Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | SARVAMAA Petri ( EPP) | RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), CHASTEL Olivier ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Greens/EFA), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( The Left) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | TOMC Romana ( EPP) | Lucia ĎURIŠ NICHOLSONOVÁ ( RE), Elżbieta RAFALSKA ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP) | Ramona STRUGARIU ( RE) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 520 votes to 69, with 4 abstentions, a resolution on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2022: performance, financial management and control.
The resolution contains, for each body, cross-cutting observations accompanying the discharge decisions.
Budget
The main findings are as follows:
- the cumulative total for the 2022 budget for the 33 decentralised Union agencies amounted to around EUR 3 471 million in commitment appropriations, representing an increase of 8.2 % compared to 2021, and amounted to EUR 3 035 million in payment appropriations, a decrease of 1.78 % compared to 2021;
- of the EUR 3 035 million in payment appropriations, approximately EUR 2 781 million were financed from the general budget of the Union, representing 74.85 % of the agencies’ total financing in 2022 (compared to 77.27 % in 2021);
- approximately EUR 935 million were financed by fees and charges and by direct contributions from participating countries (an increase of 28.23 % compared to 2021).
The total final budget for 2022 (after amending budgets) of all decentralised Union agencies was approximatively 16 % higher than that for 2021 , while the inflation rate in the Union reached up to 11.5 % in October 2022. Members noted, in this context, that the increase in the budget of some agencies from 2021 to 2022 has been significant, representing more than + 60 % (for ENISA, eu-LISA, EFCA), approximately 30 % or more (for ELA, EEA, Frontex) and more than +20 % (for EUSPA, EUAA).
Main risks identified by the Court
According to the Court’s report, the overall risk to the reliability of agencies’ accounts is low. The overall risk to the legality and regularity of revenue underlying the agencies’ accounts to be low for most agencies, and to be medium for the partly self-financed agencies.
Members noted with concern that, for a fifth year in a row, the Court considers the risk to sound financial management to be medium, primarily associated with public procurement procedures.
The resolution stated that the Court considered the risk to budget management to be low, with the Court’s audit showing high carryovers of committed appropriations, which were, however, justified according to the Court by the multiannual nature of operations or for reasons beyond the agencies’ control. The Agencies are called on to strengthen their budget management and financial planning.
Budget and financial management
Members stated that the Court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the revenue underlying the accounts for all agencies; except four : the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT), the Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA). The qualified opinions were issued by the Court due to non-compliant expenditures of EUR 1.3 million (for CdT), EUR 4.26 million (for CEPOL), EUR 0.6 million (for ECDC) which led the Court to estimate a total amount of non-compliance expenditure representing 2.8 % of the total payment appropriations available in 2022 and EUR 17.8 million (for eu-LISA).
As regards the reliability of accounts, the Court issued an ‘emphasis of matter’ paragraph for the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA), the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), eu-LISA, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex).
Members noted with concern the Court’s observation regarding weaknesses related to various aspects of budgetary management such as excessive levels of carry-over of appropriations, high rates of late payments and fee/revenue related issues in the case of 16 agencies.
Performance
Members noted that all agencies use various systems of key performance indicators (KPIs), planned outputs or strategic targets set as part of their performance measurement. They noted the achievements and successes of all agencies in 2022, the first year of the unprovoked and unjustified Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, welcoming, in this context, the rapid measures taken by the agencies in various areas such as justice and home affairs (such as the EUA, Frontex, Europol or the FRA), the supervision of financial systems (such as ESMA), security and defence (such as EASA) or employment, social affairs and inclusion (such as Eurofound).
The resolution emphasised the importance of the role played by the Union's agencies responsible for justice and home affairs (JHA), insisting that the agencies be given sufficient financial and human resources.
Efficiency and gains
Member called on the agencies to continue developing synergies (in areas such as human resources, procurement, digitalisation, building management, IT services and cyber-security), as well as cooperation and exchange of good practices with other Union agencies with a view to improving efficiency, in particular given the impact of the war in Ukraine and inflationary strains. Parliament welcomed that 19 out of 33 decentralised Agencies have implemented corporate plans to improve energy efficiency and climate neutrality. The level of digitalisation of agencies needs to be improved.
Staff policy
In 2022, the 33 decentralised agencies reported that they employ a total of 10 146 members of staff compared to 9 631 in 2021, representing an increase of 5.34 % compared to 2021. Concrete measures for geographical balance to be improved.
Despite a slight improvement, the gender balance reported for staff overall deteriorated, with 54.26 % men and 46.74 % women (50.3 % and 49.7 %, respectively in 2021). The Agencies are called on to work on improving further the gender balance in senior management. 17 agencies have already adopted the Charter on Diversity and Inclusion that had been endorsed by the Working Group dedicated to issues in the area of diversity and inclusion. The remaining agencies are invited to adopt that Charter without delay.
Conflicts of interest
The resolution noted that, with the exception of one agency, all the agencies have a policy for preventing and managing conflicts of interest. In this context, it pointed out that rules on transparency, incompatibilities, conflicts of interest and "revolving door" situations, illegal lobbying and strategies to combat fraud must be regularly updated. All the agencies request declarations of interest for their management board members and senior management and that they publish them on their website.
Public procurement
Members noted with great concern that the Court observed 48 weaknesses in public procurement in 2022 (compared to 34 in 2021 and 18 in 2020) and that the number of agencies concerned is increasing with 24 agencies concerned in 2022 (compared to 22 agencies in 2021 and 14 agencies in 2020). They are concerned that such weaknesses remain the largest source of irregular payments, stemming from irregular procurement procedures reported either in 2022 or in previous years.
They recalled the importance for all procurement procedures, to ensure fair competition between tenderers and to procure goods and services at the best price, respecting the principles of transparency, proportionality, equal treatment and non-discrimination. They invited all agencies to implement all the e-procurement IT tools developed by the Commission.
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Petri SARVAMAA (EPP, FI) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2022: performance, financial management and control.
The report contains, for each body, cross-cutting observations accompanying the discharge decisions.
Budget
The main findings are as follows:
- the cumulative total for the 2022 budget for the 33 decentralised Union agencies amounted to around EUR 3 471 million in commitment appropriations, representing an increase of 8.2 % compared to 2021, and amounted to EUR 3 035 million in payment appropriations, a decrease of 1.78 % compared to 2021;
- of the EUR 3 035 million in payment appropriations, approximately EUR 2 781 million were financed from the general budget of the Union, representing 74.85 % of the agencies’ total financing in 2022 (compared to 77.27 % in 2021);
- approximately EUR 935 million were financed by fees and charges and by direct contributions from participating countries (an increase of 28.23 % compared to 2021).
The total final budget for 2022 (after amending budgets) of all decentralised Union agencies was approximatively 16 % higher than that for 2021 , while the inflation rate in the Union reached up to 11.5 % in October 2022. Members noted, in this context, that the increase in the budget of some agencies from 2021 to 2022 has been significant, representing more than + 60 % (for ENISA, eu-LISA, EFCA), approximately 30 % or more (for ELA, EEA, Frontex) and more than +20 % (for EUSPA, EUAA).
Main risks identified by the Court
According to the Court’s report, the overall risk to the reliability of agencies’ accounts is low. The overall risk to the legality and regularity of revenue underlying the agencies’ accounts to be low for most agencies, and to be medium for the partly self-financed agencies.
Members noted with concern that, for a fifth year in a row, the Court considers the risk to sound financial management to be medium, primarily associated with public procurement procedures.
Moreover, the Court’s audit considers the risk to budget management to be low, with the Court’s audit showing high carryovers of committed appropriations, which were, however, justified according to the Court by the multiannual nature of operations or for reasons beyond the agencies’ control. The report called on the Agencies to strengthen their budget management and financial planning by setting ambitious financial key performance indicators (KPIs) and actively monitoring the financial and budgetary performance throughout the year in order to keep the carryovers in an acceptable percentage. It also called on all the agencies concerned to identify the proper corrective actions and to continue their efforts to follow up on the Court's observations that are ongoing or outstanding.
Budget and financial management
Members stated that the Court issued an unqualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the revenue underlying the accounts for all agencies; except four: the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT), the Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA). The qualified opinions were issued by the Court due to non-compliant expenditures of EUR 1.3 million (for CdT), EUR 4.26 million (for CEPOL), EUR 0.6 million (for ECDC) which led the Court to estimate a total amount of non-compliance expenditure representing 2.8 % of the total payment appropriations available in 2022 and EUR 17.8 million (for eu-LISA).
The report noted the Court’s recurrent observation related to the contributions from Schengen associated countries (SAC), that different methods in the agreements for calculating contributions entail a risk of erroneous implementation of those contribution agreements. It noted with concern the Court’s observation regarding weaknesses related to various aspects of budgetary management such as excessive levels of carry-over of appropriations, high rates of late payments and fee/revenue related issues in the case of 16 agencies.
Performance
Members noted that all agencies use various systems of key performance indicators (KPIs), planned outputs or strategic targets set as part of their performance measurement. They noted the achievements and successes of all agencies in 2022, the first year of the unprovoked and unjustified Russian war of aggression against Ukraine.
The report stressed the valuable role played by Union agencies in helping Union institutions design and implement Union policies as well as the important role of the EU Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies. It welcomed the high-quality work performed by the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion (CEDEFOP, Eurofound, EU-OSHA, ETF and ELA). Members stressed the need for agencies to co-operate with each other in order to allocate resources correctly.
Efficiency and gains
Member called on the agencies to continue developing synergies (in areas such as human resources, procurement, digitalisation, building management, IT services and cyber-security), as well as cooperation and exchange of good practices with other Union agencies with a view to improving efficiency, in particular given the impact of the war in Ukraine and inflationary strains.
Staff policy
The report noted that, in 2022, the 33 decentralised agencies reported that they employ a total of 10 146 members of staff compared to 9 631 in 2021, representing an increase of 5.34 % compared to 2021. It recalled that the Agencies need to take concrete measures for geographical balance to be improved.
Members noted that the gender balance reported for staff overall deteriorated, with 54.26 % men and 46.74 % women (50.3 % and 49.7 %, respectively in 2021). The Agencies are called on to work on improving further the gender balance in senior management.
17 agencies have already adopted the Charter on Diversity and Inclusion that had been endorsed by the Working Group dedicated to issues in the area of diversity and inclusion. The remaining agencies are invited to adopt that Charter without delay.
Conflicts of interest
The report noted that, with the exception of one agency, all the agencies have a policy for preventing and managing conflicts of interest. In this context, it pointed out that rules on transparency, incompatibilities, conflicts of interest and "revolving door" situations, illegal lobbying and strategies to combat fraud must be regularly updated.
Public procurement
Members noted with great concern that the Court observed 48 weaknesses in public procurement in 2022 (compared to 34 in 2021 and 18 in 2020) and that the number of agencies concerned is increasing with 24 agencies concerned in 2022 (compared to 22 agencies in 2021 and 14 agencies in 2020). They are concerned that such weaknesses remain the largest source of irregular payments, stemming from irregular procurement procedures reported either in 2022 or in previous years.
They recalled the importance for all procurement procedures, to ensure fair competition between tenderers and to procure goods and services at the best price, respecting the principles of transparency, proportionality, equal treatment and non-discrimination. They invited all agencies to implement all the e-procurement IT tools developed by the Commission.
