BETA


2019/2580(RSP) Resolution on a European human rights violations sanction regime

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2019/03/14
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 447 votes to 70 with 46 abstentions, a resolution on a European human rights violations sanctions regime.

The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ALDE, Greens/EFA, and ECR groups.

Parliament called on the Council to swiftly establish an autonomous, flexible and reactive EU-wide sanctions regime that would allow for the targeting of any individual, state and non-state actors, and other entities responsible for or involved in grave human rights violations. Such a regime should symbolically carry Sergei Magnitsky’s name. Parliament welcomed the fact that similar legislation targeting human rights abusers worldwide has been enacted in a number of countries, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The regime should allow for the imposition of restrictive measures, notably asset freezes and EU entry bans, against any individual or entity involved in grave human rights violations.

Parliament was convinced of the positive effect this new regime will have on the behaviour of the individuals and entities concerned, as well as of its deterrent effect. It stressed the need for:

- clearly defining the scope of violations as well as to set up appropriate legal avenues through which a listing can be challenged;

- all EU Member States to interpret, explain and enforce the application of sanctions in the same consistent manner;

- increased cooperation between Member States and the Commission in order to come up with a European oversight and enforcement mechanism;

- coordinated multilateral cooperation so as to prevent sanctions evasion;

- Parliament’s scrutiny role over this future regime, notably regarding the scope and definition of the listing criteria, as well as the possibilities for judicial redress;

- consistency of the new regime with the existing international framework on sanctions, notably in relation to the United Nations Security Council.

Members insisted that decisions to list and delist individuals or entities should be based on clear, transparent and distinct criteria and directly linked with the crime committed in order to guarantee a thorough judicial review and redress rights. They called for the systematic inclusion of clear and specific benchmarks and a methodology for the lifting of sanctions and for de-listing.

Members welcomed the proposal made by the President of the Commission to move beyond unanimity in Council decision-making in CFSP areas, and urged the Council to adopt this new sanctions instrument in such a way that the imposition of human rights sanctions might be adopted by qualified majority in the Council.

They called on all Member States to ensure that their authorities, companies and other actors registered in their territories are in full compliance with the Council decisions on restrictive measures against individuals and entities, and, in particular, the freezing of assets of individuals listed and the restrictions on admission to their respective territories as a result of violations of human rights. Parliament expressed concern at recent reports of violations of these decisions and reminded Member States of their obligation under international law to ensure the arrest and prosecution of those suspected of having committed crimes involving atrocities present on their territory.

Parliament went on to insist that the future EU human rights sanctions regime be complementary to existing EU policies and existing country-specific and horizontal restrictive measures. In this regard, the new regime should not replace the human rights scope of current country-specific measures.

Lastly, it stressed that the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of gross human rights violations and atrocity crimes through domestic or international jurisdictions should remain the primary objective of all efforts undertaken by the EU and its Member States to combat impunity.

Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC-B8-0177/2019 - Résolution 14/03/2019 12:44:29.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: +: 447, -: 70, 0: 46
DE PL ES IT GB SE NL FR BE RO AT BG FI CZ HR PT SK LT HU DK LU LV MT EE SI IE EL
Total
78
42
47
54
50
18
23
63
17
17
15
12
10
15
9
17
10
7
13
10
5
6
5
5
3
9
2
icon: PPE PPE
155

United Kingdom PPE

2

Romania PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
146

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
3

Denmark NI

1

Greece NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

2

RC-B8-0177/2019 - Résolution #

2019/03/14 Outcome: +: 447, -: 70, 0: 46
DE PL ES IT GB SE FR NL BE RO AT BG FI CZ HR PT SK LT HU DK LU LV MT EE SI IE EL
Total
78
42
47
54
50
18
62
23
17
17
15
12
10
15
9
17
10
7
13
10
5
6
5
5
3
9
2
icon: PPE PPE
155

United Kingdom PPE

2

Romania PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
145

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
3

Denmark NI

1

Greece NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
28

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0177_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0177_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0178_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0178_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0179_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0179_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0180_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0180_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0181_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0181_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0177_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0177_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190312&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-03-12-TOC_EN.html
events/1
date
2019-03-14T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32473&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0215_EN.html title: T8-0215/2019
summary
events/2
date
2019-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0215_EN.html title: T8-0215/2019
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0177_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0178_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0179_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0180_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0181_EN.html
docs/5
date
2019-03-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0177_EN.html title: RC-B8-0177/2019
type
Joint motion for resolution
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0215
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0215_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
docs
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0177/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0178/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0179/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0180/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0181/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
events
  • date: 2019-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0215 title: T8-0215/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 447 votes to 70 with 46 abstentions, a resolution on a European human rights violations sanctions regime. The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ALDE, Greens/EFA, and ECR groups. Parliament called on the Council to swiftly establish an autonomous, flexible and reactive EU-wide sanctions regime that would allow for the targeting of any individual, state and non-state actors, and other entities responsible for or involved in grave human rights violations. Such a regime should symbolically carry Sergei Magnitsky’s name. Parliament welcomed the fact that similar legislation targeting human rights abusers worldwide has been enacted in a number of countries, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The regime should allow for the imposition of restrictive measures, notably asset freezes and EU entry bans, against any individual or entity involved in grave human rights violations. Parliament was convinced of the positive effect this new regime will have on the behaviour of the individuals and entities concerned, as well as of its deterrent effect. It stressed the need for: - clearly defining the scope of violations as well as to set up appropriate legal avenues through which a listing can be challenged; - all EU Member States to interpret, explain and enforce the application of sanctions in the same consistent manner; - increased cooperation between Member States and the Commission in order to come up with a European oversight and enforcement mechanism; - coordinated multilateral cooperation so as to prevent sanctions evasion; - Parliament’s scrutiny role over this future regime, notably regarding the scope and definition of the listing criteria, as well as the possibilities for judicial redress; - consistency of the new regime with the existing international framework on sanctions, notably in relation to the United Nations Security Council. Members insisted that decisions to list and delist individuals or entities should be based on clear, transparent and distinct criteria and directly linked with the crime committed in order to guarantee a thorough judicial review and redress rights. They called for the systematic inclusion of clear and specific benchmarks and a methodology for the lifting of sanctions and for de-listing. Members welcomed the proposal made by the President of the Commission to move beyond unanimity in Council decision-making in CFSP areas, and urged the Council to adopt this new sanctions instrument in such a way that the imposition of human rights sanctions might be adopted by qualified majority in the Council. They called on all Member States to ensure that their authorities, companies and other actors registered in their territories are in full compliance with the Council decisions on restrictive measures against individuals and entities, and, in particular, the freezing of assets of individuals listed and the restrictions on admission to their respective territories as a result of violations of human rights. Parliament expressed concern at recent reports of violations of these decisions and reminded Member States of their obligation under international law to ensure the arrest and prosecution of those suspected of having committed crimes involving atrocities present on their territory. Parliament went on to insist that the future EU human rights sanctions regime be complementary to existing EU policies and existing country-specific and horizontal restrictive measures. In this regard, the new regime should not replace the human rights scope of current country-specific measures. Lastly, it stressed that the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of gross human rights violations and atrocity crimes through domestic or international jurisdictions should remain the primary objective of all efforts undertaken by the EU and its Member States to combat impunity.
  • date: 2019-03-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2019/2580(RSP)
title
Resolution on a European human rights violations sanction regime
subject
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subtype
Resolution on statement
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed