Progress: Procedure rejected
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PETER-HANSEN Kira Marie ( Verts/ALE) | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP), REGNER Evelyn ( S&D), HLAVÁČEK Martin ( Renew), MOŻDŻANOWSKA Andżelika Anna ( ECR), GUSMÃO José ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | HAYER Valérie ( Renew) | José Manuel FERNANDES ( PPE), Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN (Greens/EFA, DK) on the role of tax policy in times of crisis.
The report focuses on the most negative effects of the COVID-19 crisis on EU companies, and on the solutions that can be found to remedy it through a stronger and fairer tax system that not only responds to the current crisis and inflation, but is also up to the task of tackling, among other things, the climate crisis and the biodiversity crisis.
This report focuses on some of the strongest negative effects that the COVID-19 crisis has had on societies in the EU, and on which solutions to these effects can be found in a more solid and just taxation system that not only responds to the current immediate crisis and inflation, but also delivers in facing the climate and biodiversity crisis among other things. Along the lines of some of the most recent studies, the report addresses some of the following points:
Fiscal responses to the current crises and inflation
The report noted with concern that the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the shock to energy prices following Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and high inflation are hurting people and businesses, with the poorest households hit hardest. Effective tax rates have risen considerably for families with children, particularly those at the lower end of the income scale. Gender inequalities worsened during the pandemic. Inflation has increased overall VAT receipts, which has mechanically increased VAT receipts for Member States.
However, Members noted that Member States are still facing major imbalances in public revenue. They deplored the fact that the recent crises have also hit the self-employed and SMEs hard.
The report noted that certain multinational enterprises that make exceptional profits in times of crisis are often under-taxed. In addition, temporary VAT reductions have had a limited effect on final consumers but a more pronounced effect on businesses, which have in some cases increased their profit margins.
The report recognised that each Member State is entitled to define its own tax mix according to its needs, particularly in the social and economic spheres, but notes that, within the overall tax mix, environmental taxation still represents only a small proportion of total tax revenues in the EU.
Furthermore, subsidies for fossil fuels remain high in the EU and globally. Members noted that, on the whole, Member States' tax systems could become more effective instruments for tackling the climate and biodiversity crises.
At the same time, tax evasion and avoidance continue to deprive governments of revenue and are a cause for concern.
Resilient tax systems for the future
The report proposes key elements that could be considered in a more comprehensive approach to taxation to avoid ad hoc adjustments in times of crisis, as well as to ensure that inequalities are not exacerbated by existing tax systems.
The report recommends that:
- the Commission should assess the effectiveness of temporary tax incentives , including VAT reductions, applied in Member States and take action if necessary;
- the Commission should assess the value of VAT recovery systems and real-time VAT returns for vulnerable households;
- the Member States should design their national tax systems to promote prosperity, equality and social inclusion and should more effectively redistribute income and wealth through fair taxation;
- the Commission to analyse a temporary excess profit tax on other sectors for future crises to curb the oligopolistic power of certain companies and boost competitiveness;
- the demand to implement concrete policies, timelines and measures in order to phase out fossil fuel subsidies through tax measures as soon as possible;
- the Commission and the Council should continually assess how any revenue stemming from new temporary crisis taxation mechanisms should enter the EU budget (whether as own resources or other revenue);
- the Commission should review the taxation of air and sea transport to align them with the Green Deal objectives and create a level playing field with other modes of transport, such as road and rail transport;
- a multilateral initiative at the OECD Inclusive Forum to introduce minimum carbon price standards , would be welcomed; Members called for the creation of an international climate club to help countries advance towards a global carbon-pricing framework;
- the Commission should put in place an EU-wide programme of cooperation and coordination among national tax authorities to tackle tax evasion related to the mechanisms of the informal economy;
- the Commission should to look into the gender pay gap situation from a tax perspective; calls on the Commission to assess existing data with respect to tax policy design and its impact on unpaid care work, use of public services, income and pension differentials and labour market participation;
- the Commission should continue the efforts to identify fresh, new and preferably genuine own resources and other revenue sources for the EU budget beyond the Interinstitutional Agreement.
Lastly, Members called for an additional permanent special instrument to be put in place over and above the ceilings of the multiannual financial framework, to allow the EU budget to better adapt and quickly react to crises and their social and economic effects on its Member States.
