Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | HÜBNER Danuta Maria ( EPP) | CIMOSZEWICZ Włodzimierz ( S&D), PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite ( Renew), FREUND Daniel ( Verts/ALE), CHAIBI Leila ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 645 votes to 5, with 49 abstentions, a decision on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission on a mandatory transparency register.
The interinstitutional agreement establishes a framework and operating principles for a coordinated approach by the signatory institutions as regards transparent and ethical interest representation. Under the agreement, interest representatives will have to register in order to carry out certain lobbying activities related to one of the three signatory institutions, and each institution will now put in place additional transparency measures to encourage their registration.
Purpose and scope
While welcoming the Interinstitutional Agreement, Parliament called on the institutions to commit to a coordinated approach on reinforcing the common transparency culture with a view to improving and further strengthening ethical interest representation. It reaffirmed the need to continue with the interinstitutional dialogue with a view to establishing the transparency register on the basis of a legally binding act of Union secondary legislation.
Members regretted that, with regard to personal scope, it covers only the most senior staff of the institutions; insists that any revision of the conditionality arrangements with regard to all three institutions should include meetings with other staff of the institutions, at Heads of Unit level and above.
Covered activities
Parliament welcomed the 'activity-based approach' which covers indirect lobbying activities - increasingly so as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It welcomed the clarification of covered and not covered activities, including the exclusion of spontaneous encounters and coverage of intermediaries of third countries which do not enjoy diplomatic status.
Role of the European Parliament
The resolution called for the implementation of several measures by Parliament's bodies, including the following:
- establishing a direct link between the legislative footprint of the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament with respect to financial interests and conflicts of interest, contained in Annex I to its Rules of Procedure, and the transparency register;
- introducing a rule for Parliament’s officials from Head of Unit level to Secretary General, to meet only with registered interest representatives;
- developing a comprehensive approach in order to make participation as a speaker at all events organised by committees or by intergroups, such as workshops and seminars as well as delegation meetings, conditional upon registration for anyone falling under the scope of the transparency register;
- developing a comprehensive and coherent approach with regard to co-hosting of events on Parliament's premises and making it, where appropriate, conditional upon registration for anyone falling under the scope of the transparency register;
- adopt guidelines in order to support rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs and committee Chairs to fulfil their obligations under Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Eligibility, code of conduct, information to be provided by the registrants
Parliament welcomed the fact that registrants are obliged to publish financial information of both clients and intermediaries and that financial information is also required from registrants who do not represent commercial interests. Registrants will now be obliged to provide information about the legislative proposals, policies or initiatives that they target.
Secretariat and Management Board
Members welcomed the creation of the Management Board and its task to oversee the overall administrative implementation of the Agreement and act as review body for the measures taken by the Secretariat.
The equal footing of all three institutions in the operation of the Secretariat and of the Management Board should ensure consensus, develop the joint ownership of the framework and foster a common culture of transparency.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0130/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0123/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0123/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE689.541
- Committee draft report: PE680.718
- Committee draft report: PE680.718
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE689.541
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0123/2021
Votes
Accord interinstitutionnel sur un registre de transparence obligatoire - Interinstitutional agreement on mandatory transparency register - Interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung über ein verbindliches Transparenzregister - A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - § 11/1 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - § 11/2 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - § 11/3 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 1 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 2 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 4 #
A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 3 #
Accord interinstitutionnel sur un registre de transparence obligatoire - Interinstitutional agreement on mandatory transparency register - Interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung über ein verbindliches Transparenzregister - A9-0123/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Proposition de décision #
Amendments | Dossier |
60 |
2020/2272(ACI)
2021/02/25
AFCO
60 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B B. whereas the sanitary emergency due to the COVID pandemic has led to an increase in interactions and the emergence of new forms of interaction between interest-representatives and decision-makers; whereas lobbyists are taking advantage of the crisis to push their agenda; whereas, for example, the plastics industry is using the pandemic to attack Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment 1a; whereas the Register needs specific human and financial resources to verify the declarations; _________________ 1aOJ L 155, 12.6.2019, p. 1; https://corporateeurope.org/en/2020/05/co rona-lobby-watch
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 2 2. Insists that, in line with the political
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 2 2. Insists that, in line with the political statement, the institutions commit to a coordinated approach on reinforcing the common transparency culture with the view to improving and further strengthening ethical interest representation; highlights their obligation under the Agreement, and in accordance with Article 13(2) TEU, to practise mutual sincere cooperation when developing the scheme and that the institutions should therefore aim for the highest level of commitment;
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the status of the Council of the European Union has changed from that of an observer to that of a formal party to the Agreement; considers nevertheless that its participation is limited to meetings with the most senior officials, and, under voluntary schemes only, meetings of the Permanent Representatives and Deputy Permanent Representatives during their presidency and six months before; insists that for the credibility of the scheme all Permanent Representations should take an active part in that voluntary scheme, continue to apply it after their presidency has ended and extend
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the status of the Council of the European Union has changed from that of an observer to that of a formal party to the Agreement; considers nevertheless that its participation is limited to meetings with the most senior officials, and, under voluntary schemes only, meetings of the Permanent Representatives and Deputy Permanent Representatives during their presidency and six months before; insists that for the credibility of the scheme all Permanent Representations should take an active part in that
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the status of the Council of the European Union has changed from that of an observer to that of a formal party to the Agreement; considers nevertheless that its participation is limited to meetings with the most senior officials, and, under voluntary schemes only,
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the status of the Council of the European Union has changed from that of an observer to that of a formal party to the Agreement; considers nevertheless that its participation is limited to meetings with the most senior officials, and, under voluntary schemes only, meetings of the Permanent Representatives and Deputy Permanent Representatives during their presidency and six months before; insists that for the credibility of the scheme all Permanent Representations should take an active part in that voluntary scheme, continue to apply it after their presidency has ended and extend
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Insists that the President of the European Council and his cabinet should be transparent about their meetings with interest representatives; calls on the President of the European Council and the Council’s General Secretariat to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation of 18 June 2019, especially its proposal that the Council's General Secretariat should keep a full record of any meetings held between interest representatives and the President of the European Council and/or members of his or her cabinet and that this information should be recorded in the Council’s official file management system and made public;
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 4 4. Points out that in the negotiation process the Commission has not made any substantive additional commitments to the scheme; regrets in particular that, with regard to personal scope, it covers only the most senior staff of the institutions; insists that any revision of the conditionality arrangements with regard to all three institutions should include meetings with other staff of the institutions, at Heads of Unit level and above; stresses that no institution should wait for the others in reaching this higher level of transparency; notes that following the implementation of this new Agreement, Parliament will be the only institution of which the Secretary General and Directors-General are not covered by the obligation only to meet registered interest representatives, and pledges to close this loophole as soon as possible;
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the commitments made by Parliament in the negotiation process on conditionality and complementary transparency measures; considers that the modification of Rules 11 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure have provided a strong
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the action of the institutions and EU policies must be based on participatory democracy, thus ensuring compliance with the principles of full transparency and correct and timely information sharing for citizens; Recalls that it is the duty of the institutions to guarantee an open, transparent and continuous dialogue with civil society, in order to allow citizens to exercise direct control over the different stages of the decision-making process and to allow them to participate more closely in the decision-making process, as well as to ensure full accountability of the Union's institutions and bodies;
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers it to be important to define the meetings with interest representatives that should be published as meetings scheduled in advance; welcomes Commission’s practice to publish also those meetings taking place in a different format than in person-meetings, such as by video- conference; insists that a scheduled telephone call should be considered a meeting as well;
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 9 9. Is of the opinion that the implementation of the conditionality measures and other complementary transparency measures through individual decisions is
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 9 9. Is of the opinion that the implementation of the conditionality measures and other complementary transparency measures through individual decisions is not
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Proposes that the annual report will include information on registrants who have been convicted for fraud, corruption, non-payment of tax or social security obligations, or who are based in the list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Proposes that the annual report will include information on registrants who have been investigated and finally removed from the register because of non- compliance with the Code of Conduct;
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls for the inclusion of an analysis of the effects that new rules of transparency have on decision-making procedures and the impact that these rules have on the perception that citizens have of the Union institutions;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Proposes that the Court of Auditors be authorised to draw up regular reports on the equalisation of burdens and the resources made available to the Secretariat of the Register;
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the commitments made by the Parliament in the course of the negotiations, notably on the proposal “Closing the loopholes – Parliament’s proposals on conditionality” and insists on the need to fully implement and publish them in accordance with Article 5(3) of the Agreement without undue delay;
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 13 13. Insists on the need to ensure that, within Parliament, there is a high degree of political ownership of the implementation
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C C. whereas the Union will in various forms disburse unprecedented volumes of financial support to the Member States in order to fight the consequences of the pandemic and every decision related thereto has to be taken with full transparency, ensuring full accountability on the part of the Union's decision makers;
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 13 13. Insists on the need to ensure that, within Parliament, there is a high degree of political ownership of the implementation and review process;
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – introductory part 14. Calls specifically for the following measures to be swiftly implemented by the Bureau and other relevant bodies;
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point a (a) establishing a direct link between the publication of the meetings under Rule 11(3) and the Transparency Register and introducing substantive improvements in order to render this publication tool fully user-friendly and searchable;
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point a a (new) (aa) introducing a rule that Parliament staff are allowed to schedule meetings only with those interest representatives which are registered, with exceptions similar to those contained in Commission Decision of 25 November 2014 on the publication of information on meetings held between Directors-General of the Commission and organisations or self- employed individuals;
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point a b (new) (ab) introducing a rule that Parliament staff are to publish their meetings with individuals or organisations in the scope of the Transparency Register; this rule should apply at least to categories of staff corresponding to the similar practice in Commission, ideally to all staff working on policy matters and could build on the practices and technical solutions developed by the Commission;
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point b Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point b a (new) (ba) introducing a rule for officials of the Parliament from Head of Unit level to Secretary General to meet only with registered interest representatives;
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c (c)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c (c) making participation as a speaker at
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c a (new) (ca) establishing a binding principle not allowing lobbyists who are not registered or whose registered information is incorrect or not up-to-date to meet Members, public officials, political advisers or parliamentary assistants;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision Recital D D. whereas high ethical standards for interest representation underpin the trust that citizens have in the EU institutions; whereas an independent body with investigative, seizure and sanctioning powers is necessary in order for the EU’s ambition of being ethical and transparent to be truly effective; whereas the independence, transparency and accountability of public institutions and their elected representatives, Commissioners and also public officials, political advisers and parliamentary assistants are of the utmost importance for promoting the trust of citizens that is necessary for the legitimate functioning of democratic institutions;
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c a (new) (ca) developing a comprehensive and coherent approach with regard to co- hosting of events on Parliament's premises, and recommending the co- hosting of events to registered entities;
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c a (new) (ca) making the co-hosting of events on Parliament’s premises conditional upon registration for anyone falling under the scope of the Transparency Register;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c b (new) (cb) amending standard contracts for any staff employed by Parliament to include advance agreement for publishing their name in case, while on leave or after leaving the public service of EU institutions, they take advantage of the 'revolving door' to become an individual or employee of an organisation within the scope of the Transparency Register ;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 – point c b (new) (cb) making public all meetings between Members and lobbyists;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls specifically on the Conference of Committee Chairs to adopt guidelines in order to support rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs and committee chairs to fulfil their obligation under Rule 11(3) to publish online in respect of each report all scheduled meetings with interest representatives falling within the scope of the Transparency register by reminding them of this duty at the beginning of their work on each file and by pro-actively preparing a legislative footprint based on the meetings published by the Members on their Parliament web profile;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Secretary General to issue a recommendation for staff to systematically verify, before meeting them, whether interest representatives are registered ;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Welcomes the fact that the Secretary-General has instructed Parliament’s services to connect the tool to the Transparency Register and Legislative Observatory and encourages any effort that would further improve this tool, including by providing access for processing of the data provided by Members in the Parliament website infrastructure concerning meetings with interest representatives in a machine readable format, providing an option to link the meeting to membership of a delegation, to indicate that the meeting took place at staff-level, to link the entries on Parliament's website to the Member's own website and to make this infrastructure available in all official languages of the Union;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to consider, in the process of revision of the EP Rules of Procedure, further binding transparency measures which should be introduced in order to enhance Parliament’s commitment to the joint scheme;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 16 16. Notes that observance of the code of conduct, set out in Annex III to the Agreement is part of the eligibility criteria and that registrants are to take into account confidentiality requirements and rules applicable to the former members and staff of the institutions which apply to them after leaving office; considers that a reference to the values and principles of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) should be included in the Code of Conduct;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Recital D D. whereas high ethical standards for interest representation underpin the trust that citizens have in the EU institutions, enhancing their transparency and accountability;
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes clarification that, when they outsource part of their activities to others, registrants
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the fact that registrants are obliged to publish financial information of both clients and intermediaries and that financial information is also required from registrants that do not represent commercial interests; welcomes the fact that registrants are obliged not only to publish financial information once a year but also to keep that information up-to- date, in particular where a significant change occurs with details subject to implementing decisions;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 19 19. Highlights that the registrants are now obliged to provide information about legislative proposals, policies or initiatives targeted by them; considers that this should contribute to further transparency of the interests they represent; stresses that still too many interest representatives do not provide sufficient details; stresses, in particular, that 135 organisations do not report any costs relating to their lobbying activities and that 599 organisations report an implausibly low ratio between lobbying costs and full-time equivalents; stresses, therefore, the need to increase the human and financial resources of the Secretariat of the Register;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on registrants who very significantly change their lobbying activities or expenses during the course of a year to update the details in the Register proactively; calls on the signatory institutions to amend Annex I as soon as possible so that all financial data are provided annually, with the exception of changes taking place within one year and exceeding EUR 200 000, which should be notified to the Secretariat within two weeks of when they are known, accompanied, where necessary, by an update concerning clients and goals;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Deplores the fact that it was not possible to include an obligation for registrants to publish 'revolving door' cases, i.e. publishing the names and new roles of persons who were Members or staff of the institutions before taking up activities within the scope of the register; calls on the signatory institutions to review the Code of Conduct for registrants with the aim of achieving more transparency in this regard;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Deplores that interest representatives are not required to publicly disclose political donations to parties and candidates; calls on the signatory institutions to review the Code of Conduct for registrants to achieve more transparency in this regard; suggests such disclosure should include ‘in kind’ contributions, such as advertising, use of facilities, the provision of design and printing services, the donation of equipment, or the provision of board memberships, employment or consultancy work to elected politicians or candidates for office ;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the undertaking to increase resources for maintenance, development and promotion of the register, as well as the Council’s formal contribution to the secretariat; believes that such commitments to the joint scheme should enhance the capacity of the Secretariat to provide timely guidance to the registrants and support them in the registration and update of the requested data; nevertheless, insists, in particular, that human resources are very limited in proportion to the number of registrants in comparison with similar national schemes and that that limitation hampers the efficiency of the operation of the register; calls on the institutions to ensure the provision of the resources necessary in order to guarantee the proper functioning of the Secretariat and the Management Board;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the undertaking to increase resources for maintenance, development and promotion of the register, as well as the Council’s formal contribution to the secretariat; believes that such commitments to the joint scheme should enhance the capacity of the Secretariat to provide timely guidance to the registrants and support them in the registration and update of the requested
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the undertaking to increase resources for maintenance, development and promotion of the register, as well as the Council’s formal contribution to the secretariat; believes that such commitments to the joint scheme should enhance the capacity of the Secretariat to provide timely guidance to the registrants and support them in the registration and update of the requested data; nevertheless, insists, in particular, that human resources are very limited in proportion to the number of registrants in comparison with similar national schemes and that that limitation hampers the efficiency of the operation of the register; calls on its General Secretary to lead by example in mobilising additional staff for the Secretariat;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls for connectivity between the Register’s website and related data, such as meetings of Members and staff of the institutions with individuals or organisations, to be developed;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the Transparency Register should work together with an independent ethics body having the power to investigate on the basis of documents and on-the-spot checks, seize from and impose sanctions against both lobbies and the persons whom lobbies are seeking to influence; whereas this body is necessary for the EU’s ethics and transparency ambition to be truly effective rather than merely well-intentioned; whereas it is necessary to restore trust in the European institutions and their democratic legitimacy;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Considers that the future Union Ethics Body should be given competence to oversee compliance with the obligations imposed by the Transparency Register, as well as the competence to contribute, by way of proposals, to the development and periodic updating of a common ethical framework for the institutions, including in respect of transparency obligations;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision Recital E E. whereas the individual institutional measures that aim to implement the Agreement are taken in the European Parliament at various levels and range from implementing rules adopted by the Bureau to the modification of the Rules of Procedure; whereas the European Parliament should seize this opportunity to improve and strengthen these measures in order to lead by example with regard to transparency rules and their application;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Proposes that the Conference on the Future of Europe discusses the possibility of introducing in the Treaties an autonomous legal basis enabling the co-legislators to adopt Union legal acts under ordinary legislative procedure to regulate ethical interest representation in the Union;
source: 689.541
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |