Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | CHASTEL Olivier ( Renew) | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP), LALUCQ Aurore ( S&D), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), MOŻDŻANOWSKA Andżelika Anna ( ECR), MACMANUS Chris ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 10, with 15 abstentions, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament’s consultation), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the VAT administrative cooperation arrangements needed for the digital age.
Parliament approved the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.
The proposal is part of the legislative package on the ‘VAT in the digital age’ initiative. It sets out the changes to be made to Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of VAT as a result of amendments to the VAT Directive. Members call for the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 to apply from 1 January 2026 and from 1 January 2027.
Central electronic VAT information system (central VIES)
The proposal aims to develop a new central system for the exchange of VAT information between Member States' tax administrations at EU level, tailored to the specificities of digital reporting requirements.
The resolution suggested that the performance of the VIES VAT number validation functionality should be improved. According to Members, to ensure a streamlined process, it is necessary for the central VIES to reflect, in real time, status updates regarding validations of bulk data and regarding company subscriptions to trading partners. It is necessary for such status updates to be reliable in terms of data quality and system stability.
Moreover, in the interest of simplification and limiting the compliance costs of both businesses, in particularly SMEs, and tax administrations, the Commission should develop a secure and reliable software to connect businesses and national administrations with central VIES.
Exchange of information
According to Members, the Commission should not have direct access to the data of individual tax payers. The Commission should provide technical support for a secured connexion to the central VIES by the officials who have been granted automated access to the central VIES.
The central VIES should be installed recurring to the most suitable technology available to protect citizens rights as taxpayers, namely the right to privacy, data protection and trade secrets.
Members suggested that the Commission should support national tax authorities with financial and human resources and technical advice in order to guarantee that national electronic systems are fully operational by 1 January 2030. During a transitional period until 1 January 2030, the Commission should assess the effectiveness of the central VIES and of the exchange of information procedures.
Improved cooperation
Parliament stressed the need to enable Member States, the European Public Prosecutor's Office, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Eurofisc and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) to combat VAT fraud more effectively.
Each Member State should grant, via a secure central interface that ensures confidentiality, automated access to the central VIES system:
- European Delegated Prosecutors and the relevant staff of the EPPO who hold a personal user identification for the central VIES and where that access is in connection with an investigation into suspected VAT fraud or is to detect VAT fraud;
- the relevant officials of OLAF, where that access is in connection with an investigation into suspected VAT fraud or is to detect VAT fraud;
- Europol staff who cooperate with EPPO in the framework of the Working Arrangement establishing cooperative relations between the EPPO and Europol, which entered into force on 19 January 2021, where the investigation aims to prevent and combat any form of serious organised and international crime and cybercrime and affecting the financial interests of the Union.
Each Member State should grant, via a secure central interface that guarantees confidentiality, automated access to the central VIES system to electronic systems carrying out swift exchange, processing and analysis of targeted information on cross-border fraud by Eurofisc and the EPPO.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament’s consultation), the report by Olivier CHASTEL (Renew, BE) on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the VAT administrative cooperation arrangements needed for the digital age.
The committee called on the European Parliament to approve the Commission’s proposal subject to the following amendments.
VIES VAT number validation functionality
The report suggested that the performance of the VIES VAT number validation functionality should be improved. According to Members, to ensure a streamlined process, it is necessary for the central VIES to reflect, in real time, status updates regarding validations of bulk data and regarding company subscriptions to trading partners. It is necessary for such status updates to be reliable in terms of data quality and system stability.
Moreover, in the interest of simplification and limiting the compliance costs of both businesses, in particularly SMEs, and tax administrations, the Commission should develop a secure and reliable software to connect businesses and national administrations with central VIES.
Exchange of information
The report stated that the Commission should not have direct access to the data of individual tax payers. The Commission should provide technical support for a secured connexion to the central VIES by the officials who have been granted automated access to the central VIES.
The central VIES should be installed recurring to the most suitable technology available to protect citizens rights as taxpayers, namely the right to privacy, data protection and trade secrets.
Members suggested that the Commission should support national tax authorities with financial and human resources and technical advice in order to guarantee that national electronic systems are fully operational by 1 January 2030. During a transitional period until 1 January 2030, the Commission shall assess the effectiveness of the central VIES and of the exchange of information procedures.