Documents
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0336/2023
- Committee opinion: PE751.786
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE751.573
- Committee draft report: PE749.076
- Committee draft report: PE749.076
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE751.573
- Committee opinion: PE751.786
Activities
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude GRUFFAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Role of tax policy in times of crisis – A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 19 – Am 5 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 19 – Am 1 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 19 – Am 2 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 22 – Am 6 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 22 – Am 3 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 25 – Am 4 #
A9-0336/2023 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) #
Amendments | Dossier |
239 |
2023/2058(INI)
2023/09/04
ECON
212 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that the excess profit taxes in place in some Member States are temporary and limited measures to tackle the inflationary pressure; considers that Member States must regularly screen the proportionality, adequacy and effectiveness of such taxes; calls on the Commission to assess the framework of these taxes and their compatibility with EU primary and secondary Law with an EU-wide evaluation; warns against the risks of taking private investment away from projects linked to the twin transition by excessively taxing the "excess profits";
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned that the impact of temporary VAT reductions for end consumers was limited and was more pronounced for companies that increased their profit margins because of these reductions;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned that the impact of temporary VAT reductions for end consumers was limited
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned that the impact of temporary VAT reductions for end consumers was limited in some cases and was more pronounced for companies that increased their profit margins because of these reductions;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that since the start of the energy crisis in September 2021, EUR 646 billion has been allocated and earmarked across Member States to shield consumers from the rising energy costs, of which €265 billion has been earmarked by Germany alone6a; highlights that Member States have prioritised untargeted measures on prices, such as cuts to excise duties and VAT, compared to targeted income-support measures which have proven more direct efficiency; _________________ 6a Sgaravatti, G., S. Tagliapietra, C. Trasi and G. Zachmann (2021) National policies to shield consumers from rising energy prices’, Bruegel Datasets, first published 4 November 2021, available at https://www.bruegel.org/dataset/national- policies-shield-consumers-rising-energy- prices
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Alerts on the fairness concerns that may arise from tax cuts benefiting to fossils fuels which could translate into increasing the profit margins of fossil fuel and extractive large companies in times where vulnerable households may need more direct and targeted support; recalls its support to the temporary solidarity contribution for the fossil fuel sector as established by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas tax policy is an important instrument to finance national fiscal policies that support the economic recovery but also to uphold private initiative and investment; whereas taxation should not be an obstacle to citizens, families and companies to invest and, therefore, it shall be limited on the rates, be simple and accessible on the administrative field and be stable and predictable on its legal design;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Respects that each Member State is entitled to set its tax mix according to its needs, especially in the social and economic area, however, regrets that, in the overall tax mix, environmental taxation remains underutilised in
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that, in the overall tax mix, environmental taxation remains underutilised in the EU;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is concerned that large-scale corporate tax avoidance continues to deprive governments of revenue needed to address the cost of living crisis and worsening inequalities, and at the same time to finance high-quality public services, as well as climate action, sustainable development and humanitarian responses; Notes that a number of Member States continuously play a role in enabling corporate tax avoidance;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to consider the ‘COVID-19 precedent’ for the taxation of cross-border workers as regards the tax treatment of Ukrainian refugees, which would entail disregarding the additional days spent in the host country for the calculation of the 183-day rule; recommends that the Member States’ national tax authorities offer tax guidance to refugees and significantly reduce administrative complications; underlines the importance and clear added value of cooperation between EU Member States and Ukraine in the field of taxation; considers that national tax authorities, through Fiscalis, can put in place an effective communication channel with the Ukrainian national tax authority; calls on Member States to consider the creation of such communication and cooperation channel;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to consider the ‘COVID-19 precedent’ for the taxation of cross-border workers as regards the tax treatment of Ukrainian refugees, which would entail disregarding the additional days spent in the host country for the calculation of the 183-day rule; recommends that the Member States’ national tax authorities offer tax guidance to refugees
