Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | TARDINO Annalisa ( ID) | SEEKATZ Ralf ( EPP), VITANOV Petar ( S&D), KOVAŘÍK Ondřej ( Renew), BRICMONT Saskia ( Verts/ALE), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga ( ECR), DALY Clare ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 114
Legal Basis:
RoP 114Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 438 votes to 133, with 17 abstentions, a resolution on the recommendation of the European Parliament to the Council and the Commission on the conclusion of an agreement, under negotiation, between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism.
Parliament encouraged the Commission to start negotiations with New Zealand at an early date on the exchange of personal data between Europol and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism in accordance with the negotiating directives adopted by the Council. It insisted that the level of data protection provided for in the Agreement should be essentially equivalent to the level of protection provided for under EU law.
Parliament made the following recommendations to the Commission:
- the transfer of sensitive personal data should only be permitted in exceptional cases where such transfers are strictly necessary and proportionate for preventing and combating criminal offences covered by the agreement;
- clear safeguards should be defined for the data subject, persons linked to the data subject and persons linked to the criminal offence such as witnesses and victims should be defined to guarantee respect for fundamental rights;
- the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged;
- the agreement should contain a clear and precise provision setting out the retention period for personal data that have been transferred to New Zealand and requiring the data to be erased at the end of that period;
- the independent supervisory authority vested with effective powers of investigation and intervention is to be in charge of supervising the implementation of the international agreement should be clearly defined before the conclusion of the agreement;
- the international agreement should include a provision allowing the EU to suspend or revoke the agreement in the event of a breach;
- a mechanism for monitoring and periodically evaluating the agreement should be established in order to evaluate the partners’ compliance with the agreement and the functioning of the agreement in relation to the operational needs of Europol, and with the EU data protection law;
- the onward transfers of Europol information from competent New Zealand authorities to other authorities in New Zealand, including for use in judicial proceedings, should only be allowed for the original purposes of the transfer by Europol and should be made subject to prior authorisation by Europol.
Members stressed that Parliament will give its consent to the conclusion of the agreement only if such an agreement does not pose risks to the rights to privacy and data protection, nor to other fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)452
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0200/2020
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0131/2020
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0131/2020
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE652.503
- Committee draft report: PE650.351
- Committee draft report: PE650.351
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE652.503
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0131/2020
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)452
Votes
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Am 2 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Visa 13 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Considérant F/1 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Considérant F/2 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Considérant F/3 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Am 1 #
A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
90 |
2020/2048(INI)
2020/05/28
LIBE
90 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 — having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), and in particular Articles 2, 6, 7, 8 and
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 — having regard to the Christchurch Call to Action adopted by New Zealand, France, the Commission, technology companies and others
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Regulation (EU) 2016/794
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas international agreements allowing Europol and third countries to cooperate and exchange personal data should respect the fundamental rights and principles recognised by the Charter, in particular Articles 2, 6, 7, 8 and
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas international agreements allowing Europol and third countries to cooperate and exchange personal data should respect Articles 2, 6, 7 and 8 of the Charter, and Article 16 TFEU, and be necessary for and proportionate to the fulfilment of Europol’s tasks; respecting the principle of purpose limitation, the right of access, the right to rectification and the control by an independent authority specifically stipulated by the Charter;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas international agreements allowing Europol and third countries to
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas international agreements allowing Europol and third countries to cooperate and exchange personal data should fully respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights, notably Articles
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the Europol programming document 2020-20222a highlights that the full and successful implementation of EMPACT activities, in particular at the operational level, is not possible without close partnership with third states and organisations; whereas the EU and New Zealand are close in their outlook on global security issues and pursue similar approaches in this regard; _________________ 2aEuropol Programming Document 2020- 2022 adopted by Europol's Management Board on 25 March 2020, EDOC# 1003783v20E
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas Europol and the New Zealand Police have already established a framework of enhanced cooperation through a Working Arrangement and a Memorandum of Understanding, both signed in 2019, which allow the New Zealand Police to use SIENA and to permanently deploy a liaison officer to the Europol headquarters in The Hague;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas on 13th May 2020 the Council adopted the Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations with New Zealand for an agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the Europol and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism through a written procedure with all delegations voting in favour;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 — having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), and in particular Articles
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Europol has
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas there is a need to ensure the reliability of sources and accuracy of information;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Europol has designated the threat level from Jihadi terrorists as high, and whereas in 2018,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Europol has designated the threat level from Jihadi terrorists as extremely high, and whereas in 2018, they were responsible for all deaths from terror attacks in the EU;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas, as reported by Europol, seven Jihadi terrorist attacks were completed in 2018 and a further 16 similar such attacks were thwarted;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas, in 2018, a total of 511 individuals were arrested on suspicion of having committed crimes linked to Jihadi terrorism;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 — having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), and in particular Articles
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Europol has pointed to the high adaptability of organised crime and its ability to extract long-term gains from crises and whereas the Agency has assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cybercrime to be the most visible and striking compared to other criminal activities, as cybercriminals have been successfully exploiting emerging opportunities and vulnerabilities;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EDPS has supervised Europol since 1 May 2017, and also advises the EU institutions on policies and legislation relating to data protection, including when negotiating agreements in the law enforcement sector;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas in the light of the 2019 Christchurch lone gunman attack,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas in the light of the 2019 Christchurch
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas in the light of the 2019 Christchurch
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) — having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas transfers of personal data gathered in the context of criminal investigations and further processed by Europol under the agreement are liable to have a significant impact on the lives of the individuals concerned;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. Stresses that the agreement fully needs to respect the fundamental rights and observe the principles recognised by the Charter, in particular the right to private and family life, recognised in Article 7 of the Charter, the right to the protection of personal data, recognised in Article 8 of the Charter and the right to effective remedy and fair trial recognised by Article 47 of the Charter;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the necessity and proportionality of cooperation with New Zealand in the field of law enforcement
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the necessity of cooperation with New Zealand in the field of law enforcement
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the level of protection provided for in the agreement and in applicable law and practice in New Zealand should be essentially equivalent to the level of protection provided for in EU law; stresses that if such level of protection cannot be guaranteed both in law and in practice, the agreement cannot be concluded;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the level of data protection provided for in the agreement should be essentially equivalent to the level of protection provided for in EU law, both in law and in practice; and insists further that if such a level of protection is not guaranteed, the agreement cannot be concluded;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The agreement should be without prejudice to the transfer of personal data or other categories of cooperation between the national authorities responsible for safeguarding national security;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) — having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that, since Europol recognises that the terrorist threat level
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that, since Europol recogni
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests that the agreement contain the necessary safeguards and controls with respect to the protection of personal data; welcomes that the transfer of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data or data concerning a person’s health and sex life should only be permitted in exceptional cases where such transfers are strictly necessary and proportionate for preventing and combating criminal offences covered by the agreement; stresses that clear safeguards for the data subject, persons linked to the data subject and persons linked to the criminal offence such as witnesses and victims should be defined to guarantee respect for fundamental rights;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests that the agreement contain the necessary safeguards and controls with respect to the protection of personal data as enshrined in the Article 16 TFEU;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requ
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that, in line with the principle of purpose limitation, the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged; considers that this list should include the activities covered by such crimes, and the persons, groups and organisations likely to be affected by such transfers; considers that transferred personal data should be related to individual cases;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) — having regard to Regulation 2018/1725 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that, in line with the principle of purpose limitation, the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged, in line with EU criminal offences definitions when available; considers that this list should include the activities covered by such crimes
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that, in line with the principle of purpose limitation, the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged; considers that this list should
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that, in line with the principle of purpose limitation, the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Insists that transferred personal data should only relate to individual cases; in that regard, is of the opinion that a clear definition of the concept of individual cases is needed; highlights that this definition should only encompass actual criminal investigations and not criminal intelligence operations targeting specific individuals considered as suspects;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the transferred personal data should be related to individual cases of criminal investigations; points out that a clear definition of the concept of individual cases should be included in the agreement, as this concept is needed to assess the necessity and proportionality of data transfers;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the agreement contain a clear and precise provision setting out the retention period for personal data that have been transferred to New Zealand and requiring the data to be erased at the end of that period or earlier if the data is not necessary anymore for the individual case; requests that procedural measures be set out in the
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the agreement contain a clear and precise provision setting out the retention period for personal data
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the agreement contain a clear and precise provision setting out the retention period for personal data that have been transferred and requiring the data to be erased at the end of that period; re
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the need for clear and detailed rules regarding the information to be provided to data subjects, including information about the applicable regime for EU data subjects to exercise their rights of access, rectification and erasure in New Zealand;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Council and the Commission to work with the Government of New Zealand to define, pursuant to Court of Justice case law and within the meaning of Article 8 (3) of the Charter, which independent supervisory authority
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) — having regard to the Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations with New Zealand for an agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation ('Europol') and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism adopted on 13 May 20201a _________________ 1a ST 7047/20 + ADD1
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Council and the Commission to work with the Government of New Zealand to define, pursuant to Court of Justice case law and within the meaning of Article 8 (3) of the Charter, which independent supervisory authority is to be in charge of supervising the
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the independent supervisory body should also have the power to decide to suspend or terminate the agreement in the event of a breach; considers that under the agreement, authorities should be allowed to continue to process any personal data falling within the scope of the agreement transferred prior to its suspension or termination;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that eithe
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers it of the utmost importance that the independent supervisory body
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the international agreement should include a provision allowing the EU to suspend or revoke the agreement should there be a breach of personal data by a law enforcement authority; considers that the independent supervisory body should also have the power to decide to suspend or terminate the agreement in the event of a breach; considers that under the agreement, authorities should be allowed to continue to process any personal data falling within the scope of the agreement transferred prior to its suspension or termination; considers that a procedure for monitoring and periodically evaluating the agreement should be established in order to evaluate the partners’ compliance with the agreement;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers it should be possible for either of the contracting parties to suspend or revoke the international agreement should there be a breach thereof; recalls that the independent supervisory body should also have the power to decide to suspend or terminate the agreement in the event of a breach; considers that under the agreement, authorities should be allowed to continue to process any personal data falling within
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that data transferred to a receiving authority can never be further processed by other authorities or for other purposes; requests in this regard that an exhaustive list of the competent authorities in New Zealand to which Europol may transfer personal data should be included in the agreement, including a description of their competences; considers that any modification to such a list that would replace or add a new competent authority would require a review of the agreement;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Highlights the need to expressly indicate that onward transfers of information from the competent authorities of New Zealand to other countries are prohibited and would result in the immediate termination of the international agreement;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 79 #
9. Considers that onward transfers of Europol information from competent New Zealand authorities to other authorities in New Zealand, including for use in judicial proceedings, should only be allowed for the original purposes of the transfer by Europol and should be made subject
Amendment 8 #
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that onward transfers of Europol information from competent New Zealand authorities to other authorities in New Zealand, including for use in judicial proceedings, should only be allowed for the original purposes of the transfer by Europol
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the transfer of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinion, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data or data concerning a person’s health and sex life is extremely sensitive and gives rise to profound concerns; highlights the fact that criminal acts are defined differently in the Union and New Zealand; is of the opinion that such a transfer of data should be prohibited, except in very exceptional cases and only if there is a precise and particularly solid justification based on grounds other than the protection of public security against terrorism, and with clear safeguards for the data subject and persons linked to the data subject;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Council and Commission to consult the EDPS on the provisions of the draft agreement before its finalisation and throughout the negotiations;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the international agreement with New Zealand should
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the international agreement with New Zealand should enshrine the right of data subjects to information, rectification and erasure as provided for in other EU legislation on data protection; requests in this regard that the agreement includes clear and detailed rules regarding the information that should be provided to the data subjects;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses that the transfer of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data or data concerning a person’s health and sex life is extremely sensitive; highlights that such a transfer of data should be prohibited;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Requires that a monitoring mechanism is included in the agreement and that the agreement is subject to periodic assessments to evaluate its compliance with European data protection standards;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that the European Parliament will give its consent to the conclusion of the agreement only if such an agreement does not pose risks to the rights to privacy and data protection, nor to other fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Charter; indicates in this regard that pursuant to Article 218 Paragraph 11 TFEU the European Parliament may obtain the opinion of the Court of Justice as to whether an agreement envisaged is compatible with the Treaties;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that the consent of the European Parliament to the conclusion of the agreement will be conditional upon satisfactory involvement of the European Parliament at all stages of the procedure in accordance with Article 218 TFEU;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to suspend or terminate the agreement at the request of a majority of the European Parliament;
source: 652.503
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=53220&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0/shadows/5/group |
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green LeftNew
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.351New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-650351_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.503New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-652503_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/title |
Old
Recommendation for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorismNew
European Parliament recommendation to the Council and the Commission concerning the conclusion of an agreement, under negotiation, between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism |
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0131_EN.html
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0131_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
forecasts |
|