Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | DELLI Karima ( Verts/ALE) | ADAMOWICZ Magdalena ( EPP), TAX Vera ( S&D), NAGTEGAAL Caroline ( Renew), LECHANTEUX Julie ( ID), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan ( ECR), FERREIRA João ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | LÓPEZ Javi ( S&D) | Joëlle MÉLIN ( ID), Manuel BOMPARD ( GUE/NGL), Catherine CHABAUD ( RE), Pernille WEISS ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 453 votes to 92, with 154 abstentions, a resolution on technical and operational measures for more efficient and cleaner maritime transport.
Maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy, with almost 90 % of the EU’s external freight trade being seaborne. They also play an important role for tourism.
They are critical for ensuring uninterrupted supply chains, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
International maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5 % of global GHG emission. A system for monitoring, reporting and verifying CO2 emissions from maritime transport is currently under revision, aiming at reducing shipping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in EU waters.
If mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced, emissions from international maritime transport could increase from about 90 % of 2008 emissions in 2018 to 90-130 % of 2008 emissions by 2050, and thereby not contribute sufficiently to the achievement of the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
Clean energy incentive schemes
Parliament deplored the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil fuels, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources. It called on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting and further incentivising, including through tax exemptions, the use of alternatives to heavy fuels that are considerably reducing the impact on climate and the environment in the maritime sector.
The resolution stressed the need to effectively tackle emissions from ship fuel, to phase out the use of heavy fuel oil in shipping, and to invest in technologies such as LNG for a gradual transition to zero-emission alternatives in the maritime sector.
Ports and freight
Noting the cross-border dimension of seaports, Parliament emphasised the role of ports as clusters of all modes of transport, energy, industry and the blue economy. It called on the Commission to support, through legislation, the goal of zero emissions (GHG and air pollutants) at berth, and to promote the development of clean multimodal solutions in ports.
The Commission should also take swift action to regulate access to EU ports for the most polluting ships on the basis of the framework of the Port State Control Directive and encourage the use of clean electricity or other energy-efficient technology for shore power.
The resolution called for a clear strategy to promote roll-on/roll-off of maritime freight, so as to reduce the presence of heavy vehicles on the roads. The Green Deal should promote a modal shift to short sea shipping, along with rail and inland waterways, as a sustainable alternative to road and air transport of goods and passengers. The concept of motorways of the sea should be encouraged.
Emission control areas and the IMO
Members stressed the urgent health and environmental need to establish a sulphur and nitrogen emission control areas covering all Mediterranean countries. The Commission should provide for the extension of these emission control areas to all EU seas to achieve a uniform reduction in the permitted NOx and SOx emission levels from ships.
Ships and propulsion
Members called on the Commission, shipowners and ship-operators to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed optimisation, including slow steaming where appropriate, innovation in hydrodynamics optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion methods, such as wind-assist technologies, vessel optimisation and better optimisation within the maritime logistics chain.
The Commission is called on to:
- integrate alternative propulsion systems, including wind and solar, into the upcoming FuelEU Maritime initiative;
- introduce measures, accompanied with the necessary funding, to enable European shipyards to make additional investments into sustainable, social and digitalised shipbuilding.
EU funding
Members called on the Commission to:
- provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe and InvestEU programmes, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels;
- make projects aimed at decarbonising maritime transport and reducing polluting emissions, including the necessary port infrastructure and facilities, eligible under cohesion policy and through the European Structural and Investment Funds, as well as under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the European Green Deal;
- promote and invest in a European green shipping industry within the Union as part of its European Industrial Recovery Plan.
Control and implementation
Members called for an assessment of the introduction of a European labelling scheme, which should aim to effectively reduce emissions and increase the attractiveness of the sector. They called for the implementation of the ‘green ship’ concept, which should take into account emission reduction, waste treatment and environmental impact.
Parliament called for a revision of the Port State Control Directive by the end of 2021 at the latest to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships and simplified procedures. It called on the Commission to increase, in coordination with the ILO, capacity-building for third countries on inspections and enforcement.
Lastly, Members stressed that the partnership envisaged in the context of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU should ensure an appropriate level playing field in environmental and social areas without causing disruptions to the transport trade links, including efficient customs checks.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Karima DELLI (Greens/EFA, FR) on technical and operational measures for more efficient and cleaner maritime transport.
Maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy, with almost 90 % of the EU’s external freight trade being seaborne. They are critical for ensuring uninterrupted supply chains, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
International maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5 % of global GHG emission. A system for monitoring, reporting and verifying CO2 emissions from maritime transport is currently under revision, aiming at reducing shipping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in EU waters.
Fair competition
Members deplored the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil fuels, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources. They called on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting and further incentivising, including through tax exemptions, the use of alternatives to heavy fuels that are considerably reducing the impact on climate and the environment in the maritime sector.
The report acknowledged the impact of the use of heavy fuel oil and stressed the need to effectively address fuel emissions by ships and gradually phase out the use of heavy fuel oil in shipping, not only as a fuel itself but also as a blending substance for marine fuels.
Ports and freight
Members called on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero pollution (GHG emissions and air pollutants) at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean multimodal solutions in ports supported through a corridor approach.
It should also take swift action to regulate EU port access for the most polluting ships based on the Port State Control directive framework, and to incentivise and support the use of on-shore power supply using clean electricity or any other energy-saving technologies that have a considerable effect on diminishing GHG emissions and air pollutants.
On freight, the report called for a clear strategy to promote Roll-On-Roll-Off (RO-RO) shipping for freight, thereby reducing the presence of heavy-duty vehicles from roads. The concept of Motorways of the Sea should be promoted.
Emission control areas and the IMO
Members stressed the urgent health and environmental need to establish a sulphur and nitrogen emission control areas covering all Mediterranean countries. The Commission should provide for the extension of these emission control areas to all EU seas to achieve a uniform reduction in the permitted NOx and SOx emission levels from ships.
Ships and propulsion
Members called on the Commission, shipowners and ship-operators to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed optimisation, including slow steaming where appropriate, innovation in hydrodynamics optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion methods, such as wind-assist technologies, vessel optimisation and better optimisation within the maritime logistics chain.
They also called on the Commission to:
- integrate alternative propulsion systems, including wind and solar, into the upcoming FuelEU Maritime initiative;
- introduce measures, accompanied with the necessary funding, to enable European shipyards to make additional investments into sustainable, social and digitalised shipbuilding.
EU funding
The report called on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe and InvestEU programmes, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels.
The committee regretted the Council decision to reduce the budget allocation for future-oriented programmes, such as the CEF, InvestEU and Horizon Europe and noted that the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation agenda needs to be backed by corresponding funding and financing instruments.
Control and implementation
Members called on the Commission to ensure the transparency and availability of information on the environmental impact and energy performance of ships and to assess the establishment of a European label scheme which should aim to effectively reduce emissions and raise the sector's attractiveness.
There is also a need to develop and implement the ‘green ship’ scheme, which should take into account emission reduction, waste treatment and environmental impact, notably through the sharing of experience and expertise.
The report called for a revision of the Port State Control Directive by the end of 2021 at the latest to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships and simplified procedures. It called on the Commission to increase, in coordination with the ILO, capacity-building for third countries on inspections and enforcement.
