Events

Documents

• Committee draft report: PE764.999
• Amendments tabled in committee: PE766.887
• CofA: N10-0020/2024
• CofA: OJ OJ L 10.10.2024
• Non-legislative basic document: COM(2024)0272
• Non-legislative basic document: Go to the pageEur-Lex
• Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2024)0272
• Non-legislative basic document published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
• Amendments tabled in committee: PE766.887
• Committee draft report: PE764.999
• Non-legislative basic document: COM(2024)0272 Go to the pageEur-Lex
• CofA: N10-0020/2024 OJ OJ L 10.10.2024

Amendments

Dossier

14

2024/2020(DEC) 2024/12/12 AFCO 14 amendments... Amendment 1 # Gilles BOYER, Charles GOERENS Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the actions taken on the fight against disinformation and information manipulation by the structures of the Parliament responsible for communication with citizens and countering disinformation such as the European Parliament Liaison Offices; reiterates however its concerns about large-scale foreign interference and disinformation campaigns targeting the European Union; calls for investments in an enhanced security culture within the European Parliament; calls for a mandatory and regular security and integrity training for MEPs and staffers, appropriate security clearance and reinforced screening of staffers, in particular those attending in camera meetings; points out that one of the most powerful tools against disinformation is positive, factual-based communication aboutregardint the Parliament’s work; commends the high use of the appropriations committed by EPLOs in 2023; Amendment 10 # Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Marc ANGEL Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses concerns regarding several aspects of the Agreement establishing anWelcomes the establishment of the interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement,as a significant step towards enhancing transparency and accountability within the EU institutions; regrets exclusion of the European Council and special status of the Council, and would encourage their engagement; highly welcomes the placstatement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and defEuropean Council President António Costa in his invitation risks associated with usletter, where he confirms the European Council´s request to join the other institutions ing the interm ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedureinstitutional Ethics Body; recognises that the full implementation of the Agreement's provisions into the EP's Rules of Procedure will require resources and time; believes that the Parliament should do its utmost to incorporate all provisions of the Agreement into its Rules of Procedures in a timely manner. Amendment 11 # Anthony SMITH, Nikolas FARANTOURIS Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. ExpresseCalls concerns regarding several aspects the full and urgent implementation of the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, includingregrets that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, as well as the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. Amendment 12 # Daniel FREUND Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses concerns regarding several aspects ofWelcomes the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union,; including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament untils committed to start the work of the body as soon as possible and will provide the foreseen funding; commits to start the work on incorporating all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure as soon as possible. Amendment 13 # Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Alexandre VARAUT Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses concerns regarding several aspects of the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. Amendment 14 # Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SIMON Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the Bureau's decision to carry out a full assessment of the Europa Experiences to clearly identify the objectives, advantages and shortcomings, with a view to ensuring that financing is future-proof and as effective as possible. Amendment 2 # Marc ANGEL, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the actions taken on the fight against disinformation and information manipulation by the structures of the Parliament responsible for communication with citizens and countering disinformation such as the European Parliament Liaison Offices; points out that one of the most powerful tools against disinformation is positive, factual communication about Parliament’s work; commends the high use of the appropriations committed by EPLOs in 2023; acknowledges that the Europa Experience visitor centres are another important tool to counter disinformation and introduce the role of the Parliament and the values of European democracy to visitors; highlights that these centres have so far received wide support from Members and welcomed more than 3.5 million visitors in total; Amendment 3 # Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Alexandre VARAUT Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the actions taken on the fight against disinformation and information manipulation by the structures of the Parliament responsible for communication with citizens and countering disinformation such as the European Parliament Liaison Offices; points out that one of the most powerful tools against disinformation is, however, that these efforts should under no circumstances limit freedom of expression or marginalise legitimate political views; stresses that any positive, factual communication about Parliament’'s work; commends the high use of the appropriations committed by EPLOs in 2023 should encompass the full political spectrum represented; Amendment 4 # Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Alexandre VARAUT Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the Authority reported that it is facing constrained human resources; highlights that this issue was expected to become even more pressing in the run-up to the 2024 European Parliament elections and due to the necessary administrative implementation of any new tasks that would arise for the Authority from the ongoing negotiations on a recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014stresses, however, the need to ensure that this situation does not lead to European political parties being managed unequally; Amendment 5 # Gilles BOYER, Charles GOERENS Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that the Authority reported that it is facing constrained human resources; highlights that this issue was expected to become even more pressing in the run-up to the 2024 European Parliament elections and due to the necessary administrative implementation of any new tasks that wcould arise for the Authority from the ongoing negotiations on a recast of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014; Amendment 6 # Daniel FREUND Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Takes note of theWelcomes Parliament’s comprehensive actions related to the initiation, creation and implementation of the transparency and integrity reform as well as the EP 2024 reform process; and calls to evaluate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; recognises that a budget reinforcement was required in the course of 2023 to cover Parliament's contribution; welcomes in the course of 2023 the additional investment to the IT overhaul of the (interinstitutional) Transparency Register web platform; Amendment 7 # Jean-Paul GARRAUD, Alexandre VARAUT Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Takes note of the Parliament’s comprehensive actions related to the initiation, creation and implementation of the transparency and integrity reform as well as the EP 2024 reform process; calls to evaluinsists thate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; recognises that a budget reinforcement was required in the course of 2023 to cover Parliament's contribution to the IT overhaul of the (interinstitutional) Transparency Register web platformreforms must include an explicit guarantee of non-discrimination for all political factions represented in Parliament; calls to evaluate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; Amendment 8 # Gilles BOYER, Charles GOERENS Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Takes note ofWelcomes the Parliament’s comprehensive actions related to the initiation, creation and implementation of the transparency and integrity reform as well as the EP 2024 reform process; calls to evaluate these measures regarding their effectiveness and proportionality; recognises that a budget reinforcement was required in the course of 2023 to cover Parliament's contribution to the IT overhaul of the (interinstitutional) Transparency Register web platform; Amendment 9 # Gilles BOYER Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses concerns regarding several aspects of the Agreement establishing an interinstitutional body for ethical standards for members of institutions and advisory bodies referred to in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union, including that the Council is outside the scope of the substance of the Agreement, the placement of the secretariat of the body at the Commission and definition risks associated with using the term ethics; considers that no work of the body should commence and no funding should be provided by Parliament until all provisions of the Agreement have been incorporated into Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.deleted source: 766.887

History

Filter history Commission Committees Committees.opinion Committees.rapporteur Committees.shadows Docs Events Events.docs.title Forecasts Procedure.dossier_of_the_committee Procedure.stage_reached

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)