Progress: Procedure completed
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Commission and the executive agencies in respect of the implementation of the EU general budget for the financial year 2020 and to approve the closure of the EU general budget accounts for the financial year 2020.
In its resolution, adopted by 451 votes to 175 with 17 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations:
Political priorities
The EU budget is a significant instrument for achieving common strategic objectives and represents, on average, 1.1% of the Union's gross national income or 2.4% of Member States' public expenditure and of total public expenditure in the Union. Parliament stressed the importance of the EU budget in achieving the Union's political priorities, as well as its role in helping Member States in unforeseen situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences.
Concerned about the state of the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is causing serious losses to the EU budget, Members stressed the importance of full and immediate implementation of the rule of law conditionality regulation. The Commission should ensure that all organisations (EU or international) providing external aid respect the rule of law and human rights in the countries receiving such aid.
New initiatives to protect the EU budget have become essential with the entry into force of the NextGenerationEU instrument, which will result in much greater total disbursements from the EU budget in the coming years. Parliament stressed that, in these circumstances, the Commission should ensure that OLAF, the European Court of Auditors and the European Public Prosecutor's Office have sufficient means and staff to investigate possible cases of fraud against the EU budget.
Members deplored the fact that the Commission is still unable to present a list of the main beneficiaries of EU funds under shared management, which is a major obstacle both to assessing the risks associated with EU spending and to the overall transparency of EU spending.
The resolution pointed out that the amount of outstanding commitments (RAL) is likely to continue to rise at the end of 2020 and has reached a new record of EUR 303.2 billion. Given the steady annual increase in the RAL, it is considered a priority for the Commission to prepare a detailed action plan to reduce the amount.
The Commission should redouble its efforts to increase the absorption rate of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds), which is still around 7% lower than in the 2007-2013 MFF. In addition, automated digital reporting, monitoring and auditing systems should include the establishment of a mandatory single interoperable database of beneficiaries of funds from all EU programmes.
Members stressed the need to enlarge the areas where the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) is used beyond direct management and requested the Commission to use it for all Union funds including funds under shared management.
They called on the Commission to ensure that the preventive measures taken by Member States to avoid conflicts of interest are properly assessed.
Parliament reiterated its concern that the Commission only audits the achievement of milestones and targets before paying out funds from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), while leaving it to Member States to ensure that public procurement or state aid rules have been respected.
Special circumstances relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and the NextGenerationEU instrument
Parliament noted that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a relaxation of the applicable rules aimed at providing additional liquidity as well as exceptional flexibility for COVID-19-related expenditure in the interests of rapid reaction. It is concerned that this increases the risk of non-transparent procedures, abuse and fraud by criminal structures trying to take advantage of the crisis situation.
Members also pointed out that the combined effect of the new NextGenerationEU instrument and the delays in adopting legislation could put great pressure on the administrative capacities of Member States and the Commission, which could again lead to more errors, fewer checks and potential losses for the EU budget.
Budgetary and financial management
Parliament welcomed the Court of Auditors' conclusion that the EU's accounts for the financial year 2020 are reliable and that the budget's revenue is free of material error . However, it regretted that the Court of Auditors had again issued an unfavourable opinion on the legality and regularity of the budget's expenditure for the financial year 2020, while acknowledging that the level of error at 2.7% in 2020 is at the same level as in the financial year 2019. It reaffirmed the need to redouble efforts in the fight against fraud both at EU and Member State level, in close cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor's Office and OLAF.
Parliament pointed out that the budget for 2020 and amending budgets represented a total volume of EUR 173.9 billion in commitments, of which EUR 172.9 billion were actually committed, while the budget and amending budgets represented a volume of EUR 164.1 billion in payments, of which EUR 161.8 billion were actually spent. Taking into account payments of EUR 9.9 billion in assigned revenue and EUR 1.6 billion in carry-overs, payments totalled EUR 172.4 billion.
Members noted with concern that the EU's balance sheet shows total liabilities at the end of 2020 of EUR 313.5 billion, an increase of EUR 62.0 billion, or 24.7%, on the previous year. They are also concerned about the lack of progress in the annual absorption rate of ESIF funds on a cumulative basis, which is still only 55%. In addition, the EU's accounts as at 31 December 2020 showed that the UK owed the EU a net sum of EUR 47.5 billion arising from the obligations set out in the withdrawal agreement.
Revenue
Revenue amounted to EUR 174.3 billion in 2020 : of this amount, EUR 123 billion (70.6%) corresponded to gross national income-based own resources, EUR 19.9 billion (11.4%) to traditional own resources (TOR), EUR 17.2 billion (9.9%) to value added tax-based own resources, EUR 8.2 billion (4.7%) to contributions and refunds linked to EU agreements and programmes, EUR 3.2 billion (1.8%) to the surplus from the previous year and EUR 2.8 billion (1.6%) to other revenue.
The Commission is invited, among other things, to ensure uniform application of customs controls and to develop a real capacity for analysis and coordination at EU level, to review its approach to the verification of Member States' GNI data for the coming multi-annual cycles, and to take measures to combat fraud in the area of e-commerce and VAT collection.
Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) headings
(1a) Competitiveness for growth and employment
The sub-heading represents 13.9% or EUR 24.1 billion of the EU budget. Of this amount, EUR 13.6 billion (56.4%) is devoted to research, EUR 3.1 billion (12.8%) to education, training, youth and sport, EUR 2.4 billion (10.2%) to transport and energy, EUR 1.6 billion (6.5%) to space programmes and the rest to other actions and programmes. Total planned expenditure amounts to EUR 142 billion, of which EUR 104.6 billion had been paid out by the end of 2020.
Parliament noted with concern that the Court of Auditors estimated the level of error at 3.9%, mainly due to errors related to ineligible costs, missing key supporting documents or problems with contract notices in tender documents. Staff costs remain the main source of error, particularly for research expenditure. The Commission could further expand its information activities targeting error-prone beneficiaries, such as SMEs.
Members regretted that the level of excellence in research continues to differ significantly from one Member State to another. They noted with concern that women researchers are under-represented in Horizon 2020. They welcomed the Court of Auditors' assessment that the scale and scope of Erasmus+ has created added value and that the simplification of the programme has improved its efficiency.
(1b) Economic, social and territorial cohesion
The sub-heading represents 34.3% or EUR 59.5 billion of the Union's budget. Of this amount, EUR 32.4 billion (54.5%) is spent on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), EUR 10.2 billion (17.1%) on the Cohesion Fund (CF), EUR 14.7 billion (24.7%) on the European Social Fund (ESF) and EUR 2.2 billion (3.7%) on other actions.
The Court estimated the level of error to be 3.5% , which is well above the materiality level. 72% of the errors were due to ineligible projects and costs, and 27% to breaches of internal market rules (in particular non-compliance with state aid rules).
The proportion of contracts awarded to a single bidder is considered particularly alarming: 19 Member States reached or exceeded the 20% threshold and six Member States (Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia) reached a level of 39-51%.
Members expressed concern that the number and incidence of errors detected show that the controls in place are not yet sufficiently effective in mitigating the inherent high risk of error in this area.
(2) Natural resources
The heading represents 35%, or EUR 60.6 billion , of the EU budget. Of this amount, EUR 41.6 billion (68.7%) is spent on direct payments under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), EUR 2.6 billion (4.3%) on market-related expenditure under the EAGF, EUR 14.6 billion (24.1%) on the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), EUR 0.9 billion (1.4%) on the European Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), and the remainder on other areas.
According to the Court of Auditors, direct payments as a whole were free of material error and accounted for 69% of expenditure under this heading of the MFF. However, Members were concerned about the errors detected by the Court in the areas of rural development and market measures and in the other areas of expenditure under the heading, which account for 31% of expenditure.
Members regretted that the Commission's inability to collect reliable data on the final beneficiaries of CAP funds leaves many cases unresolved concerning the recovery of funds by Member States.
(3) Security and Citizenship
The heading represents 3.7% or EUR 6.3 billion of the EU budget. Of this amount, EUR 2.6 billion (40.5%) is spent on the instrument for Emergency Support with in the Union, EUR 1.6 billion (25.3%) on migration and security, EUR 1.2 billion (18.5%) on decentralised agencies, EUR 0.2 billion (3.7%) on food and feed, EUR 0.2 billion (3.8%) on the Creative Europe programme, and the rest on other policy areas.
Parliament noted that the Court was unable to estimate the error rate; it was concerned that of the 27 transactions examined by the Court, 8 (30%) were affected by errors.
Members regretted that the MEDIA sub-programme had not achieved the expected results for some indicators, particularly in relation to the size of the audience at events. They noted with concern that the Court found marked differences in the implementation of national programmes and that information on the performance of the Border and Visa ISF was incomplete. They welcomed the success of the effective integration and legal migration component of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund.
The Commission is called upon to urgently define a gender mainstreaming methodology in order to integrate a gender equality perspective in all policy areas.
(4) Global Europe
The heading represents 6.6%, or EUR 11.4 billion , of the EU budget. Of this amount, EUR 3 billion (26.7%) is spent on the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), EUR 2.7 billion (23.2%) on the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), EUR 1.9 billion (16.9%) on the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), EUR 1.9 billion (16.8%) on humanitarian aid and the remainder on other actions and programmes.
Parliament noted that the Court did not audit enough transactions to estimate the level of error for this heading of the MFF; it is concerned that of the 75 transactions audited, 28 (37.3%) were found to have errors.
Members noted with concern that for ‘Global Europe’ the main categories of findings are ineligible costs, costs non-incurred, procurement errors and lack of supporting documents. They also found that most indicators are not on track or progress is unclear.
(5) Administration
Payments under this heading amounted to EUR 10.3 billion in 2020, or 6.0% of the MFF. The Commission represents EUR 6.3 billion (60% of the payments under this heading) with expenditure on human resources representing 68% of this amount.
Parliament was pleased to note that the Court considers that expenditure under the heading 'administration' is not affected by a material degree of error.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2020, as part of the discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Commission
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. They are prepared according to the highest available international public sector standards.
The discharge is a Parliament decision that reflects its conclusions at the end of a process, the discharge procedure, on the way the Commission (and other institutions and bodies) has carried out its task of implementing the EU budget.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
2020 priorities
The EU faced many economic and political challenges caused by the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The Commission mobilised all means to help Member States coordinate their national responses to the crisis and help those most affected by the crises, using instruments such as the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative or SURE (Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency).
Under SURE an amount of EUR 39.5 billion out of a total of EUR 100 billion has already been disbursed in 2020 to affected Member States to address sudden increases in public expenditure for the preservation of employment.
While fighting the pandemic, the EU nevertheless delivered on its policy objectives, with a focus on young people, jobs and growth, as well as climate change. Measures to support economic growth and reduce the economic gaps between regions amounted to nearly half of the funds committed.
EU funding contributed :
- EUR 29.7 billion to less developed regions;
- EUR 16.4 billion to research and innovation under Horizon 2020;
- EUR 59 million to the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and Agricultural Fund for Rural Development with total commitments of EUR 59 billion.
2020 budget
The 2020 budget was the final budget of the current multiannual financial framework, with budget implementation totalling EUR 181.7 billion in commitments made – adding value for all Europeans.
2020 was also the year of the agreement on the EU’s long-term budget for 2021-2027 of EUR 1 074 billion (in 2018 prices), boosted by EUR 750 billion through NextGenerationEU , a temporary instrument to kickstart the recovery and steer the transition towards a more sustainable and digital Europe.
Implementation of the appropriations
Appropriations established in the final adopted budget were EUR 173.9 billion (4.6% higher compared to the 2019 budget) for commitments , and EUR 164.1 billion (10.5% higher) for payments , corresponding to 1.00% and 0.90% of EU gross national income (GNI), respectively.
The implementation of the total commitment appropriations in 2020 totalled EUR 181.7 billion :
- EUR 172.9 billion from the final adopted budget;
- EUR 1.1 billion from appropriations carried-over from 2019;
- EUR 7.7 billion from appropriations stemming from assigned revenue.
Total payments made in 2020 totalled EUR 173.3 billion :
- EUR 161.8 billion from the final adopted budget;
- EUR 1.6 billion from appropriations carried-over from 2019;
- EUR 9.9 billion from appropriations stemming from assigned revenue.
All MFF headings reached high levels of implementation in 2020 . The 2020 implementation for all types of appropriations (budget, carry-overs from previous year and assigned revenue) was 97% for commitments and 94% for payments.
Implementation rates excluding assigned revenue showed full implementation in 2020 (99.5% for commitment appropriations and 98.5% for payment appropriations).
The highest part of income was represented by Own resources, which amounted to 91.9% of the total revenue of EUR 174.3 billion, followed 4.7% from Contributions and refunds in connection with EU agreements and programmes, which mainly concern revenue from financial corrections (ESIF, EAGF and EAFRD).
Main aspects of the financial situation in 2020
- in 2020, the consolidated revenue amounted to EUR 224.0 billion, a considerable increase of EUR 63.7 billion or 39.7% from the previous year figure of EUR 160.3 billion. The main driver of this development was the financial effect of the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union (EUR 47.5 billion);
- the total assets were EUR 280.0 billion, reflecting an increase of EUR 101.1 billion or 56.5% over the previous year (2019: EUR 178.9 billion);
- pre-financing increased from EUR 51.4 billion in 2019 to EUR 62.7 billion in 2020. The increase of EUR 11.3 billion or 22.0% is mainly due to the non-recovery of the 2019 annual pre-financing in 2020 as part of the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives measures (EUR 6.6 billion) and the pre-financing paid for the development of vaccines to address the COVID-19 pandemic (EUR 1 billion);
- as at 31 December 2020, the total liabilities were EUR 313.5 billion, an increase of EUR 62.0 billion or 24.7% compared to the previous year (EUR 251.5 billion).
Outstanding commitments (sometimes referred to as RAL - reste à liquider), which are committed amounts not yet paid for, stood at EUR 303.2 billion at the end of 2020 . An increase from the 2019 level had been expected, given the difference between budgeted commitment and payment appropriations (EUR 9.8 billion) in the final adopted budget and taking into account the fact that an increase in outstanding commitments constitutes a normal evolution, as commitment appropriations increase every year as foreseen in the MFF. The increase in outstanding commitments compared to 2019 was EUR 5.5 billion.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0331
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0144/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0127/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0127/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE729.912
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE719.806
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Committee opinion: PE703.049
- Committee opinion: PE702.935
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06004/2022
- Committee opinion: PE700.428
- Committee opinion: PE700.421
- Specific opinion: PE703.011
- Committee opinion: PE699.120
- Committee opinion: PE699.170
- Committee opinion: PE699.320
- Committee draft report: PE699.012
- Committee opinion: PE699.298
- Committee opinion: PE699.194
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0043/2022
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007 N9-0043/2022
- Committee opinion: PE699.194
- Committee opinion: PE699.298
- Committee draft report: PE699.012
- Committee opinion: PE699.320
- Committee opinion: PE699.170
- Committee opinion: PE699.120
- Specific opinion: PE703.011
- Committee opinion: PE700.421
- Committee opinion: PE700.428
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06004/2022
- Committee opinion: PE702.935
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Committee opinion: PE703.049
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE719.806
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE729.912
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0127/2022
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0331 EUR-Lex
Votes
Décharge 2020: budget général de l'UE - Commission et agences exécutives - Discharge 2020: EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies - Entlastung 2020: Gesamthaushaltsplan der EU – Kommission und Exekutivagenturen - A9-0127/2022 - Olivier Chastel - § 160, après le point p - Am 38 #
A9-0127/2022 - Olivier Chastel - Après le § 163 - Am 17 #
A9-0127/2022 - Olivier Chastel - Après le § 196 - Am 14 #
A9-0127/2022 - Olivier Chastel - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
Amendments | Dossier |
526 |
2021/2106(DEC)
2021/11/29
TRAN
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that, at the end of 2020, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency under Horizon 2020 Transport had a portfolio of 291 ongoing R&I implementation activities in the transport area for EUR 1,9 billion
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the fact that in the 2014-2020 period, CEF Transport co- funding amounting to EUR 23.03 billion was allocated to 959 actions. While addressing infrastructure along both the core and the comprehensive network of the trans-European transport network, the programme focuses its support on the core network, with more than 170 sections concerned.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets the low implementation rate of CEF during the 2014-2020 period:
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets the low implementation rate of CEF during the 2014-2020 period: calls on Member States to significantly speed up investments, and on the Commission to step up its monitoring in view of the urgent need for infrastructure investment in order to facilitate a swift recovery from the Covid-19 crisis and to lay the groundwork for a transition to more sustainable transport; is concerned that a significant under-
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets the low implementation rate of CEF during the 2014-2020 period: calls on Member States to significantly speed up investments to deliver the European Green Deal objectives, and on the Commission to step up its monitoring in view of the urgent need for infrastructure investment in order to facilitate a swift recovery from the Covid- 19 crisis; is concerned that a significant under-
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes that under CEF Transport, the roll-out of the CEF debt instrument to support green mobility projects continued, and the pipeline of operations grew further; underlines that despite the delays in investment decisions due to COVID-19, four new operations were signed under the high-risk ‘Future mobility’ product, leveraging total investments of EUR 266 million.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the positive evaluation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) policy progress
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the positive evaluation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) policy progress and the agreement on the Streamlining Directive, which will play a key role in accelerating
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the positive evaluation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) policy progress and the agreement on the Streamlining Directive, which will play a key role in accelerating pre-identified cross-border projects on the core network; notes however that there are bottlenecks along the corridors where more focus is needed to guarantee connectivity and cohesion across the Union and the timely completion of the core network by 2030; is concerned that phased and new projects along the TEN-T network
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the positive evaluation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) policy progress and the agreement on the Streamlining Directive, which will play a key role in accelerating pre-identified cross-border projects on the core network; notes however that there are bottlenecks along the corridors where more focus is needed to guarantee connectivity and timely completion of the core network by 2030; is concerned that phased and new projects along the TEN-T network
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the need to allocate Union funding exclusively to transport projects that fulfil the requirements of a future- proof, sustainable European transport network, in accordance with the Union taxonomy, and consequently to prioritise projects that significantly contribute to reaching climate-neutrality in the transport sector;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Draws attention to the conclusions of European Court of Auditors' Special Report 10/2020, which raise diverse serious socioeconomic and environmental concerns over different transport flagship mega-infrastructure projects across the Union, such as inaccurate estimations regarding traffic forecasts or the cumulative delays, remarkably impacting the related cost-benefit analysis as well as the life-cycle emissions calculations within the 2030 and 2050 horizons; considers that EU transport funding would be more effectively spent, also in terms of climate neutrality contribution, by considerably supporting smaller-scale regional cross-border rail missing links;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Regrets that poor planning, diverging priorities and procedures of the Member States impact the pace of implementation of cross-border transport projects; calls, therefore for the fast adoption of the European Cross-Border Mechanism; calls also for initiation of a legislation to further reduce administrative burden and increase efficiency in transport services;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Notes that the proportion of high- risk expenditure has grown, as opposed to the previous year, from 53,1% to 59% of all expenditure; stresses that such reimbursement-based expenditures increase the chances and potential impact of related material errors; underlines that this requires complex rules on eligibility and incurring of reimbursement; notes that largest share of these high-risk expenditures take place under Cohesion expenditure (48.8 billion), which is a relevant envelope of for the CEF Transport funding.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Requests that the Commission, together with the Court and OLAF, closely monitor the EU transport projects, as public investment in infrastructure is particularly sensitive to fraud; considers this essential not only to ensure transparency that prevents corruption and misuse of taxpayers' money, but also to ensure that the highest safety standards for the users are not compromised;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Is concerned that the price hike in construction and raw materials change the total budget for many projects and could lead to underbudgeting, missed milestones, impossible implementations and therefore undermines the TEN-T core network completion;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Welcomes the fact that EU reaffirms road safety policy as a long- term strategic goal of the Union and welcomes the adoption of the Stockholm Declaration on Road Safety in February 2020; points out that investments in existing infrastructure and the construction of new infrastructure are essential elements in improving road safety in different EU regions and therefore contribute to the goal of reducing deaths and serious injuries by 50% by 2030;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that the COVID-19 pandemic placed transport and tourism in Union under an unprecedented pressure and
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that the COVID-19 pandemic placed transport and tourism in Union under an unprecedented pressure and welcomes the Commission’s efforts to provide relief to the sectors and financing using the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives (CRII and CRII+), CEF, RRF, Cohesion Fund, InvestEU, ERDF; welcomes in this regard the Commission’s initiatives such as the green lanes to ensure that freight vehicles are moving freely across the Union, the temporary relief on airport slots and the platform Re-open EU; regrets however that the lack of coordination between the Member States and the individual measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 do not facilitate the recovery of transport and tourism sectors;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that the COVID-19 pandemic placed transport and tourism in Union under an unprecedented pressure and welcomes the Commission’s efforts to provide relief to the sectors and financing using the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives (CRII and CRII+), CEF, RRF, Cohesion Fund, InvestEU, ERDF; stresses that these funds should be used to rebuild the sectors in a truly sustainable form, adapted to the circumstances of a future-looking climate-neutral European economy;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Reiterates the request for the creation of a new budgetary line for Sustainable Tourism, to support the recovery of a sector severely hit by the Covid-19 crisis by means of a green and digital transformation, making it resilient for the future and compliant with the European Green Deal ambitions; welcomes that in November 2020 the European Court of Auditors launched an audit to analyse tourism projects co- funded with EUR 6,4 billion in 2007-2013 and EUR 4 billion so far in 2014-2020 ERDF and Cohesion Fund money, as well as what the EU is doing to limit the negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis; looks forward still to the final report and its conclusions so as to assess whether EU funding for public investments in tourism was effective and provided suitable support for the sector prior to the pandemic, and ultimately to help improving EU Tourism policies in general;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the progress of the Horizon Europe to prepare for the launch of new EU partnerships in areas such as clean hydrogen, batteries, clean aviation, rail, connected and automated mobility, zero-emission road and waterborne transport, in particular for the Work Programme 2021-2022;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses that investments into good quality public transport infrastructure is crucial for building trust in public and active transport and make sustainable modes of transport more attractive and safer, especially in the wake of a crisis.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Reiterates the Parliament’s request for the creation of a new budgetary line for Tourism, in order to finance a tourism fit for the future, digitalized and sustainable;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Notes that in 2020, several Research and Innovation activities under Horizon 2020 took place to support innovation in smart and sustainable mobility and to advance the progress in digitalisation and automation of aviation and rail through the SESAR and Shift2Rail Joint Undertakings;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Notes with regret that current modal split of inland freight transport in EU is highly disproportional, e.g. 76.3 % for road freight transport, followed by rail and inland waterway transport (17.6 % and 6.1 % respectively); calls for further actions to create incentives and intensify investments in railway and inland waterway transport and its harmonisation and standardisation to achieve more competitive, climate-resilient and affordable transport system of the future;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the fact that, in 2020, the 2019 multi annual call for proposals under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) was successfully completed, selecting 125 projects with an overall contribution of more than EUR 2 billion; underlines the importance of investing in sustainable transport networks to enable the necessary faster trend in the shift towards more sustainable modes of transport; underlines the target of at least 60% of the CEF2 related expenditure to be unambiguously contributing in reaching the Union climate targets;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the fact that, in 2020, the 2019 multi annual call for proposals under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) was successfully completed, selecting 125 projects with an overall contribution of more than EUR 2 billion; notes that more than 90% of the CEF contribution was allocated to projects expected to address climate related objectives and in particular railway, inland waterways and maritime ports infrastructures and deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the fact that, in 2020, the 2019 multi annual call for proposals under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) was successfully completed, selecting 125 projects with an overall contribution of more than EUR 2 billion; notes, however, the need to improve the level of awareness of the CEF eligibility rules among the beneficiaries;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Is convinced that the work on the modernisation of the railway sector is contributing both to the objectives of A Europe fit for the digital age and of the European Green Deal; welcomes in this regard the fact that in 2020 twelve actions related to European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) were supported, under both the 2019 MAP call and the CEF Transport Blending Facility in order to improve interoperability, sustainability and security of railway transport; regrets however that currently roughly 30 national signalling systems exist across the Union; it is therefore necessary to foster the cooperation between European Commission, Member States, Infrastructure Managers and Railway Undertakings while improving funding opportunities to incentivise investments in ERTMS;
source: 700.591
2021/12/07
AFET
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that 2020 was highly affected by the COVID-19
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the Union in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the Union in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic secured financial support for partner countries and fragile populations amounting to more than EUR 40 billion; stresses the need to improve visibility and communication concerning the substantial support EU has provided in partner countries during the COVID- pandemics; welcomes Team Europe efforts in addressing the immediate effects of the health crisis and the resulting humanitarian needs in the partner countries, as well as its contribution to the COVAX Facility which provides fair and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines in low- and middle- income countries;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the Union in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which originated in Wuhan, China, secured financial support for partner countries and fragile populations amounting to more than EUR 40 billion; welcomes Team Europe efforts in addressing the immediate effects of the health crisis and the resulting humanitarian needs in the partner countries, as well as its contribution to the COVAX Facility which provides fair and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines in low- and middle- income countries;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Strongly commends the efforts of civil society worldwide in promoting and defending human rights, especially at a time of shrinking civil society space and the questioning of the universality of human rights;
Amendment 14 #
3 b. Calls for more independent and publicly available assessments of EU civilian and military security and military measures, in particular EU military training missions, capacity building of military actors in third countries, and border and migration management measures;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. Deplores the continued destruction and confiscation of EU-funded humanitarian assistance in the West Bank; notes that according to EU sources, Israeli authorities demolished or seized 122 structures in 2020 at a loss of EUR 300,000, that had been built with EU or Member States’ funds; is concerned by the lack of resolve of the EEAS and the Commission, as highlighted by the European Court of Auditors, to secure compensation from the Israeli authorities, as requested by the European Parliament in its resolution of September 2018; requests the Commission to deduct in the next draft budget under which EU-Israel programmes are funded the amount corresponding to the cost of demolished EU-funded projects;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the ECA’s Special Report “Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine” focused on the Union’s contributions to anti-corruption and judicial reforms between 2016-2019; is concerned that grand corruption is still prevalent in Ukraine and has negative effects on the rule of law and economic development in the country; notes, however, that in comparison to the period before 2014 the country has clearly developed positively through huge efforts of real political reformers, civil society activities and comprehensive Union support and cooperation to this end; calls for implementing ECA’s recommendations to the Commission, the EEAS and the European Advisory Mission in Ukraine. considers that the Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine has led to a worsening of corruption in the country, and calls on EU leaders to consider whether it is appropriate to maintain or expand the scope of that agreement;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the ECA’s Special Report “Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine” focused on the Union’s contributions to anti-corruption and judicial reforms
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Is concerned that Horizon 2020 was implemented for projects located in the illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, in full defiance of the “Guidelines on the eligibility of Israeli entities and their activities in the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967 for grants, prizes and financial instruments funded by the EU from 2014 onwards”; reminds of the position of the Council, which expressed its commitment to ensure that all agreements between Israel and the EU must unequivocally and explicitly indicate the inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967, as well as to continued implementation of existing EU legislation and bilateral arrangements applicable to settlement products; calls on the Commission to establish the necessary legal and technical arrangements to guarantee that the geographical scope of the EU-Israel agreement under Horizon Europe for the 2021-2027 period will be limited to the territory of Israel as defined by international law in 1967.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Remains concerned that incitement to hatred and violence in Palestinian school textbooks has still not been removed and is concerned about the continued failure to address this matter effectively; insists that salaries of teachers and education sector civil servants that are financed from Union funds such as PEGASE should only be used for drafting and teaching curricula which reflect UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence and non-violence.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Laments that some international organizations provided only limited access to documents and questioned the ECA mandate; calls on the Commission to take the necessary steps so that international organizations provide the Court of Auditors with complete, unlimited access to document necessary to carry out their tasks in acoordance with the Treaty;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Is repulsed and appalled by the EEAS note dated 15 November 2021 on the Political and Strategic Environment of CSDP Missions in the Central African Republic (CAR) and media reports that an EU-trained battalion, certified by EUTM RCA, is raping, pillaging and plundering under the command of Russia-linked Wagner Group mercenaries; calls for an immediate independent evaluation of all related budget lines and for those responsible to be held to account.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Noting with concern the continuous complicated situation in Belarus, it is important to review EU funding and ensure that it is not directed to Lukashenko regime, but towards support of civil society in Belarus; notes that Frontex needs to be sufficiently funded to secure EU's outside border with Belarus.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Recognises the key role performed by UNRWA in providing Palestine refugees with vital services, including health and education, in the Middle East; commends the results of the study on Palestinian school books performed by the Georg Eckert Institute, which confirms that they adhere to UNESCO standards and adopt criteria which are prominent in international education discourse.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Considers that, in comparison to 2020, the budget line structure of the European Neighbourhood for the 2021- 2027 Multiannual Financial Framework is oversimplified, since it only includes two lines, respectively for the Southern Neighbourhood and the Eastern Partnership; regrets that such a simplified structure does not allow the budgetary authority to properly perform its scrutiny role in the annual discharge procedure; believes that the financial needs of each of the two geographical areas should be addressed at least by three budget lines, respectively targeting political, development and security related matters.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Notes with grave concern that, according to the Annual Management and Performance Report 2020, the total financial impact of all reservations by Directors-General to declarations of assurance amounted to EUR 1219 million for 2020, 16% higher than in 2019;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes with grave concern that the financial impact of the reservations for the policy area 'External relations' increased from EUR 16 million in 2019 to EUR 21 million in 2020; calls for immediate action to be taken by the Commission to address this issue;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that expenditures in heading 4 ‘Global Europe’ are considered high-risk, except for budget support payment; notes that most errors found by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in this area concern absence of essential supporting documents, non-compliance with public procurement rules, costs not incurred and ineligible costs; fully supports the recommendations formulated by the ECA and calls on taking steps so that international organisations provide the ECA with complete, unlimited and timely access to documents necessary to carry out our task in accordance with the TFEU; considers in general that appropriations for the ‘Global Europe’ programme are too high, and that the role of the European Union should not be to interfere constantly in world affairs, but to prioritise defending the Member States’ interests;
Amendment 7 #
2. Underlines that expenditures in heading 4 ‘Global Europe’ are considered high-risk, except for budget support payment; is concerned by the high rate of errors (37,3%) found by the ECA in the 75 transactions samples in heading 4; notes that most errors found by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in this area concern absence of essential supporting documents, non-compliance with public procurement rules, costs not incurred and ineligible costs and calls on the Commission to improve the assistance and the monitoring of the procedure in order to improve this track record; fully supports the recommendations formulated by the ECA and calls on taking steps so that international organisations provide the ECA with complete, unlimited and timely access to documents necessary to carry out our task in accordance with the TFEU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that expenditures in heading 4 ‘Global Europe’ are considered high-risk, except for budget support payment; notes that most errors found by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in this area concern absence of essential supporting documents, non-compliance with public procurement rules, costs not incurred and ineligible costs; fully supports the recommendations formulated by the ECA and calls on
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that expenditures in heading 4 ‘Global Europe’ are considered high-risk, except for budget support payment; notes that most errors found by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in this area concern absence of essential supporting documents, non-compliance with public procurement rules, costs not incurred and ineligible costs; fully supports the recommendations formulated by the ECA and calls on
source: 700.659
2021/12/08
EMPL
47 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes note that by the end of 2020, outstanding commitments continued to rise, reaching EUR 303.2 billion; highlights that this increase was smaller than in previous years, partly due to the additional payment appropriations being made available for combating the COVID- 19 pandemic; notes that according to the Commission’s long-term forecasting, which does not include the Next Generation EU (NGEU) instrument, the amount of outstanding commitments should remain fairly stable at this high level until 2027; notes that despite the fact that the absorption of European Structural and Investment (ESI) funds has accelerated at the end of 2020 (55%), it is still slower than at the same time under the previous MFF (2000-2006: 68 %; 2007-2013: 62 %); calls, therefore, on the Commission to analyse the reasons for the low absorption level and to simplify the new rules for the post-2020 period in order to avoid unnecessarily complex and/or burdensome rules with no added value;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Is satisfied with the Commission's overall implementation of the budgetary headings for environment, climate action, public health and food safety in 2020 but stresses that climate and biodiversity spending and mainstreaming is inadequate and relies on ill justified and faulty methodologies;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Takes note of the Court’s special report 26/2021 ‘Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy: Commission discloses annually a minimum estimated level of error that is not final’;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Notes
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Is worried about the fact that for 2020 financial year, the Court of Auditors (the “Court”) concluded that the weaknesses detected in some audit authorities’ sampling methods have limited the reliance that can be placed on that work; recalls the crucial role of audit authorities in the Member States in the assurance and control framework in Cohesion;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with an annual report setting out in detail the contribution of each budget item to the climate mainstreaming (at least 30 % under the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)) and the biodiversity (7,5 % as of 2024 and 10% in 2026 and in 2027 under the 2021-2027 MFF) targets, in order to facilitate their monitoring; calls further on the Commission to report whether any
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Recalls the vital importance of the ESF as the EU's main tool in fostering increased employment and labour mobility, education and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning and promoting social inclusion, combatting poverty and discrimination; notes the Court’s report on ‘the performance of the EU budget – Status at the end of 2020’ which found that while the ESF’S performance framework increased the availability of performance information, the focus remained on financial inputs and outputs, rather than on results and that ESF-funded activities continue to face difficulties in reaching people who are disconnected from the labour market, such as NEETs; Notes that the ESF expenses increased from EUR 11.2 billion in 2019 to EUR 13.7 billion in 2020 due to increased implementation;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with an annual report setting out in detail the contribution of each budget item to the climate mainstreaming (at least 30 %) and the biodiversity (7,5 % as of 2024 and 10% in 2026 and in 2027) targets, in order to facilitate their monitoring;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the ESF expenses increased from EUR 11.2 billion in 2019 to EUR 13.7 billion in 2020 due to increased implementation; emphasizes that the ESF is supposed to counter the worst excesses of unequal development and boost local development; furthermore, regional actors must be involved more closely and the Member States contributions should be reduced in order to reach the weakest regions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Reiterates its strong concern that the reservation on reputational, legal, financial and institutional grounds related to significant security risks identified in the maintenance and the operation of the Union Registry system of the EU Emissions Trading System, as reported in AARs since 2010 and as confirmed by the latest risk assessment exercise, is repeated in DG Climate Action’s 2020 AAR; notes that the most recent evaluation in 2019 continued to reveal residual risk levels which, combined with the rapid rise in the carbon price, has lead to threats outpacing the implementation rate of the security measures that DG CLIMA and DG DIGIT can sustain given their operating constraints and resource allocations; awaits the study on potential alternative and security-sustainable operating models for the Union Registry
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Expresses satisfaction that SURE reached a total volume of EUR 94.3 billion and a total level of disbursements of EUR 89.6 billion (as of May 2021) on a budget of EUR 100 billion; welcomes that SURE have supported approximately 31 million people and 2.5 million firms in 2020; calls in this context on the Commission to put forward a permanent European Unemployment Reinsurance Scheme without farther delay taking into account the fact that job layoffs will most probably increase;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the efforts that DG Environment has made in connection with the preparation and adoption of the second Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), which brings 35 legislative and non-legislative initiatives, and new EU strategies for industry, while it perceives both initiatives as essential in the implementation of the objectives of the European legal framework for climate;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Urgently calls on the Commission to take the catering staff in-house in order to ensure good working conditions and avoid layoffs;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Welcomes the adoption of the new 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, welcomes the effort to include third countries in this effort, and draws attention, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, to the link between the degradation of ecosystems and zoonoses;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Recognises that the five decentralised agencies (Eurofound, Cedefop, ETF, EU-OSHA and ELA) under the remit of DG EMPL provide significant contribution and each have an important added value to the achievement of the specific objectives of DG EMPL’s policy areas; expresses its satisfaction that the assessment confirms a positive evaluation report on the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and added value of the agencies, as well as the need to reinforce cooperation in order to achieve synergies;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Welcomes the draft 8th Environment Action Programme submitted by the Commission in October 2020 and has hope for its early acceptance in connection with the conclusion of a preliminary agreement between Council and Parliament representatives;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Notes that for the first time the Court also issued an overall assessment of the conditions put in place by the EU to enable the agencies to deliver its policies for the public good and recommends to the Commission to ensure the relevance, coherence and flexibility of the set-up of agencies, allocate resources in a more flexible manner, improve governance, accountability and reporting on performance and strengthen the role of agencies as centres of expertise and networking;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Refers to the efforts made by DG Environment, together with the European External Action Service and the relevant DG, in connection with ‘climate diplomacy’, while it perceives this effort in relation to third countries as essential for averting and mitigating the consequences of ongoing climate change;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 e (new) 13e. Welcomes the submission of a draft regulation on batteries and waste batteries, which revises existing measures and, at the same time, represents the first legal instrument that deals with the effects of these products during their entire life cycle;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 f (new) 13f. Welcomes the submission of the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, which aims to better protect Union citizens and the environment against the impacts of hazardous substances and promote innovation and the development of safer and sustainable chemicals;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses satisfaction that the biggest part of the Union budget went to boost sustainable growth and enhance competitiveness by reducing the economic gaps between regions, stimulate the creation of quality jobs, fight climate change, and address the socio-economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the EU, as well as provide assistance to third countries; welcomes in this regard the increased flexibility and the simplification of administrative requirements for the use of existing ESI funds to help Member States in their efforts to deal with the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is satisfied with the work carried out by most of the five decentralised agencies which are under its remit, which carry out technical, scientific or managerial tasks that help the Union institutions elaborate and implement policies in the area of environment, climate action, public health and food safety, as well as with the way in which those agencies' budgets are implemented; stresses that, given the scale of current and upcoming challenges, sufficient funding must be guaranteed for the agencies and the Commission Directorates-General ('DG') working in the areas of environment, climate action, public health
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the role DG Health and Food Safety has played in securing a coordinated response to the COVID-19 pandemic across the Member States; in authorising and procuring the vaccines against COVID-19 and delivering other essential medical countermeasures; and in supporting Member States in deploying public health measures
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the role DG Health and Food Safety has played in securing a coordinated response to the COVID-19 pandemic across the Member States; in authorising and procuring the vaccines against COVID-19 and delivering other essential medical countermeasures; and in supporting Member States in deploying public health measures
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes that, in 2020, DG SANTE's expenditure in the field of health increased sevenfold compared to previous years, mainly to manage large parts of the Commission's health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: EUR 2,5 billion from the Emergency Support Instrument (ESI) were paid for the six Advanced Purchase Agreements (APA) for the COVID-19 vaccines; regrets that, despite its strong links to the EU budget, the activation of the ESI was done without full respect and observance of Parliament’s prerogatives as budgetary authority and final supervisor of the Union budget; criticises that despite several attempts to get a clear overview, the competent committees (Budgets, Budgetary Control and Environment, Public Health and Food Safety) are still not given access to relevant data on the EU funds spent under the ESI to finance the APA contracts;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Regrets that the new European Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) is ultimately just an agency of the European Commission. Calls on the European Commission to be as transparent as possible in its management of this new authority and to allow the European Parliament full exercise of its budgetary control powers;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Urges the Commission to apply a high degree of transparency to all joint procurement activities and related purchase agreements in the field of health; insists that its relevant DGs should put in place a solid and transparent EU public procurement framework, when funds from the EU budget are fully or partially involved, that would allow for comprehensive scrutiny by the Parliament, especially concerning major health crisis-related spending areas;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Notes with concern that, in its Special Report 15/2020 "Protection of wild pollinators in the EU —Commission initiatives have not borne fruit", the Court found that Union measures did not ensure the protection of wild pollinators, including by not establishing a legal framework for the protection and restoration of the species by the EU Pollinators Initiative, and that Union pesticides legislation was a ma
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Notes with concern that, in its Special Report 15/2020 "Protection of wild pollinators in the EU —Commission initiatives have not borne fruit", the Court found that Union measures did not ensure the protection of wild pollinators and that Union pesticides legislation was a main cause of wild pollinator loss; calls on the Commission to swiftly follow up on the recommendations of the Court to assess whether actions should be added to address threats currently not considered in the Pollinators Initiative in the follow- up actions and measures for the EU biodiversity strategy to 2030, accompanied by appropriate governance and monitoring mechanisms;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Notes
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 19. Is of the opinion, on the basis of the data available and the implementation report, that discharge can be granted to the Commission in respect of expenditure in the areas of environmental and climate policy, public health and food safety for the financial year 2020, but expects drastic improvements in the tracking methodologies for climate and biodiversity spending in order to be able to grant discharge in future years.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Welcomes the adoption of a pharmaceutical strategy for Europe, which includes 55 measures aimed, inter alia, at ensuring access to affordable medicines, focusing on innovations in treatment, promoting innovation, competitiveness and sustainability in the Union’s pharmaceutical industry, improving crisis preparedness and response mechanisms and addressing the lack of drugs;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes that Commission activated business continuity plans in good time to ensure the continuation of key governance processes and the well- being of staff during the COVID-19 pandemic; expresses satisfaction that Commission rapidly adapted its work to the pandemic through accelerated digitalisation measures, collaborated better, and improved the way they exchanged information to remain operational;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is satisfied with the work carried out by the five decentralised agencies which are under its remit, which carry out technical, scientific or managerial tasks that help the Union institutions elaborate and implement policies in the area of environment, climate action, public health and food safety, as well as with the way in which those agencies’ budgets are implemented; stresses that, given the scale of current and upcoming challenges, sufficient and stable funding must be guaranteed for the agencies and the Commission Directorates-General (‘DG’) working in the areas of environment, climate action, public health and food safety;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Supports the activities of DG Health and Food Safety in connection with the preparation of a legislative framework for sustainable food systems and sustainable labelling, which aims, inter alia, to revise the rules for the sustainable use of pesticides, feed additives, food labellings and materials intended for contact with food;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the total planned expenditure under this sub-heading of the 2014-2020 MFF is €142 billion, of which €104.6 billion had been paid out by the end of 2020; Expresses satisfaction that EUR 3.1 billion (12.8%) of the spending under the MFF subheading 1a is dedicated to Education, training, youth and sport;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that in 2020, DG Environment's budget reached EUR 518,30 million and had 476 members of staff; reiterates its call that the staffing level needs to be increased imminently in order to meet the objectives of the European Green Deal and its subsequent strategies; points out that the implementation rates of commitment and payment appropriations were both above 99 % at year-end;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that DG Climate Action and DG Budget monitor the 20 % climate mainstreaming target in the Multiannual Financial Framework , and that DG Climate Action supports other DGs in integrating climate in their activities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses the importance of the ESF and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) to encourage high level of employment, the creation of quality jobs and fight against poverty and social exclusion; expresses the need to provide them with the continued financial and political support of the EU, national and regional institutions in the delivery of their targets in the years to come;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that DG Climate Action and DG Budget monitor the 20 % climate mainstreaming target in the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Notes that, on average, more than one out of five persons and one out of four children are still at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the European Union; recalls the EU commitment to the support for the most deprived through FEAD, alleviating the worst forms of poverty in the Union, such as food deprivation, homelessness, and child poverty; notes that about 13 million people, including approximately 4 million children under the age of 15 are supported by FEAD annually;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Notes the Court's finding in Review No 01/2020: "Tracking climate spending in the EU budget" that the Commission’s climate tracking methodology needs to be reconsidered to render it more reliable and that there are indications that it will be challenging to reliably step up climate- related spending to 25 % of the EU budget; deeply regrets that the Court's recommendations from its 2016 report1a have not yet been implemented and calls for swift remedy of this problem which leads to overestimations of the contributions to climate action, notably by the agricultural and cohesion policies; _________________ 1a European Court of Auditors special report 2016/31: Spending at least one euro in every five from the EU budget on climate action: ambitious work underway, but at serious risk of falling short
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes with concern that the estimated overall level of error in subheading 1b ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ stood at 3.5 % in 2020 (2019:4.4 %, 2018: 5 %); underlines that despite the slight decrease in comparison with the previous years, this figure is still largely above the 2 % materiality threshold and the estimated level of error in expenditure for the Union budget as a whole (2.7 %); stresses that the new control and assurance framework was designed to ensure that annual residual error rates are below 2 %; agrees with the Court's conclusions that further improvements are necessary in terms of the implementation of the framework by the Member States’ programme authorities and by the Commission in order to reduce the high level of error;
Amendment 8 #
11. Notes
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes with concern that the estimated overall level of error in subheading 1b ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ stood at 3.5 % in 2020; underlines that despite the slight decrease in comparison with the previous years, this figure is still largely above the 2 % materiality threshold and the estimated level of error in expenditure for the Union budget as a whole (2.7 %); calls for urgent action to decrease the error rate in the future, and especially for the new funding period;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Notes with concern the Court’s findings in Special Report 18/2020: “The EU’s Emissions Trading System: free allocation of allowances needed better targeting” that free allowances are not well targeted, tended to slow decarbonisation and that the Commission needs to update its procedure for targeting free allowances to reflect the Paris Agreement; welcomes, in this context, the draft amendment to the EU ETS directive submitted within the framework of the Fit for 55 package, which, inter alia, also revises the method of allocating free allowances;
source: 700.646
2021/12/13
REGI
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that, as indicated in the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2020, the estimated level of error in spending on ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ decreased from 4,4% in 2019 to 3,5% in 2020; welcomes the continuous improvement, but is disappointed that it has not proven possible to decrease the error rate below 2% and the effects of error are therefore material and pervasive; notes that the main reasons for this error rate are ineligibility of projects and costs, infringement of internal market rules mainly related to state aid and public procurement, and absence of essential supporting documents;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses the importance of the role of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) in investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment crimes against the financial interests of the EU, with a special focus on their cross-border dimension; regrets that five Member States are not currently participating in this enhanced cooperation and deplores any irregularities or partisan interventions in the appointment of the prosecutors in the participating Member States;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that six possible fraud cases were reported to the EU’s Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) in comparison to 2019’s nine and highlights the role of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) in investigation and prosecution of fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/13711a; _________________ 1a Directive(EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29)
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the work of audit authorities in the Member States plays a critical role in limiting residual error rates and is worried about the weaknesses found in the work of several audit authorities which continue to limit the reliance that can be placed in their work; urges the Commission to offer support and technical assistance to audit authorities in order to eliminate inefficiencies and disseminate good practices; welcomes that, in 2020, the Commission increased the number of its compliance audits and recognises the Commission’s capacity to detect errors and its commitment to correct them in due time, which reduced the estimated level of error by 0,7%;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the absorption rate of European Structural and Investment Funds
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that, in spite of the change in ESIF eligibility rules for COVID-19- related expenditure, and of the introduction of the possibility of 100 % EU financing (CRII and CRII+), the absorption rate of European Structural and Investment Funds
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the absorption rate of European Structural and Investment Funds
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the absorption rate of European Structural and Investment Funds , which increased from 12% in 2019 to 15% in 2020 , is slower than expected with 45 % (EUR 209 billion) remaining to be absorbed; calls on the Commission to step up its action to address absorption difficulties and help Member States increase their absorption rates;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets that data on costs that were complete, consistent and coherent enough were not collected by the Commission to allow this data to be used for assessing the impact of simplifying EU rules on how to implement the Cohesion policy funds, even though the Commission has for the programming period from 2007-2027 commissioned five studies on the level of administrative costs and the impact of simplification measures;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Acknowledges that, in order to react to the Covid-19 pandemic, the EU co-legislators introduced the relaxation of applicable rules to facilitate the use of ESI funds to provide liquidity, flexibility and simplification; welcomes the timely adoption of such measures allowing managing authorities to accelerate the deployment of Financial Instruments to support 365.000 SMEs across Europe during 2020; calls on the Commission to provide support to the Member States to minimise the risk that these exceptional measures could weaken the control systems and increase the risk of errors and irregularities;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that, the estimated level of error in spending on ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ decreased from 4,4% in 2019 to 3,5% in 2020; welcomes the continuous improvement, but is disappointed that it has not proven possible to decrease the error rate below 2%; stresses that most of the irregularities identified by audit authorities and the Commission concern the same main categories: ineligible expenditure, public procurement, audit trail and State Aid;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Deplores, that complete, coherent and consistent information on costs were also not made publicly available to demonstrate to European citizens that policies are being implemented efficiently; points out that if costs are not kept low whenever possible, it results with less money being available for actually implementing the policy;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an overall allocation of EUR 1 824 billion from NextGenerationEU and the MFF;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an overall allocation of EUR 1 824 billion from NextGenerationEU and the MFF; urges the Commission to limit the risk of delayed start to the implementation of shared managed funds and ensure the sound financial management in the use of funds, including the respect for the rule of law and the fundamental rights
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an overall allocation of EUR 1 824 billion from Next Generation EU and the MFF; urges the Commission to limit the risk of delayed start to the implementation of shared managed funds and ensure
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an overall allocation of EUR 1 824 billion from NextGenerationEU and the MFF; urges the Commission to limit the risk of delayed start to the implementation of shared managed funds and ensure the sound financial management in the use of funds, including the respect for the rule of law and the fundamental rights; regrets that the Commission has de facto suspended the implementation of the rule of law conditionality regulation, despite its entry into force on 1 January 2021.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the EU will be able to spend significantly more than in the previous programming period, with an overall allocation of EUR
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new) Points out, that although there is a trend to place an emphasis of the cohesion programmes on results rather than outputs, the set of measurable indicators and robust monitoring to this end were not yet put in place and properly implemented.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy in promoting gender equality, as highlighted by the European Parliament's own-initiative report on the gender dimension in cohesion policy and by the “European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 10/2021: Gender mainstreaming in the EU budget: time to turn words into action”; points out the Court’s assessment that the EU’s budget cycle did not take gender equality adequately into account and the Commission had not yet lived up to its commitment to gender mainstreaming in the EU budget; reiterates therefore its call for the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the implementation of gender budgeting, at all stages of the budgetary process
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes with satisfaction that, the estimated level of error in spending on ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ decreased from 4,4% in 2019 to 3,5% in 2020; welcomes the continuous improvement of cohesion policy investments, but is disappointed that it has not proven possible to decrease the error rate below 2%; underlines in this regard the different types of irregularities and that an error rate is not identical with fraud;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the overlap between the funds from the last tranche in the implementation of the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework, the 2021-2027 MFF and the Next Generation programmes may lead to an overburdening of the managing administrations and cause implementation problems; calls on the Commission to focus special attention on issues of complementarity between the funds, since in many cases their priorities coincide, and less on forms of reporting to the Community institutions; calls for clear implementation rules to be set out for management entities, and in particular for technical assistance to be provided on this point.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes the positive trend in cohesion policy investments of further attention towards taxonomy and highlights in this respect the ecological minimum standards (“do not significant harm” or “ecological taxonomy” for climate, biodiversity and circular economy) as well as the further promotion of social minimum standards (“social taxonomy”) and the impact on discharge procedures;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Points out the worrying conclusions of the “European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 26/2021:Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy”, which highlight that the European Commission’s own control system does not sufficiently compensate for the weaknesses in the work of Member state audit authorities when they check Cohesion spending; calls on the Commission to improve its audit work, audit documentation and review process, as well as to strengthen the main elements of the regularity information provided in the Annual Activity Reports by its Directorates-General;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that high-risk expenditures are subject to complex rules and eligibility conditions; notes that the estimated level of error decreased from 4,9% in 2019 to 4,0% in 2020 and that six possible fraud cases were reported to OLAF in comparison to 2019’s nine; recalls that the way funds are disbursed has an impact on the risk of errors and
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that high-risk expenditures are subject to complex rules and eligibility conditions; notes that the estimated level of error decreased from 4,9% in 2019 to 4,0% in 2020 and that six possible fraud cases, which were reported to OLAF in comparison to 2019’s nine, most frequently concerned suspicions of artificial creation of the necessary conditions for EU financing, declaration of costs not meeting the eligibility criteria, use of the grant for purposes other than allowed or procurement irregularities; recalls that the way funds are disbursed has an impact on the risk of errors and welcomes efforts to simplify requirements for project managers and management authorities under the 2021-2027 programming period;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that high-risk expenditures are often subject to complex rules and eligibility conditions, leading to an increased risk of errors; notes that the estimated level of error decreased from 4,9% in 2019 to 4,0% in 2020
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that high-risk expenditures are subject to complex rules and eligibility conditions; notes that the estimated level of error decreased from
source: 702.976
2021/12/14
CULT
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that in 2020 the total available budget for the Union programmes and actions under the portfolio of Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (DG EAC) amounted to EUR 6 043 million in commitment appropriations (some 7 % more than in 2019); notes that, despite the unavoidable cancellation or postponement of some activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic and thanks to the measures taken under the ‘force majeure’ clause, DG EAC achieved most targets in 2020 and executed commitments fully and payments virtually fully, as did Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG CONNECT) for relevant expenditure;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Urges DG EAC, DG CONNECT and the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to take without delay all appropriate measures to improve the protection of personal data wherever needed, to minimise the risks linked to third country data transfers, in order to enable the continuation of international operations in 2021 in full compliance with EU data protection law, and to strengthen staff awareness and knowledge of data protection rules, including through targeted training.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines that on a Union level, culture and education policies remain a shared area of competence between DG EAC, DG CONNECT and the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA); urges all Directorates-General and agencies to maintain and improve the level of coordination and smooth cooperation, in order to ensure the wellbeing of Union citizens and the successful implementation of all policies, as well as the proper management of Union funds; reiterates its position that the current split of competences carries the risk of negatively impacting the performance of culture and education programmes and funding.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls for more transparency, less bureaucracy related to project implementation and the constructive use of digital instruments when this can be helpful for beneficiaries and the projects.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges DG EAC’s flexibility and efforts to prevent under- implementation of programmes due to the COVID-19 pandemic; welcomes the measures taken to mitigate the effects of the crisis on applicants and beneficiaries, such as extending application deadlines, extending the duration of ongoing projects, supporting additional costs up to the maximum amounts granted to projects under the applicable legal frameworks, and applying further flexibility towards blended activities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges DG EAC’s efforts to prevent under-implementation of programmes due to the COVID-19 pandemic; welcomes the measures taken to mitigate the effects of the crisis on applicants and beneficiaries, and calls on DG EAC to ensure that all the projects that could not be implemented will be in the future;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the crucial role of the Creative Europe Programme in funding the cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI) in Europe, especially in times of crisis; regrets, however, that due to the lack of budget for the period 2014- 2020, several high quality projects could not be funded at a time where the CCSI needed support;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer on the spot visits were possible in 2020, leading DG EAC to adapt its supervision and auditing approach and to provide specific guidance on COVID-19 for the reporting by National Agencies and Independent Audit Bodies; acknowledges the necessity of such measures; however, underlines that on the spot visits cannot fully be replaced as a means for auditing and supervision; calls, therefore, on DG EAC to increase the number of such visits, taking into account travel conditions and limitations;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls on the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to continue its efforts to help applicants and beneficiaries of programmes in the context of the pandemic;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the 2020 update of DG EAC’s Anti-Fraud Strategy a
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the 2020 update of DG EAC’s Anti-Fraud Strategy and the measures taken to prevent the risk of COVID-19-related fraud, including in the design of the next generation of programmes; underlines that the Parliament will monitor closely the implementation of the Strategy and calls on DG EAC to communicate its progress regularly to the Parliament;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Urges DG EAC, DG CONNECT and the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to take without delay all appropriate measures to improve the protection of personal data wherever needed, to minimise the risks linked to third country data transfers, in order to enable the continuation of international operations in 2021 in full compliance with EU data protection law, and to strengthen staff awareness and knowledge of data protection rules
source: 702.973
2021/12/15
FEMM
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that men and women’s rights and a
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises that the pandemic has exacerbated existing structural gender inequalities and affected women’s employment disproportionally, in particular women working in the informal economy and in precarious working conditions; calls for more gender mainstreaming in the post pandemic recovery response,
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Warns that if funds are placed arbitrarily at the service of parties with certain slanted and sectarian assumptions there is a danger that funding may become subject to ideological conditions, with urgent priority needs neglected;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Strongly stresses the important of adequate resources dedicated to preventing and combating gender-based violence under the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values, especially following the escalation of violence against women during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis; regrets in that direction that the Commission has postponed the publication of the proposal aiming at preventing and combatting specific forms of gender-based violence, expects the Commission to publish this proposal without further delay,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Asks for budget items in the General Budget of the European Union to be based on objective technical criteria with no ideological filtering;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that the Court, in its Special report No 10/21 on gender mainstreaming in the EU budget (the ‘Court’s special report’)1 , found that the Commission has not adequately applied gender mainstreaming, made insufficient use of sex-disaggregated data and indicators, and published little information on the Union budget’s overall impact on gender equality, ; calls on the Commission to implement gender-responsive budgeting to ensure women and men benefit equally from public spending including within Next Generation EU and all the economic recovery measures; __________________ 1
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that the Court, in its Special report No 10/21
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that the Court, in its Special report No 10/21 on gender mainstreaming in the EU budget (the ‘Court’s special report’)1 , found that the Commission has not adequately applied gender mainstreaming, made insufficient use of
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality as enshrined in Article
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the need for the Commission to further develop the methodology and use of gender related objectives and indicators, as recommended by the European Court of Auditors, to track funds spending on gender equality,
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that the gender perspective has to be integrated at all levels of the budgetary process in order to transform revenues and expenditures to achieving gender equality goals;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that gender equality and mainstreaming is one of the horizontal principles for Union funds in the multiannual financial framework for 2021- 2027 and in the Recovery and Resilience Facility and calls for gender impact assessments, gender objectives and gender monitoring to be rolled out as outlined in the Court’s special report, expects the Commission to take its commitments seriously in the future by closely monitoring the implementation of these horizontal principles in all of the EU policy areas and providing thorough gender impact assessments and monitoring of all of its policies and programmes;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the commitment by the Commission to put in place a methodology to measure the relevant expenditure at programme level in the 2021-2027 MFF at the latest by the end of 2022; calls on the Commission to apply the new methodology to all EU funding programmes and for the implementation of gender budgeting in the mid-term review of the current Multiannual Financial Framework;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need to consider the gender dimension of EU spending, to channel resources supporting efforts for addressing gender equality, as through the recovery and resilience plans.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out the importance to consider the potential of all policy areas to contribute towards gender equality; notes in this regard that both the European Parliament’s own-initiative report on the gender dimension in cohesion policy and the “European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 10/2021: Gender mainstreaming in the EU budget: time to turn words into action”, assess the structural funds as a very important resource to support Member States to achieve progress in the field of gender equality.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the rule of law in the Union, and thus protect fundamental rights and equality, via the rule of law conditionality mechanism for access to Union funds
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality as enshrined in Article 8 TFEU is one of the
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that the rule of law conditionality mechanism has been set up to protect EU budget from the risk of frauds and can only be used in cases when there are evident breaches of the rule of law principles which directly affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget or of the financial interests of the Union in a sufficiently direct way; stresses out in this context that it is unacceptable that this mechanism may be politically instrumentalised in order to put pressure on the Member States;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Repeats its concern at the interrelation between the attacks on the rule of law and the backlash on gender equality and women’s rights; calls for this issue to be addressed through the Article 7 procedure against Member States concerned;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Welcomes Commission’s commitment and ongoing work to design a methodology to track spending on gender equality;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Strongly reiterates its demand to increase resources dedicated to preventing and combating gender-based violence under the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values, especially following the escalation of violence against women during the COVID-19 crisis; reiterates its request for the Commission to include an independent budget line for all measures specifically targeting gender equality, including on gender-based violence; calls on the Commission and the Member States to apply effectively the gender mainstreaming horizontal priority in the multiannual financial framework 2021- 2027;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses a need to further increase resources in European Social Fund Plus (EFS+) to allow inclusion in the labour market and adapted training, as the COVID-19 crisis affected women’s employment disproportionally, in particular women working in the informal economy and in precarious working conditions, and in some heavily impacted and highly feminised sectors;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to apply effectively the gender mainstreaming horizontal priority in the multiannual financial framework 2021-2027.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas Parliament has repeatedly
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas Parliament has repeatedly asked the Commission to promote and
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas equality and the Rule of law are founding values of the Union and the European institutions shall aim to promote them according to Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU);
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas women are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly women working in precarious employment, feminised sectors and the informal economy; whereas this should be taken into account in all the economic recovery measures designed to mitigate the negative impact of the pandemic;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that women’s rights and a gender equality perspective should be integrated and ensured in all policy areas, particularly in light of the gendered impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the backlash against women’s rights in several Member States; reiterates, therefore, its call for the implementation of gender budgeting at all stages of the budgetary process, including the implementation of gender budgeting and the assessment of its execution; reiterates its demand to include gender-specific indicators in the common set of result indicators for the implementation of the EU budget;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that women’s rights a
source: 703.040
2022/01/20
LIBE
26 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that for expenditure specifically for Heading III (Security and Citizenship) the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’) chose to examine a sample of 27 transactions designed to contribute to the Court's overall statement of assurance;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes with grave concern that of two AMIF-funded projects audited in Greece, implemented by a non- governmental organisation (NGO), consisting of provision of accommodation and other services (meals, personal hygiene products, leisure activities, counselling, etc) to unaccompanied minors in shelters located in four Greek towns, with the NGO receiving funding based on a standard daily unit cost per accommodated unaccompanied minor, the Court found non-satisfactory documentation of services provided and that the internal rules of the shelters did not include clear indicators for how the NGO was to prove that certain services covered by the standard unit cost (e.g. supervision, organisation of activities, cleaning, meals) had been delivered and were of sufficient quality and that the NGO was therefore not able to demonstrate that it had actually provided these services at an appropriate level; notes another issue namely that young people stayed on in the shelters without proper justification (e.g. schooling or health problems) after reaching adulthood;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Notes that in the Court's examination of the internal control systems of four authorities responsible for auditing their respective Member States' AMIF/ISF annual accounts and providing the Commission with an annual control report (ACR), the Court identified shortcomings in the ACR's relating to sampling units not being clearly defined, audit samples being too small, responsible authorities submitting draft accounts to the audit authority before completing their own on-the-spot controls and before including technical assistance payments, error rates being calculated and presented inaccurately in the body of the ACR's, value and coverage of the audit samples being incorrectly reported and failures to report that some audit work was outsourced; further notes that the Court found shortcomings in the work of audit authorities relating to checks of project selection processes, inadequate testing of the eligibility of expenditure, insufficient audit trails or poor documentation of audit work, ineligible costs that were not always reported, procurement issues wrongly classified and inadequate reviews of outsourced audit work; regrets any shortcomings that make audit conclusions less reliable and that limit the assurance provided by the audit authority's work;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the residual error rate has increased by comparison to the previous year (2,69 % in 2020 as compared to 2,65 % in 2019)for grants under direct management of the Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (DG JUST); notes that the main cause of error is the lack of supporting documents which has even worsened in 2020
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the residual error rate has increased by comparison to the previous year (2,69 % in 2020 as compared to 2,65 % in 2019) for grants under direct management of the Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (DG JUST); notes that the main cause of error is the lack of supporting documents which has even worsened in 2020 by the fact that due to
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the residual error rate
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the residual error rate has
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets that while the Commission did fund circus workshops to integrate lone-arrival migrants by way of grants to the Swedish branch of the NGO Clowns Without Borders from 2017until December 2020, the Commission did not fund physical border barriers as the Commission does not consider physical barriers such as fences to be the most efficient tool to improve border management; calls on the Commission to urgently reassess its stance on the funding of border barriers and the funding of clown shows;1a _________________ 1a https://www.migrationsverket.se/Andra- aktorer/EU-fonder/Beviljade- projekt/Flikar/Asyl/Cirkus-for-hopp-och- styrka.html
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that the Court found five errors in payments made by the Commission; points out that one of the errors concerned a minor overpayment of costs for software licences while the other four related to staff allowances; notes the recommendation from the Court to reinforce consistency checks on staff declarations of allowances received from other sources and raise staff awareness of this issue in order to improve the Commission’s system for managing statutory family allowance;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets the rapid and alarming decline of enforcement activity of the Commission, including in the field of justice and home affairs, as a deliberate policy initiated by the Barroso I Commission and perpetuated by the Von der Leyen Commission1a; calls on the Commission to change its practice and start infringement proceedings against Member States that does not properly implement Union law; _________________ 1aKelemen, R. D. and Pavone, T., Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union (December 27, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a bstract_id=3994918
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that for expenditure specifically for Heading III (Security and Citizenship) the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’) chose to examine a sample of 27 transactions designed to contribute to the Court's overall statement of assurance;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the close cooperation between the Court and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to protect the budget of the Union; notes that in 2020 the Court referred six cases of suspected fraud to OLAF (compared to nine in 2019) and that for all those cases an investigation was opened by OLAF;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls on DG HOME to provide guidance to the Member State authorities responsible for implementing its funds for both the 2014-2020 and 2021-2027 MFFs on how to document the completeness and quality of services when funding is based on standard unit costs;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Welcomes that, following up on recommendations from the Court, DG HOME works together with national authorities and agencies to enhance the operational support by the European Union Agency for Asylum (before 19 January 2022 the European Asylum Support Office) to asylum procedures and to adjust the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s return support to the current situation and needs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Calls on the Commission for enhanced compliance with the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources1a as a matter of compliance with the Union's legal provisions and good governance principle; _________________ 1a OJ L 433I , 22.12.2020, p. 28.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Welcomes the adoption by the Commission of the EU Roma strategic framework for equality, inclusion and participation for 2020-2030, set out in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 7 October 2020(COM(2020)620 final) which answers the Parliament recommendation, contained in its resolution of 17 September 2020 on the implementation of National Roma Integration Strategies: combating negative attitudes towards people with Romani background in Europe1a, to establish a genuine European strategy for Roma inclusion; _________________ 1a EUT C 385 af 22.9.2021, s. 104.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4 d. Welcomes the strong cooperation between the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the Court to combat fraud against the budget; notes that in 2020 six cases of fraud were reported to OLAF by the Court and that OLAF opened investigations in all six cases; notes that the main types of suspected fraud detected by the Court are artificial creation of the necessary conditions for Union financing, declaration of costs not meeting the eligibility criteria, use of grants for purposes other than what is allowed and procurement irregularities;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4 e. Calls on the Commission to fully comply with the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources1a as a matter of compliance with the Union’s legal provisions and good governance principle. _________________ 1a OJ L 433I , 22.12.2020, p. 28.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that for expenditure specifically for Heading III (Security and Citizenship) the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Regrets that under MFF heading 3 (Security and citizenship) only 25,3 % was spent on Migration and security while the most significant area of expenditure under that heading, 40,5 %, was the Emergency Support Instrument (ESI);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the fact that the Court did not find major flaws in the Commission’s clearance procedures regarding the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Internal Security Fund (ISF);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Regrets that for an AMIF-funded project the documentation of services provided to unaccompanied minors in Greece was not always satisfactory; welcomes that DG HOME took steps to improve the referral and reporting system through a centralised approach; calls on the Commission to report to the discharge authority on the progress achieved;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Takes note of the Court's findings for MFF heading 3 (Security and citizenship) and welcomes the recommendation of the Court that the Commission by the end of 2021 carefully check the eligibility of ESI project costs under the Emergency Support Instrument (ESI), submitted by beneficiaries of ESI actions, in particular the regularity of procurement procedures;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the Commission to suspend payments for border control activities until clear guarantees of compliance with fundamental rights are in place as to not repeat the errors in judgement that was seen in the case of Croatia;
source: 704.538
2022/02/08
DEVE
40 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe Instrument coincides with a dramatic
Amendment 10 #
2.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Global Europe Instrument’s spending target of 20% for human development and social inclusion is a minimum target; calls for increasing the fiscal space to protect human development investments and substantially higher expenditure in this area, given the crucial importance of health, education, social protection, nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene for the realisation of human rights, addressing inequalities, with special attention to women and children, and of a life in dignity for all, the devastating impacts of the COVID pandemic and the human rights-based approach laid down in the Global Europe - NDICI regulation, the implementation of which Parliament will scrutinise; notes, however, that with the NDICI, the European Commission has effectively limited the European Parliament’s control and scrutiny role, thereby limiting transparency and accountability;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Global Europe
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Notes that the possibilities of mainstreaming migration policy in EU external policy are significantly broadened by the inclusion of migration in the thematic, geographical and rapid response component and the migration budgetary target of the Global Europe Regulation; notes with concern, however, that through the ‘rapid response’ component, cooperation with third countries on migration management can be funded without the need for the Commission to publish any programming documents or consult civil society actors, and without the involvement of Parliament; insists in this regard on the need to ensure that the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and related financial instruments including Global Europe, is accompanied by a robust human rights framework for the identification, implementation and monitoring of future migration cooperation programmes;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that Parliament resolutions shall help guide Union cooperation and intends to follow the Commission’s application of this; welcomes the success of Team Europe to contribute to positive attitudes concerning joint action; calls on the Commission to extend its ambition for a better coordinated approach to the multilateral system;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that Parliament resolutions shall help guide Union cooperation and intends to follow the Commission’s application of this through regular dialogue and evaluation reports;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges the quality of ECHO’s implementation of humanitarian aid for education, as found by the Court in its Special Report 2/20211
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe Instrument coincides with a
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges the quality of ECHO’s implementation of humanitarian aid for education, as found by the Court in its Special Report 2/20211, and the challenges regarding girls' education; _________________ 1
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the educational difficulties in some sub-Saharan African countries are attributable in particular to the security context, as a result of Islamist terrorism, and to internal displacement, and that European aid must take account of those specific circumstances;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Underlines the crucial importance of promoting and reinforcing the establishment of social protection mechanisms in developing countries;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses th
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that choices of aid modalities should always be based on realistic assessments of the likely efficiency of possible options, supported by evidence; points to the salience of this in the rapidly expanding area of private sector cooperation, where the evidence base is limited and should carefully be broadened and deepened in order to facilitate optimal use of official
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that choices of aid modalities should always be based on realistic assessments of the likely efficiency of possible options, supported by evidence, and on thorough audits concerning possible partners and aid management checks; points to the salience of this in the rapidly expanding area of private sector cooperation
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that choices of aid modalities should always be based on realistic and independent assessments of the likely efficiency of possible options, supported
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Recalls that the Union and the Member States committed under Article 2.1(c) of the Paris Agreement to align both public and private financial flows to a pathway compatible with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C; stresses that this requires a phase out of all direct and indirect fossil fuel subsidies as soon as possible and by 2025 at the very latest;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe Instrument coincides with a dramatic reversal of the progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals and with rapid aggravation of the global climate and biodiversity cris
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Supports the recommendations of the European Court of Auditors in its annual report, in particular that international organisations must grant the Court complete, unlimited and timely access to documents, and not just in read- only format; calls on the Commission to take action on this matter;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Insists that the newly established Geopolitical Dialogue's impacts on programming and budget decisions and that international initiatives of relevance to the EU, e.g. in the framework of the G7 and International Climate Conferences, should be properly discussed and implemented according to existing legislative procedures and with full respect for Parliament's role as one of the two arms of the EU's budgetary authority;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes that at the end of 2020, the Global Europe heading had 29 billion euros of pending payments;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses that, given the shortcomings recently reported on blending and guarantee mechanisms to facilitate optimal use of ODA, contribute to SDGs and the Paris Climate Agreement and to demonstrate development additionality, widening the geographical scope and budget share of blending finance via EFSD+ in NDICI-GE, and through the Global Gateway strategy, making the blending-guarantee mechanism the main financial tool for mobilising investments is premature and unjustified; insists on the importance of the scrutiny of the European Parliament on the implementation of EFSD+, including its deployment through the Global Gateway and urges the Commission to provide all the necessary means to ensure the Global Gateway Strategy is aligned with the programming exercise;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Recalls the importance of rising humanitarian aid efforts and funding given the growing financial gap due to the increasing number of humanitarian crises, partly due to climate change, and that vulnerable people are the ones who suffer more from these crises; calls for more and more specific measures for vulnerable persons, especially for persons with disabilities;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Welcomes the joint coordination of European aid as part of the Team Europe approach and insists that that become the standard method, as it has the potential to address the problem of a lack of visibility of European action and lack of coordination with Member States;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Reiterates its request of 20131a and 20171b and asks the Commission to submit, on the basis of Articles 209 and 210 TFEU, a proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid; _________________ 1a P7_TA(2013)0558 1b P8_TA(2017)0026
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Recalls that the EIB intends to strengthen its role in the implementation of European external policies and development role by creating a dedicated branch (‘EIB Global’) for this purpose, reiterates longstanding EP demands that the European Court of Auditors be empowered to audit all EIB operations, and that these audits be made public;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Stresses that in the upcoming years, Member States shall keep investing in Covid-19 and other vaccines for developing countries, as well as to help improving distribution chains;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe Instrument coincides with a dramatic reversal of the progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals and with rapid aggravation of the global climate crisis; insists that in the implementation of the Global Europe Instrument, maximum efficiency in the response to these incomparably important challenges must be sought; calls on the Commission to increase efforts in climate change mitigation that allows to reduce the impact on vulnerable people;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5 d. Calls for a regular review of partner countries in the light of the development objectives achieved and asks for resolve to end cooperation once these objectives are not met over a longer period of time; calls also on the Commission to inform the European Parliament of the countries and respective sectors in which the EU is the largest donor and whether this is in line with the EU’s geopolitical strategy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe-NDICI Instrument coincides with a dramatic reversal of the progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the replacement of the Development Cooperation Instrument with the Global Europe Instrument coincides with a dramatic reversal of the progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals and with rapid aggravation of the global climate crisis; insists that in the implementation of the Global Europe Instrument, maximum efficiency and effectiveness in the response to these incomparably important challenges must be sought;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses, furthermore, that European development aid objectives must be laid down in close cooperation with recipient countries and that job- creating sectors should be targeted; calls in this connection for lessons to be learned from the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 14/2020 of 8 September 20201 a; _________________ 1a https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocI tem.aspx?did=54267
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls the need to define a strategy for “building back better and greener” to link the COVID-19 response to the ecological transformation required by the Green Deal;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls th
source: 704.891
2022/03/04
CONT
278 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Highlights the importance of the Union budget for achieving Union’s political priorities, as well as its role to assisting Member States in unforeseen situations as COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences; stresses that sound and timely implementation of the budget contributes to addressing more efficiently and effectively the needs and challenges in different policy areas; warns that the implementation of the budget under time pressure may lead to increase in errors and irregularities;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Re
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Underlines that it is important that the Commission continues to draw lessons from the performance of the programmes also after the end of the MFF period because some results and impacts may only be evident several years after the end of the MFF period especially for programmes with large amounts of outstanding commitments and include these observations and conclusions in its reports to be shared with the discharge authority;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38 a. Takes note that the Court in this years Annual report reviewed the Commission’s reporting on financial corrections and recoveries and is worried that it found it to be complex and not always clear; call on the commission to make sure that its reporting give a clear idea of the amount of irregular expenditure corrected and returned to the EU budget;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Reiterates its concerns about the Court’s assessment that the monitoring data from Member States, on which the Commission AMPR and the programmes statements are based, is not fully reliable; regrets in particular the Court’s reiterated evaluation on the AMPR in the Cohesion areas, because of shortcomings of the audit authorities work and the issues identified regarding the residual error rates reported in the DG EMPL and DG REGIO AARs;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 b (new) 39 b. Takes note of the Commission’s statement that it is not required to align its methodology to the one used by the Court, but regrets that it leads to very different figures, in particular in the Competitiveness area, where the Commission’s estimate of the risk at payment for this MFF heading is even below the ECA range for the estimated level of error; calls on the Commission to step out from a strictly legal requirement and seriously engage in a reflection process on its methodology to make sure that the Court and Commission figures may be more comparable;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Underlines its strong and repeated requests to ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit; urges the Commission to establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40a. Calls on the Commission to stop unjustifiably withholding approval of National Recovery Plans and disbursement of the related funds;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Notes with great concern that the Court found that in 2020, the Commission closed its verification cycle in respect of GNI data for own resources from the year 2010, a 10 year gap; highlights that as a result of the verification cycle closure, the Commission set a large number of GNI reservations in respect of specific compilation procedures in the Member States that called for improvement; remarks that this significantly increases budgetary uncertainty in the national budgets in relation to the GNI-based contribution; is concerned by the Court finding that the impact of globalisation on GNI is not properly addressed and the EU revenue could be affected as a result;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 – point e e. take action in the fight against fraud in e-commerce and VAT collection, particularly by making use of the additional benefits of digital means available for tracking invoices and VAT payments;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 – point f f. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Underlines the relevance of the reporting on the performance of the Union budget’s programmes for the discharge procedure; draws attention that the added value of the invested resources is closely linked to the achieved results and their contribution to improving the daily life of European citizens;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Notes that the MFF subheading 1a
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49 a. Recognizes that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have to be at the heart of any considerations concerning the competitiveness for growth and jobs, as SMEs provide for 6 out of 10 jobs, 8 out of 10 apprenticeships in some Member States, and are responsible for close to 60% of the added value created in the European Union;
Amendment 112 #
52. Notes with concern that personnel costs continue to constitute the principal source of error, notably in research expenditure; regrets that the rules for declaring personnel costs under H2020 remain complex, despite simplification efforts; welcomes a number of simplifications specifically targeting SMEs under Horizon 2020, such as a single flat rate for indirect costs, including personnel costs;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) 52 a. Notes that beneficiaries can only claim personnel costs for tasks carried out by a natural person working under a direct contract, while costs for subcontracted tasks are not eligible; notes the Court’s observation that SMEs, who do not have enough own staff, are particularly error-prone to claiming the costs of external consultant’s services or freelancers as personnel costs;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 b (new) 52 b. Notes that the Commission has reinforced its information campaign targeting error-prone beneficiaries, such as SMEs and first-time applicants with limited experience and resources for the application process; notes that the Commission held six webinars in 2020 reaching around 7500 direct participants; is of the opinion that the Commission can further extend its information activities; underlines the importance of providing information to potential applicants in their native language, particularly on complex rules such as personnel costs and subcontracting costs;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53. Draws attention to the fact that around 20 % of ex-post audits of the entire H2020 family are carried out by DG RTD’s Common Audit Service (CAS), and 80 % on its behalf by private audit firms; notes with concern that the Court found that sampling at the level of the cost statements audited was not always in line with established procedures, highlights that despite the improvements introduced by the Commission, the representative error rate is potentially understated; expresses concerns that weaknesses in the ex post audits by the CAS still persist;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53 a. Regrets that the level of excellence in research continues to differ significantly across Member States; notes that studies have recommended to encourage researchers, experts and other national actors from institutions of lower levels of excellence to participate actively in joint research teams including researchers and institutions with the highest level of excellence; is aware that the main responsibility lies with the Member States and their investment in education, but underlines that the Commission can contribute to spreading excellence; welcomes the increased budget for widening activities for Horizon Europe;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 a (new) 55 a. Regrets that when reviewing the information in the Commission’s 2020 AMPR regarding the estimated risk at payment in the policy area under MFF1a, the Court evaluates the rate as a whole being below its range of estimated level of error;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 b (new) 55 b. Highlights the risk of the use of Horizon 2020 to fund entities complicit in illegal settlements, including funds to companies listed in the UN database of companies complicit in Israel’s illegal settlement enterprise; reminds that the EU "Guidelines on the eligibility of Israeli entities and their activities in the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967 for grants, prizes and financial instruments funded by the EU from 2014 onwards" state their aim is "to ensure the respect of EU positions and commitments in conformity with international law on the non-recognition by the EU of Israel’s sovereignty over the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967"; asks the Commission to carefully monitor for, and rectify project management transgressions, in particular in relation to the BOUNCE and GEO-CRADLE projects;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 56 a (new) 56 a. Is puzzled about the fact that the budget of the Erasmus+ has not been revised immediately by the Commission for the year 2020 during first and second lockdown in Europe and the closure of the borders; reminds that in 2020, 6 academic semesters out of 10 were handled in remote regime and under the prohibition of travel (an initial analysis by DG EAC of the numbers of individual mobility activities shows that there were some 500 000 fewer in 2020 compared with the 2016-2019 average, a reduction of around 60 %);
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Welcomes the Court’s assessment that the scale and scope of Erasmus+ created added value and that its efficiency has been improved by its simplification compared to predecessor programmes; notes
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 a (new) 58 a. Notes with concern that women researchers are underrepresented in Horizon 2020 being only 36% (28% in projects from the European Research Council (ERC), 42 % in Marie- Sklodovska Curie grants and 31%in the other parts of the Programme);
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 b (new) 58 b. Appreciates that the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Horizon 2020-funded researcher, being the 10th one funded by this programme to be honoured with a Nobel Prize to date;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 c (new) 58 c. Notes that in 2020 1 173 projects were funded through the ERC programme in Horizon 2020 and 1 255 Principal Investigators received funding; notes as well that currently among the hosting institutions there are institutions from 25 Member States and among the Principal Investigators there are nationals of 23 Member States; notes further that since 2014 the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions has supported the mobility and training of around 69 000 researchers thus exceeding its target of 65 000 researchers;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 d (new) 58 d. Is concerned by the findings of the UN Human Rights Office’s report from 12 February 2020 on business enterprises involved uncertain activities related to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory which raise particular human rights violations concerns; notes with concern that some of the identified 112 business entities, in cases of which the UN Human Rights Office has reasonable grounds to conclude that have been involved in one or more of the specific activities referenced in Human Rights Council resolution 31/36 have received EU funding through the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe programmes; calls on the Commission, especially with regard to the UN Human Rights Office’s report from 12 February 2020, to report to the discharge authority how it verifies and what is the outcome of its verification of EU support from the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe programmes to entities’ potential activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and/or the possible exploitation of Horizon project results for the building, expansion, development or management of the Israeli settlements;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point a a (new) a a. equip and assess Horizon Europe and its pillars, IPCEIs and other funding instruments and projects also in relation with job creation, ensuring synergies with the national recovery plans in order to reflect the reality of life and perspectives of SMEs and entrepreneurs; promote research and development, skills and competences for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as a growth strategy for jobs in European high-tech technologies such as li-ion batteries, fuel cells, wind energy, electric traction motors, photovoltaic technology, robotics, drones, 3D printing and a broad range of digital technologies;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point d a (new) d a. develop a digital compendium for European SMEs and mid-cap companies for regulatory information on jobs and growth opportunities support within the MFF and RRF framework similar to the Access2Markets Trade Assistant;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point g g. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h h. manage expectations by setting realistic and achievable objectives and targets;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h a (new) h a. ensure that sufficient resources are available for Horizon Europe in order to launch new Union partnerships in areas such as clean hydrogen, batteries, clean aviation, rail, connected and automated mobility, zero-emission road and waterborne transport, in particular for the Work Programme 2021-2022; stresses the need to support projects that contribute, in particular, to a future- proof, sustainable, smart and climate- friendly European transport network;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h b (new) h b. create a new budgetary line for tourism, to support the recovery of a sector severely hit by the COVID-19crisis, making it resilient for the future, digitalised and sustainable;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h c (new) h c. propose new result-oriented mechanism including short, mid and long-term planning and technical assistance, to increase the added value of European Funds and to ensure that Member States meet the 2030 and 2050 completion targets, respectively for the core and comprehensive TEN-T networks;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h d (new) h d. continue its action on the grouped purchase of vaccines to protect against COVID-19 which allows savings and develops the Union's sovereign autonomy in the field of health and which can be extended to other areas such as energy, semiconductor or rare earth elements;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h e (new) h e. implement its commitment to gender equality in the Horizon Europe and to report to the Parliament about the proportion of the male and female researchers participating;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h f (new) h f. encourage better geographical balance and participation of more researchers from underrepresented Member States;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h a (new) Ha. Calls on the Commission to encourage the UK to rejoin the Erasmus programme; calls also for the development of student and scientific exchanges for the Eastern Partnership countries, particularly Ukraine;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – point h a (new) h a. Further increase its widening activities to improve access to excellence throughout the EU and report back to the discharge authority;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 60. Notes that MFF sub-heading 1b 'Economic, social and territorial cohesion' accounts for 34,3 % or EUR 59,5 billion of the Union budget: of this amount, EUR 32,4 billion (54,5 %) is spent on the
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 a (new) 60 a. Recalls the important role of the spending under MFF heading 1b "economic, social and territorial cohesion", which focuses on reducing development disparities between the different Member States and regions of the Union and strengthening all regions’ competitiveness;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its deep concerns regarding the situation concerning the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is deeply worrying in its own right and may ultimately lead to serious losses for the Union budget and underlines its
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 62 a (new) 62 a. Notes with concern the data presented in the Single Market Scoreboard for 2020 on public procurement, which shows that the proportion of contracts awarded with just a single bidder is particularly alarming: 19 Member States reached or exceeded the threshold of 20% and six Member States (Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia) had a level of 39-51%; notes that the proportion of procurement contracts negotiated with a company without any call for bids reached or exceeded the threshold of 10% in 8Member States with four (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Romania, Slovenia) reaching levels of 22-29%; notes that the proportion of contracts awarded after a call for tender whose name and condition were no clear was above the threshold of 3% in ten Member States with levels between 8-9% in four Member States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Malta and Slovenia);
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 62 b (new) 62 b. Is deeply concerned by these observations as they indicate severe and systemic weaknesses in the public procurement procedures in several Member States, which likely also impact the management and spending of EU funds; notes in this regard the Court’s observation on an early preventive system audit on the management verifications of public procurement in Hungary, which resulted in a 10% flat-rate correction to all contracts affected covering a period of four years amounting to around 770 mio. EUR;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 62 a (new) 62 a. Is concerned that 72% of errors result from ineligible projects and costs and 27% from infringements of internal market rules (in particular non- compliance with state aid rules); notes that five projects infringed the EU's state aid rules; takes note that the Court is of the opinion that two projects should have obtained no public funding from the EU and/or the Member State; highlights that these projects accounted for 1.0 percentage points of the estimated level of error;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Expresses its concern that the number and impact of the errors detected demonstrate that the controls in place do not yet sufficiently mitigate the high inherent risk of error in this area; is concerned that this concerns, in particular, managing authorities whose verifications are
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Expresses its strong concern that the number and impact of the errors detected demonstrate that the controls in place do not yet sufficiently mitigate the high inherent risk of error in this area; is concerned that this concerns, in particular, managing authorities whose verifications are ineffective in preventing or detecting irregularities in expenditure declared by beneficiaries; notes with concern that the Court also considers that other errors are the result of decisions taken by managing authorities themselves;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Notes
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 a (new) 66 a. Reiterates its deep disapproval of the practice in some Member States to systematically overbook programmes and shift problematic or illegal projects over into the national budget after the Commission or OLAF have detected irregularities or misuse; condemns that the national tax payers are left with the burden of paying for project that suffer from conflicts of interest, fraud or other shortcomings;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 69. Underlines th
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 a (new) 69 a. Welcomes the contribution of cohesion policy to provide emergency support to Member States throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing for a rapid redirection of the available 2014-2020 funding towards the most severely affected sectors while proposing considerable simplifications such as: extension of deadlines, accelerated payments and retroactive reimbursement of COVID-19 related expenditure and the use of the temporary increase of the EU co-financing rate to 100%; notes, in this regard, that flexibility and speed did not lead to increased risks for the EU budget and contributed to performance;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 70. Takes note that the Court, in its Special Report 26/2021' Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy: Commission discloses annually a minimum estimated level of error that is not final' found that the new legal provisions for the programming period 2021-2027 address some limitations in the acceptance of accounts; regrets that nevertheless, the Court found that some risks remain at the time of releasing the payment retention;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its deep concerns regarding the situation concerning the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is deeply worrying in its own right and
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 71. Notes
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 72.
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 a (new) 72 a. Is deeply concerned by reports about severe and systematic corruption and misuse of EU cohesion funds in the ITI Danube Delta instrument in Romania worth 1.1 bn EUR coming from 8 Romanian programmes; notes that these funds are earmarked for poverty reduction, nature conservation and environmental protection projects in Romania along the Danube Delta, financed by 5 different European Structural and Investment Funds; notes that the allegations of irregularities are concentrated in one programme, the Regional operational programme, concerning 3 calls for projects under one priority axis supporting mostly SMEs and micro-enterprises amounting to 104 mio. EUR funding 347 projects; notes that in May 2021 OLAF opened an investigation related to allegations of fraud and other irregularities into a specific project financed by the ITI Danube Delta in Romania;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 b (new) 72 b. Is concerned by media revelations that one Romanian national authority was corrupted and contributed to the authorisation of projects with politicians in a conflict of interest who were not residing at the Danube delta;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 c (new) 72 c. Notes that following media reports on severe allegations of fraud, conflicts of interest and embezzlement, the Commission has issued in June 2021 an interruption of payments, blocking any EU reimbursement to the 347 risky projects pending the results of the verifications by the Romanian authorities; notes that the Romanian authorities selected 73 projects for verification leading to 35 of these projects being notified to the national anti-fraud body or prosecutor office for further investigation due to fraud suspicions; notes that the Romanian managing authorities carried out checks on additional 22 operations to verify their regularity and whether they contribute to the development of the Danube region, resulting in one additional potential irregularity being identified;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 d (new) 72 d. Notes that the Commission agreed with the Romanian authorities that the managing authority provides the results of its verifications to the Audit Authority for an independent review on the adequacy of the risk-assessment method to select operations to be reviewed and checks carried out, and for confirmation of the results; notes that these conclusions will feed into the preparation of the targeted audit that the Commission plans to also carry out at the beginning of 2022 to verify on the spot the effectiveness of the actions undertaken by the Romanian authorities; urges the Commission to keep the discharge authority informed about any new developments and particularly about any financial corrections;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 e (new) 72 e. Is concerned that once more the information on such severe allegations was revealed by journalists and not a Commission audit; recalls that the journalists pointed out that severe weaknesses and loopholes exist in the Romanian laws against conflicts of interest; underlines that these laws urgently need to be brought in line with the requirements of the EU financial regulation; recalls that clear and unambiguous legislation against conflicts of interest at national level is an important precondition for the prevention,detection and fight against misuse, corruption and fraud;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 73. Regrets that, as indicated in the special report 10/2021 of the European
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 74 a (new) 74 a. Reminds that the ESF/YEI/Multi- Fund amounted to 88 billion EUR in the 2014-2020 programming period, however, according to the European Parliament study1a, sophisticated methods, such as counterfactual analysis, theory-based approaches and cost-benefit analysis were rarely used in the assessment of the intervention outcomes and results pursued with the ressources of this multi- fund; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/STUD/2020/629219/IPOL_STU(20 20)629219_EN.pdf
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 77.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its deep concerns regarding the situation concerning the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is deeply worrying in its own right and
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 a (new) 77 a. Notes with appreciation that by the end of 2020 45.4 million participants were supported by the ESF and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) and 5.4 million people found a job (including self- employed) under both programmes as reported by the Commission;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 b (new) Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 c (new) 77 c. Welcomes the impact of the temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) as reported by the Commission in its second report; notes that SURE has been successful in cushioning the severe socio-economic impact resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic; notes that in 2020 SURE supported approximately 31million people in the 19 beneficiary Member States, of which 22.5 million are employees and 8.5 million self-employed, as well as that around 2.5 million firms affected by the COVID-19 pandemic have benefitted from SURE, allowing them to retain workers;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 d (new) 77 d. Welcomes the increase in implementation of the financial instruments under all ESI funds in 2020 leading to EUR 10.3billion cumulative payments to final recipients (EUR 4.7 billion in 2019);
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 a (new) 77 a. Notes that the construction of the Peljesac Bridge in Croatia with cohesions funds was completed by a Chinese state- owned company, which may have benefited from support from the Chinese government and lower and inadequate labour-standards which would imply a competitive advantage vis-a-vis European companies bidding for the same call; is of the opinion that the Commission as Guardian of the Treaties must ensure a level playing field between European and third-state companies in public calls and tenders; is therefore of the opinion that strong provisions on European-level standards of social and labour rights should feature in calls for public procurement and construction;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 b (new) 77 b. Is concerned about reports that the Hungarian government intended to nationalize the "Ferenc Liszt" airport near Budapest and declared its intention to use EU cohesion funds to develop infrastructure to decrease the value of the airport with the aim of lowering the cost of its expropriation, harming its current owners; is deeply concerned by the insecurity such threats constitute for international investors; recalls that EU cohesion funds were used to co-finance the airport, which would benefit oligarchic structures in case of a forced or involuntary sale of the airport; notes that the government has imposed the airport operator with extremely bureaucratic obstacles and additional requirements; is astonished by inferior purchase offers concerning the airport by oligarchs from the direct and close environment of the Prime Minister;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 a (new) 77 a. Is concerned that the price hike in construction and raw materials change the total budget for many projects and could lead to under budgeting, missed milestones, impossible implementations and therefore undermines the TEN-T core network completion;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point -a (new) -a. provide an error rate at payments and not a residual error rate in order to improve the evaluation of the scrutiny undertaken;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point -a a (new) -a a. continue its cooperation with the Court in order to further align audit methodologies and interpretation of legal texts;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point c c. make the use of IT tools such as EDES
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its deep concerns regarding the situation concerning the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is deeply worrying in its own right and may ultimately lead to serious losses for the Union budget and underlines its requests to the Commission to use all available tools to limit the risk of such losses. This should include the immediate and full application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point c c. make the use of IT tools such as EDES or Arachne systematic and mandatory for all Union funds including shared management and ensure better use of new technology in order to increase controls and protect the Union budget against fraud and misuses of funds;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point d d. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point e e. ensure that the Member States take into account and promote the implementation of the partnership principle and of gender equality throughout the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of all programmes as laid down in Regulation (EU) 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) 2021/1060;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point h h.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point h h.
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point j a (new) j a. start presenting Key Performance Indicators (KPI) in its’ AARs based on the Social Progress Index (SPI), as the return of Cohesion funds has to be measured through social and environmental outcomes and not purely economic ones;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point k k. simplify rules and procedures, encourage Member States to develop compulsory training sessions and practical information for applicants, in particular new applicants, and improve the assistance and guidelines for SMEs, spin-
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point k a (new) k a. pay increased attention, and allocate increased technical support, to Member States, whose management and control systems are only partially reliable, or not reliable, where there is an increased risk of fraud and corruption related to funds
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point l Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point l l. ensure that sufficient resources are available for Horizon Europe in order to launch new Union partnerships in areas such as clean hydrogen, batteries, clean aviation, rail, connected and automated mobility, zero-emission road and waterborne transport, in particular for the Work Programme 2021-2022 and welcomes the progress of Horizon Europe in this sense; stresses the need to support projects that contribute, in particular, to a future-proof, sustainable, smart and climate-friendly European transport network;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses that in its resolution on the Commission’s 2020 Rule of Law Report the Parliament already called on the Commission to take immediate action under the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget(Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation) and to make full use of its existing investigation tools without further delay in order to address rule of law deficiencies in Member States that affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget; notes with deep concern that despite the recent ruling of the Court of Justice which confirmed the full validity of Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, and numerous calls of the Parliament, the Commission did not yet apply the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation; stresses that not applying this conditionality mechanism goes against the letter and spirit of the Regulation upon which the Commission is bound to act; is of the opinion that the by not implementing the Rule of Law conditionality mechanism the Commission fails to perform its duty as Guardian of the Treaties which constitutes a basis strong enough to postpone the Commission’s discharge;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point l a (new) l a. calls for further actions to create incentives and intensify investments in railway and inland waterway transport and its harmonisation and standardisation to achieve more competitive, climate-resilient and affordable transport system of the future; notes that such initiative will improve the monitoring of the spending in transport investments, enhance the implementation of funds and reduce potential error rates;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point m Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point m a (new) m a. continue its work on the Decent Work Worldwide strategy for a global just transition and sustainable recovery, making Europe a responsible global player in post-pandemic period;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point n Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point n a (new) Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point n b (new) n b. calls on the co-legislators to adopt the European Cross-Border Mechanism (ECBM) in order to tackle red tape in the next implementation period; recalls that the ECBM proposal would facilitate the implementation significantly and will reduce the risks of errors; calls, in this regard, on the Council to unblock the file as soon as possible; underlines that analyses and studies clearly show the negative consequences of not adopting the ECBM regulation; notes that the ECBM has the potential of increasing efficiency in transport services planning as diverging priorities and procedures of Member States impact the pace of implementation of cross-border transport projects;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point o Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 – point o a (new) o a. provide guidance and controls that adequate minimum-standards of social and labour rights are requirements in calls for public procurement and particularly construction tenders to avoid a competitive disadvantage of European firms compared to third-state bidders; calls on the Commission to ensure that only companies from third countries that allow EU companies to participate in their public calls and tenders to participate in European public calls and tenders to ensure a level-playing field and equal access among EU and third-state companies;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Notes that the MFF heading 2
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 83 83. Acknowledges that DG AGRI has calculated the risk at payment to be around 1,9% for CAP spending as a whole in 2020; notes with concern that the Court estimates the level of error at 2%, which represents an increase of 0,1% compared to 2019; regrets that the level of error in spending on ‘Natural resources’ is close to materiality;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes that based on Article 22 of the Recovery and Resilience Facility Regulation the Member States are responsible to ensure the protection of the financial interests of the Union; notes that the Commission plays an important role in ensuring that national audit systems provide for credible, reliable and relevant information; stresses that the Member States and the Commission's administrative capacities need to be scaled up to ensure sound financial management; notes that the Commission is responsible to provide technical assistance and advisory services to improve the respective administrative capacities in the Member States; calls on the Commission to provide the discharge authority with an overview of the specific measures that have been taken to ensure an appropriate staffing in the Commission and the Member States;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 84 a (new) 84 a. Strongly regrets the fact that the Commission’s failure to gather reliable data on final CAP funds beneficiaries leaves many unresolved cases for recovery of funds by Member States; notes with concern that the use of reporting and monitoring tools, such as ARACHNE, is only being used optionally;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 85. Welcomes that the Commission has committed to providing support to the Member States in developing the new approach with regard to checks by monitoring; notes that Since 2018, Member State paying agencies may perform these kind of checks
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 a (new) 85 a. Regrets the recurrent weaknesses identified by the Court on the risk at payment affecting the spending on ‘Natural Resources", related to the Members States’ controls, reflected in their control statistics;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 b (new) 85 b. Reminds the weakness identified by the Court on the CAP anti-fraud policies and procedures both by the Commission and the Member States; recalls the recommendation to the Commission in last year Annual report and takes note that DEG AGRI updated its Anti-Fraud strategy in 2020; awaits for the Court Special Report on CAP and anti-fraud measures delayed to the 2 quarter of 2022, for a in depth analysis of the current situation;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 a (new) 85 a. Notes with concern 29 OLAF cases concerning structural and agricultural funds in Bulgaria; is concerned by the findings of the study on the impact of organised crime on the EU’s financial interests that most violations in Bulgaria have been identified in the area of agricultural funding, especially in the area of subsidies for agricultural crops, as well as the construction of “fake” guest houses that are in fact used as private homes; is aware that the issue of EU co- financed “fake” guest houses is not limited to Bulgaria as similar issues were identified also in Slovakia and Czechia; notes that the Commission is monitoring the situation and expects the Commission to take swift and decisive action against this kind of subsidy fraud;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 88 a (new) Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 90 a (new) 90 a. Takes note that by the end of 2020 ESI funds supported over 2 million projects in the agricultural sector and rural areas and contributed to maintaining 31 500jobs and creating 4 000 new jobs in the maritime and fisheries sector; notes, in addition, that more than 54 000 new jobs have been created through projects supported by the rural development programs and that 131 000 young farmers benefited from the business start up support;
Amendment 197 #
90a. Expresses regret that the Commission has imposed on the Member States very ambitious reduction targets for CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, when most of the buildings managed by the Commission and other EU institutions are not zero-emission; calls, therefore, on the Commission to lead by example and help in the fight against CO2 emissions by installing photovoltaic collectors on all buildings;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point a a. simplify rules and procedures, encourages member States to develop compulsory training sessions and practical information for applicants, in particular new applicants, and improve the assistance and guidelines for young farmers, SMEs, spin-
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point b b.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the Commission to promptly use the means at its disposal, such as the use of suspension instruments; in this regard points to the fact that the Commission never applied Common Provisions Regulation’s provision to suspend funds in case of serious deficiencies in the functioning of control and management system in Hungary or Czech Republic where confirmed serious deficiencies in management and control systems exist, still, the Commission only threatened to interrupt payments;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point c c.
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point c c. make the use of the IT tools, Arachne
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point d d. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 91 – point k a (new) k a. Increase CAP efficiency by concentrating its support to active farmers whose main activity is farming;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 92 92. Notes that the MFF heading 3 ‘Security and citizenship’ accounts for 3,7% or EUR 6,3 billion of the Union budget: of this amount EUR 2,6 billion (40,5 %) is spent on instrument for
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 94 94. Is concerned that the European Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 10/21 found that the Commission has not adequately applied gender mainstreaming in the Union Budget;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 97 97.
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 97 a (new) 97 a. Regrets that the limited sample of 27 transactions for 2020 made impossible for the Court to compare its audit results with the information reported by the DG HOME and DG CONNECT on the regularity of spending; invites the court to extend its sample and made it more representative of this spending area, in order to have a deeper evaluation of this heading;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 99 99. Notes with concern that the Court found marked differences in the implementation of national programmes and that there are gaps in ISF-Borders and Visa’s performance information;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 99 99. Notes with concern that the Court found marked differences in the implementation of national programmes and that there are gaps in ISF-Borders and
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Underlines that the fact that the Commission, after repeated demands from the Parliament to do so, still cannot present a list of the biggest recipients of Union funds under shared management, presents a major obstacle to both the assessment of EU expenditure related risks as well as the overall transparency of its spending; finds the answers and explanations on this issue offered to the Parliament by the Commission as inadequate and the Commission’s efforts to establish such a database inefficient and un-successful;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 99 a (new) 99 a. Welcomes the success under the effective integration and legal migration’ strand of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and notes with appreciation that the target of 2.6 million persons for the 2014-2020 period have been considerably surpassed as almost 6 million persons in the target group have received integration assistance;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 99 a (new) 99 a. Underlines that particularly in the area of security and citizenship, NGOs are important and valuable implementing partners of the Commission; notes that funds may be paid out to umbrella organisations that distribute and pass on the funding to member organisations or partner NGOs on the ground; is concerned that the Commission only has a limited overview the final recipients of the funding; is deeply concerned that EU funds may unintentionally end up benefitting organisations that incite terrorism or extremism; is of the opinion that rules are needed for umbrella organisations that pass on EU-funding to their member organisations or partner NGOs that are similar to the provisions on the transparency of final beneficiaries, beneficial owners and sub-contractors as agreed in the Annex XVII of the new Common Provisions Regulation;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 99 a (new) 99 a. Notes with concern the continued failure of use of Union funds by civil servants in third entities, including PEGASE, to revise educational materials to draft and teach lessons promoting peace, tolerance, and coexistence in accordance with UNESCO standards; Insists to comply with the Union’s strategy for combatting antisemitism in textbooks in partner countries; detests that positive changes to textbooks have not been sufficiently made which further threaten the goal of a future Two State Solution; reiterates previously expressed concerns in EP decisions on the discharge procedures of 2019,2018and 2016 and the Commission’s assessment of the Georg Eckert Institute report on remaining problematic content;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point a a (new) a a. Issue a clear legal guidance to ensure transparent, accurate and complete information provided by the Member States on border management; recalls the need to set out binding rules and issue more guidance on the border management IT systems to ensure fast and effective border management; report in regular intervals to the discharge authority about improvements in terms of up-to-date data-quality and sufficient training in each of the respective Member States;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point e a (new) e a. demand the immediate halting and removal of the enduring use and teaching of educational materials that promote antisemitism and incite to hatred or violence from textbooks drafted by EU funded civil servants in third entities including PEGASE; take appropriate measures to remove eligibility of EU funded civil servants who fail to do so; act in accordance with the Union’s strategy for combatting antisemitism in textbooks in partner countries; ensure that no funds are allocated or linked to directly or indirectly to use of textbooks that do not comply with UNESCO standards of peace and tolerance; insists that positive changes to textbooks have not been sufficiently made which further threaten the goal of a future Two State Solution as previously reiterated by the Commission and EP decisions on the discharge procedures of 2019,2018and 2016;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point f f. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point f a (new) f a. propose rules on the transparency of umbrella organisations or partner NGOs that pass on EU-funding to their member organisations that are similar to the provisions concerning final beneficiaries, beneficial owners and sub- contractors in Annex XVII of the Common Provisions Regulation;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point k k. implement measures to ensure complementarity and better coordination between AMIF and EASO/Frontex
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point k k. implement measures to ensure complementarity and better coordination between AMIF and EASO/Frontex (e.g.
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 – point l Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. Regards the long lasting dispute on the Conflict of Interests between the Commission and Czech ex -Prime Minister Babis as in-efficient and unduly long; reiterates that no decisive action on Prime Minister Babis’ conflict of interest was taken and that the fact that in the end, the elections ended the his conflict of interests, doesn’t shy a positive picture on the Commission; points to the fact that Prime Minister Babis has meanwhile negotiated the MFF and Recovery Fund on behalf of the Czech Republic;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 a (new) 100 a. Immediately freeze and place part of the Union funds in a reserve in the event that an irregularity is discovered by the EU with regard to any eligible entity, affiliate and/or natural person being linked to any cause or form of terrorismand/or religious and political radicalization, and only release these Unionfunds from the reserve when sufficient evidence has been gathered by the EU to ensure compliance with EU regulations;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 b (new) 100 b. Provide increased disclosure and transparency on any investigations it or its entities like the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF)conducts following irregularities with regard to Union funding, in particular when such investigation concerns Union funding being linked to any cause or form of terrorism and/or religious and political radicalization;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 103 103.
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 103 a (new) 103 a. Notes with concern the long continuing drafting and teaching of antisemitic and violent learning materials by EU funded Palestinian education civil servants; Reiterates previously expressed concerns in EP decisions on the Commission discharges of 2019 and 2018; Welcomes the Commission’s assessment on the findings of the EU study on Palestinian textbooks used in 2020 that “the study does reveal the existence of very deeply problematic content that remains of serious concern”; insists that positive changes to textbooks have not been made, which highlights a continued failure to revise problematic lessons and the urgent need for curriculum reform; notes that textbooks published in September for 2021-22 remains identical or even worse in terms of problematic content, compared to previous versions; Insists that the Union acts in line with its strategy for combatting Antisemitism in textbooks in partner countries; condemns that the Palestinian Education Ministry keeps introducing new teaching materials containing antisemitism, hate speech and incitement to violence;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 103 a (new) Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 106. Notes with great concern that most indicators are either not on track or their progress is unclear; underlines that the sector approach was a strategic choice in order to improve IPA II’s performance; regrets that it could not be applied consistently; regrets that indirect management by beneficiary countries sometimes had an adverse effect on operational efficiency;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 a (new) 106 a. Is alarmed by doubling of the budgetary support to other countries from 824 million EUR in 2019 to 1.7 billion EUR in 2020; reminds that the budgetary support is financed from the general EU budget and the ECA audit cannot trace what happens beyond the moment the Commission pays aid to the recipient country, since these funds then merge with that country’s own budget resources;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 b (new) Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 107. Welcomes that IPA II has responded flexibly to help mitigate crises; notes with concern that there are some gaps in IPA II’s performance information;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 a (new) 107 a. Deplores the ongoing distribution and use of problematic and hateful school material to Palestinian pupils; reiterates its concern that hate speech and violence taught in Palestinian school textbooks and explicitly in the newly created study cards is unacceptable; reiterates its position that all textbooks and materials used in schools supported by Union funds must be in line with UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence, and non- violence; requests that all school material, which is not in compliance with these standards shall be removed immediately and requests the Commission to closely collaborate with the Palestinian Authority (PA) and relevant experts to modify the curriculum expeditiously; asks the Commission to redirect funding intended for the PA to finance actions to adapt and rewrite the textbooks;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 a (new) 107 a. Reiterates its urgent call on the Commission to re-establish relations with International Management Group (IMG) and to resume the cooperation with this organisation by contracting it, as the Commission has done for more than EUR 100 million for 20 years until 2014, using the specific provisions of the Financial Regulation which allow the signature of direct contracts with any technically qualified contractor, irrespective of the legal nature of its legal status, in all countries in crisis situations;
Amendment 231 #
107 a. Recalls that development and cooperation policy are meant to eradicate poverty and reduce inequality and that funds should reach only their intended beneficiaries;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 b (new) 107 b. Insists on the importance of the European Parliament’s active participation in the development of partnership and cooperation agreements with third countries; stresses that future partnership agreements should be subject to parliamentary scrutiny and based on the principles of solidarity, shared responsibility, respect for human rights, the rule of law and international humanitarian law;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 c (new) Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point d d. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point e a (new) e a. reintroduce reservations for all areas found to have a high level of risk, regardless of their share of total expenditure and their financial impact;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point e b (new) e b. provide an enhanced Parliament scrutiny when developing new partnership agreements with third countries, which should always be based on the principles of solidarity, shared responsibility, respect for human rights, the rule of law and international humanitarian law;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point f f. encourages the further development of balanced trade agreements and to remain attentive to investments made by foreign powers
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point f f. encourages the further development of balanced trade agreements and to remain attentive to investments made by foreign powers such as China
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point h a (new) h a. step up its engagement with the Palestinian Authority (PA), with the aim of ensuring additional curriculum reform to address the highly problematic issues identified in school material in the shortest possible time frame; insists that all EU funding must be made conditional on educational material and course content complies with UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence, and non-violence; suggest the Commission to partly withhold funding to the PA, the reserve should only be released if substantive positive changes are made in the PA curriculum - should there be no change, appropriations in the reserve shall be used for funding Palestinian entities with a proven track record of promoting educational initiatives fostering tolerance and coexistence and respect towards the Jewish-Israeli "other";
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned that the amount of outstanding commitments (RAL) at the end of 2020 reached a new record high of EUR 303,2 billion; acknowledges that a certain level of outstanding commitments is a natural consequence of the Union budget system with commitment appropriations and payment appropriations but underlines that an amount of outstanding commitments, which equals two full years of payment appropriations may constitute a risk for the smooth operation of the budget in the future; calls on the Commission to closely monitor the progress of implementation in Member States, in particular in the cases of under- implementation and low absorption rates and to deliver country-analysis to the discharge authority, identifying the recurrent problems, as well as the measures taken to optimise the situation;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point h a (new) h a. step up its engagement with the PA, with the aim of ensuring additional curriculum reform to address the highly problematic issues identified in school material in the shortest possible time frame; insists that all EU funding must be made conditional on educational materialand course content complies with UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence, and non-violence; suggest the Commission to partly withhold funding to the UNRWA and the PA, the reserve should only be released if substantive positive changes are made in the PA curriculum- should there be no change, appropriations in the reserve shall be used for funding Palestinian NGOs with a proven track record of promoting educational initiatives fostering tolerance and coexistence;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point k a (new) k a. ensure that the new Rule of Law Conditionality is strictly applied to the new IPA III funds and Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans, as an indispensable part for distribution of funds in the 2021-2027 period;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point k a (new) k a. remove any material from schools supported by UNRWA that is not inline with UNESCO standards of peace, particularly the new study cards which incite terrorism and violence;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 – point k a (new) ka. draw up a financial support plan for Ukraine to enable it to recover from the illegal aggression by Vladimir Putin’s regime;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 111 111. Notes that the Court also examines the regularity of the information in the annual activity reports of the Commission, including those of its directorates-general and offices primarily responsible for administrative expenditure; notes with satisfaction that the Court estimates that the level of error in spending on “administration” was not material;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 a (new) 112 a. Recalls that the Paymaster Office (PMO) of the Commission is responsible on the basis of a service-level agreement for the verification of the legal conditions for the installation allowance and the payment authorisation of both installation and residence allowance of EU high-level public office holders provided for in the Council Regulation (EU) 2016/300 of 29 February 2016 determining the emoluments of EU high-level public office holders;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 a (new) 112 a. Expresses its concern over the very high approval rate of transfer requests into private sector positions for former Commission staff, as this increases the likelihood of the occurrence of conflicts of interest; urges the Commission to review its policy in this regard;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 a (new) 112 a. Notes that in 2020 the Commission received 8.001 initial and 309 confirmatory applications for access to documents, as well as that fully or partially access was granted in 81% of the initial cases, and wider or even full access was further granted in more than 37% of the cases reviewed at confirmatory stage;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 a (new) 112 a. Notes that the EU institutions have different rules for the use of official vehicles; is of the opinion that these rules should be harmonised and the own contribution of the users should be adequately increased in relation to the costs and to properly reflect the monetary advantage of such use;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned that the amount of outstanding commitments (RAL) at the end of 2020 reached a new record high of EUR 303,2 billion; acknowledges that a certain level of outstanding commitments is a natural consequence of the Union budget system with commitment appropriations and payment appropriations but underlines that an amount of outstanding commitments, which equals two full years of payment appropriations may constitute a risk for the smooth operation of the budget in the future; which would be put under serious pressure, with a possible serious risk to the liquidity of the Union budget;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 b (new) 112 b. Notes with concern the lack of understanding within the decision making and approval forums at the health insurance scheme JSIS when it comes to new treatments, medical trends and not yet approved drugs particularly linked to novel appearances of nervous diseases, autoimmune disorders as well cancer diseases; requests that the relevant bodies within JSIS duly and regularly take into account recent medical developments and knowledge gains when updating the list of eligible treatments and drugs; requests JSIS to show more flexibility when assessing clinical pictures as well as subsequent treatment and therapies that might help a patient; recommends the introduction of expert groups, which can assess and approve not-yet approved treatments, drugs, and medications to improve the treatment quality of applicants, decrease bureaucratic burden, and accommodate the most recent medical information when handling reimbursement claims; underlines that the EU is at the forefront of medical innovation and technology and is therefore of the opinion that this standard should also be applied for the medical treatment of persons under JSIS;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 b (new) 112 b. Is concern, however, about the serious lack of transparency from the Commission regarding buying and distributing of vaccines in the EU during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020; notes with regret the case of the Commission refusal of public access to text messages exchanged between the Commission President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company on the purchase of a COVID 19 vaccine; draws attention that based on its findings during the inquiry on this case, the Ombudsman considers that it constituted maladministration;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 c (new) 112 c. Takes note that as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic the Commission spent less budget amounts on missions, conferences and meetings as well as training in 2020 than the amounts included in the 2020 budget; takes note that part of the savings as well as appropriations from other areas of administrative expenditure were redirected to pandemic related needs such as ICT equipment, including for the provision of home office equipment to all staff, and expenditure of the medical service for the COVID-vaccination campaign, including sanitary measures in the childcare centres;
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 b (new) 112 b. Stresses that all EU institutions, and especially the Commission, must respect the highest data protection criteria both in the processing of public tenders and in the good or service to be procured, which requires specialised knowledge on the part of the officials in charge;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 114 a (new) 114 a. Urges the European Schools to swiftly follow up on the recommendations of the Court concerning the specific weakness founded in procurement and recruitment;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 114 a (new) 114 a. Calls most of the Schools and the Central Office to develop emergency or a business continuity plans in case of possible major incidents and disruptions;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 114 b (new) 114 b. Emphasizes, with regard to the European schools, the importance of respecting the annuality principle and of respecting payment deadlines, procurement rules and transparency in recruitment procedures;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 115 115. Welcomes the initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure gender equality
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 116.
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 116. Underlines its request for the Commission to ensure a fair geographical balance of its members of staff at all levels, especially at middle and senior management levels where strong imbalances persist, while at the same time fulfilling the requirements in the staff regulation in relation to competences and merits of candidates;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that despite the gained experience from the previous MFF and the help and cooperation provided by the Commission through the technical assistance the cumulative absorption rate from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) at the end of 2020 continues to be approximately 7
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 a (new) 116 a. Echoes the difficulties encountered by the EU institutions installed in Luxembourg to recruit staff according to their needs and recalls the Eurostat study showing that the disparity in purchasing power between Luxembourg and Brussels (25,4%) exceeded the 5% threshold even when housing was excluded from the calculations;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 a (new) 116 a. Insists on the Commission to implement a more transparent appointment procedure for all positions especially the management related ones particularly in the context of the new HR Strategy;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 a (new) 116 a. Insists on the Commission to implement a more transparent appointment procedure for all positions especially the top management related ones;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 b (new) 116 b. Reminds the Commission of the potential risks of Commissioner engaging in new activities and calls for the Commission to keep a clear attention on those cases;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 b (new) 116 b. Acknowledges that, during 2020 the COVID-19 outbreak had an impact on the internal functioning and the management of the Commission’s budget;
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 c (new) 116 c. Echoes the Court’s conclusion that “any unethical behaviour by staff and Members of EU institutions and bodies is unacceptable. Such behaviour – even if it is only alleged – attracts high levels of public interest and reduces trust in the EU. Unethical behaviour is also linked to the risk of corruption and fraud";
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 c (new) 116 c. Reiterates the European Parliament concern about the termination of the contract with the restaurant service provider, which led to the layoff of 400 workers; invites again the Commission to considers in term of sound financial management the possibility of internalisation of the catering staff in- house;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 116 d (new) 116 d. Recall Parliament’s concerns about the increasing number of contract staff hired in the Commission, and the risks related to the transfer and then loss of knowledge when their contracts expires, without forgetting the perspective and job security of the contract agents;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point a a (new) a a. is of the opinion that a rental contract for or a purchase contract of a property shall not be considered sufficient evidence in the sense of the Article 4 of the Council Regulation (EU) 2016/300 as such property may be destined for other uses than primary residence and thus, calls on the Commission to review the mechanism for verifying the legal conditions of the installation allowance to request other documents as evidence to the greatest extend possible with respect to proportionality and privacy;
Amendment 269 #
b. continue its work in order to ensure
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the cumulative absorption rate from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) at the end of 2020 continues to be approximately 7 % lower than under the previous 2007-2013 MFF; encourages the Commission to intensify its work with Members States including through technical assistance in order to increase the ability of Member States to make use of the funds allocated to them and to intensify the effort to increase the absorption rate of ESIF from both the 2013-2020 MFF and the new 2021-2027 MFF in order to avoid a further increase of total outstanding commitments, without compromising the quality of projects and the efforts made to avoid misuse and fraud of Union funds; calls on the Commission to assist where necessary countries to find eligible projects, especially those with clear European added-value; asks the Commission to relaunch the
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e a (new) e a. propose a harmonised set of rules for the use of official vehicles for all EU institutions, bodies and organs including an adequate increase of the own contribution of the users in relation to the costs, which properly reflects the monetary advantage of such use;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e a (new) Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e a (new) e a. urges the Commission to address the long-standing and serious problem of salary indexation in Luxembourg by adopting a delegated act to correct the relevant Staff Regulations provision;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e a (new) e a. to make the Commission special advisers status more transparent with a clear definition of their tasks and missions, via a revision of the current rules on Special Advisers;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e b (new) e b. ensure that JSIS shall provide a coherent and individual explanation for declining a reimbursement request; regrets the culture of declining a reimbursement request by PDF without the possibility to challenge the decision in person; calls on the PMO to introduce the possibility for doctors in charge of a treatment of an applicant to talk to the responsible JSIS unit or expert group to explain the treatment and medical benefits; further expresses its wish to improve the user-friendliness of the application enabling a quicker and more direct follow-up of individual requests;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e b (new) e b. integrate in the internal management strategy the lessons drawn from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, in terms of business continuity and crisis management approaches, IT responsiveness, resiliency of the organisation, duty of care towards its staff, effectiveness of internal communication and flexibility of working processes;
Amendment 276 #
e b. be at the front line of the Whistle- blowers protection, paving the way for a more uniform regulation among all Institutions, based on best practices and on higher standards;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 – point e c (new) e c. strongly recommends a review of the nomination and appointment procedures for the Union institutions and bodies with a view to strengthening and respecting both the opinions expressed by the Commission and Parliament, and the democratic participation of relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 117 a (new) 117 a. calls on the Commission to strengthen and optimise the collaboration with the European Data Protection Supervisor in the area of public procurement, particularly in the training of public procurement officers;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines its strong and repeated requests to the Commission and executive agencies to ensure the protection of the Union budget by making global and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit; remarks that this should include the establishment of a mandatory single interoperable database on beneficiaries of funds from all Union programmes; acknowledges that the Commission proposed to make obligatory the use of a single data-mining and risk-scoring tool for funds under shared management and the Recovery and Resilience Facility; notes that this has not been retained in the adopted texts; highlights that such a system should build on unique identifiers for all recipients including information about their ultimate beneficiaries and should also automatically ensure the use of systems such as the date mining tool, ARACHNE, in order to provide for the best possible protection of the Union finances; notes that this digitalisation is overdue and indispensable given the cross- border nature of misuse of funds, fraud, misappropriations, conflicts of interest, double-funding and other systemic problems; underlines that this single datamining tool should be easily searchable and available for OLAF, EPPO and the Commission, in order to enhance the protection of the Union budget and Next Generation EU against irregularities,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines its strong and repeated requests to the Commission and executive agencies to ensure the protection of the Union budget by making global and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit; remarks that this should include the establishment of a mandatory single interoperable database on beneficiaries of funds from all Union programmes; highlights that such a system should build on unique identifiers for all recipients including information about their ultimate beneficiaries and should also automatically ensure the use of systems
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the need to enlarge the areas where the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) is used beyond direct management and encourages the Commission to use it for all Union funds including funds under shared management: notes that, the EDES has to be used systematically to ensure that companies and beneficial owners who have been convicted in relation to fraud, corruption or other serious economic criminal activities cannot benefit from Union funds; stresses the need to harmonise the indicators in ARACHNE with the exclusion grounds of EDES to ensure that excluded economic operators are also visible in ARACHNE; calls for maximum interoperability between ARACHNE, EDES and other software to reduce the need to insert information items into various IT-systems multiple times and keep the administrative burden as low as possible;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the need to enlarge the areas where the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) is used beyond direct management and
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests the Commission to follow up on Parliament’s initiative reports concerning the revision of the Financial Regulation1 2
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Welcomes the publication of the Guidance on avoidance of conflicts of interest under the Financial Regulation in April 2021 - after the distribution to Member States in August 2020 - which promotes the uniform interpretation of the rules across all management modes; reiterates its call on the Commission to ensure proper evaluation of the preventive measures taken by the Member States to avoid conflicts of interest; ; emphasises that all form of conflicts of interest are to be tackled efficiently and effectively including within the European institutions;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Reminds that Commission’s audit reports, including for conflict of interest cases, should be published in reasonable timeframe, helping in ensuring that the recommended corrective and follow-up actions are implemented by the audited; reminds the stance of the Budgetary Control Committee that even prior to the finalisation of an audit, the Commission has to share information with the European Parliament upon request in order to allow Parliament to exercise its function of political scrutiny;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic justified considerable changes to the 2020 budget in the form of transfers and amending budgets in order for the Union to give
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic justified considerable changes to the 2020 budget in the form of transfers and amending budgets in order for the Union to give a robust input in order to help alleviate the threats from the pandemic not least through the rapid development of vaccines. Furthermore, notes that the pandemic meant that audits mainly had to be done remotely which also implies that the estimated error rates should be considered as minimum estimates due to the increased detection risk; welcomes the increase in digitalisation in the audit procedures, efficiency gains and cost savings from remote audits, but underlines that remote audits cannot fully substitute on the spot controls;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Notes that both 2019 and 2020 Court annual reports attest “pervasive error in expenditure” and gives an adverse opinion on the legality and regularity of expenditure; recalls the repeated finding by the Court that control mechanisms of the Commission and Member States are simply not reliable enough;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. A
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 3 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 42 #
10. Asks the Commission to modify the spending rule N+3 years to the previous rule N+2 years in order to increase the budget execution and reduce the outstanding commitments; underlines that the current N+3 rules should not be used to slow down or delay the implementation, but to ensure sufficient time for projects to be realised;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure the provision of sufficient funding for audits and controls of Union funds in light of the massive increase of funds to be disbursed during the coming years under the combined MFF and NextGenerationEU instrument; notes that the Commission will assess the control systems of the Member States and provide guidance to put in place sound monitoring and control systems; calls on the Commission to provide the discharge authority with detailed assessments of the audit and control systems for each Member State;
Amendment 44 #
11. Calls on the Commission and the budgetary authority to ensure the provision of sufficient funding for audits and controls of Union funds in light of the massive increase of funds to be disbursed during the coming years under the combined MFF and NextGenerationEU instrument;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Reiterates its concern that the Commission only audits the achievement of milestones and targets before paying out RRF funds while leaving it to the Member States to ensure that public procurement or state aid rules have been complied with; notes that the Commission will carry out system audits to ensure that the Member States have put in place strong controls for the protection of the Union’s financial interests against conflicts of interest or serious irregularities; is, however, of the opinion that the Commission as Guardian of the Treaties should not only rely on Member States’ audits on compliance with applicable rules to ensure an equal playing field for investments under the RRF; calls therefore on the Commission to extend its audit activities beyond system audits to include checks on public procurement and state aid rules following its risk-based approach; recalls in this regard the severe loopholes in the national legislation in certain Member States regarding efficient controls and prevention of conflicts of interests, such as Romania, Bulgaria, Czechia, Slovakia, Malta and Cyprus;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Reiterates the need to
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Reiterates the need to further simplify rules and procedures, develop
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the increased importance of performance indicators, including the selection of indicators, definition of targets and milestones and monitoring and reporting in light of the new delivery models for the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the reformed Common Agricultural Policy; notes that milestones and targets as well as output indicators are different in nature; notes that the Recovery and Resilience Facility further differentiates between investments and reforms; stresses that performance auditing is a new tool for the respective audit authorities; calls on the Commission to provide an overview of the complete audit cycle within the Member States, the Commission as well as in regard of the cooperation with the respective audit authorities including the Court of Auditors, and OLAF, EPPO;
Amendment 49 #
13. Stresses the increased importance of performance indicators, including the selection of indicators, definition of targets and milestones and monitoring and reporting in light of the new delivery models for the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the reformed Common Agricultural Policy; welcomes in this regard the Commission's work to improve monitoring and reporting on performance of the EU budget with more streamlined and qualitative indicators, as reflected in the adopted basic acts of the 2021-2027 spending programmes;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 4 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the Commission, the ECA and the Council to work towards accelerating the discharge process to N+1, reminding that this should not undermine the quality of the process;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to continue promoting gender balance and a gender budgeting approach in the allocated funds;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to continue promoting gender balance and a
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to continue promoting gender balance and a gender budgeting approach in the allocated funds in a non-bureaucratic and concise manner; calls on the Commission to urgently develop a gender mainstreaming methodology in order to integrate a gender equality perspective in all policy areas through targeted and effective incentives;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Reiterates the need to step up the efforts in the fight against fraud both at Union and Member State level, in close cooperation with the EPPO and OLAF; appreciates the remarkable efforts and stresses the role of the EPPO in the investigation and prosecution of fraud and other criminal offences affecting the
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Expresses concerns that the increasing use of financial mechanisms to deliver Union policies in third countries alongside the Union budget risks undermining the accountability and transparency of Union action and spending; insists that the Commission ensures that the delivery of external aid is subject to the rule of law and respect for human rights in recipient countries; recalls that development and cooperation policy are intended to eradicate poverty and reduce inequality and that funds should reach only their intended beneficiaries;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the establishment of new own revenues in order to repay, from 2028, the loans granted under NextGenerationEU
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Is particularly concerned by the Court’s repeated findings that the work of some national audit authorities or certifying bodies is considered too error- prone and therefore unreliable, which compromises the reliability of data for the Commission’s Annual Management and Performance Report (AMPR);; regrets that the Commission has not followed up to this specific comment included in the 2019 Commission discharge resolution; expect the Commission to provide clarifications on this aspect;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Regrets that the Court for the year
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 5 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Regrets that the Court for the year 2020 has again issued an adverse opinion on the legality and regularity of the expenditure side of the budget and at the same time acknowledges that the level of error has remained stable at 2,7 % in 2020,
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Reiterates the requests made by the Parliament in the last years discharge resolutions to the Court, namely the definition of an error rate also for low risks payments, and for each expenditure in the MFF; to expand the chapter on "Administration" in order to have a more in-depth analysis on all institutions; the qualification of the impact of the corrective measures on the overall level of error;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes with growing concern that the Union balance sheet shows that the total liabilities at the end of 2020 were EUR 313.5 billion, an increase of EUR 62,0 billion or 24,7% compared to the previous year (EUR 251.5 billion);
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that the annual absorption rate for E
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that the annual absorption rate for E
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the relaxation of applicable rules to provide additional liquidity, a
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the relaxation of applicable rules to provide additional liquidity and exceptional flexibility for COVID-19 related expenditure; is concerned that this increases the risk of misuse and fraud by criminal structures attempting to abuse the crisis situation; notes information from OLAF on criminal activities concerning personal health and safety equipment and fake vaccine offers;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that according to non- published information provided to the Court, the Commission provided EUR 12,9 billion in commitments under direct and indirect management and EUR 34,2 billion in commitments under shared management for purposes related to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020; regrets that the Commission has no published yet a report on COVID-19 related expenditure;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 6 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Regrets with great concern that relaxation of applicable rules both at the EU and national level, especially in the field of public procurement led to numerous non-transparent procedures and that the controls over the legality of public spending, while at the moment of urgency often dismissed or carried out under severe limitations, were not sufficiently carried out at later stage as ex-post controls and audits;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Regrets that the COVID-19
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Regrets that the COVID-19 pandemic made it much more difficult to carry out on-the-spot checks and audits, which implies that the estimated error rates for 2020 should be considered as minimum rates; underlines the need for more in- person audit visits in the coming period to ensure sound audit management;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Stresses that the combined effect of the new NextGenerationEU instrument and the delays in adoption of legislation risks putting serious pressure on administrative
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32 a. Notes that the use of data-mining and risk assessment instruments such as ARACHNE can help prevent and safeguard against conflict of interest, fraud, corruption and double funding. Notes that the information on the beneficiaries of the programme as well as data on the beneficial owner needs to be collected by the Member States. The Anti- Money Laundering directive requires a central EU platform, which has been set up, but not all Member States have connected to it yet; notes that Central registers of beneficiary data exist in Member States, but not all contain beneficial owner data;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32 b. Notes that Monitoring tools are essential for the audit of the implementation of milestones and targets; notes that Member States are required to use the FENIX system developed and made available by the Commission; notes that the Commission is obliged to set up a Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard to give an overview how the implementation of the RRF is progressing;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 c (new) 32 c. Notes that according to Article 60 of the RRF regulation the Commission should transmit, subject to clearance of sensitive or confidential information, or to appropriate confidentiality arrangements if necessary, relevant documents and information simultaneously and on equal terms to the European Parliament and to the Council; stresses that the early and complete transmission of documents to the Parliament and the Council will be an important element in the discharge procedure;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 d (new) 32 d. Notes that the European Parliament set up a Recovery and Resilience Facility Working Group; notes that this establishes a dialogue between Members of the respective Committees and the Commission; notes that the involvement of the European Parliament and Council is crucial to ensure the democratic oversight and scrutiny; signals that the discharge will be postponed if the transparent access to the documents is denied or delayed by the Commission;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Requests the Commission to identify additional possibilities to further strengthen the absorption capacities of the Member States by investing in the administrative capacities, trainings and digitalisation of fund management;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Notes that according to Article 31 of the RRF Regulation by 31 July 2022, the Commission should present an annual report on the implementation of the Facility to the European Parliament and to the Council;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 7 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point -a (new) -a. to carry out analysis for each individual Member State of the funds received and status of implementation, at the latest in May for the previous budgetary year, in the context of annual report foreseen under Article 31 of Regulation 2021/241; expects the Commission to publish the annual report for the first time early in the 2nd half of 2022 and to promptly inform the discharge authority about the findings;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised interoperable systems for reporting, monitoring and audit; develop the Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard to ensure that description of milestones and target and outcome of the audit are transparent; ensure that all Member States use the systems and central registers to report on beneficial owners and end beneficiaries;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and automatised systems for reporting, monitoring and audit and urgently establish an integrated and interoperable system building on but not limited to existing tools and databases;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a. ensure the protection of the Union budget by making general and systematic use of digital and
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a (new) a a. carry out a series of ex-post on- the-spot checks and controls of national public procurements using EU funds and take note of the already carried out audits or media reports, pointing to a considerable risks to legality of these procedures;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a (new) a a. to transmit, subject to clearance of sensitive or confidential information, or to appropriate confidentiality arrangements if necessary, relevant documents as the Summary of Audits (SoA) and information timely to the discharge authority
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point b b. simplify rules and procedures, develop compulsory training sessions and practical information for applicants , in particular new applicants, and improve the assistance and guidelines for SMEs, spin- offs, start-ups, administration and payment agencies and all relevant stakeholders; provide the discharge authority with an overview of the trainings conducted;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point c a (new) c a. share the outcomes on budgetary control contents in the light of the review report with the discharge authority by conducting a meeting with the respective committee;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point c b (new) c b. strengthen the Financial Regulation in the context of the RRF during the upcoming revision in the sense of introducing the obligation for an interoperable internal audit system in the Member States;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point d d. intensify its work to ensure that the funds under the Recovery and Resilience facility are used for
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision 8 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point d d. intensify its work to ensure that the funds under the Recovery and Resilience facility are used for high-quality projects and that double funding of projects is avoided; urges the Commission to not only rely on compliance audits by the Member States concerning applicable rules such as public procurement and state aid rules, but to extend its audit activity beyond system audits in a risk- based approach;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point g g. increase the administrative capacity of the Commission
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point g g. increase the administrative capacity of the Commission
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point h h. develop a non-bureaucratic and concise gender mainstreaming methodology for use across the budget through targeted and effective incentives at the latest by the end of 2022, and to follow the recommendations of the Court in its special report on gender mainstreaming in the EU Budget;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point h h.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Notes that the Court bases its annual management and performance report on the information retrieved from several reports by the Commission; notes that the Court supplements this information with recent findings from its own audit and review work; notes that the Court reviews the Commission’s performance information for plausibility and consistency with their findings, but not for its reliability;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Underlines that auditing the performance of the Union budget is equally as important as compliance auditing in order to get a comprehensive view of the legality of spending as well as the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the spending; points to the numerous recommendations issued by the Court as well as the Discharge authority that the Commission should pay much more attention to assessing the results, outcomes and impacts of its policies and programs (effectiveness) and don’t stop at presenting sheer numbers of funds spend or people involved in individual programs (efficiency);
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Underlines that auditing the performance of the Union budget is equally as important as compliance auditing in order to get
Amendment 98 #
36 a. Notes that the better regulation approach helps the Commission in identifying lessons learnt from past implementation of policies and programmes; highlights that all spending programmes should be reviewed by the Commission, points out that cost- effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis are important tools in budget control to review the spending; calls on the Commission to include more qualitative information that shows the EU-added value of spending programmes; welcomes that the Regulatory Scrutiny Board contributes to improving the quality of evaluations and impact assessments; calls on the Commission to implement the recommendations given by the Regulatory Scrutiny Board and to sufficiently justify when comments have not been taken into account;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37.
source: 719.806
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/0 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0144_EN.html
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0144_EN.html
|
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/14 |
|
events/2 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-03-03T00:00:00New
2022-03-28T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-719806_EN.html
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-703049_EN.html
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-702935_EN.html
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2022-02-09T00:00:00New
2022-02-18T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2022-01-31T00:00:00New
2022-02-14T00:00:00 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-700428_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-699120_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-699170_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-699320_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-699012_EN.html
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-699194_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/11/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/16/rapporteur |
|
committees/10/rapporteur |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/18/rapporteur |
|
committees/19/opinion |
False
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/12/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
committees/14/rapporteur |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
commission |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/date |
Old
2021-07-13T00:00:00New
2021-07-12T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/6/rapporteur |
|