Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | ||
Former Responsible Committee | ENVI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Former Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | VIRKKUNEN Henna ( EPP) | |
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57_o, TFEU 114, TFEU 168-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 57_o, TFEU 114, TFEU 168-p4Events
The European Parliament adopted by 488 votes to 67, with 34 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human use and establishing rules governing the European Medicines Agency, amending Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 and Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006.
The position adopted by the European Parliament at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope
The proposed regulation: (i) lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, (ii) establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the monitoring and management of shortages and critical shortages and the security of supply of medicinal products and (iii) lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency.
Environmental risk assessment
The environmental risk assessment of medicinal products consisting of or containing genetically modified organisms should include the identification and characterisation of risks to the environment, animals and human health throughout the life-cycle of the medicinal product, including its production, and the risk reduction and mitigation strategies proposed to address the identified risks.
Combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
In order to support the development of antimicrobials and address existing market failures, Members wish to introduce market entry rewards and intermediate reward payment systems. Accordingly, they suggested developing a milestone payment reward scheme , complemented by a subscription model voluntary joint procurement scheme, should be developed to ensure that a market exists for developers that delink volumes sold from payment received.
Milestone payments are an early-stage financial reward granted upon achieving certain R&D objectives prior to market approval. While such mechanisms would serve primarily to provide access to existing antimicrobials, they could also support new antimicrobials in the development phase.
Granting the right to a transferable data exclusivity voucher
Following a request by the applicant for a marketing authorisation, made before the marketing authorisation is granted, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, grant a transferable data exclusivity voucher to a ‘priority antimicrobial’, under certain conditions based on a scientific assessment by the Agency. The voucher should give the right to its holder to a maximum of additional 12 months of data protection for one authorised medicinal product.
The Commission should adopt delegated acts by setting up the eligibility of pathogens for the protection periods referred to in the regulation in accordance with the WHO priority pathogens list or an equivalent established at Union level, with 12 months of data protection for an authorised product ranked ‘critical’ , 9 months of data protection for those ranked ‘high’ and 6 months of data protection for those ranked ‘medium’.
A voucher should only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if that product is within its first four years of regulatory data protection. The voucher should not be used for a product which already benefited from the maximum regulatory data protection period.
By five years from the date of entry into force of this regulation, the Commission should submit an evaluation report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a scientific assessment measuring the progress with regard to antimicrobial research and development and the effectiveness of the incentives and rewards in this regulation.
Agency’s scientific advice
The Agency should, to the greatest extent possible, ensure that there is a separation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a given medicinal product developer and those subsequently responsible for the evaluation of the marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product. The Agency should ensure that at least one of the two rapporteurs for a marketing authorisation application has not taken part in any pre-submission activities concerning the medicinal product.
Orphan drugs
Orphan drugs (medicines developed to treat rare diseases) would benefit from up to 11 years of market exclusivity if they address a high unmet medical need. By 24 months from the date of entry into force of this regulation, the Commission should, following a consultation with the Member States, patient organisations and other relevant stakeholders, propose a needs-driven and goals-based Union Framework for Rare Diseases with a view to better framing and coordinating Union policies and programmes.
Transparency
To increase transparency of scientific assessments and all other activities, a user-friendly European medicines web-portal should be created and maintained by the Agency. The portal should provide information for all centrally authorised medicinal products, inter alia on safety, efficacy, environmental risk, patient populations, and where relevant information on antimicrobial resistance, shortages, and pending obligations for marketing authorisation holders. Sufficient budgetary resources should be allocated to the Agency to ensure its transparency obligations and commitments are appropriately implemented.
Medicine shortages
The marketing authorisation holder should notify and explain its decision to temporarily suspend the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State as soon as possible and no less than six months before the start of the temporary suspension of supply of that medicinal product into the market of a given Member State by the marketing authorisation holder.
The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. Information on such shortages should be made available on the European medicines web-portal provided for in this regulation.
When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to communicate the necessary information to patients, consumers and healthcare professionals, including on the estimated duration of the shortage and available alternatives, and manage those critical shortages.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to ensure the authorisation of high-quality medicinal products, including for paediatric patients and patients suffering from rare diseases throughout the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Union pharmaceutical framework has enabled the authorisation of safe, efficacious and high-quality medicines in the Union, contributing to a high level of public health and a smooth functioning of the internal market of these products.
The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by creating a modern framework that makes innovative and established medicinal products available to patients and healthcare systems at affordable prices, while ensuring security of supply and addressing environmental concerns.
Addressing unequal patient access of medicinal products has become a key priority of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe as has been highlighted by the Council and the European Parliament. Member States have called for revised mechanisms and incentives for development of medicinal products tailored to the level of unmet medical need, while ensuring patient access and availability of medicinal products in all Member States.
Previous amendments to the Union pharmaceutical legislation have addressed access to medicinal products by providing for accelerated assessment for marketing authorisation applications or by allowing conditional marketing authorisation for medicinal products for unmet medical need. While these measures accelerated the authorisation of innovative and promising therapies, these medicinal products do not always reach the patient and patients in the Union still have different levels of access to medicines.
The proposed revision of the pharmaceuticals legislation consists of this proposal for a new regulation and a proposal for a new directive, which will also cover orphan and paediatric medicinal products.
CONTENT: this proposal lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the security of supply of medicinal products and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
This Regulation will not affect the powers of Member States' authorities as regards setting the prices of medicinal products or their inclusion in the scope of the national health system or social security schemes on the basis of health, economic and social conditions. Member States may choose from the particulars shown in the marketing authorisation those therapeutic indications and pack sizes which will be covered by their social security bodies.
Objectives
The objectives of the proposal are the following:
- guarantee a high level of public health by ensuring the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products for EU patients;
- harmonise the internal market for the supervision and control of medicinal products and the rights and duties incumbent upon the competent authorities of the Member States;
- make sure all patients across the EU have timely and equitable access to safe, effective, and affordable medicines;
- enhance security of supply and ensure medicines are always available to patients, regardless of where they live in the EU;
- offer an attractive innovation-and competitiveness friendly environment for research, development, and production of medicines in Europe;
- make medicines more environmentally sustainable .
The proposed regulation includes the following main areas of revision :
- promoting innovation and access to affordable medicines creating a balanced pharmaceutical ecosystem;
- modulation of the length of the market exclusivity for orphan medicinal products. For rare disease medicines, the standard duration of market exclusivity would be 9 years with the possibility of granting a one-year extension of market exclusivity, based on patient access in all Member States concerned;
- paediatric investigation plans for medicinal products for children, based on a medicinal product’s mechanism of action;
- measures related to antimicrobials and provisions on transferable data exclusivity vouchers. A voucher system will provide ‘transferable data exclusivity vouchers’ under strict conditions to developers of new antimicrobials. Such a voucher will grant an additional year of regulatory data protection to the developer of the priority antimicrobial, which the developer can either use for any product in their own product portfolio or sell it to another marketing authorisation holder;
- strengthening the scientific and regulatory support of the European Medicines Agency, in particular for developers of medicines that address unmet medical needs;
- enhanced pre-authorisation scientific and regulatory support;
- temporary emergency marketing authorisation;
- improving security of supply of medicines;
- a framework for activities to be undertaken by Member States and the Agency to improve the EU's ability to respond in an effective and coordinated manner to support the management of medicines shortages at all times;
- EMA capacity to inspect sites located in non-EU countries;
- reducing regulatory burden and providing a flexible regulatory framework to support innovation and competitiveness;
- improved structure and governance of EMA and the regulatory network.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to ensure the authorisation of high-quality medicinal products, including for paediatric patients and patients suffering from rare diseases throughout the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Union pharmaceutical framework has enabled the authorisation of safe, efficacious and high-quality medicines in the Union, contributing to a high level of public health and a smooth functioning of the internal market of these products.
The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by creating a modern framework that makes innovative and established medicinal products available to patients and healthcare systems at affordable prices, while ensuring security of supply and addressing environmental concerns.
Addressing unequal patient access of medicinal products has become a key priority of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe as has been highlighted by the Council and the European Parliament. Member States have called for revised mechanisms and incentives for development of medicinal products tailored to the level of unmet medical need, while ensuring patient access and availability of medicinal products in all Member States.
Previous amendments to the Union pharmaceutical legislation have addressed access to medicinal products by providing for accelerated assessment for marketing authorisation applications or by allowing conditional marketing authorisation for medicinal products for unmet medical need. While these measures accelerated the authorisation of innovative and promising therapies, these medicinal products do not always reach the patient and patients in the Union still have different levels of access to medicines.
The proposed revision of the pharmaceuticals legislation consists of this proposal for a new regulation and a proposal for a new directive, which will also cover orphan and paediatric medicinal products.
CONTENT: this proposal lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the security of supply of medicinal products and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
This Regulation will not affect the powers of Member States' authorities as regards setting the prices of medicinal products or their inclusion in the scope of the national health system or social security schemes on the basis of health, economic and social conditions. Member States may choose from the particulars shown in the marketing authorisation those therapeutic indications and pack sizes which will be covered by their social security bodies.
Objectives
The objectives of the proposal are the following:
- guarantee a high level of public health by ensuring the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products for EU patients;
- harmonise the internal market for the supervision and control of medicinal products and the rights and duties incumbent upon the competent authorities of the Member States;
- make sure all patients across the EU have timely and equitable access to safe, effective, and affordable medicines;
- enhance security of supply and ensure medicines are always available to patients, regardless of where they live in the EU;
- offer an attractive innovation-and competitiveness friendly environment for research, development, and production of medicines in Europe;
- make medicines more environmentally sustainable .
The proposed regulation includes the following main areas of revision :
- promoting innovation and access to affordable medicines creating a balanced pharmaceutical ecosystem;
- modulation of the length of the market exclusivity for orphan medicinal products. For rare disease medicines, the standard duration of market exclusivity would be 9 years with the possibility of granting a one-year extension of market exclusivity, based on patient access in all Member States concerned;
- paediatric investigation plans for medicinal products for children, based on a medicinal product’s mechanism of action;
- measures related to antimicrobials and provisions on transferable data exclusivity vouchers. A voucher system will provide ‘transferable data exclusivity vouchers’ under strict conditions to developers of new antimicrobials. Such a voucher will grant an additional year of regulatory data protection to the developer of the priority antimicrobial, which the developer can either use for any product in their own product portfolio or sell it to another marketing authorisation holder;
- strengthening the scientific and regulatory support of the European Medicines Agency, in particular for developers of medicines that address unmet medical needs;
- enhanced pre-authorisation scientific and regulatory support;
- temporary emergency marketing authorisation;
- improving security of supply of medicines;
- a framework for activities to be undertaken by Member States and the Agency to improve the EU's ability to respond in an effective and coordinated manner to support the management of medicines shortages at all times;
- EMA capacity to inspect sites located in non-EU countries;
- reducing regulatory burden and providing a flexible regulatory framework to support innovation and competitiveness;
- improved structure and governance of EMA and the regulatory network.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)377
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0221/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0141/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0141/2024
- Specific opinion: PE759.054
- Committee opinion: PE754.772
- Specific opinion: PE757.314
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.081
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.080
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.138
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.137
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.136
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.134
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.133
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.132
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.131
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.135
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Committee draft report: PE753.550
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- EDPS: OJ C 000 14.11.2023, p. 0000
- EDPS: N9-0082/2023
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0193
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0192
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0193
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0194
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0193
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE753.550
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.138
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.137
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.136
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.134
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.133
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.132
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.131
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.135
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.081
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.080
- Specific opinion: PE757.314
- Committee opinion: PE754.772
- Specific opinion: PE759.054
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0141/2024
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0193
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0192
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0193 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0194
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)377
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- Contribution: COM(2023)0193
- EDPS: OJ C 000 14.11.2023, p. 0000 N9-0082/2023
Votes
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – Article 33, § 3 – Am 373 #
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – After Article 40 – Am 379 #
IT | PT | MT | FI | CY | LU | LT | EL | HR | IE | FR | LV | EE | SI | RO | NL | DK | AT | HU | BG | SK | BE | ES | CZ | SE | DE | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
57
|
21
|
4
|
13
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
10
|
5
|
12
|
70
|
7
|
6
|
6
|
18
|
26
|
13
|
18
|
16
|
14
|
14
|
19
|
52
|
20
|
21
|
84
|
42
|
|
Verts/ALE |
63
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (11) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11)Against (2) |
1
|
||||||||||
S&D |
120
|
Portugal S&DFor (6)Abstain (3) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
France S&DFor (7) |
1
|
2
|
Romania S&DFor (2)Against (2)Abstain (5) |
5
|
2
|
Austria S&DAbstain (5) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Spain S&DAbstain (16)
Alicia HOMS GINEL,
Clara AGUILERA,
Cristina MAESTRE,
César LUENA,
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA,
Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL,
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO,
Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ,
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ,
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR,
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA,
Marcos ROS SEMPERE,
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR,
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
|
1
|
5
|
Germany S&D |
Poland S&DAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
|||
The Left |
33
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
France The LeftFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Spain The LeftFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
Germany The Left |
||||||||||||||
NI |
34
|
Italy NIFor (6)Against (1) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Hungary NIFor (1)Against (10) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
ID |
45
|
France IDFor (2)Against (13) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Germany IDAgainst (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
57
|
Italy ECRAgainst (8) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ECRAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
Spain ECR |
4
|
3
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (21)
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA,
Anna ZALEWSKA,
Beata MAZUREK,
Beata SZYDŁO,
Bogdan RZOŃCA,
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI,
Elżbieta KRUK,
Elżbieta RAFALSKA,
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI,
Izabela-Helena KLOC,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI,
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA,
Karol KARSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Krzysztof JURGIEL,
Patryk JAKI,
Rafał ROMANOWSKI,
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
|||||||||||||
Renew |
92
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
France RenewAgainst (22)
Bernard GUETTA,
Catherine AMALRIC,
Catherine CHABAUD,
Christophe GRUDLER,
Dominique RIQUET,
Fabienne KELLER,
Gilles BOYER,
Guy LAVOCAT,
Ilana CICUREL,
Irène TOLLERET,
Jérémy DECERLE,
Laurence FARRENG,
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE,
Max ORVILLE,
Nathalie LOISEAU,
Pascal CANFIN,
Pierre KARLESKIND,
Salima YENBOU,
Sandro GOZI,
Stéphane BIJOUX,
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN,
Valérie HAYER
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
Netherlands RenewAgainst (6) |
Denmark RenewAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
Spain RenewFor (1)Against (8) |
Czechia RenewAgainst (5) |
3
|
Germany RenewAgainst (6) |
1
|
||||
PPE |
144
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
France PPEFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
Romania PPEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Austria PPEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
4
|
Spain PPEAgainst (12) |
4
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (6) |
Germany PPEAgainst (28)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christian EHLER,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Markus FERBER,
Marlene MORTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Niclas HERBST,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan BERGER,
Sven SIMON
Abstain (1) |
12
|
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – Article 134, before § 1 – Am 378 #
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – After recital 3 – Am 377 #
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – After recital 5 – Am 368 #
MT | CZ | EE | CY | HU | LU | HR | EL | LV | SI | FI | SK | DK | LT | BG | IE | AT | BE | PL | SE | NL | IT | RO | PT | FR | ES | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
2
|
19
|
6
|
4
|
16
|
5
|
5
|
7
|
7
|
6
|
12
|
14
|
11
|
9
|
12
|
12
|
18
|
18
|
38
|
21
|
26
|
55
|
18
|
20
|
68
|
52
|
83
|
|
ID |
43
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Germany IDFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
55
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Poland ECRFor (1)Abstain (20)
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA,
Anna ZALEWSKA,
Beata MAZUREK,
Beata SZYDŁO,
Bogdan RZOŃCA,
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI,
Elżbieta KRUK,
Elżbieta RAFALSKA,
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI,
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA,
Karol KARSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Krzysztof JURGIEL,
Patryk JAKI,
Rafał ROMANOWSKI,
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
3
|
Netherlands ECRFor (2)Abstain (3) |
Italy ECR |
1
|
Spain ECRAbstain (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||
NI |
33
|
1
|
Hungary NI |
1
|
1
|
Slovakia NIFor (2)Against (2) |
1
|
1
|
Italy NIFor (1)Against (6) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
The Left |
29
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Ireland The LeftAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
France The LeftFor (1)Against (3) |
Spain The LeftAgainst (5) |
Germany The LeftAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
65
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
3
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (23)
Alexandra GEESE,
Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG,
Daniel FREUND,
Erik MARQUARDT,
Hannah NEUMANN,
Henrike HAHN,
Jan OVELGÖNNE,
Jutta PAULUS,
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN,
Manuela RIPA,
Martin HÄUSLING,
Michael BLOSS,
Nico SEMSROTT,
Niklas NIENASS,
Patrick BREYER,
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA,
Rasmus ANDRESEN,
Reinhard BÜTIKOFER,
Romeo FRANZ,
Sergey LAGODINSKY,
Ska KELLER,
Terry REINTKE,
Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL
|
|||||||||||
Renew |
90
|
Czechia RenewFor (3)Against (2) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands RenewAgainst (7) |
3
|
3
|
France RenewAgainst (22)
Bernard GUETTA,
Catherine AMALRIC,
Catherine CHABAUD,
Christophe GRUDLER,
Dominique RIQUET,
Fabienne KELLER,
Gilles BOYER,
Guy LAVOCAT,
Ilana CICUREL,
Irène TOLLERET,
Jérémy DECERLE,
Laurence FARRENG,
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE,
Max ORVILLE,
Nathalie LOISEAU,
Pascal CANFIN,
Pierre KARLESKIND,
Salima YENBOU,
Sandro GOZI,
Stéphane BIJOUX,
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN,
Valérie HAYER
|
Spain RenewFor (1)Against (8) |
Germany RenewAgainst (6) |
||||
S&D |
116
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
2
|
Poland S&DAgainst (6) |
5
|
5
|
Romania S&DAgainst (9) |
Portugal S&DAgainst (9) |
France S&DAgainst (7) |
Spain S&DFor (1)Against (16)
Alicia HOMS GINEL,
Clara AGUILERA,
Cristina MAESTRE,
César LUENA,
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA,
Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL,
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO,
Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ,
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR,
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA,
Lina GÁLVEZ,
Marcos ROS SEMPERE,
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR
|
Germany S&DAgainst (15) |
|||
PPE |
133
|
1
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5) |
5
|
Austria PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Poland PPEAgainst (9) |
Sweden PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Romania PPEAgainst (5) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
France PPEAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
Spain PPEAgainst (11) |
Germany PPEAgainst (26)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Marlene MORTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Niclas HERBST,
Niels GEUKING,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan BERGER,
Sven SIMON
|
A9-0141/2024 – Tiemo Wölken – Commission proposal #
Amendments | Dossier |
2004 |
2023/0131(COD)
2023/11/21
ENVI
1505 amendments...
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Disclosed conflicts of interest and the mitigating actions implemented by the concerned individual(s) must be documented in the abridged minutes of the meetings, following the stipulations of Article 147(2).
Amendment 1001 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. The Agency staff and experts from national competent authorities providing the scientific advice shall not be involved in a subsequent evaluation of marketing authorisation application for the same products. In cases where such situation is unavoidable due to specific expertise, it shall be stated and duly justified in the products’ European Public Assessment Report.
Amendment 1002 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. In addition to providing scientific advice, the Agency shall ensure that scientific guidelines are updated and shall promote public discussion on scientific developments.
Amendment 1003 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 2 2. In case of medicinal products
Amendment 1004 #
1. The Agency
Amendment 1005 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency
Amendment 1006 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products and new indications of medicinal products, that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil one or more of the following conditions:
Amendment 1007 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products or certain medical devices that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil the following conditions:
Amendment 1008 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products or medical devices that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil the following conditions:
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency
Amendment 1010 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil at least one of the following conditions:
Amendment 1012 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59
Amendment 1013 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil any of the following conditions:
Amendment 1014 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil any of the following conditions:
Amendment 1015 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil one of the following conditions:
Amendment 1016 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) are
Amendment 1017 #
(a) are likely to address an unmet medical need as referred to in Article 83(1) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], including orphan medicinal products as referred to in Article 83(2);
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) are likely to address an unmet medical need as referred to in Article 83(1) and (2) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC];
Amendment 1019 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) are innovative Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs);
Amendment 1020 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1021 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1022 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1023 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1024 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1025 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1026 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are
Amendment 1027 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products or certain medical devices and are likely to address a high unmet medical need as referred to in Article 70(1);
Amendment 1028 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials
Amendment 1029 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) can provide an advancement in therapeutic deemed to be exeptional or are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials with any of the characteristics mentioned in Article 40(3).
Amendment 1030 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) provide an exceptional therapeutic advancement or are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials with any of the characteristics mentioned in Article 40(3).
Amendment 1031 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) provide an exceptional therapeutic advancement or are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials with any of the characteristics mentioned in Article 40(3).
Amendment 1032 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) provide an exceptional therapeutic advancement or are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials with any of the characteristics mentioned in Article 40(3).
Amendment 1033 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) The Agency's working group on advanced therapy medicinal products is tasked with evaluating which products fulfill the criteria of innovative advanced therapy medicinal products as set out in point (b) of this article. The determinations made by the working group shall take into account the progressive development inherent to advanced therapy medicinal products.
Amendment 1034 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, at the request of the Commission and after consulting the EMA Emergency Task Force or expert panel referred to in Article 61(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/745, may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support to developers of a medicinal product or certain medical devices preventing, diagnosing or treating a disease
Amendment 1035 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, at the request of the Commission and after consulting the EMA Emergency Task Force, may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support to developers of a certain medicinal product or medical device preventing, diagnosing or treating a disease resulting from serious cross border threats to health if access to such products is considered necessary to ensure high level of Union preparedness and response to health threats.
Amendment 1036 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency may stop the enhanced support if it is established that the medicinal product or the medical device will not address the identified unmet medical need to the
Amendment 1037 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency may stop the enhanced support if it is established that the medicinal product or the medical device will not address the identified unmet medical need to the anticipated extent.
Amendment 1038 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 4 4. The compliance of a medicinal product with the criteria set out in Article 83 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or of a medical device as set out in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 shall be assessed on the basis of the relevant criteria, independently of whether it has received priority medicinal product support under this Article.
Amendment 1039 #
4 a. The Commission may adopt an implementing act, establishing the enhanced scientific and regulatory support for priority medical devices, taking into consideration the requirements set by Regulation (EU) 2017/745.
Amendment 1040 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 For products under development which may fall within the categories of medicinal products to be authorised by the Union listed in Annex I, a developer or a competent authority of the Member States may submit a duly substantiated request to the Agency for a scientific recommendation with a view to determining on scientific grounds whether the concerned product is potentially a ‘medicinal product’, including an ‘advanced therapy medicinal product’ as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council71 . The Agency may rely on the relevant expertise of working parties and pools of experts, including on advanced therapy medicinal products, when making its recommendation. _________________ 71 Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the
Amendment 1041 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 For products under development which may fall within the categories of medicinal products to be authorised by the Union listed in Annex I, a developer or a competent authority of the Member States may submit a duly substantiated request to the Agency for a scientific recommendation with a view to determining on scientific grounds whether the concerned product is potentially a ‘medicinal product’, including an ‘advanced therapy medicinal product’ as defined in Article 4 (7), (29) and (30) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council71 . _________________ 71 Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the
Amendment 1042 #
Amendment 1043 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 When forming the recommendation referred to in paragraph 1, the Agency shall consult, where appropriate, relevant advisory or regulatory bodies established in other Union legal acts in related fields. In the case of products which are based on substances of human origin, the Agency shall consult the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Coordination Board as established in Regulation (EU) No [reference to be added after adoption cf. COM(2022)338 final], and classify all products that are significantly manipulated or utilized in a non- homologous manner, as either a medicinal product or an advanced therapy medicinal product, whichever is applicable.
Amendment 1044 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 The Agency shall publish
Amendment 1045 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 The Agency shall publish summaries of the recommendations delivered in accordance with paragraph 1, including substantiated opinions received from other advisory bodies, after deletion of all information of a commercially confidential nature.
Amendment 1046 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In the case of duly substantiated disagreement with the Agency’s recommendation, raised by other advisory bodies, in accordance with Article 61(2), a Member State may request the Commission to decide whether the product is a product referred to in Article 61(1).
Amendment 1047 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In the case of duly substantiated disagreement with the
Amendment 1048 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may ask the Agency and the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies involved in the delivery of the scientific recommendation for clarifications or refer the recommendation back to the Agency for further consideration where a Member State's substantiated request raises new questions of a scientific or technical nature or on its own initiative.
Amendment 1049 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may ask the Agency and other advisory bodies for clarifications or refer the recommendation back to the Agency for further consideration where a Member State's substantiated request raises new questions of a scientific or technical nature or on its own initiative.
Amendment 1050 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 3. The decision of the Commission referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted by means of implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 173(2), taking into account the scientific recommendation of the Agency and other advisory bodies.
Amendment 1051 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the condition affects not more than
Amendment 1052 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1053 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1054 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1055 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1056 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1057 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 1058 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt the necessary provisions for implementing this Article by means of implementing acts in
Amendment 1059 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt the necessary provisions for implementing this Article by means of implementing acts in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 173(2)
Amendment 1060 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt the necessary provisions for implementing this Article by means of
Amendment 1061 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 1 1. The orphan medicin
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 1 1. The orphan medicin
Amendment 1063 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The application for the designation of the orphan medicin
Amendment 1064 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The application for the designation of the orphan medicin
Amendment 1065 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) justification that the criteria laid down in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1066 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall verify the validity of the application and share its draft scientific conclusions with the applicant. The applicant shall be invited to provide their observations on the draft conclusions.The Agency shall, in consultation with the Member States, the Commission and interested parties, draw up detailed guidelines on the required procedure, format and content of applications for designation and for the transfer of the orphan designation pursuant to Article 65.
Amendment 1067 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1) or in the relevant delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 63(2) within 90 days of the receipt of a valid application. Within the timelines for adoption of a decision foreseen in paragraph 3, the Agency shall transmit its scientific conclusions to the applicant. Within 30 days of receipt of the scientific conclusions, the sponsor may submit to the Agency a written request, citing detailed grounds, for a re-examination. Within 30 days following receipt of a request for re-examination, the Agency shall confirm or revise its previous scientific conclusions.Where the Agency considers it necessary, it may consult the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use or the appropriate working parties when re-examining the above mentioned scientific conclusions. If, within the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph 3, the applicant does not request re-examination, the scientific conclusions shall become definitive. The Agency shall adopt a decision within a period not exceeding 10 days following the date on which the scientific conclusions have become definitive. The application is considered valid if it includes all the particulars and documentation referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 1068 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1069 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1) or in the relevant
Amendment 1070 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1071 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1072 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1) or in the relevant
Amendment 1073 #
The
Amendment 1074 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 5 5. Decisions of the Agency and a summary of consultation referred to in paragraph 4 on granting or refusing the orphan designation shall be made public after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature.
Amendment 1075 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) detailed reason(s) for the transferring of the orphan designation
Amendment 1076 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1077 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1078 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1079 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1080 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 1. An orphan designation shall be valid f
Amendment 1081 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 1. An orphan designation shall be valid f
Amendment 1082 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1083 #
Amendment 1084 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1085 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1086 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1087 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1088 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1089 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1090 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1091 #
Amendment 1092 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 4 4. An orphan designation ceases to be valid once an orphan medicine sponsor has obtained a marketing authorisation for the relevant medicinal product in accordance with Article 13(2). An orphan designation shall however remain valid in case the indication of the initial marketing authorisation addresses only a subset of the population affected by the designated orphan condition or where the orphan medicinal product sponsor can provide evidence that studies supporting the use of the designated orphan medicinal product are planned or ongoing with respect to additional indications within the scope of the designated condition / orphan designation.
Amendment 1093 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 4 4. An orphan designation ceases to be valid once an orphan medicine sponsor has obtained a marketing authorisation for the relevant medicinal product in accordance with Article 13(2). However, when the original marketing authorization only addresses part of the population affected by the designated orphan condition, the orphan designation shall remain valid.
Amendment 1094 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 5 5. At any time, an orphan designation may be withdrawn at the request of the orphan medicine sponsor. The orphan medicine sponsor may provide a reasoned justification for the withdrawal request which shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 1095 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 5 5. At any time, an orphan designation
Amendment 1096 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (c a) the stage of development;
Amendment 1097 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) any request and related decision under article 66 (2).
Amendment 1098 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 1099 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 1100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 1101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 1102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 1103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the conduct of the various tests and trials necessary to demonstrate the quality, safety
Amendment 1104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and not-for-profit organisations provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development. For the purpose of paragraph 2, the definitions set out in Article 58a paragraph 1 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall apply.
Amendment 1105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and not-for-profit entities, such as for example the European Medicine Facility as established in article 40a, provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 1106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and entities not engaged in economic activity provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 1107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and not-for-profit entities provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 1108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and not-for-profit entities provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 1109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research
Amendment 1110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of paragraph 2, the definitions set out in Article 58a paragraph 1 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall apply.
Amendment 1111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of paragraph 2, the definitions set out in Article 58a paragraph 1 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall apply.
Amendment 1112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 In addition, the applicant shall demonstrate that the medicinal product has been granted an orphan designation and that the criteria set out in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where appropriate, the applicant shall provide relevant evidence to demonstrate that the medicinal product
Amendment 1114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall assess whether the medicinal product fulfils the requirements set out in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall assess whether the medicinal product fulfils the requirements set out in Article 63(1) or in the relevant delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 63(2). In the situation referred in paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, that Committee shall also assess whether the medicinal product
Amendment 1116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 4 4. The orphan marketing authorisation shall cover only those therapeutic indications, which fulfil the requirements set out in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 6 6. An applicant may submit an application for a separate marketing authorisation for other indications which do not fulfil the requirements set out in Article 63(1)
Amendment 1118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. As laid down in Article 17, authorised products shall be subject to re- evaluation after 5 years. In cases of orphan medicinal products, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human use shall in addition to the product’s safety, efficacy and environmental impact also review the criteria in set in Article 63 and assess the profitability of the product, taking into account all authorised indications, as laid down in Article 72.
Amendment 1119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 1126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – title Breakthrough Designated Orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – title Amendment 1128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An orphan medicinal product shall be
Amendment 1130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An orphan medicinal product shall be
Amendment 1131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there
Amendment 1132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 1133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition, or
Amendment 1134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition or where, despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant benefit, will bring exceptional therapeutic advancement; and
Amendment 1135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant clinical benefit based on improved efficacy, safety and contribution to patient care, will bring a therapeutic advancement to a part of the relevant patient population;
Amendment 1136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 1138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 1139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal product results in a meaningful reduction in disease morbidity or mortality or in a meaningful positive impact on quality of life for the relevant patient population.
Amendment 1140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal product results in a meaningful reduction in disease morbidity
Amendment 1141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the
Amendment 1142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal product results in a
Amendment 1143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal
Amendment 1144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) the use of the medicinal product results in a substantial improvement of patients' quality of life.
Amendment 1145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission and the authorities or bodies, as well as the stakeholders such as representatives of patients' organisations in the relevant disease areas, healthcare professionals, orphan medicinal product sponsors, representatives of pharmaceutical industry and other relevant stakeholders referred to in Article 162.
Amendment 1150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission and the authorities or bodies and other relevant stakeholders referred to in Article 162.
Amendment 1151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission, all relevant stakeholders and the authorities or bodies referred to in Article 162.
Amendment 1152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission
Amendment 1153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission
Amendment 1154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 1. Where an orphan marketing authorisation is granted and without prejudice to intellectual property law,
Amendment 1155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 1156 #
(a)
Amendment 1157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) nine years for orphan medicinal products other than those referred to in points (b), (c) and (ca);
Amendment 1159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) nine years for orphan medicinal products other than those referred to in points (b), (c) and (ca);
Amendment 1160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 1173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) ten years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) therteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 1182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 1187 #
(b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products a
Amendment 1188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 1189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (new) i) no medicinal product in the Union are authorised for such condition;
Amendment 1190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (new) ii) regardless if medicinal products in the Union are being authorised for such condition, the applicant can demonstrate that the orphan medicinal product (apart of having a demonstrated benifit) will contribute to exceptional advancement for therapeutic;
Amendment 1191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii (new) iii) the condition affects no more than 0,5 in 10,000 persons in the European Union when the application designated for an orphan has been submitted.
Amendment 1192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) Amendment 1193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) ten years for an orphan medicinal product where: 1. fewer than three orphan medicinal products have been approved in the Union for the indication in question, or; 2. despite medical products being authorised for such a condition, no orphan medicinal product has been approved in the Union for a part of the target population or subpopulation that is covered by the therapeutic indication for the new medicinal product, or; 3. an orphan medicinal product has been approved in the Union for the indication, but the orphan medical product will represent a new mechanism of action or technology;
Amendment 1194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) twelve years for orphan medicinal products addressing a high unmet medical need as referred to in Article 70 in the paediatric population;
Amendment 1195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) twelve years for orphan medicinal products addressing an unmet medical need as referred to in Article 70 in the paediatric population;
Amendment 1196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (b b) eight years for an orphan medicinal product that does not fall under paragraphs (b), (ba) or (bb);
Amendment 1197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 1198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 1205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 1206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) twelve years for orphan medicinal products addressing requirements set in Article 70, paragraph 1 point (a) and (b) in the paediatric population.
Amendment 1207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) twelve years for orphan medicinal products addressing a high unmet medical need as referred to in Article 70 in the paediatric population;
Amendment 1208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) eight years for orphan medicinal products that are not referred to in points (a), (b) or (c);
Amendment 1209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation holder holds more than one orphan marketing authorisations for the same active substance, other than in cases foreseen in Article 72, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, those authorisations shall not benefit from separate market exclusivity periods. The duration of the market exclusivity shall start from the date when the first orphan marketing authorisation was granted in the Union.
Amendment 1210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation
Amendment 1211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation holder holds more than one orphan marketing authorisations for the same active substance, those authorisations shall
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation holder holds more than one orphan marketing authorisations for the same active substance, those authorisations shall
Amendment 1213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Where the orphan marketing authorisation holders benefit from market exclusivity for an orphan medicinal product under paragraph 1 of this Article, they must demonstrate that they meet the requirements set in paragraph 1 of Article 72a of this Regulation.
Amendment 1214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) (c a) a compulsory license has been granted in accordance with [Regulation on compulsory licensing for crisis management and amending Regulation (EC) 816/2006].
Amendment 1215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 5 Amendment 1216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 5 5. The submission, validation and assessment of the application for the marketing authorisation and granting the marketing authorisation for a generic or biosimilar product to the reference medicinal product
Amendment 1217 #
6. The market exclusivity of the orphan medicinal product shall not prevent the submission, validation
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 6 6. The market exclusivity of the orphan medicinal product shall not prevent the submission, validation
Amendment 1219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 1220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 Amendment 1221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – title Prolongation and reduction of market exclusivity period
Amendment 1222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 24 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a) and (b), if at least two years before the end of the exclusivity period, the orphan marketing authorisation holder obtains a marketing authorisation for one or more new therapeutic indications for a different orphan condition. If the newly approved therapeutic indication meets one of the requirements listed in Article 71(2) point (b), and where the first orphan marketing authorisation was not granted a period of market exclusivity as referred in Article 71(2) point (b), the period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by 36 months in total.
Amendment 1241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by 24 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71, paragraph 2, point (a), if one of its therapeutic indications fulfils one of the following requirements: i. there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition or; ii. despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant benefit, will bring exceptional therapeutic advancement or; iii. the condition affects not more than 0,5 in 10,000 persons in the Union when the application for an orphan designation is submitted. When applying to new therapeutic indications, this prolongation shall apply for indications approved at least two years before the end of the exclusivity period.
Amendment 1242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1246 #
The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 1251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 12 months for
Amendment 1252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Such a prolongation may be granted twice, if the new therapeutic indications are
Amendment 1258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) When the marketing authorisation holder obtains any further marketing authorisations for one or more therapeutic indications covering different orphan conditions for the same orphan medicinal product, these specific therapeutic indications shall be protected by a separate market exclusivity of three years, starting from the expiration of the market exclusivity for the entire product under Article 71, where relevant as extended under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article.
Amendment 1259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Any subsequent marketing authorisation obtained by the marketing authorisation holder for one or more new therapeutic indications for different orphan conditions shall receive a separate market exclusivity of three years, starting from the expiration date of the market exclusivity for the entire product under Article 71, where relevant as extended under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article.
Amendment 1260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) When the orphan marketing authorisation holder obtains any further marketing authorisations for one or more therapeutic indications relative to different orphan conditions for the same orphan medicinal product, these specific therapeutic indications shall be protected by a separate market exclusivity of three years from the expiry of the market exclusivity for the entire product pursuant to Article 71, where appropriate in accordance with Article 71(1) and (2).
Amendment 1261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) After the orphan medical product in question first receives an authorization as stated in Article 69, the holder of an orphan marketing authorization shall be entitled to a maximum of [15] years of orphan marketing exclusivity.
Amendment 1262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new) If requested by the applicant as an option instead of the stipulated reward in Article 86 of the revised Directive, the duration of market exclusivity for orphan medicinal products, as specified in Article 71(2), points (a) and (b), will be extended by an extra 24 months. This extension applies when an application for orphan marketing authorization is submitted for a designated orphan medicinal product under the Revised Regulation, and the application incorporates the findings of all studies conducted in adherence to an agreed-upon paediatric investigation plan. The first subparagraph shall also be applicable where fulfilment of the stipulated paediatric investigation plan does not result in the approval of a pediatric indication. However, the findings from the conducted studies should be incorporated into the summary of product characteristics and, if deemed suitable, into the package leaflet of the respective medicinal product. The extension of the market exclusivity period by 24 months will be acknowledged in the marketing authorization.
Amendment 1263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The holder of an orphan marketing authorisation shall be entitled to a total maximum period of [15] years of orphan marketing exclusivity from the time the orphan medicinal product in question first obtains an authorization as defined in Article 69.
Amendment 1264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 12 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a), (b), and (ba) if the orphan medicinal product is not authorised for the indication in question in any third country at the time of granting the authorisation.
Amendment 1265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. As an alternative to the reward foreseen under Article 86 [of revised Directive] and upon request from the applicant, the period of market exclusivity for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a) and (b) shall be prolonged by an additional 24 months where an application for orphan marketing authorisation is submitted in respect of a designated orphan medicinal product pursuant to [Revised Regulation] and that application includes the results of all studies conducted in compliance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan. The first subparagraph shall also apply where completion of the agreed paediatric investigation plan fails to lead to the authorisation of a paediatric indication, but the results of the studies conducted are reflected in the summary of product characteristics and, if appropriate, in the package leaflet of the medicinal product concerned. The 24- month extension of the period of market exclusivity will be reflected in the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 1266 #
2 c. An orphan medicinal product which benefits from the prolongation of market exclusivity as referred to in paragraph 4, shall not benefit from the rewards referred to in Article 86 [of revised Directive].
Amendment 1267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2 d. The limitation referred to in paragraph 3 shall not apply where the period of orphan marketing exclusivity is extended in accordance with paragraph 4 in relation to such extension.
Amendment 1268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 1269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 1270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 3. The orphan medicinal products which benefit from the prolongation of market exclusivity referred to in the paragraph 2 shall not benefit from the additional period of data protection referred to in Article 81(2), point (d), of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC].
Amendment 1271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The restriction mentioned in paragraph 3 shall not apply when the orphan marketing exclusivity period is prolonged as outlined in paragraph 4 concerning that extension.
Amendment 1272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. The extended market exclusivity mentioned in paragraph 2 does not apply to orphan medicinal products, and they will not receive the extra period of data protection outlined in Article 81(2), point (d) of the revised Directive 2001/83/EC.
Amendment 1273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 Amendment 1274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 4. A
Amendment 1275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The total period of orphan marketing exclusivity for an orphan marketing authorisation shall not exceed twenty years from the date of the initial marketing authorisation.
Amendment 1276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The market exclusivity period shall be reduced to five years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established, in respect of the medicinal product concerned, that the criteria laid down in Article 63 are no longer met or where it is shown on the basis of available evidence that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. The sponsor shall provide the Agency with the information necessary to re- assess the criteria laid down in Article 63 and the externally audited product-related profit margins for all authorised indications at least nine months before end of the fifth year.
Amendment 1277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. An orphan medicinal product which benefits from the prolongation of market exclusivity as referred to in paragraph 3, shall not benefit from the rewards referred to in Article 86 [of revised Directive 2001/83/EC].
Amendment 1278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. The holder of an orphan marketing authorisation shall be entitled to a total maximum period of 14 years of orphan marketing exclusivity from the time the orphan medicinal product in question first obtains an authorization as defined in Article 69.
Amendment 1279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 a (new) Amendment 1280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 a (new) Article73a Reporting of research and development costs from the marketing authorisation holder 1. Where the marketing authorisation holder benefits from the incentives outlined in Article 71 paragraph 2, it shall: (a) upon request, submit to the Commission and/or the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for pricing and reimbursement an report with detailed information on their actual costs and expenditure in research and development activities related to the medicinal product. (b) make the report available within 30 days from the receipt of the request; (c) publish a summary of the report on the same webpage where the information described in Article 57 of revised Directive 2001/83/EC will be published. The link should be communicated to the Agency. (d) ensure that the electronic report and lay summary are accurate and have been audited by an independent external auditor. 2. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to lay down the methodology and format in which the information should be reported and published pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 1281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 a (new) Article73a Reporting of research and development costs from the marketing authorisation holder 1. Where the marketing authorisation holder benefits from the incentives outlined in Article 71 paragraph 2, it shall: (a)upon request, submit to the Commission and/or the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for pricing and reimbursement an electronic report with detailed information on their expenditure in research and development activities related to the medicinal product; (b) make the report available within 30 days from the receipt of the request; (c) publish a summary of the report on the same webpage where the information described in Article 57 of revised Directive 2001/83/EC will be published. The link should be communicated to the Agency; (d) ensure that the electronic report and lay summary are accurate and have been audited by an independent external auditor. 2. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to lay down the methodology and format in which the information should be reported and published pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 1282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 a (new) Article 73a European Framework for Rare Diseases By (OP: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation), the Commission shall, following appropriate consultation with the Member States, patient organisations and, where relevant, other interested parties, propose a needs driven and goals based European Framework for Rare Diseases with a view to bridge relevant Union legislation, policies and programmes, and support national strategies to better meet the unmet needs of people living with rare diseases, and their carers.
Amendment 1283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 b (new) Amendment 1284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 74 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) when the active substance concerned is not yet authorised in any medicinal product in the EU and is intended to treat
Amendment 1285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 74 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) when the active substance concerned is
Amendment 1286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) that the disease or condition for which the specific medicinal product or class is intended occurs only in adult populations, unless
Amendment 1287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) that the disease or condition for which the specific medicinal product or class is intended occurs only in adult populations, unless
Amendment 1288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) that the disease or condition for which the specific medicinal product or class is intended occurs only in adult populations, unless
Amendment 1289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) that the disease or condition for which the specific medicinal product or class is intended occurs only in adult populations, unless
Amendment 1290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) that the specific medicinal product is likely to not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing
Amendment 1291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) that the specific medicinal product is likely to not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing
Amendment 1292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) that the specific medicinal product is likely to not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatments for paediatric patients.
Amendment 1293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) that the specific medicinal product is likely to not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatment
Amendment 1294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Agency shall, after consultation with the Commission and relevant interested parties, draw up guidelines for the application of this Article.
Amendment 1295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. In consultation with the Commission and with interested parties, the Agency shall draw up guidelines for the application of this Article.
Amendment 1297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The Agency shall, in consultation with the Commission and with all interested parties, draw up guidelines for the application of this Article.
Amendment 1298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. In consultation with the Commission and with interested parties, the Agency shall draw up guidelines for the application of this Article.
Amendment 1299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. A paediatric investigation plan or an application for waiver shall be submitted to the Agency with a request for agreement, except in duly justified cases, before the initiation of confirmatory safety and efficacy clinical studies in adults or children so as to ensure that a decision on use in the paediatric population of the medicinal product concerned can be
Amendment 1300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. A paediatric investigation plan or an application for waiver shall be submitted to the Agency with a request for agreement, except in duly justified cases, before the initiation confirmatory of safety and efficacy clinical studies in adults or children so as to ensure that a decision on use in the paediatric population of the medicinal product concerned can be given at the time of the marketing authorisation or other application concerned.
Amendment 1301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. A paediatric investigation plan or an application for waiver shall be submitted to the Agency with a request for agreement, except in duly justified cases, before the initiation of confirmatory safety and efficacy clinical studies in adults or children so as to ensure that a decision on use in the paediatric population of the medicinal product concerned can be given at the time of the marketing authorisation or other application
Amendment 1302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. A paediatric investigation plan or an application for waiver shall be submitted to the Agency with a request for agreement, except in duly justified cases, before the initiation of confirmatory safety and efficacy clinical studies so as to ensure that a decision on use in the paediatric population of the medicinal product concerned can be given at the time of the marketing authorisation or other application concerned.
Amendment 1303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 76 – paragraph 4 4. In consultation with the Commission and with interested parties, and with the CPOMP, the Agency shall draw up and publish guidelines for the practical application of this Article.
Amendment 1304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 1. After the validation of the proposed paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 74(1)
Amendment 1305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 1. After the validation of the proposed paediatric investigation plan referred to in
Amendment 1306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 1. After the validation of the proposed paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 74(1).which is valid in accordance with the provisions of Article 76(2), the Agency shall adopt within
Amendment 1307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 1310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 After receiving an updated version of the paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 74(2), third subparagraph, the Agency shall, after receiving the input of the paediatric working party, review it within 30 days.
Amendment 1311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 4 Amendment 1313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 5 5. Within the time period
Amendment 1314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Following the receipt of a valid application in accordance with the provisions of Article 76(2), the Agency shall, after receiving the input of its paediatric working party, within 90 days adopt a decision as to whether or not a product- specific waiver shall be granted.
Amendment 1315 #
3. When appropriate, the Agency may, either of its own motion or acting upon the recommendations of the paediatric working party, adopt decisions
Amendment 1316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 7 7. In consultation with the Commission and with interested parties, the Agency and its paediatric working party shall draw up and publish guidelines for the practical application of this Article.
Amendment 1317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 7 7. In consultation with the Commission and with interested parties, and with the CPOMP, the Agency shall draw up and publish guidelines for the practical application of this Article.
Amendment 1318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 80 – paragraph 1 If, having considered a paediatric investigation plan, the Agency concludes that Article 75(1), points (a), (b) or (c), applies to the medicinal product concerned, it shall adopt negative a decision under Article 77, paragraph
Amendment 1319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision on the request referred to in paragraph 1 and inform the applicant thereof. The Agency shall adopt such decision at the same time as the adoption of the positive decision under Article 77, paragraph
Amendment 1320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 3 3. The length of the deferral shall be specified in a decision of the Agency and shall not exceed five years and should ensure that the PIP is completed no more than two years after the marketing authorisation for other populations is granted.
Amendment 1321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 3 3. The length of the deferral shall be specified in a decision of the Agency and shall
Amendment 1322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 3 3. The length of the deferral shall be specified in a decision of the Agency and shall
Amendment 1323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 3 3. The length of the deferral shall be specified in a decision of the Agency
Amendment 1324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In duly justified cases, a request for a prolongation of the deferral
Amendment 1325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In duly justified cases, a request for a prolongation of the deferral, may be submitted, at least
Amendment 1326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. In case of the product that has already been authorized for use in adults in accordance with the provision of this Regulation, and if the cause for deferral of the PIP was a failure to timely complete clinical studies in children, before granting another deferral, the Agency may consider the evidence obtained from extrapolation and from the appropriately designed post-marketing long-term studies for monitoring safety and efficacy as specified in Article 138, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, point za a(new)
Amendment 1327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The procedure foreseen in paragraph 1 shall also apply when the applicant updates the elements of an initial paediatric investigation plan submitted in accordance with Article 74(2).
Amendment 1328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The procedure foreseen in paragraph 1 shall also apply when the applicant updates the elements of an initial paediatric investigation plan submitted in accordance with Article 74(2).
Amendment 1329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 If, following the decision agreeing the paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 77, paragraph
Amendment 1330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 If, following the decision agreeing the paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 77, paragraph
Amendment 1331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The applicant shall submit
Amendment 1332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The applicant shall submit
Amendment 1333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The applicant shall submit the changes requested within
Amendment 1334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Within 30 days, and after receiving the opinion of its paediatric working party, the Agency shall review these changes and adopt a decision on their refusal or acceptance.
Amendment 1335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Within 30 days, the Agency shall review the
Amendment 1336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Within 30 days, the Agency shall review the
Amendment 1337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 85 – paragraph 1 1. In consultation with the Member States, the Commission, and interested parties, the Agency and its relevant Committee (CPOMP) shall draw up the detailed arrangements concerning the format and content which applications for agreement or modification of a paediatric investigation plan, and requests for waivers or deferrals are to follow in order to be considered valid and concerning the
Amendment 1338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 86 – paragraph 1 a (new) The paediatric experts who are taking part in the CHMP's working parties shall contribute to the conformity assessment.
Amendment 1339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 1 1. Decisions referred to in Articles 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 84 adopted by the Agency shall be supported by scientific conclusions, which should incorporate the opinion expressed by the paediatric working party and which shall be annexed to the decision.
Amendment 1340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Agency considers it necessary, it may consult the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
Amendment 1341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Within the timelines for adoption of a decision foreseen in Articles 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 84, the Agency shall transmit its scientific conclusions to the applicant.
Amendment 1342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Within the timelines for adoption of a decision foreseen in Articles 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 84, the Agency shall transmit its scientific conclusions to the applicant.
Amendment 1343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Within the timelines for adoption of a decision foreseen in Articles 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 84, the Agency shall transmit its scientific conclusions to the applicant.
Amendment 1344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Within 20 days following receipt of the scientific conclusions, the applicant may submit to the Agency a written request, citing detailed grounds, for a re- examination. Within 30 days following receipt of a request for re-examination pursuant to paragraph 2b, the Agency shall confirm or revise its previous scientific conclusions.The Agency shall be able to question the applicant directly.The applicant may also offer to be questioned.Where the Agency considers it necessary, it may consult the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use or the appropriate working parties when re- examining the above mentioned scientific conclusions. If, within the 15-day period referred to in paragraph 4, the applicant does not request re-examination, the scientific conclusions shall become definitive. The Agency shall adopt a decision within a period not exceeding 15 days following the date on which the scientific conclusions have become definitive. This decision shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and shall annex the final scientific conclusions.
Amendment 1345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Within 30 days following receipt of the scientific conclusions, the applicant may submit to the Agency a written request, citing detailed grounds, for a re- examination.
Amendment 1346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Within 30 days following receipt of the scientific conclusions, the applicant may submit to the Agency a written request, citing detailed grounds, for a re- examination.
Amendment 1347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Within 30 days following receipt of a request for re-examination pursuant to paragraph 2b, the Agency shall confirm or revise its previous scientific conclusions. The Agency shall be able to question the applicant directly. The applicant may also offer to be questioned. Where the Agency considers it necessary, it may consult the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use or the appropriate working parties when re- examining the above mentioned scientific conclusions.
Amendment 1348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 c (new) Amendment 1349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2 d. If, within the 30-day period referred to in paragraph 2b, the applicant does not request re-examination, the scientific conclusions shall become definitive.
Amendment 1350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2 d. If, within the 30-day period referred to in paragraph 4, the applicant does not request re-examination, the scientific conclusions shall become definitive.
Amendment 1351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 e (new) 2 e. The Agency shall adopt a decision within a period not exceeding 10 days following the date on which the scientific conclusions have become definitive. This decision shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and shall annex the final scientific conclusions.
Amendment 1352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 e (new) 2 e. The Agency shall adopt a decision within a period not exceeding 10 days following the date on which the scientific conclusions have become definitive. This decision shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and shall annex the final scientific conclusions.
Amendment 1353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 88 – paragraph 1 Where a paediatric investigation plan, agreed in accordance with the provisions of
Amendment 1354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 88 – paragraph 1 Where a paediatric investigation plan, agreed in accordance with the provisions of Article 77, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, is discontinued, the applicant shall notify the Agency of its intention to discontinue the conduct of the paediatric investigation plan and provide the reasons for such discontinuation no less than six months before the discontinuation or as soon as possible.
Amendment 1355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 88 – paragraph 1 a (new) Where a paediatric investigation plan, agreed in accordance with the provisions of Article 77, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 could not be completed due to failure of timely completion of pediatric studies, for the product that has already been authorized for use in adults in accordance with the provision of this Regulation, the Agency should consider evidence from the pediatric studies as specified in Article 138, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, point za a(new)
Amendment 1356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 1 1. Any clinical study which involves the use in the paediatric population of a medicinal product covered by a marketing authorisation and is sponsored by the marketing authorisation holder, whether or not it is conducted in compliance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan, shall be submitted to the Agency or to the Member States which have previously authorised the medicinal product concerned within
Amendment 1357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 3. When products are authorised in
Amendment 1358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 3. When products are authorised in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation, the Commission may update the summary of product characteristics and package leaflet, including the accurate dosage, and may vary the marketing authorisation accordingly.
Amendment 1359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 3. When products are authorised in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation, the Commission may update the summary of product characteristics and
Amendment 1360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. By way of derogation of Article 91, paragraph 1, marketing authorisation holders of vaccines, any clinical study which involves the use in the paediatric population of a vaccine covered by a marketing authorisation and is sponsored by the marketing authorisation holder, whether or not it is conducted in compliance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan, shall be submitted to the Agency or to the Member States which have previously authorised the medicinal product concerned within twelve months of completion of the studies concerned.
Amendment 1361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Where a medicinal product is covered by a marketing authorization for adults, and the paediatric authorisation could not be completed due to the inability to timely complete the pediatric clinical studies, instead of granting deferrals, the Agency should consider evidence from the pediatric studies defined in Article 138, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, point za a(new)
Amendment 1362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Irrespective of the outcome of a clinical trial within
Amendment 1363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 1364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Within the European network, the Agency shall, together with the proposed members of the network, develop a platform study concept for paediatric patients. The objectives of the platform study concept are to create active paediatric patients’ master files open for future authorizations of the same molecules or molecules with the same mechanism of action, and/or to share the same pool of patients for joined clinical trials of industry and academia within the same administrative process.
Amendment 1365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 96 – paragraph 1 Paediatric medicinal products shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, paediatric medicinal products. These incentives will be granted by means of specific calls for research proposals encompassing the product's entire development phase, from discovery to post-marketing, as outlined in the annual paediatric research plans, which are part of the EU's research programmes concerning health and health products.
Amendment 1366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 98 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation, including errors of medication, and on those occurring in the course of post-authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure.
Amendment 1368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation, including medication errors, and on those occurring in the course of post-authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure.
Amendment 1369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation, including medication errors, and on those occurring in the course of post-authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure
Amendment 1370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation, including medication errors and on those occurring in the course of post-authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure.
Amendment 1371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation and medication errors, and on those occurring in the course of post- authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure.
Amendment 1372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Eudravigilance database shall contain information on suspected adverse reactions in human beings arising from use of the medicinal product within the terms of the marketing authorisation as well as from uses outside the terms of the marketing authorisation, including medication errors, and on those occurring in the course of post-authorisation studies with the medicinal product or associated with occupational exposure
Amendment 1373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5 The Agency shall ensure that healthcare professionals and the public have appropriate levels of access to the Eudravigilance database, and that personal data is protected in line with the EU data protection and privacy legislation. The Agency shall work together with all stakeholders, including research institutions, healthcare professionals, and patient and consumer organisations, in order to define the ‘appropriate level of access’ for healthcare professionals and the public to the Eudravigilance database.
Amendment 1374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 The data held on the Eudravigilance database shall be made publicly available in an aggregated and anonymised format together with an explanation of how to interpret the data. Where anonymization is not possible, the data shall be pseudonymised.
Amendment 1375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 101 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new) The Commission is empowered to adopt an implementing act to further specify the categories of personal data processed in the Eudravigilance database after consulting with and duly integrating the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17.
Amendment 1376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 103 – paragraph 3 a (new) The periodic safety update reports shall, in addition, be made publicly available in the web-portal referred to in Article 135(1)(n).
Amendment 1377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point h (h) the initiation of the procedure provided for in
Amendment 1379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point i (i) conclusions of assessments, obligations for post-marketing studies, recommendations, opinions, approvals and decisions taken by the Agency and its Committees under this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point j (j) conclusions of assessments, recommendations, opinions, approvals, obligations deriving from the conditional marketing authorisation and decisions taken by the coordination group, the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission in the framework of the procedures set out in Articles 16, 106, 107 and 108 of this Regulation and of Chapter IX, Sections 3 and 7 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC].
Amendment 1381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The
Amendment 1382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 2 2. In the development and review of the web portal, the Agency shall consult relevant stakeholders, including patient and consumer groups, healthcare professionals, non-profit research entities and industry representatives.
Amendment 1383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall, in collaboration with the Member States and the Commission, set up and maintain a register of environmental risk assessment studies conducted for the purpose of supporting an environmental
Amendment 1384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Information in such register shall be publicly available and includes as a minimum the information reported in Annex II - Section 1.6 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], unless restrictions are necessary to protect commercially confidential information. For the purpose of setting up such register, the Agency may request marketing authorisation holders and competent authorities to submit results of any such study already completed for products authorised in the Union within [OP please add the date = 24 months after the date of application of this Regulation].
Amendment 1385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Information in
Amendment 1386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 109 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency and the European
Amendment 1387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 111 – paragraph 1 The Agency and the Member States shall cooperate to continuously develop pharmacovigilance systems, including those that record adverse events including medication errors, processes and standards for medication safety, and implement digital technologies in healthcare settings, capable of
Amendment 1388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 111 – paragraph 1 The Agency and the Member States shall cooperate to continuously develop pharmacovigilance systems, including those that record adverse events including medication errors, processes and standards for medication safety, and implement digital technologies in healthcare settings, capable of achieving high standards of public health protection for all medicinal products, regardless of the routes of marketing authorisation, including the use of collaborative approaches, to maximise use of resources available within the Union.
Amendment 1389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 111 – paragraph 1 The Agency and the Member States shall cooperate to continuously develop pharmacovigilance systems, including those that record adverse events including medication errors, processes and standards for medication safety, and implement digital technologies in healthcare settings, capable of achieving high standards of public health protection for all medicinal products, regardless of the routes of marketing authorisation, including the use of collaborative approaches, to maximise use of resources available within the Union.
Amendment 1390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 111 – paragraph 1 The Agency and the Member States shall cooperate to continuously develop pharmacovigilance systems
Amendment 1391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 111 – paragraph 1 The Agency and the Member States shall cooperate to continuously develop pharmacovigilance systems, and implement digital technologies in healthcare proceedings, capable of achieving high standards of public health protection for all medicinal products, regardless of the routes of marketing authorisation, including the use of collaborative approaches, to maximise use of resources available within the Union.
Amendment 1392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 112 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 1393 #
Medicinal products subject to additional surveillance 1.The Agency, in cooperation with the Member States, shall establish, maintain and make public a list of medicinal products subject to additional monitoring. That list shall include the names and active substances of: (a) medicinal products authorised in the Union containing a new active substance not contained in any medicinal product authorised in the Union; (b) any biological medicinal product not referred to in point (a) authorised after [date of application]; (c) medicinal products authorised under this Regulation, under the conditions laid down in Article 12, paragraph 4, point f), Article 20, paragraph 1, point a), or Articles 18, 19, 30 or 113. (d) medicinal products authorized under [Directive 2001/83/EC as revised] under the conditions referred to in Article 44, first paragraph b) and c) or in Article 45 or a) of the first paragraph of Article 87 thereof. At the request of the Commission, after consulting the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, medicinal products authorized under this Regulation under the conditions referred to in Article 12, paragraph d), e) or g), Article 20.1 b) or 46.2 may also be included in the list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.At the request of a competent national authority, after consulting the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, medicinal products authorised under [Directive 2001/83/EC revised] under the conditions referred to in the first paragraph of Article 44 a), d) or f), in the first subparagraph of Article 87 b), or in paragraph 2 of Article 100, may also be included in the list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. 2.The list referred to in paragraph 1 shall include an electronic link to the product information and the summary of the risk management plan. 3.In the cases referred to in paragraphs a) and b) of this Article, the Agency shall remove a medicinal product from the list five years after the Union reference date referred to in paragraph 5 of Article 108 of [Revised Directive 2001/83/EC] In the cases referred to in points c) and d) of paragraph 1 of this Article, the Agency shall remove a medicinal product from the list once the conditions have been met. 4.For medicinal products included in the list referred to in paragraph 1, the summary of product characteristics and the package leaflet shall include the statement "This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring".The declaration shall be preceded by an inverted black triangle and followed by a standard explanatory phrase. 5. The Agency, in cooperation with the competent authorities, shall develop and carry out awareness-raising campaigns on the promotion of information on medicinal products subject to additional monitoring. These campaigns shall aim to raise awareness among healthcare professionals, patients, consumers and the general public about the pharmacovigilance system and the additional monitoring of medicinal products
Amendment 1394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 112 a (new) Amendment 1395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 112 a (new) Amendment 1398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) it is not possible to develop the medicinal product, even if medical devices or in-vitro diagnostic are used as combined products, or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product;
Amendment 1399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) it is not possible to adequately develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product;
Amendment 1400 #
(a) it is not possible to adequately develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to such medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product;
Amendment 1401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) it is not possible to adequately develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to such medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product;
Amendment 1402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) it is not possible to satisfactorily develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to
Amendment 1403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) it is not possible to effectively develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product;
Amendment 1404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The creation of a regulatory sandbox is intended to fulfill the following objectives: a) enabling competent authorities to offer advice to potential marketing authorization applicants to ensure adherence to this Regulation, or other pertinent EU legislation as applicable: b) assisting prospective marketing authorization applicants in the experimentation and advancement of innovative medicinal products or product categories; c) facilitating regulatory learning within a managed setting.
Amendment 1405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific
Amendment 1407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 under the conditions set out in Article 114, while balancing innovation in regulatory procedures with patient safety.
Amendment 1408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 under the conditions set out in Article 114, while balancing patient safety and innovation in regulatory process.
Amendment 1409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 and other applicable Union legislation under the conditions set out in Article 114.
Amendment 1410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and
Amendment 1413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and may request information and data from marketing authorisation holders, developers, independent experts and researchers, and representatives of healthcare professionals and of patients and may engage with them in preliminary discussions. The Agency may establish a dialogue framework with regulatory bodies both within and outside the Union to aid in its oversight role. Additionally, the Agency is tasked with creating and routinely revising a roster of nascent medicinal or health products that could be considered for a regulatory sandbox environment.
Amendment 1414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and
Amendment 1415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and
Amendment 1416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and
Amendment 1417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. Taking into account HTA expertise, the Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and may request information and data from marketing authorisation holders,
Amendment 1418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and may request information and data from marketing authorisation holders, developers, independent experts and researchers, and representatives of healthcare professionals and of patients and
Amendment 1419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The regulatory sandbox may also cover the exploration and application of medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics, in silico methods, AI and machine learning technologies in the developement, manifacturing, quality control, and administration of medicinal products, as their use can significanlty add to the efficiency, safety, and effectiveness of the life cycle of medicinal products.
Amendment 1420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for
Amendment 1421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for
Amendment 1422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for
Amendment 1423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for medicinal products which
Amendment 1424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for medicinal products (inlcuding ATMPs), or medical devices and other technologies, which are likely to fall under the scope of this Regulation, it shall provide a recommendation to the Commission. The Agency shall list eligible products or category of products in that recommendation and shall include the sandbox plan referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 1425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the
Amendment 1426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for
Amendment 1427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for medicinal products
Amendment 1428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations including, where relevant, with academia, HTA bodies, patients and their caregivers, healthcare professionals, sponsors, or developers. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations, by where relevant, HTA bodies, healthcare professionals, patients and their caregivers, and other relevant stakeholders. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 that cannot be complied with and a proposal for alternative or mitigation measures, where appropriate. The plan shall also include a proposed timeline for the duration of the sandbox. Where appropriate, the Agency shall also propose measures in order to mitigate any possible distortion of market conditions as a consequence of establishing a regulatory.
Amendment 1430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations, including, where relevant, of HTA bodies, patients and their caregivers, clinicians, sponsors, developers and academia. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive
Amendment 1431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations including, where relevant, HTA bodies, patients and their caregivers, clinicians, sponsors, developers and academia . The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 that cannot be complied with and a proposal for alternative or mitigation measures, where appropriate. The plan shall also include a proposed timeline for the duration of the sandbox. Where appropriate, the Agency shall also propose measures in order to mitigate any possible distortion of market conditions as a consequence of establishing a regulatory.
Amendment 1432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the
Amendment 1434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 1435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall, by means of
Amendment 1436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation
Amendment 1437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation
Amendment 1438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation, and of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], and other applicable Union legislation that cannot be complied with and shall include appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks to health and to the environment.
Amendment 1439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation
Amendment 1440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation
Amendment 1441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission may, by means of
Amendment 1442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) it is appropriate to protect public health or the environment.
Amendment 1443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 Those
Amendment 1444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 9 9. Where after the Decision to establish the regulatory sandbox in accordance with paragraph 6, risks to health are identified but these risks can be fully mitigated by
Amendment 1445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 9 9. Where after the Decision to establish the regulatory sandbox in accordance with paragraph 6, risks to health are identified but these risks can be fully mitigated by
Amendment 1446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 9 9. Where after the Decision to establish the regulatory sandbox in accordance with paragraph 6, risks to health are identified but these risks can be fully mitigated
Amendment 1447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 9 9. Where after the Decision to establish the regulatory sandbox in accordance with paragraph 6, risks to health are identified but these risks can be fully mitigated by the adoption of supplementary conditions, the Commission may, after consultation of the Agency, amend its decision by means of
Amendment 1448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 10 10. This Article shall not exclude the setting up of time limited pilot projects to test different ways of implementing the applicable legislation through delegated acts.
Amendment 1449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 Amendment 1450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. Those derogations may entail adapted, enhanced, waived or deferred requirements. Each derogation shall be limited to what is apt and strictly necessary to attain the objectives pursued, duly justified and specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation. Derogations that could compromise patient safety or run contrary to ethical principles in medicine shall not be granted.
Amendment 1451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 and of other applicable Union legislation. Those derogations may entail adapted, enhanced, waived or deferred requirements. Each derogation shall be limited to what is apt and strictly necessary to attain the objectives pursued, duly justified and specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 1452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation
Amendment 1453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 and other relevant Union legislation . Th
Amendment 1454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation
Amendment 1455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 – paragraph 3 3. In duly justified cases, the marketing authorisation of a medicinal product developed under the regulatory sandbox may include derogations from the requirements set out in this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], and Regulation (EC) 1394/2007. Those derogations may entail adapted, enhanced, waived or deferred requirements. Each derogation shall be limited to what is apt and strictly necessary to attain the objectives pursued, duly justified and specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 1456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 Amendment 1457 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory and corrective powers of the competent authorities. In case of identification of risks to public health or environment or safety concerns associated with the use of products covered by a sandbox, competent authorities shall take immediate and adequate temporary measures in order to suspend or restrict their use and inform the Commission in accordance with Article 113(2).
Amendment 1458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory and corrective powers of the competent authorities. In case of identification of risks to public health or safety concerns associated with the use of
Amendment 1459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory and corrective powers of the competent authorities. In case of identification of risks to public health or safety concerns associated with the use of products covered by a sandbox, competent authorities shall take immediate and adequate temporary measures in order to s
Amendment 1460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory and corrective powers of the competent authorities. In case of identification of risks to public health or safety concerns associated with the use of products covered by a sandbox, competent authorities shall take immediate and
Amendment 1461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where such mitigation is not possible or proves to be ineffective, the development and testing process shall be suspended without any delay until an effective mitigation takes place.
Amendment 1462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where such mitigation is not possible or proves to be ineffective, the development and testing process shall be suspended without any delay until an effective mitigation takes place.
Amendment 1463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The marketing authorisation holder of a medicinal product in possession of a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation (‘the marketing authorisation holder’) shall notify and explain the reasons for the competent authority of the Member State where the medicinal product has been placed on the market and, in addition, the Agency for a medicinal product covered by a centralised marketing authorisation (these are referred to in this Chapter as ‘the competent authority concerned’) of the following:
Amendment 1464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) its decision to permanently cease the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1465 #
(a) its decision to permanently cease the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) its decision to permanently cease the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) its request to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for that medicinal product authorised in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) its request to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for that medicinal product authorised in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) its request to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for that medicinal product authorised in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) its decision to temporarily suspend the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) its decision to temporarily suspend the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) its decision to temporarily suspend the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 1473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 1474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of
Amendment 1475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation
Amendment 1482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 1483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess
Amendment 1484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected and forecasted duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than six months before the start of such temporary disruption of supply or, if this is not possible and where duly justified, as soon as they become aware of such temporary disruption, to allow the Member State to monitor any potential or actual shortage in accordance with Article 118(1).
Amendment 1485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State
Amendment 1486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State,
Amendment 1487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The marketing authorisation holder of a medicinal product in possession of a centralised marketing or a national marketing authorisation shall notify the Agency of a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than three months before the start of such temporary disruption of supply or, if this is not possible, as soon as they become aware of such temporary disruption.The temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product for which another pack size of that same product is available shall not need to be notified. The Agency shall make available the information to the concerned Member States to allow the Member State to monitor any potential or actual shortage in accordance with Article 118(1).
Amendment 1488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the market. To put in place the shortage prevention plan, the marketing authorisation holder shall include the minimum set of information set out in Part V of Annex IV and take into account the guidance drawn up by the Agency according to paragraph 2. The marketing authorisation holder shall submit the prevention plan of a critical medicinal product with the concerned competent authority, following paragraph 9 of Article 127. In addition, and following the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 132, the prevention plans of those medicinal products included in the Union list of critical medicinal products shall be shared with the Agency. The marketing authorisation holder shall comply with any binding recommendations issued by the competent authority of the Member State and by the MSSG, and take in due consideration any other recommendation.
Amendment 1490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the market. To put in place the shortage prevention plan, the marketing authorisation holder shall include the minimum set of information set out in Part V of Annex IV and take into account the guidance drawn up by the Agency according to paragraph 2. The shortage prevention plan shall be made available to the Agency and the competent authority of the Member State where the medicinal product is placed on the market.
Amendment 1491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 1492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for
Amendment 1493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the market. To put in place the shortage prevention plan, the marketing authorisation holder shall include the minimum set of information
Amendment 1494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product
Amendment 1496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 1497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage
Amendment 1498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 1499 #
1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 1500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for
Amendment 1501 #
1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product
Amendment 1502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any critical medicinal product placed on the market. To put in place the shortage prevention plan, the marketing authorisation holder shall include the minimum set of information set out in Part V of Annex IV and take into account the guidance drawn up by the Agency according to paragraph 2.
Amendment 1503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Pursuant to Article 173(2), the Commission may adopt implementing acts listing medicinal products not included on the Union list of critical medicinal products for which a shortage prevention plan is required due to a lack of therapeutic alternatives.
Amendment 1504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Shortage prevention plans shall be without delay submitted to the competent authority concerned defined in Article 116(1) and be made publicly available, upon request.
Amendment 1505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c)
Amendment 1506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), patients´ organisations and healthcare professionals and other interested parties shall draw up guidance to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1) to put in place the shortage prevention plan.
Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), and other relevant parties, shall draw up guidance to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1) to put in place the shortage prevention plan.
Amendment 1509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Based on the reports referred to in Articles 120(1) and 121(1), point (c), information referred to in Articles 119, 120(2) and 121 and the notification made pursuant to Article 116(1), points (a) to (d), the competent authority concerned as referred to in Article 116(1) shall continuously monitor any potential or actual shortage of those medicinal products through IT surveillance systems or data bases including the European Medicines Verifications System (EMVS).
Amendment 1510 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Based on the reports referred to in Articles 120(1) and 121(1), point (c), information referred to in Articles 119, 120(2) and 121 and the notification made pursuant to Article 116(1), points (a) to (d), the competent authority concerned as referred to in Article 116(1) shall continuously monitor any potential or actual shortage of those medicinal products and send the information to the Agency without undue delay.
Amendment 1511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Based on the reports referred to in Articles 120(1) and 121(1), point (c), information referred to in Articles 119, 120(2) and 121 and the notification made pursuant to Article 116(1), points (a) to (d), the competent authority concerned as referred to in Article 116(1) shall continuously monitor any potential or actual shortage of those medicinal products through their national IT surveillance systems or data bases.
Amendment 1512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 1513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. To carry out that monitoring, the Agency shall establish a European medicine stock platform that is continuously updated in real time with data sent by the competent authorities of the Member States, marketing authorisation holders and wholesale distributors.
Amendment 1514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing
Amendment 1515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117, where this has not already been requested following paragraph 9 of article 127. The competent authority concerned
Amendment 1516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit
Amendment 1517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing
Amendment 1518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117. The competent authority concerned
Amendment 1519 #
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117. The competent authority concerned
Amendment 1520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117. The competent authority concerned
Amendment 1521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 119 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) promptly provide information on the stock available and any supply shortages in accordance with Article 130(2), point (da), establishing a European medicine stock platform.
Amendment 1522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 119 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) issue forecast of demand to provide early-warning of potential critical shortages.
Amendment 1523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 119 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. To comply with their obligations, marketing authorisation holders shall have access to all relevant information contained in the repositories system referred to Article 67, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, point (e) for the purpose of fulfilling any obligation arising under [Revised] Directive (…) or this Regulation, including notifying shortages and assessing whether a product was supplied to another Member State than the one where it was placed.
Amendment 1524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 119 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. For the purposes of developing the shortage mitigation plan referred to in Article 118, the marketing authorization holder within the meaning of Article 116(1) shall include the minimum set of information provided for in Annex IV on primary packaging, in order to allow dispensation by unit upon request from the competent authorities of the Member State.
Amendment 1525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 1. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] to the public may report a shortage of a given medicinal product marketed in the Member State concerned to the competent authority in that Member State. In addition, wholesale distributors shall submit regular information on the available stocks of the medicines they supply to the competent authority.
Amendment 1526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 1. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] to the public
Amendment 1527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. When a marketing authorisation holder notifies a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product, wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products shall provide information requested in a timely manner to the Agency, the competent authority in a Member State, and the relevant marketing authorisation holder to confirm that the temporary disruption in supply of the product in a Member State was not caused by parallel distribution to another Member State.
Amendment 1528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. When a marketing authorisation holder notifies a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product, wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products shall provide information requested in a timely manner to the Agency, the competent authority in a Member State, and the relevant marketing authorisation holder to confirm that the temporary disruption in supply of the product in a Member State was not caused by parallel distribution to another Member State.
Amendment 1529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. When a marketing authorisation holder notifies a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product, wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products shall provide information requested in a timely manner to the Agency and to the competent authority in a Member State, to confirm that the temporary disruption in supply of the product in a Member State was not caused by parallel distribution to another Member State.
Amendment 1530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. For the purposes of the reporting in accordance with Article 118(1) and for the early detection of supply shortages, wholesalers designated under article 166(1)(a) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall transmit the information set out in Part Va of Annex IV to the competent authorities of the Member States in a timely manner.
Amendment 1531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be accessible by the relevant competent authorities.
Amendment 1532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any relevant information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 1533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 1534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1),
Amendment 1535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a) collect and assess the information on potential and actual shortages provided by marketing authorisation holders, importers, manufacturers and suppliers of medicinal products or active substances, wholesale distributors, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public;
Amendment 1536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish and regularly update information on actual shortages of medicinal products, including date when the shortage occurred, expected duration, the reasons as per Article 24(1) and mitigation measures, in cases in which that competent authority has
Amendment 1537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish information on actual shortages of medicinal products,
Amendment 1538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish information on actual shortages of medicinal products,
Amendment 1539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish on a publicly available website information on actual shortages of medicinal products, in
Amendment 1540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish information on expected or actual shortages of medicinal products, in cases in which that competent authority has assessed the shortage, on a publicly available
Amendment 1541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish information on a
Amendment 1542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) create a system that is user- friendly and straightforward, allowing patients and patient organizations to report shortages of medicinal products.
Amendment 1543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) establish an accessible and easily understandable system for patients and patient organisations to report shortages of medicinal products;
Amendment 1544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) establish an accessible and easily understandable system for patients and patient organisations to report shortages of medicinal products;
Amendment 1545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) establish an accessible and easily understandable system for patient organisations to report shortages of medicinal products;
Amendment 1546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) assess information on potential or actual deficiencies provided by marketing authorisation holders authorised to market in a Member State in accordance with Article 5 of [Directive 2001/83/EC as revised] as defined in paragraph 1 of Article 116, importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active ingredients and relevant suppliers thereof, wholesale distributors, associations representing interested parties or other legal persons or entities which are authorised or authorised to supply medicinal products to the public.
Amendment 1547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) assess information on potential or actual shortages provided by marketing authorisation holders authorised to place on the market in a Member State in accordance with Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers thereof, wholesale distributors, representative associations of interested parties or other legal persons or entities authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public.
Amendment 1548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) in order to avert or mitigate an imminent or existing supply shortage relevant to the supply of a medication product request pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies, to communicate electronically data on available stock of the respective medicinal product.
Amendment 1549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) shall in order to avert or mitigate an imminent or existing supply shortage relevant to the supply of a medication product request pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies, to communicate electronically data on available stock of the respective medicinal product
Amendment 1550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) request from pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies, to electronically communicate data on available stock of the respective medicinal product, in order to avert or mitigate an imminent or existing supply shortage relevant to the supply of a medicinal product.
Amendment 1551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) Amendment 1552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) address recommandations to health professionals and patients on the alternative medicinal products to use to pursue treatments;
Amendment 1553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) consider the use of appropriate regulatory measures to mitigate the shortage.
Amendment 1554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) launch information campaign to discourage hoarding or to avoid waste, at any level of the supply chain, from wholesalers to patients.
Amendment 1555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) examine the options for regulatory flexibility to alleviate shortages of medicinal products in the event of a health crisis.
Amendment 1556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The competent authority of the Member State may recommend to the relevant authority or social security schemes to raise the prices of medicinal products for which they have identified a risk of shortage or of consolidation. The recommendation must be justified in writing, stating the active substance and the dosage forms concerned. Based on the recommendation, the relevant authority or social security schemes can increase the regulated price caps.
Amendment 1557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. shall request pharmacies supplying hospitals or hospital pharmacies, to communicate electronic data on the availability and stock of the relevant medicinal product, in order to mitigate or avert supply shortage.
Amendment 1558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) as soon as possible inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State to mitigate the shortage at national level.
Amendment 1559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) inform the Agency within one week of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State to mitigate the shortage at national level.
Amendment 1560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. After the expansion of the ESMP referred to in article 122 (6) and for the purpose of articles 118 (1), and 121 (2), point (a), competent authorities of the Member States shall set up national IT systems which are interoperable with the ESMP and allow for the automated exchange of information with the ESMP while avoiding duplication of reporting.
Amendment 1561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) as soon as possible inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State in accordance with points (b) and (c) and report on any other actions taken to mitigate or resolve the critical shortage in the Member State, as well as the results of these actions.
Amendment 1562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) inform the Agency in a timely manner of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State in accordance with points (b) and (c) and report within one week on any other actions taken to mitigate or resolve the critical shortage in the Member State, as well as the results of these actions.
Amendment 1563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) within one week, inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State in accordance with points (b) and (c) and report on any other actions taken to mitigate or resolve the critical shortage in the Member State, as well as the results of these actions, within one month.
Amendment 1564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 6 6. The Member States may request that the MSSG provide further recommendations, referred to in Article 123(4).
Amendment 1565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 a (new) Article121a National websites on medicines shortages The website referred to in article 121 paragraph 1(b) shall include at least the following information: (a) trade name of the medicinal product and international non-proprietary name, for interoperability purposes; (b) indication; (c) reasons of the shortages; (d) start and end dates of the shortages; (e) information for healthcare professionals and patients, including information about therapeutic alternatives available.
Amendment 1566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 a (new) Article121a National websites on medicine shortages The website referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall include at least the following information: (a) trade name of the medicinal product and international-non-proprietary name; (b) indication; (c) reasons for the shortage; (d) start and end dates; (e) information for healthcare professionals and patients, including information on alternative treatments.
Amendment 1567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of Article 118(1) and 118(1a)(new), the Agency may request additional information from the competent authority of the Member State, through the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). The Agency may set a deadline for the submission of the information requested.
Amendment 1568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of Article 118(1), the Agency may request additional information from the competent authority of the Member State, through the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). The Agency
Amendment 1569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. For the purpose of Article 118 (1a) (new) and based on the information provided pursuant to articles 121 (1), point (d), and 121 (2), the Agency shall assess the actions taken or foreseen by a Member State to mitigate a shortage at national level with regards to any potential or actual negative impacts of these actions on the availability and security of supply in another Member State and at European level. The Agency shall inform the Member State in question of its assessment in a timely manner and the MSSG and the Member States potentially or actually impacted through the single point of contact working party referred to in Article 3(6) of Regulation (EU) 2022/123. The Agency shall also inform the Commission of its assessment.
Amendment 1570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 2 2. On the basis of Article 118(1), the Agency, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), shall identify the the critical and/or other medicinal products for which the shortage cannot be resolved without EU coordination.
Amendment 1571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. For the purpose of identifying the medicinal products for which the shortage cannot be resolved without EU coordination pursuant to paragraph 2, the Agency may consult market authorisation holders and other relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 1572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall inform the MSSG of the shortages of the critical or strategic medicinal products that have been identified pursuant to paragraph 2.
Amendment 1573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. For the purposes of fulfilling the tasks referred to in Articles 118(1), 123 and 124, the Agency shall ensure the following, in consultation with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and, where relevant, market authorisation holders and other stakeholders:
Amendment 1574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. For the purposes of fulfilling the tasks referred to in Articles 118(1), 123 and 124, the Agency shall ensure the following, in consultation with patients’ organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c):
Amendment 1575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. For the purposes of fulfilling the tasks referred to in Articles 118(1), 123 and 124, the Agency shall ensure the following, in consultation with patients' organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c):
Amendment 1576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point d (d) specify the methods for the provision of recommendations referred to in Article 123(4), including the introduction of regulatory flexibility;
Amendment 1577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) define the tools, working methods and guidelines for the solidarity mechanism referred to in Article 123(3a), in particular any necessary regulatory flexibility allowing for the quick movement of medicinal products between Member States and backed up by appropriate funding.
Amendment 1578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new) (e a) specify the systems and procedures to ensure the European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP) includes accurate information on available critical medicinal stocks in legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public including pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies.
Amendment 1579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new) (e a) specify the systems and procedures to ensure the European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP) includes accurate information on available critical medicinal stocks in legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public including pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies.
Amendment 1580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new) (e a) specify the systems and procedures to ensure the European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP) includes accurate information on available critical medicinal stocks in legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public including pharmacies supplying hospitals and hospital pharmacies.
Amendment 1581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new) (e a) suggest specific procedures to include accurate information, at the European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP), on available critical medicinal stocks in legal entities authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public.
Amendment 1582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 1583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 1584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 1585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 1586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP to make it a genuine prevention tool by transforming it into a European medicine stock platform that is continuously updated in real time, as provided for in Article 130. The Agency shall ensure that, where relevant, data is interoperable between the ESMP, Member States’ IT systems and other relevant IT systems and databases, without duplication of reporting.
Amendment 1587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 1588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP and include, among others, information on the duration, reasons and mitigation measures of medicine shortages. The Agency shall ensure that, where relevant, data is interoperable between the ESMP, Member States’ IT systems and other relevant IT systems and databases, without duplication of reporting.
Amendment 1589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that, where relevant, data is interoperable between the ESMP, Member States’ IT systems and other relevant IT systems and databases, without duplication of reporting, and that the ESMP is fully digitalised and automated.
Amendment 1590 #
6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that, where relevant, data is interoperable between the ESMP, Member States’ IT systems and other relevant IT systems and databases, without duplication of reporting, and that the ESMP is automated and digitalised.
Amendment 1591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 1592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 1593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the monitoring referred to in Article 118(1), and following consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and, where relevant, market authorisation holders and other stakeholders involved in the supply chain, the MSSG shall adopt a list of critical shortages of medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]and for which co- ordinated Union level action is necessary (‘the list of critical shortages of medicinal products’).
Amendment 1594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the monitoring referred to in Article 118(1), and following consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) with MAHs and other actors of the supply chain, the MSSG shall adopt a list of
Amendment 1595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the monitoring referred to in Article 118(1), and following consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG shall adopt a list of critical shortages of critical and strategic medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]and for which co-ordinated Union level action is necessary (‘the list of critical shortages of medicinal products’).
Amendment 1596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 2 2. The MSSG shall review the status of the critical shortage whenever necessary and shall update the list when it considers that a medicinal product needs to be added
Amendment 1597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) After adopting the list of critical shortages of medicinal products, the MSSG may analyse the vulnerabilities in the supply chain of those medicines.
Amendment 1598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In accordance with the methods established in Article 122(4), point d, the MSSG may decide to activate the solidarity mechanism to allow available national surplus stocks to be shared to alleviate critical shortages.
Amendment 1599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG
Amendment 1600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG
Amendment 1601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG
Amendment 1602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG
Amendment 1603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG may provide recommendations on measures to resolve or to mitigate the critical shortage of critical or strategic medicinal products, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 122(4), point (d), to relevant marketing authorisation holders, the Member States, the Commission, the representatives of healthcare professionals or other entities.
Amendment 1604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG may provide without any undue delay recommendations on measures to resolve or to mitigate the critical shortage, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 122(4), point (d), to relevant marketing authorisation holders, the Member States, the Commission, the representatives of healthcare professionals or other entities.
Amendment 1605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 4. The MSSG may provide as soon as possible recommendations on measures to resolve or to mitigate the critical shortage, in
Amendment 1606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) Member States, within the MSSG, may decide to activate the “Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism for medicines” to (a) notify a critical shortage of a medicinal product at national level to other Member States and the Commisison, (b) identify, with the support of the Agency, the availabilities of the medicinal product in other Member States, (c) organise, with the support of the Agency, meetings with the issuing Member States, the donating part and other relevant parties to discuss operational requirements, (d) request the activation of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism to coordinate and logistically support the voluntary transfer of medicines.
Amendment 1607 #
1 a. The competent authority of the Member State, the Agency and the Commission shall be entitled to restrict parallel distribution of medicinal products following their additions to the list of critical shortages of medicinal products in accordance with Article 123, paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 1608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission shall be entitled to restrict parallel distribution of medicinal products following their additions to the list of critical shortages of medicinal products in accordance with Article 123, paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 1609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this paragraph, the Agency
Amendment 1610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this paragraph, the Agency
Amendment 1611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this paragraph, the Agency
Amendment 1612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this paragraph, the Agency
Amendment 1613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Agency shall assess actual critical shortages of medicinal products and provide recommendations to healthcare professionals and patients
Amendment 1614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available
Amendment 1615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on actual critical shortages of medicinal products in cases in which the Agency has assessed the shortage and has provided recommendations to healthcare professionals and patients and on critical shortages in the Member States. This webpage shall also provide references to the lists of actual shortages published by the competent authorities of the Member State pursuant to Article 121(1), point (b) and include, to the extent possible, information from other relevant sources and databases identified by the Agency.
Amendment 1616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on actual critical shortages of medicinal products in cases in which the Agency has assessed the shortage and has provided recommendations to healthcare professionals and patients. This webpage shall also provide references to the lists of actual shortages published by the competent authorities of the Member State
Amendment 1617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on actual critical shortages of medicinal products
Amendment 1618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on actual critical shortages of medicinal products in cases in which the Agency has assessed the shortage and has provided recommendations to healthcare professionals and patients. This webpage shall also provide references to the
Amendment 1619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on a
Amendment 1620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The web portal referred to in paragraph 3 shall include at least the following information: (a) the name and common name of the medicinal product on critical shortage; (b) the therapeutic indications for the medicinal product on critical shortage; (c) the reason for the critical shortage of the medicinal product; (d) the start and expected duration of the critical shortage of the medicinal product; (e) the Member States affected by the critical shortage of the medicinal product; (f) mitigation measures taken to address the critical shortage of the medicinal product; (g) other relevant information for healthcare professionals and patients, including information on whether alternative medicinal products are available.
Amendment 1621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1) and other actors listed in Article 120(2) that are directly affected by the measures notified under Articles 121(1), point (b); 121(2), point (f); and 121(5), point (d) shall be granted access to documents, while protecting commercially confidential information. The Agency may set a deadline within which marketing authorisation holders and other actors may submit their comments.
Amendment 1622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) provide any additional information that the Agency may request, including regular information on the available stocks of medicines;
Amendment 1623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) inform the Agency of the causes and of the end date of the critical shortage.
Amendment 1625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) inform the Agency of the causes and of the end date of the critical shortage.
Amendment 1626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) inform the Agency of the causes and the end date of the critical shortage.
Amendment 1627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) inform the Agency of the end date of the critical shortage, without undue delay.
Amendment 1628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) inform the Agency about the exact causes for the shortage and provide clear clarifications about the responsibilities for this shortage along the entire life cycle of the medicinal product;
Amendment 1629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall, where it considers it appropriate and necessary to manage shortages and critical shortages:
Amendment 1630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Where relevant, the Commission may within the scope of its competences take appropriate measures to address findings of the Agency according to the assessment in Article 122 – paragraph 6 a (new).
Amendment 1631 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall take the appropriate steps to address any concerns raised by the assessment of the Agency referred to in Article 122 (1a) (new).
Amendment 1632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall take the appropriate steps to address any concerns raised by the report of the Agency in Article 122(6).
Amendment 1633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – title Identification and management of critical and strategic medicinal products by the competent authority of the Member State
Amendment 1634 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authority of the Member State shall identify critical medicinal products in that Member State, using the methodology set out in Article 130(1), point (a), following a consultation with national health professionals and patients organisations.
Amendment 1635 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authority of the Member State shall identify critical and strategic medicinal products in that Member State, using the methodology set out in Article
Amendment 1636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 2 2. The competent authority of the Member State acting through the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), shall report to the Agency the critical and strategic medicinal products in that Member State identified pursuant to the paragraph 1, as well as the information received from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1).
Amendment 1637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 3 3. For the purposes of the identification of critical medicinal products referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority of the Member State may request relevant information including the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117 and information on the available stocks of medicines from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1).
Amendment 1638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 3 3. For the purposes of the identification of critical and medicinal products referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority of the Member State may request relevant information
Amendment 1639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 4 4. For the purposes of the identification of critical and strategic medicinal products referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority of the Member State may request relevant information from other entities including other marketing authorisation holders, importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public.
Amendment 1640 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Once the competent authority has identified the critical medicinal products, it shall request the corresponding marketing authorisation holders to submit the shortage prevention plan for each product, providing it has not been already requested following paragraph 3. Where necessary, the competent authority shall provide binding and other recommendations on measures to reinforce the prevention plan. Such recommendations may be issued through the MSSG following the procedure described in paragraph 1 of Article 132. The competent authority may request at any time the prevention plans of non- critical medicinal products and shall issue binding or other recommendations where necessary. The competent authority shall set a deadline for the submission by marketing authorisation holders of the requested information.
Amendment 1641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) manage and replenish the European reserve of medicines of health and strategic importance (MISSs) established in Article 134(2).
Amendment 1642 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 2. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1)
Amendment 1643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The marketing authorisation referred to in Article 116(1) shall also entail the obligation to establish and maintain minimum safety stocks of critical medicinal products set out in Article 131.The minimum safety stocks of critical medicinal products shall be sufficient to cover demand for them for a period of two months in the Member States in which the medicinal product is marketed. The marketing authorisation holder may apply to the relevant authority for an exemption from maintaining minimum safety stocks on the following grounds: (a) the manufacturing process or shelf life of the critical medicinal product is incompatible with the duration of the minimum safety stock; (b) other valid reasons agreed with the relevant authority.
Amendment 1644 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The marketing authorisation holder shall set up and maintain a minimum safety stock of critical medicinal products which shall be sufficient to cover two months demand of all Member States where the product has been placed on the market.
Amendment 1645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. By derogation from paragraph 2a, national competent authorities may, in duly justified cases, grant an exemption from stockpiling obligations to the marketing authorisation holder, upon request, or adopt other complementary measures on the safety of stocks.
Amendment 1646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information
Amendment 1647 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 1648 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested
Amendment 1649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public, including hospitals and ambulatory care settings, shall provide any information requested in a timely manner.
Amendment 1650 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), patients’ organisations, healthcare professionals and marketing authorisation holders ensure the following:
Amendment 1651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and marketing authorisation holders, ensure the following:
Amendment 1652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and marketing authorisation holders, ensure the following:
Amendment 1653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with patients’ organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), ensure the following:
Amendment 1654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with patient organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), ensure the following:
Amendment 1655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with patient organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), ensure the following:
Amendment 1656 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of the therapeutic indication and importance, the availability of appropriate alternatives, and vulnerabilities with respect to the supply chain of those
Amendment 1657 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, prioritising medicines of health and strategic importance (MISSs) and in consultation, where appropriate, with relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 1658 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, in consultation,
Amendment 1659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities and availability of alternatives with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, in consultation, where appropriate, with relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 1660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities and availability of alternatives with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, in consultation, where appropriate, with relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 1661 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products,
Amendment 1662 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities with respect to the supply chain of those medicines,
Amendment 1663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) establish a European medicine stock platform that is continuously updated in real time with data sent by the competent authorities of the Member States, industrial actors and wholesale distributors.
Amendment 1664 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) develop, with the Member States, innovative and coordinated strategies and step up exchanges of good practice in the area of stock management.
Amendment 1665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) coordinate, with marketing authorisation holders, the management of the European reserve of medicines of health and strategic importance (MISSs) established in Article 134(2).
Amendment 1666 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall publish the information referred to in points
Amendment 1667 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall publish the information referred to in p
Amendment 1668 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the marketing authorisation holder of the medicinal product, including the shortage prevention and mitigation plan, referred to in Article 117 and 119(2);
Amendment 1669 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 5 5. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products in accordance with Article 131, the Agency shall assess and report to the MSSG on any relevant information received from the marketing authorisation holder pursuant to Article 133 and the competent authority of the Member State in accordance with Article 127, paragraphs 7 and 8.
Amendment 1670 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 1671 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – title The Union List of Critical and Strategic Medicinal Products
Amendment 1672 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], prioritising medicines of health and strategic importance (MISSs) and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”). The Union list of critical medicinal products shall be drawn up in coordination with the lists established and communicated by the Member States.
Amendment 1673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”). The Union list of critical m,edicinal products shall be coordinated with the list identified in the Member States by the competent authority of that Member State and shall supersede all national lists.
Amendment 1674 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal
Amendment 1675 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) in addition to marketing authorisation holders, patients´ organisations and other relevant stakeholders. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1676 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), in addition to marketing authorisation holders and other relevant stakeholders. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1677 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) as well as representatives of patients, consumers and healthcare professionals. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1678 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) also markreting authorisation holders, national agencys and other actors. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1679 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and health professionals and patients organisations. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1680 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical and strategic medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 1681 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Agency shall establish a consultation process with patients and consumers in relation to the procedure for establishing the Union list of critical medicines.
Amendment 1682 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) in addition to marketing authorisation holders, patients’ organisations and other relevant stakeholders, the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities. Such measures
Amendment 1683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article
Amendment 1684 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG
Amendment 1685 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) in addition to marketing authorisation holders and other relevant stakeholders, the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities.
Amendment 1686 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), with the marketing autorisation holders and other actors, the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities.
Amendment 1687 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities. Such measures may include recommendations on diversification of suppliers
Amendment 1688 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities. Such measures may include recommendations on diversification of suppliers
Amendment 1689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities. Such measures may include recommendations on diversification of suppliers and inventory management, pricing mechanisms, tender procedures and the use of regulatory flexibility.
Amendment 1690 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities.
Amendment 1691 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article
Amendment 1692 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Any recommandations provided pursuant to paragraph 1 should be justified and risk-based, targeted and proportionate.
Amendment 1693 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. The MSSG shall set up a Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism to allow Member States to request assistance in obtaining stocks of a medicine during critical shortages. The MSSG shall specify the procedures and criteria to launch the Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism in consultation with the Member States, the Agency and the Commission.
Amendment 1694 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Following the adoption or update of the Union list of critical medicinal products, the MSSG shall assess the shortage prevention plan of the medicinal products present on the list.
Amendment 1695 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 133 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1696 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 133 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) maintain contingency stocks of finished medicinal products included in the list referred to in Article 131. Contingency stocks shall be sufficient to meet at least a two-month demand of the medicinal product in each Member State where it has been placed on the market. This obligation shall not preclude the possibility of Member States to adopt complementary measures on safety stocks based on their own lists of medicines considered of major interest.
Amendment 1697 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 133 a (new) Amendment 1698 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission
Amendment 1699 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a) take all necessary action within the limits of the powers conferred on it, with a view to mitigating critical shortages of medicinal products;
Amendment 1700 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point a (
Amendment 1701 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) inform the MSSG and the Member State authorities of those measures taken by the Commission.
Amendment 1702 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point c (
Amendment 1703 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) Amendment 1704 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) develop, within the framework of the Public Procurement Directive 2014/24/EU1 c, guidelines to support sustainable public procurement practices in the pharmaceutical field, in particular with regard to the implementation of the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) criteria in order to establish remedies against single-winner, price- only tenders. _________________ 1 c Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94 28.3.2014, p. 65).
Amendment 1705 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission shall also work with the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control on building reliable forecasts of potentiel threats and potential shortages.
Amendment 1706 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission, taking into consideration the information or the opinion, referred to in paragraph 1, or MSSG recommendations,
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital -1 (new) (-1) Ensuring that Europeans receive the medicines they need, when they need them, regardless of where they live in the EU, is a central objective of the European Health Union. Boosting the competitiveness of the European pharmaceutical industry, whilst also ensuring better availability of medicines and more equal and timely access for patients, is a key deliverable of the proposed EU pharmaceutical reform.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) This Regulation contributes to the implementation of the One Health Approach, stressing the well-established interconnectedness between human, animal, and ecosystem health and the need to include those three dimensions when addressing public health threats. The loss of biodiversity, changes in land use, deforestation, urbanisation, agricultural expansion and intensification, poor air quality, wildlife trafficking and consumption patterns and transmissions of diseases between humans and animals are all factors that have contributed to the increasing disease burden. In addition, pollution from active pharmaceutical ingredients negatively affects the quality of waters and ecosystems, posing risks to public health globally.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by creating a modern framework that makes innovative and established medicinal products available to patients and healthcare systems at affordable prices, while strengthening the fight against shortages of medicinal products, in particular by ensuring security of supply and addressing environmental concerns.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) Addressing the issue of shortages of medicinal products has been a long- standing priority for the Member States and European Parliament as illustrated by several reports from the European Parliament such as the European Parliament resolution of 17 September 2020 on the shortage of medicines – how to address an emerging problem1 a, as well as by discussions within the Council of the European Union. However, that issue has remained, to date, unaddressed. _________________ 1 a OJ C 385, 22.9.2021, p. 83.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 b (new) Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 c (new) (2 c) The implementation of the 'Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform' (STEP) should contribute to reducing the Union's dependencies on third countries in the field of biotechnologies and turn into a fully- fledged sovereignty fund for the pharmaceutical industry in the future1 aa. The European pharmaceutical industry must be protected from international competition, and fiscal and financial incentives should be permitted in order to encourage manufacturers to relocate to Europe the production of active ingredients and medicines of strategic importance for healthcare. _________________ 1 aa Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’) and amending Directive 2003/87/EC, Regulations (EU) 2021/1058, (EU) 2021/1056, (EU) 2021/1057, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) 2021/1060, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697 and (EU) 2021/241.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Addressing unequal patient access of medicinal products has become a key priority of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe as has been highlighted by the Council and the European Parliament. Member States have called for revised mechanisms and incentives for development of medicinal products tailored to the level of unmet medical need, while ensuring
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Addressing unequal patient access of medicinal products has become a key priority of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe as has been highlighted by the Council and the European Parliament. Member States and the Parliament have called for revised mechanisms and incentives for development of medicinal products tailored to the level of unmet medical need, while ensuring patient access and availability of
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Previous amendments to the Union pharmaceutical legislation have addressed access to medicinal products by providing for accelerated assessment for marketing authorisation applications or by allowing conditional marketing authorisation for medicinal products for unmet medical need. While these measures accelerated the authorisation of innovative and promising therapies in some areas, and there still exist many unaddressed public health priorities, these medicinal products do not always reach the patient and patients in the Union still have different levels of access to medicines, for instance due to their high prices, inadequate infrastructures in Member States or the industry’s business strategy.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In the interests of public health and with a view to the proper functioning of the EU regulatory framework, an innovative medicinal product should be understood as a medicinal product that satisfies a substantial health need that was previously unsatisfactorily or inadequately met and offers greater efficacy or other incremental benefits than existing therapeutic alternatives.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The COVID-19 pandemic
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted critical issues which require a reform of the Union pharmaceuticals framework to strengthen its resilience and to ensure that it serves the people under all circumstances. In light of the disparities in terms of national immunization infrastructures and preparation highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States should strengthen their national immunization programmes, ensuring a proper protection of their population against infectious diseases and building sustainable pandemic responses.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted critical issues which require a reform of the Union pharmaceuticals framework to strengthen its resilience and to ensure that it serves the people under all circumstances. In light of the disparities in terms of national immunization infrastructures and preparation, Member States should evaluate their national immunization programmes, and determine whether they are fit to protect their population.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) The pharmaceutical framework should be aligned with the EU's ambitions in industry, digitalization and trade, acknowledging the critical role of the European life sciences sector, especially the pharmaceutical industry, in upholding the EU's competitive edge. Bolstering robust European research and development is crucial for European sovereignty within the ambit of a globally competitive geopolitical landscape. The pharmaceutical legislative framework should be attuned to the broader EU industrial strategy, echoing the Council's emphasis from 23 March 2023 on amplifying incentives for investment in innovation and the 2016 Council's guidance that any amendments, including those affecting the incentive system, should not hinder the creation of drugs for rare disease treatment. Advancements in innovation are pivotal for enhancing patient health outcomes and the wider public health sector.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) The pharmaceutical framework should be consistent with overarching EU industrial policy, including the Council Conclusions from 23 March 2023 which stress the importance of strengthening incentives for investment in innovation and the 2016 Council Conclusions which stress any revision, including to the incentive framework, should not discourage the development of medicinal products needed for the treatment of rare diseases; increased innovation will further support patient outcomes and public health.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) As to the scope of this Regulation, the authorisation of antimicrobials is
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The structure and operation of the various bodies making up the Agency should be designed in such a way as to take into account the need to constantly renew scientific expertise, the need for cooperation between Union and national bodies, the need for adequate involvement of civil society, and the future enlargement of the Union. The various bodies of the Agency should establish and develop appropriate contacts with the parties concerned, in particular with representatives of patients, consumers and healthcare professionals.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) To prevent influence on the development or implementation of pharmaceutical policies or legislation or the decision-making processes of the Agency and the other EU institutions, the Executive Director, the Deputy Executive Director, the members of the Management Board and the members of the Committees may not, for two years after leaving office, hold any office or accept posts or engage in any activity whether remunerated or free of charge, on behalf of any person over whom they have exercised regulatory, negotiating or authorising powers.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) The chief task of the Agency should be to provide Union institutions and Member States with the best possible scientific opinions to enable them to exercise the powers of authorisation and supervision of medicinal products conferred on them by Union legal acts in the field of medicinal products. Marketing authorisation should be granted by the Commission only after a single scientific evaluation procedure addressing the quality, safety
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The Agency's budget should be transparent composed of fees and charges paid by the private sector and contributions from the Union budget to implement Union policies and contributions paid from third countries. Although the majority of its funding comes from fees, the Agency is a public authority and it is of utmost importance to safeguard its integrity and independence in order to ensure public trust in the Union regulatory framework.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Scientific advice for future applicants seeking a marketing authorisation should be provided more generally and in greater depth. Similarly, structures allowing the development of advice for companies, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (‘SMEs’), should be put in place. It is important to ensure that this robust, efficient and transparent advice mechanism also applies to health technologies, in order to support timely and effective evaluation of all health products and technologies, including particularly promising medical devices that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Scientific advice for future applicants seeking a marketing authorisation should be provided more generally and in greater depth. Similarly, structures allowing the development of
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Promising medicinal products that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs should benefit from early and enhanced scientific support, including through supporting innovative patient-relevant in vitro and in silico technologies which are key to the development of these products. Such support will ultimately help patients benefit from new therapies as early as possible.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Promising medicinal products that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs should benefit from early and enhanced scientific support, including through supporting innovative patient-relevant in vitro and in silico technologies which are key to the development of these products. Such support will ultimately help patients benefit from new therapies as early as possible.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Promising medicinal products and certain medical devices that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs should benefit from early and enhanced scientific support. Such support will ultimately help patients benefit from new therapies as early as possible.
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Promising medicinal products and medical devices that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs should benefit from early and enhanced scientific support. Such support will ultimately help patients benefit from new therapies as early as possible.
Amendment 233 #
(20 a) Despite the evolution of science and technology at a rapid pace and the regulatory incentives currently in place, there are many diseases without or only with suboptimal treatments. This Regulation should contribute to the development of treatments to tackle these unmet medical needs. These are in particular life threatening or severely debilitating diseases where no treatment alternative exists or where the disease still causes high morbidity or mortality, despite available therapeutic options. Products receiving regulatory incentives should result in a meaningful reduction in disease morbidity or mortality for the relevant patient population and a significant increase in patient’s quality of life.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20 a) Given that poor physical and mental health has a profound impact on societies and communities, high unmet medical needs shall be evaluated also within the broader context of public health and societal challenges.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 b (new) (20 b) Next to unmet medical needs already recognized in the antimicrobial, oncological, rare, and neurodegenerative diseases, particular attention should be given to unmet medical needs related to mental health sector and thus supporting novel mental health treatments which are showing promising potential.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 c (new) (20 c) The revision shall aim to support innovative mental health care treatments that combine pharmacological, and psychological aspects. Moreover, generation of empirical evidence for the quality and safety of novel mental health treatments should be further explored and supported. This includes understanding the interactions between the pharmacological substances and the psychotherapy as well as assistive technologies that can assist to patient preparation, monitoring or treatment integration.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21 a) Based on the Ombudsman’s decision in the strategic inquiry on how the European Medicines Agency engages with medicine developers in the period leading up to applications for authorisations to market new medicines in the EU1a, the Agency should enhance transparency of scientific advice. In addition, staff and experts from national competent authorities providing scientific advice should not be involved in a subsequent evaluation of marketing authorisation application for the same products. _________________ 1a European Ombudsman’s Decision in strategic inquiry OI/7/2017/KR on how the European Medicines Agency engages with medicine developers in the period leading up to applications for authorizations to market new medicines in the EU, July 2019.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) In certain cases, shortcomings in Member States’ system of supervision and related enforcement activities could risk to substantially hinder the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation and those of revised Directive 2001/83/EC which could even lead to the emergence of risks to public health or to environment. To address these challenges, harmonised inspection standards should be ensured through the establishment of a joint audit programme within the Agency.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Pharmaceutical research plays a decisive role in the continuing improvement in public health. Medicinal products, in particular those that are the result of long, costly research will not continue to be developed in the Union unless they are covered by favourable rules that provide for sufficient protection to encourage such research. However, it is hard to establish a direct link between between EU incentives and EU competitiveness because while the incentives make the EU markets more attractive, they are agnostic to the medicines’ geographical origin and authorised medicines from third countries are equally eligible to all EU incentives, as EU based innovative companies can equally benefit from incentives elsewhere.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Legal entities that are not engaged in an economic activity such as universities, public bodies, research centres or not-for-profit organisations, represent an important source of research in unmet medical needs, research in different subpopulations, repurposing, optimisation and innovation and should also benefit from this support scheme. Whereas it should be possible to take account of the particular situation of these entities on an individual basis, such support can best be achieved by means of a dedicated support scheme, including administrative support and through the reduction, deferral and waiver of fees.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Legal entities that are not engaged in an economic activity as their main activity such as universities, public bodies, research centres or not-for-profit organisations, represent an important source of innovation and should also benefit from this support scheme. Whereas it should be possible to take account of the particular situation of these entities on an individual basis, such support
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product. Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies. Where there is a doubt about the regulatory status of a particular product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product, the Agency and the relevant advisory bodies responsible for other regulatory frameworks, namely medical devices and substances of human origin should engage in consultations. In such cases, the compendium referred to in Regulation (EU) No [reference to be added after adoption cf. COM(2022)338 final] should be consulted. If after consulting the compendium, there remains doubt about the regulatory status the relevant bodies should further consult to determine the regulatory status. The Commission should facilitate the cooperation between the Agency and advisory bodies established by other Union legislation. Where an agreement by consensus cannot be reached by the Agency and the relevant advisory bodies, the Commission should be empowered to take a decision on the regulatory status of the product in question. The opinions and inclusions of the Agency and the relevant advisory bodies on the regulatory status of the product should be made publicly available after the consultations have taken place.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product such as an advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies. For Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs), the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) working group dedicated to ATMPs should seek input from the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Coordination Board when dealing with cases that are not clearly defined.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product such as advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies. The ad-hoc working group on Advanced Therapies should consult the SoHo Coordination Board on borderline cases.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product. Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as in particular substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies. In the case of the advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), the EMA working group on ATMPs shall consult the SoHO Coordination Board.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product. Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as in particular biological products, food supplements and nutraceuticals, dietary products, biotechnology derived products, substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) For informed policy development, the Agency should maintain its authority to carry out pilot programs, fostering a regulatory environment that is adaptive to future challenges. Efforts like the 2022 pilot program that provided augmented assistance to academic and non-profit developers of advanced therapy medicinal products should inform policy decisions and refine regulatory guidance.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) To support evidence-based policy making, the Agency should continue to be empowered to undertake pilot programmes to ensure a future-proof regulatory ecosystem. Initiatives such as the pilot programme launched in 2022 offering enhanced support to academic and non-profit developers of advanced therapy medicinal products should guide policy-making and update regulatory support.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) The Agency has an important role in sharing of information with the general public in order to ensure trust in its work and to support health literacy of patient and consumers. In addition, it is key to share up to date information with healthcare professionals, including pharmacists, and the scientific community. To increase transparency of scientific assessments and all other activities, a user-friendly European medicines web-
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) To optimise the functioning and efficiency of the regulatory system, the structure of the Agency’s scientific
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) The simplification of procedures should not have an impact on standards or the quality of scientific evaluation of the medicinal products to guarantee the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products. It should also allow for the reduction of the scientific evaluation period from 210 days to 1
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) The simplification of procedures should not have an impact on standards or the quality of scientific evaluation of the medicinal products to guarantee the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products. It should also allow for the reduction of the scientific evaluation period from 210 days to 180 days, excluding clock-stops.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The Agency’s scientific committees should be
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The Agency’s scientific committees should be
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The Agency’s scientific committees should be
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. Their evaluation will continue to encompass all the necessary expertise for each product as part of the rapporteur teams, with the possibility for CHMP and PRAC to call upon additional scientific experts to provide specific input and advice on specific aspects raised during the evaluation. In addition patients and healthcare professionals will be part of the pool of experts and will also be brought into EMA’s work according to their expertise in a certain disease area. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties and expert groups consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. Their evaluation will continue to encompass all the necessary expertise for each product as part of the rapporteur teams, with the possibility for CHMP and PRAC to call upon additional scientific experts to provide specific input and advice on specific aspects raised during the evaluation. In addition, patients and healthcare professionals will be part of the pool of experts and will also be brought into EMA’s work according to their expertise in a certain disease area. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties and expert groups consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. Their evaluation will continue to encompass all the necessary expertise for each product as part of the rapporteur teams, with the possibility for CHMP and PRAC to call upon additional scientific experts to provide specific input and advice on specific aspects raised during the evaluation. In addition patients and healthcare professionals will be part of the pool of experts and will also be brought into EMA’s work according to their expertise in a certain disease area. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas,
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients, their caregivers and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients, their caregivers and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Scientific committees like the CAT have been instrumental to ensure expertise and capacity building in an emerging technological field. However, after more than 15 years, advanced therapy medicinal products are now more common. The full integration of their assessment in the work
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 a (new) (37 a) To ensure the adequate expertise and evaluation of the environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances, the Agency establishes a new Environmental Risk Assessment working party which will have the scientific knowledge to characterise and assess the risks and hazards related to the development, production, use and disposal of medicines and their impact on the environment, animals, humans and public health. The working party will ensure the One Health Approach in medicines evaluation and closing the gap between pharmaceutical and environmental assessment. The working party ensures, based on cross-sectorial scientific knowledge, that substance is adequately assessed and the risk minimisation and containment strategies proposed by the applicants are sufficient in order to place the product on the market.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38 a) For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, with a view to enabling earlier availability for patients, the Agency should be able to perform a ‘phased review’ of data packages concerning finalised tests and trials before a formal application for marketing authorisation is submitted, to allow a more efficient assessment of medicinal products, while guaranteeing a high level of human health protection.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. Additionally, to improve regulatory certainty and cross-sectoral cooperation the Commission should on an annual basis, or more frequently where deemed necessary, organise joint meetings with the advisory bodies established in other Union legislation to assess emerging trends and questions on regulatory status of products and find agreement on common regulatory status principles. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of medicines, national insurance funds or healthcare payers. The Agency should also be able to extend the consultation mechanism to consumers, patients, healthcare professionals, industry, associations representing payers, or other stakeholders, as relevant.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate,
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment,
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of medicines, national insurance funds or healthcare payers. The Agency should
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) Member States should ensure adequate funding of competent authorities to carry out their tasks under this Regulation and under [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. In addition, in line with the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Commission on decentralised agencies48 , Member States should ensure adequate resources are assigned by the competent authorities of the Member States for the purpose of their contributions to the work of the Agency, taking into account the cost-based remuneration they receive from the Agency, while ensuring that adequate resources are also available for their national tasks. _________________ 48 https://europa.eu/european-
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 a (new) (41 a) Protecting global health is one of the priorities of the EU and under Article 178 of the Treaty, the Union should take into account the development policy aspects in any measure and promote the creation of conditions fit for human beings worldwide. To this end, this Regulation should particularly allow for the development of efficacious, safe, accessible, and affordable innovations to address global public health needs, including antimicrobial resistance, poverty-related and neglected diseases, widespread tropical disease and ensure high quality standards for medicinal products that are exported.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) In the interest of public health, marketing authorisation decisions under the centralised procedure should be taken on the basis of the objective scientific criteria of quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product concerned, to the exclusion of economic
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 a (new) (43 a) The Union is required, pursuant to Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to take account of development objectives in policies that are likely to have an impact on low- and middle-income countries. Pharmaceutical law has a role to play in the realisation of global public health objectives by promoting the development of efficacious, safe, accessible, and affordable innovations for antimicrobial resistance, poverty-related and neglected diseases, and other conditions of global public health interest and it should continue to ensure the highest standards in exported health products and contribute to stronger and more harmonised international technical requirements applicable to medicinal products. The Commission should consider to explore novel mechanisms to encourage research, development and innovation in areas of major global health interest, such as poverty-related, emerging and re-emerging, and neglected infectious diseases; chronic diseases; or comorbidities, in line with its international commitments and within the limits of its competences.
Amendment 278 #
(43 b) The Commission is empowered to explore novel mechanisms to encourage research, development and innovation in areas of major global health interest, such as poverty-related, emerging and re- emerging, and neglected infectious diseases; chronic diseases; or comorbidities, in line with its international commitments and within the limits of its competences.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) The quality, safety
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) To avoid unnecessary administrative and financial burdens for applicants, marketing authorisation holders and competent authorities, certain streamlining measures should be introduced. Marketing authorisation applications, like any other application submitted to the Agency, including applications for a variation to the terms of marketing authorisations, should follow the digital by default principle and hence be sent to the Agency in electronic form. Applications should be assessed based on the file submitted by the applicant in accordance with the different legal basis provided by [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. At the same time, the Agency and the relevant committees may take into account any information that is in its possession. Applicants shall be requested to generally submit raw data, in particular with regard to the clinical trials performed by the applicant in order to ensure a full assessment of the quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) Marketing authorisation applications, like any other application submitted to the Agency, should follow the digital by default principle and hence be sent to the Agency in electronic form. Applications should be assessed based on the file submitted by the applicant in accordance with the different legal basis provided by [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. At the same time, the Agency and the relevant committees may
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45 a) Particular attention should be given to the gender balance of clinical trials so that women can fully and safely benefit from medicines throughout their life-course.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Directive 2010/63/EU of the
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes49 lays down provisions on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes based on the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement. Any study involving the use of live animals, which provides essential information on the quality, safety and efficacy of a medicinal product, should take into account those principles of replacement, reduction and refinement, where they concern the care and use of live animals for scientific purposes, and should be optimised in order to provide the most satisfactory results whilst using the minimum number of animals. The procedures of such testing should be designed to avoid causing pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm to animals and should follow the available Agency and the International Committee for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. In particular, the marketing authorisation applicant and the marketing authorisation holder should take into account the principles laid down in Directive 2010/63/EU,
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Procedures should be in place to facilitate joint animal testing, wherever possible, in order to avoid unnecessary
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) The summary of product characteristics and the package leaflet should reflect the assessment of the Agency and be part of its scientific opinion. The opinion may recommend certain conditions that should be part of the marketing authorisation, for example on the safe and efficacious use of the medicinal product or on post-authorisation obligations that have to be complied with by the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51)
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51)
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As a general rule a marketing authorisation
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As a general rule a marketing authorisation should be granted for an unlimited time; however,
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51 a) As a general rule, marketing authorisation should be granted based on comparative clinical trials on patients who are representative of the population to be treated with the product. To this end, placebo controlled trials should only be accepted where duly justified, necessary and ethical. In addition, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient- reported experience measures (PREMs) should be an integral part of clinical data submitted with the marketing authorisation application in order to assess the quality of care and the impact of the treatments on patients.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) Environmental risks may arise from medicinal products containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms. It is thus necessary to subject such medicinal products to an environmental risk-assessment procedure similar to the procedure under Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 a (new) (53 a) The distinct properties of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) create substantial infrastructural and knowledge hurdles, along with systemic obstacles, making the 'release and continuous supply' of many ATMPs across all 27 Member States within a brief period challenging. It is essential to investigate alternative care options to ensure the availability of these therapies throughout the Member States, potentially utilizing frameworks for cross-border healthcare access, like Directive 2011/24/EU and Regulation (EC) No 883/2004.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 a (new) (53 a) Several care pathways should be explored to make therapies available in all Member States, including by advancing provisions for access to cross border care such as Directive 2011/24/EU and Regulation (EC) No 883/2004. This is particularly important for the advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), as their unique characteristics result in significant infrastructural complexities and system barriers, which can substantially limit their continuously supply.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] permits Member States to temporarily allow the use and supply of unauthorised medicinal products for public health reasons or individual patient needs and that includes medicinal products to be authorised under this Regulation. It is also necessary, that Member States are allowed under this Regulation to make a medicinal product available for compassionate use prior to its marketing authorisation. In those exceptional and urgent situations, where there is a lack of a suitable authorised medicinal product, the need to protect public health or the health of individual patients must prevail over other considerations, in particular the need to obtain a marketing authorisation and consequently, to have available complete information about the risks posed by the medicinal product, including any risks to the environment from medicinal products containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). To avoid delays in making these products available or uncertainties as regards their status in certain Member States, it is appropriate, in those exceptional and urgent situations, that for a medicinal product containing or consisting of GMOs, an environmental risk assessment or consent in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC or Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] permits Member States to temporarily allow the use and supply of unauthorised medicinal products for public health reasons or individual patient needs and that includes medicinal products to be authorised under this Regulation. It is also necessary, that Member States are allowed under this Regulation to make a medicinal product available for compassionate use prior to its marketing authorisation. In those exceptional and urgent situations, where there is a lack of a suitable authorised medicinal product, the need to protect public health or the health of individual patients must prevail over other considerations, in particular the need to obtain a marketing authorisation and consequently, to have available complete information about the risks posed by the medicinal product, including any risks to the environment from medicinal products containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). To avoid delays in making these products available or uncertainties as regards their status in certain Member States, it is appropriate, in those exceptional and urgent situations, that for a medicinal product containing or consisting of GMOs, an environmental risk
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 a (new) (56a) To prevent delays in treatment and to provide timely access for patients to medicines undergoing clinical trials, the EU body responsible for centralised procurement of medicinal products shall use the framework agreement, as regulated by Directive 2014/24/EU, for the purchase of experimental drugs, as soon as the first phase of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 has been completed. It is also recommended that the Member States use that institution.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 a (new) (56 a) The role of patient organisations is crucial in European Health Policy. Their finance, particularly their finance independent of individual pharmaceutical companies, is of particular importance. That is why the Commission should examine the situation and, if appropriate, make proposals to strengthen independent financing.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 a (new) (57 a) Given the unmet needs in the area of mental health, the revision shall support early access to novel treatments for patients who need them most through means like compassionate use programmes and conditional marketing authorisation. These programs shall play a pivotal role in providing treatment experience for providers and generating valuable real-world data to inform safety policies and future product labelling.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 b (new) (57 b) Use of early access pilot programs to treat a diverse set of patients with complex comorbidities who are often excluded from clinical trials focused on novel mental health treatments should be supported. Allowing this would support gathering critical additional data on the safety and efficacy of these treatments in a broader population. Furthermore, these programs shall explore different treatment protocols, such as group therapy and peer support specialists, to find the optimal balance of safety, efficacy, affordability, and equitable access.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 c (new) (57 c) If an applicant for compassionate use is an SME, research institute, or not- for-profit entity, the administrative burden associated with making available for compassionate use a medicinal product for human use shall be reduced. This might include procedural and administrative assistance by the national competent authorities of the Member States and the Agency.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) There is the possibility under certain duly justified circumstances for marketing authorisations to be granted, subject to specific obligations or conditions, on a conditional basis or under exceptional circumstances. The legislation should allow under similar circumstances for medicinal products with a standard marketing authorisation for new indications to be authorised on a conditional basis or under exceptional circumstances. The medicinal products authorised on a conditional basis or under exceptional circumstances should in principle satisfy the requirements for a standard marketing authorisation with the exception of the specific derogations or conditions outlined in the relevant conditional or exceptional marketing authorisation and shall be subject to specific review of the fulfilment of the imposed specific conditions or obligations. It is also understood that the grounds for refusal of a marketing authorisation shall apply mutatis mutandis for such cases.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Regulatory decision-making on the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products may be supported by access and analysis of health data, including real world data, where
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Regulatory decision-making on the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products may be supported by access and analysis of health data, including real world data, where appropriate, i.e. health data generated outside of clinical studies and/or through the use of in silico methods, such as computational modelling and simulation (CM&S) which includes PBPK, molecular modelling and mechanistic modelling, digital twin & artificial intelligence (AI). The Agency should be able to use such data, including via the Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (DARWIN) and the
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) In the preparation of scientific advice and in duly justified cases, the Agency should
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) In the preparation of scientific advice and in duly justified cases, the Agency should
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) Expedited Regulatory Pathways are a well-utilised tool to make assessments of pharmaceuticals more efficient and to modernise regulatory systems. Through the Priority Medicines (PRIME) scheme, the Agency has gained experience of the provision of early scientific and regulatory support to developers of certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence, are likely to address an unmet medical need and are considered promising at an early stage of development.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) Expedited Regulatory Pathways are a well-utilised tool to make assessments of pharmaceuticals more efficient and to modernise regulatory systems. Through the Priority Medicines (PRIME) scheme, the Agency has gained experience of the provision of early scientific and regulatory support to developers of certain medicinal products that, based on preliminary evidence, are likely to address an unmet medical need and are considered promising at an early stage of development.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 (67) The Agency, in consultation with the Member States and the Commission, should set the scientific selection criteria for medicinal products that receive pre- authorisation support with priority to be given to public health need and the most promising developments in therapies. In the case of medicinal products for unmet medical needs, based on the scientific selection criteria set by the Agency, any interested developer can submit preliminary evidence to demonstrate that the medicinal product has the potential to provide a major therapeutic advancement with respect to the identified unmet medical need.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67 a) To ensure patients with unmet medical needs, or suffering from life- threatening, or highly debilitating conditions treatable through the use or implant of a medical device are subject to the same quality, access and availability of treatment as other patients, EMA should have a a greater role in the evaluation of all health products and technologies. This may include the introduction of a dedicated priority review process which enhances patient access and facilitates interaction and early dialogue with manufacturers of certain class III and class IIb medical devices addressing unmet needs.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 68 (68) Before a medicinal product for human use is authorised for placing on the market of one or more Member States, it generally has to undergo extensive studies to ensure that it is safe, of high quality and effective for use in the target population. However, in the case of certain categories of medicinal products for human use, in order to meet unmet medical needs of patients and in the interest of public health, it may be necessary to grant a conditional marketing authorisation on the basis of less complete data than is normally the case. Such marketing authorisation should be granted subject to specific obligations. The categories of medicinal products for human use concerned should be the medicinal products, including orphan medicinal products, that aim at the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of seriously debilitating or life-threatening diseases
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 68 a (new) (68 a) There is still a lack of sufficiently detailed and comparable data at Union level to determine the trends and identify possible risk factors that could lead to the development of further measures to limit the risk from antimicrobial resistance and to monitor the effect of measures already introduced. Therefore it is important to collect data on the sales and use of antimicrobials, and data on antimicrobial resistant organisms found in animals, humans and food. To ensure that the information collected can be used effectively, appropriate rules should be laid down concerning the collection and the exchange of data. The Member States should be responsible for collecting data on the use of antimicrobials under the coordination of the Agency.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) In the event of a risk to public health or the environment, the marketing authorisation holder or the competent authorities should be able to make urgent safety or efficacy restrictions on their own initiative to ensure a swift adaption of the marketing authorisation to maintain the safe and efficacious use of the medicinal product by healthcare professionals and patients. If a review is launched on the same safety or efficacy concern addressed by urgent restrictions initiated by a competent authority, any written observations by the marketing authorisation holder should be considered in that review to avoid duplication of assessment.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) (71 a) Phased reviews have been a success during the COVID-19 pandemic and led to a rapid authorisation of the urgently needed vaccines. An application in times outside of public health emergencies is therefore appropriate and the procedure should be extended to orphan medicinal products and medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition. Moreover, the Commission should evaluate the performance of the phased reviews with the aim to further expand the category of medicinal products for which this procedure may apply.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) To optimise the use of resources for both applicants for marketing authorisations and competent authorities assessing such applications, a single assessment of an active substance master file should be introduced. The outcome of the assessment should be issued through a certificate. To avoid duplication of assessment, the use of an active substance master file certificate should be mandatory for subsequent applications or marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing that active substance from an active substance master file certification holder. The Commission should be empowered to establish the procedure for the single assessment of an active substance master file. To further optimise the use of resources, the Commission should be empowered to extend the certification scheme to additional
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) To optimise the use of resources for both applicants for marketing authorisations and competent authorities assessing such applications, a single assessment of an active substance master file should be introduced. The outcome of the assessment should be issued through a certificate. To avoid duplication of assessment, the use of an active substance master file certificate should be mandatory for subsequent applications or marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing that active substance from an active substance master file certification holder. The Commission should be empowered to establish the procedure for the single assessment of an active substance master file. To further optimise the use of resources, the Commission should be empowered to extend the certification scheme to additional quality master files, e.g. in case of novel excipients, adjuvants, raw materials, viral vectors and other starting materials, growth media, radiopharmaceutical precursors and active substance intermediates, when the intermediate is a chemical active substance by itself or used in conjugation with a biological substance.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) To optimise the use of resources for both applicants for marketing authorisations and competent authorities assessing such applications, a single assessment of an active substance master file should be introduced. The outcome of the assessment should be issued through a certificate. To avoid duplication of assessment, the use of an active substance master file certificate should be mandatory for subsequent applications or marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing that active substance from an active substance master file certification holder. The Commission should be empowered to establish the procedure for the single assessment of an active substance master file. To further optimise the use of resources, the Commission should be empowered to extend the certification scheme to additional quality master files, e.g. in case of novel excipients, adjuvants, raw materials, viral vectors and other starting materials, growth media, radiopharmaceutical precursors and active substance intermediates, when the intermediate is a chemical active substance by itself or used in conjugation with a biological substance
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 76 Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 76 (76) It is considered appropriate to also have the possibility for the Commission to grant temporary emergency marketing authorisations to address public health emergencies. Temporary emergency marketing authorisations may be granted provided that, having regard to the circumstances of the public health emergency, the benefit of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product concerned outweighs the risk inherent to the fact that additional comprehensive quality, non-clinical, clinical data may still be required. The decision of the Commission should be based on the opinion issued by the Agency, detailing how the medicinal product could be effective in treating, preventing or diagnosing the disease or condition directly related to the public health emergency and how the benefits of using the product outweigh the risks. In that effect, and given the limited knowledge of both the benefits and risks, the Agency should only take into account plausible expectations of benefits which should be grounded on the data available at the time of the opinion. A temporary emergency marketing authorisation should be valid only during the public health emergency. The Commission should be given the possibility to vary, suspend or revoke such marketing authorisations in order to protect public health or when the marketing authorisation holder has not complied with the conditions and obligations set out in the temporary emergency marketing authorisation.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 76 (76) It is considered appropriate to also have the possibility for the Commission to grant temporary emergency marketing authorisations to address public health emergencies. Temporary emergency marketing authorisations may be granted provided that, having regard to the circumstances of the public health emergency, the benefit of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product concerned outweighs the risk inherent to the fact that additional comprehensive quality, non-clinical, clinical data may still be required. A temporary emergency marketing authorisation should be valid only during the public health emergency. The Commission should be given the possibility to vary, suspend or revoke such marketing authorisations in order to protect public health or when the marketing authorisation holder has not complied with the conditions and obligations set out in the temporary emergency marketing
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 76 (76) It is considered appropriate to also have the possibility for the Commission to grant temporary emergency marketing authorisations to address public health emergencies. Temporary emergency marketing authorisations may be granted provided that, having regard to the circumstances of the public health emergency, the benefit of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product concerned outweighs the risk inherent to the fact that additional comprehensive quality, non-clinical, clinical data may still be required. A temporary emergency marketing authorisation should be valid only during the public health emergency. The Commission should be given the possibility to vary, suspend or revoke such marketing authorisations in order to protect public health or when the marketing authorisation holder has not complied with the conditions and obligations set out in the temporary emergency marketing authorisation, or when a standard or conditional marketing authorisation has been granted for the relevant indication.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure whereby pharmaceutical companies neglect investment in research and development (R&D) concerning novel antibiotics due to profitability considerations; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to promote the development of priority antimicrobials that are effective against antimicrobial resistance and to support undertakings, often SMEs, which choose to invest in this area. It is equally necessary to support research and development with an aim to develop alternative treatments such as bacteriophages, that are effective against multi-drug resistant bacteria and can be used as alternative or together with antibiotics.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure whereby access dynamics at Member State level constitute a significant disincentive for companies to invest in the development of novel antibiotics; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to promote the development of priority antimicrobials that are effective against antimicrobial resistance and to support undertakings, often SMEs, which choose to invest in this area.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure, whereby antimicrobial R&D is hampered by the low commercial value of antimicrobial medicinal products; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to promote the development of
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to incentivize companies' investments in research and development and to promote the development of priority antimicrobials that are effective against antimicrobial resistance and to support undertakings, often SMEs, which choose to invest in this area.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure; it is therefore necessary to consider new
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 (78) To be considered a ‘priority antimicrobial’, a medicinal product should represent a real advancement against antimicrobial resistance and should therefore bring forward non-clinical and clinical data that underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance. When assessing the conditions for antibiotics, the Agency shall take into account the prioritisation of pathogens as regards the risk of antimicrobial resistance provided for in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, specifically those listed as priority 1 (critical) or priority 2 (high) or in case there is an equivalent list of priority pathogens adopted at Union level, the Agency should take such Union list into account as a priority. In order to address market failures for the development of antimicrobials, the priority focus should be on the research and development and subsequent production and fair distribution of new antimicrobials. However, addressing AMR will not be solved by R&D alone. To ensure prudent use of existing antibiotics, the Authority should also support the development and procurement of rapid diagnostic tools to ensure appropriate prescriptions.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) (78 a) To seriously tackle major ongoing public health challenges, the antimicrobial resistance in particular, while also building on existing resources, the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) should be established as a separate structure under the legal personality of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to boost EU’s capability to address health emergencies. The Authority should be responsible for creating, coordinating and implementing the long-term European portfolio of biomedical research and development agenda for medical countermeasures against current and emerging public health threats, as well as providing tools to ensure EU-wide access to these products, including those to support production, procurement, stockpiling and distribution capacity of medical countermeasures and other priority medical products in the EU. The Authority will play a crucial role in addressing health threats globally. The Authority should primarily focus on the fight against antimicrobial resistance and the development of new antimicrobials and medical countermeasures linked to public health emergencies. However, in the future with increasing capacity, the Authority should expand the scope of its agenda, specifically to tackle other areas of unmet medical need such as rare and neglected diseases. The Authority should have adequate resources to fulfil its mandate.
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) (78 a) Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance requires a rethinking of the approach to incentives both at Union and national level. Member States must be willing to re-valuate their commitment to generating pharmaceutical R&D in key areas of priority and in public expenditure directed towards health. The European Commission, the Council and the European Parliament have published a large number of studies and recommendations, addressing the need to refocus on producing novel antimicrobials as soon as possible. These approaches need to be evaluated, consolidated and made operational under a single, comprehensive long-term Action Plan on addressing Antimicrobial Resistance in the Union, which will contain all the necessery measures to stimulate research and developing novel antimicrobials.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) (78 a) In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, to counteract market failures exacerbated by the public health crisis and to better respond to cross-border health threats, the Commission service HERA was set up under Commission Decision C(2021) 6712. HERA is tasked to strengthen the Union’s ability to prevent, detect and rapidly respond, by ensuring the supply of crisis relevant medical countermeasures, including through their monitoring, procurement and purchase, by activating emergency research and innovation plans, providing emergency funding and financing, and by taking measures concerning the production, availability and supply of such key medical countermeasures.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 b (new) (78b) Member States, the Union, third countries, international organisations and agencies have identified the key areas of priority pharmaceutical research, including novel antibiotics and antivirals, improved diagnostics and treatments for emerging infectious diseases, affordable and efficacious medicinal products in the areas of oncology and neurodegenerative diseases and other areas of unmet medical need for which the development of orphan medicinal products is needed. However, while Member States and the Union offer generous corporate R&D subsidies as well as R&D tax incentives to stimulate pharmaceutical research, there is little evidence to suggest, and no obligation to ensure, that the composition of R&D portfolios of pharmaceutical companies is determined by such direct or indirect subsidies. It is therefore increasingly evident that effective public health policy is undermined by shortcomings in transparency and accountability in public expenditure on health.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 b (new) Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 b (new) (78 b) To ensure that the Union has the most efficient and rapid access to innovations in priority antimicrobials, a short-term incentive measure must be put in place to bridge the gap until the Action Plan begins to have effect on the research and development ecosystem and on the pharmaceutical market for antimicrobials. The transferable exclusivity voucher is, therefore, introduced as a short-term tool to incentivise innovation.
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 b (new) (78 b) However with the increasing awareness and need for transparency and accountability in expenditure on public health measures and the importance of the missions and responsibilities of HERA it is considered appropriate that it is subject to the same level of oversight and scrutiny requirements as other agencies established under Union legislation such as the ECDC and the EMA.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 c (new) (78b) Those market failures highlight the need for a paradigm shift in both the Member States’ and the Union’s approach to generating pharmaceutical R&D in key areas of priority and in public expenditure directed towards health.The establishment at EU of mission-oriented R&D infrastructure which acts in the public interest is a tool to alleviate those market failures.This public law infrastructure must be able to carry out research and development activities concerning novel antimicrobials, and in other sectors where unmet medical needs are common. What is more, with a view to overcoming market failures of that kind, more preliminary purchasing agreements must be concluded and joint procurement must be carried out, with the aim of providing the EU and its Member States with greater flexibility in line with their needs and of ensuring that medicines are available for all EU residents, irrespective of their Member State of origin.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 c (new) Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 c (new) (78 c) The principle of open science is pivotal to ensure rapid progress in the field of scientific research for priority antimicrobials. Over the past 30 years, the lack of sharing of results, failed trials and ongoing research has created bottlenecks for scientific development and contributes to the current market failure for the placing on the market of new antimicrobials. It is therefore of the utmost importance to have a paradigm shift towards open science, particularly in the area of publicly-funded research, to reduce duplication of research, allow for peer-verification of results and building further evidence based on most recent findings, as to making research and development funding efforts more efficient. Indeed, it would also allow HERA to avoid funding research projects that would lead to similar mistakes being repeated over and over. Open science should serve as the basis for the coordinated research effort.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 d (new) (78 d) In order to ensure sufficient investment to address AMR, the European Antimicrobial Innovation Fund should be established. The Fund should generate and invest at least 1 billion EUR per year to address antimicrobial resistance. Since the manufacturing, use and disposal of antibiotics and other pharmaceutical substances in humans and animals and their prevalent occurance in the environment is the main cause of AMR and only a handful of developers are actively addressing this emergency, the collective effort, under the One Health Approach, of the industry and public authorities must be in place to solve the crisis. As per the polluter pays principle, companies selling medicines on the EU market, therefore contributing to the growing problem of environmental pollution including antimicrobial resistance, which do not wish to invest in R&D of antimicrobials should financially support, through annual penalty payments, the collective efforts to solving this public health emergency to the European Antimicrobial Innovation Fund. Other EU funding as well as voluntary contributions from philanthropic organisations, international schemes or Member States should represent complementary sources allocated to this Fund.
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 d (new) (78d) To prevent overlapping of competences and with a view to better coordination and efficiency of the use of public resources, the Commission must present a proposal, where necessary, to streamline and restore the competences of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 e (new) (78 e) The increasing prevalence and threat of antimicrobial resistance requires action on different fronts in parallel. In addition to the role of the European Medicines Facility, it is necessary to create a Union push and pull incentive scheme to promote and accelerate the development of novel antimicrobials. In this regard, the Commission should create and define a Union push and pull scheme as well as its funding mechanisms. Given the urgency of need for novel antimicrobials, the Commission should therefore have developed and began the implementation of the scheme by one year after the adoption of the Regulation.
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 f (new) (78 f) Practices in procurement procedures for medicines differ between Member States and long-term availability is rarely a primary consideration. The 2014 Procurement Directive encourages a more strategic approach through award criteria, including criteria beyond price. Using the lowest price as the main selection criterion may reduce incentives for the industry to build for long-term supply in the EU. At the same time, vulnerability may be increased when public procurement procedures award contracts to a single company. Where challenges with access to a critical medicine and related affordability may be an issue, Member States can work together to increase buying power: Joint procurement between Member States can act as a powerful tool to improve access, affordability and security of supply, of particular benefit in smaller EU markets. This can improve the negotiating position of Member States to incentivise production capacities, as well as diversifying supply chains. In specific cases, those instruments could also support enhanced predictability through multi-annual contracts.
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 g (new) (78 g) Coordination at EU level of medicinal products could offer a strategic frame to enhance security of supply of needed critical medicines through public procurement. This could draw on Commission guidance and common criteria for the procurement of critical medicines, such as green production and prioritisation of supplies in Europe at times of critical shortages. Such procurement efforts should also be based on the principle of the ‘most economically advantageous tender’ (‘MEAT’ criteria), which aims to ensure the best value for money rather than most economically advantageous product. Such an approach could also help in defining adequate supply in relation to critical medicines and, thereby, compensate and incentivise industry, and support the application of these criteria in a coordinated way, at EU level. Predictability of supply would also be helped by medium-term contractual incentives to diversify and attract the next generation of manufacturing investments in Europe.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 (79) The creation of a voucher rewarding the development of priority antimicrobials through an additional year of regulatory data protection
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 (79) The creation of a voucher rewarding the development of priority
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 a (new) (79 a) The fight against antimicrobial resistance will only be addressed through push (R&D focused) and pull (access focused) incentives at EU and national level. In order to provide the right signal on which products to incentivise at both EU and national level, the creation of an AMR Designation is needed. Such AMR Designation would allow the EU to identify all products which could contribute to the fight against antimicrobial resistance and would provide the necessary focus to coherently target R&D and access incentives.
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 a (new) (79 a) In order to fight against antimicrobial resistance, push and pull incentives are to be considered essential at both Union and national level. In this regard, the creation of an AMR designation is needed to allow the identification of all products which could contribute to this aim and would provide the necessary focus to coherently target research and development and aceess incentives.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 (80) A transferable data exclusivity voucher should only be available to
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 (80) A transferable data exclusivity voucher and other push and pull incentives schemes to boost the development of priority antimicrobials should only be available to those antimicrobial products that bring a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance, and which have the characteristics described in this Regulation. It is also necessary to ensure that an undertaking which receives this incentive is in turn capable to supply the medicinal product to patients across the Union in sufficient quantities and to provide information on all funding received for research related to its development in order to provide a full account of the direct financial support given to the medicinal product.
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 (83) The provisions related to transferable data exclusivity vouchers shall be applicable for a specified period from the entry into force of this Regulation
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 380 #
(84 a) The Transferable Exclusivity Vouchers (TEV) could be complemented by a procurement mechanism, as outlined in the Council Recommendation on “Stepping up actions to combat AMR in a One Health approach”, providing coordinated financial commitment across the EU and Member States. This would provide the predictability that will encourage comprehensive commercialisation of new priority antimicrobials.
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 86 (86) Medicinal products for rare diseases and for children should be subject to the same provisions as any other medicinal product concerning their quality, safety, and efficacy and environmental risk, for example for what concerns the marketing authorisation procedures, the pharmacovigilance and quality requirements. However, specific requirements also apply to them. Such requirements, which are currently defined in separate legislations, should be integrated in this Regulation in order to ensure clarity and coherency of all the measures applicable to these medicinal products.
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 (87) Some orphan conditions occur so infrequently that the cost of developing and bringing to the market a medicinal product to diagnose, prevent or treat the condition cannot be recovered by the expected sales of the medicinal product. However, patients suffering from rare conditions should be entitled to the same quality of treatment as other patients; it is therefore necessary to stimulate the research, development and placing on the market of appropriate medications
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) The European Parliament adopted a resolution of 10 July 2020 concerning the EU's post-COVID-19 public health strategy, which called for an EU Action Plan specifically targeting rare diseases.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) The European Parliament adopted a resolution of 10 July 2020 on the EU’s public health strategy post-COVID-19, which requested an EU Action plan for rare diseases.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) The European Parliament adopted a resolution of 10 July 2020 on the EU’s public health strategy post-COVID-19, which requested an EU Action plan for rare diseases
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) The European Parliament resolution of 10 July 2020 on the EU’s public health strategy post-COVID-19, called for an EU Action plan for rare diseases.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 has proved to be successful in boosting developments of orphan medicinal products in the Union; therefore an action at Union level remains preferable to uncoordinated measures by the Member States which may result in distortions of competition and barriers to intra-Union trade. The Union should not neglect or disregard the success of the Regulation since its entry into force in 2000; it should build upon its success, in order to ensure an even greater degree of innovation under this Regulation; _________________ 55 Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 has proved to be successful in boosting developments of orphan medicinal products in the Union; therefore an action at Union level remains preferable
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 has proved to be successful in boosting developments of orphan medicinal products in the Union; therefore an action at Union level remains preferable to uncoordinated measures by the Member States which may result in distortions of competition and barriers to intra-Union trade. The Union should not neglect or disregard the success of the Regulation since its entry into force in 2000, and build on its success driving and ensuring a similar degree of innovation under this Regulation. _________________ 55 Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 has proved to be successful in boosting developments of orphan
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 90 (90) Objective criteria for the orphan designation based on the prevalence of the life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition for which diagnosis, prevention or treatment is sought and the existence of no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorised in the Union should be maintained; a prevalence of not more than five affected persons per 10 000 is generally regarded as the appropriate threshold. The orphan designation criterion on the basis of return on investment has been abolished,
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 90 a (new) (90 a) The aim of intellectual property and regulatory incentives is to benefit society and promote innovation in areas of public health and unmet medical needs, such as rare diseases. It is of utmost importance that such incentives are not misused or abused, nor pose threats to affordability and patient access to treatments. In particular, the practice of artificially subdividing diseases to create subgroups of patients in order to fall under the orphan medicine prevalence criterion should be prohibited.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 91 Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 91 Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 a (new) (92 a) Significant benefit should remain the main determining factor for a therapy's eligibility for orphan status when assessing an orphan medicinal product that meets the incidence threshold.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 a (new) (92 a) Significant benefit should remain the main determining factor for eligibility for orphan status when assessing an orphan medicinal product that meets the incidence threshold.
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 a (new) (92 a) What constitutes significant benefit in a patient population can change over time, therefore, the concept should remain sufficiently flexible to ensure a future-proof regulatory framework while ensuring predictability through additional guidance.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 b (new) (92 b) What constitutes significant benefit in a patient population can change over time, therefore, the concept should remain sufficiently flexible to ensure a future-proof regulatory framework while ensuring predictability through additional guidance developped in consultation with patient organisations.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 b (new) Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. In this context,
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. In this context, a medicinal product authorised in one Member State is generally deemed as being authorised in the Union. It is not necessary for it to have Union authorisation or to be authorised in all Member States to be considered as a satisfactory method. In addition, commonly used methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatment that are not subject to a marketing authorisation may be considered satisfactory if there is scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety. In certain cases, medicinal products prepared for an individual patient in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription, or according to the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy, may be considered as satisfactory treatment if they are well known and safe and this is a general practice for the relevant patient population in the Union. This provision is applicable solely to medicinal products that are not classified as advanced therapy medicinal products and do not contain complex active substances.
Amendment 405 #
(93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. In this context, a medicinal product authorised in one Member State is generally deemed as being authorised in the Union. It is not necessary for it to have Union authorisation or to be authorised in all Member States to be considered as a satisfactory method. In addition, commonly used methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatment that are not subject to a marketing authorisation may be considered satisfactory if there is scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety. In certain cases, medicinal products prepared for an individual patient in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription, or according to the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy, may be considered as satisfactory treatment if they are well known and safe and this is a general practice for the relevant patient population in the Union. This only applies to medicinal products that are not advanced therapy medicinal products and that do not otherwise contain complex active substances.
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. In this context, a medicinal product authorised in one Member State is generally deemed as being authorised in the Union. It is not necessary for it to have Union authorisation or to be authorised in all Member States to be considered as a satisfactory method. In addition,
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 94 (94) The competence to designate a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product, in the form of a decision, is accorded to the Agency. The designation shall be valid from the day of the adoption of the decision by the Agency. This is expected to facilitate and expedite the designation procedure, while ensuring high level of scientific expertise. The orphan designation may be withdrawn at the request of the orphan medicine sponsor.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 95 Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 96 a (new) Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 99 (99) A vast percentage of rare diseases remains without treatment with research and development clustered in the areas where profit is better assured. Therefore, there is a need to target those areas where research is mostly needed and where investments are
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 100 Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 100 (100) Orphan medicinal products addressing a high unmet medical need prevent, diagnose or treat conditions where either no other method of prevention, diagnosis or treatment exists or, if such method already exists, they would bring exceptional therapeutic advancement. In both cases, the criterion of
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise investment and innovation, research and development of orphan medicinal products
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivi
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivi
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise research and development of orphan medicinal products addressing high unmet needs, to ensure market predictability and to ensure a fair
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise research and development of orphan medicinal products addressing high unmet needs, to ensure market predictability and to ensure a fair distribution of incentives, a modulation of market exclusivity has been introduced; pioneering orphan medicinal products addressing
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise research, innovation and development of orphan medicinal products
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 (103)
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 (103) In order to encourage faster and wider access also to orphan medicinal products, an additional period of
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 a (new) (103 a)Information is key to ensuring access to novel treatments for patients with rare diseases. Large dispariteis remain between Member States as to the level of information access for both clinicians and patients. Without addressing this crucial break of communication starting at the manufacturer of a novel orphan medicinal product and ending with the relevant patient population, awareness of and takeup of novel treatments will remain low. Clinicians must continuously be kept up-to-date with developments in the fields of rare diseases, in order to provide their patients with the best possible treatment. In order to address this gap, action is needed across the board, starting with applicants for a marketing authorisation for an orphan medicinal product. They must prove their commitment to continuously provide the necessary information not only in the Member States where their treatments are sold, but within the entire Union. This can only be achieved with the support of the Agency and with the full cooperation of national and Union-level professional and patient organisations. Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure financial and structural support enabling the flow of information.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 b (new) (103 b)Informing clinicians and other medical professionals of available orphan medicinal products placed on the Union markets should be accopmanied by measures ensuring their upskilling. Member States must invest in the creation of Centres of Excellence for one or a group of rare diseases, with the material base and skilled professionals to offer the latest available treatments. These Centres may be established on a national or regional level. Furthermore, Member States may elect to enter into cooperation and co-financing, in order to establish joint Centres of Excellence, based on their patient populations, territorial proximity, ease of access/travel and material conditions.
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 c (new) (103 c) The Union must build on the successful implementation since 2017 of the European Reference Networks (ERNs) for rare diseases. As highlighted in the EU Joint Action on Rare Diseases Plan, the support for and cooperation with the ERNs must be enchanced both from the public and private sectors. Therefore, applicants for market authorisation of orphan medicinal products must prove that they have put in place robust pathways for partnering with ERNs and for the exchange and use of relevant data. Member States must guarantee appropriate levels of funding - an estimated €77 million, in order to realise the full potential of the ERNs.
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 d (new) (103 d)Presently, conditions under which a patient may travel from one Member State to another to receive medical care and reimbursement are established in the Directive 2011/24/EU on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, as well as in Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems. Patients seeking cross-border healthcare continue to face issues with regards to their rights, partially due to the incomplete transposition of Directive 2011/24/EU by all Member States. For many patient populations in certain Member States these pathways remain the only way to seek treatment for rare diseases, which are available in other Member States. Directive 2011/24/EU must, therefore, be fully transposed and used by all Member States to guarantee their patients access to orphan medicinal products put on the Union markets.
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 (104) To maximise the potential benefit of clinical research, continued exploration of new indications should be encouraged. To reward research into and development of new therapeutic indications, an additional period of one
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 (104)
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 (104)
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 a (new) Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 105 (105) This Regulation includes several provisions aimed to avoid not-justified benefits being derived from the market exclusivity and to improve accessibility of medicinal products by ensuring faster entry of generics and biosimilars, and similar medicinal products on the market, i.e. on day one after the market exclusivity expires. It also clarifies the concurrence of market exclusivity with data protection and defines situations when a similar medicinal product may be granted a marketing authorisation, despite the ongoing market exclusivity. The market exclusivity of the orphan medicinal product shall not prevent the submission, validation, assessment of an application for and granting of a marketing authorisation for a similar medicinal product, including generics and biosimilars, where the remainder of the duration of the initial market exclusivity is less than two years.
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 105 a (new) (105 a)One of the overarching goals of this Regulation is to help meeting the medical needs of patients with rare diseases, to improve the affordability of orphan medicinal products and the patient access to orphan medicinal products across the Union, and to encourage innovation in areas of need. While other Union programmes and policies also contribute to these goals, people living with a rare disease continue to face common challenges that are many and multifactorial, including delayed diagnoses, lack of available transformative treatments, and difficulties to access treatments where they live, reflecting the fragmentation of the market across the Member States. The European added value to addressing the needs of people living with a rare disease being exceptionally high due to the rarity of patients, experts, data, and resources, it is appropriate for the Commission to develop, to complement this Regulation, a dedicated framework for rare diseases to bridge relevant legislation, policies and programmes, and support national strategies with a view to better meet the unmet needs of people living with rare diseases and their carers. This framework should be needs driven and goals based, and developped in consultation with the Member States and patient organisations as well as, where relevant, other interested parties.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 106 (106) Before a medicinal product for human use is placed on the market in one or more Member States, it has to have undergone extensive studies, including non-clinical tests and clinical trials, to ensure that it is safe, of high quality and effective for use in the target population. It is imp
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 110 (110) In order to not endanger the health of children and avoid to expose them to unnecessary clinical trials, the obligation to agree and conduct paediatric studies in children should be waived when the medicinal product is likely to be ineffective or unsafe in part or all of the paediatric population, the specific medicinal product does not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing treatments for children or the disease for which the medicinal product is intended occurs only in adult populations.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 112 (112) With a view to ensuring that research is conducted only when safe and ethical and that the requirement for study data in the paediatric population does not block or delay the authorisation of medicinal products for other populations, the Agency may defer the initiation or completion of some or all of the measures
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 112 (112) With a view to ensuring that research is conducted only when safe and ethical and that the requirement for study data in the paediatric population does not block or delay the authorisation of medicinal products for other populations, the Agency may defer the initiation or completion of some or all of the measures contained in a paediatric investigation plan
Amendment 438 #
(126) It is necessary to take measures for the supervision of medicinal products authorised by the Union, and in particular for the intensive supervision of undesirable effects of these medicinal products, and the collection of real-world data within the framework of Union pharmacovigilance activities, so as to ensure the rapid withdrawal from the market of any medicinal product presenting a negative benefit-risk balance under normal conditions of use.
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 129 (129) Scientific and technological progresses in data analytics and data infrastructure are essential for the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products. The digital transformation has affected regulatory decision-making, making it more data- driven and multiplying the possibilities to access evidence, across the life cycle of a medicinal product. This Regulation recognises the Agency’s experience and capacity to access and analyse data submitted independently from the marketing authorisation applicant or marketing authorisation holder. On th
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 129 (129) Scientific and technological progresses in data analytics and data infrastructure are essential for the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products. The digital transformation has affected regulatory decision-making, making it more data- driven and multiplying the possibilities to access evidence and real-world data, across the life cycle of a medicinal product. This Regulation recognises the Agency’s experience and capacity to access and analyse data submitted independently from the marketing authorisation applicant or marketing authorisation holder. On this basis, the Agency should take initiative to update the summary of product characteristics in case new efficacy or safety data has an impact on the benefit- risk balance of a medicinal product. In such case, the Agency and the marketing authorisation holder should collaborate to determine the particulars of any such update.
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 (132) The Union and Member States have developed a scientific evidence-based process that allows competent authorities to determine the relative effectiveness of new or existing medicinal products. This process focuses specifically on the added value of a medicinal product in comparison with other new or existing health technologies
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 a (new) (132 a)To ensure patients’ access to innovative medicines, it is appropriate to establish common rules for the testing and authorisation of innovative medicinal products and innovative technologies related to such products that, due to their exceptional nature or characteristics, are expected to not completely fit the EU medicines regulatory framework.
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 a (new) (132 a)To ensure access to innovative medicines, it is appropriate to establish common rules for the testing and authorisation of innovative medicinal products and innovative technologies related to such products that, due to their exceptional nature or characteristics, are expected to not completely fit the Union medicines regulatory framework.
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 b (new) (132 b)Regulatory sandboxes may be set up when it is not possible to develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product, and those characteristics or methods positively and distinctively contribute to the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicinal product or category of products, or provide a major advantage contribution to patient access to treatment.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 b (new) (132 b)Regulatory sandboxes may be set up when it is not possible to develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product, and those characteristics or methods positively and distinctively contribute to the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicinal product or category of products or provide a major advantage contribution to patient access to treatment.
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 c (new) (132 c) The objectives of the regulatory sandboxes should be: for the Agency and national competent authorities to increase their understanding of technical and scientific developments, to allow developers in a controlled environment to test and develop innovative medicinal products and related technologies that are not fitting the current regulatory framework, as agreed with the competent authorities, and to identify possible future adaptations of the legal framework.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 c (new) (132 c) The regulatory sandboxes will allow for the Agency and national competent authorities to increase their understanding of technical and scientific developments, for developers to test and develop in a controlled environment innovative medicinal products and related technologies that do not fit the current regulatory framework, in agreement with the competent authorities, and make it possible to identify possible future adaptations of the legal framework.
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on real-world evidence, especially at a very early stage of development of a medicinal product, which can be particularly
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on real-world evidence, especially at a very early stage of development of a medicinal product, which can be particularly important in the face of high uncertainty and disruptive challenges, as well as when preparing new policies.
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning,
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on real-world evidence, especially at a very early stage of development of a medicinal product, which can be particularly
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 (134) In the area of medicinal products, a high level of protection of inter alia citizens, consumers, health, as well as legal certainty, a level playing field and fair competition always need to be ensured and existing levels of protection need to be respected. Whenever possible, priority should be given to the use of non-animal approaches.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 (134) In the area of medicinal products, a high level of protection of inter alia citizens, consumers, health, the environment, as well as legal certainty, a level playing field and fair competition always need to be ensured and existing levels of protection need to be respected.
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 (134) In the area of medicinal products, a high level of protection of inter alia citizens, consumers, health, as well as legal certainty, a level playing field and fair competition always need to be ensured and
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 (134) In the area of medicinal products, a high level of protection of inter alia citizens, consumers, health, as well as legal certainty, a level playing field and fair competition always need to be ensured and
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 a (new) (134 a)Member States may introduce or maintain more robust provisions than those provided for in this Regulation with regard to the security of supply of and the availability of medicinal products, only in consistent and coordinated way.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 (135) The establishment of a regulatory sandbox should be based on a Commission Decision following a recommendation of the Agency. Such decision should be based on a detailed and comprehensive plan outlining the
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 (135) The establishment of a regulatory sandbox should be based on a Commission Decision following a recommendation of the Agency. Such decision should be based on a detailed plan outlining the
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 a (new) (135 a)The EU market for medicines remains fragmented, despite the EU having a single market and being the second largest market for pharmaceuticals in the world. The organisation of healthcare systems is a national competence of Member States: this allows decisions closer to the patient, but also brings major divergences in both pricing and patient access. Better and closer coordination between national authorities opens the door to a more efficient and effective supply of medicines throughout the EU. The reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation is essential to take the work on critical shortages and security of supply forward, building a pharmaceutical ecosystem that is competitive, future-proof and with a single market in medicines benefitting all Europeans. Furthermore, its goal are to prevent or mitigate critical shortages at EU level and to assure a particular focus on the critical medicines for which security of supply needs to be assured in the EU at all times, in normal times, and in times of crisis.
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 b (new) (135 b)More often, Member States experienced critical shortages of certain antibiotics, endangering the health of patients and risking the development of antimicrobial resistance. These critical shortages were the result of changing infection patterns, which strongly increased demand. On the supply side, the long lead times needed to boost production made it difficult to respond quickly. This experience underlined the need for a dedicated effort – from the industry, as well as from Member States and the EU level to address the issue of critical shortages.
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all marketing authorisation holders should have shortage prevention plans in place for critical medicinal products, and especially those that do not have alternatives, to prevent shortages. The Agency should provide guidance to marketing authorisation holders on approaches to streamline the implementation of those plans.
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment, including longer delays or interruptions in care or therapy, longer periods of hospitalisation, increased risks of exposure to falsified medicinal products, medication errors, adverse effects resulting from the substitution of unavailable medicinal products with alternative ones, significant psychological distress for patients and increased costs for healthcare systems. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all marketing authorisation holders should have shortage prevention plans in place, to prevent shortages. The Agency should provide guidance to marketing authorisation holders on approaches to streamline the implementation of those plans.
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems to parallel trade . In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation. It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across Europe. This is especially true for the most critical medicinal products which are essential to ensure the continuity of care, the provision of quality healthcare and guarantee a high level of public health protection in Europe. To combat certain shortages, medicinal products prepared for individual patients in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription “magistral formula”, or according to the pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy “officinal formula”, may be used. Member States may introduce or maintain additional robust measures to achieve security of supply of medicines, only when in consistent and coordinated way with the safeguards provided for in this Regulation.
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation. It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across Europe. This is especially true for the most critical medicinal products which are essential to ensure the continuity of care, the provision of quality healthcare and guarantee a high level of public health protection in Europe. To counter certain shortages, medicinal products prepared for individual patients in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription “magistral formula”, or according to the pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy “officinal formula”, may be used. Member States should be able to introduce or maintain more robust measures to achieve security of supply for medicines than the safeguards provided for in this Regulation.
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation. It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across Europe. This is especially true for the most critical medicinal products which are essential to ensure the continuity of care, the provision of quality healthcare and guarantee a high level of public health protection in Europe. To combat certain shortages, medicinal products prepared for individual patients in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription “magistral formula”, or according to the pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy “officinal formula”, may be used.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation, while allowing Member States to adopt or maintain legislation ensuring a higher degree of protection against medicine shortages, in respect of the commitments taken in the framework of the "Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism for medicines". It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation. It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across Europe. This is especially true for the most critical medicinal products which are essential to ensure the continuity of care, the provision of quality healthcare and guarantee a high level of public health protection in Europe. Member States may indroduce measures to ensure the security of supply of critical or strategic medicinal products on national level according their needs.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities and the Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities and the Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to communicate the necessary information to patients, consumers and healthcare professionals, including on estimated duration and available alternatives, and manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation and register such information in the European Shortages Monitoring Platform. Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure continuously and in real time, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. To this end, the Agency should set up a European platform on stocks of medicinal products which is continuously updated in real time with data transmitted by the competent authorities of the Member States, marketing authorisation holders and wholesale distributors. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation. Marketing authorisation holders and other
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation. Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including patient organisations or health care professionals,
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation and to identify the cause or causes of the respective critical shortage. If the critical shortage is triggered by a marketing authorisation holder, wholesale distributor or other legal entity, the Commission should be able to impose sanctions. Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including patient organisations or health care professionals, may also report a shortage of a given medicinal product marketed in the Member State concerned to the competent authority. The Executive Steering Group on Shortages and Safety of Medicinal
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders and the information available in the European Medicines Verifications System (EMVS). The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation. Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including patient organisations or health care professionals, may also report a shortage of a given medicinal product marketed in the Member State concerned to the competent authority. The Executive Steering Group on Shortages and Safety of Medicinal Products (‘the Medicines Shortages Steering Group’ (MSSG)) already established within the Agency pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council56 , should adopt a list of critical shortages of medicinal products and ensure monitoring of those shortages by the Agency. The MSSG should also adopt a list of critical medicinal products authorised in
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 a (new) (138 a)To facilitate appropriate communication between patients and consumers, on the one hand, and competent authorities on the other, Member States should collect data on the impact of shortages of medicinal products on patients and consumers, and share relevant information through the MSSG, in order to inform approaches to management of shortages of medicinal products. Marketing authorisation holders should set up and maintain a minimum safety stock of critical medicinal products which shall be sufficient to cover two months demand of all Member States where the product has been placed on the market. Delegated acts can be adopted by the Commission to ensure that appropriate measures, including the establishment or maintenance of contingency stocks, are taken by marketing authorisation holders, wholesale distributors or other relevant entities. The setting up of safety stocks of critical medicinal products should not hamper the availability and affordability of these products or harm the environment by inappropriate disposals at both European and global level. Given the global nature of pharmaceutical supply chains, the safety stocks should be proportionate and take into account the potential impacts on shortages in other Member States and third countries. In order to avoid any interruption of access to critical medicinal products, national competent authorities may, in duly justified cases, grant an exemption from stockpiling obligations to the marketing authorisation holder, upon request, or adopt other complementary measures on the safety of stocks
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 a (new) (138 a)In addition to existing and planned policy, legislative and regulatory measures, the Union need a strategic and coordinated industrial approach to ensure the security of supply of the most critical medicines. The Critical Medicines Alliance and the future Critical Medicines Act could allow national authorities, industry, civil society representatives, the Commission and the EU agencies to develop together coordinated actions at Union level against the shortages of medicines, in compliance with the competition rules and the Union’s international commitments. The future Critical Medicines Act could support the European green, digital manufacturing of critical medicines, APIs and intermediate ingredients, diversify the EU pharmaceutical supply chains and secure the strategic autonomy of critical medicines.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 a (new) (138 a)To avoid that measures foreseen or taken by a Member State to prevent or mitigate a shortage at national level when responding to the legitimate needs of its citizen increase the risk of shortages in another Member State, the Agency should assess those measures with regards to their potential or actual impact on the availability and security of supply in other Member States and at European level, and inform of its assessment the Member States and the MSSG.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 b (new) (138 b)One of the aims of this Regulation is to set out a framework for the activities to be deployed by the Member States and the Agency to improve the Union's capacity to react efficiently and in a coordinated manner to support shortage management and security of supply of medicinal products, in particular critical medicinal products, to EU citizens, at all times. Those shortages are a persistent problem that has been increasingly affecting the health and lives of Union citizens for decades and the root causes are multifactorial. Therefore, this Regulation should be a first step towards improving the Union response to that persistent problem. The Commission should subsequently expand that framework to continue addressing the causes of shortages of medicinal products, and better prevent and mitigate their effects.
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 c (new) (138 c) To complement this Regulation and as a first step to a more structural, long term approach to reduce Union dependencies for critical medicines and ingredients, particularly for products where there are only a few supplying manufacturers or countries, the Commission should propose by (OP: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation) a legislative initiative for an EU Critical Medicines Act for supporting the European green, digital manufacturing of key medicines, active pharmaceutical ingredients, and intermediate pharmaceutical ingredients for which the Union is dependent on one country or a limited number of manufacturers.
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 d (new) (138 d)It is appropriate for the Commission to build upon the Communication addressing medicine shortages in the European Union of 24 October 2023 and the many tools which can be used to promote a coordinated industrial approach, bringing together public and private actors from the European health and industrial ecosystem.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 a (new) (139a) The list of critical medicinal products drawn up at Union level should harmonise existing national lists and should not create confusion for the different actors in the pharmaceutical sector.
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 b (new) (139b) The creation of one of more non- profit pharmaceutical undertakings capable of producing certain medicines of health and strategic interest (MHSI) whose situation is critical or which are no longer profitable for pharmaceutical firms should complement and guarantee security of supply and prevent possible shortages of critical medicinal products.
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 c (new) (139c) Policies on the pricing of pharmaceutical products which only contain expenditure have a negative effect on the reliability of supply. The competent authorities of the Member States should be able to recommend an increase in the prices of products for which a risk of shortages or market consolidation has been identified.
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 d (new) (139d) The Covid-19 pandemic showed that introducing temporary regulatory flexibility measures in the event of a public health emergency can help tackle shortages of medicinal products.
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 e (new) Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 139 f (new) (139f) Public procurement procedures can be an effective tool for tackling shortages of medicinal products. At Member State level, invitations to tender based solely on price and where there is only one bidder increase the risk of shortages of medicinal products by strongly eroding prices, reducing the number of suppliers on the market. At Union level, joint procurement should be recognised as a tool to tackle critical shortages, in particular during a health crisis, as demonstrated by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 140 (140) It is recognised that improved access to information contributes to public awareness and increases public trust, gives the public the opportunity to express its observations and enables authorities to take due account of those observations. The general public should
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 140 (140) It is recognised that improved access to information contributes to public
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 141 (141) To ensure the enforcement of certain obligations relating to the marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use granted in accordance with this Regulation, the Commission should be able to impose financial penalties. When assessing the responsibility for failures to comply with those obligations and imposing such penalties, it is important that means exist to address the fact that marketing authorisation holders could be part of a wider economic entity. Otherwise, there is a clear and identifiable risk that the responsibility for a failure to comply with those obligations could be evaded, which might have an impact on the ability to impose effective, proportional and dissuasive penalties. The penalties imposed should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, having regard to the circumstances of the specific case. For the purposes of ensuring legal certainty in the conduct of the infringement procedure,
Amendment 502 #
(141) To ensure the enforcement of certain obligations relating to the marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use granted in accordance with this Regulation, the Commission should be able to impose appropriate and adequate financial penalties. When assessing the responsibility for failures to comply with those obligations and imposing such penalties, it is important that means exist to address the fact that marketing authorisation holders could be part of a wider economic entity. Otherwise, there is a clear and identifiable risk that the responsibility for a failure to comply with those obligations could be evaded, which might have an impact on the ability to impose effective, proportional and dissuasive penalties. The penalties imposed should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, having regard to the circumstances of the specific case. For the purposes of ensuring legal certainty in the conduct of the infringement procedure, it is necessary to set maximum amounts for penalties. Those maximum amounts should not be linked to the turnover of a particular medicinal product but the economic entity involved.
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 141 (141) To ensure the enforcement of certain obligations relating to the marketing authorisation for medicinal
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 143 (143) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation in relation to marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. The implementing powers related to the granting of centralised marketing authorisations and for suspending, revoking or withdrawing those authorisations
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 143 (143) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation in relation to marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. The implementing powers related to the granting of centralised marketing authorisations and for suspending, revoking or withdrawing those authorisations,
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 143 (143) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation in relation to marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use, implementing powers should be conferred
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 145 (145) Experience shows that, in clinical trials with investigational medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs, including some advanced therapy medicinal products, the procedure to achieve compliance with the requirements of Directives 2001/18/EC and 2009/41/EC as regards the environmental risk assessment and consent by the competent authority of a Member State is complex and can take a significant amount of time.
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 145 (145) Experience shows that, in clinical trials with investigational medicinal
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 145 (145) Experience shows that, in clinical trials with investigational medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs, including some ATMPs, the procedure to achieve compliance with the requirements of Directives 2001/18/EC and 2009/41/EC as regards the environmental risk assessment and consent by the competent authority of a Member State is complex and can take a significant amount of time.
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 149 (149) It is therefore appropriate to envisage a centralised assessment of the
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 149 (149) It is therefore appropriate to envisage a centralised assessment of the ERA involving experts from the national competent authorities and the Environmental Risk Assessment working party.
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 154 (154) This Regulation is based on the double legal basis of Article 114 and Article 168(4), point (c), TFEU. It aims at achieving an internal market as regards medicinal products for human use, taking as a base a high level of protection of health. At the same time, this Regulation sets high standards of quality and safety for medicinal products in order to meet common safety concerns as regards these products. Both objectives are being pursued simultaneously. These two objectives are inseparably linked and one is not secondary to another. Regarding Article 114 TFEU, this Regulation
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 155 (155) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and notably human dignity, the integrity of the person, the rights of the child, respect for private and family life, the protection of personal data and the freedom of art and science. To this end, specific actions will be established to reduce the gap between paediatric medicinal products, including speeding up the development and marketing of paediatric medicinal products, providing funds for paediatric research and setting which paediatric medicinal products are a priority with a view to covering unmet needs.
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 155 (155) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and notably human dignity, the integrity of the person, the rights of the child, respect for private and family life, the protection of personal data and the freedom of art and science. Similarly, this Regulation respects the Aarhus Convention which protects every person’s right to live in a healthy environment.
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 156 (156) The objective of this Regulation is to ensure the authorisation of high quality medicinal products, including for paediatric patients and patients suffering from rare diseases throughout the Union. Where this objective cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, such as in the case of the development of paediatric medicinal products, but can rather, by reason of its scale, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the monitoring and managamenet of shortages and critical shortages and security of supply of medicinal products and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (‘the Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 which shall carry out the tasks relating to medicinal products for human use that are laid down in this Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 2019/6 and other relevant Union legal acts.
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the monitoring and management of shortages and critical shortages and security of supply of medicinal products, and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (‘the Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 which shall carry out the tasks relating to medicinal products for human use that are laid down in this Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 2019/6 and other relevant Union legal acts.
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the security of supply of medicinal products and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (‘the Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 which shall carry out the tasks relating to medicinal products for human use that are laid down
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to tackling shortages and to the security of supply of medicinal products and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (‘the Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 which shall carry out the tasks relating to medicinal products for human use that are laid down in this Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 2019/6 and other relevant Union legal acts.
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 525 #
(7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product if such an advantage or contribution benefits a
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 a (new) (7 a) 'adverse reaction' means a response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended, and includes medication errors and uses outside of the terms of the marketing authorisation, including the misuse and abuse of the medication product;
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 a (new) (7 a) 'adverse reaction' means a response to a medical that is noxious and includes medication errors and uses outside of the terms of the marketing authorisation, including the misuse and abuse of the medication product;
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 a (new) (7 a) 'adverse reaction' means a response to a medical that is noxious and unintended and includes medication errors and uses outside of the terms of the marketing authorisation, including the misuse and abuse of the medication product;
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 a (new) (7 a) ‘adverse reaction’ means an effect on a person in response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended;
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 8 – point a (a) greater efficacy than an authorised
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 8 – point b (b) greater safety than an authorised medicinal product in a substantial part of the target population based on direct comparative trial;
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9 a (new) (9a) 'Paediatric population' means the proportion of the population aged between infancy and 18.
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9 b (new) (9b) 'Paediatric investigation plan' means a research and development programme designed to ensure that the requisite data are generated determining the conditions in which a medicinal product may be authorised to treat the paediatric population;
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9 c (new) (9c) 'Medicinal product authorised for a paediatric indication' means a medicinal product authorised for use in all or part of the paediatric population and for which the details of the indication authorised are specified in the summary of product characteristics drawn up in accordance with Article 4 of the [revised directive];
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 (10) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a regulatory framework during which it is possible to develop, validate and test in a controlled environment innovative or adapted regulatory solutions, including, when applicable, the use of real-world evidence, in silico methods, digital twin, and AI, that facilitate the development and authorisation of innovative products which
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 (10) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a regulatory framework during which it is possible to develop, validate and test in a
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 (10) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a regulatory framework during which it is possible to develop, validate and test in a controlled environment innovative or adapted regulatory solutions that facilitate the development and authorisation of innovative products which
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 (10) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a regulatory framework during which it is possible to develop, validate and test in a controlled environment innovative or adapted regulatory solutions that facilitate the development and authorisation of
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 (11) ‘critical medicinal product’ means a medicinal product for which insufficient supply results in serious harm or risk of serious harm to patients or does not allow to satisfy priority health care needs of the population, and identified using the methodology pursuant to Article 130(1), point (a).
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 (11) ‘critical medicinal product’ means a medicinal product for which insufficient supply results in serious harm or risk of serious harm to patients
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11a) ‘medicine of health and strategic interest’ (MHSI) means a medicinal product for which an interruption in treatment poses an immediate danger to the life of the patient.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product or a medical device by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product or the medical device is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the best care of patients;
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product or a medical device by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product or the medical device is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the best care of patients;
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the best care of patients;
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) 'demand' means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal products is acequired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of provision of the best care to patients. Wholesalers are usually a key supply link between market authorization holders and the users of medicines, and in those cases, in order to estimate demand, the quantity requested in wholesale orders should be considered;
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of provision of the best care to patients; Wholesalers are usually a key supply link between MAHs and the users of medicines, and in those cases, in order to estimate demand, the quantity requested in wholesale orders should be considered;
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) 'demand' means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare professional or patient in response to a clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the care of patients;
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the best care of patients.
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State does not meet the demand for that medicinal product
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State or of a CE-marked medical device does not meet the demand for that medicinal product or medical device in that Member State, whatever the cause.
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State does not meet the needs of patients’ demand for that medicinal product in that Member State, whatever the cause.
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State does not meet the demand for that medicinal product in that Member State, whatever the cause.
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State does not meet the demand for that medicinal product in that Member State whatever the cause.
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product or medical device that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product or medical device that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product that is placed on the market by a marketing authorization holder or a manufacturer.
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) 'supply' means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product or medical device that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 a (new) (12 a) ‘Supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product that is placed on the market by a marketing authorization holder or a manufacturer.
Amendment 570 #
(13) ‘critical shortage in the Member State’ means a shortage of a medicinal product, for which there is no
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 13 (13) ‘critical shortage in the Member State’ means a shortage of a medicinal product, for which there is no appropriate
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 a (new) (14 a) 'Healthcare professionals’ organisations’ means not-for-profit organisations that have an interest in patient care, and where healthcare professionals represent a majority of members in governing bodies.
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 a (new) (14 a) ‘clock stops’ means a period of time during which the evaluation of a medicine is officially stopped, while the applicant prepares responses to questions from the regulatory authority. The clock resumes when the applicant has sent its responses.
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 b (new) (14 b) ‘Patients’ organisations’ means as not-for-profit organisations which are patient focused, and where patients and/or carers (the latter when patients are unable to represent themselves) represent a majority of members in governing bodies.
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 a (new) (14 a) 'unavailability’ means a situation a product has not been launched, has been permanently withdrawn or marketing has been ceased or suspended.
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the applicant shows that the medicinal product constitutes a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or that the granting of marketing authorisation in accordance with this Regulation is in the interest of patients' health at Union level, including as regards antimicrobial resistance and potential countermeasures such as bacteriophages and medicinal products for public health emergencies;
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Member State authorisation of
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Member State authorisation of
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Member State authorisation of
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the application for marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with Article 9, 10, 13 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], or for active substances used in fixed dose combination medicinal products that have previously been used in the composition of authorised medicinal products;
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the application for marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with Article 9, 10, 13 of [revised Directive
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the application for marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with Article 9, 10, 13 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or for active substances used in fixed dose combination medicinal products that have previously been used in the composition of authorised medicinal products;
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Point (b), first subparagraph, shall not apply to those parts of summary of product characteristics and package leaflet referring to indications, posologies, pharmaceutical forms, methods or routes of administration or any other way in which the medicinal product may be used which were still covered by a patent or a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products at the time when the
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Point (b), first subparagraph, shall not apply to those parts of summary of product characteristics and package leaflet referring to indications, posologies, pharmaceutical forms, methods or routes of administration or any other way in which the medicinal product may be used which were still covered by a patent or a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products at the time when the
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Point (b), first subparagraph, shall not apply to those parts of summary of product characteristics and package leaflet referring to indications, posologies, pharmaceutical forms, methods or routes of administration
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. Within 20 days of receipt of an application, the Agency shall check whether all the information and documentation required in accordance with Article 6 have been submitted, that the application does not contain critical deficiencies as defined in guidelines established under paragraph 7 that may prevent the evaluation of the medicinal product and decide whether the application is valid.
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. Within 20 days of receipt of an application, the Agency shall check whether all the information and
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The documentation shall include a declaration to the effect that clinical trials carried out outside the Union meet the ethical requirements of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014. Those particulars and documentation shall take account of the unique, Union nature of the authorisation requested and, otherwise than in exceptional cases relating to the application of the law on trademarks pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 ,
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The documentation shall include a substantiated declaration to the effect that clinical trials carried out outside the Union meet the ethical requirements of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014. Those particulars and documentation shall take account of the unique, Union nature of the authorisation requested and, otherwise than in exceptional cases relating to the application
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 1 (new) (1) Applications for market authorisation shall provide evidence from comparative studies with a standard-of- care active comparator, including, but not limited to, randomised controlled trials. In exceptional curcumstances, where such studies cannot be provided for scientifically substantiated reasons, the applicant shall submit such duly justified reasoning to the Agency as part of the application for marketing authorisation. The Agency shall set the scientific guidelines on criteria for proposing a comparator for a clinical trial, taking into account the results of the consultation of the Commission and the authorities or bodies involved in the mechanism of consultation referred to in Article 162 of this Regulation.
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Applications for marketing authorisation shall include patient experience data (PROMs/PREMs) in the marketing application dossier. Where such data cannot be provided, the applicant should provide a justification to the Agency.
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment, including with regard to the quality of life of a relevant patient population or subpopulation, of a life- threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment, including the improvement of quality of life of certain patient's groups, of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement or are expected to be of great interest for public health in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life- threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For orphan medicinal products and medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products, during a public health emergency or to address a major event, that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life- threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, after the Commission has recognised a public health emergency at Union level in accordance with Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 and following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may at any stage suspend or cancel the phased review, where the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient maturity or where it is considered that the medicinal product no longer fulfils an exceptional therapeutic advancement or is no longer expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health. The Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly.
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may at any stage suspend or cancel the phased review, where the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient maturity or where it is considered that the medicinal product no longer fulfils an exceptional therapeutic advancement or does no longer present great interest for public health. The Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly.
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Where appropriate, the application may include an active substance master file certificate or an application for an active substance master file or any other quality master file certificate or application as referred to in Article 25 and Article 26 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC].
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Where appropriate, the application may include an active substance master file certificate or an application for an active substance master file or any other
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation applicant shall not carry out animal tests in case scientifically satisfactory non-animal testing methods are available. When scientifically reliable non-animal testing alternatives are unavailable, applicants utilizing animal testing must adhere to the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing for scientific purposes. This adherence must be in accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU for any animal study carried out to support their application.
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation applicant shall not carry out animal tests in case scientifically satisfactory New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), particularly non- animal testing methods are available. The Agency shall in its annual report highlight key observations and best practices in the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing submitted by applicants.
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation applicant shall not carry out animal test
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall ensure that the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use is given within 1
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall ensure that the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use is given within 180 days, excluding clock stops, after receipt of a valid application. In the case of a medicinal product for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms, the opinion of that Committee shall take into account the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment in accordance with Article 8.
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 On the basis of a duly reasoned request, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use may call for the duration of the analysis of the scientific data in the file concerning the application for marketing authorisation to be extended, once for an additional period of 30 days.
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 When an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of medicinal products for human use
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 When an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of medicinal products for human use which are of major interest from the point of view of public health and in particular from the viewpoint of
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use accepts the request, the time-limit laid down in Article 6(6), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 1
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use accepts the request, the
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use accepts the request, the time-limit laid down in Article 6(6), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 1
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. An application for a marketing authorisation submitted pursuant to this Regulation for a medicinal product for human use that has not been granted a paediatric derogation shall be considered valid only if it includes the results of all paediatric studies performed and other information collected in accordance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan, as laid down in Article 6 of the revised [Directive 2001/83/EC];
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article6a Parallel application (1) During the scientific assessment of an initial marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product by the Agency, the applicant may submit to the Agency a separate parallel application for one or more new indications concerning the same medicinal product. (2) The parallel application shall be assessed by the Agency as a marketing authorisation application in accordance with this Regulation, subject to the following: a) to the extent the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use can assess the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application, leading to the same outcome for both applications it shall group the applications and issue a single opinion. b) to the extent the said Committee cannot issue an opinion on the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application, the parallel application shall be converted to a Type II variation application. c) if the initial marketing authorisation application is withdrawn or receives a negative opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the Committee will pursue the assessment of the parallel application as a standalone marketing authorisation application.
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article6a Parallel application for one or more new indications (1) During the scientific assessment of an initial marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product by the Agency, the applicant may submit to the Agency a separate parallel application for one or more new indications concerning the same medicinal product. (2) The parallel application shall be assessed by the Agency as a marketing authorisation application in accordance with this Regulation, subject to the following: (a) To the extent the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use can assess the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application, leading to the same outcome for both applications it shall group the applications and issue a single opinion. (b) To the extent the said Committee cannot issue an opinion on the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application the parallel application shall be converted to a Type II variation application in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008. (c) If the initial marketing authorisation application is withdrawn or receives a negative opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the Committee will pursue the assessment of the parallel application as a standalone marketing authorisation application.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 22 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], the marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms as defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC shall be accompanied by an environmental risk assessment identifying and evaluating potential adverse effects of the genetically modified organisms on human health and the environment, and shall set out measures to prevent or minimise such effects.
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 22 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], the marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms as defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC shall be accompanied by an environmental risk assessment identifying and evaluating potential adverse effects of the genetically modified organisms on human and animal health, and the environment.
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 22 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], the marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms as defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC shall be accompanied by an environmental risk assessment identifying and evaluating potential adverse effects of the genetically modified organisms on human health, animals and the environment.
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Articles 6 to 11 of [revised Directive 2001/
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 In the cases referred to in paragraph 4, Member States shall implement appropriate measures
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new) By derogation from this Article, where the marketing authorisation application concerns a medicinal product for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms which comply with the criteria referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 5a of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, Article 22 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall apply.
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 b (new) No later than [note to OP = five years after the date of entry into application of this Regulation], the Commission shall conduct an impact assessment of the Union legislation on genetically modified organisms* on medicinal products containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms and produce an evaluation report, taking into account the experience gained from the application of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1043. On the basis of the impact assessment and evaluation, the Commission shall come forward with a legislative proposal to amend this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] to lay down specific rules on environmental risk assessments for medicines containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms outside the scope of the general Union legislation on genetically modified organisations.
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) identification and characterisation of hazards for the environment, animals and for human health throughout the life cycle of the medicine, including during its production; these risks include those linked to the greenhouse gas emissions footprint;
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) identification and characterisation of hazards for the environment, animals and for human and public health;
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) risk minimisation and mitigation strategies proposed to address identified risks including specific containment measures to limit contact with the medicinal product, as well as any circular economy processes adopted.
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The applicant shall submit an environmental risk assessment referred to in Article 7(1) to the Agency and will be answer in a limit time of period.
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall establish an Environmental Risk Assessment Working Party and assess the environmental risk assessment.
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 a (new) Article9a Availability plan 1. The The applicant shall submit an availability plan to the Agency. The availability plan shall describe the modalities by which the authorised medicinal product is made available during the period of regulatory data protection or patent, in a Member States where the medicinal product is needed. applicant shall submit an availability plan to the Agency. The availability plan shall describe the modalities by which the authorised medicinal product is made available during the period of regulatory data protection or patent, in a Member States where the medicinal product is needed. 2. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall assess the availalibility plan and request modification thereto, if it comes to the conclusion that the foreseen modalities do not guarantee timely access to patients. In case of such a request the applicant shall adjust the availability plan.
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies.
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a reasonable time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies. If the applicant fails to address those deficiencies within the time limit set by the Agency, the application shall be considered as
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies. If the applicant fails to address those deficiencies within the time limit set by the Agency, the application shall be considered as
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies. If the applicant fails to address those deficiencies within the time limit set by the Agency, the application shall be
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies. If the applicant fails to address those deficiencies within the time limit set by the Agency, the application
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point h (h) where appropriate, details of any recommended obligation to conduct
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point h (h) where appropriate, details of any recommended obligation to conduct any other post-authorisation studies, including post-authorisation treatment optimisation studies, to improve the safe and effective use of the medicinal product;
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point i (i) in case of medicinal products for which
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point i (i) in case of medicinal products for which
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point i (i) in case of medicinal products for which there is substantial uncertainty as to the surrogate endpoint relation to the expected health outcome, where patient- centered, hard or validated surrogate trial endpoints - including survival and quality of life - that are well defined in the study protocol and can be measured objectively are not possible, and where appropriate and relevant for the benefit-risk balance, a post-authorisation obligation to substantiate the clinical benefit;
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point i a (new) (i a) justification in case marketing authorisation was granted where no comparative data with a standard-of-care active comparator were submitted;
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new) (j a) where appropriate any justified reasoning for granting marketing authorisation pursuant to Article 18, 19 and 30 of this Regulation;
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point m (m)
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point m a (new) (m a) for antimicrobials, the stewardship plan referred to in Article 17 and information materials referred to in Article 69 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] as well as any related obligations imposed on the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Within 12 days of receipt of the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal products for Human Use the Commission shall submit to the Standing Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use referred to in Article 173(1) a draft of the decision on the application, including details on any rewards and incentives granted.
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Within
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 6 a (new) Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, take a final decision within
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Commission decision-making phase shall not exceed 30 days from the date of CHMP opinion.
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 If an applicant withdraws an application for a marketing authorisation submitted to the Agency before an opinion has been given on the application by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the applicant shall communicate its reasons for doing so to the Agency. The Agency shall make this information publicly available and shall publish the assessment report, if available, after deletion of all information of a commercially confidential nature.
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the environmental risk assessment is incomplete
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the environmental risk assessment is incomplete or insufficiently substantiated by the applicant or if the risks identified in the environmental risk assessment
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the environmental risk assessment
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the environmental risk assessment is incomplete or insufficiently substantiated by the applicant or if the risks identified in the environmental risk assessment have not been sufficiently addressed by the applicant, with the exception of medicinal products authorised before 30 october 2005 to avoid restricting patients’ access to existing treatments;
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) the content or timelines of post- authorisation studies to further clarify environmental risk assessment, as required in Article 20(c), cannot be agreed.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) the content or timelines of post- authorisation studies to further clarify environmental risk assessment, as required in article 20(c), cannot be agreed.
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) there is an equivalent product on the market with less negative environmental impacts.
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The marketing authorisation may furthermore be refused if, after verification of the particulars and documentation submitted in accordance with Article 6, the view is taken that the environmental risk assessment is incomplete or insufficiently substantiated by the applicant or if the risks identified in the environmental risk assessment have not been sufficiently addressed by the applicant.
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation,
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation, after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature. Before the publishment of the assessment report, the Agency shall firstly notify patients´ organisations about the outcomes of the report.
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation, after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature unless there is an overriding public interest in disclosure.
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation, after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature and following consultation of patients’ organisations.
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation, after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature and subsequent consultation of patient organisations.
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2 – a summary of environmental risk assessment studies and their results as submitted by the marketing authorisation holder and the assessment of the environmental risk assessment and the information referred to in Article 22(5) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] by the Agency
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2 a (new) – for antimicrobials, the stewardship plan referred to in Article 17 and information materials referred to in Article 69 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], as well as any related obligations imposed on the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2 a (new) – a summary of any rewards and incentives granted.
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) When the medicinal product is an antimicrobial, the Agency shall publish the information referred to in Article 17 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], as well as any obligations imposed on the marketing authorisation holder if it finds the risk mitigation measures contained in the stewardship plan unsatisfactory.
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) a potential or actual shortage in that Member State in accordance with Article 116(1), point (d); and its reasons for such action under points (a) and (b) in accordance with Article 24 and the cause of shortage under point (c) , as well as any other reason relating to precautionary actions with regard to quality, safety,
Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the marketing authorisation for the medicinal products described in Article 9 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall be valid for an unlimited period.
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 By way of derogation from paragraph 1,
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where the validity of the marketing authorisation is limited to five years, as laid down in paragraph 1, the marketing authorisation holder shall apply to the Agency for a renewal of the marketing authorisation at least nine months before the marketing authorisation ceases to be valid.
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where a renewal application has been submitted
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where a renewal application has been submitted in accordance with the
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 The marketing authorisation may be renewed on the basis of a re-evaluation by the Agency of the benefit-risk balance. Once renewed, the marketing authorisation shall be valid for an unlimited period unless the Agency decides, on justified grounds, to proceed with one additional five-year renewal.
Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, marketing authorisation for a medicinal product shall be withdrawn if the review of the post-authorisation studies referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 20 result in a negative risk-benefit assessment.
Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In exceptional circumstances where, in an application under Article 6 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] for a marketing authorisation of a medicinal product or a new therapeutic indication of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, an applicant is unable to provide comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety, and, where missing, on the environmental risk of the medicinal product under normal conditions of use, the Commission may, by derogation to Article 6, grant an authorisation under Article 13, subject to specific conditions, where the following requirements are met:
Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In exceptional circumstances where, in an application under Article 6 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] for a marketing authorisation of a medicinal product or a new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, an applicant is unable to provide comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of the medicinal product under normal conditions of use, the Commission may, by derogation to Article 6, grant an authorisation under Article 13, subject to specific conditions, where the following requirements are met:
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In exceptional circumstances where, in an application under Article 6 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] for a marketing authorisation of a medicinal product or a new therapeutic indication including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, an applicant is unable to provide comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of the medicinal product under normal conditions of use, the Commission may, by derogation to Article 6, grant an authorisation under Article 13, subject to specific conditions, where the following requirements are met:
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The maintenance of the authorised new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, and the validity of the marketing authorisation granted in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be linked to the reassessment by the Agency of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 after two years from the date when the new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, was authorised or the marketing authorisation was granted, and thereafter at a risk-based frequency to be determined by the Agency and specified by the Commission in the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The maintenance of the authorised new therapeutic indication including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation and the validity of the marketing authorisation granted in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be linked to the reassessment by the Agency of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 after two years from the date when the new therapeutic indication was authorised or the marketing authorisation was granted, and thereafter at a risk-based frequency to be determined by the Agency and specified by the Commission in the marketing
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 This reassessment shall be conducted on the basis of an application by the marketing authorisation holder to maintain the authorised new therapeutic indication
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 This reassessment shall be conducted on the basis of an application by the marketing authorisation holder to maintain the authorised new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, or renew the marketing authorisation under exceptional circumstances.
Amendment 704 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Before granting an authorisation pursuant to paragraph 1, the Agency shall publish in the product’s assessment report a justification for granting marketing authorisation under this Article and explain why an authorisation pursuant to Article 19 is deemed unsuitable.
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In duly justified cases, to meet an unmet medical need of patients, as referred to in Article 83(1), point (a) and (2), of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication
Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 In emergency situations, a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, referred to in the first subparagraph may be granted also where comprehensive non- clinical or pharmaceutical data have not been supplied.
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 In emergency situations, a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation referred to in the first subparagraph may be granted also where comprehensive non- clinical or pharmaceutical data have not been supplied.
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 In emergency situations, a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication referred to in the first subparagraph may be granted also where comprehensive non-clinical or pharmaceutical data have not been supplied. However, this provision shall not apply to biological medicinal products.
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, referred to in paragraph 1 may be granted only if the benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product is favourable and the applicant is likely to be able to provide comprehensive data.
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 may be granted only if the benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product is favourable and the applicant is likely to be able to provide comprehensive data.
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication referred to in paragraph 1 may be granted only if the benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product is favourable and the applicant
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and,
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and
Amendment 714 #
3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations, such as the obligation to conduct a post-authorisation environmental risk assessment study. Those specific obligations and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation. Those specific obligations shall be reviewed annually by the Agency for the first three years after granting the authorisation and every two years thereafter.
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation. Those specific obligations shall be reviewed annually by the Agency for the first three years after granting the authorisation and every two years thereafter.
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation. Those specific obligations shall be reviewed annually by the Agency for the
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and
Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and,
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 172, impose financial penalties to the marketing authorisation holder for unjustified situations of non-compliance with specific obligations, in particular for delays in the submission of study results.
Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming that the benefit- risk balance is favourable. The Agency shall lay down deadlines and criteria for the fulfilment of these conditions and make them publicly available. The holder of a conditional marketing authorisation shall respond to a Member State’s call for negotiation and conclusion of a risk- sharing or managed entry agreement when such institute is required for making the medicinal product available to patients in the Member State.
Amendment 723 #
4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming that the benefit- risk balance is favourable. Information on concrete commitments, timelines, status and, where applicable, justifications for any delays, for the product-specific obligations shall be made publicly available and easily accessible on EMA’s website.
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming that the benefit- risk balance is favourable. After consultation with the marketing authorisation holder, the Agency shall lay down deadlines and criteria for the fulfilment of these conditions, and make them publicly available.
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming th
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming that the benefit- risk balance is favourable. The Agency shall establish and publish specific deadlines and criteria for meeting these conditions, making them accessible to the public.
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Agency shall lay down criteria for the fulfilment of these conditions and make them publicly available.
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 – point b (b) the procedures and requirements for granting a conditional marketing authorisation, for its renewal,
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 – point b (b) the procedures and requirements for granting a conditional marketing authorisation, for its renewal, and for adding a new conditional therapeutic indication, or extension to an existing marketing authorisation.
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. The Agency shall publish in a database the list of conditional marketing authorisations, together with the following information: (a) specific obligations to be fulfilled by the marketing authorisation holder; (b) timelines for compliance with specific obligations; (c) any delays by the marketing authorisation holder regarding the fulfilment of obligations and the reasons for it; (d) any penalties imposed by the Commission on the marketing authorisation holder for non-compliance with the specific obligations, in accordance with Article 172; (e) any actions on the conditional marketing authorisation taken in accordance with Article 56.
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) conducts a post-authorisation safety study if there are concerns about the risks of an authorised medicinal product to the environment or to public health. If the same concerns apply to more than one medicinal product, the Agency shall, following consultation with the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, encourage the marketing authorisation holders concerned to conduct a joint post-authorisation safety study;
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) conducts a post-authorisation treatment optimisation study when the optimal usage of medicinal product was not previously established.
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) submits Treatment optimisation (TO) data to the EMA within certain time limit.
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) performs a Treatment optimisation( TO) clinical trial in collaboration with an independent not- for-profit research organisation able to develop and peer-review the clinical trial protocol, and to collect and analyse independently the clinical trial data. The marketing authorisation holder shall provide all relevant information regarding the drug and financial support to the independent non-profit research organisation.
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 If this obligation would apply to several medicinal products, the Agency shall encourage the marketing authorisation holders concerned to conduct a joint post authorisation environmental risk assessment study, which shall be designed where possible considering non-animal approaches such as in vitro and in silico methods.
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where the Agency considers that any of the post-authorisations studies referred to in points (a) to (ca) is necessary, it shall inform the marketing authorisation holder thereof in writing, stating the grounds for its assessment and shall include the objectives and timeframe for submission and conduct of the study.
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 4. Where the opinion of the Agency confirms the need for any of the post- authorisation studies referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (ca), to be carried out, the Commission shall vary the marketing authorisation, by means of implementing acts, adopted pursuant to Article 13 to include the obligation as a condition of the marketing authorisation unless the Commission returns the opinion to the Agency for further consideration. For obligations under paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), the marketing authorisation holder shall update the risk management system accordingly.
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 a (new) Article22a Obligations and liability of the marketing authorisation holder The marketing authorisation holder of a centralised medicinal product shall, within the limits of its responsibility, ensure appropriate and continued supplies of that medicinal product to wholesale distributors, pharmacies or persons authorised to supply medicinal products, so that the needs of patients in those Member States in which it is prescribed are covered.
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 The granting of a marketing authorisation as well as the granting of a temporary emergency marketing authorisation shall not affect the civil or criminal liability of the manufacturer or of the marketing authorisation holder pursuant to the applicable national law in Member States.
Amendment 742 #
In addition to the notification made pursuant to Article 116, the marketing authorisation holder shall notify the Agency
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) a decision driven by commercial considerations, while safeguarding any information that is of a commercially confidential nature.
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) a decision based on commercial grounds, without prejudice to any commercially-confidential information.
Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) commercial reasons.
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) commercial reasons.
Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) commercial reasons;
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where the action referred to in the first subparagraph is to withdraw a medicinal product with no alternative therapeutic equivalent from the market, the marketing authorisation holder shall provide information on the impact of such withdrawal on patients who are already being treated.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Following the receipt of a notification of the suspension of a medicinal product's marketing issued pursuant to Article 116, the competent authority of the Member State where the medicinal product was marketed can recommend increasing the prices of products for which a risk of shortages or market consolidation has been identified.
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. In the cases referred to in paragraph 1 point (f), the competent authorities shall forward the information to drinking water and wastewater operators.
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 4. Where the marketing authorisation holder intends to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for a critical
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 4. Where the marketing authorisation holder intends to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for a
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 4. Where the marketing authorisation holder intends to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for a critical medicinal product, the marketing authorisation holder shall, prior to the notification referred to in paragraph 1, offer, on reasonable terms, to transfer the marketing authorisation to a third party that has declared its intention to place that critical medicinal product on the market, or to use the pharmaceutical non-clinical and clinical documentation contained in the file of the medicinal product for the purposes of submitting an application in accordance with Article 14 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. The competent authority of the Member State may extend the obligation referred to in the first subparagraph to a marketing authorisation holder that intends to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for a non-critical medicinal product.
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The national competent authority of the Member State may decide to extend obligations set in paragraph 4 to a specific non-critical medicinal product on a case by case basis.
Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) if one of its indications
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 As soon as the relevant patent or supplementary protection certificate referred to in point (a) expires, the marketing authorisation holder shall withdraw the initial or duplicate marketing authorisation or where appropriate vary the term of the marketing authorisation to include the relevant SmPC information for which the corresponding patent(s) or supplementary protection certificate(s) has(ve) expired.
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 As soon as the relevant patent or supplementary protection certificate referred to in point (a) expires, the marketing authorisation holder shall, without undue delay, withdraw the initial or duplicate marketing authorisation.
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of this Article, ‘compassionate use’ shall mean making a medicinal product belonging to the categories referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 available for compassionate reasons to a group of patients with a chronically or seriously debilitating disease
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of this Article, ‘compassionate use’ shall mean making a medicinal product belonging to the categories referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 available for compassionate reasons to a group of patients or a single patient with a chronically or seriously debilitating disease or whose disease is considered to be life- threatening, and who cannot be treated satisfactorily by an authorised medicinal product. The medicinal product concerned must either be the subject of an application for a marketing authorisation in accordance with Article 6 or the submission of such application is imminent, or it must be undergoing clinical trials in the same
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. When applying paragraph 1, the Member State shall notify the Agency, which shall make the notification publicly available.
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. When applying paragraph 1, the Member State shall notify the Agency, which shall make the notification publicly available.
Amendment 763 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. When applying paragraph 1, the Member State shall notify the Agency which shall make the notification publicly available.
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 When compassionate use is envisaged by a Member State, or by the applicant or sponsor, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, after consulting the manufacturer or the applicant, may adopt opinions on the conditions for use, the conditions for distribution and the patients targeted. The opinions shall be updated where necessary.
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 When compassionate use is envisaged by a Member State, or by the applicant or sponsor, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, after consulting the manufacturer or the applicant, may adopt opinions on the conditions for use, the conditions for distribution and the patients targeted. The opinions shall be updated where necessary.
Amendment 766 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 In the preparation of the opinion, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use may request information and data from marketing authorisation holders and from developers and may engage with them in preliminary discussions. The Committee may also make use of health data generated outside of clinical studies, including real world data, where available, taking into account the reliability of those data.
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it in a centralized database for compassionate use programs on its website.
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it in a central repository for compassionate use on its website.
Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it in a central repository for compassionate use on its website.
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it in a central repository for compassionate use on its website.
Amendment 771 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it on its website in an accessible, searchable data format.
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 10 10. The Agency
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – title Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to the law on the protection of industrial and commercial property, medicinal products for human use which have been authorised in accordance with this Regulation shall benefit from the periods of regulatory protection set out in Chapter VII of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. Marketing authorisation holders that benefit from regulatory protection shall disclose information on actual costs of research and development in accordance with Article 84a of the aforementioned Directive.
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to the law on the protection of industrial and commercial property, medicinal products for human use which have been authorised in accordance with this Regulation shall benefit from the periods of regulatory protection set out in Chapter VII of
Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to the law on the protection of industrial and commercial property, medicinal products for human use which have been authorised in accordance with this Regulation shall benefit from the periods of regulatory protection set out in Chapter VII of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. The granting of periods of regulatory protection shall be published and updated by the Agency in a designated registry.
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new) Marketing authorisation holders that benefit from regulatory protection shall disclose information on research and development costs in accordance with Article 84a of the aforementioned Directive.
Amendment 779 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 During a public health emergency, the Commission may grant a temporary emergency marketing authorisation (‘TEMA’) for medicinal products intended for the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition which are directly related to the public health emergency, prior to the submission of the complete quality, non-clinical, clinical data and environmental data and information. However, prior to the submission of a full environmental risk assessment as referred to in Article 7(1), a temporary emergency authorisation may only be granted if the best available scientific information indicates that there is no risk of serious or irreversible harm to the environment, animals or human health arising from the manufacture or use of the medicinal product containing or consisting of the GMO.
Amendment 780 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 During a public health emergency, the Commission may, following an application by a developer, grant a temporary emergency marketing authorisation (‘TEMA’) or a new temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, for medicinal products intended for the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition which are directly related to the public health emergency, prior to the submission of the complete quality, non- clinical, clinical data and environmental data and information.
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 During a public health emergency, the Commission may, following an application by a developer grant a temporary emergency marketing authorisation (‘TEMA’) or a new temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, for medicinal products intended for the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition which are directly related to the public health emergency, prior to the submission of the complete quality, non- clinical, clinical data and
Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 During a public health emergency, the Commission may grant a temporary emergency marketing authorisation (‘TEMA’) or a new temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, for medicinal products intended for the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of a serious or life- threatening disease or condition which are directly related to the public health emergency, prior to the submission of the complete quality, non-clinical, clinical data and environmental data and information.
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) Derogations to Articles 5 and 6 of this Regulation may apply in the context of submission of an application for a temporary emergency marketing authorisation.
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A temporary emergency marketing authorisation or a temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, may be granted only after the recognition of a public health emergency at Union level in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 and where the following requirements are met: _________________ 67 Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A temporary emergency marketing authorisation or a temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, may be granted only after the recognition of a public health emergency at Union level in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 and where the following requirements are met: _________________ 67 Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A temporary emergency marketing authorisation or a temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, may be granted only after the recognition of a public health emergency at Union level in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Counci
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no other satisfactory method of treatment, prevention or diagnosis authorised or sufficiently available in the Union or, if such method is already available, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation o
Amendment 789 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no other satisfactory method of treatment, prevention or diagnosis authorised or sufficiently available in the Union or, if such method is already available, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation o
Amendment 790 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no other satisfactory method of treatment, prevention or diagnosis authorised or sufficiently available in the Union or, if such method is already available, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation o
Amendment 791 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) based on the scientific evidence available, the Agency issues an opinion concluding that the medicinal product could be effective in treating, preventing or diagnosing the disease or condition directly related to the public health emergency, and the
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) based on the scientific evidence available, the Agency issues an opinion concluding that the medicinal product could be effective in treating, preventing or diagnosing the disease or condition directly related to the public health emergency, and the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product, taking into consideration the threat posed by the public health emergency. The Agency shall ensure that expectations of benefits are plausible.
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) based on the scientific evidence available, the Agency issues an opinion concluding that the medicinal product could be effective in treating, preventing or diagnosing the disease or condition directly related to the public health emergency, and the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential environmental and health risks of the product, taking into consideration the threat posed by the public health emergency.
Amendment 794 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency shall ensure that the scientific opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use is given to the applicant without undue delay, taking into account, the recommendation of the Emergency Task Force referred to in Article 38(1), second subparagraph. For the purpose of issuing its opinion, the Agency may consider any relevant data on the medicinal product concerned
Amendment 795 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall review any new evidence provided by the
Amendment 796 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 797 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall transmit without undue delay to the Commission the scientific opinion and its updates and any recommendations on the temporary emergency marketing authorisation. The scientific opinion and information on the application on the use of temporary emergency marketing authorisation shall be made publicly available by the Agency.
Amendment 798 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall transmit without undue delay to the Commission the scientific opinion and its updates and any recommendations on the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or new temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall transmit without undue delay to the Commission the scientific opinion and its updates and any
Amendment 800 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. On the basis of the scientific opinion of the Agency referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall set specific conditions with respect to the temporary emergency marketing authorisation, in particular the conditions for manufacturing, use, supply and safety monitoring and the compliance with related good manufacturing, and pharmacovigilance practices. If necessary, the conditions may specify the batches of the medicinal product concerned by the temporary emergency marketing authorisation, in consultation with the with the applicant or marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 801 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. On the basis of the scientific opinion of the Agency referred to in
Amendment 802 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 3. Specific conditions
Amendment 803 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 4 4. Those specific conditions and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the
Amendment 804 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 4 4. Those specific conditions and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation and shall be reviewed annually by the Agency, in consultation with the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 805 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 The temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, shall cease to be valid when the Commission terminates the recognition of a public health emergency in accordance with Article 23(2) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371.
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 The temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, shall cease to be valid when the Commission terminates the recognition of a public health emergency in accordance with Article 23(2) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371.
Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 The temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, shall cease to be valid when the Commission terminates the recognition of a public health emergency in accordance with Article 23(2) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371.
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. When the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, ceases to be valid in accordance with first subparagraph of this Article, a transitional period shall be set by the Agency in agreement with the marketing authorisation holder in order to avoid any disruption in supply of the medicinal product concerned.
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. When the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, ceases to be valid in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, the Agency may set a transitional period after consultation with the marketing authorisation holder in order to avoid any disruption in supply of the medicinal product concerned.
Amendment 810 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Without prejudice to Article 37, when the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, ceases to be valid in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, a transitional period shall be set by the Agency in order to avoid any disruption in supply of the medicinal product concerned.
Amendment 811 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it is appropriate to protect public health or the environment;
Amendment 812 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) a marketing authorization is granted in accordance with Article 36, subparagraph 1.
Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where the Commission adopts any such implementing act, the provisions of Article 34, paragraph 1a shall apply.
Amendment 814 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where the Commission adopts any such implementing act, the provisions of Article 34, paragraph 1a shall apply.
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 The marketing authorisation holder of an authorisation in accordance with Article 33
Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new) To ensure a smooth administrative conversion of the temporary marketing authorization referred under Article 33 into a marketing authorisation under Articles 13, 16 or 19 according to paragraph 1, and in order to avoid any disruption in availability on the market of the medicinal products concerned, a transitional period shall be set by the Agency.
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 For the purpose of regulatory data protection, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, and any subsequent marketing authorisation, as referred to in subparagraph 1, shall be considered as part of the same global marketing authorisation.
Amendment 818 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 For the purpose of regulatory data protection, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, and any subsequent marketing authorisation, as referred to in subparagraph 1, shall be considered as part of the same global marketing authorisation.
Amendment 819 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – title III
Amendment 821 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – title III ADDRESSING PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET FAILURES IN THE UNION AND GREATER INCENTIVES FOR THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF
Amendment 822 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – title III ADDRESSING PHARMACEUTUCAL MARKET FAILURES IN THE UNION AND FURTHER INCENTIVES FOR THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ‘PRIORITY ANTIMICROBIALS’
Amendment 823 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III a (new) III a ADDRESSING PHARMACEUTUCAL MARKET FAILURES IN THE UNION AND FURTHER INCENTIVES FOR THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITY ANTIMICROBIALS SECTION 1 TASKS OF THE AGENCY
Amendment 824 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 826 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 828 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – title Amendment 830 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – title Granting the right to a transferable data exclusivity voucher as a short-term measure of addressing Antimicrobial Resistance
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – title Granting the right to a transferable
Amendment 832 #
1.
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant when applying for a marketing authorisation, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, grant a transferable
Amendment 834 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant when applying for a marketing authorisation, made before that marketing authorisation is granted, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, grant a transferable data exclusivity voucher to a ‘priority antimicrobial’ referred to in paragraph 3, under the conditions referred to in paragraph 4 based on a scientific assessment by the Agency.
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant
Amendment 837 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant
Amendment 838 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 175 to define further the Union scheme and its funding.
Amendment 839 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 Amendment 840 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 2. The voucher referred to in paragraph 1 shall give the right to its holder to an additional
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 2. The voucher referred to in paragraph 1 shall give the right to its holder to an additional 12 months of data protection for one authorised medicinal product, if the medicinal product is released and continuously supplied into the supply chain in a sufficient quantity and in the presentations necessary to cover the needs of the patients in all Member States in which the marketing authorisation is valid.
Amendment 843 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 845 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 846 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 853 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) it represents a new class of
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 858 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 859 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 862 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 864 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) is of major interest from the point of view of public health and in particular from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation.
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In the scientific assessment
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In the scientific assessment of
Amendment 867 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In
Amendment 869 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The Agency shall develop a weighting of each criteria and a corresponding scoring system allowing priority antimicrobials to be designated one of three categories of vouchers according to its expected impact on combatting antimicrobial resistance. The agency shall assign each voucher category a corresponding financial value which will be payed to the applicant following the auction process set out in Article 41.
Amendment 871 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part To be granted
Amendment 872 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) demonstrate capacity and ensure to supply the priority antimicrobial in sufficient quantities for the expected needs of the Union market;
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all publicly and direct financial support received from a body that is publicly funded or public authority located in the Union, for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial.
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all direct financial support received from any public authority of publicly funded body based in the European Union, for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial.
Amendment 875 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all direct financial support received from any public authority of publicly funded body based in the European Union, for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all direct EU financial support received for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial.
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) provide information regarding the corporate sustainability reporting as referred to in Commission Directive (EU) 2022/24641a, where applicable, as well as any environmental plans to reduce its carbon footprint. _________________ 1a Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15–80).)
Amendment 878 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within 30 days after the marketing authorisation is granted, the marketing authorisation
Amendment 880 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) By [18 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall have developed the Union scheme of push and pull incentives.
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 b (new) By [10 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council assessing the implementation of the Union scheme of push and pull incentives.
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Amendment 884 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Establishment and legal status of the European Medicines Facility The European Medicines Facility ( ‘EMF’) is hereby established, taking over the tasks and responsibilities of the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority repealing Commission’s decision (2021) 67 and Council Regulation 2021/577. The EMF shall have legal personality. In each of the Member States, the EMF shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under their laws. It may, in particular, acquire or dispose of movable and immovable property, and be party to legal proceedings. The EMF shall be represented by an Executive Director.
Amendment 885 #
Amendment 886 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article40a AMR designation All AMR medicinal products designed to combat a priority pathogen should receive an AMR designation through a transparent and open Community procedure. An AMR medicinal product will be identified as such when its sponsor can demonstrate: a) That it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a pathogen included in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, or a comparable list established at Union level. b) that there is no approved method within the community for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the specified condition that is deemed satisfactory. If such a method does exist, the medicinal product must provide substantial benefits to individuals suffering from the condition. 3. To secure the classification of a pharmaceutical product as an AMR medicinal product, the sponsor must submit an application to the Agency either prior to, or concurrently, with the submission for marketing authorization. The application should include the specified details and accompanying documents: a) name or corporate name and permanent address of the sponsor; b) active ingredients of the medicinal product; c) proposed therapeutic indication; d) verification of compliance with the criteria specified in Article x(y), confirmation of anticipated indications, and review of pertinent preclinical and clinical information constitute the rationale for the approval process. The Agency is responsible for validating the application's legitimacy and issuing an opinion within 90 days of receiving a valid application.
Amendment 887 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article 40a AMR Designation 1. All AMR medicinal products developed to address a priority pathogens should be granted an AMR designation through an open and transparent Community procedure. 2. A medicinal product shall be designated as an AMR medicinal product if its sponsor can establish: a) That it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a pathogen included in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, or an equivalent list established at Union level. b) That there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorised in the Community or, if such method exists, that the medicinal product will be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. 3. In order to obtain the designation of a medicinal product as an AMR medicinal product, the sponsor shall submit an application to the Agency before or at the moment of the application for marketing authorisation is made. The application shall be accompanied by the following particulars and documents: a) name or corporate name and permanent address of the sponsor; b) active ingredients of the medicinal product; c) proposed therapeutic indication; d) justification that the criteria laid down in Article x(y) are met, the indications expected and the relevant preclinical and clinical data. The Agency shall verify the validity of the application and ensure that an opinion is given within 90 days of the receipt of a valid application.
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article40a Push and pull incentives scheme to boost the development of priority antimicrobials 1. The Commission shall establish a Union push and pull incentives scheme to promote and urgently accelerate the development of novel antimicrobials, as well as promote increased access to existing and newly developed antimicrobials. Member States shall be encouraged to participate in the Union level scheme. 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 175 to supplement this Regulation by further defining the scheme and its funding, which shall include i.a. the following incentives: (a) research grants under Union funds; (b) milestone prizes for novel antimicrobial developers; (c) voluntary joint procurement with subscription payment mechanisms or market entry rewards that delink or partially delink revenues and sales; 3. The Union push and pull incentives scheme shall be coordinated and managed by the Commission. 4. By ... [one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall have developed, and commenced the implementation of the Union push and pull incentives scheme. 5. By ... [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council reviewing the application of the scheme laid down in this Article.
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Development and access to antimicrobials The Commission shall examine specific incentives and joint procurement procedures and propose measures to promote research, development, and accessibility of antimicrobials by [OP please insert the date = one year after the date of entering into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article40a Any product receiving AMR Designation shall be considered as meeting the criteria for Unmet Need outlined in the [revised Directive 2001/83/EC].
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 b (new) Amendment 892 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 b (new) Article 40b Additional measures to incentivise the creation of antimicrobials 1. The Commission shall furthermore establish a Union push and pull incentive scheme to promote and accelerate the development of novel antimicrobials, as well as to promote increased access to existing and newly developed antimicrobials. Member States shall be encouraged to participate in the Union- level scheme. 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 175 to supplement this Regulation by further defining the scheme and its funding and shall, at the least, include the development of the following incentives in such delegated acts: a) research grants under Union funds with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials; b) milestone prizes for novel antimicrobial developers with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials;
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 b (new) Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 c (new) Amendment 895 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 d (new) Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 e (new) Article 40e Management Board of the EMF 1. The EMF Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State, two representatives of the Commission and two representatives of the European Parliament, all with voting rights. In addition, two representatives of patients' organisations, one representative of doctors' organisations, and one representative of veterinarians' organisations, all without voting rights, shall be appointed by the Council in consultation with the European Parliament on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission which includes appreciably more names than there are posts to be filled. The list drawn up by the Commission shall be forwarded to the European Parliament, together with the relevant background documents. As quickly as possible, and at the latest within three months of notification, the European Parliament may submit its views for consideration to the Council, which shall then appoint these representatives to the Management Board. The members of the Management Board shall be appointed in such a way as to guarantee the highest levels of specialist qualifications, a broad spectrum of relevant expertise and the broadest possible geographic spread within the European Union. 2. Members of the Management Board and their alternates shall be appointed on the basis of their knowledge, recognised experience and commitment in the field of medical countermeasures, antimicrobial and other unmet medical neds, taking into account relevant managerial, administrative and budgetary expertise. All parties represented in the Management Board shall make efforts to limit turnover of their representatives, in order to ensure continuity of the work of the Management Board. All parties shall aim to achieve a balanced representation between men and women on the Management Board. 3. Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint their members of the EMF Management Board as well as an alternate who will replace the member in their absence and vote on their behalf.
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 f (new) Article 40f EMF Advisory Forum 1. The EMF Advisory Forum (‘Forum’) shall constitute a mechanism for an exchange of information on preparedness and response in the area of medical countermeasures and the pooling of knowledge and expertise. It shall ensure close cooperation between EMF and the competent bodies in the Member States, in particular on the planning and implementation of scientific, health and industrial activities of EMF. 2. The Forum shall be composed of members from technically competent bodies designated by each Member State. Members of the Forum shall not be members of the EMF Board. 3. The Forum shall support the EMF Board in providing scientific and technical advice. 4. The EMF Board may set up sub-groups of the Forum for the purpose of examining specific questions in the fields of science, research or industrial matters. In particular, a subgroup named ‘Joint Industrial Cooperation Forum’ composed of the representatives of the industry and Member States shall be set up. The sub- groups shall report to the Forum. They shall be dissolved as soon as their mandate is fulfilled. 5. The Forum and its sub-groups shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission. It shall meet regularly upon the invitation of the EMF Executive Director and at least four times per year. 6. Representatives of the Commission’s departments may participate in the work of the Forum. 7. The Commission shall provide the secretariat for the Forum. 8. The EMF Executive Director may invite experts or representatives of professional or scientific bodies, or non- governmental organisations with recognised experience in disciplines related to the work of EMF to cooperate in specific tasks and to take part in the relevant activities of the Forum.
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 g (new) Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 902 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 905 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 907 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A voucher
Amendment 908 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A voucher may be used to
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 910 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single
Amendment 911 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if
Amendment 912 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if that product
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if that product
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if that product
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 916 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 2 Amendment 917 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 2 Amendment 918 #
Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 920 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 3 3. A voucher may be transferred to another marketing authorisation
Amendment 921 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 Amendment 922 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 923 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 4. A marketing authorisation holder to whom a voucher is transferred shall notify the Agency of the transfer within
Amendment 924 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 4. A marketing authorisation
Amendment 925 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The acceleration assessment procedure voucher does not have an expiration date.
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 927 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 928 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 931 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 932 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where the Commission adopts a decision in accordance with Article 47 to
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) In case the transfer of voucher occurs, the party holding the voucher does not comply with the corporate sustainability reporting as referred to in Commission Directive (EU) 2022/24641a, or does not present any environmental plans to reduce its carbon footprint.
Amendment 934 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may revoke the voucher prior to its transfer as referred to in Article 41(3) if
Amendment 935 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may revoke the voucher prior to its transfer as referred to in Article 41(3) if
Amendment 936 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may revoke the voucher prior to its transfer as referred to in Article 41(3) if a reasonable request for supply, procurement or purchase of the priority antimicrobial in the Union has not been fulfilled, where such request is in line with the predicted needs of the market of the Union and the non-fulfilment not is due to situations beyond the control of the holder to the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 937 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may revoke the voucher prior to its transfer as referred to in Article 41(3) if a request for supply, procurement or purchase of the priority antimicrobial in the Union has not been fulfilled. Such a decision to revoke shall take into account whether the non- fulfilment is not due to circumstances beyond the control of the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 938 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may revoke the voucher
Amendment 939 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 940 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 941 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 943 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 944 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 945 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 Amendment 947 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 951 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply until [Note to OP: insert the date of 15 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] or until the date when the Commission has granted a total of 1
Amendment 954 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 a (new) Article43a Establishing long-term measures to address Antimicrobial Resistance in the Union 1. The Commission shall, by [one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], develop a comprehensive Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (the "Action Plan"), building on the current and ongoing work in the field. The goal of the Action Plan will be to establish long-term measures addressing the pharmaceutical market failures in the Union and to develop appropriate incentives in order to secure access to novel antimicrobials. 2. The Action Plan shall: (a) serve as a continuation and replacement of the measure established in Article 40 of this Regulation; (b) set out long-term health priorities in the public interest at Union level, in the form of a strategic roadmap with a number of specific purpose-led R&D projects; the roadmap will be elaborated and updated through continuing, transparent consultations with: (i) representatives of each Member State, including national public health authorities; (ii) relevant stakeholders, including public health authorities at Union level, clinician representatives and patient organisations; (iii) relevant agencies established at Union level; (c) establish a portfolio of priority R&D projects addressing at least the development of priority antimicrobials provided for in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, specifically those listed as priority 1 (critical) or priority 2 (high), or taking into account any equivalent list of priority pathogens adopted at Union level; (d) establish a Union push and pull incentive scheme to promote and accelerate the development of novel antimicrobials, as well as promote increased access to existing and newly developed antimicrobials. Member States shall be encouraged to participate in the Union level scheme. The scheme will be established through separate legislative acts and contain at least the following elements: (i) research grants under Union funds with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials; (ii) milestone prizes for novel antimicrobial developers with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials; (iii) voluntary joint procurement with subscription payment mechanisms or market entry rewards that delink or partially delink revenues and sales; (iv) an annual revenue guarantee scheme, aimed at securing access to antibioticsin line with the 2021 Health Council Conclusions; (e) contain appropriate and proportionate requirements for transparency and compliance, monitored by the Commission with assistance from public health authorities at Union and national level; 3. The Commission shall, as part of the Action Plan, develop a roadman for the application, and cessation thereof, of Article 40, in accordance with Article 43.
Amendment 955 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 If, in the event of a risk to public health or the environment, the marketing authorisation holder takes urgent safety or efficacy restrictions on their own initiative, the marketing authorisation holder shall immediately inform the Agency.
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 In the event of a risk to public health or the environment, the Commission may vary the marketing authorisation to impose urgent safety or efficacy restrictions on the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 957 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation holder shall without undue delay inform the Agency and the Commission of any prohibition or restriction imposed on the marketing authorisation holder or any entity in
Amendment 958 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency may at any time request the marketing authorisation holder to submit data demonstrating that the benefit-risk balance remains favourable. The marketing authorisation holder shall answer fully and
Amendment 959 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non- clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 961 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non- clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 962 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non- clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 963 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity as its main activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non-
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence, including any additional evidence that may be submitted by the marketing authorisation holders of the medicinal products concerned, make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication that concerns an unmet medical need. The evaluation shall consider the position of the marketing authorisation holders on the totality of evidence submitted.
Amendment 966 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 968 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 969 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 970 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a
Amendment 971 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The opinion of the Agency shall be made publicly available and the competent authorities of the Member States and the marketing authorisation holders shall be informed.
Amendment 972 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The opinion of the Agency shall be made publicly available and the competent authorities of the Member States and the marketing authorisation holder shall be informed.
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 2. In cases where the opinion is favourable, marketing authorisation holders of the medicinal products concerned shall
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 Amendment 975 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 3. Article 81(2), point (c) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 976 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Competent authorities and the Agency shall have procedures in place to ensure independence, impartiality, transparency and that personnel performing supervisory activities are free from any conflict of interest.
Amendment 977 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) to lend its assistance by participating in a joint inspection with the supervisory authority of the site to assess the respect of the good manufacturing practice (GMP) including the practices relating to the environmental and social standards. In that case the supervisory authority leads the inspection and the follow up thereof. After completion of the inspection, the supervisory authority grants the relevant good manufacturing practice (GMP) certificate and enters the certificate in the Union database; or
Amendment 978 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 2. In cooperation with the Agency, the Commission
Amendment 979 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 Where the Agency concludes that a holder of a marketing authorisation, or a new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, granted in accordance with Article 19, including a new therapeutic indication granted referred to Article 19, failed to comply with the obligations laid down in the marketing authorisation, the Agency shall inform the Commission accordingly.
Amendment 980 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 Where the Agency concludes that a holder of a marketing authorisation granted in accordance with Article 19, or a new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, including a new therapeutic indication granted referred to Article 19, failed to comply with the obligations laid down in the marketing authorisation, the Agency shall inform the Commission accordingly.
Amendment 981 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 Where the Agency concludes that a holder of a marketing authorisation granted in accordance with Article 19, including a new therapeutic indication granted referred to Article 19, failed to comply with the obligations laid down in the marketing authorisation, or with post-authorisation studies laid down in Article 20, the Agency shall inform the Commission accordingly.
Amendment 982 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 Where the Agency concludes that a holder of a marketing authorisation granted in accordance with Article 19, including a new therapeutic indication granted referred to Article 19, failed to comply with the obligations laid down in the marketing authorisation, including under Article 20, the Agency shall inform the Commission accordingly.
Amendment 983 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Such advice can also be requested for medicinal products referred to in Articles 83 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. The scientific advice provided for medicinal products falling under Articles 9 to 13, 15 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall be adapted to the specificities of these products.
Amendment 984 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Such advice can also be requested for medicinal products referred to in Articles 83 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], and for medicinal products used with an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Such advice can also be requested for medicinal products referred to in Articles 83 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for medicinal products used with an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Such advice can also be requested for medicinal products referred to in Articles 83 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for medicinal products used with an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
Amendment 987 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 2. In the preparation of the scientific advice referred to in paragraph 1 and upon request by undertakings or, as relevant, not-for-profit entities that requested the scientific advice, the Agency
Amendment 988 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 2. In the preparation of the scientific advice referred to in paragraph 1 and upon request by undertakings or, as relevant, not-for-profit entities that requested the scientific advice, the Agency may consult experts of the Member States with clinical trial or
Amendment 989 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. In the preparation of the scientific advice referred to in paragraph 1 and
Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. In the preparation of the scientific advice referred to in paragraph 1 and in duly justified cases, the Agency may consult authorities established in other Union legal acts as relevant for the provision of the scientific advice in question or other
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. In the preparation of the scientific advice referred to in paragraph 1 and in duly justified cases, the Agency may consult authorities established in other Union legal acts as relevant for the provision of the scientific advice in question or other public bodies established in the Union, as applicable. To avoid any conflict of interest, the Agency shall ensure a separation between the experts responsible for providing scientific advice to a medicinal product developer and those subsequently involved in evaluating marketing authorisation for the same medicine. In the absence of a sufficient panel in the context of a rare disease, an exception may be granted.
Amendment 992 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency shall include in the European public assessment report
Amendment 993 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency shall include in the European public assessment report the key areas of the scientific advice. The Agency shall also indicate the names of experts, rapporteurs and coordinators giving scientific advice. This report shall be made publicly available once the corresponding marketing authorisation decision has been taken in relation to the medicinal product
Amendment 994 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency shall include in the European public assessment report
Amendment 995 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Agency shall, to the greatest extent possible, ensure that there is continuation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a given medicinal product developer and those subsequently responsible for the evaluation of the marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product.When appointing rapporteurs for the purpose of evaluating marketing authorisation applications, the Agency’s Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use shall duly take into account any involvement of individuals as coordinators in providing scientific advice for the same medicinal product in the pre- submission stage of activities. It should be noted in the summary minutes of the meetings in accordance with Article 147 (2) whether there was continuation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a given medicinal product and those subsequently responsible for the evaluation of the marketing authorisation application.
Amendment 996 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. When granting scientific advice, the Agency shall ensure to the greatest extent possible that there is a separation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a medicine developer and those subsequently involved in evaluating a marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product. The Agency shall ensure that at least one of the two rapporteurs for a marketing authorisation application should not have taken part in any pre- submission activities concerning the medicinal product. The reasons for any exceptions shall be documented and published with the European Public Assessment Report.
Amendment 997 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. When granting scientific advice, the Agency shall ensure to the greatest extent possible that there is a separation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a medicine developer and those subsequently involved in evaluating a marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product. The Agency shall ensure that at least one of the two rapporteurs for a marketing authorisation application should not have taken part in any pre-submission activities concerning the medicinal product. The reasons for any exceptions shall be documented and published with the European Public Assessment Report.
Amendment 998 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Agency shall make publicly available and update on a monthly basis the list of products undergoing scientific advise, including the information on the active substance, therapeutic indication, stage of development, type of applicant and date, as well as names and affiliations of staff, rapporteurs and experts involved in the scientific advise. A summary of such information, including statistics per type of developer, indication, affiliations of rapporteurs and experts, shall be published in the Agency’s annual report.
Amendment 999 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Agency shall, to the greatest extent possible, ensure that there is continuation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a given medicinal product developer and those subsequently responsible for the evaluation of the marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product.
source: 756.132
2023/11/30
ITRE
499 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) If a satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question has already been authorised in the Union, the orphan medicinal product will have to be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. In this context, a medicinal product authorised in one Member State is generally deemed as being authorised in the Union. It is not necessary for it to have Union authorisation or to be authorised in all Member States to be considered as a satisfactory method. In addition, commonly used methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatment that are not subject to a marketing authorisation may be considered satisfactory if there is scientific evidence of their efficacy and safety. In certain cases, medicinal products prepared for an individual patient in a pharmacy according to a medical prescription, or according to the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to patients served by the pharmacy, may be considered as satisfactory treatment if they are well known and safe and this is a general practice for the relevant patient population in the Union. This provision is applicable solely to medicinal products that are not classified as advanced therapy medicinal products and do not contain complex active substances.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 96 a (new) (96 a) The regulatory pathway can be uncertain and lack flexibility towards the unique challenges of orphan medicinal products, both in the way developers are required to meet evidentiary standards and in the interactions between developers and the regulatory actors. Therefore, the Agency should develop a dedicated and tailored procedure for early engagement with developers of orphan medicinal products with a view to ensuring that more orphan medicinal product candidates are successful on the regulatory pathway, while managing resources in an efficient way.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 100 (100) Orphan medicinal products addressing a high unmet medical need prevent, diagnose or treat conditions where either no other method of prevention, diagnosis or treatment exists or, if such method already exists, they would bring exceptional therapeutic advancement. In both cases, the criterion of
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivi
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise research and development of orphan medicinal products addressing high unmet needs, to ensure market predictability and to ensure a fair distribution of incentives, a modulation of market exclusivity has been introduced; orphan medicinal products addressing high unmet medical needs benefit from the longest market exclusivity, while market exclusivity for well-established use orphan medicinal products, requiring less investment, is the shortest.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 102 (102) In order to incentivise research and development of orphan medicinal products addressing high unmet needs, to ensure market predictability and to ensure a fair distribution of incentives, a modulation of market exclusivity has been introduced; pioneering orphan medicinal products addressing
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 103 (103) In order to encourage faster and wider access also to orphan medicinal products, an additional period of
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 104 (104) To maximise the potential benefit of clinical research, continued exploration of new indications should be encouraged. To reward research into and development of new therapeutic indications, an additional period of one year of market exclusivity is provided for a new therapeutic indication (with a maximum of two indications). To continue incentivising innovation, especially in underserved areas, while also allowing generic entry, any subsequent new orphan marketing authorisations granted to the marketing authorisation holder should receive three years of market exclusivity bound to the indication, not the active substance. This will allow generic competition in the first two orphan indications, while allowing for continued research for those patients who could still benefit.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 105 a (new) (105 a)) One of the overarching goals of this Regulation is to help meet the medical needs of patients with rare diseases, to improve the affordability of orphan medicinal products and the patient access to orphan medicinal products across the Union, and to encourage innovation in areas of need. While other Union programmes and policies also contribute to these goals, people living with a rare disease continue to face common challenges that are many and multifactorial, including delayed diagnoses, lack of available transformative treatments, and difficulties to access treatments where they live, reflecting the fragmentation of the market across the Member States. The European added value to addressing the needs of people living with a rare disease being exceptionally high due to the rarity of patients, experts, data, and resources, it is appropriate for the Commission to develop, to complement this Regulation, a dedicated framework for rare diseases to bridge relevant legislation, policies and programmes, and support national strategies with a view to better meet the unmet needs of people living with rare diseases and their carers. This framework should be needs driven and goals based, and developped in consultation with the Member States and patient organisations as well as, where relevant, other interested parties.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 106 (106) Before a medicinal product for human use is placed on the market in one or more Member States, it has to have undergone extensive studies, including non-clinical tests and clinical trials, to ensure that it is safe, of high quality and effective for use in the target population, strictly respecting the timing and phases of the clinical trial. It is important that such studies are undertaken also on the paediatric population in order to ensure that medicinal products are appropriately authorised for use in the paediatric population, and to improve the information available on the use of medicinal products in the various paediatric population. It is also important that medicinal products are presented in dosages and formulations adequate for the use in children.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 109 Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 126 (126) It is necessary to take measures for the supervision of medicinal products authorised by the Union, and in particular for the intensive supervision of undesirable effects of these medicinal products, and the collection of real-world data within the framework of Union pharmacovigilance activities, so as to ensure the rapid withdrawal from the market of any medicinal product presenting a negative benefit-risk balance under normal conditions of use.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 129 (129) Scientific and technological progresses in data analytics and data infrastructure are essential for the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products. The digital transformation has affected regulatory decision-making, making it more data- driven and multiplying the possibilities to access evidence and real-world data, across the life cycle of a medicinal product. This Regulation recognises the Agency’s experience and capacity to access and analyse data submitted independently from the marketing authorisation applicant or marketing authorisation holder. On this basis, the Agency should take initiative to update the summary of product characteristics in case new efficacy or safety data has an impact on the benefit- risk balance of a medicinal product. In such case, the Agency and the marketing authorisation holder should collaborate to determine the particulars of any such update.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 131 (131) It is necessary to provide for the coordinated implementation of Union procedures for the marketing authorisation of medicinal products, and of the marketing authorisation procedures of Member States which have already been harmonised to a considerable degree by [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and respect clinical drug trial times.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 (132) The Union and Member States have developed a scientific evidence-based process that allows competent authorities to determine the relative effectiveness of new or existing medicinal products. This process focuses specifically on the added value of a medicinal product in comparison with other new or existing health technologies
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 a (new) (132 a)To ensure medicines’ access to innovative medicines, it is appropriate to establish common rules for the testing and authorisation of innovative medicinal products and innovative technologies related to such products that, due to their exceptional nature or characteristics, are expected to not completely fit the EU medicines regulatory framework.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 b (new) (132 b)Regulatory sandboxes may be set up when it is not possible to develop the medicinal product or category of products in compliance with the requirements applicable to medicinal products due to scientific or regulatory challenges arising from characteristics or methods related to the product, and those characteristics or methods positively and distinctively contribute to the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicinal product or category of products or provide a major advantage contribution to patient access to treatment.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 132 c (new) (132 c)The objectives of the regulatory sandboxes should be: for the Agency and national competent authorities to increase their understanding of technical and scientific developments, to allow developers in a controlled environment to test and develop innovative medicinal products and related technologies that are not fitting the current regulatory framework, as agreed with the competent authorities, and to identify possible future adaptations of the legal framework.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on real-world evidence, especially at a very early stage of development of a medicinal product, which can be particularly important in the face of high uncertainty and disruptive challenges, as well as when preparing new policies.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 133 (133) Regulatory sandboxes can provide the opportunity for advancing regulation through proactive regulatory learning, enabling regulators to gain better regulatory knowledge and to find the best means to regulate innovations based on real-world evidence, especially at a very early stage of development of a medicinal product, which can be particularly important in the face of high uncertainty and disruptive challenges, as well as when preparing new policies. Regulatory sandboxes provide a structured context for experimentation, enable where appropriate in a real-world environment the testing of innovative technologies, products, services or approaches – at the moment especially in the context of digitalisation or the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the life cycle of medicinal products from drug discovery, development to the administration of medicinal products – for a limited time and in a limited part of a sector or area under strict regulatory supervision ensuring that
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 134 (134) In the area of medicinal products, a high level of protection of inter alia citizens, consumers, health, as well as legal certainty, a level playing field and fair competition always need to be ensured and existing levels of protection need to be respected. Whenever possible, priority should be given to the use of non-animal approaches.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 135 (135) The establishment of a regulatory sandbox should be based on a Commission Decision following a recommendation of the Agency. Such decision should be based on a detailed plan outlining the particularities of the sandbox as well as describing the products to be covered. A regulatory sandbox should be limited in duration and may be terminated at any time based on public health considerations. The learning stemming from a regulatory sandbox should inform future changes to the legal framework to fully integrate the particular innovative aspects into the medicinal product regulation. It is of utmost importance to ensure a harmonised implementation of these provisions across Member States. Where appropriate, adapted frameworks may be developed by the Commission on the basis of the results of a regulatory sandbox.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all marketing authorisation holders should have shortage prevention plans in place for critical medicinal products, and especially those that do not have alternatives, to prevent shortages. The Agency should provide guidance to marketing authorisation holders on approaches to streamline the implementation of those
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment, including longer delays or interruptions in care or therapy, longer periods of hospitalisation, increased risks of exposure to falsified medicinal products, medication errors, adverse effects resulting from the substitution of unavailable medicinal products with alternative ones, significant psychological distress for patients and increased costs for healthcare systems. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all marketing authorisation holders should have shortage prevention plans in place, to prevent shortages. The Agency should provide guidance to marketing authorisation holders on approaches to streamline the implementation of those plans.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore, all marketing authorisation holders should have shortage prevention plans in place, to prevent shortages. The Agency should provide guidance to marketing authorisation holders on approaches to streamline the implementation of those plans.Preventing and monitoring shortages should also go through better use of data, including from existing IT systems such as the European Medicines Verification System which can aid in the monitoring and timely response to supply shortages, and has the potential to detect supply issues through predictive models.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 136 (136) Shortages of medicinal products represent a growing threat to public health, with potential serious risks to the health of patients in the Union and impacts on the right of patients to access appropriate medical treatment. The root causes of shortages are multifactorial, with challenges identified along the entire pharmaceutical value chain, from quality and manufacturing problems. In particular, shortages of medicinal products can result from supply chain disruptions and vulnerabilities affecting the supply of key ingredients and components. Therefore,
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 137 (137) To achieve a better security of supply for medicinal products in the internal market and to contribute thereby to a high level of public health protection, it is appropriate to approximate the rules on monitoring and reporting of actual or potential shortages of medicinal products, including the procedures and the respective roles and obligations of concerned entities in this Regulation. It is important to ensure continued supply of medicinal products, which is often taken for granted across Europe. This is especially true for the most critical medicinal products which are essential to ensure the continuity of care, the provision of quality healthcare and guarantee a high level of public health protection in Europe. Member States should be able to introduce or maintain more robust measures to achieve security of supply for medicines than the safeguards provided for in this Regulation as long as these measures do not have a negative impact on the security of supply of other Member States.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities and the Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities and the Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders and the information available in the European Medicines Verifications System (EMVS). The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation. Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including patient organisations or health care professionals, may also report a shortage of a given medicinal product marketed in the Member State concerned to the competent authority. The Executive Steering Group on Shortages and Safety of Medicinal Products (‘the Medicines Shortages Steering Group’ (MSSG)) already established within the Agency pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council56 , should adopt a list of critical shortages of medicinal products and ensure monitoring of those shortages by the Agency. The MSSG should also adopt a list of critical medicinal products authorised in accordance with [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or this Regulation to ensure monitoring of the supply of those products. The MSSG may provide recommendations on measures to be taken by marketing authorisation holders, the Member States, the Commission and other entities to resolve any critical shortage or to ensure the security of supply of those critical medicinal products to the market. Implementing acts can be adopted by the Commission to ensure that appropriate measures, including the establishment or maintenance of contingency stocks, are taken by marketing authorisation holders, wholesale distributors or other relevant entities.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 (138) The national competent authorities should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through both national and centralised procedures, based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. The Agency should be empowered to monitor shortages of medicinal products that are authorised through the centralised procedure, also based on notifications of marketing authorisation holders. When critical shortages are identified, both national competent authorities and the Agency should work in a coordinated manner to communicate the necessary information to patients, consumers, and healthcare professionals, including on estimated duration and available alternatives, and manage those critical shortages, whether the medicinal product concerned by the critical shortage is covered by a centralised marketing authorisation or a national marketing authorisation and register such information in the European Shortages Monitoring Platform. . Marketing authorisation holders and other relevant entities must provide the relevant information to inform the monitoring. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities, including
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 a (new) (138 a)To facilitate appropriate communication between patients and consumers, on the one hand, and competent authorities on the other, Member States should collect data on the impact of shortages of medicinal products on patients and consumers, and share relevant information through the MSSG, in order to inform approaches to management of shortages of medicinal products. Marketing authorisation holders should set up and maintain a minimum safety stock of critical medicinal products which shall be sufficient to cover two months demand of all Member States where the product has been placed on the market. Delegated acts can be adopted by the Commission to ensure that appropriate measures, including the establishment or maintenance of contingency stocks, are taken by marketing authorisation holders, wholesale distributors or other relevant entities. The setting up of safety stocks of critical medicinal products should not hamper the availability and affordability of these products or harm the environment by inappropriate disposals at both European and global level. Given the global nature of pharmaceutical supply chains, the safety stocks should be proportionate and take into account the potential impacts on shortages in other Member States and third countries. In order to avoid any interruption of access to critical medicinal products, national competent authorities may, in duly justified cases, grant an exemption from stockpiling obligations to the marketing authorisation holder, upon request, or adopt other complementary measures on the safety of stocks.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 a (new) (138 a)To avoid that measures foreseen or taken by a Member State to prevent or mitigate a shortage at national level when responding to the legitimate needs of its citizen increase the risk of shortages in another Member State, the Agency should assess those measures with regards to their potential or actual impact on the availability and security of supply in other Member States and at European level, and inform of its assessment the Member States and the MSSG.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 b (new) (138 b)) One of the aims of this Regulation is to set out a framework for the activities to be deployed by the Member States and the Agency to improve the Union's capacity to react efficiently and in a coordinated manner to support shortage management and security of supply of medicinal products, in particular critical medicinal products, to EU citizens, at all times. Those shortages are a persistent problem that has been increasingly affecting the health and lives of Union citizens for decades and the root causes are multifactorial. Therefore, this Regulation should be a first step towards improving the Union response to that persistent problem. The Commission should subsequently expand that framework to continue addressing the causes of shortages of medicinal products, and better prevent and mitigate their effects.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 c (new) (138 c)To complement this Regulation and as a first step to a more structural, long term approach to reduce Union dependencies for critical medicines and ingredients, particularly for products where there are only a few supplying manufacturers or countries, the Commission should propose by (OP: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation) a legislative initiative for an EU Critical Medicines Act for supporting the European green, digital manufacturing of key medicines, active pharmaceutical ingredients, and intermediate pharmaceutical ingredients for which the Union is dependent on one country or a limited number of manufacturers
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 138 d (new) (138 d)It is appropriate for the Commission to build upon the Communication addressing medicine shortages in the European Union of 24 October 2023 and the many tools which can be used to promote a coordinated industrial approach, bringing together public and private actors from the European health and industrial ecosystem.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 145 (145) Experience shows that, in clinical trials with investigational medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs, including some advanced therapy medicinal products, the procedure to achieve compliance with the requirements of Directives 2001/18/EC and 2009/41/EC as regards the environmental risk assessment and consent by the competent authority of a Member State is complex and can take a significant amount of time.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 147 (147) Consequently, it is particularly difficult - although it can be justified in accordance with the precautionary principle - to conduct multi-centre clinical trials with investigational medicinal products that contain or consist of GMOs involving several Member States.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 151 Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation lays down Union procedures for the authorisation, supervision and pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use at Union level, establishes rules and procedures at Union and at Member State level relating to the monitoring and management of shortages and critical shortages and security of supply of medicinal products, and lays down the governance provisions of the European Medicines Agency (‘the Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 which shall carry out the tasks relating to medicinal products for human use that are laid down in this Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 2019/6 and other relevant Union legal acts.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (4) ‘orphan medicin
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 7 (7) ‘significant benefit’ means a clinically relevant advantage or a major contribution to patient care of an orphan medicinal product
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 8 a (new) (8 a) ‘paediatric population’ means that part of the population aged between birth and 18 years;
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9 a (new) (9 a) paediatric investigation plan’ means a research and development programme aimed at ensuring that the necessary data are generated determining the conditions in which a medicinal product may be authorised to treat the paediatric population
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10 (10) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a regulatory framework during which it is possible to develop, validate and test in a controlled environment innovative or adapted regulatory solutions that facilitate the development and authorisation of innovative products
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product or medical device that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 b (new) (11 b) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product or a medical device by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical need; the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product or the medical device is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of the best care of patients;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11 c (new) (11 c) 'adverse reaction' means a response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended, and includes medication errors and uses outside of the terms of the marketing authorisation, including the misuse and abuse of the medication product
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12 (12) ‘shortage’ means a situation in which the supply of a medicinal product that is authorised and placed on the market in a Member State or of a CE- marked medical device does not meet
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 a (new) (14 a) ‘supply’ means the total volume of stock of a given medicinal product that is placed on the market by a marketing authorisation holder or a manufacturer;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14 b (new) (14 b) ‘demand’ means the request for a medicinal product by a healthcare professional or patient in response to clinical the demand is satisfactorily met when the medicinal product is acquired in appropriate time and in sufficient quantity to allow continuity of provision of the best care to patients.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Member State authorisation of
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Member State authorisation of
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the application for marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with Article 9, 10, 13 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], or for active substances used in fixed dose combination medicinal products that have previously been used in the composition of authorised medicinal products;
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the application for marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with Article 9, 10, 13 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] or for active substances used in fixed dose combination medicinal products that have previously been used in the composition of authorised medicinal products;
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Point (b), first subparagraph, shall not apply to those parts of summary of product characteristics and package leaflet referring to indications, posologies, pharmaceutical forms, methods or routes of administration or any other way in which the medicinal product may be used which were still covered by a patent or a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products at the time when the
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Point (b), first subparagraph, shall not apply to those parts of summary of product characteristics and package leaflet referring to indications, posologies, pharmaceutical forms, methods or routes of administration or any other way in which the medicinal product may be used which were still covered by a patent or a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products at the time when the
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. Within 20 days of receipt of an application, the Agency shall check whether all the information and documentation required in accordance with Article 6 have been submitted, that the application does not contain critical deficiencies as defined in guidelines established under paragraph 7 that may prevent the evaluation of the medicinal product and decide whether the application is valid.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The documentation shall include a declaration to the effect that clinical trials carried out outside the Union meet the ethical requirements of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014. Those particulars and documentation shall take account of the unique, Union nature of the authorisation requested and, otherwise than in exceptional cases relating to the application of the law on trademarks pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 , shall include the use of a single name for the medicinal product. The use of a single name does not exclude: (a) the use of additional qualifiers where necessary to identify different presentations of the medicinal product concerned.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment, including with regard to the quality of life of a relevant patient population or subpopulation, of a life- threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 For orphan medicinal products and medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, the Agency may, following the advice of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use regarding the maturity of the data related to the development, offer to the applicant a phased review of complete data packages for individual modules of particulars and documentation as referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Where appropriate, the application may include an active substance master file certificate or an application for an active substance master file or any other
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation applicant shall not carry out animal tests in case scientifically satisfactory non-animal testing methods are available. Where scientifically satisfactory non-animal testing methods are not available, applicants that use animal testing shall ensure that the principle of replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing for scientific purposes has been applied in compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU with regard to any animal study conducted for the purpose of supporting the application.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The marketing authorisation applicant shall not carry out animal tests in case scientifically satisfactory non-animal testing methods are available. When scientifically reliable non-animal testing alternatives are unavailable, applicants utilizing animal testing must adhere to the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing for scientific purposes. This adherence must be in accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU for any animal study carried out to support their application.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use accepts the request, the time-limit laid down in Article 6(6), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 1
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article6a Parallel application for one or more new indications (1) During the scientific assessment of an initial marketing authorisation application of a medicinal product by the Agency, the applicant may submit to the Agency a separate parallel application for one or more new indications concerning the same medicinal product. (2) The parallel application shall be assessed by the Agency as a marketing authorisation application in accordance with this Regulation, subject to the following: (a) To the extent the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use can assess the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application, leading to the same outcome for both applications it shall group the applications and issue a single opinion. (b) To the extent the said Committee cannot issue an opinion on the parallel application within the timeframe applicable to the initial marketing authorisation application the parallel application shall be converted to a Type II variation application in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008. (c) If the initial marketing authorisation application is withdrawn or receives a negative opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the Committee will pursue the assessment of the parallel application as a standalone marketing authorisation application.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) identification and characterisation of hazards for the environment, animals and for human health; for the purpose of this point, ‘hazards for human health’ includes the risks to the health of human beings other than the treated patient as the risk to the treated patient shall be assessed as part of the benefit-risk assessment of the medicinal product;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. In case of first-in-class medicinal products or when a novel question is raised during the assessment of the submitted environmental risk assessment, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or the rapporteur, shall carry out necessary consultations with bodies Member States have set up in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC. They
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 a (new) Article 9a Availability plan 1. The applicant shall submit an availability plan to the Agency. The availability plan shall describe the modalities by which the authorised medicinal product is made available during the period of regulatory data protection or patent, in a Member States where the medicinal product is needed. applicant shall submit an availability plan to the Agency. The availability plan shall describe the modalities by which the authorised medicinal product is made available during the period of regulatory data protection or patent, in a Member States where the medicinal product is needed. 2. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall assess the availalibility plan and request modification thereto, if it comes to the conclusion that the foreseen modalities do not guarantee timely access to patients. In case of such a request the applicant shall adjust the availability plan.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Where within 90 days of the validation of the marketing authorisation application and during the assessment the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use considers that the submitted data are not of sufficient quality or maturity to complete the assessment, the assessment can be terminated. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use shall summarise the deficiencies in writing. On this basis, the Agency shall inform the applicant accordingly and set a reasonable time limit to address the deficiencies. The application shall be suspended until the applicant addresses the deficiencies. If the applicant fails to address those deficiencies within the time limit set by the Agency, the application shall be considered as
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point h (h) where appropriate, details of any recommended obligation to conduct any other post-authorisation studies, including post-authorisation treatment optimisation studies, to improve the safe and effective use of the medicinal product;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point m a (new) (m a) a stewardship plan in accordance with Article 17 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and special information requirements in accordance with Article 69 of that Directive for any antimicrobials, as well as any other obligations imposed on the marketing authorisation holder;
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point m b (new) (m b) where applicable, a confirmation as to whether the medicinal product satisfies the criteria of Article 83 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] regarding medicinal products addressing an unmet medical need;
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5 Where the draft decision differs from the opinion of the Agency, the Commission shall provide a detailed explanation of the reasons for the differences and make that information publicly available at the same time as the decision.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. the benefit/risk balance is objectively favourable and any adverse reactions are not statistically relevant
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the environmental risk assessment is incomplete or insufficiently substantiated by the applicant or if the risks identified in the environmental risk assessment have not been sufficiently addressed by the
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The marketing authorisation may furthermore be refused if, after verification of the particulars and documentation submitted in accordance with Article 6, the view is taken that the environmental risk assessment is incomplete or insufficiently substantiated by the applicant or if the risks identified in the environmental risk assessment have not been sufficiently addressed by the applicant.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall immediately publish the assessment report on the medicinal product for human use and the reasons for its opinion in favour of granting marketing authorisation, after deletion of any information of a commercially confidential nature and following consultation of patients’ organisations.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – indent 1 –
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2 a (new) – for antimicrobials, all information referred to in Article 17 of and Annex I to [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] as well as any other obligations imposed on the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) Where post-authorisation studies to be performed in accordance with Article 20(1) justify it, the Commission may decide to withdraw a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product based on evidence pointing to a risk to public health.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) clinical studies on all aspects of efficacy and safety have been carried out with a monitoring period of at least six months, demonstrating in a sufficiently clear and reliable manner both the efficacy and safety of the medicinal product and the total absence of serious or lethal adverse effects
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) clinical studies are conducted under external supervision by independent parties subject to confidentiality for commercial purposes, but who are able to report to the Agency on the correctness and completeness of the trials carried out
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new) (c c) for medicines authorised in an emergency, there must be an active pharmacovigilance system – not only passive – also in the consources of the subjects on which the medicine is administered outside the clinical trial.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 In duly justified cases, to meet an unmet medical need of patients, as referred to in Article 83(1), point (a), of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication to an existing marketing authorisation authorised under this Regulation may be granted by the Commission to a medicinal product that is likely to address the unmet medical need in accordance with Article 83(1), point (b), of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC], prior to the submission of comprehensive clinical data provided that the benefit of the immediate availability on the market of that medicinal product outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still required. The benefit-risk assessment must be based on reliable, clear and verifiable data and not approximate and based on presumptive or generic assessments.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 In emergency situations, as referred to in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371, a conditional marketing authorisation or a new conditional therapeutic indication referred to in the first subparagraph may be granted also where comprehensive non-clinical or pharmaceutical data have not been supplied.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication referred to in paragraph 1 may be granted only if the benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product is favourable and the applicant is likely to be able to provide comprehensive data. the benefit-risk assessment must be based on reliable, clear and verifiable data and not approximate and based on presumptive or generic assessments.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. Conditional marketing authorisations or a new conditional therapeutic indication granted pursuant to this Article shall be subject to specific obligations. Those specific obligations and
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies, with a view to confirming that the benefit- risk balance is favourable. The Agency will establish and publish specific deadlines and criteria for meeting these conditions, making them accessible to the public.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. As part of the specific obligations referred to in paragraph 3, the marketing authorisation holder of a conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be required to complete ongoing studies, or to conduct new studies
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 6. By way of derogation from Article 17(1), an initial conditional marketing authorisation granted pursuant to this Article shall be valid for one year, on a renewable basis for the first three years after granting the authorisation and every two years thereafter. However, where the Commission terminates the recognition of a public health emergency in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371, the marketing authorisation holder shall pursue a marketing authorisation in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. the benefit-risk assessment should be reassessed every two months on the basis of new available data on the safety and efficacy of the product, on the possible lethal effects of the disease, including when treated, and on the availability of therapeutic solutions to treat it.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 a (new) Article19a Revocation of conditional marketing authorisation The Commission may in justified cases revoke the conditional marketing authorisation that was granted in accordance with Article 19 where the benefit of the immediate availability of the medicinal product on the Union market no longer outweighs the risk due to missing confirming data or noncompliance with the obligations set out in Article 19.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part After the granting of a marketing authorisation, the Agency
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 If this obligation would apply to several medicinal products, the Agency shall
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The competent authorities of the Member States may withdraw the authorisation for placing on the market the presence of statistically relevant evidence of adverse reactions and serious side effects and shall reserve the same possibility of withdrawal until the labelling and package leaflet of the medicinal product concerned has been updated with those serious side effects
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 The granting of a marketing authorisation as well as the granting of a temporary emergency marketing authorisation shall not affect the civil or criminal liability of the manufacturer or of the marketing authorisation holder pursuant to the applicable national law in Member States.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f (f) a serious risk to the environment or to public health via the environment has been identified and not sufficiently addressed by the marketing authorisation holder; in such cases, the Agency shall immediately inform the Commission who is to be responsible for informing the relevant national and Union authorities.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) a decision driven by commercial considerations, while safeguarding any information that is of a commercially confidential nature.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (f a) commercial considerations
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where the action referred to in the first subparagraph is to withdraw a medicinal product with no alternative therapeutic equivalent from the market, the marketing authorisation holder shall provide information on the impact of such withdrawal on patients who are already being treated.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 4. Where the marketing authorisation holder intends to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for a critical medicinal product, the marketing authorisation holder shall, prior to the notification referred to in paragraph 1, offer, on reasonable terms, to transfer the marketing authorisation to a third party that has declared its intention to place that critical medicinal product on the market, or to use the pharmaceutical non-clinical and clinical documentation contained in the file of the medicinal product for the purposes of submitting an application in accordance with Article 14 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. When a marketing authorization is transferred to a new holder, said change shall be reported to the Agency within a 30-day timeframe and include the financial details of the transaction between the transferring parties. This information is then to be made accessible to the public by the Agency.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) if one of its indications
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 As soon as the relevant patent or supplementary protection certificate referred to in point (a) expires, the marketing authorisation holder shall withdraw the initial or duplicate marketing authorisation or where appropriate vary the term of the marketing authorisation to include the relevant SmPC information for which the corresponding patent(s) or supplementary protection certificate(s) has(ve) expired.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. When applying paragraph 1, the Member State shall notify the Agency, which shall make the notification publicly available.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 When compassionate use is envisaged by a Member State, or by the applicant or sponsor, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, after consulting the manufacturer or the applicant, may adopt opinions on the conditions for use, the conditions for distribution and the patients targeted. The opinions shall be updated where necessary.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it in a centralized database for compassionate use programs on its website.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. The Agency shall keep an up-to- date list of the opinions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4 and shall publish it on its website in an accessible, searchable data format.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to the law on the protection of industrial and commercial property, medicinal products for human use which have been authorised in accordance with this Regulation shall benefit from the periods of regulatory protection set out in Chapter VII of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]. The granting of periods of regulatory protection shall be published and updated where appropriate by the Agency in a designated registry.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 During a public health emergency, the Commission may grant a temporary emergency marketing authorisation (‘TEMA’) or a new temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of an existing marketing authorisation under this Regulation, for medicinal products intended for the treatment, prevention or medical diagnosis of a serious or life- threatening disease or condition which are directly related to the public health emergency, prior to the submission of the complete quality, non-clinical, clinical data and environmental data and information.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A temporary emergency marketing authorisation or a temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, may be granted only after the recognition of a public health emergency at Union level in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 and where the following requirements are met:
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no other satisfactory method of treatment, prevention or diagnosis authorised or sufficiently available in the Union or, if such method is already available, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation o
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no other satisfactory method of treatment, prevention or diagnosis authorised or sufficiently available in the Union or, if such method is already available
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) based on the scientific evidence available, the Agency issues an opinion concluding that the medicinal product could be effective in treating, preventing or diagnosing the disease or condition directly related to the public health emergency, and the known
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall transmit without undue delay to the Commission the scientific opinion and its updates and any recommendations on the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. On the basis of the scientific opinion of the Agency referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall set specific conditions with respect to the temporary emergency marketing authorisation, in particular the conditions for manufacturing, use, supply and safety monitoring and the compliance with related good manufacturing, and pharmacovigilance practices. If necessary, the conditions may specify the batches of the medicinal product concerned by the temporary emergency marketing authorisation, after consultation with the applicant or marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 4 4. Those specific conditions and, where appropriate, the time limit for compliance shall be specified in the conditions to the marketing authorisation and shall be reviewed annually by the Agency, in consultation with the applicant or marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 The temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, shall cease to be valid when the Commission terminates the recognition of a public health emergency in accordance with Article 23(2) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 a (new) When the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, ceases to be valid in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, to avoid any disruption in supply of the medicinal product concerned, the Agency may set a transitional period after consultation with the marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new) Where the Commission adopts any such implementing act, the provisions of Article 34, paragraph 1a shall apply.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 For the purpose of regulatory data protection, the temporary emergency marketing authorisation or temporary emergency therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, and any subsequent marketing authorisation, as referred to in subparagraph 1, shall be considered as part of the same global marketing authorisation.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – title III
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant when applying for a marketing authorisation, issued prior to the granting of the marketing authorization, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, grant a transferable data exclusivity voucher to a ‘priority antimicrobial’ referred to in paragraph 3, under the conditions referred to in paragraph 4 based on a scientific assessment by the Agency or alternatively incentives already implemented in other domains such as rare diseases.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Following a request by the applicant when applying for a marketing authorisation, made before that marketing authorisation is granted, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, grant a transferable data exclusivity voucher to a ‘priority antimicrobial’ referred to in paragraph 3, under the conditions referred to in paragraph 4 based on a scientific assessment by the Agency.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 2. The voucher referred to in paragraph 1 shall give the right to its holder to an additional
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In the scientific assessment of
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In the scientific assessment
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The Agency shall develop a weighting of each criteria and a corresponding scoring system allowing priority antimicrobials to be designated one of three categories of vouchers according to its expected impact on combatting antimicrobial resistance. The agency shall assign each voucher category a corresponding financial value which will be payed to the applicant following the auction process set out in Article 41.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) demonstrate capacity and ensure to supply the priority antimicrobial in sufficient quantities for the expected needs of the Union market;
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all direct financial support received from any public authority of publicly funded body based in the European Union, for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) provide information on all direct EU financial support received for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Push and pull incentives scheme to boost the development of priority antimicrobials 1. The Commission shall establish a Union push and pull incentives scheme to promote and urgently accelerate the development of priority antimicrobials. Member States shall be encouraged to participate in the Union level scheme. 2. An antimicrobial shall be considered ‘priority antimicrobial’ if preclinical and clinical data underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance and it has at least one of the following characteristics: (a) it represents a new class of antimicrobials; (b) its mechanism of action is distinctly different from that of any authorised antimicrobial in the Union; (c) it contains an active substance not previously authorised in a medicinal product in the Union that addresses a multi-drug resistant organism and serious or life threatening infection. In the scientific assessment of the criteria referred to in the first subparagraph, and in the case of antibiotics, the Agency shall take into account the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, specifically those listed as priority 1 (critical) or priority 2 (high), or an equivalent list established at Union level 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 175 to supplement this Regulation by further defining the scheme and its funding, which shall at least include the following incentives: (a) research grants under Union fund with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials; (b) milestone prizes for novel antimicrobial developers with conditionalities linked to the affordability and supply of new and existing antimicrobials; (c) voluntary joint procurement with subscription payment mechanisms or market entry rewards that delink or partially delink revenues and sales; (d) an annual revenue guarantee scheme, aimed at securing access to antibiotics in line with the 2021 Health Council Conclusions. 4. The Union push and pull incentives scheme shall be coordinated and managed by the Commission. provide information on all direct financial support received for research related to the development of the priority antimicrobial. 5. By ... [one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall have developed, and commenced the implementation of the Union push and pull incentives scheme. 5. By ... [six years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council reviewing the application of the scheme laid down in this Article.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article 40a Procedure for AMR designation 1 An antimicrobial medicinal product developed to address priority pathogens shall be granted an AMR designation where the antimicrobial medicinal sponsor can demonstrate that the following requirements are met: a) the product is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a pathogen included in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, or an equivalent list established at Union level; b) there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorised in the Union or, where such method exists, that the medicinal product would be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. 2. The antimicrobial medicinal product sponsor shall submit an application for the designation of the orphan medicinal product to the Agency at any stage of the development of the medicinal product before the application for marketing authorisation referred to in Articles 5 and 6 is submitted. 3. The application of the antimicrobial medicinal sponsor shall be accompanied by the following particulars and documentation: a) name or corporate name and permanent address of the sponsor; b) active substances of the medicinal product; c) proposed condition for which it is intended or the proposed therapeutic indication; d) justification that the criteria laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article are met, and a description of the stage of development, including the expected therapeutic indication. 4. The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article within 90 days of the receipt of a valid application. 5. Designated antimicrobial medicinal products shall be considered as addressing an unmet medical need as referred to in Article 83 of [Proposal for a Directive on the Union code relating to medicinal products for human use].
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 a (new) Article40a Push and pull incentives scheme to boost the development of priority antimicrobials 1. The Commission shall establish a Union push and pull incentives scheme to promote and urgently accelerate the development of novel antimicrobials, as well as promote increased access to existing and newly developed antimicrobials. Member States shall be encouraged to participate in the Union level scheme. 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 175 to supplement this Regulation by further defining the scheme and its funding, which shall include i.a. the following incentives: (a) research grants under Union funds; (b) milestone prizes for novel antimicrobial developers; (c) voluntary joint procurement with subscription payment mechanisms or market entry rewards that delink or partially delink revenues and sales; 3. The Union push and pull incentives scheme shall be coordinated and managed by the Commission. 4. By ... [one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall have developed, and commenced the implementation of the Union push and pull incentives scheme. 5. By ... [7 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council reviewing the application of the scheme laid down in this Article.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A voucher
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 A voucher shall only be used once and in relation to a single centrally authorised medicinal product and only if
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall apply
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 This Chapter shall
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 An entity not engaged in an economic activity (‘not-for-profit entity’) may submit to the Agency or to a competent authority of the Member State substantive non- clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency may, at the request of a Member State, the Commission, or on its own initiative and on the basis of all available evidence make a scientific evaluation of the benefit-risk of the use of a medicinal product with a new therapeutic indication
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 3. Article 81(2), point (c) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 Where the Agency concludes that a holder of a marketing authorisation, or a new therapeutic indication, including when grouped with an extension of the marketing authorisation, granted in accordance with Article 19, including a new therapeutic indication granted referred to Article 19, failed to comply with the obligations laid down in the marketing authorisation, the Agency shall inform the Commission accordingly.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Such advice can also be requested for medicinal products referred to in Articles 83 and 84 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for medicinal products used with an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Disclosed conflicts of interest and the mitigating actions implemented by the concerned individual(s) must be documented in the abridged minutes of the meetings, following the stipulations of Article 147(2).
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. When granting scientific advice, the Agency shall ensure to the greatest extent possible that there is a separation between those responsible for providing scientific advice to a medicine developer and those subsequently involved in evaluating a marketing authorisation application for the same medicinal product. The Agency shall ensure that at least one of the two rapporteurs for a marketing authorisation application should not have taken part in any pre- submission activities concerning the medicinal product. The reasons for any exceptions shall be documented and published with the European Public Assessment Report.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency may offer enhanced scientific and regulatory support, including as applicable consultation with other bodies as referred to in Articles 58 and 59 and accelerated assessment mechanisms, for certain medicinal products and new indications of medicinal products, that, based on preliminary evidence submitted by the developer fulfil one or more of the following conditions:
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Agency
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) are likely to address an unmet medical need as referred to in Article 83(1) and 83(2) of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC];
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are orphan medicinal products
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) provide an exceptional therapeutic advancement or are expected to be of major interest from the point of view of public health, in particular as regards therapeutic innovation, taking into account the early stage of development, or antimicrobials with any of the characteristics mentioned in Article 40(3).
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) The Agency's working group on advanced therapy medicinal products is tasked with evaluating which products fulfill the criteria of innovative advanced therapy medicinal products as set out in point (b) of this article. The determinations made by the working group should take into account the progressive development inherent to advanced therapy medicinal products.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 When forming the recommendation referred to in paragraph 1, the Agency shall consult, where appropriate, relevant advisory or regulatory bodies established in other Union legal acts in related fields. In the case of products which are based on substances of human origin, the Agency shall consult the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Coordination Board as established in Regulation (EU) No [reference to be added after adoption cf. COM(2022)338 final], and classify all products that are significantly manipulated or utilized in a non- homologous manner, as either a medicinal product or an advanced therapy medicinal product, whichever is applicable.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt the necessary provisions for implementing this Article by means of implementing acts in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 173(2)
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 1 1. The orphan medicin
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 1 1. The orphan medicin
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The application for the designation of the orphan medicin
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The application
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall confirm the application's validity and share its preliminary scientific findings with the applicant. The applicant shall be requested to provide their comments on these preliminary conclusions. The Agency shall, in consultation with the Member States, the Commission and interested parties, draw up detailed guidelines on the required procedure, format and content of applications for designation and for the transfer of the orphan designation pursuant to Article 65.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall verify the validity of the application and share its draft scientific conclusions with the applicant. The applicant shall be invited to provide their observations on the draft conclusions. The Agency shall, in consultation with the Member States, the Commission and interested parties, draw up detailed guidelines on the required procedure, format and content of applications for designation and for the transfer of the orphan designation pursuant to Article 65.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 The Agency shall adopt a decision granting or refusing the orphan designation based on the criteria referred to in Article 63(1)
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Where the opinion of the Agency is that the application does not satisfy the criteria, the Agency shall forthwith inform the sponsor. Within 30 days of receipt of the draft opinion, the sponsor may submit detailed grounds for re- examination. Within 30 days following receipt of a request for re-examination, the Agency shall confirm or revise its previous conclusions.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 1 Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 2 Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 3 Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 4 4. An orphan designation ceases to be valid once an orphan medicine sponsor has obtained a marketing authorisation for the relevant medicinal product in accordance with Article 13(2). An orphan designation shall however remain valid in case the indication of the initial marketing authorisation addresses only a subset of the population affected by the designated orphan condition OR where the orphan medicinal product sponsor can provide evidence that studies supporting the use of the designated orphan medicinal product are planned or ongoing with respect to additional indications within the scope of the designated condition / orphan designation.
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 4 4. An orphan designation ceases to be valid once an orphan medicine sponsor has obtained a marketing authorisation for the relevant medicinal product in accordance with Article 13(2). However, when the original marketing authorization only addresses part of the population affected by the designated orphan condition, the orphan designation shall remain valid.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 66 – paragraph 5 5. At any time, an orphan designation may be withdrawn at the request of the orphan medicine sponsor. The orphan medicine sponsor shall provide a reasoned justification for the withdrawal request which shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 67 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) where applicable, any request made in accordance with Article 66(2) and any decisions taken in that respect.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The orphan medicine sponsor
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the conduct of the various tests and trials necessary to demonstrate the quality, safety
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and entities not engaged in economic activities provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 2. Medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal products under the provisions of this Regulation shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products and in particular aid for research for small- and medium-sized undertakings and not-for-profit entities provided for in framework programmes for research and technological development.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of paragraph 2, this Regulation and [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] as a whole, the Commission shall by ... [18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive] adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 215 to supplement this Directive by laying down the criteria to qualify as a micro, small and medium-sized enterprise, taking into account the specificities of enterprises of this sector within the Union.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) For the purpose of paragraph 2, the definitions set out in Article 58a paragraph 1 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] shall apply.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – title Breakthrough Designated Orphan medicinal products
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An orphan medicinal product shall be
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition or where, despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant benefit, will bring exceptional therapeutic advancement; and
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition orwhere, despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant benefit, will bring
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal product results in a
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the use of the orphan medicinal product results in a
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission and the authorities or bodies, as well as the stakeholders such as representatives of patients' organisations in the relevant disease areas, healthcare professionals, orphan medicinal product sponsors, representatives of pharmaceutical industry and other relevant stakeholders referred to in Article 162.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Agency adopts scientific guidelines for the application of this Article, it shall consult the Commission
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) twelve
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) thirteen years for orphan medicinal products
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) (b a) Ten years for orphan medicinal products where one of the following criteria applies: i. fewer than three orphan medicinal products have been approved in the Union for the indication in question; ii. despite medicinal products being authorised for the indication in question, none has been approved in the Union for the relevant subpopulation that is covered by the therapeutic indication of the new medicinal product; iii. an orphan medicinal product has been approved in the Union for the indication, but the new orphan medical product will represent a new mechanism of action or technology, and will result in significant reduction in disease morbidity or mortality for the relevant patient population, or a major contribution to the quality of life of the relevant population.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) five years for a new orphan therapeutic indication of medicinal products which have already received marketing authorisation in the Union ;
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) f
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) twelve years for orphan medicinal products addressing requirements set in Article 70, paragraph 1 point (a) and (b) in the paediatric population.
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. For the medicinal products referred to in paragraph 2, points (ba) and (c), the market exclusivity in respect of the orphan indication shall not prevent the entry of generic and biosimilar medicinal products on the market, provided that they are for other uses that are not subject to the market protection applicable in accordance with paragraph 2.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation holder holds more than one orphan marketing authorisations for the same active substance, other than in cases foreseen in Article 72 (2), subparagraph 2, those authorisations shall not benefit from separate market exclusivity periods. The duration of the market exclusivity shall start from the date when the first orphan marketing authorisation was granted in the Union.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 3 3. Where a marketing authorisation holder holds more than one orphan marketing authorisations for the same active substance, those authorisations shall
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) (c a) a compulsory license has been granted in accordance with [Regulation on compulsory licensing for crisis management and amending Regulation (EC) 816/2006].
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) Ensuring that Europeans receive the medicines they need, when they need them, regardless of where they live in the EU is a central objective of the European Health Union. Boosting the competitiveness of the European pharmaceutical industry, whilst also ensuring better availability of medicines and more equal and timely access for patients is a key deliverable of the proposed EU pharmaceutical reform.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – title Prolongation and reduction of market exclusivity period
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) 1. The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by 24 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71, paragraph 2, point (a), if one of its therapeutic indications fulfils one of the following requirements: i. there is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such condition or where ii. despite medicinal products being authorised for such condition in the Union, the applicant demonstrates that the orphan medicinal product, in addition to having a significant benefit, will bring exceptional therapeutic advancement or iii. the condition affects not more than 0,5 in 10,000 persons in the Union when the application for an orphan designation is submitted. When applying to new therapeutic indications, this prolongation shall apply for indications approved at least two years before the end of the exclusivity period.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) The European Parliament resolution of 12 July 2023 on the COVID- 19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future 2022/2076 (INI);
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. 1 a. 1. The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 24 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a) and (b), if at least two years before the end of the exclusivity period, the orphan marketing authorisation holder obtains a marketing authorisation for one or more new therapeutic indications for a different orphan condition. If the newly approved therapeutic indication meets one of the requirements listed in Article 71(2) point (b), and where the first orphan marketing authorisation was not granted a period of market exclusivity as referred in Article 71(2) point (b), the period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by 36 months in total.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 12 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a), (b) and (ba), if at least two years before the end of the exclusivity period, the orphan marketing authorisation holder obtains a marketing authorisation for one or more new therapeutic indications for a different orphan condition.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Such a prolongation may be granted twice, if the new therapeutic indications are each time for different orphan conditions. Any subsequent marketing authorisation obtained by the marketing authorisation holder for one or more new therapeutic indications for different orphan conditions shall receive a separate market exclusivity of three years, starting from the expiration date of the market exclusivity for the entire product under Article 71, where relevant as extended under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1 b) European Parliament Resolution 2022/2076 calls for further investment in research and development activities geared towards achieving public interest objectives (Article 296) and ‘calls on the Commission to use industrial, intellectual property and pharmaceutical strategies to encourage public funding for research and development projects in order to comply with the principle of open science and to close the persistent gap in research and medicine production through partnerships, technology transfer and the creation of open research centres’ (Article 590);
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Such a prolongation may be granted twice, if the new therapeutic indications are
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The period of market exclusivity shall be prolonged by an additional 12 months for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a), (b), and (ba) if the orphan medicinal product is not authorised for the indication in question in any third country at the time of granting the authorisation.
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. 2 a. 2. The holder of an orphan marketing authorisation shall be entitled to a total maximum period of [15] years of orphan marketing exclusivity from the time the orphan medicinal product in question first obtains an authorization as defined in Article 69. 3. As an alternative to the reward foreseen under Article 86 [of revised Directive] and upon request from the applicant, the period of market exclusivity for orphan medicinal products referred to in Article 71(2), points (a) and (b) shall be prolonged by an additional 24 months where an application for orphan marketing authorisation is submitted in respect of a designated orphan medicinal product pursuant to [Revised Regulation] and that application includes the results of all studies conducted in compliance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan. The first subparagraph shall also apply where completion of the agreed paediatric investigation plan fails to lead to the authorisation of a paediatric indication, but the results of the studies conducted are reflected in the summary of product characteristics and, if appropriate, in the package leaflet of the medicinal product concerned. The 24- month extension of the period of market exclusivity will be reflected in the marketing authorisation. 4. An orphan medicinal product which benefits from the prolongation of market exclusivity as referred to in paragraph 4, shall not benefit from the rewards referred to in Article 86 [of revised Directive]. 5. The limitation referred to in paragraph 3 shall not apply where the period of orphan marketing exclusivity is extended in accordance with paragraph 4 in relation to such extension.
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 4. Article 71(3) equally applies to the prolongations of market exclusivity referred to in paragraph
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The market exclusivity period shall be reduced to five years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established, in respect of the medicinal product concerned, that the criteria laid down in Article 63 are no longer met or where it is shown on the basis of available evidence that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. The sponsor shall provide the Agency with the information necessary to re- assess the criteria laid down in Article 63 and the externally audited product-related profit margins for all authorised indications at least nine months before end of the fifth year.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 a (new) Article 73a Joint procurement of orphan medicinal products 1. Upon request by one or more Member States, the Commission and any of the Member States may engage, as contracting parties, in a joint procurement procedure conducted pursuant to Article 165(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 with a view to the advance purchase of orphan medicinal products. 2. Provisions referred to in Directive 2014/24/UE, Article 12(2) and Article 12(3) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 shall apply for the joint procurement procedure as referred to in paragraph 1. 3. The Commission shall set up a coordination mechanism between the entities organising and participating in any action of the joint procurement, providing technical expertise and assistance at all stages of the procedure. 4. In order to provide incentives to encourage the uptake of the joint procurement procedure, a dedicated fund is made available. 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, set up the Fund as referred to in paragraph 4, where operating procedures and financial resources to be allocated are specified.
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 73 a (new) Article73a European Framework for Rare Diseases By (OP: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation), the Commission shall, following appropriate consultation with the Member States, patient organisations and, where relevant, other interested parties, propose a needs driven and goals based European Framework for Rare Diseases with a view to bridge relevant Union legislation, policies and programmes, and support national strategies to better meet the unmet needs of people living with rare diseases, and their carers.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) that the disease or condition for which the specific medicinal product or class is intended occurs only in adult populations, unless
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe marks a turning point with the addition of further key objectives and by
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) that the specific medicinal product is likely to not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing methods of diagnosis, prevention or treatment
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 75 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Agency shall, after consultation with the Commission and relevant interested parties, draw up guidelines for the application of this Article.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 1. After the validation of the proposed paediatric investigation plan referred to in Article 74(1).which is valid in accordance with the provisions of Article 76(2), the Agency, after receiving the opinion of its Paediatric Working Party, shall adopt within 90 days a decision as to whether or not the proposed studies will ensure the generation of the necessary data determining the conditions in which the medicinal product may be used to treat the paediatric population or subsets thereof, and as to whether or not the expected therapeutic benefits, where appropriate also over existing treatments, justify the studies proposed. When adopting its decision, the Agency shall consider whether or not the measures proposed to adapt the pharmaceutical form, the strength, the route of administration and the eventual administration device of the medicinal product for use in different subsets of the paediatric population are appropriate.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 3 3. The length of the deferral shall be specified in a decision of the Agency and shall
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Within 30 days and after receiving the opinion of its Paediatric Working Party, the Agency shall review these changes and adopt a decision on their refusal or acceptance.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Within the timelines for adoption of a decision foreseen in Articles 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 84, the Agency shall transmit its scientific conclusions to the applicant.
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Within 20 days following receipt of the scientific conclusions, the applicant may submit to the Agency a written request, citing detailed grounds, for a re- examination. Within 30 days following receipt of a request for re-examination pursuant to paragraph 4, the Agency shall confirm or revise its previous scientific conclusions. The Agency shall be able to question the applicant directly. The applicant may also offer to be questioned. Where the Agency considers it necessary, it may consult the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use or the appropriate working parties when re- examining the above mentioned scientific conclusions. If, within the 15-day period referred to in paragraph 4, the applicant does not request re-examination, the scientific conclusions shall become definitive. The Agency shall adopt a decision within a period not exceeding 15 days following the date on which the scientific conclusions have become definitive. This decision shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and shall annex the final scientific conclusions.
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 88 – paragraph 1 Where a paediatric investigation plan, agreed in accordance with the provisions of Article 77, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, is discontinued, the applicant shall notify the Agency of its intention to discontinue the conduct of the paediatric investigation plan and provide the reasons for such discontinuation
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 91 – paragraph 3 3. When products are authorised in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation, the Commission may update the summary of product characteristics and package leaflet, including dosage accuracy, and may vary the marketing authorisation accordingly.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 96 – paragraph 1 Paediatric medicinal products shall be eligible for incentives made available by the Union and by the Member States to support the additional efforts necessary in this field, such as clinical trials and research into, and the development and availability of, paediatric medicinal products.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) The digital transformation of health and care will help increase the capacity of healthcare systems to deliver more personalised and effective health and care with less resource wasting. This regulation will contribute to the delivery of healthcare to European citizens, the design of health technologies and their manufacturing to be more sustainable by reducing energy consumption, waste, pollution and the release of harmful substances, including pharmaceuticals, into the environment.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) The creation of a regulatory sandbox is intended to fulfill the following objectives: a) Enabling competent authorities to offer advice to potential marketing authorization applicants to ensure adherence to this Regulation, or other pertinent EU legislation as applicable. b) Assisting prospective marketing authorization applicants in the experimentation and advancement of innovative medicinal products or product categories. c) Facilitating regulatory learning within a managed setting.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The creation of a regulatory sandbox is intended to fulfill the following objectives: a) improve legal certainty and contribute to the sharing of best practices in the field of emerging medicinal products and collecting information and data from marketing authorisation holders, developers, independent experts and researchers, and representatives of healthcare professionals and of patients through cooperation with the authorities involved in the sandbox with a view to ensuring compliance with this Regulation and, where appropriate, with other Union and Member States legislation; b) assisting prospective marketing authorization applicants in the experimentation and advancement of innovative medicinal products or product categories; c) contribute to evidence-based regulatory learning within a managed setting and identify possible future adaptations of the legal framework.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The regulatory sandbox shall set out a regulatory framework, including scientific requirements, for the development and, where appropriate clinical trials and placing on the market of a product referred to in paragraph 1 under the conditions set out in this Chapter. The regulatory sandbox may allow targeted derogations to this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall monitor the field of emerging medicinal products and may request information and data from marketing authorisation holders, developers, independent experts and researchers, and representatives of healthcare professionals and of patients and may engage with them in preliminary discussions. The Agency may establish a dialogue framework with regulatory bodies both within and outside the Union to aid in its oversight role. Additionally, the Agency is tasked with creating and routinely revising a roster of nascent medicinal or health products that could be considered for a regulatory sandbox environment.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Agency considers it appropriate to set up a regulatory sandbox for
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations including, where relevant, with academia, HTA bodies, patients and their caregivers, healthcare professionals, sponsors, or developers. The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall be responsible for developing a sandbox plan based on data submitted by developers of eligible products and following appropriate consultations including, where relevant, HTA bodies, patients and their caregivers, clinicians, sponsors, developers and academia . The plan shall set out clinical, scientific and regulatory justification for a sandbox, including the identification of the requirements of this Regulation, [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 that cannot be complied with and a proposal for alternative or mitigation measures, where appropriate. The plan shall also include a proposed timeline for the duration of the sandbox. Where appropriate, the Agency shall also propose measures in order to mitigate any possible distortion of market conditions as a consequence of establishing a regulatory.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 b (new) (2 b) It is of outmost importance to involve patients and healthy citizens, healthcare professionals, providers and payers, public health authorities and regulators, researchers or innovators from academia and industry - early in the knowledge generation or technology development process, including through patient and citizen engagement, community involvement or other forms of social innovation approaches, such that research and innovation activities are adjusted to the users’ particular expectations, needs, constraints and potential.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 113 – paragraph 7 – point c (c) include as part of the sandbox plan the requirements of this Regulation
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 114 Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency with input from Member States shall submit annual reports to the Commission on the results from the implementation of a regulatory sandbox, including good practices, cases in which a regulatory sandbox had to be suspended or revoked as established in Article 113 (8), lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the application of this Regulation and other Union legal acts supervised within the sandbox. These reports shall be made publicly available by the Commission.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 115 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. By ... [12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], in order to ensure a harmonised approach across Member States and support to the implementation of the regulatory sandboxes, the Commission, in consultation with the Agency, shall issue guidelines, without prejudice to other Union legislative acts. Where necessary, the guidelines should be updated to incorporate any relevant findings in the annual reports submitted by the Agency, as established in the fourth paragraph of this Article.
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) its decision to permanently cease the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) its request to permanently withdraw the marketing authorisation for that medicinal product authorised in that Member State no less than
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) its decision to temporarily suspend the marketing of a medicinal product in that Member State no less than
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 1a. The marketing authorisation holder of a medicinal product in possession of a centralised marketing or a national marketing authorisation shall notify the Agency of a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Addressing unequal patient access of medicinal products has become a key priority of the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe as has been highlighted by the Council and the European Parliament. Member States and the Parliament have called for revised mechanisms and incentives for development of medicinal products tailored to the level of unmet medical need, while ensuring patient access and availability of medicinal products in all Member States.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State, of an expected duration of in excess of two weeks or, based on the demand forecast of the marketing authorisation holder no less than
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 116 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a temporary disruption in supply of a medicinal product in a given Member State,
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 1. The marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan, for any medicinal product placed on the
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Shortage prevention plans shall be without delay submitted to the competent authority concerned defined in Article 116(1) and be made publicly available, upon request.
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 117 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), patients´ organisations and healthcare professionals and other interested parties shall draw up guidance to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1) to put in place the shortage prevention plan.
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Based on the reports referred to in Articles 120(1) and 121(1), point (c), information referred to in Articles 119, 120(2) and 121 and the notification made pursuant to Article 116(1), points (a) to (d), the competent authority concerned as referred to in Article 116(1) shall continuously monitor any potential or actual shortage of those medicinal products through IT surveillance systems or data bases including the European Medicines Verifications System (EMVS).
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) The pharmaceutical framework should be aligned with the EU's ambitions in industry, digitalization, and trade, acknowledging the critical role of the European life sciences sector, especially the pharmaceutical industry, in upholding the EU's competitive edge. Bolstering robust European research and development is crucial for European sovereignty within the ambit of a globally competitive geopolitical landscape. The pharmaceutical legislative framework should be attuned to the broader EU industrial strategy, echoing the Council's emphasis from 23 March 2023 on amplifying incentives for investment in innovation and the 2016 Council's guidance that any amendments, including those affecting the incentive system, should not hinder the creation of drugs for rare disease treatment. Advancements in innovation are pivotal for enhancing patient health outcomes and the wider public health sector.
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) On the basis of the information provided pursuant to article 121(2), point (f), the Agency should monitor and assess any actions foreseen or taken by a Member State to mitigate a shortage at national level with regards to their impact on the availability and supply of medicinal products at European level.
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit updated versions of a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117. The competent authority concerned may set a deadline for the submission of the information requested.
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 118 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1) may request any additional information from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1). In particular, it may request the marketing authorisation holder to submit a shortage mitigation plan in accordance with Article 119(2), a risk assessment of impact of suspension, cessation or withdrawal in accordance with Article 119(3), or the shortage prevention plan referred to in Article 117. The competent authority concerned
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 119 – paragraph 2 2. To prepare the shortage mitigation plan referred to in Article 118(2), the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) shall include the minimum set of information set out in Part IV of Annex IV and take into account the guidance drawn up by the Agency according to Article 122(4), point (c). However, the marketing authorization holder is not required to establish or maintain a safety stock of critical medicinal products.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 1. Wholesale distributors and other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] to the public
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. For the purposes of the reporting in accordance with Article 118(1) and for the early detection of supply shortages, wholesalers shall transmit the information set out in Part Va of Annex IV to the competent authorities of the Member States in a timely manner.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be accessible by the relevant competent authorities.
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any relevant information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) Beyond cooperating along the value chain of knowledge and know-how production and valorisation or within the knowledge triangle (research-education- innovation), it is in the EU’s strategic interest to also reach out and cooperate with other countries outside the EU and on other continents. This applies in particular for multi-lateral cooperation on global health issues with countries associated to Horizon Europe but also with other partner countries and regions in the world. Involving international partners should lead to increased scientific knowledge and transfer of technology among partner countries allowing to address global health challenges across the world, thus creating sustainable growth and jobs.
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 120 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of Article 118(1), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) publish information on all expected or actual shortages of medicinal products,
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) Create a system that is user- friendly and straightforward, allowing patients and patient organizations to report shortages of medicinal products.
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) assess information on potential or actual deficiencies provided by marketing authorisation holders authorised to market in a Member State in accordance with Article 5 of [Directive 2001/83/EC as revised] as defined in paragraph 1 of Article 116, importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active ingredients and relevant suppliers thereof, wholesale distributors, associations representing interested parties or other legal persons or entities which are authorised or authorised to supply medicinal products to the public.
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) as soon as possible inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State to mitigate the shortage at national level.
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State to mitigate the shortage at national level without undue delay.
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) inform the Agency within one week of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State to mitigate the shortage at national level.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. After the expansion of the ESMP referred to in article 122 (6) and for the purpose of articles 118 (1), and 121 (2), point (a), competent authorities of the Member States shall set up national IT systems which are interoperable with the ESMP and allow for the automated exchange of information with the ESMP while avoiding duplication of reporting.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point a (a) report to the Agency on any information received from the marketing authorisation holder as defined in Article 116(1) of the medicinal product concerned or from other actors pursuant to Article 120(1a) and (2);
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) inform the Agency in a timely manner of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State in accordance with points (b) and (c) and report within one week on any other actions taken to mitigate or resolve the critical shortage in the Member State, as well as the results of these actions.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) The pharmaceutical framework should be consistent with overarching EU industrial policy, including the Council Conclusions from 23 March 2023 which stressed the importance of strengthening incentives for investment in innovation and the 2016 Council Conclusions which stress any revision, including to the incentive framework, should not discourage the development of medicinal products needed for the treatment of rare diseases; increased innovation will further support patient outcomes and public health;
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 121 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) as soon as possible inform the Agency of any actions foreseen or taken by that Member State in accordance with points (b) and (c) and report on any other actions taken to mitigate or resolve the critical shortage in the Member State, as well as the results of these actions.
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. For the purpose of article 118 (1a new) and based on the information provided pursuant to articles 121 (1), point (d), and 121 (2), the Agency shall assess the actions taken or foreseen by a Member State to mitigate a shortage at national level with regards to any potential or actual negative impacts of these actions on the availability and security of supply in another Member State and at European level. The Agency shall inform the Member State in question of its assessment in a timely manner and the MSSG and the Member States potentially or actually impacted through the single point of contact working party referred to in Article 3(6) of Regulation (EU) 2022/123. The Agency shall also inform the Commission of its assessment.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. For the purposes of fulfilling the tasks referred to in Articles 118(1), 123 and 124, the Agency shall ensure the following, in consultation with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and in consultation with relevant patient and consumer organisations:
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. For the purposes of fulfilling the tasks referred to in Articles 118(1), 123 and 124, the Agency shall ensure the following, in consultation with patient organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c):
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP and include, among others, information on the duration, reasons and mitigation measures of medicine shortages. The Agency shall ensure that, where relevant, data is interoperable between the ESMP, Member States’ IT systems, including the repositories system containing information on safety features referred to in Article 67, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, point (e) of Directive 2023/0132 (COD), and other relevant IT systems and databases, without duplication of reporting.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of implementing this Regulation, the Agency shall expand the scope of the ESMP. The Agency shall ensure that
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 122 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. The Agency shall assess measures notified by competent authorities of the Member States under Article 121 with regard to possible effects on the availability of medicines in other Member States, and shall where relevant report its findings to the Commission.
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 123 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the monitoring referred to in Article 118(1), and following consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) with MAHs and other actors of the supply chain, the MSSG shall adopt a list of critical shortages of medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC]and for which co-ordinated Union level action is necessary (‘the list of critical shortages of medicinal products’).
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this paragraph, the Agency
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) As to the scope of this Regulation, the authorisation of antimicrobials is
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Agency shall assess actual critical shortages of medicinal products and provide recommendations to healthcare professionals and patients
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available and user-friendly webpage that provides information on all actual critical shortages of medicinal products, in
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 124 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall establish within its web-portal referred to in Article 104 a publicly available webpage that provides information on actual critical shortages of medicinal products
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) inform the Agency of the end date of the critical shortage
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 125 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) inform the Agency of the cause of the critical shortage.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Where relevant, the Commission may within the scope of its competences take appropriate measures to address findings of the Agency according to the assessment in Article 122 – paragraph 6 a (new).
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 126 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall take the appropriate steps to address any concerns raised by the asseessment of the Agency referred to in Article 122 (1a new).
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 127 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authority of the Member State shall, after consultation with healthcare professionals and national patient and consumer organisations, identify critical medicinal products in that Member State, using the methodology set out in Article 130(1), point (a).
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The marketing authorisation holder shall set up and maintain a minimum safety stock of critical medicinal products which shall be sufficient to cover two months demand of all Member States where the product has been placed on the market.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Promising medicinal products that have the potential to significantly address patients’ unmet medical needs should benefit from early and enhanced scientific support, including through supporting innovative patient-relevant in vitro and in silico technologies which are key to the development of these products. Such support will ultimately help patients benefit from new therapies as early as possible.
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 128 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. By derogation from paragraph 2a, national competent authorities may, in duly justified cases, grant an exemption from stockpiling obligations to the marketing authorisation holder, upon request, or adopt other complementary measures on the safety of stocks.
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested in a timely manner. Commercially sensitive information shall only be available to the relevant authorities.
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 129 – paragraph 1 For the purposes of Article 127(4) and Article 130(2), point (c), and Article 130(4), point (c), where relevant, upon request from the competent authority concerned as defined in Article 116(1), entities including other marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), importers and manufacturers of medicinal products or active substances and relevant suppliers of these, wholesale distributors, stakeholder representative associations or other persons or legal entities that are authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public shall provide any information requested
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and after consultation with patient organisations, ensure the following:
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) and Marketing Authorisation Holders, ensure the following:
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), and Marketing Authoritation Holder, ensure the following:
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Agency shall, in collaboration with patient organisations and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), ensure the following:
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities and availability of alternatives with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, in consultation, where appropriate, with relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Research in the pharmaceutical sector has a decisive role in alleviating patients’ conditions and improving public health. Favourable but balanced rules, facilitating innovation and sufficient protection to encourage such research, including through regulatory sandboxes, will contribute to make the EU markets more attractive and to promote the development of efficacious, safe, accessible, and affordable innovations for antimicrobial resistance, poverty-related and neglected diseases, and other conditions of global public health interest. Research and innovation should continue to ensure the highest standards in health products.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) develop a common methodology to identify critical medicinal products, including the evaluation of vulnerabilities and availability of alternatives with respect to the supply chain of those medicines, in consultation, where appropriate, with relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 130 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Following the request by a Member State to launch the Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism referred to in article 132(5), the Agency shall provide assistance to the MSSG and may: (a) Confirm that the conditions are met to launch the Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism; (b) Notify the members of the MSSG of the launch of the Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism; (c) Request from the members of the MSSG relevant information within a specific time-limit; (d) Put the issuing country in contact with those Member States able to support them; (e) Organise meetings with the issuing Member States, the donating party and other relevant concerned parties; (f) request the activation of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism to coordinate and logistically support the voluntary transfer of medicines.
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c). Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”). The Union list of critical medicinal products shall be coordinated with the list identified in the Member States by the competent authority of that Member State and shall supersede all national lists.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), and patient and consumer organisations, as well as other relevant stakeholders as set out in Article 162 of this Regulation. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 1 1. Following the reporting referred to in Article 130, paragraph 2, second subparagraph, and Article 130(5), the MSSG shall consult the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c) also Marketing Authorisation Holder, National Agencies and other actors. Based on this consultation, the MSSG shall propose a Union list of critical medicinal products authorised to be placed on the market of a Member State pursuant to Article 5 of [revised Directive 2001/83/EC] and for which coordinated Union level action is necessary (“the Union list of critical medicinal products”).
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 131 – paragraph 2 2. The MSSG
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), with the Marketing Autorisation Holder and other actors , the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities.
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 132 – paragraph 1 1. Following the adoption of the Union list of critical medicinal products pursuant to Article 131(3), in consultation with the Agency and the working party referred to in Article 121(1), point (c), the MSSG may provide recommendations, in accordance with the methods referred to in Article 130(1), point (d), on appropriate security of supply measures to marketing authorisation holders as defined in Article 116(1), the Member States, the Commission or other entities.
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 133 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Legal entities that are not engaged in an economic activity such as universities, public bodies, research centres or not-for-profit organisations, represent an important source of research in unmet medical needs, research in different subpopulations, repurposing, optimisation and innovation and should also benefit from this support scheme. Whereas it should be possible to take account of the particular situation of these entities on an individual basis, such support can best be achieved by means of a dedicated support scheme, including administrative support and through the reduction, deferral and waiver of fees.
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission, taking into consideration the information or the opinion, referred to in paragraph 1, or MSSG recommendations, may decide to adopt an implementing act to improve security of supply. The implementing act, in consultancy with Marketing Authorisation Holder, National Agencys, and other relevant actors, may impose contingency stock requirements of active pharmaceutical ingredient or finished dosage forms, or other relevant well balance measures required to improve security of supply, on marketing authorisation holders, wholesale distributors or other relevant entities responding for their responsabilities facing root causes of suply risk.
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission, taking into consideration the information or the opinion, referred to in paragraph 1, or MSSG recommendations, may decide to adopt an implementing act to improve security of supply. The implementing act may impose contingency stock requirements of active pharmaceutical ingredient or finished dosage forms, or other relevant measures required to improve security of supply, on marketing authorisation holders, wholesale distributors or other relevant cent
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 134 a (new) Article 134a General provisions 1. Member States may introduce or maintain more robust provisions than those provided for in this Regulation with regard to the security of supply of and the availability of medicinal products. These provisions should not have a negative impact on the security of supply and availability of medicinal products in other Member States. 2. The implementation of this Regulation shall in no circumstances constitute grounds for a reduction of the level of safeguards already afforded by Member States with regard to the security and availability of supply of medicinal products. Where Member States detect infringements of measures in relation to Chapter X, penalties in accordance with Article 171(1) shall be imposed without undue delay.
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 138 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point ze (ze) cooperating with EU decentralised agencies and other scientific authorities and bodies established under Union law, notably the European Chemicals Agency, the European Food Safety Authority, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Environment Agency as regards the scientific assessment of relevant substances, exchange of data and information and development of coherent scientific methodologies, including replacing, reducing or refining animal testing, and where possible prioritising replacement strategies such for example as non-animal in vitro and silico approaches, taking into account the specificities of the assessment of medicinal products;
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 142 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) the Paediatric Working Party
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 142 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new) (j a) an ad hoc working group on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products;
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 142 – paragraph 1 – point j b (new) (j b) an ad hoc working group on Orphan Medicinal Products;
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 142 – paragraph 1 – point j c (new) (j c) an ad hoc working group on Paediatric Products;
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 142 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (k a) establish a reservoir of specialists drawn from Member States and key interested parties to serve on ad hoc working groups; members will be chosen for their pertinent expertise corresponding to the varied ad hoc working groups' needs, enabling them to contribute to regulatory support and scientific advisory processes, while ensuring they are not subject to any conflicts of interest.
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 146 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. representatives from patients' organizations serving as members or alternate members on scientific committees shall receive remuneration from the Agency's budget, following the financial regulations that apply to the Agency
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) (29 a) The Bonn Declaration includes in the definition of freedom of scientific research the right to critical debate, the protection of plurality of voices, the ‘right to freely define questions, choose and develop theories, collect empirical material and use sound academic research methods to question recognised knowledge and advance new ideas’; the “right to share, disseminate and publish its results openly, including through training and teaching”; “the freedom of researchers to express their views without being penalised by the system in which they work or by government or government censorship or discrimination”;
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 146 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 The scientific committees and any working parties and scientific advisory groups established in accordance with this Article shall in general matters establish contacts, on an advisory basis, with parties concerned with the use of medicinal products for human use, in particular patient and consumer organisations, including paediatric patients, and healthcare professionals’ associations. For that purpose working groups of patient and consumer organisations and healthcare professionals’ associations shall be established by the Agency. They shall ensure a fair representation of healthcare professionals, patients and consumers covering a wide range of experience and disease areas, including orphan, paediatric and geriatric diseases and advanced therapy medicinal products, and a broad geographical range.
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 146 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The Agency shall establish a procedure ensuring the remuneration through the Agency's budget, in accordance with the financial rules applicable to the Agency, of patients’ organisations representatives appointed as members or alternate members on scientific committees.
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Committee for Human Medicinal Products shall establish for the evaluation of specific types of medicinal products or treatments, working parties with scientific expertise in the fields of pharmaceutical quality, methodologies, non-clinical
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Committee for Human Medicinal Products shall establish for the evaluation of specific types of medicinal products or treatments, working parties with scientific expertise in the fields of pharmaceutical quality, methodologies, non-clinical and clinical evaluations
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Committee for Human Medicinal Products shall establish for the evaluation of specific types of medicinal products or treatments, working parties with scientific expertise in the fields of pharmaceutical quality, methodologies, non- clinical
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The majority of the members of the working parties shall consist of experts from the competent authorities of the Member States
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 152 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where, in accordance with this Regulation, any of the Committees referred to in Article 142 is required to evaluate a medicinal product for human use, it shall appoint one of its members to act as rapporteur, taking into account existing expertise in the Member State. The Committee concerned may appoint a second member to act as co-rapporteur who may represent the patient or healthcare professional community.
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 153 – paragraph 1 At the request of the Commission, the Agency shall, in respect of authorised medicinal products for human use, collect any available information on methods that Member States' competent authorities use to determine the added therapeutic value that any new medicinal product for human use provides. Guidelines for the determination of added therapeutic value shall be drawn up in collaboration with patient organisations and healthcare professionals.
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 153 – paragraph 1 At the request of the Commission, the Agency shall, in respect of authorised medicinal products for human use, collect any available information on methods that Member States' competent authorities use to determine the added therapeutic value that any new medicinal product for human use provides. The Agency shall jointly develop guidelines for assessing added therapeutic value with patient organizations.
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 162 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The Agency should be empowered to give scientific recommendations on whether a product under development, which could potentially fall under the mandatory scope of the centralised procedure, meets the scientific criteria to be a medicinal product such as an advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). Such an advisory mechanism would address, as early as possible, questions related to borderline cases with other areas such as substances of human origin, cosmetics or medical devices, which may arise as science develops. To ensure that recommendations given by the Agency take into account the views of equivalent advisory mechanisms in other legal frameworks, the Agency should consult the relevant advisory or regulatory bodies. For Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs), the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) working group dedicated to ATMPs should seek input from the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Coordination Board when dealing with cases that are not clearly defined.
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 162 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 164 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency shall ensure that micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (‘SMEs’), research institutes, academic institutions, and not-for-profit entities are offered a support scheme.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 164 – paragraph 2 2. The comprehensive support scheme
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 164 – paragraph 4 4. SMEs shall benefit from the incentives laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2049/2005, a
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 166 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency may consider and decide upon additional evidence available, independently from the data submitted by the marketing authorisation applicant or marketing authorisation holder.
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 167 – paragraph 2 For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the Agency shall actively
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 175 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(5), 19(8), 21, 40a, 47(4), 49(2), 63(2), 67(4), 75(3), 81(4) and 172(10) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from [date of entry into force]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 3 3. Medicinal products for human use containing an active substance which on 20 May 2004 was not authorised in the Union, excluding
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 8 a (new) (8 a) The obligation to make the product available as laid out in the availability plan set out in the marketing authorization.
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 25 a (new) (25 a) the obligation to notify the competent authority of the Member State and, where relevant, the Agency about cessation, withdrawal, temporary suspension or temporary disruption in accordance with the deadlines provided for in Article 116;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30 a) For informed policy development, the Agency should maintain its authority to carry out pilot programs, fostering a regulatory environment that is adaptive to future challenges. Efforts like the 2022 pilot program that provided augmented assistance to academic and non-profit developers of advanced therapy medicinal products should inform policy decisions and refine regulatory guidance.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 25 b (new) (25 b) the obligation to have in place and keep up to date a shortage prevention plan as provided for in Article 117;
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 25 c (new) (25 c) the obligation to comply with the recommendations and measures taken in case of a critical shortage as provided for in Article 125;
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 25 d (new) (25 d) the obligation to comply with the recommendations and measures taken in relation to critical medicinal products as provided for in Article 133.
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IV – Part III – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e (e) Reason for shortage
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IV – Part V – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) (d a) For the purpose of reporting in accordance with Article 118, wholesale distributors shall provide regular stock level data reports indicating available quantities of all medicines in each of their warehouses.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IV – Part V a (new) V a For the purposes of reporting in accordance with Article 118(1) and for the early detection of supply shortages, wholesalers shall provide the following information in a timely manner: 1. Product availability information: Product availabilities shall be reported per wholesale warehouse and shall be indexed as yes/no. 2. Service level information: Service level information which captures the level of fulfilment of wholesale orders by marketing authorisation holders and suppliers shall be reported. Such information involves comparing the quantity ordered with the quantity actually received at the product level. The resulting difference describes the service level.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The Agency’s scientific committees should be
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. In addition, the Paediatric Committee’s competences and expertise with reference to the scientific assessment and agreement of paediatric investigation plans and other matters of paediatric interest not falling under the PRAC and CHMP responsibilities, will be retained into a Paediatric Working Party, composed of experts in different medical areas, which should provide scientific support and expertise to all Bodies of the Agency on matters related to paediatric medicinal products development and use. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. Their evaluation will continue to encompass all the necessary expertise for each product as part of the rapporteur teams, with the possibility for CHMP and PRAC to call upon additional scientific experts to provide specific input and advice on specific aspects raised during the evaluation. In addition patients and healthcare professionals will be part of the pool of experts and will also be brought into EMA’s work according to their expertise in a certain disease area. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties and expert groups consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals. The composition, responsibilities, operating methods, and areas of expertise of the Committees, Working Parties, and Working Groups, along with their work programs and suggestions, will be disclosed to the public and may be opened for stakeholder feedback.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The expertise of the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT), the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is retained through working groups, working parties and a pool of experts who are organised based on different domains and who are giving input to the CHMP and PRAC. The CHMP and PRAC consists of experts from all Member States while working parties consist in majority of experts appointed by the Member States, based on their expertise, and of external experts. The model of rapporteurs remains unchanged. Representation of patients, their caregivers and health care professionals, with expertise in all areas, including rare and paediatric diseases, is increased at the CHMP and PRAC, in addition to the dedicated working groups representing patients and health care professionals. Information regarding the composition and work of the committees and working groups should be publically available.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of medicines, national insurance funds or healthcare payers. The Agency should also be able to extend the consultation mechanism to consumers, patients and their caregivers, healthcare professionals, industry, associations representing payers, academia, or other stakeholders, as relevant.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of medicines, national insurance funds or healthcare payers. The Agency should also be able to extend the consultation mechanism to consumers, patients, their caregivers, healthcare professionals, acdemia, industry, associations representing payers, or other stakeholders, as relevant.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To allow for a more informative decision making and for exchange of information and pooling of knowledge on general issues of scientific or technical nature related to the tasks of the Agency regarding medicinal products for human use, in particular to scientific guidelines on unmet medical needs and the design of clinical trials, or other studies and the generation of evidence along the life cycle of medicinal product, the Agency should be able to have recourse to a consultation process of authorities or bodies active along the life cycle of medicinal products. These authorities could be, as appropriate, representatives from Heads of Medicines Agencies, the Clinical Trial Coordination and Advisory Group, the SoHO Coordination Board, the Coordination Group on Health Technology Assessment, Medical Devices Coordination Group, medical devices national competent authorities, national competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement of medicines, national insurance funds or healthcare payers. The Agency should also be able to extend the consultation mechanism to consumers, patients, healthcare professionals, industry, associations representing payers, academia or other stakeholders, as relevant.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 a (new) (41 a) Protecting global health is one of the priorities of the EU and under Article 178 of the Treaty, the Union should take into account the development policy aspects in any measure and promote the creation of conditions fit for human beings worldwide. To this end, this Regulation should particularly allow for the development of efficacious, safe, accessible, and affordable innovations to address global public health needs, including antimicrobial resistance, poverty-related and neglected diseases, widespread tropical disease and ensure high quality standards for medicinal products that are exported.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) (42 a) Beyond cooperating along the value chain of knowledge and know-how production and valorisation or within the knowledge triangle (research-education- innovation), it is in the EU’s strategic interest to also reach out and cooperate with other countries outside the EU. This applies in particular to multi-lateral cooperation on global health issues with countries associated to Horizon Europe but also with other partner countries and regions in the world. Involving international partners should lead to increased scientific knowledge and transfer of technology among partner countries allowing to address global health challenges across the world, thus creating sustainable growth and jobs.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) In the interest of public health, marketing authorisation decisions under the centralised procedure should be taken on the basis of the objective scientific criteria of quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product concerned, to the exclusion of economic and other considerations. However, Member States should
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45 a) Particular attention should be given to the gender balance of clinical trials so that women can fully and safely benefit from medicines throughout their life-course.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51)
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As a general rule a marketing authorisation
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 a (new) (53 a) The distinct properties of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) create substantial infrastructural and knowledge hurdles, along with systemic obstacles, making the 'release and continuous supply' of many ATMPs across all 27 Member States within a brief period challenging. It is essential to investigate alternative care options to ensure the availability of these therapies throughout the Member States, potentially utilizing frameworks for cross-border healthcare access, like Directive 2011/24/EU and Regulation (EC) No 883/2004.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Regulatory decision-making on the development, authorisation and supervision of medicinal products may be supported by access and analysis of health data, including real world data, where appropriate, i.e. health data generated outside of clinical studies and/or through the use of in silico methods, such as computational modelling and simulation (CM&S) which includes PBPK, molecular modelling and mechanistic modelling, digital twin & artificial intelligence (AI). The Agency should be able to use such data, including via the Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (DARWIN) and the European Health Data Space interoperable infrastructure. Through these capabilities the Agency may take advantage of all the potential of supercomputing, artificial intelligence and big data science to fulfil its mandate, without compromising privacy rights. Where necessary the Agency may cooperate with the competent authorities of the Member States towards this objective.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) In the preparation of scientific advice and in duly justified cases, the Agency should
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) (71 a) Phased reviews have been a success during the COVID-19 Pandemic and led to a rapid authorisation of the urgently needed vaccines. An application in times outside of public health emergencies is therefore appropriate and the precedure should be extended to orphan medicinal products and medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition. Moreover, the Commission shall evaluate the performance of the phased reviews with the aim to further expand the category of medicinal products for which this procedure may apply.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) To optimise the use of resources for both applicants for marketing authorisations and competent authorities assessing such applications, a single assessment of an active substance master file should be introduced. The outcome of the assessment should be issued through a certificate. To avoid duplication of assessment, the use of an active substance master file certificate should be mandatory for subsequent applications or marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing that active substance from an active substance master file certification holder. The Commission should be empowered to establish the procedure for the single assessment of an active substance master file. To further optimise the use of resources, the Commission should be empowered to extend the certification scheme to additional
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to promote the development of priority antimicrobials that are effective against antimicrobial resistance and to support undertakings, often SMEs, which choose to invest in this area. The Union should thus establish a mechanism of AMR Designation to identify medicinal products that can contribute to the fight against AMR and to support the targetting of R&D and access incentives.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The development of antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern and the pipeline of effective antimicrobials is obstructed due to a market failure; it is therefore necessary to consider new measures to promote the development of priority antimicrobials that are effective against antimicrobial resistance and to support undertakings, often SMEs and not- for profit entities, which choose to invest in this area.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 a (new) (77 a) The above mentioned market failures highlight the need for considering the establishment of a mission oriented R&D and manufacturing infrastructure at Union level which acts in the public interest. This initiative should be tasked to research and develop novel antimicrobials as well as other areas of unmet medical need, to respond to health threats and emergencies, to support the Union to overcome market failures, to conduct treatment optimisation studies and to prevent shortages and guarantee security of supply of critical medicinal products.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 (78) To be considered a ‘priority antimicrobial’, a medicinal product should represent a real advancement against antimicrobial resistance and should therefore bring forward non-clinical and clinical data that underpin a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance. When assessing the conditions for antibiotics, the Agency shall take into account the prioritisation of pathogens as regards the risk of antimicrobial resistance provided for in the ‘WHO priority pathogens list for R&D of new antibiotics’, specifically those listed as priority 1 (critical) or priority 2 (high) or in case there is an equivalent list of priority pathogens adopted at Union level, the Agency should take such Union list into account as a priority. In order to address market failures for the development of antimicrobials, the priority focus should be on the research and development and subsequent production and fair distribution of new antimicrobials. However, addressing AMR will not be solved by R&D alone. To ensure prudent use of existing antibiotics, the Authority should also support the development and procurement of rapid diagnostic tools to ensure appropriate prescriptions.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) (78 a) As the Commission’s study on bringing antimicrobial medical countermeasures to the market1a demonstrated, different kinds of push and pull incentives are needed to face this public health emergency. These tools may include market entry rewards, advance purchase agreements, milestone payments, innovation prizes, or subscription payments. In order to maximize the benefits from such public investments, the allocation of these financial and other incentives should respect the following principles and conditions of open science, affordability and EU-wide availability of developed products, delinking revenue from sale volumes of procured products, full transparency of all received funding and purchase agreements, gradient incentive scheme that rewards according to the innovation level, and the development of a stewardship and access plans. These principles and conditions should ensure that public money will be allocated with the objective of a rapid public return on investment for patients. _________________ 1a [1] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication- detail/-/publication/51b2c82c-c21b-11ed- 8912-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format- PDF/source-282347876
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 b (new) (78 b) The principle of open science is pivotal to ensure rapid progress in the field of scientific research for priority antimicrobials. Over the past 30 years, the lack of sharing of results, failed trials and ongoing research has created bottlenecks for scientific development and contributes to the current market failure for the placing on the market of new antimicrobials. It is therefore of the utmost importance to have a paradigm shift towards open science, particularly in the area of publicly-funded research, to reduce duplication of research, allow for peer-verification of results and building further evidence based on most recent findings, as to making research and development funding efforts more efficient.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 (79) The creation of a voucher rewarding the development of priority antimicrobials through an additional year of regulatory data protection
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 a (new) (79 a) In order to address the threat of antimicrobial resistance and its impact on public health and national healthcare budgets, the development and uptake of new economic models, pilot projects and push and pull incentives to boost the development of new therapies, diagnostics, antibiotics, medical devices and alternatives to using antimicrobials should be supported. Providing Member States with a toolkit of push and pull incentives will be decisive in tackling the growing negative impacts caused by antimicrobial resistance and will serve to address this market failure.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 (80) A transferable data exclusivity voucher and other push and pull incentives schemes to boost the development of priority antimicrobials should only be available to those antimicrobial products that bring a significant clinical benefit with respect to antimicrobial resistance, and which have the characteristics described in this Regulation. It is also necessary to ensure that an undertaking which receives this incentive is in turn capable to supply the medicinal product to patients across the Union in sufficient quantities and to provide information on all funding received for research related to its development in order to provide a full account of the direct financial support given to the medicinal product.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 82 Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 83 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 84 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) For medicinal products that are likely to offer an exceptional therapeutic advancement in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition in the Union, with a view to enabling earlier availability for patients, the Agency should be able to perform a ‘phased review’ of data packages concerning finalised tests and trials before a formal application for marketing authorisation is submitted, to allow a more efficient assessment of medicinal products, while guaranteeing a high level of human health protection.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 a (new) (87 a) Recalls the European Parliament's resolution from 10 July 2020 concerning the EU's post-COVID-19 public health strategy, which called for an EU Action Plan specifically targeting rare diseases.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 90 (90) Objective criteria for the orphan designation based on the prevalence of the life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition for which diagnosis, prevention or treatment is sought and the existence of no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question that has been authorised in the Union should be maintained; a prevalence of not more than five affected persons per 10 000 is generally regarded as the appropriate threshold. The orphan designation criterion on the basis of return on investment has been abolished,
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 90 a (new) (90 a) The aim of intellectual property and regulatory incentives is to benefit society and promote innovation in areas of public health and unmet medical needs, such as rare diseases. It is of utmost importance that such incentives are not misused or abused, nor pose threats to affordability and patient access to treatments. In particular, the practice of artificially subdividing diseases to create subgroups of patients in order to fall under the orphan medicine prevalence criterion should be prohibited.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 a (new) (92 a) Significant benefit should remain the main determining factor for eligibility for orphan status when assessing an orphan medicinal product that meets the incidence threshold.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 92 b (new) (92 b) What constitutes significant benefit in a patient population can change over time, therefore, the concept should remain sufficiently flexible to ensure a future-proof regulatory framework while ensuring predictability through additional guidance developped in consultation with patient organisations.
source: 757.081
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/6/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/6/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/19/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/20 |
Old
New
|
docs/21 |
Old
New
|
docs/23 |
Old
New
|
docs/24 |
Old
New
|
docs/25 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/24 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61595&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=61595 |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/8 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41380 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ENVI/9/11874 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation 2000/141
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation 2000/141 1998/0240(COD) Repealing Regulation 2004/726 2001/0252(COD) Repealing Regulation 2006/1901 2004/0217(COD) Amending Regulation 2007/1394 2005/0227(COD) Amending Regulation 2014/536 2012/0192(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
1998/0240(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/3 |
Repealing Regulation 2004/726
|
procedure/instrument/4 |
2001/0252(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/5 |
Repealing Regulation 2006/1901
|
procedure/instrument/6 |
2004/0217(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/7 |
Amending Regulation 2007/1394
|
procedure/instrument/8 |
2005/0227(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/9 |
Amending Regulation 2014/536
|
procedure/instrument/10 |
2012/0192(COD)
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
procedure/subject/4.60.08 |
Safety of products and services, product liability
|
procedure/subject/8.40.08 |
Agencies and bodies of the EU
|
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61595&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0221_en.docx |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
docs/17 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/17 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/17 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/17 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
links |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/16 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/13 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2023-09-05T00:00:00New
2023-09-06T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2023-10-03T00:00:00New
2023-10-20T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/3 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
docs/3 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
commission |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|