2021/2255(INI) The New European Bauhaus
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint Responsible Committee | ['ITRE', 'CULT'] |
EHLER Christian ( EPP),
ROS SEMPERE Marcos ( S&D)
|
ZOVKO Željana ( EPP),
TOIA Patrizia ( S&D),
LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew),
MIHAYLOVA Iskra ( Renew),
CUFFE Ciarán ( Verts/ALE),
RIBA I GINER Diana ( Verts/ALE),
DA RE Gianantonio ( ID),
LIZZI Elena ( ID),
MELBĀRDE Dace ( ECR),
BARRENA ARZA Pernando ( GUE/NGL),
ERNST Cornelia ( GUE/NGL)
|
| Committee Opinion | EMPL |
MANDERS Antonius ( EPP)
|
Romeo FRANZ ( Verts/ALE),
Jordi CAÑAS ( RE),
Manuel PIZARRO ( S&D),
Elena LIZZI ( ID)
|
| Committee Opinion | BUDG |
OLBRYCHT Jan ( EPP)
|
Martina DLABAJOVÁ ( RE),
Henrike HAHN ( Verts/ALE),
Joachim KUHS ( ID),
Ilan DE BASSO ( S&D)
|
| Committee Opinion | REGI |
MICHELS Martina ( GUE/NGL)
|
Raffaele FITTO ( ECR),
Ciarán CUFFE ( Verts/ALE)
|
| Committee Opinion | TRAN |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58Events
2023/01/05
EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2022/09/14
EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
2022/09/14
EP - Decision by Parliament
Details
The European Parliament adopted by 466 votes to 83, with 55 abstentions, a resolution on the new European Bauhaus.
The EU has been responding to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources, which require far-reaching and ambitious political action to implement the European Green Deal, which is driving the quest for renewal and innovation within planetary boundaries. As the ‘soul’ of the European Green Deal, the new European Bauhaus (NEB) aims to address Europe’s spatial and environmental needs in a transdisciplinary, sustainable, inclusive and aesthetic way.
Parliament supports the NEB project, which aspires to create a pan-European cultural movement contributing to a smarter, more sustainable, inclusive and enjoyable living environment and promoting the development of knowledge at local and global level. The project should focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by creating healthy and affordable living spaces, rethinking the status quo and transforming the spaces, buildings, cities and territories in which they live.
Governance and criteria for the New European Bauhaus
The resolution encouraged Member States to implement the NBE in their national policies and called on the Commission to: (i) provide an integrated governance model for the NEB, based on citizens' participation and ownership, (ii) provide timely information on how to participate in the NBE, including through technical assistance for interested stakeholders and good practice.
Parliament insisted that the criteria for the selection and evaluation of projects under the new European Bauhaus should be clearly defined. In particular, these projects should meet the following criteria: (i) support the implementation of major policies such as the Green Deal and the Digital Decade, as well as environmental, industrial, social and cultural policies; (ii) be fully in line with the New European Bauhaus guiding principles of sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics; (iii) contribute to the creation of new jobs and business opportunities; (iv) promote accessibility and affordability; (v) promote citizen participation; (vi) involve the cultural and creative sectors, including cultural creators; and (vii) be aligned to indicators associated with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
The Commission is called on to further broaden the reach of the NEB by involving associated and partner countries outside the EU to take part in the initiative, including by means of a permanent dialogue on the NEB. Parliament acknowledged that the NEB has the potential to contribute to the post-war restoration of cities, societies and the economy, in particular in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Funding
Deploring the lack of clarity regarding the funding of the NEB from 2023 onwards, Members called for an amendment to the Horizon Europe regulation in the context of the mid-term review of the current multiannual financial framework to create a ‘new European Bauhaus’ programme with EUR 500 million . The Commission is invited to come forward as soon as possible with a proposal to make the NEB a new stand-alone EU programme , before the adoption of the next MFF, without burdening the funding of other under-funded programmes, in particular Creative Europe, Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps. Member States are encouraged to allocate sufficient funds in line with the principles of the NEB, through their recovery and resilience plans and the European Structural and Investment Funds.
Development and priority areas
The resolution stressed that the NEB should:
- promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of living based on new, holistic models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment, with the meaningful involvement of residents in decision-making processes;
- provide an opportunity to envision a well-designed green regeneration of public spaces with the aim of achieving decarbonisation objectives, to retrofit and repurpose obsolete buildings, to transform old industrial areas into new green urban and public spaces, and to build the relevant infrastructure to facilitate physical activity, knowledge and cultural exchanges;
- promote 15-minute cities to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance and to provide innovative solutions for the development of sustainable urban areas, including sustainable mobility solutions;
- showcase affordable, socially inclusive and energy efficient buildings , and contribute to a modal shift towards public and collective transport and less polluting means of transport;
- support initiatives for the construction and renovation of affordable, quality and energy-efficient social housing ;
- promote energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and supporting low-tech, zero-emission and energy-efficient solutions and materials;
- facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide.
Implementation
The report called on the Commission and Member States to connect the NEB with the renovation wave strategy . Members support the creation, in partnership with relevant stakeholders, of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in a systematic, comprehensive and inclusive way, which determines the value of projects in terms of sustainability and from an economic, environmental and social perspective.
The Commission is called on to create a public, digital and easily accessible database of NEB projects and actions to make the results of the initiative more visible, to further develop the NEB based on best practices, including within the cultural sector, and to strengthen knowledge sharing, research and development.
Documents
2022/09/13
EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
2022/07/19
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report presented by Christian EHLER (EPP, DE) and Marcos ROS SEMPERE (S&D, ES) on the new European Bauhaus.
Members recalled that the original Bauhaus movement marked a profound change in design, architecture and the arts, which left important legacies for the democratisation of culture, led to fundamental innovations and promoted genuine cultural and social change in a progressive artistic and educational environment in the aftermath of the First World War, while at the same time having a positive impact on everyday life.
Main objectives
Members support the European Bauhaus Project (NEB), which aspires to create a pan-European cultural movement contributing to a smarter, more sustainable, inclusive and enjoyable living environment and promoting the development of knowledge at local and global level. The project should focus primarily on:
- improving the quality of life by creating healthy and affordable living spaces, rethinking the status quo and transforming spaces, buildings, cities, rural areas and territories, including in less developed, peri-urban, rural, remote or cross-border areas and regions;
- improving cohabitation and public spaces , in the interest of social cohesion and democratic life, by providing solutions to the problems of spatial segregation and the long-term exclusion of certain social groups and by protecting the environment when planning and constructing buildings and their surrounding spaces.
The new European Bauhaus could help to reshape the ways policies are conceived and shape the spatial and design environment of the future, with a view to a more sustainable, inclusive and aesthetic Europe. These ambitions can only be realised through well-designed, long-term projects.
Governance and criteria for the New European Bauhaus
The report encouraged Member States to implement the NBE in their national policies and called on the Commission to: (i) provide an integrated governance model for the NEB, based on citizens' participation and ownership, (ii) provide timely information on how to participate in the NBE, including through technical assistance for interested stakeholders and good practice.
The report insisted that the criteria for the selection and evaluation of projects under the new European Bauhaus should be clearly defined. In particular, these projects should meet the following criteria: (i) support the implementation of major policies such as the Green Deal and the Digital Decade, as well as environmental, industrial, social and cultural policies; (ii) be fully in line with the New European Bauhaus guiding principles of sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics; (iii) contribute to the creation of new jobs and business opportunities; (iv) promote accessibility and affordability; (v) promote citizen participation; (vi) involve the cultural and creative sectors, including cultural creators; and (vii) be aligned to indicators associated with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Funding
Deploring the lack of clarity regarding the funding of the NEB from 2023 onwards, Members called for an amendment to the Horizon Europe regulation in the context of the mid-term review of the current multiannual financial framework to create a ‘new European Bauhaus’ programme with EUR 500 million . The Commission is invited to come forward as soon as possible with a proposal to make the NEB a new stand-alone EU programme , before the adoption of the next MFF, without burdening the funding of other under-funded programmes, in particular Creative Europe, Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps. Member States are encouraged to allocate sufficient funds in line with the principles of the NEB, through their recovery and resilience plans and the European Structural and Investment Funds.
Development and priority areas
Members consider that the NEB should:
- promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of living based on new, holistic models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment, with the meaningful involvement of residents in decision-making processes;
- provide an opportunity to envision a well-designed green regeneration of public spaces with the aim of achieving decarbonisation objectives, to retrofit and repurpose obsolete buildings, to transform old industrial areas into new green urban and public spaces, and to build the relevant infrastructure to facilitate physical activity, knowledge and cultural exchanges;
- promote 15-minute cities to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance and to provide innovative solutions for the development of sustainable urban areas, including sustainable mobility solutions;
- showcase affordable, socially inclusive and energy efficient buildings , and contribute to a modal shift towards public and collective transport and less polluting means of transport;
- support initiatives for the construction and renovation of affordable, quality and energy-efficient social housing ;
- promote energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and supporting low-tech, zero-emission and energy-efficient solutions and materials;
- facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide.
The report stressed the importance of supporting entrepreneurs, start-ups, talent and skills through business development services and training, thus contributing to the Green Deal for Europe by highlighting efforts to develop high-impact solutions for improved sustainability and quality of life.
Implementation
The report called on the Commission and Member States to connect the NEB with the renovation wave strategy . Members support the creation, in partnership with relevant stakeholders, of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in a systematic, comprehensive and inclusive way, which determines the value of projects in terms of sustainability and from an economic, environmental and social perspective.
The Commission and the Member States are invited to encourage the direct involvement of local and regional authorities in the design and implementation of projects.
Documents
2022/07/12
EP - Vote in committee
2022/06/20
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/06/15
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/03/17
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/01/13
EP - EHLER Christian (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2022/01/13
EP - ROS SEMPERE Marcos (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2021/12/16
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - OLBRYCHT Jan (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2021/10/25
EP - MANDERS Antonius (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2021/09/27
EP - MICHELS Martina (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)642
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0319/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0213/2022
- Committee opinion: PE719.934
- Committee opinion: PE704.689
- Committee opinion: PE703.237
- Committee opinion: PE703.237
- Committee opinion: PE704.689
- Committee opinion: PE719.934
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)642
Activities
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Eva KAILI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Antonius MANDERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Martina MICHELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Iskra MIHAYLOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Patrizia TOIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Juozas OLEKAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Alexis GEORGOULIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Ciarán CUFFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Pernille WEISS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Elżbieta KRUK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
- Ilan DE BASSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/13 The new European Bauhaus (debate)
Votes
Le nouveau Bauhaus européen - The new European Bauhaus - Das Neue Europäische Bauhaus - A9-0213/2022 - Christian Ehler, Marcos Ros Sempere - Proposition de résolution #
2022/09/14 Outcome: +: 466, -: 83, 0: 55
PPE
The Left
NI| Amendments | Dossier |
| 721 |
2021/2255(INI)
2022/02/07
BUDG
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal, achieving climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest, promoting just green and digital transition of the European economy, as well as fighting the biodiversity crisis through the intersection of art and culture; emphasises the importance of ensuring coherence with legislative and programming instruments and a level of ambition that is in line with EU’s climate commitments, by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role; stresses that the NEB must not erode funding for core programme objectives as agreed by the legislator nor divert focus from agreed political priorities;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the NEB should have a separate line of funding so as not to affect that of other ongoing programmes; calls on the Commission to reflect on the volume of funding needed for the objectives set, identify the financial resources in the budget and submit proposals for NEB funding;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; stresses the importance of making regional and local authorities aware of this initiative so that they can access the corresponding opportunities and funding; calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; calls on the Commission to develop and present to the Parliament a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; notes a lack of communication regarding the proposed NEB objectives and opportunities and calls on the Commission and Member States to endeavour to promote the project among European citizens;
Amendment 16 #
5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; stresses the need to ensure that circularity and sustainable criteria for building materials are at the heart of the selection for pilot projects;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase; underlines that
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase, including an assessment of its contribution to the achievement of the Union’s Green Deal objectives and its effectiveness in promoting synergies between the different Union programmes; underlines that, if continued, the NEB must be designed to ensure democratic oversight and safeguard the role of the budgetary authority; insists that any decision to develop the NEB into a longer-term initiative or programme requires fresh resources as part of the necessary mid-term revision of the MFF.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension; stresses that the NEB must include all Member States of the European Union and be accessible to all citizens, including those in small urban, rural and other remote or isolated areas;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension by bringing together environmental and social sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics in the places where people live and in the way they live;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU’s energy demand, are the single largest energy consumer in Europe and account for 36% of the EU’s CO2 emissions; stresses that, in line with the European Green Deal, the NEB should focus on preparing our current building stock and infrastructure for a more sustainable and climate- friendly future; emphasises that conservation and preservation of monuments and culturally relevant historic buildings should be taken into account;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus initiative, which bridges the worlds of science and technology, art and culture to efficiently address societal issues and build sustainable and inclusive living spaces, but notes with concern that a coherent and strategic approach for the financing of the initiative is still lacking; Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; considers also that the mere re- deployment of existing funds may not be sufficient to achieve the objectives of this initiative and emphasises the need for new funds;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; calls on the European Commission to ensure that all categories of beneficiary in every Member State have access to the resources and results available from the pilot phase; calls on the Commission to introduce a pronounced educational component in the implementation of the pilot phase;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; asks the Commission to clarify its budgetary approach for continuation of the NEB after the pilot phase; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed yet for what is a new initiative;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role;
source: 704.871
2022/03/23
EMPL
140 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the New European Bauhaus (NEB) aims to reimagine the way we live together and to create awareness about our built and designed environment, including in terms of quality and sustainability; whereas the NEB intends to make the benefits of the green transition a tangible reality in citizens' everyday lives and at a local and neighbourhood level; whereas New European Bauhaus projects should be in line with the principles of the EPSR and the UN SDGs;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas a transdisciplinary approach to the opportunities and challenges arising from the green and digital transitions can foster innovative solutions which serve people and communities in a circular and future- proof way; whereas there is a need for such solutions to mainstream a gender- equal and intersectional approach, inclusivity for persons with disabilities as well as inter-generational solidarity;
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Invites the Member States to incentivise the preservation and revaluation of know-how by finding local craftspeople, promoting their work, creating a network and bringing them closer to relevant VET and higher education curricula; encourages the Member States to launch targeted actions to support the upskilling of workers, innovation, research and education within the entire construction ecosystem with the support of professional organisations that offer continuous professional development; notes that innovative education and training models for architects and professionals in the construction sector are necessary to promote greater synergies between spatial planning, design, arts, landscape and interior architecture, craftsmanship and architecture, and achieve a high-quality built environment;
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the New European Bauhaus as a tool to implement the European Parliament resolutions on combating homelessness[1]and ensuring access to adequate and affordable housing[2], by promoting social and publicly funded housing; [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2020-0314_EN.html[2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0020_EN.html
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6 e. Considers that the digital transition can be key in enhancing the use of local resources and competences, as digital fabrication in fablabs or industries allows for a local distribution of production and, in many cases, gives a new life to certain traditions that could otherwise fade away;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6 e. Stresses that the Commission and Member States should use New European Bauhaus housing solutions to provide permanent housing for homeless persons and enforce the “housing first”[1]principle; [1] https://housingfirsteurope.eu/guide/core- principles-housing-first/
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Underlines that Small and Medium Enterprises are important employers at the local level and can adapt quickly to innovate; cautions, however, against the risk that they may be pushed out of markets due to the very rapid transition to large scale solutions in industry such as the construction materials industry; invites the Commission and the Member States to reflect on how to best support SMEs in construction as well as in design and materials production;
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Welcomes the inclusive nature of the New European Bauhaus movement; proposes the cooperation with stakeholders and local authorities to ensure equal access to housing for all and tackle discrimination on grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, disabilities, economic and social status and religion;
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6 g. Underlines the important role of the New European Bauhaus in the promotion of gender equality; proposes the use of New European Bauhaus housing and neighbourhood projects to ensure access to safe and affordable housing for women, in particular single mothers and victims of domestic violence, as well as access to services such as child care, psychological and social support in the neighbourhood;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6 g. Welcomes initiatives such as Interreg’s CRAFTS CODE to improve the competitiveness of SMEs in the crafts sector by creating a framework stimulating capacity building and policy learning and improving the implementation of regional development policies and programmes aimed at supporting these SMEs across their life cycle;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 h (new) 6 h. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all New European Bauhaus housing and neighbourhood projects provide affordable and accessible connectivity for all citizens;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the principles of the New European Bauhaus should not give rise to overly interventionist policies, but rather policies respectful of property rights;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to require Member States to ensure a minimum of 100 m² of green space per home when planning New European Bauhaus housing projects, and a minimum of one hectare of continuous green space per New European Bauhaus neighbourhood as an investment in healthy housing taking into account the lessons of the pandemic;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to require Member States to
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that New European Bauhaus projects will contribute to reduce the land use for buildings, by focussing for example on the renovation of the existing housing stock and the use of already built-up areas;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Member States to recognise advantageous arrangements for house purchases by means of tax reductions and introducing tax exemptions and tax relief;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Notes that empowering local communities to incorporate elements of food security within local areas and regions and to generate energy locally connects to employment and social affairs and can contribute to social equity, resilience and cohesion, ambitions that chime with the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls in regards to Russia's war in Ukraine to re-evaluate the energy- question and - in view of the large number of refugees-, to intensify all efforts concerning human rights, as well as the inclusion dimension; calls on the Commission and the Members States to take into account these new challenges and implications in The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 126 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure better recognition and compensation of asbestos-related and other occupational diseases to all exposed workers in order to protect the health of construction and other workers in the green transition and The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to recognise the digital dimension as an explicit part of how future spaces are conceived; notes that the values that New European Bauhaus promotes for the development of the built environment should be mirrored in the digital sphere;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure good governance, transparency and accountability towards relevant stakeholders for all New European Bauhaus projects;
Amendment 129 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on the Commission to invest in prefabricated housing to quickly reduce housing shortages;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 130 #
8 b. Calls on the Commission to cooperate with local authorities and stakeholders so that citizens looking for housing have access to information on available New European Bauhaus housing projects; stresses the importance of strengthening the institutional and structured participation of tenants and residents and urges the Commission to facilitate this process by providing them with the necessary knowledge and information about the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to significantly increase their focus on prevention strategies such, for example by strengthening labour inspectorates, national health and safety services and social partner dialogue to ensure that all employees have a right to the highest level of health and safety protection possible in the implementation of The New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Welcomes the so-called 15-minute city model implemented by some European cities and invites Member States to consider replicating that model in more cities; encourages the Member States to cluster rural towns to better share resources and capacities with a view to supporting resilience;
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Calls on the Commission to present a clear NEB roadmap for the next decade with clear objectives; Invites the Commission to work alongside stakeholders to make the New European Bauhaus more understandable and inclusive for communities and local authorities; encourages the Commission to launch a dedicated website with an accessible and user-friendly repository of bottom-up best practices, including best practice adaptive re-use and energy upgrade;
Amendment 134 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Stresses that health and safety of workers in construction or renovation, in particular to New European Bauhaus projects, should be ensured, and that protective equipment should be provided;
Amendment 135 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8 d. Calls on the Member States who have not done so already to set up and support a state architect team (and similar) within their administration to provide strategic advice to authorities, promote spatial quality, improve the design and sustainability of public interventions, including their social inclusion considerations, and to foster a culture of place-making; calls on the Member States to set up a quality assurance system, an independent advisory body for public authorities, consisting of experts from other geographical areas and who have no personal interest in the place;6a _________________ 6a European Commission, Directorate- General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, Towards a shared culture of architecture : investing in a high-quality living environment for everyone : executive summary, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/502671
Amendment 136 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8 d. Calls on the Commission to adopt measures for tenants of New European Bauhaus projects to protect them from exposure to asbestos and other harmful materials during energy renovation works; emphasizes that all tenants should be protected from carrying the expenses of the renovation works; stresses that temporary adequate accommodation for tenants should be ensured during renovation works; welcomes the use of safe and sustainable materials for the construction and renovation of all New European Bauhaus projects;
Amendment 137 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8 e. Encourages the Member States to appoint a New European Bauhaus contact to coordinate local efforts and participate in an EU wide informal network to exchange best practices in collaboration with the high-level roundtable; calls on the Commission to duly include all levels of governance in the development and implementation of the New European Bauhaus, be it national, regional or local – as the level closest to citizens -, and to build on the movement of civil society organisations and partners created by the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 138 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8 e. Urges for EU-funded upskilling and training, in particular to digital tools, of workers in New European Bauhaus relevant sectors; calls on the Commission to ensure diversity and equal representation in the New European Bauhaus work environment; urges that workers’ and unions’ rights in the New European Bauhaus work environment should be safeguarded;
Amendment 139 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8 f. Calls on the Commission to designate 2023 the European Year of Craft, 40 years after the first European Year, namely the European Year of SMEs and Craft Industry, with a view to making the craft sector more visible, strengthening the principles championed by the New European Bauhaus and taking stock of the evolution of the sector in the last four decades.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the New European Bauhaus i
Amendment 140 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 g (new) 8 g. Stresses the importance for Member States to integrate New European Bauhaus projects as part of the reforms and investments foreseen in their national recovery and resilience plans in line with the six pillars of the RRF;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the New European Bauhaus movement focuses on creating a healthy, sustainable, beautiful and accessible environment, landscape, housing, workplace, society, economy and way of living;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the New European Bauhaus initiative should be based on innovation at all levels and the active participation and involvement of people and local communities including the integration of female creativity and knowledge in the planning of the daily life in the homes and city spaces as well as the future ways of living;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas The New European Bauhaus movement will include massive renovation works; whereas although asbestos has been banned in the EU since 2005, it is still often present in administrative buildings, schools, housing, infrastructure and public- transport facilities;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the New European Bauhaus aims to capitalise on social assets (social economy organisations, local associations, etc.), natural assets and cultural assets to regain a sense of belonging;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Whereas the New Bauhaus movement should be a continuation of the original Bauhaus, which introduced the social role of art and architecture in addressing societal needs;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Whereas the New European Bauhaus must connect all Member States;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. Whereas EU citizens face growing difficulties in finding affordable housing, mainly due to housing speculation, the expansive growth of short-term holiday rentals and the consequential increase in rental prices;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. whereas the New European Bauhaus should ensure design for ability and empowerment, by designing environments that actively welcome everyone;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) D c. Whereas the cost of living in EU countries is rapidly rising due to the inflation growth and the energy and fuel crisis in the eurozone; whereas energy poverty is rising among low-income households in the EU;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) D c. whereas inclusive environments such as shared infrastructures and services and public spaces enable a sense of shared identity and belonging;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital D d (new) Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital D d (new) D d. whereas the inclusion of local communities and meaningful local ownership play a key role in the process of decarbonisation;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital D e (new) D e. whereas the New European Bauhaus has been a co-creation process and its implementation should also involve the participation of the communities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the New European Bauhaus should facilitate and steer the transformation of our societies in line with three interlinked values: inclusion - from valorising diversity, to securing accessibility and affordability, to aesthetics- quality of experience and style, beyond functionality, and sustainability - from climate goals, to circularity, zero pollution, and biodiversity;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital D e (new) D e. Whereas the need for housing spaces in the EU will increase due to the expected rise of refugees fleeing the war on Ukraine and other non-EU countries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Recital D f (new) D f. Whereas homelessness in the EU has risen 70% in the past decade; whereas estimates show that there are approximately 700.000 homeless people on any given night in the EU; whereas 4.1 million people in the EU are exposed to homelessness each year for a shorter or longer period, while there are more than 11 million empty houses in the European Union;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Recital D g (new) D g. Whereas buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are intertwined values at the core of the New European Bauhaus initiative and calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the universal right to adequate, affordable and healthy housing conditions, including social housing;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the universal right to a
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure they support the
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that sustainability and inclusion are values at the core of the New European Bauhaus and calls on the
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas housing policy in the Member States should be guided by the common principles of bringing down housing prices so as to make housing accessible to citizens both for sale and rent, including with the option to buy, as well to ensure legal certainty;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure gender equality and the inclusion of minorities and people with disabilities in projects supported in the context of the New European Bauhaus; calls on the Commission to ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities in each application for the New European Bauhaus prizes, as appropriate;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses that the announcement of the Commission for the New European Bauhaus initiative must be followed up by concrete action and receive sufficient financial support in the long-run to make it meaningful and ensure added value;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Member States to cut red tape in access to housing, liberalise access to land and combat illegal occupation;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes that inclusion implies pursuing a Design for All approach to remove accessibility barriers; calls on the Member States to pay particular attention to the groups and individuals who are at risk of exclusion, at greater risk of energy poverty and air pollution, or who are experiencing homelessness; calls on the Commission to ensure that the construction and built environment projected and funded through the New European Bauhaus consider a Design for All approach as a requirement;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Stresses the need to support changes not only in cities but also in rural and remote areas; calls on the Commission to ensure the inclusiveness of the New European Bauhaus Lab and its participation in rural and remote areas; calls on the Commission to support projects providing inclusive job opportunities, in particular in rural and remote areas;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to examine how the New European Bauhaus can contribute to the goal of reducing and eradicating homelessness and supporting homeless people's social inclusion; invites the Commission and Member States to explore links between the Housing First approach and the New European Bauhaus; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from community- designing projects in the field of architecture and sociability such as Home not Shelter, mixed housing and cohousing for young people and refugees, intergenerational cohousing schemes, etc., and promote them in their housing policies;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Highlights the need to promote the New European Bauhaus values in every Member State and in particular in low- income Member States to assist their socio-economic development;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green trans
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the industrial ecosystem through the New European Bauhaus, while making sure no one is left behind; stresses that this initiative should consider the needs of communities and groups most vulnerable to the effects of this change, and in desperate need for a fair and just New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the industrial ecosystem
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. Whereas the New European Bauhaus Lab will serve to reach out to society, industry and politics to connect people and find new ways of creating together;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to continue the green transition of the housing and industrial ecosystem through the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the Commission to use the New European Bauhaus to realize social sustainability whilst protecting EU citizens, in particular vulnerable groups, from the social impact of the European Green Deal with regard to housing and energy efficiency;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on Member States to introduce genuine aid for access to housing;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to mandate the development of an EU technical standard for New European Bauhaus housing projects in the form of standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), which
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) A b. Whereas New European Bauhaus projects should invest in good thermal isolation to be able to partly offset rising heating costs and achieving the Paris climate agreement;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to mandate the development of an EU technical standard for New European Bauhaus housing projects in the form of standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), which
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes the European Commission’s European Level(s) framework which provides clear priorities and a standardised basis to assess and report on the sustainability of buildings throughout their fully lifecycle; encourages the Member States to use the Davos Baukultur Quality System (DBQS) to determine the Baukultur quality of a spatial intervention, its strengths and weaknesses from a Baukultur perspective;2a _________________ 2a For a definition, please refer to the Council conclusions on culture, high- quality architecture and built environment as key elements of the New European Bauhaus initiative of 30 November 2021.
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that responsibility for housing policies as well as spatial planning lies within Member States’ competences; stresses that the New Bauhaus Initiative cannot lead to the development of a common architectural style across the European Union, with no regard for national and local specificities as well as the cultural and historical context;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on the Commission to have an own fund to finance New European Bauhaus projects, and to cooperate with citizens, neighbourhood organisations and relevant social enterprises, such as NGOs and cooperatives, as well as local authorities in the decision making process;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Expects a successful New European Bauhaus initiative to create new quality employment in the construction, restoration, architecture, design, textile, cultural and creative sectors, and to offer upskilling and reskilling opportunities;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights the importance that local and regional authorities should actively enable the take-up of the New European Bauhaus construction style as it is based on EU standards and values;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a common European identity and a shared sense of belonging based on the conviction that housing is not a luxury that only a few can afford;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus movement, as it contributes to creating a
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recalls that cultural heritage plays an important role in enhancing and creating social capital because it helps to reduce social disparities, facilitates social inclusion, promotes social cohesion and intergenerational dialogue3a;notes that the uptake of digital technologies by cultural heritage sites can offer accessible and innovative experiences for communities; _________________ 3a Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe, Council of the European Union, 20 May 2014
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Urges the Commission to increase efforts in making this initiative more inclusive; notes that most contributions are related to aesthetics or sustainability while accessibility, affordability and inclusion are less present;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to promote and support sustainable housing solutions that lead to more inclusive communities, life-proof housing and solidarity between the generations through the New European Bauhaus, enabling elderly people and persons with disabilities to live at home and to remain active in society for longer and to pass on their experience and knowledge to younger generations;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Considers that the New European Bauhaus should guarantee the quality of housing and social housing; welcomes the acknowledgement of the need to prioritise reuse, regeneration, life extension and transformation of existing buildings over the construction of new ones whenever these activities are technically, economically and functionally feasible as they contribute to reduced energy needs, carbon emissions and pressure for new buildings, and to an improved health, comfort and well-being; is concerned about the disproportionate impact of the poor energy performance of social housing on those who already have lower living standards;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to place in the New European Bauhaus a greater focus on disadvantaged groups, including people experiencing, homelessness, racism, discrimination, poverty and social exclusion; emphasizes in this regards a human-rights based and intersectional, non-discriminatory approach at its core;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to introduce aid for young people and families to access housing, taking into account their needs;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative is guided by the principles of sustainability, inclusiveness, reconnecting with nature, regaining a sense of belonging, prioritising the places and people that need it most, and fostering long-term, life cycle and integrated thinking in the industrial and housing ecosystem;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to proactively reach out to social actors and organisations representing civil society and notably disadvantaged, vulnerable groups as New European Bauhaus partners; recalls, that in order to realize the inclusiveness of the New European Bauhaus, a non-paternalistic approach together with the affected people is essential, who need to be equally represented as promoters, community managers and key interlocutors for the initiative;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Proposes the use of the New Bauhaus to ensure citizens’ “Right to the City”[1], and to help them to reclaim the city as a space created with their participation, as a space of encounter, societal interaction, collective actions and activities and on the basis of collective participation;[1] https://www.right2city.org/
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the authorities to roll out stronger regulatory and fiscal support mechanisms for energy upgrade, repurposing and renovation of existing buildings, which take into consideration the intangible heritage and culture of buildings;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the Commission to take action through the NEB for marginalised Roma communities, living in environmentally polluted areas, with no access to safe drinking water and sanitation, and to support access to decent, safe and adequate housing; urges the Commission to implement NEB projects that aim to truly improve the living conditions of this vulnerable groups and to contribute to territorial developments avoiding spatial segregation of marginalised Roma communities and other vulnerable groups;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Proposes the use of New European Bauhaus to develop neighbourhoods with open, inclusive, accessible and vibrant spaces that promote equality, cultural exchange, democracy and strengthen the sense of community, co-existence and cooperation;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that New European Bauhaus projects promote social and affordable housing as a way to combine social justice, environmental performance and urban aesthetics;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5 d. Welcomes the intention of the New European Bauhaus initiative to promote 15-minute cities[1] in order to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance; [1] https://www.15minutecity.com/
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 e (new) 5 e. Stresses the importance of proximity, functionality and accessibility in planning New European Bauhaus neighbourhoods and 15-minute cities, with particular focus on persons with disabilities; underlines the role of mobility and interconnectivity in safeguarding work-life balance, time efficiency and reduction of energy and fuel costs;
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 f (new) 5 f. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should be used to develop sustainable, aesthetic and inclusive neighbourhoods that allow for access to affordable goods and services for all;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 g (new) 5 g. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should promote social cohesion and interaction by developing projects that provide cultural and creative activities as well as care for people of all ages and groups, such as community centres and multigenerational housing projects;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the implementation of the New European Bauhaus initiative is guided by the
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in reviving traditional building techniques and materials which contribute to the objectives of the European Green Deal; urges the Commission and the Member States to also invest in high-quality spatial design and landscape and in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs based on the above-mentioned quality criteria to create a New European Bauhaus way of thinking
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs to create a New European Bauhaus way of thinking and to contribute to an EU-wide healthy lifestyle for all Europeans; calls on the Commission and Member States to invest in new forms of city-planning in order to create sustainable, green and inclusive living;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in developing new, sustainable building techniques and designs
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Commission to define concrete guidelines and guiding principles according to the New European Bauhaus to ensure the quality of the concepts for our built environment in terms of architecture, space and sustainability of the materials used; notes, however, that public space, infrastructure and buildings must be constructed bearing in mind the local planning context, to prevent regional differences and specificities from becoming levelled out;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Proposes that the New European Bauhaus should focus on the use and energy upgrade of the already existing empty housing spaces in the EU; stresses that New European Bauhaus projects should aim to bring back to life, renovate and reuse existing buildings instead of building new ones, and use as little new space as possible;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that social housing must remain affordable for people with low incomes and that New European Bauhaus could contribute to this goal;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Believes that craftsmanship ensures the longevity of the infrastructure, buildings and public space; considers that craftspeople facilitate social cohesion and the preservation of rural communities, and, given their deep acquaintance with the raw materials they work with, usually local materials, their production has a lower carbon footprint;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Calls on the Commission to take into account that housing costs should be no higher than 25% of the disposable income of a household; calls for the cooperation with local authorities, residents and other relevant stakeholders to ensure affordable rents and security of tenure based on fair and safe tenancy agreements;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Reiterates the call by the Council on the Commission to ensure that architectural quality and a professional architectural service are taken into account in all its measures, policies and programmes, and to encourage the mobility and training of professionals and students of that field;5a _________________ 5a Council Resolution of 12 February 2001 on architectural quality in urban and rural environments
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Underlines the need to develop accessible and affordable New European Bauhaus housing solutions for young people, groups that are vulnerable to social exclusion and citizens who are not considered eligible for housing aid, but are still unable to afford a mortgage or high rental prices;
source: 729.994
2022/04/28
REGI
66 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, which is intended to
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountainous areas and islands
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas a
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas and islands in line with the Art. 174 TFEU; emphasises that local and regional authorities and stakeholders and above all residents must be the drivers of NEB projects;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas, cross-border areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas and islands; emphasises that local and regional authorities, companies and all stakeholders
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas and islands; emphasises that local and regional authorities and stakeholders and above all residents must be the drivers of NEB projects, offering all parties concerned the possibility of sharing visions and challenges;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas, outermost regions as definded in Article 349 TFEU and islands; emphasises that local and regional authorities and stakeholders and above all residents must be the drivers of NEB projects;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the importance of the multi-level governance principle, and calls on New European Bauhaus initiative to take into account the different territorial realities in order to ensure that citizens across all the EU have access to beautiful, sustainable and innovative solutions, in rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, cross-border, mountain regions; calls to ensure an even distribution of NEB pilot projects across all territories, including rural areas and outermost regions;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Recalls the importance of geographical balance for this initiative, which should seek to be equally present in all EU territories, and to maintain an appropriate balance between urban and rural areas; calls for the NEB to reduce existing disparities in the development of regions in the EU and to address problems as depopulation, lack of infrastructure, ageing population, etc. suffered by some areas in the EU, providing solutions based on respect for heritage, the environment and rural areas;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Believes that cities and regions are crucial actors in driving culture forward, and that the local and regional levels have key responsibilities for sustainable urban, regional and cultural policies; therefore, local and regional elected representatives are key in making the NEB more accessible and involving citizens in the participation processes;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, which is intended to r
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions and respect the principle of energy efficiency first (EE1st) in urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable renovation, building conversions, and the recreation of public and green space as the centre of community life, particularly for those groups and areas that need it the most; that the NEB should be climate- and user- friendly, particularly with regards to persons with disabilities or reduced mobility;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions in urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions in urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable renovation, building conversions, and the recreation of public space as the centre of community life,
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that the NEB will only have added value if it is realised on the basis of a genuinely integrated approach that addresses not only social problems and climate challenges, but also residents' well-being and social cohesion; considers that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions in urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable renovation, building conversions, and the recreation of public space as the centre of community life, particularly for those groups and areas that need it the most;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions in urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable renovation, building conversions, and the recreation of public space as the centre of community life, particularly for those groups and areas that need it the most, while always respecting the local traditions and needs of different EU territories;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the fact that NEB projects should contribute to the affordability and accessibility of the green and digital transitions in the enhancement of research capacities, urban and spatial planning, housing, resilient and sustainable renovation, the promotion of energy efficiency measures, building conversions, and the recreation of public space as the centre of community life, particularly for those groups and areas that need it the most;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls for the NEB to provide innovative solutions for the development of sustainable and innovative urban areas, such as sustainable mobility solutions, inclusive public spaces and nature-based solutions;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Calls on the European Commission to study the creation of European harmonised and sustainable urban development indicators to measure the evolution of our cities and territories through the correct application and development of European funds, and especially of NEB projects;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, which is intended to
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Proposes that the New Bauhaus be used to ensure the 'Right to the City'1a for citizens and to help them reclaim the city as a space created with their participation, as a space of encounter, societal interaction, collective actions and activities and on the basis of collective participation; _________________ 1a https://www.right2city.org/
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that the specific objectives of the new Bauhaus initiative need to include the creation of new jobs and new business opportunities, especially in economically and socially depressed regions, with particular reference to peripheral urban areas and rural, mountainous, coastal, island and sparsely populated areas;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the intention of the NEB initiative to promote 15-minute cities1a in order to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance; _________________ 1a https://www.15minutecity.com/
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses that - as part of the NEB initiative - good, accessible and affordable housing solutions must be developed, with the involvement of tenants and residents in the decision-making processes, which, in accordance with the best possible standards and within tenants' and residents' financial means, help reduce the eco-footprint of housing and energy and resource use in buildings and counter energy poverty; calls for long-term investment in sustainable and affordable housing in order to contribute to stable housing markets and thus counter the negative effects of property speculation, end homelessness, and support local economic growth and employment opportunities, research and innovation;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Suggests that a guaranteed universal material subsistence level be negotiated with welfare organisations and tenants' associations in the context of which ecological construction, conversions and new builds for housing purposes, as well as public-space design and accessibility, revert to being strictly matters for democratic decision-sharing and that the NEB be used to open up scope for embedding these democratic processes into local politics in a socially inclusive, successful and sustainable manner;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Points to the opportunities afforded by renovating, reusing and repurposing old and abandoned buildings and sites to form healthy and affordable housing or public cultural, artistic and recreational spaces, including in connection with safeguarding and preserving cultural heritage;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities, requiring expert creative, scientific and technological perspectives; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information on projects, funding, technological and capacity-building opportunities as well as clear definitions of award criteria;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, which is intended to round off the European Green Deal and complement strategies for territorial, social and economic cohesion, in so far as it is a motor for economic development, with its values of beautiful, sustainable and inclusive solutions, and which always pays due regard to cultural heritage and its original form, thereby improving quality of life for people in the EU;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB, as decentralised management allows for a better territorial approach; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information on projects, funding, technological and capacity- building opportunities as well as clear definitions of award criteria;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information on
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB and their ability to facilitate the process rather than hinder it by potentially introducing additional criteria or redundancies; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information on projects, funding, technological and
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information on projects, including small-scale projects, funding, technological and capacity- building opportunities as well as clear definitions of award criteria;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the NEB encompasses many dimensions and policy areas, which may make it difficult for regional and local authorities to fully understand how to make the most of its opportunities; underlines the crucial role of local and regional authorities in implementing the NEB; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide specific and targeted information and guidelines on projects, funding, technological and capacity-building opportunities as well as clear definitions of award criteria;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that the NEB links the three pillars of the Urban Agenda for the EU, calls for the NEB to be linked to EU Urban Agenda partnerships, as this Agenda has been working on concepts related to the Green Deal and the NEB for nearly four years, especially in relation to climate action capacity, the Greening Cities proposal and use of public spaces;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Underlines that the NEB, in order to be really impactful, visible and successful in the long term, requires fresh financial resources;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Highlights the successful work carried out by URBACT on developing tools which should build synergies with the NEB to foster territorial cooperation and encourage innovation in the exchange of good practices in urban regeneration;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding is crucial for encouraging and implementing NEB ideas and projects at a local level; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide local and regional authorities with relevant and user-friendly information on all financial possibilities and to support the sharing of best practices; highlights the ability of the NEB to provide greater opportunities for local and regional authorities, as well as NGOs, to learn best practices from each other, particularly when it comes to inclusive projects with meaningful participation of NGOs and other relevant stakeholders, and interdisciplinary coordination.
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding is crucial for encouraging and implementing NEB ideas and projects at a local level; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide local and regional authorities with relevant and user-friendly information on all financial possibilities and to support the sharing of best practices. calls on the Commission to consider the desirability of a dedicated NEB European financing programme by the next MFF, with distinct sources of funding correlating to national funding programmes in each Member State and financing programmes already agreed under the National Recovery and Resilience Plans, Partnership Agreements, or other Community initiatives; the programme should facilitate and stimulate the participation of different categories of owners in projects, in compliance with Community and national State aid legislation.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding is crucial for encouraging and implementing NEB ideas and projects at a local level; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide local and regional authorities with relevant and user-friendly information on all financial possibilities
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding is crucial for encouraging and implementing NEB ideas and projects at a local level; recalls that it is thanks to companies and individuals with a vision for change that the Bauhas movement came into being, as well as to the initiative shown by inidviduals and companies, and that this spirit of entrepreneurship must be maintained in this proposal, it being hoped that public institutions will lend their support to promote this type of initiative. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide local and regional authorities with relevant and user-friendly information on all financial possibilities and to support the sharing of best practices.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that appropriate and accessible public funding is crucial for encouraging and implementing NEB ideas and projects at a local level; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide local and regional authorities with relevant and user-friendly information and guidelines on all financial possibilities and to support the sharing of best practices.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Suggests that incorporating traditional ideas or elements, such as building materials or construction techniques, which respect the sustainability pillars, are in line with the Green Deal, reflect Europe’s diverse multicultural identity and would enrich the NEB initiative, should be explored;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB an EU programme by the next MFF, with a dedicated and stable budget based on fresh resources;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Points to the pressing issue of rising energy prices and a resulting increase in energy poverty among EU households; highlights that the NEB therefore needs to prioritise the showcasing of affordable, socially inclusive, energy efficient buildings with renewable energy installations for any residual demand or other energy system needs, including mobility;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Support the increased budget allocated for the period 2021-2027 for the new Cohesion Policy which in line with the strong focus on smart, green and social actions, will provide confident enough for new innovative projects; to this, ask for a strong coordination between this funds and NEB programmes and actions;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that the realisation of such an ambitious initiative as the New European Bauhaus requires a massive amount of financing which neither the Member States nor the regions are in a position to take on at present, with the many calls already being made on them in regard to tackling the Ukrainian crisis. Furthermore, the Commission will have to invest considerable effort on this initiative to make it more real and fruitful for EU citizens;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s regular stance that new initiatives require additional funding, no fresh funding has been made available; stresses that merely redeploying existing funds will not be sufficient to achieve the objectives of this initiative, and calls on the Commission to submit a medium- and long-term financing strategy;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises the need for a long- term vision integrated within cohesion policy, and with other EU policies, in order to create a structured initiative able to create prospects for development and jobs; considers strengthening the public- private partnership, particularly with small and medium-sized enterprises, to be vital, therefore;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls in particular on the Commission to provide clear information on the source of financing for existing EU programmes such as Horizon Europe, Life and the European Regional Development Fund, bearing in mind that around EUR 85 million from said programmes will be assigned to the New Bauhaus project in the 2021-2022 period;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to factor NEB principles into relevant prospective legislation, ensure that the NEB complements other EU policy areas, and in particular cohesion policy, and provide appropriate additional resources that are accessible to the specific target groups;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on Member States to promote synergies in terms of content, organisational arrangements and funding between NEB projects and established operational cohesion programmes, drawing on local, participatory, partnership-based and multi-level approaches that focus on local needs and development;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. whereas the NEB connects with the social and community-building function of the original Bauhaus in that it integrates art and architecture into everyday residential living and working life in urban neighbourhoods in particular;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Welcomes the NEB initiative also as a possible bridge between science and technology and arts and culture, between border regions, between northern and southern Europe, and between eastern and western Europe;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that opportunities to participate in the NEB must be fully inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens and all regions and territories, including peripheral urban areas and less populated, rural and mountain areas
source: 731.671
2022/05/02
ITRE, CULT
496 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas poor planning and design in the public realm, the growth of urban sprawl and inappropriate land use have resulted in the loss of building quality across Europe;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas access to decent and affordable housing is a fundamental right;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas Russia's aggression against and war in Ukraine, and Russian forces' deliberate targeting of public infrastructure, housing stock and other civilian infrastructure as well as cultural heritage are deplorable; whereas the New European Bauhaus must have an external dimension that seeks to help Ukraine, including through planning and rebuilding efforts;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas a high-quality built environment is the result of the work of skilled professionals in the construction sector and creative and cultural industries and can only be the outcome of quality processes, in particular public procurement procedures;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas there is an urgent need to develop more sustainable and regenerative economic models in the construction and building sectors, which enable the circular economy in the EU;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas NEB projects should, as a minimum, comply with sectorial EU legislation, such as Energy Efficiency Directive and EPBD;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas cultural heritage can promote the NEB priorities; whereas in order to help protect and promote cultural heritage, including through quality restoration and renovation and repurposing, the NEB must play its role;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas a high-quality built environment requires the work of skilled professionals and craft persons in the construction sector as well as creative and cultural workers;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. Whereas NEB projects should explore opportunities to utilize the limited spaces in cities and surplus land in a sustainable, aesthetic and inclusive way;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas war actions are targeting the housing stock, cultural heritage and other civilian infrastructures in Ukraine;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) — having regard to its resolution of 20 October 2021 on the situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU (2020/2261(INI))2a; _________________ 2a Texts adopted: P9_TA(2021)0430
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F d (new) Fd. whereas homelessness and lack of access to quality housing is a crisis throughout the EU;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical innovation and reflected true cultural and social changes in a progressive artistic and educational context; notes that in these challenging times, the New European Bauhaus can significantly contribute in the same way and positively impact our daily lives by creating real changes on the ground that are complementary with our sustainable goals, without being considered elitist;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical innovation and reflected true cultural and social changes in a
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts, with important legacies such as the optimization of the form-function relationship, which delivered radical innovation and reflected true cultural and social changes in a progressive artistic and educational context in the aftermath of the First World War;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement, aided by innovation in building materials and techniques, was a truly bottom-up initiative which created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement c
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical innovation and reflected true cultural and progressive social changes in a
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) — having regard to the European Parliament resolution on access to decent and affordable housing for all (2019/2187(INI))3a _________________ 3a OJ C 456, 10.11.2021, p. 145–160
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement created a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical innovation and reflected true cultural and social changes in a
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the transdisciplinary character and wide objectives of the New European Bauhaus; notes that the ongoing climate change requires a comprehensive and action-based approach; calls on the Commission to further expand the New European Bauhaus by adding the safety component to its framework and policies; underlines that this will significantly improve the initiative and create tangible results by protecting citizens in the event of natural and man-made disasters;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reiterates that NEB aims at improving the quality of life of all people, regardless of their race, gender, nationality, age or possible disability;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Highlights the importance of broadening the perspective of the New European Bauhaus, so that it reflects our values and efforts to strengthen European cultural diversity, and thus moving away from the original Bauhaus, that reflected only the cultural perspective of one country, Member State or artistic school;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, as a conception of a way of living together, and emphasises that it must primarily focus on continuously improving the quality of people’s lives by transforming the spaces, buildings, cities, rural areas and territories in which they live in a manner respecting the correlation between care for the environment, planning and construction of buildings and surrounding spaces in an inclusive way, and the creation of accessibility for people with special needs and disadvantaged groups, and bringing about improvements for all;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by rethinking the status quo and transforming the spaces, buildings, cities and territories in which they live through making them more accessible, inclusive and sustainable; highlights in this regard the importance of having good design from the outset, which inevitably includes aspects such as cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency and sustainability;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives, including healthy and affordable living spaces, by eradicating energy poverty and asbestos in buildings, as well as fostering a more inclusive society, whose public services, cultural, social, and economic life is accessible to all by transforming the spaces, buildings, cities
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises its role as forming part of the ‘soul’ of the European Green Deal and that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by transforming
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by transforming the spaces, buildings, cities and territories in which they live; so that it contributes to planning that is tailor-made for human beings, and architectural language that is mindful of the sense of place;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by transforming the spaces, buildings, cities and territories in which they live, addressing the missing connections between rural and urban areas and the spatial segregation of social groups;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by sustainably transforming the spaces, means of mobility, buildings, cities and territories in which they live, work and recreate;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the potential that the New European Bauhaus has; encourages the Commission to organise consultations among citizens and institutions to help achieve full implementation of the initiative in Member States and enable better local, regional and national cooperation that will strengthen social and territorial cohesion and assist in carrying out projects that embody NEB objectives; recalls the importance of respecting geographical balance in this regard;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that the NEB should be part of a broader Cultural Deal for Europe and support as well as achieve mutual benefits with the Creative Europe programme for the cultural and creative sectors; reiterates in this context that the Creative Europe budget shall not be reallocated to fund the NEB;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the need to implement digital technologies in the areas of architectural redevelopment and layout design, throughout the whole building lifecycle, especially through increased use of smart applications for the management of energy, water and waste;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to further broaden the reach of the New European Bauhaus and allow partner countries from the Western Balkans and the rest of Europe to take part in the initiative; reiterates that this will lead to enhanced cooperation and better results in the field; highlights the importance of using pilot projects in this regard, while taking into account geographical balance and all NEB aspects, including the safety component that will ensure protection of citizens in cases of natural and man made disasters;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) — having regard to its resolution of 21 January 2021 on access to decent and affordable housing for all (2019/2187(INI))4a, _________________ 4a OJ C 456, 10.11.2021, p. 145–160
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 141 #
3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts and science at the forefront of EU policies for the first time, making the European Green Deal a tangible, positive and inclusive experience for all; emphasises the importance of cooperation of all relevant actors in this field; underlines that for true progress and visible impact, the New European Bauhaus also needs to also protect citizens against natural disasters by including a safety component in its objectives; notes that this will enable new and innovative ways of building and guarantee usage of high-quality and resilient building materials;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which has the potential to bring
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts and science at the forefront of EU policies for the first time, making the European Green Deal a tangible, positive and inclusive experience for all and giving it a strong creative and cultural dimension;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts and science at the forefront of EU policies for the first time
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the
Amendment 147 #
3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and interdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the NEB as a creative and inter- and transdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts and science at the forefront of EU policies for the first time, making the European Green Deal a tangible, positive and inclusive experience for all;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises NEB as a catalyst for bringing about transformative changes in the creative, construction and business ecosystems and of new understanding and quality in planning, designing and building our future life, encompassing principles of circularity and resource efficiency in moving towards carbon neutrality, using sustainable and durable technologies, innovation in materials, processes and techniques in renewable, recyclable and cost efficient manner that lowers the energy-related greenhouse emissions;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the enormous creative potential that the NEB can unleash by opening up new opportunities for artists, performers and other cultural creators, especially with regards to collaboration across different professions within and beyond the cultural and creative sectors;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB has the potential to reshape the way policies are conceived and to define the environment of the future by meeting the need for spaces adapted to new ways of life; Considers the need to ensure coherence with legislative and programming instruments - both sector-specific and across complementary policy sectors such as regional cohesion, mobility and social policy - and with a level of ambition that is in line with climate commitments, and create guidelines for Member States to implement the NEB alongside those instruments;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB has the potential to reshape the way policies are
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB has the potential to reshape the way policies are conceived to nurture policies and legislative developments having an impact on the built environment, and to define the environment of
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB has the potential to reshape the way policies are conceived and to define the environment of the future by meeting the need for spaces adapted to new ways of life, without compromising people's basic needs;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB has the potential to reshape the way European and national policies are conceived and to define the environment of the future by meeting the need for
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms that the NEB also has the potential to reshape the way policies are conceived and to define the environment of the future by meeting the need for spaces adapted to new
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Re
Amendment 16 #
— having regard to its resolution of 20 October 2021 on the situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU (2020/2261(INI))5a, _________________ 5a Texts adopted: P9_TA(2021)0430
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that as a prerequisite for realising the environmental and social objectives of the European Green Deal, it is necessary via the NEB to envision a well-designed green regeneration of public spaces, and to build the relevant infrastructure that facilitates physical activity, sports and bicycling, which in turn will lead to a change of habits, fostering social inclusion, a sense of belonging and mindset change for harmony with nature;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Rejects the New European Bauhaus initiative and proclaims respect for the principle of artistic and creative freedom, which is part of the broad scope of ideological freedom and freedom of thought, with no curtailment, limitation or restriction of the creativity of human beings;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Acknowledges that, by translating the values of the original Bauhaus to today’s challenges, the NEB aspires to create a cultural movement that contributes to a smarter, more sustainable and more enjoyable living environment;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that renovation and the establishment of buildings, areas or residential environments must take place in a cost-effective manner;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Underlines that the NEB, in order to be really impactful, visible and successful in the long term, requires fresh financial resources;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be based on an intersectional framework that is accessible, affordable, socially fair, and inclusive and must actively involve
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be innovative, accessible, affordable, socially and geographically fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches; calls on the Commission to provide new financing models and underlines the importance of providing clear access to both national and European funding; encourages the Commission to set up focal points in the Member States to help facilitate better implementation of the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches; highlights that the NEB should facilitate the promotion of inclusive and vibrant communities, thereby enhancing citizens’ participation and integration into a just and fair energy transition;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable and profitable, socially fair and inclusive and must make it possible to actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation –
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 b (new) — having regard to its resolution of 8 March 2022 on the role of culture, education, media and sport in the fight against racism6a; _________________ 6a Texts adopted: P9_TA(2022)005
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches; highlights in particular the need to engage young people in the initiative, especially by involving young architects, artists and workers in the CCSI;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens, including those in small cities, rural areas and other remote or isolated communities, and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – thus ensuring the active participation of local authorities and small territories while avoiding any elitist approaches;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises, in order to be successful, that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations from all people and territories in their diversity, in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be innovative, embrace technology and be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive, and must actively involve EU citizens
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable, socially fair and inclusive and must actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages Member States to take into account NEB to envision tailored- made plans for funding in order to stimulate the sustainable development of different cities, regions and places, with the aim of achieving decarbonisation objectives and the preservation of natural resources in local context, considering all affirmed as successful European methods, practices and process for creating effective interaction for economic growth, with design of qualitatively new, inclusive and participatory environment, which will furthermore contribute to the revitalisation of depopulated rural areas and remote places;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the importance of a special focus on SMEs, minimizing the administrative burden and ensuring easy, streamlined procedures to apply for the NEB label and funding in order for SMEs to contribute to the NEB movement and the circular economy;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 23 Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of sustainable architecture,
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of architecture, design, culture, technology and energy efficiency by promoting ways of living better together, which can also be applied beyond the EU; concedes that the EU has in many of the above areas lost its competitiveness or influence; believes that innovation must be adequately supported and hence public and private investment in research and development is paramount;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of architecture, design, culture, technology and energy efficiency by promoting ways of living better together, which can also be applied beyond the EU; urges therefore that the NEB needs to be transparent and easily accessible;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of architecture, design, culture,
Amendment 187 #
6. Considers that this innovative cultural
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of architecture, design, culture, technology, circular economy, and energy efficiency by promoting ways of living better together, which can also be applied beyond the EU;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potential to position Europe as a global frontrunner in the area of architecture, design, culture, health, technology and energy efficiency by promoting ways of living better together, which can also be applied beyond the EU;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 24 Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. believes that NEB can pave the way for the creation of a truly pan- European network of architectural, urban and rural, artistic and cultural research centres, along with related SMEs and sectoral industries in the construction and renovation sector; is of the idea that such a network could additionally serve as an accelerator for socially promising green and digital solutions, technologies and products for which Europe should aim at becoming a worldwide industrial and economic leader;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the NEB should provide a forum for the exchange and collaboration of ideas between local and regional authorities, cultural actors, organisations representing marginalised communities and minorities, NGOs, research centres, businesses and other stakeholders, in order to create inclusive, environmentally friendly and sustainable living spaces.
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that the purpose of NEB should be to empower and accelerate positive change in areas and communities that have historically been excluded, marginalised or disadvantaged;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Reiterates the need for the NEB to be an instrument of exchange of culture and art between people from different backgrounds and ideas;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Underlines that the NEB has the potential to nurture future EU policy and legislative developments having a direct or indirect impact on culture and the built environment and professionals therein;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Acknowledges NEB’s potential in contributing to post-war, just transition and post natural disaster restoration of the urban and natural environment, society and economy;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 d (new) Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Emphasises that the NEB must be inclusive of all communities, especially those most marginalised, in a way that is accessible, affordable, socially fair and must actively involve all peoples within the EU such as community-based organisations, energy communities and self-led organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approaches;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 f (new) 6f. Considers that the NEB must be developed through an intersectional framework to ensure wide-ranging inclusion, especially of children, young people and women in all their diversity throughout its planning and execution, as well as to include clearly gender mainstreaming as a huge potential to increase sustainable living quality; Supports the incorporation of a gendered approach that takes into account daily life and care as basic issues to tackle when designing and defining living environments;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 g (new) 6g. Recognises the benefits of citizen- led projects that adopt a neighbourhood approach in the NEB such as citizen led renovation programmes, which aim to be inclusive of all citizens living in, and using a district, in reducing the environmental impact, energy and resource use of buildings, as well as improving the accessibility of buildings, and their links to better heating, cooling and transport systems; recognises that such projects have a pivotal role in fighting energy poverty and protecting vulnerable households;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 — having regard to the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, in particular Goal 4 on quality education, Goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities and Goal 13 on climate action,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 25 Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 h (new) 6h. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on use of and access to public spaces, new models of participative planning, designing, renovation, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and challenges and help to ensure quality housing and living environment for all; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB as a tool to combat homelessness across the EU;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 i (new) 6i. Considers that the NEB has the potential to contribute to the decentralisation of knowledge through the creation of spaces and environments that facilitate knowledge exchange and encourage understanding and respect of others;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 j (new) 6j. Considers that lifelong learning and informal and non formal education are key to the advancement of the NEB; calls for its key principles to be reflected in curricula, pedagogical material and resources and for the promotion of creative thinking and problem solving as an integral part of all educational institutions;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 k (new) 6k. Considers that the NEB must enable and develop European best practices and foster knowledge transfer and peer-learning among people, local and regional authorities and professionals;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 l (new) 6l. Considers that the NEB needs to focus more attention and resources on finding “beautiful, inclusive and sustainable” solutions to urgent social challenges linked to the built environment, notably homelessness and housing exclusion;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 m (new) 6m. Emphasizes NEB’s potential to drive social change by targeting homelessness and prioritising vulnerable households and by promoting sustainable, renewable-based and energy efficient housing solutions;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 a (new) Acknowledges that NEB has the potential to contribute to the post-war restoration of cities, societies and economy
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission and Member States to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance,
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance, which should have timely access to information and equitable access to opportunities and funding; regrets that some NEB related initiatives, due to their short deadlines, have already effectively limited participation of some of the interested parties;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance, which should have equitable access to opportunities and funding; notes that the visibility and knowledge about the NEB needs to be supported; whereas awareness raising campaigns can help to boost knowledge;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance, civil society, professionals and their representative organisations, which should have equitable access to opportunities and funding;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance, civil society, professionals and their representative organisations, which should have equitable access to opportunities and funding;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to raise awareness about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance,
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines the need to create support for the NEB on local and regional level; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to share best practices of NEB projects from all Member States and to publish an extensive, though non- exhaustive, list of NEB related goals, which NEB projects can help achieve, and for the Commission to prepare a detailed application guideline for local and regional authorities, focusing on EU funds and programs available for local and regional projects;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to create an integrated, non discriminatory, accountable and territorially-structured governance for the NEB, including public involvement and ownership, e.g. through responsibility over project selection, appropriate territorial layout based on functional criteria rather than administrative units and an overarching governance framework providing for coordination, capitalisation, accountability and exchange of experience;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Brings attention to the fact that access to EU funding can be onerous for micro and small enterprises and, by extension and especially, for a significant share of stakeholders of the cultural and creative sectors; calls, therefore, for tailored funding models and procedures with minimised administrative burden to be devised so as to help unlock the funding streams to the above parties;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 — having regard to the Davos Declaration adopted by the Conference of Ministers of Culture on 22 January 2018 entitled ‘Towards a high-quality Baukultur for Europe’, as well as the Davos Baukultur Quality System ‘Eight criteria for a high-quality Baukultur’ developed thereafter,
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets that no participation of the residents is foreseen for the committees of the New European Bauhaus; urges the Commission to include the perspective of ethical architecture and engage the people most affected by a New European Bauhaus project as active participants in the design process, as well as respect their cultural differences and diverse needs and perspectives;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to hold regular consultations on the implementation of the New European Bauhaus that will serve as exchanges of good practices and meeting points to raise important issues and suggest improvements that will allow the initiative to extend its reach;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission to develop and implement specific initiatives aimed at providing technical assistance to small municipalities that do not have the necessary capacity or expertise to implement their own projects related to the new Bauhaus initiative;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission to develop and implement specific initiatives aimed at providing technical assistance to small municipalities that do not have the necessary capacity or expertise to implement their own projects related to the new Bauhaus initiative;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Highlights the need to address the difficulty in obtaining EU funding for grassroots and community groups in order to ensure the true inclusivity of the NEB; calls in this regard for any future budget to include specific provisions for access to funding for marginalised communities, tailored to their profiles and ways of working to enable, empower and resource the process of brief development and ideation of any future intervention in the built environment;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Emphasizes the need for local and regional authorities to include citizens throughout all phases of NEB projects; Underlines the importance of including methodologies from the design industry, which could help to enhance participation of European citizens in NEB projects; urges the Commission to gather and share best practices on how to include and activate European citizens in NEB projects;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to facilitate dialogues on the New European Bauhaus between Member States and neighbouring countries, including the Western Balkans, in order to spread the initiative beyond EU borders; notes that this will largely benefit all citizens and enable the initiative to reach its full potential and create real, tangible results;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Proposes the use of the New Bauhaus to ensure citizens’ “Right to the City”[1], and to help them to reclaim the city as a space created with their participation, as a space of encounter, societal interaction, collective actions and activities and on the basis of collective participation;[1]https://www.right2city.or g/
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Calls on the Commission to ensure good governance, transparency and accountability towards relevant stakeholders for all New European Bauhaus projects;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Calls on the Commission to cooperate with local authorities and stakeholders so that citizens looking for housing have access to information on available New European Bauhaus housing projects; stresses the importance of strengthening the institutional and structured participation of tenants and residents and urges the Commission to facilitate this process by providing them with the necessary knowledge and information about the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 a (new) Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and evaluation of NEB projects, as well as information on how to participate in the NEB and for the allocation of funds, in particular:
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission, in close cooperation with relevant stakeholders, clarify the general criteria for the selection and evaluation of NEB projects and for the allocation of funds, in particular:
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and ongoing evaluation of the projects that will be on the list of NEB projects and for the allocation of funds, in particular:
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and evaluation of NEB projects and for the
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and evaluation of NEB projects and for the allocation of funds, in particular for the priority areas:
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and evaluation of NEB projects and initiatives and for the allocation of funds, in particular:
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 1 - supporting the implementation of key policies; (e.g. Green Deal, environmental, industrial, social and cultural policies);
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 1 - supporting the implementation of key climate and social policies;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 1 a (new) - construction and renovation of affordable social housing that provides a high quality of life, energy efficiency and healthy indoor climate;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 a (new) — having regard to the Davos Baukultur Quality System entitled "Eight criteria for a high-quality Baukultur"; 1a _________________ 1a https://davosdeclaration2018.ch/media/D BQS-en.pdf
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 1 b (new) - contributing to a modal shift towards public and collective transportation and less polluting means of transport;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 2 - following the NEB guiding principles of sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics, and taking inspiration from the Davos Baukultur Quality System;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 - creating new
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 - creating new jobs
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 - creating new jobs and business opportunities, which are both stable and of significant economic value;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 - creating new jobs with quality working conditions and business opportunities;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 - creating new jobs and business opportunities and adding economic value;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 a (new) - improving access to essential public services, social, cultural and economic life of the community;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 a (new) - protecting the environment and diverse cultural and natural landscapes,
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 b (new) - contributing to the circularity and sustainability of the European economy
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 b (new) — having regard to Article 4(1) of the Treaty on European Union, according to which competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States,
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 4 - securing accessibility
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 4 - securing accessibility, medium to long-term sustainability and affordability;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 4 - securing accessibility
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 4 - securing accessibility, security and affordability;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 4 a (new) - promoting pluralism and focusing on historically excluded areas and communities;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 5 - promoting the participation of
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 5 -
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 5 - promoting the participation and connection of EU citizens;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 5 a (new) - involving local and regional organisations, experts and stakeholders;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 5 b (new) - involving local and regional governments;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 c (new) — having regard to Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union, according to which in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States,
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 6 - involving the cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI), particularly small and medium-sized cultural enterprises, including cultural creators;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 6 - involving the cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI), particularly small and medium-sized cultural enterprises, including cultural creators;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 6 - involving the cultural and creative sectors
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 -
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 - linking the NEB to the indicators of the 2030 Agenda, the European Pillar of Social Rights and core
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 - linking the NEB to the indicators of the 2030 Agenda and core
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 a (new) - – minimising the full environmental impact of the project over its life cycle, according to the Level(s) framework, taking into account both operational and embodied carbon; - fighting energy poverty and homelessness; - minimising greenhouse gas emissions and resource use from the building sector; - reducing waste and increasing recuperation and recycling in line with circular economy principles; - combating climate change and advancing environmental protection and biodiversity, including through green and blue infrastructures in and around buildings; - promoting inclusion and cross-sectoral participation.
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 a (new) - evaluating the environmental and social impacts of the project over its life cycle,
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new) - the creation of net economic value within the local areas where the project is implemented:
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 a (new) - linking the NEB to the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 d (new) — having regard to Article 6 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in so far as it does not attribute any exclusive competence to the Union either in relation to the protection and improvement of human health, or in relation to industry, culture, education or civil protection,
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 b (new) - respecting the European Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 c (new) - enhancing the viability of SMEs;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 d (new) - -creating affordable housing;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 7 e (new) - contributing to modal shift towards public and collective transportation and less polluting means of transport;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to define and develop a New European Bauhaus evidence-based design methodology to ensure the processes of transforming spaces, buildings, cities and territories are based on scientific research to achieve the best possible outcomes; underlines that the design decisions in NEB projects shall be based on relevant and reliable data and the physical and psychological effects of the built environment shall be measured; underlines that researchers can use the data for assessments and proof of concept evaluations and a New European Bauhaus evidence-based design methodology should promote interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral research and innovation;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance for the interested stakeholders that want to develop projects under the NEB program;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to make the principles
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to make the principles of the NEB an integral part of all relevant future legislation and to make sure that the regulatory framework supports the NEB ambitions and implementation; underlines the need to include NEB principles in existing regulation such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD);
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to make a structured programme and implement the principles of the NEB as an integral part
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 27 — having regard to Article 167 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in so far as it states that the Union shall contribute to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity; encouraging cooperation between Member States,
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to make the principles of the NEB an integral part of
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Highlights that sustainable finance principles should be guiding the NEB;
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, tourism, education and skills, crafts, and the arts, and calls for these criteria to be reviewed regularly to ensure the continued effectiveness they are required to provide through their application in the sectors identified;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, tourism, education and skills, crafts, and the arts in close co-operation with stakeholders in these sectors and building on existing industrial standards;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular culture, construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, including sustainability and climate neutrality by design, tourism, education and skills, crafts, and the arts;
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular, but not limited to, construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, tourism, cultural heritage, technology, education and skills, crafts, and the arts;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 27 a (new) — having regard to Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, especially in so far as it indicates that Union policy on energy shall aim to ensure energy supply in the Member States,
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, tourism, healthcare, education and skills, crafts, and the arts;
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines the need to include sector specific certification to become eligible for the NEB label; urges the Commission to incorporate existing sector specific certifications, which for example ensures the use of sustainable materials and a minimum level of quality, as a key part of the criteria to receive a NEB label, and if necessary to develop, in close cooperation with industry stakeholders, new certifications for specific sectors to receive the NEB label; furthermore, emphasizes that projects does not have to be cross national to receive the NEB label;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges for EU-funded upskilling and training, in particular to digital tools, of workers in New European Bauhaus relevant sectors; calls on the Commission to ensure diversity and equal representation in the New European Bauhaus work environment; urges that workers’ and unions’ rights in the New European Bauhaus work environment should be safeguarded;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Welcomes the efforts made by the European Commission to launch the first calls for projects by taking money from existing programmes, but considers that their impact is not proportionate to the ambition of the project;
Amendment 294 #
10a. Calls on the Commission to increase of transparency of the NEB initiative and all activities deriving thereof by the providing for open tenders;
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amended during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in order to create an NEB mission funded with EUR 500 million; underlines that the programme should also be supported by other relevant programmes in order to generate additional impact;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amended during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in order to create an NEB mission funded with EUR 500 million; underlines that the programme should also be supported by other relevant programmes in order to generate additional impact; believes, furthermore, that existing funding allocated through Union programmes such as the Horizon Europe's funding for EIT, can help implement the objectives of the NEB;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the overall insufficient funding currently secured for the period up to 2023 and the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amended during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in order to create an
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) — having regard to the UN IPCC report on Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 29 a (new) — having regard to the Commission communication of 8 March 2022 entitled ‘REPowerEU: Joint European Action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy’ (COM(2022)108),
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amended during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in order to create an NEB mission funded with EUR 500 million if the current mission is positively evaluated in 2022; underlines that the programme should also be supported by other relevant programmes in order to generate additional impact;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amended during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in order to create an NEB mission funded with EUR 500 million; underlines that the
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes, however, that the funds available will not be unlimited; stresses, therefore, the need for prioritisation and redistribution between existing budgetary expenditures within the multiannual financial framework when creating a new NEB programme;
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB an EU programme by the next MFF; insists that this will require fresh resources
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB an EU programme by the next MFF; insists that this will require fresh resources with a dedicated and stable budget line; underlines that this new programme must not reduce funding for other programmes nor divert focus from their agreed political priorities; underlines that a substantial amount of the resources must be dedicated to research and innovation;
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 30 a (new) — having regard to the final report of the ‘Building Better, Building Beautiful’ Commission of the Government of the United Kingdom dated 30 January 2020, entitled ‘Living with beauty’,
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB an EU programme by the next MFF whereby concrete ideas and objectives are accompanied with dedicated funding; insists that this will require fresh resources with a dedicated and stable budget line; underlines that this new programme must not reduce funding for other programmes nor divert focus from their agreed political priorities;
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB a
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment; encourages the
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment; encourages the Member States to allocate adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds; underlines the NEB initiative also must focus on supporting the creating of spaces and buildings which facilitates entrepreneurship and strengthen the relationship between entrepreneurs and investors especially with the focus on women entrepreneurship;
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment, including with the aim to help address the significant disparities between Member States in their economic and financial capabilities to fulfil the objectives of the NEB, thus ensuring a level playing field; encourages the Member States to allocate adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear and feasible plan for attracting public and, more importantly, private investment; encourages the Member States, subject to their fiscal scope, to allocate adequate funding to the NEB and initiatives supporting the aims of the NEB, including, to the extent possible, through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds;
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment;
Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment; encourages the Member States to allocate adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds; notes that this will further accelerate the proper implementation of the initiative and create tangible results on the ground;
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe finds itself in a moment of ecological, digital and social transition, which is being accelerated by the economic and social impact of COVID- 19 and geopolitical tensions linked to the war on Ukraine in a context of rising populism and anti-European sentiment; highlights the importance of defining the role that the New European Bauhaus can play in this regard by contributing to the reconstruction of housing, buildings, historical and cultural landmarks in war afflicted areas in Ukraine; notes that the same practice can be used in EU Member States and other partner countries in Europe, notably the Western Balkans and the Eastern and Southern neighbourhood countries;
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and private investment, with a particular focus on promoting female leadership in venture capital and start-ups; encourages the Member States to allocate adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds;
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear, effective and efficient plan for attracting public and private investment; encourages the Member States to allocate what they consider to be adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds;
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for attracting public and ethical private investment; encourages the
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Urges the Commission to draw up a strategy to promote all aspects of innovation and research, including through special-purpose companies, encouraging collaboration between creative cultural enterprises, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and higher education institutions;
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to protect of the Union budget in the case of breaches of the principles of the rule of law and set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism that includes relevant stakeholders, which should continuously review all NEB activities and report regularly to Parliament and the Council; expects to receive the first monitoring report in 2022;
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism to assess the actual value creation of the NEB concept over time, which should continuously review all NEB activities and report regularly to Parliament and the Council; expects to receive the first monitoring report in 2022;
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism, which should continuously review all NEB activities and report regularly to Parliament and the Council, including on the societal and climate impact of its activities; expects to receive the first monitoring report in 2022;
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism, starting with year 2022, which should continuously review all NEB activities at the EU and national levels, and report regularly to Parliament and the Council; expects to receive the first monitoring report
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe finds itself in a moment of ecological, digital and social transition, which is being accelerated by the economic and social impact of COVID- 19 and geopolitical tensions linked to the war on Ukraine in a context of rising populism and anti-European sentiment due to the opacity of its operation and a far too systematic recourse to English; whereas the NEB Lab, for example, is only available in English, which creates a barrier, in particular towards ‘remote’ populations;
Amendment 330 #
14. Calls on the Commission to set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism that is constantly updated, including at the request of citizens, which should continuously review all NEB activities and report regularly to Parliament and the Council; expects to receive the first monitoring report in 2022;
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to set up a
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to share best practices and establish a permanent dialogue on NEB with associated countries, in particular in the Western Balkans, Eastern and Southern Neighbourhood;
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of li
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure decent housing for all; urges that the NEB should not only focus on urban areas, but as well enable and put special focus on less developed regions, country sides or rural areas to have a long lasting benefit from NEB financed projects as well;
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure decent housing for all, and should avoid becoming a project benefitting only the highest earning Member States and citizens in the EU;
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive, gender balanced and innovative ways of life based on a paradigm shift in consuming, mobility patterns and new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure decent housing and housing conditions for all;
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs, tackle energy poverty and help to ensure decent
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe finds itself in a moment of ecological, digital and social transition, which is being accelerated by the economic and social impact of COVID- 19
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our urban and rural built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure decent and affordable housing for all;
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 343 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure
Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should pr
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote more sustainable, socially inclusive and innovative ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emerging needs and help to ensure
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers that the NEB should play a key role in promoting greater circularity in the built environment, notably by promoting renovation and adaptive re-use over demolition, by applying nature-based solutions in urban areas and by developing urban greening plans; calls on the Commission to further incentivise the uptake of nature-based materials such as wood in construction and renovation, for instance by exploring the possibility to foresee a system enabling consumers to make an informed choice on embodied carbon and stored carbon in such products;
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers that the NEB should play a key role in promoting greater circularity in the built environment, including, where appropriate, by promoting renovation and adaptive re-use over new development and demolition; is of the view, however, that, going forward and in line with the Union's climate objectives, renovation should be cost- effective and implemented to the highest standards applicable, especially energy efficiency whereby nearly zero emissions building standard being the absolute minimum;
Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers that the NEB must develop new ways of thinking that are clear and inclusive, generating greater security and comfort for our citizens, supporting cultural movements to foster local and global knowledge; underlines that without culturally-based social dynamism, the Bauhaus will not act as a catalyst for a true pan-European movement and could fall only into the hands of elite actors;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe finds itself in a moment of
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Highlights that NEB should promote a more sustainable use of resources including through repair, re- use, and applying circular economy principles to the use of building materials and other products and resources; and by reducing waste and improving durability, re-usability and circularity at the design stage;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Underlines the significance of re- purposing and retrofitting obsolete buildings, whose transformation has a key role in Europe’s green transition, as an example of this dimension is the re-use of industrial heritage buildings, which offer many opportunities for advancing the goals of the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Believes that the NEB movement should take into account the situation of minority and endangered languages when new buildings are planned, constructed or inhabited and their impact on the social and cultural communities;
Amendment 353 #
15b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to secure the supply for wooden raw materials for the production of construction and renovation materials, while guaranteeing a level playing field by avoiding any kind of market distortion and technical barriers; recalls that these supply chains should encourage optimal resource use and recycling; pursues energy efficiency in terms of carbon storage; promotes increased circularity through cascading use, when economically and regionally possible; safeguards biodiversity and ecosystem functions, as well as revitalize rural economies;
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Believes that a key objective of the NEB should be the promotion of sustainable construction materials as well as simple and locally tested building techniques that meet the highest energy efficiency standards; considers, however, that innovation and commercialisation of novel building materials and techniques, including 3D printing, remains untapped; urges a direct funding under the auspices of the NEB to be devoted to relevant research, development and bringing to the market of the applicable products;
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Emphasizes the importance of more flexibility for local and regional authorities to experiment with NEB projects and underlines the potential in allowing regulatory “sandboxing” to boost innovation within the circular economy and NEB;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Believes that the NEB can help revitalise the Soviet era building stock and in this regard calls for a specific focus on such architecture and its related challenges, namely, the need to improve aesthetics, energy efficiency and their integration and role in the wider redevelopment processes; calls, among other initiatives, to explore the idea of transforming such building developments into the NEB clusters;
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliver the European Skills Agenda; calls
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial, orientation and drawing skills and to integrate green and digital skills within higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliver the European Skills Agenda; stresses the importance of raising awareness and education on respect for environment, including respect to historical and cultural heritage; calls for the EU to promote such endeavours; calls on the Commission to make mobility opportunities an integral part of the NEB;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe finds itself in a moment of ecological, digital and social transition, which is being accelerated by the economic and social impact of COVID- 19 and geopolitical tensions linked to the war on Ukraine in a context of rising populism, far right extremism and anti- European sentiment;
Amendment 360 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliver the European Skills Agenda; calls for the EU to promote such endeavours; calls on the Commission to make mobility opportunities an integral part of the NEB, including in rural, insular, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas;
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within vocational training, higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliver the European Skills Agenda; calls for the EU
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula in line with NEB principles and objectives for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliver the European Skills Agenda; calls for the EU to promote such endeavours; calls on the Commission to make mobility opportunities an integral part of the NEB;
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative
Amendment 367 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educational curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate
Amendment 369 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to develop an educational module on the New European Bauhaus and encourages Members States to integrate it in their curricula at all levels; in this regard, calls on the Commission to foster the participation of existing or future European University Alliances to NEB projects or by helping universities establish common curricula relevant to NEB objectives;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Europe
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Urges the Member States to establish consultative groups of experts made up of architects and other relevant professionals at the relevant levels of authority, such as teams of State architects and municipal architects, as well as procedures aimed at achieving high-quality results in architecture and planning;
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to recognize the NEB as a tool to contribute to the up- and reskilling of cultural professionals and the improvement of their overall working conditions, particularly in the context of the green and digital transitions and of the cultural recovery of Europe;
Amendment 372 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Highlights the importance of linking NEB to the development of green skills as well as in education and lifelong learning curricula in construction, farming, waste treatment, social housing, landscaping, tourism and transport, which should be taken into account when developing the Education for Climate Coalition;
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises the necessity of providing special informative and education materials, courses and conferences, as well as providing exchanges of best practices between Member States to create equal opportunities to participate for all;
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Recognises the role of green public procurement procedures in developing a high-quality built environment;
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Notes the high potential of the Centers of Vocational Excellence for the NEB through, amongst other actions, the mobility of Vocational Education and Training (VET) students and the sharing of know-how and skills; in this regard, calls on the Commission to foster their participation to the NEB through specific calls, and by sharing best practices from Member States concerning integration of NEB skills and knowledge in VET education, and by removing the remaining obstacles to the VET European mobility;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to integrate all aspects of the knowledge triangle – innovation, research and education – by promoting partnerships between universities, research organisations and industry, including the relevant small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in close cooperation with the European Institute of Innovation and Technology and the Joint Research Centre. In order to create the next wave of research and innovations, Europe must build on its creative and cultural strengths and assets in a multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach, including novel methodologies. These concepts and approaches are essential in increasing high societal impact. The greatest added value and impact are created through ecosystems, by bringing various actors, stakeholders and different disciplines together;
Amendment 377 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to integrate all aspects of the knowledge triangle – innovation, research and education – by promoting partnerships between universities, research organisations and industry, including the relevant micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in close cooperation with the European Institute of Innovation and Technology and the Joint Research Centre; believes that the EIT's KIC on CCSI should actively embrace and promote the NEB, especially in Member States and regions where innovation capacity is moderate;
Amendment 378 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to
Amendment 379 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to integrate all aspects of the knowledge triangle – innovation, research and education – by promoting partnerships between universities, scientific secondary schools, research organisations and industry, including
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas buildings are responsible for 40% of EU energy consumption and for 36% of its greenhouse gas emissions from energy 1a; _________________ 1a European Commission 2021
Amendment 380 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to integrate all aspects of the knowledge triangle – innovation, research and education – by promoting partnerships
Amendment 381 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Proposes the use of New European Bauhaus to develop neighbourhoods with open, inclusive, accessible and vibrant spaces that promote equality, cultural exchange, democracy and strengthen the sense of community, co-existence and cooperation;
Amendment 382 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Welcomes the intention of the New European Bauhaus initiative to promote15-minute cities[1] in order to make all essential services and amenities accessible to citizens within walking distance; [1]https://www.15minutecity.com/
Amendment 383 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising community energy projects, low-tech, low- energy solutions and
Amendment 384 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising low-tech, low-energy solutions and by focussing on low carbon materials and solutions, and could facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide; underlines the importance of the NEB fighting energy poverty through innovative
Amendment 385 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising
Amendment 386 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support EU objectives on climate policy, energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising
Amendment 387 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising low-tech, low-energy solutions and could facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide; underlines the importance of the NEB fighting energy poverty through innovative solutions for the building, construction, industrial and materials sectors, considering it is a precondition for achieving a just and fair energy transition;
Amendment 388 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that one of the aims of the NEB
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security, affordability and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising low-tech, low-energy solutions and could facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide; underlines the importance of the NEB fighting energy poverty through innovative solutions for the building, mobility, construction, industrial and materials sectors;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has been responding to the challenges of
Amendment 390 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising high-tech, low-tech, low-energy solutions and could facilitate the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide;
Amendment 391 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the importance of securing energy efficiency in both older and newer buildings, including energy renovation of cultural institutions and buildings; furthermore, emphasizes the need to also focus on utilization of waste heat and integrated energy systems in e.g. buildings and the possibility of using buildings to capture and storage carbon dioxide;
Amendment 392 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Welcomes the development and maximization of digital technologies to achieve more efficient, inclusive, accessible, and eco-sustainable solutions; stresses that such technologies should be used to improve the social well-being of the citizens, and do not translate into the creation of digital surveillance of people;
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Underlines the need to engage with the culture and creative sector, citizen- and community-based organisations to design, implement and assess NEB delivery so that it achieves ‘living better together’; considers their essential role in answering new needs for spaces adapted to new ways of life as intergenerational cohabitation, working and co-working spaces adapted to changing habits, child-friendly urban environments, safer spaces for women and ease of moving and participating in work and public life for the most vulnerable people;
Amendment 394 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Recognizes the red tape concerning using biomaterials and re- used building materials in the building industry; calls for the Commission to increase the opportunities to use these within the building sector; furthermore, underlines that NEB should prioritize design for reuse for projects, especially in the building sector;
Amendment 395 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Underlines that the NEB is opportunity for fostering сross-border cooperation in data exchange in order to build capacity for creating innovative models and digital technologies for urban planning, circular design for resource use and creating climate-friendly solutions for sustainable construction and renovation of the building stock, public and residential, for the successful reconstruction of damaged historical buildings, as an ambition for joint development and well-being;
Amendment 396 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Stresses that the gender perspective and gender balance is not sufficiently represented in the CE communication; calls for the NEB to take into account the views of women and LGTBQI+ in the development of criteria, projects and initiatives; stresses the fundamental role of this view in the design of safe urban spaces and adapted domestic spaces to non-traditional household configurations;
Amendment 397 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new) 18d. Stresses that the NEB is an opportunity to rethink and improve accessibility in our cities and buildings; encourages this initiative to reflect and incorporate concrete accessibility criteria in projects as a requirement, applying real legislation; calls for incorporating the perspective of people with disabilities in the inclusivity dimension of this initiative;
Amendment 398 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new) 18e. Given the essential role of culture and artistic practices for self-development and well-being, debate and free expression, considers that the NEB should play a key role in ensuring ease of access to culture, fostering the proximity of cultural venues for everyone, including those living in remote and rural areas;
Amendment 399 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB to better protect Europe’s rich cultural heritage from the impact of climate change; highlights in this regard, that NEB gives chance to look at the European Green Deal from the prism of culture - with a special focus on cultural heritage, acknowledging the significance of its protection, restoration or adaptation, as an important vector of preservation of European cultural identity, memory and diversity, but also as strong impetus, exerting influence on the sustainable development and economic prosperity of cities, rural areas and peripheral territories;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) — having regard to the agreement adopted at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) in Paris on 12 December 2015 (the Paris Agreement),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has been responding to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources with far-reaching and ambitious political endeavours such as the European Green Deal, which is driving the quest for renewal and innovation and is setting global perspectives that contribute to the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB
Amendment 401 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB to better protect areas and communities that have historically been disadvantaged and Europe’s rich cultural heritage from the impact of climate change;
Amendment 402 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 403 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop ambitious plans and use the NEB to better protect Europe’s rich cultural heritage from the impact of climate change;
Amendment 404 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB to better protect Europe’s rich cultural heritage from the impact of underfinancing and the climate change;
Amendment 405 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the NEB to better protect Europe’s rich cultural heritage from neglect and the impact of climate change;
Amendment 406 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Is of the view that cultural heritage can and must be at the centre of living spaces' revitalisation efforts; highlights the need for a specific focus through the NEB on cultural heritage reuse, repurposing and renovation activities, including energy efficiency improvements; calls, in this regard, for a dedicated cultural heritage strand within the NEB which would also facilitate the sharing of best practices;
Amendment 407 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) Amendment 408 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls for the promotion of artistic creation within cultural and creative ecosystems that assure the working conditions of creators; acknowledge the cultural aspect of the NEB is critical to its social and democratic dimension;
Amendment 409 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Considers that the NEB should play a key role in promoting greater circularity in the built environment, by promoting renovation and adaptive re-use over demolition and new built, as appropriate;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has been responding to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources with far-reaching and ambitious political endeavours such as the European Green Deal, which is driving the quest for renewal and innovation; whereas more needs to be done, especially at local, regional and national levels matched by ambitious funding, including at EU level;
Amendment 410 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on the Commission to consider expanding the NEB to projects beyond the European Union borders, for example for new schools and social housing in Ukraine post-war reconstruction phase;
Amendment 411 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Believes that the NEB should play a central role in promoting greater circularity in the built environment, notably by promoting deep renovation and adaptive re-use over demolition and new built, as appropriate; Calls to ensure that circularity and sustainable criteria for building materials are at the heart of the selection for projects;
Amendment 412 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Believes that the NEB should have a dedicated external dimension, with specific focus on Ukraine, whereby the NEB could, among other initiatives, involve and liaise with the Ukrainian CCSI and its professionals as well as help the country's rebuilding efforts;
Amendment 413 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Considers that a key objective of the NEB should promote sustainable construction materials, in particular bio- and geo-sourced materials, low-carbon materials as well as simple, passive, low- tech and locally tested building techniques;
Amendment 414 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 c (new) 19c. Considers that the NEB should promote sustainable and circular construction materials, in particular bio- and geo-sourced materials and secondary raw materials, as well as simple, passive, low-tech and locally tested building techniques;
Amendment 415 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovative solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including with regard to energy efficiency; warns that the implementation of the NEB and the Renovation Wave may be hampered because of regulatory obstacles and lack of capacity on the part of public authorities; urges all public authorities to break down the existing barriers that hamper renovation and, in particular, the excessive length of the administrative procedures for granting licences;
Amendment 416 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovative solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including with regard to energy efficiency
Amendment 417 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovative solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including with regard to energy efficiency; notes that this will ensure a truly holistic and quality renovation of building stock, including houses and buildings in all areas in line with their specific contexts and surrounding neighbourhood;
Amendment 418 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the
Amendment 419 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovative solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has been responding to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources, w
Amendment 420 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave,
Amendment 421 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovative solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including with regard to energy efficiency and for achieving significant positive ecological impact;
Amendment 422 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave,
Amendment 423 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to effectively connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the
Amendment 424 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Believes that the implementation of the NEB at its core must encompass the bottom-up approach and as much as possible serve as a forum, a platform and an incubator for devising new ideas, concepts, products and services; urges the Commission, therefore, to speed up and sufficiently fund on a permanent basis the forthcoming NEB lab whereby relevant stakeholders at all levels can participate and contribute to realising the NEB's aims and objectives;
Amendment 425 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to further integrate the newly established framework for sustainable buildings, Level(s), to improve sustainability within the sector; underlines the need to optimize the framework to make it more accessible for professionals in the building sector; demands that the framework must be updated continuously to include new findings and conclusion from NEB projects;
Amendment 426 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to cooperate with Member States in mapping out specific projects in line with geographical balance that can be carried out through the New European Bauhaus; notes that priority needs to be given to urgent situations, f.e. reconstruction of damaged housing caused by earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters;
Amendment 427 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Member States to apply high-quality standards in the planning, design, conservation, restoration, renovation and adaptive re- use processes relating to building stock, so that we can benefit from buildings that, instead of deteriorating, grow old;
Amendment 428 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to create synergies in the research and university communities on the NEB fields, making use of the European Universities Initiative or networks that should indeed allow exchange and sharing knowledge and good practices;
Amendment 429 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to use the New European Bauhaus to realize social sustainability whilst protecting EU citizens, in particular vulnerable groups, from the social impact of the European Green Deal with regard to housing and energy efficiency;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 430 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to consider the NEB as an opportunity for the re-use, development and safeguarding of buildings, villages and historic centres;
Amendment 431 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to consider the NEB as an opportunity for the re-use, development and safeguarding of buildings, villages and historic centres;
Amendment 432 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Emphasizes that NEB should facilitate the wide implementation of the Renovation Wave throughout the whole chain of the rehabilitation of the existing building stock, in order to extend the life cycle of buildings, improve their energy performance, ensure the safety and durability of architectural assets, the application of new technologies in the construction and management of buildings, with resource-efficient and human-centricity goals for tackling energy poverty and ensuring access to healthy living conditions for households;
Amendment 433 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Calls on the Commission to take into account geographic balance and EU's rich cultural diversity when creating and implementing New European Bauhaus strategies, events, projects and actions, including winners of the NEB Festival and the NEB Prize;
Amendment 434 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Calls on Member States to consider the NEB principles in public procurement and underlines the need for more flexibility concerning regulatory limitations to promote innovation;
Amendment 435 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 436 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explored, among others in the construction and building sector, whereby a label could quantify and rate in a comprehensive and holistic way the sustainability, economic, environmental and social value of a building, while showcasing at the same time the sustainability performance of nature- based materials and products used in the building process;
Amendment 437 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label in partnership with NGOs and other relevant stakeholders, coordinated with existing labels, based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that
Amendment 438 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the possible creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive and effective way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for
Amendment 439 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU
Amendment 440 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls on the Commission to ensure swift and clear communication of the funding opportunities arising from the NEB label and calls for market uptake of the label to be explored;
Amendment 441 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; notes, however, that successful devising of the label must involve all relevant stakeholders, especially industry experts; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explored;
Amendment 442 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explored; based on existing tools and systems; as well to foster synergies between existing projects, funds and tools;
Amendment 443 #
21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria based on the a New European Bauhaus evidence based design methodology applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explored;
Amendment 444 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the creation of an NEB label in partnership with stakeholders, coordinated with existing labels, based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explored;
Amendment 445 #
21. Supports the creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Commission to have an own fund to finance New European Bauhaus projects, and to cooperate with citizens, neighbourhood organisations and relevant social enterprises, such as NGOs and cooperatives, as well as local authorities in the decision making process;
Amendment 447 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Urges Member States to incorporate NEB principles in national funding schemes when choosing innovation projects for national funding and to support projects which received a NEB label;
Amendment 448 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Supports the creation of an annual NEB festival and awards; calls for synergies with other relevant European awards and events;
Amendment 449 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Underlines that building and renovation projects should perform calculations concerning life circle analysis and life cycle cost to be eligible for the NEB label; calls on the Commission to present methodologies for calculating life circle analysis and life cycle cost;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has been responding to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources with
Amendment 450 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. calls for making 2023 the ‘European Year of NEB’;
Amendment 451 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace the potential of the CCSI, including cultural creators, as drivers of economic growth and innovative, high- quality services and products. Creative practices benefit not only the disciplines themselves but also the economic, societal and cultural standing of European societies as a whole. New technologies alone will not solve our climate and environmental challenges, new ways of thinking and working are needed. Novel tools and skills are needed for European organisations to think and act more creatively. The transition requires a broad engagement of businesses, universities and cities, as well as citizens of Europe;
Amendment 452 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace
Amendment 453 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB
Amendment 454 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace the potential of the CCSI, and particularly small and medium-sized cultural enterprises including cultural creators, as drivers of economic growth and innovative, high-
Amendment 455 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace the potential of the CCSI, including cultural creators, cultural institutions such as museums and libraries, as drivers of economic growth and innovative, high-
Amendment 456 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace as well as promote the potential of the CCSI, including cultural creators, as drivers of sustainable economic growth and a source for innovative, high-
Amendment 457 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace the potential of the CCS
Amendment 458 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Highlights that the NEB should embrace the potential of
Amendment 459 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission to guarantee the adequate and continuous involvement of all stakeholders from the cultural and creative sectors in the implementation and monitoring of the NEB, and to facilitate the exchange of good practices, mutual learning, and capacity building to ensure the NEB will create tangible, sustainable, cultural, social and economic benefits;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas climate change is a challenge that transcends borders and requires immediate and ambitious action; whereas the transition to a climate- neutral economy by 2050 represents a great opportunity as well as a challenge for the Union, its Member States and businesses from every sector; whereas cohesion policy is a crucial tool in delivering a fair transition to a climate- neutral economy;
Amendment 460 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission to publish specific guidelines for how the CCSI can contribute to the NEB; emphasizes that professional artists contributing to the NEB movement should receive fair remuneration for their work, including when involved with the NEB festival;
Amendment 461 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Highlights that the NEB should explore ways to support small-scale projects developed by individuals and local communities;
Amendment 462 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Calls on the Commission gather and publish best practices of NEB projects within the cultural sector, such as theatres, festivals or cinemas e.g., to inspire new projects; urges regional and local authorities in Member States to investigate how local cultural buildings and/or institutions can mitigate their climate footprint by implementing NEB policy;
Amendment 463 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 c (new) 22c. Emphasizes a need for including projects focussing on circular economy and improving sustainability of cultural outdoor events and activities, festivals or concert stadiums e.g.; therefore, highlights that outdoor events should be eligible to receive NEB funding and/or NEB label; highlights the potential for gathering data from outdoor events concerning how to improve circular economy, such as recycling, among citizens;
Amendment 464 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to allow Parliament to be more closely involved in
Amendment 465 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Encourages all European innovation and research centres, in particular the EIT , to put their expertise at the service of NEB implementation; by directing EIT and its Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs), the Climate Kic and the Creative Industries KIC in particular, to serve NEB objectives, capitalising on its topical expertise and relevant capacities substantiated in the EIT ecosystem;
Amendment 466 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. invites the Commission and Member states to encourage the direct involvement of local and regional authorities in the technical implementation of projects, which are in line with the principles and objectives set out in the Commission's communication on the New European Bauhaus;
Amendment 467 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative; calls on the Commission to present, in close cooperation with business stakeholders, proposals on how the NEB Lab can facilitate anonymous data sharing between European businesses in order to create collective growth while ensuring protection of trade secrets and data privacy of businesses;
Amendment 468 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative; insists that this tool must be translated into all the official languages of the European Union in the name of diversity and inclusion;
Amendment 469 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative, which will also ensure that the aesthetic and architectural characteristics on national, regional and local level are preserved and protected;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the NEB needs to be reinterpreting the original Bauhaus in light of the climate crisis and re-design our private and public spaces at a time when war, the pandemic, natural disasters, social inequalities and costs for citizens are all dramatically increasing;
Amendment 470 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to
Amendment 471 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national
Amendment 472 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative and independent recommendations, to feed them and collaborate with other institutions, national and, where applicable, regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative;
Amendment 473 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, with local bodies and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative;
Amendment 474 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear and transparent operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative;
Amendment 475 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear
Amendment 476 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to identify and make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative;
Amendment 477 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendations, to collaborate with other institutions, national
Amendment 478 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls for the NEB lab to help lead research and innovation within the focus areas of NEB as well as related areas, such as research in new alternative building materials, new building techniques, new ways of using automation and robotics, new membranes to produce clean water, new ways of reusing wastewater and building materials e.g.;
Amendment 479 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Supports the creation of an annual NEB Festival and awards; calls for synergies with other European awards and events of a similar nature, such as the EU Mies Van Der Rohe Award for contemporary architecture, Europan Europe, European Heritage Awards and others;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. Whereas buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 480 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. highlights that the NEB lab should also prioritize research focussing on how buildings, architecture and city planning can affect people mentally and neurologically;
Amendment 481 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to create a public
Amendment 482 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to create a publicly accessible database of NEB projects to make the results of the initiative more visible and to further develop the NEB based on best practices; encourages the Commission to hold regular meetings with representatives from Member States and partner countries in order to further improve the initiative;
Amendment 483 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to create a publicly accessible database of NEB projects, that is regularly updated, with clear data demonstrating the impact of the initiatives on the regions, to make the results of the initiative more visible and to further develop the NEB based on best practices;
Amendment 484 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to create a publicly accessible database of NEB projects, available in all the languages of the European Union, to make the results of the initiative
Amendment 485 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to create and regularly update a publicly accessible database of NEB projects and actions so as to make the results of the initiative more visible and to further develop the NEB based on best practices;
Amendment 486 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Suggests that quantitative and qualitative surveys, among local citizens, be conducted to evaluate the success of NEB projects relating to the primary goals of NEB;
Amendment 487 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for the communication efforts of the NEB to be enhanced in order to stimulate EU citizens’ knowledge of and interest in the initiative, in particular through participatory public outreach activities, new media and a platform providing information, best practices and educational content; urges the Commission to consider a quarterly or biennial NEB digital publication to promote projects, events and networks related to the movement;
Amendment 488 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for the communication efforts of the NEB to be enhanced in order to stimulate EU citizens’ knowledge of and interest in the initiative, and thus their investment, trust and support in it, in particular through participatory public outreach activities and a platform providing information, best practices and educational content;
Amendment 489 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for the communication and outreach efforts of the NEB to be enhanced in order to stimulate EU citizens’ knowledge
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together and to build democratic and free societies, and yet has been one of the areas hardest hit by the pandemic;
Amendment 490 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for the communication efforts of the NEB to be enhanced in order to
Amendment 491 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the NEB Prize and the NEB Festival and all events related to it; highlights the importance of organising various events across Europe in order to reach more citizens and raise awareness of the initiative; encourages local, regional, national and European cooperation in this regard;
Amendment 492 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Underlines the need to promote NEB among the European youth and calls on the Commission to organise a yearly Bauhaus Design Day competition for students of all education levels and to possibly link it with NEB festival;
Amendment 493 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the NEB Prize and the NEB Festival, in particular side-events taking place in diverse locations across Europe, and encourages the Commission to pursue these initiatives in future;
Amendment 494 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Calls on the Commission to establish a yearly creative competition for artists to create art focussing on specific issues related NEB or potential solutions;
Amendment 495 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Encourages all public authorities, including the European Union, to incorporate NEB principles into the management of their own built environment;
Amendment 496 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls on the Commission to plan the destinations of the yearly NEB festivals in respect of European cities chosen by UNESCO to be a “World Capital of Architecture”; suggests that the NEB festival is held in these EU cities selected as World Capitals of Architecture to improve the promotion of European architecture and innovation;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together among ourselves and with other peoples and to build democratic and free societies, and yet unfortunately has been one of the areas hardest hit by the measures put in place to address the pandemic;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is supposed to be a strategic sector
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together and to build democratic and free societies, where all people are valued and included and yet has been one of the areas hardest hit by the pandemic;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together, to have social interaction and to build democratic and free societies, and yet has been one of the areas hardest hit by the pandemic;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together and to build democratic, sustainable, inclusive and free societies, and yet has been one of the areas hardest hit by the pandemic;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Union has only had limited competence in the field of culture thus far, with Creative Europe being the sole programme dedicated to culture and whose funding still falls far short of the needs of our European cultural and creative sectors;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas culture is also essential to an exploration of the complex challenges of society, and to facilitate inquiries into our interdependence with the environment, and the nourishment of humans’ collective life;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. Whereas the New Bauhaus movement should be a continuation of the original Bauhaus, which introduced the social role of art and architecture in addressing societal needs;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas access to decent and affordable housing is a fundamental right;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas culture, arts and cultural heritage are of great value to European society from a cultural, educational, democratic, environmental, social, human rights and economic point of view, and should be promoted and supported;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building an inclusive
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building a
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building a
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building a
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building an inclusive, beautiful, and sustainable society;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, mobility, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building an inclusive and fair society;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas cities are places of pluralism, creativity and solidarity, and test beds for new forms of problem solving and for social innovation; whereas public spaces are central places for stimulating open, inclusive and transparent debate and participation in public life, thereby contributing to democratic systems for our society; whereas culture and artistic venues are essential places for freedom of expression and debate;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas a high-quality built environment is the result of the work of talented and skilled professionals with novel ideas in the construction, urban planning, industrial design and other fields, and the creative and cultural sectors and industries more broadly;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas delivering access to digital connectivity for all people is an essential tool for independent living, getting access to information, or taking advantage of the opportunities offered within the community;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a better future starts with quality education and training; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right that needs to be available to every individual; notes that the New European Bauhaus needs to address the issue of accessibility of online learning opportunities to all individuals, including adjusting necessary infrastructure for broadband internet in all areas, such as remote, less populated, rural, peripheral, insular and mountainous areas;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a better future starts with quality education and training; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right; whereas a high-quality built environment is the result of the work of skilled professionals in the construction sector and creative and cultural industries;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a better future
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 Amendment 80 #
E. whereas building a better future starts with quality education and training; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right; whereas education and culture play a crucial role in the democratic and civic participation of citizens;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a better future starts and continues with quality education and training, including in their digital forms, that are accessible to everyone, including through a lifelong learning approach; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas building a better future starts with quality education and training, including through vocational and lifelong learning; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas cultural and artistic education are vital for personal development and for being able to value the arts, culture and architecture that surround us and design tomorrow’s cultural heritage; whereas everyone should have the right to access to and participate in culture;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas, in light of the sustainability and greening agendas, it is vital that more effort is devoted towards cost-effective repurposing, renovation and restoration of building stock and infrastructure as opposed to demolition and newly builds;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas educating and empowering children and young people in a participatory way to understand, experience and embrace sustainability and inclusion will create a stronger solidarity and ties with the community for the future generations;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. E (new) whereas investing in more sustainable construction, sustainable housing and ensuring energy security is an effective way of combating energy poverty and achieving the Union’s climate goals;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas architects, among other professionals, play an essential role in every phase of developing responsible, quality architecture and planning, and must contribute to the common good by taking into account the needs of society and respect for cultural heritage and tradition;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) — having regard to the European Parliament resolution on access to decent and affordable housing for all (2019/2187(INI))1a _________________ 1a OJ C 456, 10.11.2021, p. 145–160.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas the Union’s strategic autonomy rests on its ability to lead technological, environmentally sustainable economic and social progress; whereas this depends on its ability to excel in education, research and innovation - often referred to as the ‘knowledge triangle’;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cultural heritage is increasingly impacted by climate change and environmental degradation, causing damage to historical and cultural landmarks in all areas; whereas the New European Bauhaus must be used to restore, adapt and protect it for the future, including also safety measures that will protect citizens living in all regions;
Amendment 92 #
F. whereas cultural heritage is increasingly impacted by underinvestment, bad policy planning, poorly managed tourist flows, disregard for its long-term viability, climate change a
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cultural heritage is increasingly impacted by climate change and environmental degradation and must be preserved;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cultural heritage is increasingly impacted by climate and social change, and environmental and cultural degradation;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cultural heritage
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the promotion of quality sustainable, aesthetic and energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure also rests on a supportive regulatory framework; whereas public procurement must evolve and avoid trappings of the past whereby the cheapest offers without regard to other qualities must implicitly or even explicitly be prioritised or chosen;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the notion of aesthetics varies depending on the individual, which suggests favouring potentially mould- breaking harmony in urban planning over aesthetics, taking as a model the town of Le Plessis-Robinson and its ‘Cœur de ville’ project, designed by François Spoerry;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the NEB has a potential to include smaller cities and towns, especially in the rural and remote areas, in the green transition and to ensure the involvement of citizens in spatial planning and cultural activities;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the Renovation Wave strategy aims to double the rate of building renovation in Europe, aiming at the renovation of more than 35 million buildings and the creation of up to 160 000 jobs in the construction sector;
source: 731.714
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2023-08-03Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
| events/7/summary |
|
2022-09-16Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4 |
|
| events/5 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
2022-09-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
2022-09-13Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2022-09-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0213_EN.html
|
| events/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0213_EN.html
|
2022-09-10Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
2022-09-01Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4 |
|
| events/4/docs |
|
2022-07-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
2022-07-13Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| events/3 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2022-06-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2022-07-13T00:00:00New
2022-07-12T00:00:00 |
2022-06-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-719934_EN.html
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2022-06-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts |
|
2022-06-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/3/date |
Old
2022-06-17T00:00:00New
2022-06-20T00:00:00 |
2022-06-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-704689_EN.html
|
2022-06-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/2 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
2022-03-29Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/1 |
|
| docs/1/date |
Old
2022-03-02T00:00:00New
2022-03-28T00:00:00 |
2022-03-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-703237_EN.html
|
2022-03-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1 |
|
2022-03-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs |
|
2022-01-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| commission |
|
2022-01-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/9 |
|
2022-01-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2022-01-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2021-12-22Show (3) Changes
| events |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |