Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | GANCIA Gianna ( ID), MODIG Silvia ( The Left) | |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | TAX Vera ( S&D) | Peter LUNDGREN ( ECR), Marian-Jean MARINESCU ( PPE), Bergur Løkke RASMUSSEN ( RE) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Recast Technique Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 113, TFEU 192
Legal Basis:
RoP 113, TFEU 192Events
PURPOSE: to set out air quality provisions with the aim to achieve a zero-pollution objective, so that air quality within the Union is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health, natural ecosystems or biodiversity, contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2024/2881 of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast).
CONTENT: the directive lays down enhanced EU air quality standards for 2030 that are closer to the WHO guidelines on air quality. It lays down limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, alert thresholds, information thresholds and long-term objectives.
Scope
The revised directive covers a host of air-polluting substances, including fine particles and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), benzo(a)pyrene, arsenic, lead and nickel, among others, and establishes specific standards for each one of them. For instance, the annual limit values for the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, PM2.5 and NO2, would be reduced from 25 µg/m³ to 10 µg/m³ and from 40 µg/m³ to 20 µg/m³ respectively.
By 31 December 2030 and every 5 years thereafter, and more often if substantial new scientific findings, such as revised WHO Air Quality Guidelines, point to the need for it, the Commission will review the scientific evidence related to air pollutants and their effects on human health and the environment. Based on this review, the Commission will then present proposals to revise air quality standards, to include other pollutants and/or to propose further action to be taken at EU level.
Assessment of ambient air quality
The directive provides for a common approach to the assessment of ambient air quality which should be followed by applying common assessment criteria . When assessing ambient air quality, account should be taken of the size of populations and ecosystems exposed to air pollution. It is therefore appropriate to classify the territory of each Member State into zones reflecting the population density and average exposure territorial units.
Fixed measurements should be mandatory in zones where assessment thresholds are exceeded.
Pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, will be measured at monitoring supersites at both rural background locations and urban background locations. Detailed measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2,5) should be made in order to understand better the impacts of that pollutant and to develop appropriate policies.
Postponement of attainment deadlines
The provisional agreement provides Member States with the possibility to request, by 31 January 2029 and for specific reasons and under strict conditions, a postponement of the deadline for attaining the air quality limit values:
- until no later than 1 January 2040 for areas where compliance with the directive by the deadline would prove unachievable due to specific climatic and orographic conditions or where the necessary reductions can only be achieved with significant impact on existing domestic heating systems;
- until no later than 1 January 2035 (with possibility to extend it by two more years) if projections show that the limit values cannot be achieved by the attainment deadline.
Any extension of the deadline in a given area will have to be accompanied by an air quality roadmap (to be established by 2028) and assessed by the Commission, demonstrating that the exceedance will be as short as possible and that the limit value will be respected at the latest by the end of the postponement period.
Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps
In cases where a limit or target value is exceeded or there is a concrete risk of exceeding the alert or information thresholds for certain pollutants, the directive requires Member States to establish:
- an air quality roadmap ahead of the deadline if between 2026 and 2029 the level of pollutants exceeds the limit or target value to be attained by 2030;
- air quality plans for areas where the levels of pollutants exceed the limit and target values set out in the directive after the deadline;
- short-term action plans setting out emergency measures (e.g. restricting the circulation of vehicles, suspending construction works, etc.) to reduce the immediate risk to human health in areas where the alert thresholds will be exceeded.
Transboundary air pollution
Where transboundary transport of air pollution from one or more Member State contributes significantly to the exceedance of any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold in another Member State, that other Member State will notify the Member States from which the air pollution originated and the Commission thereof. The Member States concerned will cooperate with each other, including by establishing joint teams of experts and with technical support from the Commission, to identify the sources of air pollution, contributions of those sources to exceedances in another Member State and the measures to be taken individually and in coordination with other Member States to address those sources, and draw up coordinated activities, such as the coordination of air quality plans.
Access to justice and right to compensation
The new directive sets out provisions to ensure access to justice for those who have a sufficient interest and want to challenge its implementation, including public health and environmental NGOs. Member States should ensure that citizens are entitled to claim and obtain compensation where damage to their health has occurred as a result of an intentional or negligent violation of the national rules transposing certain provisions of the directive.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10.12.2024.
TRANSPOSITION: 11.12.2026 at the latest.
Final act
The European Parliament adopted by 381 votes to 225, with 17 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast).
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Objectives
The directive lays down provisions on air quality with the aim of achieving a ‘ zero pollution ’ objective, so that air quality within the Union is progressively improved to levels that are no longer considered harmful to human health, natural ecosystems and biodiversity, thus contributing to an environment free of toxic substances by 2050.
The new rules set stricter 2030 limits and target values, compared to current rules, for several pollutants including particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) and SO2 (sulphur dioxide), benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, lead, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene.
By 31 December 2030 and every 5 years thereafter, and more often if substantial new scientific findings, such as revised WHO Air Quality Guidelines, point to the need for it, the Commission should review the scientific evidence related to air pollutants and their effects on human health and the environment relevant to achieving the objectives set out in the Directive.
Establishment of zones and average exposure territorial units
Member States should establish zones and average exposure territorial units throughout their territory, including, where appropriate for the purposes of air quality assessment and management, at the level of agglomerations. Air quality assessment and air quality management should be carried out in all zones and average exposure territorial units.
Postponement of attainment deadline and exemption from the obligation to apply certain limit values
Where, in a given zone, conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide, benzene or benzo(a)pyrene cannot be achieved by the deadline of 2030, Member States may postpone that deadline for that particular zone by a period justified by an air quality roadmap and provided that the certain conditions are met:
(a) up to 1 January 2040 , if justified by site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions, transboundary contributions, or where the necessary reductions can only be achieved by replacing a considerable fraction of the existing domestic heating systems that are the source of pollution causing exceedances; or
(b) up to 1 January 2035 , if justified by projections that demonstrate that even taking into account the expected impact of effective air pollution measures identified in the air quality roadmap, the limit values cannot be attained by the attainment deadline.
Air quality plans and roadmaps
Where, in given zones, the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value or target value laid down in Annex I, Member States should establish air quality plans for those zones that set out appropriate measures to achieve the limit value or target value concerned and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 4 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was recorded.
In addition to air quality plans, required for those EU countries exceeding limits, all member states will have to create air quality roadmaps by 31 December 2028 that set out short- and long-term measures to comply with the new 2030 limit values.
Where an air quality plan or air quality roadmap is not established, Member States should provide to the public and the Commission a detailed justification as to why there is no significant potential to reduce the exceedance resulting in a decision not to establish an air quality plan or air quality roadmap.
Member States should encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the preparation, implementation and update of air quality plans and air quality roadmaps.
Public information
Member States should:
- make available through a public source, in an easily understandable manner, an air quality index covering hourly updates on at least sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, provided that there is an obligation to monitor those pollutants pursuant to this Directive. Insofar as possible, the air quality index should be comparable across all Member States and follow WHO recommendations;
- make publicly available information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on air pollution exposure reduction and protection behaviours, and should encourage its display to the public in locations frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups, such as healthcare facilities.
Access to justice
It is intended that concerned citizens and environmental NGOs should have access to justice to challenge the implementation of this directive in the Member States, and that citizens should be entitled to compensation where their health has been damaged as a result of breaches of the new national rules.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The European Parliament adopted by 363 votes to 226, with 43 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast).
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for inter-institutional negotiations.
Subject matter
This Directive seeks to set out a zero-pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health, natural ecosystems and biodiversity , as well as aligning with the most recent air quality recommendations from the World Health Organisation (WHO).
This Directive sets:
- intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives and critical levels to be met as soon as possible and by the year 2030 at the latest;
- limit values to be met by 2035 , which are to be regularly reviewed;
- long-term objectives , information thresholds and alert thresholds as part of air quality standards.
This Directive defines: (i) measures for monitoring ambient air quality long-term trends and impacts of Union and national measures, as well as measures established in cooperation with third countries, on ambient air quality; (ii) measures ensuring that the information on ambient air quality is harmonised across the Union and made available to the public; (iii) measures promoting increased cooperation between Member States, regional and local authorities, within and between Member States, as well as with third countries that have a common border with the Union, in reducing air pollution.
Sampling points
The amended text stressed the need to increase the number of sampling points for air quality. It is stipulated that the location of sampling points should be representative of the exposure of at-risk communities and of the exposure of one or more sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
Monitoring supersites
Each Member State should establish at least one monitoring supersite per 2 million inhabitants (instead of 10 million inhabitants) at an urban background location. Member States that have fewer than 2 million inhabitants should establish at least one monitoring supersite at an urban background location.
In zones where high concentrations of ultrafine particles, black carbon, mercury and ammonia (NH3) are likely to occur, there should be one sampling point per one million inhabitants (instead of one sampling point per 5 million inhabitants).
Measurements at all monitoring supersites at locations characteristic of urban background pollution and locations characteristic of rural background pollution should include fixed measurements of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), black carbon, ammonia (NH3) and ultrafine particles.
With regard to ambient air quality assessment of pollutants, it is specified that Member States will have to monitor levels of black carbon, ammonia and mercury.
Requirements where levels are below limit values, the target value for ozone and average exposure indicators
Members suggest defining a smaller geographical area for calculating the average exposure indicator (AEI) and the obligation to reduce average exposure. They propose that this calculation be carried out at NUTS 2 level rather than NUTS 1.
Air quality plans and roadmaps
Members propose that, in addition to air quality plans, all Member States should also draw up air quality roadmaps for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values set for 2030. The air quality roadmap should set out short- and long-term policies and measures in order to comply with those limit values by 2030 at the latest.
Member States should ensure that before the time period for receiving comments from the public starts, the draft air quality plan or draft air quality roadmap containing the minimum information required is made available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, and, where appropriate, through other non-digital communication channels.
Relevant stakeholders and citizens should be duly informed about the specific sources and air pollutants affecting air quality and the relevant air pollution mitigation measures that exist and are available on the market.
Greater protection for citizens
In order to inform citizens about poor air quality and its effects, competent authorities shall require the permanent display of easily understandable information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on behaviour to reduce exposure to air pollution in the vicinity of communities of sensitive population and vulnerable groups.
Member States should establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone and make it available in a coherent and easily understandable manner through a public source providing an hourly update , ensuring that sufficient real-time data is available in all stations.
Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Javi LÓPEZ (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (recast).
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading in the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Objectives
The report calls for full alignment of EU limit values with the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 air quality guidelines by 2030.
The Directive will set limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration targets and critical levels, which must be achieved as soon as possible and by 2030 at the latest, then reviewed regularly thereafter. It will also set long-term objectives, information thresholds and alert thresholds, which are part of air quality standards.
The Directive should define: (i) ambient air quality monitoring measures, long-term trends and the effects of Union and national measures, as well as measures established in cooperation with third countries , on ambient air quality; (ii) measures to ensure that information on ambient air quality is harmonised throughout the Union and made available to the public; (iii) measures to promote greater cooperation between Member States, regional and local authorities, at national and cross-border level, and with third countries bordering the Union.
Definitions
Members introduced the definition of ‘air quality standards’ as well as the definition of ‘ air pollution hotspots ’ including ports or airports.
'Limit value' is defined as a level which is established on the basis of scientific knowledge, with the aim of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects on human health and/or the environment, and which is to be attained within a given period and not to be exceeded once attained.
Members consider it necessary to clearly distinguish between plans that must be adopted before the deadline for compliance and those that must be adopted after, and this is why a definition of the ‘air quality roadmap’ is proposed.
Assessment of Ambient Air Quality
With regard to the assessment of ambient air quality for pollutants, it is specified that Member States should monitor the levels of ultrafine particulate matter, black carbon, ammonia and mercury .
Sampling points
The location of sampling points should be representative of the exposure of at-risk populations and the exposure of one or more sensitive populations and vulnerable groups.
Monitoring supersites
Each Member State should establish at least one monitoring supersite per 2 million inhabitants (instead of 10 million) at an urban background location. Member States that have fewer than 2 million inhabitants shall establish at least one monitoring supersite at an urban background location.
Measurements at all monitoring supersites at urban background locations and rural background locations should include fixed measurements of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), black carbon (BC), ammonia (NH3) and ultrafine particles (UFP).
Requirements when levels are below limit values, ozone target and average exposure concentration objectives
Members suggested defining a smaller geographical area for the calculation of the average exposure indicator (AEI) and the obligation to reduce the average exposure. They propose this calculation at NUTS 2 rather than NUTS 1.
Member States should endeavour to achieve and maintain the best ambient air quality and a high level of protection of the environment and human health, in accordance with the most recent WHO air quality guidelines and reviews published by the WHO Regional Office for Europe and below the assessment thresholds set out in Annex II, paying particular attention to the protection of sensitive populations and vulnerable groups.
Exceeding alert or information thresholds
Where any alert threshold laid down in Section 4, Point A, of Annex I is exceeded, Member States should implement without undue delay the emergency measures indicated in the short-term action plans.
Where any alert threshold is exceeded, Member States should take the necessary steps to inform the public within a few hours at the latest, in a coherent and easily understandable manner , providing detailed information about the severity of the exceedance and the associated health impacts, as well as suggestions for the protection of the population, with a special focus on sensitive population and vulnerable groups .
Air quality roadmap
Where from three months after the date of entry into force of this Directive, in a zone or NUTS 2 territorial unit, the levels of any pollutant recorded for the preceding calendar year are above any limit or target value to be attained by 1 January 2030, Member State concerned should establish an air quality roadmap for that pollutant as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the pollutant was recorded in order to attain the respective limit values or ozone target value by the expiration of the attainment deadline.
Air quality plans
Member States should ensure that before the time period for receiving comments from the public starts, the draft air quality plan or draft air quality roadmap containing the minimum information required under Points A and B of Annex VIII is made available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users , and, where appropriate, through other non-digital communication channels.
To inform citizens about poor air quality and its effects, the competent authorities should require the permanent display of easily understandable information on the symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on behaviour to reduce exposure to air pollution in the vicinity of sensitive population communities and vulnerable groups.
Public information
Member States should establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, based on an EU-wide framework containing data that will ensure harmonised information across the EU and make it available in a coherent and easily understandable manner through a public source providing an hourly update . The air quality index must be comparable in all Member States, follow the latest WHO recommendations and be based on the European-wide air quality indices provided by the European Environment Agency. The air quality index should be accompanied by information on the health risks associated with each pollutant, including information tailored to sensitive populations and vulnerable groups.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to simplify and consolidate the directives on ambient air quality.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: clean air is essential to human health and sustaining the environment. Major improvements in air quality have been achieved in the European Union over the past three decades, thanks to joint efforts by the EU and national, regional and local authorities in the Member States to reduce the adverse impacts of air pollution. However, about 300 000 premature deaths per year and a significant number of non-communicable diseases such as asthma, cardiovascular problems and lung cancer are attributed to air pollution. Air pollution continues to be the number one environmental cause of early death in the EU with the worst pollutants being particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Polluted air also harms the environment causing acidification, eutrophication and damage to forests, ecosystems and crops.
The last update to the Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC and 2004/107/EC) dates back to 2008. Since then, new scientific evidence about the health impacts of air pollution has become available. The revised WHO Air Quality Guidelines published in September 2021 recommend introducing stricter air quality standards.
PURPOSE: after more than a decade of implementing Directive 2008/50/EC and Directive 2004/107/EC in parallel, the revision of the Ambient Air Quality Directives provides an opportunity to incorporate the latest scientific knowledge and experience with implementation by merging them into a single Directive. This will consolidate air quality legislation, while simplifying rules applying to relevant authorities, enhancing overall consistency and clarity, and thus making implementation more efficient.
Amendments made through this proposal to merge the current Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC and 2004/107/EC) aim to consolidate and simplify the legislation.
In particular, the recast Directive:
- introduces the 2050 zero pollution objective for air quality to ensure that, by 2050, air quality is so improved that pollution is no longer considered harmful to human health and the environment;
- provides for a regular review of scientific evidence to check whether the air quality standards in force are still sufficient to protect human health and the environment, and whether additional air pollutants should be regulated. The first review will take place by the end of 2028, with the objective in particular to ensuring full alignment with WHO recommendations;
- supports local authorities by strengthening the provisions on air quality monitoring, modelling, and improved air quality plans ;
- replaces the current lower and upper assessment threshold with a single assessment threshold per pollutant;
- updates and clarifies rules for the number and location of sampling points , including stricter rules for relocating sampling points;
- introduces a new provision requiring a reduction, by more than half, in public's average exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) at regional level (NUTS 1 territorial units), towards the levels recommended by the WHO;
- introduces alert thresholds for short-term measures on peak pollution from particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), in addition to the existing alert thresholds for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2), given the significant health impacts of particulate matter pollution;
- establishes an effective right for people to be compensated where damage to their health has occurred wholly or partially as a result of a violation of rules prescribed on limit values, air quality plans, short-term action plans or in relation to transboundary pollution;
- brings more clarity on access to justice , effective penalties, and better public information on air quality.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to simplify and consolidate the directives on ambient air quality.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: clean air is essential to human health and sustaining the environment. Major improvements in air quality have been achieved in the European Union over the past three decades, thanks to joint efforts by the EU and national, regional and local authorities in the Member States to reduce the adverse impacts of air pollution. However, about 300 000 premature deaths per year and a significant number of non-communicable diseases such as asthma, cardiovascular problems and lung cancer are attributed to air pollution. Air pollution continues to be the number one environmental cause of early death in the EU with the worst pollutants being particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Polluted air also harms the environment causing acidification, eutrophication and damage to forests, ecosystems and crops.
The last update to the Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC and 2004/107/EC) dates back to 2008. Since then, new scientific evidence about the health impacts of air pollution has become available. The revised WHO Air Quality Guidelines published in September 2021 recommend introducing stricter air quality standards.
PURPOSE: after more than a decade of implementing Directive 2008/50/EC and Directive 2004/107/EC in parallel, the revision of the Ambient Air Quality Directives provides an opportunity to incorporate the latest scientific knowledge and experience with implementation by merging them into a single Directive. This will consolidate air quality legislation, while simplifying rules applying to relevant authorities, enhancing overall consistency and clarity, and thus making implementation more efficient.
Amendments made through this proposal to merge the current Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC and 2004/107/EC) aim to consolidate and simplify the legislation.
In particular, the recast Directive:
- introduces the 2050 zero pollution objective for air quality to ensure that, by 2050, air quality is so improved that pollution is no longer considered harmful to human health and the environment;
- provides for a regular review of scientific evidence to check whether the air quality standards in force are still sufficient to protect human health and the environment, and whether additional air pollutants should be regulated. The first review will take place by the end of 2028, with the objective in particular to ensuring full alignment with WHO recommendations;
- supports local authorities by strengthening the provisions on air quality monitoring, modelling, and improved air quality plans ;
- replaces the current lower and upper assessment threshold with a single assessment threshold per pollutant;
- updates and clarifies rules for the number and location of sampling points , including stricter rules for relocating sampling points;
- introduces a new provision requiring a reduction, by more than half, in public's average exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) at regional level (NUTS 1 territorial units), towards the levels recommended by the WHO;
- introduces alert thresholds for short-term measures on peak pollution from particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), in addition to the existing alert thresholds for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2), given the significant health impacts of particulate matter pollution;
- establishes an effective right for people to be compensated where damage to their health has occurred wholly or partially as a result of a violation of rules prescribed on limit values, air quality plans, short-term action plans or in relation to transboundary pollution;
- brings more clarity on access to justice , effective penalties, and better public information on air quality.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Draft final act: 00088/2024/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0319/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE761.037
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2024)001398
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001398
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0318/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- CofR: CDR6180/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0233/2023
- Specific opinion: PE750.118
- Committee draft report: PE749.886
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Committee opinion: PE742.298
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.427
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.423
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.424
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.351
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Committee draft report: PE742.410
- ESC: CES5604/2022
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0345
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0542
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0542
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0545
- Legislative proposal: COM(2022)0542
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0542
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE742.410
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.351
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.423
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.424
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE745.427
- Committee opinion: PE742.298
- Committee draft report: PE749.886
- Specific opinion: PE750.118
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001398
- Draft final act: 00088/2024/LEX
- Legislative proposal: COM(2022)0542 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2022)0345
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SEC(2022)0542
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2022)0542
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0545
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- Contribution: COM(2022)0542
- ESC: CES5604/2022
- CofR: CDR6180/2022
Activities
- Heidi HAUTALA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- João PIMENTA LOPES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc TARABELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valter FLEGO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Grace O'SULLIVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianna GANCIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petros KOKKALIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvia LIMMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alessandro PANZA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edina TÓTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sara CERDAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janina OCHOJSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ciarán CUFFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petar VITANOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vera TAX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cyrus ENGERER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Angela DANZÌ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Achille VARIATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bergur Løkke RASMUSSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
La qualité de l’air ambiant et un air pur pour l’Europe - A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Proposition de rejet - Am 310 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 53 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 76 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 105 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 276 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 285/1 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 285/2 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 1, § 2 - Am 312 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 1, § 2 - Am 340 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 3, § 1 - Am 313=341= #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 3, § 2, sous § 2 - Am 342 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 18, § 1, introduction - Am 314 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 19, après le § 5 - Am 345 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 20, § 2 - Am 346 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 28 - Am 326S #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 28 - Am 173-175 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 29, § 1 - Am 327 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Article 29, § 2 - Am 328 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 1, titre - Am 300=330= #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 1 - Am 185/1 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 1 - Am 185/2 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 1 - Am 185/3 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 1 - Am 185/4 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe I, section 1, tableau 2 - Am 331 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Annexe IV, partie C, § 1, point c - Am 351 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Considérant 4 - Am 293 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Après le considérant 8 - Am 311 #
A9-0233/2023 - Javi López - Proposition de la Commission #
A9-0233/2023 – Javi López – Provisional agreement – Am 355 #
FR | ES | PT | SE | IE | NL | DK | FI | EL | BE | AT | LU | HR | SK | RO | MT | LV | CZ | EE | LT | DE | BG | SI | HU | PL | IT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
72
|
58
|
20
|
21
|
12
|
28
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
21
|
17
|
6
|
11
|
11
|
28
|
4
|
8
|
20
|
7
|
10
|
87
|
16
|
8
|
16
|
44
|
56
|
|
S&D |
126
|
France S&DFor (7) |
Spain S&DFor (21)Alicia HOMS GINEL, Clara AGUILERA, Cristina MAESTRE, César LUENA, Domènec RUIZ DEVESA, Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL, Estrella DURÁ FERRANDIS, Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO, Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ, Javi LÓPEZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Jonás FERNÁNDEZ, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA, Lina GÁLVEZ, Marcos ROS SEMPERE, Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ, Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR, Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
|
Portugal S&DFor (9) |
5
|
Netherlands S&DFor (6) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Germany S&DFor (13) |
Bulgaria S&D |
2
|
5
|
Poland S&DFor (6) |
Italy S&DAgainst (9) |
|
Renew |
97
|
France RenewFor (21)Bernard GUETTA, Catherine AMALRIC, Catherine CHABAUD, Dominique RIQUET, Fabienne KELLER, Gilles BOYER, Guy LAVOCAT, Irène TOLLERET, Jérémy DECERLE, Laurence FARRENG, Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE, Max ORVILLE, Nathalie LOISEAU, Pascal CANFIN, Pierre KARLESKIND, Salima YENBOU, Sandro GOZI, Stéphane BIJOUX, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN, Sylvie BRUNET, Valérie HAYER
|
Spain RenewFor (8)Abstain (1) |
3
|
2
|
Netherlands RenewFor (7) |
Denmark RenewFor (6) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Romania RenewFor (7) |
1
|
Czechia RenewFor (2)Abstain (3) |
3
|
1
|
Germany RenewAgainst (7) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
||
Verts/ALE |
67
|
France Verts/ALEFor (12) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (22)Alexandra GEESE, Anna CAVAZZINI, Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG, Damian BOESELAGER, Daniel FREUND, Erik MARQUARDT, Hannah NEUMANN, Henrike HAHN, Jan OVELGÖNNE, Katrin LANGENSIEPEN, Manuela RIPA, Martin HÄUSLING, Michael BLOSS, Niklas NIENASS, Patrick BREYER, Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA, Rasmus ANDRESEN, Reinhard BÜTIKOFER, Sergey LAGODINSKY, Ska KELLER, Terry REINTKE, Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
The Left |
31
|
France The LeftFor (6) |
Spain The LeftFor (6) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Germany The Left |
|||||||||||||||
NI |
35
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Hungary NIAgainst (9) |
Italy NIFor (7) |
|||||||||||||
PPE |
158
|
France PPEFor (7)Against (1) |
Spain PPEAgainst (12) |
Portugal PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
Sweden PPEFor (5)Against (1) |
4
|
Netherlands PPEFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
Austria PPEFor (3)Against (2) |
2
|
3
|
Slovakia PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Romania PPEFor (2)Against (11) |
1
|
3
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
4
|
Germany PPEFor (1)Against (27)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christian EHLER,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Marlene MORTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Niclas HERBST,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Stefan BERGER,
Sven SIMON
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
1
|
Poland PPEFor (10)Against (3) |
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (7) |
|
ECR |
61
|
1
|
Spain ECR |
3
|
Netherlands ECRFor (1)Against (4) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Poland ECRAgainst (22)
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA,
Anna FOTYGA,
Anna ZALEWSKA,
Beata KEMPA,
Beata MAZUREK,
Beata SZYDŁO,
Bogdan RZOŃCA,
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI,
Elżbieta KRUK,
Elżbieta RAFALSKA,
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI,
Izabela-Helena KLOC,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Krzysztof JURGIEL,
Patryk JAKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI
Abstain (1) |
Italy ECRAgainst (7) |
|||||||||
ID |
48
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Germany IDAgainst (8) |
Italy IDAgainst (17) |
Amendments | Dossier |
978 |
2022/0347(COD)
2023/03/28
TRAN
195 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared ahead of 203
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Action plans should be drawn up indicating the measures to be taken in the short term where there is a risk of an exceedance of one or more alert thresholds in order to reduce that risk and to limit its duration.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Action plans should be drawn up indicating the measures to be taken in the short term where there is a risk of an exceedance of one or more alert thresholds in order to reduce that risk and to limit its duration.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, based also on transboundary measurements the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants, such as ozone and particulate matter, may require coordination between neighbouring Member States in drawing up and implementing air quality plans and short- term action plans and in informing the public. Where appropriate, Member States should pursue cooperation with third countries, with particular emphasis on the early involvement of candidate countries. The Commission should be timely informed
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air as well as air quality plans and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public. In order for such information to be consistent and reliable, it is essential that Member States have sufficient air quality monitoring infrastructure deployed across the cities and towns. Where such infrastructure is lacking, it should be put in place at the earliest possibility, including with the use of the EU funding opportunities.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air and their category as well as air quality plans and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Where damage to human health and well-being has occurred as a result of a violation of Articles 19, 20, 21 of this Directive, Member States should fully ensure
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 a (new) (41a) In order to ensure comparable conditions for data measurement among member States, Commission shall provide detailed guidelines in the form of delegated act regarding standardised requirements of sampling points and its location for new sampling points and existing sampling points which do not ensure sufficient level of air quality assessment neither trough measurement or modelling with required uncertainty levels.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health and natural ecosystems, as defined by the most up-to date scientific evidence, thus contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 (1) This Directive se
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 203
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: a) the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 . b) enhanced synergies between the Union's air quality policy and other relevant Union policies, in particular climate and energy policies. __________________ 55 Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive also sets target values, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 . __________________ 55 Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Finally, this Directive protects the individual rights to breathe clean and healthy air stemming from the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and reduces health inequalities by protecting sensitive population and vulnerable groups from polluted air.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3. standardised measures for monitoring ambient air quality, short and long-term trends and impacts of Union
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4. measures ensuring that the information on ambient air quality
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. measures promoting increased cooperation between the Member States in reducing air pollution monitored and overseen by the European transboundary coordinator.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part For the purposes of the review, the Commission shall commission to the WHO 5-year reviews and take into account, inter
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d (d) progress made in implementing national and Union reduction measures for pollutants, especially the Fit for 55 legislative package, and improving air quality.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d (d) progress made in implementing national and Union reduction measures for pollutants and improving air quality
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (da) current socio-economic situation in the Union
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, and in particular where the latest review of WHO Air Quality Guidelines finds health effects of pollutant concentrations that are below the current limit values, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or to cover other air pollutants, in line with the non-regression principle.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) ‘level’ means the measured or modelled concentration of a pollutant in ambient air or the deposition thereof on surfaces in a given time;
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new) (24a) ‘traffic location’ means a place whose pollution level is determined predominantly by the emissions from nearby traffic (roads, motorways, highways, airports, ports);
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 b (new) (24b) ‘industrial location’ means a place whose pollution level is influenced predominantly by emissions from nearby single industrial sources or industrial areas with many sources. An ‘industry source’ is to be interpreted widely in this context and shall include but not be limited to sources of power generation, incinerators, waste treatment plants and ports;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 c (new) (24c) ‘residential location’ means a place whose predominant use is residential, and whose concentration levels are higher than urban background locations as a result of the choice of residential heating sources in the area.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 28 (28) ‘average exposure indicator’ means an average level determined on the basis of measurements at urban background, traffic, industrial, and residential locations throughout the territorial unit at NUTS 1 level as described in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003, or, if there is no urban area located in that territorial unit, at rural background locations, and which reflects population exposure, used to check whether the average exposure reduction obligation and the average exposure concentration objective for that territorial unit have been met
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 32 (32) ‘information threshold’ means a level beyond which there is a risk to human health from brief exposure for particularly sensitive population
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new) (39a) 'early warning system’ is a set of modelling tools and stress tests identifying a risk of pollutant concentration exceedance;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 b (new) (39b) ‘category of the source of pollutants’ means the categories of industrial stationary installations, transport, buildings, agriculture, waste;
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 c (new) (39c) 'European transboundary Coordinator', is a Commission representative who oversees and assists the transboundary cooperation between Member States;
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) provision of hourly updated air quality index and other related and relevant health information;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) approval of measurement systems (locations, methods, equipment, networks and laboratories);
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ensuring the accuracy of air quality modelling applications;
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) cooperation with the other Member States and the Commission including the European transboundary Coordinator ;
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall establish sufficiently representative for the purposes of the measurements zones throughout their territory , including, where appropriate for the purposes of air quality assessment and management, at the level of agglomerations . Air quality assessment and air quality management shall be carried out in all zones
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall establish zones throughout their territory , including, where appropriate for the purposes of air quality assessment and management, at the level of agglomerations
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. To assess the contribution of benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air, each Member State shall monitor other relevant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. In addition to monitoring required under Article 10, Member States shall
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States may continue to use the existing infrastructure in place, provided that the existing sampling points and monitoring sites correspond to the objectives of this Directive.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) indicative measurements and modelling provide sufficient information for the assessment of air quality with regard to limit values
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements have a minimum duration of 2 months per calendar year in representative period;
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) fixed measurements of sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), black carbon (BC), ammonia (NH3) and ultrafine particles (UFP).
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point c (c) fixed
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone target value Member States shall take necessary measures to maintain those levels below the ozone target value and
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall endeavour to achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental and human health protection
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The alert thresholds for concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – title Contributions from natural and transboundary sources
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) zones where exceedances of limit values for a given pollutant are attributable to another Member State or another country due to the transboundary nature of a pollution spread;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with lists of any such zones and NUTS 1 territorial units, as referred to in paragraph 1, together with information on concentrations and sources and the evidence demonstrating that the exceedances are attributable to natural or transboundary sources.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Commission has been informed of an exceedance attributable to natural or transboundary sources in accordance with paragraph 2, that exceedance shall not be considered as an exceedance for the purposes of this Directive.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. Member States may
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the air quality plan referred to in point (a) outlines how the public and, in particular, sensitive population
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the ozone target value persist during the
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 20
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consider including measures referred to in Article 20(2) and specific measures aiming at the protection of sensitive population
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consider including measures referred to in Article 20(2) and shall include specific measures aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups , including children in their air quality plans .
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States shall consider adopting measures to address and reduce voluntary engine idling, so as to reduce the impact of idling-related emissions which is particularly damaging in the areas of schools, hospitals and densely populated areas.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 a (new) Article 19a Early warning system 1. The Commission shall establish by means of a delegated act guidelines concerning modelling approach and tools, as well as stress tests methodology functioning as an early warning system (EWS). 2. The system shall identify any systemic problem(s) with the air quality in a Member State which will likely lead in the future to the exceedance of the concentrations of the pollutants. 3. Where the EWS identifies a problem, Member State shall draft a Preventive Air Plan. 4. The Preventive Air Plan shall contain preventive measures based on the problem identified by the EWS.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, those short- term action plans shall consider including measures in relation to transport
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Within one year after the entry into force of this directive, the Commission shall publish examples of best practice actions to take within transport, residential and industrial sectors for the drawing-up of short-term action plans.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Member States concerned shall cooperate with the other Member State and the European transboundary coordinator to identify the sources of air pollution and the measures to be taken to address those sources, and draw up joint activities, such as the preparation of joint or coordinated air quality plans pursuant to Article 19, in order to remove such exceedances .
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall be informed of, and invited to be present
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 3 3. Member States and the European transboundary Coordinator shall, if appropriate pursuant to Article 20, prepare and implement joint short-term action plans covering neighbouring zones in other Member States. Member States shall ensure that neighbouring zones in other Member States receive all appropriate information regarding these short-term action plans without undue delay .
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) air pollution sources and air pollutants affecting air quality
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) best practice mitigation measures and technologies available to reduce pollutant emissions
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 24 and Annex IV(a)(1)(2a) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from … [date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 24 and Annex IV(a)(1)(2a) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Revenues from transport related penalties shall be spent for measures to encourage the roll-out of e-charging and other fully additional renewable energy- based alternative fuels, measures that encourage modal shift towards public transport use and discourage car commuting, increased investment in sustainable public transport and active mobility, infrastructure for active and zero emission transport modes and demand-related measures.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 – Limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by 1 January 203
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1– table 1 Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Annex II – Section 1– table Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 5 – subpart B – paragraph 1 – introductory part As from 203
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 5 For each zone, the minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements set out in the tables in this point shall include at least 1 background location sampling point and 1 sampling point in the area with the highest concentrations according to Point B, of Annex IV provided this does not increase the number of sampling points. For sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, benzene and carbon monoxide, this shall include at least 1 sampling point focused on measuring contribution from transport emissions. However, in the cases where there is only 1 sampling point required, this shall be in the area with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c (c) on the carriageway of roads; and on the central reservations of roads except where there is normally pedestrian access to the central reservation or where cycling lanes are present .
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act with detailed guidelines regarding standardised requirements of sampling points and its location for new sampling points and existing sampling points which do not ensure sufficient level of air quality assessment neither trough indicative measurement or modelling with required uncertainty levels. Those guidelines shall provide additional and specific details for principles in Points A, B, C and D;
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – introductory part (a) Sampling points directed at the protection of human health shall be sited in such a way as to provide reliable data on all of the following:
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point i (i) concentration levels in the areas within zones with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point b (b) sampling points shall
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point b a (new) (ba) urban traffic locations shall be located in such a way as to provide data on the streets where the highest concentrations occur, taking into consideration traffic volume (at least 10,000 vehicles per day or representing the largest traffic density in the zone), local dispersion conditions and spatial land use (e.g. in street canyons);
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point c a (new) (ca) urban traffic location shall be located in immediate vicinity of streets with highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be exposed;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point f (f) where contributions from industrial sources, farms, ports
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new) (ia) sufficient number of sampling points shall be located in the transborder zones;
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the annual average of the observed pollutant concentration shall be used as the air quality metric for a specific year
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and 4 m above the ground. Higher siting
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point e (e) for all pollutants, sampling probes shall be
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point e (e) for all pollutants, sampling probes shall be at least
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 1 1. The competent authorities responsible for air quality assessment shall provide, for all zones, assessment based on data, fully document the site-
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 2 2. The documentation shall include the location of the sampling points through spatial coordinates, detailed maps, photos and shall include information on the spatial representativeness of all sampling points.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 3 3. The documentations shall include reports explaining the reasons for the network design, in particular: (a) the reasons for selecting sites representative of the highest pollution levels in the zone for each pollutant; (b) the reasons for selecting sites representative of the general population exposure; and (c) any deviation from the micro-scale siting criteria, their underlying reasons and the likely impact on measured levels.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 9 9. At least every 5 years the selection criteria, network design and monitoring
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part B – paragraph 3 For the other cases, measurements are to be evenly distributed over the calendar year (or over the April-September period for indicative measurements of O3). In order to comply with these requirements and to ensure that any potential losses of data do not skew results, the minimum data coverage and distribution requirements shall be met for specific periods (quarter, month, weekday) of the whole year depending on the pollutant and measurement method/frequency.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part D – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) for measurements from the transborder stations estimation of transborder pollution related to another Member States;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VI – Part B – point 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 – point a (a) list of the main emission sources, including its category, responsible for pollution;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 a (new) 4a. Where the transport sector is part of the emission sources responsible for pollution referred to under point (a), the relevant information provided under points (a-d) shall be broken down and reported per mode of transport if possible.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point a (a) expected quantified concentration reduction (in µg/m³) at each sampling point in exceedance of limit values, ozone target value or of the average exposure indicator in case of an exceedance of the average exposure reduction obligation, from the short-term and long-term measures referred to in point 6 and their related to category ;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point b a (new) (ba) for air quality plans under Article 19(2), detailed reasons to explain how the plan sets out all appropriate measures, so that the exceedance period can be kept as short as possible, including the following: (i) where the start date for implementation of a measure is later than 6 months from the date of adoption of the air quality plan, an explanation of the reasons why an earlier start date is not possible; (ii) where the analysis pursuant to point 4a has identified measures that would have greater impacts in improving air quality, but they have not been selected for adoption, an explanation of the reasons why adoption of such measures is impossible and evidence that the selected measures will achieve at least an equivalent reduction in emissions and concentrations.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a (a) listing and description of all the
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a a (new) (aa) listing and description of all the long-term measures related to relevant categories set out in the air quality plan and justification for those measures regarding the source and category of exceedance, their efficiency, availability in time and socio-economic impact, including the identification of the competent authority in charge of their implementation;
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point b (b) quantification of emission reduction (in tonnes/year) of each measure and category under point (a);
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point c (c) timetable for implementation of each measure and responsible actors, the economic and social impact, including the access to energy and mobility;
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point e (e) list of the information (including modelling and assessment results of short- term and long-term measures) to reach the air quality standard concerned in accordance with Annex I.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 – point d (d) listing
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 – point d a (new) (da) data on existing and planned zero- emission zones;
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 – point d b (new) (db) where applicable, data relevant for the reductions of emissions and pollutant concentrations contained in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, as established in COM/2013/0913;
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 8 – point b (b) estimate of impact on emission reduction and pollutant concentrations of measures from the previous air quality plan
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 8 – point b a (new) (ba) estimate of impact of measures to reduce emissions and pollutant concentrations in the transport sector.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – introductory part 2. Information on all air pollution abatement measures that have been considered at local, regional or national level for implementation in connection with the attainment of air quality objectives for each category in short and long term, including:
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a a (new) (aa) reduction of emissions from the uptake of zero and low emission vehicles based on economic incentives;
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b a (new) (ba) reduction of emissions from road, maritime, and air transport through the use of renewable alternative fuels and deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, as well as the use of economic incentives to accelerate their take-ups;
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b a (new) (ba) reduction of emissions from uptake of zero and low emission vehicles of collective and public transport and/or vehicles equipped with modern digital solutions affecting emission reduction ;
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b b (new) (bb) reduction of transport emissions through investments in an extensive cycling infrastructure, particularly in urban areas, in order to ensure the safety of all vulnerable road users and increase its attractiveness as an efficient and healthy commuting mode. Ensuring smooth inter-modality between rail and cycling in order to offer sustainable rural- urban commuting; encourages in this sense also the expansion of the EuroVélo network
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b b (new) (bb) measures related to improved quality, efficiency, affordability and connectivity of collective and public transport;
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b c (new) (bc) measures related to the uptake and implementation of alternative fuel infrastructure;
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b d (new) (bd) measures related to the implementation of intelligent transport systems and digital solutions related to emissions reduction;
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b e (new) (be) measures related to smart parking;
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b f (new) (bf) reduction of emissions related to the creation of multimodal hubs connecting various sustainable transport solutions and parking facilities;
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on environmental public procurement, of zero emissions
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) measures to limit transport emissions through traffic planning and management,
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift towards less polluting forms of transport and to support changes in mobility behaviour;
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point f (f) measures to encourage a shift towards zero and low emissions vehicles and non-
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point g (g) measure to ensure that
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) measures to reduce air pollution in hotspots, including in ports, establishing specific requirements for moored ships, boats and port traffic, while speeding-up on-shore power and electrification of ships and port working machinery;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i (i) measures to protect the health of children
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new) (ia) measures to reduce air pollution in hotspots, including in ports, notably through the deployment of on-shore power infrastructure for ships at berth;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new) (ia) measures by health authorities to encourage behavioural changes.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII a (new) Emergency measures to be considered for inclusion in the short-term action plans required under Article 20 1. Measures aimed at addressing the sources which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded: (a) restricting the circulation of private vehicles; (b) temporary free public transportation; (c) street cleaning;
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 2 – point d (d) information on short term measures and preventive actions to reduce pollution and/or exposure to it: indication of main source sectors; recommendations for action to reduce emissions and limitations for exposure;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In December 2020, the Commission presented its Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, advocating for increasing the modal shares of collective transport, walking and cycling, as well as automated, connected and multimodal mobility, in order to significantly lower pollution and congestion from transport, especially in cities, and improve the health and well-being of citizens.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) (2b) In the 2005 impact assessment prior to the proposal of the current Ambient Air Quality directive, the Commission assessed the direct costs of complying with their proposal for the directive at between €5 and €8 billion, and the monetised health benefits at between €37 to €119 billion per annum in 2020, thereby concluding that benefits of the air quality policy greatly exceeded implementation cost.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The European Parliament had proposed 2022 as the European Year of Greener Cities, in order to create a culture of appreciation of green spaces and clean air as an important aspect, yet often underestimated, of quality of life for European citizens. Expanding green infrastructure in urban communities would improve everyday life particularly for those affected by asthma and other airway diseases as plants can filter pollutants from the air. Encouraging urban development in this regard has to go hand in hand with initiatives to reduce urban road traffic, and promote and invest in public transport, as in average a 60% of public space is occupied by private cars only, although those are 95% of the time idle. Hence most of this ill used space could be greened and serve social purposes.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 2030 and beyond, and developing a perspective for alignment
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 2030 and beyond, and
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 203
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In September 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released new Air Quality Guidelines, based on a comprehensive synthesis of the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution. This Directive takes into account the latest scientific understanding on the need to fully align the Union air quality standards with the most recent WHO guidelines in order to fulfil the overall objectives of the Zero Pollution Action Plan.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions and their infrastructure including alternative fuel infrastructure; the impact of behavioural changes; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States, in light of their economic capability, national circumstances, such as the specificities of islands or coal regions, and the need for convergence over time; the need to make the transition just and socially fair through appropriate education and training programmes; best available and most recent scientific evidence, in particular the findings reported by the WHO; the need to integrate air pollution related risks into investment and planning decisions; cost- effectiveness and technological neutrality
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and the modal shift towards such transport solutions; the impact of behavioural changes; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and by the
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The ‘Eighth General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030’ adopted by Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 6 April 2022
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Relevant EU transport legislation such as European vehicle emission standards is instrumental to further reduce ambient air pollution from the transport sector and should be aligned with the objectives under the European Green Deal and the Zero Pollution Action Plan. This is important to stop the negative impact of road transport emissions for respiratory diseases and other major health problems and the direct causality between long-term road traffic exposure and respiratory diseases eventually causing death.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment and technological development. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information. The assessment should take into account the latest scientific knowledge on pollutants of emerging concerns and assess the opportunity to include air quality standards on those pollutants in the regulation.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) A common approach to the assessment of ambient air quality should be followed by applying common assessment criteria. When assessing ambient air quality, account should be taken of the size of populations and ecosystems exposed to air pollution. It is therefore appropriate to classify the territory of each Member State into zones reflecting the population density
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon, and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support further scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure that the information collected on air pollution is sufficiently representative and comparable across the Union
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport and energy generation . Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality taking into account relevant World Health Organization standards, guidelines and programmes. Member States should collect data on measures and technologies to combat emissions of harmful air pollutants and make available information on best practices.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective available emission reduction measures related to source category at local, national and Union level
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The Commission should assist Member States in carrying out regular transport infrastructure quality checks to identify the areas in need of decongestion and infrastructure optimisation, and take appropriate measures in these areas i.e. with the use of available EU funding opportunities;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for significant negative impacts o
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45 has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups, including workers in the transport sector, people living in heavily trafficked neighbourhoods and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, black carbon, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air . Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. __________________ 45 Fitness check of the Ambient Air Quality
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45 has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups, particularly transport workers and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air . Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. __________________ 45 Fitness check of the Ambient Air Quality
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46 . Progress towards the air quality targets and long-term objectives for ozone set in this Directive should be determined by the targets and emission reduction commitments provided for in Directive 2016/2284/EU and
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Commission should draft recommendations with short and long term measures based on pollution source and its category and Member States should take immediate a
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Member States
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Air quality plans should include provisions for the reduction of voluntary idling of vehicles in order to reduce the emissions related to such idling.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28) The risk posed by air pollution to vegetation and natural ecosystems is most important in places away from urban areas since urban pollution is drifting to rural areas, in addition to pollution through motorways and airports in rural vicinities. The assessment of such risks and the compliance with critical levels for the protection of vegetation should therefore focus on places away from built-up areas. This assessment should take into account and complement requirements under Directive 2016/2284/EU to monitor the impacts of air pollution on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and to report such impacts.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 a (new) (28a) Air pollutants emitted from the transport sector pose a particular risk to the health of people living in urban areas and near transport hubs. Therefore, Member States and the relevant regional and local authorities should consider implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans and invest in zero-emission technologies and measures enabling a shift towards active, public and sustainable transport systems aimed to reducing air pollution and road congestion, especially in urban areas where petrol and particularly diesel cars have the greatest detrimental impact on air quality.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 b (new) (28b) Air pollution from maritime transport is responsible for over 50 000 deaths annually in the EU1a. It is therefore of utmost urgency to reduce these emissions as, unlike cars and trucks, ships do not have to fulfil emission standards outside emission control areas, and inside emission control areas, emission standards are much weaker than for road transport. Member States should take appropriate and effective measures to reduce air pollution in port and in port cities, in order to ensure an adequate protection of the health of residents and port workers. __________________ 1aBrandt, J., Silver, J. D., and Frohn, L. M., ‘Assessment of Health-Cost Externalities of Air Pollution at the National Level using the EVA Model System. CEEH Scientific Report No 3’, 2011.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 c (new) (28c) The impact of maritime transport, particularly sulphur dioxide emissions, on the environment and on coastal communities, both in terms of ecosystem damage and public health could be alleviated with a comprehensive electrification of short-distance and urban maritime transport, in addition to zero- emission-requirements and infrastructure at berth.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 d (new) (28d) For the Mediterranean, implementation of a SECA zone was agreed at IMO level recently. While sulphur dioxide pollution is the most detrimental part of exhausts of maritime transport, NOx should not be forgotten. The European Union should therefore work further at IMO level to succeed in declaring the Mediterranean a NECA zone. NECA zones are effective in decreasing air pollution as the experience from North and Baltic Sea shows.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 e (new) (28e) Vehicle emissions are not limited to CO2, NOx and PM tailpipe emissions. PM is produced also from tyre and brake wear, as well as road wear. It is therefore important to adopt an EU-wide daily limit on particulate matter; this daily limit, as well as all the other limit values, should be in line with the World Health Organisation’s guidelines on air quality.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Contributions from natural sources or sources coming from different Member State or another country can be assessed but cannot be controlled. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Contributions from natural sources can be assessed but cannot be controlled. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations . Contributions to exceedances of particulate matter limit values attributable to winter-sanding or winter -salting of roads may also be subtracted in exceptional circumstances when assessing compliance with air quality limit values provided that reasonable measures have been taken to lower concentrations.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) For zones where conditions are particularly difficult, it should be possible to postpone the deadline for compliance with the air quality limit values in cases where, notwithstanding the implementation of all appropriate pollution abatement measures, acute compliance problems exist
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 a (new) (30a) Early warning system shall include modelling tools and stress tests to detect problems before becoming systemic and resulting into exceeding of pollutants concentrations.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) Air quality plans should be developed and updated for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values , ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) Air quality plans should be developed and updated for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values , ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared ahead of 2030 where there is a risk that Member States will not attain the limit values or ozone target value by that date in order to ensure that levels of pollutants are reduced accordingly. The Commission should provide recommendation how the Member States should prepare those plans.
source: 745.351
2023/04/03
ENVI
514 amendments...
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In December 2019, the European Commission set out in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’40an ambitious roadmap to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, aiming to protect, conserve and enhance the Union’s natural capital, and to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. Specifically on clean air, the European Green Deal committed to further improving air quality and to aligning EU air quality standards
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 2030 and beyond, and developing a perspective for alignment with the WHO Air Quality Guidelines by the year 2050 at the latest based on a regular review mechanism to take into account the latest scientific understanding.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 2030 and beyond, and developing a perspective for alignment with the most up-to-date WHO Air Quality Guidelines by the year 2050 at the latest based on a regular review mechanism to take into account the latest scientific understanding. Given the links between pollution reduction and decarbonisation, the long-
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) The World Health Organization (WHO) released new Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) in September 2021, based on a comprehensive synthesis of the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution. The conclusions are bold and stress the importance of lowering air pollution concentrations at every level. The benefits are clear: lowering air pollution levels will lead to enormous improvements in public health for people of all ages breathing cleaner air.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4 b) Pursuant to Article 191(2), second sentence, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Union policy on the environment is to be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action is to be taken, that environmental damage is, as a priority, to be rectified at source and that the polluter is to pay.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’, the principle that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source, and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment and ecosystem resilience, the well-being of citizens, cultural heritage, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should therefore be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, factors that make people vulnerable to the health effects of air pollution, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions; the impact of behavioural changes; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States, in light of their economic
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution,
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the zero pollution objective for air pollution, Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should be guided by the ‘precautionary principle’ and the ‘polluter pays principle’ established in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the European Green Deal. They should, inter alia, take into account: the contribution of improved air quality to public health, the quality of the environment, the well-being of citizens, the prosperity of society, employment and the competitiveness of the economy; the energy transition, strengthened energy security and the tackling of energy poverty; food security and affordability; the development of sustainable and smart mobility and transport solutions; the impact of behavioural changes; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States, in light of their economic capability, national circumstances, such as the specificities of islands, and the need for convergence over time; the need to make the transition just and socially fair through appropriate education and training programmes, including the training of healthcare professionals; best available and most recent scientific evidence, in particular the findings reported by the WHO; the need to integrate air pollution related risks into investment and planning decisions; cost-
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The ‘Eighth General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030’ adopted by Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 6 April 202243 establishes the objective to achieve a non-toxic environment protecting the health and well-being of people, animals and ecosystems from environment- related risks and negative impacts, and, for that purpose, stipulates that further improvement of monitoring methods
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The ‘Eighth General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030’ adopted by Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 6 April 2022
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6 a) A holistic approach to combating air pollution should aim, inter alia, at creating green spaces and pedestrian areas in cities, at promoting a modal shift from private vehicles towards active mobility such as the use of bicycles and less polluting modes of transport, including by extending cycle paths in city centres and surrounding areas, as well as at promoting cleaner and free public transport.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment, health inequalities, direct and indirect healthcare costs associated with air pollution, environmental costs, and behavioural, fiscal and technological developments. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment and technological development. To this end, the Commission should closely follow, inter alia, new developments in the World Health Organization's (WHO) global air quality guidelines (AQG). Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment and technological development. To cost-effectively mitigate emissions of air pollutants, best available technologies should be included. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their medium- and long-term effects on human health and the environment and technological development. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The Commission should regularly review the latest scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment and technological development. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The Commission review should be complemented by an independent review of the scientific evidence by the WHO on a regular basis. For this purpose, the Commission together with the WHO should form a standing committee which will meet at least once every year to discuss progress towards the first review by 31/12/2028. Reviews should be conducted at least every 5 years thereafter.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) A common approach to the assessment of ambient air quality should be followed by applying common assessment criteria. When assessing ambient air quality, account should be taken of the size of populations and ecosystems exposed to air pollution. It is therefore appropriate to classify the territory of each Member State into zones reflecting the population
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Modelling applications should be applied to enable point data to be interpreted in terms of geographical distribution of concentration , to help to detect breaches of air quality standards, and to inform air quality roadmaps and air quality plans and the placement of sampling points
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO. The Commission should continue to monitor the scientific developments regarding pollutants not covered by this Regulation, including levoglucosan, and assess the need to extend the current provisions to these pollutants in order to limit their possible effects on human health or their role as precursors of secondary pollutants.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO, and that the Commission already start the process of presenting a proposal of limit values for these pollutants by the first review of this Directive in 2028.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO, with the perspective of establishing limit values when sufficient information is gathered.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as, but not limited to, ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) It is important that pollutants of emerging concern, such as ultrafine particles, black carbon and elemental carbon, as well as ammonia, mercury and the oxidative potential of particulate matter, be monitored in order to support scientific understanding of their effects on health and the environment, as recommended by the WHO.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Detailed measurements of fine particulate matter
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure that the
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport, heating and energy generation . Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced at source and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality taking into account
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport and energy generation . Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality taking into account relevant World Health Organization standards, guidelines and programmes. Since diffuse air emissions are the most difficult to combat, close cooperation at all levels of governance is needed to tackle pollution at its source.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport, heating and energy generation
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective available emission reduction measures by source category at local, national and Union level
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport, heating and cooling systems and energy generation . Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality taking into account relevant World Health Organization standards, guidelines and programmes.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, some polycyclic aromatic
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for significant negative impacts on human
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Scientific evidence shows that sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and ozone are responsible for significant negative impacts on human health . Impact on human health and the environment occurs via concentrations in ambient air . In severe cases, air pollution can even amount to ecocide. Releasing these damaging substances also poses a threat of a serious violation against human rights. Therefore, Member States that fail to reduce the amount of harmful substances in the air, are also failing in their responsibility to protect their citizens.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced based on WHO recommendations. To this end, an average exposure reduction obligation should be introduced for these pollutants, in addition to limit values. This obligation should be implemented at both national and regional levels in order to support the nation-wide attainment of the average exposure reduction obligation.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be reduced based on WHO recommendations. This could be done by using best available technologies as identified by the 2022 EU Clean Air Tech Hub report.To this end, an average exposure reduction obligation should be introduced for these pollutants, in addition to limit values.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) The average exposure of the population to the pollutants with the highest documented impact on human health, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), should be
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, lead, benzene, ozone,carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air . Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. _________________ 45 Fitness check of the Ambient Air Quality
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) The Fitness Check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC)45has shown that limit values are more effective in bringing down pollutant concentrations than target values. With the aim of minimising harmful effects on human health, paying particular attention to vulnerable groups and sensitive populations, and the environment limit values should be set for the concentration of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, ozone,lead, benzene, carbon monoxide, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air . Benzo(a)pyrene should be used as a marker for the carcinogenic risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. _________________ 45 Fitness check of the Ambient Air Quality
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46. Progress towards the air quality targets and long-term objectives for ozone set in this Directive should be determined by the targets and emission reduction commitments provided for in Directive 2016/2284/EU and, by implementing cost- effective measures
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Ozone is a transboundary pollutant formed in the atmosphere from the emission of primary pollutants addressed by Directive 2016/2284/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46. Progress towards the air quality
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) The ozone target values and long- term objectives of ensuring effective protection against harmful effects on human health and vegetation and ecosystems from exposure to ozone should be updated in light of the most recent recommendations of the World Health Organization
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22)
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) The ozone target values and long- term objectives of ensuring effective protection against harmful effects on human health and vegetation and ecosystems from exposure to ozone should be regularly updated in light of the most recent recommendations of the World Health Organization .
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) A
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) An alert threshold for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone should be set for the protection of the general population, and an information threshold for ozone
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, the Commission should make recommendations with short- and long- term measures, based on the source and category of pollution, and Member States should take immediate and continuous action in order to comply with the limit values , average exposure reduction obligations and critical levels, and where possible, to attain the ozone target values and long-term objectives.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Member States should take immediate action in order to comply with the limit values , average exposure reduction obligations and critical levels
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) Air quality status should be maintained where it is already good, or improved. Where the standards for ambient air quality laid down in this Directive are at risk of not being met, or have not been met, Member States should take immediate action in order to comply with the limit values , average exposure reduction obligations and critical levels
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) Mercury is a very hazardous substance for human health and the environment, with harmful effects in the medium and long term. It is present throughout the environment and, in the form of methylmercury, has the capacity to accumulate in organisms, and in particular to concentrate in organisms higher up the food chain. Mercury released into the atmosphere is capable of being transported over long distances.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Contributions from natural sources or sources coming from a different Member State or a third country can be assessed but cannot be controlled. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Contributions from natural sources can be assessed but cannot be controlled. Therefore, where natural contributions to pollutants in ambient air, which the Member States could not mitigate or prevent, can be determined with sufficient certainty, and where exceedances are due in whole or in part to these natural contributions, these may, under the conditions laid down in this Directive, be subtracted when assessing compliance with air quality limit values and average exposure reduction obligations
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29 a) Systematic monitoring of air quality in the vicinity of airports and ports should be carried out throughout the EU in order to improve the understanding of the impact of air and waterborne transport on air pollution, and to take appropriate measures to minimise their impact on human health. To this end, this Directive should also require Member States to install sampling points in the vicinity of ports and airports.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) For zones where conditions are particularly difficult, it should be possible to postpone the deadline for compliance with the air quality limit values in cases where, notwithstanding the implementation of appropriate pollution abatement measures, acute compliance problems exist in specific zones
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) The early warning system should include modelling tools and stress tests to detect problems before they become systemic and lead to exceedances of pollutants concentrations.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) Air quality plans should be developed and updated for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values , ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations . Air pollutants are emitted from many different sources and activities. To ensure coherence between different policies, such air quality plans should where feasible be
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) Air quality plans should be developed and updated for zones within which concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed the relevant air quality limit values
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 a (new) Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared ahead of 2030 where the
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared ahead of 2030 where there is a risk that Member States will not attain the limit values or ozone target value by that date in order to ensure that levels of pollutants are reduced accordingly. The Commission shall provide a recommendation as to which Member States should prepare those plans.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared a
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Air quality plans should also be prepared ahead of 2030
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) Action plans should be drawn up indicating the measures to be taken in the short term where there is a risk of an exceedance of one or more alert thresholds in order to reduce that risk and to limit its duration. When the risk applies to one or more limit
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, including as a result of transboundary measurements, the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants, such as ozone and particulate matter, may require coordination between neighbouring Member States in drawing up and implementing air quality plans and short- term action plans and in informing the public. Where appropriate, Member States should pursue cooperation with third countries, with particular emphasis on the early involvement of candidate countries. The Commission should be timely informed
Amendment 281 #
(34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants, such as ozone and particulate matter,
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value, ozone target value, average exposure reduction obligation or alert threshold. The transboundary nature of specific pollutants,
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Member States should cooperate with one another if, following significant pollution originating in another Member State, the level of a pollutant exceeds, or is likely to exceed, any limit value,
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34 a) This Directive encourages Member States to promote the use of existing innovative solutions and technologies to reduce air pollution levels in the short and long term.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34 b) While indoor air quality is as important as outdoor air quality for human health and well-being, the Commission should propose legislation on indoor air quality as soon as possible, and by 2025 at the latest.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air as well as air quality plans, air quality roadmaps and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public in a coherent and easily understandable manner.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air and their category as well
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35 a) To increase transparency and accountability and facilitate access to justice for citizens and the action to be taken against the competent authorities responsible for the development and implementation of air quality plans when they fail to keep the level of pollutants below the respective limit values, it should be feasible for citizens to easily access information on the competent authority operating each sampling point accross the EU.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) As clarified by the case-law of the Court of Justice51, Member States may not restrict legal standing to challenge a decision of a public authority to those members of the public
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Where damage to human health has occurred as a result of a violation of Articles 19, 20, 21 of this Directive, Member States should ensure that the individuals affected by such violations are able to claim and obtain compensation for that damage from the relevant competent authority. The rules on compensation, access to justice and penalties set in this Directive have the objective to avoid, prevent and reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment from air pollution, in line with Article 191(1) TFEU. They thus seek
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 a (new) (40 a) This Directive, directly or indirectly, contributes to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs), in particular SGDs 3, 7, 10, 11, and 13.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 a (new) (41 a) In order to ensure comparable conditions for data measurement between Member States, the Commission shall provide detailed guidelines in the form of a delegated act on standardised requirements for sampling points and location for new sampling points, as well as for existing sampling points which do not ensure sufficient level of air quality assessment neither trough measurement or modelling with required uncertainty levels.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 (42) In order to ensure that this Directive continues meeting its objectives, in particular to avoid, prevent and reduce harmful effects from deteriorating ambient air quality on human health and the environment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 43 (43) The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health and natural ecosystems, as defined by scientific evidence, thus contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is progressively improved to levels no longer considered harmful to human health and natural ecosystems, as defined by the most up-to-date scientific evidence, thus contributing to a toxic-free environment at the latest by 2050.
Amendment 302 #
1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive sets out a zero pollution objective for air quality, so that within the Union air quality is
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met as soon as possible and at the latest by the year
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met as soon as possible and at the latest by the year 2030, and regularly reviewed thereafter in accordance with Article 3.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 203
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 20
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 203
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets intermediate limit values, target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives (‘air quality standards’) to be met by the year 203
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Directive sets
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. This Directive also sets target values, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: (a) the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council;55
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive also sets target values, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55. _________________ 55 Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive also sets target values, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55. _________________ 55 Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: the Union’s pollution-reduction
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The relevant EU institutions and the Member States shall implement the necessary measures at Union and national level, respectively, to enable the achievement of the objective for air quality set out in paragraph 1 throughout the Union.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3. standardised measures for monitoring ambient air quality, short and long-term trends and impacts of
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4. measures ensuring that the information on ambient air quality is made available to the public
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 5. proportionate and non- discriminatory measures that maintain
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. measures promoting increased cooperation between Member States in reducing air pollution, along with cooperation with third countries sharing borders with the EU in the event of cross- border pollution events.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. measures promoting increased cooperation between the Member States in reducing air pollution monitored and overseen by the European transboundary coordinator.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. measures promoting increased cooperation between Member States and regional and local authorities within and between Member States in reducing air pollution.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 2028 at the latest, and every 5 years thereafter, and more often if substantial new scientific findings point to the need for it, the Commission shall review the scientific evidence related to air pollutants and their effects on human health and the environment relevant to achieving the objective set in Article 1 and present a report with the main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 202
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 20
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. By 31 December 2028, and every
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission's review shall be complemented by an independent review carried out by the WHO. For this purpose, the Commission and the WHO should form a standing committee which will meet at least once every year to discuss progress towards the first review by 31 December 2028. Reviews shall be conducted at least every 5 years thereafter. Both reviews shall be publicly available.
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The review shall assess whether applicable levels of legally binding limit values and other air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objective of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects on human health and the environment and whether additional air pollutants should be covered.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The review shall assess whether applicable air quality standards are still
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised through the introduction of more stringent air quality standards with a view to ensuring full alignment with the latest World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring prompt alignment with the most up-to-date World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines, the latest review by the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring alignment, as far as technically and economically feasible, with the World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring alignment, as far as technically and economically feasible, with the World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring full and continuous alignment with the most up-to-date World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 348 #
In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring alignment with the most- up-to-date World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring the broadest possible alignment with the World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and the latest scientific information.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In order to achieve the objectives set in Article 1, the review shall assess whether this Directive needs to be revised with a view to ensuring a
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part For the purposes of the review, the Commission shall engage the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe to monitor and review, on a regular basis and at least every five years, the scientific evidence on health effects of air pollution and shall take into account, inter alia, the following:
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a (a) latest scientific information from WHO and other relevant organisations
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a (a) latest scientific information from WHO and other relevant scientific organisations on health and environmental effects, health inequalities, direct and indirect healthcare costs associated with air pollution, and environmental costs due to damage to ecosystems,
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a (a) latest scientific information from WHO and other relevant organisations on health and environmental effects, health inequalities, direct and indirect healthcare costs associated with air pollution, and environmental costs due to damage to ecosystems, crops and forests,
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a (a) latest scientific information from WHO and other relevant organisations and experts,
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point a (a) latest scientific information
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b (b) behavioural, fiscal and technological developments impacting air quality and its assessment,
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b (b) behavioural, fiscal and technological developments impacting air quality and its assessment,
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b (b) demonstrated technological
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b (b) demonstrated technological
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) environmental, climate or behavioural developments impacting air quality and its assessment;
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c (c) air quality situations and associated impacts on human health and the environment in Member States, and the introduction by Member States of more stringent air quality standards, in accordance with Article 193 TFEU,
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c (c) air quality situations and associated impacts on human health and the environment in Member States,
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c (c) air quality
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d (d) efficiency of the Directive and progress made in implementing national and Union reduction measures for pollutants and improving air quality.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d (d) progress made in implementing national and Union reduction measures for pollutants, especially the Fit for 55 legislative package, and improving air quality.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) enhanced synergies between the Union's air quality policy and other relevant Union policies, in particular climate, transport and energy policies, and progress made in implementing the corresponding Union legislation.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) progress made in implementing other relevant Union legislation, in particular in the field of climate, transport and energy.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) economic, social and environmental impact studies following the application of the previous sets of measures.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) the proportionality of implementation measures,
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) the current socio-economic situation in the Union
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) The advice and regular reviews provided by the WHO Regional Office for Europe referred to in the third subparagraph of this paragraph shall be made publicly available without delay.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. By 31 December 2028, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall review all relevant Union legislation setting emissions standards for sources of air pollution, and assess whether it provides a sufficient contribution to the achievement of the air quality standards established in this Directive.
Amendment 376 #
3. The European Environment Agency and relevant stakeholders, including industry, shall assist the Commission in carrying out the review.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The European Environment Agency and relevant stakeholders, including industry, shall assist the Commission in carrying out the review.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The European Environment Agency shall assist the Commission in carrying out the reviews.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. In the first regular review by 31 December 2028, the Commission shall propose limit or target values for those air pollutants measured by the monitoring supersites referred to in Article 10 but not currently included in Annex I. These values shall be in line with the latest scientific information on what is necessary to protect human health and the environment.
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or to cover other air pollutants. This proposal shall be based on the precautionary and non-degradation principles.
Amendment 383 #
4. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. .Where the Commission considers it appropriate, as a result of the review, it shall present a proposal to revise air quality standards or to cover other air pollutants within one year of the publication of the WHO review.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. When reviewing the current Directive, the Commission shall assess the possibility of converting it into a Regulation.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3 a The measures prescribed under paragraphs (1) to (3) should be distributed fairly among the sectors contributing to the exceedance(s), to the extent of their contribution to the exceedance(s) and their techno-economic capabilities.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 23 (23) ‘urban background locations’ means places in urban areas where levels are representative of the exposure of both the general urban population and urban sensitive population and vulnerable groups;
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 (24) ‘rural background locations’ means places in rural areas with low population density where levels are representative of the exposure of both the general rural population and rural vulnerable population and sensitive groups;
Amendment 390 #
(24) ‘rural background locations’ means places in rural areas with low population density where levels are representative of the exposure of the general rural population, taking socio-economic health inequalities into account;
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new) (24 a) ‘air pollution hotspot’ means a place where pollution levels are higher than the average of the area due to the influence of heavy pollution sources, such as, but not limited to, congested and heavily trafficked roads, industrial plants, ports, or pollution intensive residential heating;
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 26 (26) ‘limit value’ means a level which is
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 26 (26) ‘limit value’ means a level which is not to be exceeded and which is fixed on the basis of the best scientific knowledge, with the aim of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects on human health or the environment ;
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new) (26 a) 'intermediary limit value’ means a level which is fixed with the aim of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects on human health or the environment, and which, where possible, is to be attained within a given period and not to be exceeded once attained;
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 27 Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 27 Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 27 (27) ‘ ozone target value’ means a level fixed on the basis of the best scientific knowledge, with the aim of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects from ozone on human health or the environment , to be complied with where possible over a given period;
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 28 (28) ‘average exposure indicator’ means an average level determined on the basis of measurements at urban background locations and air pollution hotspots throughout the territorial unit at NUTS
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 28 (28) ‘average exposure indicator’ means an average level determined on the basis of measurements at urban background locations throughout the territorial unit at NUTS
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 29 (29) ‘ average exposure reduction obligation ’ means a percentage reduction of the average exposure of the population , expressed as average exposure indicator, of a territorial unit at NUTS
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 29 (29) ‘ average exposure reduction obligation ’ means a percentage reduction of the average exposure of the population , expressed as average exposure indicator, of a territorial unit at NUTS
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 30 (30) ‘ average exposure concentration objective ’ means a level of the average exposure indicator
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35 (35) ‘contributions from natural sources’ means emissions of pollutants not caused directly or indirectly by human activities, including natural events such as volcanic eruptions, seismic activities, geothermal activities, wild-land fires, high-wind events, sea sprays or the atmospheric re- suspension or transport of natural particles from dry regions, which the Member State could not have prevented or mitigated by policy actions;
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35 (35) ‘contributions from natural sources’ means emissions of pollutants not caused directly or indirectly by human activities, including natural events such as volcanic eruptions, seismic activities, geothermal activities,
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 35 (35) ‘contributions from natural sources’
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new) (36 a) ‘air quality roadmaps’ means plans established before the attainment deadline that set out measures in order for Member States to comply with limit values, ozone target values or average exposure reduction obligations;
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 37 (37)
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 38 (38) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 38 (38) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in, the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, including non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 38 (38) ‘the public concerned’ means the public affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in, the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 (39) ‘sensitive population and vulnerable groups’ means those population groups that are permanently or temporarily more sensitive or more vulnerable to the effects of air pollution exposure than the average population, because of specific characteristics that make the health consequences of exposure more significant or because they have a higher sensitivity or a lower threshold for health effects or have a reduced ability to protect themselves, such as those with specific pre-existing health conditions, pregnant women, newborns, children, elderly people, people living in poverty or people with disabilities.
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 (39) ‘sensitive population and vulnerable groups’ means those population groups that are permanently or temporarily more sensitive or more vulnerable to air pollution exposure than the average population, because they have a higher sensitivity or a lower threshold for health effects or have a reduced ability to protect themselves.
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 (39) ‘sensitive population and vulnerable groups’ means
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new) (39 a) 'Average exposure' means the environmental pollution to which the population in a definable area is exposed over the respective averaging period.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new) Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 b (new) (39 b) ‘pollutant source category’ means the categories of industrial stationary installations, transport, buildings, agriculture, and waste;
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 39 c (new) (39 c) 'European transboundary coordinator', is a Commission representative who oversees and supports the transboundary cooperation between Member States;
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assessment of ambient air quality including roll-out and insurance of proper functioning of the monitoring network;
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) approval of measurement systems (locations, methods, equipment, networks and laboratories);
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensuring the accuracy of measurements and the transfer and sharing of measurement data;
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) provision of public information;
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ensuring the accuracy of air quality modelling applications;
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) cooperation with the other Member
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) cooperation with the other Member States and the Commission including the European transboundary coordinator;
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) establishment of air quality plans and air quality roadmaps;
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) establishment of short-term action plans, including at cross-border level when cross-border events occur.
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) to assess the consequences on the quality of life (reduction of air pollution, economic, social and environmental impacts of the measures applied)
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) provision and maintenance of hourly updated air quality index and other relevant public information.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) compliance of data with the quality objectives laid down in Annex V.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) i a) provision of information to the public.
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 Member States shall establish zones throughout their territory which are sufficiently representative for the purposes of measurement, including, where appropriate for the purposes of air quality assessment and management, at the level of agglomerations . Air quality assessment and air quality management shall be carried out in all zones
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall review the classification referred to in paragraph 1 at least every
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 In all zones where the level of pollutants exceeds a limit value established for those pollutants in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 In all zones where the level of pollutants exceeds a limit value established for those pollutants in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 In all zones where the level of pollutants exceeds a limit and target value established for those pollutants in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I or an ozone target value established in Section 2 of Annex I , modelling applications shall be used in addition to fixed measurements to assess the ambient air quality.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. In all zones where the level of pollutants is below the assessment threshold established for those pollutants, a combination of modelling applications
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. If modelling or indicative measurements show
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. If modelling shows an exceedance of any limit value
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. In addition to monitoring required
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. In addition to monitoring required under Article 10, Member States shall
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States may continue to use the existing infrastructure in place, provided that the existing sampling points and monitoring sites correspond to the objectives of this Directive.
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The location of sampling points shall be representative of the exposure of at risk communities and of the exposure of one or more sensitive or vulnerable groups.
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. For zones where the level of pollutants exceeds the relevant assessment threshold specified in Annex II, but not the respective limit values specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. For zones where the level of pollutants exceeds the relevant assessment threshold specified in Annex II, but not the respective limit and target values specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, ozone target values specified in Section 2 of Annex I or critical levels specified in Section 3 of Annex I , the minimum number of sampling points may be reduced by up to 50 %, in accordance with Points A and C of Annex III provided that the following conditions are met:
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) indicative measurements and modelling provide sufficient information for the assessment of air quality with regard to limit
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements have a minimum duration of 2 months per calendar year in the representative period;
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements have a minimum duration of 2 months per calendar year equally distributed over the calendar year;
Amendment 448 #
(c) the number of indicative measurements is the same as the number of fixed measurements that are being replaced and the indicative measurements
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 5 5. Each Member State shall, in accordance with Annex IV, ensure that the distribution used for the calculation of the average exposure indicators for PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), reflect the general population exposure adequately. The number of sampling points shall be no less than that determined by application of Point B, of Annex III.
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 7 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is necessary due to
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 7 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is necessary due to
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 7 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is strictly necessary due to special circumstances, including spatial development. Relocation of sampling
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 7 7. Sampling points at which exceedances of any limit value specified in Section 1 of Annex I were recorded within the previous 3 years shall not be relocated, unless a relocation is strictly necessary
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State shall establish at least one monitoring supersite per
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State shall establish at least one monitoring supersite per
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Each Member State shall establish at least one monitoring supersite per
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Measurements at all monitoring supersites at urban background locations shall include fixed
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) fixed measurements of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), black carbon (BC), ammonia (NH3) and ultrafine particles (UFP), irrespective of concentration levels and measurements of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) where appropriate.
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) fixed measurements of sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), black carbon (BC), ammonia (NH3) and ultrafine particles (UFP).
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) fixed measurements of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3)
Amendment 462 #
(b) fixed
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point c (c) fixed
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point c (c) fixed
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 7 7. Measurements of particulate and gaseous divalent mercury
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – title 12 Requirements where levels are lower than the limit values
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – title 12 Requirements where levels are lower than the limit values
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. In zones where the levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), lead, benzene, carbon monoxide
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. In zones where the levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), ozone, lead, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air are below the respective limit values specified in Section 1 of Annex I , Member States shall maintain the levels of those pollutants below the limit values .
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. In zones where the levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), lead, ozone, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air are below the respective limit values specified in Section 1 of Annex I , Member States shall maintain the levels of those
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. In areas which are already in compliance with the limit values, Member States should continue to strive for a further reduction in the average exposure of the population. The impact of poor air quality on the most sensitive groups should be taken into consideration.
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone target value Member States shall take necessary measures to maintain those levels below the ozone target value and endeavour to attain the long-term objectives specified in Section 2 of Annex I , in so far as factors including the transboundary nature of ozone pollution and meteorological conditions so permit, and provided that
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone target value Member States shall take necessary measures to
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In zones in which ozone, arsenic, cadmium and nickel levels are below the
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. In territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 478 #
3. In territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall endeavour to achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental and human health protection
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall endeavour to achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental and human health protection
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall endeavour to achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall endeavour to achieve and preserve the best ambient air quality and a high level of environmental and human health protection
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title 13 Limit
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title 13 Limit
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that, throughout their zones , levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), lead, benzene, carbon monoxide
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that,
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that, throughout their zones , levels of ozone, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter ( PM10 and PM2.5), lead, benzene, carbon monoxide , arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section 1 of Annex I.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2.. For ozone, arsenic, cadmium and nickel Member States shall ensure, by taking all necessary measures not entailing disproportionate costs, that throughout the zone levels do not exceed the
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2.. For ozone, Member States shall ensure, by taking all necessary measures
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2.. For ozone, Member States shall ensure, by taking all necessary measures not entailing disproportionate costs, that throughout the zone l
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure by taking all necessary measures not entailing disproportionate costs that the average exposure reduction obligations for PM2.5 and NO2 laid down in Section 5, Point B, of Annex I, are met throughout their territorial units at NUTS 1 level, where they exceed the average exposure concentration objectives set out in Section 5, Point C, of Annex I.
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the average exposure reduction obligations for PM2.5 and NO2 laid down in Section 5, Point B, of Annex I, are met throughout their territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the average exposure reduction obligations for PM2.5 and NO2 laid down in Section 5, Point B, of Annex I, are met throughout their territorial units at NUTS 1 level, where they exceed the average exposure concentration objectives set out in Section 5, Point C, of Annex I. taking into acount proportionality between measures and costs.
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – title 1 SECTION 1 – TARGET AND LIMIT VALUES FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH
Amendment 766 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 –
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 – Limit and target values for the protection of human health to be attained
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 – Limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by 1 January 203
Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 – Limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by 1 January 20
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Part 1 – paragraph 1 Table 1 – Limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by 1 January 20
Amendment 771 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Averaging period Limit value PM2.5 1 day
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Averaging period Limit value PM2.5
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Averaging period Limit value
Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 1 a (new) Table 1a (new) Intermediate limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by 1 January 2028 Averaging period Limit value PM2.5 1 day 25 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 3 times per calendar year Calendar year 10 μg/m³ PM10 1 day 45 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 3 times per calendar year Calendar year 20 μg/m3 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 1 hour 200 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than once per calendar year 1 day 50 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 3 times per calendar year Calendar year 20 μg/m3 Sulphur dioxide (SO2) 1 hour 350 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than once per calendar year 1 day 50 μg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 3 times per calendar year Calendar year 20 μg/m3 Ozone (O3) Maximum daily 8 - hours 120 μg/m3 mean (1) Peak season (2) 70 μg/m3 Benzene Calendar year 3,4 μg/m3 Carbon monoxide (CO) maximum daily 8 – hour 10 mg/m3 mean (1) 1 day 4 mg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 3 times per calendar year Lead (Pb) Calendar year 0,5 μg/m3 Arsenic (As) Calendar year 6,0 ng/m³ Cadmium (Cd) Calendar year 5,0 ng/m³ Nickel (Ni) Calendar year 20 ng/m³ Benzo(a)pyrene Calendar year 1,0 ng/m³ (1) The maximum daily 8-hour mean concentration will be selected by examining 8-hour running averages, calculated from hourly data and updated each hour. Each 8-hour average so calculated will be assigned to the day on which it ends i.e. the first calculation period for any 1 day will be the period from 17.00 on the previous day to 1.00 on that day; the last calculation period for any 1 day will be the period from 16.00 to 24.00 on that day. (2) Average of daily maximum 8-hour mean O3 concentration in the six consecutive months with the highest six-month running-average O3 concentration.
Amendment 778 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 2 – title Table 2 – Limit values for the protection of human health to be attained by [
Amendment 779 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 2 Averaging period Limit value PM2.5 Calendar year 25 μg/m³
Amendment 780 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 1 – table 2 a (new) Target values for the protection of human health to be attained by [INSERT TRANSPOSITION DEADLINE] Averaging period Target value Arsenic (As) Calendar year 6,0 ng/m³ Cadmium (Cd) Calendar year 5,0 ng/m³ Nickel (Ni) Calendar year 20 ng/m³
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 2 Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 2 – title 2 SECTION 2 - OZONE LONG- TERM OBJECTIVES
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 2– point B – table Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 2– point C – table Objective Averaging period Long-term objective Protection of Maximum daily 8- 100 μg/m3 (1) human health hour mean within a calendar year Peak season (2) 60 μg/m3 (2) Protection of May to July AOT40 (calculated 6 000 μg/m3 × h vegetation from 1 h values) (1) 99th percentile (i.e. 3 exceedance days per year). (2) Average of daily maximum 8-hour mean O3 concentration in the six consecutive months with the highest six-month running- average O3 concentration. Or. enJustification Ozone concentrations peak in certain parts of the year, especially in regions with high emissions from traffic and industry. In regions away from the equator, in the northern hemisphere, this period will typically be in the warm season (summer) within a single calendar year. Consequently, possible exceedances are likely to be recorded during that period. The long-term objective for this pollutant should therefore be also linked to the peak season exposure in line with the 2021 WHO Guidelines.
Amendment 785 #
Averaging period Critical level Sulphur dioxide (SO2) Calendar year and winter (1 October to 31 20 μg/m3 March) Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) Calendar year 30 μg/m3 NOx Ammonia (NH3) Calendar year 3 μg/m3 Ozone (O3) May to July AOT40 18 000 μg/m3 × h (calculated from 1 averaged over 5 h values) years (1) If the 5-year averages cannot be determined on the basis of a full and consecutive set of annual data, the minimum annual data required for checking compliance with the critical level will be valid data for 3 years. Or. enJustification For the sake of consistency with the other pollutants having adverse effect on the ecosystem, the ozone target value for the protection of the environment should be transformed into an ozone critical level. Moreover, critical level for ammonia should be also introduced, in line with the provisions of the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) and the values recommended by the group of experts under the Convention.
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 4 – point A – title A Alert thresholds
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 4 – Point A – table Pollutant Alert threshold Sulphur dioxide (SO2)
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 4 – point A– table Amendment 789 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 4 – Point B – title B Information
Amendment 790 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 4 – Point B – table Amendment 791 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 1 The Average Exposure Indicator expressed in μg/m3 (AEI) shall be based upon measurements in urban background locations and air pollution hotspots in territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 1 The Average Exposure Indicator expressed in μg/m3 (AEI) shall be based upon
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 1 The Average Exposure Indicator expressed in μg/m3 (AEI) shall be based upon measurements in urban background locations in territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 794 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point A – paragraph 2 Where Member States identify exceedances attributable to natural sources, which the Member State could not have mitigated, contributions from natural sources shall be deducted before calculating the AEI.
Amendment 795 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – introductory part As from 203
Amendment 796 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 797 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 798 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 1 – for PM2.5, 25% lower than the AEI was
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 1 – for PM2.5,
Amendment 800 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 1 – for PM2.5, 25% lower than the AEI was
Amendment 801 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – for NO2, 25% lower than the AEI was
Amendment 802 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – for NO2, 25% lower than the AEI was
Amendment 803 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – for NO2,
Amendment 804 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 a (new) As from 2031, the AEI for PM2.5 and PM2.5, shall not exceed the level that is 10% lower than the AEI of the previous year, unless it is already not higher than the average exposure concentration objective set out in Section C.
Amendment 805 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – Section 5 – point B – paragraph 1 a (new) As from 2031, the AEI for PM2.5 and NO2, shall not exceed the level that is 5% lower than the AEI of the previous year, unless it is already not higher than the average exposure concentration objective set out in Section C.
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a directive Annex II – Section 1 – table Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 2 Table 2 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurement to assess compliance with ozone
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 4 Table 4 - Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements to assess compliance with ozone
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 5 For each zone, the minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements set out in the tables in this point shall include at least 1 background location sampling point and 1 sampling point in the area with the highest concentrations according to Point B, of Annex IV provided this does not increase the number of sampling points. For nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, benzene, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide, this shall include at least 1 sampling point focused on measuring contribution from transport emissions. However, in the cases where there is only 1 sampling point required, this shall be in the area with the
Amendment 810 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 5 For each zone, the minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements set out in the tables in this point shall include at least 1 background location sampling point and 1 sampling point in
Amendment 811 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 6 For each zone, for nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, benzene and carbon
Amendment 812 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 1 Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 1 Minimum number of sampling points if concentrations exceed the assessment threshold Population NO2, SO2, Sum Minimum Minimum Pb, Cd, Benzo(a)pyrene of zone CO, benzene PM PM10 PM2.5 As, Ni in PM10 (thousands) (1) in PM10 0 - 249
Amendment 814 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 1 Minimum number of sampling points if concentrations exceed the assessment
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 2 Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 3 Population of Minimum number of sampling points if the number of sampling points is zone reduced by up to 50% (thousands) NO2, Sum PM Minimum Minimum Pb, Cd, Benzo(a)p SO2, (1) PM10 PM2.5 As, Ni in yrene in CO, PM10 PM10 benzene 0 - 249 1 2 1 1 1 1 250 - 499 1 2 1 1 1 1 500 - 749
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 3 Population of Minimum number of sampling points if the number of sampling points is zone reduced by up to 50% (thousands) NO2, Sum PM Minimum Minimum Pb, Cd, Benzo(a)p SO2, (1) PM10 PM2.5 As, Ni in yrene in CO, PM10 PM10 benzene 0 - 249 1 2 1 1 1 1 250 - 499 1 2 1 1 1 1 500 - 749 1 2 1 1 1 1 750 - 999 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 000 - 1 499 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 500 - 1 999 3 4 2 2 1 1 2 000 - 2 749 3 4 2 2 1 2 2 750 - 3 749 4 5 2 2 1 2 3 750 - 4 749 4 6 2 2 2 2 4 750 - 5 999 5 7 3 3 2 3 6 000+ 5 8 3 3 3 3 (1) The number of PM2.5 and NO2 sampling points in the urban background locations of urban areas and air quality hotspots shall meet the requirements set out in Point B.
Amendment 818 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 3 Population of Minimum number of sampling points if the number of sampling points zone (thousands) is reduced by up to 50% NO2, Sum Minimum Minimum Pb, Cd, Benzo(a) SO2, CO, PM (1)
Amendment 819 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part A – point 1 – table 4 Population of zone Minimum number of sampling points if the number of (thousands) sampling points is reduced by up to 50% (1) < 250
Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part B Amendment 821 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part B – paragraph 1 For PM2.5 and NO2 each, one sampling point per NUTS
Amendment 822 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part D – title D Minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements of ultrafine particles, black carbon, mercury and ammonia where high concentrations are likely to occur
Amendment 823 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part D – paragraph 1 Ultrafine particle
Amendment 824 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part D – paragraph 1 Ultrafine particles shall be monitored at selected locations in addition to other air pollutants. Sampling points to monitor ultrafine particles shall coincide
Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – Part D – paragraph 2 Monitoring supersites at urban background or rural background locations established in accordance with Article 10 shall not be included for the purpose of meeting the requirements on the minimum number of sampling points for UFP, BC and NH3 set here.
Amendment 826 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c (c) on the carriageway of roads; and on the central reservations of roads except where there is normally pedestrian access to the central reservation or where cycling lanes are present .
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act setting out detailed guidelines on standardised requirements for sampling points and location for new sampling points as well as for existing sampling points which do not ensure sufficient level of air quality assessment neither through measurement, indicative measurement or modelling with required uncertainty levels. Those guidelines shall provide additional and specific details for the principles set out in Points A, B, C and D;
Amendment 828 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – introductory part (a) Sampling points directed at the protection of human health shall be sited in
Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point i (i) concentration levels in the areas within zones with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit value(s). To ensure this, the assessment of short-term air quality standards (hourly and daily means) should be designed to address associated short-term exposure situations. The assessment of long-term air quality standards (annual means) and exposure concentration obligations should mirror long-term exposure situations,
Amendment 830 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point i (i) concentration levels in the areas within zones with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point i (i) concentration levels in the areas within zones with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit value(s), including in the vicinity of all pollution hotspots such as industries, farms, airports and ports, and streets where the highest concentrations occur and where traffic density is the highest,
Amendment 832 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point i a (new) (ia) concentration levels in the areas within zones that are close to ports and airports,
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point ii (ii) concentration levels in other areas within the zones which are representative of the exposure of the general population,
Amendment 834 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point ii (ii) concentration levels in other areas within the zones which are spatially representative of the exposure of the
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) concentration levels in areas referred to in points (i) and (ii) which are frequented by vulnerable population and sensitive groups, including, but not limited to, schools, hospitals, homes for the elderly, social housing units,
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) concentration levels in the residential areas of at-risk communities or where there are anticipated effects from sources in the area (for example: a major port, residential heating or industrial area).
Amendment 837 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point b (b) sampling points
Amendment 838 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point b (b) sampling points shall
Amendment 839 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) urban background locations shall be located so that their pollution level is influenced by the integrated contribution from all sources
Amendment 840 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) urban background locations shall be located so that their pollution level is influenced by the integrated contribution from all sources upwind of the sampling point. The pollution level shall not be dominated by a single source unless such a situation is typical for a larger urban area. Those sampling points shall, as a general rule, be able to guarantee spatial representativeness for several square kilometres;
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point c a (new) (ca) air quality hotspot locations shall be covered by sufficient sampling points in all wind directions where there is a near residential area or an area where the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit or target value(s), including but not limited to schools, hospitals, assisted living facilities and office areas.
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the urban traffic location shall be located in immediate vicinity to streets and roads with the highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be exposed;
Amendment 843 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) where the objective is to measure the contribution of
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 845 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point f (f) where contributions from industrial sources, farms, ports
Amendment 846 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point f (f) where contributions from industrial sources, ports or airports are to be assessed, at least 1 sampling point shall be installed
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point g (g) sampling points shall
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point i (i) sampling points measuring arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons shall
Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new) (ia) a sufficient number of sampling points shall be installed in the transboundary zones;
Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part B – point 2 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the annual average of the observed pollutant concentration shall be used as the air quality metric for a specific year
Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the flow around the sampling point inlet shall be unrestricted (in general, where possible the air must flow freely in an arc of at least 270°, or, for sampling points at the building line, of at least 180°) without any obstructions affecting the airflow in the vicinity of the inlet (at least 1,5 m away from buildings, balconies, tree crowns and other obstacles, and
Amendment 853 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between
Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and
Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the inlet probe shall not be positioned in the immediate vicinity of sources in order to avoid the direct intake of emissions including emissions from traffic, unmixed with ambient air to which members of the public are unlikely to be exposed;
Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point f (f) for the deposition measurements in rural background locations, the guidelines and criteria of EMEP shall apply
Amendment 858 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 1 1. The competent authorities responsible for air quality assessment shall provide a data-based assessment for all zones, fully document the site-
Amendment 859 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 2 2. The documentation shall include the location of the sampling points through spatial coordinates, detailed maps and photos, and shall include information on the spatial representativeness of all sampling points.
Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 3 3. The documentations shall include any deviation from the mandatory micro- scale siting criteria, their underlying reasons
Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 3 3. The documentations shall include
Amendment 862 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 9 9. At least every 5 years the selection criteria, network design and monitoring site locations, defined by the competent authorities in view of the requirements of this Annex, shall be reviewed to ensure they remain valid and optimal overtime. The review shall be supported at least by either modelling or indicative measurements
Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 9 9. At least every 5 years the selection criteria, network design and monitoring site locations, defined by the competent authorities in view of the requirements of this Annex, shall be reviewed to ensure they remain valid and optimal overtime. The review shall be supported at least by either modelling or indicative measurements, and where discrepancies or insufficiencies are found, the competent authority shall rectify the situation within six months.
Amendment 864 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV – Part D – point 10 a (new) 10a. The competent authorities responsible for air quality assessment shall ensure that monitoring sites operate properly and provide reliable and at least hourly data throughout their entire lifetime. They shall carry out and document regular checks and maintenance and make the documentation public through appropriate communication channels.
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part A – point 1 – table Air pollutant Maximum uncertainty of Maximum uncertainty of Maximum fixed measurements indicative measurements (1) ratio of uncertainty of modelling
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part A – point 1 – table Air pollutant
Amendment 867 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part A – point 2 – table Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part A – point 2 – table Amendment 869 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part B – paragraph 3 For the other cases, measurements are to be evenly distributed over the calendar year (or over the April-September period for indicative measurements of O3). In order to comply with these requirements and to ensure that any potential losses of data do not skew results, the minimum data coverage and distribution requirements shall be met for specific periods (quarter, month, weekday) of the whole year depending on the pollutant and measurement method/frequency.
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part D – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) observed lack of data or information from specific sampling points,
Amendment 871 #
Proposal for a directive Annex V – Part D – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) for measurements from transboundary stations, estimation of transboundary pollution related to another Member State;
Amendment 872 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 1 – point A – paragraph 1 The main objectives of such measurements are to ensure that adequate information is made available on levels in urban background and rural background locations. This information is essential to judge the enhanced levels in more polluted areas (such as urban background, air quality hotspots, industry related locations, traffic related locations), assess the possible contribution from long-
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 1 – point C – paragraph 1 Measurements shall be taken in urban background, air quality hotspots and rural background locations in accordance with Annex IV.
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 2 – point B – paragraph 1 Measurement of ozone precursor substances shall include at least methane (CH4), nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), and appropriate volatile organic compounds (VOC). The selection of the specific compounds to be measured completed by other compounds of interest will depend on the objective sought.
Amendment 875 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 2 – point B – paragraph 1 Measurement of ozone precursor substances shall include at least nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), methane (CH4) and appropriate volatile organic compounds (VOC). The selection of the specific compounds to be measured completed by other compounds of interest will depend on the objective sought.
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 3 a (new) 3a SECTION 3A- MEASUREMENT OF BLACK CARBON (BC) A. Objectives The objective of such measurements is to ensure that adequate information is available at locations where high concentrations of BC occur that are mainly influenced by sources from air, water, or road transport (such as airports, ports, roads), industrial sites or domestic heating. The information shall be appropriate to judge on enhanced levels of BC concentrations from those sources. B. Substances BC C. Siting Sampling points shall be established in accordance with Annex IV and V at a location where high BC concentrations are likely to occur and within the main wind direction.
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 3 b (new) 3b SECTION 3B- MEASUREMENT OF AMMONIA (NH3) A. Objectives The objective of such measurements is to ensure that adequate information is available at locations where high concentrations of NH3 occur that are mainly influenced by sources from agricultural and animal farming (fields and grassland subject to application of fertiliser, stables and storages of manure). The information shall be appropriate to judge on enhanced levels of NH3 concentrations from those sources. B. Substances NH3 C. Siting Sampling points shall be established in accordance with Annex IV and V at a location where high NH3 concentrations are likely to occur and within the main wind direction.
Amendment 878 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VII – Section 3 c (new) Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – title 1 Information to be included in air quality roadmaps and air quality plans for improvement in ambient air quality
Amendment 880 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 1 – point c (c) sampling point(s) (map, geographical coordinates, and competent authority).
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 2 – point a (a) type of zone (urban, industrial, air quality hotspot or rural area) or characteristics of NUTS
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 2 – point b a (new) (ba) concentrations or average exposure indicator registered during the exceedance period by each of the relevant sampling points and comparison with limit values or average exposure reduction obligation, duration of the exceedance period, amount of the overall excess pollution (in micro or nanograms/m3);
Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 2 – point b b (new) (bb) estimation of health and environment impacts of the exceedances, including on sensitive population and vulnerable groups, and workers particularly exposed to air pollution, and analysis methods and assumptions used for such estimation;
Amendment 884 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 3 – paragraph 2 Names and addresses of the competent authorities responsible for the development and implementation of the air quality roadmap or air quality plans.
Amendment 885 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 – point a (a) list of the main emission sources and, where relevant, of the specific entities (e.g. industrial installations, airports, ports, and farms), responsible for pollution;
Amendment 886 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 – point a (a) list of the main emission sources, including their category, responsible for pollution;
Amendment 887 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 – point b (b) total quantity of emissions from these sources, and where relevant, specific entities (in tonnes/year);
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 – point d (d) source apportionment according to relevant sectors and, where relevant, apportionment to specific entities, that contribute to the exceedance in the national air pollution control programme.
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 4 a (new) 4a. Review of all possible effective pollution reduction measures which could be adopted at national, regional or local level and their estimated effect in air pollution reduction of each air pollutant, including at least the measures listed under Point B;
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – introductory part 5. Expected impact of measures to reach compliance within 3 years after adoption of the air quality roadmap or air quality plan
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – introductory part 5. Expected impact of measures to reach compliance
Amendment 892 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – introductory part 5. Expected impact of measures to reach compliance
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point a (a) expected quantified concentration reduction (in µg/m³) at each sampling point in exceedance of limit values, ozone target value or of the average exposure indicator in case of an exceedance of the average exposure reduction obligation, from the short-term and long-term measures referred to in point 6 and their associated category;
Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point b (b) estimated annual concentration reduction per air pollutant and year of compliance per air pollutant covered by the air quality plan taking into account measures referred to in point 6.
Amendment 895 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 5 – point b (b) estimated year of compliance per air pollutant covered by the air quality roadmap or air quality plan taking into account measures referred to in point 6.
Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point -a (new) (-a) review of all possible effective pollution reduction measures which could be adopted at national, regional or local level and their estimated effect in air pollution reduction of each air pollutant, including at least the measures listed under Point B;
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a (a) listing and description of all the measures
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a (a) listing and description of all the
Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a (a) listing and description of all the measures set out in the air quality plan or air quality roadmap including the justification for the choice in relation to air pollution reduction efficiency, including the identification of the competent authority in charge of their implementation;
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point a a (new) (aa) listing and description of all the long-term measures relating to the relevant categories set out in the air quality plan and justification for those measures in terms of the source and category of exceedance, their effectiveness, their availability in time and their socio-economic impact, including the identification of the competent authority in charge of their implementation;
Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point b (b) quantification of emission reduction (in tonnes/year) of each measure
Amendment 902 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point b (b) quantification of emission reduction (in tonnes/year) of each measure and category under point (a);
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point b (b) quantification of emission reduction (in tonnes/year) of each measure or group of measures under
Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point c (c) timetable for implementation of each measure and
Amendment 905 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point c (c) timetable for implementation of each measure and responsible actors, the economic and social impact, including access to energy and mobility;
Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point d (d) estimate of the concentration reduction in relation to the exceedance concerned, as a consequence of each air quality measure,
Amendment 907 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point d (d) estimate of the concentration reduction as a consequence of each relevant air quality measure or group of relevant interrelated measures, in relation to the exceedance concerned;
Amendment 908 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 6 – point e (e) list of the information (including modelling and assessment results of short- term and long-term measures) to reach the air quality standard concerned in accordance with Annex I.
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 – point c a (new) (ca) description of the air pollution reduction measures in place and their projected effect during the time period covered by the air quality roadmap or air quality plan;
Amendment 910 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 – point d (d) listing
Amendment 911 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part A – point 7 a (new) 7a. Annex 2a: A summary of the public information and consultation measures undertaken pursuant to Article 19(6), their results and an explanation of how these results were taken into account in the final plan.
Amendment 912 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – introductory part 2. Information on all air pollution abatement measures that have been considered at local, regional or national level for implementation in connection with the attainment of air quality objectives for each category in the short and long term, including:
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – introductory part 2. Information on all air pollution abatement measures that have been considered at local, regional or national level for implementation in connection with the attainment of air quality objectives,
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a (a) reduction of emissions from stationary sources by ensuring that polluting small and medium-sized stationary combustion sources (including
Amendment 916 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a (a) reduction of emissions from stationary sources by ensuring that polluting small and medium-sized stationary combustion sources (including
Amendment 917 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a (a) reduction of emissions from
Amendment 918 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a (a) reduction of emissions from stationary sources by ensuring that polluting small and medium-sized stationary combustion sources (including
Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a (a) reduction of emissions from stationary sources by ensuring that polluting small and medium-sized stationary combustion sources (including for biomass) are gradually replaced with zero-emission alternatives, or if this is not feasible, fitted with emission
Amendment 920 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point a a (new) (aa) reduction of emissions through the uptake of zero- and low-emission vehicles based on economic incentives;
Amendment 921 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b a (new) (ba) reduction of emissions through the uptake of zero- and low-emission collective and public transport vehicles and/or vehicles equipped with modern digital solutions affecting emissions reduction;
Amendment 922 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b b (new) (bb) measures to improve the quality, efficiency, affordability and connectivity of collective and public transport;
Amendment 923 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b c (new) (bc) measures related to the uptake and implementation of alternative fuel infrastructure;
Amendment 924 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b d (new) (bd) measures related to the implementation of intelligent transport systems and digital solutions related to emissions reduction;
Amendment 925 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b e (new) (be) measures related to smart parking;
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point b f (new) (bf) reduction of emissions related to the creation of multimodal hubs connecting various sustainable transport solutions and parking facilities;
Amendment 927 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on environmental public procurement, of zero- emission
Amendment 928 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on environmental public procurement, of zero emissions
Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point c (c) procurement by public authorities, in line with the handbook on environmental public procurement, of zero- emission
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) measures to limit transport emissions through traffic planning and management
Amendment 931 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) measures to limit transport emissions through traffic planning and management (including congestion pricing, differentiated parking fees or other economic incentives; establishing urban vehicles access restrictions schemes, including at least low emission zones
Amendment 932 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) measures to limit transport emissions through
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d (d) measures to limit transport emissions
Amendment 934 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d – point i (new) (i) congestion pricing, road pricing and mileage-based user fees;
Amendment 935 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d – point ii (new) (ii) parking fees on all public land or other economic incentives to reduce unnecessary mobility by car and with differentiated fees for polluting and zero- emission vehicles;
Amendment 936 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d – point iii (new) (iii) establishing urban vehicles access restrictions schemes, including low emission zones in line with the most recent Euro standard, and zero-emission zones;
Amendment 937 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d – point iv (new) (iv) establishing low-traffic neighbourhoods and car-free neighbourhoods;
Amendment 938 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point d – point v (new) (v) establishing car-free streets on weekends;
Amendment 939 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift towards active mobility and less polluting forms of transport
Amendment 940 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift towards less polluting forms of transport, (such as walking, cycling, public transport), including at least: (i) strengthening the public transport network; (ii) reducing or eliminating the cost of public transport (e.g., for residents, students, etc.); (iii) improving the infrastructure to create more space for people to walk and cycle safely; (iv) prioritising walking and cycling in new infrastructure planning and measures; (v) economic incentives for the purchase of active and shared mobility solutions (e.g. bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters);
Amendment 941 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a
Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift towards less polluting forms of transport and to support changes in mobility behaviour, such as provide incentives for the public to use public transportation and walking, cycling and e-mobility solutions;
Amendment 943 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a
Amendment 944 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e (e) measures to encourage a shift towards less polluting forms of transport including for rail and inland waterways;
Amendment 945 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e – point i (new) (i) strengthening the public transport network; ensuring smooth inter-modality between rail and cycling in order to offer sustainable rural-urban commuting; reducing roads width for private vehicles and expanding infrastructure for public transport and bikes; expanding the EuroVélo network;
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e – point ii (new) (ii) simplifying access to public transport through digital and interconnected booking; introducing real- time passenger information for transit users;
Amendment 947 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e – point iii (new) (iii) creating park and ride schemes;
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e – point iv (new) (iv) planning for compact cities (e.g. 15-minute city);
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e – point v (new) (v) introducing per-kilometre incentives for cycling and walking commute to work; eliminating fiscal incentives for company vehicles;
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point f (f) measures to encourage a shift towards zero
Amendment 951 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point g (g)
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point g (g) measure to ensure that
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point g (g) measure to ensure that
Amendment 954 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture, including sustainable management of agricultural waste, nitrogen management systems, taking into account the whole nitrogen cycle, livestock feeding strategies, low-emission manure spreading techniques, low- emission manure storage systems, low- emission animal housing systems, the reduction of animal number; while taking into account the upcoming revised UNECE Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for reducing ammonia emissions and greenhouse gases;
Amendment 955 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture, including nitrogen management systems, taking into account the whole nitrogen cycle, avoidance of urea-based fertilisers, livestock feeding strategies, including efficient use of protein in the diet, low-emission manure spreading techniques, low-emission manure storage systems, including covering of slurry stores, low-emission animal housing systems and frequent cleaning of livestock areas, reduction of livestock farming; while taking into account the upcoming revised UNECE Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for Reducing Ammonia Emissions;
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) measures to reduce air pollution in ports and port cities, including provision of on-shore power supply for ships at berth;
Amendment 957 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) measures to reduce air pollution from hotspots;
Amendment 958 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h b (new) (hb) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture, including sustainable management of agricultural waste, avoiding its unjustified burning, nitrogen management systems, taking into account the whole nitrogen cycle, livestock feeding strategies, low-emission manure spreading techniques, low-emission manure storage systems, low-emission animal housing systems, the reduction of animal number; while taking into account the upcoming revised UNECE Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for reducing ammonia emissions and greenhouse gases;
Amendment 959 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h b (new) (hb) measures to reduce emissions from agriculture, including nitrogen management systems;
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point h b (new) (hb) measures to reduce air pollution from agriculture and forest management;
Amendment 961 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i (i) measures to protect the health of children
Amendment 962 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i (i) measures
Amendment 963 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new) (ia) measures by health authorities to encourage behavioural changes.
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII a (new) Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a directive Annex VIII a (new) ANNEX VIIIa 1. Measures aimed at addressing the sources which contribute to the risk of the alert thresholds being exceeded: (a) restricting the circulation of private vehicles; (b) temporary free public transportation; (c) implementing stricter emission limits or suspending the operation of industrial facilities, or both; (d) suspending operations at construction works; (e) street cleaning; (f) flexible work arrangements; (g) restricting the use of solid fuels for domestic heating. 2. Measures aimed at protecting sensitive population and vulnerable groups: (a) permitting or mandating remote working; (b) closing nurseries and elementary schools; (c) introducing driving restrictions around nurseries, and elementary schools, hospitals and retirement homes. 3. Proactive steps to provide specific air pollution, health and health protection information both to the general public and to sensitive population and vulnerable groups, as soon as exceedances of information and alert thresholds and of limit values are projected: (a) including information on street billboards; (b) including air quality forecasts in weather forecasts on television and radio; (c) informing environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups and other relevant health-care bodies; (d) disseminating information on impacts of air pollution levels forecasted or registered on human health to the general population and sensitive population and vulnerable groups; (e) disseminating information on steps that people can personally take to diminish their exposure and protect themselves; (f) using mobile phone applications and social media to disseminate live information and forecasts on air quality.
Amendment 966 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point a (a) hourly up-to-date data per sampling
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point b (b) measured concentrations of all pollutants and how they compare with information thresholds, alert thresholds, limit values and average exposure obligations, and with the most recent WHO recommended maximum concentrations, presented according to the appropriate periods as laid down in Annex I;
Amendment 968 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point c – introductory part (c) information on observed exceedance(s) of any limit value,
Amendment 969 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point d – point i (i) the health impacts of air pollution, and specifically of each pollutant measured under this Directive, on general population,
Amendment 970 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point d – point ii (ii) the health impacts of air pollution, and specifically of each pollutant measured under this Directive, on vulnerable groups,
Amendment 971 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point d – point iv (iv) recommended precautions to be taken, broken down into precautions to be taken by the general population, vulnerable groups, and workers particularly exposed to air pollution, to avoid exposure to air pollutants and to relieve the symptoms once exposure has happened,
Amendment 972 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 1 – point e a (new) (ea) any failure to provide the information under points (a) to (e);
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 2 – point a – indent 2 – type of threshold exceeded (information or alert), and how the registered exceedance compares with the relevant alert and/or information threshold,
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IX – point 2 – point d (d) information on short-term measures and preventive actions to reduce pollution and/or exposure to it: indication of main source sectors; recommendations for action to reduce emissions and limitations on exposure;
source: 745.427
2023/04/04
ENVI
269 amendments...
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the average exposure reduction obligations for PM2.5 and NO2 laid down in Section 5, Point B, of Annex I, are met throughout their territorial units at NUTS
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 6 6. The deadline for attaining the limit values
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The alert thresholds for concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide , ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in ambient air shall be those laid down in Section 4, Point A of Annex I.
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. When any air pollutant exceeds its alert threshold, Member States shall without undue delay implement the emergency measures drawn up in their short-term action plans referred to in Article 20.
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where any alert threshold or any information threshold laid down in Section 4 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall take the necessary steps to inform the public at local, national, and also cross- border level where necessary, within a few hours at the latest, making use of different media, timely alert systems and communication channels and ensuring broad public access
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where any alert threshold or any information threshold laid down in Section
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where any alert threshold or any information threshold laid down in Section 4 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall take the necessary steps to inform the public within a few hours at the latest, making use of different media and communication channels and ensuring broad
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where any alert threshold or any information threshold laid down in Section 4 of Annex I is exceeded, Member States shall take the necessary steps to inform the public within a few hours at the latest, in a coherent and easily understandable manner, making use of different media and communication channels and ensuring broad public access
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that information about actual or predicted exceedance
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that information about actual or predicted exceedances of any alert threshold or information threshold is provided to the public in a coherent and easily understandable manner as soon as possible in accordance with, points 2 and 3 of Annex IX.
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that information about actual
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – title Contributions from natural and transboundary sources
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) zones where exceedances of limit values for a given pollutant are attributable to natural sources and to indirect human activities; and
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) NUTS
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) NUTS
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) zones where exceedances of limit values for a given pollutant are attributable to another Member State or a third country due to the transboundary nature of the spread of pollution;
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with lists of any such zones and NUTS
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with lists of any such zones and NUTS 1 territorial units, as referred to in paragraph 1, together with information on concentrations and sources and the evidence demonstrating that the exceedances are attributable to natural sources and to indirect human activities.
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with lists of any such zones and NUTS 1 territorial units, as referred to in paragraph 1, together with information on concentrations and sources and the evidence demonstrating that the exceedances are attributable to natural or transboundary sources.
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Commission has been informed of an exceedance attributable to natural sources in accordance with paragraph 2, it shall review the evidence and inform the Member State whether that exceedance
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Commission has been informed of an exceedance attributable to natural sources and to indirect human activities in accordance with paragraph 2, that exceedance shall not be considered as an exceedance for the purposes of this Directive.
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Commission has been informed of an exceedance attributable to natural or transboundary sources in accordance with paragraph 2, that exceedance shall not be considered as an exceedance for the purposes of this Directive.
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. Member States may , for a given
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 a (new) Article 18 a Early warning system 1. The Commission shall establish by means of a delegated act guidelines on the modelling approach and tools, as well as on the methodology for stress testing as an early warning system (EWS). 2. The system shall identify any systemic problem with the air quality in a Member State which is likely to lead to exceedances of pollutant concentrations in the future. 3. If the early warning system identifies a problem, the Member State must draw up a preventive air plan. 4. The preventive air plan shall contain preventive measures based on the identified problem by the EWS.
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions, or due to the complex characteristics and the relevance of its secondary formation in the atmosphere which complicate the task of assessing the feasibility of complying with strict limit values, a Member
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions or conditions resulting from the temporary switch from natural gas to alternative energy sources for reasons of energy security (fuel switch), a Member State may postpone - that deadline once by a maximum of 5 years for that particular zone , if the following conditions are met:
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I,
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), sulphur dioxode (SO2) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions, a Member State may postpone - that deadline once by a maximum of
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of unpreventable site-specific dispersion characteristics
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where, in a given zone , conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) or nitrogen dioxide cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of unusual site-specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions, a Member State may postpone
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a) the levels of pollutants in ambient air in the relevant zone exceed the limit values referred to in Table -1 of Section 1 of Annex I by a maximum of 10%;
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) an air quality plan is established in accordance with Article 19(
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the air quality plan referred in point (a) is supplemented by the information listed in Point B of Annex VIII related to the pollutants concerned and demonstrates how exceedance periods above the limit values will be kept as short as possible and how the limit values will be attained by the new postponed deadlines;
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the air quality plan referred in point (a) is supplemented by the information listed in Point B of Annex VIII related to the pollutants concerned and demonstrates how the limit values will be adhered to by the new deadline and exceedance periods above the limit values will be kept as short as possible
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the air quality plan referred in point (a) is supplemented by the information listed in Point B of Annex VIIIrelated to the pollutants concerned and demonstrates how exceedance periods above the limit values will be kept as short as possible and before the new deadline for compliance;
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the air quality plan referred to in point (a) outlines how the public and, in particular, sensitive population and vulnerable groups will be informed in a coherent and easily understandable manner about
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the air quality plan referred to in point (a) outlines how the public and, in particular, sensitive population and vulnerable groups will be informed about and protected from the consequences of the postponement for human health and the environment;
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Where, in a given zone, conformity with the limit values for particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) cannot be achieved by the deadline specified in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, because of site- specific dispersion characteristics, orographic boundary conditions, adverse climatic conditions or transboundary contributions, due to the complex characteristics of its secondary formation in the atmosphere which complicate the task of assessing the feasibility of complying with strict limit values, a Member State may postpone that deadline for that particular zone if the following conditions are met: a) an air quality plan is established in accordance with Article 19(4) and meeting the requirements listed in Article 19(5) to (7) for the zone to which the postponement would apply; b) the air quality plan referred in point (a) is supplemented by the information listed in Point B of Annex VIII related to the pollutants concerned and demonstrates how exceedance periods above the limit values will be kept as short as possible; c) the air quality plan referred to in point (a) outlines how additional funding, including via relevant national and Union funding programmes, will be mobilised to accelerate the improvement of air quality in the zone to which the postponement would apply.
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Derogations granted under Article 19, paragraph 5a (new), are not subject to the provisions of Article 18.
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall notify the Commission where, in their view, paragraph 1 is applicable, and shall communicate the air quality plan referred to in paragraph 1 and all relevant information necessary for the Commission to assess whether the invoked reason for postponement and the conditions set out in that paragraph are satisfied. In its assessment, the Commission shall take into account estimated effects on ambient air quality in Member States, at present and in the future, of measures that have been taken by Member States as well as estimated effects on ambient air quality of Union measures
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – title 19 Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. Where, from [date of entry into force of this Directive] until 31 December 2027, the levels of pollutants in ambient air in a given zone or NUTS 3 territorial unit exceed any limit value to be attained by 1 January 2030 as laid down in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, Member States shall establish an air quality plan for the concerned pollutant, as soon as possible and no later than 1 year after the exceedance was recorded, in order to attain the respective limit values by the attainment deadline.The air quality plan shall include a linear trajectory until 1 January 2030 with a milestone on 1 January 2028, by which date Member States shall endeavour to achieve levels of pollutants in ambient air not exceeding the intermediary limit values laid down in Table 1a of Section 1 of Annex I. Where, on 1 January 2028, the levels of pollutants in ambient air in a given zone or NUTS 3 territorial unit exceed any intermediary limit value that had to be attained by that date as laid down in Table 1a of Annex I, Member States shall, as soon as possible and no later than 1 July 2028, update their air quality plan and the measures therein and take additional and more effective measures in order to attain the limit values laid down in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I by the attainment deadline of 1 January 2030.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones, the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out proportionate and appropriate measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was reported
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, after the expiration of the attainment deadlines referred to in Tables 1 and 2 of Section 1 of Annex I, in given zones, the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate measures, including triggering permit revision in accordance with Article 21 (5) of Directive (EU).../….[recast IED], to achieve the concerned limit value and to
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate and proportionate measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was reported .
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in given zones the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed any limit value , laid down in Section 1 of Annex I, , Member States shall establish air quality plans for those zones as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which that exceedance of any limit value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate and sufficient measures to achieve the concerned limit value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible, and in any case no longer than 3 years from the end of the calendar year in which the first exceedance was
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the third calendar year after the
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of any limit values persist during the third calendar year after the establishment of the air quality plan, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, and take additional and more effective measures,
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Air quality plans shall only set measures in line with air emission standards laid down in EU legislation.
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Where in a given NUTS 1 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants in ambient air exceed the ozone target value, laid down in Section 2 of Annex I, Member States shall establish air quality plans for those NUTS 1 territorial units as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the ozone target value was recorded. Those air quality plans shall set out appropriate measures in order to achieve the ozone target value and to keep the exceedance period as short as possible. In the event of an exceedance of the ozone target values, the preparation of a Clean Air Plan pursuant to this paragraph may be waived for territorial units at NUTS level, should Member States be able to ensure that their National Clean Air Programmes in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/2284 contain all measures necessary to address these exceedances.
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Where in a given NUTS
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the ozone target value persist during the fifth calendar year after the
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the ozone target value persist during the fifth calendar year after the establishment of the air quality plan in the relevant NUTS 1 territorial unit, Member States shall update air quality plan and the measures therein, and take additional and more effective measures,
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For NUTS
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where in a given NUTS
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where in a given NUTS
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where in a given NUTS
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Where exceedances of the average exposure reduction obligation persist during the fifth calendar year after the establishment of the air quality plan, Member States shall update the air quality plan and the measures therein, and take additional and more effective measures,
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Member States shall lay down rules to provide that competent authorities at all relevant levels which bear responsibility, in full or in part, for the exceedance of any limit values referred to in Tables 1 and 2 of Section 1 of Annex I and of any average exposure reduction obligations referred to in Section 5 of Annex I, pay periodic fines starting from the calendar year during which the exceedance occurred and continuing for as long as such exceedance persists. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The proceeds of the penalties shall not be paid into an account which ultimately benefits the budget from which the relevant competent authority receives its funding. This requirement is without prejudice to the power conferred to the Commission to launch infringement procedures, including with referral to the Court of Justice, which may impose financial sanctions, against Member States failing to attain any of the limit values and average exposure reduction obligations by the attainment deadlines.
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The measures prescribed under paragraphs (1) to (3) should be based on an analysis of their potential for mitigating the exceedance(s) as well as their costs and benefits, as recommended by the World Health Organization, taking specifically into account sector-specific environmental legislation.
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The measures prescribed under paragraphs (1) to (3) should be distributed fairly among the sectors contributing to the exceedances, to the extent of their contribution to the exceedances and their technological and economic capabilities.
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. The measures prescribed under paragraphs (1) to (3) should be based on an analysis of their potential for mitigating the exceedances as well as their costs and benefits, as recommended by the World Health Organization, taking specifically into account sector-specific environmental legislation.
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 2029 in a zone or NUTS 1 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants are above any limit value to be attained by 1 January 2030 as laid down in Table 1 of Section 1 of Annex I, and where model applications, taking into account the predicted effect of measures already in place by Union, national or regional policies, do not indicate compliance by 1 January 2030, Member States shall establish an air quality plan for the concerned pollutant as soon as possible and no later than 2 years after the calendar year during which the exceedance of the was recorded to attain the respective limit values or ozone target value
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 2029 in a zone or NUTS
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 2029 in a zone or NUTS 1
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 2029 in a zone or NUTS 1 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants are above any limit value to be attained by 1 January 20
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert year 2 years after entry into force of this Directive], until 31 December 2029 in a zone or NUTS 1 territorial unit, the levels of pollutants are above any limit value to be attained by 1 January 203
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where from [insert
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Where, for the same pollutant, Member States are required to establish an air quality
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Member States are encouraged, where applicable and feasible, to employ new and developing technologies and innovative solutions in their air quality plans, or to complement and facilitate the implementation of their air quality plans.
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. The Commission shall provide assistance, including information campaigns, and sufficient technical know- how, at the request of Member States, to help successfully foster projects from Horizon Europe, InvestEU, the Cohesion Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, EU4Health, the LIFE programme, and others, where appropriate, to help improve the ambient air quality and implement Member State air quality plans. The Commission and Member States shall endeavour to realise at least one such project in each Member State.
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Member States and the Commission may, where appplicable and feasible, explore possibilities of capturing carbon at point-source emissions or directly from the ambient air and its subsequent utilisation or sequestration, if it would improve the ambient air quality and complement or facilitate the implementation of Member State air quality plans.
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps shall contain at least the following information:
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) the information referred to in Point B, point 1, of Annex VIII;
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) where appropriate, information on abatement measures listed in Point B, Points 1 and 2 of Annex VIII.
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consider including measures referred to in Article 20(2) and shall include specific measures aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 Regarding the pollutants concerned, when preparing air quality plans or air quality roadmaps , Member States shall assess the risk of exceeding the respective alert thresholds. That analysis shall be used for establishing short-term action plans where applicable.
Amendment 605 #
Where air quality plans shall be established in respect of several pollutants
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4 Where air quality plans or air quality roadmaps shall be established in respect of several pollutants or air quality standards
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5 Member States shall, to the extent feasible, ensure consistency of their air quality plans and air quality roadmaps with other plans that have a significant impact on air quality, including those required under Directive 2010/75/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58, Directives (EU) 2016/2284 and 2002/49/EC and under climate, energy, transport and agriculture legislation
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5 Member States shall, to the extent feasible, ensure consistency of their air quality plans with other plans that have a significant impact on air quality, including those required under Directive 2010/75/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58, Directives (EU) 2016/2284 and
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5 a (new) Air quality plans shall not include measures requiring investments in industrial processes and measures that already comply with environmental legislation and will be phased out as part of their deep industrial transformation.
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5 a (new) Air quality plans shall not include measures requiring investments in industrial processes and measures that already comply with environmental legislation and will be phased out as part of their deep industrial transformation.
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Competent authorities, which are responsible to establish air quality plans, may together with the operators of installations pursuant to Annex I of Directive 2010/75/EU agree on special conditions for the operation, substantial change or new construction of such installations if these installations contribute significantly to the limit values in the air quality plans concerned being exceeded. To be able to enable operators to convert their installations and their sites to more climate-friendly production processes under economic conditions such derogations shall be agreed. The derogations may include existing installations, which may continue to operate in the area of exceedance without additional measures for up to ten years if it is ensured that they no longer contribute significantly to the exceedance after the expiry of the period, and Article 18 of Directive 2010/75/EU does not apply to the operation of existing installations, the construction of new or the substantial change of existing installations for a period of up to ten years.
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Commission shall take every measure to provide financial and technical support to Member States, without undue delay, in implementing the Member States' air quality plans, at the request of Member States, in order to swiftly ensure the health and well-being of citizens affected by the levels of ambient air quality.
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall consult the public, in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59, and the competent authorities, which, by reason of their responsibilities in the field of air pollution and air quality, are likely to be concerned by the implementation of the air quality plans, on draft air quality plans and any significant updates of air quality plans prior to their finalisation. In doing so, Member States shall ensure that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation, review or update of the air quality plans established under this Article and that all relevant information is timely and proactively made available to the public. _________________ 59 Directive 2003/35/EC of the European
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall consult the public, in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59, and the competent authorities, which, by reason of their responsibilities in the field of air pollution and air quality, are likely to be concerned by the implementation of the air quality plans, on draft air quality plans and any significant updates of air quality plans prior to their finalisation. Competent authorities that are responsible for implementing measures of an air quality plan shall sign a commitment clause to ensure timely and adequate implementation. _________________ 59 Directive 2003/35/EC of the European
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall consult the public, in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59, and the competent authorities, which, by reason of their responsibilities in the field of air pollution and air quality, are likely to be concerned by the implementation of the air quality plans and air quality roadmaps, on draft air quality plans and draft air quality roadmapsand any significant updates of air quality plans and air quality roadmapsprior to their finalisation. _________________ 59 Directive 2003/35/EC of the European
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that before the time period for receiving comments from the public starts, the following is made available to the public on the internet, free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, and is communicated through other non- digital communication channels to groups with limited access to digital communication: (a) the draft air quality plan containing at least the information listed in Annex VIII; (b) a non-technical summary of the information referred to under point (a).
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans and air quality roadmaps, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non-
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of this Directive, in particular in the preparation, review and update of air quality plans. When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health- care bodies, in particular healthcare professionals, and the relevant industrial federations are allowed to take part in those consultations.
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health- care bodies, including healthcare professionals and health insurance funds, and the relevant industrial federations are
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health- care bodies, in particular healthcare professionals, and the relevant industrial federations are allowed to take part in those consultations.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as, for example, environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health-
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 7 7. Air quality plans and air quality roadmaps shall be communicated to the Commission within 2 months after their adoption .
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Air Quality Plans shall be duly taken into account when preparing heating and cooling plans of municipalities and for any measures to be taken in the context of the obligations under the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive which may have an impact on ambient air quality, the limit and target values, average exposure reduction obligations, average exposure concentration objectives, critical levels, information thresholds, alert thresholds and long-term objectives.
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. The Commission shall establish, by means of implementing acts, a template for the air quality plans. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 26(2). The Commission shall promote exchange of best practices among Member States through the EU Clean Air Forum and may issue guidance on the content of air quality plans.
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in a given zone , there is a risk that the levels of pollutants will exceed one or more of the alert thresholds specified in Section 4 of Annex I, Member States shall draw up short-term action plans indicating the emergency measures to be taken in the short term in order to reduce the risk or duration of such an exceedance.
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in a given zone
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 However, where there is a risk that the alert threshold for ozone will be exceeded, Member States may refrain from drawing up such short-term action plans when there is no significant potential, taking into account national geographical, meteorological and economic conditions, to reduce the risk, duration or severity of such an exceedance.
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) In order to inform citizens about poor air quality and its effects, competent authorities should require the permanent display of easily understandable information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on behaviour to reduce exposure to air pollution in the vicinity of communities of sensitive and vulnerable groups.
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, those short- term action plans shall consider including measures in relation to transport , construction works, industrial installations and the use of products and domestic heating. Such conditions related to industrial installations shall include specific additional conditions in the permit that are more stringent than those set in the relevant BAT conclusions, in order to ensure that the installation complies with environmental quality standards, and may consist in setting stricter emission limit values or limiting the operation or capacity of the installation. Specific actions aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, including children, shall
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, and, while taking into account socio-economic impacts and protecting groups of the population with low socio-economic status, those short-
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, those short- term action plans shall at least consider including measures in relation to transport
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded.
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or target values or alert threshold being exceeded. Depending on the share of the main pollution sources to the exceedances to be addressed, those short- term action plans shall consider including measures in relation to transport
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. When drawing up the short-term action plans referred to in paragraph 1 Member States may, depending on the individual case, provide for effective measures to control and, where necessary, temporarily suspend activities which contribute to the risk of the respective limit values or
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The Commission shall take every measure to financially and technically support the Member States without undue delay in drawing up or implementing the short-term action plans, at the request of the Member State, in order to swiftly ensure the health and well-being of citizens affected.
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 4 4. When Member States have drawn up a short-term action plan, they shall make available to the public and to appropriate organisations such as environmental organisations and organisations promoting human health, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, healthcare professionals, other relevant health-
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall submit short- term action plans to the Commission within 2 months after their adoption. The Commission shall promote the exchange of best practices among Member States through the EU Clean Air Forum on short-term plans and may issue guidance on the content of those plans.
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Within one year after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall adopt guidelines setting out best practice actions to take to reduce air pollution from air pollution hotspots for the drawing-up of short-term action plans. These examples shall be updated regularly.
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where transboundary transport of air pollution from one or more Member State contributes
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where transboundary transport of air pollution from one or more Member State contributes significantly to the exceedance of any limit value,
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (new) (a) In the event of accidental pollution events with cross-border effects, EU Member States and those sharing a border with the EU shall establish as a matter of urgency short-term joint action plans at local and cross-border level, including the establishment of joint teams of experts from the states affected, and shall notify the Commission as soon as possible of the situation and the measures taken.
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Member States concerned shall cooperate at national, regional and local level to identify the sources of air pollution and the
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Member States concerned shall cooperate with the other Member States and the European transboundary coordinator to identify the sources of air pollution and the measures to be taken to address those sources, and draw up joint activities, such as the preparation of joint or coordinated air quality plans pursuant to Article 19, in order to remove such exceedances .
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall respond to each other in a timely manner, and no later than
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall be informed of, and invited to be present
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 3 3. Member States and the European transboundary coordinator shall, if appropriate pursuant to Article 20, prepare and implement joint short-term action plans covering neighbouring zones in other Member States. Member States shall ensure that neighbouring zones in other Member States receive all appropriate information regarding these short-term action plans without undue delay
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that the public as well as appropriate organisations such as environmental organisations and organisations promoting human health, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive populations and vulnerable groups
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that the public as well as appropriate organisations such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive populations and vulnerable groups
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) air quality in accordance with Annex
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) any failure to provide the information required under Annex IX and the measures taken to rectify such failure;
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) air quality plans and air quality roadmaps as provided for in Article 19;
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) short-term action plans
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) the documentation sent to the Commission in relation to exceedances caused by natural sources referred to in Article 16(2);
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) air pollution sources and air pollutants affecting air quality;
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (d b) the documentation on site selection referred to in Annex IV, point 4, point D.
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the effects of exceedances of limit values,
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the effects of exceedances of limit values,
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Air quality information has to be accessible, transparent, real-time and include health-related messaging targeted also at vulnerable groups.
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make it available in a coherent and easily understandable manner through a public source providing an hourly update. The air quality index shall
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make it available through a public source providing an hourly update.
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make it available through a public source providing
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall ensure that information on symptoms associated with air pollution peaks and on air pollution exposure reduction and protection behaviours be displayed in an easy to understand format in areas and buildings frequented by sensitive population and vulnerable groups, such as social housing blocks, schools, playgrounds, and homes for the elderly.
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a (new) (a) Member States shall establish timely alert systems for cases in which limit values are exceeded at local, regional, national and cross-border levels, and shall work with the other Member States under joint action plans tailored to the event in question.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, Member States shall inform the public of the competent authority or body operating the sampling points established within their territory pursuant to Article 9 and Annex IV.
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. The information referred to in this
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. The information referred to in this Article shall be made available to the public free of charge by means of easily accessible media and communication channels in a coherent and easily understandable manner in accordance with Directive 2007/2/EC60and Directive (EU)2019/102461of the European Parliament and of the Council
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that information on ambient air quality is made available to the Commission within the required timescale in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5,
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. For the specific purpose of assessing compliance with the limit values, ozone target values, average exposure reduction obligations and critical levels , the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made available to the Commission no later than
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. For the specific purpose of assessing compliance with the limit values,
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. For the specific purpose of assessing compliance with the limit values,
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the changes made in that year to the list and delimitation of zones established under Article 6 or any NUTS
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the changes made in that year to the list and delimitation of zones established under Article 6 or any NUTS
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the list of zones and NUTS
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the list of zones and NUTS
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 The Commission is empowered to adopt
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the limit values,
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 24 shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 24 and in Annex IV(A)(1)(2a) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from … [date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 24 and in Annex IV(A)(1)(2a) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a directive Chapter VII – title VII ACCESS TO JUSTICE
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with their national legal system, members of the public
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with their national legal system, members of the public
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with their national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or another independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of all decisions, acts or omissions by Member States to be in compliance with this Directive including, but not limited to, those concerning air quality plans and air quality roadmaps referred to in Article 19, and short term action plans referred to in Article 20, of the Member State, provided that any of the following conditions is met:
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) where the applicable law of the Member State requires this as a precondition, the members of the public maintain the impairment of a right.
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall determine what constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right consistently with the objective of giving the public
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 704 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The interest of any natural legal person affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in, the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, and non-governmental organisation which is a member of the public concerned shall be deemed sufficient for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (a). Such natural persons and organisations shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (b).
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The interest of any natural person affected or likely to be affected by exceedances of air quality standards, or having an interest in the decision-making procedures related to the implementation of the obligations under this Directive, and any non-governmental organisation which is a member of the public
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The interest of any non-governmental organisation which is a member of the public concerned shall be deemed sufficient for the purposes of the first paragraph, point (
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. To have standing to participate in the review procedure shall not be conditional on the role that the member of the public
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. To have standing to participate in the review procedure shall not be conditional on the role that the member of the public
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 3 Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 3 3. The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate. Member States shall ensure that the courts or other independent and impartial review bodies are able to apply effective coercive measures, including by setting periodic penalty payments starting from the moment of the first infringement to the moment of attainment of compliance.
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 3 3. The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including injunctive relief as appropriate. Member States shall ensure that the courts or other independent and impartial review bodies are able to retain supervisory jurisdiction on the implementation of the order and to apply effective coercive measures.
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 3 3. The review procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective redress mechanisms, including in
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 4 Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 5 Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that natural persons who suffer damage to human health and well-being caused by a violation of the provisions of this Directive, including, but not limited to, Articles 13, 19(-1) to 19(4), 20(1) and 20(2), 21(1) second sub-paragraph and 21(3) of this Directive by a decision, act, or omission, delayed or ceased action by the competent authorities are entitled to compensation in accordance with this article.
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that natural persons who suffer damage to human health caused by a violation of the provisions under this Direcitive, including but not limited to Articles 13, 19(1) to 19(4), 20(1) and 20(2), 21(1) second sub- paragraph and 21(3) of this Directive by an omission, decision, act or delay therof of the competent authorities are entitled to compensation in accordance with this article.
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that natural persons who suffer damage to human health caused by a violation
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that natural persons who
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 2 Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that non-governmental organisations promoting the protection of human health or the environment and meeting
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 3 Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where a claim for compensation is supported by evidence showing that the violation referred to in paragraph 1 is
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where a claim for compensation is supported by evidence
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The respondent public authority shall be able to rebut this presumption. In particular, the respondent shall have the right to
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States shall ensure that, where the claimant has provided reasonably available evidence to support a claim for compensation and has reasonably substantiated that additional evidence lies in the control of the respondent or a third party, if requested by the claimant, the court or administrative authority is able to order that such evidence be disclosed by the respondent or the third party in accordance with national procedural law, subject to the applicable Union and national rules on confidentiality and proportionality. The violation of this Directive by the respondent shall be presumed when the respondent has failed to comply with an obligation to disclose evidence at its disposal, relevant for the assessment of the violation. Member States shall ensure that the person responsible for the violation shall have the right to rebut the presumption.
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States shall ensure that, where the claimant has reasonably substantiated that evidence lies in the control of the respondent, the court or administrative authority is able to order that such evidence be disclosed by the respondent in accordance with national procedural law and subject to applicable Union and national rules on confidentiality.
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 b (new) The violation of this Directive by the respondent shall be presumed when the respondent has failed to comply with an obligation to disclose evidence at its disposal pursuant to this paragraph.
Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. For the purpose of this Article, it shall be presumed that where limit values laid down in Section 1 of Annex I are exceeded, air pollution becomes harmful to human health and well-being of those exposed to it, in particular sensitive population and vulnerable groups, and it causes or contributes to the associated health effects. The association between the exceedance of the limit values and health effects shall be based on reliable relevant data, including, but not limited to, epidemiological studies.
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. For the purposes of this Article, air pollution in excess of the limit values specified in Article 13 and in Table 1 of Annex I, shall be presumed to be harmful to the health of those exposed to it, in particular sensitive population and vulnerable groups, and it causes or contributes to the associated health effects.
Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Member States shall lay down the appropriate rules to the effect that, in the event that following a full examination of the evidence, doubt remains as to whether a violation referred to in paragraph 1 caused or contributed to the occurrence of damage, the relevant courts shall reach a decision based on the precautionary principle and thereby fall in favour of the claimant.
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 5 Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 6 Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 2. The penalties referred to in paragraph 1 shall include fines proportionate to the
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 2 2. The penalties referred to in paragraph 1 shall include fines proportionate to the turnover of the legal person or to the income of the natural person having committed the
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (a a) real or estimated avoided cost of compliance;
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) b a) the amount of the benefits gained by the responsible person from the infringement;
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the population, including sensitive population and vulnerable groups, or the environment affected by the violation, and the harm caused taking into account the objective of achieving a high level of protection of human health and the environment;
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point d (d) the repetitive or singular character of the violation, including any previous receipt of an admonition penalty, administrative or criminal sanction.
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) The Commission shall adopt by [6 months after entry into force of this Directive] implementing acts laying down common criteria for determining the amount of financial penalties. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The amounts of financial penalties collected shall contribute to a clean air fund, independently managed with the active participation of the public and of appropriate organisations such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population groups and other relevant healthcare bodies. The Commission shall adopt by [6 months after entry into force of this Directive] implementing acts laying down common criteria for determining the amount of financial penalties, referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, and the setting up of clean air funds, referred to in paragraph 3a of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 763 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Member States shall ensure that the revenues from the financial penalties referred to in paragraph 1 are used in a fully transparent way to finance measures related to the improvement of air quality. The Commission may issue guidance on the use of the revenues, including for the setting up of clean air funds.
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a directive Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1, 2 and 3, Article 4, points (2), (13), (14), (16), (18), (19), (21), (22), points (24) to (30), points (36), (37), (38) and (39), Articles 5 to 12, Article 13(1), (2), (3), (6) and (7), Article 15, Article 16(1) and (2), Articles 17 to 21, Article 22(1), (2) and (4), Articles 23 to 29 and Annexes I to IX by [insert date :
source: 745.424
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and DemocratsNew
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats |
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/body |
Old
CSLNew
Council of the EU |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/body |
Old
CSLNew
Council of the EU |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/19 |
Old
New
|
docs/21 |
Old
New
|
docs/23 |
|
docs/24 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/summary/30 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/4/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/5/summary/25 |
Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6/type |
Old
Matter referred back to the committee responsibleNew
Matter referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations |
events/7/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/summary/23 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=60330&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=60330 |
events/12 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41360&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41360 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/1/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41380 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ENVI/9/10502 |
procedure/final |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60330&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2023-0318_en.docx |
docs/15 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2023-09-13T00:00:00New
2024-04-24T00:00:00 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 113
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 110
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/14 |
|
events/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/13 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2023-02-09T00:00:00New
2023-02-10T00:00:00 |
docs/14/date |
Old
2023-03-12T00:00:00New
2023-03-13T00:00:00 |
docs/15/date |
Old
2023-06-07T00:00:00New
2023-06-08T00:00:00 |
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-04-11T00:00:00New
2023-04-12T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-04-10T00:00:00New
2023-04-11T00:00:00 |
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-09-14T00:00:00New
2023-09-15T00:00:00 |
docs/19 |
|
docs/13 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/13 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2023-07-10T00:00:00New
2023-09-11T00:00:00 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/11 |
|
events/2 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2023-02-10T00:00:00New
2023-02-09T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-03-13T00:00:00New
2023-03-12T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-04-12T00:00:00New
2023-04-11T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2023-04-11T00:00:00New
2023-04-10T00:00:00 |
docs/9/date |
Old
2023-02-09T00:00:00New
2023-02-10T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-03-12T00:00:00New
2023-03-13T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-04-11T00:00:00New
2023-04-12T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2023-04-10T00:00:00New
2023-04-11T00:00:00 |
docs/9/date |
Old
2023-02-10T00:00:00New
2023-02-09T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-03-13T00:00:00New
2023-03-12T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-04-12T00:00:00New
2023-04-11T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2023-04-11T00:00:00New
2023-04-10T00:00:00 |
docs/9/date |
Old
2023-02-09T00:00:00New
2023-02-10T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-03-12T00:00:00New
2023-03-13T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-04-11T00:00:00New
2023-04-12T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2023-04-10T00:00:00New
2023-04-11T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2023-02-10T00:00:00New
2023-02-09T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2023-03-13T00:00:00New
2023-03-12T00:00:00 |
docs/8/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2023-02-09T00:00:00New
2023-02-10T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2023-03-12T00:00:00New
2023-03-13T00:00:00 |
docs/8/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
forecasts |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/1/title |
Old
Joint Declaration on EU legislative priorities for 2023 and 2024New
Joint Declaration 2023-24 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
commission |
|
docs/0/docs/1 |
|
events/0/docs/1 |
|