2023/0265(COD) Road vehicles: maximum weights and dimensions
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | TRAN |
SERRANO SIERRA Rosa ( S&D)
|
FERBER Markus ( EPP),
ZŁOTOWSKI Kosma ( ECR),
OETJEN Jan-Christoph ( Renew),
SCHILLING Lena ( Greens/EFA),
KYLLÖNEN Merja ( The Left)
|
| Former Responsible Committee | TRAN |
GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D)
|
|
| Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
| Former Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 0, 9, 1
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 0, 9, 1Subjects
Events
2024/11/13
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2024/10/21
EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 72)
2024/10/07
EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
2024/09/03
EP - SERRANO SIERRA Rosa (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2024/07/22
European Commission - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2024/03/12
EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details
The European Parliament adopted by 330 votes to 207, with 74 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Improve driver’s working conditions
The Directive is intended to improve the competitiveness of the road transport sector by promoting more cost-efficient and sustainable transport operations as well as encouraging intermodality.
In order to address this situation and enhance the attractiveness of the sector, Members consider that the increased dimensions required to install zero-emission technologies in vehicles should not be at the expense of sufficient cabin space and should improve the comfort of drivers . Where possible, concepts enabling additional space in the cabins for the installation of sanitary facilities on-board should be explored and incentivised.
Permits
Member States should issue the permits or similar arrangements in an electronic format and cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines. They should also cooperate to harmonise the relevant rules for escorting transport of indivisible loads, such as on the prescribed use, markings and signs for escort vehicles.
European Modular Systems
Member States may allow the circulation in their territories in national and international traffic of European Modular Systems subject to all of the following conditions:
- for new EMS routes, the Member States should make a prior assessment of the possible impact of European Modular Systems on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal split. The assessment should be made publicly available;
- Member States should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to avoid any possible negative impacts on road safety , including the safety of vulnerable road users, as a result of use of European Modular Systems.
Member States may establish minimum requirements or a certification scheme for the drivers of European Modular Systems, provided that they ensure proportionality and non-discrimination. Member States should cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications.
Electronic information system
Member States should set up and manage an electronic information and communication system with a single national access point for obtaining information, in a clear, accessible, and transparent manner, regarding national maximum authorised weights and dimensions of vehicles, as well as any restrictions, including on height, in specified areas or on specific roads.
To ensure that operators and citizens can access all relevant information in one place, a dedicated European web portal, in all the official languages of the Union, connecting the national electronic and communication systems should be established by the Commission, at the latest by 6 months after the date of transposition of this Directive.
This European portal should also make publicly available, in an accessible and transparent way, the parts of the road network where European Modular Systems, and, where available, vehicles transporting indivisible loads, can circulate.
EU label
Members proposed the introduction of a standardised EU label for the length of motor vehicles or vehicle combinations used in European Modular Systems (EMS) or which deviate from standard dimensions should be established at Union level. That EU label, displayed clearly and visibly at the rear of their motor vehicle or vehicle combination, should clearly indicate the length of all the vehicles or vehicle combinations of this Directive in order to help other road users to identify and familiarise themselves with these vehicles and reduce any possible risks caused by visibility restrictions or blind spots, for example when overtaking.
Member States should take specific measures to detect vehicles or vehicle combinations in circulation that exceed the maximum authorised weight.
Maximum authorised dimensions for vehicles
Members proposed to allow 44 tonnes (instead of 42 tonnes) for two-axle motor vehicles with a three-axle semi-trailer involved in intermodal transport operations.
Revenues
Member States should be encouraged to use the revenues generated from the penalties applicable to the infringements of this Directive, or the equivalent in financial value of those revenues, to support the uptake of sustainable transport means and hence mitigate the external costs generated by transport operations, encourage intermodality, and increase the sustainability of cross-border transport operations.
Reporting
By 2027, and every 4 years thereafter, the Commission should present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the application of this Directive. The report should contain a detailed assessment of the evolution of national and international road transport.
The report should analyse whether the necessary enabling conditions for the market uptake of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles in the Union, are satisfactorily met. In addition, the report should inform on technological advancements in the area of road transport which are relevant, including with regards to new technologies or new concepts and aerodynamic devices, as well as trailers or semi-trailers with zero-emission technology.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2024/03/12
EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
2024/02/21
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Permits
Member States should ensure that the procedure for obtaining permits or similar arrangements for the transport of indivisible loads is smooth, efficient and non-discriminatory, by providing an EU common standard application form and by minimising administrative burdens and avoiding unnecessary delays. Member States should issue the permits or similar arrangements in an electronic format and cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines.
European Modular Systems
Member States may allow the circulation in their territories in national and international traffic of European Modular Systems subject to all of the following conditions:
- for new EMS routes, the Member States should make a prior assessment of the possible impact of European Modular Systems on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal split. The assessment should be made publicly available;
- Member States should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to avoid any possible negative impacts on road safety , including the safety of vulnerable road users, as a result of use of European Modular Systems.
Electronic information system
Member States should set up and manage an electronic information and communication system with a single national access point for obtaining information, in a clear, accessible, and transparent manner, regarding national maximum authorised weights and dimensions of vehicles, as well as any restrictions, including on height, in specified areas or on specific roads.
EU label
Members proposed the introduction of a standardised EU label for the length of motor vehicles or vehicle combinations used in European Modular Systems (EMS) or which deviate from standard dimensions should be established at Union level. That EU label should clearly indicate the length of all the vehicles or vehicle combinations of this Directive in order to help other road users to identify and familiarise themselves with these vehicles and reduce any possible risks caused by visibility restrictions or blind spots, for example when overtaking.
EU web portal
To ensure that operators and citizens can access all relevant information in one place, a dedicated European web portal, in all the official languages of the Union, connecting the national electronic and communication systems and providing, among others, a clear graphic overview of the roads on which EMS, and, where available, vehicles transporting indivisible loads, are allowed to circulate in the relevant Member States, should be established by the Commission, at the latest by 6 months after the date of transposition of this Directive.
Training certificates
The amended text stipulates that Member States should have the possibility to establish minimum requirements or a certification scheme for drivers of EMS. In order to ensure a level playing field that provides for equal treatment, and non-discrimination, of drivers and operators of EMS, Member States should guarantee that these certifications are mutually recognised in the concerned Member States.
Maximum authorised dimensions for vehicles
Members proposed to allow 44 tonnes (instead of 42 tonnes) for two-axle motor vehicles with a three-axle semi-trailer involved in intermodal transport operations.
Revenues
In order to make progress in the green and digital transitions and to comply with the objectives set in the European Green Deal and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, particularly as regards the GHG emission reductions from the transport sector, Member States should be encouraged to use the revenues generated from the penalties applicable to the infringements of this Directive, or the equivalent in financial value of those revenues, to support the uptake of sustainable transport means and hence mitigate the external costs generated by transport operations, encourage intermodality, and increase the sustainability of cross-border transport operations.
Reporting
By 2027, and every 4 years thereafter, the Commission should present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the application of this Directive. The report should contain a detailed assessment of the evolution of national and international road transport.
In addition, the report should analyse the use of the Intelligent Access Policy (IAP) schemes in regards to enforcement, taking into account their availability and cost-efficiency. Furthermore, the report should inform on technological advancements in the area of road transport which are relevant, including with regards to new technologies or new concepts and aerodynamic devices , as well as trailers or semi-trailers with zero-emission technology.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2024/02/14
EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2024/02/01
Committee of the Regions: opinion - CofR
Documents
2023/11/30
European Parliament - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/11/20
RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/11/14
CZ_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/10/20
European Parliament - Committee draft report
Documents
2023/09/14
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2023/09/05
EP - GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2023/07/12
European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2023/07/12
European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2023/07/12
European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2023/07/12
European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2023/07/11
European Commission - Legislative proposal
Details
PURPOSE: to revise Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Council Directive 96/53/EC (the Weights and Dimensions Directive), sets out the maximum permitted weights and dimensions of heavy-duty vehicles that can circulate on the Union’s roads in order to ensure road safety and the smooth functioning of the internal market as well as foster the energy and operational efficiency of transport operations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from those operations. An evaluation of Directive 96/53/EC concluded that incentives to improve energy efficiency of road transport operations and reduce GHG emissions were insufficient and did not reflect the practical implications of using new zero-emission technologies , which can be heavier and take more space than combustion engine technologies. The national derogations allowing the circulation of longer and/or heavier vehicles have also resulted in a patchwork of diverging rules, hindering smooth cross-border heavy-duty vehicles (HDV) traffic in the EU and leading to loss of operational and energy efficiency. This mix of EU and national requirements, as well as bilateral arrangements, coupled with legal uncertainties, has also led to ineffective and inconsistent enforcement, especially in cross-border transport. These findings confirmed that there is a need to remove regulatory and technical barriers and provide stronger incentives for the uptake of the zero-emission technologies and energy saving devices in the heavy-duty vehicles sector.
This legislative proposal is part of the Greening Freight Package of proposals covering several modes of transport. Its aim is to advance the decarbonisation of freight transport, promote intermodal transport and complete the single European railway area. In addition to this proposal, it includes:
- the revision of Council Directive 92/106/EEC (the Combined Transport Directive) to encourage the use of intermodal transport;
- this proposed revision of Council Directive 96/53/EC on weights and dimensions;
- the proposal for a regulation establishing a harmonised framework for GHG emissions from freight and passenger transport services (the CountEmissions EU initiative).
CONTENT: the Commission proposal to revise Council Directive 96/53/EC seeks to accelerate the uptake of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles and promote intermodal transport . In particular, it aims to improve the energy and operational efficiency of road transport operations in the broader context of increased EU environmental and climate ambition by 2030 and EU climate neutrality by 2050 and to ensure the free movement of goods and fair competition on the internal road transport market.
The main objectives of the revision of the directive are to:
- remove regulatory and technical barriers and provide stronger incentives for the uptake of the zero-emission technologies and energy saving devices in the HDV sector;
- facilitate intermodal operations;
- clarify the rules on the use of longer and/or heavier HDVs in cross-border operations;
- make enforcement more effective and efficient.
The specific provisions of the proposal aim to:
- update the references to relevant legislation on the type-approval and market surveillance of vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles;
- align the definitions of ‘trailer’ and ‘semi-trailer’ and the procedures to measure the maximum authorised dimensions with those of the vehicle type-approval legislation, adding the key definitions of ‘European Modular System’ and ‘vehicle transporter’ and the definition of ‘electronic freight transport information (eFTI) platform’;
- amend the definition of intermodal transport operation and necessary references to these kinds of transport to allow lorries, trailers and semitrailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as for road vehicles that carry containers or swap bodies and are used in containerised intermodal transport;
- provide legal clarity on the circulation of HDVs that exceed the weights and dimensions set in the existing Directive;
- require Member States to simplify and streamline the procedures for the issuance of national permits or the adoption of similar arrangements for the transport of indivisible loads in order to minimise the administrative burden for operators and avoid delays;
- introduce the obligation of cooperation between Member States with regard to the requirements on vehicle signalling or markings, and prevents disproportionate barriers in the form of national language requirements;
- extend the geographical scope of trials aimed at testing, assessing and progressively introducing new technologies and schemes, including EMS, which could be conducted also across borders, strengthens their temporary nature and sets up a maximum period of 5 years for such trials with European Modular Systems. Member States should set up a monitoring system to take advantage at EU level of the lesson learnt from the technology tested in trials as well as ensure the comparability of the information gathered, including the impact of EMS;
- remove artificial barriers to the cross-border movement of heavier lorries that prevent road transport from improving its operational, energy and environmental efficiency in the transition to zero-emission operations;
- raise the weight limit for zero-emission vehicles from the current 42 tonnes to 44 tonnes , regardless of the weight of the actual zero-emission technology. This means that operators will gain additional loading weight and therefore payload capacity if the technology becomes lighter;
- allow extra height for the carriage of high-cube containers , thus enabling standard vehicles to involve in this type of intermodal transport;
- clarify that the excess in maximum lengths provided for elongated cabs can be such that it can accommodate also zero-emission technologies, such as batteries and hydrogen tanks, in vehicles equipped with elongated cabs.
Legislative proposal
Documents
2023/07/11
EC - Legislative proposal published
Details
PURPOSE: to revise Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Council Directive 96/53/EC (the Weights and Dimensions Directive), sets out the maximum permitted weights and dimensions of heavy-duty vehicles that can circulate on the Union’s roads in order to ensure road safety and the smooth functioning of the internal market as well as foster the energy and operational efficiency of transport operations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from those operations. An evaluation of Directive 96/53/EC concluded that incentives to improve energy efficiency of road transport operations and reduce GHG emissions were insufficient and did not reflect the practical implications of using new zero-emission technologies , which can be heavier and take more space than combustion engine technologies. The national derogations allowing the circulation of longer and/or heavier vehicles have also resulted in a patchwork of diverging rules, hindering smooth cross-border heavy-duty vehicles (HDV) traffic in the EU and leading to loss of operational and energy efficiency. This mix of EU and national requirements, as well as bilateral arrangements, coupled with legal uncertainties, has also led to ineffective and inconsistent enforcement, especially in cross-border transport. These findings confirmed that there is a need to remove regulatory and technical barriers and provide stronger incentives for the uptake of the zero-emission technologies and energy saving devices in the heavy-duty vehicles sector.
This legislative proposal is part of the Greening Freight Package of proposals covering several modes of transport. Its aim is to advance the decarbonisation of freight transport, promote intermodal transport and complete the single European railway area. In addition to this proposal, it includes:
- the revision of Council Directive 92/106/EEC (the Combined Transport Directive) to encourage the use of intermodal transport;
- this proposed revision of Council Directive 96/53/EC on weights and dimensions;
- the proposal for a regulation establishing a harmonised framework for GHG emissions from freight and passenger transport services (the CountEmissions EU initiative).
CONTENT: the Commission proposal to revise Council Directive 96/53/EC seeks to accelerate the uptake of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles and promote intermodal transport . In particular, it aims to improve the energy and operational efficiency of road transport operations in the broader context of increased EU environmental and climate ambition by 2030 and EU climate neutrality by 2050 and to ensure the free movement of goods and fair competition on the internal road transport market.
The main objectives of the revision of the directive are to:
- remove regulatory and technical barriers and provide stronger incentives for the uptake of the zero-emission technologies and energy saving devices in the HDV sector;
- facilitate intermodal operations;
- clarify the rules on the use of longer and/or heavier HDVs in cross-border operations;
- make enforcement more effective and efficient.
The specific provisions of the proposal aim to:
- update the references to relevant legislation on the type-approval and market surveillance of vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles;
- align the definitions of ‘trailer’ and ‘semi-trailer’ and the procedures to measure the maximum authorised dimensions with those of the vehicle type-approval legislation, adding the key definitions of ‘European Modular System’ and ‘vehicle transporter’ and the definition of ‘electronic freight transport information (eFTI) platform’;
- amend the definition of intermodal transport operation and necessary references to these kinds of transport to allow lorries, trailers and semitrailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as for road vehicles that carry containers or swap bodies and are used in containerised intermodal transport;
- provide legal clarity on the circulation of HDVs that exceed the weights and dimensions set in the existing Directive;
- require Member States to simplify and streamline the procedures for the issuance of national permits or the adoption of similar arrangements for the transport of indivisible loads in order to minimise the administrative burden for operators and avoid delays;
- introduce the obligation of cooperation between Member States with regard to the requirements on vehicle signalling or markings, and prevents disproportionate barriers in the form of national language requirements;
- extend the geographical scope of trials aimed at testing, assessing and progressively introducing new technologies and schemes, including EMS, which could be conducted also across borders, strengthens their temporary nature and sets up a maximum period of 5 years for such trials with European Modular Systems. Member States should set up a monitoring system to take advantage at EU level of the lesson learnt from the technology tested in trials as well as ensure the comparability of the information gathered, including the impact of EMS;
- remove artificial barriers to the cross-border movement of heavier lorries that prevent road transport from improving its operational, energy and environmental efficiency in the transition to zero-emission operations;
- raise the weight limit for zero-emission vehicles from the current 42 tonnes to 44 tonnes , regardless of the weight of the actual zero-emission technology. This means that operators will gain additional loading weight and therefore payload capacity if the technology becomes lighter;
- allow extra height for the carriage of high-cube containers , thus enabling standard vehicles to involve in this type of intermodal transport;
- clarify that the excess in maximum lengths provided for elongated cabs can be such that it can accommodate also zero-emission technologies, such as batteries and hydrogen tanks, in vehicles equipped with elongated cabs.
Legislative proposal
Documents
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)350
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0126/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0047/2024
- CofR: CDR4958/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.298
- Contribution: COM(2023)0445
- Contribution: COM(2023)0445
- Committee draft report: PE754.850
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0446
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0445
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2023)0445
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0447
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0445
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0445
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE754.850
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.298
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0445 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0446
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0445
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SEC(2023)0445
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0447
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)350
- Contribution: COM(2023)0445
- Contribution: COM(2023)0445
- CofR: CDR4958/2023
Activities
- Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 3, point b; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4, paragraph 4, sub§ 2, point b – Am 62 #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 303, +: 276, 0: 34
Verts/ALE
ID
NI
PPEA9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 3, point c; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4, paragraph 4a, sub§ 1 – Am 63D #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 298, +: 292, 0: 25
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 3, point c; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4, paragraph 4a, sub§ 1, introductory part – Am 52 #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 343, +: 250, 0: 24
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 3, point c; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4, paragraph 4a, § 1, after point d – Am 54 #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 401, +: 202, 0: 10
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 3, point c; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4, paragraph 4a, sub§ 2 – Am 56D #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 332, +: 233, 0: 48
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Article 1, § 1, point 4; Directive 96/53/EC; Article 4 b – Am 58D= 65D= #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 338, +: 261, 0: 16
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Recital 9 – Am 61D #
2024/03/12 Outcome: -: 300, +: 295, 0: 21
A9-0047/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Commission proposal #
2024/03/12 Outcome: +: 330, -: 207, 0: 74
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 507 |
2023/0265(COD)
2023/11/24
TRAN
507 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The system in place should recognise additional allowed weights or dimensions to abnormal transport if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for such transports.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The system in place should recognise additional allowed weights or dimensions to abnormal transport if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for such transports.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The system in place should recognise additional allowed weights or dimensions to abnormal transport if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for such transports.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The system in place should recognise additional allowed weights or dimensions to abnormal transport if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for such transports.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) The framework conditions for truck drivers in the exercise of their profession need to be urgently improved. The lack of truck parking spaces in the EU adds to the deterioration of the working conditions of truck drivers and fuels the shortage of drivers. To counteract the consequences of this, the European Commission should develop vehicle concepts that make drivers more independent of comfort equipment from parking spaces and provide for the installation of sanitary facilities in the vehicles, reflected in the dimensions of vehicles.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) The framework conditions for truck drivers in the exercise of their profession need to be urgently improved. The lack of truck parking spaces in the EU adds to the deterioration of the working conditions of truck drivers and fuels the shortage of drivers. To counteract the consequences of this, the European Commission should develop vehicle concepts that make drivers more independent of comfort equipment from parking spaces and provide for the installation of sanitary facilities in the vehicles, reflected in the dimensions of vehicles.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, containerised transport should be further facilitated by allowing extra height to road vehicles to transport high-cube containers and by creating the necessary framework conditions for the road and rail infrastructure to transport these units.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, containerised transport should be further facilitated by allowing extra height to road vehicles to transport high-cube containers and by creating the necessary framework conditions for the road and rail infrastructure to transport these units.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, in particular in combination with rail transport, containerised transport should be further facilitated by allowing extra height to road vehicles to transport high- cube containers.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, in particular in combination with rail transport, containerised transport should be further facilitated by allowing extra height to road vehicles to transport high- cube containers.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, containerised transport should be further facilitated by
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) To promote the growth of multimodal transportation system, containerised transport should be further facilitated by
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Given the efforts deployed to facilitate combined transport under the modal shift objectives, the maximum height of road vehicles should not be modified, in particular due to the application of the P400 standard to the railway infrastructure.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Given the efforts deployed to facilitate combined transport under the modal shift objectives, the maximum height of road vehicles should not be modified, in particular due to the application of the P400 standard to the railway infrastructure.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22a) European Modular System vehicles are still relatively novel in the EU, even though they are already in use in some Member States. In order to utilise the insights gained from monitoring and data collection, as well as to share experiences and exchange knowledge on EMS vehicles between different Member States, an EMS Best Practices Forum should be set up, which should meet at least once a year.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22a) European Modular System vehicles are still relatively novel in the EU, even though they are already in use in some Member States. In order to utilise the insights gained from monitoring and data collection, as well as to share experiences and exchange knowledge on EMS vehicles between different Member States, an EMS Best Practices Forum should be set up, which should meet at least once a year.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish a common standard application form and harmonise the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements for vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights and/or dimensions and are intended to carry indivisible loads, and to establish a standard reporting format for Member States to comply with their reporting obligations
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish a common standard application form and harmonise the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements for vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights and/or dimensions and are intended to carry indivisible loads, and to establish a standard reporting format for Member States to comply with their reporting obligations
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish an EU common standard application form and harmonise the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements for vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights and/or dimensions and are intended to carry indivisible loads, to establish a standard reporting format for Member States to comply with their reporting obligations, and to establish temporary exceptions from the application of the weights and dimensions limits used in international traffic between Member States affected by a crisis. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council45 . __________________ 45 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish an EU common standard application form and harmonise the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements for vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights and/or dimensions and are intended to carry indivisible loads, to establish a standard reporting format for Member States to comply with their reporting obligations, and to establish temporary exceptions from the application of the weights and dimensions limits used in international traffic between Member States affected by a crisis. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council45 . __________________ 45 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – second indent — ‘trailer’ shall mean a
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – second indent — ‘trailer’ shall mean a
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point aa (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent the following definition is inserted: – ‘e-trailer technology’ means a technology designed to support auxiliary trailer equipment, in particular a transport refrigeration unit, that may include an e-axle with regenerative braking and a battery pack system for storage of electricity generated by the e- axle or received from an auxiliary source.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point aa (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent the following definition is inserted: – ‘e-trailer technology’ means a technology designed to support auxiliary trailer equipment, in particular a transport refrigeration unit, that may include an e-axle with regenerative braking and a battery pack system for storage of electricity generated by the e- axle or received from an auxiliary source.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – third indent — ‘semi-trailer’ shall mean a
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – third indent — ‘semi-trailer’ shall mean a
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifth indent — ‘European Modular System’ shall mean a motor vehicle or vehicle combination coupled to one or more trailers or semitrailers where the total combination exceeds the maximum authorised length and may exceed the maximum authorised weights laid down in Annex I and where the individual motor vehicle, trailer(s) and semitrailer(s) do not exceed the weights or dimensions laid down in Annex I, and are technically and operationally compatible with intermodal operations and transshipments techniques;
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifth indent — ‘European Modular System’ shall mean a motor vehicle or vehicle combination coupled to one or more trailers or semitrailers where the total combination exceeds the maximum authorised length and may exceed the maximum authorised weights laid down in Annex I and where the individual motor vehicle, trailer(s) and semitrailer(s) do not exceed the weights or dimensions laid down in Annex I, and are technically and operationally compatible with intermodal operations and transshipments techniques;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifth indent — ‘European Modular System’ shall mean a motor vehicle or vehicle combination coupled to one or more trailers or semitrailers where the total combination exceeds the maximum authorised length and may exceed the maximum authorised weights laid down in Annex I and where the individual motor vehicle, trailer(s) and semitrailer(s) do not exceed the weights or dimensions laid down in Annex I, and are technically compatible with combined transport operations;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifth indent — ‘European Modular System’ shall mean a motor vehicle or vehicle combination coupled to one or more trailers or semitrailers where the total combination exceeds the maximum authorised length and may exceed the maximum authorised weights laid down in Annex I and where the individual motor vehicle, trailer(s) and semitrailer(s) do not exceed the weights or dimensions laid down in Annex I, and are technically compatible with combined transport operations;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (ca) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Non-containerised transport’ shall mean transportation of goods or cargo loaded, transported, and unloaded individually, in bulk, or using other specialized methods, without the use of standard shipping containers’;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (ca) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Non-containerised transport’ shall mean transportation of goods or cargo loaded, transported, and unloaded individually, in bulk, or using other specialized methods, without the use of standard shipping containers’;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (cb) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Open body vehicle' shall mean a vehicle that has an open cargo area or bed without a fully enclosed or covered cargo compartment.'
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (cb) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Open body vehicle' shall mean a vehicle that has an open cargo area or bed without a fully enclosed or covered cargo compartment.'
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c c (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (cc) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Overhanging of loads' shall mean a situation where a part of a load on a vehicle extends beyond the legal or authorised limits of the vehicle, including its length, width, or height.'
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c c (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (cc) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘conditioned vehicle’: ‘— ‘Overhanging of loads' shall mean a situation where a part of a load on a vehicle extends beyond the legal or authorised limits of the vehicle, including its length, width, or height.'
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – thirteenth indent Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – thirteenth indent Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – thirteenth indent Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – thirteenth indent Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 95/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 95/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fourteenth indent — ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new)Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – indent Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new)Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – indent Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifteenth indent 'intermodal transport operation' shall mean
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – fifteenth indent 'intermodal transport operation' shall mean
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point ga (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (ga) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘eFTI Platform’: 'external costs' shall mean the costs as defined in Council Directive 92/106/EEC.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point ga (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – new indent (ga) the following definition is inserted after the definition of ‘eFTI Platform’: 'external costs' shall mean the costs as defined in Council Directive 92/106/EEC.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 (a) in paragraph
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 (a) in paragraph
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraphs 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I with the exception of cross-border operations with vehicle combinations not complying with the characteristics set out in Annex I, providing there is mutual consent among the Member States concerned and providing that these operations do not significantly affect international competition in the road transport sector as defined by Article 4.4.;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraphs 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I with the exception of cross-border operations with vehicle combinations not complying with the characteristics set out in Annex I, providing there is mutual consent among the Member States concerned and providing that these operations do not significantly affect international competition in the road transport sector as defined by Article 4.4.;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) of vehicles or vehicle combinations for the international transport of goods or passengers which are not in conformity with the characteristics set out in Annex I
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines. Member States shall also cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text. Member States shall
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines. Member States shall also cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text. Member States shall
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – second subparagraph Member States shall ensure that the procedure for obtaining permits or similar arrangements for the transport of indivisible loads is smooth, efficient and non-discriminatory, by providing an EU common standard application form and by minimising administrative burdens and avoiding unnecessary delays.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – second subparagraph Member States shall ensure that the procedure for obtaining permits or similar arrangements for the transport of indivisible loads is smooth, efficient and non-discriminatory, by providing an EU common standard application form and by minimising administrative burdens and avoiding unnecessary delays.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines. Member States shall act jointly to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to further harmonise the permit issuing deadlines. Member States shall act jointly to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to issue the permits or similar arrangements in an electronic format as well as to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text. Member States shall also cooperate to harmonise rules on the prescribed use, markings and signs for escort vehicles. Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport of indivisible loads.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to issue the permits or similar arrangements in an electronic format as well as to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text. Member States shall also cooperate to harmonise rules on the prescribed use, markings and signs for escort vehicles. Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport of indivisible loads.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text and to align the rules for escorting abnormal transports. Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport and drivers of indivisible loads.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text and to align the rules for escorting abnormal transports. Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport and drivers of indivisible loads.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text and to align the rules for escorting abnormal transports . Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport of indivisible loads.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling, and to favour the use of pictograms over text and to align the rules for escorting abnormal transports . Member States shall not impose language requirements related to the transport of indivisible loads.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 3 – third subparagraph Member States shall guarantee that the conditions under which the permits or similar arrangements related to the transport of indivisible loads are issued are proportionate and non-discriminatory. In particular, Member States shall cooperate to avoid the multiplicity of vehicle markings and signalling,
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights and dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights and dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – first subparagraph Member States may allow vehicles or vehicle combinations used for transport which carry out certain national or international transport operations that do not significantly affect international competition in the transport sector to circulate in their territory with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in points 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 to 1.8, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) the Member State which permits transport operations to be carried out in its territory by vehicles or vehicle combinations with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I also permits the circulation of European Modular Systems pursuant to paragraph 4a, so as to achieve at least the loading length authorised in that Member State, and so that every operator may benefit from equal conditions of competition.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) the Member State which permits transport operations to be carried out in its territory by vehicles or vehicle combinations with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I also permits the circulation of European Modular Systems pursuant to paragraph 4a, so as to achieve at least the loading length authorised in that Member State, and so that every operator may benefit from equal conditions of competition.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) the Member State which permits transport operations to be carried out in its territory by vehicles or vehicle combinations with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I also permits the circulation of European Modular Systems pursuant to paragraph 4a, so as to achieve at least the loading length authorised in that Member State, and so that every operator may benefit from equal conditions of competition.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) the Member State which permits transport operations to be carried out in its territory by vehicles or vehicle combinations with weights or dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I also permits the circulation of European Modular Systems pursuant to paragraph 4a, so as to achieve at least the loading length authorised in that Member State, and so that every operator may benefit from equal conditions of competition.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – introductory part Member States may only allow the circulation in their territories in national
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – introductory part Member States may only allow the circulation in their territories in national
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point ba (new) (ba) the Member States shall conduct an analysis of the investment that may be required to adapt the infrastructure to allow for the safe circulation of EMS, and make this analysis public;
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point ba (new) (ba) the Member States shall conduct an analysis of the investment that may be required to adapt the infrastructure to allow for the safe circulation of EMS, and make this analysis public;
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point c Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point c Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point d (d) the Member States shall set
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point d (d) the Member States shall set
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point d (d) the Member States shall set a monitoring system and assess the impact of European Modular Systems on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on the need for additional driver training, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal split.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point d (d) the Member States shall set a monitoring system and assess the impact of European Modular Systems on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on the need for additional driver training, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal split.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point da (new) (da) the Member States shall ensure that the use of European Modular Systems is strictly limited to: roads with separate carriageways for the two directions of traffic, separated from each other by a dividing strip not intended for traffic or, exceptionally, separated by other means; roads outside residential areas; roads outside urban areas; and roads outside rural conurbations;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point da (new) (da) the Member States shall ensure that the use of European Modular Systems is strictly limited to: roads with separate carriageways for the two directions of traffic, separated from each other by a dividing strip not intended for traffic or, exceptionally, separated by other means; roads outside residential areas; roads outside urban areas; and roads outside rural conurbations;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point db (new) (db) the Member States shall ensure that any decision regarding the roads that European Modular Systems may circulate on is subject to, and informed by, a public consultation;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point db (new) (db) the Member States shall ensure that any decision regarding the roads that European Modular Systems may circulate on is subject to, and informed by, a public consultation;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dc (new) (dc) the Member States shall ensure that the use of European Modular Systems will not lead to an increase in road transport’s share of the modal split within those Member States, have a detrimental impact on rail freight or waterborne transport, or lead to a notable increase in the external costs generated by road transport;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dc (new) (dc) the Member States shall ensure that the use of European Modular Systems will not lead to an increase in road transport’s share of the modal split within those Member States, have a detrimental impact on rail freight or waterborne transport, or lead to a notable increase in the external costs generated by road transport;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dd (new) (dd) the Member State shall ensure there is no competition with rail freight or waterborne freight for routes used by European Modular Systems and shall demonstrate that the introduction of European Modular Systems is required because of an absence of non-road transport alternatives that generate comparatively less external costs;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dd (new) (dd) the Member State shall ensure there is no competition with rail freight or waterborne freight for routes used by European Modular Systems and shall demonstrate that the introduction of European Modular Systems is required because of an absence of non-road transport alternatives that generate comparatively less external costs;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point de (new) (de) the Member States shall ensure that measures are taken to avoid negative impacts on road safety brought about as a result of the circulation of European Modular Systems;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point de (new) (de) the Member States shall ensure that measures are taken to avoid negative impacts on road safety brought about as a result of the circulation of European Modular Systems;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point df (new) (df) the Member States shall ensure that European Modular Systems may circulate only when part of an intermodal transport operation;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point df (new) (df) the Member States shall ensure that European Modular Systems may circulate only when part of an intermodal transport operation;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dg (new) (dg) the Member States shall ensure that where road infrastructure requires maintenance, expansion, alteration or any other redesign to allow for the circulation of European Modular Systems, that the costs involved are covered partially or entirely by the operators of the European Modular Systems benefiting from such works.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dg (new) (dg) the Member States shall ensure that where road infrastructure requires maintenance, expansion, alteration or any other redesign to allow for the circulation of European Modular Systems, that the costs involved are covered partially or entirely by the operators of the European Modular Systems benefiting from such works.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dh (new) (dh) the Member States shall ensure that by 1 January 2030 all European Modular Systems shall be operated by zero-emission vehicles;
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point dh (new) (dh) the Member States shall ensure that by 1 January 2030 all European Modular Systems shall be operated by zero-emission vehicles;
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point di (new) (di) the Member States shall ensure that, when their national meteorological institutes or other relevant bodies issue a dangerous traffic weather warning, European Modular Systems are automatically informed of such announcements and their use on roads is halted, where necessary, until such time as the warning has been withdrawn;
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – point di (new) (di) the Member States shall ensure that, when their national meteorological institutes or other relevant bodies issue a dangerous traffic weather warning, European Modular Systems are automatically informed of such announcements and their use on roads is halted, where necessary, until such time as the warning has been withdrawn;
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – Paragraph 4a – point dj (new) (dj) the Member States shall ensure that drivers of European Modular Systems have a minimum age of 24, possess a minimum of 5 years' experience operating vehicles of Category C and CE, maintain a clean driving record without suspensions for the past 3 years, and hold a specific certificate for operating EMS.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – Paragraph 4a – point dj (new) (dj) the Member States shall ensure that drivers of European Modular Systems have a minimum age of 24, possess a minimum of 5 years' experience operating vehicles of Category C and CE, maintain a clean driving record without suspensions for the past 3 years, and hold a specific certificate for operating EMS.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States should cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States should cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I allowed in national traffic.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems or vehicle combinations deviating from Annex I allowed in national traffic.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States shall cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States shall cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States shall cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – sixth subparagraph Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic. Member States shall cooperate to mutually recognise each other’s certifications for drivers of European Modular Systems.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a (new) – seventh subparagraph Member States shall inform the Commission in case they allow the circulation in their territories of European Modular Systems. Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a (new) – seventh subparagraph Member States shall inform the Commission in case they allow the circulation in their territories of European Modular Systems. Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a (new) – seventh subparagraph Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a (new) – seventh subparagraph Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.’;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.’;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph Three years after the entry into force, the Commission shall present a report on the cross-border circulation of the European Modular System combinations in the EU and shall, if appropriate, make a legislative proposal duly accompanied by an impact assessment to widen the scope of its use.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph From 1 January 2040, where Member States allow the circulation in their territories of vehicles or vehicle combinations of European Modular Systems (EMS) engaged in international traffic, they shall evaluate whether the state of the technology developments in the markets allows phasing out the use of such EMS running on fossil fuels.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4a – new subparagraph From 1 January 2040, where Member States allow the circulation in their territories of vehicles or vehicle combinations of European Modular Systems (EMS) engaged in international traffic, they shall evaluate whether the state of the technology developments in the markets allows phasing out the use of such EMS running on fossil fuels.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/CE Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period only after demonstrating that the targeted transport activities cannot be conducted by rail or any other form of transport that offers similar or superior safety and environmental benefits. It must be proven that this does not have a significant impact on intermodal competition in the transportation industry as a whole. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for a maximum of five years. The number of trials shall not be limited. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/CE Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period only after demonstrating that the targeted transport activities cannot be conducted by rail or any other form of transport that offers similar or superior safety and environmental benefits. It must be proven that this does not have a significant impact on intermodal competition in the transportation industry as a whole. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for a maximum of five years. The number of trials shall not be limited. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for a maximum of five years and can be renewed once for another five years. If a Member State decides to renew a trial, it shall provide sufficient justification to the Commission. The number of trials shall not be limited. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5 – first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national or international transport operations for the trial period. In particular, trials with European Modular Systems shall be allowed for a maximum of five years and can be renewed once for another five years. If a Member State decides to renew a trial, it shall provide sufficient justification to the Commission. The number of trials shall not be limited. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5– first subparagraph Member States may allow for a limited period of time trials of vehicles or vehicle combinations incorporating new technologies or new concepts which cannot comply with requirements of this Directive. Such vehicles or vehicle combinations shall be allowed to carry out certain national
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5a 5a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10h to supplement this Directive by determining the minimum sets of data and the performance indicators, linked to the points (a) to (dj) of this Article, to be provided by the monitoring systems set up by the Member States as referred to in paragraphs 4a, point (d), and 5 of this Article.;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point e Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5a 5a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10h to supplement this Directive by determining the minimum sets of data and the performance indicators, linked to the points (a) to (dj) of this Article, to be provided by the monitoring systems set up by the Member States as referred to in paragraphs 4a, point (d), and 5 of this Article.;
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point ee (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5b (new) The following paragraph 5b is inserted: By 30 June 2025, the Commission shall ensure that all requirements and technologies for heavy duty vehicles under Regulation (EU) 2019/21441a are made applicable to, and, where necessary, altered for, European Modular Systems, in order to take account of the potential increased road safety risk posed by such vehicles; __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on type-approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulations (EC) No 78/2009, (EC) No 79/2009 and (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 631/2009, (EU) No 406/2010, (EU) No 672/2010, (EU) No 1003/2010, (EU) No 1005/2010, (EU) No 1008/2010, (EU) No 1009/2010, (EU) No 19/2011, (EU) No 109/2011, (EU) No 458/2011, (EU) No 65/2012, (EU) No 130/2012, (EU) No 347/2012, (EU) No 351/2012, (EU) No 1230/2012 and (EU) 2015/166 (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point ee (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 5b (new) The following paragraph 5b is inserted: By 30 June 2025, the Commission shall ensure that all requirements and technologies for heavy duty vehicles under Regulation (EU) 2019/21441a are made applicable to, and, where necessary, altered for, European Modular Systems, in order to take account of the potential increased road safety risk posed by such vehicles; __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on type-approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulations (EC) No 78/2009, (EC) No 79/2009 and (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 631/2009, (EU) No 406/2010, (EU) No 672/2010, (EU) No 1003/2010, (EU) No 1005/2010, (EU) No 1008/2010, (EU) No 1009/2010, (EU) No 19/2011, (EU) No 109/2011, (EU) No 458/2011, (EU) No 65/2012, (EU) No 130/2012, (EU) No 347/2012, (EU) No 351/2012, (EU) No 1230/2012 and (EU) 2015/166 (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a and 4b (4) the following Articles 4a, 4b and 4
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a and 4b (4) the following Articles 4a, 4b and 4
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a and 4b (4) the following Article
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a and 4b (4) the following Article
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a – point b (b) a single national access point for the applicants to obtain the information on the requirements for applying for special permits or similar arrangements as laid down in Article 4(3) and to the necessary information to plan their routes in a clear, accessible, and transparent manner. Information on height restrictions shall be included;
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Articles 4a – point b (b) a single national access point for the applicants to obtain the information on the requirements for applying for special permits or similar arrangements as laid down in Article 4(3) and to the necessary information to plan their routes in a clear, accessible, and transparent manner. Information on height restrictions shall be included;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – point b (b) a single national access point
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – point b (b) a single national access point
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – point b (b) a single national access point
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – point b (b) a single national access point
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing an EU common standard application form and harmonising the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and in Article 4(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 10i(2).
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing an EU common standard application form and harmonising the rules and procedures for the issuing of national permits or similar arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and in Article 4(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 10i(2).
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 2. The Commission
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1. Whenever a Member State, pursuant to Article 4(2), point (a), allows the circulation within its territory of vehicle combinations with a maximum weight exceeding the limits set out in points 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 of Annex I, it may
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1. Whenever a Member State, pursuant to Article 4(2), point (a), allows the circulation within its territory of vehicle combinations with a maximum weight exceeding the limits set out in points 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 of Annex I, it may
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1. Whenever a Member State, pursuant to Article 4(2), point (a), allows the circulation within its territory of vehicle combinations with a maximum weight exceeding the limits set out in points 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 of Annex I, it may not reject or prohibit the use in its territory in international traffic of those vehicle combinations complying with the weight values set for the national transport of goods, provided that such vehicle combinations do not have a maximum authorised weight exceeding 4
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1. Whenever a Member State, pursuant to Article 4(2), point (a), allows the circulation within its territory of vehicle combinations with a maximum weight exceeding the limits set out in points 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 of Annex I, it may not reject or prohibit the use in its territory in international traffic of those vehicle combinations complying with the weight values set for the national transport of goods, provided that such vehicle combinations do not have a maximum authorised weight exceeding 4
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the 4
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the 4
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall apply until 31 December 203
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall apply until 31 December 203
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall apply until 31 December 203
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall apply until 31 December 203
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, th
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, th
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4c (new) Article 4c The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing abnormal road transports corridors as well as a simplified permit application procedure for use of these corridors. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 10i(2).
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 96/53/EC Article 4c (new) Article 4c The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing abnormal road transports corridors as well as a simplified permit application procedure for use of these corridors. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 10i(2).
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point aa (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point aa (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 6 – paragraph 7 Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Article 6 – paragraph 7 Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c Vehicle transporters
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c Vehicle transporters
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 20,75 meters, using
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 20,75 meters, using
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 2
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 2
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 2
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters with open bodies may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I while loaded, up to a total of 2
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 1 Vehicle transporters
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 2 The
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 2 The
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 2 The
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 8c – paragraph 2 The
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 2 The overhang or load support of vehicle transporters may not protrude in relation to the load. The load may protrude in front of the towing vehicle up to a maximum of 0,5 meters, provided that the first axle of the transported vehicle rests on the
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 2 The overhang or load support of vehicle transporters may not protrude in relation to the load. The load may protrude in front of the towing vehicle up to a maximum of 0,5 meters, provided that the first axle of the transported vehicle rests on the
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 2 The overhang or load support of vehicle transporters may not protrude in relation to the load. The load may protrude in front of the towing vehicle up to a maximum of 0,5 meters, provided that the first axle of the transported vehicle rests on the
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/CE Article 8c – paragraph 2 The overhang or load support of vehicle transporters may not protrude in relation to the load. The load may protrude in front of the towing vehicle up to a maximum of 0,5 meters, provided that the first axle of the transported vehicle rests on the
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency and safety performance. Any excess of the maximum lengths allowed under this Article may also be used to install zero-emission technology. Vehicles or vehicle combinations equipped with such cabs shall comply with point 1.5 of Annex I to this Directive and any exceeding of the maximum lengths shall not result in an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles. Where cabs are equipped with toilets, those toilets cannot be removed to allow the installation of zero-emission technology.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency and safety performance. Any excess of the maximum lengths allowed under this Article may also be used to install zero-emission technology. Vehicles or vehicle combinations equipped with such cabs shall comply with point 1.5 of Annex I to this Directive and any exceeding of the maximum lengths shall not result in an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles. Where cabs are equipped with toilets, those toilets cannot be removed to allow the installation of zero-emission technology.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency, improved driver comfort and safety performance. Any excess of the maximum lengths allowed under this Article may also be used to install zero-emission technology. Vehicles or vehicle combinations equipped with such cabs shall comply with point 1.5 of Annex I to this Directive and any exceeding of the maximum lengths shall not result in an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency, improved driver comfort and safety performance. Any excess of the maximum lengths allowed under this Article may also be used to install zero-emission technology. Vehicles or vehicle combinations equipped with such cabs shall comply with point 1.5 of Annex I to this Directive and any exceeding of the maximum lengths shall not result in an increase in the load capacity of those vehicles.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53 EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53 EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 9a – paragraph 1 1. Vehicles or vehicle combinations which comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/858 may exceed the maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I to this Directive provided that their cabs deliver improved aerodynamic performance, energy efficiency
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 9b (new) (8a) the following Article 9b is inserted: Within one year of the entry into force of this Directive, the European Commission shall amend relevant type approval legislation including Regulation (EU) 2018/8586a to ensure that new vehicles or vehicle combinations are technically and operationally compatible with intermodal transshipment requirements, including but not limited to requirements of weight, shape, size, craneability, resistance to railway air forces, and the retractability and foldability of protruding devices. __________________ 6a Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 9b (new) (8a) the following Article 9b is inserted: Within one year of the entry into force of this Directive, the European Commission shall amend relevant type approval legislation including Regulation (EU) 2018/8586a to ensure that new vehicles or vehicle combinations are technically and operationally compatible with intermodal transshipment requirements, including but not limited to requirements of weight, shape, size, craneability, resistance to railway air forces, and the retractability and foldability of protruding devices. __________________ 6a Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – first subparagraph The maximum authorised weights and axle weights of alternatively fuelled or zero- emission vehicles shall be those set out in points 2.2., 2.3, 2.4, 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 of Annex I. Alternatively fuelled vehicles shall also comply with the maximum authorised axle weight limits set out in point 3 of Annex I.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – first subparagraph The maximum authorised weights and axle weights of alternatively fuelled or zero- emission vehicles shall be those set out in points 2.2., 2.3, 2.4, 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 of Annex I. Alternatively fuelled vehicles shall also comply with the maximum authorised axle weight limits set out in point 3 of Annex I.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – first subparagraph The maximum authorised weights and axle weights of alternatively fuelled or zero- emission vehicles shall be those set out in points 2.2., 2.3, 2.4
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – first subparagraph The maximum authorised weights and axle weights of alternatively fuelled or zero- emission vehicles shall be those set out in points 2.2., 2.3, 2.4
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – second subparagraph The additional weight required by alternatively fuelled vehicles
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – second subparagraph The additional weight required by alternatively fuelled vehicles
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10h to supplement this Directive by updating the list of alternative fuels referred to in Article 2 that require additional weight, provided such additions are for a vehicle to comply with point 11 of Article 3 in Regulation (EU) 2019/12421a. It is of particular importance that the Commission follow its usual practice and carry out consultations with experts, including Member States’ experts, before adopting those delegated acts.’. __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy- duty vehicles and amending Regulations (EC) No 595/2009 and (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/53/EC
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10h to supplement this Directive by updating the list of alternative fuels referred to in Article 2 that require additional weight, provided such additions are for a vehicle to comply with point 11 of Article 3 in Regulation (EU) 2019/12421a. It is of particular importance that the Commission follow its usual practice and carry out consultations with experts, including Member States’ experts, before adopting those delegated acts.’. __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy- duty vehicles and amending Regulations (EC) No 595/2009 and (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/53/EC
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 2 Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 2 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 2a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall revise EU type approval legislation in order to take account of the requirements set out in points 3.4.2, 3.4.3 and 3.4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – paragraph 2a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall revise EU type approval legislation in order to take account of the requirements set out in points 3.4.2, 3.4.3 and 3.4.4 of Annex I.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive96/53/EC Article 10c The maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I, subject where applicable to Article 9a(1) and 10b(2), and the maximum distance laid down in point 1.6 of Annex I, may be exceeded by 15 cm for vehicles or vehicle combinations engaged in the transport of 45-foot containers or 45-foot swap bodies, empty or loaded, provided that the road transport of the container or swap body in question is part of an intermodal transport operation. 45-Foot or longer containers and swap bodies which are part of an intermodal transport operation may also be carried by articulated vehicle combination with a semi-trailer with a length of up to 15 metres providing the conditions in Article 4 (1) and (2) are complied with’;
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive96/53/EC Article 10c The maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I, subject where applicable to Article 9a(1) and 10b(2), and the maximum distance laid down in point 1.6 of Annex I, may be exceeded by 15 cm for vehicles or vehicle combinations engaged in the transport of 45-foot containers or 45-foot swap bodies, empty or loaded, provided that the road transport of the container or swap body in question is part of an intermodal transport operation. 45-Foot or longer containers and swap bodies which are part of an intermodal transport operation may also be carried by articulated vehicle combination with a semi-trailer with a length of up to 15 metres providing the conditions in Article 4 (1) and (2) are complied with’;
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10c The maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I, subject where applicable to Article 9a(1) and 10b(2), and the maximum distance laid down in point 1.6 of Annex I, may be exceeded
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10c The maximum lengths laid down in point 1.1 of Annex I, subject where applicable to Article 9a(1) and 10b(2), and the maximum distance laid down in point 1.6 of Annex I, may be exceeded
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – new subparagraph Certified automatic systems shall be linked to the single national entry point for special permits or similar arrangement set out in Article 4a in order to be able to recognise vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum authorised weights and are in possession of a special permit.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – new subparagraph Certified automatic systems shall be linked to the single national entry point for special permits or similar arrangement set out in Article 4a in order to be able to recognise vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum authorised weights and are in possession of a special permit.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph If a Member State chooses to set up automatic systems on the road infrastructure, it shall ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network set out in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013*. Automatic systems shall be able to, if technically possible, identify vehicles or combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph If a Member State chooses to set up automatic systems on the road infrastructure, it shall ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network set out in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013*. Automatic systems shall be able to, if technically possible, identify vehicles or combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph If a Member State chooses to set up automatic systems on the road infrastructure, it shall ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network set out in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013*. Automatic systems shall be able to identify vehicles or combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph If a Member State chooses to set up automatic systems on the road infrastructure, it shall ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network set out in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013*. Automatic systems shall be able to identify vehicles or combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – third subparagraph Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – third subparagraph Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – third subparagraph Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – third subparagraph Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to Union and national law, where automatic systems are used to establish infringements of this Directive and to impose penalties, such automatic systems shall be certified. These systems must also be linked to the electronic non- standard transport licensing system so that they can identify authorised vehicles carrying indivisible loads. Where automatic systems are used only for identification purposes, they need not be certified.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to Union and national law, where automatic systems are used to establish infringements of this Directive and to impose penalties, such automatic systems shall be certified. These systems must also be linked to the electronic non- standard transport licensing system so that they can identify authorised vehicles carrying indivisible loads. Where automatic systems are used only for identification purposes, they need not be certified.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – fourth subparagraph Without prejudice to Union and national law, where automatic systems are used to establish infringements of this Directive and to impose penalties, such automatic systems shall be certified. These systems shall also have to be linked to an electronic licensing system for abnormal transports in order to recognise permitted vehicles carrying indivisible loads. Where automatic systems are used only for identification purposes, they need not be certified.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – fourth subparagraph Without prejudice to Union and national law, where automatic systems are used to establish infringements of this Directive and to impose penalties, such automatic systems shall be certified. These systems shall also have to be linked to an electronic licensing system for abnormal transports in order to recognise permitted vehicles carrying indivisible loads. Where automatic systems are used only for identification purposes, they need not be certified.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 2 Each Member State shall carry out each calendar year at least
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 10d – paragraph 2 Each Member State shall carry out each calendar year at least
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10da – paragraph 2 2. When a Member State implements IAP pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall ensure that their IAP schemes comply with Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*. In particular, Member States shall ensure that data related to the IAP scheme and falling within the scope of Directive 2010/40/EU, including weight, length, width or height restrictions, are available in digital machine-readable format and made accessible via the National Access Points established under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/670**. Member States shall also ensure that the IAP scheme is able to identify vehicles and combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10da – paragraph 2 2. When a Member State implements IAP pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall ensure that their IAP schemes comply with Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*. In particular, Member States shall ensure that data related to the IAP scheme and falling within the scope of Directive 2010/40/EU, including weight, length, width or height restrictions, are available in digital machine-readable format and made accessible via the National Access Points established under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/670**. Member States shall also ensure that the IAP scheme is able to identify vehicles and combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10da – paragraph 2 2. When a Member State implements IAP pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall ensure that their IAP schemes comply with Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*. In particular, Member States shall ensure that data related to the IAP scheme and falling within the scope of Directive 2010/40/EU, including weight, length, width or height restrictions, are available in digital machine-readable format and made accessible via the National Access Points established under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/670**. Member States shall also ensure that the IAP scheme is able to identify vehicles and combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10da – paragraph 2 2. When a Member State implements IAP pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall ensure that their IAP schemes comply with Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*. In particular, Member States shall ensure that data related to the IAP scheme and falling within the scope of Directive 2010/40/EU, including weight, length, width or height restrictions, are available in digital machine-readable format and made accessible via the National Access Points established under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/670**. Member States shall also ensure that the IAP scheme is able to identify vehicles and combinations with a special permit and link the conditions laid down in the permit with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10 da – paragraph 3 – point a (a) define the criteria for granting access to heavy-duty vehicles, including but not limited to vehicle weight, length, height technical specifications, and compliance with specific safety standards;
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10 da – paragraph 3 – point a (a) define the criteria for granting access to heavy-duty vehicles, including but not limited to vehicle weight, length, height technical specifications, and compliance with specific safety standards;
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10e – paragraph 1a (new) (14a) In Article 10e, the following new paragraph is added: Member States shall ensure that revenues generated from these penalties are used to develop and support intermodal transport operations, reduce the external costs generated by road transport operations and improve cross-border transport operations for rail and waterborne transport modes.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10e – paragraph 1a (new) (14a) In Article 10e, the following new paragraph is added: Member States shall ensure that revenues generated from these penalties are used to develop and support intermodal transport operations, reduce the external costs generated by road transport operations and improve cross-border transport operations for rail and waterborne transport modes.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – point 15 Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10b – point 15 Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10g – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall analyse the information received pursuant to paragraph 1, and on the basis of the information received, present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Directive, no later than 1
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10g – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall analyse the information received pursuant to paragraph 1, and on the basis of the information received, present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Directive, no later than 1
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10 ga (new) (16a) The following Article 10 ga is inserted: Article 10 ga EMS Best Practices Forum 1. An EMS Best Practices Forum shall be set up in order to support dialogue and share experiences and best practices on EMS vehicles in the Union among Member States’ experts and members of the Road Transport Committee. 2. Member States shall delegate as experts to the EMS Best Practices Forum the experts participating in the Road Transport Committee referred to in Article 10i. 3. Stakeholders, representatives of vehicle manufacturers, representatives of transport operators and social partners may be invited to the EMS Best Practices Forum. 4. The EMS Best Practices Forum shall adopt its rules of procedure. 5. The EMS Best Practices Forum shall meet at least once a year.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 10 ga (new) (16a) The following Article 10 ga is inserted: Article 10 ga EMS Best Practices Forum 1. An EMS Best Practices Forum shall be set up in order to support dialogue and share experiences and best practices on EMS vehicles in the Union among Member States’ experts and members of the Road Transport Committee. 2. Member States shall delegate as experts to the EMS Best Practices Forum the experts participating in the Road Transport Committee referred to in Article 10i. 3. Stakeholders, representatives of vehicle manufacturers, representatives of transport operators and social partners may be invited to the EMS Best Practices Forum. 4. The EMS Best Practices Forum shall adopt its rules of procedure. 5. The EMS Best Practices Forum shall meet at least once a year.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Directive 96/53/CE Article 10j (19) Article 10j is
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Directive 96/53/CE Article 10j (19) Article 10j is
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) Directive 96/53/CE Article 10ja (new) (19a) the following Article 10 ja is inserted: Article 10 ja Review The Commission shall by 2027 at the latest , review the effectiveness and impact of this Directive , the feasibility of the dates set out in Article 4b and its compatibility with other relevant Union legislation and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council with the result of the review. The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amending this Directive based on findings of the review and an impact assessment. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the state of the enabling conditions for the market adoption of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles in the Union. In this report, the Commission shall assess in particular, but not limited to, the following elements: (a) the amount of registrations of zero- emission heavy-duty vehicles in Member States, (b) the deployment of charging and refuelling infrastructure suitable for heavy-duty vehicles in Member States, (c) the implementation of road user charges differentiated by CO2 emissions in Member States (d) the level of the average price of allowances under the new the emissions trading system covering road transport (e) other measures that support the uptake of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) Directive 96/53/CE Article 10ja (new) (19a) the following Article 10 ja is inserted: Article 10 ja Review The Commission shall by 2027 at the latest , review the effectiveness and impact of this Directive , the feasibility of the dates set out in Article 4b and its compatibility with other relevant Union legislation and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council with the result of the review. The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amending this Directive based on findings of the review and an impact assessment. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the state of the enabling conditions for the market adoption of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles in the Union. In this report, the Commission shall assess in particular, but not limited to, the following elements: (a) the amount of registrations of zero- emission heavy-duty vehicles in Member States, (b) the deployment of charging and refuelling infrastructure suitable for heavy-duty vehicles in Member States, (c) the implementation of road user charges differentiated by CO2 emissions in Member States (d) the level of the average price of allowances under the new the emissions trading system covering road transport (e) other measures that support the uptake of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10k – fourth subparagraph For the purposes of this Article, a crisis means an exceptional, unexpected and sudden, natural or man-made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union, with significant direct or indirect impacts on the area of road transport or the economy, safety or welfare of the Union citizens, where the normal functioning of society is significantly disrupted, and where the public interest requires urgent action to be taken.;
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10k – fourth subparagraph For the purposes of this Article, a crisis means an exceptional, unexpected and sudden, natural or man-made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union, with significant direct or indirect impacts on the area of road transport or the economy, safety or welfare of the Union citizens, where the normal functioning of society is significantly disrupted, and where the public interest requires urgent action to be taken.;
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article2a Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 Article 3 (17) of Regulation (EU) 2018/858, is replaced by the following: (17) ‘trailer’ means any non-self propelled vehicle, which is designed and constructed to be towed by a power driven vehicle and includes semi-trailers. However, the trailer may be propelled to support the motion without applying propelling forces when not coupled to a towing vehicle.; Article 3 (33) of Regulation (EU) 2018/858, is replaced by the following: (33) ‘semi-trailer’ A towable vehicle, in which the axle(s) is (are) positioned behind the centre of gravity of the vehicle (when uniformly loaded), and which is equipped with a connecting device permitting horizontal and vertical forces to be transmitted to a towing vehicle. One or more of the axles may be driven to support the towing vehicle, and a contribution to the propelling forces of the vehicle combination is permitted at all speeds. To ensure the stability of the vehicle combination, the propelling forces of the semi-trailer shall not exceed those of the towing vehicle at speeds above 15 km/h.;
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article2a Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 Article 3 (17) of Regulation (EU) 2018/858, is replaced by the following: (17) ‘trailer’ means any non-self propelled vehicle, which is designed and constructed to be towed by a power driven vehicle and includes semi-trailers. However, the trailer may be propelled to support the motion without applying propelling forces when not coupled to a towing vehicle.; Article 3 (33) of Regulation (EU) 2018/858, is replaced by the following: (33) ‘semi-trailer’ A towable vehicle, in which the axle(s) is (are) positioned behind the centre of gravity of the vehicle (when uniformly loaded), and which is equipped with a connecting device permitting horizontal and vertical forces to be transmitted to a towing vehicle. One or more of the axles may be driven to support the towing vehicle, and a contribution to the propelling forces of the vehicle combination is permitted at all speeds. To ensure the stability of the vehicle combination, the propelling forces of the semi-trailer shall not exceed those of the towing vehicle at speeds above 15 km/h.;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2a (new) Article 2a Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 In Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, the following paragraph 4a is inserted: 4a. The vehicles of categories M1 and N1 shall have the following maximum authorised width: 1. M1: 1,921 m save for M1 vehicles with at least 10 cubic metres of internal space, for which the width limit shall be 2,07 m 2. N1: 1,921m save for N1 vehicles with at least 7 cubic metres of internal space, for which the width limit shall be 2,07m 3. N1: 2,60m for vehicles fitted with a bodywork with insulated walls of at least 45mm thick, having bodywork code 04 or 05, as referred to in Appendix 2 to Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 The requirements mentioned in points 1 and 2 of the first subparagraph shall be applicable from 1 January 2028 for the vehicles that emit tailpipe emissions, and from 1 January 2032 for zero-emission vehicles.
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2a (new) Article 2a Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 In Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, the following paragraph 4a is inserted: 4a. The vehicles of categories M1 and N1 shall have the following maximum authorised width: 1. M1: 1,921 m save for M1 vehicles with at least 10 cubic metres of internal space, for which the width limit shall be 2,07 m 2. N1: 1,921m save for N1 vehicles with at least 7 cubic metres of internal space, for which the width limit shall be 2,07m 3. N1: 2,60m for vehicles fitted with a bodywork with insulated walls of at least 45mm thick, having bodywork code 04 or 05, as referred to in Appendix 2 to Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 The requirements mentioned in points 1 and 2 of the first subparagraph shall be applicable from 1 January 2028 for the vehicles that emit tailpipe emissions, and from 1 January 2032 for zero-emission vehicles.
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [date-of-adoption+
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Not later than 31 December 2024, the Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and, if appropriate, bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Not later than 31 December 2024, the Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and, if appropriate, bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a The Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates no later than 31 December 2024.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a The Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates no later than 31 December 2024.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3a (new) Article 3a Not later than 31 December 2024, the Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3a (new) Article 3a Not later than 31 December 2024, the Commission shall review the maximum width in EU law for light duty vehicles and bring forward legislative proposals that apply to new registrations from an appropriate date or dates.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 1. Maximum authorised dimensions for the vehicles referred to in Article 1(1), point (a) 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 1
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 1. Maximum authorised dimensions for the vehicles referred to in Article 1(1), point (a) 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 1
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 and point 2.5 (new) 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 16,50 m — road train 18,75 m — articulated bus with three axles
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 and point 2.5 (new) 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 16,50 m — road train 18,75 m — articulated bus with three axles
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 16,50 m — articulated vehicle for the carriage of 45-foot containers or swap 18,00 m bodies involved in intermodal transport — road train 18,75 m — articulated bus with three axles
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 16,50 m — articulated vehicle for the carriage of 45-foot containers or swap 18,00 m bodies involved in intermodal transport — road train 18,75 m — articulated bus with three axles
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.3 1.3 Maximum height — any vehicle 4,00 m — vehicles or vehicle combinations carrying in intermodal transport 4,
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.3 1.3 Maximum height — any vehicle 4,00 m — vehicles or vehicle combinations carrying in intermodal transport 4,
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 and point 1.6 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 1
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 1.1 and point 1.6 1.1 Maximum length — motor vehicle other than a bus 12,00 m — trailer 12,00 m — articulated vehicle 1
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2 2.2 Vehicle combinations
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2 2.2 Vehicle combinations
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.1 and point 2.2.2 2.2.1 Road trains with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.1 and point 2.2.2 2.2.1 Road trains with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two or three-axle semi- 40 tonnes trailer
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two or three-axle semi- 40 tonnes trailer
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.2 2.2.2 Articulated vehicles with five or six axles (a) two-axle motor vehicle with three-axle semi-trailer 40 tonnes (b) three-axle motor vehicle with two
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 2.2.4 Articulated vehicles with four axles consisting of a two-axle motor vehicle and a two- axle semi-trailer, if the distance between the axles of the semi-trailer: 2.2.4.1 is 1,3 m or greater but not more than 1,8 m 36 tonnes 2.2.4.2 is greater than 1,8 m 36 tonnes In case the maximum authorised weight (MAW) of the motor vehicle (18 tonnes) and the MAW of the tandem axle of the semi-trailer (20 tonnes) are respected and the driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II the maximum authorised weight provided for in point 2.2.4.2 shall be increased by 2 tonnes.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 2.2.4 Articulated vehicles with four axles consisting of a two-axle motor vehicle and a two- axle semi-trailer, if the distance between the axles of the semi-trailer: 2.2.4.1 is 1,3 m or greater but not more than 1,8 m 36 tonnes 2.2.4.2 is greater than 1,8 m 36 tonnes In case the maximum authorised weight (MAW) of the motor vehicle (18 tonnes) and the MAW of the tandem axle of the semi-trailer (20 tonnes) are respected and the driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II the maximum authorised weight provided for in point 2.2.4.2 shall be increased by 2 tonnes.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 2.2.4 Articulated vehicles with four axles consisting of a two-axle motor vehicle and a two- axle semi-trailer, if the distance between the axles of the semi-trailer:
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 2.2.4 Articulated vehicles with four axles consisting of a two-axle motor vehicle and a two- axle semi-trailer, if the distance between the axles of the semi-trailer:
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 –last three rows Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 –last three rows Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 –last three rows In the case of vehicle combinations including alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero- emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weights provided for in Sub-section 2.2 shall be increased by the additional weight of the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.2.4 –last three rows In the case of vehicle combinations including alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero- emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weights provided for in Sub-section 2.2 shall be increased by the additional weight of the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 32 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes 2.3.6 Five-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 32 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes 2.3.6 Five-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 32 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes 2.3.6 Five-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 40 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3. 2.3 Motor vehicles 2.3.1 Two-axle motor vehicles other than buses: 18 tonnes 2.3.2 two-axle buses: 19,5 tonnes 2.3.3 Three-axle motor vehicles: 25 tonnes 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 32 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes 2.3.6 Five-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles where the 40 tonnes driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognized as being equivalent
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.- last row In the case of zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weights provided for in Sub- section 2.3 shall be increased by 2 tonnes. Point 2.3.2 shall be increased by 0,5 tonnes.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.- last row In the case of zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weights provided for in Sub- section 2.3 shall be increased by 2 tonnes. Point 2.3.2 shall be increased by 0,5 tonnes.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.4, point 2.3.5, point 2.3.6 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes or with driving axles according to 3.5.2 or 3.5.3. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.4, point 2.3.5, point 2.3.6 2.3.4 Three-axle motor vehicles where the driving axle is fitted with 26 tonnes twin tyres and air suspension or suspension recognised as being equivalent within the Union as defined in Annex II, or where each driving axle is fitted with twin tyres and the maximum weight of each axle does not exceed 9,5 tonnes or with driving axles according to 3.5.2 or 3.5.3. 2.3.5 Four-axle motor vehicles with two steering axles
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.6 – last two rows 2.4 Three-axle articulated buses 28 tonnes In the case of alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weight of 28 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.4 is increased by the additional weight required for the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of 1 tonne. In the case of zero-emission motor vehicles the maximum authorised weight of 28 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.4 is increased by 2 tonnes. This weight allowance for zero- emission vehicle combinations shall be applicable for both national and international traffic.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.3.6 – last two rows 2.4 Three-axle articulated buses 28 tonnes In the case of alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weight of 28 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.4 is increased by the additional weight required for the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of 1 tonne. In the case of zero-emission motor vehicles the maximum authorised weight of 28 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.4 is increased by 2 tonnes. This weight allowance for zero- emission vehicle combinations shall be applicable for both national and international traffic.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 11,5 tonnes 2.4 other than zero-emission vehicles 3.4.2 Driving axle of zero-emission vehicles referred to in points 1
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.4 2.4 Articulated buses 2.4.1 Three
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.4 2.4 Articulated buses 2.4.1 Three
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.5 (new) 2.5 Four-axle articulated buses 32 tonnes In the case of alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weight of 32 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.5 is increased by the additional weight required for the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of 1 tonne. In the case of zero-emission vehicles the maximum authorised weight of 32 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.5 is increased by 4 tonnes
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 2.5 (new) 2.5 Four-axle articulated buses 32 tonnes In the case of alternatively fuelled vehicles other than zero-emission vehicles, the maximum authorised weight of 32 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.5 is increased by the additional weight required for the alternative fuel technology with a maximum of 1 tonne. In the case of zero-emission vehicles the maximum authorised weight of 32 tonnes provided for in Sub-section 2.5 is increased by 4 tonnes
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.1, point 3.4 3.1 Single axles
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.1, point 3.4 3.1 Single axles
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 11,5 tonnes 2.4 other than zero-emission vehicles 3.4.2 Driving axle of zero-emission vehicles referred to in points 1
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 11,5 tonnes 2.4 other than zero-emission vehicles 3.4.2 Driving axle of zero-emission vehicles referred to in points 1
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 1
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 1
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 11,5 tonnes 2.4 other than zero-emission vehicles 3.4.2 Driving axle of zero-emission vehicles referred to in points 1
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle 3.4.1 Driving axle of the vehicles referred to in points 2.2, 2.3 and 11,5 tonnes 2.4 other than zero-emission vehicles 3.4.2 Driving axle of zero-emission vehicles referred to in points 1
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.4 3.4 Driving axle
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.5.3 3.5.3 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 18 tonnes
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.5.3 3.5.3 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 18 tonnes
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.5.3 3.5.3 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 3.5.3. In general 18 tonnes 1
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.5.3 3.5.3 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 3.5.3. In general 18 tonnes 1
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 less than 1,3 m (d < 1,3) 21 tonnes 3.6.2 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 24 tonnes
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 less than 1,3 m (d < 1,3) 21 tonnes 3.6.2 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 24 tonnes
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 24 tonnes 3.6.2 In the case of zero-emissions vehicles, if at least two axles 26 tonnes are fitted with twin tires. 1,3 m or greater but less than 1.8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8)
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 24 tonnes 3.6.2 In the case of zero-emissions vehicles, if at least two axles 26 tonnes are fitted with twin tires. 1,3 m or greater but less than 1.8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8)
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 less than 1,3 m (d < 1,3) 21 tonnes 3.6.2 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 27 tonnes
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 3.6 (new) 3.6 Tri-axles of motor vehicles The sum of the axle weights per tri-axle must not exceed, if the distance (d) between the axles is: 3.6.1 less than 1,3 m (d < 1,3) 21 tonnes 3.6.2 1,3 m or greater but less than 1,8 m (1,3 ≤ d < 1,8) 27 tonnes
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase The maximum authorised weight in tonnes of a four-axle or five-axle motor vehicle may
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase The maximum authorised weight in tonnes of a four-axle or five-axle motor vehicle may
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase The maximum authorised weight in tonnes of a four-axle or five-axle motor vehicle may
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – table – point 4.3 4.3 Maximum authorised weight depending on the wheelbase The maximum authorised weight in tonnes of a four-axle or five-axle motor vehicle may
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) By streamlining and clarifying the rules on weights and dimensions of road transport heavy-duty vehicles, it is necessary to address the energy and operational inefficiencies of cross-border transport operations, provide strong incentives to operators for the uptake of zero-emission technologies while facilitating the use of the existing energy- saving solutions, and further support intermodal freight transport operations. To minimise administrative burdens, prevent distortion of competition
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) By streamlining and clarifying the rules on weights and dimensions of road transport heavy-duty vehicles, it is necessary to address the energy and operational inefficiencies of cross-border transport operations, provide strong incentives to operators for the uptake of zero-emission technologies while facilitating the use of the existing energy- saving solutions, and further support intermodal freight transport operations. To minimise administrative burdens, prevent distortion of competition
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To achieve these objectives, the right balance between economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, protection of road infrastructure and road safety aspects should be struck. Furthermore, to ensure legislative coherence and legal certainty, this Directive should be aligned as closely as possible with the CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles Regulation and the Combined Transport Directive.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To achieve these objectives, the right balance between economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, protection of road infrastructure and road safety aspects should be struck. Furthermore, to ensure legislative coherence and legal certainty, this Directive should be aligned as closely as possible with the CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles Regulation and the Combined Transport Directive.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To achieve these objectives, the right balance between economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, protection of road infrastructure and road safety aspects should be struck. In order to ensure legal certainty and consistency, this Directive should be aligned with the Regulation on CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles and the Combined Transport Directive.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To achieve these objectives, the right balance between economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, protection of road infrastructure and road safety aspects should be struck. In order to ensure legal certainty and consistency, this Directive should be aligned with the Regulation on CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles and the Combined Transport Directive.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised combined intermodal transport.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised combined intermodal transport.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The provisions of Directive 96/53/EU complement Council Directive 92/106/EEC41 as regards promoting and supporting the growth of intermodal transport. The definition of intermodal transport operation should therefore be aligned with the terminology applied in Directive 92/106/EEC, in order to allow lorries, trailers and semi-trailers used in intermodal operations to benefit from the same extra weight allowances as in cases of road vehicles carrying containers or swap bodies and used in containerised intermodal transport. Such weight incentive should encourage road transport operators to engage also in non- containerised
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should put in place simplified approval procedures for specialised one-off vehicles to allow them to be commercially viable.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should put in place simplified approval procedures for specialised one-off vehicles to allow them to be commercially viable.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible via electronic means of communications.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible via electronic means of communications.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in the most representative EU languages and accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in all EU languages and easily accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should cooperate to harmonise, to the extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non- discriminatory, refraining from imposing unjustified requirements such as fluency in the national language of the Member State concerned. To reduce administrative burden for operators and to ensure efficient, fair and safe operations, it is crucial to put in place a transparent, harmonised, user-friendly system for obtaining permits that is available in all EU languages and easily accessible by electronic communication means.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should closely cooperate to harmonise, to the best extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non-
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The transport of indivisible loads is an important market segment linked with the strategic areas of renewable energy, civil engineering and infrastructure, oil and gas, heavy industry and power generation sectors. Despite the recognised value of the existing European Best Practice Guidelines for Abnormal Transport, adopted by experts designated by the Member States, very little progress has been made towards the simplification and harmonisation of the rules and procedures to obtain permits for the transport of indivisible loads. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to establish the necessary conditions to ensure the safe transport of indivisible loads in their territories, Member States should closely cooperate to harmonise, to the best extent possible, those requirements to avoid the multiplication of diverging conditions serving the same purpose. Member States should also ensure that national requirements are proportionate and non-
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Abnormal road transport operators should be able to use a simplified authorization procedure to operate in abnormal road transport corridors. These corridors should effectively connect European industrial centres and central logistics hubs such as ports. The creation of such corridors would, among other things, promote the expansion of renewable energies, as the expansion of wind power plants in particular requires abnormal transportation. These corridors should follow the trans-European road network and be based on the road network, pavements, bridges and other specific road structures that are considered suitable for the transportation of abnormal transport. The information on the corridors should be publicly available to operators and other interested parties. Member States should provide up- to-date information on the accessibility of corridors for abnormal road transport, e.g. through traffic reports on ongoing road works, natural disasters and traffic density.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Abnormal road transport operators should be able to use a simplified authorization procedure to operate in abnormal road transport corridors. These corridors should effectively connect European industrial centres and central logistics hubs such as ports. The creation of such corridors would, among other things, promote the expansion of renewable energies, as the expansion of wind power plants in particular requires abnormal transportation. These corridors should follow the trans-European road network and be based on the road network, pavements, bridges and other specific road structures that are considered suitable for the transportation of abnormal transport. The information on the corridors should be publicly available to operators and other interested parties. Member States should provide up- to-date information on the accessibility of corridors for abnormal road transport, e.g. through traffic reports on ongoing road works, natural disasters and traffic density.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS)
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross- border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share. Five years after the adoption of this legislation, in order to facilitate the transition towards decarbonisation in the road transport sector in line with the European Green Deal, the Commission should analyse the data collected from European Modular Systems engaged in international traffic and consider, if appropriate, zero emission objectives for EMS vehicles.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross- border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share. Five years after the adoption of this legislation, in order to facilitate the transition towards decarbonisation in the road transport sector in line with the European Green Deal, the Commission should analyse the data collected from European Modular Systems engaged in international traffic and consider, if appropriate, zero emission objectives for EMS vehicles.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS and other high- capacity vehicles combinations on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS and other high- capacity vehicles combinations on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross- border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share. The clear definition of EMS in this Directive guarantees that EMS are composed of standard vehicle units to ensure compatibility with other transport modes, notably rail.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross- border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share. The clear definition of EMS in this Directive guarantees that EMS are composed of standard vehicle units to ensure compatibility with other transport modes, notably rail.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS and high-capacity vehicle combinations, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS and high-capacity vehicle combinations, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Member States should continue to be allowed to run trials on a temporary basis. Indeed, new technologies allowing for in-motion charging, such as solar panels, pantographs and electric roads, or the progressive introduction of EMS in Member States, may require exceeding the maximum weights and dimensions in a testing environment
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Member States should continue to be allowed to run trials on a temporary basis. Indeed, new technologies allowing for in-motion charging, such as solar panels, pantographs and electric roads, or the progressive introduction of EMS in Member States, may require exceeding the maximum weights and dimensions in a testing environment
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Member States should continue to be allowed to run trials on a temporary basis. Indeed, new technologies allowing for in-motion charging, such as solar panels, pantographs and electric roads, or the progressive introduction of EMS in Member States, may require exceeding the maximum weights and dimensions in a testing environment, including in cross- border sections of the road network. Therefore, Member States should continue to be allowed to conduct such trials and be able to test the compatibility of new technologies and concepts across borders. The temporary and innovative nature of trials needs to be clarified by setting up a maximum period of time to conduct them with a possibility for one-time renewal justified by the Member State to the Commission. At the same time, the number of trials of new technologies and innovative schemes should not be restricted to avoid hampering innovation. Member States should regularly monitor and assess the performance and impacts of testing the new technologies and new concepts on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts on the transport system, such as impacts on the modal share.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Member States should continue to be allowed to run trials on a temporary basis. Indeed, new technologies allowing for in-motion charging, such as solar panels, pantographs and electric roads, or the progressive introduction of EMS in Member States, may require exceeding the maximum weights and dimensions in a testing environment, including in cross- border sections of the road network. Therefore, Member States should continue to be allowed to conduct such trials and be able to test the compatibility of new technologies and concepts across borders. The temporary and innovative nature of trials needs to be clarified by setting up a maximum period of time to conduct them with a possibility for one-time renewal justified by the Member State to the Commission. At the same time, the number of trials of new technologies and innovative schemes should not be restricted to avoid hampering innovation. Member States should regularly monitor and assess the performance and impacts of testing the new technologies and new concepts on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts on the transport system, such as impacts on the modal share.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in an EU standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format and it should be possible to carry out an abnormal transport using this electronic document. In addition, that national system should provide information on the national maximum authorised dimensions and weights of vehicles and vehicle combinations, information on possible restrictions, in particular on height, as well as on the minimum qualifications requirements for drivers. To ensure that operators and citizens can access all relevant information in one place, a dedicated European web portal connecting the national electronic and communication systems and providing, among others, a clear graphic overview of the roads on which EMS are allowed to circulate in the relevant Member States, should be established by the Commission, at the latest by [6 months after the date of transposition of this Directive].
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in an EU standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format and it should be possible to carry out an abnormal transport using this electronic document. In addition, that national system should provide information on the national maximum authorised dimensions and weights of vehicles and vehicle combinations, information on possible restrictions, in particular on height, as well as on the minimum qualifications requirements for drivers. To ensure that operators and citizens can access all relevant information in one place, a dedicated European web portal connecting the national electronic and communication systems and providing, among others, a clear graphic overview of the roads on which EMS are allowed to circulate in the relevant Member States, should be established by the Commission, at the latest by [6 months after the date of transposition of this Directive].
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format,
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format,
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. The permits should be issued in an electronic format allowing transport operators to carry out such an abnormal transport by using this electronic document.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. The permits should be issued in an electronic format allowing transport operators to carry out such an abnormal transport by using this electronic document.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in electronic format and operators should be allowed to carry out abnormal transports using the electronic document.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in electronic format and operators should be allowed to carry out abnormal transports using the electronic document.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format and it should be possible to carry out an abnormal transport using this electronic document.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format, for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format and it should be possible to carry out an abnormal transport using this electronic document.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format , for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The transport of indivisible loads carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations exceeding the maximum weights or dimensions and the use of EMS, given their needs for additional safety features and for suitable infrastructure, require that special attention is given to elements such as transparency of relevant information, legal certainty and harmonisation of the permit processes. It is therefore necessary for Member States to establish a single electronic information and communication system containing all the relevant information regarding the operational and administrative conditions for the transport of indivisible loads and for the use of EMS, in a clear and easily accessible manner. This national system should also enable the operators to obtain the information and submit electronically the application, in a standardised format , for special permits for the carriage of indivisible loads in the Member State concerned. These permits should be issued in an electronic format.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) T
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) T
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to phase out the use of such heavier lorries running on fossil fuels
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to phase out the use of such heavier lorries running on fossil fuels
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Vehicle
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Vehicle
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Vehicle
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Vehicle
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) New passenger vehicles are becoming ever-wider, spurred on by rising sales of larger Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs). EU law currently applies a single legal limit (255 cm) to govern the width of all types of new vehicles. This one-size- fits-all approach followed to date is enabling the average width of cars and pick-up trucks to rapidly increase towards the 255 cm width limit, with a number of large SUVs and pick-up truck models already measuring 200-215 cm in width. The larger size of vehicles poses particular problems from a road safety, environmental and road infrastructure perspective, because vulnerable road users are put at a greater safety risk, more materials are required for vehicle construction, tail pipe emissions and energy consumption increase and greater weight puts more stress on road infrastructure. The legal limit in width of vehicle categories M1 and N1 should therefore be lowered through an amendment to Regulation 2019/2144, while also providing sufficient lead-in time for manufacturers, particularly those of zero emission vehicles.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) New passenger vehicles are becoming ever-wider, spurred on by rising sales of larger Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs). EU law currently applies a single legal limit (255 cm) to govern the width of all types of new vehicles. This one-size- fits-all approach followed to date is enabling the average width of cars and pick-up trucks to rapidly increase towards the 255 cm width limit, with a number of large SUVs and pick-up truck models already measuring 200-215 cm in width. The larger size of vehicles poses particular problems from a road safety, environmental and road infrastructure perspective, because vulnerable road users are put at a greater safety risk, more materials are required for vehicle construction, tail pipe emissions and energy consumption increase and greater weight puts more stress on road infrastructure. The legal limit in width of vehicle categories M1 and N1 should therefore be lowered through an amendment to Regulation 2019/2144, while also providing sufficient lead-in time for manufacturers, particularly those of zero emission vehicles.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Heavy-duty vehicles with elongated cabs have started making their entrance on the market, paired with zero-emission propulsion systems. Using zero-emission propulsion systems requires, depending on the technology, extra space which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle, so that the zero-emission road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms. It should thus be clarified that the excess in the maximum lengths provided for the elongated cabs can be such that it provides space needed for accommodating zero-emission technology, such as batteries and hydrogen tanks, provided that the safety, efficiency and comfort features of aerodynamic cabs are not jeopardized. In particular, where cabs are equipped with toilets, those toilets must remain and cannot be removed to allow the accommodation of zero-emission technology.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Heavy-duty vehicles with elongated cabs have started making their entrance on the market, paired with zero-emission propulsion systems. Using zero-emission propulsion systems requires, depending on the technology, extra space which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle, so that the zero-emission road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms. It should thus be clarified that the excess in the maximum lengths provided for the elongated cabs can be such that it provides space needed for accommodating zero-emission technology, such as batteries and hydrogen tanks, provided that the safety, efficiency and comfort features of aerodynamic cabs are not jeopardized. In particular, where cabs are equipped with toilets, those toilets must remain and cannot be removed to allow the accommodation of zero-emission technology.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In order to ensure that the capacity of intermodal transport to cooperate and compete with road transport is not hindered by a lack of compatibility between road transport and rail and inland waterways, the Commission should ensure that new vehicles and new vehicle combinations are technically and operationally compatible with the requirements of combined transport operations. To this end, the Commission should amend type approval legislation and address, among other things, the weight, shape, size, craneability, resistance to railway air forces, and retractability and foldability of protruding devices when it comes to new trailers.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In order to ensure that the capacity of intermodal transport to cooperate and compete with road transport is not hindered by a lack of compatibility between road transport and rail and inland waterways, the Commission should ensure that new vehicles and new vehicle combinations are technically and operationally compatible with the requirements of combined transport operations. To this end, the Commission should amend type approval legislation and address, among other things, the weight, shape, size, craneability, resistance to railway air forces, and retractability and foldability of protruding devices when it comes to new trailers.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight are necessary for zero-emission vehicle combinations, as well as to the most common passenger vehicles in use in the Union. Lighter technologies and better aerodynamics will render the use of zero- emission propulsion systems more efficient (for example, to allow for longer range travelled and longer battery life) by reducing their energy consumption.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight are necessary for zero-emission vehicle combinations, as well as to the most common passenger vehicles in use in the Union. Lighter technologies and better aerodynamics will render the use of zero- emission propulsion systems more efficient (for example, to allow for longer range travelled and longer battery life) by reducing their energy consumption.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of alternative drive of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight up to the weight of the alternative drive but not more than the values stated in Annex I, 2.2.2 are necessary for zero-emission vehicle combinations, as well as to the most common passenger vehicles in use in the Union. Lighter technologies and better aerodynamics will render the use of zero- emission propulsion systems more efficient (for example, to allow for longer range travelled and longer battery life) by reducing their energy consumption.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of alternative drive of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight up to the weight of the alternative drive but not more than the values stated in Annex I, 2.2.2 are necessary for zero-emission vehicle combinations, as well as to the most common passenger vehicles in use in the Union. Lighter technologies and better aerodynamics will render the use of zero- emission propulsion systems more efficient (for example, to allow for longer range travelled and longer battery life) by reducing their energy consumption.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight are necessary for vehicle combinations including a zero-emission motor vehicle
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight are necessary for vehicle combinations including a zero-emission motor vehicle
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Battery electric, fuel-cell and other hydrogen-powered vehicles have a strong potential to decarbonise certain segments of the heavy duty transport sector and their development should be encouraged, while taking into account the fact that no technology goes without an environmental impact. Where electrification is not possible or less efficient and hydrogen fuelled vehicles are not appropriate or cost competitive, the principle of technological neutrality allows for ensuring a level playing field with other technologies that are more mature.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Battery electric, fuel-cell and other hydrogen-powered vehicles have a strong potential to decarbonise certain segments of the heavy duty transport sector and their development should be encouraged, while taking into account the fact that no technology goes without an environmental impact. Where electrification is not possible or less efficient and hydrogen fuelled vehicles are not appropriate or cost competitive, the principle of technological neutrality allows for ensuring a level playing field with other technologies that are more mature.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. Certified automatic systems should be able to recognise vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum authorised weights and have a derogation based on a special permit or a similar arrangement. This will avoid unjustified penalties and save administrative costs for both operators and Member States.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. Certified automatic systems should be able to recognise vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum authorised weights and have a derogation based on a special permit or a similar arrangement. This will avoid unjustified penalties and save administrative costs for both operators and Member States.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The implemented system should recognise non-standard transport rights where a valid permit has been issued, in order to avoid unjustified penalties for carriers for carrying out such transport operations.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The implemented system should recognise non-standard transport rights where a valid permit has been issued, in order to avoid unjustified penalties for carriers for carrying out such transport operations.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The existing system should recognize permits for exceptional transports if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for these transports.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The existing system should recognize permits for exceptional transports if a valid permit has been issued in order to avoid unjustified fines for these transports.
source: 756.298
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2024-12-18Show (40) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and DemocratsNew
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats |
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
| docs/1 |
|
| docs/1 |
|
| docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
| docs/2 |
|
| docs/2 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/6 |
|
| docs/6 |
|
| docs/7/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
| docs/8 |
Old
New
|
| docs/9 |
Old
New
|
| docs/10 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/3/summary/23 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
| events/4 |
|
| events/4 |
|
| events/4/summary/26 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
| events/5 |
|
| events/5 |
|
| events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61353&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=61353 |
| events/8 |
|
| procedure/Legislative priorities/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41380 |
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
TRAN/9/12725 |
| procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 1996/53
|
| procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 1996/53 1993/0486(SYN)
|
| procedure/instrument/2 |
1993/0486(SYN)
|
| procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 091 |
| procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
2024-10-30Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-29Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-28Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-27Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-26Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-25Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-24Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-23Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
| events/7 |
|
2024-10-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61353&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0126_en.docx |
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/6 |
|
2024-10-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2024-10-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2024-10-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2024-10-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2024-10-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2024-09-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2024-09-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2024-09-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2024-09-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2024-09-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
2024-09-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2024-09-05Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-09-04Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-09-03Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-09-02Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-09-01Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-31Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-30Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-29Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-08-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-07-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-07-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-07-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-07-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
2024-07-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| commission/0/commissioner |
Old
VĂLEAN Adina-IoanaNew
VĂLEAN Adina |
2024-07-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
2024-07-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
2024-05-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-05-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/4 |
|
2024-04-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-13Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-04-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2024-03-15Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| events/4 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
2024-03-14Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts |
|
2024-03-13Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-12Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-11Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-10Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-09Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-08Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3/summary |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-02-29Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/6 |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
2024-02-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| events/2 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-01-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| links |
|
2023-12-09Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/6 |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
2023-11-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| commission |
|
2023-10-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts |
|
2023-10-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4 |
|
2023-10-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/1/opinion |
False
|
2023-10-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
2023-10-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/2/opinion |
False
|
2023-09-26Show (2) Changes
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0/summary |
|