Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando ( S&D) | MANDL Lukas ( EPP), KÖRNER Moritz ( Renew), FREUND Daniel ( Verts/ALE), GARRAUD Jean-Paul ( ID), JAKI Patryk ( ECR), ARVANITIS Konstantinos ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the 2022 Rule of Law Report - the rule of law situation in the European Union.
The resolution stressed that it is necessary to strengthen and streamline existing mechanisms and to develop a single comprehensive EU mechanism to protect democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights effectively and to ensure that Article 2 TEU values are upheld throughout the Union. Parliament has been addressing issues in Hungary, Malta, Poland, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain. However, the Commission and the Council have continued to dismiss the need for an interinstitutional agreement on an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights.
Overall assessment of the report
Parliament welcomed the Commission’s third annual rule of law report as part of the Commission’s rule of law toolbox. It noted improvements compared to previous annual reports, such as the addition of country-specific recommendations. The Commission is encouraged to deepen its participation in public debates at local, regional and national levels and to invest more in awareness-raising about the Union values and applicable tools, including the annual report, particularly in the countries where serious concerns exist. Members expressed support for the Commission’s efforts to upgrade the reporting methodology and considered that the expansion of scope of the report should go hand in hand with an increase in resources .
On the other hand, Parliament regretted the worrying trends with respect to freedom of the press, media pluralism and the safety of journalists in several Member States and called on the Commission to closely monitor the situation of the media in future editions of the report, including media ownership and the funding of public service media, as well as to provide recommendations and follow-up through adequate policy and legal measures.
It condemns disruptive political interference in editorial decisions, abusive lawsuits (SLAPPs) and the illegal surveillance of journalists, especially through the use of spyware.
Furthermore, the resolution acknowledged the important role of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) in safeguarding the rule of law and in combating corruption in the Union, and encouraged the Commission to closely monitor Member States’ level of cooperation with the EPPO in subsequent reports. Parliament called on the Member States which have not yet done so to join the EPPO.
Country-specific recommendations
Parliament welcomed the addition of country-specific recommendations as they help to target specific issues with a view to achieving real improvements in Member States. It deplored, however, the fact that the recommendations are not binding . The Commission is called on to develop the annual rule of law cycle further by assessing the implementation of the country-specific recommendations in the next annual report, with specific benchmarks and a clear timeline for implementation, clearly indicating progress and regression.
More specifically, Members regretted the fact that many of the recommendations are too vague and lack the specificity required to ensure effective implementation.
Parliament also called on the Commission to:
- pursue the consistent and meaningful involvement of civil society in both the preparation of and the follow-up to the report at national level;
- further invest, through dedicated funding, in building capacity for civil society organisations to monitor and report on the rule of law situation in the Member States, and to ensure adequate protection to civil society engaging in this process;
- consider direct management of EU funds to ensure that end beneficiaries receive the EU funding intended for them.
Parliament also regretted the lack of cooperation by some Member States’ authorities with Parliament’s Committee of Inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware .
Outstanding calls from Parliament on the annual rule of law report
The resolution set out the outstanding calls from Parliament such as, inter alia :
- the inclusion in the annual report of important elements such as the prevention of the abuse of powers, equality before the law and non-discrimination;
- including a new separate chapter on the Union’s institutions, which would assess the situation in relation to the separation of powers, the anti-corruption framework, accountability and checks and balances;
- the creation of an independent panel of experts to advise the three institutions, in close cooperation with the Fundamental Rights Agency;
- the creation of a direct link between the annual rule of law reports, among other sources, and the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2023)265
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0094/2023
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0191/2023
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0189/2023
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0190/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.843
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.843
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0189/2023
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0190/2023
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0191/2023
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2023)265
Activities
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicolaus FEST
Institutional Motions (1)
- Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola BEER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vlad GHEORGHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport 2022 sur l'état de droit - la situation de l'état de droit dans l'Union européenne - 2022 Rule of Law Report - The Rule of Law situation in the European Union - Bericht über die Rechtsstaatlichkeit 2022 – Die Lage der Rechtsstaatlichkeit in der Europäischen Union - B9-0189/2023 - § 1 - Am 27 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 1 - Am 28 #
