Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | LANGENSIEPEN Katrin ( Verts/ALE) | DE MEO Salvatore ( EPP), PENKOVA Tsvetelina ( S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew), BIELAN Adam ( ECR), PELLETIER Anne-Sophie ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 611 votes to 3, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on the AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.
Parliament recalled that accessibility is an essential precondition for persons with disabilities to fully enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms. It is one of the general principles of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which is legally binding on the EU and its Member States.
More than 87 million people in the EU have some form of disability. Member States must ensure that the principle of accessibility is mainstreamed at all levels, not only in buildings, spaces and public transport, but also in health and education, and to increase the mobility and integration of people with disabilities.
Improving the implementation of legislation
Parliament welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).
The EU has put in place a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market, which includes, inter alia , the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for stations and vehicles. However, Members regretted that the implementation of this legislation varies considerably from one Member State to another and is not satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts .
The resolution therefore stressed the need to improve overall knowledge , as well as practical and theoretical expertise, of accessibility policies among public administrations, economic operators and society in general. In this context, the Centre should be an important resource for providing knowledge and support to Member States during the implementation phase.
Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation and on Member States to ensure the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through the use of EU funds.
Structure
Parliament called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. It considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.
Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.
Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.
Mandate
Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
The Centre should in particular:
- establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors;
- encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies , and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;
- identify and assist in addressing gaps and inconsistencies in existing legislation, to make policy recommendations for the updating and development of accessibility legislation, mainstreaming accessibility into all relevant policies under the responsibility of different Commission Directorates-General;
- generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;
- provide the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;
- support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.
- help overcome inconsistencies between the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and EU policies, and to help Member States achieve the primary objective of increasing the employment rate of people with disabilities.
Standardisation system
Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Katrin LANGENSIEPEN (Greens/EFA, DE) on AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.
The report welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).
Members argued that greater accessibility outcomes in society can only be achieved if the Centre adopts the holistic approach of ‘ universal design ’, particularly with regard to the physical environment, transport, information, communication and services, but also in public procurement and tendering.
Insufficient implementation
In recent years, the European Union has approved several pieces of legislation and technical standards that have created a new accessibility ecosystem, such as the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for railway stations and vehicles. In addition, accessibility requirements must be considered when allocating EU funds and awarding public contracts.
However, the implementation of this essential body of legislation at national level has not been satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility specialists.
The report stressed the need to improve the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical specialist knowledge , of accessibility policies within public administrations, economic operators and society in general, in order to help develop relevant, sustainable and affordable solutions in each Member State, and thus improve the implementation of current and future accessibility requirements.
Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation, and on Member States to guarantee the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds.
Structure
The report called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. They considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.
Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.
Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.
Mandate
Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
The Centre should in particular:
- establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors, as well as through the creation of tools aiming to facilitate the implementation of Union law;
- encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies, and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;
- generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;
- play a key role in providing the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;
- support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.
Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)656
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0339/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0209/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.598
- Committee draft report: PE730.040
- Committee draft report: PE730.040
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.598
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)656
Activities
- Heidi HAUTALA
- Dita CHARANZOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ádám KÓSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan ŠTEFANEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne-Sophie PELLETIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Laura HUHTASAARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik BERGKVIST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alessandra BASSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Leszek MILLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Geert BOURGEOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław DUDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Centre AccessibleEU à l’appui des politiques d’accessibilité dans le marché intérieur de l’Union - AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market - Zentrum „AccessibleEU“ zur Unterstützung der Strategien für Barrierefreiheit im Binnenmarkt der EU - A9-0209/2022 - Katrin Langensiepen - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
89 |
2022/2013(INI)
2022/05/02
IMCO
89 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 — having regard to the general comments on the CRPD
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 26 b (new) — having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1300/2014 of 18 November 2014 on the technical specifications for interoperability relating to accessibility of the Union's rail system for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility1a , _________________ 1a OJ L 356, 12.12.2014, p. 110.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas persons with disabilities have equal rights on an equal basis with others in all fields of life and have the inalienable rights to dignity, equal treatment, independent living, autonomy and full participation in
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas more than 87 million persons in the Union have some form of disability, and given the ageing demographic in the Union;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas around 80 million people in the Union are affected by a disability to some degree;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas accessibility to physical and virtual environments, to information and communications, including ICT and the related systems, to goods and services, including transportation and infrastructure, both in urban and remote areas, is a prerequisite to ensure the full participation of persons with disabilities in society and enables equal rights on an equal basis with others;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas accessibility is an essential precondition for the full participation of persons with disabilities in society in a level playing field and for the effective enjoyment of all of their human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas Member States must ensure that accessibility becomes mainstreamed at all levels, not only in public buildings, areas and transport, but also in health and education, as well as to increase mobility and integration of people with disabilities;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A f (new) Af. whereas accessibility is a prerequisite to enabling persons with disabilities to participate fully in society on an equal basis and to effectively enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the CRPD defines ‘universal design’ as the design of products, environments, programmes and services to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialised design and without excluding assistive devices for particular groups of persons with disabilities; whereas accessibility is one of the CRPD’s general principles, and the EU and Member States are legally bound by the CRPD under Council Decision 2010/48/EC; whereas General Comment No. 2 on the CRPD notes the obligation of State parties to adopt action plans and strategies to identify existing barriers to accessibility, set time frames with specific deadlines and provide both the human and material resources necessary to remove the barriers; whereas accessibility is crucial for enjoyment of rights of persons with disabilities to privacy, non- discrimination, employment, inclusive education, political participation, and other rights enshrined by the CRPD.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas according to Article 9 of the CRDP on accessibility, in order ‘to enable persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully in all aspects of life, States Parties shall take appropriate measures to ensure to persons with disabilities access, on an equal basis with others, to the physical environment, to transportation, to information and communications, including information and communications technologies and systems, and to other facilities and services open or provided to the public, both in urban and in rural areas';
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 — having regard to the general comments on the CRPD as the authoritative guidance on its implementation, in particular General Comment No.2 - Article 9: Accessibility (adopted on 11 April 2014);
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas local authorities play a crucial role in the implementation of social policies, including policies on disability and accessibility;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas ensuring high-quality and affordable
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Union has established a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the internal market, notably with the adoption of specific accessibility legislation such as Directive (EU) 2019/882, and includes accessibility obligations in different sectorial legislation, including in the EU funds regulations;
Amendment 23 #
Ca. whereas the correct implementation of policies related to disabilities will contribute positively to the competitiveness of the EU's internal market and therefore represents an integral resource for the EU economy.
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas assistive technologies will foster the full inclusion of persons with disabilities in society, and will help to reduce disparities among Member States;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the high levels of employment of people with disabilities, greater accessibility and greater inclusion of this group in the workforce has a clear economic potential;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 1 (new) -1. Welcomes the Commission's Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030, whose aim is to ensure that all persons with disabilities in Europe can enjoy their rights, take part in society and in the economy under equal conditions and no longer be the subject of discrimination.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative, announced in the Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030, to establish
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative, announced in the European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, to establish the AccessibleEU Centre (‘Centre’), which aims to increase the coherence
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative, announced in the European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, to establish the AccessibleEU Centre (‘Centre’), which aims to increase coherence in implementing harmonised accessibility policies, and to facilitate access to relevant knowledge and skills, promoting a culture of equal opportunities and full participation in society for persons with disabilities, by means of collaboration and cooperation with public administrations, civil society in the area of disability, accessibility experts and users;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 — having regard to Regulation (E
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the evaluation of the European Disability Strategy 2010- 2020 showed that it contributed to improving the situation in a number of areas; however, that persons with disabilities still face considerable barriers in access to healthcare, education, transport, built environment, ICT, employment, recreation activities, as well in participation in political life and other areas of life;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the Centre could play a crucial role in promoting the creation of a common standard of accessibility among Member States, so that persons with disabilities will be aware of the circumstances while moving across the EU, empowering their right to work, live or travel freely within the EU;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that increasing employment levels of people with disabilities should be a primary goal to be achieved through the work of the Centre, through the involvement of and close cooperation with civil society organisations and businesses;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that greater accessibility outcomes in society can only be achieved if the Centre follows the ‘universal design’ approach; emphasises the need to ensure that
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that greater accessibility outcomes in society can only be achieved if the Centre follows the ‘universal design’ approach; emphasises the need to ensure that this approach is duly taken into account in all areas of accessibility to the physical environment, transport, information, communication and services, in particular
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the EU has established a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market, including but not limited to the European Accessibility Act, Web Accessibility Directive, Directives on audiovisual media services and electronic communications, technical specifications for railway stations and vehicles; regrets, however, that the implementation of such crucial legislation has not yet been satisfactory, mostly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts; stresses the need for improving the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical expertise, on accessibility policies among public administrations and economic operators, in order to help find suitable solutions in each Member State, and therefore improve the implementation of accessibility legislation;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the EU has established a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market, based on the mandate of the CRPD; regrets, however, that the implementation of such crucial legislation has not yet been satisfactory, mostly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts; stresses the need for improving the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical expertise, on accessibility policies among public administrations and economic operators and society in general, in order to help find suitable solutions in each Member State;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the EU has established a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market; regrets, however, that the implementation of such crucial legislation remains underway or, where applied, has not yet been satisfactory, mostly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts; stresses the need for improving the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical expertise, on accessibility policies among public administrations and
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the EU has established a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market; regrets, however, that the implementation of such crucial legislation has not yet been satisfactory, mostly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts; stresses the need for improving the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical expertise, on accessibility policies among public administrations and economic operators, in order to help find suitable, sustainable and affordable solutions in each Member State;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls attention to the fact that the degree of implementation of the accessibility mandate of the CRPD varies widely between Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 — having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive)8
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the fact that the extent to which the mandate of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has been implemented varies considerably between Member States; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts to further harmonisation;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Believes that the absence of a coordination and cooperation framework between the EU, the Member States
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Believes that the absence of a coordination and cooperation framework between the EU, the Member States and the relevant stakeholders within both the private and public sector represents a further obstacle to the implementation of accessibility laws and to the harmonised enforcement across the EU;
Amendment 44 #
4. Believes that the absence of a coordination and cooperation framework between the EU, the Member States and the relevant stakeholders from the public and private sector represents a further obstacle to the implementation of accessibility laws and to the harmonised enforcement across the EU;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to ensure adequate and sufficient funding for the functioning of the Centre, both in terms of financial and human resources, and calls on the Member States to significantly increase resources for the enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds; stresses that a sufficient and ambitious funding is an imperative for effective public policies on accessibility as well as for achieving progress on a wide range of topics such as visibility of invisible disabilities, harmonisation of national disability cards or accessibility standards.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to ensure adequate funding and human resources for the functioning of the Centre, and calls on the Member States to increase resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to ensure adequate funding for the establishment of and functioning of the Centre, and calls on the Member States to increase resources for the enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to ensure adequate funding for the functioning of the Centre, and calls on the Member States to
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to ensure adequate funding for the functioning of the Centre, and calls on the Member States to
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) — having regard to the
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to provide the Centre with sufficient resources to promote its activities and to have efficient communication actions towards various audiences, in particular organisations representing persons with disabilities and civil society in general; stresses that the Centre should become a key reference and a major player at a European level on disability policies and issues;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and lead the work of the Centre; underlines that the
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and lead the work of the Centre; underlines that the forum should guarantee the balanced participation of stakeholders and right-holders with suitable experience in the field of accessibility; stresses that equal gender representation should be ensured; underlines also that the participation of disability civil society organizations and of persons with disabilities and their families themselves must be ensured as an essential part of the Centre’s work;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and lead the work of the Centre; underlines that the forum should guarantee the balanced participation of stakeholders from the public and private sector and right- holders with suitable experience in the field of accessibility; stresses that
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and lead the work of the Centre; underlines that the forum should guarantee the balanced participation of stakeholders
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and lead the work of the Centre; underlines that the forum should guarantee the balanced participation of stakeholders and right-holders with suitable experience in the field of accessibility; stresses that equal gender representation should be ensured; stresses the need to ensure that disability civil society organisations and persons with disabilities themselves and their families participate as an essential part of the Centre’s work;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that the Centre must have a physical seat in one of the 27 Member States and, to that end, any Member State may apply to host the Centre’s seat;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that the AccessibileEU Centre must have physical headquarters established in one of the 27 Member States of the Union; stresses that any Member State may apply to host the headquarters of the Centre;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Requests the Commission to develop the nomination process and proposes the following assessment criteria: level of development and implementation of accessibility in the candidate country, volume of legislative activity in defence of accessibility from a human rights approach and with an age and gender perspective, existence of spaces for dialogue and effective participation of disability civil society in the construction of the political and legislative agenda on accessibility, implementation of accessibility projects built in co-governance between public administration, public institutions, the business world, academia, civil society and persons with disabilities and their families;
Amendment 59 #
6b. Calls on the Commission to draw up the application process on the basis of the following assessment criteria: – extent of accessibility progress and implementation in the candidate Member States; – number of legislative acts on accessibility, taking account of fundamental rights and matters of age and gender; – existence of spaces for dialogue and participation of the public administration with disability civil society in the development of the country’s political and legislative agenda; – implementation of accessibility projects built in co-governance between the public and private sector, along with academia, civil society and people with disabilities and their families;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 b (new) — having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘New Consumer Agenda’ (COM(2020)696),
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the specific challenges posed by particular domains of accessibility policies, such as built environment, public procurement, digital
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the specific challenges posed by particular domains of accessibility policies, such as built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the specific challenges posed by particular domains of accessibility policies, such as built environment, transport, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, emerging technologies, and assistive technologies; believes, therefore, that specialised sub-groups of experts are needed for certain areas; is convinced that these groups should work closely with the Centre and the Member States in order to guarantee better assessment, implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility-related legislation;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to establish national accessibility centres, including contact points, and mirror groups of experts to work hand in hand with the Centre on implementing, monitoring and enforcing accessibility legislation; believes that the national accessibility centres should facilitate exchange and coordination among relevant stakeholders and rights-holders, including economic operators, national authorities responsible for accessibility and sectorial legislation implementation and organisations of persons with disabilities; believes that subject matter experts of the Centre should provide guidance and training to all relevant stakeholders; believes that such groups could help finding accessibility solutions which take into account the national specificities;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Centre should function as a hub which
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Centre should function as a hub which provides relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States when implementing Union law with regular assistance and expertise relating to accessibility policies and technical requirements; believes that the Centre should establish a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all users groups, in particular organisations representing persons with disabilities, civil society organisations, academia and professionals from all areas of accessibility and consumer rights, in order to guarantee harmonised enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy learning and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices; as well as to develop tools and standards aiming to facilitate the implementation of Union law; believes that in order to ensure effective participation of all stakeholders and rights-holders, the Centre should follow the "universal design" approach and ensure accessibility for all persons with disabilities in their proceedings, and calls all Member States to ensure this approach in relation to national accessibility centres and mirror groups;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Centre should function as a hub which provides relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States when implementing Union law with regular assistance and expertise relating to accessibility policies and technical requirements; believes that the Centre should establish a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all users groups, in particular organisations representing persons with disabilities, civil society organisations, academia and professionals from all areas of accessibility, in order to guarantee harmonised enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy learning and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices; believes that the Centre should also conduct audits and provide advice to other European institutions and bodies on their internal accessibility policies and practises;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Centre should function as a hub which
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the Centre should function as a hub which provides relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States when implementing Union law with regular assistance and expertise relating to accessibility policies and technical requirements; believes that the Centre should establish a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all users groups, in particular organisations representing persons with disabilities, civil society organisations, academia and
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the potential benefits of the Centre in supporting the Commission’s work, inter alia identifying and helping overcome gaps and inconsistencies in current legislation, providing policy recommendations for updating and developing accessibility laws, mainstreaming accessibility in all relevant policies under the responsibility of different Directorates General of the Commission, conducting projects that explore innovative ways to implement accessibility, assisting in drafting technical accessibility specifications, and helping EU agencies and bodies with accessibility- related matters;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 25 a (new) — having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air1 a, _________________ 1a OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 1.
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the Centre should provide research and studies to both the Commission and the Member States, as well as specialised and comparable information and fully accessible data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility laws; highlights that these actions would help accessibility policies to be solidly based on users’ requirements and experiences; stresses that the Centre should help address gaps in the collection of statistical data at national level on the situation of persons with disabilities;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the Centre should
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the Centre
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the Centre should provide research and studies to both the Commission and the Member States, as well as specialised and comparable information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility laws; highlights that these actions would help accessibility policies to be solidly based on
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the role of the Centre would be essential in providing Member States, stakeholders and right- holders with constant support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through training and guidance documents in a
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the role of the Centre would be essential in providing the Commission and Member States, stakeholders and right-
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the role of the Centre would be essential in providing knowledge and support to Member States, stakeholders and right-
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the role of the Centre would be
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes that the European Accessibility Act, (EEA) which will apply from 28 June 2025, will introduce significant new requirements in respect of accessibility for products and services; stresses that the Centre should be an important resource to provide knowledge and support to Member States in preparing the effective implementation of the EEA;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes the important role of the Centre in ensuring effective mainstreaming of accessibility in relevant sectorial legislation and policies, including by identifying priority areas where accessibility should be improved;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 25 a (new) — having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air1a, _________________ 1a OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 1
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes that implementing accessibility policies requires a high degree of technical expertise and is not sufficiently included in higher education programmes, thus leading to a lack of qualified accessibility experts in the public and private sectors across domains; stresses that the Centre should provide training to professionals, EU and national public officials and to relevant stakeholders and right-holders;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes that implementing accessibility policies requires a high degree of technical expertise and
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regrets that the standardisation system does not adequately allow persons with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders when drafting accessibility standards; considers that the Centre should appoint technical experts to the standardisation committees and, where possible, should assist the
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regrets that the standardisation system does not adequately allow persons with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders when drafting accessibility standards; regrets the over-representation of business interests among designated experts that influences the outcome of Union's accessibility legislation and standards; considers that the Centre should appoint technical experts to the standardisation committees and, where possible, should assist the Commission in drafting technical specifications by involving all relevant stakeholders and right-holders;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 86 #
15. Calls on the Commission to assess the developments in accessibility-related policies regularly and
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to assess the developments in accessibility-related policies regularly and to
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to monitor the work of the Centre and its achievements through yearly reports to be presented to the European Parliament;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Calls on the Commission to conduct an assessment five years after the creation of the Centre to evaluate its effectiveness and the added value in enhancing accessibility policies within the EU; underlines that based on this assessment, the Commission should take appropriate steps to update and improve the Centre;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 25 a (new) — having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2016 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air1a, _________________ 1a OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 1.
source: 731.598
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
forecasts/1 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/2/summary |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0209_EN.html
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0209_EN.html
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2022-09-12T00:00:00New
2022-10-03T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
events/2/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/1 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-731598_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-730040_EN.html
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|