Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D) | LENAERS Jeroen ( EPP), MITUȚA Alin ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), KUHS Joachim ( ID), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | GAHLER Michael ( EPP) | Ernest URTASUN ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 555 votes to 83, with 6 abstentions, to grant discharge to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) for the implementation of the budget of the European External Action Service (EEAS) for the financial year 2020.
Parliament found that the Court of Auditors did not identify any significant weaknesses in the EEAS during its audit of the areas of human resources and procurement. On the basis of its audit work, the Court concluded that the payments for the administrative expenditure of the institutions, including the EEAS, for the financial year 2020 were, taken as a whole, free from material error . No specific problems with the regularity of transactions were identified.
In its resolution, adopted by 545 votes to 84 with 12 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations.
Budgetary and financial management
The EEAS budget for 2020 was EUR 731 000 000 (an increase of 5.2% compared to the budget for 2019, which was EUR 694 800 000), broken down as follows: EUR 276 300 000 for headquarters and EUR 454 700 000 for the delegations. EUR 212 400 000 from the Commission to cover the administrative costs of its staff working in delegations.
Overall, in 2020, the EEAS committed EUR 934 400 000, or 90% of the available budget for the year. EUR 919 200 000, or 79% of the available payment appropriations. Overall, the final EEAS budget for 2020 recorded a commitment implementation rate of 95% and a payment implementation rate of 82.3%, compared to 99.94% and 87.9% respectively in 2019.
During 2020, due to the pandemic, the change in intensity of the EEAS activities resulted in transfers, notably from human resources and mission budget lines to IT budget lines, which were efficient and result-oriented.
Human resources, equality and staff well-being
Overall, the EEAS had 4 643 employees in 2020 (compared to 4 474 in 2019). Overall, a total of 2 286 staff worked at headquarters and 2 357 in delegations. Parliament highlighted the high occupancy rate of posts, particularly in delegations, and a slightly lower rate at headquarters.
In a volatile international environment, Parliament noted that the strengthening of the EEAS' role in dealing with new challenges such as disinformation should be accompanied by a corresponding increase in staffing. It supported the EEAS's call for sufficient human resources to ensure the effectiveness of the Union's action as a global actor.
Parliament welcomed the fact that at the end of 2020 the overall gender representation was almost balanced, with women representing 48.65% of the staff. It welcomed the fact that the upward trend in the proportion of women reaching senior management positions continued in 2020, with women accounting for 27.3% of senior managers and 33.2% of middle managers. It regretted that only 27.4% of the Head of Delegation posts in 2020 were held by women.
Concerned about the gender imbalance in applications for management positions, Members called on the EEAS to explore strategies to encourage and facilitate female applications for management positions. They encouraged the EEAS to better promote its career opportunities and vacancies to national diplomats, international studies professionals, academia and civil society.
Parliament reiterated its concern about the geographical representation of EEAS staff, in particular as regards the posts of heads of delegation and middle and senior management. Stressing the importance of ensuring a balanced representation of countries that joined the Union after 2004 or later (EU13), it called on the EEAS to make significant progress towards achieving a balanced representation of Member States.
Members welcomed the fact that in 2020 the EEAS launched its first ever mandatory training for managers on how to create a harassment-free working environment.
Ethical framework and transparency
Parliament welcomed the adoption of the EU's global human rights sanctions regime in December 2020 and the adoption of the new EU Action Plan for Human Rights and Democracy for the period 2020-2024.
Members called on the EEAS to monitor the posts of former heads of delegation, in view of their politically sensitive role and functions in the host countries, and to continue monitoring the professional activity of former senior officials until the end of the mandatory cooling-off period. They called on the EEAS to automatically request information on the intended occupation of senior members of staff leaving their positions.
Parliament believed that the highest ethical standards should be applied to avoid possible conflicts of interest, in particular with regard to heads of delegation. It encouraged the EEAS to join the transparency register, based on a service level agreement, in order to improve transparency by making public all meetings with all lobby groups that try to influence the policy implementation processes of the EU institutions.
Buildings and security
Acknowledging the complexity of managing EEAS buildings, Parliament noted that the office development projects carried out by the EEAS in 2020 have introduced mostly collaborative spaces while respecting the social distancing guidelines introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EEAS manages 178 office buildings in the delegations, representing a total surface area of 275 000 m2 . The annual cost of the rented properties for the delegations amounts to EUR 61 800 000. At the end of 2020, the EEAS managed 148 residences for Heads of Delegation, with a total surface area of 84 000 m2. Parliament supported the EEAS in its efforts to increase the use of co-location in its delegations, which has more than quadrupled in the last five years and represents 7% of the total office space.
Parliament pointed out that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU institutions saw a 600% increase in cyber attacks. It supported the EEAS in strengthening its security measures protecting both staff members and its digital infrastructure from external threats and attacks. The EEAS has allocated a total budget of EUR 65 600 000 for security services for 2020.
COVID-19 pandemic
Parliament underlined that the EEAS has been able to ensure the continuity of its activities and the sound financial management of its operations without having experienced any significant problems during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
Members commended the EEAS for the crucial role it played in the major emergency action to repatriate more than 600 000 stranded EU citizens worldwide, while contributing to the implementation of the large-scale humanitarian and assistance operation ‘ Team Europe ’, which mobilised more than EUR 38 billion in support to partner countries and contributed EUR 850 million to COVAX, the global vaccine distribution initiative.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2020, as part of the 2020 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European External Action Service
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. They are prepared according to the highest available international public sector standards.
The discharge is a Parliament decision that reflects its conclusions at the end of a process, the discharge procedure, on the way the Commission (and other institutions and bodies) has carried out its task of implementing the EU budget.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
Implementation of the EEAS’s appropriations for the financial year 2020
The initial budget for 2020 approved by Budget Authority was EUR 731.1 million , representing an increase of 5.2% compared to 2019. This amount was divided between:
- budget headquarters: EUR 276.3 million : 62.3% of this budget (EUR 172.1 million) was allocated to the payment of salaries and other entitlements of statutory and external staff. Other significant costs in the budget relate to buildings and associated costs (15% or EUR 42.2 million) and computer systems (including classified information systems), equipment and furniture with 18% or EUR 48.5 million;
- budget delegations: EUR 454.7 million : this amount was divided between EUR 132.3 million (29.1%) for remuneration and entitlements of statutory staff, EUR 79.4 million (17.5%) for external staff and outside services, EUR 33.9 million (7.5%) for other expenditure related to staff, EUR 162.6 million (35.7%) for buildings and associated costs and EUR 46.5 million (10.2%) for other administrative expenditure.
In addition to the EEAS’s own budget, the EEAS also disposed of an amount of EUR 212.4 million (including assigned revenues and carried over amounts) of Commission money to cover the administrative costs of Commission staff working in EU Delegations.
The EEAS’s activities in 2020 were marked by :
- the continuation of a challenging security environment affecting several areas of the work under civil unrest and political turmoil due to intensified conflicts or election processes;
- the COVID-19 pandemic which lead to a special situation for the entire Institution and impacted heavily the operations of the HQ and EU Delegations. The EEAS implemented the Joint Communication on the Global EU response to COVID-19 and the Team Europe package with Member States. It contributed to addressing the urgent needs arising from the crisis through an emergency humanitarian response, support to the strengthening of health systems and research capacities, as well as to address the socio-economic consequences. By mobilising all existing cooperation programmes and redirecting existing financial resources, Team Europe has mobilised over EUR 38 billion in support to partner countries with over 50% of the funds disbursed in 2020. A particular focus was put on the most vulnerable partner countries and fragile populations, especially in the Neighbourhood, Africa and the Western Balkans, but also in the Middle East, parts of Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean;
- the EEAS contributing to the efforts at multilateral level. The EU used its convening power to secure funding and commitment across the world for universal access to prevention, diagnostic and treatment against COVID-19, including through the Coronavirus Global Response Pledging Conference. It pledged EUR 1.4 billion to this COVID-19 response pillar in the form of grants and guarantees. Team Europe contributed EUR 850 million to COVAX, the global vaccine initiative;
- the HR/VP supported the repatriation of stranded EU citizens. Coordinated by the EEAS and EU Delegations, more than 625 000 European nationals were repatriated between January and May 2020;
- an unprecedented disruption to the 2020 budget execution caused by the pandemic;
- the EU Delegation to China organising the voluntary evacuation of non-essential expatriate staff and / or their family members;
- the EEAS withdrew evacuation decisions in Iraq, Haiti and Afghanistan after significant reinforcements of these Delegations’ security.
Documents
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0153/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0065/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0065/2022
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.193
- Committee opinion: PE699.319
- Committee draft report: PE699.078
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0043/2022
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007 N9-0043/2022
- Committee draft report: PE699.078
- Committee opinion: PE699.319
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.193
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0065/2022
Votes
Décharge 2020: budget général de l'UE - Service européen pour l’action extérieure - Discharge 2020: EU general budget - European External Action Service - Entlastung 2020: Gesamthaushaltsplan der EU – Europäischer Auswärtiger Dienst - A9-0065/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Proposition de décision #
A9-0065/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Après le § 11 - Am 2 #
A9-0065/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Après le § 61 - Am 3 #
A9-0065/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
Amendments | Dossier |
86 |
2021/2115(DEC)
2021/12/07
AFET
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes growing instability and the rise of unprecedented challenges in the international environment, which increased demands on the Union to act
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Emphasises the need to ensure the coherence of EU’s foreign policy, there is also a need to provide necessary resources for a successful implementation of an efficient EU Security and Defence Policy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the lack of diversity and remaining gender and geographical imbalances within the EEAS staff, despite slightly positive trends in previous years; reiterates the importance of ensuring greater diversity, gender equality and a balanced distribution
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the remaining gender and geographical imbalances within the EEAS staff, despite slightly positive trends in previous years; reiterates the importance of ensuring a balanced distribution of staff in terms of gender and geographical origin within different categories and grades, particularly at middle and senior management levels; points also to a remaining overrepresentation of some Member States’ diplomats among the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the remaining gender and geographical imbalances within the EEAS staff, despite slightly positive trends in previous years; reiterates the importance of ensuring a
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the remaining
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the remaining gender and geographical imbalances within the EEAS staff, despite slightly positive trends in previous years; reiterates the importance of
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the EEAS to follow-up without further delay on their announcement provided in their written answers to the Committee on Budgetary Control in the context of the 2019 discharge, to adopt and implement its self- standing implementation provisions on outside activities and assignments, which create a sui generis legal basis for Heads of Delegations to better protect the image and reputation of the EU as a whole;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the ECA’s Special Report on Disinformation affecting the Union and calls for implementing the ECA recommendations in the Union’s action plan against disinformation; stresses the continuous need to fight foreign propaganda and expose disinformation, espionage and malicious foreign influence
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes growing instability, deteriorating security environment, geopolitical impact of COVID-19 pandemic and
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the ECA’s Special Report on Disinformation affecting the Union and calls for implementing the ECA recommendations in the Union’s action plan against disinformation based on a published timeline; believes that improvements to the coordination and accountability of EU actions against disinformation and to the operational arrangements of the StratCom division and its task forces should be treated as a priority, including enhancing engagement with Council and Parliament and reaching recruitment targets; stresses the continuous need to fight foreign
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 22 #
4.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the importance of public diplomacy and strategic communication as an integral aspect of the Union's external relations and an instrument to communicate its values and interests and to enhance the Union’s visibility; calls on the EEAS to continue its efforts to modernise its approaches and invest in new skills and capabilities; reiterates the importance of promoting rule of law, fundamental freedoms and values that the EU is based on.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the importance of Member States coordinating public diplomacy and strategic communication as an integral aspect of the
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the findings of the Court of Auditors in their Special report no 07/2016 that EEAS owns buildings that it does not use, considers that EU delegations and EEAS buildings would be a natural place to start cutting costs and requests a detailed review to be carried out to identify delegations that could be closed or merged to enable further cost reductions.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Repeats its call for a more dedicated review of the administrative expenditure and support activities of the EEAS and specifically on topics that are becoming of higher or even critical relevance for the EEAS; calls on the Court of Auditors to explore ways of providing more information on the administrative expenditure of other Union institutions in the context of the discharge.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Recalls the leading role of EU delegations in third countries with respect to the conduct of EU's foreign policy goals; calls on EU delegations to continue their coordinated efforts to increase the visibility of EU-funded projects.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Emphasises the growing need for a coherent updated EU-Arctic policy; notes that the new NDICI instrument opens up opportunities to finance the Arctic region.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the EEAS to strengthen the role of the EU delegations in third countries in order to reinforce their ability to debunk disinformation campaigns threatening democratic values orchestrated by foreign state actors; in light of the ongoing disinformation campaigns, calls for support to more active and effective communication policy on the European perspective for candidate and potential candidate countries and on EU values and democracy more general, aimed at both local and EU citizens.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes growing instability and the rise of unprecedented challenges in the international environment
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the EEAS to strengthen the Union Delegations engagement in our neighbourhood and particularly in the Western Balkan countries in order to provide a best possible assistance to the countries engaged in pro-democratic and pro-European reforms.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Deplores that the EU continues to reward blackmail by giving EUR 700 000 to the unrecognised Lukashenko regime in connection to the migration crisis at the EU’s external borders; calls for an immediate reversal of policy as there are reasonable indications to suspect that Lukashenko will use EU money for further hybrid warfare activities against Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Notes with grave concern that the total financial impact of all reservations by Directors-General to declarations of assurance amounted to EUR 1219 million for 2020, 16% higher than in 20191a; _________________ 1aAnnual Management and Performance Report 2020
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Emphasises that the EU needs a robust and resilient external service with clear political leadership in order to tackle the current challenges;
Amendment 6 #
1 b. Notes with grave concern that the financial impact of the reservations for the policy area 'External relations' increased from EUR 16 million in 2019 to EUR 21 million in 2020; calls for immediate action to be taken by the Commission to address this issue;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the central role played by the European External Action Service (EEAS) in conducting the Union’s external policy and welcomes that it lived up to the many challenges over the 10 years of its existence;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the central role played by the European External Action Service (EEAS) in conducting the Union’s external policy and welcomes that it lived up to the many challenges over the 10 years of its existence; notes, however, that enhanced EEAS performance has to be underpinned by a corresponding staff increase and a stronger EU esprit de corps within the EEAS; calls for sufficient human resources to be made available in order to deliver on the Union’s external policy priorities;
source: 700.658
2022/02/03
CONT
55 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European External Action Service (EEAS) is responsible for the management of the administrative expenditure of its Headquarter (HQ) in Brussels and for the network of the 14
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes that following the “Innovative 2019” exercise, aiming at fostering simplification and modernisation of working procedures and processes, several actions were launched in 2020, in particular the centralisation of high-value calls for tenders, the treasury functions and the payment of individual entitlements; notes that in 2020 some operations, in particular pre-award matters for all procurement procedures, have been increasingly centralised at HQ level to improve the quality of the procurement procedures and to alleviate the workload of the Delegations; notes with satisfaction that the full centralisation is expected during year 202
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Understands that the current provisions on procurement set down in the Financial Regulation for application by Delegations in third countries have proved to be inefficient; agrees with the EEAS’ call for a revision of the relevant procurement provisions either by the integration of a separate chapter for Delegations in third countries
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that in 2020 the EEAS published 40 high-value procurement procedures (with a value above the Directive thresholds for services and supplies and above EUR 500 000 for works); notes that the Court examined fifteen procurement procedures for personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies organised in 2020 by some institutions, including EEAS; observes that the Court detected some problems in the procedures used by the audited institutions when procuring urgently required protective masks; observes that these institutions had set strict minimum requirements in the tender specifications (including European reference quality standards for medical
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Notes that the EU Delegation to Syria was the only one to express a reservation (since 2017) on the management of administrative expenditure due to the current security climate; notes with appreciation that the EEAS succeeded to resolve two pending issues in 2020, regarding income tax of local agents and access to the Delegation's Syrian bank account;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes that the nomenclature of errors regarding procurement procedures, used for
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Welcomes the implementation of the Multi-Annual Strategic Audit Plan developed by the IAS; calls on the EEAS to inform the discharge authority about the results and lessons learnt from this strategy;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Highlights that the Union is confronted with a volatile international environment and an increasing number of crises, which has led to increasing demands on the Union to play an important role at an international level; notes that the enhanced role of the EEAS in dealing with new challenges such as disinformation
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that in the AST and AST/SC categories the percentage of women decreased to 65.35 % compared to 66.3 % in 2019; stresses that imbalances remained among the different grades, with women representing 66.2 % of staff in the lower grades (AST2 to AST9) but only 33.3 % in the higher grades (AST10 to AST11); points out the gender balance reached with regard to contract agents (59.4 %) and local agents (54.5 %), while the majority of seconded national experts were men (75.2 %, mostly due to the limited female presence in the Member States military);
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that in the AST and AST/SC
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Welcomes the many actions launched by EEAS to reach the gender balance, as well as to create an open and inclusive working environment, to integrate result-oriented and flexible working conditions incorporating work-life balance; welcomes specific actions like networking for women in pre-management positions and tailored programmes for women in middle-management positions as a talent-base for future senior management posts, mandatory training on unconscious bias for members of recruitment panels, enhanced coordination with Member States to encourage more female candidates and support spouses seeking to find employment in third countries; applauds that, to further improve gender mainstreaming, a gender auditing of internal policies is ongoing, and asks the EEAS to report to Parliament about the recommendations and follow up to promote a strong gender-responsive leadership; Underlines that this a recurrent issue and reiterates the call for the EEAS to continue its efforts to achieve gender balance at all hierarchical levels and welcomes actions such as the mandatory presence of both genders on selection panels, the active encouragement of female applicants for all managerial positions, specific training sessions for female staff who wish to prepare for a managerial career and more flexible working arrangement.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas under the EEAS Internal Rules the Secretary General of the EEAS acts as Authorising Officer by Delegation for the Institution and the Director General for
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Is concerned by the lack of gender balance across the applications for management posts, where only 27 % of applicants were women; observes that women made up 53 % of the applicants for heads of administration, 82 % of applicants for assistant to head of Delegation and 100 % of applicants for assistant to deputy head of Delegation; calls on the EEAS to exploring strategies to encourage and facilitate female candidates to apply for management posts; insists on encouraging Member States to put forward qualified women for management positions, including senior management positions; encourages the EEAS to better promoting its carrer opportunities and vacancies among national diplomats, international studies professionals, academia and civil society;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Reiterates its concern about the geographical imbalances in the composition of the EEAS staff as it is a recurrent issue, especially concerning the positions of Heads of delegations, middle and senior management; Is aware of the EEAS efforts to achieve a meaningful geographical representation while respecting the competences and merits of candidates and reiterates, in this regard, the necessary provision of additional SNEs to face the EEAS’ increasing workload; observes that at the end of 2020 EEAS staff included nationals from all Member States and welcomes the efforts made by the EEAS to keep the Human Resources Network of Member States informed about the composition of staff, to publish vacancies and to promote national efforts to increase the number of candidates;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Is aware of the EEAS efforts to achieve a meaningful geographical representation while respecting the competences and merits of candidates and reiterates, in this regard, the necessary provision of additional SNEs to face the EEAS’ increasing workload; urges the EEAS to continue its efforts to improve the geographical representation, as this is a recurring problem, especially in the positions of Heads of Delegation and middle and senior management; observes that at the end of 2020 EEAS staff included nationals from all Member States and welcomes the efforts made by the EEAS to
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Considers it important to ensure a balanced representation of countries that joined the Union after 2004 or later (EU13) and thus, welcomes that the number of staff from these Member States at the end of 2020 had increased by 6 % compared to the previous year;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Considers it important to ensure a balanced representation of countries that joined the Union after 2004 or later (EU13)
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Notes that the EEAS
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Commends the EEAS’ attention to social dialogue and underlines the positive impact of the direct participation of members of staff having first-hand experience of the measures submitted for discussion; welcomes in particular the broad consultation on the future of the EEAS where more than 500 colleagues from both HQ and Delegations took part and seven focus groups channelled all reflections into concrete working proposals, a project known as #EEAS@20; encourages the EEAS to keep this approach in order to respond to the expectation of members of staff while addressing the needs of the service;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Notes that the EEAS administration handled four formal requests for assistance which concerned allegations of harassment, out of which three cases have been closed without any sanction, while the opinion of the Disciplinary Board has been requested for the last case; asks the EEAS to report on this case in due time; commends that in 2020 the EEAS launched its first-ever
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Notes that in 2020 the EEAS recruited 41 remunerated Blue Book Trainees for a 5-month traineeship in its HQ; notes that 385 trainees were employed for 101 Delegations, for traineeships with an average length of 5 months;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Notes that in 2020 the EEAS
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Whereas in the context of the discharge procedure, the discharge authority wishes to stress the particular importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the Union institutions by improving transparency and accountability, and implementing the concept of performance-based budgeting and good governance of human resources;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 a (new) 43 a. Expresses its grave concern about the revelations on alleged modifications conducted by EEAS to its critical report assessing narratives and disinformation around the COVID-19 pandemic, following pressure from Chinese diplomats; notes that EEAS confirmed that there has been influence attempts from China; highlights that specific references to China running a 'global disinformation' campaign and Chinese criticism of France's reaction to the pandemic were absent in the final version of the report; seriously questions in this context the denial by the High Representative of any link between China's influence attempt and the modification of the report; stresses that EEAS is the main Union institution responsible for countering foreign interference; highlights that EEAS should lead by example by never bending for external pressures and foreign attempts that destabilize or influence its functioning; regrets the loss of credibility of the EEAS as a result of these revelations; urges the EEAS to take action to counter any future foreign interference attempts; requests the EEAS to keep the discharge authority informed about possible additional inference attempts and its subsequent response;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Calls on the EEAS to monitor the positions of the former heads of Delegations, given their sensitive political role and functions in host countries; invites the EEAS to systematically review potentially problematic transitions to the private sector or to third country organisations and to continue monitoring the occupation of the former senior officials until the end of the mandatory cooling-off period, as unaddressed conflict-of-interest situations may compromise the enforcement of high ethical standards throughout the Union administration;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Notes that in 2020 the EEAS
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 a (new) 47 a. Considers that the highest ethical standards should be applied to avoid potential conflicts of interests, taking into account the specificities of work in Delegation to mitigate reputational risk for the Union and the EEAS, particularly for Heads of Delegation;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Notes that the EEAS does not hold meetings with organisations and self- employed individuals qualified as lobbyists in line with Article 11 TEU; strongly encourages the EEAS to nevertheless explore the possibility of joining the Union’s transparency register, on the basis of a service level agreement, in order to improve transparency by disclosing all meetings with all lobby organisations that try to influence the law-making and policy implementation processes of the Union institutions; reiterates its disagreement with the EEAS’ opinion that an obligation to record meetings with lobbyists in third countries would make it difficult for Heads of Union Delegations to engage with the Union's economic interests in third countries; believes that citizens should be allowed to know which organisations Union Ambassadors are meeting;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Notes that the EEAS does not hold meetings with organisations and self- employed individuals qualified as lobbyists in line with Article 11 TEU; strongly encourages the EEAS to nevertheless explore the possibility of joining the Union’s transparency register, on the basis of a service level agreement, in order to improve transparency by disclosing all meetings with all lobby organisations that try to influence decisions and policy implementation processes;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Notes that the EEAS does not hold meetings with organisations and self- employed individuals qualified as lobbyists in line with Article 11 TEU; encourages the EEAS to
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Observes that EEAS has received 20 requests for information from OLAF related to possible cases of fraud, involving Union staff or external actors and in the case of five of them OLAF decided to open an investigation; observes that the Ombudsman has handled 14 cases concerning EEAS without issuing any recommendation; welcomes that cooperation with the EPPO is being explored on the advice and with the support of OLAF; calls on the EEAS to timely and diligently inform the discharge authority about the outcome of those investigations;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Observes that EEAS has received 20 requests for information from OLAF related to possible cases of fraud, involving Union staff or external actors and in the case of five of them OLAF decided to open an investigation; observes that the Ombudsman has handled 14 cases concerning EEAS without issuing any recommendation; welcomes that cooperation with the EPPO is being explored on the advice and with the support of OLAF; Invites EEAS to intensify the cooperation with EPPO and to integrate it as a component of its general anti-fraud strategy;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49 a. Emphasises the necessity for the EEAS to fully comply with the Commission's Guidelines on Whistleblowing, in particular to protect whistleblowers in good faith against any form of prejudice.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets, despite the Court's general consideration, that its audit has a rather limited scope and conclusions; requests that the audit work for the chapter on Administration be more focused on issues that are of high relevance or even critical for the EEAS
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53 a. Encourages the EEAS to prioritise open source technology in order to retain control over its own technical systems, avoid dependency and vendor lock-in, provide stronger safeguards for user’s privacy and data protection, as well as increase security and transparency for the public;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Supports the EEAS in its efforts to increase the use of colocations in its Delegations, which has more than
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 a (new) 57 a. Seriously questions the purchase projects envisaged in D.R. Congo (offices), Afghanistan (plot of land), Mali (offices) and in the UK (Residence)1a; requires a justification note from the EEAS regarding the eventual guarantee of its private property over the planned purchase of the land in Afghanistan given the Taliban practices to seize public and private estate; _________________ 1a Working document on the real estate policy of the European external action service in 2020(article 266.11 of the financial regulation)
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 58. Underlines that during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the Union institutions observed a 600 % increase in cyber- attacks; welcomes the several initiatives launched by the EEAS to raise security awareness and promote a security culture across the institution, such security campaigns, training of members of staff to detect security threats and providing guidance on how to mitigate threats or reduce their impact; supports the EEAS in increasing its safety measures protecting both members of staff and the EEAS’s
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 59. Points out that the EEAS has managed a total budget of EUR 65 600 000 for 2020 covering security services; notes that the total amount spent on security installations & maintenance for Delegations was EUR 12 942 311; observes that the whole budget for secure communications amounted to EUR 18 163 000; takes notes of the expected challenges for the protection of EU Delegations identified by the EEAS and, in particular, the lack of autonomous action to mobilise any defence capabilities in case of crises and evacuations; notes that the EEAS has reached agreements with some Members States to support, in some countries, the evacuation of expatriate staff and dependant, which has the negative aspect that this option limits the autonomy of the EEAS and EU Delegations to stay in host countries during crises; reiterates its call for fully using the potential of the Lisbon Treaty provisions to works towards a European defence union and its support for more cooperation, increased investment and pooling resources to create synergies at EU level in order to better protect Europeans;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 a (new) 60 a. Deeply regrets that the EEAS has given into Chinese pressure, as it toned down the language of one of its reports initially calling China a “propagator of disinformation” related to the COVID-19 pandemic; notes that the High Representative admitted that Chinese officials had “expressed their concerns” over the leak of the draft publication, which led to the changes; asks the EEAS to set up strong measures to protect the EEAS staff from foreign interference;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Notes the success of many EEAS media campaigns on key issues, such as ’We Take You Home’ on the repatriation of Union citizens due to COVID-19, ‘United in Distance’ to showcase stories of solidarity across the world in times of crisis, ’EU in Action’ on the work on the ground of the Union as a security provider, and ’BeTheWave’ on climate issues; points out that EEAS channels have also contributed to enhance visibility of 'Team Europe' worldwide; highlights that that EEAS social media account is one of the global leaders
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 a (new) 66 a. Calls urgently for the deployment of adequate capabilities by the EEAS in order to address information manipulation and interference emanating from China; stresses further the need to significantly boost expertise and language capacity with regard to China and other strategically important regions;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 67 a (new) 67 a. Welcomes that the EEAS published five Special Reports on COVID- 19 disinformation to raise awareness of persistent actors’ activity, such as Russia, and highlight the emergence of new actors; Welcomes the increased East Strat Com Task Force budget; calls for further substantial increase in the budget in order for the Union to successfully counter- attack the disinformation campaigns; reiterates its calls for more information campaigns to better inform about Union policies in the Eastern Partnership countries;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 a (new) 69 a. Is concerned by researchers accusing EU vs Disinfo of not respecting the International Fact-Checking Network’s code of principles because its methodology would not be transparent enough, it would violate the right to freedom of expression and of the press by labelling publishers and media outlets that report on third party opinions as “disinforming outlets”, as well as it would fail to provide objective impartiality, as it does not provide the right to be heard; asks the EEAS to provide more information to the Parliament on the compliance of its review methodology with EU law and international standards;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes with grave concern that the total financial impact of all reservations by Directors-General to declarations of assurance amounted to EUR 1219 million for 2020, 16% higher than in 20191a; _________________ 1aAnnual Management and Performance Report 2020
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 72.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 72. Notes that following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union on 31 January 2020, the EEAS established, in close cooperation with the Commission
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 a (new) 73 a. regrets past situations of leakage to the press of confidential reports on elections observation missions and welcomes the solution founds between the EP and EEAS on the transmission of files; expresses confidence that EEAS will keep facilitating the regular exchange of views between the Chief Observers and Deputy Chief Observers and the MEPs, before, during and after an election observation mission;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78. Supports that in a number of countries additional measures were taken to reduce the medical risks posed to members of staff because the health care systems were deemed fragile; highlights that the EEAS shipped vaccines to the 72 Delegations asking for support, which were provided to around 4,000 people, including expatriate staff in Delegations, their family members and to local agents; points out that all members of staff in HQ were provided with a corporate laptop and that over 5 000 were dispatched to the Delegations, together with PPE and medical supplies for those who were most exposed, despite the challenging delivery in countries with quarantine or lockdown measures; acknowledges that the IT infrastructure was ramped up rapidly to meet the requirements of full-scale teleworking, including increasing the internet capacity and the capacity for video conferencing;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak also exposed the Union’s strategic and systemic vulnerabilities, such as supply chains or pharmaceutical products, and drew attention to the need for the Union to strengthen its own resilience and autonomy, while at the same time to pursue more assertively international partnerships;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 82 82. Supports the EEAS’ approach to calling for an assertive and comprehensive response as a main tool to aid recovery from a deep geopolitical crisis and to “build back better” at home and globally; encourages the EEAS to fully integrate in the internal management strategy the lessons drawn from the pandemic outbreak, in terms of business continuity and crisis management approaches, IT responsiveness, resilience of the organisation, duty of care towards its staff, effectiveness of internal communication and flexibility of working processes.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Notes with grave concern that the financial impact of the reservations for the policy area 'External relations' increased from EUR 16 million in 2019 to EUR 21 million in 2020; calls for immediate action to be taken by the Commission to address this issue;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the approved additional amounts are earmarked for financing the Action Plan against disinformation, the reinforcement of security in Delegations and HQ, investments in cyber-security, the replacement of a number of cost-free national experts with officials, an increase to the stipend amount for trainees in Delegations, , strengthening the structures of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), and some reinforcements of the geographical departments in high- priority key areas;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Finds scandalous the EEAS publication of the tender1aaiming to organise EU Study Tours of the Delegation of the European Union to the United States during the year 2020 in full pandemic and amounting to 400 000.00 EUR; stresses that, according to the tender, the EEAS has requested accommodation arrangements and related services three times a year for an average of 15 participants visiting Brussels and other EU Member States cities; _________________ 1aEEAS/DELUSAW/2020/OP/0007 - https://etendering.ted.europa.eu/cft/cft- display.html?cftId=5854
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes that following the “Innovative 2019” exercise, aiming at fostering simplification and modernisation of working procedures and processes, several actions were launched in 2020, in particular the centralisation of high-value calls for tenders, the treasury functions and the payment of individual entitlements; notes that in 2020 some operations, in particular pre-award matters for all procurement procedures, have been increasingly centralised at HQ level to
source: 703.193
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0153_EN.html
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0153_EN.html
|
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/3 |
|
events/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-703193_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-699319_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2022-01-11T00:00:00New
2022-02-01T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-699078_EN.html
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
commission |
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|