Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) | STAVROU Eleni ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA Adrián ( Renew) | Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 550 votes to 55, with 6 abstentions, to grant the Registrar of the Court of Justice discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2022.
In its resolution, adopted by 525 votes to 69 with 9 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations:
In its Annual Report for the financial year 2022, states that it did not identify any specific issues concerning the CJEU. Members noted that 14 (23 %) of the 60 transactions contained errors but that the Court of Auditors, based on the five errors which were quantified, estimates the level of error to be below the materiality threshold.
Budgetary and financial management
The overall budget allocated for the CJEU for 2022 amounted to EUR 467 900 000 , an increase from EUR 444 049 000 in 2021 and in 2020, equivalent to an increase of 5.4 % from 2021 to 2022, and that 79 % of the budget in 2022 was used for its members and staff, 14 % for buildings, 6 % for IT and 1 % for other expenditure. The general mission budget of the CJEU declined from EUR 405 000 in 2021 to EUR 390 000 in 2022, equivalent to a reduction of 3.7 %, which was primarily due to changes in working methods with a larger number of remote meetings.
Members noted that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine in various ways created budgetary pressures for the CJEU, including through rising inflation and salary adjustments, strongly increasing energy costs and costs for a number of goods and services.
Internal management, performance and internal control
In 2022, for the Court of Justice, 68 % of new cases were references for preliminary rulings, 24 % were appeals against decisions of the General Court, and 4 % were actions against Member States for failure to fulfil obligations. In addition, the resolution stated that, in 2022, for the General Court, 46 % of new cases concerned actions for annulment of acts of Union institutions, 30 % concerned actions relating to intellectual property, and 7 % concerned disputes between institutions of the Union and their staff.
The number of cases brought before the two courts in 2022 is comparable to that of the previous year (1 710 cases in 2022 as compared to 1 720 in 2021). The resolution noted that, together, the Court of Justice and the General Court were able to complete 1 666 cases in 2022, compared to 1 723 in 2021, which corresponds to the average in recent years (1 692 cases per year between 2018 and 2021). The total number of pending cases is increasing, with 2 585 cases pending in 2022 compared to 2 541 in 2021.
Human resources
Members noted with concern that the Court of Justice and the General Court continue to have a very unbalanced gender composition and that of the eight new Judges taking office in the General Court in 2022, five were men and three were women. For senior management, the gender distribution was nine men and six women, equivalent to 60 % mem and 40 % women. There is also an overrepresentation of Union nationalities represented on the staff of the CJEU with French nationals accounting for 22 % of overall staff. The CJEU is encouraged to support a multilingual working environment. All necessary measures should be taken to ensure the wellbeing of its staff in order to bring the number of cases associated with burnout down.
Ethical framework and transparency
Members continue to appreciate the reforms made in 2021 concerning the members of the Court of Justice and of the General Court concerning their code of conduct and the declarations of interest which together with the new requirements for the curriculum vitae of the members represents an improvement in the transparency of the CJEU. They are, nevertheless, of the opinion that the validity and usefulness of the declarations of interest could be improved through some kind of verification and quality control.
Members welcomed the publication of the list of external activities carried out by Members of the Court of Justice and the General Court, but recommend that it be made more informative for the general public.
Members noted that no new investigations involving the CJEU were opened by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in 2022, and that four cases dealt with by the European Ombudsman concerning the CJEU found no maladministration. There were no cases of whistleblowing at the CJEU in 2022 and no cases of conflict of interest were detected.
The Court is called on to finalise and adopt a new code of conduct with no delay, in line with requests from previous discharge cycles.
Interinstitutional cooperation
Members welcomed that the CJEU has a wide range of service level agreements with other Union institutions which helps reduce costs for the institutions involved and ensures that similar procedures, techniques and work flows are used across the institutions. They noted with appreciation that the CJEU, together with all other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, have entered into a joint procurement for the supply of accident insurance.
The resolution noted enhanced cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO).
Digitisation, cyber security and data protection
Members welcomed the fact that the CJEU sped up the implementation of an integrated case management system (SIGA), which will allow it to work on an entirely digital, secure and integrated workflow. They welcomed that the CJEU decided to no longer use cloud platforms for sensitive judicial data. They welcomed the CJEU's consideration of how and to what extent digital technologies should be used in its work and the CJEU's commitment to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into its work and the adoption of a comprehensive AI strategy in July 2023.
Communication
Lastly, the resolution noted that, in 2022, the budget for communications, covering content preparation and printing of internal and external publications was EUR 527 500, equivalent to an increase of 3.3 % from 2021.
Regarding transparency, Members noted with appreciation that, in 2022, the CJEU started a streaming service of the case hearings assigned to the Grand Chamber, providing the public with an opportunity to have a better understanding of how the CJEU works. The CJEU is encouraged to widen this initiative to ensure more transparency.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Luke Ming FLANAGAN (The Left, IE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, Section IV – Court of Justice of the European Union.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Registrar of the Court of Justice discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the financial year 2022.
Budgetary and financial management
The report noted that the overall budget allocated for the CJEU for 2022 amounted to EUR 467 900 000, an increase from EUR 444 049 000 in 2021 and in 2020, equivalent to an increase of 5.4 % from 2021 to 2022, and that 79 % of the budget in 2022 was used for its members and staff, 14 % for buildings, 6 % for IT and 1 % for other expenditure.
Members noted that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine in various ways created budgetary pressures for the CJEU, including through rising inflation and salary adjustments, strongly increasing energy costs and costs for a number of goods and services.
Internal management, performance and internal control
In 2022, for the Court of Justice, 68 % of new cases were references for preliminary rulings, 24 % were appeals against decisions of the General Court, and 4 % were actions against Member States for failure to fulfil obligations. In addition, the report stated that, in 2022, for the General Court, 46 % of new cases concerned actions for annulment of acts of Union institutions, 30 % concerned actions relating to intellectual property, and 7 % concerned disputes between institutions of the Union and their staff.
The number of cases brought before the two courts in 2022 is comparable to that of the previous year (1 710 cases in 2022 as compared to 1 720 in 2021). The report noted that, together, the Court of Justice and the General Court were able to complete 1 666 cases in 2022, compared to 1 723 in 2021, which corresponds to the average in recent years (1 692 cases per year between 2018 and 2021). The total number of pending cases is increasing, with 2 585 cases pending in 2022 compared to 2 541 in 2021.
Human resources
The report noted with concern that the Court of Justice and the General Court continue to have a very unbalanced gender composition and that of the eight new Judges taking office in the General Court in 2022, five were men and three were women. There is also an overrepresentation of Union nationalities represented on the staff of the CJEU with French nationals accounting for 22 % of overall staff.
Ethical framework and transparency
Members continue to appreciate the reforms made in 2021 concerning the members of the Court of Justice and of the General Court concerning their code of conduct and the declarations of interest which together with the new requirements for the curriculum vitae of the members represents an improvement in the transparency of the CJEU. They are, nevertheless, of the opinion that the validity and usefulness of the declarations of interest could be improved through some kind of verification and quality control.
The Court is called on to finalise and adopt a new code of conduct with no delay, in line with requests from previous discharge cycles.
Interinstitutional cooperation
Members welcomed that the CJEU has a wide range of service level agreements with other Union institutions which helps reduce costs for the institutions involved and ensures that similar procedures, techniques and work flows are used across the institutions. They noted with appreciation that the CJEU, together with all other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, have entered into a joint procurement for the supply of accident insurance.
The report noted enhanced cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO).
Communication
Lastly, the report noted that, in 2022, the budget for communications, covering content preparation and printing of internal and external publications was EUR 527 500, equivalent to an increase of 3.3 % from 2021.
Regarding transparency, Members noted with appreciation that, in 2022, the CJEU started a streaming service of the case hearings assigned to the Grand Chamber, providing the public with an opportunity to have a better understanding of how the CJEU works. The CJEU is encouraged to widen this initiative to ensure more transparency.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0230/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06179/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0075/2024
- Committee opinion: PE753.556
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE758.199
- Committee draft report: PE753.480
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 04.10.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0060/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 04.10.2023, p. 0000 N9-0060/2023
- Committee draft report: PE753.480
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE758.199
- Committee opinion: PE753.556
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06179/2024
Votes
A9-0075/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision #
A9-0075/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 36 – Am 1 #
HU | BE | IT | PL | IE | CZ | LV | EE | DK | CY | DE | EL | NL | FI | LU | MT | HR | SE | SI | LT | FR | AT | PT | BG | SK | ES | RO | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
16
|
19
|
57
|
48
|
12
|
20
|
8
|
7
|
13
|
3
|
87
|
12
|
26
|
12
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
21
|
7
|
10
|
67
|
18
|
20
|
13
|
13
|
52
|
20
|
|
Verts/ALE |
64
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (22)Anna CAVAZZINI, Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG, Damian BOESELAGER, Daniel FREUND, Erik MARQUARDT, Hannah NEUMANN, Henrike HAHN, Jan OVELGÖNNE, Katrin LANGENSIEPEN, Manuela RIPA, Martin HÄUSLING, Michael BLOSS, Nico SEMSROTT, Niklas NIENASS, Patrick BREYER, Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA, Rasmus ANDRESEN, Reinhard BÜTIKOFER, Romeo FRANZ, Sergey LAGODINSKY, Ska KELLER, Terry REINTKE
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (10) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
||||||||||
ECR |
61
|
3
|
Italy ECRFor (7) |
Poland ECRFor (20)Adam BIELAN, Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA, Anna FOTYGA, Beata KEMPA, Beata MAZUREK, Bogdan RZOŃCA, Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Elżbieta KRUK, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI, Izabela-Helena KLOC, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Joanna KOPCIŃSKA, Karol KARSKI, Krzysztof JURGIEL, Rafał ROMANOWSKI, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA, Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI
Against (4)Abstain (1) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ECRAgainst (1) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Spain ECRAgainst (1) |
|||||||||||
The Left |
32
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany The LeftAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
France The LeftAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
4
|
Spain The LeftFor (6) |
|||||||||||||||
ID |
48
|
3
|
Italy IDFor (10)Against (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany IDFor (8) |
France IDFor (8)Against (7) |
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NI |
35
|
Hungary NIFor (9) |
1
|
Italy NIFor (7)Against (2) |
1
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
Slovakia NIFor (2)Against (2) |
Spain NIAgainst (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renew |
93
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Czechia RenewFor (2)Abstain (3) |
1
|
3
|
Denmark RenewFor (2)Against (4) |
Germany RenewAgainst (7) |
1
|
Netherlands RenewFor (2)Against (4) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
France RenewAgainst (17) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
Romania RenewAgainst (5) |
|||||
S&D |
116
|
4
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (3)Against (7) |
Poland S&DFor (1)Against (6) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Germany S&DFor (1)Against (13) |
1
|
Netherlands S&DFor (3)Against (3) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
2
|
France S&DAgainst (6) |
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (8) |
2
|
Spain S&DAgainst (13) |
Romania S&DFor (4)Against (4) |
||
PPE |
147
|
1
|
Belgium PPEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Poland PPEFor (2)Against (12) |
Ireland PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Czechia PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany PPEFor (4)Against (24)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Markus FERBER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Niclas HERBST,
Niels GEUKING,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan BERGER,
Sven SIMON
|
Greece PPEAgainst (4) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Lithuania PPEFor (1)Against (3) |
France PPEAgainst (3) |
Austria PPEFor (2)Against (5) |
Portugal PPEFor (2)Against (4) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Romania PPEAgainst (6) |
A9-0075/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) #
Amendments | Dossier |
14 |
2023/2132(DEC)
2023/11/06
JURI
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Takes note of the institution's return to normal after two difficult years marked by the COVID-19 pandemic; in this respect, welcomes the continued use of technological tools put in place in response to the pandemic;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Appreciates the makeover of the CJEU’s Annual Report with a view to
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the efficient functioning of the system for translating written documents into 24 languages; in this respect, notes that, in 2022, 1 279 000 out of a total 1 281 000 pages were translated;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the fact that the proportion of women in managerial posts remains at a high level (40% in 2022 as in
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the fact that the proportion of women in both managerial posts
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the number of cases brought before the two courts in 2022 is comparable to that of the previous year (1 710 cases in 2022, as against 1 720 in 2021) and underlines that, together, the Court of Justice and the General Court were able to complete 1 666 cases in 2022 ( 1 723 in 2021), which corresponds to the average in recent years (1 692 cases per year between 2018 and 2021); notes, however, that the total number of pending cases is increasing, with 2 585 cases pending in 2022 compared to 2 541 in 2021;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that most of the cases pending at the Court of Justice relate to the area of freedom, security and justice, followed by approximation of laws, taxation, consumer protection and social policy;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes that most of the cases pending at the Court relate to intellectual and industrial property, state aid policy and economic and monetary policy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes the accelerating digitalisation of the CJEU by introduction of the electronic signature, used to sign judgments and orders of the General Court;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting up of a streaming system for hearings of the Court of Justice which serves to strengthen the
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the setting up of a streaming system for hearings of the Court of Justice which serves to strengthen the CJEU’s ‘Citizen Court’ dimension through increased accessibility for the general public, allowing citizens to follow the Court's hearings under the same conditions as if they were physically present at the hearings in Luxembourg;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that digitalisation processes are accelerating and, in this context, welcomes the use of qualified electronic signatures for signing the Court's judgments and orders;
source: 755.997
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2023-12-04T00:00:00New
2024-02-06T00:00:00 |
docs/4 |
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/2 |
|
commission |
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
forecasts |
|