Lastly, Members stressed that the partnership envisaged in the context of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU should ensure an appropriate level playing field in environmental and social areas without causing disruptions to the transport trade links, including efficient customs checks, which should not hamper the competitiveness of the EU fleet and should ensure smooth export and import operations between UK and EU ports.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)537
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0131/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0029/2021
- Committee opinion: PE650.358
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.197
- Committee draft report: PE658.855
- Committee draft report: PE658.855
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.197
- Committee opinion: PE650.358
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)537
Votes
Un transport maritime plus efficace et plus propre - More efficient and cleaner maritime transport - Effizienterer und saubererer Seeverkehr - A9-0029/2021 - Karima Delli - Am 1 #
A9-0029/2021 - Karima Delli - Am 2 #
A9-0029/2021 - Karima Delli - Am 3 #
Un transport maritime plus efficace et plus propre - More efficient and cleaner maritime transport - Effizienterer und saubererer Seeverkehr - A9-0029/2021 - Karima Delli - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
371 |
2019/2193(INI)
2020/09/14
ENVI
133 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas healthy oceans and the preservation thereof are essential for humankind as climate regulators, as producers of half of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere, as hosts of biodiversity, a
Amendment 10 #
B. whereas CO2 emissions from maritime transport, according to the new 'Fourth IMO Green House Gas Study' from August 2020, are projected to increase by
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4 d. Recommends the Commission to secure the use of promising sustainable fuels when a future revision of the Energy Taxation Directive 2003/96/EC will be undertaken;
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use shore-side electricity
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use recharging and refuelling infrastructures including shore-side electricity to decrease greenhouse gas and air polluting emissions at berth;
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use shore-side electricity as a way to decrease greenhouse gas and
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use shore-side electricity
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use shore-side electricity to decrease greenhouse gas and air polluting emissions; calls for non- compliant vessels to be eventually banned from European ports; points out that this would reduce sulphur oxide, nitrogen oxide and fine particle emissions in ports by over 90%, and could reduce CO2 emissions by the same amount using sustainable energy sources;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to urgently fulfil its commitment to regulate access of the most polluting ships to ports and oblige docked ships to use shore-side electricity to decrease greenhouse gas and air polluting emissions; calls on the Commission to support Member States in modernising seaports so as to provide them with suitably equipped infrastructure for this purpose;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Underlines that in line with the objectives of the Green Deal, the Union must accompany the decarbonisation of the maritime sector with a strategic approach towards EU ports to support their role as facilitator of the energy transition; emphasises that Member States should be encouraged to stimulate the development of zero-emission ports and invest in refuelling and recharging infrastructures; this would ensure immediate health benefits to all citizens living in port and coastal areas, as well as limit negative impacts on marine and coastal biodiversity in these areas, which also represent vast land territories, some of which are part of the Natura 2000 network;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that EU ports have adequate infrastructure in place to allow shipping to go zero-emission whilst in port and to bunker the renewable sustainable alternative fuels for use whilst at sea; calls in this context on the Commission to adopt a plan that secures more on-shore electricity (port power grid) and other mobile installations for alternative fuels where relevant;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas ships transport 80% of the world's goods while accounting for 6.7% of final oil consumption and 2% to 3% of GHG emissions; whereas stopovers in European ports are responsible for 10% of these emissions; whereas CO2 emissions from maritime transport are projected to increase by 50 % to 250 % by 20501 in a business as usual scenario
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to provide financial incentives for green transport, e.g. through public procurement and provisional tax exemptions for power supplied to electric vessels; notes that ports could charge sliding-scale taxes in line with environmental criteria; at the same time, governments could work with financial institutions to provide green transport funding;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on European and national institutions to be extremely vigilant with regard to foreign investment in European ports, especially from China, so as to prevent distortions of competition in Europe or any adverse ecological impact;
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of extending emission control areas (ECAs) to all EU seas;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of extending emission control areas (ECAs) to all EU seas
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of extending emission control areas (ECAs) to all EU seas, especially in OR waters; calls on all parties to rapidly agree on Mediterranean ECA to reduce both sulphur and nitrogen oxides from ships;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of extending emission control areas (ECAs) to all EU seas; calls on all parties to rapidly agree on making the Mediterranean an ECA to reduce both sulphur and nitrogen oxides from ships;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of extending emission control areas (ECAs) to
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes that the IMO has scheduled to agree on a global regulation on the limitations of so-called 'black carbon emissions' in 2021 and highlights and supports the possibility to agree banning the use of high emitting heavy fuel oil in the Arctic;
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Is particularly concerned about the present and future situation of the Mediterranean, a 'closed' sea that must nevertheless remain a privileged transit and cruise zone;
Amendment 12 #
B. whereas CO2 emissions from international maritime transport are projected to increase by 50 % to 250 % by 2050 in a business as usual scenario1
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Commission to draft a legislative proposal to phase out bunker fuel use and refill in European waters and ports by 2025 at the latest;
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Welcomes the application of the global sulphur cap that went into force 1 January 2020; supports the global sulphur cap that limits the sulphur in heavy fuel oil used on board ships operating outside the so-called designated emission control areas (ECAs) is reduced from 3.50 % to 0.50% m/m (mass by mass) and stresses that this global cap will significantly reduce the amount of sulphur oxides emanating from ships and should have major health and environmental benefits for the world, particularly for populations living close to ports and coasts; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of extending the ECAs and push for this at global level through the IMO;
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Acknowledges that effective and proper compliance with emissions on sulphur is mainly secured through effective port controls when a ship calls at port to unload cargo or bunker fuel; highlights in this context the challenge to secure effective and trustworthy compliance with the sulphur cap if the ECA is extended to cover the Mediterranean; demands in this scenario the IMO to come up with a solution in order to secure proper compliance by the relevant port states (Morocco, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt);
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the EU should lead by example by adopting
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the EU should lead
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the EU should lead by example by adopting stringent requirements to clean maritime transport domestically, while pushing for ambitious measures at international forums such as the I
Amendment 126 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the EU should lead by example by adopting stringent requirements to clean maritime transport while pushing for
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the EU should lead by example by adopting stringent requirements to clean maritime transport while pushing for ambitious measures at international forums such as the IMO
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses that combined transport of goods contributes to the reduction of transport emissions by promoting a shift from road freight transport to lower- emission transport modes, including zero- emission rivers corridors; underlines that a more efficient and cleaner maritime transport should be promoted via multimodal transport to increase efficiency and low-emission alternatives; also stresses that zero-emission waterway transport is key to developing a sustainable modal shift from road to waterways, and it is therefore necessary to support investments in refuelling and recharging infrastructures in inland ports.
Amendment 129 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for particular attention to be given to cruise vessels; urges that strict emission standards be applied to them as soon as possible, with non-compliant vessels at risk of being refused entry into European ports; calls for access to ports located in cities to be restricted to vessels with zero nitrogen oxide, sulphur oxide and fine particle emissions; calls for access to maritime conservation areas to be restricted accordingly; stresses the need for a ban on increased port capacity.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas CO2 emissions from maritime transport are projected to increase by 50 % to 250 % by 2050 in a business as usual scenario1 ; whereas GHG emissions from maritime transport have already increased by 9,6% between 2012 and 2018, including a sharp increase of 150% in methane emissions due to the surge of ships using liquefied natural gas (LNG)1a; _________________ 1 Third IMO GHG Study 2014 1a Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020
Amendment 130 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Highlights the importance of applying European labour law standards for all ships that are entering EEA territory, regardless of the flag state; calls on the Commission to regularly do checks whether ship operators comply with EU labour law.
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Recalls that ship dismantling is a sector which is largely located outside the European Union, and which usually takes place in poor working and environmental conditions, thus breaching human rights, and having negative impacts both on human health and marine ecosystems; calls, therefore on the Commission to address the ship dismantling gaps in the current Union legislation, which notably fails to prevent European shipowners from re-flagging their vessels or selling them, before dismantlement; however, stresses that the EU lacks facilities capable of dismantling ships on its territory, especially the bigger ones; therefore, calls on the Commission and Member States, to promote and invest in the establishment of a genuine European network of ship dismantling, respecting social and environmental criteria, as part of its European Industrial Recovery Plan.
