Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GRAPINI Maria ( S&D) | HOHLMEIER Monika ( EPP), CHASTEL Olivier ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47
Legal Basis:
RoP 47Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 659 votes to 28, with 1 abstention, a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and audit.
Ensuring confidence in the financial management of EU funds
Public knowledge and full transparency about the spending of Union funds is essential for the acceptance of this spending. However, the number of off-budget instruments continues to grow, with instruments such as Next Generation EU being managed directly by the Commission. Members therefore called for the financial regulation to be updated to allow Parliament to fulfil its oversight role over these new mechanisms. This is particularly important in the context of the digitalisation of European reporting, monitoring and auditing procedures.
Clear, comprehensible and fair rules on eligibility for support or participation in spending programmes is a first precondition for support in the financial management of EU funds.
With this in mind, Parliament believes that the most effective way to strengthen the protection of the EU budget against fraud and irregularities is to establish a digitalised programme creating an integrated, interoperable and harmonised system for collecting, monitoring and analysing information on the final recipients of EU funds in all Member States.
This system would allow national and regional authorities as well as EU institutions, including the Parliament, the Commission, the Court of Auditors, OLAF and the European Public Prosecutor's Office, to ensure effective controls on conflicts of interest, irregularities, double-funding issues and misuse of funds, as well as the use of modern IT tools such as ARACHNE.
Proposals to revise the Financial Regulation
Parliament called on the European Commission, in particular in the context of the forthcoming revision of the Financial Regulation, to present, before the end of 2021, the necessary legislative proposals to amend the Financial Regulation in order to ensure the use of standardised datasets and the possibility to identify the final beneficiaries of EU funds.
Under the proposal requested by Members, the Commission should make available to financial actors and entities responsible for budget implementation, an integrated and interoperable electronic information and monitoring system, including a single data mining and risk scoring tool, to access, store, aggregate and analyse data on final beneficiaries of EU funds with a view to a generalised mandatory application by Member States.
The Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other Union investigative and control bodies should have the necessary access to that data in order to exercise their supervisory functions in relation to the controls and audits that are to be carried out by the Member States in the first place to detect irregularities and conduct administrative investigations into the misuse of the Union funding concerned, and to get a precise overview of its distribution.
The resolution stressed that this system should:
- be based as far as possible on open-source principles and use standardised data sets and measures to collect, compare and aggregate information and figures on recipients and direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds for control, audit and discharge purposes;
- be developed with a view to ensuring full compliance with the principles of transparency set out in the Financial Regulation;
- be accessible to journalists, civil society representatives and the general public in order to facilitate research into the use of public funds and possibly uncover fraud, while respecting the rules of the General Data Protection Regulation.
- be designed in such a way that it automatically links to databases containing updated information about company ownership.
This system should allow for very quick identification of recurrent and possible overrepresented beneficiaries of Union funds, including tender winners. Information about recipients of Union funds is made publicly available for a minimum period of five years .
Members called for this system to be developed within two years and to be made available, free of charge, and mandatory for Member States' reporting authorities.
The financial implications of the proposal should be covered by the EU budget.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted a legislative initiative report by Maria GRAPINI (S&D, RO) containing recommendations to the Commission on the digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and auditing.
Ensuring confidence in the financial management of EU funds is essential for the overall trust in the EU institutions and thus for the credibility of the project for further European integration.
Members consider that the most effective way to enhance the protection of the EU budget and the EU instrument for recovery against fraud and irregularities is to create an integrated, interoperable and harmonised system for the collection, monitoring and analysis of information on final beneficiaries in all Member States. This system should ensure effective controls on conflicts of interest, irregularities, double funding issues and any misuse of funds. It could also be the best instrument to fight disinformation in all Member States.
Therefore, the Committee on Budgetary Control asks the European Commission, in particular in the context of the forthcoming revision of the Financial Regulation, to present, before the end of 2021, the necessary legislative proposals to amend the Financial Regulation in order to ensure the use of standardised data sets and the possibility to identify the final beneficiaries of funds.
Under the proposal requested by Members, the Commission should make available an integrated and interoperable electronic information and monitoring system , including a single data mining and risk scoring tool, to access, store, aggregate and analyse data on final beneficiaries of EU funds with a view to a generalised mandatory application by Member States.
The Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other Union investigative and control bodies should have the necessary access to that data in order to exercise their supervisory functions in relation to the controls and audits that are to be carried out by the Member States in the first place to detect irregularities and conduct administrative investigations into the misuse of the Union funding concerned, and to get a precise overview of its distribution.
The report stressed that this system should:
- be based as far as possible on open-source principles and use standardised data sets and measures to collect, compare and aggregate information and figures on recipients and direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds for control, audit and discharge purposes;
- be developed with a view to ensuring full compliance with the principles of transparency set out in the Financial Regulation;
- be accessible to journalists, civil society representatives and the general public in order to facilitate research into the use of public funds and possibly uncover fraud, while respecting the rules of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Members called for this system to be developed within two years and to be made available, free of charge, and mandatory for Member States' reporting authorities.
The financial implications of the proposal should be covered by the EU budget.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0464/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0311/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE697.748
- Committee draft report: PE696.492
- Committee draft report: PE696.492
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE697.748
Votes
Numérisation de la communication d’informations, du suivi et de l’audit au niveau européen - Digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and audit - Digitalisierung der europäischen Berichterstattung, Überwachung und Rechnungsprüfung - A9-0311/2021 - Maria Grapini - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
Amendments | Dossier |
77 |
2021/2054(INL)
2021/10/07
CONT
77 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 a (new) — having regards to the Court of Auditors' Special Report 04/2020: Using new imaging technologies to monitor the Common Agricultural Policy: steady progress overall, but slower for climate and environment monitoring,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. whereas digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and audit is the most useful instrument to avoid disinformation if information is publicly available;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas Parliament in 2020 initiated a study with a view to identify the 50 largest beneficiaries of CAP and structural funds in each Member State based on publicly available information, which has provided interesting findings but also has illustrated how difficult it is still to identify clearly many final beneficiaries;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) K a. whereas the Court of Auditors' findings presented during the public hearing of the 2nd September 2021 in CONT showed a clear need to improve transparency of the existing system of the oversight of Union funds;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas some companies and natural persons operate in more than one Member State
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas some companies and natural persons operate in more than one Member State and company structures can be highly complex and opaque;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas some companies and
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas all these factors illustrate that there is an urgent need to create a
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas all these factors illustrate that there is an urgent need to create a single standardised Union-wide interoperable digital system for Member States‘ implementing authorities to report about the beneficiaries of CAP
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas all these factors illustrate that there is an urgent need to create a
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) N a. whereas the public should have access to information on the direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds to the greatest extend possible in line with applicable data protection rules and the standing jurisprudence of the CJEU on the publication of data on beneficiaries of EU funds;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas with regard to budget implementation, the application of that principle implies that European citizens should know where, and for what purpose, funds are spent by the Union;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas such a system should ensure data format harmonisation, be machine readable, contain unique identification numbers, include search and
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas such a system should be open-source, ensure data format harmonisation, be machine readable, contain unique identification numbers, include search and sort functions and be interoperable so that data can be aggregated not only in respect of one policy or fund but across all policies, funds and Member States;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) O a. whereas such a system should be transparent and easy to use;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P a (new) P a. whereas such a system must be developed in conjunction with the highest level of cyber security in order to avoid any attempt of cyber attacks on this system used in all Member States;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the Union budget should finance the development of such a system, which should be made available to Member States and regional authorities in charge of running and maintaining such reporting systems, as well as for journalist, civil society representatives and the general public, together with training courses for officials in charge of the daily operation of the systems;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas the reporting systems for CAP and structural and cohesion policies cannot realistically be constantly updated with the most recent information about company ownerships and thereby ultimate beneficiaries, the systems should therefore be automatically linked to public company databases and common databases about ultimate beneficiaries;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. whereas public entities are often the direct recipients of money from CAP or structural funds which is then paid to other recipients as part of a specific program implementation; whereas in such situations the public entity should also be obliged to report about who the final recipients of the money have been; whereas the digital system should include interoperability inter alia with internal systems of relevant national bodies and authorities, managementand paying authorities, as well as national public procurement and tender databases;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T T. whereas such an interoperable
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U U. whereas data on recipients of funds from CAP and structural and cohesion funds should be available to the public for a minimum period of
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital V V. whereas rules on t
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. notes that the number of off- budget instruments continues to grow, considers that the instruments such as Next Generation EU underlie the direct management of the Commission; highlights that the Parliament needs to fulfil its mandate in decision-making, scrutiny and discharge functions; requests that the Financial Regulation is updated, allowing the Parliament to fulfil its mandate in controlling these new mechanisms; stresses that this is particularly important in the context the digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and audit;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital V a (new) V a. whereas more and a better use of satellite data should be made, removing the obstacles currently hampering the wide use of new technologies by paying agencies9a _________________ 9aECA Special Report 04/2020: Using new imaging technologies to monitor the Common Agricultural Policy: steady progress overall, but slower for climate and environment monitoring
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that ensuring trust in the financial management of the Union funds is essential for overall trust in the Union institutions and thereby the credibility in the project of further European integration;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Is of the opinion that data is at the centre of digital transformation and cloud services are strategic innovation enablers for this transformation;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Welcomes the launch of the European Alliance for Industrial Data, Edge and Cloud in July 2021; Emphasises the need for the creation of a Government cloud in each Member State a step for the EU digital sovereignty;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the firm opinion that the most efficient and effective way to
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that transparency about the implementation of the rules and accordingly about the identity of recipients of money from different funds and programmes and about the amounts they receive is an essential part of ensuring trust in the financial management of Union funds; acknowledges that the publication of data on beneficiaries should include “de minimis” thresholds in line with applicable data protection rules and the standing jurisprudence of the CJEU;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that transparency about the implementation of the rules and accordingly about the identity of recipients of money from different funds and programmes and about the amounts they receive
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Considers furthermore that transparency ensured with a digitalisation program creating an integrated, interoperable and harmonised system could be the best instrument to fight against disinformation across all Members states;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Believes that transparency of public funds ensures better accountability and enhanced trust from citizens in public authorities; recommends that all political parties in Europe operate with transparent bank accounts, which allows citizens to consult the transaction history and identify potential fraudulent behaviour such as corruption of public officials or conflicts of interests;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transparency about final beneficiaries will ensure that auditing, control and discharge authorities in national administrations, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament will have much better and more accurate possibilities to ensure that money is being spent efficiently according to rules and policy
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas public knowledge and full transparency about the spending of Union funds is essential for the acceptance of this spending and is also crucial in order to ensure accountability and ensure better control of spending including avoidance of misuse, corruption, fraud and of conflicts of interests;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transparency about final beneficiaries will ensure that auditing, control and discharge authorities in national administrations, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament will have much better and more accurate possibilities to ensure that money is being spent efficiently or to carry out recoveries in the event of fraud according to rules and policy ambitions;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that transparency about final beneficiaries will ensure that auditing, control and discharge authorities in national and regional administrations, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament will have much better and more accurate possibilities to ensure that money is being spent
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines furthermore, that transparency about final beneficiaries will give journalists, civil society representatives and the general public much better possibilities to raise legitimate questions and concerns and thereby to expose potential cases of misuse or fraud of Union funds or problematic involvement from Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs);
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines furthermore, that
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the present situation where it is impossible to get a reasonably complete picture about who is receiving how much from especially shared management funds, including particularly the lacking possibility to aggregate individual amounts concerning the same direct and/or final beneficiary and/or beneficial owner, is unacceptable and needs to be changed as soon as possible to increase the efficiency of Union funds;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the present situation where it is impossible to get a reasonably complete picture about who is receiving how much from especially shared management funds is unacceptable and needs to be changed as soon as possible to increase t
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Believes that the review of the Financial Regulation should include a solid legal basis for mandatory use of open and standardized public procurement data, as well as to make budgetary control IT-systems mandatory, public and interoperable with national and regional databases;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the revision should ensure that it is possible to identify final beneficiaries of funds
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the revision should ensure that it is possible to identify final beneficiaries of funds and therefore the revision should, among other things, contain an obligation for reporting systems to use standardised datasets, which include detailed information about the type of beneficiary and unique identifiers for all direct beneficiaries;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Stresses that the Commission should ensure that the use of integrated and standardised reporting and monitoring tools is mandatory and fully implemented in the Member States and thus no longer operates solely on voluntary basis;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas public knowledge about the spending of Union funds is essential for the acceptance of this spending and is also crucial in order to ensure accountability, credibility and ensure better control of spending including avoidance of misuse, fraud, corruption and of
Amendment 50 #
15. Underlines that the revision should further ensure that when the direct recipient of Union funds is a company it should be ensured that it is possible to identify the beneficial owners of that company;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines that in situations where the direct recipient is a company which is owned by another company, it should be ensured that it is possible to identify the owners of the second company also, and that this obligation should continue to apply no matter how many companies are involved; considers therefore that it is necessary to have unique identification numbers set up for beneficiaries by parent companies, so that every subsidiary has a subsequent number, allowing to really know where money goes;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines that in situations where the direct recipient is a company which is owned by another company, it should be ensured that it is possible to identify the owners of the second company also, and that this obligation should continue to apply
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Underlines that in situations where the direct recipient is a company which is owned by another company, it should be ensured that it is possible to identify the beneficial owners of the second company also, and that this obligation should continue to apply no matter how many companies are involved;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that this obligation to identify the beneficial owner should as a minimum apply whenever any natural or legal person owns more than
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that this obligation to identify the owner should as a minimum apply whenever any natural or legal person owns more than
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the obligation of being able to identify the beneficial owners of the company should also apply when a company is located in a non-Union country;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that the revision of the Financial Regulation should also ensure that public entities, which are the direct recipients of Union funds, should be obliged to report concerning the final beneficiaries of the funds, i.e. if it is natural or legal persons other than the public entity itself; underlines the necessity for the digital system to include interoperability with internal systems of relevant national bodies and authorities, management and paying authorities, as well as national public procurement and tender databases;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to develop and make available to financial actors and entities responsible for tasks of budget implementation, including competent national and regional authorities under shared management, a system to ensure the digitalisation of European reporting, monitoring and audit for the CAP, cohesion and structural funds policies and other policies;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that such a system shall be based on standardised measures to collect, compare and aggregate information and figures on the final recipients and beneficiaries of Union funding, for the purposes of control and audit; emphasises the need for an electronic identity as first step to increase the trust of citizens in public institutions;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there are currently major differences in how these systems are designed, how they work and how to retrieve and share information from them;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that such a system shall be based on
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that such a system shall be based on standardised measures to collect, compare and aggregate information and figures on the direct and final recipients and
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Highlights that such a system should be accessible to journalist, civil society representatives and the general public in order to facilitate research on the use of public funds and possibly uncover fraud, while respecting the GDPR rules;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Asks for this system to be developed
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Underlines that the development of such a system should be accompanied with the enabling of national and regional authorities and relevant Union institutions, including the Parliament, the Commission, ECA, OLAF and EPPO where relevant, to ensure efficient checks on conflicts of interests, irregularities, issues of double funding and any misuse of the funds including the use of modern IT tools such as ARACHNE;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Asks for the Commission to ensure that the necessary funding for such a system is made available in the Union budget together with appropriations for training and technical assistance for staff of national and regional authorities that will be using this system;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Requests that the system is designed in such a way that it automatically links to databases containing updated information about company ownership as well as interoperability with internal systems of relevant national bodies and authorities, management and paying authorities, as well as national public procurement and tender databases;;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Asks that information about recipients of Union funds is made publicly available for a minimum period of
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Underlines that such a system should respect the Union data protection rules and standing jurisprudence of the CJEU; notes that there
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Insists that such a system should be developed with a high level of cybersecurity to avoid security breaches or cyberattack possible in each Member State;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas fragmentation of data make the identification of final beneficiaries extremely difficult, if not impossible for direct, indirect or shared management Union funds;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Highlights that such a system shall be effectively protected from cyberthreats; asks the Commission to invest in high level cybersecurity software and run periodic tests to identify potential vulnerabilities;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Acknowledges that the system should respect rules concerning minimum amounts that will not be made publicly available; stresses that the responsible authorities should nevertheless always aggregate all the funds that are being paid to a single beneficiary and if the total amount that is being paid to any single beneficiary exceeds the minimum amount, information regarding all the payments made to that beneficiary should be
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32 a. Stresses that the existing Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) also plays an important role in the protection of the Union's financial interests; is concerned that it only applies to funds under direct management, which only represent about 20% of the EU funds; is equally concerned that economic operators identified by OLAF as abusing public funds are not automatically excluded from contracts financed by the EU budget or subject to financial penalties; urges the Commission to extend the scope of the EDES in the upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation in order to make it more effective;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 10 – point 3 (3) To enhance the protection of the Union budget, the Commission should make available an integrated and interoperable information and monitoring system, including a single data-mining and risk-scoring tool, to access, store, aggregate and analyse the aforementioned data with a view to a generalised mandatory application by Member States. That system should ensure efficient checks on conflicts of interests, irregularities, issues of double funding, and any misuse of the funds. The Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other Union investigative and control bodies should have the necessary access to that data in order to exercise their supervisory functions in relation to the controls and audits that are to be carried out by the Member States in the first place to detect irregularities and conduct administrative investigations into the misuse of the Union funding concerned, and to get a precise overview of its distribution
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 12 – point 2 – point a – paragraph 3 Where the recipient of funds is a legal person, information shall be published on persons and entities holding more than
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 12 – point 2 – point b – paragraph 1 – introductory part ‘The following non-sensitive information shall be published, having due regard for the requirements of confidentiality and security, in particular the protection of personal data
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 12 – point 4 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new) Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 12 – point 4 – paragraph 2 – point 3 3. The Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the Court of Auditors and, in respect of those Member States participating in enhanced cooperation pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), as well as other Union investigative and control bodies, including the discharge authority, shall be granted access to the information contained in the system referred to in paragraph 1 where necessary for the exercise of their functions.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are many systems that do not include unique identification numbers for
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas for companies the current systems in most cases do not contain information about the owner or owners of the companies, and their beneficial owners;
source: 697.748
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/2/summary |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/2/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/1 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-697748_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-696492_EN.html
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
commission |
|