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0280/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0118/2024
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.250
- Committee opinion: PE752.899
- Committee draft report: PE753.545
- Committee opinion: PE756.205
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.006
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.280
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE756.280
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.006
- Committee opinion: PE756.205
- Committee draft report: PE753.545
- Committee opinion: PE752.899
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.250
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 Go to the pageEur-Lex
Votes
A9-0118/2024 – Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
33 |
2023/2182(DEC)
2023/11/22
EMPL
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 a (new) – having regard to the Eurofound's Consolidated Annual Activity report 2022;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the agencies are the most qualified at assessing the use of resources and play a crucial role in supporting the right sustainable projects in line with the European Green Deal;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the agencies are the most qualified at assessing the use of resources and play a crucial role in supporting the right sustainable projects in line with the European Green Deal; welcomes in this regard that almost all agencies have established corporate plans to improve energy efficiency and climate neutrality of its operations; calls on the Commission to ensure funding supporting the EU agencies in securing the social dialogue; notes that EU agencies have a crucial role in securing social dialogue with the EU institutions;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure funding supporting the EU agencies in securing the social dialogue; notes that EU agencies have a crucial role in securing social dialogue with the EU institutions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Welcomes the deepened cooperation between the agencies within the framework of the European Union Agencies Network (EUAN) which is an important inter-agency cooperation platform to enhance agencies’ visibility, identify and promote possible efficiency gains, add value and ensure efficient communication between the agencies and relevant stakeholders with a focus on sharing services, knowledge and expertise; appreciates and encourages the close collaboration among the agencies under the remit of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs in order to ensure synergies, complementarity and sharing resources;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls that gender balance must be ensured within the Agencies in accordance with the basic regulations establishing them; regrets the fact that gender equality is absent in the multiannual strategy 2021- 2027 for the EU Agencies Network (EUAN); reiterates its call on the EUAN to integrate gender equality in their strategies, on the Agencies to collect and present data on gender balance for all categories of management staff and to align their ambition with the aim of the Commission to reach a gender balance of 50 % at all levels of its management by the end of 2024 and to pursue gender mainstreaming in all fields
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new) (1) 9a. Welcomes the Commission communication entitled ‘Long-term competitiveness of the EU: looking beyond 2030’ aiming to rationalise and simplify reporting requirements by 25 % for each of the green, digital and economic thematic areas, and calls on the EU agencies to streamline their internal procedures to reduce unnecessary administrative burdens;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 b (new) – having regard to the Cedefop's Consolidated Annual Activity report 2022;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 c (new) – having regard to the ETF's Consolidated Annual Activity report 2022;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 d (new) – having regard to the EU-OSHA's Consolidated Annual Activity report 2022;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 e (new) – having regard to the ELA's Consolidated Annual Activity report 2022;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the valuable role played by Union agencies in helping Union institutions to design and implement policies, especially in carrying out specific technical, scientific, operational and managerial tasks; appreciates the high quality expertise and work performed by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), the European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), the European Training Foundation (ETF) and European Labour Authority (ELA), the agencies working in the area of employment, social affairs and inclusion; reiterates in this regard the need to equip the agencies at a level commensurate to the assigned tasks, with a sufficient number of staff, employed in a stable manner and having sufficient material resources; reiterates therefore the need of ensuring adequate human and financial resources allowing them to continue implementing their work programmes with a very high activity completion rate; stresses the importance and added value of each agency in their field of expertise and their autonomy; reiterates that the proper functioning of the agencies also requires a high-quality social dialogue; closely involving the Local Staff Committees;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that, following a formal decision by the Management Board of Eurofound, the Executive Directors of ETF, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) participated in person or were represented at the Management Board meeting for the first time, joining colleagues from EU-OSHA and Cedefop, who already joined the meetings in the past; notes that such participation is in line with the reinforced cooperation foreseen in the Commission’s 2019 staff working document on the evaluation of the EU agencies working in the employment and social affairs policy field; appreciates and encourages the close collaboration among the agencies under the remit of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs in order to ensure synergies, complementarity and sharing resources;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that, following a formal decision by the Management Board of Eurofound, the Executive Directors of ETF, ELA, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) participated in person or were represented at the Management Board meeting for the first time, joining colleagues from EU-OSHA and Cedefop, who already joined the meetings in the past; notes that such participation is in line with the reinforced cooperation foreseen in the Commission’s 2019 staff working document on the evaluation of the EU agencies working in the employment and social affairs policy field;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the agencies are the most qualified at assessing the use of resources and play a crucial role in supporting the right sustainable projects in line with the European Green Deal; calls on all agencies to further improve their public procurement procedures to by leading by example and enforcing the social clause in the existing EU Public Procurement Directive to ensure that companies benefiting from EU money need to comply with all applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law established by Union law, national law or collective agreement, or by applicable international environmental, social or labour law provisions; calls on the Commission to ensure funding supporting the EU agencies in securing the social dialogue; notes that EU agencies have a crucial role in securing social dialogue with the EU institutions;
source: 756.280
2023/12/05
LIBE
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reiterates the important role of the JHA agencies, as they are indispensable for the implementation of EU policies, and the important support they ensure to the Union institutions and bodies and Member States in the sectors of fundamental rights, security and justice, by carrying out operational, analytical, managerial and monitoring tasks; reiterates therefore the need to ensure adequate financial and human resources to JHA agencies; notes that all agencies should effectively perform their mandates;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses that EU agencies shall proactively contribute to national and Union efforts while carrying out their tasks in full cooperation with Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and Member States, avoiding any duplication of work, promoting synergy and complementarity; further calls on the agencies, where and when appropriate, to achieve financial savings by cooperating closely with other Union institutions, agencies and bodies, especially those that have their seat in the same Member State;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Considers that the EU legal framework for managing ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interests risks should define a common legal basis defining a minimum level of requirements to prevent such situations, as well as the manner in which monitoring compliance of current and former staff with the ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest requirements should take place; welcomes that FRA and Europol are two of the nine EU decentralized agencies that have provisions covering the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations in relation to members of its board, and requests that such provisions are fully implemented to prevent any potential future ‘revolving door’ case; calls on all EU agencies to take over this practice and implement provisions covering the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations; calls on the Commission to propose changes to prevent any risk of ‘revolving door’ and conflict of interest; welcomes that most agencies publish the declarations of interest of their senior management and members of their respective management boards; recalls that such declarations should have a clear format allowing for the listing of any interests that may come in conflict with the nature of the position occupied; calls on the remaining agencies to follow this model and publish yearly declarations of interest of the above-mentioned representatives without further delay;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Underlines that it is essential that the EU agencies act impartially, demonstrate integrity and establish high professional standards in particular with regard to senior representatives of an agency, which shall not undermine its integrity during or after their term of office; reminds that there should never be any legitimate reason to suspect that decisions might be influenced by interests conflicting with the role of an agency as a body serving the Union as a whole or by private interests or affiliations of any member of the Management Board which would create, or have the potential to create, a conflict with the proper performance of the official duties of the person concerned;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Reminds that cooperation among JHA agencies must be fully transparent and accountable; requests all JHA agencies to take measures to ensure full compliance with EU transparency rules as well as with financial regulations, fundamental rights and data protection and sound budgetary management standards; considers that the disclosure of meetings and interactions between JHA agencies and third parties when this can be ensured without prejudice to its operational activities, contributes to ensuring transparency by JHA agencies; urges JHA agencies to step up efforts in this direction;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7 d. Calls on all JHA agencies to take into account sustainability in their overall business processes in order to improve the agencies’ environmental performance, and to report to the discharge authority on implemented measures and progress;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 e (new) 7 e. Regrets the lack of gender balance and diversity in the Management boards and within the staff of some JHA agencies; calls on all JHA agencies to ensure a gender balanced distribution on all levels of staff; further calls on all JHA agencies to take into consideration geographical balance when conducting their recruitment procedures and report to the discharge authority on implemented measures and progress achieved; further calls on all JHA agencies to develop internal policies and practices to ensure inclusiveness and diversity, and prevent any type of discrimination; asks the Court to systematically inform about it in its future reports;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 f (new) 7 f. Urges all JHA agencies to implement a clear anti-harassment and anti-racism policy to prevent and firmly condemn any such behaviour within the organisation;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 g (new) 7 g. Recalls that whistle-blower protection within EU agencies is very important and should be in line with directive (EU)2019/1937; insists that a strong transparency and whistle-blower culture should be encouraged;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 h (new) 7 h. Is strongly concerned by the special report published by the European Ombudsman concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; considers that the delays in dealing with access to documents requests are leading to a lack of democratic scrutiny and accountability; considers that EU staff members should, in general, be aware that their work can at any point be scrutinised by the public and should think of transparency as the default approach; calls on all JHA agencies and the European Commission to address recommendations by the European Ombudsman in this regard as a matter of priority;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Welcomes the agencies prompt response and unequivocal support provided to Member States to deal with the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; particularly appreciates the deployment of 500 standing corps to the Eastern border by Frontex; further welcomes the operational support and assistance provided by EUAA to Member states dealing with an influx of refugees, Europol’s cooperation with Ukraine and the support provided to bordering countries, as well extension of Eurojust mandate to include preserving, analysing and storing evidence related to prosecution of international crimes;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the Court issued ‘emphasis on the matter’ paragraphs for eleven agencies, including (i) for the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) due to the implementation of “SUMMA” a new pilot budgetary and accounting system rolled out by the Commission, (ii) for eu-LISA because of delays in the implementation of the Entry/Exit System and the related impact on eu-LISA operations; acknowledges the response of eu-LISA that it has already undertaken the necessary revisions to its contract management practice; and (iii) for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) regarding the accounting system which could not be validated because of missing information relating to an IT system, owned by the Commission, which supplies accounting data and another disclosure regarding the calculation of the contributions from Schengen associated countries;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Acknowledges the weaknesses in public procurement procedures which are increasing and remain the main source of irregular payments and that the Court reported shortcomings in previous years for 24 EU agencies, including in relation to contracts signed by CEPOL, EUAA, eu- LISA
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Emphasizes the weaknesses of 16 EU agencies in various aspects of budgetary management and management and control systems concerning deficiencies in data quality and completeness, expenditure implemented without the proper delegation of power of an authorising officer, absence of adequate ex-post/ex-ante checks, and weaknesses in management of grants and commitments;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the agencies involved to rely as much as possible on permanent staff and on the Commission to ensure appropriate human resources allocations for this purpose; further calls on the agencies to comply with their mandates and the repeated calls from the Parliament to end the huge dependency on interim contracts and temporary workers;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes the Court’s observation that the agreements between the EU and the Schengen associated countries (SAC) serving as legal basis for calculating their contributions to EUAA’s and Frontex’
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Recalls that the Court examined potential ‘revolving door’ situations in its audit 2022 and asks that this topic, as well as the associated risk of conflict of interests, to be followed up and included in its future annual reports; is concerned that agencies are particularly prone to the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations, in particular due to their governance model, which includes boards; expresses deep concern that the EU legal framework applicable to managing ‘revolving door’ risks lacks clear requirements on compliance and monitoring, and that it do not apply to members of the agencies’ management boards; urges the agencies to ensure that internal rules managing ‘revolving door’ and potential conflict of interests risks are put in place and fully and correctly implemented; expresses strong concerns about the cases identified in Europol, Frontex and the European Commission;
source: 757.006
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/6/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of European People's PartyNew
European People's Party |
committees/16/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of European People's PartyNew
European People's Party |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/6 |
|
events/0/docs/1/title |
Old
EUR-LexNew
Go to the page Eur-Lex |
events/3/summary/29 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
|
events/4/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/29 |
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61574&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=61574 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
CONT/9/12985 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
forecasts |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2024-01-12T00:00:00New
2024-02-05T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2024-01-16T00:00:00New
2024-01-29T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/16/rapporteur |
|
commission |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|