Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GIEGOLD Sven ( Verts/ALE) | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP), LALUCQ Aurore ( S&D), SEMEDO Monica ( Renew), BECK Gunnar ( ID), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR), PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115Events
The European Parliament adopted by 568 votes to 63, with 64 abstentions, under a special legislative procedure (Parliament’s consultation), a resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.
As a reminder, the proposed revision of the Administrative Cooperation Directive provides that Member States will automatically exchange information on the income generated by sellers on digital platforms. It also suggests a series of adjustments to the Directive, including provisions on joint audits between tax authorities, an explicit reference to the possibility for a Member State to make group requests to another Member State or clarification of the concept of foreseeable relevance.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to amendments.
Procedure governing the exchange of information on request
A tax authority that receives a request for information should provide it within a maximum of three months, rather than six, from the date of receipt of the request.
Before 1 January 2023, the Commission should present a report giving an overview and assessment of the statistics and information received on a country-to-country basis, on issues such as the administrative and other costs and benefits of exchange of information on request (including the number of requests accepted and refused), as well as the time taken to process them.
Scope of the automatic and compulsory exchange of information
The competent authority of each Member State should, by automatic exchange, communicate to the competent authority of any other Member State all information that is available or could reasonably be made available concerning residents in that other Member State, on the following specific categories of income and capital as they are to be understood under the national legislation of the Member State which communicates the information.
The competent authority should not negotiate and agree new bilateral or multilateral advance pricing arrangements with third countries that do not permit their disclosure to competent authorities of other Member States as from 1 January 2022.
Members proposed including an obligation for the Commission to publish annually anonymised and aggregated statistical data from country-by-country reporting to all Member States.
Registration
Foreign platforms should be required to register and report in one single Member State for the purpose of operating in the internal market, taking into account the location of their global or regional headquarters, their effective place of management as well as the existence of substantial economic activity in that chosen Member State, in the absence of identification for VAT purposes.
Disclosure of information and documents
Members proposed that information and documents received by a competent authority of a Member State under the Directive may be used for purposes other than tax purposes only insofar as it is allowed under the laws of the Member State of the competent authority receiving the information.
Assessment
Member States should communicate the results of their evaluation to the European Parliament and the Commission on an annual basis. A summary of those results should be made public, taking into account taxpayers’ rights and confidentiality. The evaluation and analysis shared by Member States to the European Commission should be published insofar those evaluations do not disclose any information that can be attributable to a specific taxpayer.
The Commission would be required to publish annually anonymised summaries of the statistical data provided by Member States.
Excluded operators and activities
Members proposed including a definition of excluded relevant activities and excluded reporting platform operators in order to reduce the administrative burden on small platforms and to ensure that non-monetary and non-remunerated activities fall outside the scope.
This would exclude reporting operators whose turnover in the EU in the previous calendar year did not exceed EUR 100 000.
Penalties
Members considered it useful to provide for certain types of sanctions that Member States can use against platforms that do not fulfil their obligations and to proceed with the harmonisation of sanctions in the Member States to encourage uniform and effective implementation by platforms.
Member States are especially encouraged to consider as penalties options for restrictions of regulated means of payment, the charging of additional consequential fees per transaction, the exclusion of public contracts and, in extreme and repeated cases, the revoking of the business licence of the platform operator.
Review
No later than two years after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, the Commission should present a report on the implementation and efficiency of the provisions introduced by the Council Directive and make specific proposals, including legislative proposals, for the improvement of that Directive.
When examining a proposal presented by the Commission, the Council should assess further strengthening of the obligation to report by the Reporting Platform Operators.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, under a special legislative procedure (Parliament’s consultation), the report by Sven GIEGOLD (Greens/EFA, DE) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.
As a reminder, the proposed revision of the Administrative Cooperation Directive provides that Member States will automatically exchange information on the income generated by sellers on digital platforms. It also suggests a series of adjustments to the Directive, including provisions on joint audits between tax authorities, an explicit reference to the possibility for a Member State to make group requests to another Member State or clarification of the concept of foreseeable relevance.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission proposal subject to amendments.