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7 d. Recalls that maritime transport is at the centre of outermost regions' life and development, in terms of connection and access to essential goods and services; underlines that such regions represent hotspots of biodiversity, which needs to be preserved; calls therefore on the Commission to take due account of the outermost regions in the deployment of greener ships and the relevant infrastructures.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas global CO2 emissions from maritime transport are projected to increase by 50 % to 250 % by 2050 in a business as usual scenario1 ; _________________ 1 Third IMO GHG Study 2014
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas according to the latest IPCC report, there is a 66% chance of staying below 1.5°C if future GHG emissions are limited to 420Gt CO2eq – or 10 years of current emissions, and a 50 % chance of staying below 1.5°C if future emissions are limited to 580 Gt CO2eq – or 14 years of current emissions; whereas the maritime transport sector alone emitted globally around 1076 Mt CO2eq in 2018, and is responsible for about 2.9 % of global GHG emissions1a; _________________ 1a Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has adopted a strategy that has been aiming at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions since April 2018, seeking a reduction of at least 50% in total annual GHGs from international maritime transport by 2050 compared to 20081a ;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the overall carbon intensity, as an average across international maritime transport, is 29% better than in 2008 and whereas more research and innovation remains needed to enable zero-emission waterborne transport;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) B b. whereas the Fourth IMO Study shows that there is an increase in so- called black carbon emissions by 12 % and an increase by 150 % in methane emissions;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas international maritime transport accounts for 3.15% of CO2 emissions in the European Union1a;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas oceans and the preservation
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) B b. whereas the maritime transport sector is the only transport sector that remains unregulated at Union level;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) B c. whereas EU action is a necessity to achieve the Paris objective of limiting the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre- industrial levels;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas maritime transport represented 90% of international trade in 20181a;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital B d (new) Bd. whereas, in the absence of massive European re-industrialisation, European states are directly dependent on international maritime transport for their strategic autonomy;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital B e (new) Be. whereas the economic activity of both freight and cruise passenger transport has been severely curtailed following the onset of the COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas maritime transport
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas maritime transport
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas maritime transport impacts human health
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas maritime transport impacts human health and the environment also through air pollution; whereas the EU is dependent on its ports for trade but also for the functioning of its own internal market, with short sea shipping accounting for 60% of the tonnage handled in EU ports; stressing the advantages of inland waterway transport in terms of environmental protection and efficiency and the need for sustainable exploitation of the Rhine-Main-Danube canal, accompanied by increased intermodality, interconnection with other river basins and infrastructural modernisation and expansion in transport nodes such as inland ports;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas oceans and the preservation thereof are essential for humankind as climate regulators, hosts of biodiversity, and source of food security; recalling that modern ports and efficient river transport play a key role in developing new industries and logistics activities, connecting the different regions of the Union's internal market and supporting greening of transport; emphasising the need for green transport in the EU in the context of climate change; whereas specific measures are needed in the maritime and inland waterway transport sector to achieve the Green Deal objectives;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas maritime transport has considerable impacts on human health and the environment also through air pollution
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) C a. whereas the IMO regulations to reduce sulphur emissions from ships first came into force in 2005, under Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (known as the MARPOL Convention) and whereas the limits on sulphur oxides since then have been progressively tightened (latest 1 January 2020); whereas the maximum sulfur content permitted fell from 3.5 % to 0.5% (5,000 ppm) in 2020; whereas the limits in emission control areas (ECAs) fell from 1% to 0.1% (1,000 ppm) in 2015; whereas these standards may also be met through the use of exhaust gas cleaning systems (often referred to as "scrubbers.");
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Paris Agreement seeks to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels; whereas the International Maritime Organisation target for GHG emissions, a 50% reduction by 2050 compared to 2008, falls way short of compliance with the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the environmental standards applicable to maritime transport, requiring adjustments and investments by operators in that sector, have repercussions on the entire import/export sector, more generally, on all European companies and, ultimately, on all European consumers;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Commission is urged to draw up a plan to improve the standards set by the conference of European Transport Ministers on waterways in the Rhine-Danube Basin and to remedy the substantial disparities between east and west regarding the quality of infrastructures;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the cost of goods transport is passed on directly to consumers, calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment taking account of all economic and social conditions;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) Ca. whereas the Commission is called on to present an action plan for the creation of a network of multimodal transport corridors, linking up industries in outlying and island areas with modern transshipment facilities, efficient and sustainable port infrastructures, automated systems and advanced technologies governed by harmonised legislative framework provisions, especially on the Rhine-Main-Danube route;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the application of environmental restrictions to maritime transport would better reflect the cost of distance and encourage the emergence of short circuit arrangements in Europe;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas, since the average lifespan of a ship is 30 years, maritime transport decisions taken today will determine 2050 emission levels;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) C b. whereas 40 % of the world fleet by gross tonnage is EU controlled2a; _________________ 2aOxford Economics (2020): The Economic Value of the EU Shipping Industry
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas oceans and the preservation thereof are essential for humankind as climate regulators, hosts of biodiversity, and source of food security; whereas global warming is now irreversible, urgently necessitating a change in our production, consumption and trade patterns;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas it is essential for the maritime transport sector to strike a balance between economic objectives, environmental concerns and employment issues; whereas restrictive measures must therefore be phased in over time and accompanied by incentives;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Recital C c (new) Ca. whereas the Council is called on to give a negotiating mandate to European Commission to initiate and launch the process of harmonising navigation rules on the Rhine-Main-Danube Canal, together with the Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine (CCNR) and the Danube Commission (DC);
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas a 10% to 20% reduction in vessel speeds means a 13% to 24% reduction in CO2, nitrogen oxide and sulphur oxide emissions;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Recital C c (new) C c. whereas the direct economic impact accounts for 685,000 sea- and land-based jobs in the EU2c; _________________ 2cOxford Economics (2020): The Economic Value of the EU Shipping Industry
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Recital C d (new) Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Recital C d (new) C d. whereas the EU maritime sector contributes to € 54 billion to the EU GDP 2b; _________________ 2bOxford Economics (2020): The Economic Value of the EU Shipping Industry
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Recital C e (new) Ce. whereas the cruise sector is expanding; whereas the environmental damage caused by stopovers outweighs the economic benefits thereof; whereas, while under way, cruise vessels are responsible for many forms of pollution (noise, visual pollution, solid waste, effluent);
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Recital C e (new) C e. whereas for every €1 million of GDP the maritime sector creates, another € 1.6 million is created elsewhere in the EU economy 2d; _________________ 2dOxford Economics (2020): The Economic Value of the EU Shipping Industry
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Recital C f (new) C f. whereas the total economic impact contributes €149 billion to EU GDP and supports more than 2 million jobs 2e; _________________ 2eOxford Economics (2020): The Economic Value of the EU Shipping Industry
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that all sectors, including maritime transport, have to fully contribute to achieving climate neutrality in the EU by 2050 at the latest;
Amendment 5 #
Aa. whereas the maritime domain of the outermost regions (OR) makes up a very substantial part of the European Union's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)1a; whereas the EEZs of the ORs provide long-distance European transit routes for international maritime transport;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that all sectors, including maritime transport, have to fully contribute to achieving
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that all sectors, including maritime transport, have to fully contribute to achieving climate neutrality in the EU by 2050 at the latest; stresses the importance of urgently including the sector in the EU ETS, and establishing mandatory targets to reduce CO2 emissions;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that all sectors, including maritime transport, have to fully contribute to achieving climate neutrality in the EU by 2050 at the latest; stresses the importance of urgently including the sector in the EU ETS; ; stresses the importance for the EU to adopt appropriate and effective measures to decarbonise maritime transport as soon as possible, following a thorough impact assessment of all options including whether solutions could be more effectively delivered via the IMO; revenues from any market-based measure should be used for research and development in new technologies such as sustainable fuels and port infrastructure to enable the decarbonisation of the maritime sector in the EU;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Underlines that including the maritime sector under the EU ETS at this time risks the following possible negative effects: a distortion of shipping competitiveness at the global level, obstructing negotiations within the IMO on the implementation of the 2018 strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships, and increased political tensions between the EU and third countries;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the European and national institutions not to limit their approach to air pollution and transport issues alone when considering the environmental implications of maritime transport, but to take a broader view in order ensure that future regulatory efforts encompass the entire gamut;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. welcomes that the new Fourth IMO GHG Study now differentiates between emissions from global voyages, intra-EU voyages and voyages between two ports in a member state and; urges in this regard the Commission to secure its future legal initiatives are compatible with the nature of both international and domestic voyages;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Proposes the Commission to set up a long-term target together alongside a future market-based mechanism that secures that companies