Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | WIEZIK Michal ( Renew) | WINZIG Angelika ( EPP), CREȚU Corina ( S&D), THIOLLET François ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), ADINOLFI Matteo ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking's budget for the financial year 2022.
Noting that the Court of Auditors finds that the accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the year 2022 present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position at 31 December 2022, the results of its operations, its cash flows, Parliament adopted by 518 votes to 17, with 55 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision.
Parliament welcomed the Joint Undertaking’s objective and role in developing a supercomputing ecosystem in Europe. It noted, however, that the Court assessed the risk to the legality and regularity of recruitment procedures as medium for the Joint Undertaking, due to the need to recruit a large number of staff quickly. In addition, the risk related to the Joint Undertaking operational contract expenditure was assessed by the Court as medium due to its complex procurement procedures for high-value contracts.
Budgetary and financial management
For 2022,the available payment budget amounted to EUR 629.9 million (EUR 348.2 million in 2021) and the available committed budget amounted to EUR 1 374.5 million (EUR 753.4 million in 2021).
The Court categorises the risk to budget management as medium because the complex and lengthy acquisition process for supercomputers.
Members noted that due to the length of time it takes to procure supercomputers, the low implementation of both 2022 operational - commitment and payment appropriations were at 79% and 24% respectively (2% and 47% in 2021) - and administrative budgets - 45% for administrative commitment appropriations and 37% of its administrative payment appropriations.
Parliament called on the Joint Undertaking’ to disclose important information regarding members’ contributions at programme level, relevant for the complete communication of the Joint Undertaking’s achievements at the year-end.
Members welcomed that, at the end of 2022, the Joint Undertaking fully committed the maximum Union operational contribution of EUR 526 million for signed grant agreements and contracts under the Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility (CEF 1) programmes. Of this amount, around EUR 266.3 million (or 50.6 %) remains to be paid in the coming years for projects yet to be completed.
At the end of 2022, the participating states signed contractual commitments amounting to EUR 447.3 million for the Joint Undertaking’s Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility 1 activities. Members noted, however, that at the end of 2022, the Joint Undertaking’s private members had only committed and reported EUR 11 million (or 2.6 %) in in-kind contributions for Horizon 2020 projects, a figure considerably below the minimum private members’ target of EUR 420 million to be achieved by the end of the Horizon 2020 programme.
The significant reduction in private members’ in-kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s operational activities presents a risk to the overall achievement of its parts of the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
Other comments
The resolution also contains a series of observations on management and control systems, public procurement and personnel.
In particular, it noted that:
- the main reasons for the low implementation rate of the operational payment budget were (i) delays in completing the pre-exascale supercomputers that prevented interim payments related to the Joint Undertaking’s operating grants; (ii) delays in the procurement for supercomputers that prevented the related pre-financing payments; (iii) the postponement of the Connecting Europe Facility 2 call on Hyperconnectivity to 2023 due to the need of a pre-study; and (iv) delays in beneficiaries’ cost claims for ongoing research activities;
- by the end of 2022, the Joint Undertaking had only recruited 8 staff and 20 by mid-2023, so had not met its 2022 recruitment target; however, Members welcomed the gender balance of staff;
- the fact that key jobs are not being filled could jeopardise the continuity of the Joint Undertaking's activities;
- the Joint Undertaking should include specific ex-post audits in its internal control system for expenditure co-financed under the Connecting Europe Facility for the purchase of supercomputers;
- the Joint Undertaking has carried out, on an ad hoc basis, risk-based ex-ante controls for risky projects, but had not yet applied a structured risk-based approach to ex-ante controls by the end of 2022;
- the Joint Undertaking should apply a structured risk-based approach to ex-ante controls covering relevant project and beneficiary risks;
- the Joint Undertaking should ensure that all reinforced monitoring actions are accompanied by specific control actions targeting the identified risks, and that they are followed-up at a pre-defined deadline.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0278/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0095/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0095/2024
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.343
- Committee draft report: PE753.492
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0085/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000 N9-0085/2023
- Committee draft report: PE753.492
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.343
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0095/2024
Votes
A9-0095/2024 – Michal Wiezik – Motion for a resolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
27 |
2023/2177(DEC)
2024/01/31
CONT
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Court assessed the risk to programme implementation as medium due to the high risk that EuroHPC may not achieve the minimum contributions targets for their private members by the end of the Horizon 2020 programme; notes that, according to the Joint Undertaking, the lower achievement rates are explained by the involvement of
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, in 2022, the JU only implemented 45% of its administrative commitment appropriations and 37 % of its administrative payment appropriations, partly due to the
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, in 2022, the JU only implemented 45% of its administrative commitment appropriations and 37 % of its administrative payment appropriations, partly due to the no achievement of its recruitment plan for 2022 and to the no reallocation of significant amounts of unused payment appropriations of previous years when planning its 2022 budget; understands that the late adoption of its new founding regulation made the achievement of its ambitious recruitment plan impossible;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that in the Joint Undertaking’s 2022 annual accounts, the amounts of contributions recognised per member category (EU and private members) differ significantly among each other, because EU cash contributions are validated and recognised when paid to the JU at the beginning of the project implementation, but members’ in-kind contributions are only recognised after validation of the costs incurred and declared for project implementation;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that in the Joint Undertaking’s 2022 annual accounts, the amounts of contributions recognised per member category (EU and private members) differ significantly among each other, because EU cash contributions are validated and recognised when paid to the JU at the beginning of the project implementation, but members’ in-kind contributions are only recognised after validation of the costs incurred and declared for project implementation; is concerned that the gap between the recognised amount of cash contributions on the one hand and in-kind contributions on the other hand, was
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the new work programme for 2021 and 2022 including new activities and financing as set out in the new founding Regulation were only adopted by the Joint Undertaking’s Governing Board in December 2021 and that this delayed implementation of activities, development of internal control activities and recruitment;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that, at the end of 2022, the JU fully committed the maximum EU operational contribution of EUR 526 million for signed grant agreements and contracts under the Horizon 2020 and CEF 1 programmes; takes note
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that, according to the new EuroHPC founding Regulation8 , the JU will have to implement projects amounting to EUR 7 billion, of which EUR 3 billion should be leveraged from the Participating States and EUR 900 million from private members, in the form of cash and in-kind contributions; welcomes this significant increase, compared to the previous MFF programme, of around EUR 1.4 billion; regrets, however, that as the Joint Undertaking’s financing arrangements remain the same for the 2021-2027 MFF, there is a high risk that the JU will not achieve the private members' contribution targets under the new founding Regulation; Calls on the Commission to re-assess the feasibility of the current contribution targets from the private members in the new founding Regulation; _________________ 8 The new founding regulation repealed the
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Is concerned that the JU’s
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Is concerned that the JU’s lengthy process for the acquisition of supercomputers significantly affected the implementation of the 2022 operational budget; understands that these delays were also caused by shortages in supply chains and raw materials;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes with concern that, by the end of 2022, the JU had only recruited eight staff members and 20 by mid-2023, and therefore did not meet its 2022 recruitment target10 ; notes that the Court considers that this situation negatively impacted the implementation of the 2022 administrative budget; welcomes however the gender distribution of the staff in the JU in 2022; _________________ 10 According to the Consolidated Annual
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Regrets that the
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas under the 2021-2027
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas, to increase transparency, the Joint Undertaking should disclose in its annual accounts, relevant information regarding members’ contributions at programme level; whereas, for each programme under which they operate, the Joint Undertaking should present per member category up to the year-end, all relevant information made available by the members including the legal contribution targets set for the respective programme, the volume of contributions received, and the volume of legal commitments; suggests that the Joint Undertaking continues to improve the transparency;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the JU's objective and role in developing a supercomputing ecosystem in Europe;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that, for 20223 , the available payment budget amounted to EUR 629.9 million (EUR 348.2 million in 2021) and the available committed budget amounted to EUR 1 374.5 billion (EUR 753.4 million in 2021); notes that the available budget includes unused appropriations of previous years, which the Joint Undertaking re- entered in the budget of the current year, in line with the N+3 rules assigned revenues and reallocations to the next year; _________________ 3 Total budget includes operational budget
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the Court categorises the risk to budget management as medium because
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes th
source: 757.343
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
commission |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|