Procedure governing the exchange of information on request
The requested authority should provide information as soon as possible and no later than three months (instead of six months) from the date of receipt of the request.
Before 1 January 2023, the Commission should submit a report that provides an overview and an assessment of the statistics and information received on a country-by-country basis, on issues such as the administrative and other relevant costs and benefits, including incremental tax revenues and of exchanges of information on request.
Scope of the automatic and compulsory exchange of information
The competent authority of each Member State should, by automatic exchange, communicate to the competent authority of any other Member State all information that is available or could reasonably be made available concerning residents in that other Member State, on the following specific categories of income and capital as they are to be understood under the national legislation of the Member State which communicates the information.
The competent authority should not negotiate and agree new bilateral or multilateral advance pricing arrangements with third countries that do not permit their disclosure to competent authorities of other Member States as from 1 January 2022.
Members proposed including an obligation for the Commission to publish annually anonymised and aggregated statistical data from country-by-country reporting to all Member States.
Registration
Foreign platforms should be required to register and report in a single Member State for the purposes of their activities in the internal market, taking into account the location of their global or regional headquarters, their effective centre of management and the existence of substantial economic activities in the chosen Member State.
Disclosure of information and documents
Members proposed that information and documents received by a competent authority of a Member State under the Directive may be used for purposes other than tax purposes only insofar as it is allowed under the laws of the Member State of the competent authority receiving the information.
Assessment
Member States should communicate the results of their evaluation to the European Parliament and the Commission on an annual basis. A summary of those results should be made public, taking into account taxpayers’ rights and confidentiality. The evaluation and analysis shared by Member States to the European Commission should be published insofar those evaluations do not disclose any information that can be attributable to a specific taxpayer.
The Commission would be required to publish annually anonymised summaries of the statistical data provided by Member States.
Excluded operators and activities
Members proposed including a definition of excluded relevant activities and excluded reporting platform operators in order to reduce the administrative burden on small platforms and to ensure that non-monetary and non-remunerated activities fall outside the scope.
Penalties
Members considered it useful to provide for certain types of sanctions that Member States can use against platforms that do not fulfil their obligations and to proceed with the harmonisation of sanctions in the Member States to encourage uniform and effective implementation by platforms.
Review
No later than two years after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, the Commission should present a report on the implementation and efficiency of the provisions introduced by the Council Directive and make specific proposals, including legislative proposals, for the improvement of that Directive.
When examining a proposal presented by the Commission, the Council should assess further strengthening of the obligation to report by the Reporting Platform Operators.
PURPOSE: to improve the functioning of the existing provisions of Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States need sufficient tax revenue to finance their considerable efforts, while ensuring that the most vulnerable groups do not bear the burden of increasing such revenue. To achieve this, fair taxation, based on rules that ensure that everyone pays their fair share, while allowing taxpayers, be they businesses or citizens, to comply easily with the rules, is essential.
In the past years, the EU has focused its efforts on tackling tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance and boosting transparency. While major improvements have been made in particular in the field of exchange of information, the evaluation of the application of Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation6 showed that there is still a need to improve existing provisions that relate to all forms of exchanges of information and administrative cooperation.
The characteristics of the digital platform economy make the traceability and detection of taxable events by tax authorities very difficult. In addition to reinforcing existing rules, the expansion of administrative cooperation to new areas is required in the EU, in order to address the challenges posed by the digitalisation of the economy and help tax administrations better and more efficiently collect taxes and keep pace with new developments.
The present legislative proposal is part of a package for fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery of the EU, which includes a Communication for an Action Plan presenting a number of upcoming initiatives for fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery strategy, and a Commission Communication on Tax good governance in the EU and beyond.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: as regards digital platform operators, the impact assessment indicates that the regulatory option at EU level is the most appropriate to implement the policy defined.
EU regulatory action shall put all tax authorities on an equal footing when it comes to the access to information collected for an identified tax purpose. This also allows for the automatic exchange of information at the EU level on the basis of common standards and specifications.
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to amend the existing provisions on exchange of information and administrative cooperation and to extend the scope to automatic exchange of information in respect of information declared by operators of digital platforms.
Extension of EU tax transparency rules to digital platforms
Member States shall automatically exchange information on income earned through digital platforms. This shall not only allow national authorities to identify the situations in which the tax has to be paid, but shall also reduce the administrative burden on the platforms, which have to deal with several different national reporting obligations.
The proposal lays down the scope and conditions for the mandatory automatic exchange of information which will be reported by platform operators to competent authority. Detailed rules are laid down in Annex V.
The new rules shall impose on reporting platform operators the obligation: (i) to collect and verify information in accordance with due diligence procedures; (ii) to report information on sellers who use their platform to conduct their business and to sell their goods or provide their services.
The information reported by platform operators has to be communicated by the competent authorities of the Member States where the reporting took place to the Member States where the Reportable Seller is a resident and/or the immovable property is located.
Exchange of information on request
The proposal includes a definition of the standard of foreseeable relevance that would apply in the event of a request for information. The definition sets out the elements of the standard and the procedural requirements with which the requesting authority must comply. It also provides for the possibility for tax administrations to make group requests for information which may concern a group of taxpayers that cannot be identified by name or on an individual basis but can be designated solely on the basis of a common set of characteristics.
Administrative cooperation
The proposal improves the existing rules by: (i) introducing an obligation on the requested competent authority to respond to a request for the presence of an official of another Member State during an enquiry; (ii) providing for a 30-day time limit within which the requested authorities must respond to a proposal for a simultaneous control and (iii) establishing an explicit and clear legal framework for carrying out joint audits between two or more Member States.
Budgetary implications
The impact on expenditure, including administrative expenditure, is estimated at EUR 1 306 million over 5 years.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)234
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2021/514
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 104 25.03.2021, p. 0001
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0072/2021
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0015/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE663.118
- Committee draft report: PE658.793
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 096 22.03.2021, p. 0009
- Document attached to the procedure: N9-0015/2021
- Contribution: COM(2020)0314
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2020)0271
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0129
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0130
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0131
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2020)0314
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2020)0271
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0129
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0130
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0131
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 096 22.03.2021, p. 0009 N9-0015/2021
- Committee draft report: PE658.793
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE663.118
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)234
- Contribution: COM(2020)0314
Activities
- Sven GIEGOLD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul TANG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gunnar BECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José GUSMÃO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eugen JURZYCA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica SEMEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Coopération administrative dans le domaine fiscal - Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation - Zusammenarbeit der Verwaltungsbehörden im Bereich der Besteuerung - A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 1-65, 67-76 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 66 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 77 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 78 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 79 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 80 #
A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Am 81 #
Coopération administrative dans le domaine fiscal - Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation - Zusammenarbeit der Verwaltungsbehörden im Bereich der Besteuerung - A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold - Proposition de la Commission #
Amendments | Dossier |
92 |
2020/0148(CNS)
2021/01/11
ECON
92 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ac – paragraph 2 – point h (h) the Financial Account Identifier to which the Consideration is paid or credited,
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ac – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The information referred to in point (a) and (b) should be made accessible to other competent authorities of Member States to deter and prosecute infringements to local and/or national law, without prejudice to the rules on tax secrecy and data protection applicable in the Member State in which the Reportable Seller is resident.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2016/11/EU Article 8ac – paragraph 3 3. The communication pursuant to paragraph 2 shall take place using the standard form referred to in Article 20(7) without undue delay and at the latest within
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ac – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall lay down rules pursuant to which a Reporting Platform Operator may choose to register with the competent authorities of a single Member State in accordance with the rules laid down in paragraph F of Section IV of Annex V, taking into account the location of its global or regional headquarters, the effective place of management as well as the existence of substantial economic activity in that chosen Member State, in the absence of identification for VAT purposes as indicated in paragraph F of Section IV of Annex V.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a Directive 2011/16EU Article 8b – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide the Commission on an annual basis with all relevant material information, including statistics on the volume of automatic exchanges as well as an assessment of the usability of the data being exchanged under Articles 8(1), 8(3a), 8aa and 8ac, and with information on the administrative and other relevant costs and benefits relating to exchanges that have taken place and any potential changes, for both tax administrations and third parties..
