact and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, while leaving no-one behind, in its partner countries.

Increased cooperation

Members stressed that the EU should use its powerful toolbox of instruments (grants, loans, etc) and aid modalities in a coordinated manner to allow task sharing and avoid fragmentation of aid, and identify priorities where it can effectively provide the greatest value added impact. It should also closely monitor the use of funds and take all necessary measures to avoid any misuse of aid funds. In this regard, Members called for effective mechanisms to be put in place to thoroughly control the final destination of those funds and assess the projects which received funding.

The resolution highlighted the need to implement the policy objectives in the new European Consensus on Development in a more strategic and targeted manner in each partner country, thereby respecting policy coherence for development principles.

The EU is also urged to engage directly with and to build inclusive sustainable partnerships with countries of origin and transit of migration, based on the specific needs of each country and the individual circumstances of migrants.

Members stressed that, in order to make development aid more effective, deliver long-lasting results and address local needs, in particular in protracted crisis and post-crisis settings, it is imperative to improve the coordination of humanitarian aid and development assistance and to strengthen the humanitarian-development nexus and its links with actions related to peace and security in developing countries.

The Commission and the Member States are called on to enhance cooperation with local authorities in partner countries and for budget support as an aid modality to be used at sub-national level, and for redistribution mechanisms between different levels of government and across regions to be developed with the primary objective of reducing in-country disparities and inequalities.

Parliament considered that European development aid and public investments should promote joint strategic priorities and policy objectives, including poverty eradication, climate and environmental action, economic and trade policies and migration management, and should also be fully aligned with the principles of fundamental rights, democracy and good governance.

Members stressed that making humanitarian aid and emergency aid allocation conditional on cooperation with the EU on migration or security issues is not compatible with agreed development effectiveness principles.

Joint programming

Parliament called on the Commission and the Council to scale up joint programming between the EU and its Member States. Joint programming has proven to be successful in terms of policy coherence across political, trade, development and security strategies.

Members called on the Commission to publish, at least biannually, an aid effectiveness progress report, covering joint planning, joint implementation and joint results frameworks, and actions by EU institutions, Member States and local and regional authorities.

The resolution stressed that in view of the future implementation of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI), joint programming and implementation by the EU, its Member States and EU development financing partners should build upon the aid effectiveness principles.

In addition, the Commission should ensure that the programming and implementation of these modalities is coordinated, strategically aligned with partner countries' priorities and processes, and focused on delivering outcomes and impacts relevant to achieving the sustainable development objectives (SDGs) in the specific context of each partner country. Progress in combating discrimination and violence against women and girls in partner countries should be seen as a key aspect of aid effectiveness.

In the interests of transparency, Parliament encouraged the EU to step up its efforts to ensure public access to and dissemination of data, as well as reporting on EU development aid spending. It also stressed the importance of exchanging best practice, coordinating policies and actions and working together with other actors, such as the UN and its agencies, that provide aid in partner countries.

Documents
2020/11/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2020/11/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Development adopted the report by Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) on improving development effectiveness and the efficiency of aid.

The EU is the world’s biggest donor of official development assistance (ODA), to a total of EUR 74.4 billion in 2018 representing almost 57 % of all ODA worldwide. It is committed to promoting effective development cooperation geared towards ending all forms of poverty and inequality.

The context for development cooperation has changed over the years, with the emergence of new global challenges such as climate change, migration, food insecurity, geopolitical rivalry, terrorism and violent extremism, and outbreaks of infectious diseases such as COVID-19.

The EU should take the lead in using the principles of aid effectiveness and aid efficiency to secure real impact and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, while leaving no-one behind, in its partner countries.

Increased cooperation

Members stressed that the EU should use its powerful toolbox of instruments (grants, loans, etc) and aid modalities in a coordinated manner to allow task sharing and avoid fragmentation of aid, and identify priorities where it can effectively provide the greatest value added impact. It should also closely monitor the use of funds and take all necessary measures to avoid any misuse of aid funds. In this regard, Members called for effective mechanisms to be put in place to thoroughly control the final destination of those funds and assess the projects which received funding.

The report highlighted the need to implement the policy objectives in the new European Consensus on Development in a more strategic and targeted manner in each partner country, thereby respecting policy coherence for development principles.

The EU is also urged to engage directly with and to build inclusive sustainable partnerships with countries of origin and transit of migration, based on the specific needs of each country and the individual circumstances of migrants.

Members stressed that, in order to make development aid more effective, deliver long-lasting results and address local needs, in particular in protracted crisis and post-crisis settings, it is imperative to improve the coordination of humanitarian aid and development assistance and to strengthen the humanitarian-development nexus and its links with actions related to peace and security in developing countries.

The Commission and the Member States are called on to enhance cooperation with local authorities in partner countries and for budget support as an aid modality to used at sub-national level, and for redistribution mechanisms between different levels of government and across regions to be developed with the primary objective of reducing in-country disparities and inequalities.

Noting with grave concern that the EU and Member States are currently attaching conditions to aid related to cooperation by developing countries on migration and border control efforts, Members stressed that aid must never be conditional on migration control.

Joint programming

Joint programming has proven to be successful in terms of policy coherence across political, trade, development and security strategies. The committee called on the Commission to publish, at least biannually, an aid effectiveness progress report, covering joint planning, joint implementation and joint results frameworks, and actions by EU institutions, Member States and local and regional authorities.

The report stressed that in view of the future implementation of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI), joint programming and implementation by the EU, its Member States and EU development financing partners should build upon the aid effectiveness principles.

Documents
2020/10/29
   EP - Vote in committee
2020/09/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2020/02/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/01/07
   EP - TOBÉ Tomas (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2019/12/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Votes

A9-0212/2020 - Tomas Tobé - Am 1 #

2020/11/24 Outcome: +: 363, -: 296, 0: 41
IT FR PL CZ RO HU DK SK LV LT HR SI MT BG DE EE FI EL SE NL CY LU AT BE PT IE ES
Total
75
79
51
21
33
21
14
14
8
11
12
8
6
17
95
7
13
21
21
29
6
6
19
20
21
13
59
icon: PPE PPE
185

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Belgium ECR

2
icon: ID ID
75

Czechia ID

2

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3
icon: Renew Renew
97

Italy Renew

Against (1)

1

Hungary Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Estonia Renew

3

Finland Renew

Against (1)

2

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Belgium Renew

4

Ireland Renew

2
icon: NI NI
31

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia NI

2

Germany NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
144

Slovakia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Estonia S&D

2

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

A9-0212/2020 - Tomas Tobé - Am 2 #

2020/11/24 Outcome: +: 337, -: 309, 0: 54
IT PL CZ RO HU SK DK HR LV LT SI MT BG EE NL FI SE FR CY LU EL AT BE PT DE IE ES
Total
75
51
21
33
21
14
14
12
8
11
8
6
17
7
29
13
21
79
6
6
21
19
20
21
95
13
59
icon: PPE PPE
185

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

4

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ID ID
75

Czechia ID

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Austria ID

3
icon: Renew Renew
97

Italy Renew

Against (1)

1

Hungary Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Estonia Renew

3

Finland Renew

Against (1)

2

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Belgium Renew

4

Ireland Renew

2
icon: NI NI
31

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

1

Germany NI

2

Ireland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
144

Slovakia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Estonia S&D

2

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3

A9-0212/2020 - Tomas Tobé – Résolution #

2020/11/25 Outcome: +: 331, -: 294, 0: 72
FR RO HU PL CZ IT DK SI HR BG LV SK LT EE FI SE BE EL MT CY LU NL IE AT DE PT ES
Total
79
33
21
51
21
74
14
8
12
17
8
14
11
7
14
21
21
20
6
6
6
29
13
19
92
21
59
icon: PPE PPE
186

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Malta PPE

2
2

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: ID ID
74

Czechia ID

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3
icon: Renew Renew
98

Hungary Renew

2

Italy Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Bulgaria Renew

3

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia Renew

3

Finland Renew

Against (1)

3

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3

Belgium Renew

4

Luxembourg Renew

2

Ireland Renew

2

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
30

Hungary NI

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

1

Germany NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
140

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Latvia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
208 2019/2184(INI)
2020/09/25 DEVE 208 amendments...
source: 658.707

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-PR-648376_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-658707_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: TOBÉ Tomas date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: TOBÉ Tomas date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.376
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.707
docs/2
date
2021-06-02T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=54403&j=0&l=en title: SP(2021)129
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0323_EN.html title: T9-0323/2020
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2020-11-23-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=54403&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0323_EN.html title: T9-0323/2020
events/5
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0323_EN.html title: T9-0323/2020
summary
events/6
date
2020-11-26T00:00:00
type
End of procedure in Parliament
body
EP
docs/2
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0323_EN.html title: T9-0323/2020
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0323_EN.html title: T9-0323/2020
forecasts
  • date: 2020-11-25T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
events/3
date
2020-11-23T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2020-11-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
forecasts/0
date
2020-11-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/1
date
2020-11-25T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
forecasts/1/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts/0/date
Old
2020-11-23T00:00:00
New
2020-11-25T00:00:00
docs/2
date
2020-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0212_EN.html title: A9-0212/2020
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Development adopted the report by Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) on improving development effectiveness and the efficiency of aid.
  • The EU is the world’s biggest donor of official development assistance (ODA), to a total of EUR 74.4 billion in 2018 representing almost 57 % of all ODA worldwide. It is committed to promoting effective development cooperation geared towards ending all forms of poverty and inequality.
  • The context for development cooperation has changed over the years, with the emergence of new global challenges such as climate change, migration, food insecurity, geopolitical rivalry, terrorism and violent extremism, and outbreaks of infectious diseases such as COVID-19.
  • The EU should take the lead in using the principles of aid effectiveness and aid efficiency to secure real impact and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, while leaving no-one behind, in its partner countries.
  • Increased cooperation
  • Members stressed that the EU should use its powerful toolbox of instruments (grants, loans, etc) and aid modalities in a coordinated manner to allow task sharing and avoid fragmentation of aid, and identify priorities where it can effectively provide the greatest value added impact. It should also closely monitor the use of funds and take all necessary measures to avoid any misuse of aid funds. In this regard, Members called for effective mechanisms to be put in place to thoroughly control the final destination of those funds and assess the projects which received funding.
  • The report highlighted the need to implement the policy objectives in the new European Consensus on Development in a more strategic and targeted manner in each partner country, thereby respecting policy coherence for development principles.
  • The EU is also urged to engage directly with and to build inclusive sustainable partnerships with countries of origin and transit of migration, based on the specific needs of each country and the individual circumstances of migrants.
  • Members stressed that, in order to make development aid more effective, deliver long-lasting results and address local needs, in particular in protracted crisis and post-crisis settings, it is imperative to improve the coordination of humanitarian aid and development assistance and to strengthen the humanitarian-development nexus and its links with actions related to peace and security in developing countries.
  • The Commission and the Member States are called on to enhance cooperation with local authorities in partner countries and for budget support as an aid modality to used at sub-national level, and for redistribution mechanisms between different levels of government and across regions to be developed with the primary objective of reducing in-country disparities and inequalities.
  • Noting with grave concern that the EU and Member States are currently attaching conditions to aid related to cooperation by developing countries on migration and border control efforts, Members stressed that aid must never be conditional on migration control.
  • Joint programming
  • Joint programming has proven to be successful in terms of policy coherence across political, trade, development and security strategies. The committee called on the Commission to publish, at least biannually, an aid effectiveness progress report, covering joint planning, joint implementation and joint results frameworks, and actions by EU institutions, Member States and local and regional authorities.
  • The report stressed that in view of the future implementation of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI), joint programming and implementation by the EU, its Member States and EU development financing partners should build upon the aid effectiveness principles.
docs/2
date
2020-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0212_EN.html title: A9-0212/2020
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0212_EN.html title: A9-0212/2020
events/2
date
2020-11-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2020-10-29T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.707
docs/1
date
2020-09-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE658.707
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
URBÁN CRESPO Miguel
group
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
forecasts/0/date
Old
2020-11-11T00:00:00
New
2020-11-23T00:00:00
forecasts/0/date
Old
2020-06-15T00:00:00
New
2020-11-11T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.376
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: TOBÉ Tomas date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: TOBÉ Tomas date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
docs
  • date: 2020-02-28T00:00:00 docs: title: PE648.376 type: Committee draft report body: EP
forecasts
  • date: 2020-06-15T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/1
name
MARQUARDT Erik
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/0
name
MAJORINO Pierfrancesco
group
Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
abbr
S&D
events
  • date: 2019-12-19T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • DEVE/9/02069
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: TOBÉ Tomas date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
name: KEMPA Beata group: European Conservatives and Reformists Group abbr: ECR
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
associated
False