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recognises that climate change and other external shocks, together with the digital revolution and the possibility of teleworking, are causing population displacement within the EU; underlines the right to free movement of people recognised in the Treaties and, nevertheless, acknowledges the impact that this movement has on the public finances of Member States; considers it inappropriate for the tax treatment of the exercise of the right to free movement to be agreed bilaterally between Member States and regrets the fact that, even though we are facing a common challenge, there is no common response at EU level;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on Member States to consider a significant reduction on personal income taxes and corporate income tax taking advantage of the extraordinary amount of tax revenues that resulted from the effects of inflationary pressure; recommends that such reduction on personal income taxation is focused in lowest income households;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on Member States to consider a significant reduction on personal income tax rates, namely through the limitation of such rate at 15% to young people under 35 years old, in order to support younger households, conditions for investment and entrepreneurship, youth emancipation and tackle the "brain drain";
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and holistic analysis of its tax systems; points out, at the same time, that tax policy is a matter for the Member States and that EU action, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, should consist of coordinating and supporting the policies of the Member States, not bailing them out or formulating tax priorities;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by citizens and the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and holistic analysis of its tax
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU Member States should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and holistic analysis of
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthen the resilience of Member States’ tax systems by making them progressive, future and crisis proof, including through the simplification of their national tax systems; calls for the Commission to come forward with a tax proposal under Article 116 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to solve specific tax distortions in the Member States
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas EU past experience showed the limits of fiscal consolidation, namely on public debt sustainability; whereas debating further options of revenues through fair taxation should complement the current debate on EU fiscal rules;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthen the Member States’ tax systems by making them future and crisis proof
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthen the Member States’ tax systems by making them future and crisis proof, including th
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthen the Member States’ tax systems by making them future and crisis proof
Amendment 135 #
10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthen the Member States’ tax systems by making them future and crisis proof, including through the simplification of their national tax systems; calls for the Commission to come forward with a tax proposal under Article 11
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the temporary VAT reductions applied in Member States and to take measures if deemed necessary; calls on the Commission to issue guidance on the best tools to provide targeted income support to vulnerable households without creating distortions within the Union; calls on the Commission to assess the efficiency of VAT cash back systems and the feasibility of replacing VAT exemptions and reduced rates with VAT returned in real time to vulnerable households;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the temporary VAT reductions applied in Member States and to take measures if deemed necessary; Calls on the Commission to assess the different price control schemes carried out by Member States to support the development of measures to protect consumers, especially vulnerable households;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the temporary tax incentives, including VAT reductions, applied in Member States and their impact on the EU Single Market and competitiveness, and to take measures if deemed necessary;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas tax policy has a fundamental role in times of crisis because it can be used to free citizens from excessive tax, administrative and legal burdens that block the much needed private investment to support economic recovery;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the temporary VAT reductions applied in Member States
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recognises that tax incentives are tools at the disposal of governments to support a variety of goals, including fostering investments, addressing externalities and curbing behaviour; alerts on the fact that such tax incentives can be costly, and if poorly designed, may fail to achieve their intended goals, lead to windfall gains for investors, and compromise public finances; therefore calls on the Commission to produce guidelines on how to design fair and transparent tax incentives while preventing a market distortion; calls on the Member States to favour incentives that are expenditure-based, limited in time, regularly assessed, and repealed in case of no positive impact, limited in geographical scope and rather partial than full exemptions; considers that all incentives should aim at fostering equality between and within countries as well as the green and digital transformation;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. In times of crisis and in the light of current and future economic and climate challenges, the EU and its companies need a well-functioning tax system providing clarity and predictability. For this purpose, the future BEFIT proposal designing a new single EU corporate tax rulebook should be key in reducing administrative burdens, removing tax obstacles, limiting opportunities for tax evasion and creating a more business-friendly environment within the single market.
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Highlights that the OECD/G20 Pillars, introducing a global minimum effective tax rate for large multinationals, will limit the scope of tax reduction incentives and increase global corporate tax collections, create fiscal space for governments, place limits on tax competition and contribute to reducing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) activity; however notes that such minimum tax rate is not applicable to companies having a yearly turnover below EUR 750 million; deplores the recent guidance of the OECD expanding the scope of qualifying tax credits, increasing the risks of a tax credits race and revenues losses 12a; _________________ 12a OECD (2023) Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy – Administrative Guidance on the Global Anti Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two)
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that environmental taxes and well-designed incentives have the potential to both cover the need for additional revenues and support a carbon- free economy;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that environmental taxes and well-designed incentives have the potential to both cover the need for additional revenues and support a carbon- free economy; calls on the Member States to finally agree on the proposed revision of the Energy Taxation Directive,11 taking into account the needs of individual Member States; _________________ 11 Commission proposal of 14 July 2021
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that environmental taxes and well-designed incentives have the potential to both cover the need for additional revenues and support a carbon- free economy;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Reiterates the importance of the OECD BEPS project; recalls that the U.S. asked for the removal of the digital service act during the BEPS negotiations; regrets the current political situation in the United States that frustrates the implementation of Pillar 1; reminds that the implementation of Pillar 1 is a prerequisite for not imposing new digital service taxes; takes the position that in the case that the United States has not implemented pillar 1 before December 31 2024, Commission should implement a digital services tax; asks the commission to prepare for this scenario;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas tax policy is a national competence under the EU treaties and the European legislation must be focused on the legislative coordination and administrative cooperation;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes that in current challenging economic climate, the sustainable tax revenue is crucial; highlights the need to focus on reduction of tax frauds and evasion, especially in the area of indirect taxation; calls on the Member States to use the current tools more effectively or to introduce the new ones in order to eliminate fraudulent practices as much as possible;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Regrets that Member States such as Portugal, Germany and Malta designed tax benefits specifically targeted to attract crypto-assets leading to harmful tax practices and losses of tax revenues;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; considers that the Member States should more effectively redistribute income and wealth through the taxation of capital gains, property and wealth; supports calls to start international-level negotiations to establish a progressive wealth tax, in the same vein as the OECD/G20 global tax deal for corporations; recalls its demand to the Commission and the Member States to take the lead in the OECD, and in particular in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, to create a level playing field in taxation of capital gains and to limit harmful tax practices aimed at attracting foreign-earned income, wealth and assets;
Amendment 156 #
13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; c
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; considers that the Member States should more effectively redistribute income and wealth through the taxation of capital gains, property and wealth;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; considers that the Member States should more effectively redistribute income and wealth through the taxation of capital gains, property and wealth; calls on the Commission to play a more active role in these areas; supports calls to start international-level negotiations to establish a progressive wealth tax, in the same vein as the OECD/G20 global tax deal for corporations;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; c
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; considers that the Member States should more effectively redistribute income and wealth through the taxation of
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the registration of the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) on ‘Taxing great wealth to finance the ecological and social transition' on the basis of Article 115 TFEU; highlights that in its decision for registration, the Commission acknowledged that the request does not fall outside the framework of the Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties13a; _________________ 13a Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1487 of 11 July 2023 on the request for registration of the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Taxing great wealth to finance the ecological and social transition’ https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?pk_campaign=todays_ OJ&pk_cid=EURLEX_todaysOJ&pk_con tent=Other&pk_keyword=Citizen+initiativ e+&pk_medium=TW&pk_source=EURL EX&uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2023.182.01.0 197.01.ENG ]
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Notes that the EU should lead in taxing more effectively capital gains and wealth; Observes the proposals put forward in the United States in this regard; Calls on Member States to introduce wealth taxes; Calls on the EU Code of Conduct to assess harmful tax practices to attract high net worth individuals in Member States;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Takes the view that, as the recent crisis have clearly shown that not all companies or citizens are harmed in the same way, the targeted tax policy can deliver better results than a more general approach, and that tax measures taken by Member States should in future be targeted at those who really need them;
Amendment 165 #
13b. Calls on the Commission to consider submitting a proposal for a solidarity levy on great levels of wealth to provide for funding to mitigate the great challenges of our times, notably the upward social convergence, including equality between men and women, the fight against climate change and the sustainable development of developing economies;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Points out that digitalization are making the taxpayers and tax bases of all types of tax increasingly mobile; notes that this could reinforce the tendency to rely on immobile tax bases; emphasises that such tendency leads to severe unequal outcomes for ordinary citizens;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Notes that inflationary shocks can indirectly increase the level of personal income tax in real terms considering that tax brackets are set in nominal terms (hidden taxation); calls on all Member States to automatically adjust personal income tax brackets to inflation to ensure the level of taxation remains constant if there is no political decision to change the level of taxation
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the adopted solidarity contribution in the EU; regrets, however, its limited scope and short time span;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the adopted solidarity contribution in the EU; regrets, however, its limited scope and short time span; calls on the Commission to consider a
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the adopted solidarity contribution in the EU;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the adopted solidarity contribution in the EU;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Highlights specifically the case of the windfall profits of the banking sector as a consequence of the current monetary policy and a high level of market concentration; Stresses that according to the economist Eric Dor, a deposit facility rate of 3 % – the rate in March 2023 – means that banks in the euro zone will make no less than 122 billion euros per year in revenue from the liquid assets they have placed in central banks; Reminds that the ECB raised its rates since then to 3,75%, meaning a even higher value of revenues; Highlights that according to the same economist, this effortless profit would amount to 183 billion euros per year for a rate of 4.5 % - which will be attained if ECB continues the cycle of restrictive monetary policy; Stresses that a growing number of countries is taxing such profits, namely Czech Republic, France, Italy, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines the potential of the BEFIT initiative to provide clarity and predictability for companies, as well as sustainable tax revenues, which would help Member States to face current and future crises; recognises that simplifying the complexity of tax systems would reduce the administrative burden for SMEs and would attract foreign direct investment, thus improving the efficiency of the systems and the revenue available;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Notes, in addition to the increased share of profit units contributing to domestic inflation, the growing repurchase of corporate stock (share buyback) in the Union; notes that the US Inflation Reduction Act foresees a tax equal to 1% of the fair market value of any stock of the corporation which is repurchased by such corporation during the taxable year and that it is expected to generate $79bn in ten years; calls on the Commission to assess the feasibility of a similar excise duty for the Union to disincentives the growing phenomenon of share buybacks that rewards shareholders instead of fostering new investments;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to review the taxation of air and maritime transport to align it with the goal of decarbonisation and the promotion of cleaner transport solutions; recalls that the creation of tax frameworks for maritime and air transport increases the prices of products and goods, which has an impact on the final consumer;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Regrets the political stall of the USA to apply Pillar 1 of the OECD/G20 agreement and underlines the consequential lack of 7 to 15% of the revenues needed to pay back the RRF8a;Calls for the Commission to come up with an alternative digital levy; _________________ 8a EU Tax Observatory - The Long Road to Pillar One Implementation: Impact of Global Minimum Thresholds for Key Countries on the Effective Implementation of the Reform
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas rising corporate profits account for almost half of the increase in inflation in the EU over the past two years
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a multilateral initiative at the
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Recalls its resolution of 20 October 2022 on COP27, calling on the European Commission to engage with major CO2 emitters outside the EU in creating an international climate club; recalls the CBAM agreement of December 2022 stressing the need for bilateral, multilateral and international cooperation with third countries and reiterates its calls for setting up a climate club to promote global implementation of ambitious climate action and to help countries advance towards a global carbon-pricing framework;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Observes with concern that private jet flights have exponentially increased in the EU in the past few crisis years; calls for an EU-wide prohibitive tax on private jets; calls on the Commission to consider in general progressive carbon taxes; urges Member States to finally conclude the negotiations on the revision of the Energy Taxation directive;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Observes with concern that private jet flights have exponentially increased in the EU in the past few crisis years; calls for an EU-wide
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to put in place an EU-wide programme of cooperation and coordination among national tax authorities to tackle the tax evasion related to the mechanisms of informal economy, sharing good practices and benchmarking adopted solutions at the national level;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Calls on the Commission to increase the financing of the Fiscalis programme and to promote its reform in order to transform this network in a true space of benchmarking and sharing of good practices, namely in the field of administrative simplification and strategies to tackle tax fraud and evasion;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Recommends to the Member States with progressive systems on what regards personal income taxation to consider a solution of automatic legal adaptation of tax brackets according to inflation;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 d (new) 17d. Calls on the Commission to conduct a comparative study on the tax incentives applied across Europe; calls on the Fiscalis network to support the Commission on this task and to promote a comprehensive debate on the effectiveness of such incentives and their adequacy to the political objectives pursued;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 e (new) 17e. Recommends to the Member States to consider tax exemptions on productivity bonus in order to promote higher productivity levels with proper incentives to workers that can increase their income through these bonus;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Observes that eliminating tax- related disincentives for female employment and unequal distribution of
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Observes that eliminating
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Observes that eliminating tax- related disincentives for female employment and unequal distribution of paid and unpaid work is one of the
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses the importance of EU funds to face common crises and challenges; calls for increasing EU own resources by using a portion of tax revenue in order to allow the EU more flexibility to mobilise enough funds in times of crises;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas some analysis show that rising corporate profits account for almost half of the increase in inflation in the EU over the past two years, as companies increased prices by more than the spiking costs of imported energy;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to look into the gender pay gap situation from a tax perspective;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls on the Commission to conduct an extensive assessment on the added value of EU legislation in the field of taxation and the consequences of consecutive changes in the legal framework, namely on the costs incurred by citizens and companies to comply with volatile legal regimes; asks the Commission to abstain from proposing new initiatives when new obligations can represent an excessive tax and/or administrative burden;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Regrets that the Commission did not presented the announced recommendation on EU Taxpayers Rights - Simplified Procedures for Better Tax Compliance, although it conducted a public consultation in order to present such act in the third quarter of 2021; calls on the Commission to present this recommendation without any delay;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas rising corporate profits account for almost
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas ECB raised interest rates to a 22-year high of 3,75% in July; whereas the current cycle of restrictive monetary policy is still ongoing; whereas the full set of economic and social consequences are yet to be fully assessed, such as further pressure on the EU and national budgets, on the stability of the financial system, and hardships for households;
Amendment 24 #
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas one of the distinctive features of an era in which the economy is being digitalised is the growing trend of cross-
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the growing trend of cross- border teleworkers, including digital nomads, has created difficulties for the
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the growing trend of cross- border teleworkers, including digital nomads, has created
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas over the years, in cases of some Member States, the tax incidence has shifted from wealth to
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas in total, the composition of the tax mix in the EU remained broadly stable in the 2004-2019 period, while the overall level of tax revenue slightly increased; whereas the composition of the tax mix (relative shares of labour, consumption, capital, environmental and other taxes) varies significantly in the EU, with some Member States having a more growth-friendly tax mix than others;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the composition of the tax mix (relative shares of labour, consumption, capital and other taxes) varies significantly in the EU from Member State to Member State with some Member States having a more growth- friendly tax mix than others;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU Member States rely disproportionately on labour income taxes, social contributions and indirect taxes, such as the value added tax (VAT); whereas labour taxation remains substantial across the European Union, tax rates on corporate profits have plummeted by more than half since the 1980s, according to OECD and European Commission statistics;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU Member States
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU Member States rely
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas in order to enhance the performance of the single market, tax coordination among the Member States is essential for further integration, always bearing in mind that Member States are free to determine their own tax policies within the limits of the EU Treaties;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas women face implicit tax biases, as they typically rely more on labour income than capital income and spend a higher proportion of their income on consumption; whereas in the EU, secondary earners are predominantly women, earning on average about one third of the household’s joint income; whereas in many EU countries, such as France and Portugal, the secondary earners are penalized by income taxation because the total income of the household is taxed jointly; whereas in many EU countries, such as France, child support is taxed as any other labour income, and more than capital income; whereas women rely on public services to a greater extent;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas crises amplify and exacerbate pre-existing structural inequalities, including gender inequalities; whereas women were more impacted by economic insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic; whereas adequately resourced public services play a vital role in supporting and protecting women during times of crises;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Europe, as well as the rest of the globe, is facing environmental challenges of unprecedented scale and urgency;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas concerns have been raised about the potential double taxation of Ukrainian refugees who continue to perform their duties for their Ukrainian employer while working remotely from their host countries and about the lack of a common EU approach on this matter; whereas double taxation in general remains a problem for all involuntarily displaced individuals affected by double taxation, and hence should be tackled jointly by a common EU approach;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas concerns have been raised about the potential double taxation of
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas concerns have been raised about the potential double taxation of Ukrainian refugees who continue to perform their duties for their Ukrainian employer while working remotely from their host countries, and
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas VAT rates have been reduced across crisis-stricken sectors and on basic goods to dampen the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and high inflation; whereas this decision did not yield the benefits expected in most cases;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU econom
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas Europe as well as the rest of the globe is facing environmental challenges of unprecedented scale and urgency;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas the polluter pays principle’s coverage and application in the EU is fragmented and incomplete;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H c (new) Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the number of private jet flights in Europe increased by 64 % between 2021 and 2022; whereas
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the number of private jet flights in Europe increased by 64 % between 2021 and 2022; whereas carbon- dioxide emissions from private flights more than doubled in that period; whereas wealthy individuals rely at a far higher rate on private jets, causing disproportionately higher carbon dioxide emissions;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas in particular the wealthy parts of society have ecological footprints beyond the planetary carrying capacity 3a _________________ 3a https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ global-sustainability/article/unequal- distribution-of-household-carbon- footprints-in-europe-and-its-link-to- sustainability/F1ED4F705AF1C6C1FCA D477398353DC2
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic recovery and the climate crisis increase the need to mobilise more resources, increase public investment and re-evaluate current taxation policies in the Member States;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas between 2020 and 2022, the shipping industry generated as much profit as it had during the previous six decades combined; whereas it still faces low global taxation; whereas the OECD/G20 agreement on multinationals exempted this sector;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas between 2020 and 2022, the shipping industry generated as much profit as it had during the previous six decades combined;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas air and maritime transport are the main drivers of international trade and facilitate the global distribution of goods; whereas the creation of a specific tax framework for those sectors would have an impact on the price of products and, consequently, on the final consumer; whereas the tax system for those sectors should seek not to penalise but to encourage the application of technological solutions aimed at decarbonising the sector and promoting the use of clean energy;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas SMEs are especially affected by the complexities of the tax system, in particular tax compliance, compared to MNEs; whereas estimated tax compliance costs for large companies amount to about 2% of taxes paid, while for SMEs the estimate is about 30% of taxes paid1a; _________________ 1a European Commission 15.7.2020 – Communication on an Action Plan for Fair and Simple Taxation Supporting the Recovery Strategy, p. 6
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas SMEs are especially affected by the complexities of the tax system, in particular tax compliance, compared to MNEs; whereas tax avoidance by MNEs undermines the level playing field between MNEs and SMEs;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas SMEs are especially
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas SMEs are especially affected by the complexities of the tax system and the high costs of regulatory compliance, in particular tax compliance, compared to MNEs;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the informal economy represents an exorbitant part of the EU Member States economy, although national realities are significantly different among them; whereas this scenario means that an inordinate part of due taxes are lost to tax evasion;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K b (new) Kb. whereas the complexity of national tax systems and the bureaucracy involved in taxation-related matters are excessive and represent a significant administrative burden that is an overwhelming cost for citizens, families and companies;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic recovery
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe shocks, an ageing population and challenges related to the green transition, the digital transformation of their labour markets and the existing tax gap9 , all of which emphasise the need for large public investments in order to achieve a sustainable economic recovery, mobilise private capital and attract entrepreneurship;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe shocks, an ageing population and challenges related to the green transition, the digital transformation of their labour markets and the existing tax gap9, all of which emphasise the need for
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe shocks, an ageing population and challenges related to the green transition, the digital transformation of their labour markets and the existing tax gap9, all of which emphasise the need
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe shocks, an ageing population and challenges related to the green transition, the digital transformation of their labour markets and the existing tax gap9 , all of which emphasise the need for
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that during times of crises, the need as well as the associated burden on public resources is heightened, underlining the necessity for all societal actors to contribute their fair share; highlights the inconsistency in companies evading their governmental responsibilities during prosperous times while seeking financial assistance during periods of crises; calls upon the commission to propose a framework through which companies that evade their tax responsibility are prohibited from receiving subsidies;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe economic impact on every national account across the European Union, notes that Members States are still confronted with significant imbalances in state revenue; notes that such imbalances can partially be corrected by raising adequate revenues;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock and inflation are highly regressive, with the poorest households being hit the hardest; observes that effective tax rates rose significantly for families with children, particularly at lower income levels10 ; notes with concern that gender inequality worsened during the pandemic; and regrets that the recent crises have also significantly affected the EU SMEs; _________________ 10 OECD, ‘Double blow for workers as
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock and inflation are highly regressive, with the poorest households being hit the hardest; observes that effective tax rates rose significantly for families with children, particularly at lower income levels10;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock and inflation, as well as the costs of the green transition, are highly regressive, with the poorest households being hit the hardest; observes that effective tax rates rose significantly for families with children, particularly at lower income levels10; notes with concern that gender inequality worsened during the pandemic; _________________ 10 OECD, ‘Double blow for workers as
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that, despite the increased tax revenue registered in some Member States due to the effects of inflation - namely on indirect taxes -, in most Member States this window of opportunity to lower tax rates without compromising the stability of public finances was not taken;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that COVID-19 financial aid in the form of tax deductions and tax credits had a limited impact on those in the greatest need, such as the unemployed, students, pensioners, unreported workers and part-time workers, and has only marginally helped the SME sector, whose very existence was threatened by prolonged lockdowns, resulting in a long- term and persistent weakening of this sector of the economy;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that COVID-19 financial aid in the form of tax deductions and tax credits helped many companies to overcome the negative consequences of the COVID-19 crisis, however, had a limited impact on those in the greatest need, such as the unemployed, students, pensioners, unreported workers and part- time workers;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that COVID-19 financial aid in the form of tax deductions and tax credits ha
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic recovery and the climate crisis increase the need to mobilise more resources and
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes with concern that inflation has been partially driven by some companies increasing their profit margins
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes with concern that high inflation has been
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the fact that that MNEs that realise excess profits in times of crisis and wealthy individuals who realise significant capital gains through speculation are often undertaxed; Is concerned that insufficient transparency, information exchange and administrative cooperation undermine states’ ability to adequately tax profits, wealth and capital gains8a _________________ 8a European Court of Auditors, ‘Exchanging tax information in the EU: solid foundation, cracks in the implementation’, p5, March 2021,
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the fact that that MNEs that
source: 751.573
2023/09/05
BUDG
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Holds that the EU budget’s investment policy and its multiannual programming are a potentially stabilising factor, helping to ensur
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Is highly concerned that large- scale corporate tax avoidance continues to deprive governments of revenue needed to address the cost of living crisis and worsening inequalities, and at the same time to finance high-quality public services, as well as climate action, sustainable development and humanitarian responses; notes that a number of Member States continuously plays a role in enabling corporate tax avoidance;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes with concern the increase in income inequality, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; stresses the need for a more effective and fair redistribution of income and wealth through the taxation of capital gains, property and wealth; calls on the Commission to propose a progressive EU wealth tax and to support calls to start negotiations for such a tax at international level;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the EU should lead in taxing more effectively capital gains and wealth; calls on Member States to introduce wealth taxes; calls on the EU Code of Conduct to assess harmful tax practices to attract high net worth individuals in Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Regrets the limited scope and short time span of the EU solidarity contribution; calls on the Commission to propose a permanent excess profit tax on all sectors, in light of growing evidence that inflation is significantly driven by excess corporate profits;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Points out that digitalization is making the taxpayers and tax bases of all types of tax increasingly mobile; notes that this could reinforce the tendency to rely on immobile tax bases which could leads to severe unequal outcomes for ordinary citizens;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Holds that the EU budget’s investment policy and its multiannual programming are a potentially stabilising factor, ensuring that certain long-term investments that enhance
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for a
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that windfall profits do not correspond to any regular profits that large firms would or could have expected to obtain under normal circumstances, had unpredictable events, such as the recent Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine not taken place; reiterates its support for measures taxing all sectors profiteering off the global crises; stresses that the revenues of windfall profits should benefit consumers and businesses, in particular in support of vulnerable households and SMEs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore the possibility of using the EU budget’s expenditure and revenue mechanisms as response instruments and for redistribution purposes during symmetrical and asymmetrical crises, such
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore the possibility of using the EU budget’s expenditure and revenue mechanisms as response instruments and for redistribution purposes during symmetrical and asymmetrical crises, such as through a permanent fiscal capacity for the euro area, and a solidarity mechanism for Member States outside of the euro area.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore the possibility of using the EU budget’s expenditure and revenue mechanisms as response instruments and for redistribution purposes during symmetrical and asymmetrical crises
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Holds that the EU budget’s investment policy and its multiannual programming are a
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the own resources system already includes mechanisms that can be considered modest automatic stabilisers during asymmetrical crises, namely the value added tax-based own resource and the gross national income- based own resource;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the own resources system
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that Europe as well as the rest of the world is facing climate and environmental challenges of unprecedented scale and urgency; deplores that the polluter pays principle’s coverage and application in the EU is fragmented and incomplete, while the environmental taxes remain marginal in the total tax revenues across the EU and thus falling short of environmental taxation potential to help to fight climate change and protect nature;
source: 752.742
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure rejected |
events/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/2/summary |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting dateNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
forecasts/1 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/2/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/1 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
commission |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|