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8b – paragraph 2 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8b – paragraph 2 (ba) Paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. Before 1 January 20
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (ba) In paragraph 2, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “2. Before 1 January 20
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a (bb) In paragraph 2, point a of the second subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘(a) the competent authority of each Member State shall, by automatic exchange, communicate to the competent authority of any other Member State, information regarding taxable periods as from 1 January 20
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Council Directive 2011/16/EU Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point (c) Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A competent authority shall respond to a request in accordance with the first subparagraph within 30 days, to confirm its agreement or communicate its
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Council Directive 2011/16/EU Article 11– paragraph 2 Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Council Directive 2011/16/EU Article 12a Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 12a – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. A request for a joint audit by a competent authority of a Member State
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 12a – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. A request for a joint audit by a competent authority of a Member State may be rejected on justified grounds
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Information communicated between Member States in any form pursuant to this Directive shall be covered by the obligation of official secrecy under the national law of the requested Member States and requesting Member State and enjoy the protection extended to similar information
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 17 – paragraph 4 a (new) (13a) In Article 17, the following paragraph is inserted: “4a. The possibility to refuse the provision of information referred to in paragraph 4 shall not apply if the requesting authority is able to demonstrate that the information will not be disclosed to the public and will only be used for the purpose of the assessment, management and control of the relevant tax affairs of the person or group of persons concerned by the request for information.”
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 7. The Commission shall develop and provide technical and logistical support for a secure central interface on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation where Member States communicate with the use of standard forms pursuant to Article 20(1) and (3). The competent authorities of all Member States shall have access to that interface. This central interface must be secured with the highest level of cybersecurity and technically certified procedures to guarantee data protection. For the purpose of collecting statistics, the Commission shall have access to information about the exchanges recorded to the interface and which can be extracted automatically. The access by the Commission shall be without prejudice to the obligation of Member States to provide statistics on exchanges of information in accordance with Article 23(4).
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 7. The Commission shall develop and provide all the necessary technical and logistical support for a secure central interface on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation where
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall examine and evaluate, in their jurisdiction, the effectiveness of administrative cooperation in accordance with this Directive in combating tax evasion and tax avoidance
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall examine and evaluate, in their jurisdiction, the effectiveness of administrative cooperation in accordance with this Directive in combating tax evasion and tax avoidance and shall communicate annually the results of their evaluation to the Commission. These annual reports shall be made public.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 3 (17a) In Article 23, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: 3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the exchange of information on request referred to in Article 5, 6 and 7 and the automatic exchange of information referred to in Articles 8, 8a, 8aa and 8ab as well as the practical results achieved, including the incremental tax revenues associated with administrative cooperation. The information communicated shall be disaggregated, at minimum to a country- by-country level. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the form and the conditions of communication for that yearly assessment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23a – paragraph 1 (17a) In Article 23a, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. Information communicated to the Commission pursuant to this Directive shall be kept confidential
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 2011/16/EU Reports and documents produced by the Commission, referred to in the first subparagraph, may be used by the Member States
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Reports and documents produced by the Commission, referred to in the first subparagraph
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Notwithstanding the first and second subparagraphs, the Commission
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 25 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that, in the event of a personal data breach in the meaning of point 12 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 25 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The suspension shall last until the competent authorities ask the Commission to enable again the exchanges of information under this Directive with the Member State where the breach occurred. The Commission shall enable the exchanges of information only when there is technical evidence that the data flow is secured.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 25a – paragraph 1 Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and concerning Articles 8aa, 8ab and 8ac, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 25b (new) (20a) The following article is added: ‘Article 25b Review clause By ... [three years after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive], and every three years henceforth, the Commission shall present a report on the efficiency of the Directive and make specific proposals, including legislative proposals, for its improvement. This report shall be made public.’
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I Directive 2011/16/EU ANNEX V – Section 1 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) it has revenues made in the Union exceeding EUR 100 000 over the previous calendar year.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I Directive 2011/16/EU ANNEX V – Section III – point B – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the Financial Account Identifier,
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I Directive 2011/16/EU ANNEX V – Section III – point B – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the Financial Account Identifier,
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In order to accommodate new initiatives of the Union in the field of tax transparency, Council Directive 2011/16/EU21 has been the subject of a series of amendments over the last years. These changes mainly introduced reporting obligations, followed by communication to other Member States, related to financial accounts, advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements, country-by- country reports and reportable cross-border arrangements. In such a way, these amendments extended the scope of the automatic exchange of information. The tax authorities now have a broader set of cooperation tools at their disposal, to detect and tackle forms of tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, in order to safeguard tax revenues and to ensure fair taxation. _________________ 21Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1).
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The broader set of cooperation tools, the digital transition and the aim to enhance cooperation between national authorities require qualified human resources and adequate financial resources. To that end, the changes proposed must be accompanied by an adequate level of investment, mainly on the adaptation of informatics and digital infrastructure and professional training.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In the past years, the Commission has been monitoring the application and, in 2019, completed an evaluation of Directive 2011/16/EU22. While significant improvements have been made in the field of automatic exchange of information, there is still a need to improve existing provisions that relate to all forms of exchanges of information and administrative cooperation. In order to take into account the evolution of the situation with regard to tax transparency, this directive might need to be regularly updated. _________________ 22European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Evaluation of the Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC, SWD(2019) 328 final.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The Union and the Member States should ensure a harmonised system of penalties and sanctions across the Union to prevent the exploitation of loopholes and differences among Member States’ taxation systems by platform operators. In case of violation of the rules, financial penalties and exclusion from public contracts should be considered. In extreme and repeated cases, the possibility of revoking the business licence of the platform operator should be an option.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Given the global technological advancement, there is a need for advanced supervisory mechanisms that are in close contact with the relevant counter-criminal financing bodies.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Any information regarding cross- border schemes with implications for third countries should also be disclosed to the tax authorities in these countries. This should concern in particular developing countries, which often have a more limited access to international systems of exchange of tax information.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The digitalisation of Europe’s economy is one of the mainstays of its reconstruction. This means that Europe must make itself an attractive place for digital companies to conduct their economic and commercial activities, establish themselves and expand, because this will help generate wealth, create jobs and achieve Europe’s objective of digitalisation of its business fabric and administration. This is why the European Union must be sure to introduce fair and appropriate rules which facilitate a free market and free competition between digital platforms, shunning confiscatory tax models and bureaucratic hurdles that make it more expensive and more difficult for companies to operate.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Proper identification of taxpayers is essential to effective exchange of information between tax administrations. A European taxpayer identification number (TIN) should always be made available when required in this Directive and a European TIN should be created to provide the best means for this identification. It would allow any third party to quickly, easily and correctly identify and record TINs in cross-border relations and serve as a basis for effective automatic exchange of information between Member States tax administrations.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Tax administrations frequently request information from digital platform operators. This causes platform operators significant administrative and compliance costs. At the same time, some Member States have imposed a unilateral reporting obligation, which creates an additional administrative burden for platform operators, as they have to comply with multitude of national standards of reporting. It would therefore be essential that a standardised reporting obligation
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The mainstream digitalisation of many sectors of the economy coupled with the fast developing digital economy calls into question the suitability of the Union corporate tax models designed for brick and mortar industries, including with regard to the extent that valuation and calculation criteria could be re-invented to reflect the commercial activities of the 21st century. Although those situations highlight shortcomings that are completely different in nature, they all create obstacles which impede the proper functioning of the internal market and give rise to distortions between large companies and small and medium-sized enterprises. This directive will solve the problems of information exchange with regard to digital platforms.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) (7b) Digital goods and services tend to be highly mobile and intangible and therefore more prone to suffer from aggressive tax planning practices, since many business models do not require physical infrastructure in order to carry out transactions with customers and make profits. In particular, online sellers and sellers operating via platforms currently enjoy the opportunity to make revenues that are poorly reported, hence at high risk of remaining undertaxed or not taxed at all.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Given the wide use of digital platforms in performing commercial activities, both by individuals and entities, it is crucial to ensure that the information is reportable regardless of the legal nature of the seller.
Amendment 53 #
(10) Given the wide use of digital platforms in performing commercial activities, both by individuals and entities, it is crucial to ensure that the information is reportable regardless of the legal nature of the seller. Nevertheless, an exception should be provided for governmental entities, which should not be captured by the reporting obligation, provided this is justifiable on account of it being sensitive information, prior knowledge of which could affect the market and operators on the market.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Given the digital nature and flexibility of digital platforms, the reporting obligation should extend to those platform operators that perform commercial activity in the Union but are neither residents for tax purposes, nor incorporated or managed nor have a permanent establishment in a Member State. This would ensure a level playing field among the platforms and prevent unfair competition. In order to facilitate this, foreign platforms should be required to register and report in one single Member State for the purpose of operating in the internal market, taking into account the location of their global or regional headquarter, the effective place of management as well as the existence of substantial economic activity in that chosen Member State.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Considering the developments in the digitalised economy, the reporting of commercial activity should include the rental of immovable property, personal services, sales of goods, the rental of any mode of transport
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Considering that the progressively digitised and globalised economy reveals complex and challenging dimensions, such as crypto-assets, it is important to increase cooperation between national tax administrations in this field. A clear definition of crypto-assets, in line with the ongoing work within the OECD and FATF, would be important to enhance the combat against tax evasion and to promote fair taxation. The proliferation of crypto-currencies is a topical matter and should be considered in any effort to increase administrative cooperation, based on the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) The objective of preventing tax evasion and avoidance could be ensured by requiring digital platform operators to report income earned through platforms at an early stage, before the national tax authorities carry out their yearly tax assessments. To facilitate the work of Member States’ tax authorities, the reported information should be exchanged within one month following the reporting. In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges should be carried out electronically through the existing common communication network (‘CCN’) developed by the Union. So as to avoid additional bureaucratic burdens for SMEs, digital platform operators with annual revenues below EUR 50 million globally and EUR 10 million in the EU as a whole should be able to continue to provide information to national authorities by way of the means and tools already in use under Member States’ legislation, at no additional cost.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) The objective of preventing tax evasion and avoidance could be ensured by requiring digital platform operators to report income earned through platforms at an early stage, before the national tax authorities carry out their yearly tax assessments. To facilitate the work of Member States’ tax authorities, the reported information should be exchanged within one month following the reporting. In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges should be carried out electronically through the existing common communication network (‘CCN’) developed by the Union. The digital infrastructure should therefore be resilient and guarantee the highest standard of security.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) The objective of preventing tax evasion and avoidance could be ensured by requiring digital platform operators to report income earned through platforms at an early stage, before the national tax authorities carry out their yearly tax assessments. To facilitate the work of Member States’ tax authorities, the reported information should be exchanged without undue delay and at the latest within one month following the reporting. In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges should be carried out electronically through the existing common communication network (‘CCN’) developed by the Union.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) Individuals who have access to information related to sensitive tax information of platform operators and multinational corporations regarding tax evasion and tax avoidance practices, should be encouraged to come forward and cooperate with the authorities with discretion and respect to the public interest, and they should be fully protected if they do so.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) This Directive should ensure that competent authorities can access data on the duration of rental contracts where short term property renting is limited in time so as to facilitate the implementation of those limitations and a control over rental price increases in the Union.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) The evaluation of Directive 2011/16/EU carried out by the Commission demonstrated the need for consistent monitoring of the effectiveness in the application of that Directive and of the national transposing provisions enabling this application. In order for the Commission to continue to properly monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the automatic exchanges of information under Directive 2011/16/EU, Member States should be obliged to communicate
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Commission should provide, every three years after the entry into force of this Directive, a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and the Council, taking into account the Member States’ reports on exchange of information and best practices and propose concrete improvements when necessary, including by legislative proposals. The Commission should make this evaluation report public.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) It is necessary to strengthen the mechanisms of Directive 2011/16/EU regarding the presence of officials of the tax administration of one Member State in the territory of another Member State and the carrying out of simultaneous controls by two or more Member States in order to ensure their effective application. It follows that responses to requests for the presence of officials of another Member State and for simultaneous controls should be provided within a specified timeframe.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) It is necessary to strengthen the mechanisms of Directive 2011/16/EU regarding the presence of officials of the tax administration of one Member State in the territory of another Member State and the carrying out of simultaneous controls by two or more Member States in order to ensure their effective application. It follows that responses to requests for the presence of officials of another Member State and for simultaneous controls should be provided within a specified timeframe. Where foreign officials are present in the territory of another Member State during an administrative enquiry, or participate through the use of electronic means of communication, they should be allowed to directly interview individuals and examine records. These diligences are important to safeguard the efficiency of such enquiries and must respect, at all time, fundamental rights.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Multilateral controls carried out with the support of the Fiscalis 2020 programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 have demonstrated the benefit of co-ordinated controls of one or more taxpayers that are of common or complementary interest to two or more tax
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Multilateral controls carried out with the support of the Fiscalis 2020 programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 have demonstrated the benefit of co-ordinated controls of one or more taxpayers that are of common or complementary interest to two or more tax administrations in the Union. As there is no explicit legal base for conducting joint audits, such joint actions are currently conducted based on the combined provisions of Directive 2011/16/EU regarding the presence of foreign officials in the territory of other Member States and
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Member States should adopt a clear and efficient legal framework to allow their tax authorities to perform joint audits of persons with cross-border activity. Joint audits are administrative enquiries conducted jointly by the competent authorities of two or more Member States, to examine a case linked to one or more persons of common or complementary interest to these Member States. Joint audits can play an important role in contributing to the better functioning of the internal market. Joint audits should be structured to offer legal certainty to taxpayers through clear procedural rules, including for mitigating the risk of double taxation. In addition to the legal framework required, Member States should provide for the conditions that facilitate the organisation of joint audits at an operational level, notably by supporting training, including linguistic training, for staff likely to perform joint audits. It is recalled that the Fiscalis programme can provide financial support in this regard.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the process, responses to requests for joint audits should be provided within a given timeframe. Rejections of requests should be duly justified and subject to a right of reply by the requesting Member State authority. The procedural
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the process, responses to requests for joint audits should be provided within a given timeframe. Rejections of requests should be duly justified and should only be possible for the reasons laid out in this directive. The procedural arrangements applicable to a joint audit should be those of the Member State where the relevant audit action takes place. Accordingly, evidence collected during a joint audit should be mutually recognised by the participating Member State(s). It is equally important that the competent authorities agree on the facts and
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Recognising that joint audits are founded on mutual trust and consent between the competent authorities of the participating Member States, the exchange of information related to commercial, industrial or professional secrets or to a commercial process, or information the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy, should
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Recognising that joint audits are founded on mutual trust between the competent authorities of the participating Member States, the exchange of information related to commercial, industrial or professional secrets or to a commercial process, or information the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy, should not be refused in the context of a joint audit. Such exchanged information should however remain confidential and not be disclosed to third parties, and applicable rules on the disclosure of a commercial, industrial or professional secret or a commercial process, or information the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy, should not be circumvented.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2011/16/EU and in particular, for the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities, implementing
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 a (new) Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29a) This Directive aims at limiting the exposure of the entire Union to high risks of money laundering, tax fraud and corruption, which could also threaten its security. Other tools should be proposed to also share information such as the granting of European visas and citizenship by investment or residency by investment programmes.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) The objective of this Directive
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 a (new) (30a) The Commission has announced its intention to propose a revision of this directive to allow for the exchange of information regarding crypto-assets. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) adopted a broad definition of virtual currency and recommended incorporating within the scope of AML/CFT obligations any natural or legal person who conducts activities including exchange between crypto-assets, transfer of crypto-assets and participation in and provision of financial services related to initial coin offerings.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 9 – point a a (new) (aa) The following point is inserted in the first subparagraph: (aa) for the purpose of Articles 8a, 8aa, and 8ab, the systematic notification of new information communicated to the other Member States.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 14 Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 16 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 5a – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of a request as referred to in Article 5, the requested information shall be deemed to be foreseeably relevant where at the time the request is made the requesting authority considers that, in accordance with its national law, there is a reasonable possibility that the requested information be relevant to the tax affairs of one or several taxpayers, whether identified by name or otherwise, and be justified for the purposes of
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 5a – paragraph 2 2. With the aim to demonstrate the foreseeable relevance of the requested information, the requesting competent authority shall provide the requested authority with supporting information
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 6 – paragraph 4 (3a) In article 6, paragraph 4 is amended as follows: “4. When specifically requested by the requesting authority, the requested authority shall communicate original documents provided that th
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) (3a) In Article 7, the following paragraph is added: “6a. Before 1 January 2023, the Commission shall submit a report that provides an overview and an assessment of the statistics and information received on a country-by-country basis, on issues such as the administrative and other relevant costs and benefits, including incremental tax revenues of the exchange of information on request, as well as practical aspects linked thereto, including the number of accepted and refused requests received and sent per country, time of handling and other relevant aspects for a comprehensive assessment.”
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (3b) In Article 7(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “1. The requested authority shall provide the information referred to in Article 5 as quickly as possible, and no later than
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall inform the Commission annually of at least t
Amendment 90 #
Member States shall inform the Commission annually of
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall inform the Commission annually of a
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Before 1 January 2023, Member States shall inform the Commission of a
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Before 1 January 2023, Member States shall inform the Commission of a
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Before 1 January 2023, Member States shall inform the Commission of a
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point -a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8a – title (-a) The title is amended as follows: “Scope and conditions of mandatory automatic exchange of information on advance
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point -a a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) (-aa) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: “The competent authority shall not negotiate and agree new bilateral or multilateral advance pricing arrangements with third countries that do not permit their disclosure to competent authorities of other Member States as from 1 January 2022.”
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8a – paragraph 6 – point b (b) a summary of the advance
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8aa – paragraph 2 (5a) In Article 8aa, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. The competent authority of a Member State where the country-by- country report was received pursuant to paragraph 1 shall, by means of automatic exchange and within the deadline laid down in paragraph 4, communicate the country-by-country report to any other Member State in which, on the basis of the information in the country-by-country report, one or more Constituent Entities of the MNE Group of the Reporting Entity are either resident for tax purposes or subject to tax with respect to the business carried out through a permanent establishment.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ab – paragraph 14 – point h a (new) (5b) In Article 8ab, paragraph 14, the following point (ha) is added: “(ha) the list of beneficiaries, which is updated on a yearly basis.”
source: 663.118
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed |
events/4/docs |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.793New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-658793_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE663.118New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-663118_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20210308&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20210308&type=CRE |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|