reduce their annual CO2 emissions per transport work by at least 50% by 2030 at fleet basis compared to 2008; calls the Commission to indicate how to achieve the 50% reduction by 2030 and suggest appropriate measures in order to reach the target as soon as possible while taking into account the future outcomes of short- term measures in the IMO;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Stresses the importance of recognising emission reductions and energy efficiency efforts already undertaken by the ‘decarbonising first movers’ companies; underlines the utmost importance that future reduction targets and or other climate-mitigating measures take into account the efforts and investments already carried out by these first movers; reminds in this context the Commission to make use of the same baseline year as used in the IMO (i.e. 2008) if proposing measures related to carbon reductions for European shipping companies at fleet level;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the European maritime sector should also contribute to tackling biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, and contribute to the objectives of the new 2030 Biodiversity strategy;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1 d. Welcomes the 72nd meeting of the MEPC at the IMO in 2015 and its adopted resolution codifying an initial greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy for international shipping which calls for a 40% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 and pursuing efforts towards a 70% reduction by 2050, both compared to 2008 levels and furthermore calls for a peak in GHG emissions from international maritime transport as soon as possible followed by a reduction by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels; reminds the Commission that agreements at global level are possible and should be the preferable option when regulating the European maritime sector due to its global nature; calls, however, the Commission to push for higher ambitions at global level and reminds, in this regard, the Union's target on climate neutrality as stated by the Commission in its 'European Green Deal';
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1 e. Calls the Commission to update, by 31 December 2020, the impact assessment carried out in 2013 and accompanying the Commission proposal for Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and propose a revision of Directive 2003/87/EC to include the issue and allocation of allowances in respect of greenhouse gas emissions taking place as from 1 January 2023 from ships arriving at, within, or departing from ports under the jurisdiction of an EU Member State; asks the Commission to make use of the best available data and to conduct an assessment of the impact of different options, including the impact on emissions as well as the economic impact and stresses the need to use a flag-neutral approach in order to ensure the best possible environmental integrity and safeguard the competitiveness of European ship owners and operators; calls the Commission to secure that at least 50% of the revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances shall be used through for a maritime decarbonisation fund with the purpose to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investment in innovative technologies and infrastructure to decarbonise the maritime transport sector, including in short sea shipping and ports, and the deployment of sustainable alternative fuels;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Advocates the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in the short term, in particular slow steaming and wind propulsion, but also digitalisation and logistics optimisation, and greater use of SEEMP and EEDI indexes; recommends the introduction of speed limits for various vessel types; points out that these measures, while necessary in the short term, fall short of what is necessary to meet the 2050 targets; calls for the introduction of maximum GHG emission standards for various vessel types, based on the existing MRV regulation, with vessels exceeding those limits no longer allowed to enter European ports, in a bid to encourage the design and use of cleaner vessels by operators in this sector; calls for these standards to be progressively adjusted with the ultimate objective of allowing only zero-emission vessels into EU ports; calls for ETS proceeds to be channelled into improving port infrastructures, providing facilities for alternative refuelling (with hydrogen, etc.);
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Advocates the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in the short term, in particular slow steaming and wind propulsion, but also digitalisation and logistics optimisation while constantly applying the energy efficiency first principle; in order to incentivise emissions reduction and increase the transparency of information, the Commission should set up a holistic Union labelling system for the environmental performance of ships, as well as the relevant technical standards, by 1 July 2021;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Advocates the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in the short term, in particular s
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Advocates the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to improve energy efficiency, energy sobriety, energy storage and reduce emissions in the short term, in particular slow steaming and wind
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Advocates the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in the short term, in particular slow steaming and wind propulsion, but also digitalisation and logistics optimisation; draws attention to the need for the European Commission to support the Member States in the modernisation of the sector;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that digitalisation such as more advanced navigation systems and automatic identification systems, can be used to carry out technical operations and maintenance, for example to predict the most fuel-efficient way to operate a ship on a specific route, making ships more energy-efficient so they can meet emission control standards, as well as to facilitate the management of environmental risks; also underlines that digitalisation bears a high potential with new technologies for port call optimisation, which contributes to reduce waiting times for vessels in the ports and therefore emissions;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses that any legal action related to the improvement of energy efficiency via improved operational and technical measure should be subject to a proper impact assessment and should not duplicate or impede the initiatives and actions already taken at global level in the IMO in order to keep the amount of administrative burden at a minimum;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas maritime transport is of strategic importance, as 90% of goods are transported by sea worldwide and 70% of these maritime transport operations take place in European waters;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls, however, that limiting the speed of freight vessels would have a major impact on the rapidity of international trade, with significant consequences for all European companies that depend on it, and encourages efforts to strike a balance;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses the need for an impact study to determine to what extent new smart technologies (smart containers, port community systems) could offset vessel speed limits, mitigating the impact thereof on international trade;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Encourages the development and deployment of electronic devices to avoid and limit cetacean collisions, such as pingers and digital surveillance aiming to locate cetaceans and sharing the relevant information with ships navigating in the area;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset; points out in this connection that LNG is a non- starter and must be phased out, given that it produces greenhouse gas emissions; calls on the Commission to propose a ban on using open-loop scrubbers to comply with emission limits;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset; calls in this regard on the Commission to propose a ban on
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset; calls on the Commission to propose a ban on using open-loop scrubbers to comply with emission limits as soon as possible;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that sustainable solutions should be favoured from the outset; calls on the Commission to propose a ban on using open-loop scrubbers to comply with emission limits; emphasises that reducing emissions from maritime transport and their impacts on global warming and air pollution should not be implemented in a way that harms marine biodiversity, and should be accompanied by measures targeted towards the restoration of marine and coastal ecosystems impacted by the shipping industry;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that tools exist to take action against degassing at sea, such as the European CleanSeaNet program, which aims at identifying and monitoring oil pollution and contributing to the identification of polluters; underlines, however, that infractions are still common and that further measures are necessary to reduce this source of pollution; emphasises that regional cooperation, including with third countries, is essential in this area, especially in the Mediterranean Sea; calls therefore on the Commission to reinforce the exchange of information and cooperation regarding sanctions between countries, as well as to encourage the deployment of legal degassing infrastructures in ports;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the spread of digitalisation and automation in the shipping industry will bring about a change in individual job specifications and requisite skills; points out that these different skills and areas of knowledge, especially with regard to information technology, will be required of seafarers to ensure ship safety and operational efficiency; notes at the same time, that these less physically demanding skills and requirements will improve opportunities for women seeking a career in the maritime sector;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recommends the provision of incentives for shipowners to select closed- loop scrubbers retaining sulphur for subsequent removal at port disposal facilities;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that the need for national governments to promote ecological domestic transport by supporting research into zero-carbon technologies; notes that ports should also provide shore-side power supply, charging points and alternative refuelling systems and installations;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to support investment and research in new technologies, alternative zero-emission propulsion technologies and sustainable fuels to find long-term solutions to decarbonise the sector; highlights the potential of electrification and green hydrogen
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to support investment and research in new technologies and sustainable fuels to find long-term solutions to decarbonise the sector; highlights the potential of electrification and green hydrogen and ammonia; points out that batteries are not at present a viable solution for medium and long-distance transport; stresses that public funding should no longer be channelled into LNG, biofuels and synthetic fuels but should instead be earmarked for genuinely sustainable solutions; emphasises that alternative fuels must not increase greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to support
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to support cooperation between academia and operators in the public and private sector that are seeking to develop partnerships and leverage investments in new technologies;investment and research in new technologies and sustainable fuels to find long-term solutions to decarbonise the sector; highlights the potential of electrification and green hydrogen;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to support
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas CO2 emissions from maritime transport are projected to increase by
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls on the Commission to apply a strong cost-effective, goal-based and technology-neutral approach when adopting future proposals related to decarbonisation of the European maritime sector; highlights in this regard the promising initial results by certain technologies such as methanol and ammonia and recommends the Commission to follow the development of promising technologies closely;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls on the Commission, as part of its European Industrial Recovery Plan, to promote and invest in a European green ship industry on its territory, taking the leadership in developing new eco- designed ships, renovation and modernisation of existing vessels and dismantlement; the EU should focus on modernising and greening its shipbuilding yards, in line with the Green Deal’s objectives;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the crucial importance of protecting ports from the impact of climate change and variable conditions; points out in this regard that the implementation of activities and measures to support the transition to greener and more sustainable ports will require additional funding, the development of new capacity, the promotion of new technologies and technology transfer, especially to developing countries;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the need to prohibit use of the lowest grade of fuel, 'bunker fuel', on which many vessels currently run, which means that maritime transport is effectively serving as a disposal facility for certain oil companies1a;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Calls on the Commission to establish a reliable tool, such as a database, to assess the impacts of ships on the environment during their entire life cycles, from production, use, to dismantlement and recycling; such a database should provide the shipping sector with relevant information on materials, production, energy consumption, maintenance, use, and their impacts regarding greenhouse effect, water consumption, acidification, eutrophication of waters, etc., thereby enabling the industry to move towards eco-designed and green ships while fostering innovation; believes that this tool should also contribute to a circular economy for ships and ports, and to better communication on sustainable initiatives developed by the sector, in line with a European shipping label for products;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Calls on the Commission to map the potential best practices regarding decarbonisation of the European maritime sector; urges therefore the Commission to undertake and push for similar initiatives through the IMO in order to secure a level-playing field at international level and retain EU competitiveness;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses the importance of increasing and supporting all maritime transport decarbonisation options, enabling all those operating in the sector to contribute to the reduction of pollutant emissions with minimal constraints;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Calls on the Commission to develop a European shipping label for products, in cooperation with shipowners, other stakeholders and independent experts, in order to inform consumers about the environmental impacts of maritime transport related to products that they purchase; such label would support the environmental and energy transition of the shipping sector by providing a reliable and transparent way of informing customers about voluntary initiatives, and it would encourage consumers to purchase products transported by shipowners that have reduced their environmental impacts, for example regarding greenhouse gases and pollutant emissions, noise pollution, waste and water management;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Takes the view that, in order to meet the objectives laid down in the programmes set out in the European Green Deal, the Union must ensure that the Member States have the necessary resources and incentives to invest in sustainable fuels for the maritime sector in the transition towards climate neutrality in 2050;
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses the importance of not giving priority to one particular technology so that all those operating in the sector can find the most suitable solution for their own particular activity;
source: 655.976
2020/11/09
TRAN
238 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the European maritime sector should also contribute to tackling biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, and contribute to the objectives of the European Green Deal and 2030 Biodiversity strategy;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the strong European maritime cluster and the positive developments internationally to support innovation and reduce shipping emissions and calls on the Commission and the Member States to support initiatives contributing these positive developments.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the positive role of European maritime cluster in encouraging innovation to reduce shipping emissions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to further support research and development initiatives in the sector;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes the cross-border dimension of maritime ports; stresses the role of ports as clusters of all modes of transport, energy, industry and blue economy; recognises the increased development of port cooperation and clustering;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean, multimodal solutions in
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, including cruise ships, and to
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate EU port access for the most polluting ships
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the maritime transport of goods and passengers is a key factor in territorial communication and cohesion, especially in the case of the outermost regions and/or islands;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy, while also giving Member States the necessary time and financial support to establish the requisite infrastructure; calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC; calls on the Commission to ensure that it consults all stakeholders in the maritime sector (shipping companies, port stakeholders, ship agents, dock workers, maritime companies, handling service providers, etc.) so that the organisational and economic impact of the deployment of clean solutions at berth is as neutral as possible in respect of the smooth running of maritime and port activities;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the objective of zero
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that an ambitious decarbonisation agenda must be underpinned by adequate financing; calls, therefore, for urgent action on the Commission’s part to ensure that European port infrastructure is ready to implement the energy transition that is needed, allowing ships to be replenished with alternative fuels delivered via the harbour grid or mobile installations;
Amendment 119 #
6a. Calls on the Commission to draw up a strategy on zero-emission ports, including measures to promote the development of port industries specialising in the circular economy, which would, in particular, ensure better use of ships’ waste that is recovered and treated in ports;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the maritime sector is a fundamental part of the EU internal market and plays an important role in the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU, especially in peripheral, rural, island and outermost regions, and in this regard the EU needs to invest in the maritime sector’s competitiveness and its capacity to make the sustainable transition a reality;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for further liberalisation of the port services allowing for high standards in quality and the safety of the services. Call also for a clear strategy to promote Roll-On-Roll-Off (RO-RO )shipping for freight, thereby reducing the presence of heavy-duty vehicles from roads;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to promote short-sea shipping in the Green Deal, on the same basis as rail and inland
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to promote short-sea shipping in the Green Deal, on the same basis as rail and inland waterways, as a sustainable alternative to goods and passenger transport by road and air and as stepping stone towards a zero emission mode of transport; and to launch to this end a EU fleet renewal strategy to promote its green and digital transition and foster the competitiveness of the European maritime technology sector;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to promote short-sea shipping in the Green Deal, on the same basis as rail and inland waterways, as a sustainable alternative to goods and passenger transport by road and
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to promote short-sea shipping vessels over 5000 gt in the Green Deal , on the same basis as rail and inland waterways, as a sustainable alternative to goods and passenger transport by road and air;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to promote a modal shift towards short-sea shipping in the Green Deal, on the same basis as rail and inland waterways, as a sustainable alternative to goods and passenger transport by road and air;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission to take specific measures in its maritime policy to prevent the use of long-distance road freight transport, which is harmful to the environment, especially ecologically fragile areas such as the Alps, by encouraging deliveries of goods closer to the destination markets via less used ports, such as those in the Mediterranean or the Black Sea;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to revise the definition of short sea shipping contained in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 so that it includes the size and propulsion technology of ships, thereby covering the most polluting ships and those with a greater potential environmental and safety impact;
Amendment 128 #
8. Calls on the Commission to restore meaning to the concept of Motorways of the Sea as it is instrumental to facilitate short-sea links and services as sustainable alternatives to land transport, to facilitate the cooperation of maritime ports as well as the connection to their hinterland, by simplifying the access criteria, in particular for links between ports outside the core network, and by providing significant financial support for maritime links as an alternative to land transport;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to restore meaning to the concept of Motorways of the Sea by simplifying the access criteria and adapting the concept so that it takes account of the particular characteristics of the outermost regions and islands, in particular for links between ports outside the core network, and by providing significant financial support for maritime links as an alternative to land transport and for new internal maritime links with Member States;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to restore meaning to the concept of Motorways of the Sea by simplifying the access criteria, in particular for links between ports outside the core network, and by providing significant financial support for maritime links in all Member States as an alternative to land transport so that no one is left behind;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to restore meaning to the concept of Motorways of the Sea as an integral part of the TEN-T network, by simplifying the access criteria, in particular for links between ports outside the core network, and by providing significant financial support for maritime links as an alternative to land transport;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to restore
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully implement Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure in the maritime sector, promoting investment in shore-side electricity facilities that provide clean energy for maritime and inland waterway transport, especially in those ports affected by poor air quality or excessive noise levels;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that a sustainable European waterborne sector and a future proof infrastructure, including the trans- European transport network (TEN-T) and its future extension, are crucial to achieving a climate-neutral economy; stresses that the percentage increase in waterborne freight transport as envisaged in the European Green Deal needs a concrete EU investment plan and concrete measures at EU level;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the creation of a European multimodal transport network to use the potential created by the Road Transport Package, the Single European Railway Area, Short-Sea Shipping and NAIADES; calls for measures to remove the legislative, administrative, and cross- border obstacles that hamper multimodal transport within the European economy;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses th
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the urgent health and environmental need to establish a sulphur emission control area (SECA) and a nitrogen emission control area (NECA) in the Mediterranean; calls on the Commission and the Member States to give active support to the submission of such an area to the IMO before 2022; urges the Member States also to support the principle of swiftly adopting a nitrogen emission control area (NECA) aimed at reducing nitrogen emissions in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the urgent health and environmental need to establish a sulphur
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to provide for the extension of these emission control areas
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the maritime sector is
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to provide for the extension of these emission control areas to all EU seas, in cooperation with stakeholders and by presenting the respective impact assessment, in order to achieve a uniform reduction in the permitted NOx and SOx emission levels from ships;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to provide for the extension of these emission control areas to all EU seas in order to achieve a uniform reduction in the permitted Nix and SOS emission levels from ships; stresses that the cumulative reduction in sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions has a direct impact on the reduction of fine particles (PM10 and PM2.5);
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to use its weight in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), to achieve a carbon offsetting scheme in international shipping and to ensure a realistic path of emissions reduction;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed reduction, optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion methods and better optimisation of logistics; stresses the need to conduct impact assessments for any such measure significantly impacting the maritime transport sector;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission, shipowners and ship operators to ensure
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed reduction, optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion methods and better optimisation
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed reduction, optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the maritime sector is
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the implementation of all available operational and technical measures to achieve energy efficiency, in particular speed reduction where relevant, optimisation of navigable routes, the introduction of new propulsion methods and better optimisation of logistics;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Welcomes the promotion of new power and propulsion systems that can help to partially reduce emissions (e.g. hybrid power systems, propulsion efficiency devices, waste heat recovery, design speed reductions, auxiliary power systems, engine and thrust efficiency, wind rotors and solar panels);
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Stresses the importance of taking into account the specific characteristics of ships, the availability of bunkering infrastructure, new technologies (ratio costs/reliability), alternative fuels and their related costs, the maturity of engine technology, the safety of on-board storage, the needs in terms of autonomy of vessels and length of transports, when defining standards, targets and incentive schemes;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Reminds that it is necessary to analyse the whole life cycle of fuels in order to evaluate their effectiveness, based on the total emissions generated in the fuel production processes;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation and automation of the maritime sector, ports and ships
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation of the maritime sector, ports and ships
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation of the maritime sector, ports and ships
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation of the maritime sector, ports and ships
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation of the maritime sector, ports and ships must contribute to a reduction in the sector’s
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the digitalisation of the maritime sector, ports and ships must contribute to a reduction in the sector’s emissions, in particular through increased exchanges of up-to-date and verified data and better cooperation between Member State authorities and stakeholders in the sector;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the maritime sector is
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/883, to
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/883, to
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/883, to
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/883, to
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the new sulphur content limit in fuels of 0.5% introduced by the IMO on 1 January 2020, and stresses that it should not lead to a shift in pollution from air to water; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/883, to prohibit
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to integrate
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the least-regulated emissions at European level,
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to integrate
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to integrate sail and wind propulsion into the FuelEU Maritime initiative for vessel types where it is achievable and affordable;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to integrate sail propulsion into the FuelEU Maritime initiative; calls on it to assess the current initiatives and projects concerning sail freight transport and to ensure that this alternative mode of transport is eligible for European funding;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU and the role of the EU in promoting internationally best practices enabling the re-use of valuable materials; in this regard, calls on the Commission to assess whether ship recycling facilities included in the current EU list are sufficient to cover the needs to recycle all end-of-life EU-flagged vessels;
Amendment 178 #
15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for building and dismantling vessels within the EU with a view to giving priority to local European shipyards, preserving jobs and, consequently, reducing dependence on the three main Asian shipbuilding companies that dominate the global shipbuilding market;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures, accompanied with the necessary funding, to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU, in line with the new circular economy action plan;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel; whereas, due to the nature of this sector, it is more efficient to focus on global instead of EU legislation;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU, meeting increased demand there rather than in third countries;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition in all Member States to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU;
Amendment 182 #
15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding and ship repair industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within the EU;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to green the European shipbuilding industry, supporting the transition to a circular economy model that takes into account the entire life cycle of ships; stresses the importance of supporting and developing sustainable solutions for dismantling vessels within and outside the EU;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the Commission to provide, as part of the revision of the Directive 2014/94/EU, more ambitious targets for the construction of infrastructure for LNG and onshore electricity, agreeing with Member States that a share of the funds provided by the Next Generation EU should be specifically allocated to support investments in this field;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe programme, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe programme, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels; highlights the potential of electricity exclusively from additional renewable sources: green hydrogen, ammonia and wind propulsion; in this regard, stresses the financial implications of the transition to carbon-neutral fuels, both for the shipbuilding industry and the land-based fuel supply chain; considers that ports are natural hubs for the production, storage, distribution and transport of renewable
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe programme, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels; highlights the potential of electricity exclusively from additional sources: renewable
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe and InvestEU programmes, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels; highlights the potential of electricity exclusively from additional renewable sources: green hydrogen, ammonia and wind propulsion; considers that ports are natural hubs for the production, distribution and transport of renewable-
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas every sector must help to achieve the climate targets and the decarbonisation agenda; whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to provide support under its European funding programmes, in particular the Horizon Europe programme, for research into and deployment of clean technologies and fuels; highlights the potential of electricity exclusively from additional renewable sources: green hydrogen, ammonia and wind propulsion; considers that ports are natural hubs for the production, distribution and transport of renewable- energy fuels; calls for the Horizon Europe programme to renew the calls for ‘Green Deal’ projects, launched by the Commission under Horizon 2020, in particular to green the maritime sector and to support research and innovation and the deployment of renewable energies in the transport sector;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers that any realistic transition process towards the goal of zero emissions must be based on the involvement and participation of the stakeholders in the sector as well as EU support in the form of an adequate budget together with dialogue, flexibility and diligence in promoting the necessary regulatory reforms; notes that these conditions are essential to encourage strategic cooperation focusing on sustainability through instruments such as the co-programmed partnership on ‘zero-emission waterborne transport’;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to make projects aimed at decarbonising maritime transport and reducing polluting emissions eligible under the cohesion policy and through the European Structural and Investment Funds,
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to make projects aimed at decarbonising maritime transport and reducing polluting emissions, including the necessary port infrastructures and facilities, eligible under the cohesion policy and through the European Structural and Investment Funds, as well as under the Connecting Europe Facility (CLEF) and
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to make projects aimed at decarbonising maritime transport and reducing polluting emissions eligible under the cohesion policy and through the European Structural and Investment Funds, as well as under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the Green Deal; urges the Commission to propose a plan for the modernisation of vessels in line with the Green Deal, and to make funds and incentives available to support the maritime sector in the transition towards a zero-carbon economy, taking into account the social dimension of the transformation;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls for the creation of a POSEI- Transport to fund the modernisation, environmental efficiency and accessibility of maritime transport services in the outermost regions, thereby contributing to their socioeconomic development, and improved territorial intercommunication and service provision with the aim of fighting isolation and promoting genuine convergence with the rest of the EU; calls for the creation of an instrument to subsidise maritime passenger transport between the mainland and the islands;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recalls that the objectives of decarbonisation and modal shift should be supported by the CEF, which should benefit from increased budgetary resources; regrets, in this regard, the Council decision to reduce the budget allocation for future-oriented programmes, such as the Connecting Europe Facility, InvestEU and Horizon Europe; notes that the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation agenda needs to be backed by corresponding funding and financing instruments;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recalls that the objectives of decarbonisation and modal shift to rail, as well as intermodality, should be
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Recalls that the European Investment Bank (EIB) provides support for attractive capital loans, however considers that the threshold for financing small scale projects should be lowered; points out, in this regard, that the Green Shipping Guarantee (GSG) Programme aimed at accelerating the implementation of investments in greener technologies by European shipping companies, should also provide support for smaller transactions including more flexible loan conditions; furthermore, considers that the EIB should provide both pre-delivery and post-delivery financing for shipbuilders, which would considerably enhance the implementation and the viability of projects;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Urges the EIB to suspend its "lending policy" on alternative fossil fuels (i.e. fuels ensuring a significant reduction of carbon footprint and air polluting emissions), which envisages not to finance projects aiming at LNG diffusion;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the sector has been making constant efforts to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets, by complying with the existing regulatory framework and implementing those technological developments made to date;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Regrets the Council Decision to reduce the budget allocation for future- oriented programmes, such as the CEF, InvestEU and Horizon Europe; notes that the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation agenda needs to be backed by corresponding funding and financing instruments;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Regrets in that regard the Council Decision to reduce the budget allocation for future-oriented programmes, such as the Connecting Europe Facility, InvestEU and Horizon Europe; notes that the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation agenda needs to be backed by corresponding funding and financing instruments;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Regrets, in this context, the Council’s decision to cut these budgets, which are also essential for innovative solutions for a sustainable transition; stresses that the strategic value of ports and the maritime sector should be clearly reflected in CEF II budget allocations;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Highlights that the swift towards decarbonisation and the impulse of clean energy incentive schemes in the maritime transport sector would entail the need of re-skilling and training of workers; recalls that EU and Member States' financing would have to be foreseen for this matter; encourages the Commission to establish an EU network to exchange good practices on how to adapt workforce to the new needs of the sector;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Notes that less than 10% of the current CEF budget (2014-2020) went to the maritime transport sector; considers that the share of funding received does not reflect the strategic role the maritime sector and ports play for the EU economy; regrets in that regard the Council Decision to pre-allocate a substantial amount of the CEF II transport general envelope in favour of a single transport mode;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Notes that less than 10% of the current CEF budget (2014-2020) went to the maritime transport sector; considers that the share of funding received does not reflect the strategic role the maritime sector and ports play for the EU economy; regrets in that regard the Council Decision to pre-allocate a substantial amount of the CEF II transport general envelope in favour of a single transport mode;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that E
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas there is a significant international dimension to maritime transport, which means that the sector’s competitiveness depends on a level playing field globally;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives that do not risk creating lock-in effects, as is the case with LG; notes, however, that LG is an alternative solution and that a reduced tax rate should, therefore, be authorised for it until other alternative solutions are technologically mature and available on the market;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives that do not risk creating lock-in effects
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives that do not risk creating lock-in effects
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives that do not risk creating lock-in effects
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used for long-term sustainable alternatives
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that methane emissions have a significant impact on climate change, and stresses that European taxpayers’ money should only be used gradually for long-term sustainable alternatives that do not risk creating lock-in effects, as is the case with LNG;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas most of the costs of decarbonising the maritime sector are related to land-based infrastructure; whereas adequate funding is therefore essential to achieve this necessary transition; whereas further research and innovation are crucial in making zero- carbon maritime transport possible;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Considers that flexible state aid rules are needed for the transition towards a climate neutral waterborne sector, without disproportionately distorting the level playing field within Europe; urges the Commission to provide clarity on state aid for sustainable shipping projects;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses that financial support or subsidies to national maritime industries should be conditional on environmental investment and targets by these industries;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on the Commission to establish a ‘green ship’ label scheme for shipping companies that comply with emissions reduction, water consumption, waste treatment and environmental impact criteria;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Points out the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for the waterborne sector, especially collective passenger transport; calls on the Member States to include the waterborne sector as a priority in their national recovery plans, so as to ensure that it can have comprehensive access to the resources allocated under the Recovery and Resilience Facility; asks the Commission, moreover, to map smart investment initiatives for the sustainable and resilient recovery of the sector;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to ensure the transparency and availability of information on the environmental and energy performance of ships
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to ensure the transparency and availability of information on the environmental performance of ships by setting up a European label scheme, and to implement the ‘green ship’ concept; stresses that ships with this label should be given operational advantages in EU ports;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global GHG emissions6, but is the most energy efficient mode of transport based on the amount of cargo transported and the respective emissions per tonne of goods transported and per kilometre travelled; _________________ 6 Third IMO GHG Study.
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to revise the Port State Control Directive to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships, including compliance with environmental, social, public health and labour law standards, safety on board of ships calling EU port for both seafarers and dock workers as well as the possibilities for effective sanctions, such as denying port access in European ports, including the establishment of a European blacklist of individual vessels taking into account environmental, public health, tax and social law;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to revise the Port State Control Directive to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships, including compliance with environmental, social, public health and labour law standards, safety on board of ships calling EU port for both seafarers and dock workers, as well as the possibilities for effective sanctions, including the establishment of a European blacklist taking into account environmental, public health, tax and social law;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to revise the Port State Control Directive to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships, including compliance with environmental, social, public health and labour law standards, safety standards on board ships calling at EU ports, for both crews and dock workers, as well as the possibilities for effective sanctions, including the establishment of a European blacklist taking into account environmental, public health, tax and social law;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to revise the Port State Control Directive to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships, including compliance with environmental, social, public health and labour law standards, and safety standards on board ships calling at EU ports, for crews and dock workers, as well as the possibilities for effective sanctions, including the establishment of a European blacklist taking into account environmental, public health, tax and social law;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to revise the Port State Control Directive to allow for more effective and comprehensive control of ships, including compliance with environmental, social, public health and labour law standards, safety standards on board ships calling at EU ports, for crews and dock workers, as well as the possibilities for effective sanctions, including the establishment of a European blacklist taking into account environmental, public health, tax and social law;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Commission to increase, in coordination with the International Labour Organisation (ILO), capacity building for third countries on inspections and enforcement and to launch campaigns with the social partners to increase awareness of rights and obligations under the Maritime Labour Convention; calls on the Commission to promote the creation by the ILO of a database containing inspection findings and seafarers’ complaints to help seafarers and shipowners engage with the most reputable MLC-compliant recruitment and placement services;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on national authorities to disclose who is fined for violations of the environmental regulations on shipping in order to enable a transparent comparison of ships, especially for sale or rent;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that the partnership envisaged in the context of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU should ensure an appropriate level playing field
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Stresses that continued efforts need to be made from the EU level to strengthen the IMO approach and contribute to emissions reduction on a global level;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global GHG emissions6 ; The mentioned elements should be updated after the IMO decision for a global cap of 0,5% sulphur content in maritime fuels; _________________ 6 Third IMO GHG Study.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas international maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global GHG emissions6 ; _________________ 6 Third IMO GHG Study.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Directive 2014/94/EU has identified LNG and onshore electricity as very useful alternative fuels in maritime transport, with a potential for long-term oil substitution and decarbonisation, both during navigation and while dockside, setting targets for the development of the supply infrastructure of these fuels;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced, emissions from maritime transport could increase
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced, emissions from maritime transport could increase by between
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced, emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 50% and 250% by 20507
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced, emissions from international maritime transport could increase by between 50% and 250% by 20507 , thereby undermining the objectives of the Paris Agreement; _________________ 7 Third IMO GHG Study.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and regulated
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas a clear link has been established between ship exhaust gases and a number of cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases and cancer, and every year in Europe emissions from maritime transport cause nearly 60 000 deaths and cost health services EUR 58 billion;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the EU should defend a high level of ambition for emissions reductions in the maritime sector both at international and EU level, and whereas any new EU measures should not undermine the international competitiveness of EU-flagged ships;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas different technologies and solutions should be adopted depending on the type of ship and the naval segment;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas investments and research are fundamental to ensure innovative solutions and sustainable technologies, in particular in terms of costs and reliability;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E c (new) Ec. whereas there is need of an adequate support for already planned investments of transport sector operators that may be hampered or postponed due to the current crisis, thus resulting in slowing down the energy transition process;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs, retraining and redeployment guarantees and structural health and safety measures for all workers, with particular focus on opportunities for women and young workers in order to diversify the maritime sector workforce; whereas adequate training and decent working conditions of maritime personnel are fundamental, among others to prevent incidents, including environmental incidents;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas public and private investments related to the decarbonisation of the maritime sector must comply with the regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and the key principles of the just transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and structural health and safety measures for all workers;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea; whereas the maritime sector, and ports in particular, are playing a critical and strategic role in the supply of goods and in ensuring the continuity of the economy as clearly demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and structural health and safety measures for all workers, starting by drawing up plans aimed to accomplish a green transition for daily maritime transport;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and structural health and safety measures for all workers, without hampering the competitiveness of the EU maritime sector;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Article 2(15) of Regulation (EU) 2017/352 defines ‘short sea shipping’ as ‘the movement of cargo and passengers by sea between ports situated in geographical Europe or between those ports and ports situated in non-European countries having a coastline on the enclosed seas bordering Europe’; whereas, due to this new definition, short sea shipping – which used to mean only freight transport by smaller ships (ro-ro or feeder ships) – now includes any vessel of 14 000 TEUs, oil tankers of 200 000 GT or LNG ships, which, in addition to posing safety problems for ports, now benefit from support and exemptions that encourage the most polluting practices;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the European Commission is currently working on an impact assessment on integrating maritime transport into the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS);
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas a climate neutral transition of the maritime transport sector by 2050 is needed in order to achieve the goals of the Green Deal;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas maritime transport comprises a wide spectrum of activities from freight and passenger transport (e.g. ferries and cruises) to dredging, cable laying and towage;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources which is not in line with the polluter-pays principle; calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies,
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of renewable-energy alternative fuels, as well as investing in the transition to cleaner fuels, like LNG, lithium-ion batteries, fuel cells and shore power, in the maritime sector;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies, which benefit
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax treatment, and cleaner alternative fuels, including those from renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the EU should defend a high level of ambition for GHG reductions in the maritime sector both at international and EU level, while any new EU measures should not undermine the international competitiveness of EU flagged ships; believes that EU and international measures should go hand in hand in order to avoid creating double regulations for the industry1a; therefore calls for support for the ‘Initial Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships’ of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and for a clear EU strategy for reducing emissions in the EU maritime sector; _________________ 1a Resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal (2019/2956(RSP))
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls, therefore, for renewable- energy alternative fuels to be given appropriate consideration under the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER) declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU, to be revised for the period 2021- 2027, under the rules on State aid for environmental protection, aid for research and development and innovation, and regional aid;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea, and maritime transport plays an important role for tourism;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil, which is still used by many ships; underlines the need to engage in ongoing dialogue with shipping companies in order to determine their actual investment capacity and identify their shortcomings as regards the acquisition and depreciation of less polluting ships with a view to renewal of their fleet; regrets that oil companies currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their waste;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to p
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil in the long-term, which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their waste;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that, in the maritime sector, the shipowner is not always the same as the person or entity commercially operating the ship. Therefore, the “polluter pays” principle should apply to and make responsible the party responsible for the commercial operation of the ship. This is the commercial entity that pays for the fuel that the ship consumes, such as the shipowner, the manager, the time charterer or the bareboat charterer.
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that, in the maritime sector, the shipowner is not always the same as the person or entity commercially operating the ship. Therefore, the "polluter pays" principle should apply to and make responsible the party responsible for the commercial operation of the ship. This is the commercial entity that pays for the fuel that the ship consumes, such as the shipowner, the manager, the time charterer or the bareboat charterer;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the importance of investing in low-emitting fuels and finding long-term sustainable alternatives; in this regard, recalls the importance of transitional fuels, such as LNG, as the cleanest currently deployable alternative to heavy fuel oil, enabling the clean energy transition of maritime transport;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. stresses that the use of most alternative fuels in the maritime sector is still hampered by economic and technical barriers, and it is necessary to ensure the availability of mature and sustainable technologies before imposing strict constraints;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the current COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated that the maritime sector, ports and its workers is the backbone of the European economy as the uninterrupted freight transport has been essential for the functioning of supply chains;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the EU can lead the way in clean shipping, but that continued cooperation at IMO level remains essential to achieve long-term international solutions;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need not to include the European maritime sector, as defined by
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022 in accordance with the amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 16 September 2020 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data; proposes that maritime-
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022; recalls that the inclusion of maritime transport emissions into the EU ETS should be based on a comprehensive impact assessment that adequately takes into consideration the competitiveness of EU operators and businesses; proposes that maritime-
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022; highlights the importance of in-depth impact assessment, including risk assessment on carbon leakage, prior to inclusion of maritime sector in the EU ETS; proposes that maritime-
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the maritime sector, and ports in particular, play a critical and strategic role in the supply of goods and in ensuring the continuity of the economy as clearly demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022, following a thorough impact assessment by the Commission; proposes that maritime-
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, after an impact assessment is conducted, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that all maritime- related ETS revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports; _________________ 8 Directive 2003/87/EC.
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that an overregulation aiming at the reduction of emissions could be harmful for the competitiveness of the maritime sector in the European Union;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not only fuels but also the technical and operational measures, which would boost the efficiency of ships and their operations; recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations; recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40% reduction in emissions by
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations; recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions; stresses that the binding target of 40% by 2030 for shipping companies, which will need to replace equipment, comes in the midst of a global economic crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic; notes that this constitutes a major handicap from the outset for a maritime sector in the process of energy transition and must be taken into account, given that the sector is already being seriously undermined, with matters likely to become still worse over the coming years;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations as well as ensure the use of existing and future alternative fuels infrastructure through a goal-based approach; recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes the strong European maritime cluster and the positive developments internationally to support innovation and reduce shipping emissions and calls on the Commission and the Member States to support initiatives contributing these positive developments;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the critical and strategic function of transport, including ports;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to propose a contracts for difference scheme to help bridge the price gap between fossil fuels and sustainable alternative marine fuels; maritime-related ETS revenues could be used to finance such a scheme;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders, in
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders, in
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders and exchange of best practices between ports, the shipping sector as well as fuel and energy suppliers in order to develop an overall policy framework for the decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders, including shipping lines, ports and energy providers, in order to develop an overall policy for the decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas; urges the port authorities to put in place sustainable management methods and to certify them using methodologies that incorporate a Life Cycle Assessment of the port services, such as that offered by the Environmental Product Declaration;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that overseas territories, including Outermost regions and Overseas countries and territories, and the ports located therein, are of paramount importance to the European sovereignty and to the European and international maritime trade given their strategic location; highlights that investment drivers for these ports are very diverse, ranging from supporting their classic role for the reception of ships (loading, unloading, storage and transport of goods) to ensuring multimodal connections, constructing energy-related infrastructures, building resilience to climate change and the overall greening and digitalisation of vessels; calls for massive investments in ports located in overseas territories to turn them into strategic clusters for multi- modal transport, energy generation, storage and distribution as well as tourism;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Highlights that boosting seamless multimodal transport links between ports and the TEN-T network as well as improving interoperability between the various modes of transport, would eliminate bottlenecks and reduce congestion; underlines the importance of maritime and inland ports as strategic and multimodal nodes of the TEN-T network;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the strong efforts made by the European maritime cluster and the positive developments reached at international level to support innovation and reduce shipping emissions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support initiatives contributing these positive developments.
source: 660.197
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=55920&j=0&l=en
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
events/0/body |
EP
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.855New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-658855_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.197New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-660197_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-650358_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-04-26T00:00:00New
2021-04-27T00:00:00 |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02 |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-03-24T00:00:00New
2021-04-26T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
125042
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.197
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.358&secondRef=02 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.855
|
docs |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |