Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | SARVAMAA Petri ( EPP) | RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), CSEH Katalin ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | CANFIN Pascal ( Renew) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for the financial year 2022 and to approve the closure of the accounts for that year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors had stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the Authority's annual accounts for the financial year 2022 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Parliament adopted, by 554 votes to 50 with 6 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations which form an integral part of the discharge decision and which complement the general recommendations set out in the resolution on the performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.
Authority’s financial statements
The Authority's final budget for the financial year 2022 was EUR 149 841 816.93 , representing an increase of 15.99 % compared to 2021.
Budgetary and financial management
Budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2022 resulted in a budget implementation of current year commitment appropriation rate of 99.95 % representing a slight decrease of 0.04 % compared to 2021. The payment appropriations execution rate was at 89.77 % representing an increase of 0.92 % compared to 2021.
The lack of resources and posts for plant protection products regulatory authorities is noted which results in delays in approving low risk active substances and updating assessment methodologies according to scientific developments, which would lower the environmental impact of plant protection products in the long term. In this regard, Parliament called on the Commission to take appropriate steps to ensure that the Authority has sufficient resources and posts to support Member States to meet their deadline and to double the amount of assessments of active substances for plant protection products per year and to triple the speed of development of methodologies to keep risk assessments abreast of the latest scientific developments and in line with societal expectations.
Other observations
Parliament also made a number of observations concerning performance, staff policy, conflicts of interest and communication.
In particular, it noted that:
- the Authority implemented an integrated performance framework connecting resources and activities to outputs and expected results, complemented by a set of key performance indicators to monitor and drive performance. The performance against the targets set out in the Performance Framework reached an overall rate of 96 %;
- 2022 marked the first year of the implementation of the Authority’s 2027 Strategy addressing new evolving Union policies (in the longer term);
- on 31 December 2022, the establishment plan was 95.55 % implemented, with five officials and 382 temporary agents appointed out of 405 posts authorised under the Union budget (compared to 380 authorised posts in 2021);
- three cases of burnout were reported in 2022 by the medical service. The Authority is called on to continue promoting a healthy work-life balance among staff;
- the Authority identified and managed seven conflicts of interest at the level of annual declarations of interest pertaining to external experts. The Authority prevented them from participating in the scientific activity;
- the Authority increased its public visibility and online presence and invested in making its website multilingual, with artificial intelligence via the Commission’s eTranslation widget.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0250/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0129/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0129/2024
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06180/2024
- Committee opinion: PE754.679
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.221
- Committee draft report: PE753.519
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0096/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000 N9-0096/2023
- Committee draft report: PE753.519
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.221
- Committee opinion: PE754.679
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06180/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0129/2024
Votes
A9-0129/2024 – Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
12 |
2023/2151(DEC)
2023/12/04
ENVI
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that the EU’s risk assessment for genetically modified crops for food and feed is one of the strictest in the world, providing Member States and the public with many opportunities for input, and that products passing the Authority's independent safety assessment should have fair market access;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Welcomes EFSA's intention to strengthen joint data management with Member States and other agencies in order to improve data quality and interoperability (in line with the One Health approach);
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Welcomes the fact that EFSA, in cooperation with ECHA, has taken steps to promote the 'one substance - one assessment' principle to ensure greater consistency in the hazard and risk assessment of active substances;
Amendment 12 #
7. Recommends, based on the facts available, that discharge be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2022 if commitments are given in terms of independence policy and management of conflict of interests.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Considers that six years after the updating of the Authority’s independence policy, its limits in addressing properly the main independence loopholes have become evident; notes with concern that continuous controversies around conflicts of interest risk undermining the scientific reliability and credibility of the Authority; regrets that the new independence policy has not led to any tangible change in the Authority’s policy to select experts and in the working groups composition;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Calls on EFSA to expressly include national interests and political pressure in its independence policy definition of conflicts of interests and adopt a precise definition of ‘expert’ and ‘external expert’; calls on EFSA to ensure that all management and advisory members, their alternates and other experts have dutifully submitted the annual declarations of interest;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3 d. Notes that the sectors where conflicts of interests occur more often are ‘Animal Health and Welfare’ and ‘Pesticides’1c; calls EFSA to publish the names of experts giving testimony and opinions about the safety of chemicals used in foods; Calls on the Authority to publicly commit to carry out an independent and transparent risk assessment of glyphosate, taking into account all available scientific evidence from peer-reviewed independent literature; _________________ 1c Vos, E., Volpato, A., Bellenghi, G., 2023, Independence and transparency policies of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), publication for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI), Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/STUD/2023/740080/IPOL_STU(20 23)740080_EN.pdf
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Deplores the long delay on the safety assessments of sweeteners due to be completed in 2020 and the inaccessibility of documents and processes to the external interested audience1d; highlights the new and relevant evidence on negative health effects of aspartame since the 2013 opinion of EFSA, notably the classification of aspartame (E961) as a possible group 2B human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); therefore calls EFSA to review the safety of aspartame by 31 December 2024; _________________ 1d https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultatio ns/call/call-technical-data-sweeteners- authorised-food-additives-eu
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Recalls that in its ninth term, the Parliament has already adopted 34 resolutions objecting to the placing on the market of GMOs for food and feed; highlights that one reason for these objections are gaps in the risk assessment undertaken by the Authority's Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms; urges the Authority to address and close these gaps as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that a lack of resources and post for plant protection products regulatory authorities results in delays in approving low risk active substances and updating assessment methodologies according to scientific developments, which would lower the environmental impact of plant protection products in the long term; calls on the Commission to take appropriate steps to ensure that EFSA has sufficient resources and posts to support Member States to meet their deadlines as set in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, to double the amount of assessments of active substances for plant protection products per year and to triple the speed of development of methodologies to keep risk assessments abreast of the latest scientific developments and societal expectations;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that increasing EFSA's risk- assessment capacity by means other than internal FTEs is crucial to achieving the long-term objectives of increasing the speed of risk assessment and reducing the number of questions;
source: 757.133
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/5 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2024-02-06T00:00:00New
2024-02-12T00:00:00 |
docs/3/date |
Old
2024-01-25T00:00:00New
2024-02-06T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2024-01-16T00:00:00New
2024-01-24T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
commission |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|