Improved cooperation
Members called for improved cooperation between all actors involved in the fight against VAT fraud, in particular EPPO, EUROFISC, EUROPOL and EUROJUST. They play a central role on the protection of public money and on the fight against fraud. Therefore, they should have access to all sources of data enabling them to fulfil their mandate, in particular the new upgraded VIES system.
PURPOSE: to develop a new central system for the exchange of VAT information between Member States’ tax administrations at EU level that is adapted to the specificities of digital reporting requirements.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: the proposal to amend Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 is an important part of the package. The VAT in the Digital Age package modernises the way cross-border transactions within the single market are reported for VAT purposes to make use of well-established technology and address VAT fraud. The current way of collecting aggregated data through recapitulative statements and exchanging data through the VAT Information Exchange System has been in use since the introduction of the single market in 1993. It is no longer fit for purpose in light of the scale of cross-border transactions and the level of VAT fraud.
The amended VAT Directive replaces recapitulative statements with new, transaction-based reporting obligations . To complement these changes, the amended Regulation provides for the necessary practical rules on how these newly collected data will be exchanged between Member States, the IT infrastructure required, and the personal data protection rules that will govern the new exchanges. These details are necessary to ensure that the new rules are implemented smoothly and that the new measures can reduce VAT fraud.
This proposal is part of the package of legislation on the VAT in the Digital Age initiative, together with a proposal for a Council Directive on amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age, and the proposal for a Council implementing Regulation amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards information requirements for certain VAT schemes.
CONTENT: the Commission proposal sets out modifications required to Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation and the fight against fraud in the field of VAT stemming from changes to the VAT Directive.
The main objective of the proposal is to modernise VAT reporting obligations , by introducing digital reporting requirements, which will standardise the information that needs to be submitted by taxable persons on each transaction to the tax authorities in an electronic format. At the same time it will impose the use of e-invoicing for cross-border transactions.
More specifically, the proposal lays down the following provisions:
Central electronic system for VAT information (the central VIES)
The proposal seeks to develop a new central system for the exchange of VAT information between Member States’ tax administrations at EU level that is adapted to the specificities of digital reporting requirements. It establishes the central VIES system by determining that the Commission should develop, maintain, host and technically manage the central system, while each Member State should develop, maintain, host and technically manage a national electronic system to automatically transmit different categories of information to the central VIES.
Member States should make all necessary updates and adopt measures in order to ensure that the central VIES data is kept up-to-date and is complete and accurate. The information should remain available in central VIES for five years from the end of the year in which the information was transmitted to the central VIES.
Phasing out the existing VIES system
The proposal also deals with the phase out of the legacy VIES. The existing VIES system needs to be retained for two years after establishing the central VIES system in order to facilitate the controls of transactions which were reported with recapitulative statements, prior to the introduction of the digital reporting requirements.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0422/2023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0324/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.002
- Contribution: COM(2022)0703
- Committee draft report: PE746.901
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6315/2022
- Contribution: COM(2022)0703
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 113 28.03.2023, p. 0026
- Document attached to the procedure: N9-0023/2023
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0393
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0394
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0703
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0393
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0394
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 113 28.03.2023, p. 0026 N9-0023/2023
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6315/2022
- Committee draft report: PE746.901
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.002
- Contribution: COM(2022)0703
- Contribution: COM(2022)0703
Votes
VAT: administrative cooperation arrangements for the digital age – A9-0324/2023 – Olivier Chastel – Commission proposal #
Amendments | Dossier |
64 |
2022/0409(CNS)
2023/06/20
ECON
64 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (bb) officials of the OLAF as authorized by the Director General of the Office and and where that access is in connection with an investigation into suspected VAT fraud or is to detect VAT fraud;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Each Member State shall grant automated access to the central VIES, in a secure and confidential system to:
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) European Delegated Prosecutors and staff of the EPPO which has been designated by the EPPO for that purpose;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 2 – point d (d) the electronic systems carrying out
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Amendments to Regulation (EU) 904/2010 applicable from 1 January 203
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Article 1, shall apply from 1 January 202
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 Article 2 shall apply from 1 January 202
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 Article 3 shall apply from 1 January 202
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 Article 4 shall apply from 1 January 203
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital -1 (new) (-1) The current EU VAT system which was introduced in 1993 is similar to the European customs system. However, equivalent checks are lacking, which makes it a target for cross-border fraud.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The current VAT system would perform better if intra-community supplies were taxed as if they were domestic transactions. A Council Directive proposal amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of the detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States was released in 2018 and remains under discussion. The provision included in the amended Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 strengthen both the current system and a definitive VAT system.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The existing cooperation between Member States’ tax authorities is based on exchanging aggregated information between national electronic systems. The introduction of DRR aims to increase the effectiveness of tax collection procedures by providing transaction-by-
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In order to enable Member States and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, to fight VAT fraud more effectively, a central electronic VAT information exchange system (‘central VIES’) for sharing VAT information should be established. That system should receive, from national electronic systems of Member States information about intra- Community transactions as reported by the respective suppliers and acquirers in different Member States. That system should also receive from Member States the VAT identification information of taxable persons making intra-Community
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The VAT identification information of taxable persons making intra- Community transactions should be automatically updated in the central VIES without undue delay whenever identification information changes, except where Member States agree that such update is not pertinent, essential or useful. Such updates are necessary because the validity of the VAT identification numbers of taxable persons is subject to verification as regards the condition for exempting intra-
Amendment 50 #
(8) To assist Member States in their fight against VAT fraud and to detect fraudsters, VAT identification information and VAT information on intra-Community transactions should be retained for 5 years. That period constitutes the minimum period necessary for Member States and, if appropriate, the EPPO to carry out controls effectively and investigate suspected VAT fraud or detect such fraud. It is also proportionate considering the massive volume of the intra-Community transaction information and the sensitivity of the information as commercial and personal data.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) All data collected should, for security reasons and economic sovereignty, be stored physically within the Union.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Access to the information in the central VIES should be provided to national tax authorities on a need-to-know basis. That information should not be used for other purposes than to monitor the correct application of VAT and combat VAT fraud. All users should be bound by the confidentiality rules laid down in this Regulation. The exchange of information procedures and the access to data must be pursued in full compliance with the EU legal framework on data protection.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To fight VAT fraud, Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials as referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 should be able to access and analyse VAT information on intra- Community transactions. To monitor the correct application of VAT laws, Member States’ officials who check whether the exemption of VAT for certain imported goods, which is laid down in Article 143(1), point (d), of Directive 2006/112/EC, applies, should also be able to access VAT identification information that is stored in the central VIES. Moreover, for the same reasons, Member States’ competent authorities should select other officials who need to have direct access to the central VIES and grant them such access where needed. Finally, duly accredited persons of the Commission should be able to access the information contained in the central VIES, but only to the extent that such access is necessary for the development and maintenance of that
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To fight VAT fraud, Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials as referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 should be able to access and analyse VAT information on intra- Community transactions. To monitor the correct application of VAT laws, Member States’ officials who check whether the exemption of VAT for certain imported goods, which is laid down in Article 143(1), point (d), of Directive 2006/112/EC, applies, should also be able to access VAT identification information that is stored in the central VIES. Moreover, for the same reasons, Member States’ competent authorities should select other officials who need to have direct access to the central VIES and grant them such access where needed. Finally, duly accredited persons of the Commission should be able to access the information contained in the central VIES, but only to the extent that such access is necessary for the development and maintenance of that
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To fight VAT fraud, Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials as referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 and the EPPO should be able to access and analyse VAT information on intra-
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) To investigate suspected VAT fraud and to detect such fraud, the information systems supporting the Eurofisc network in the fight against VAT fraud, including the Transaction Network Analysis system and the central electronic system of payment information (“CESOP”), and the EPPO should have direct access to the central VIES.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The EPPO should also have direct access to the central VIES in so far as necessary for the performance of its tasks, as laid down in Article 4 of Council Regulation 2017/1939, and in accordance with Article 43 of that Regulation.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) The mechanism by which carousel fraud functions has been clearly laid out by the European Commission in a document published on 16 April 2004: Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the use of administrative cooperation arrangements in the fight against VAT fraud.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right of protection of personal data laid down in Article 8 of the Charter. In that regard, this Regulation strictly limits the amount of personal data that will be made available to the tax authorities. Access by tax authorities to information on the personal purchases of individuals poses a serious risk to privacy. The processing of intra- Community transaction information pursuant to this Regulation should
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation s
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) In keeping with the public interest and the financial interests of the Union, whistle blowers should enjoy effective legal protection, in order to facilitate the detection and prevention of all forms of fraud.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 was previously amended to take into account the role of Europol and OLAF. It should also reflect the role of the EPPO. As laid down in Article 13(1) of Regulation 2017/1939, the European Delegated Prosecutors of the EPPO act on behalf the EPPO in their respective Member States and have the same powers as national prosecutors in respect of investigations, prosecutions and bringing cases to judgment. In this capacity, they may engage with the Eurofisc liaison official in their respective Member State. They should be granted the same power in their capacity as European Delegated Prosecutors, in line with Article 43 of Regulation 2017/1939. In so far as necessary for the performance of the tasks of EPPO, direct reporting from Eurofisc to EPPO should be authorised. Selected staff of the EPPO should also be allowed to request information from Eurofisc.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – title Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 applicable from 1 January 202
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) – point v b (new) and point v c (new) (1a) in Article 2(1), the following points are added: ‘(va) “European Delegated Prosecutors” means officials employed by the EPPO referred to in Article 13 of Council Regulation 2017/1939; (vb) “officials of the EPPO” means officials employed by the EPPO as defined in Article 2 point 4 of Regulation 2017/1939; (vc) “officials of the OLAF” means officials employed by the European Anti- Fraud Office (OLAF) as set up by Regulation 883/2013 and to whom the Director General granted investigations powers.’
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) and point v b (new) (1a) in Article 2, pargraph 1, the following points are added: '(va) European Delegated Prosecutors” means the staff of the EPPO referred to in Article 13 of Council Regulation 2017/1939; (vb) staff of the EPPO” means staff of the EPPO as defined in Article 2 point 4 of Regulation 2017/1939.'
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) (3a) in Article 17, the following paragraph is inserted: ‘1a. The information referred to in paragraph 1 collected through e-invoicing and e-reporting shall not be stored outside the territory of the Union.’
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) (3a) in Article 17, the following paragraph is inserted: '1a. The information referred to in paragraph 1 collected through e-invoicing and e-reporting shall not be stored outside the territory of the Union.'
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 33 – paragraph 1 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 33 – paragraph 1 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (3c) in Article 33(2), the following point is added: ‘(da) cooperate with the EPPO and OLAF, within their respective mandate and competences according to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office investigations’
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (3c) in Article 33, paragraph 2, the following point is added: ‘(da) cooperate with the EPPO within its respective mandate and competences.’
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 d (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 36 – paragraph 5 a (new) (3d) in Article 36, the following paragraph is added: ‘(5a) In so far as necessary for the performance of their tasks, European Delegated Prosecutors may request relevant information from any Eurofisc working field coordinator located in the same Member State as the European Delegated Prosecutor. In so far as necessary for the performance of their tasks, staff of the EPPO which has been designated by the EPPO for that purpose may request information from any Eurofisc working field coordinator located in one of the Member States that participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO. To that end, Eurofisc may conclude a working arrangement with EPPO setting out the details of the cooperation between Eurofisc and the EPPO.’
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 d (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 36 – paragraph 5 a (new) (3d) in Article 36, the following paragraph is added: ‘(5a) In so far as necessary for the performance of their tasks, European Delegated Prosecutors may request relevant information from any Eurofisc working field coordinator located in the same Member State as the European Delegated Prosecutor. In so far as necessary for the performance of their tasks, staff of the EPPO which has been designated by the EPPO for that purpose may request information from any Eurofisc working field coordinator located in one of the Member States that participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO. To that end, Eurofisc may conclude a working arrangement with EPPO setting out the details of the cooperation between Eurofisc and the EPPO.’
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47b – paragraph 3 3. Where a taxable person making use of one of the special schemes laid down in Title XII, Chapter 6, Sections 2, 3 and 5, of Directive 2006/112/EC is excluded from that special scheme, the Member State of identification shall inform the competent authorities of the other Member States
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47d – paragraph 2 2. The Member State of identification shall transmit the information referred to in paragraph 1 by electronic means to the competent authority of the Member State of consumption or the Member States from and to which the goods have been dispatched or transported at the latest
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47i – paragraph 5 5. Where the requesting Member State of consumption or Member State from or to which the goods have been dispatched or transported does not receive the records within 30 days of the date of the making of the request, that Member State may take
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47j – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to Article 7(4), if the Member State of consumption or the Member State from or to which the goods have been dispatched or transported decides that an administrative enquiry is required, it shall first consult with the Member State of identification on the need for such an enquiry
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47la – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall provide that, upon request, a taxable person submits the requested records by electronic means to the Member State in which that taxable person is identified for VAT purposes. Member States shall only accept th
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 47la – paragraph 5 5. Where the requesting Member State in which those supplies are taxable does not receive the records within 30 days of the date of the making of the request, that Member State may take
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – title Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 applicable from 1 January 202
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – title Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 applicable from 1 January 202
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24g – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall develop, maintain, host and technically manage an electronic, central VAT information exchange system (“central VIES”) for the purposes referred to in Article 1. The Commission should provide for a secured connexion to the central VIES by the officials authorized in Article 24k (1).
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation 904/2010/EU Article 24g – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall develop,
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24g – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The central VIES must be installed recurring to the most suitable technology available to guarantee citizens rights, as taxpayers, namely the right to privacy, data protection and professional, industrial or commercial secrecy; the Commission must regularly assess the effectiveness of the central VIES and evaluate the added value of the use of new technologies, in full cooperation with national tax authorities.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24g – paragraph 2 – introductory part Each Member State shall develop, maintain, host and technically manage, with technical support from the Commission, a
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24g – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The central VIES must be fully operational by 1 January 2029; the Commission must support national tax authorities with financial and human resources and technical advise in order to guarantee that national electronic systems are fully operational by 1 January 2030; a transitional period must be defined until 1 January 2030 to assess the effectiveness of the system and the exchange of information procedures.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall enter the information referred to in Article 24g(2) into the central VIES without undue delay.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24 – paragraph 5 5. By way of derogation from paragraph 4 of the Article, the information referred to in Article 24g(2), point (a), shall be entered into the central VIES no later than
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 6 6. The information referred to in Article 24g(2) shall be available in central VIES for 5 years from the end of the year in which the information was transmitted to it and by the taxpayer for 10 years.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24h – paragraph 6 6. The information referred to in Article 24g(2) shall be available in central VIES for
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24i – paragraph 2 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24j – paragraph 1 – point a (a) to store the information referred to in points (b), (c) and (d) of this Article and Article 24g(2) of this Regulation
Amendment 96 #
(c) to aggregate information in respect of persons to whom a VAT identification number was issued and collected pursuant to Article 213 of Directive 2006/112/EC and make the following details accessible to the officials or electronic systems referred to in Article 24k, in a secure and confidential system:
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24j – paragraph 1 – point e (e) to make the information referred to in Article 24g(2) and in points (b), (c) and (d) of this Article accessible to the officials or electronic systems referred to in Article 24k, in a secure and confidential system.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State shall grant
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 24k – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) European Delegated Prosecutors and officials of the EPPO which have been designated by the EPPO for that purpose and whom shall be granted a personal user identification for the central VIES and and where that access is in connection with an investigation into suspected VAT fraud or is to detect VAT fraud;
source: 749.002
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=28030202 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:113:TOC |
docs/6/date |
Old
2023-03-22T00:00:00New
2023-03-23T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2023-05-21T00:00:00New
2023-05-22T00:00:00 |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
forecasts/1 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/3 |
|
commission |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2023-03-23T00:00:00New
2023-03-22T00:00:00 |
docs/3/date |
Old
2023-03-22T00:00:00New
2023-03-23T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
docs/0/docs/1 |
|
events/0/docs/1 |
|