B9-0189/2023 - § 11 - Am 29 #
B9-0189/2023 - § 12 - Am 30S #
B9-0189/2023 - § 12/2 #
B9-0189/2023 - § 13 - Am 31S #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 13 - Am 32 #
B9-0189/2023 - § 16 - Am 33 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 17 - Am 6 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 17 - Am 34 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 18 - Am 35 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le § 19 - Am 36 #
B9-0189/2023 - § 25 - Am 37S #
B9-0189/2023 - § 27 - Am 38S #
B9-0189/2023 - Visa 6 - Am 7S #
B9-0189/2023 - Visa 22 - Am 8S #
B9-0189/2023 - Visa 24 - Am 9S #
B9-0189/2023 - Visa 26 - Am 10S #
B9-0189/2023 - Visa 28 - Am 11S #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le visa 37 - Am 12 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le visa 37 - Am 15 #
B9-0189/2023 - Considérant A - Am 18 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant A - Am 13 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant A - Am 19 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant A - Am 14 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant A - Am 16 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant A - Am 17 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant B - Am 20 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant C - Am 21 #
B9-0189/2023 - Considérant D - Am 22S #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant E - Am 23 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant E - Am 24 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant E - Am 25 #
B9-0189/2023 - Après le considérant F - Am 26 #
Amendments | Dossier |
132 |
2022/2898(RSP)
2023/01/05
LIBE
132 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Citation 6 Amendment 10 #
Citation 22 Amendment 100 #
Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Points out, similarly to the previous year, the fact that the independence of lawyers and bar associations is unconditionally interlinked with the independence of other actors of the judiciary and is therefore a part of the independence of the justice system; regrets, therefore, that the issue is not taken properly into consideration by the Commission and requests that in the 2023 Rule of law Report there is a more developed analysis of the independence of lawyers and bar associations as indispensable component of the independence of the justice system, due process and of the rule of law;
Amendment 101 #
Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Stresses that, in order to prevent foreign interference in the Member States democracies and sovereignty as well as meddling with the EU democratic institutions, the NGOs must make public their funding sources; underlines that, in order to respect the transparency principle and the right to know of the European citizens, all European bodies must disclose and publish a list with all the NGOs they finance;
Amendment 102 #
Paragraph 12 Amendment 103 #
Paragraph 12 12. Reiterates its call on the Commission to expand the scope of its reporting to cover all values enshrined in Article 2 TEU; reiterates the intrinsic link between the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights; urges the Commission and the Council to immediately enter into negotiations with Parliament on an interinstitutional agreement on an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, which should cover the full scope of Article 2 TEU values; deplores that human rights violation on migrants happening at the EU external borders are not part of the assessment made by the Commission;
Amendment 104 #
Paragraph 12 12. Reiterates
Amendment 105 #
Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 106 #
Paragraph 12 12. Reiterates its call on the Commission to expand the scope of its reporting to cover all values enshrined in Article 2 TEU
Amendment 107 #
Paragraph 12 a (new) Amendment 108 #
Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Reminds the Commission that serious breaches with respect to corruption among members of government, high level politicians, media, independence and integrity of judges and prosecutors are taking place in Austria for many years now without the Commission taking any concrete actions as it does in the case of other Member States3a _________________ 3a https://www.politico.eu/article/austrian- court-convicts-on-heinz-christian-strache- on-corruption-charges/ https://orf.at/stories/3293604/ https://democracy- reporting.org/en/office/EU/publications/a ustrian-presidential-elections-and-the- rule-of-law https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch- scandal-serves-as-a-warning-for-europe- over-risks-of-using-algorithms/
Amendment 109 #
Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Welcomes the step taken by the Commission in including in its report the implementation of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decisions by Member States as an indicator of quality and respect for the rule of law; calls on the Commission to extend this analysis to the implementation of national court rulings;
Amendment 11 #
Citation 24 Amendment 110 #
Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to include a new separate chapter on the Union’s institutions, which would assess the situation in relation to separation of powers, accountability and checks and balances;
Amendment 111 #
Paragraph 12 b (new) Amendment 112 #
Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 113 #
Paragraph 13 13. Strongly regrets th
Amendment 114 #
Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Emphasises that any discussions about sanctions against a Member State must be based solely on objective and technical criteria and not on political considerations or motivations;
Amendment 115 #
Paragraph 14 14. Str
Amendment 116 #
Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 117 #
Paragraph 14 14. Strongly condemns
Amendment 118 #
Paragraph 15 Amendment 119 #
Paragraph 15 Amendment 12 #
Citation 26 Amendment 120 #
Paragraph 15 15. Reiterates the recommendations to the Commission to differentiate between systemic and individual breaches, and to accompany the country-specific recommendations with deadlines for implementation, targets and concrete actions to be taken; is concerned that biased distribution of funding in some countries impacts civil society organisations (CSOs) working on rights of vulnerable groups or working in general for causes that governments do not support; encourages a thorough assessment of these issues in all countries covered by the report and stresses the need for country recommendations addressing these issues; urges the Commission to consider direct management of EU funds so as to also ensure that end beneficiaries, including CSOs working with vulnerable groups, receive EU funding intended for them;
Amendment 121 #
Paragraph 15 15. Re
Amendment 122 #
Paragraph 16 Amendment 123 #
Paragraph 16 Amendment 124 #
Paragraph 16 16. Recalls its position regarding the involvement of a panel of independent experts to advise the three institutions, in close cooperation with the FRA; repeats its call on the Commission to invite the FRA to provide methodological advice and conduct comparative research to add detail in key areas of the annual report, given the intrinsic links between fundamental rights and the rule of law; asks its Bureau, in light of the reluctance of the Commission and the Council, to organise a public procurement procedure in order to create such a panel under the auspices of Parliament, in line with the commitment undertaken in its previous resolutions1a, in order to advise Parliament on compliance with Article 2 TEU values in different Member States and to show by example how such a panel could work in practice; _________________ 1a Resolutions of 24 June 2021 on the Commission’s 2020 Rule of Law Report and of 19 May 2022 on the Commission’s 2021 Rule of Law Report
Amendment 125 #
Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 126 #
Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Reiterates its call on the Commission to consider a more comprehensive and ambitious revision of the FRA Regulation; calls on the Commission, therefore, to explore in the long-term the full potential of developing the FRA in accordance with principles relating to the status and functioning of national institutions for the protection and promotion of human rights (the Paris Principles) in order for it to become a fully independent body providing impartial and publicly available positions on country-specific situations in the field of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights; underlines that such development should go hand in hand with an increase in available resources for the FRA;
Amendment 127 #
Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Considers that cooperation with the Council of Europe and other international organisations is of particular relevance for advancing democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in the EU; calls on the Commission to analyse systematically data on non-compliance with judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and views of the UN Treaty Bodies concerning individual communications;
Amendment 128 #
Paragraph 17 Amendment 129 #
Paragraph 17 Amendment 13 #
Citation 28 Amendment 130 #
Paragraph 17 17. Re
Amendment 131 #
Paragraph 17 17. Reiterates that the annual rule of law cycle should serve as input for the activation of other instruments to respond to threats or breaches of the rule of law at national level, such as Article 7 TEU, the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation
Amendment 132 #
Paragraph 18 18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council
Amendment 14 #
Citation 30 Amendment 15 #
Citation 31 Amendment 16 #
Citation 35 a (new) — having regard to its resolution of 24 November 2022 on the assessment of Hungary’s compliance with the rule of law conditions under the Conditionality Regulation and state of play of the Hungarian RRP,
Amendment 17 #
Citation 38 a (new) — having regard to GRECO´s Fourth Evaluation Round - Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors - Second Interim Compliance Report - Austria - published on the 20st of April 2022,1a _________________ 1a https://rm.coe.int/fourth-evaluation- round-corruption-prevention-in-respect- of-members-of/1680a63353
Amendment 18 #
Citation 38 b (new) Amendment 19 #
Citation 38 c (new) Amendment 2 #
Citation 6 Amendment 20 #
Citation 38 d (new) Amendment 21 #
Citation 38 e (new) — having regard to the fact that with respect to its 16 recommendations to the Netherlands regarding the prevention of corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, GRECO concludes that the Netherlands have satisfactorily implemented none of the 16 recommendations contained in the Fifth Round 16 Evaluation Report and eight recommendations have been partly implemented and eight have not been implemented,
Amendment 22 #
Citation 38 f (new) — whereas Article 2 TEU applies to the European Union and the Rule of Law Report should cover primarily the EU institutions, especially since they have long been accused of democratic deficit;
Amendment 23 #
Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 24 #
Recital A A. whereas the Union is founded on the common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including
Amendment 25 #
Recital A A. whereas the Union is founded on the common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities – values that are common to the EU Member States and to which candidate countries must adhere in order to join the Union as part of the Copenhagen criteria, which cannot be disregarded or reinterpreted after accession, especially by the Commission and the Court of Justice; whereas democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights are mutually
Amendment 26 #
Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas there is not yet an agreed definition of the rule of law and a single system to assess the compliance with the rule of law at the level at the Union, equally applied to all Member States;
Amendment 27 #
Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union are mandatory for the member states as long as they do not contravene their national constitutions;
Amendment 28 #
Recital B Amendment 29 #
Recital B B. whereas the Conference on the Future of Europe clearly expressed a desire for the EU to systematically uphold the rule of law across all Member States, to protect citizens’ fundamental rights and to retain the EU’s credibility when promoting its values abroad; whereas the European Parliament Delegation did not give its consent to the draft proposals of the Conference on the Future of Europe unanimously; whereas the Council reserved its position on each individual proposal; whereas there was no consensus among the national parliaments;
Amendment 3 #
Citation 11 — having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Social Charter, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights, and the conventions, recommendations, resolutions, opinions and reports of the Parliamentary Assembly, the Committee of Ministers, the Human Rights Commissioner, the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance, the Steering Committee on Anti- Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion
Amendment 30 #
Recital B B. whereas the Conference on the Future of Europe clearly expressed a desire for the EU to systematically uphold the rule of law across all Member States, to protect citizens’ fundamental rights and to retain the EU’s credibility when promoting its values within the EU and abroad;
Amendment 31 #
Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas there is no commonly accepted legal definition of the concept of the ‘rule of law’ at EU level and the Commission seeks to attribute a subjective set of values and principles to it;
Amendment 32 #
Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 33 #
Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the supreme law of each state, validated through the direct vote of the citizens, is the Constitution, and considering that the European citizens rejected to adopt a European Super- Constitution, the European Treaties cannot themselves fulfil the role of the European Constitution and prevail over the national constitutions;
Amendment 34 #
Recital D Amendment 35 #
Recital D Amendment 36 #
Recital D D. whereas the addition of concrete and legally binding country-specific recommendations would help Member States to prevent, detect and address
Amendment 37 #
Recital D D. whereas the addition of concrete
Amendment 38 #
Recital E Amendment 39 #
Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the Commission has blatantly violated the transparency principle and negotiated with the pharmaceutical companies contracts regarding the manufacturing of the anti- COVID-19 vaccines, which, to this day, are not fully published;
Amendment 4 #
Citation 12 Amendment 40 #
Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas the European Ombudsman has conducted an investigation at the end of 2021 regarding the Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla about the exchange of personal texts and calls related to the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines, which the Commission has refused to disclose afterwards; whereas the Ombudsman found that this behaviour constituted maladministration, as the exchanges took place in the context of negotiations on a contract for the procurement of vaccines that was later concluded;1a _________________ 1a https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/rec ommendation/en/151678
Amendment 41 #
Recital E c (new) Ec. Whereas the European Public Prosecutor's Office has announced on the 14th of October 2022 that there is an ongoing investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU and the fact that the exceptional confirmation comes after the extremely high public interest into the matter;
Amendment 42 #
Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 43 #
Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 44 #
Recital F F. whereas it is necessary to strengthen and streamline existing mechanisms and to develop a single comprehensive EU mechanism to protect democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights effectively and to ensure that Article 2 TEU values are upheld throughout the Union as well as
Amendment 45 #
Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas since May 2022, the Parliament has also addressed the rule of law situation in Hungary, Malta and Poland in its plenary resolutions; whereas Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights Monitoring Group has also addressed certain issues in Bulgaria, Greece, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain;
Amendment 46 #
Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas transparency is one of the key founding elements of the European Union and, despite this fact, the Commission had not disclose the name of authors of none of the Rule of law reports, which raises doubts about the objectivity, accuracy and professionalism of these reports;
Amendment 47 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 48 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 49 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Citation 13 Amendment 50 #
Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s third annual rule of law report as part of the Commission’s rule of law toolbox; considers that
Amendment 51 #
Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s third annual rule of law report as part of the Commission’s rule of law toolbox; considers that while the report represents a step towards a coherent mechanism to
Amendment 52 #
Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the 2020 Rule of Law report, the 2021 and the current one, do not have the name of the authors who wrote the report; calls on the Commission to be fully transparent about the report and disclose in the report the name of the experts who wrote it;
Amendment 53 #
Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 54 #
Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 55 #
Paragraph 2 2. Notes some improvements compared to previous annual reports,
Amendment 56 #
Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 57 #
Paragraph 2 2. Notes some improvements compared to previous annual reports, such as the addition of country-specific recommendations;
Amendment 58 #
Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges the Commission to actively participate in public debates at local, regional and national level and to invest more into awareness-raising about the Union values and applicable tools, including the annual report, especially in those countries where there are serious concerns; encourages the Commission to devote greater efforts to deepening the analysis, and invites the Commission to ensure proper resources for that; believes that more time should be devoted to the Commission’s country visits, including onsite;
Amendment 59 #
Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Condemns the Commission for its unequal treatment of the Member States described in the reports; condemns especially the Commission's different treatment of the same or similar legal solutions in different Member States; condemns the Commission for trying to impose ideological and religious solutions on Member States, in particular on LGBT and abortion;
Amendment 6 #
Citation 14 Amendment 60 #
Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Council and the Commission to provide adequate funding for an independent and European-wide, national, regional an d local quality journalism that investigates in particular where violations and shortcomings have been identified;
Amendment 61 #
Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Calls on the Commission to launch a dedicated programme that supports innovative initiatives with the aim of promoting formal and informal education with regard to the rule of law and democratic institutions among EU citizens of all ages, in particular among legal professionals;
Amendment 62 #
Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Regrets worrying trends with respect to freedom of the press, media pluralism and safety of journalists in several member states and calls on the Commission to closely monitor situation of the media in future editions of the report, as well as to provide recommendations and follow up through adequate policy and legal measures; expresses serious concern about the impunity afforded to Maltese high public officials implicated in corruption and money laundering that was reported by murdered investigative Daphne Caruana Galizia; affirms that journalists will be at risk as long as institutions remain unable to or unwilling to prosecute corruption exposed by journalists; expresses concern about an attempt by the government of Slovenia to change media law in an urgent procedure without sufficient public debate and consultation, thereby undermining confidence in the independence of public broadcaster;
Amendment 63 #
Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Stresses the special role national councils of judiciary play in protecting independence of courts and judges against political interference; deplores the continued politicisation of those bodies in Poland and Hungary as well as the devastating effect this has on the independence and integrity of their justice systems; strongly regrets the inability of the government in Spain to renew the General Council of Judiciary, which compromises its ability to perform its tasks effectively, and undermines the stability of the judiciary as a whole;
Amendment 64 #
Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Acknowledges the important role of European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) in guarding the rule of law and anti-corruption in the Union, and encourages the Commission to closely monitor the level of cooperation of member states with EPPO in subsequent reports; calls on the member states who have not done so yet to join the EPPO;
Amendment 65 #
Paragraph 2 g (new) 2g. Points out that the prosecution service is a key element in fighting crime, corruption and abuse of power; stresses the need for safeguards to be put in place to ensure the independence of the prosecution service and individual prosecutors so that they are free from undue political pressure, especially from the government, while meeting necessary conditions of accountability to prevent abuse of negligence; expresses its solidarity and support to all victims of crime;
Amendment 66 #
Paragraph 3 Amendment 67 #
Paragraph 3 Amendment 68 #
Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 69 #
Paragraph 4 Amendment 7 #
Citation 16 Amendment 70 #
Paragraph 5 Amendment 71 #
Paragraph 5 5. Highlights that t
Amendment 72 #
Paragraph 5 5. Highlights that the intentional
Amendment 73 #
Paragraph 5 5. Highlights that the intentional targeting of minority groups’ rights in some Member States has created and established momentum elsewhere, as can be evidenced by backtracking on the rights of women, including a deterioration in the situation
Amendment 74 #
Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to include country chapters of all candidate and potential candidate countries to EU enlargement with an in-depth analysis on their justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, on media freedom and pluralism, as well as on institutional checks and balances;
Amendment 75 #
Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 76 #
Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 77 #
Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 78 #
Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the addition of country- specific recommendations, as a follow up to the reiterated calls from Parliament to this end; recalls that the annual reports serve as a basis for informed discussions on the rule of law situation in Member States; acknowledges that these country- specific recommendations help to target specific issues with a view to achieving real improvements in Member States; deplores, however, the fact that the recommendations are not binding; calls on the Commission to develop the annual rule of law cycle further by assessing the implementation of the country-specific recommendations in the next annual report, with specific benchmarks and a clear timeline for implementation, clearly indicating progress and regression;
Amendment 79 #
Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the addition of country- specific recommendations, as a follow up to the reiterated calls from Parliament and civil society to this end; recalls that the annual reports serve as a basis for informed discussions on the rule of law situation in Member States and in EU institutions; acknowledges that these country-
Amendment 8 #
Citation 18 Amendment 80 #
Paragraph 7 Amendment 81 #
Paragraph 7 Amendment 82 #
Paragraph 8 Amendment 83 #
Paragraph 8 Amendment 84 #
Paragraph 8 Amendment 85 #
Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 86 #
Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Is concerned about the complaints from NGOs, professional associations of magistrates and Member States about the objectivity of the Rule of Law Reports and the sources of information chosen by the Commission;
Amendment 87 #
Paragraph 9 9. Commends the efforts by the Commission to engage better with national stakeholders; recognises civil society as an essential actor for the rule of law, with an important role to play in the follow-up to the annual report and its implementation; calls on the Commission to pursue the consistent and meaningful involvement of civil society in both the preparation and the follow-up to the report at national level, in cooperation with the FRA; including by allowing sufficient time to contribute to the process and reaching out extensively to civil society organisations in country visits; calls on the Commission to secure a more inclusive, transparent and user- friendly approach to the cycle, to ensure meaningful stakeholder participation and accountability throughout the process; calls on the Commission to further invest, through dedicated funding, in building capacity for CSOs to monitor and report on the RoL situation in the Member States, and to ensure adequate protection to civil society engaging in the process;
Amendment 88 #
Paragraph 9 9. C
Amendment 89 #
Paragraph 9 9. Co
Amendment 9 #
Citation 19 a (new) — having regard to the report of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights of 10 September 2020 on Anti-Semitism: Overview of anti- Semitic incidents recorded in the European Union,
Amendment 90 #
Paragraph 9 9. Commends the efforts by the Commission to engage better with national stakeholders; recognises civil society as an essential actor for the rule of law, with an important role to play in the follow-up to the annual report and its implementation; calls on the Commission to pursue the consistent involvement of civil society in the follow-up to the report at national level
Amendment 91 #
Paragraph 9 9. Commends the efforts by the Commission to engage better with national stakeholders; recognises civil society as an essential actor for the rule of law, with an important role to play in the follow-up to the annual report and its implementation; calls on the Commission to pursue the consistent involvement of civil society in
Amendment 92 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Acknowledges the crucial role civil society and healthy civic space play for upholding and protecting the rule of law and reiterates its call to dedicate a separate chapter to the condition of civil society in Member States; calls on the Commission to monitor the impact of the Citizens Equality Rights and Values programme on the civil society in Member States;
Amendment 93 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for a more systematic presentation of the contributions made by civil society, in particular those made by groups of qualitative value such as associations of judges, lawyers and prosecutors, in order to supplement the information provided by the governments of the Member States;
Amendment 94 #
Paragraph 10 10. Stresses th
Amendment 95 #
Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need for country- specific
Amendment 96 #
Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 97 #
Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the absence of country- specific recommendations related to Member States’ unlawful use of surveillance spyware technologies, such as Pegasus or Predator, in spite of the concrete revelations on, and increasing evidence of, their use against journalists, politicians, law enforcement officials, diplomats, lawyers, business people, civil society actors and other actors; is extremely concerned about the related risks to civil society, democracy, the rule of law
Amendment 98 #
Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 99 #
Paragraph 11 11. Regrets the absence of country- specific recommendations related to Member States’ unlawful interference of intelligence agencies in the judiciary as well as the use of surveillance spyware technologies, such as Pegasus or Predator, in spite of the concrete revelations on, and increasing evidence of, their use against journalists, politicians, law enforcement officials, diplomats, lawyers, business people, civil society actors and other actors; is extremely concerned about the related risks to civil society, democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights posed by national governments’ uncontrolled use of spyware; regrets the lack of cooperation by some Member States’ authorities with Parliament’s Committee of Inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware;
source: 739.843
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
2022 Rule of Law Report - The rule of law situation in the European UnionNew
Resolution on the 2022 Rule of Law Report – the rule of law situation in the European Union |
docs/4 |
|
events |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting plenary debate/voteNew
Procedure completed |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
forecasts/1/title |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2023-0189_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2023-0190_EN.html
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2023-0191_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|