Activities of Karl-Heinz FLORENZ
Plenary speeches (103)
Waste prevention and recycling
Order of business
Detergents
Gaseous and particulate emissions from non-road mobile machinery
Demolition of contaminated US warships in the EU
Packaging and packaging waste
Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading
Detergents
Vote
Cosmetics
Electrical and electronic equipment: 1. Waste (WEEE), 2. Dangerous substances
Cosmetic products
Electrical and electronic equipment
Chemicals strategy
Packaging and packaging waste
Packaging and packaging waste
Environmental noise
Electrical and electronic equipment
VOTE
Emissions of pollutants from large combustion plants
Assessment and management of environmental noise
Vote
End-of-life vehicles
Tyres for motor vehicles and trailers
Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (continuation)
End-of-life vehicles
Food safety
Public health and food safety
Dioxin
2050: The future begins today − Recommendations for the EU's future integrated policy on climate change (debate)
2050: The future begins today − Recommendations for the EU's future integrated policy on climate change (debate)
Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system (debate)
State of the negotiations on the climate change and energy package (debate)
Revision of the framework directive on waste (debate)
Scientific facts of climate change: findings and recommendations for decision-making (debate)
Scientific facts of climate change: findings and recommendations for decision-making (debate)
Rising food prices in the European Union and developing countries (debate)
Preparation of the European Council (Brussels, 13-14 March 2008) (debate)
Outcome of the Bali climate change conference (debate)
Proposals on energy and climate change (debate)
Council's strategy for the Bali Conference on Climate Change (COP 13 and COP/MOP 3) (debate)
Tobacco smoke: policy options at EU level (debate)
Waste - Waste recycling (debate)
European Chemicals Agency (REACH) (vote)
European Chemicals Agency – Amendment of Directive 67/548/EEC on dangerous substances (debate)
Export of toxic waste to Africa – Use of criminal law to protect the environment (debate)
Breast cancer (debate)
Cleaner air for Europe – Thematic strategy on air pollution (debate)
Commission Question Time
Explanations of vote
Protection of groundwater against pollution (debate)
Rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (debate)
Explanations of vote
REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals)
Fight against terrorism
Climate change
Second meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention
Financing nature protection policy
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Naval sonars
Shipments of waste (debate)
Climate change conference (debate)
Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (debate)
European carbon market in 2012 (debate)
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (debate)
Climate change conference in Doha (COP 18) (debate)
Outcome of the Rio+20 Summit (20-22 June 2012) (debate)
A resource-efficient Europe (debate)
Follow-up to the Durban climate change conference (debate)
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)
Climate change conference in Durban (debate)
Rio+20 earth summit (debate)
Rio+20 earth summit (debate)
An effective raw materials strategy for Europe (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)
Explanations of vote
Preparations for Cancún Climate Change Conference (29 November-10 December) (debate)
Question Time (Commission)
International Climate Policy post-Copenhagen: Reinvigorating the international negotiations through immediate action
Preparation of the Copenhagen Summit on climate change (debate)
Climate change and developing countries in the framework of the UN Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen (debate)
Sustainable use of pesticides (debate) DE
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (debate) DE
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy - Options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (debate) DE
Packaging and packaging waste - End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment - Waste - Landfill of waste - Procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting (debate) DE
Decision on the Strategy on Plastics (debate) DE
Decision adopted on the second Mobility Package (debate) DE
Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (debate) DE
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment - Landfill of waste - Waste - Packaging and packaging waste (debate) DE
Outcome of the COP 21 (debate) DE
Decision adopted on the Circular Economy package (debate) DE
Emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants (debate) DE
Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (debate) DE
Emission measurements in the automotive sector (debate) DE
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (debate) DE
Tobacco agreements (debate) DE
Roadmap towards a new international climate agreement in Paris (debate) (debate) DE
2014 UN Climate Change Conference - COP 20 in Lima, Peru (1-12 December 2014) (debate) DE
Reports (26)
Report on the proposal for a Council Directive on end of life vehicles - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection PDF (105 KB)
Report concerning the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on European Union Water Policy - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
Indstilling ved andenbehandling om Rådets fælles holdning fastlagt med henblik på vedtagelse af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om ændring af Rådets direktiv 80/777/EØF om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om udvinding og markedsføring af naturligt mineralvand - Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse DA
Report on the communication from the Commission: Towards a thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PDF (169 KB) DOC (80 KB)
Report on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PDF (133 KB) DOC (45 KB)
Report 1. on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Directive on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (PE-CONS 3663/2002 - C5-0486/2002 - 2000/0158(COD)) 2. on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (PE-CONS 3663/2002 - C5-0487/2002 - 2000/0159(COD)) - European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committe PDF (140 KB) DOC (57 KB)
Recommendation for second reading on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to adopting a European Parliament and Council directive on waste electrical and electronic equipment - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PDF (227 KB) DOC (201 KB)
Recommendation for second reading on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to adopting the proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy PDF (168 KB) DOC (78 KB)
PDF (344 KB) DOC (329 KB)
PDF (224 KB) DOC (141 KB)
PDF (22 KB) DOC (46 KB)
PDF (74 KB) DOC (80 KB)
REPORT Report on "2050: The future begins today - Recommendations for the EU´s future integrated policy on climate change" PDF (579 KB) DOC (575 KB)
REPORT Draft Interim Report on the scientific facts of Climate Change: Findings and recommendations for decision-making PDF (214 KB) DOC (127 KB)
REPORT Report on the Green Paper "Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: policy options at EU level" PDF (142 KB) DOC (80 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission PDF (132 KB) DOC (79 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission PDF (130 KB) DOC (79 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/53/CE on end-of-life vehicles, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission PDF (133 KB) DOC (81 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the base year for the allocation of quotas of hydrochlorofluorocarbons with respect to the Member States that acceded on 1 May 2004 PDF (137 KB) DOC (77 KB)
REPORT Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/14/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the noise emission in the environment by equipment for use outdoors PDF (136 KB) DOC (89 KB)
REPORT Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 297/95 on fees payable to the European Medicines Agency PDF (169 KB) DOC (119 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds PDF (186 KB) DOC (70 KB)
REPORT Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur 29. Änderung der Richtlinie 76/769/EWG des Rates vom zur Angleichung der Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten für Beschränkungen des Inverkehrbringens und der Verwendung gewisser gefährlicher Stoffe und Zubereitungen (als krebserzeugend, erbgutverändernd bzw. fortpflanzungsgefährdend - k/e/f - eingestufte Stoffe) PDF (137 KB) DOC (41 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC) PDF (161 KB) DOC (48 KB)
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (Recast) PDF (468 KB) DOC (667 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (recast) PDF (462 KB) DOC (666 KB)
Shadow reports (13)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on shipment of waste PDF (324 KB) DOC (398 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products PDF (1 MB) DOC (2 MB)
REPORT on improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness PDF (177 KB) DOC (123 KB)
REPORT on a resource-efficient Europe PDF (292 KB) DOC (190 KB)
REPORT on the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides PDF (229 KB) DOC (89 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment PDF (1 MB) DOC (281 KB)
REPORT on a European strategy for plastics in a circular economy PDF (487 KB) DOC (83 KB)
REPORT on EU options for improving access to medicines PDF (447 KB) DOC (95 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste PDF (1 MB) DOC (278 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste PDF (861 KB) DOC (125 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste PDF (1 MB) DOC (158 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment PDF (867 KB) DOC (122 KB)
REPORT on Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris PDF (259 KB) DOC (205 KB)
Shadow opinions (4)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars
OPINION on the protection of animals during transport
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings
Institutional motions (1)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 2014 UN Climate Change Conference – COP 20 in Lima, Peru (1-12 December 2014) PDF (190 KB) DOC (109 KB)
Oral questions (11)
Monitoring framework for the circular economy PDF (44 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Monitoring framework for the circular economy PDF (43 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Monitoring framework for the circular economy PDF (190 KB) DOC (20 KB)
Monitoring framework for the circular economy PDF (190 KB) DOC (20 KB)
Major interpellation - Violation of fundamental human rights of women in Pakistan PDF (195 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Commission's answers to written questions PDF (205 KB) DOC (19 KB)
Call for a limitation of abusive fees charged for cross-border intra-EU phone calls and SMSs in the upcoming review of the telecoms framework PDF (106 KB) DOC (18 KB)
The existence of non-tariff barriers for food exporters on the internal EU market PDF (98 KB) DOC (28 KB)
Commission's answers to Written Questions PDF DOC
Climate Change Conference in Lima (COP 20) PDF DOC
Climate Change Conference in Lima (COP 20) PDF DOC
Major interpellations (1)
Violation of fundamental human rights of women in Pakistan PDF (194 KB) DOC (17 KB)
Written questions (14)
Income averaging and taxation in the agricultural sector - rules on State aid PDF (39 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Follow-up questions regarding GenX, PMT substances and REACH PDF (105 KB) DOC (20 KB)
EU eco-label for fishery and aquaculture products PDF (6 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS Directive) - Annex III exemption requests PDF (106 KB) DOC (20 KB)
Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species PDF (6 KB) DOC (18 KB)
Reassessment and reclassification of quarantine pests in accordance with the EU plant quarantine directive 2000/29/EC PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive - objection to Commission's delegated act exempting cadmium in display and lighting applications PDF (104 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Alleged price discrimination on the basis of nationality in the Balearic Islands PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Combatting vine wood diseases PDF (102 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Regulation (EU) No 333/2014 on reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars - implementing the WLTP test cycle in the European Union PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Formal proposal for amendment for consideration at the 27th meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol PDF (192 KB) DOC (28 KB)
REACH implementation (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006): prioritising and authorising SVHCs used exclusively in industrial applications and processes PDF (103 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Written declarations (2)
Amendments (1068)
Amendment 33 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls its demand expressed in its COP23 resolution for the Commission to prepare by COP24 a mid-century zero emissions strategy for the Union; welcomes in this regardwelcomes the publication of the Commission Communication "A Clean Planet for all – A European strategic long- term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy"; asks the Member States to agree on a net- zero 2050 strategy, as part of the future Europe debate, at the special EU summit in Sibiu in May 2019;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 7
7. Points that according to the Commission the EU GDP is expected to increase more under zero emissions scenarios than in scenarios with lower emission reductions, however this may be spread unevenly across the EU; considers that the price of non-action would be by far the costliest scenario and would not only result in massive GDP loss in Europe, but also further increase economic inequalities between Member States as some are expected to be harder hit than others by the consequences of inaction;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the inclusion of two pathways aiming at reaching net zero GHG emissions by 2050 and the Commission’s support for these, and considers this mid- century objective as the only one compatible with the Union'slong-term commitments under the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 78 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasizes the central and primordial role of energy efficiency measures in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in all proposed scenarios and recalls for that purpose that Energy Efficiency First principle has been introduced by the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union.
Amendment 131 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Insists on a dedicated earmarked fund for just transition in the MFF proposals.
Amendment 148 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Recalls that 71% of all energy is used for space heating alone; agrees with the Commission that energy-efficient homes will become the norm in a climate neutral EU, delivering better health and comfort for all Europeans.
Amendment 159 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that reaching net-zero GHG emissions in 2050 in the most cost- efficient manner, requires prioritising the stable, predictable and ambitious implementation of the adopted 2030 Clean Energy Package targets and may require raising and aligning the 2030 ambition level with net- zero 2050 scenarios; believes it is of upmost importance that the Union sends a clear message, at the latest during the UN Climate Summit in New York in September 2019, that it stands ready to review its contribution to the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 164 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 15
15. SupportCalls aon update of the Union’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC); calls therefore on EU leaders to consider raising the level of ambition of the Union’s NDC at the special EU Summit in Sibiu in May 2019, in view of the UN Clithe Commission to analyse if an increased 2030 target is in line with the cost-efficient pathway to net zero emissions in 2050 and if it is economically feasible and if it is possible by implementing the existing legislation without new legislation and then matke Summit in September 2019if appropriate a respective proposal;
Amendment 211 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that technology developments and solutions, energy efficiency in both supply & demand and sustainable renewable energy in the transport and power sectors will be key; underlines in this respect the importance of putting in place an overall framework that sets a level playing field for all available and innovative decarbonising solutions, to be complemented by technology-specific strategies, such as for hydrogen or methane;
Amendment 232 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines the central and complementary importance of a renewable-based powerand efficient power and heat sector and asks the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary action in that regard as it will have spill- over effects across all economic sectors; highlights that all pathways assume full decarbonisation of the power sector by 2050, a drastic reduction of fossil fuels and a strong increase in renewable energies and energy efficiency measures;
Amendment 248 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the need to implement the Energy Union and ensure further integration of the European Energy market in order to most effectively decarbonise the power sector and to facilitate investments where most renewable energy production can be effectuatachieved;
Amendment 249 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Stresses that sectoral efforts must be complemented by a cross-sector approach towards energy system integration in project planning for development and operations, making use of synergies between all energy infrastructures within a territory,including electricity, heat and gas networks, as well as technologies linking these networks; recognises that energy systems integration can provide higher flexibility, improved system efficiency, higher uptake of renewable energy across all energy carriers, and ultimately a cost-effective, feasible and acceptable energy transition.
Amendment 254 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that the strategy confirms that GHG emissions from the transport sector are still on the rise, and that the Clean Mobility Package will not be sufficient to decarbonise the transport sector by 2050;
Amendment 266 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Draft motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Notes the different burden on different modes of transport; calls that increasing income should be used to promote environmental friendly modes of transport such as busses or railways.
Amendment 275 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Notes that the EU building stock is responsible for about 40% of Europe’s final energy consumption and 36% of CO2 emissions in Europe; calls for unlocking its energy savings potential and for carbon-footprint reduction, in consistency with the EPBD objective of reaching an energy efficient and decarbonised building stock by 2050; considers that if deployed at scale, safe, reliable and readily-available technologies can tap the energy efficiency potential of Europe’s energy inefficient building stock, applying the deep staged renovation approach, and in synergy with renewable energy sources, limit the devastating impact of climate change; further considers that the achievement of low energy demand building, fully supplied by renewable energy, is a sine qua non for the Paris Agreement and for an EU agenda for growth, local jobs and improved living conditions for citizens across Europe.
Amendment 369 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 31
31. HighlightsUnderlines that a very large part of energy use and therefore GHG emissions is tied directly to the acquisition, processing, transport, conversion, use and disposal of resources; stresses that very significant savings in both energy and emissions are possible at each of these stages in the resource management chain; highlights therefore, that raising resource productivity through improved efficiency and reducing resource waste through measures such as reuse, recycling and remanufacturing can greatly lower both resource consumption and GHG emissions which is at the heart of the circular economy; underlines that in a circular economy the resources are retained within the economy and remain in productive use when a product has reached the end of its life, reducing the resource consumption and therefore GHG emissions; highlights as well the cost efficiency of circular economy measures; believes that improved circular product design will help bring about a switch in industrial materialto close the production cycles, bring about a switch in production and consumption patterns and a reduced but improved production; the amount of waste;
Amendment 392 #
2018/2974(RSP)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34 a. Regrets that many other major economies are not yet working on 2050 strategies and there is almost no debate in other major economies about increasing the NDCs to bring them in line with the global target under the Paris Agreement; therefore asks the Council and the Commission to increase climate diplomacy and take other appropriate measures to encourage other major economies so that we can achieve together the long-term Paris Agreement targets.
Amendment 3 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Citation 22 a (new)
- having regard to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants,
Amendment 17 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates that moving towards a circular economy requires applying strictly the waste hierarchy and phasing out toxic substances of concern where possible, in particular where safer alternatives exist or will be developed, so as to ensure the development of non-toxic material cycles, which will facilitate recycling and are essential for the sound development of a functioning secondary raw materials market;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that all substances of very high concern should be tracked and that information relating to these substances should be fully available to recyclers and to the public; welcomes in this respect, upon request, to the public in line with the new provisions included in Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2018/... amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights that the quality of the data on chemicals hazards, uses and exposure available on ECHA’s website should urgently be improvedin the REACH registration dossiers should urgently be improved, and therefore encourages the registrants to ensure compliance of their registration dossiers and keep them up-to-date;
Amendment 48 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that in line with Article 20(2) of REACH, ECHA should not grant access to the market to chemicals with incompliant, incomplete and inadequate registration dossiers and should make sure that the necessary information is generated as soon as possible; recalls that it is crucial that the information provided for registration dossiers is accurate, adequate, reliable, relevant and trustworthy;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 21
Amendment 67 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights that it is crucial to ensure a level playing field between EU- produced and imported articles; notes that EU-produced articles must not, under any circumstances, be disadvantaged; asks therefore the Commission to promote the timely use of restrictions in REACH and other product legislation so that EU produced and imported products are subject to the same rules; calls on the competent authorities in the Member States to increase controls on imported materials to ensure compliance with REACH and product legislation;
Amendment 73 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that clear EU rules specifying which conditions need to be met to exit the waste regime are needed, and that robustharmonized end-of-waste criteria striking the right balance between encouraging recycling and avoiding re-injecting hazardous substances into the economy are required;
Amendment 78 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that the rules for classifying waste as hazardous or non- hazardous should be fully alignedconsistent with those for the classification of substances and mixtures under CLP, taking into account the specifics of waste and the way in which it is handled, and furthermore welcomes the new technical guidance on waste classification;
Amendment 84 #
2018/2589(RSP)
Paragraph 30
30. Considers thatalls on the Commission to review the European List of Waste should be reviewedwithout delay;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas it is important that the future CAP is coherent with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement and EU policies, particularly in the areas of sustainability, environment, climate, public health and food;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
B b. whereas the future CAP will have to play an enhanced role in sustainable development, public health and environmental and climate protection, with specific objectives to be agreed at EU level and delivered by the Members States on biodiversity, climate change and antimicrobial resistance as well as on air, soil and water protection;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the CAP, as a sectorial and common policy, should encourage and strengthen the contribution each farmer makes towards meeting environmental and climate challenges, and should promote the transition towards an sustainable agriculture combining economic with environmental performance standards;
Amendment 89 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas greening measures are complex and inefficient, and show how the lack of binding measurable targets to be achieved can lead to failure in providing environmental public goods;
Amendment 135 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for a CAP that has its top priority the transition of each European farm towards an sustainable undertaking combining economic with environmental performance standards;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls on the Commission to make sure that the future CAP accords with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement and EU nature, climate and environment legislation in order to steer the post-2020 CAP towards a fair, effective and efficient farming policy which has as its core objective facilitating the transition towards a sustainable food and farming system in Europe, and stresses that sufficient funding to reach the targets must be provided;
Amendment 150 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that the future CAP supports more sustainable production systems and enhanced delivery of public goods from land management, and that the level of support should be scaled to the volume of services delivered;
Amendment 155 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Calls for the future CAP to reinforce the EU added value of the policy by aligning the agri-environmental CAP interventions to the existing objectives and targets in EU nature, climate and environment legislation and international agreements;
Amendment 158 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Calls for the future CAP to be designed to better address critical public health issues, such as those related to antimicrobial resistance or air quality;
Amendment 177 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a first pillar, defined at EU level, that recognises the importance of direct aid and that includ, better supports farmers in their transition towards sustainable farming and that includes in all EU Member States, as a share of up to 30 % of the pillar budget, a contractual incitement eco- scheme for athe transition towards an agriculture combining economic withfarm sustainability and higher environmental performance standards;
Amendment 184 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States set quantified targets wherever possible and introduce indicators for measuring progress of the targets set in their Strategic Plans;
Amendment 186 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Asks the Commission to provide clear guidance and support for Member States when developing their Strategic Plans to ensure that these plans are robust and of a high quality;
Amendment 233 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the CAP must include an ambitious European green energy strategy promoting highly sustainable biofuels based on the co- production of plant protein;
Amendment 255 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Underlines the important role of sustainably managed forests for the adaption of forests to climate change and highlights the significance of the forest- wood-value chain for sustaining rural livelihood, creating jobs, growth and social stability in rural areas as well as contributing to new value chains in line with the circular economy and bioeconomy;
Amendment 14 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
Amendment 81 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the EU is committed to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals, several of which are relevant to the sustainable consumption and production of plastics limiting their marine and terrestrial impacts;
Amendment 114 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is convinced that the plastics strategy should also serve as a lever for stimulating new, smart and circular business, production and consumption models covering the entire value chain in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goal number 12 "Sustainable Consumption and Production"; calls on the Commission to foster clear linkages between the Union’s waste, chemicals and product policies to this end;
Amendment 155 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the competent authorities in the Member States to ensure that the entire waste acquis is fully implemented; points out that today's landfilling of 30% of plastics is a waste of resources; stresses that plastics shall no longer be accepted in landfills by 2030;
Amendment 185 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls onReminds the Commission to come forward with an updateof its obligation to propose a reinforcement of the essential requirements in the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive by 2020, taking into account the relative properties of different packaging materials on the basis of life-cycle assessments, addressing in particular prevention, design for circularity and over-packaging, focusing on implementable and effective requirements;
Amendment 204 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to make ‘circularity first’resource efficiency an overarching principle, including the important part that circular materials, products and systems can play, also for non-packaging plastic items, inter alia by developing product standards and revising the eco- design legislative framework;
Amendment 246 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that mandatory rules on recycled content for specific plastic products may be needconsidered in order to drive the uptake of secondary raw materials;
Amendment 287 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes thatPoints to the presence of a substance of concern should not be a blanket justification for precluding the recycling of waste streams for specific, well-defined and safe applications, since this could stifle innovation and discourage recycling potential in favour of incinerolution of the European Parliament on implementation of the circular economy package: options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation;
Amendment 312 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Takes note of actions already taken in some Member States and therefore supports the Commission in coming forward with a specific legislative framework on single-use plastics with the aim of halting the generation of marine litter in the EUand believes that this proposal would also significantly reduce marine litter of which more than 80% is plastic and thereby contributing to the goal of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution of all kinds;
Amendment 330 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Stresses the importance of consumer awareness and active participation in reducing plastic consumption and the impacts it has;
Amendment 351 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines that fiscal policy remains a Member State competence and opposes the introduction of an EU-wide plastics tax as a potential own resource stream for the EUTakes note of the Commission's proposal "On the System of Own Resources of the European Union" for a contribution based on non-recycled plastic packaging waste; stresses that the steering effect of such a contribution shall be coherent with the waste hierarchy and therefore shall encourage prevention; highlights that such contributions may cause distortive economic and ecological consequences and substitution effects;
Amendment 365 #
Amendment 371 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Strongly supports the Commission in coming forward with clear standards and harmonised rules on both bio-based content and biodegradability (a feedstock independent property) in order to tackle existing misconceptions and misunderstandings about bio-plastics and biodegradable plastics;
Amendment 383 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Highlights the importance of lifecycle assessments in order to demonstrate a reduced environmpotential role for bio-plastics compared to alternative plastic products, based on robust lifecycle assessments; points to the need for analysis and tests of the potential impact for all bio-plasticbiodegrading ability under diverse real life conditions;
Amendment 396 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for a ban on oxo-degradable plastic, as this type of plastic does not safely biodegrade and therefore fails to deliver a proven environmental benefit; welcomes in this respect the Commission's request to ECHA to prepare a proposal for a possible restriction;
Amendment 405 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission to introduce a ban on micro-plastics which are intentionally added to products, such as cosmetics and cleaning products, and for which viable alternatives are available; welcomes in this respect the Commission's request to ECHA to prepare a proposal for a possible restriction and supports the control-at-source measures;
Amendment 433 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Welcomes the Commission’s announcement that an additional EUR 100 million under Horizon 2020 will be invested to drive investment towards circular solutions under Horizon 2020; supports the development of a Strategic Research Innovation Agenda on plastics, such as design options, diversification of feedstock and innovative recycling technologies such as chemical recycling as well as the improvement of mechanical recycling; calls on the Commission to also provide funding for waste prevention schemes and their corresponding business models; supports the development of a Strategic Research Innovation Agenda on material circularity, with specific focus on plastic and plastic containing materials, to guide future funding decisions;
Amendment 451 #
2018/2035(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Emphasises the strong potential for linking the Digital Agenda and Circular Economy, particularly in gathering and processing information to make markets work better for business and consumers and the potential for innovative business models;
Amendment 56 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, market-oriented, to boost modernisation and sustainability, including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and rural areas, and to help reducing the Union legislation- related administrative burden for beneficiaries.
Amendment 62 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The use of common definitions entirely set at Union level has caused certain difficulties for Member States to cater their own specificities at national, regional, and local level. Member States should therefore be given thea certain level of flexibility to specify certain definitions in their CAP Strategic Plan. In order to ensure a common level playing field, a certain framework has, however, to be set at Union level constituting the necessary essential elements to be included in those definitions (‘framework definitions’).
Amendment 91 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) It is of utmost importance that the CAP at least maintains the same level of financing in the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework, as it has in the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.
Amendment 160 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The CAP should ensure that Member States increase the environmental delivery by respecting local needs and farmers' actual circumstances. Member States should under direct payments in the CAP Strategic Plan set up Eco-schemes voluntary for farmers, which should be fully coordinated with the other relevant interventions. They should be defined by the Member States as a payment granted either for incentivising and remunerating the provision of public goods by agricultural practices beneficial to the environment and climate or as a compensation for the introduction of these practices. In both cases they should aim at enhancing the environmental and climate performance of the CAP and should consequently be conceived to go beyond the mandatory requirements already prescribed by the system of conditionality. Member States may decide to set up eco- schemes for agricultural practices such as the enhanced management of permanent pastures and landscape features, high nature value farming, Natura 2000 farming and organic farming. These schemes may also include ‘entry-level schemes’ which may be a condition for taking up more ambitious rural development commitments.
Amendment 184 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Forestry measures should contribute to the implementation of the Union Forest Strategy, and be based on Member States' national or sub-national forest programs or equivalent instruments, which should build on the commitments stemming from the Regulation on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emission and removals from land use, land use energy and forestry [LULUCF Regulation] and those made in the Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Interventions should be based on forest management plans or equivalent instruments and may comprise forest area development and sustainable management of forests, including the afforestation of land, fire prevention and the creation and regeneration of agroforestry systems; the protection, restoration and improvement of forest resources, taking into account adaptation needs; investments to guarantee and enhance forest conservation and resilience, and the provision of forest ecosystem and climate services; and measures and investments in support of the renewable energy and bio-economy.
Amendment 272 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) 'permanent crops' shall be non- rotational crops other than permanent grassland and permanent pasture that occupy the land for five years or more, which yield repeated harvests, including nurseries, including those in planters lined with plastic (if the Member State makes provision for this), and short rotation coppice;
Amendment 278 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) 'permanent grassland and permanent pasture' (together referred to as 'permanent grassland') shall be land not included in the crop rotation of the holding for five years or more, used to grow grasses or other herbaceous forage naturally (self-seeded) or through cultivation (sown). It may include other species such as shrubs and/or trees which can be grazed or produce animal feed; Member States may decide that land which can be grazed, where grasses and other herbaceous forage are not predominant or are absent, be considered permanent grassland.
Amendment 336 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Those objectives shall be complemented by the cross-cutting objective of modernising the sector by fostering sustainable development and sharing of knowledge, innovation and digitalisation in agriculture and rural areas, and encouraging their uptake.
Amendment 378 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) fostercontribute to the protection and the improvement of the quality of air, water and soil, and foster a more sustainable developmentuse and and efficient management of natural resources such as water, soil and air;
Amendment 394 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) contribute to the protection and improvement of biodiversity, enhance ecosystem services and preserve and restore habitats and landscapes;
Amendment 491 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that all agricultural areas including land which is no longer used for production purposes, is maintained in good agricultural and environmental condition. Member States shall define, at national or regional level, minimum standards for beneficiaries for good agricultural and environmental condition of land in line with the main objective of the standards as referred to in Annex III, taking into account the specific characteristics of the areas concerned in line with established local practices and the specific environmental-related objectives set out in point (f) of Article 6(1), including soil, water and climatic condition, existing farming systems, land use, crop rotation, farming practices, and farm structures.
Amendment 534 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall include in the CAP Strategic Plan a system providing services for advising farmers, forest owners and other beneficiaries of CAP support on land management and farm management ('farm advisory services').
Amendment 673 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In this context, it should be noted that at least 5 % of all direct payments according to Article 14 shall be redistributed and linked to areas defined in Article 4(1)(b)(iii).
Amendment 674 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure redistribution of support from bigger to smaller or medium-sized farms by providing for a redistributive income support in the form of an annual decoupled payment per eligible hectare to farmers who are entitled to a payment under the basic income support referred to in Article 17. Member States shall ensure a redistribution of at least 15 % of the direct payments for the respective Member State granted according to Article 14. Member States shall set limits for the number of these payment claims or hectares. However, these must be at least 1.5 times the average farm size for the respective Member State.
Amendment 738 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish the list of agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment, with a focus on the provision of public goods.
Amendment 747 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Those practices shall be designed to meet one or more of the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives laid down in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1)and the socio-economic specific objective laid down in point (i) of Article 6(1), prioritising with regard to objective (f) high nature value farming and Natura 2000 farming.
Amendment 1057 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 2
Article 65 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall include agri- environment-climate commitments in their CAP Strategic Plans with 50 % of commitments ring-fenced for objective (f) set out in Article 6(1).
Amendment 1068 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 4
Article 65 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall only grant payments to farmers and other beneficiaries who undertake, on a voluntary basis, management commitments which are considered to be beneficial and targeted to achieving the specific objectives set out in Article 6(1).
Amendment 1099 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 6
Article 65 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall compensate beneficiaries for costs incurred and income foregone resulting from the commitments made. Where necessary, they may also cover transaction costs and establish an incentive. In duly justified cases, Member States may grant support as a flat-rate or as a one- off payment per unit. Payments shall be granted annually.
Amendment 1246 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 a (new)
Article 72 a (new)
Article 72 a Support to prevent and mitigate damage caused by protected large carnivore species 1. Member States may, under the conditions laid down in this Article, support the introduction of measures to protect livestock farms from damages by large carnivore species protected by Council Directive 92/43/EEC and compensate producers for losses deriving from those damages. 2. Member States shall provide total or partial compensation for the additional costs and loss of income taking place as a result of the prevention measures or the casualties to herds as a result of these damages. 3. Member States shall define the types of losses as well as the preventive measures that will be covered by the compensation referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 1283 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
At least 3050 % of the total EAFRD contribution to the CAP Strategic Plan as set out in Annex IX shall be reserved for interventions addressing the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1) of this Regulation, excluding interventions based on Article 66.
Amendment 1294 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 86 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The indicative financial allocations for the Schemes for the Climate and the Environment referred to in Subsection 4 of Section 2 of Chapter II of Title III, will be at least 30% of the amounts set out in Annex VII. Member States may choose to transfer the financial allocation referred to in the first sub-paragraph to the Member State’s allocation for EAFRD, in accordance with Article 90, provided that it is used in EAFRD interventions addressing the specific environmental-, climate- and societal demands-related objectives referred to in points (d), (e), (f) and (i) of Article 6(1).
Amendment 1301 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 86 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The indicative financial allocations for the coupled income support interventions referred to in Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter II of Title III, shall be limited to a maximum of 105% of the amounts set out in Annex VII.
Amendment 1311 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 86 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Payments from the first pillar, including coupled support, shall be limited per hectare and beneficiary to the equivalent of twice the average of EU direct payments per hectare.
Amendment 1318 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87 – title
Article 87 – title
Tracking environmental and climate expenditure
Amendment 1321 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87 – paragraph 1
Article 87 – paragraph 1
1. On the basis of the information provided by Member States the Commission shall evaluate the contribution of the policy to the environmental and climate change objectives using a simple, appropriate and common methodology.
Amendment 1340 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1369 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 2
Article 92 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall explain in their CAP Strategic Plans, on the basis of available information, the environmental and climate objectives they aim to achieve in the period 2021-2027, on the basis of targets for the relevant impact indicators set out in Annex I, and how they intend to achieve the greater overall contribution set out to in paragraph 1. That explanation shall be based on relevant information such as the elements referred to in points (a) to (f) of Article 95(1) and in point (b) of Article 95(2).
Amendment 1389 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) economic, environmental and social partners;
Amendment 1399 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall involve those partners in the preparation and implementation of the CAP Strategic Plans.
Amendment 1431 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
Article 100 – paragraph 1
1. The target plan referred to in point (e) of Article 95(1) shall consist of a recapitulative table showing the targets as referred to in point (a) of Article 97(1), indicating the break-down in abiennuial milestones.
Amendment 1494 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 121 – paragraph 1
Article 121 – paragraph 1
1. By 15 February 2023 and 15 February of each subsequentvery other year until and including 2030, the Member States shall submit to the Commission an a biennuial performance report on the implementation of the CAP Strategic Plan in the previous two financial years. The report submitted in 2023 shall cover the financial years 2021 and 2022. For direct payments as referred to in Chapter II of Title III, the report shall cover only financial year 2022.
Amendment 1557 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.15 a (new)
Annex I – Result indicators – R.15 a (new)
R.15a Reducing emissions from fertiliser use: Share of agricultural land under management commitments to reduce GHG emissions from fertiliser use.
Amendment 1591 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.20 a (new)
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.20 a (new)
I.20a High nature value farming: Percentage of Utilised Agricultural Area farmed to generate high nature value (HNV).
Amendment 1611 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.29 a (new)
Annex I – Result indicators – R.29 a (new)
R.29a Fostering high nature value farming: Percentage of farmland under management commitments to generate high nature value.
Amendment 1693 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – GAEC 3 a (new) - Requirements and standards
Annex III – GAEC 3 a (new) - Requirements and standards
GAEC 3a: Maximum stocking density.
Amendment 1694 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – GAEC 3 a (new) - Main objective of the standard
Annex III – GAEC 3 a (new) - Main objective of the standard
no exceedance of a limit of 0.7 livestock units per hectare on agricultural land.
Amendment 216 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) To encourage environmentally sustainable innovation and to avoid distorting competition when raising financing for environmentally sustainable economic activities, the technical screening criteria should ensure that all relevant economic activities within amajor economic specific sectortors, including among others agriculture, construction, energy, chemicals, transportation and production, can qualify as environmentally sustainable and are treated equally if they contribute equally towards one or more of the environmental objectives laid out in this Regulation. The potential capacity to contribute towards those environmental objectives may however vary across sectors, which should be reflected in the criteria. However, within each sector, those criteria should not unfairly disadvantage certain economic activities over others if the former contribute towards the environmental objectives to the same extent as the latter.
Amendment 222 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27 a (new)
Recital 27 a (new)
(27 a) Environmentally sustainable activities are the result of technologies and products developed all along the value-chain. For this reason, the technical screening criteria should consider the role of the whole value- chain, from the processing of raw materials to the final product and its waste phase, in the final delivery of environmental sustainable activities.
Amendment 232 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) It is of particular importance that the Commission when preparing the development of the technical screening criteria, carry out appropriate consultations in line with Better Regulation requirements. The process for the establishment and the update of the technical screening criteria should also involve relevant stakeholders and build on the advice of experts with proven knowledge and experience in the relevant areas. For that purpose, the Commission should set up a Platform on sustainable finance. This Platform should be composed of experts representing both the public and the private sector. Public sector representatives should include experts from the European Environmental Agency, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Investment Bank. Private sector experts should include representatives of relevant stakeholders, including financial market actors, universities, research institutes, associations and organisations and major economic sectors, including among others agriculture, construction, energy, chemicals, transportation and production. The Platform should advise the Commission on the development, analysis and review of technical screening criteria, including their potential impact on the valuation of assets that until the adoption of the technical screening criteria were considered as green assets under existing market practices. The Platform should also advise the Commission on whether the technical screening criteria are suitable for further uses in future Union policy initiatives aimed at facilitating sustainable investment.
Amendment 462 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) reducing the content of hazardous substances in materials and products, in line with the harmonised legal requirements laid down at Union level, wherever it is technically feasible;
Amendment 544 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) consider the role of the whole value-chain, from the processing of raw materials to the final product, in the final delivery of environmental sustainable activities;
Amendment 642 #
2018/0178(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The report shall take into account the possibility to introduce integrated reporting requirements in relation to the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups in accordance with Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, and it shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. _________________ 1aDirective 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
Amendment 90 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) This Directive is without prejudice to the provisions established in Directive 94/62/EC regarding single-use plastic products that are considered packaging items as defined by Article 3(1) of Directive 94/62/EC.
Amendment 122 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) For certain single-use plastic products, suitable and more sustainable alternatives are not yet readily available and the consumption of most such single- use plastic products is expected to increase. To reverse that trend and promote efforts towards more sustainable solutions Member States should be required to take the necessary measures to achieve a significant reduction in the consumption of those products, without prejudice to Article 18 of Directive 94/62/EC, without compromising food hygiene or food safety, good hygiene practices, good manufacturing practices, consumer information, or traceability requirements set out in Union food legislation44 . When considering a measure having restrictive effects on intra-Union trade, Member States should be able to demonstrate that the measure in question is adequate to attain the objective of reducing a significant reduction in the consumption of those products, does not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective and does not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States. Member States should encourage the use of products that are suitable for multiple use and that are, after having become waste, suitable for preparing for re-use and recycling and without compromising the free movement of goods in the internal market. Those measures should take into account the impact of products throughout their life cycle inclusive the marine environment and the waste hierarchy. Member States should encourage reusable cutlery, plates and cups in establishments where food or drinks are provided for consumption in the store or on the spot, including but not limited to restaurants, fast food stores, cafés and food trucks. __________________ 44 Regulation (EC) 178/2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p.1-24), Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p.1-54), Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 on materials intended to come into contact and other relevant legislation related to food safety, hygiene and labelling (OJ L 338, 13.11.2004, p.4-17).
Amendment 130 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) Member States should be required, in accordance with Directive 94/62/EC, to notify the Commission of any drafted measure related to packaging before adopting it, in order to verify whether it may create barriers to the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 164 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) With regard to single-use plastic products for which there are no readily available suitable and more sustainable alternatives, Member States should, in line with the polluter pays principle, also introduce extended producer responsibility schemes to cover the necessary costs of waste management and clean-up of litterin line with Article 8 and 8a of Directive 2008/98/EC and Article 7 of Directive 94/62/EC as well as the costs of awareness-raising measures to prevent and reduce such litter.
Amendment 175 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The large portion of plastic stemming from abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear containing plastic in marine litter indicates that the existing legal requirements46 do not provide sufficient incentives to return such fishing gear to shore for collection and treatment. The indirect fee system envisaged under Union law on port reception facilities for the delivery of waste from ships takes away the incentive for ships to discharge their waste at sea, and ensures a right of delivery. That system should, however, be supplemented by a collection target and further financial incentives for fishermen to bring their fishing gear waste on shore to avoid any potential increase in the indirect waste fee to be paid. As plastic components of fishing gear have a high recycling potential, Member States should, in line with the polluter pays principle, introduce extended producer responsibility for fishing gear containing plastic to facilitate separate collection of waste fishing gear and to finance sound waste management of such fishing gear, in particular recycling. __________________ 46 Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, Directive 2000/59/EC and Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 183 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In order to prevent littering and other inappropriate forms of disposal resulting in marine litter containing plastic, consumers need to be properly informed about the most appropriate waste disposal options available and/or waste disposal options to be avoided, best practices with regard to waste disposal and the environmental impact of bad disposal practices as well as about the plastic content in certain single-use plastic products and fishing gear. Therefore, Member States should be required to take awareness raising measures, including education campaigns at schools, ensuring that such information is given to the consumers to incentivise them to change their behaviour and to participate more actively in litter prevention. This information should include the impact of inappropriate waste disposal on the sewer network. The information should not contain any promotional content encouraging the use of the single-use plastic products. Member States should be able to choose the measures which are most appropriate based on the nature of the product or its use. The fight against litter should be a shared effort between competent authorities, producers and consumers. Producers of single-use plastic products and fishing gear containing plastic should cover the costs of the awareness raising measures as part of their extended producer responsibility obligation.
Amendment 192 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Directive 2008/98/EC lays down general minimum requirements for extended producer responsibility schemes. Those requirements should apply to extended producer responsibility schemes established by this Directive. This Directive, however, establishes additional extended producer responsibility requirements, for example, the requirement on producers of certain single-use plastic products to cover the costs of clean-up of litter.
Amendment 204 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) As the Court of Justice has held on numerous occasions, it would be incompatible with the binding effect, which the third paragraph of Article 288 of the Treaty ascribes to a Directive, to exclude, in principle, the possibility of an obligation imposed by a Directive from being relied on by persons concerned. That consideration applies particularly in respect of a Directive, which has amongst its objectives the protection of the environment from the adverse effects of marine litter. Therefore, in accordance with the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, members of the public concerned should have access to justice in order to contribute to the protection of the right to live in an environment, which is adequate for personal health and well-being. In addition, where a large number of persons are in a 'mass harm situation', due to the same illegal practices relating to the violation of rights granted by this Directive, they should have the possibility to use collective redress mechanisms, where such mechanisms have been established by Member States in line with Commission Recommendation 2013/396/EU47 . __________________ 47 Commission Recommendation of 11 June 2013 on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union law (OJ L 201, 26.7.2013, p. 60).
Amendment 209 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201648 , the Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Directive. That evaluation should be based on experience gathered and data collected during the implementation of this Directive and data collected under Directive 2008/56/EC or Directive 2008/98/EC. The evaluation should provide the basis for an assessment of possible further measures and an assessment whether, in view of monitoring of marine litter in the Union, the Annex listing single-use plastic products needs to be reviewed. The evaluation should also consider whether scientific and technical progress that has taken place in the meantime, including the development of biodegradable materials and the development of criteria or a standard for biodegradability of plastics in the marine environment, as foreseen in the European Plastics Strategy, allows the setting of a standard for biodegradation of certain single-use plastic products in the marine environment. That standard would include a standard to test if, as a result of physical and biological decomposition in the marine environment, plastics would fully decompose into carbon dioxide (CO2), biomass and water within a timescale short enough for the plastics not to be harmful for marine life and not lead to an accumulation of plastics in the environment. If that is the case, single-use plastic products that meet such a standard could be exempted from the prohibition on placing on the market. While the European Strategy for Plastics already envisages action in this area, it also recognises the challenges in relation to determining a regulatory framework for plastics with biodegradable properties due to different marine conditions across seas. __________________ 48 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1. OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 292 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures, without prejudice to Article 18 of Directive 94/62/EC, to achieve a significant reduction in the consumption of the single-use plastic products listed in Part A of the Annex on their territory by … [six years after the end-date for transposition of this Directive].
Amendment 306 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Those measures may include national consumption reduction targets, measures ensuring that reusable alternatives to those products are made available at the point of sale to the final consumer, economic instruments such as ensuring that single- use plastic products are not provided free of charge at the point of sale to the final consumer. Those measures shall be proportionate and non-discriminatory and may vary depending on the environmental impact of the products referred to in the first subparagraph.
Amendment 309 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall notify the Commission, in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 94/62/EC, of any draft measures that they plan to adopt pursuant to the first subparagraph to permit the Commission to examine it in light of the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 348 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. TBy [3 months after entering into force of this directive] the Commission shall request the European standardisation organisations to develop harmonised standards relating to the requirement referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 362 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that each sales packaging of the single-use plastic product listed in Part D of the Annex placed on the market bears a conspicuous, clearly legible and indelible marking informing consumers of one or more of the following:
Amendment 376 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the negative environmental impacts of littering or other inappropriate waste disposal of the products, or
Amendment 382 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the presence of plastics in the product., and
Amendment 390 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) the recyclability of a product.
Amendment 394 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall, by … [12 months before the end-date for transposition of this Directive] adopt an implementing act laying down the specifications for the marking referred to in paragraph 1 and in doing so shall take account of sectoral voluntary agreements and shall not mislead the consumer. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
Amendment 405 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
With regard to the schemes established pursuant to paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that the producers of the single-use plastic products listed in Part E of the Annex shall cover the necessary costs of the collection of waste consisting of those single-use plastic products and its subsequent transport and treatment, including the costs to clean up litteras defined under Article 8 and 8a of Directive 2008/98/EC and the costs of the awareness raising measures referred to in Article 10 regarding those products.
Amendment 420 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For single-use plastic products that are packaging, the requirements laid down in this paragraph supplementare without prejudice to the requirements regarding extended producer responsibility schemes laid down in Directive 94/62/EEC and Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 424 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that extended producer responsibility schemes are established for fishing gear containing plastic placed on the Union market, in accordance with the provisions on extended producer responsibility in Directive 2008/98/EC. Member States shall ensure on that basis that a minimum collection rate of fishing gear containing plastic is achieved annually. From 2025 the minimum collection rate shall be 35 % calculated on the basis of the total weight of fishing gear collected in a given year in the Member State concerned, expressed as a percentage of the average weight of fishing gear placed on the market in the three preceding years in that Member State.
Amendment 460 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the available of reusable alternatives, re-use systems and waste management options for those products and fishing gear containing plastic as well as best practices in sound waste management carried out in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC;
Amendment 503 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) it is feasible to establish binding quantitative Union targets. expressed in absolute numbers, for the consumption reduction of, in particular, single-use plastic products listed in Part A of the Annex, taking into account already achieved reductions as well as low consumption in some of the Member States;
Amendment 514 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) sufficient scientific and technical progress has been made, and criteria or a standard for biodegradability in the marine environment applicable to single-use plastic products within the scope of this directive and their single-use substitutes have been developed, in order to determine wh based on solid field testing in real marine life conditions and where the biodegradation of the plastich products no longer need to be subject to the restrictions on placing on the market, where appropriate results in carbon dioxide (CO2), biomass and water that is fully re- integrated into the natural carbon and nitrogen cycles without damaging ecosystem balances.
Amendment 525 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, the Member States shall apply the measures necessary to comply with Articles 5 and 7(1) from … [2 years after entry into force of this Directive] and with Article 6(1) from …[32 years after the entry into force of this Directivee standard referred to in Article 6(3)].
Amendment 640 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – part D – indent 3 a (new)
Annex I – part D – indent 3 a (new)
- Tobacco products with filters and filters marketed for use in combination with tobacco products
Amendment 682 #
2018/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – part F – indent 1
Annex I – part F – indent 1
— Beverage bottles, including its cap and lid
Amendment 39 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned about the proposed 5 % decrease in financial resources for the decentralised agencies under the remit of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ECHA, ECDC, EEA, EFSA, EMA); calls for the decentralised agencies to be allocated more financial and human resources, at least at the level of 2014-2020 in real terms, where appropriate and based on their individual needs, in particular if new tasks are allocated;
Amendment 159 #
2018/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) From 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2029 by 1520%;
Amendment 173 #
2018/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) From 1 January 2030 onwards by at least 305% subject to the review pursuant to Article 13.
Amendment 51 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Different operators are active in the agricultural and food supply chain at the stages of production, processing, marketing, distribution and retail of agricultural or food products. The chain is by far the most important channel for bringing food products from “farm to fork”. delivering products.Those operators trade agricultural or food products, that is to say primary agricultural products, including fishery and aquaculture products, as listed in Annex I to the Treaty for use as food, and, other food products not listed in that Annex but processed from agricultural products for use as food and agricultural products.
Amendment 57 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The number and size of operators vary across the different stages of the food supply chain. Differences in bargaining power relate to the different levels of concentration of operators and can enable the unfair exercise of bargaining power by using unfair trading practices. Unfair trading practices are in particular harmful for small and medium-sized and mid-cap operators in the agricultural and food supply chain. Agricultural producers, who supply primary agricultural products, are largely small and medium-sized.
Amendment 58 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Agricultural producers, who supply primary agricultural products, are largely small and medium-sized. But the limited criteria of small and medium-sized enterprises in agricultural production are often exceeded e.g. when employing seasonal workers. Therefore, it is adequate to enlarge the scope to mid-caps. Mid-cap companies are enterprises or Producer Organisation, cooperatives or Associations of Producer Organisations with a medium-sized structure and with a high capital ratio with a staff headcount of up to 3000 employees. Furthermore, mid-caps can be family-run enterprises. Small and medium-sized enterprises and mid-caps have little market power in comparison to the big players in the agricultural or food supply chain.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) A majority of all Member States, but not all of them, have specific national rules that protect suppliers against unfair trading practices occurring in business-to- business relationships in the agricultural or food supply chain. Where reliance on contract law or self-regulatory initiatives is possible, fear of retaliation against a complainant limits the practical value of these forms of redress. Certain Member States, which have specific rules on unfair trading practices in place, therefore entrust administrative authorities with their enforcement. However, Member States’ unfair trading practices rules - to the extent they exist - are characterised by significant divergence.
Amendment 64 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) A minimum Union standard of protection against certain manifestly unfair trading practices should be introduced to reduce the occurrence of such practices and to contribute to ensuring a fair standard of living for agricultural producers. It should benefit all agricultural producers or any natural or legal person that supplies agricultural or food products, including producer organisations and associations of producer organisations, provided that all those persons meet the definition of micro, small and medium- sized enterprises set out in the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC12 or are mid-cap enterprises. Those micro, small or, medium or mid-cap suppliers are particularly vulnerable to unfair trading practices and least able to weather them without negative effects on their economic viability. As the financial pressure on small and medium- sized and mid-cap enterprises caused by unfair trading practices often passes through the chain and reaches agricultural producers, rules on unfair trading practices should also protect small and medium-sized and mid-cap intermediary suppliers at the stages downstream of primary production. Protection of intermediary suppliers should also avoid unintended consequences (notably in terms of unduly raising prices) of trade diversion away from agricultural producers and their associations, who produce processed products, to non- protected suppliers. __________________ 12 OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36.
Amendment 74 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) As a majority of Member States already have national rules on unfair trading practices, albeit diverging, it is appropriate to use the tool of a Directive to introduce a minimum protection standard under Union law. This should enable Member States to integrate the relevant rules into their national legal order in such a way as to bring about a cohesive regime. Member States should not be precluded from adopting and applying on their territory stricter national laws protecting small and medium-sized suppliers and buyers against unfair trading practices occurring in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain, subject to the limits of Union law applicable to the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 78 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) As unfair trading practices may occur at any stage of the sale of an agricultural or food product, i.e. before, during or after a sales transaction, Member States should ensure that the provisions of this Directive should apply to such practices whenever they occur.
Amendment 91 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In the interest of an effective implementation of the policy in respect of unfair trading practices in business-to- business relationships in the food supply chain, the Commission should review the application of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The review should also pay particular attention to a possible enlargement of the lists of prohibited unfair trading practices and whether protection of small and medium-sized buyers of food products in the supply chain – in addition to the protection of small and medium sized suppliers – in the future would be justified,
Amendment 96 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive establishes a minimum list of prohibited unfair trading practices between buyers and suppliers in the agricultural or food supply chain and lays down minimum rules concerning their enforcement and arrangements for the coordination between enforcement authorities.
Amendment 102 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive applies to certain unfair trading practices which occur in relation to the sales of agricultural or food products by a supplier that is a small and medium-sized or mid-cap enterprise to a buyer that is not a small and medium-sized enterprise.
Amendment 128 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) "mid-cap enterprise" means an enterprise or a Producer Organisation, cooperative or Association of Producer Organisations with a medium-sized structure, a high capital ratio and a staff headcount of up to 3000 employees;
Amendment 129 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) “agricultural or food products” means products listed in Annex I to the Treaty intended for use as food as well as, products not listed in that Annex, but processed from those products for use as food, and agricultural products;
Amendment 134 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) “perishable agricultural or food products” means fresh agricultural or food products that will become unfit for human consumption or intended use unless they are stored, treated, packaged or otherwise conserved to prevent them from becoming unfit.
Amendment 147 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the following trading practices for perishable agricultural or food products are prohibited:
Amendment 150 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) a buyer pays a supplier for perishable agricultural or food products later than 30 calendar days after the receipt of the supplier’s invoice or later than 30 calendar days after the date of delivery of the perishable food products, whichever is the later. This prohibition shall be without prejudice:
Amendment 154 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a buyer cancels orders of perishable agricultural or food products at such short notice that a supplier cannot reasonably be expected to find an alternative to commercialise or use these products;
Amendment 159 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a buyer unilaterally and retroactively changes the terms of the supply agreement concerning the frequency, timing or volume of the supply or delivery, the quality standards or the prices of the agricultural or food products;
Amendment 211 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) a supplier pays for the promotion of agricultural or food products sold by the buyer. Prior to a promotion and if that promotion is initiated by the buyer, the buyer shall specify the period of the promotion and the expected quantity of the agricultural or food products to be ordered;
Amendment 215 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) a supplier pays for the marketing of agricultural or food products by the buyer.
Amendment 262 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to initiate and conduct investigations on its own initiative or based on an anonymous complaint;
Amendment 292 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. By 15 March of each year, Member States shall send to the Commission a report on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural or food supply chain. That report shall contain, in particular, all relevant data on the application and enforcement of the rules under this Directive in the Member State concerned in the previous year.
Amendment 296 #
2018/0082(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. No soonlater than three years after the date of application of this Directive, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Directive and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. In the framework of the evaluation, the need for additional unfair trading practices should be examined.
Amendment 272 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Coordination Group shall act by consensus, or, where necessary, vote by simplequalified majority. There shall be one vote per Member State.
Amendment 312 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 315 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall, by means of Delegated Acts, include in Article 5 paragraph 1 of this Regulation a specific product category of medical devices if at least five Member States are systematically performing health technology assessments on the same specific product category of medical devices.
Amendment 317 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 320 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall, by means of Delegated acts, include in Article 5 paragraph 1 of this Regulation a specific product category of in vitro diagnostic medical devices if at least five Member States are systematically performing health technology assessments on the same specific product category of in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
Amendment 329 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Coordination Group shall initiate joint clinical assessments of health technologies on the basis of its annual work programme by designating a sub-group to oversee the preparation of the joint clinical assessment report on behalf of the Coordination Group. Member States may propose additional comparator, which from their point of view represents the relevant evidence-based standard of care in their Member State. In case this proposal has not been taken into account, the relevant Member State may use the mechanism referred to in Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new).
Amendment 356 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) an analysis of the relative effects of the health technology being assessed on the patient-relevant health outcomes chosen for the assessment compared to one or more comparator treatments to be determined by the Coordination Group;
Amendment 399 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 12
Article 6 – paragraph 12
12. The Coordination Group shall approve the final joint clinical assessment report and summary report, wherever possible by consensus or, where necessary, by a simplequalified majority of Member States.
Amendment 407 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission considers that there are no legal obstacles to the inclusion of the approved joint clinical assessment report and summary report comply with the substantiin a list of technologies that have aund procedural requirements laid down in this Regulation,ergone a joint clinical assessment (hereafter referred to as ‘the list of assessed technologies’ or ‘list’) it shall include the name of the health technology which has been the subject of the approved report and summary report, in a list of technologies having undergone joint clinical assessment (the "the ‘List of Assessed Health Technologies" or the "List")’ at the latest 30 days after receipt of the approved report and summary report from the Coordination Group.
Amendment 413 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Where, within 30 days of receipt of the approved joint clinical assessment report and the summary report, the Commission concludes that the approved joint clinical assessment report and summary report do not comply with the substantive and procedurlegal requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall inform the Coordination Group of the reasons for its conclusions and request it to review the report and summary report.
Amendment 420 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Following the submission of the modified approved joint clinical assessment report and summary report, and where the Commission considers that the modified approved joint clinical assessment report and summary report comply with the substantive and procedurlegal requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall include the name of the health technology which has been the subject of the report and summary report, in the List of Assessed Health Technologies.
Amendment 424 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. If the Commission concludes that the modified approved joint clinical assessment report and summary report do not comply with the substantive and procedurlegal requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall decline to include the name of the health technology in the List. The Commission shall inform the Coordination Group thereof, setting out the reasons for the non- inclusion. The obligations laid down in Article 8 shall not apply with respect to the health technology concerned. The Coordination Group shall inform the submitting health technology developer accordingly and include summary information on those reports in its annual report.
Amendment 436 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This shall not prevent the Member States from complementing the joint clinical assessment with clinical assessments comparing the technology against a comparator which represents the best available evidence based standard of care in this Member State which, despite the Member States request during the scoping face, will not form part of the joint clinical assessment and which is necessary to complete the health technology assessment in that Member State. Any such measure should be justified, necessary and proportionate to achieving this aim. Any national assessment complementing the joint clinical assessment should follow the methodology established in accordance with Article 22. Member States shall notify the Commission and the Coordination Group of their intention to complement the joint clinical assessment together with a justification for doing so no later than 2 weeks after the Coordination Group has laid down the specific requirements for the joint assessment of the specific technology.
Amendment 486 #
2018/0018(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 12
Article 13 – paragraph 12
12. The Coordination Group shall approve the final joint scientific consultation report, wherever possible by consensus or, where necessary, by a simplequalified majority of Member States, at the latest 100 days following the start of the preparation of the report referred to in paragraph 4.
Amendment 4 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 19 June 2017 on the EU Action Plan for nature, people and the economy1a; _________________ 1ahttp://www.consilium.europa.eu/press- releases-pdf/2017/6/47244661427_en.pdf
Amendment 5 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the Nature Directives have an important role in achieving the targets of the CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on climate change;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Action Plan for nature, people and the economy, as a step in the right direction to deliver on the objectives of the Nature Directiveboost the implementation of the Nature Directives and to deliver on the objectives of the Nature Directives as well as to strengthen their coherence with socio-economic objectives and to mobilise engagement with national, regional and local authorities, stakeholders, especially land owners and users, and citizens;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Welcomes that the Commission will update and further develop guidance documents in all official languages of the EU in order to promote greater understanding of the legislation on the ground and to help public authorities apply it better and calls on the European Commission in this regard to involve and consult all stakeholders in this process;
Amendment 29 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the four priority areas of the Action Plan and considers that the active involvement of all relevant actors at national, regional and local level in all the priority areas is needed;
Amendment 35 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the role of civil society in ensuring better implementation of the Union nature legislation, and the importance of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention in this regard;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Commission to clarify the role of the Committee of the Regions to raise awareness and promote local involvement and exchanges of knowledge;
Amendment 57 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the full and effective implementation of the invasive alien species (IAS) Regulation; considers that in the management of IAS priority should be given tois an urgent priority, especially in Natura 2000 sites; welcomes the online platform, European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN), which facilitates access to data on alien species;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote better recognition of economic, recreational, social and cultural requirements and to take into account regional and local characteristics in compliance with Article 2 of the Birds Directive and Article 2.3 of the Habitats Directive, when implementing the measures pursuant to the Directives;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls that the coexistence between people and conflict species, such as large carnivores, can have negative impacts on parts of the agriculture sector and other socio-economic activities in certain areas or regions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider further measures to address these issues recognising the available flexibility within the Habitats Directive, and asks the Commission to strengthen the stakeholder involvement building on the dedicated stakeholder platforms that have been set up;
Amendment 88 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on the Commission to support measures such as training for farmers regarding the protection of livestock against large carnivores and sharing best practices on livestock protection across Member States;
Amendment 89 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Calls on the European Commission to consider especially adaptive harvest management as a best practice tool to sustainably manage sufficiently abundant and conserve declining waterbird populations within the EU;
Amendment 95 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to tailor funding schemes more effectively to the Natura 2000 objectives and establish cross-cutting Natura 2000 performance indicators for all relevant EU funds; calls on the Commission to also establish a tracking mechanism for Natura 2000 spending in order to improve transparency, accountability and effectiveness, and integrate these into the next MFF;
Amendment 97 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Calls on the Commission to promote and propose means for the funding and the development of transboundary management plans for large carnivore species and calls also for a detailed examination of the role of large carnivores and the possible introduction of adjustment measures to ensure that biodiversity, the agricultural landscape and the centuries-old practice of letting stock graze in mountain regions are maintained;
Amendment 106 #
2017/2819(RSP)
Paragraph 26
26. States that it is important for the competent authorities in the Member States, with the involvement of all relevant stakeholders, to make better use of integrated spatial planning processes, to improve a horizontal understanding of TEN-G with sector- specific knowledge, and to enable the financing of increased connectivity, and green infrastructure in general, through rural development and regional development funds;
Amendment 18 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document on Agriculture and Sustainable Water Management in the EU (SWD(2017) 153 final);
Amendment 41 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas it is important to promote the development of alternative procedures or techniques to reduce dependence on conventional pesticides and to deal with the rising threads of resistances to conventional plant protection products;
Amendment 71 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned by the fact that the National Action Plans (NAPs) are notoriously inconsistent as regards the establishment of quantitative objectives, targets, measurements and timetables for the various action areas, making it impossible to assess the progress made; regrets the fact that just twoonly eleven Member States have produced a revised NAP to date, although the deadline for revision was at the end of 2017;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets the fact that in many Member States there is no real commitment to IPM practices, which are the cornerstone of the directive; underlines the fact that rigorousStresses the importance of commitment from Member States to apply integrated pest management; regrets that one of the main challenges regarding the implementation of the principles of IPM, which are the cornerstone of the directive, seems to be the current lack of appropriate control instruments and methods to assess compliance in the Member States as well as clear rules and guidance; recalls that while IPM techniques are sustainable from a long- term perspective, IPM can mean a higher economic risk in the short-term; underlines the fact that implementation of IPM is one of the key measures to reduce dependency on pesticide use in sustainable agriculture, which is environmentally friendly, economically viable and socially responsible and contributes to Europe’s food security while strengthening biodiversity and human and animal health, boosting the rural economy and reducing costs for farmers by facilitating the market uptake of low-risk and non-chemical alternatives; stresses that additional financial incentives are needed to strengthen the uptake of IPM practices by individual farms;
Amendment 89 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that IPM represents a valuable tool for farmers to combat pests and disease and to ensure production yields; notes that a more intensive effort is needed to encourage the uptake of IPM through research and Member States' advisory bodies; recalls that IPM is not a silver-bullet solution to combat all threats to plant health but can play an important role in reducing the quantities and varieties of pesticides used;
Amendment 116 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the common agriculture policy (CAP), in its current form, is not capable of reducing farms’ dependency on pesticides; cConsiders that specific policy instruments in the post- 2020 CAP are required in order to help change farmers’ behaviour as regards pesticide use, such as fiscal measures at national level, cross-compliance between IPM and CAP direct payments etc.;
Amendment 125 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that most Member States use national risk indicators to assess, either entirely or in part, the adverse impact of pesticide use; recalls that in spite of the explicit obligation laid down in Article 15 of the directive, the Commission has not yet established EU-wide harmonised risk indicators, which makes it all but impossible to compare the progress made in different Member States and across the Union as a whole; hopes, however, that the harmonised risk indicators, whose establishment is now on the way, will be ready at the beginning of 2019;
Amendment 131 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is deeply concerned about the gradual depletion ofcontinuing loss of biodiversity, in particular farmland biodiversity, in Europe and about the particularly disconcertalarming demiscline of winged insects, including pollinators, as evidenced by the findings of a recent scientific study26 thataccording to which the population of flying insects in Germany has plummeted by more than 75 % in 27 years; considers that this collapse must be linked to the use of pestinotes also the unintentional effects of pesticides on soil and soil organisms26a and other non-target species; considers that pesticides are one of the relevant factors that are responsible for the decline of insects, farmland bird specides as well as other non-target organisms and further underlines the need for Europe to switch to a more sustainable pesticide use and increase the number of non-chemical alternatives for farmers; _________________ 26 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id= 10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 26a https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path /shared_folder/doc_pub/EUR27607.pdf
Amendment 155 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets the fact that the improvement of water quality has been insufficiently targeted, with most Member States failing to establishWelcomes that Member States have taken a range of measures to protect the aquatic environment from pesticide use; regrets, however, that most Member States have not established quantitative targets and timetables for measures to protect the aquatic environment from pesticides, and those that did so have not specifyingied how the achievement of targets or objectives would be measured; also believes that the monitoring in the aquatic environment of currently used pesticides should be improved;
Amendment 159 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Highlights the need to focus on precision farming and digital agriculture, so as to prevent the dispersion of plant protection products in areas where they are not needed, for example by means of drone and GPS precision technology; considers that further investment and research into equipment and technology could play an important role in rendering plant protection products more efficient and reduce the potential exposure of professional users and the general public;
Amendment 181 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States to adhere to the established timelines for delivering revised NAPs; urges those Member States that have not yet delivered revised NAPs to do so without further delay, this time with the clear overall objective of an immediate and long-term reduction in pesticide use, expressed either through a quantity- or risk-based approach, including clearly defined annual reduction targets and with special attention for the possible effects on pollinators and the uptake of alternative techniques in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls on the Commission to further develop guidance on the IPM principles and their implementation; asks the Commission in this regard to establish guidelines on the establishment of criteria for measuring and assessing the implementation of IPM in the Member States;
Amendment 244 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Calls on the Member States to ensure that professionally qualified and independent advisory services are available to provide advice on IPM to end- users;
Amendment 251 #
2017/2284(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 300 #
2017/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support applied research into the breeding of Varroa resistant honey bee-stocks possessing the behavioural trait of Varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH), in order to ensure optimal use of VSH knowledge and resources and to integrate and exchange materials, techniques and methods at an European scale and level;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to structure the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) in a manner that clearly reflects the EU’s priorities for the coming years, particularly with respect to the resources needed to make a success of the transition to a low-carbon circular economy based on the UN's sustainable development goals and to sustain the EU’s leading role in tackling climate change and its internal and external biodiversity commitments and goals;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework accords with the United Nations SDGs, in order to increase the coherence of Union expenditure and to improve the balance between the economic, social and environmental dimensions;
Amendment 22 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Draws attention to the first recommendations of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance1a, which relate inter alia to the Multiannual Financial Framework and stress that the sustainable development goals must be supported by a financial system that can promote growth in a way that is sustainable over the longer term; calls on the Commission to consider those recommendations for the next Multiannual Financial Framework carefully and act on them, inter alia with reference to the development of a sustainable financial system; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/17 0713-sustainable-finance-report_en.pdf
Amendment 38 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the transition to a sustainable, low-carbon circular economy is the only way to ensure a healthy living environment and the long-term wellbeing of Union citizens and the European economy; considers that the EU should be the global frontrunner in the transition to a sustainable, low-carbon circular economy and a sustainable production-consumption system;
Amendment 54 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the next MFF should help the Union achieve its environmental objectives and the 2030 climate and energy framework objectives; underlinstresses that the EU should not finance projects and investments thatwhich stand in the way of these objectives, make it more difficult to implement them or are contrary to their achievement of these goals;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the reports of the International Resource Panel "Policy Coherence of the Sustainable Development Goals UNEP (2015)", "Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity UNEP (2016)" and "Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications UNEP (2017)",
Amendment 40 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the communication on a European action for sustainability, which serves of the European Commission, which is mapping existing policy initiatives and instruments at the European level; highlights the need for a comprehensive gap assessment of existing EU policies and legislation in all sectors in order to allow systemic and integrated policies to be developed as the EU’'s response to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to develop a coherent action plan for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Agenda at the European level for the short term but also for the longer term beyond 2020, ensuring a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated policy strategy to achieve all of the SDGs to promote synergies, to gain co-benefits and to avoid trade-offs between the different SDGs by applying a cross-sector policy approach;
Amendment 84 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that in order to meet the SDGs, multi-stakeholder engagement will be required from the EU, Member States, civil society, businesses, and third partners; therefore, calls upon the Commission to establish a multi-stakeholder platform and to report to the European Parliament and the Council how the recommendations of the platform will be followed up;
Amendment 103 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the inclusion of the SDGs incontribution of the Environmental Implementation Review in ensuring that the Member States meet some of the SDGs through implementation of the acquis; calls for a series of annual reports to Parliament on the EU’s progress in SDG implementation starting with a report of the EU's position for the United Nations High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development in New York taking place in July this year; asks that Parliament become a partner in the process, particularly in the second work stream post-2020; calls for annual dialogue and reporting between Parliament and the Commission resulting in the production of a report; urges that the results should be both transparent and easily understandable and communicable for a wide range of audiences;
Amendment 111 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls the importance of indicators to effectively monitor, report and review the progress towards the SDGs; stresses that the Member States should be supported by the European Commission in their coherent reporting;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes recent developments around resource and waste efficiency and the circular economyPoints to the fact that 12 out of the 17 SDGs are dependent on the sustainable use of natural resources; highlights the importance of sustainable consumption and production by increasing efficiency, decreasing pollution and reducing resource demand and waste; stresses the need to decouple economic growth, resource use and environmental impacts; welcomes therefore the concept of the circular economy and the recent developments around resource and waste efficiency; calls on the Commission to come up with a regular report on the state of the Circular economy that informs about the state and trends and allows to modify existing policies based on objective, reliable and comparable information; calls on the Commission to retain an upward trajectory with targets while supporting and guiding Member States as regards achieving waste reduction; calls on the Commission to come up with an ambitious and comprehensive strategy on plastics while also keeping with the 2020 target for environmentally sound management of chemicals;
Amendment 156 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 194 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that in moving towards any new economic and social model, there will inevitably be communities centred around traditional heavy industry that will over time become obsolete; calls on the Commission to stream funding from sources such as the EU ETS in order to fina resource efficient economy has a great potential for job creation and economic growth, adding an extra US$ 2 trillion to the global economy by 2050 or US$ 600 billion for G7 countries by 2050, whereas if current trends continue we would need worldwide annually by 2050 three times today's amount of resources, which is especially important for Europe as an highly import dependent continent; recalls that it is important to mancge a ‘Just Tthe transition Fund’ to help such communitieswithout creating losers and highlighting the significant role of a resilient industrial strategy;
Amendment 200 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that one of the current and future push factors in third-country migration is extreme climate and environmental events; insists that the Commission must take this seriously in its external action, and reflect in all actions that mitigating the worst effects of climate change is a priority of the EU; points to the fact that improving resource efficiency is indispensable for meeting climate change targets cost effectively and that improved resource efficiency alone reduces annual global GHG emissions by 19 percent in 2050 and the GHG emissions of the G7 nations up to 25 percent by 2050;
Amendment 233 #
2017/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 130 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) It is necessary to exclude from the scope of this Directive natural mineral waters and waters which are medicinal products, since these waters are respectively covered by Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council68 and Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council69. However, Directive 2009/54/EC deals with both natural mineral waters and spring waters, and only the former category should be exempted from the scope of this Directive. In accordance with the third subparagraph of Article 9(4) of Directive 2009/54/EC, spring waters should comply with the provisions of this Directive. In the case of water intended for human consumption from public water supply or private wells put into bottles or containers intended for sale or used in the commercial manufacture, preparation or treatment of food, the water should as a matter of principle continue to comply with the provisions of this Directive until the point of compliance (i.e. until the point of use, i.e. the tap), and should afterwards be considered as food, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council70. _________________ 68 Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters (R;(recast) (OJ. L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 45). 69 Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ. L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67). 70 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ. L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).
Amendment 164 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Preventive safety planning and risk- based elements were only considered to a limited extent in Directive 98/83/EC. The first elements of a risk-based approach were already introduced in 2015 with Directive (EU) 2015/1787, which amended Directive 98/83/EC so as to allow Member States to derogate from the monitoring programmes they have established, provided credible risk assessments are performed, which may be based on the WHO’s Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality76. Those Guidelines, laying down the so-called "Water Safety Plan" approach, together with standard EN 15975-2 concerning security of drinking water supply, are internationally recognised principles on which the production, distribution, monitoring and analysis of parameters in water intended for human consumption are based. They should be maintained in this Directive. To ensure that those principles are not limited to monitoring aspects, to focus time and resources on risks that matter and on cost- effective source measures, and to avoid analyses and efforts on non-relevant issues, it is appropriate to introduce a complete risk-based approach, throughout the supply chain, from the abstraction area to distribution until the tap. That approach should consist of three components: first, an assessment by the Member State of the hazards associated with the abstraction area ("hazard assessment"), in line with the WHO’s Guidelines and Water Safety Plan Manual77; second, a possibility for the water supplier to adapt monitoring to the main risks ("supply risk assessment"); and third, an assessment by the Member State of the possible risks stemming from the domestic distribution systems (e.g. Legionella or lead) ("domestic distribution risk assessment"). Those assessments should be regularly reviewed, inter alia, in response to threats from climate-related extreme weather events, known changes of human activity in the abstraction area or in response to source-related incidents. The risk-based approach ensures a continuous exchange of information between competent authorities and, water suppliers and other stakeholders. _________________ 76 Guidelines for drinking water quality, Ffourth Eedition, World Health Organisation, 2011 http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_healt h/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/ind ex.html 77 Water Safety Plan Manual: step-by-step risk management for drinking water suppliers, World Health Organisation, 2009, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75 141/1/9789241562638_eng.pdf
Amendment 194 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In the event of non-compliance with the standards imposed by this Directive the Member State concerned should immediately investigate the cause and ensure that the necessary remedial action is taken as soon as possible to restore the quality of the water. In cases where the water supply constitutes a potential danger to human health, the supply of such water should be prohibited or its use restricted. In addition, it is important to clarify thatn the event of failure to meet the minimum requirements for values relating to microbiological and chemical parameters should automatically be considered by Member States a, Member States should determine whether the exceedance of the values constitutes a potential dangerrisk to human health. In cases where remedial action is necessary to restore the quality of water intended for human consumption, in accordance with Article 191(2) of the Treaty, priority should be given to action which rectifies the problem at source.
Amendment 262 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. ‘water intended for human consumption’ shall mean all water either in its original state or after treatment, intended for drinking, cooking, food preparation, processing or production, or for other food purposes, or other domestic purposes in both public and private premises , including food businesses, regardless of its origin and whether it is supplied from a distribution network, from private wells, supplied from a tanker or, for spring waters, put in bottles .
Amendment 321 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the treatment agents, materials and disinfection procedures used in water supply systems do not adversely affect drinking water quality. The resulting contaminations must be minimised without, however, compromising the effectiveness of disinfection.
Amendment 398 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
On the basis of the information collected under paragraphs 1 and 2 and gathered under Directive 2000/60/EC, Member States shall take the following measures in cooperation with water suppliers and other stakeholders, or ensure that those measures are taken by the water suppliers:
Amendment 449 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) take other measures, such as appropriate conditioning techniques, in cooperation with water suppliers, to change the nature or properties of the water before it is supplied so as to eliminate or reduce the risk of non-compliance with the parametric values after supply, if this is appropriate and reasonable in a supply zone, in addition to the measures referred to in points (a) and (b);
Amendment 483 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall automatically considerdecide, in the case of any failure to meet the minimum requirements for parametric values set out in Annex I, parts A and B, whether this failure is as a potential danger to human health.
Amendment 508 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Article 9 of Directive 2000/60/EC and the principle of proportionality, Member States shall take all necessary measures to improve access for all to water intended for human consumption and promote its use on their territory. This shall include all of the following measures inter alia:
Amendment 597 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i
Amendment 689 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 739 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – part B – point 2 – table 1
Annex II – part B – point 2 – table 1
Table 1 Minimum frequency of sampling and analysis for compliance monitoring Volume (m3) of water distributed Minimum number of samples per year or produced each day within a supply zone ≤ 10 Microbiological Chemical parameters parameters (Group (Group B) A) < 10* >0 >0 ≥ 10 10a ≤ 100 4a 1 > 100 ≤ 1 000 12a 10a 1 > 1 000 ≤ 10 000 50b 12b 1 +3 +1 for each 1 000 m3/d for each 4 500 m3/d and and part thereof of part thereof of the total the total volume volume > 10 000 ≤ 100000 3 +1 for each 10 000 m3/d 365 > 100 000 365 and part thereof of the total volume > 100000 12 +1 for each 25 000 m3/d and part thereof of the total volume a: all samples are to be taken during times when the risk of treatment breakthrough of enteric pathogens is high. b: at least 10 samples are to be taken during times when the risk of treatment breakthrough of enteric pathogens is high. *: The Member State may leave it up to the competent supervisory authority to decide which parameters are to be investigated and how often. The key parameters must be examined at least once a year.
Amendment 770 #
2017/0332(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
(2) the most recent monitoring results for parameters listed in Annex I, parts A and B, including frequency and location of sampling points, relevant to the area of interest to the person supplied, together with the parametric value set in accordance with Article 5. The monitoring results must not be older than:
Amendment 44 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Prevention is of key importance for protection against disasters and requires further action. To that effect, Member States should share risk assessments on a regular basis as well as summaries of their disaster risk management planning in order to ensure an integrated approach to disaster management, linking risk prevention, preparedness and response actions. In addition, the Commission should be able to require Member States to provide specific prevention and preparedness plans in relation to specific disasters, notably with a view to maximising overall Union support to disaster risk management. Administrative burden should be reduced andIt is essential to reduce the administrative burden and to strengthen prevention policies strengthened, including by ensuring necessaryreinforcing links towith other key Union policies and instruments, notably the European Structural and Investment Funds as listed in recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/201313. _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 ( OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320).
Amendment 59 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The role of regional and local authorities in disaster prevention and management is of great importance and their response capacities need to be appropriately involved in the activities carried out under this Decision, in accordance with Member States' institutional and legal framework. These authorities can play an important preventive role and they are also the first to react in the aftermath of a disaster.
Amendment 71 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to strengthenTraining, research and innovation are essential aspects of cooperation in the civil protection field. The efficiency and effectiveness of training and exercises and enhance, the promotion of innovations and the dialogue and co-operation between Member States' national civil protection authorities and services it is necessary to establish a Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network that isshould be strengthened on the basedis onf existing structures.
Amendment 105 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) take action to improve the knowledge base on disaster risks and facilitate the dialogue, sharing of knowledge and cooperation, the results of scientific research and innovation, best practices and information, including among Member States that share common risks.
Amendment 128 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 6 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – subparagraph 2
A summary of the relevant elements of the risk management planning shall be provided to the Commission, including information on the selected prevention and preparedness measures, by 31 January 2019 and every three years thereafter. In addition, the Commission may require Member States to provide specific prevention and preparedness plans, which shall cover both short- and long-term efforts. The Union shall duly consider the progress made by the Member States with respect to disaster prevention and preparedness as part of any future ex-ante conditionality mechanism under the European Structural and Investment Funds. In this context, the additional administrative burden at national and sub-national levels shall be kept as low as possible.
Amendment 131 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 6 – subparagraph 3
Article 6 – subparagraph 3
(e) The Commission may also establish specific consultation mechanisms to enhance appropriate prevention and preparedness planning and coordination among Member States prone to similar type disasters. In addition, the Member States concerned should also be given the opportunity to initiate such a consultation.
Amendment 140 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. On the basis of identified risks, the Commission shallrisks and needs identified on the ground, the Commission shall, in cooperation with the competent authorities of Member States, define the types and the number of key response capacities required for the European Civil Protection Pool ("capacity goals"). The Commission shall monitor progress towards the capacity goals and remaining gaps and shall encourage Member States to address such gaps. The Commission may support Member States in accordance with Article 20, point (i) of Article 21(1) and Article 21(2).
Amendment 148 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 7
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. Response capacities that Member States make available for the European Civil Protection Pool shall be available for response operations under the Union Mechanism following a request for assistance through the ERCC, unless Member States are faced with an exceptional situation substantially affecting the discharge of national tasks or a technical and personal need exists.
Amendment 152 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Article 11 – paragraph 8
In the event of deployment of such response they shall remain under the command and control of the Member States making them available and may be withdrawn when Member States are faced with an exceptional situation substantially affecting the discharge of national tasks preventing themprevented from keeping those response capacities available. In such cases, the Commission shall be consultinformed.
Amendment 156 #
2017/0309(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 12
Article 12
Amendment 223 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 1520% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part A of Annex I;
Amendment 233 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 1520% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part B of Annex I;
Amendment 248 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 340% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.2 of Part A of Annex I;
Amendment 264 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet- wide target equal to a 340% reduction of the average of the specific emissions targets in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.2 of Part B of Annex I.
Amendment 340 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Amendment 391 #
2017/0293(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission shall assess, by 2024, the feasibility of a real-world CO2 emissions test to ensure the representativeness referred to in paragraph 1 and measure compliance. If the feasibility of such a test is proven, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16 in order to supplement this Regulation with a real-world CO2 emissions test.
Amendment 83 #
2016/2327(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious mandate for the market uptake of electric vehiclesvehicles with zero emissions or particularly low emissions in accordance with its new proposal on reducing CO2 emissions from new cars and light vehicles by 2025, and calls for a long-term European initiative on next generation batteries in this regard;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2327(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on Member States soon to make available an interoperable and accessible charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in public areas and to promote the installation of charging points in private places, by at least creating the preconditions for subsequent installation of charging points in new buildings and buildings undergoing major renovation;
Amendment 209 #
2016/2327(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Reminds Member States of the need to expand shore-side electricity for use by ships, in particular at berths located close to residential or business areas and at all cruise and ferry ports, as well as ports in the TEN-T core network;
Amendment 272 #
2016/2327(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to make use of the potential offered by digitalisation (e.g. modern, digitally supported transport technologies) when drawing up new transport and mobility concepts, in order to optimise transport operations;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the Special Report by the European Court of Auditors entitled ‘Combating Food Waste: an opportunity for the EU to improve the resource-efficiency of the food supply chain’ of 10 November 2016,
Amendment 9 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas food is a precious commodity; whereas, as the „food system" utilises a lot of resources such as land, soil, water, phosphorous and energy, the efficient and sustainable managing of these resources is of utmost importance; whereas food waste causes massive economic and environmental costs (1.7 trillion USD per year on global scale according to FAO estimates1a); whereas preventing and reducing food waste provides economic benefits for households and society while at the same time decreasing environmental damage; _________________ 1aFAO „Food waste Foodprint. Impacts on natural resources"; FAO Rome, 2013.
Amendment 13 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas food wastage has high social and economic, economic and environmental costs; whereas food that is lost or wasted contributes to climate change with a global carbon footprint of about 8 % of total anthropogenic global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and represents a waste of scarce resources such as land, energy and water8 through the products' lifecycle; _________________ 8 FAO, 2015. Food wastage footprint & climate change.
Amendment 16 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas according to the World Food Programme (WFP) 795 million people in the world do not have enough food to lead a healthy and active life; whereas poor nutrition causes nearly half (45%) or approximately 3.1 million of deaths in children under the age of five; whereas one in six children in the world are underweight and one in four is stunted; whereas it is therefore not only an economic and environmental but also a moral obligation to reduce food waste1a ; _________________ 1a https://www.wfp.org/hunger/stats.
Amendment 24 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12.3 is aimed at halving per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels by 2030 and reducing food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses; whereas the UN estimates that world population will increase from 7.3 billion people today to 9.7 billion in 20501a ; whereas reducing food waste is an essential step in reducing world hunger and a necessity to feed an ever growing world population; _________________ 1a http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/n ews/population/2015-report.html
Amendment 31 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Amendment 35 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas food is lost or wasted at all steps of the supplyfood chain, including production, processing, transport, storage, retail, marketing and consumption chain; whereas estimates from the FUSIONS project indicate that the sectors contributing the most to food waste within the EU are households and processing, accounting for up to 53 %, and processing, accounting for up to 19 %10; _________________ 10 FUSIONS, Estimates of European food waste levels, March 2016.
Amendment 45 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas a targeted measure, tailored to the operators and the step in the chain, is more appropriate to combating food waste, as the problems encountered are not the same across the board;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2223(INI)
F. whereas there is no common consistent definition of ‘food waste’ nor a common methodology for measuring food waste at Union level yet, which makes it difficult to compare different datasets and to measure progress in reducing food waste; whereas in the FUSIONS project, food wasdifficulties associated was defined as ‘any food, and inedible parts of food, removed from the food supply chain to be recovered or disposed (including composted, crops ploughed in/not harvested, anaerobic digestion, bio-energy productiith collecting full, reliable and harmonised data are an additional obstacle in evaluating food waste in the EU; whereas there is no common, co- generation, incineration, disposal to sewer, landfill or discarded to sea)’11; _________________ 11FUSIONS Definitional Framework for Food Waste, 3 July 2014.nsistent definition of the concept of ‘loss’ either, nor a common methodology for measuring it at Union level;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the waste management hierarchy established by the Waste Framework Directive12 (prevention, preparing for re-use, recycling, recovery and disposal) cannot be applied in full to food waste; whereas currently there is no specific hierarchy for the management of unconsumed food at EU level; whereas prevention ought to be the priority measure in combating food waste; _________________ 12 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
Amendment 77 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas date marking on food products is poorly understood; whereas ‘best before’ labelling indicates the date after which an item of food may still be eaten but may not be at its best in terms of quality, and ‘use by’ labelling indicates the date after which an item of food is no longer safe to eat; whereas not even half of EU citizens understand the meaning of ‘best before’ and ‘use by’ labelling14; whereas the use of these concepts and the understanding of them vary from one Member State to another, but also, for the same product, vary between different producers, processors and distributors; _________________ 14 Flash Eurobarometer 425, ‘Food waste and date marking’, September 2015.
Amendment 87 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the donation of unsold food along the entire supplyfood chain leads to considerable reductions in food waste, while helping people in need of food;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas European funds facilitate the donation of food, such as the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), which enables finance to be provided for, among other necessities, storage and transport infrastructure for food donation bodies; whereas not enough use is made of these means by the Member States;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the European Commission is currently working on a clarification of European legislation on donations;
Amendment 94 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas countries such as Italyseveral Member States have adopted legislation that facilitates food donation by excluding donor liability for food that is donated in good faith and known to be fit for consumption at the time of donation;
Amendment 102 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas active and intelligent food contact materials can improve the quality of packaged food and extend its shelf-life or better monitor the condition of packaged food and provide information on the freshness of the food;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas combating food waste also brings economic benefits, as each euro spent on preventing food waste makes it possible to avoid 265 kg of food waste, with a value of EUR 535, and enables local authorities to save EUR 9 on the cost of waste and EUR 50 on environmental costs linked to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution1 a; _________________ 1a Commission staff working document, executive summary of the impact assessment, impact assessment on measures addressing food waste to complete SWD (2014) 207 regarding the review of EU waste management targets (SWD(2014) 289 final, 23.9.2014).
Amendment 109 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the urgent need to reduce the amount of food waste in the Union at every step of the supplyfood chain, including production, processing, transport, storage, retail, marketing and consumption chain;
Amendment 111 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the urgent need to reduce the amount of food waste in the Union at every step of the supply and consumptionand to improve consequently resource efficiency in the Union along the entire food supply chain;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2223(INI)
1. Stresses the urgent need to reduce the amount of food waste in the Union at every step of the supply and consumption chain; in this regard, underlines the importance of political leadership and commitment from both the Commission and Member States; reminds that the European Parliament repeatedly, in its resolutions from 2011, 2012, 2015 and 2016, asked the Commission to take action against food waste;
Amendment 126 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a coordinated policy response at EU and Member State level that takes into account policies regarding waste, food safety and information, but also aspects of economic, research and innovation, environment, agriculture, education, and social policy; emphasises that the EU efforts to reduce food waste should be strengthened and better aligned;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Urges the European Commission and Member States to use the following definition of "food waste": "food waste means food intended for human consumption, either in edible or inedible status, removed from the production or supply chain to be discarded including at primary production, processing, manufacturing, transportation, storage, retail and consumer levels, with the exception of primary production losses";
Amendment 131 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to apply a systemic approach to food waste addressing the wide range of relevant areas and all the stages of the food chain and their interrelationships; therefore calls on the Commission to establish an action plan on food waste covering the various policy areas and outlining the strategy for the years ahead;
Amendment 135 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to put the financial support that already exists for combating food waste on a permanent footing; calls on the Member States to make better use of the opportunities offered in this area by the various European Union policies and funding programmes;
Amendment 136 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Urges the Commission to involve all relevant Commission services dealing with food waste such as DG ENV, DG MARE, DG AGRI, DG SANTE and to ensure continued and strengthened coordination at Commission level;
Amendment 139 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a binding food waste reduction target of 50 % by 2030 and reiterates its call for a binding food waste reduction target of at least 30 % by 2025on the Member States to take measures which aim to achieve an EU food waste reduction target of 30 % by 2025 and 50 % by 2030 as compared with the 2014 baseline;
Amendment 140 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes that market standards contribute to food waste. Therefore, asks the Commission to promote research on the relation between marketing standards and food waste; calls upon the Commission and the Member States to influence the UNECE public standards with the aim of avoiding the waste of resources by preventing the generation of food waste.
Amendment 146 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on Member States to take measures to reduce food losses along the whole supply chain, including primary production, transportation and storage;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to swiftlyInvites Member States to monitor and assess the implementation of their food waste prevention measures by measuring the levels of food waste on the basis of a common methodology; urges the Commission to adopt asuch common methodology to measure foodby 31 December 2017, including minimum quality requirements, for the uniform measurement of the levels of food waste; that methodology shall take into account the waste prevention measures implemented through donations or other ways of preventing food from becoming waste;
Amendment 164 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to work on a common definition of the concept of ‘loss’ at each step in the food chain, and a common measurement methodology in collaboration with the Member States and all the parties involved;
Amendment 168 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the establishment in EU legislation of a hierarchy for the management of unsold fooda specific food waste hierarchy to be applied in Directive 2008/98/EC as follows: a) source prevention; b) edible food rescue, prioritising human use over animal feed and the reprocessing into non-food products; c) organic recycling; d) energy recovery; e) disposal;
Amendment 187 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 192 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the recent creation of the EU Platform on Food Losses and Food Waste, which enables information to be exchanged between the operators involved; calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with a precise list of the measures currently being taken and the objectives and sub-objectives pursued, as well as the state of progress of the work being done on a common methodology and on donations;
Amendment 197 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the European Commission, in the framework of the research projects financed by the EU budget, to promote innovative technologies able to extend the shelf-life of food products;
Amendment 198 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to engage, in cooperation with stakeholders, in improving consumers’the understanding of ‘use by’ dates and ‘best before’ dates; asks the Commission to assess whether on the part of producers, processors, distributors and consumers by cuarrent EU legislation and current practice in use with ‘use by’ and ‘best before’ dates in different Member States are fit for purposeying out awareness- raising and education campaigns, with a particular focus on consumers; stresses the efforts already made by many operators in the chain on this issue, such as the running of information campaigns in shops or on the internet;
Amendment 211 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission, as part of the evaluation that it is currently carrying out, to assess, in particular: whether current EU legislation and the use currently made in various Member States of the ‘best before’ date and the ‘use by’ date are fit for purpose; whether a revision of the ‘use by’ and ‘best before’ dates terminology, according to the Member States, should be considered to make it easier for consumers to understand them; whether it might be beneficial to remove certain dates for products where no risk to health or the environment exists; whether it might be advisable to introduce European guidelines on this issue;
Amendment 218 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote consumer understanding by all operators in the food chain of food waste, food safety, and good practices in relation to their management and consumption of food by establishing information and communication campaigns;
Amendment 243 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote and exchange successful practices of food waste reduction and resource conservation methods already used by stakeholders;
Amendment 279 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to propose a change in the VAT Directive that would explicitly authorise tax exemptions on food donations; calls on the Member States to follow the Commission’s recommendations and to set a VAT rate that is low or close to zero if the donation is made close to the recommended ‘use by’ date or if the food is unsaleable;
Amendment 281 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission, when conducting an impact assessment on new relevant legislative proposals, to evaluate their potential impact on food waste;
Amendment 284 #
2016/2223(INI)
13a. Calls on the Commission to identify the European legislation that might hamper the effective combating of food waste and analyse how it might be adapted to meet the food waste prevention objective;
Amendment 303 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Amendment 315 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the importance of packaging that is appropriate for the product and for consumers’ needs, taking into account the functions fulfilled by the packaging throughout the distribution chain, in order to avoid food waste, and taking into account an approach based on the packaging life-cycle;
Amendment 316 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on Member States to take action in order to encourage food business operators to use active and intelligent food contact materials, which actively contribute to extending the shelf- life of products and provide clear information about freshness of the food;
Amendment 318 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Member States to introduce in their national waste prevention plans measures to reduce food waste with the aim of achieving an EU- wide food waste reduction target of 30% by 2025 and of 50% by 2030; to this end, invites Member States to set out national specific food waste prevention programs, describing at least the implementation of the measures and the economic instruments adopted to achieve the reduction of food waste;
Amendment 321 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the European Commission, within the actions of the EU Platform on Food Losses and Food waste, to assess the best practices already implemented in the different Member States, in order to better define effective instruments to reduce food waste;
Amendment 326 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Stresses the importance, with a view to reducing waste, of ensuring that food is distributed and kept using methods which are appropriate to each product’s characteristics;
Amendment 327 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders to provide consumers with better information on methods for keeping and/or reusing products;
Amendment 332 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15d. Stresses that recovering co- and by-products may be considered one way to combat food waste;
Amendment 334 #
2016/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 e (new)
Paragraph 15 e (new)
Amendment 1 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a high level of human health protection should be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities,
Amendment 4 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment1a on the strengthening of EU cooperation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA), __________________ 1ahttp://ec.europa.eu/smart- regulation/roadmaps/docs/2016_sante_14 4_health_technology_assessments_en.pdf
Amendment 5 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 c (new)
Citation 1 c (new)
Amendment 17 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Council’s conclusions on innovation for the benefit of patients of 1 December 2014 1c, __________________ 1c http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/c ms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/145978.pdf
Amendment 35 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to European Parliament resolution of 16 September 2015 on the Commission Work Programme 2016 (2015/2729(RSP))
Amendment 37 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 b (new)
Citation 7 b (new)
- having regard to European Parliament resolution of 11 September 2012 on voluntary and unpaid donation of tissues and cells (2011/2193(INI))
Amendment 51 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas pharmaceuticals are one of the main pillars of healthcare rather than mere objects of trade;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas, in some cases, the prices of new medicines have increased during the past few decades to the point of being unaffordable for many European citizenthreatening the sustainability of national healthcare systems;
Amendment 88 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the aim of intellectual property is to benefit society, guaranteeing investment returns to and promote innovation, and whereas there is concern about the abuse/misuse thereof; notes the Council Conclusions of 17 June 2016 inviting the Commission to conduct an evidence-based analysis on the overall impact of IP in promoting innovation;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas significant progress has been made in recent decades as regards treating previously incurable diseases, meaning, for example, that no more patients die of HIV/AIDS in the EU today; however, there are still many diseases against which there is no optimal treatment (including cancer, which kills almost 1.3 million individuals in the EU every year);
Amendment 105 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
F. whereas the Commission has had to introduced incentives to promote research in areas such as rare diseases, and whereas 25 000 people die each year in the EU owing to lack of access to adequate antimicrobial drugs;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the gap between the growing resistance to antimicrobial agents and the development of new antimicrobial agents is widening, and whereas 25 000 people die each year in the EU owing to lack of access to adequate antimicrobial agents;
Amendment 139 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas under Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Parliament and the Council can, in order to meet common safety concerns, adopt measures setting high standards of quality and safety for medicinal products, and whereas, in accordance with Article 114(3) of the TFEU, legislative proposals in the health sector shall take as a base a high level of protection;
Amendment 145 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the Regulation on advanced therapy medicinal products was introduced to promote EU-wide innovation in this area while ensuring safety, but only eight novel therapies have been approved to date;
Amendment 168 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. RegretNotes that the research priorities of the pharmaceutical industry are profit- oriented rather than patient-orientedemployees of pharmaceutical companies are primarily interested in medical progress and the well-being of patients, but that pharmaceutical companies ultimately want to make a profit , which means that the political framework has to create the best possible outcome for patients and the general public;
Amendment 224 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that IP rights allow a legal monopoly, which needs to be carefully regulatedprovide a limited period of exclusivity, which is carefully regulated and monitored by the authorities to avoid conflict with the right to health protection and to promote quality of innovation and competitiveness;
Amendment 261 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the large number of litigation cases aiming to delay generic entry;
Amendment 278 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that most national assessment agencies are already using clinical, economic and social benefit criteria to assessevaluate new drugs in termorder to support their decisions ofn pricing and reimbursement;
Amendment 303 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 331 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes initiatives such as the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), but regrets that only a few of them are entirely publicwhich aim to develop new medicines that address the unmet medical needs of patients, e.g. new antimicrobial agents;
Amendment 370 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for national and, if necessary, EU-wide measures to guarantee the right of patients to universal, affordable, effective, safe and timely access to essential and innovative therapies, and to guarantee the sustainability of EU public health care systems;
Amendment 387 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for EU-wide measures on the pharmaceutical market to reinforce the negotiation capacities of Member States in order to achieve fair prices for medicines, including by strengthening collaborations in health technology assessment (HTA) and evaluating its relative effectiveness at EU level;
Amendment 416 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to analyse the overall impact of IP in promoting innovation with a neutral, fact-based and comprehensive approach, especially the impact of supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), data exclusivity or market exclusivity on competitiveness and quality of innovation, and to set strict limits on these practices;
Amendment 419 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the Commission to adopt a targeted SPC manufacturing waiver for export purposes to allow EU-based manufacturers of generic and biosimilar medicines to compete on equal footing with competitors from non-EU countries, thus avoiding the outsourcing of production and helping to maintain and create additional jobs and growth in the EU;
Amendment 436 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for the framework conditions in the areas of research and medicine policy to be established in a way that promotes innovation, particularly against diseases such as cancer, which cannot yet be treated to a satisfactory degree;
Amendment 439 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to reviewanalyse the implementation of the regulatory framework for orphan medicines, to define clearly the concept of unmet medical needs, to assess and subsequently decide whether impact of incentives to develop effective, safe and affordable drugs compared to the best available alternativet needs to be revised, and to promote the European register of rare diseases and reference centres;
Amendment 453 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to clearly define the concept of unmet medical needs;
Amendment 458 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to guaranteeensure a thorough assessment of quality, safety and efficacy in any fast- track approval process and to introduce the concept of conditional authorisation based on effectivenesssystematic monitoring of the conditions and sanctions as regards non-compliance;
Amendment 483 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Stresses that health technology assessments (HTA) are an important and effective instrument that contributes to the sustainability of national healthcare systems and creates incentives for innovations by rewarding them with high added value;
Amendment 485 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Reiterates that European collaboration on HTA allows Member States to pool their expertise and use their resources more effectively, thus helping them to better meet the increasing demand for assessments;
Amendment 495 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose legislation on a European system for health technology assessment as soon as possible, and to assess added-value medicines compared with the best available alternative; also calls on the Commission to harmonise pricing and reimbursement criteria to take into account the level of innovation and the social and economic cost-benefit analysis,promote early dialogue with companies that develop new health technologies, introduce compulsory relative effectiveness assessments at EU level as a first step for new medicines, ensure that joint HTA information at national level can be reused to harmonise processes and methods to prevent unnecessary overlaps, and address any financing and organisational issues with regard to this new system; also calls on the Commission to take into account the degree of innovation and to put in place a European classification on the added value level of medicines;
Amendment 525 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Council to increase coopermprove communication between the Member States as regards price-setting procedures, in order to share information about prices, reimbursement, negotiation agreements and good practices and to avoid unnecessary administrative requirements and delays;
Amendment 536 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Stresses that antimicrobial resistance has become a serious problem that needs to be urgently tackled; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to tackle the key scientific, regulatory and economic challenges facing the development of antimicrobial agents, particularly by creating incentives for investments in research and development as well as new financing models to address the most urgent needs of the public healthcare sector and at the same time safeguard the sustainability of public healthcare systems in order to improve and ensure future access to suitable antimicrobial agents;
Amendment 543 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore new measures to control prices, such as horizontal scanning and coordinating joint procurementsinitiatives that predict developments in the pharmaceutical market and prices, such as horizontal scanning and voluntary cooperation in price negotiations and joint procurements, as is the case in the initiative between the Benelux countries and Austria;
Amendment 583 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
Amendment 589 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Calls on the Commission to recommend measures to improve the rate of approval of novel therapies and their supply to patients;
Amendment 599 #
2016/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the Commission to analyse the causes of shortages, to establishcheck the practicality and purpose of a list of essential medicines and monitor the Member States’ compliance with Article 81 of Directive 2001/83/EU on shortages of supply, and to promote the supply of generics;
Amendment 214 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 65
Recital 65
(65) The promotion of low carbon fossil fuels that are produced from fossil waste streams and chemical feedstocks based on gaseous waste can also contribute towards the policy objectives of energy diversification and transport decarbonisation. It is therefore appropriate to include those fuels in the incorporation obligation on fuel suppliers.
Amendment 241 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 72 a (new)
Recital 72 a (new)
(72a) EU sustainability criteria for biofuel, bioliquids and biomass fuels have to ensure that the transition to a low- carbon economy supports the objectives of the Circular Economy Action Plan and is firmly guided by the EU waste hierarchy.
Amendment 348 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f f
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f f
(ff) ‘waste-based fossil fuels’ means liquid and gaseous fuels produced from waste streams of non-renewable origin, including waste processing gases and exhaust gasesfuels and chemical feed stocks based on gaseous waste’ means liquid and gaseous fuels and chemical feed stocks produced in carbon capture and utilization projects from gaseous waste streams, being gaseous effluents which the holder discards, intends to or is obliged to discard;
Amendment 428 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Subject to the second subparagraph of Article 26 (1), biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels that do not fulfil the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria set out in Article 26(2) to (78a) shall not be taken into account.
Amendment 561 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. With effect from 1 January 2021, Member States shall require fuel suppliers to include a minimum share of energy from advanced biofuels and other biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in Annex IX, from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin, from gaseous waste-based fossil fuels and from renewable electricity in the total amount of transport fuels they supply for consumption or use on the market in the course of a calendar year.
Amendment 668 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 32 to further specify the methodology referred to in paragraph 3(b) of this Article to determine the share of biofuel resulting from biomass being processed with fossil fuels in a common process, to specify the methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emission savings from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin and waste-based fossil fuelsfuels and chemical feedstocks based on gaseous waste and to determine minimum greenhouse gas emission savings required for these fuels for the purpose of paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 696 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from waste and residues, other than agricultural, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry residues, need only fulfil the greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria set out in paragraph 7 and the sustainability criteria set in paragraph 8a in order to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of this paragraph. This provision shall also apply to waste and residues that are first processed into a product before being further processed into biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels.
Amendment 902 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. The production of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from waste, (by)products and residues, other than agricultural, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry residues, taken into account for the purposes referred to in points (a), (b), and (c) of paragraph 1 shall be in line with the principle of the waste hierarchy and avoid significant distortive effects on markets for (by)products, wastes or residues. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act set in accordance with article 32 establishing detailed rules on the application of this paragraph.
Amendment 918 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Articles 23 and 25 and in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 26(1), Member States shall require economic operators to show that the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria set out in Article 26(2) to (78 a) have been fulfilled. For that purpose they shall require economic operators to use a mass balance system which:
Amendment 936 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. The Commission may decide that voluntary national or international schemes setting standards for the production of biomass products contain accurate data for the purposes of Article 26(7), and/or demonstrate that consignments of biofuels, bioliquids or biomass fuels comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 26(2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (68a), and/or that no materials have been intentionally modified or discarded so that the consignment or part thereof would fall under Annex IX. When demonstrating that requirements set out in Article 26(5) and (6) for forest biomass are met, the operators may decide to directly provide the required evidence at the forest holding level. The Commission may also recognise areas for the protection of rare, threatened or endangered ecosystems or species recognised by international agreements or included in lists drawn up by intergovernmental organisations or the International Union for the Conservation of Nature for the purposes of Article 26(2)(b)(ii). (see wording of Article 26 para 8 a new - adaptation in Article 27 para 4 is a logicalOr. en consequence)
Amendment 975 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 7(5), 7(6); 19(11), 19(14), 25(6), 28(5) and 28(56(8a) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 1st January 2021.
Amendment 979 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The delegation of power referred to in Articles 7(5), 7(6); 19(11), 19(14), 25(6) , 26(8 a) and 28(5)
Amendment 1024 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex IX – Part A – point b
Annex IX – Part A – point b
Amendment 1033 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex IX – Part A – point h
Annex IX – Part A – point h
Amendment 1070 #
2016/0382(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex IX – Part B – point c
Annex IX – Part B – point c
Amendment 44 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The Union is committed to developing a secure, competitive and decarbonised energy system by 205012. To meet this goal, Member States and investors need milestones to ensure that buildings are decarbonised and that the overall energy efficiency of buildings is increased so that they comply with the most stringent low-energy standard by 2050. In order to ensure this highly energy-efficient, decarbonised building stock by 2050, Member States should identify the intermediary steps and corresponding concrete measures needed to achievinge the mid-term (2030 and 2040) and long-term (2050) objectives. _________________ 12 Communication on an Energy roadmap 2050, (COM(2011) 885 final).
Amendment 52 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The provisions on long-term renovation strategies provided for in Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13 should be moved to Directive 2010/31/EU, where they fit more coherently. Financing mechanisms and financial incentives should be given a central position in the Member States’ long-term national renovation strategies and be actively promoted by the Member States. Furthermore, a strategy for promoting specialist support and advice for consumers and for training specialists should be included. _________________ 13 Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1).
Amendment 56 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) Ambitious goals for the deep, gradual renovation of existing building stock will create millions of jobs in the Union, in particular in small and medium-sized enterprises. The construction industry alone directly accounts for 18 million jobs in Europe and generates nine per cent of GDP. Energy efficiency measures in the building industry have the potential to accelerate the modernisation of that sector and its associated workforce. In that context, it is necessary for Member States to provide a clear link between their national long-term renovation strategies and suitable initiatives to promote skills and education in the construction and energy efficiency sectors.
Amendment 92 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The impact assessment identified two existing sets of provisions, whose aim could be achieved in a more efficient manner compared to the current situation. First the obligation, before any construction starts, to carry out a feasibility study on highly-efficiency alternative systems becomes an unnecessary burden. Second, provisions related to inspections of heating systems and air-conditioning systems were found to not sufficiently ensure, in an efficient manner, the initial and maintained performance of these technical systems. Even cCheap technical solutions with very short payback periods, such as hydraulic balancing of the heating system and installation/replacement of thermostatic control valves, are insufficiently considered today and should be fully exploited, including as solutions for assisting energy-poor consumers. Provisions related to inspections are amended to ensure a better result from inspections.
Amendment 111 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation, which and should promote a holistic approach to building renovations with a view to securing high energy efficiency, improved indoor climates and improved well-being. Those renovations should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation or by use of similar appropriate processes.
Amendment 145 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The provisions of this Directive should not prevent Member States from setting more ambitious energy performance requirements at building level and for building elements, nor should they prevent the Member States from setting more ambitious requirements for indoor climates, as long as such measures are compatible with Union law. It is consistent with the objectives of this Directive and of Directive 2012/27/EC that these requirements may, in certain circumstances, limit the installation or use of products subject to other applicable Union harmonisation legislation, provided that such requirements should not constitute an unjustifiable market barrier.
Amendment 176 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In their long-term renovation strategy referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall set out a roadmap with clear milestones and measures to deliver on the long-term 2050 goal to decarbonise their national building stock, including technical building systems and in a highly energy-efficient manner, with specific milestones for 2030 and 2040.
Amendment 195 #
2016/0381(COD)
(a) assisting project developers with the preparation, implementation and monitoring of their energy renovation projects, and mechanisms for the aggregation of projects, to make it easier for investors to fund the renovations referred to in points (b) and (c) in paragraph 1;
Amendment 196 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) de-risking energy efficiency operations for investors and the private sector, by e.g. supporting the disclosure of loan-level performance data related to energy renovations, the development of a valuation framework linking energy efficiency with increased property values, encouraging the refinancing of portfolios of assets related to energy renovations; and
Amendment 198 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) to make available accessible and transparent advisory tools, such as single points of contact for consumers which provide information about the structuring and provision of finances for building renovations and support users in taking steps to improve energy efficiency in buildings; and
Amendment 217 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that in all new non-residential buildings with more than ten parking spaces and in all existing non- residential buildings undergoing majorsignificant renovation with more than ten parking spaces, at least one of every ten is equipped withwhere that renovation affects the electrical infrastructure of the building or of the parking spaces, at least one of every three is furnished with suitable pre-cabling or ducting to enable the construction of a recharging point within the meaning of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, which is capable of stand at least one rechartging and stopping charging inpoint within the meaning of Directive 2014/94/EU is constructed which is capable of dynamically reactiong to price signals. This requirement shall apply to all non-residential buildings, with more than ten parking spaces, as of 1 January 2025. _________________ 17 OJ. L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 241 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that newly built residential buildings and those undergoing majorsignificant renovations which affect the electrical infrastructure of the building or of adjacent or integrated parking areas, with more than ten parking spaces, include the pre- cablappropriate pre-cabling or ducting to enable the installation of recharging points for electric vehicles for every parking space.
Amendment 273 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall link their financial measures for energy efficiency improvements in the renovation of buildings to the energy savings and indoor air quality improvements achieved due to such renovation. These savings and improvements shall be determined by comparing energy performance certificates issued before and after renovation, or the results of another relevant, transparent and proportionate method that shows the improvement in energy performance, and that delivers meaningful information to support the mobilisation of private and public finance for energy efficiency investments in buildings.;
Amendment 280 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6a
Article 10 – paragraph 6a
6a. When Member States put in place a database for registering EPCs it shall allow tracking the actual energy consumption of the buildings covered, regardless of their size and category. The database shall contain the actual energy consumption data of public buildings with useful floor area of over 250 m² and buildings frequently visited by the public with useful floor area of over 250 m² which shall be regularly updated.
Amendment 299 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. As an alternative to paragraph 1 Member States may opt to take measures to ensure that adequate advice is given to users concerning the replacement of heat generators, other modifications to the heating system and alternative solutions to assess the efficiency and appropriate size of the heating generator. The overall impact of this approach shall be equivalent to the impact arising from the measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1.;
Amendment 300 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Technical building systems explicitly covered by a contractual arrangement on an agreed level of energy efficiency improvement or other agreed energy performance criterion, such as energy performance contracting as defined in Article 2(27) of Directive 2012/27/EU shall be exempted from the requirements laid down in paragraph 1.
Amendment 308 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 309 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Technical building systems explicitly covered by a contractual arrangement on an agreed level of energy efficiency improvement or other agreed energy performance criterion, such as energy performance contracting as defined in Article 2(27) of Directive 2012/27/EU shall be exempted from the requirements laid down in paragraph 1.
Amendment 312 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 19
Article 19
9. in Article 19, 2017 is replaced by 20284;
Amendment 322 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Annex I – point 1 – subparagraph 1
Annex I – point 1 – subparagraph 1
The energy performance of a building is to be determined on the basis of the estimated or actual energy usage for heating, cooling, domestic hot water, ventilation and lighting and shall reflect its typical energy use for heating, cooling, domestic hot water, ventilation and lighting.
Amendment 327 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Annex I – point 2 – subparagraph 1
Annex I – point 2 – subparagraph 1
The energy needs for space heating, space cooling, domestic hot water and adequate ventilation shall be calculated in order to ensure minimum health, expressed as delivered energy and primary energy, shall be calculated in order to maximise requirements for health, indoor air quality and comfort levels defined by Member States.
Amendment 108 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive establishes a common framework of measures to promote energy efficiency within the Union in order to ensure that the Union’s 2020 20 % headline targets and its 2030 305 % binding headline targets on energy efficiency are met and paves the way for further energy efficiency improvements beyond those dates. It lays down rules designed to remove barriers in the energy market and overcome market failures that impede efficiency in the supply and use of energy, and provides for the establishment of indicative national energy efficiency targets and contributions for 2020 and 2030. The 2030 headline targets on energy efficiency can be adjusted in the review in 2024 and 2028 to not less than 30 % in the case that the Union's GDP growth is significantly higher than assumed by the energy model used by the Commission to express the overall percentage target.
Amendment 120 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
Amendment 146 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall set indicative national energy efficiency contributions towards the Union's 2030 target referred to in Article 1 paragraph 1 in accordance with Articles [4] and [6] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union]. When setting those contributions, Member States shall take into account that the Union’s 2030 energy consumption has to be no more than 1 321220 Mtoe of primary energy and no more than 987893 Mtoe of final energy. Member States shall notify those contributions to the Commission as part of their integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with the procedure pursuant to Articles [3] and [7] to [11] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union].
Amendment 180 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 208 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7a – title
Article 7a – title
Energy efficiency obligationsaving support schemes
Amendment 49 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Decision No 529/2013/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,11 as a first step, set out accounting rules applicable to greenhouse gas emissions and removals from the LULUCF sector and thereby contributed to policy development towards the inclusion of the LULUCF sector in the Union’s emission reduction commitment. This Regulation should build on the existing accounting rules, updating and improving them for the period 2021- 2030. It should lay down the obligations of Member States in implementing those accounting rules and the obligation to ensure that the overall LULUCF sector would not generate net emissions. It should not lay down any accounting or reporting obligations for private parties including farmers and foresters. __________________ 11 Decision No 529/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on accounting rules on greenhouse gas emissions and removals resulting from activities relating to land use, land-use change and forestry and on information concerning actions relating to those activities (OJ L 165, 18.6.2013, p. 80)
Amendment 94 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation sets out Member States' commitments on land use, land use change and forestry ('LULUCF') that ensure meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction commitment of the Union for the period from 2021 to 2030, as well as the rules for the accounting of emissions and removals from LULUCF and checking the compliance of Member States with these commitments. This Regulation does not lay down accounting or reporting obligations for private parties including farmers and foresters.
Amendment 201 #
2016/0230(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The national forestry accounting plan shall contain all the elements listed in Annex IV, section B and include a proposed new forest reference level based on the continuation of current forest management practice and intensity, as documented between 1992000-2009 per forest type and per age class in national forests, expressed in tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year, assuming a constant ratio between solid and energy use of forest biomass. The Commission may grant a derogation from the base period 2000-2009 upon submission of a reasoned request submitted by a Member State justifying that this derogation is absolutely necessary for reasons of data availability, such as the timing of forest inventories.
Amendment 772 #
2016/0084(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – part 1 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Annex III – part 1 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) in the case of any product containing material originating from organic wastes or by-products, which has not been through a process which has destroyed all organic materials, the label will specify which wastes and by-products have been used and a batch number or production time series number. This number shall refer to the traceability data held by the producer and which identifies the individual sources (farms, factories, etc.) of each organic waste/by-product used in the batch/time series. The Commission shall publish, after a public consultation and within 2 years of the entry into force of this Regulation, specifications for the implementation of this provision, which will enter into force after 3 years after the publication of the specifications. In order to minimise the administrative burden for operators and for market surveillance authorities, the Commission specifications should take into account both the requirements of Articles 6(5) – 6(7) and Article 11 and existing traceability systems (e.g. for animal by-products or industry systems) as well as EU waste classification codes.
Amendment 16 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, in addition to its overwhelming intrinsic value, biodiversity also contributes an enormous social and economic value and benefits for human health;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the entry into force of the Nature Directives (Birds Directive and Habitat Directive) has helped to improve the conservation of certain species, such as the large carnivores; whereas this situation should nonetheless be analysed with regard to the local and regional context, particularly in respect of predation by wolves and vultures on livestock or the presence of brown bears;
Amendment 105 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urgently calls on the Commission and Member States to give priority to achieving the 2020 targets; calls for a multi- stakeholder approach and stresses the vital role of socio-economic actors at national, regional and local actorlevels in this regard; stresses that greater public awareness of and support forunderstanding of biodiversity are also essential;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to improve the guidelines, which should facilitate the optimal application of the directives, in accordance with existing case-law; calls on the Commission to give higher priority to dialogue with Member States and other important stakeholders and to encourage exchanges of best practices;
Amendment 150 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Commission and Member States to continue to enforce the Nature Directives conscientiously along with the flexibility therein; calls, in that context, for additional efforts to halt illegal hunting of protected birdkilling, trapping and trade of birds and to reduce local conflicts;
Amendment 192 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes and regrets that there has not yet been a measurable improvement of the biodiversity status in agricultureRecalls that the agricultural and forestry sectors have an important role to play in improving the biodiversity status; recalls the recent implementation of the greening measures of the common agricultural policy (CAP); urges the Commission and Member States to monitor, assess and increase and assess the effectiveness of greeningenvironmental measures and other rural development measures of the CAP; calls on the Commission to take into account its findings in the mid-term review of the biodiversity measures of the common agricultural policy (CAP);
Amendment 281 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that the Nature Directives are milestones for nature policy, not only within the EU but also internationally; considers that, thanks to their concise, coherent and consistent form, these Nature Directives can, so to speak, be regarded as smart regulation avant la lettreappreciates the importance of taking account of national, regional and local characteristics for effective implementation of that legislation;
Amendment 318 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Regards biodiversity loss outside protected nature areas as a gap in the strategy; encourages the Commission to develop an appropriate framework for preventing the net lossMember States to pool the work they carry out ofn biodiversity and ecosystem services and to promote national biodiversity strategies;
Amendment 337 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to provide the necessary incentives – including financial incentives – so that economic growth is brought into line with nature conservation and the preservation of biodiversity. Stable ecosystems and their assets and services are important not only for environmental, but also for economic and social development;
Amendment 351 #
2015/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission and Member States to launch a European initiative on pollinators on the basis of national policies already conducted;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance to treat energy efficiency as an energy source in its own right; therefore underlines that the Commission and the Member States shall embed the ‘Energy Efficiency First’ principle in all decision-making related to energy;
Amendment 113 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the EU building stock is responsible for approximately 40% of final EU energy consumption and for the consumption of approximately 60% of EU gas imports, therefore making the moderation of its energy demand an important factor towards achieving energy independence;
Amendment 126 #
2015/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that the EU building stock is responsible for approximately 40% of final energy consumption, for the consumption of approximately 60% of EU gas imports and for 36% of CO2 emissions in the EU and that heating and cooling is the largest single source of energy demand in the EU, therefore calls on the Commission to address the potential of reduction of energy demand and efficiency gains in the building sector;
Amendment 189 #
2015/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Highlights the fact that in a true circular economy waste has to feed back into the economy as raw material in order to keep the added value in the product for as long as possible and therefore preparation for reuse and recycling have a much higher priority than incineration; points to the fact that many Member States already have an overcapacity of incineration plants, stresses the need for better planning and information sharing and preventing lock-in effects; urges the Commission to take the link between the Energy Union and the circular economy into account;
Amendment 233 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Y
Recital Y
Y. whereas diversification of supplies, the completion of the internal energy market, moreenergy efficient energy consumptioncy as an energy source in itself by moderation of demand, the development of indigenous energy resources and R&D activities are the key drivers of the Energy Union;
Amendment 264 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reiterates its commitment to the 2030 targets for climate and energy; to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40%, to increase the share of renewables in the European energy mix to 27% and to increase energy efficiency by 30%.
Amendment 290 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that all EU infrastructure projects aimed at diversifying energy sources, suppliers and routes must be fully in line with EU legislation and EU energy security priorities and calls on the Commission to consider investments that moderate energy demand, e.g. in building stock, as eligible projects;
Amendment 301 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Reiterates its commitment to achieve the 10% interconnectivity market in order to complete the Internal Energy Market in EU; whilst acknowledging the importance of also achieving a quantitative target of interconnectivity by ensuring availability of existing national and cross-border infrastructure in order to ensure effective use of European energy sources and increased security of supply;
Amendment 606 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that a properly designed future model of the electricity market in the EU must aim at a more market-based and optimal, from the point of view of network security, integration of renewableincluding initiatives and resources which will increase the stability of the electricity network and the ability to use innovative technologies and energy sources;
Amendment 741 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Notes that following the European Council conclusions of 23 and 24 October 2014, post-2020 EUcalled for an EU wide target for energy- efficiency targets must be non-binding and not apply at national levelof at least 27%, whereas the European Commission called for a target of 30% energy efficiency and the European Parliament supported a target of 40%;
Amendment 839 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Acknowledges that local authorities of European cities undoubtedly make an important contribution toStresses the need for a continued commitment to ensure energy independence by increasing energy- efficiency through cogeneration, modernising district heating systems, modernisation of heating and cooling systems, increasing the use of cleaner public transport, encouraging more active travel models and renovating building stocks; calls in this respect on the Commission to adopt an EU strategy for heating and cooling to identify all actions and synergies needed in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors to reduce the dependency while contributing to EU's climate and energy targets;
Amendment 868 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Underlines the crucial role of renewables in the EU, both in attaining its greenhouse gas reduction targets, energy security and in the creation of growth and jobs in the EU; underlines that, in this regard, the current market design should be improved by fully integrating renewables, e.g. for heating, cooling, transport and electricity, into the market and introducing cost-reflective balancing prices;
Amendment 991 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Calls on the Commission to put forward a proposals for establishing a Modernisation Fund, which should have strict criteria and guidance to ensure that funding is targeted at genuine energy modernisation projects, which would be selected based on a technology-neutral approach and on whether they are demonstrably consistent with attainment of the EU's 2030 greenhouse gas objectivesrevision of the European Trade Emission System (ETS) in order to support the EU decarbonisation efforts, and calls in this respect on the Commission to include a proposal for a Modernisation Fund;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
Citation 18 a (new)
– having regard to the encyclical ‘laudato si’;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 b (new)
Citation 18 b (new)
– having regard to the leaders’ declaration of the G7 summit entitled ‘Think ahead. Act together’;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the extraordinary scale and seriousness of the threats induced by climate change and is extremely concerned that the world is severely off track to limit global warming to below 2°C; calls on governments to take, without delay, concrete measures against climate change and towards a global agreement in Paris 2015 to deliver this target; welcomes therefore the encyclical ‘laudato si’ and the G7 declaration of 8th of June 2015;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that, in line with the IPCC AR5 findings, the global carbon budget available after 2011, if there is to be a likely chance of keeping the rise in global average temperature below 2°C, is 1010 Gtons of CO2; emphasises that all countries need to contribute and that delaying action will increase costs and reduce options; underlines the findings of the New Climate Economy report ‘Better Growth, Better Climate’ that countries at all levels of income have the opportunity to build lasting economic growth at the same time as reducing the immense risks of climate change;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the 2015 Protocol must be legally binding and ambitious from the outset when adopted in Paris, and should aim at phasing out global carbon emissions by 2050 or shortly thereafter; calls for the EU to work with its international partners to that endto reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the upper end of the latest IPCC recommendation of 40-70% by 2050 compared to 2010 and reach near zero emissions by the end of the century, so as to keep the world on a cost-effective emission trajectory compatible with the ‘below 2°C’ objective and that a global greenhouse gas emissions peak will be reached as soon as possible; calls for the EU to work with its international partners to that end; underlines that the agreement must provide a predictable framework which encourages investments and scaling by business of efficient carbon reductions and adaptation technologies;
Amendment 67 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that an ambitious and legally binding international agreement would help to address the carbon leakage and competitiveness concerns of the relevant sectors and in particular the energy intensive sector;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that the agreement has to address mitigation, adaptation and means of implementation;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that in case of a gap between the level of ambitions of the aggregated INDC presented before Paris and the necessary level of greenhouse gases reduction, it will be necessary to elaborate a work programme which will start in 2016 in order to define the additional reduction measures; calls for a comprehensive review process, which will be conducted every five years, will ensure the dynamism of the implemented mechanism and will allow to reinforce the level of ambition of reduction commitments in light of the below 2˚C objective in accordance with the most recent scientific data; calls on the EU to support legally binding 5-year commitment periods so as to avoid locking into low level of ambition, increase political accountability and allow for revision of targets to match scientific adequacy and the implementation of existing commitments, without the need for the agreement to be ratified each time;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for general reinvigoration of the EU’s climate policyStresses the importance of the EU’s commitment to play a leading role in fighting against climate change which would help build momentum in international climate discussions and are in line with upper limit of the EU’s commitment to reduce its GHG emissions to 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050; considers that a binding EU 2030 50% reduction target fortarget of at least 40% domestic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels is the absolute minimum required to stay on track for the below 2° C target and is both realistic and affordable; moreover calls for a binding EU 2030 energy efficiency target of 40 %, in line with research on cost-effective energy saving potential and a binding EU 2030 target of producing at least 45 % of total final energy consumption from renewable energy sources;
Amendment 99 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises the importance of a structured and constructive dialogue between governments, the business community, cities, regions, international organisations, civil society and academic institutions in order to mobilise robust global action towards low carbon and resilient societies as it involves both state and non-state actors; therefore, welcomes the Lima-Paris Action Agenda;
Amendment 159 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that financemeans of implementation - including climate- finance, technology transfer and capacity building - will play an essential role in finding an agreement at the Paris Conference and that it seems therefore necessary to prepare a credible ‘financial package’, in order to support greater efforts for greenhouse gas reduction and adaptation to climate change impacts; calls for climate finance to be included in the agreement as a dynamic element that reflects the changing environmental and economic realities and supports the enhanced ambition of mitigation contribution and adaptation actions;
Amendment 167 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Requests the EU and its Member States to agree on a roadmap for scaling up predictable, new and additional finance, in line with existing commitments, towards its fair share in the overall targeted amount of USD 100 billion a year by 2020 from a variety of public and private sources; calls for a robust monitoring and accountability framework for effective follow-up of the implementation of climate finance commitments and objectives;
Amendment 181 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for concrete commitments to deliver additional sources of climate finance, such as the adoption of a financial transactions taxbroad-based pricing of carbon as a globally applicable instrument for managing emissions and the allocation of emissions trading revenues to climate-related investments, and revenues from carbon pricing of international transport fuels; highlights the importance of mobilising private sector capital and of unlocking the required investment in low-carbon technologies; calls for concrete steps including a timetable for the phase out of fossil fuel subsidies, an ambitious roadmap of commitments of public sources and multilateral banks in favour of financing the ecological transition, specific public guarantees in favour of green investments, labels and fiscal advantages for green investment funds and for issuing green bonds;
Amendment 187 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls for an intensification of R&D, innovation and deployment of mature and breakthrough technologies;
Amendment 197 #
2015/2112(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that adaptation action is an inevitable necessity and needs to play a central role in the new agreement; underlines that acting now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will be less expensive to the global and national economies and would make adaptation action less costly;
Amendment 294 #
2015/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that the European Institutions must strive towards achieving greater and better representation in the Conference of the Parties (COP) of the UNFCCC, UNCCD and UNCBD;
Amendment 352 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 2
The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3d. The first reporting with respect to the targets in Article 6(f) to (i) shall cover data for the period from 1 January [enter year of entry into force of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of entry into force of this Directive + 1 year].
Amendment 169 #
2015/0275(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- Having regard to the Report of the European Parliament "Resource Efficiency: moving towards a Circular Economy",
Amendment 170 #
2015/0275(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
- Having regard to the report of the International Resource Panel "Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications UNEP (2016)",
Amendment 240 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Extended producer responsibility schemes form an essential part of efficient waste management, but their effectiveness and performance differ significantly between Member States. Thus, it is necessary to set minimum operating requirements for extended producer responsibility. Those requirements should reduce costs and boost performance, as well as ensure a level-playing field, including for small and medium sized enterprises as well as e-commerce enterprises, and avoid obstacles to the smooth functioning of the internal market. They should also contribute to the incorporation of end-of-life costs into product prices and provide incentives for producers to take better into account recyclability and reusability when designing their products. The requirements should apply to both new and existing extended producer responsibility schemes. A transitional period is however necessary for existing extended producer responsibility schemes to adapt their structures and procedures to the new requirements.
Amendment 241 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Other Union legal acts, such as Directive 94/62/EC or 2012/19/EU, also contain provisions concerning producer responsibility, regarding, among other things, the producers' responsibility for the costs incurred in different stages of waste management. These provisions sometimes differ from the general rules established by this directive. Taking into account e.g. the need to ensure the functioning of the internal market and to avoid obstacles to trade and distortion and restriction of competition within the Community, this this Directive should be without prejudice to the continued application of the rules contained in those legislative acts.
Amendment 347 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Littering has direct detrimental impacts on the environment and the wellbeing of citizens, and high clean-up costs are an unnecessary economic burden for society. The introduction of specific measures in waste management plans and proper enforcement by competent authorities should help eradicate this problem. Furthermore, education and awareness raising play a crucial role in order to spur behavioural change.
Amendment 410 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 1a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3 – point 1a – paragraph 2 a (new)
The definition of municipal waste in this Directive is neutral with regard to the public or private status of the operator managing waste.
Amendment 416 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a b (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 1a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3 – point 1a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Member States may use corresponding categories in the list of waste for statistical purposes.
Amendment 474 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 17a
Article 3 – point 17a
17a. "final recycling process" means the recycling process which begins when no further mechanical sorting operation is needed and waste materials enter a production process and are effectively reprocessed into products, materials or substances;
Amendment 486 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 17 b
Article 3 – point 17 b
17b. "backfilling" means any recovery operation where suitableother than recycling where suitable non-hazardous waste is used for reclamation purposes in excavated areas or for engineering purposes in landscaping or construction instead of other non-waste materials which would otherwise have been used for that purpose;
Amendment 526 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Member States shall make use of adequate economic instruments to provide incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy. Member States shall ensure that the allocation of all EU funds are in line with the waste hierarchy and that investments in the waste management shall prioritise the top of the waste hierarchy (prevention, reuse, preparation for reuse and recycling)
Amendment 532 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Member States shall establish fee systems in order to ensure the full financing of the waste management infrastructure for municipal waste necessary for the implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 562 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a in order to establish detailed criteria on the application of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 to specific substances or objects. The Commission shall prioritise the existing and replicable practices of industrial symbiosis in the development of the detailed criteria.
Amendment 601 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall notify the Commission of technical regulations adopted under paragraph 1 in accordance with Directive 2015/1535/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council where so required by that DirectiveWhere criteria have not been set at Union level in accordance the procedure set out in paragraph 2, Member States may establish detailed criteria on the application of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 to specific waste, including limit values for pollutants. Member States shall notify the Commission of technical regulations adopted under paragraph 1 in accordance with Directive 2015/1535/EC where so required by that Directive. In view of ensuring coherence in the single market the Commission shall adopt by delegated acts general requirements to be followed by Member States when they adopt technical regulations under paragraph 1.
Amendment 625 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Such measures may also include the establishment of extended producer responsibility schemes defining specific operational and financial obligations for producers of products. Irrespective of whether or not such schemes are established, producers of the product may choose to fulfil their extended producer responsibility individually.
Amendment 648 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall organise an exchange of information between Member States and the actors involved in producer responsibility schemes on the practical implementation of the requirements defined in Article 8a and on best practices to ensure adequate governance and cross- border cooperation of extended producer responsibility schemes and a smooth functioning of the internal market. This includes, inter alia, exchange of information on the organisational features and the monitoring of producer responsibility organisations, the development of harmonized criteria for the financial contributions referred to in point (b) of Article 8a (4), the selection of waste management operators and the prevention of littering. The Commission shall publish the results of the exchange of information. No later than [insert date 12 months after the entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall conduct a study and establish a multi-stakeholder platform in cooperation with the Member States to define the harmonized criteria for the financial contributions referred to in point (b) of Article 8a(4). The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a to supplement this Directive by laying down harmonized criteria for determining the financial contributions referred to in point (b) of Article 8a(4).
Amendment 660 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is inserted: "5a. The provisions of Article 8 and Article 8a are without prejudice to the provisions concerning extended producer responsibility contained in other Union legal acts."
Amendment 674 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 1 – indent 1
Article 8a – paragraph 1 – indent 1
- define in a clear way the roles and responsibilities of producers of products placing goods on the market of the Union, organisations implementing extended producer responsibility on their behalf, private or public waste operators, distributors, local authorities, consumers and, where appropriate, reuse and repair networks and recognised preparation for re-use operators;
Amendment 761 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point a – indent 1
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point a – indent 1
- costs of separate collection, sorting and related treatment operations required to meet the waste management targets referred to in paragraph 1, second indent, taking into account the revenues from re- use or sales of secondary raw material from their products;
Amendment 782 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) are modulated on the basis of the real end-of-life cost of individual products or groups of similar products, notably by taking into account their re-pairability, re- usability and recyclability; and the presence of hazardous substances based on harmonized criteria in order to ensure a smooth functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 821 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 6
Article 8a – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall establish a platform to ensure a regular dialogue between the stakeholders involved in the implementation of extended producer responsibility, including producers and distributors, consumers, private or public waste operators, local authorities and, where applicable, repair and re-use networks and recognised preparation for re-use operators.'
Amendment 1065 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtainrequest five additional years for the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d). The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 24 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c) and (d). In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measprovided that they have met the target in Article 11 paragraph 2(a). The Member State shall submit a request to the Commission to make use of such additional five years at the latest 24 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c). (This AM should be seen in combination with AM 117 of the rapporteur es to increase the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste to a minimum of 50% and 60% by weight, by 2025 and 2030 respectively.tablishing requirements for the implementation plans.)
Amendment 1074 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Member States referred to in paragraph 3, which prepare for re-use and recycle at least 60 % of their municipal waste by 2030, may obtain an additional five years for the attainment of the target referred to in point (d) of paragraph 2. In order to request such an extension, a Member State shall submit its request to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3. However, if the Member State does not reach at least 60 % preparing for re-use and recycling of its municipal waste by 2030, the above extension shall be considered to be automatically cancelled.
Amendment 1148 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11a – paragraph 5
Article 11a – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of calculating whether the targets laid down in Article 11(2)(c) and (d) and Article 11(3) have been achieved Member States may take into account the recycling of metals that takes place in conjunction with incineration and of minerals that takes place in conjunction with co-incineration, only if waste has been sorted prior to incineration or if the obligation to set up separate collection for paper, metal, plastic, glass and biowaste has been complied with, in proportion to the share of the municipal waste incinerated or co- incinerated provided that the recycled metals meet certain quality requirements.
Amendment 1154 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11a – paragraph 6
Article 11a – paragraph 6
6. In order to ensure harmonised conditions for the application of paragraph 5, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a establishing a common methodology for the calculation of the weight of metals and of minerals that have been recycled in conjunction with co-incineration that have been recycled in conjunction with incineration, including, the quality criteria for the recycled metaterials.
Amendment 1213 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensureset up systems for the separate collection of bio-waste where technically, environmentally and economicby 31 December 2020 where environmentally practicable and appropriate to ensure the relevant quality standards for compost and digestate and to attain the targets set out in Article 11(2)(a), (c) and (d) and 11(3).
Amendment 1235 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Member States may exempt the competent authorities from keeping a register of establishments or undertakings which collect or transport quantities of non- hazardous waste not exceeding 20 tonnes and of hazardous waste not exceeding 2 tonnes annually.
Amendment 1241 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1245 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(ba) The following paragraph is added: 4a. The Commission shall, not later than [6 months after the entry into force of this Directive], request the European standardisation organisations to develop European quality standards for sorted waste and for secondary raw materials (output of the final recycling), in particular for plastics.
Amendment 1266 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 37 –paragraph 1
Article 37 –paragraph 1
1. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 11(2)(a) to (d) and Article 11(3) for each calendar year to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting year for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 6. The first reporting with respect to the targets in Article 11(2) (c) and (d) and 11(3) shall cover the data for the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020.
Amendment 1276 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 37 a (new)
Article 37 a (new)
(21a) The following Article is inserted: 'Article 37a Framework for Circular Economy In order to support the objectives of this Directive as defined in Article 1, and not later than 31 December 2018, the Commission shall: draw up an impact report to identify legislations whose interactions hamper the development of synergies between different industries and prevent the subsequent use of by-products and the preparation for reuse and recycling of waste for specific applications. This report may be accompanied by a legislative proposal, if appropriate, or by a guidance on how to remove identified barriers and how to unleash the market potential of by- products and secondary raw materials.'
Amendment 57 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) A progressive reduction of landfilling is necessary to prevent detrimental impacts on human health and the environment and to ensure that economically valuable waste materials are gradually and effectively recovered through proper waste management and in line with the waste hierarchy. This reduction should avoid the development of excessive capacity for the treatment of residual waste facilities, such as through energy recovery or low grade mechanical biological treatment of untreated municipal waste, as this could result in undermining the achievement of the Union's long-term preparation for reuse and recycling targets for municipal waste as laid down in Article 11 of Directive 2008/98/EC. Similarly, and to prevent detrimental impacts on human health and the environment, while Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that only waste that has been subject to treatment is landfilled, compliance with such obligation should not lead to the creation of overcapacities for the treatment of residual municipal waste. In the light of the recent investments made in some Member States leading to over capacities of residual waste facilities (energy recovery or low grade mechanical biological treatment), it is essential to give today a clear signal to the waste operators and to the Member States to avoid 'regret' investments incompatible with the long term targets set in the Landfill and Waste framework Directives. For these reasons a limit for incineration of municipal waste in line with the preparation for reuse and recycling targets in Article 11 of Directive 2008/98/EC and Article 5 of Directive 1999/31/EC may be considered in order to apply and put the waste hierarchy into action. In addition, in order to ensure consistency between the targets laid down in Article 11 of Directive 2008/98/EC and the landfill reduction target defined in Article 5 of this Directive and to ensure a coordinated planning of the infrastructures and investments needed to meet those targets, Member States which may obtain additional time for the attainment of the municipal waste recycling targets should also be given additional time to attain the landfill reduction target for 2030 as laid down in this Directive.
Amendment 155 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 5(2) and (5) for each calendar year to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting year for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 5. The first reporting with respect to the targets in Article 5(5) shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year].
Amendment 44 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2000/53/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a
1a. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 7(2) for each calendar year to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting year for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 1d. The first report shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year].
Amendment 52 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 2000/53/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 d a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 d a (new)
(2a) After paragraph 1d, the following paragraph is added: 1da. By 1 January 2018, in the context of the Circular Economy Action Plan, the Commission shall review this Directive as a whole and in particular its scope and the targets, based on an impact assessment and take into account the Union's circular economy policy objectives and initiatives. A special focus shall be on shipments of used vehicles suspected to be end-of-life vehicles and therefore the Correspondents' Guidelines No 9 on shipments of end-of-life vehicles* shall be included in the directive. The review shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal, if appropriate.
Amendment 66 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 2006/66/EC
Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(ba) In Article 23, after paragraph 3, the following paragraph is inserted: (3a) By 31 December 2018, in the context of Circular Economy Action Plan, the Commission shall review this Directive as a whole and in particular its scope and the targets, based on an impact assessment and take into account: (a) the Union's circular economy policy objectives and initiatives; (b) the technical development of new types of battery for whose energy storage no hazardous substances, in particular no heavy and other metals or metal ions maybe used. The review shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 86 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2012//19/EU
Article 16 – paragraph 5 a
Article 16 – paragraph 5 a
5a. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 16(4) for each calendar year to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting year for which the data are collected. The datay shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 5d. The first report shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year]ensure that data from all actors collecting or treating WEEE are reported. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 5d.
Amendment 120 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) The armed defence forces of a Member State as defined under national law may, in addition to the military, include units such as a home guard as well as persons obliged to take part in armed defence activities and reservists.
Amendment 213 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) To ensure that firearms are duly traceable throughout the Union, common conversion standards should be established to guarantee that any conversion of a firearm that changes its category is irreversible.
Amendment 221 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 261 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Selling arrangements of firearms and, their essential components and ammunition by means of distance communication may pose a serious threat to security as they are more difficult to control thshould be subject to the control of the Member States and their conventional selling methods, especially as regards the on line verification of the legality of authorisations. It is therefore appropriate to limit the selling of arms and components by means of distance communication, notably internet, to dealers and brokersmpetent authorities should verify the identity of the persons engaged in such transfer and of their entitlement to do so.
Amendment 319 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1b
Article 1 – paragraph 1b
1b. For the purposes of this Directive, "essential component" shall mean the barrel, frame, receiver, slide or cylinder, bolt or breaech block and any device designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firing a firearm which, being separate objects, are included in the category of the firearms on which they are or are intended to be mounted.
Amendment 443 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
For the purposes of identifying and tracing each assembled firearm, Member States shall, at the time of manufacture of each firearm or at the time of import to the Union, require a unique marking including the name of the manufacturer, the country or place of manufacture, the serial number and the year of manufacture, if not already part of the serial number. This shall be without prejudice to the affixing of the manufacturer's trademark. Essential components must be marked with a serial number. This requirement shall not apply to firearms and essential components that were placed on the market before the entry into force of this Amending Directive.
Amendment 550 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide for standard medical tests for issuing or renewing authorisations as referred to in paragraph 1monitor firearms authorisations and shall withdraw authorisations if any of the conditions on the basis of which it wasthey were granted isare no longer met.
Amendment 617 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Amendment 638 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Amendment 658 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 7 - paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 (new)
Article 7 - paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 (new)
Amendment 700 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 10b a (new)
Article 10b a (new)
Amendment 764 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 7
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 7
Amendment 790 #
2015/0269(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point ii
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category B – point 7
Annex I – part II – point A – category B – point 7
Amendment 22 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas an excessivunsustainable use of resources is the root cause of various environmental hazards, such as climate change, desertification, deforestation and loss of biodiversity; whereas the global economy uses the equivalent of 1.5 planets’ worth of resources to produce global output and absorb waste and this figure is estimated to reach the equivalent of two planets’ worth of resources by the 2030s;
Amendment 81 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that resource scarcity requires an absolute decoupling of growth from the use of natural resources ‒ a systemic change which requires backcasting the actions needed from a 2050 sustainability perspective;
Amendment 153 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to develop and introduce by 2019 a lead indicator and a number of sub-indicators on resource efficiency, including ecosystem services; these binding; these indicators should measure resource consumption, including imports and exports, at EU, Member State and industry level and take account of the whole lifecycle of products and services;
Amendment 173 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to set a non- binding target to increase resource efficiency at EU level by 30 % by 2030 and individual targets for each Member State;
Amendment 214 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. UrgesCalls on the Commission to propose a review offurther look into the Ecodesign Directive by the end of 2016, incorporating the following important changes: broadening the scope to cover all main product lines; gradually including all relevantand to evaluate the idea of resource- efficiency features in the mandatory requirements for product design; introducing a mandatory product passport based on these requirements; implementing self- monitoring and third-party auditing to ensure that products comply with these standards; and defining horizontal requirements on, inter alia, reusability and recyclabilitycriteria as well as the idea to broaden its scope to not only cover energy-related products;
Amendment 279 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission to submit the announced proposal on the review of waste legislation by the end of 2015 and to include the following points: setting extended producer responsibility requirement, carefully applying the waste hierarchy, and to include the following points: developing waste prevention measures; setting minimum extended producer responsibility requirements to ensure transparency and cost effectiveness of the EPR schemes; endorsing the ‘pay-as-you- throw-principle’ prioritisingfor residual waste combined with separate collection schemes in order to facilitate the development of business based on the reusehigh quality of srecondary rawycling materials; increasing recycling and preparing for reuse targets to at least 70 % of municipal solid waste, based on the output of recycling facilitiesa solid reporting method preventing the reporting of discarded waste (landfilled or incinerated) as recycled waste, using the same harmonised method for all Member States with externally verified statistics; introducing a ban on landfilling recyclable and biodegradable waste by 2025 andfollowed by a ban on all landfilling by 2030;of recoverable waste by 2030; calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to introducinge fees on landfilling and incineration;
Amendment 286 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Urges the Commission to ensure that existing waste legislation and its targets are properly implemented and that Member States increase the efforts to reach existing targets and to establish measures to support Member States to put in place the right instruments to achieve the targets within the deadlines;
Amendment 292 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Highlights that, in order to make best use of available waste management capacities in the EU, better planning and information sharing is necessary to avoid overcapacities and therefore - at least as a transitional measure - tolerating more waste shipment within the EU towards the most modern and efficient installations, while combatting illegal exports;
Amendment 315 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to propose a regulatory frameworkevaluate the possibilities for urban mining in existing landfills and to develop an environmental permit system for the recycling industry based on self- monitoring and external auditing;
Amendment 407 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Urges the Commission to propose compulsorydevelop guidance for effective green public procurement procedures; considers that reused, repaired, remanufactured, refurbished and other resource-efficient products and solutions are to be preferred in all public procurement, and if they are not preferred, the ‘comply or explain’ principle should apply;
Amendment 443 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to establish a cross-sectorial, inter-DG sustainable financing working group in order to include the resource-efficiency indicators in company-level integrated reporting and accounting while respecting the confidentiality of certain business information; further calls on the Commission to examine how to incorporate resource-efficiency and environmental risks in, inter alia, credit ratings and capital requirements of banks, to develop a comprehensive insurance system for environmental hazards and to set out information requirements for investment products;
Amendment 445 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on the Commission to develop measures to incentivise and facilitate the development of markets for high quality secondary raw materials and the development of business based on the reuse of secondary raw materials;
Amendment 455 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that all EU funding, including funding through EFSI, Horizon 2020, cohesion funds and the EIB, must be in line with the waste hierarchy, must promote investment in waste management options at the top of the waste hierarchy (prevention, reuse and recycling) and must be mobilised to promote resource efficiency and urges the Commission to abolishphase out all environmentally harmful subsidies;
Amendment 465 #
2014/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the Commission to examine whether existing legislation is hindering the circular economy or the emergence of new business models, such as a lease economy or sharing/collaborative economy, and to address these barriers;
Amendment 62 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes with astonishment the Commission’s announcement that it intends to withdraw the proposal on the revision of waste legislation and to modify the proposal on the reduction of national emissions; deplores the fact that the proposal for the two withdrawals was announced without presenting any analysis or evidence to justify it nor was there any preceding consultation with the co-legislators and stakeholders; stresses the Commission´s announced commitment, as stipulated in its Work Programme 2015, to consider the view of the European Parliament and the Council before finalising its decision on its Working Programme 2015, especially the withdrawal of legislation; therefore underlines the fact that in several votes in plenary the majority of MEPs expressed their support for maintaining the Circular Economy package unchanged on the table; emphasises in this context the need to proceed with the work on the package as scheduled in order to avoid further waste of time and resources;
Amendment 135 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) It is recognised that the potential effect of a product on the environment may depend on the volume used and the resulting amount of the pharmaceutical substance that may reach the environment. Therefore, where there is evidence that a constituent of a medicinal product for which a generic application for a marketing authorisation is submitted is a hazard for the environment, it is appropriate to require data on the potential effect on the environment in order to safeguard the environment. In such cases applicants should endeavour to join efforts in generating such data in order to reduce costs and to reduce testing on vertebrate animals. The current impact assessment system results in repetitive and potentially divergent assessments of substances' environmental properties. This can lead to divergent decisions being taken on products with similar effects on the environment, especially in the case of products authorised before the environmental impact assessment was carried out. The establishment of a single centralised assessment of the environmental properties of active substances for veterinary use by means of a monograph system could be a potential alternative. The Commission should therefore submit a report to Parliament and the Council examining the feasibility of monographs and potential alternative options as soon as possible.
Amendment 479 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Within 24 months of the date of entry into force of this regulation, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the desirability and possible details of the creation of an environmental monograph system for the active substance to assess the environmental impact of veterinary medicinal products and potential alternatives, accompanied, if necessary, by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 518 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1
Article 68 – paragraph 1
1. A hHarmonised summary of product characteristicconditions of use and quality parts shall be prepared in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 69 for groups of essentially similar veterinary medicinal products, other than homeopathic veterinary medicinal products, which have the same qualitative and quantitative composition of their active substances and the same pharmaceutical form and for which national marketing authorisations have been granted in different Member States before 1 January 2004 (‘similar products').
Amendment 534 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 3
Article 69 – paragraph 3
3. Within 120 days of his appointment, the rapporteur shall present the coordination group a report regarding possible harmonisation of summaries of product characteristics for the similar veterinary medicinal products in the group and propose a harmonised summary of products characteristicproposing harmonisation of the conditions governing the use of the group of essentially similar veterinary medicinal products and of their quality parts.
Amendment 551 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 6
Article 69 – paragraph 6
6. In the event of an opinion in favour of adopting a harmonised summary of the product characteristicsation of conditions of use and of the quality part, each Member State shall vary athe marketing authorisations of the products in their territory so that the elements listed in paragraph 4, where they are already included in the summaries of characteristics for a product belonging to that group, and the quality part are in conformity with the agreement within 30 days of receipt of the information regarding the agreement from the rapporteur.
Amendment 554 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. By way of derogation from Article 69, the Committee may recommend to the Commission groups of similar veterinary medicinal products for which a scientific reassessment is necessary before a harmonised summary of the product characteristics isand quality part are prepared.
Amendment 559 #
2014/0257(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
Article 71 – paragraph 1
Upon request from the coordination group or the Agency, holders of the marketing authorisations foshall submit information concerning their products, included ing a gproup of similar products identifiedposal for a harmonisation of the quality part and summaries of the product characteristics shall submit information concerning their productsfor their medicines which belong to the group.
Amendment 227 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) as non-therapeutic medicines and products to help ensure animal health and welfare.
Amendment 354 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 7 – point 10
Annex II – part II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 7 – point 10
1.7.10. Any suffering to the animals shall be reduced to a minimum by applying adequate anaesthesia and/or analgesiasound veterinary practices and medicinal products designed for this purpose and by carrying out theany operations only at the most appropriate age by qualified personnel.
Amendment 357 #
2014/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 7 – point 11
Annex II – part II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 7 – point 11
1.7.11. Physical castration shall be allowed in order to maintain the quality of products and traditional production practices but only under adequate anaesthesia or analgesia and by carrying out the operationprohibited except where it is unavoidable. If it is unavoidable, interventions shall be carried out only under adequate anaesthesia and/or prolonged analgesia and only at the most appropriate age by qualified personnel.
Amendment 24 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of the European carbon market in 21027 identified the need for measures in order to tackle structural supply-demand imbalances. The impact assessment on the 2030 climate and energy policy framework8 indicates that this imbalance is expected to continue, and would not be sufficiently addressed by adapting the linear trajectory to a more stringent target within this framework. A change in the linear factor only changes gradually the cap. Accordingly, the surplus would also only gradually decline, such that the market would have to continue to operate for more than a decade with a surplus of around 2 billion allowances or more, thereby preventing the ETS from delivering the necessary investment signal to reduce CO2 emissions in a cost efficient manner. In order to address this problem and to make the European Emission Trading System more resilient to imbalances, a market stability reserve should be established. To ensure regulatory certainty as regards auction supply in phase 3 and allow for some lead-time adjusting to the introduction of the design change, the market stability reserve should be established as of phase 4 starting in 20217. In order to preserve a maximum degree of predictability, clear rules should be set for placing allowances into the reserve and releasing them from the reserve. Where the conditions are met, beginning in 20217, allowances corresponding to 12% of the number of allowances in circulation in year x-2 should be put into the reserve. A corresponding number of allowances should be released from the reserve when the total number of allowances in circulation is lower than 400 million. __________________ 7 8COM(2012)652 final. COM(2012)652. 8 Insert reference. Insert reference.
Amendment 32 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of the European carbon market in 21027 identified the need for measures in order to tackle structural supply-demand imbalances. The impact assessment on the 2030 climate and energy policy framework8 indicates that this imbalance is expected to continue, and would not be sufficiently addressed by adapting the linear trajectory to a more stringent target within this framework. A change in the linear factor only changes gradually the cap. Accordingly, the surplus would also only gradually decline, such that the market would have to continue to operate for more than a decade with a surplus of around 2 billion allowances or more, thereby preventing the ETS from delivering the necessary investment signal to reduce CO2 emissions in a cost efficient manner. In order to address this problem and to make the European Emission Trading System more resilient to imbalances, a market stability reserve should be established. To ensure regulatory certainty as regards auction supply in phase 3 and allow for some lead-time adjusting to the introduction of the design change, the market stability reserve should be established as of phase 4 starting in 20212017. In order to preserve a maximum degree of predictability, clear rules should be set for placing allowances into the reserve and releasing them from the reserve. Where the conditions are met, beginning in 20217, allowances corresponding to 12% of the number of allowances in circulation in year x-2 should be put into the reserve. A corresponding number of allowances should be released from the reserve when the total number of allowances in circulation is lower than 400 million. __________________ 7 COM(2012)652 final. 8 Insert reference.
Amendment 48 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Commission should review the functioning of the market stability reserve in relation to its operation in the light of experience of its application. The review of the functioning of the market stability reserve should in particular consider whether the rules on placing allowances in the reserve are appropriate with regard to the aim pursued to tackle structural supply- demand imbalances. The review should be carried out in 2022.
Amendment 53 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The European Council conclusions of 23 and 24 October 2014 on the 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework give clear guidance on the continuation of free allocations and carbon leakage provisions after 2020, stating that "the most efficient installations in the sectors at risk of losing international competitiveness should not face undue carbon costs leading to carbon leakage" and that "future allocations will ensure better alignment with changing production levels in different sectors" and "at the same time, incentives for industry to innovate will be fully preserved and administrative complexity will not be increased." The conclusions further underline that both direct and indirect costs for the respective industry sectors will be taken into account as well as the need for affordable energy prices. It is of paramount importance that the Commission reviews the functioning of Directive 2003/87/EC, in that respect.
Amendment 54 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. A market stability reserve is established, and shall operate from 1 January 20217.
Amendment 73 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Commission should review the functioning of the market stability reserve in relation to its operation in the light of experience of its application. The review of the functioning of the market stability reserve should in particular consider whether the rules on placing allowances in the reserve are appropriate with regard to the aim pursued to tackle structural supply- demand imbalances. The review should be carried out in 2021.
Amendment 73 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. In each year beginning in 20217, a number of allowances equal to 12% of the total number of allowances in circulation in year x-2, as published in May year x-1, shall be placed in the reserve, unless this number of allowances to be placed in the reserve would be less than 100 million.
Amendment 94 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. A market stability reserve is established, and shall operate from 1 January 20217.
Amendment 100 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
2. “1. From 20217 onwards, Member States shall auction all allowances that are not allocated free of charge in accordance with Article 10a and 10c and are not placed in the market stability reserve established by Decision [OPEU please insert number of this Decision when known] of the European Parliament and of the Council(*).”
Amendment 121 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 20262, the Commission shall on the basis of an analysis of the orderly functioning of the European carbon market review the market stability reserve and submit a proposal, where appropriate, to the European Parliament and to the Council. The review shall pay particular attention to the percentage figure for the determination of the number of allowances to be placed into the reserve according to Article 1(3) and the numerical value of the threshold for the total number of allowances in circulation set by Article 1(4).
Amendment 127 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 10(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC shall continue to apply until 31 December 202016.
Amendment 131 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. In each year beginning in 20217, a number of allowances equal to 12% of the total number of allowances in circulation in year x-2, as published in May year x-1, shall be placed in the reserve, unless this number of allowances to be placed in the reserve would be less than 100 million.
Amendment 167 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
2. “1. From 20217 onwards, Member States shall auction all allowances that are not allocated free of charge in accordance with Article 10a and 10c and are not placed in the market stability reserve established by Decision [OPEU please insert number of this Decision when known] of the European Parliament and of the Council(*).” In 2019 and 2020 an additional quantity of allowances as set out in the third column of the table in Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2014 shall be placed in the reserve.
Amendment 196 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2a Review of Directive 2003/87/EC By ...+, the Commission shall review Directive 2003/87/EC, taking into account the conclusions of the European Council of 23 and 24 October 2014, in particular with regard to carbon leakage provisions and the continuation of free allocations, better reflecting changing production levels and incentivising the most efficient performance taking into account direct and indirect carbon costs, and if appropriate shall, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, submit a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council. ________________ + OJ: Please, insert the date: six months from the entry into force of this Decision.
Amendment 216 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 20261, the Commission shall on the basis of an analysis of the orderly functioning of the European carbon market review the market stability reserve and submit a proposal, where appropriate, to the European Parliament and to the Council. The review shall pay particular attention to the percentage figure for the determination of the number of allowances to be placed into the reserve according to Article 1(3) and the numerical value of the threshold for the total number of allowances in circulation set by Article 1(4).
Amendment 225 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 10(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC shall continue to apply until 31 December 202016.
Amendment 30 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
Citation 18 a (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 15 March 2012 on a ‘Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ 1 , __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0086.
Amendment 35 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 b (new)
Citation 18 b (new)
- having regard to ‘Renewable Energy: a major player in the European energy market’ COM(2012)271,
Amendment 37 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 c (new)
Citation 18 c (new)
- having regard to European Parliament resolution of 21 November 2012 on ‘the environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities’ 2, __________________ 2 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0443.
Amendment 53 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas climate targets, security of supply, and competitiveness and climate objectives are of the utmost importance for the EU, are inextricabnd deeply linked and, they must be equally addressed and considered on an equal footing;
Amendment 193 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the various subsidies for various energy sources and technologies, without coordination and cost-effective implementation, distort competition and hinder the completion of the internal energy market without increasing investment certainty;
Amendment 219 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes the recent publication of the "first part of the fifth assessment report of the International Panel on Climate Change", adopted on September 27th 2013, confirming that global warming is for 95% due to human activities (90% in the 2007 fourth report) and warning on the consequences inaction might imply for the stability of our ecosystem;
Amendment 236 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Asks the Commission to take a multifaceted approach, the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of which ought to be enhanced byCalls on the Council to adopt and the Member States and the Commission to implement, for the EU 2030 climate and energy framework, an approach combining coordinated and, coherent policies that address in equal measure issues such as competitiveness, energy security and climate objectives (e.g.and ambitious binding targets in terms of GHG emissions reduction, renewable energy sources anddevelopment of RES and development of energy efficiency);
Amendment 249 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Asks the Commission to better take advantage of the interactions between these three targets in order for them to boost and strengthen competitiveness and energy security in the EU;
Amendment 276 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the European Council to keep up the progress made at EU level and, in order to maintain the continuity of the progress realised at the EU scale, to set ambitious butand realistic objectivetargets for the 2030 EU policies that take account of the economic, social, environmental, international and technological contexts, and to establish a clear, stable, long-term andclimate and energy policies in a cost- effective framework for industries and investorsmanner;
Amendment 309 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Considers that to keep the EU in the lead in terms of the development of technologies for a future low carbon economy, the EU shall set a binding target in terms of GHG emissions reduction in its 2030 framework;
Amendment 318 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Is of the opinion that the development of RES contributes to the achievement of the GHG emissions reduction target, to decrease the need for fossil fuel imports and to increase the diversification of our energy sources; Therefore, considers that the EU shall set a binding target in terms of RES in its 2030 framework;
Amendment 321 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 f (new)
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Insists that any national support schemes for RES should move towards a European system of support; is convinced that in a more integrated system for promoting RES at the EU-level for post- 2020 forward, taking fully account of regional and geographical differences as well as existing supranational initiatives, which is integrated in a general effort towards decarbonisation, could help to provide a more cost-effective framework for renewables, investment certainty and a level-playing field in which their full potential can be realised;
Amendment 322 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 f (new)
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Considers that the development of energy efficiency contributes to decrease the energy bill, to reduce our energy dependency and our energy trade balance, to the creation of new and non- relocatable activities, to face the rising energy prices and fight climate change; Recalls that the cheapest energy is the energy that is never used; Therefore, considers that the EU shall set a binding target for energy efficiency in its 2030 framework;
Amendment 373 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that some RESthe long-term design of a number of national RES support schemes has led to overcompensation and that some technologies should now be considered mature energy sources and; believes that their subsidies should therefore be phased out on time while avoiding retro- active changes, in order to be able to reallocate these to research and development (R&D) programmes ands well as to RES that are not yet cost- effective; asks the Commission to study the impact of RES priority dispatch on general energy costhe functioning of the energy internal market and on general energy costs; urges the Commission and the Member States to consider all relevant aspects of the integration of renewables into the electricity markets;
Amendment 391 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the investments necessary to achieve industrialisation of the next generation of renewables are currently being withheld due to the uncertainty about European political ambitions in the field of renewables;
Amendment 474 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that as one of the cornerstones of the EU’s climate and energy package, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) should be able to best fulfil its main function, the reduction ofthe EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is currently the main instrument for reducing industrial GHG emissions, and respond efficiently to promoting investments in low-carbon tecohnomic downturns and upturns; recalls that the main objectivelogies; Notes therefore that structural improvement of the EU ETS is to reduce GHG emissions and not to provide investors winecessary in order to increase the sufficient incentives to invest in low-carbon tcheme's ability to respond efficiently to echonologies, as these should be seen merely as a secondary objective and not as a basis for evaluating if the scheme works as intendedmic downturns and upturns and restore investors' certainty thanks to a predictable and reliable system in the long-term;
Amendment 497 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the EU needs a comprehensive policy framework for 2030 that encourages investment ins and the long- term decarbonisation ofin non-ETS sectors; Underlines the significant unused potential of energy efficiency in specific sectors such as building or transport; Asks therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to review the non- ETS targets while preserving the flexibility for Member States to define their own ways of meetachieving their effort sharing targets;
Amendment 533 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Asks Member States for better cooperation and interaction at EU level in order to make national measures more consistent; believes that the 2030 climate and energy framework should include some mandatory elements requiring Member States to consult with their neighbouring countries in case they plan significant changes in their energy supply; urges that the Commission takes appropriate steps to coordinate Member States' actions in defining their energy policies which have cross-border consequences;
Amendment 635 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines the importance of an energy strategy focused on boostingincreasing the EU's energy security and, economic and industrial competitiveness in the EU, jobs creation, social aspects and environmental sustainability by means ofthrough measures such as the diversification of supply routes, suppliers and sources and by increasing the, promoting energy efficiency and the increased deployment of RES;
Amendment 684 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that the lack ofCalls on the Member States to timely and fully implementation of and apply the internal energy market legislation remains one of the to remove all remaining obstacles to completion of the single market; highlights the importance of eliminating remaining infrastructure bottlenecks and instances of market failure and of ensuring that no new barriers to electricity and gas market integration are created;
Amendment 781 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Believes that a clear 2030 framework including, binding renewable and energy efficiency targets, will drive private investment beyond 2020 in low carbon technologies, increasing the potential of the job creation in the sectors; Therefore, asks the Commission to better underline the potential of low carbon employment in each Member State in the European semester framework, increasing low carbon skills intelligence and strengthening partnerships between national labour market actors;
Amendment 784 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 b (new)
Paragraph 28 b (new)
28b. Asks the Commission to implement its set of key employment actions for the low carbon economy, to promote greater use of the EU financial instruments available for Member States, regional and local levels as well as for private sectors for smart low carbon investments, for instance by engaging with the European Investment Bank to further boost its capacity to lend in the field of resource efficiency and renewable energy;
Amendment 785 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 c (new)
Paragraph 28 c (new)
28c. Underlines that the building sector counts for 40% of the EU energy gross consumption and that, according to the International Energy Agency, 80% of the energy efficiency potential in the building sector, and more than 50% in the industry sector, remain unexploited; Sees here a significant potential for reducing energy bills while creating unrelocatable jobs in the EU;
Amendment 797 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission to launch a study analysing new and cost-efficient market designs with a view to ensuring reasonably pricedthe lowest possible electricity toprices for consumers and to preventing carbon leakage; aAsks therefore the Commission to come forward as soon as possible with an additional assessment and recommendations for further actions to prevent the risk of carbon leakage notably for the electricity intensive sectors, caused by reallocation of production facilities outside the EU, focusing in particular on additional scenarios in which limited or no further global action is taken on carbon emission reduction taking into account the international context;
Amendment 822 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Underlines the risk of "low carbon leakage" where investments in low carbon technology flee Europe due to uncertainty concerning EU ambitions towards further decarbonisation; notes in this context, that the EU's current share of global low carbon tech patents filed has fallen to a third, from almost half in 1999.
Amendment 850 #
2013/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 b (new)
Paragraph 32 b (new)
32b. Notes that the EU is a resource constraint continent, and that the EU imports approximately 60 % of its gas consumption, over 80 % of oil consumption and almost 50 % of coal used for energy production; Insists in this regards on a 2030 framework with a strong focus on sustainable and renewable energy resources within the EU.
Amendment 2 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
– having regard to the Commission communication of 26 January 2011 entitled ‘A Resource-Efficient Europe – Flagship Initiative Under The Europe 2020 Strategy’ (COM(2011)0021), as well as to the European Parliament resolution of 24 May 2012 on a resource-efficient Europe (P7 – TA(2012)0223),
Amendment 9 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 32 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the EU coulda better performance in recycling would help the EU to benefit in terms of job creation and growth from a robust effort to move towards a balanced, cradle- to-cradle circular economy, Christian based on the concept of waste as a resource;
Amendment 37 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the economic potential for recycling of plastic waste is much higher than the 33% achieved with regard to plastic packaging waste and the 25% achieved with regard to total plastic waste at the moment;
Amendment 39 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas statistics on the amount of plastic waste exported outside of the EU are mostly missing;
Amendment 41 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas about 80 million tons of plastic waste is estimated to float in the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean;
Amendment 45 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's Green Paper and recognises the need for specific EU legislation on plastic waste, as well as more coherent as well as rigorous implementation of the existing legislation concerning waste;
Amendment 64 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises that any future regulation should include waste stream specific recycling targets in order to stimulate plastic waste recycling;
Amendment 74 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the EU legislation on plastic waste should define:be adapted in order to ensure better and more efficient collection systems: - setting specific targets for collection and sorting and mandatory criteria for recyclability (clarifying the distinctions between mechanical/organic recycling and recovery/incineration); the aim should be a target of at least 75 % of recycled plastic by 2020);- introducing separate collection of materials, as well as ensuring a harmonised approach on collection, separation and general waste management across the EU in order to create a level playing field in line with the waste hierarchy; - making possible specific labelling of materials in order to inform consumers concerning their mechanical or organic recyclability; and, finally,about the recyclability of a product, together with indications how consumers could help to increase separate collection, recycling etc.; - identifying criteria for the replacement of single-use and short-lived plastic products by reusable and more durable materials;
Amendment 88 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Agrees that plastic waste should be treated as a valuable resource by promoting its reuse, recycling, and recovery; believes that in any case landfilling should be bannedcalls on the Commission, therefore, to make proposals by 2020,14 without, however, incentivising as a result the energy recovery option over recycling; considers that, alongside the targets mentioned above for recycling, it is therefore advisable to introduce appropriate sanctions for a view to gradually introducing a general ban on waste landfill at European level and for the phasing-out, by the end of this decade, of incineration of recyclable and biodegradcompostable plwastics, in order to level the playing field for different plastic typese; this should be accompanied by appropriate transition measures including the further development of common standards based on life-cycle thinking; points out that this would also invert an unsustainable tendency that has until now privileged the use of virgin products over the more expensive recycled ones; (Adopted text/ European Parliament resolution of 24 May 2012 on a resource- efficient Europe)
Amendment 100 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the most dangerous plastics, those that are the most disruptive to humare needs to be a separate collection of materials, with an emphasis on certain separations within thealth and the environment (such as micro- and oxo-biodegradable plastics) and those which contain heavy met plastics waste stream (such as degradable and oxo-fragmentable plastics); calls for materials that can also make recycling processes more difficult, should to be phased out of the market or banned outright, as soon as possible before 2020; also believes that, as demanded by a majority of European citizens (and consumers), it is finally time to phase out or ban single-use, non-biodegradable and non-compostable plastic products, also before 2020time to fundamentally reduce the use of single-use plastic products, based on a clear definition what exactly a single-use product is;
Amendment 113 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Is of the opinion that the two most effective ways of addressing the growing waste burden are awareness raising (with a view to foster waste prevention) and the establishment of innovative waste- management infrastructures;
Amendment 118 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Is of the opinion that the use of oxo- additives in plastics should be discouraged;
Amendment 120 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Is of the opinion that the use of biodegradable plastic should not be promoted since biodegradable bags need to be up to twice as thick as normal plastic carrier bags to meet the same criteria and are much more expensive than normal plastic carrier bags; highlights that they only decompose very slowly even in industrial composting plants while they do not degrade in water at all, thus failing to solve the issue of maritime littering; notes that they worsen the littering situation because consumers falsely think they decompose, and finally underlines that they damage the recycling process in general since even two percent of biodegradable content make the entire material useless for recycling;
Amendment 122 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that for biodegradable, bio- based and compostable-based plastics, adequate measures should be adopted to promote them, provided their production does not impact negatively on agricultural output for human or animal consumption; also believes that clearer information on their characteristics should be provided to consumers;
Amendment 167 #
2013/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls forIn order to foster awareness raising, calls for more concrete action through campaigns, e.g. through the establishment of a European Day for plastic waste, on which citizens could return any volume of plastic waste to predetermined points in return for appropriate monetary compensation, as a means of ensuring the supply of recyclable plastic and increasing public awareness of recycling; considers that this event could also or through events such as a "Clean up Europe" day, includeing community beach cleaning activities, as a symbolic contribution to the containment of coastal pollution caused by plastic waste;
Amendment 25 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Is concerned about the fact that the competitiveness and industrialization gap between the EU countries is widening; calls on the importance of the new Multiannual Financial Framework and synergies between the Cohesion Fund and funding dedicated to Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs (Heading 1A);
Amendment 30 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has adopted the goal of providing strong support to industry, as this will help to restore economic growth in EuropeCommission's goal to develop an ambitious and sustainable European industrial strategy; calls for an integrated approach, which provides appropriate answers to the European challenges, such as resource efficiency, climate change, demography and social aspect;
Amendment 50 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 60 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that the EU laws need to take into account attractiveness for investment, and that therefore there needs to be a fair balance between competitiveness and social as well as environmental aspects;
Amendment 63 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 70 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that energy costs are an important part of operational expenses in some industrial sectors; stresses in this regard the importance of a diversified and sustainable energy mix;
Amendment 78 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 87 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that competitiveness should be fostered in all sectors of industry; calls, therefore, for respect for the principle of proportionality in the formulation of such market-based instruments as eco-designs, eco-labelling and public procurementCalls for the respect for the principle of proportionality in the EU environmental legislation (enshrined in Article 5 Paragraph 4 TFEU);
Amendment 97 #
2013/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the Commission's efforts to promote Europe as an innovation leader by increasing the volume of private and public fundsing for research and development, such as Horizon 2020, and calls on the Commission to promote an appropriate framework to increase the volume of private funding; calls in this context to put more emphasis on labour-intensive sector with human capital creation;
Amendment 484 #
2013/0443(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – section 1 – part C a (new)
Annex III – section 1 – part C a (new)
C a. Emission reduction measures to restrict hydrocarbon emissions Member States shall reduce emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) by promoting the use of modern emission-free tube technologies that are used in various sectors.
Amendment 109 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 120 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f
Amendment 154 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘operating hours’ means the time, expressed in hours, during which a combustion plant is operating and discharging emissions into the air;
Amendment 157 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Amendment 206 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
From 1 January 20252 emissions into air of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from an existing medium combustion plant with a rated thermal input above 5 MW shall not exceed the emission limit values set out in Part 1 of Annex II.
Amendment 215 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
From 1 January 203025 emissions into air of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from an existing medium combustion plant with a rated thermal input of 5 MW or less shall not exceed the emission limit values set out in Part 1 of Annex II.
Amendment 234 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Member States may exempt existing medium combustion plants which do not operate more than 5300 operating hours per year from compliance with the emission limit values set out in Part 1 of Annex II. In that case, for plants firing solid fuels, an emission limit value for particulate matter of 2050 mg/Nm³ shall apply.
Amendment 260 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States may exempt new medium combustion plants which do not operate more than 5300 operating hours per year from compliance with the emission limit values set out in Part 2 of Annex II. In that case, for plants firing solid fuels, an emission limit value for particulate matter of 1020 mg/Nm³ shall apply.
Amendment 272 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. In zones not complying with EU air quality limit values laid down in Directive 2008/50/EC, Member States shall apply, for individual medium combustion plants in those zones, emission limit values based on the benchmark values laid down in Annex III or on stricter values established by the Member States, unless it is demonstrated to the Commission that applying such emission limit valuWhere an environmental quality standard requires stricter conditions than the application of the emission limit values in Annex II, Member States shall apply additional measures, would entail disproportionate costs and that other measures ensuring compliance with the air quality limit values have been included in the air quality plans required under Article 23 of Directive 2008/50/ECithout prejudice to other measures which may be taken to comply with environmental quality standards.
Amendment 279 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall organise an exchange of information with Member States and stakeholders on the benchmark values for more stringent emission limit values referred to in paragraph 4emission limit values of Annex II. The Commission shall, by 1 January 2023, review the emission limit values referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 on the basis of the state of the art of technologies. The Commission shall report the results of the review to the European Parliament and to the Council accompanied by a legislative proposal where appropriate.
Amendment 345 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where a combustion plant is changed, the emission limit values set out in Part 2 of Annex II shall apply to the changed part of the plant affected by the change and shall be set in relation to the total thermal input of the entire combustion plant.
Amendment 437 #
2013/0442(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Amendment 42 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Illegal waste shipments frequently stem from uncontrolled collection, storage and sorting facilities. Inspection requirements should therefore be introduced for such waste sites. In addition, the Commission should consider the possibility of introducing a Union-wide certification system for hazardous waste treatment facilities and, if appropriate, submit a proposal.
Amendment 49 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006
Article 2 – point 36 a (new)
Article 2 – point 36 a (new)
(1a) in Article 2, the following point is added: '36a. 'inspection' means actions undertaken by or on behalf of the relevant authorities to verify that an establishment, an undertaking, brokers and dealers, a shipment of waste or the related recovery and disposal complies with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation;
Amendment 54 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006
Article 50 - paragraph 2
Article 50 - paragraph 2
'2. Member States shall, by way of measures for the enforcement of this Regulation, provide, inter alia, for inspections of establishments and undertakings in accordance with Article 34 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste14, and for spot check14, including brokers and dealers, and for inspections on shipments of waste orand on the related recovery or disposal.' __________________ 14 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p.3).
Amendment 64 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – point 3 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006
Article 50 paragraph 2 a - point d
Article 50 paragraph 2 a - point d
(d) information on the numbers and types of planned inspections concerning establishments, undertakings, brokers and dealers in accordance with Article 34 of Directive 2008/98/EC, waste sites, road, air, waterway and railway transports and consignments in ports, including the number of planned physical checks of facilities and waste shipments;
Amendment 83 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 – point c
Article 1 – point 3 – point c
Regulation EC No 1013/2006
Article 50 – paragraph 4b a (new)
Article 50 – paragraph 4b a (new)
4ba. In the absence of proof as required pursuant to paragraphs 4a, 4aa and 4b, or in the absence of adequate protection of the substance or object against damage during transport, loading and unloading as referred to in paragraph 4a, the competent authorities shall presume that the load is an illegal shipment. In these circumstances, the load will be dealt with in accordance with Articles 24 and 25.
Amendment 85 #
2013/0239(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 – point c
Article 1 – point 3 – point c
Regulation EC No 1013/2006
Article 50 – paragraph 4 b b (new)
Article 50 – paragraph 4 b b (new)
4bb. In order to ascertain that a shipment complies with this regulation, the relevant authorities may require any documentary proof in particular by the holder, notifier or the person who arranges the shipment.
Amendment 1 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
Heading 1
on improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness - Better implementation of EU environmental legislation -
Amendment 5 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Subheading 1
General points: no Union acquis and shortcomings of existing regulationremarks
Amendment 8 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 10 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas much of EU law takes the form of directives, setting out general rules and objectives, while leaving the choice of means, how to reach those objectives up to Member States and regional and local entities;
Amendment 11 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas key responsibility for ensuring effective implementation and enforcement of EU legislation lies with national authorities and very often at regional and local levels;
Amendment 12 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas inefficient implementation not only harms the environment and human health but also gives uncertainty for industry and places obstacles to the Single Market as well as more bureaucracy and thus higher costs;
Amendment 13 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas studies have concluded that full implementation of EU legislation in the waste sector alone would generate 400,000 jobs and save 72 billion Euros per year 1 __________________ 1 BIOS report, COM/2012/095 final
Amendment 14 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A e (new)
Recital A e (new)
Ae. whereas the unsatisfactory level of implementation of environmental law is reflected in the high number of infringements and complaints in this area;
Amendment 15 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A f (new)
Recital A f (new)
Af. whereas the lack of precise information and knowledge on the state of implementation and quantitative data for several environmental sectors act is a hindrance to the proper implementation of the environmental acquis;
Amendment 16 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A g (new)
Recital A g (new)
Ag. whereas according to the Commission, the cost of non- implementation of EU environmental legislation is currently €50bn per year in health costs and direct costs to the environment, not including the negative impacts on the state of the environment in the EU; whereas, from 2020 onwards, this figure will rise to €90bn per year 1; __________________ 1 European Commission, Directorate - General Environment, "The costs of not implementing the environmental acquis" Final report, ENV.G.1/FRA/2006/0073, September 2011
Amendment 17 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A h (new)
Recital A h (new)
Ah. whereas problems arising from implementation of EU environment law can be two-fold, with on the one hand late or insufficient implementation and on the other hand "over-implementation" ("gold plating"), both aspects running counter to the original political ideas behind EU environmental law;
Amendment 18 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A i (new)
Recital A i (new)
Ai. whereas there are significant differences in implementation both between and within Member States which lead to a negative impact on the environment, thus making a more systematic and holistic approach necessary in order to bridge this "implementation gap";
Amendment 19 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 21 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 29 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 32 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 34 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 40 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas full compliance with EU environmental law is a Treaty obligation and a criterion for the use of EU funds in Member States; whereas Member States should therefore implement environmental legislation in a timely, cost-efficient manner, in order to improve the state of the environment in the EU;
Amendment 42 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Implementation inas compliance with the subsidiarity principlemon task and opportunity
Amendment 44 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission communication entitled ‘Improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness’ (COM(2012)0095), but deplores its failure to refer specifically to the key role which regional and local authorities are called upon to play when European environment regulations are put into effect;
Amendment 48 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. is of the opinion that the administrative burden is not always a result of excessive implementation or lack of implementation, notes that administrative costs are unavoidable but these should be kept as low as possible because of their negative impacts on citizens and industry;
Amendment 49 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. notes that much of the unnecessary administrative costs linked to environmental legislation is due to inadequate or inefficient public and private administrative practices in various Member States and their regional or local authorities;
Amendment 50 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. emphasises that only the timely and correct implementation (transposition) of EU law by the Member States and regional and local authorities will ensure that the desired results of the EU policy in question are attained;
Amendment 51 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. emphasises that assuring a level- playing field and a common market as well as a harmonised approach are at the centre of EU legislation;
Amendment 52 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. is of the opinion that an efficient implementation can bring about benefits for industry, e.g. by reducing administrative burdens, providing investment security and in then creating more jobs;
Amendment 53 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 f (new)
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. deplores that citizens become aware of EU legislation only after it enters into force; is of the opinion that an earlier means of information exchange between legislators and citizens is needed to bring about a higher level of acceptance and understanding for what is the objective of EU legislation is;
Amendment 54 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 g (new)
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Clarifies that the Commission as guardian of the Treaties should act sooner in order to allow a better and more timely implementation; asks the Commission to examine what needs to be done to ensure the correct transposition, implementation and enforcement of environmental legislation;
Amendment 55 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 h (new)
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Notes that the current fragmented state of implementation in the Member States undermines the level-playing field for the industry and increases the uncertainty about the exact requirements and it therefore discourages investments in those environmental areas which can generate jobs;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 i (new)
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1i. Emphasises that the European institutions' responsibility with regard to EU legislation does not end with the adoption of legislation by Parliament and Council and that the European Parliament is willing to assist Member States, in order to allow a more efficient implementation;
Amendment 57 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 61 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 66 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Simplification and easing of administrative burdens to encourageolutions to assure a more effectiveicient implementation
Amendment 67 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 72 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is of the opinion that environmental legislation can be implemented more effectively through dissemination of best practices between the Member States, regional and local authorities responsible for implementing EU legislation, as well as through greater cooperation with the European Institutions;
Amendment 73 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Deplores the lack of data on compliance and enforcement work undertaken at national, regional and local level and thus asks the Commission, with the help of its networks and bodies, such as the European Environment Agency, to improve this situation;
Amendment 74 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Notes the importance of strengthening and monitoring the relevant indicators for the implementation of environmental legislation and encourages the setting up of a user-friendly website, where the most recent indicator measurements would be available and informal comparison among the Member States would be possible;
Amendment 75 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Is of the opinion that the Commission itself should be at the centre of efforts to ensure a better implementation and deplores that currently, these efforts are increasingly referred to other bodies which often do not have the Commissions competences, personnel or financial resources;
Amendment 76 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Urges the Commission and Member States to help improving the knowledge and capacity of the people involved in implementing environmental legislation, at national, regional and local levels, to ensure a better delivery of benefits from this legislation; is furthermore of the opinion that opening a dialogue with relevant stakeholders would improve implementation as well;
Amendment 77 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 f (new)
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of setting up partnership implementation agreements between the Commission and individual Member States or between Member States in order to promote better implementation as well as to identify and resolve implementation problems;
Amendment 78 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 g (new)
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Calls on the Commission to examine whether greater local authority participation throughout the process of defining environmental policy would be useful in improving implementation of legislation across the board, including the possibility of setting up teams to transpose environmental law at regional and local level;
Amendment 79 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 h (new)
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4h. Recommends the setting up of a systematic and easily accessible online information tool on implementation; calls on all actors, but especially on industry and citizens, to provide the implementing bodies with feedback on problems arising from implementation; values the availability of reliable, comparable and easily accessible information about the state of the environment as key in order to effectively tracking the state of implementation;
Amendment 80 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 i (new)
Paragraph 4 i (new)
4i. Urges the Commission to re-consider demands for the introduction of a best- practise database, allowing best practice in implementation to be disseminated across Member States, regional and local authorities; and calls on the Commission to explore ways in which information and communication technology can be deployed to provide as much useful online information as possible on how EU environmental law should be implemented;
Amendment 82 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 86 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Amendment 87 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 88 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
Amendment 91 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
Amendment 92 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 3
Paragraph 6 – indent 3
Amendment 94 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that there are many benefits to be gained from proper implementation of EU environmental legislation: a level playing field for economic actors in the Single market, as well as a stimulus for innovation are created, and first mover advantages for European businesses are just three;
Amendment 95 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Underlines that a high level of environmental protection is one of the fundamental objectives of the European Union which would deliver direct benefits to citizens, such as better living conditions through improved air quality, less noise and less health problems;
Amendment 96 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Emphasises that the EU has set itself an ambitious agenda to move towards a resilient, resource efficient and low- carbon economy by 2050 and that commitment on all levels is needed to reach this goal; recalls that a common effort is vital in ensuring that the European economy grows in a way that respects resource constraints and planetary boundaries;
Amendment 97 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
Amendment 101 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers the monitoring of implementation activities of great importance and therefore underlines the value of the European Environment Agencies' work in that field - in line with its statutory remit;
Amendment 102 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines the European Environment Agency's important role in providing a solid knowledge base underpinning policy and implementation and recognises the work done by the EEA in this field; urges the EEA to further develop its capacities to assist the Commission and Member States in assuring the quality of monitoring and the comparability of the environmental information collected in different parts of the EU; further encourages the EEA to also focus on capacity building and dissemination of best practice in the Member States; expects the European Environmental Agency's new Strategy to address the issue of implementation in more detail;
Amendment 103 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. supports the Commission in its plan to ask Member States, with support from the Commission, to develop structured implementation and information frameworks (SIIFs) for all key EU environment laws, to clarify the main provisions of a directive as well as to identify the types of information needed to demonstrate how EU law is being implemented;
Amendment 104 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Urges the Commission to create, in co- operation with national authorities, with the involvement of the European Environment Agency as appropriate, a complaint-unit where citizens can communicate problems related to the implementation of environmental legislation;
Amendment 105 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Underlines the crucial importance of effective inspections and urges Member States to step up their inspection capacities in line with best practices; calls for common minimum criteria for inspections in order to ensure fair implementation in all parts of the EU;
Amendment 106 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Urges all actors to streamline inspection and surveillance activities with a view to using available resources with greater efficiency; in this regard stresses also the value of a more systematic use of peer-review inspections, as pointed out by the Commission; emphasises the need to complement the existing inspections with enhanced cooperation and peer-reviews among inspection authorities; encourages the IMPEL network to take action in this direction; also calls on the Commission to promote knowledge and capacity-building by supporting networks of judges and prosecutors, and in close cooperation with the Committee of the Regions to reduce the environmental and economic costs of non-compliance and ensure a level playing field;
Amendment 107 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 g (new)
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Urges the Commission, to set up an Environmental Law Inspection Unit, whose role will be to oversee and help towards the implementation of the environmental legislation; asks that this Unit will use new technologies and cooperates with local agencies in order to keep the inspection costs at low levels; is of the view that this unit should operate on a cost-basis and that the revenues should be directed to the EU Budget and should be reserved for services related to better implementation;
Amendment 108 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 h (new)
Paragraph 7 h (new)
7h. Encourages Member States to draw up and publish correlation tables to describe the transposition of EU directives into national law in order to improve transparency and openness of the legislative process and make it easier for both the Commission and national parliaments to oversee the proper implementation of EU legislation;
Amendment 109 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 i (new)
Paragraph 7 i (new)
7i. Underlines that judges and prosecutors play a key role in the enforcement of environmental legislation and that it is therefore of vital importance that they receive proper training and information on these policies;
Amendment 110 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 114 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises the important role of the citizens in the implementation process and urges Member States and European Commission to involve them in a structured way in this process; in this regard also notes the importance of citizens´ access to justice;
Amendment 115 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to explicitly define a specific timeframe in which court cases relating to the implementation of environmental law shall be resolved, in order not to use the implementation of the environmental law and the court cases delays as an excuse to avoid compliance and hinder investments; and calls on the Commission to assess how many investments have been held back because of delays legal proceedings relating to irregularities on the implementation of environmental legislation;
Amendment 116 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Underscores the fundamental importance of actively informing citizens and NGOs about EU environmental policies at an early stage in order to involve them in drawing up and realizing such policies; urges therefore - also with a view to the findings of the high-level group of independent stakeholders on administrative burdens - that a greater effort in this respect shall be made so that public trust and confidence in EU environment law is enhanced, bearing in mind that a better environment for a better life cannot be created unilaterally from within the Institutions without the support of society itself;
Amendment 117 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Calls on the Member States to further advance the full and proper implementation of EU environmental legislation and adopted policies and strategies in the framework of the 7th EAP, and to ensure adequate capacity and finances for their full implementation, even in times of austerity, as the non- implementation or incomplete implementation of EU environmental legislation is not only unlawful, but also far more costly to society in the long run;
Amendment 118 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Highlights the need to ensure that legislation is fit for purpose and reflects the latest scientific research; thus calls on the EU and Member States to regularly assess if European environmental law fulfils these requirements and, where necessary, adjust it accordingly;
Amendment 119 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 f (new)
Paragraph 8 f (new)
8f. Acknowledges that first reading agreements might lead to the inadequate implementation of legislation if concrete content is left to be specified in the implementing provisions, therefore asks all actors to ensure that decision-making is based on an unambiguous statement of political will; emphasises the need for clear, consistent environmental legislation, drawn up on the basis of public policy evaluations and feedback;
Amendment 120 #
2012/2104(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 g (new)
Paragraph 8 g (new)
8g. is of the opinion that the Commission should continue to use directives in EU legislation to allow Members States as well as regional and local authorities to implement European legislation according to their respective situation; however, asks the Commission to bolster support already outlined in its proposal through further studies or actions referred to in the impact assessment;
Amendment 8 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that reducing the volume of transport by transporting carcasses and meat instead of live animals would have a positive impact on the environment, reducing pollution, improving the carbon footprint of the transport sector, and encouraging the development of local production and consumption; also points out that the transport of carcasses or meat is more sustainable than the transport of live animals; therefore considers that only carcasses or meat should be transported over long distances;
Amendment 17 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that Recital 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 requires that suitable special provisions should be proposed for poultry as soon as the relevant assessments by the EFSA are available; regrets therefore that, despite new scientific evidence and recommendation from the EFSA[1], the Commission’s report was not accompanied by any legislative proposals in relation to the transport of poultry, despite the fact that poultry is the most commonly transported species in Europe; [1] EFSA Journal 2011; 9(1):1966
Amendment 20 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to examine the maximum height of four metres for heavy goods vehicles and to increase this as appropriate for vehicles used in the transport of animals, so as to prevent animal welfare problems that arise as a result of inadequate head height in cargo holds;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that Article 32 of the Regulation states that the Commission report shall take into account ‘scientific evidence on the welfare needs of animals’, and may be accompanied if necessary by appropriate legislative proposals concerning long journeys; also recalls written declaration 49/2011, signed by the majority of the European Parliament, calling for the limiting of the transport of animals for slaughter to a maximum of 8 hours, and the 8 hours initiative supported by more than one million European citizens; calls on the Commission and the Council, therefore, to review Regulation 1/2005 in order to establish a maximumtime limit of significantly less than 8- hour limits for the journeys of animals transported for the purpose of being slaughtered;
Amendment 31 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Regrets that Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 has failed to fulfil its function in relation to the restriction of animal transport and that serious animal protection problems still exist during transport; therefore calls on the Commission to take the appropriate steps to promote regional production, slaughtering and marketing, so that it is no longer absolutely necessary to transport animals over long or very long distances;
Amendment 39 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that there are insufficient inspection stations in some Member States and that it is therefore impossible to carry out adequate controls on animal transport or the unloading of animals in emergency situation; therefore welcomes the fact the Commission’s report announces more controls on animal transport; also calls for greater efficiency in these controls;
Amendment 68 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In accordance with Article 114(3) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: "Treaty"), a high level of health protection should be taken as a basis, regard being had, in particular, to any new developments based on scientific facts. Tobacco products are not ordinary commodities and in view of the particularly harmful effects of tobacco, health protection should be given high importance, in particular to reduce smoking prevalence among young people. In accordance with the principle of producer responsibility, manufacturers of tobacco products should therefore be made responsible for all health costs arising as a consequence of tobacco consumption.
Amendment 94 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) In order to protect human health, the safety of additives for use in tobacco products should be assessed (risk assessment) and they should receive authorisation from the Commission prior to being marketed in the Community. Additives should only then be permitted for use in tobacco products if they are included in an EU list of authorised additives.
Amendment 122 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Considering the Directive's focus on young people, tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco and smokeless tobaccotobacco for oral use which are mainly consumed by older consumers, should be granted an exemption from certain ingredients requirements as long as there is no substantial change of circumstances in terms of sales volumes or consumption patterns in relation to young people.
Amendment 151 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure the integrity and the visibility of health warnings and maximise their efficacy, provisions should be made regarding the dimension of the warnings as well as regarding certain aspects of the appearance of the tobacco package, including the opening mechanism. The package and the products may mislead consumers, in particular young people, suggesting that products are less harmful. For instance, this is the case with certain texts or features, such as ‘low-tar’, ‘light’, ‘ultra-light’, ‘mild’, '‘natural'’, '‘organic'’, ‘without additives’, ‘without flavours’, '‘slim'’, names, pictures, and figurative or other signs. Likewise, the size and appearance of individual cigarettes can mislead consumers by creating the impression that they are less harmful. A recent study has also shown that smokers of slim cigarettes were more likely to believe that their own brand might be less harmful. This should be addressed.
Amendment 153 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23 a (new)
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Tobacco products have been shown to contain and emit many noxious substances and known carcinogens hazardous to human health when burnt. Scientific studies have clearly proven that passive smoking is a cause of death, illness and disability and that passive smoking is dangerous in particular to unborn children and infants. It can cause or aggravate respiratory problems in persons inhaling smoke. The health warnings should therefore also draw attention to the dangers to health of passive smoking.
Amendment 192 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) Nicotine-containing products are sold on the Union market. The different regulatory approaches taken by Member States to address health and safety concerns associated with these products have a negative impact on thHowever, Member States have taken different regulatory approaches which are functiodermining of the internal market, in particular considering that these products are subject to significant cross-border distance sales including via the internet. There is a need for harmonized rules, and given the potential of these products to aid with the harm reduction agenda, there should be an option for a light-touch regulatory regime to guarantee safety and quality, which is a middle-way between medicines and tobacco regulation.
Amendment 245 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
Recital 45
(45) The proposal affects several fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom of expression and information (Article 11), freedom of economic operators to conduct business (Article 16), and the right to property (Article 17). The obligations imposed on manufacturers, importers and distributors of tobacco products are necessary to improve the functioning of the internal market while ensuring a high level of health and consumer protection as set out in Articles 35 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The application of this Directive should respect the EU law and relevant international obligations. Member States should respect the right to clean air in the spirit of Articles 7 (b) and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights providing for rights for safe and healthy working conditions and the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. This is within the aim of article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental rights where a high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment must be integrated into the policies of the Union.
Amendment 260 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 263 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) '‘additive'’ means a substance contained in a tobacco product, its unitwhich is used in the manufacture of a tobacco product, including its components such as paper, filter, inks, capsules, adhesives, packet or anyd outside packaging, and is still present, including in modified form, in the finished product with the exception of tobacco leaves and other natural or unprocessed parts of tobacco plants;
Amendment 276 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Amendment 301 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) '‘ingredient'’ means an additive, tobacco (leaves and other natural, processed or unprocessed parts of tobacco plants including expanded and reconstituted tobacco), as well as any substance present in a finished tobacco product including paper, filter, inks, capsules and adhesives and tobacco;
Amendment 309 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 b (new)
(18b) 'tobacco' means leaves and other processed or unprocessed parts of tobacco plants, including expanded and reconstituted tobacco;
Amendment 422 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. First and foremost, Member States shall examine tobacco product ingredients so as to assess the need to take measures under Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) and (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP). On the basis of those examinations, and taking account of the precautionary principle, Member States shall submit scientific dossiers to the European Chemicals Agency, in particular pursuant to Articles 59(3) and 69(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and Article 37(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Member States shall report regularly to the Commission on the measures under examination in connection with tobacco product ingredients and on the steps which they have taken, where appropriate, on that basis. Every three years, the Commission shall publish a report on the progress made by Member States in this connection.
Amendment 425 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The list shall be accompanied by a statement setting out the reasons for the inclusion of such ingredients in those tobacco products. The list shall indicate their status, including whether the ingredients have been registered under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as well as their classification under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. The list shall also be accompanied by the toxicological data available to the manufacturer or importer regarding these ingredients in burnt or unburnt form as appropriate, referring in particular to their effects on health of consumers and taking into account, inter alia, any addictive effects. The list shall be established in descending order of the weight of each ingredient included in the product. Within one year following the entry into force of this Directive, manufacturers and importers of tobacco products shall submit the list of ingredients and all the accompanying information referred to above. Member States shall penalise manufacturers and importers of tobacco products who fail to submit that list and the accompanying information by the time limit. Other than for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide and for emissions referred to in Article 4 paragraph 4, the manufacturers and importers shall indicate the measurement methods used. Member States may also require manufacturers or importers to carry out other tests as may be laid down by the competent national authorities in order to assess the effects of substances on health, taking into account, inter alia, their addictiveness and toxicity.
Amendment 445 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 462 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 482 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 492 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 500 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 508 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Amendment 514 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Amendment 517 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
Amendment 521 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 524 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
Amendment 530 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Amendment 539 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Amendment 540 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 547 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 551 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Amendment 556 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Amendment 567 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Amendment 572 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Article 6 – paragraph 10
10. Tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco and smokeless tobacco productstobacco for oral use shall be exempted from the prohibitions laid down in paragraphs 1 and 5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to withdraw this exemption if there is a substantial change of circumstances as established in a Commission report.
Amendment 595 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. In order to ensure their graphic integrity and visibility, health warnings shall be irremovably printed, indelible and in no way hidden or interrupted, including by tax stamps, price marks, tracking and tracing marks, security features or by any type of wrapper, pouch, jacket, box or other device or by the opening of the unit packet. In the case of tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco and smokeless tobacco products health warnings may be affixed by means of stickers, provided that these cannot be removed.
Amendment 675 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cover 765 % of the external area of both the front and back surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging;
Amendment 718 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g – point i
(i) height: not less than 6455 mm;
Amendment 775 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In the case of packets whose most visible side has an area exceeding 75 cm², the warnings referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 must, however, cover an area of at least 22.5 cm² on each side. That area shall be increased to 24 cm² for Member States with two official languages and 26.25 cm² for Member States with three official languages.
Amendment 801 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
This tobacco product canis damageing to your health and is addictive
Amendment 817 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The labelling of a unit packet and any outside packaging and the tobacco product itself shall not include any information about nicotine, tar or carbon monoxide content or any element or feature that:
Amendment 858 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
In the case of filter cigarettes, the tipping paper must afford sufficient protection against product counterfeiting by means of its complexity. To this end it must, at the minimum, possess the following characteristics: (a) several visible print colours and production using gravure printing; (b) all white areas must be coated; (c) complex printing with partially thin structures; (d) printing on white base paper; (e) pre-perforation situated sufficiently far from the end of the cigarette.
Amendment 859 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) The cigarette paper must include watermarks.
Amendment 877 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A unit packet of cigarettes shall have a cuboid shape. A unit packet of roll-your- own tobacco shall have the form of a pouch, i.e. a rectangular pocket with a flap that covers the opening. The flap of the pouch shall cover at least 70% of the front of the packet. A unit packet of cigarettes shall include at least 20 cigarettes. A unit packet of roll- your-own tobacco shall contain tobacco weighing at least 40 g.
Amendment 890 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Amendment 925 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1250 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a (new)
Amendment 1257 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This product can damages your health.
Amendment 1271 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(104), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [Office of Publications: please insert the date of the entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 1283 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of powers referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(104), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 1293 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act pursuant to Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(104), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 1323 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [Publications Office, please insert the exact date: entry into force + 18 months] and in the case of Article 6 by [Publications Office, please insert the exact date: entry into force + 36 months] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 1329 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Member States may allow the following products, which are not in compliance with this Directive, to be placed on the market until [Publications Office, please insert the exact date: entry into force + 2436 months]:
Amendment 1334 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) nicotine containing products below the threshold set out in Article 18(1);
Amendment 1343 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 6 a (new)
Annex 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) Smoking causes cancer of the bladder
Amendment 1352 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 14 a (new)
Annex 1 – point 14 a (new)
(14 a) Smoking in presence of children can cause sudden infant death
Amendment 1354 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 14 b (new)
Annex 1 – point 14 b (new)
(14 b) Smoking during pregnancy causes premature birth
Amendment 1355 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 14 c (new)
Annex 1 – point 14 c (new)
(14 c) Children that are forced to smoke passive are more vulnerable to asthma and meningitis
Amendment 82 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The Union has agreed to achieve a reduction of EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of at least 20 % by 2020 (30 %, provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emissions reductions and that developing countries contribute adequately according to their responsibilities and respective capabilities); to ensure that 20 % of energy consumption comes from renewable energy by 2020; and a 20 % cut in primary energy use compared with projected levels, to be achieved by improving energy efficiency10. These pledges should continue to apply on the basis of the existing climate and energy policy framework, which sets binding targets for 2030, in order to ensure that long-term climate-policy objectives can be achieved in a cost-effective manner.
Amendment 101 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Environmental objectives should be supported by adequate investments, in particular in the waste management sector, through the targeting of EU Structural Fund support in accordance with the Waste Framework Directive. EU funding should thus be made available as a matter of priority for activities higher up the waste hierarchy (for example, recycling plants should take priority over waste disposal).
Amendment 106 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 33 a (new)
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) In keeping with the Commission Communication (COM(2012)0095) and the European Parliament report (2012/2104(INI) on improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness, greater attention should be paid to the implementation of EU environmental law.
Amendment 239 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 31
Annex 1 – point 31
31. All sectors of the economy will need to contribute to reducing GHG emissions for the EU to deliver its fair share of global efforts. The EU needs to agree the next steps for its climate and energy framework beyond 2020 in order to prepare itself for international negotiations on a new legally binding agreement, but also to provide Member States and industry with a clear framework to make the medium-term investments needed. Hence the EU needs to consider policy options for delivering the reductions should commit itself without delay to a framework for energy and climate policy for 2030 basetd out n binding the Low-Carbon Economy Roadmap for the period beyond 2020argets for greenhouse gas emissions, sustainable energy and energy efficiency. The 2050 Energy roadmap and the White Paper on transport need to be underpinned by strong policy frameworks. Moreover, Member States need to develop and put in place long-term, cost-effective low-carbon development strategies aimed at achieving the EU objective of reducing GHG emissions by 80% to 95% by mid- century, compared to 1990, as part of a global effort to limit average temperature increase to below 2°C. The EU Emissions Trading System will continue to be a central pillar of EU climate policy beyond 2020.
Amendment 250 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 35
Annex 1 – point 35
35. To set a framework for action to improve resource efficiency aspects beyond GHG emissions and energy, targets for reducing the overall environmental impact of consumption will be set, in particular in the food, housing and mobility sectors. Taken together, these are responsible for almost 80 % of the environmental impacts of consumption. The Rio+20 outcome recognised the need to significantly reduce post-harvest and other food losses and waste throughout the food supply chain. The Commission should therefore present a comprehensive strategy to combat unnecessary food waste and provide active support to the Member States in the fight against excessive waste generation.
Amendment 263 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 38
Annex 1 – point 38
38. Turning waste into a resource, as called for in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap, requires the full implementation of EU waste legislation across the EU, based on strict application of the waste hierarchy and covering different types of waste. Additional efforts are needed to: reduce per capita waste generation in absolute terms, limit energy recovery to non- recyclable and non-biodegradable materials, phase out landfilling, ensure high quality recycling, and develop markets for secondary raw materials. Hazardous waste will need to be managed so as to minimise significant adverse effects on human health and the environment, as agreed at the Rio+20 Summit. To achieve this, market-based instruments that privilege precorrespond to the fiven-tion, recycling and re-user hierarchy of waste should be applied much more systematically across the EU. Barriers facing recycling activities in the EU internal market should be removed and existing prevention, re-use, recycling, recovery and landfill diversion timetable targets reviewed so as to move towards a ‘circular’ economy, with a cascading use of resources and residual waste close to zero.
Amendment 282 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 41 – subparagraph 1 - point a
Annex 1 – point 41 – subparagraph 1 - point a
(a) The EU has met its 2020 climate and energy targets, established a framework for energy and climate policy for 2030 which is based on binding GHG emission, renewable energy and energy efficiency targets and is working towards reducing GHG emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990, as part of a global effort to limit the average temperature increase below 2°C.
Amendment 312 #
2012/0337(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 41 – subparagraph 2 - point e
Annex 1 – point 41 – subparagraph 2 - point e
(e) Fully implementing EU waste legislation. This will include applying the five-tier waste hierarchy and the effective use of market-based instruments and measures to ensure that landfilling is effectively phased outan overall ban on landfilling is gradually introduced at EU level, energy recovery is limited to non- recyclable and non-biodegradable materials, recycled waste is used as a major, reliable source of raw material for the EU and, correspondingly, the viability of recycling and the demand for secondary raw materials increases, hazardous waste is safely managed and its generation is reduced, illegal waste shipments are eradicated (including by the use of more stringent monitoring) and internal market barriers for environmentally-sound recycling activities in the EU are removed.
Amendment 106 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
Amendment 137 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. PIn the case of projects for which the obligation to carry out assessments of the effects on the environment arises simultaneously from this Directive and other Union legislation shall be subject toMember States shall seek to introduce coordinated or joint procedures fulfilling the requirements of the relevant Union legislation where this seems appropriate.
Amendment 151 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 166 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 3 – point a
Article 3 – point a
(a) population, human health, and biodiversity, with particular attention to species and habitats protected under Council Directive 92/43/EEC(*) and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Councilhuman beings, fauna and flora;
Amendment 171 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
2011/92/EG
Article 3 – point b
Article 3 – point b
(b) land, soil, water, air and, climate changand the landscape;
Amendment 180 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 3 – point c
Article 3 – point c
(c) material assets, and the cultural heritage and the landscape;
Amendment 193 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
3. For projects listed in Annex II, the developer shall, where necessary and appropriate, provide information on the characteristics of the project, its potential impact on the environment and the measures envisaged in order to avoid and reduce significant effects. The detailed list of information to be provided is specified in Annex II.A.
Amendment 207 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. When a case-by-case examination is carried out or thresholds or criteria are set for the purpose of paragraph 2, the competent authority shall, where necessary, take account of selection criteria related to the characteristics and location of the project and its potential impact on the environment. The detailed list of selection criteria to be used is specified in Annex III.
Amendment 212 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The competent authority shall make its decision pursuant to paragraph 2, on the basis of the information provided by the developer and taking into account, where relevant, the results of studies with which it is familiar, preliminary verifications or assessments of the effects on the environment arising from other Union legislation. The decision pursuant to paragraph 2 shall:
Amendment 215 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point a
Amendment 242 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Where an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 10, the developer shall prepare an environmental report. The environmental report shall be based on the determination pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and include the information that may reasonably be required for making informed decisions on the environmental impacts of the proposed project, taking into account current knowledge and methods of assessment, the characteristics, technical capacity and location of the project, the characteristics of the potential impact, reasonable alternatives to the proposed projectconsidered by the developer which, taking into account the specific features of the project, could achieve its main objectives to the same extent, and the extent to which certain matters (including the evaluation of alternatives) are more appropriately assessed at different levels including the planning level, or on the basis of other assessment requirements. The detailed list of information to be provided in the environmental report is specified in Annex IV.
Amendment 254 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. The competent authority, after having consulted the authorities referred to in Article 6(1) and the developer, shall determine the scope and level of detail of the information to be included by the developer in the environmental report, in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, if the operator asks for this. In particular, it shall determininclude:
Amendment 275 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) reasonable alternatives relevant to the proposed project and itsdefined in paragraph 1 and their specific characteristics;
Amendment 296 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
(a) the developer shall ensure that the environmental report is prepared by accredited and technically competent experts orpersons, who have the required level of expertise and/or experience (experts in the field),
Amendment 306 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) if deemed necessary due to obvious technical deficiencies in the environmental report, the competent authority shall ensure that the environmental report is verified by accredited and technically competent expertsons and/or expert committees of national experts.
Amendment 322 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where accredited and technically competent experts assisted the competent authority to prepare the determination referred to in Article 5(2), the same experts shall not be used by the developer for the preparation of the environmental report.
Amendment 324 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 359 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ) the main reasons for choosing the project as adopted, in the light of the other alternatives considered, including the likely evolution of the existing state of the environment without implementation of the project (baseline scenario);
Amendment 372 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
1. If the consultations and the information gathered pursuant to Articles 5, 6 and 7 conclude that a project will have significant adverse environmental effects, the competent authority shall, as early as possible and in close cooperation, discuss with the authorities referred to in Article 6(1) and the developer, shall consider whether the environmental report referred to in Article 5(1) should be revised and the project modified to avoid or reduce these adverse effects and whether additional mitigation or compensation measures are needed under the relevant law.
Amendment 377 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
If the competent authority decides to grant development consent, it shall, in accordance with the relevant legislation, ensure that the development consent includes measures to monitor the significant adverse environmental effects, in order to assess the implementation and the expected effectiveness of mitigation and compensation measures, and to identify any unforeseeable adverse effects.
Amendment 383 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 387 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 404 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Amendment 436 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 11
Article 1 – point 11
Directive 2011/92/EU
Articles 12 a and 12b
Articles 12 a and 12b
Amendment 455 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3
Article 3
Projects for which the request for development consent was introduced before the date referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 2(1) and for which the environmental impact assessment has not been concluded before that date shall be subject to the obligations referred to in Articles 3 to 11 of Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by this D, pending entry into force of the amended directive.
Amendment 478 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 1
Annex – point 1
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex II.A
Annex II.A
Amendment 507 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 2
Annex – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point g
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) impacts of the project on climate change (in terms of greenhouse gas emissions including from land use, land- use change and forestry)the local climate, contribution of the project to an improved resilience, and the impacts of climate change on the project (e.g. if the project is coherent with a changing climate);
Amendment 555 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 2
Annex – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex IV – paragraph 2
Annex IV – paragraph 2
2. A description, of the technical, locational or other aspects (e.g. in terms of project design, technical capacity, size and scale) of the alternatives considered, including by the identification of the least environmentally impacting one,veloper and an indication of the main reasons for the choice made, taking into account the environmental effects.
Amendment 560 #
2012/0297(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 2
Annex – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex IV – paragraph 3
Annex IV – paragraph 3
3. A description of the relevant aspects of the existing state of the environment and the likely evolution thereof without implementation of the project (baseline scenario). This description should cover any existing environmental problems relevant to the project, including, in particular, those relating to any areas of a particular environmental importance and the use of natural resources.
Amendment 44 #
2012/0202(COD)
(2) For the purposes of legal certainty and market predictability, it should be clarified that, in order to ensure an orderly functioning of the market, the Commission is able in exceptional circumstances to adapt the auction timetable pursuant to Article 10(4) of Directive 2003/87/EC provided that such intervention can be justified by an impact assessment showing that impact on sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage is limited. The Commission should be able to make no more than one such adaptation and only during the eight-year period beginning on 1 January 2013. The transition to a low carbon economy represents a major challenge, in particular for energy intensive industry. For this reason active support for demonstration projects in low carbon technologies is needed. To this end the adjustment of the auctioning timetable represents an opportunity to initiate such support. Experience has already been collected in supporting low carbon technologies via the NER 300. Such support should be continued and further increased, also for breakthrough technologies, in the context of the climate and energy policy framework for 2030.
Amendment 49 #
2012/0202(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Despite the carbon price being lower than originally envisaged, the Commission should be guided by the principle of regulatory continuity within a trading period and take into account the current economic circumstances when determining the list of sectors and subsectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage for the years 2015 to 2019.
Amendment 66 #
2012/0202(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 14 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 147 g CO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which have resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributed to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), should therefore be amended as a matter of urgency, and at the latest by the end of 2014, to ensure that the test procedures adequately reflect the CO2 emissions which occur in real driving conditions. As the next step, the World Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP), which is currently being developed under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, should be incorporated into European law as soon as possible after it has been finalised. The Commission should, however, consider the need to supplement the WLTP by additional provisions when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the emissions generated by real driving on the road.
Amendment 17 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 147 g CO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which have resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributable to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, and the New European Drive Cycle (NEDC), should therefore be amended as a matter of urgency, and at the latest by the end of 2014, in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the CO2 emissions generated by real driving on the road. The next step should be to incorporate the World Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP), which is currently being developed under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, into Union law as soon as possible after it has been established. The Commission should consider whether there is a need to supplement the WLTP, by incorporating additional provisions, when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the emissions generated by real driving on the road.
Amendment 26 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The Commission hasshould assessed further the availability of footprint data and its use as the utility parameter in the formulae in Annex I. This data is available and its potential use has been assessed in the impact assessment, on the basis of that assessment it is concluded thatdata on utility parameters other than mass and its use as the utility parameter used in the formula for 2020 should be masse in Annex I.
Amendment 35 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 510/2011
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
In Article 5 the following paragraph is added: ‘Super-credits shall expire on 1 January 2018.’
Amendment 39 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The Commission hasshould assessed the availability of footprint data and its use as the utility parameter in the formulae in Annex I. This data is available and its potential use has been assessed in the impact assessment, on the basis of that assessment it is concluded that thedata on utility parameters other than mass and their use as utility parameter useds in the formula for 2020 should be masse in Annex I.
Amendment 40 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The Regulation requires the Commission to carry out an impact assessment in order to review the test procedures to reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars. This work is proceeding through the development of a World Light Duty Test procedure in the framework of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe but is not yet complete. In view of this, Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 establishes emission limits for 2020 as measured according to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Annex XII to Regulation (EC) No 692/2008. As soon as possible after it has been finalised, however, the test cycle should be incorporated into Union law. The Commission should consider whether there is a need to supplement the WLTP, by incorporating additional provisions, when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the emissions generated by real driving on the road. When the test procedures are amended, the limits set in Annex I should be adjusted to ensure comparable stringency for manufacturers and classes of vehicles.
Amendment 59 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 510/2011
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(1a) In Article 1, the following paragraph is added: ‘(2a) From 2025 onwards, this Regulation sets a target within a range of 100 g CO2/km to 115 g CO2/km for the average emissions of new light commercial vehicles, as specified in Article 13(1).’
Amendment 61 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 510/2011
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) In Article 5, the following paragraph is added: ‘Super credits shall expire on 1 January 2018.’
Amendment 77 #
2012/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 510/2011
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall review the specific emissions targets, modalities and other aspects of this Regulation in order to establish the CO2 emission targets for new light commercial vehicles for the period beyond 2020. The aim of this review shall be to set an average emissions target for the fleet of new light vehicles for the period after 2025 which falls within a range of 100 to 115 g CO2/ km. On the basis of this review, which shall include an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its dependent industries, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way which is cost-effective and as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition and ensures the achievement of the Union's long term objectives in combating climate change.
Amendment 24 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 95gCO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which have resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributable to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, and the New European Drive Cycle (NEDC), should therefore be amended as a matter of urgency, and at the latest by the end of 2014, in order to ensure that test procedures give an accurate picture of the CO2 emissions generated by real driving on the road. The next step should be to incorporate the World Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP), which is currently being developed under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, into Union law as soon as possible after it has been finalised. The Commission should consider whether there is a need to supplement the WLTP, by incorporating additional provisions, when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures give an accurate picture of the emissions generated by real driving on the road
Amendment 26 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 95gCO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which have resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributable to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, and the New European Drive Cycle (NEDC), should therefore be amended as a matter of urgency, and at the latest by the end of 2014, in order to ensure that test procedures give an accurate picture of the CO2 emissions generated by real driving on the road. The next step should be to incorporate the World Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP), which is currently being developed under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, into Union law as soon as possible after it has been finalised. The Commission should consider whether there is a need to supplement the WLTP, by incorporating additional provisions, when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures give an accurate picture of the emissions generated by real driving on the road.
Amendment 33 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) In order to speed up the market uptake of ultra-low carbon vehicles and/or e-cars, it is necessary to develop across the Union appropriate infrastructure for the supply of alternative fuels and electric power to vehicles, including a dense network of charging points at all appropriate locations where many e-cars are parked for many hours, such as park-and-ride car parks. E-cars should, as a matter of priority, store surplus electricity generated using wind and/or solar energy. In addition, exchangeable number plates should be introduced Europe-wide, so that greater use can be made of commuter e-cars for short journeys.
Amendment 33 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) In order to speed up the market uptake of ultra-low carbon vehicles and/or e-cars, it is necessary to develop across the Union appropriate infrastructure for the supply of alternative fuels and electric power to vehicles, including a dense network of charging points at all appropriate locations where many e-cars are parked for many hours, such as park-and-ride car parks. E-cars should, as a matter of priority, store surplus electricity generated using wind and/or solar energy. In addition, exchangeable number plates should be introduced Europe-wide, so that greater use can be made of commuter e-cars for short journeys.
Amendment 36 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In recognition of the disproportionate impacts on the smallest manufacturers resulting from compliance with specific emissions targets defined on the basis of the utility of the vehicle, high administrative burden of the derogation procedure and only marginal benefit in terms of avoided CO2 from the vehicles sold by these manufacturers, producers responsible annually for less than 51000 new passenger cars are excluded from the scope of the specific emissions target and the excess emissions premium.
Amendment 54 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 443/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 4
Article 2 – paragraph 4
Article 4, Article 8(4)(b) and (c), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) and (c) shall not apply to a manufacturer which is responsible together with all of its connected undertakings for less than 51000 new passenger cars registered in the EU in the previous calendar year.’
Amendment 55 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The Regulation requires the Commission to carry out an impact assessment in order to review the test procedures to reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars. This work is proceeding through the development of a World Light Duty Test procedure in the framework of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe but is not yet complete. In view of this, Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 establishes emission limits for 2020 as measured according to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Annex XII to Regulation (EC) No 692/2008. As soon as possible after it has been finalised, however, the test cycle should be incorporated into Union law. The Commission should consider whether there is a need to supplement the WLTP, by incorporating additional provisions, when integrating it into Union law in order to ensure that test procedures give an accurate picture of the emissions generated by real driving on the road. When the test procedures are amended, the limits set in Annex I should be adjusted to ensure comparable stringency for manufacturers and classes of vehicles.
Amendment 58 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 443/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 (new)
(3a) In Article 5 the following paragraph is added: ‘Super-credits shall expire on 1 January 2016.’
Amendment 60 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in order to supplement the rules on derogations from the specific emissions targets, to amend data requirements for the purpose of monitoring of CO2 emissions and to adjust the formulae for calculating the specific CO2 emissions in Annex I to changes in the vehicle mass value and vehicle footprint and the regulatory test procedure for the measurement of specific CO2 emissions referred to in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 63 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 443/2009
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
(4) Following Article 5 the following article shall be inserted: "“Article 5a Super-credits for 95 g CO2/km target 1. In calculating theUltra-low-carbon vehicles 1. From 2020: a) the target for average specific emissions of CO2, for each manufacturer which is responsible for the registration on the Union market of more than 5% of new passenger cars with specific emissions of CO2 of less than 350 g CO2/km shall be counted as 1.3 passenger cars in thincreased by 2 g CO2/km; b) the target for average speriod from 2020 to 2023 and as 1 passenger car from 2024 onwards. 2. The maximum number of new passenger cars to be taken into account in the applicatcific emissions of CO2 for each manufacturer which is responsible for the registration in the Union market of more than 2.5% of new passenger cars with specific emissions of less than 50 g CO2/km shall be increased by 1 g CO2/km; c) the target for average specific emissions of the multipliers set out in paragraph 1 for the period 2020 to 2023 shall not exceed a cumulative total of 20 000 new registrations of passenger cars per manufacturer."CO2 for manufacturers which are responsible for the registration in the Union market of less than 2.5% of new passenger cars with specific emissions of CO2 of less than 50 g CO2/km shall not be affected.
Amendment 65 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Commission has assessed the availability of footprint data and its use as the utility parameter in the formulae in Annex I. This data is available and its potential use has been assessed in the impact assessment, on the basis of that assessment it is concluded. The outcome was that the utility parameter used in the formula for 2020 should be mass. Nevertheless, the lower cost and merits of a change to footprint as the utility parameter should be considered in the future review, since manufacturers have planned their compliance pathways to 2020 on the basis of continuation of the current parameter. Nevertheless, the lower cost and merits of footprint would justify its use as the utility parameter from 2025 onwards. Therefore, in order to ensure a smooth future shift from mass to footprint, a footprint-based formula should be introduced, which may be used from 2016 onwards by manufacturers as an alternative to the mass-based formula.
Amendment 75 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(1a) In Article 1 the following paragraph is inserted after paragraph 2: "From 2025 onwards, this Regulation sets an average emissions target for the new car fleet of between 65 and 75 g CO2/km, as outlined in Article 13(5)."
Amendment 87 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Article 5
Article 5
Amendment 94 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Article 5a
Article 5a
Amendment 129 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 10 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – point 10 – point - a (new)
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
-a) In paragraph 2, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: „(2) By 31 October 2014, and every three years thereafter, measures shall be adopted to amend Annex I to adjust the figures M0 and F0, referred to therein, to the average mass or footprint of new passenger cars in the previous three calendar years.
Amendment 151 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 10 – point c
Article 1 – point 10 – point c
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 5
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Bis 31. By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall review the specific emissions targets, modalities and other aspects of this Regulation in order to establish the CO2 emission targets for new passenger cars for the period beyond 2020.’ The purpose of this review shall be to set, for the period beyond 2025, an average emissions target for the fleet of new cars of between 65 and 75 g CO2/km. On the basis of this review, which shall include an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its dependent industries, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way which is cost-effective and as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition and ensures the achievement of the Union's long-term objectives in combating climate change.
Amendment 154 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 12 a (new)
Article 1 – point 12 a (new)
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Annex I – point 1 – point b
Annex I – point 1 – point b
(12a) In Annex I, point (b) of point 1 is replaced by the following: „b) As from 2016 one of the following formulae shall apply: (i) Specific emissions of CO2 = 130 + a × (M – M0) Where: M = mass of the vehicle in kilograms (kg) M0 = the value a = 0.0457 adopted pursuant to Article 13(2). (ii) Specific emissions of CO2 = 130 + b × (F - F0) Where: F = footprint of vehicle in square meters (m2) F0 = the value b = 17.6 adopted pursuant to Article 13(2).”
Amendment 155 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 13
Article 1 – point 13
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Annex I – point 1 – point c
c) As from 2020: one of the following formulae shall apply: (i) Specific emissions of CO2 = 95 + b × (F - F0) Where: F = footprint of vehicle in square meters (m2) F0 = the value b = 17.6 adopted pursuant to Article 13(2).” (ii) Specific emissions of CO2 = 95 + a × (M – M0) Where: M = mass of the vehicle in kilograms (kg) M0 = the value adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) a = 0,0333.
Amendment 175 #
2012/0190(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 13 a (new)
Article 1 – point 13 a (new)
Regulation 2009/443/EC
Annex I – point 2 a (new)
Annex I – point 2 a (new)
(13a) The following point is added to Annex I: “2a. A manufacturer shall apply the same utility parameter (mass or footprint) for the whole of its car fleet. Once a manufacturer has chosen to use footprint as the utility parameter for establishing compliance with its specific emissions target, it may not revert to the use of mass in the subsequent years.
Amendment 33 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that some actions should be strengthened after their effectiveness has been examined;
Amendment 134 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for ensuring the competitiveness of the agricultural sector the development of rural areas and the protection of the environment and biodiversity; calls, therefore, for a strong reorientation of the CAP towards the delivery of public goods;
Amendment 148 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change ; welcomes the Commission’s CAP reform proposal that provides for a ‘greening’ of the CAP through the allocation of 30 % of Pillar I payments to a package of worthwhile, basic good practices applied at farm level, which should include crop rotation and diversification, permanent pasture and a minimum ‘ecological focus area’; takwelcomes the view, however,proposal from the Commission that the minimum ‘ecological focus area’ should be 107 % of farmland, and not the 7 % proposed by the Commission; takes the view, however that this figure of 7 % should be examined in a comprehensive impact assessment;
Amendment 163 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules, covering the Water Framework Directive, pesticides legislation and the Birds and Habitats Directives; further calls for an examination of these cross compliance rules in terms of the red tape involved and for their significant simplification if this red tape is found to be excessive;
Amendment 175 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar in all EU Member States and the effectiveness of its agro-environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory spending on environmental measures;
Amendment 276 #
2011/2307(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €EUR 5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding; calls, further, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate funding is made available through thevarious EU funds (such as CAP funds, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the cohesion funds and the LIFE+ fund);
Amendment 3 #
2011/2217(DEC)
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Grants the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2010;
Amendment 22 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the 7th EAP should be an overarching framework that makes it possible to deal with both persistent and emerging environmental challengeschallenges with due regard to existing and planned measures;
Amendment 39 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Invites the Commission to include in the 7th EAP binding targets for energy efficiency and/or energy savingstake into account the ongoing discussions on energy efficiency and/or energy savings in the 7th EAP , as set out in the directive on energy efficiency;
Amendment 56 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Invites the Commission to already use – and improve – existing resource efficiency indicators where available and set targets without any delay, and to develop as soon as possible new indicators and targets where needed, as requested in the Roadmap;
Amendment 62 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that the 7th EAP should include objectives on how to specifically deal with urban environmental issuessubsidiarity principle should be applied to a greater extent in the 7th EAP concerning urban environmental issues and that European targets should allow urban areas and other regions sufficient leeway to take measures that reflect the conditions in the respective area;
Amendment 78 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that the 7th EAP should provide for full implementation of waste legislation and, by paying particular attention to the 5-stage waste hierarchy, should set very ambitious targets, including a net decrease ofin waste generation and ‘zero landfill’, without driving waste incinerationa strict ban on the dumping of segregated waste in landfills;
Amendment 114 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 – indent 3
Paragraph 20 – indent 3
– provide for the development of specific measures relatto examinge to emerging health threatshe effects of new developments on human and animal health, such as nanomaterials or the combination effects of chemicals
Amendment 143 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that integrating environmental considerations into other relevantare gaining increasing importance in other sectoral policies – in particular agriculture, fisheries, cohesion policy, transport, industry, energy, trade, employment and research – should be a key priority of the 7th EAPand, accordingly, it would be desirable to integrate environmental considerations into other sectoral policies;
Amendment 148 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Invites the Commission to develop indicatorinvestigate whether indicators can be developed without additional expenditures in order to be able to measure improvement of integration;
Amendment 149 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Urges the Commission to include in its 7th EAP proposal an aggregated list of allmeasures to establish coherence between the existing environment-related targets for the different policy areas, notably climate change, biodiversity, transport, energy, agriculture, fisheries and cohesion policy, and examine them in conjunction with each other, so as to allow for an appropriate comparison and to ensure that objectives are coherent;
Amendment 165 #
2011/2194(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Takes the view that the 7th EAP should aim at supporting the development of alternative models to measure growth and welfare ‘beyondthat supplement the GDP’;
Amendment 2 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
– having regard to the Environment Council conclusions on the Commission’s Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe adopted on 19 December 2011 (18786/11) and the, the Competitiveness Council conclusions of 29 September 2011 on a competitive European economy, and the Environment Council conclusions of 20 December 2010 on sustainable materials management and sustainable production and consumption: key contribution to a resource-efficient Europe,
Amendment 3 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Making raw materials available for Europe’s future well-being – Proposal for a European innovation partnership on raw materials’ (COM(2012)0082),
Amendment 18 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas switching the economy onto a resource-efficient path which respects planetary boundaries willcan bring increased competitiveness and new sources of growth and jobs through cost savings from improved efficiency, the commercialisation of innovations and better management of resources over their whole life cycle;
Amendment 19 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas recycling amounts to more than the collection of recyclable waste and whereas it is therefore essential for every step along the value chain to be encompassed within future measures;
Amendment 21 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas a future holistic resource policy should no longer merely distinguish between ‘renewable’ and ‘non-renewable’ resources, but should also extend to ‘sustainable’ materials;
Amendment 29 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts from the Commission, Member States, industry and civil society and develop European Resource Efficiency Action Plans with clearindicative benchmarks within one yearas quickly as possible;
Amendment 37 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to transpose the existing legislation on waste as a matter of urgency in order to establish the necessary conditions for a functioning market;
Amendment 40 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulateremove any obstacles to the operation of the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials, or the availability of, recycled materials and by- products, for example by developing stringent end-of- waste criteria andfor other priority waste streams or by offering economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013 in sectors in which the market is failing to function or measures to promote the use of innovative collection and sorting technologies; calls also therefore for the creation of a ‘Schengen area’ for waste in order to move waste for recycling more freely within the single market between the Member States; considers it essential, however, to press more determinedly than hitherto for observance of the principles deriving from existing legislation, for instance the Waste Shipment Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006), and for high standards comparable throughout the EU;
Amendment 59 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to boost research and technological innovation to speed up the transition to a green economy; underlines that the ‘Innovation Union’ is one of the engines for a resource-efficient Europe; calls on the Commission to set up an online ‘best practice’ data bank in the resource efficiency field, which should be accessible without difficulty to citizens and businesses as a whole and help to disseminate potential solutions and new ideas and translate them into reality;
Amendment 66 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission and Member States to act as quickly as possible – publishing the grounds for their decision- making – to develop and use clear, robust, and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012, as well as of the globalised economy and possible business cycle fluctuations;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, after carrying out comprehensive impact assessments, to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non- energy-related products and to come forward with additional eco- design requirements on the performance of products, including recycled content, durability, recyclability, and reusability, in order to improve their environmental impact and promote recycling markets; points out that the impact assessments must focus in particular on the effects on competitiveness and that the possibility of overlapping with other regulations must, in addition, be ruled out;
Amendment 91 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are coherently aligned to them;
Amendment 105 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models and to create the incentives that will bring long- term benefits for the economy; emphasises the key role of the private sector in delivering green economic growth, but notes that small and medium-sized enterprises are, from that point of view, in a special position;
Amendment 108 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models, such as a leasing society, and to create the incentives that will bring both short- and long- term benefits for the economy; emphasises the key role of the private sector in delivering green economic growth;
Amendment 134 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies and to identify those cases in which feedback might pose problems, with a view to remedying them as quickly as possible;
Amendment 142 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take more effective action to combat illegal shipments of waste to non-EU countries and, in particular, to strengthen the appropriate monitoring systems; suggests that a ‘European external waste policy’ be established with a view to spreading the best European waste treatment standards beyond the confines of the EU;
Amendment 147 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive landfill ban, accompanied by appropriate transition measures; is of the opinion that a landfill tax – as has already been introduced by some Member States – could also help to achieve the above ends;
Amendment 158 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Points out that existing landfills could serve as raw material depots (urban mining), but that there is little in the way of research findings on that subject;
Amendment 169 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, chemistry, farming, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use; points out that granting tax credits (deductions from tax payable) would also benefit research, development, and innovation activities;
Amendment 175 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Considers that EU support serves to point the way and should therefore be used as a matter of priority for projects relating to higher rungs of the waste hierarchy;
Amendment 182 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues accounting for an EU average of more than 10% by 2020, in line with the best performing Member States; emphasises that this will allow for cuts; emphasises that cuts must at the same time be made in other taxes such as on labour, so as to increase competitiveness and create a level playing field;
Amendment 195 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Urges the Commission and Member States, as quickly as possible, to draw up a clear definition, based on objective criteria, of ‘environmentally harmful subsidies’ and to present concrete plans for phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies before 2020;
Amendment 204 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give more active support in future to scientific research to assess the economic value of ecosystems or ecosystem services and, integrate these values addition, to consider how far such values could be integrated into reporting and accounting systems by 2015;
Amendment 210 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Endorses the Commission's commitment in the Roadmap to developing market-based instruments to enable negative externalities to be included in market prices thereby reflecting the true cost of using resources and their environmental impacts;
Amendment 222 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and diminishing imported land use and diminishing imported land use; points out that consumers should be informed in detail about the importance of a healthy balanced diet based on high-quality seasonal and regional foods;
Amendment 241 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear sectoral targets, including an overall target, in order to implement the vision and the milestonetargets of the Roadmap; calls onpoints, however, to the Ccommission to bring forward a concrete proposal for such targets for the EU by 2013 at the latest and to ensure that all EU policies are consistent with the targets set; considers that the milestones included in the Roadmap should be considered as targets until more detailedplexity of the subject and the consequent imperative need for such steps to be scientifically examined; calls on the Commission, working together with the scientific community, to devise and introduce indicators as quickly as possible in order to provide a basis for a future concrete proposal for such targets for the EU; considers it necessary in addition to ensure that all EU policies are consistent with the targets are set; calls on Member States to include corresponding targets in their own resource efficiency strategies;
Amendment 251 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Urges the Commission to adopt robust and easily understandable indicators, which should be based on integrated accounting tools and explicitly laid down to apply in all parts of Europe, in order to monitor progress towards the targets;
Amendment 255 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Supports the proposal by the Commission to devise and, as soon as possible, to establish a lead indicator complemented byrising a set of indicators on land, water, materials and carbon; underlines that these must be based on a footprint approach that takes the full life cycle impacts into accountintegrated indicators derived from scientific knowledge must be based on a footprint approach that takes impacts into account over the full life cycle and along the entire value chain;
Amendment 261 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines that specific resource efficiency indicators are crucial in all areas of policy and calls on the Commission to integrate resource efficiency indicators into all its impact assessments; also considers that a ‘fitness check’ along the lines set out in Commission communication COM(2010)0614 should be a mandatory part of every impact assessment;
Amendment 264 #
2011/2068(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that the 7th EAP should be aimed at achieving the vision and milestones of the Roadmap towards a resource-efficient Europe;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycli, its determination to look at all three pillars of this broad challenge, and its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling RM; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re-usenamely assuring a fair and sustainable supply of raw materials from international markets, fostering sustainable supply within the EU and promoting resource efficiency and recycling;
Amendment 7 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Is of the opinion that clarification as regards the exact scope of the raw materials strategy is important; feels that while the Commission should monitor challenges with regard to all resources, a focus on industrial raw materials might indeed be sensible with regard to this initiative in order to allow a more targeted approach;
Amendment 8 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Highlights that - especially with regard to the subject of raw materials - a coherent policy, a strategic and long-term vision, as well as a coordinated approach of all involved actors, especially within the Commission, are of utmost importance;
Amendment 9 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Stresses that further data and more studies are needed to ensure a more targeted approach, especially as regards analyses of waste streams, but also the potential of innovative technologies for recycling and substitution;
Amendment 10 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Welcomes its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling raw materials and is of the opinion that there is a dire need for more information on urban mining and therefore asks the Commission to assess especially the potential, but also possible limitations in this regard; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re-use;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential; insists therefore that reduction targets should ba robust and reliable smet to stabilise material use and proposes an annual material EU efficiency target of 3%hodology is introduced to be able to set (sector- specific) efficiency targets to stabilise material use;
Amendment 25 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the EC to research the development ofall actors to raise awareness about competition as regards the use of raw materials and feels that a RM hierarchy to ensure the highest added value use of RM without compromising the environment; calls on the EC to map the competition for the same materials and to address non- essential consumption of RM might be one pathway to tackle the challenge in the future;
Amendment 41 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EC and Member States to further increase producer responsibility in legislation to ensure a higher level of RM recovery, reusability and re- and upcyclability and to stimulate efficient use of RM, highlights the importance of an effective circular economy in this respect;
Amendment 53 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EC to look into possibilities of developing a system of chain of custody for all RM where possible, instructing producers to record the origin of RM through a transparent system, following existing examples (FSC and FLEGT for illegal RM), allowing for the future development of sustainability criteria for RM;
Amendment 57 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and a landfill ban on recyclable RMrelated legislation as well as for a landfill ban on untreated household waste until 2025 (perhaps through a step- by-step approach) and strict and ambitious efficiency criteria for incineration with energy recovery, which should aim at reuse and recycling of RM instead of incineration.;
Amendment 70 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EC to integrate the biodiversity action plan objectives into the RM strategy to strengthen links between the economy and environment and to take account of ensure that legislation in the field of biodiversity is implemented coherently and urges the Commission to use all possible instruments to ensure that Member States follow the Commission's view that it is possible to reconcile extractive activities in or near Natura 2000 sites withe environmental effects of extraction, produtection, use and disposal of RM; urges the EC to support the development of and biodiversity and that strategic land use planning in all Member States to balance raw material extraction with other land use demands and to safeguard the environment and biodiversityshould not exclude the demand for raw materials from neighbouring Members States; urges the Commission to further disseminate the findings of its guidance document of July 2010;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the role of corporate social responsibility and adherence to the highest international environmental and social standards and the application of BAT; calls on the EC to follow the spirit of the US Dodd-Frank Bill on conflict minerals where feasible and urges the EC to present a legislative proposal; supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 83 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for the active introduction and promotion of more sustainable economic models decoupled from material use, to ensure the future availability of RM in the EU; calls for the EC to develop legal instrumentsnew instruments (for example 'green certificates' aiming at increasing the uptake of secondary raw materials) targeting a more efficient use of resources, avoiding rebound effects,; suggests that the EC undertake a comprehensive study on economic leasing models as alternatives to ownership of goods and their impact on material use and recovery; highlights that awareness is the main challenge in this regard;
Amendment 87 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 96 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Encourages the Commission to continue preparations for an Innovation Partnership on raw materials in line with the 'Innovation Union' flagship initiative and stresses the importance of close cooperation already at an early stage between all institutions concerned in this regard;
Amendment 6 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication on Energy Efficiency Plan 2011(COM(2011)0109),
Amendment 8 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Council Conclusions of June 2010 agreeing that the Commission should “conduct more detailed analysis on the policy options and costs and benefits, including at Member State level, as appropriate."
Amendment 36 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, due to the economic crisis, emissions from sectors in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) have been considerably lower than projected, and below the level of initial allocation,; whereas the actual price of allowances in the third trading period is subject to many uncertainties caused, for example, by the economic recovery, the effects of the benchmarks that have just been established and the possibility that some Member States may speed up plans to phase out nuclear power;
Amendment 45 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the temporary lower carbon price will have a significantn impact on investment decisions and will reduce the revenues from auctioning allowances for financing climate action in the EU and in developing countries,
Amendment 60 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Recital F c (new)
Fc. whereas even if the European Union were to move to -30% the obligations under the Copenhagen Agreement would in no way suffice to meet the 2°C objective, so an intermediate step is justified, but every effort needs to be made to improve the situation at international level, which would then facilitate moving to -30% at a later stage;
Amendment 61 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F d (new)
Recital F d (new)
Fd. whereas the European Union’s credibility would be enhanced if an intermediate step was first taken and, at the same time, legislation was adopted that mapped out the specific path to be followed if the international situation further improved;
Amendment 87 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the CommissReiterates that the European Union tohas come forwarmitted with proposals to move to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction target for 2020 as soon as possible, and at the latest by the end of 2011self to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 20%, or 30% if other industrialised and emerging countries follow suit;
Amendment 99 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 100 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Points out that the EU’s main priority should be to convince other partners in the world of the merits of making their own commitments on reductions that may even exceed those set out in the Copenhagen Agreement;
Amendment 117 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that the EU needs to step up its efforts from 2020 onwards and in this respect it could make sense to identify an intermediate target for 2030, for example; calls on the Commission to develop specific instruments to achieve these goals in the most cost-effective way;
Amendment 129 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls that the EU with little more than 10% of global emissions will not be able to tackle climate change on its own.
Amendment 132 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that delaying global and European climate action would result in higher costs for achieving the 2050 target due to stranded investment in high-carbon capital stock and slower technological learning;
Amendment 141 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that, according to the 2010 Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS will correspond to aroundcould be up to 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020;
Amendment 147 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises that investment in green technologies depends heavily on the price signal delivered by the carbon market and concludes therefore that, under the current 20% target, the ETS will have a very limited rolerole which the ETS will play in driving emission reductions and deployment of low-emission technologies in the sectors it covers cannot currently be predicted with any certainty, as the forecast range for the carbon price is quite wide;
Amendment 158 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that, due to the surplus and low carbon price, the auction of allowances will alsomight not mobilise resources for climate investments as expected;
Amendment 211 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores the lack of measures to capture thStresses again that, in particular, improvements in energy efficiency offer considerable negative-cost greenhouse gasemission reduction potential in energy and resource efficiency, and that a substantial number of climate protection measures consequently exist which pay for themselves simply thanks to the lower energy costs associated with them; calls for strict application of the least lifecycle cost principle in implementing measures under the Eco- design Directive and for the Commission to review the methodology to consider alignment to a ‘top-runner’ approach;
Amendment 217 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Is deeply concerned that the EU is not on track to meet the target of reducing energy consumption by 20% as compared with the forecast level in 2020 by improving energy efficiency; calls on the Commission to take all necessary measures to ensure that the Member States exploit this potential, whether by adopting a provision requiring national energy efficiency action plans to be approved by the Commission or by means of other measures, such as the introduction of binding energy efficiency targets;
Amendment 218 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recognises that achieving the energy efficiency target would enable the EU to reduce emissions by more than 20% by 2020;
Amendment 262 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Takes into account the need to carry out an in-depth analysis of the cumulative costs of climate objectives in terms of carbon prices, energy prices and expenditure for innovation and research.
Amendment 271 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that a move to a 30% climate target for 2020 would restore the incentives for innovation lost by the easing of the 20% target;
Amendment 283 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Observes that more and more countries worldwide have already recognised the opportunity afforded by climate technologies and environmental technologies and are converting their economies accordingly, more than is the case in Europe; notes in this connection promising developments, for example China’s new Five Year Plan, which provides for accelerated expansion of markets for environmental technologies, or the Meseberg decisions adopted in Germany;
Amendment 295 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Draws attention to the fact that, in addition to developing new climate technologies, disseminating them is decisive; calls on the Commission to take action in this field too, for example by creating new financing arrangements;
Amendment 302 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Emphasises that the co-benefits of emissions reductions onparticularly occur for emissions reductions achieved inside the EU and where there is a strong emphasis on increased energy efficiency investment;
Amendment 341 #
2011/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Remains concerned about the large potential for windfall profits and the ongoing uncertainty and discussion on the ETS undermining public acceptance of the EU's climate policy and points to lack of evidence of any delocalisation;
Amendment 51 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Prevention is of key importance for protectionEffective prevention measures are the key to protecting the population effectively against disasters and. Prevention requires further action as called for in the Council Conclusions of 30 November 2009 and in the European Parliament Resolution of 21 September 2010 on the Commission's Communication a "Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters".
Amendment 77 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 5
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. The Mechanism shall not affectIn accordance with Article 196 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union the Member States' bear primary responsibility tofor protecting people, the environment and property on their territory against disasters and endowing. The Member States alone shall ensure that their emergency management systems withhave sufficient capabilities to enable them to cope adequately with disasters of a magnitude and nature that can reasonably be expected and prepared for.
Amendment 89 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to enhance the Union’sMember States’ state of preparedness to respond to disasters;
Amendment 92 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 102 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – point 1
Article 4 – point 1
1. "disaster" means any situation,extreme event which has or may have an adverse impact on people, the environment or property;
Amendment 107 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – point 2
Article 4 – point 2
2. "major disaster" means any situation,extreme event giving rise to extraordinary damage with which the people immediately affected are unable to deal by themselves and which has or may have an adverse impact on people, the environment or property and which may result in a call for assistance under the Mechanism;
Amendment 124 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – point g
Article 5 – point g
Amendment 153 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point f
Article 7 – point f
Amendment 158 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point g
Article 7 – point g
Amendment 167 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a Each Member State, in planning and deploying its resources, shall focus on the risks that have been identified as falling within its own national responsibility. It shall take these risks into account by providing appropriate capacities. The primary national responsibility shall be complemented by EU measures only when the Member State concerned is unable to deal with the situation.
Amendment 179 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 6
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The capacities registered in the European Emergency Response Capacity shall be available for emergency response operations under the Mechanism at the request of the Commission through the ERC. Member States shall inform the Commission as soon as possible of any compellingin good time of the reasons that prevent them from making these capacities available in a specific emergency.
Amendment 184 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall monitor progress towards the capacity goals and, in cooperation with Member States, identify. The Member States shall bear sole responsibility for filling gaps in the European Emergency Response Capacity.
Amendment 185 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Amendment 204 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) propose a response plan based on the needs on the ground and pre-developed contingency plans, and invite Member States to deploy specific capacities from the European Emergency Response Capacity in accordance with the plan;
Amendment 206 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point e
Amendment 219 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Amendment 229 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Amendment 249 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 22 – point d
Article 22 – point d
Amendment 85 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. When the limit values relating to the test method are laid down in UNECE Regulation No 51, the Commission shall consider replacing the technical requirements laid down in Annex III with a direct reference to the corresponding requirements of UNECE Regulations No 51 and No 59, on condition that these do not result in a weakening of the EU’s environmental and health standards, and with due regard for the opinions of the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 130 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III, remark below table (new)
Annex III, remark below table (new)
And shall not exceed 90 dB(A) in any driving conditions, below a maximum speed of130 km/h, in accordance with Anne VIII.
Amendment 140 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – point 4 – paragraph 3
Annex VIII – point 4 – paragraph 3
If the measured noise level at a point exceeds the limit, two additional measurements at the same point shall be carried out to verify the measurement uncertainty. The vehicle is still in compliance with ASEP, if the average of the three valid measurements at this specific point fulfils the specification. The noise level may not exceed 90 dB(A) in any driving situation.
Amendment 142 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IX – point 4
Annex IX – point 4
Annex IX 4. Sound type and volume (a) The sound to be generated by the AVAS should be a continuous sound that provides information to the pedestrians and vulnerable road users of a vehicle in operation. However, the following and similar types of sounds are not acceptable: (i) Siren, horn, chime, bell and emergency vehicle sounds (ii) Alarm sounds e.g. fire, theft, smoke alarms (iii) Intermittent sound The following and similar types of sounds should be avoided: (iv) Melodious sounds, animal and insect sounds (v) Sounds that confuse the identification of a vehicle and/or its operation (e.g. acceleration, deceleration etc.) (b) The sound to be generated by the AVAS shouldmust be easily indicative of vehicle behaviour and direction of travel, for example, through the automatic variation of sound level or sound level or characteristics in synchronization with vehicle speed. (c) The sound level to be generated by the AVAS shouldmay not exceed the approximate sound sound level of a similar vehicle of the same category equipped with an internal combustion combustion engine and operating under the same conditions. Environmental consideration: The development of the AVAS shall give consideration to the overall community noise impact.
Amendment 59 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Noise assessments should build on existing information available and ensure that suchIn accordance with Directive 2002/49/EC, noise assessments should be based on objective and measurable criteria common to all the Member States. This information ismust be reliable and accessible to competent authorities and stakeholders. Competent authorities should put in place the necessary monitoring and enforcement tools, obtained in a transparent manner, comparable and accessible to all stakeholders. Assessments should include monitoring of the latest technological developments and exchanges of the latest findings concerning the procedures to be employed. Competent authorities should put in place the necessary monitoring and enforcement tools. Noise assessments should be carried out or supervised by outside agencies independent of the airport operator.
Amendment 61 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) It is recognised that Member States have decided on noise-related operating restrictions in accordance with national legislation based on nationally acknowledged noise methods, which may not (yet) be fully consistent with the method as described in the authoritative European Civil Aviation Conference Report Doc 29 on 'Standard Method of Computing Noise Contours around Civil Airports' nor use the internationally recognised aircraft noise performance information. However, the efficiency and effectiveness of an operating restriction, together with the efficiency and effectiveness of the relevant action plan of which the restriction is a part, should be assessed in accordance with methods prescribbased ion ECAC Doc 29 and the ICAO Balanced Approach. Accordingly, Member States should adapt their assessments of operating restrictions in national legislation towards full compliance with ECAC Doc 29This assessment is currently being carried out in the context of the revision of Directive 2002/49/EC.
Amendment 64 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to enable selection of the most cost- effective noise mitigation measures, taking account of both the health and the economic aspects, in accordance with the Balanced Approach so as to achieve the sustainable development of the airport and air traffic management network capacity from a gate- to-gate perspective.
Amendment 70 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘Balanced Approach’ means the method under which the range of available measures, namely reduction of aircraft noise at source, land-use planning and management, noise abatement operational procedures and operating restrictions, is considered in a consistent way with the view to addressing the noise problem in the most cost-effective way on an airport by airport basion an airport by airport basis in a way which takes account of both the health and the economic aspects.
Amendment 74 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7a) ‘Interest groups’ means natural or legal persons who are affected by or would benefit from the introduction or non-introduction of noise reduction measures, including operating restrictions, or who have a legitimate interest in the introduction of such measure;
Amendment 78 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) identify measures available to reduce the noise impact, including the more effective use of existing time slots through the introduction of larger aircraft, a reduction in the number of uneconomic feeder flights which take up time slots and a greater focus on point-to-point routes in order to reduce the number of feeder flights operated with small aircraft;
Amendment 80 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) evaluate the likely cost-effectiveness of the available measures in the light of the environmental objective set;
Amendment 92 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resortfollowing careful prior consideration of the measures outlined in letters (a) to (c), operating restrictions.
Amendment 94 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Measures or a combination of measures taken in accordance with this Regulation for a given airport shall not be more restrictive than necessary to achieve the health-related and environmental noise abatement objectives set for that airport. Operating restrictions shall be non- discriminatory, in particular on grounds of nationality, identity or activity of aircraft operators.
Amendment 98 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authorities shall use the method, indicators and information described in Annex IDirective 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise1 for the assessment of the current and future noise situation. __________________ OJ L 189, 18.7.2002, p. 12.
Amendment 100 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. When the assessment of the noise situation reveals that new measures are necessary to achieve or maintain the level of noise abatement objectives, the competent authorities shall take due account of the contribution of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, in accordance with Annex I.
Amendment 102 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The competent authorities shall ensure that, at the appropriate level, a forum for technical cooperation is established between the airport operator, aircraft operator and air navigation service provider, for actions which these operators are responsible for, and taking due account of the interdependency between measures to mitigate noise and to reduce emissions. The members of this forum for technical cooperation shall regularly consult local residents or their representativeinterest groups, and provide technical information and advice on noise mitigating measures to the competent authorities. No decision shall be taken to implement a measure until interest groups have been consulted.
Amendment 104 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The competent authorities shall assess the cost-effectiveness of the new measures, as referred to in paragraph 3 in accordance with Annex II in the context of the noise action plans provided for in Directive 2002/49/EC. A minor technical amendment to an existing measure without substantive implications on capacity or operations is not considered as a new operating restriction.
Amendment 113 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) aircraft used in humanitarian operations
Amendment 115 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of a Member State or interest group or on its own initiative, and without prejudice to a pending appeal procedure, the Commission may scrutinise the decision on an operating restriction, prior to its implementation. Where the Commission finds that the decision does not respect the requirements set out in this Regulation, or is otherwise contrary to Union law, it may suspend the decision, unless the competent authority has imposed the operating restrictions on the basis of the outcome of a mediation procedure or another type of extrajudicial dispute resolution procedure.
Amendment 119 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) amendments to the method and technical report set out in Annex Irticle 6(2).
Amendment 120 #
Amendment 122 #
Amendment 61 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
6 a. "closed distribution system" means a system which distributes energy products within a geographically confined industrial, commercial or shared service site and does not supply household customers except incidentical use by a smaller number of households with employment or similar associations with the owner of the distribution system and located within the area served by a closed system.
Amendment 150 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Sales or deliveries of energy products shall not result in energy savings obligations of paragraph 1 of this article, if - they consist of energy by-products or energy products derived by energy recovery; or - they are delivered or sold mainly to own sites and subsidiaries; or - they are conducted within "closed distribution systems".
Amendment 193 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Energy audits and energy management systems implemented under this article shall not exclude the same or similar measures to be used as a justification for existing or future financial incentive and support schemes such as tax rebates. If necessary, the European state aid guidelines in this field and the EU energy taxations directive 2003/96/EC are to be adapted accordingly.
Amendment 244 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States mayshall lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 3 when:
Amendment 253 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison withallow no competitive return on investments, taking into account the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.
Amendment 270 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States mayshall lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 6 when:
Amendment 274 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison withallow no competitive return on investments, taking into account the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling. .
Amendment 283 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
Member States mayshall lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions in the first sub-paragraph when:
Amendment 288 #
2011/0172(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison withallow no competitive return on investments, taking into account the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.
Amendment 300 #
2010/0377(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) identification of neighbouring establishments, as well as other sites, areas and developments that could increase the risk or consequences of a major accident and of domino effects, including on the basis of information provided by the authorities;
Amendment 8 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas public procurement law serves to ensure that public funds are managed soundly and to give interested undertakings the opportunity to be awarded contracts in the context of fairer competition,
Amendment 47 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the Lisbon Reform Treaty, which came into force on 1 December 2009, incorporates for the first time into European Union primary law an acknowledgement of the right to regional and local self-government (Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union); emphasises that in several judgments the CJEU has invoked the right to local self- government andthe CJEU has made it clear that the ‘possibility for public authorities to use their own resources to perform the public- interest tasks conferred on them may be exercised in cooperation with other public authorities’ (judgment in Case C- 324/07); draws attention, further, to the judgment of the Grand Chamber of the CJEU of 9 June 2009 in Case C-480/06, which found, further, that Community law does not require public authorities to use any particular legal form in order to carry out jointly their public service tasks; stresses that the CJEU regards cooperation between public bodies as falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives only under certain conditions, which were fulfilled in each of the situations underlying its judgments; accordingly, regards public-public partnerships, such as cooperation agreements between local authorities and national cooperation, as falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives, provided that the following criteria are all met:
Amendment 50 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 a (new)
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 a (new)
– the joint provision of a public-service task conferred on all the relevant parties involves actual cooperation in the sense of an exchange of goods and services,
Amendment 51 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 b (new)
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 b (new)
– the exchange of goods and services is made without remuneration,
Amendment 52 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 c (new)
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 c (new)
– the cooperation may only pursue objectives in the public interest and the performance of the task by the relevant parties must be actually made possible or significantly improved through the cooperation,
Amendment 60 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 e (new)
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Reaffirms that the non-remuneration of the exchange of goods and services is to be interpreted strictly, so that absolutely no financial transfers may take place between the relevant parties; in particular, neither may compensatory payments be made nor may profits be generated; states that cooperation between local authorities falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives must remain limited geographically to neighbouring public bodies and authorities and functionally to the performance of the joint task;
Amendment 63 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that in its judgment of 10 September 2009 in Case C-573/07 the CJEU found that the mere possibility of the opening-up of the capital of a previously publicly-owned company to private investors may not be taken into consideration as a factor making competitive tendering a requirement unless there exists, at the time the contract is awarded, a real prospect in the short term of such an opening-up; notes that the law in this area is now sufficiently clear; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide information about the legal implications of these judgments and expects that in future no further appeal procedures will be brought in these areas; further points out that in its judgment the CJEU also found that the admission of a capital contribution during the term of a contract awarded without a formal procurement procedure would constitute an alteration of the fundamental conditions of the contract and would require the contract to be put out for competitive tender; states that the case- law in this area now provides sufficient indications for binding criteria governing cooperation between local authorities falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives and in-house operations; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and the European Parliament, to define clear and generally binding criteria governing cooperation between local authorities falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives and in-house operations on the basis of the case-law of the CJEU and to provide information on them in a communication;
Amendment 98 #
2009/2175(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Draws attention to the great importance of public procurement for climate protection, energy efficiency, the environment and innovation and reiterates that public authorities should be encouraged and put in a position to base public procurement on ecological, social and other criteria; welcomes the practical assistance given to public authorities and other public bodies in connection with sustainable procurement and urges the Commission and the Member States to organise training courses and campaigns to raise awareness of this issue; supports the idea of a transparent process, involving the Member States and stakeholders, to develop the relevant criteria further; points out that in the area of social criteria in particular such a process offers good prospects for improvementsit is necessary to involve stakeholders and above all the relevant economic sectors, in order to ensure that the solution is practicable;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Recalls its abovementioned resolution of 21 May 2008, and in particular the fact that all efforts to curb emissions should aim at staying well below the objective of limiting global temperature increases to below 2°C, inasmuch as a level of warming of that magnitude would already heavily impact on our society and individual lifestyles and would also entail significant changes in ecosystems and water resources; is deeply concerned about the fact that, as indicated by many recent scientific reports, climate change is both more rapid and more serious in terms of its adverse effects than was previously thought; consequently, calls on the Commission to closely monitor and analyse the latest scientific findings with a view to assessing, in particular, whether the EU 2°C target would still achieve the aim of avoiding dangerous climate change;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas human society is facing a dual challenge as regards threats to the earth's life-supporting system, namely climate change and the overuse and destruction of many of the most important ecosystems; whereas there are many interlinkages between the climate system and ecosystems – in particular the capacity of oceans and terrestrial ecosystems to sequester carbon – and whereas climate change can only be addressed effectively within the context of healthy ecosystems,
Amendment 3 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls in particular the essential objectives in combating climate change and stresses the importance of setting a clear, in accordance with the recommendations contained in the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) and as included in the Bali road- map, of setting, for the EU and the other industrialised countries as a group, a medium-term target of a 20%-35-40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, ands well as a long-term reduction target of 50%-at least 80% by 2050, in order to achieve a 50% probabilitycompared to 1990, maintaining the focus ofn restricting the increase in average global temperature to 2°C over pre-industrial levels; and thus achieving a 50% probability of meeting this objective;
Amendment 4 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls its position of [date of adoption in plenary] within the framework of the legislative procedures on the "climate and energy package";
Amendment 5 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas it is examining, together with the Council, proposals for legislation aimed at delivering the EU climate commitments,
Amendment 6 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the Lisbon Treaty explicitly lays down the objectives and competences of the Union in the field of climate change and, if ratified, will strengthen the European Union's role in promoting sustainable development and fighting climate change,
Amendment 7 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Agrees that the development, application and export of modern environmental technologies makes a contribution to fulfilling the Lisbon Strategy and meeting the EU’s Kyoto targets and other climate objectives, thus enabling environmental targets and economic growth to be realised; emphasises, in this context, that tackling climate change will lead to societal changes that will help to create new jobs and industries, combat dependency on imports of fossil fuels and provide social benefits for citizens; is convinced, moreover, that climate change can only be successfully combated if citizens are fully engaged in the process and are protected during the period of transition to a carbon-neutral economy;
Amendment 8 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas the available funding for adaptation measuresmitigation and adaptation efforts are both of paramount importance; whereas industrialised countries have a historical responsibility for climate change; whereas developing countries have contributed little to climate change and yet are the most affected by it; whereas the available funding to combat climate change in developing countries is quite inadequate and should be substantially increased, International Dimension: Post-2012Or. en
Amendment 9 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that the new climate change agreement should come into being under the auspices of the UN and on the principle of a ‘sharedcommon but differentiated responsibility’, with the countries of the industrialised world mtaking a clear contribution to emission reductthe lead in reducing their domestic emissions while the developing countries also commit themselves to climate measures within the limits of their capabilit, in accordance with the Bali Action Plan, to taking nationally appropriate mitigation actions in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled, in a measurable, reportable and verifiable manner by technology, financing and capacity- building from industrialised countries;
Amendment 10 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to incorporate the requirements of emission reductions, and measures to adapt to the consequences of climate change, into development aid programmes, and/or to refer to these requirements in the decision-making processes of international development aid agencies, thus involving the private sector and, public authorities and non-governmental organisations in the countries or regions concerned by way of partnerships; stresses that additional resources need to be mobilised to help developing countries to tackle the climate change challenge and that emerging initiatives in this context must be formally linked to the UNFCCC process and to achieving the Millennium Development Goals; welcomes the EU’s launching of a Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) to support adaptation to climate change in poor developing countries that are most vulnerable to climate change and recalls in this regard its resolution of 21 October 20081; Or. en Energy
Amendment 11 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that Europe needs a forward- looking strategic energy and external energy policy, common energy policy, both within the EU and in external relations, to ensure a high level of security of energy supply meeting the conditions of sustainability, resource efficiency and climate neutrality, and that questions regarding the transport and storage of energy under the umbrella term ‘energy infrastructure’ must be answered alongside the question of the availability of energy;
Amendment 12 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure: – the development of, and investment in, a European energy transport infrastructure (including the so-called supergrid) needed to ensure diversity for the EU in terms of energy sources; – ongoing research and development of pilot projects related to ICT-linked technology, decentralised production and other new technological developments;
Amendment 13 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on politicianthe EU, the Member States and the business community: – to invest in infrastructure, networks and grids for the generation of solar power for hydrogen production, andproduction, transport and storage of solar energy and hydrogen; – to offer third countries, by way of energy partnerships, programmes for the creation of the necessary institutions, infrastructures and training programmes for locally based experts and network access for their own needs;
Amendment 14 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses the considerable potential of the use of sustainable biomass for energy production with a view to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and calls for a European strategy for the exploitation of biomass forsustainable biomass for production of electricity and gas, heating and cooling; BiofuelsOr. en
Amendment 15 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Notes that thecertain production-types of biofuels is partly to blame for increased food prices, but that abandoning biofuels can resolve neither the problem of hunger in the world nor the issue of climate-compatible mobility; can have an impact on food prices, loss of biodiversity and deforestation, and notes at the same time that biofuels must be produced responsibly and through a verifiably sustainable process;
Amendment 16 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Suggests that the Commission rethink the notion of a fixed quota for biofuels and instead develop flexible scenariopolicies which take account not only of the growing worldwide need for agricultural land for food and feedstuffs but also of the question of the need to import biofuels into the EU, with a view to meeting the requireof the complex nature of biofuels production, including life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and assessments of individual mobility and goods transport in futureall relevant indirect effects;
Amendment 17 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Considers it essential to involve the developing countries in a long-term strategy for the development and production of biofuels, in order to examine the possibility of their economic planning and profitability, to secure availability and production of food, to answer the question of their environmental sustainability, and not least to permit social developments and lasting increase in earnings; Energy efficiency, as well as to ensure that developing countries receive the training needed in order to be in a position to meet the EU sustainability criteria; Or. en
Amendment 18 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to reconsider the non-binding nature of the 20% goal for energy efficiency by 2020 and if necessary to propose to the Council that this target be made bindingpropose a binding goal of 20% in energy efficiency by 2020 and to accompany that proposal with concrete interim reduction targets;
Amendment 19 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Calls on the relevant local authorities and professional associations in the Member States to establish the criterion of energy efficiency criteria, guidelines and national legislation or administrative decisions for new buildings as a leitmotiv for architects and building engineers, with building regulations for the energy efficiency of new buildings as a possible first step in this directionnd major renovation works;
Amendment 20 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Amendment 21 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
Paragraph 51
51. Welcomes the creation and the extension within the EU, as well as to the neighbourhood countries, of the Trans- European NetworksTransport Networks (TEN-T) and calls for the priority projects, in particular those which are most climate- friendly, to be completed as soon as possible, since these are vitally important for freight transport logistics and a sustainable European transport policy; Agriculture and livestock breedingOr. en
Amendment 24 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 95
Paragraph 95
95. Calls on the Member States to establish a policy of soil protection by appropriate soil treatment methods, taking account of the importance of organic materials in the soil for its fertility, water retention capacity and ability to function as a carbon sink; , and to consider the possibilities of using biochar; Or. en Health
Amendment 25 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 116
Paragraph 116
116. Notes that possible measures may include collection and evaluation of relevant data on the effects of climate change on human health, improving preparedness for natural disasters, public health services and emergency planning, support for measures to promote health in all sectors, and measures to increase awareness, particularly public information about new types of dangers to health, warnings and specific tips on avoiding exposure, with special reference to insect- borne diseases and heat waves;
Amendment 26 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CA
Recital CA
CA. whereas many of the effects of climate change on health as reported for instance by the WHO may be kept at bay by preparing and strengthening health systems, and by appropriate preventive measures, with particular attention being paid to the spread of tropical diseases, and by public information campaigns addressing especially vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, newborn babies, children and elderly people, Or. en Advanced technologies
Amendment 27 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 125
Paragraph 125
125. Calls for the establishment of a European Climate Fund and/or corresponding funds in the Member States, to be financed by the proceeds of ETS auctions, and regards this as a way of creating a capital stock to fund a future climate policy, given that there are limits on how far one can plan now for the individual measures of that policy and the investment and solidarity they will require; Or. en 2050 - The future begins today
Amendment 28 #
2008/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 146 a (new)
Paragraph 146 a (new)
Amendment 75 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Proposes solar energy partnerships with third countries in the Mediterranean region as building blocks of a European external energy policy, representingwhich aim in the initial phase to generate solar power and transfer it to the European Union via high-voltage cables, and in a second phase may form the basis for hydrogen production and thus for the switch to a low-carbon, hydrogen-based economy;
Amendment 80 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on politicians and the business community to invest in infrastructure, networks and grids for the generation of solar power and for hydrogen production, and to offer third countries, by way of energy partnerships, programmes for the creation of the necessary institutions, infrastructures and training programmes for locally based experts and network access for their own needs;
Amendment 178 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54 a (new)
Paragraph 54 a (new)
54a. Calls on the Member States to promote co-modality by introducing transferable number plates in line with existing practice, making it more attractive for citizens to use rail for long journeys and energy-saving local-use cars at their starting point and destination;
Amendment 290 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 105
Paragraph 105
105. Notes that waste prevention, for example by using lessoptimising packaging, is the best way of reducing the sector's direct emissions from waste collection;
Amendment 293 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 107
Paragraph 107
107. Considers that, in order to restrict direct emissions from the waste sector, it makes sense to avoid transporting unsorted waste over long distances; takes the view that cross-border waste transport of mixed domestic waste in the EU should therefore be confined to regional areasreduced to a minimum; considers that illegal exports outside the EU of material suitable for recycling should be halmust be combated in order to avoid 'exporting emissions' and retain valuable raw materials in the EU;
Amendment 356 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 135
Paragraph 135
135. Regards it as urgently necessary to Calls on the Commission to develop communication strategies to spread information on the science of climakte change (based on the latest IPCC findings), energy saving strategies, energy efficiency measures and the use of renewable energy sources impinge much more strongly on the everyday consciousness of the publicto the general public, in addition suggests that EU youth exchange programmes focus on common climate change awareness projects and therefore calls on the Commission to commission annually, via Eurobarometer, an EU citizen survey measuring citizen's attitudes and perceptions towards climate change, and furtherefmore calls for general and simple efficiency standards for all areas of everyday life;
Amendment 361 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 139 a (new)
Paragraph 139 a (new)
139a. Calls on the Member States, with a view to raising public awareness, to incorporate into the relevant building regulations a provision to the effect that citizens applying for planning permission will receive comprehensive information on what opportunities exist locally for the use of renewable energy sources;
Amendment 374 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 149 a (new)
Paragraph 149 a (new)
149a. Calls on the European Parliament’s relevant bodies to draw up and publish a version of this report for the general reader within three months of its adoption;
Amendment 456 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital AF
Recital AF
AF. whereas the building sector (residential buildings, commercial and public buildings) has an enormous cost- efficient potential for reducing CO2 by modernising thermal insulation and heating / cooling systems, electrical appliances and ventilation systems and by installing sun protection,
Amendment 523 #
2008/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital CA
Recital CA
CA. whereas many of the effects of climate change on health may be kept at bay by preparing and strengthening health systems, and by appropriate preventive measures such as public information campaigns,
Amendment 44 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) This Directive should cover all electrical and electronic equipment used by consumers and electrical and electronic equipment intended for professional use. This Directive should apply without prejudice to Community legislation on safety and health requirements protecting all actors in contact with WEEE as well as specific Community waste management legislation, in particular Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and Community product design legislation, in particular Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Fixed industrial large- scale installations, inter alia, should be excluded from the Directive’s scope because they are permanently installed and operated at a particular location, are assembled and disassembled by specialist personnel and therefore represent a regulated waste stream. The same should apply to stationary large-scale industrial tools installed for operation at a specific location. Mobile machinery operated exclusively by professional users should likewise be excluded because it too is disassembled and disposed of by specialist personnel and it therefore represents a regulated waste stream.
Amendment 55 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The adaptation to scientific and technical progress of certain provisAccording to Article 291 TFEU, rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control, by Member States, of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers are to be laid down in advance by a regulation adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. Pending the adoptions of the Directat new regulation, and give,n the selective treatment for materials and components of WEEE, the technical requirements for collection, storage and treatment of WEEE and the symbol for the marking of EEE should be effected by the Commission under a committee procedurnecessity to adopt and implement as soon as possible this Directive, control by Member States should be exercised in accordance with the provisions of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, insofar as those provisions remain compatible with the amended Treaties. References to those provisions should nevertheless be replaced with references to the rules and principles set out in the new regulation as soon as that regulation enters into force.
Amendment 57 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The measures necessary for the implementatIn order to allow the provisions of this Directive shouldto be adoapted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission Tto technical and scientific progress and to adopt other necessary measures, the Commission should be empowered to adaopt the annexes and to adopt rules for monitoring compliance. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of Directive 2002/96/EC, inter alia, by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided fdelegated acts in accordance with Article 290 in respect of the adaptation of annexes and rules for monitor in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/ECg compliance.
Amendment 67 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(ea) fixed industrial or commercial large- scale installations and stationary large- scale industrial tools;
Amendment 68 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(eb) mobile machinery intended exclusively for professional users;
Amendment 107 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point s a (new)
Article 3 – point s a (new)
(sa) “fixed industrial or commercial large-scale installation” means a particular industrial or commercial large- scale combination of several types of apparatus and, where applicable, other devices, which are interlinked or are installed together and are intended to be used permanently at a predefined location;
Amendment 109 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point s b (new)
Article 3 – point s b (new)
(sb) “stationary large-scale industrial tool” means a combination of systems, finished products and/or components for industrial purposes, assembled and/or installed by specialist personnel for use at a specific location, functioning together in an industrial environment.
Amendment 110 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point s c (new)
Article 3 – point s c (new)
(sc) “mobile machinery intended exclusively for professional users” means machinery the operation of which requires either mobility while working or continuous or semi-continuous movement between a succession of fixed working locations, or machinery which is operated without being moved, but which may be equipped in such a way as to enable it to be moved more easily from one place to another.
Amendment 150 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. A common methodology shall be established for the calculation of the total weight of electrical and electronic equipment placed on the national market. This measure designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(3)In order to ensure the functioning of efficient collection schemes, the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 18a, 18b and 18c, a common methodology for the calculation of the total weight of electrical and electronic equipment placed on the national market.
Amendment 167 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. Annex II may be amended iIn order to introduce other treatment technologies ensuring at least the same level of protection for human health and the environment. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(3)Article 18a, 18b and 18c, adaptations of Annex II. The Commission shall evaluate as a matter of priority whether the entries regarding printed circuit boards for mobile phones and liquid crystal displays are to be amended.
Amendment 171 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Detailed rules for the implementation of paragraph 1 and 2, in particular criteria for the assessment of equivalent condiIn order to allow treatment operations outside the Community at an equivalent level of protections, shall be laid down. Those measures designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatthe Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 18a, 18b and 18c, detailed rules fory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(3)aragraphs 1 and 2, in particular criteria for the assessment of equivalent conditions.
Amendment 229 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. The format for registration and reporting and the frequency of reporting shall be established. Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(3)In order to ensure the smooth functioning of the registration, information and reporting system, the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 18a, 18b and 18c, the format for registration and reporting and the frequency of reporting.
Amendment 235 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Amendment 236 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Amendment 237 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18a Exercise of the delegation 1. The powers to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Articles 7, 8, 10, 16, 17 and 20 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time. 2. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 3. The powers to adopt delegated acts are conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 18b and 18c.
Amendment 238 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 b (new)
Article 18 b (new)
Article 18b Revocation of the delegation 1. The delegation of power referred to in Article 18a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. 2. The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation. 3. The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the powers specified in that decision. It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of the delegated acts already in force. It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 239 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 c (new)
Article 18 c (new)
Article 18c Objections to delegated acts 1. The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of two months from the date of notification. At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council this period shall be extended by two months. 2. If neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force at the date stated therein. 3. If the European Parliament or the Council objects to the adopted delegated act, it shall not enter into force. The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.
Amendment 243 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Additional rules on inspections and monitoring may be laid down. Those measures designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred In order to ensure the proper functioning of inspections and monitoring, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 18a, 18b and 18c, additional rules on inspections and monito rin Article 18(3)g.
Amendment 251 #
2008/0241(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In addition to the re-examinations provided for in Articles 2 and 7 of this Directive, the Commission shall, within five years of its entry into force, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council based on experience with the application of the Directive. If appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to amend the Directive.
Amendment 211 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) ‘prepacked food’ means any single item for presentation as such to the final consumer and to mass caterers, consisting of a food and the packaging into which it was put before being offered for sale, whether such packaging encloses the food completely or only partially, but in any case in such a way that the contents cannot be altered without opening or changing the packaging. This excludes food which is not prepacked;
Amendment 215 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) 'non-prepacked food' means any food which is offered for sale to the consumer without packaging or is packaged at the request of the consumer or is prepacked at the place of sale for immediate sale;
Amendment 255 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) by explicitly advertising a significant reduction in sugar and/or fat unless at the same time the energy content (kilojoules or kilocalories) is correspondingly reduced, except in cases where the sugar or fat reduction has the effect of improving the impact of the product on health;
Amendment 272 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
ca) by explicitly advertising a significant reduction in sugar and/or fat unless at the same time the energy content (kilojoules or kilocalories) is correspondingly reduced, except in cases where the sugar or fat reduction has the effect of improving the impact of the product on health;
Amendment 334 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 - paragraph 1
Article 14 - paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to specific Community legislation applicable to particular foods as regards to the requirements referred to in Article 9(1)(a) to (k), when appearing on the package or on the label attached thereto, the mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be printed on the package or on the label in characters of a font size of at least 3mm and shall be presented in a way so as to ensure a significant contrast between the print and backgrounda clearly legible manner.
Amendment 353 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 - paragraph 1 - point (a) (new)
Article 14 - paragraph 1 - point (a) (new)
(a) Working with representatives of the relevant interest groups, the Commission shall draw up guidelines on legibility. .
Amendment 389 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 - paragraph 2
Article 17 - paragraph 2
Amendment 454 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
b) the amounts of sugars, fat, saturates, carbohydrates with specific reference to sugars, andand sodium or salt.
Amendment 474 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
Article 29 – paragraph 2
(2) The nutrition declaration may also include the amounts of one or more of the following: a) trans fats; b) mono-unsaturates; c) polyunsaturates; ca) cholesterol; d) polyols; e) starch; f) fibre; g) protein; ga) carbohydrates; gb) sodium; h) any of the minerals or vitamins listed in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI, and present in significant amounts as defined in point 2 of Part A of Annex XI. ha) other substances as listed in Part A of Annex XIII.
Amendment 515 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. TIn addition to the mandatory nutrition declaration shallper 100 g or per 100 ml required in paragraphs 1 and 2, the information may be expressed, as appropriate, as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in Part B of Annex XI in relation to per 100 g or per 100 ml or per portion. When provided, the declaration on vitamins and minerals shall also be expressed as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI.
Amendment 522 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In addition, the information may also optionally, where appropriate, be provided as a percentage of the reference intakes for children set out in Part B of Annex XI.
Amendment 550 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 - paragraph 1
Article 34 - paragraph 1
1. The particulars referred to in Article 31(2) related to the mandatory nutrition declaration shall be included in the principala table in the same field of vision. They shall be presented, where appropriate, together in a clear format in the following order: energy, sugar, fat, saturates, carbohydrates with specific reference to sugars, and and sodium or salt.
Amendment 564 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 - paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 34 - paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The particulars referred to in Article 29(1)(a) concerning the nutrition declaration shall appear on the front of the packaging in a conspicuous form.
Amendment 609 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 681 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV
Annex IV
FOODS WHICH ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE MANDATORY NUTRITION DECLARATION - unprocessed products that comprise a single ingredient or category of ingredients. This includes water, salt, flavourings, food additives, processing aids and food enzymes; - processed products which the only processing they have been subjected to is smoking or, maturing or boiling in water and that comprise a single ingredient or category of ingredients; -– natural mineral waters or other waters intended for human consumption, including those where the only added ingredients are carbon dioxide and/or flavourings; - a herb, a spice or mixtures thereof; - salt and salt substitutes; - sugars as defined in Council Directive 2001/111/EC relating to certain sugars intended for human consumption; - products covered by Directive 1999/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 relating to coffee extracts and chicory extracts, whole or milled coffee beans and whole or milled decaffeinated coffee beans; - herbal infusion, tea, decaffeinated tea, instant or soluble tea or tea extract, decaffeinated instant or soluble tea or tea extract, which do not contain added ingredients; - fermented vinegars and substitutes for vinegar, including those where the only added ingredients are flavourings; - flavourings; - food additives; - processing aids; - food enzymes; - gGelatine; - jam setting compounds; - yeast; - food in packaging or containers the largest printable surface of which has an area of less than 250 cm2; - food sold by private persons in the context of occasional activities, and not as part of an undertaking that would imply a certain continuity of activities and a certain degree of organisation; - food directly supplied by the manufacturer of small quantities of products to the final consumer or to local retail establishments directly supplying the final consumer; - food in inner package not designed for sale without the outer package (nutrition information shall be provided on the outer package unless it belongs to the categories of foods that are exempted under this Annex). - non-prepacked food as defined in Article 2(2)(ea) of this Regulation.
Amendment 43 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The ultimate objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 94/69/EC of 15 December 1993 concerning the conclusion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. In order to meet that objective, the overall global annual mean surface temperature increase should not exceed 2°C above pre-industrial levels. The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment (IPCC) report shows that, in order to reach that objective, global emissions of greenhouse gases must peak by 2020. This implies the increasing of efforts by the Community and the quick involvement of developed and newly industrialised countries and encouraging the participation of developing countries in the emission reduction process.
Amendment 53 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to contribute to achieving those long-term objectives, it is appropriate to set out a predictable path according to which the emissions of installations covered by the Community scheme should be reduced. To achieve cost-effectively the commitment of the Community to at least a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels, emission allowances allocated in respect of those installations should be 21% below their 2005 emission levels by 2020, which is more than 30 % below their 1990 levels.
Amendment 74 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Where equivalent measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, in particular taxation, are in place for small installations whose emissions do not exceed a threshold of 1025 000 tonnes of CO2 per year, there should be a procedure for enabling Member States to exclude such small installations from the emissions trading system for so long as those measures are applied. This threshold relatively offers the maximum gain in terms of reduction of administrative costs for each tonne excluded from the system, for reasons of administrative simplicity. As a consequence of the move from five-year allocation periods, and in order to increase certainty and predictability, provisions should be set on the frequency of revision of greenhouse gas emission permits.
Amendment 84 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) This contribution is equivalent to a reduction of emissions in 2020 in the Community scheme of 21% below reported 2005 levels, which is more than 30 % below their 1990 levels, including the effect of the increased scope from the period 2005 to 2007 to the period 2008 to 2012 and the 2005 emission figures for the trading sector used for the assessment of the Bulgarian and Romanian national allocation plan for the period 2008 to 2012, leading to an issue of a maximum of 1 720 million allowances in the year 2020. Exact quantities of emissions will be calculated once Member States have issued allowances pursuant to Commission Decisions on their national allocation plans for the period 2008 to 2012, as the approval of allocations to some installations was contingent upon their emissions having been substantiated and verified. Once the issue of allowances for the period 2008 to 2012 has taken place, the Commission will publish the Community-wide quantity. Adjustments should be made to the Community-wide quantity in relation to installations which are included in the Community scheme during the period 2008 to 2012 or from 2013 onwards.
Amendment 106 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Given the magnitude and speed of global deforestation, it is essential to allow operators of installations to use credits from avoided deforestation and afforestation and reforestation projects and activities in developing countries and to ensure that revenues from auctioning in the Community scheme are used to support capacity-building in developing countries to enable their forestry projects and activities to be credible in the international carbon markets. In addition, the EU should work to establish an internationally recognised market- based system for reducing deforestation and increasing afforestation and reforestation. Revenues should be contributed by Member States on the basis of a 'Coalition of the Willing' to an EU or international fund to support capacity building.
Amendment 134 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) For other sectors covered by the Community scheme, a transitional system should be foreseen for which grants free allocation in 2013 would be 80% of the amount that corresponded to the percentage of the overall Community- wide emissions, throughout the period 2005 to 2007 that those installations emitted as a proportion of the annual Community-wide total quantity of allowances. Thereafter, the free allocation should decrease each year by equal amounts resulting in no free allocation in 2020o the extent feasible, based on sector specific benchmarks.
Amendment 144 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) TransitionalIn the absence of an international agreement which provides for equal treatment of the sectors affected, free allocation to installations should be provided for through harmonised Community-wide rules (sector specific "benchmarks") in order to minimise distortions of competition within the Community. These rules should take accountbe based ofn the most greenhouse gas and energy efficient techniques and technologies, and take account of the potential, including the technical potential, to reduce emissions, substitutes, alternative production processes, use of biomass, renewables and greenhouse gas capture and storage and renewables. Any such rules should not give incentives to increase emissions and ensure that an increasing proportion of these allowances is aper unit of productioned. Allocations must be fixed prior to the trading period so as to enable the market to function properly. They shall also avoid undue distortions of competition on the markets for electricity and heat supplied to industrial installations. These rules should apply to new entrants carrying out the same activities as existing installations receiving transitional free allocations. To avoid any distortion of competition within the internal market, no free allocation should be made in respect of the production of electricity by new entrants. Allowances which remain in the set-aside for new entrants in 2020 should be auctioned. In defining the principles for setting benchmarks in individual sectors, the Commission should consult with the sectors concerned.
Amendment 146 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Transitional free allocation to installations should be provided for through harmonised Community-wide rules ("benchmarks") in order to minimise distortions of competition within the Community. These rules should take account of the most greenhouse gas and energy efficient techniques, substitutes, alternative production processes, use of biomass, renewables and greenhouse gas capture and storage. Any such rules should not give incentives to increase emissions and ensure that an increasing proportion of these allowances is auctioned. Allocations must be fixed prior to the trading period so as to enable the market to function properly. They shall also avoid undue distortions of competition on the markets for electricity and heat supplied to industrial installations. They shall further avoid undue distortions of competition between industrial activities carried out in installations operated by a single operator and production in outsourced installations. These rules should apply to new entrants carrying out the same activities as existing installations receiving transitional free allocations. To avoid any distortion of competition within the internal market, no free allocation should be made in respect of the production of electricity by new entrants, which is not the case of electricity recovered from unavoidable waste gases and other residues, and electricity produced in connection with industrial heat consumption for the own consumption of the operators of the installations. Allowances which remain in the set-aside for new entrants in 2020 should be auctioned.
Amendment 150 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Transitional free allocation to installations should be provided for through harmonized Community-wide rules ("benchmarks") in order to minimise distortions of competition within the Community. These rules should take account of the most greenhouse gas and energy efficient techniques, substitutes, alternative production processes, use of biomass, renewables, clean energy carriers such as hydrogen and greenhouse gas capture and storage. Any such rules should not give incentives to increase emissions and ensure that an increasing proportion of these allowances is auctioned. Allocations must be fixed prior to the trading period so as to enable the market to function properly. They shall also avoid undue distortions of competition on the markets for electricity and heat, heat and industrial gases supplied to industrial installations. These rules should apply to new entrants carrying out the same activities as existing installations receiving transitional free allocations. To avoid any distortion of competition within the internal market, no free allocation should be made in respect of the production of electricity by new entrants. Allowances which remain in the set-aside for new entrants in 2020 should be auctioned.
Amendment 167 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The Community will continue to take the lead in the negotiation of an ambitious international agreement that will achieve the objective of limiting global temperature increase to 2°C and is encouraged by the progress made in Bali towards this objective. In the event that other developed countries and other major emitters of greenhouse gases do not participate in this international agreement, this could lead to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions in third countries where industry would not be subject to comparable carbon constraints (“carbon leakage”), and at the same time could put certain energy- intensive sectors and sub-sectors, and parts of installations including heat or industrial gases supply thereto owned and/or operated by third parties, in the Community which are subject to international competition at an economic disadvantage. This could undermine the environmental integrity and benefit of actions by the Community. To address the risk of carbon leakage, the Community will allocate allowances free of charge up to 100% to sectors or sub-sectors meeting the relevant criteria. The definition of these sectors and sub-sectors and the measures required will be subject to re-assessment to ensure that action is taken where necessary and to avoid overcompensation. For those specific sectors or sub-sectors where it can be duly substantiated that the risk of carbon leakage cannot be prevented otherwise, where electricity constitutes a high proportion of production costs and is produced efficiently, the action taken may take into account the electricity consumption in the production process, without changing the total quantity of allowances.
Amendment 177 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The Commission should therefore review the situation by June 2011 at the latest, consult with all relevant social partners, and, in the light of the outcome of the international negotiations, submit a report accompanied by any appropriate proposals. In this context, the Commission should identify whichn analytical report assessing the situation with special regard to energy -intensive industry sectors or sub-sectors are likely to be subject to carbon leakage not later than 30 June 2010. It should base its analysis on the assessment of the inability to pass on the cost of required allowances in product prices without significant loss of market share to installations outside the Community not taking comparable action to reduce emissions. Energy-intensive industries which are determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage could receive a higher amount of free allocation orsectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage. This report should be accompanied by any appropriate proposals which may include adjusting the proportion of allowances received free of charge and, as a complementary measure, an effective carbon equalisation system could be introduced, with a view to putting installations from the Community which are at significant risk of carbon leakage and those from third countries on a comparable footing. Such a system could apply requirements to importers that would be no less favourable than those applicable to installations within the EU, for example by requiring the surrender of allowances but also address exports. Any action taken would need to be in conformity with the principles of the UNFCCC, in particular the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, taking into account the particular situation of Least Developed Countries. It would also need to be in conformity with the international obligations of the Community including the WTO agreement.
Amendment 185 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 20
Recital 20
The Commission should therefore review the situation by June 2011 at the latest, consult with all relevant social partners, and, in the light of the outcome of the international negotiations, submit a report accompanied by any appropriate proposals. In this context, the Commission should identify which energy intensive industry sectors or sub-sectors are likely to be subject to carbon leakage not later than 30 June 2010. It should base its analysis on the assessment of the inability to pass on the cost of required allowances in product prices without significant loss of market share to installations outside the Community not taking comparable action to reduce emissions. Energy-intensive industries which are determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage could receive a higher amount of free allocation or an effective carbon equalisation system could be introduced with a view to putting installations from the Community which are at significant risk of carbon leakage and those from third countries on a comparable footing. Such a system could apply requirements to importers that would be no less favourable than those applicable to installations within the EU, for example by requiring the surrender of allowances. Any action taken would need to be in conformity with the principles of the UNFCCC, in particular the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, taking into account the particular situation of Least Developed Countries. Due account should also be taken of the issue of securing supplies of raw materials for the European Community, particularly those raw materials which are in short supply for European industrial undertakings. Raw materials are an important factor in the successful economic development of the Community; long-term security of supply of raw materials is therefore vitally important. It would also need to be in conformity with the international Community with the international obligations of the Community including the WTO agreement.
Amendment 194 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) In order to provide predictability, operators should be given certainty about their potential after 2012 to use CERs and ERUs up to the remainder of the level which they were allowed to use in the period 2008 to 20125 % of their emissions in the respective year, from project types which were accepted by all Member States in the Community scheme during the period 2008 to 2012. As carry-over by Member States of CERs and ERUs held by operators between commitments periods under international agreements (‘banking’ of CERs and ERUs) cannot take place before 2015, and only if Member States choose to allow the banking of those CERs and ERUs within the context of limited rights to bank such credits, this certainty should be given by requiring Member States to allow operators to exchange such CERs and ERUs issued in respect of emission reductions before 2012 for allowances valid from 2013 onwards. However, as Member States should not be obliged to accept CERs and ERUs which it is not certain they will be able to use towards their existing international commitments, this requirement should not extend beyond 31 December 2014. Operators should be given the same certainty concerning such CERs issued from projects that have been established before 2013 in respect of emission reductions from 2013 onwards.
Amendment 284 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 5
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall review the linear factor no later than 202516.
Amendment 328 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - Point 7
Article 1 - Point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point a
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point a
(a) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including by contributing to the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund, to adapt to the impacts of climate change and to fund research and development of the industries within the scope of this Directive for reducing emissions and adapting, including participation in initiatives within the framework of European Strategic Energy Technology Plan and the European Technology Platforms;
Amendment 332 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - Point 7
Article 1 - Point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point c
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point c
(c) for the capture and geological storage of greenhouse gases, in particular from coal power stations;
Amendment 335 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - Point 7
Article 1 - Point 7
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point c a (new)
Article 10 - paragraph 3 - point c a (new)
(ca) to enable further development of clean energy carriers such as hydrogen;
Amendment 389 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The measures referred to in the first subparagraph shall, to the extent feasible, establish harmonised sector specific benchmarks to ensure that allocation takes place in a manner that gives incentives for greenhouse gas and energy efficient techniques and for reductions in emissions, by taking. They shall be based on the most efficient techniques and technologies, and take into account of the most efficient techniquepotential, including the technical potential, to reduce emissions, substitutes, alternative production processes, and the use of biomass and greenhouse gas capture and storage, and. The measures shall not give incentives to increase emissions per unit of production. No free allocation shall be made in respect of any electricity production. In defining the principles for setting benchmarks in individual sectors, the Commission shall consult with the sectors concerned.
Amendment 400 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The measures referred to in the first subparagraph shall, to the extent feasible, ensure that allocation takes place in a manner that gives incentives for greenhouse gas and energy efficient techniques and for reductions in emissions, by taking account of the most efficient techniques, substitutes, alternative production processes, use of biomass and greenhouse gas capture and storage, and shall not give incentives to increase emissions. No free allocation shall be made in respect of any electricity production, except for electricity produced in connection with industrial heat consumption or produced from residues from an industrial process provided that it is for the own consumption of the operators of the installations; such allocations shall be made under the same allocation principles as applied to that industrial activity as mentioned in Annex I. However, where a waste gas from a production process is used as a fuel, all allowances shall be allocated for free to the operator of the installation generating the waste gas according to the same allocation principles as applied for that installation.
Amendment 444 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 3
3. Free allocation mayshall be given to electricity generators in respect of the production of heatthe production of heat that is supplied to industries and other consumers through high efficiency cogeneration as defined by Directive 2004/8/EC for economically justifiable demand to ensure equal treatment with regard to other producers of heat. In each year subsequent to 2013, the total allocation to such installations in respect of the production of that heat shall be adjusted by the linear factor referred to in Article 9.
Amendment 466 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 4
Article 10a – paragraph 4
Amendment 472 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 5
Article 10a – paragraph 5
Amendment 492 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
No free allocation shall be made in respect of any electricity production by new entrants, except for electricity produced in connection with industrial heat consumption or produced from residues from an industrial process provided that it is for the own consumption of the operators of the installations; such allocations shall be made under the same allocation principles as applied to that industrial activity as mentioned in Annex I. However, where a waste gas from a production process is used as a fuel, all allowances shall be allocated for free to the operator of the installation generating the waste gas with the same allocation principles as applied for that installation.
Amendment 509 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 7
Article 10a – paragraph 7
7. SUntil an international agreement enters into force and subject to Articles 10b and 28, the amount of allowances allocated free of charge under paragraphs 3 to 6 of this Article [and paragraph 2 of Article 3c] in 2013to installations not covered by paragraph 2 in 2013 and each subsequent year shall be 8100% of the quantity determined in accordance with the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and thereafter the free allocation shall decrease each year by equal amounts resulting in no free allocation in 2020without changing the total quantity of allowances according to Article 9.
Amendment 524 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 8
Article 10a – paragraph 8
Amendment 540 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 - point 8
Article 1 - point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a - paragraph 9
Article 10a - paragraph 9
Amendment 578 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 - point 8
Article 1 - point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a - paragraph 9 - subparagraph 4 a (new)
Article 10a - paragraph 9 - subparagraph 4 a (new)
In the determination referred to in the first subparagraph the Commission shall also take into account the need for raw materials security in the Community. This applies particularly to raw materials which are in short supply for European industry.
Amendment 587 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 8
Article 1 - point 8
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10b
Article 10b
1. Not later than June 2011 and thereafter every five years, the Commission shall, in the light of the outcome of the international negotiations and the extent to which these lead to global greenhouse gas emission reductions, whilst providing for equal treatment of competing industries and after consulting with all relevant social partners, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council an analytical report assessing the situation with special regard to energy-intensive sectors or sub- sectors that have beeno determined to beheir exposured to significant risks of carbon leakage. This shall be accompanied by any appropriate proposals, which may include: - adjusting the proportion of allowances received free of charge by those sectors or sub-sectors under Article 10a; - inclusion in the Community scheme of importers of products produced by the sectors or sub-sectors determined in accordance with Article 10a. Any binding sectoral agreements which lead to global emiss according to paragraph 3. 2. The analytical report referred to in paragraph 1 shall be accompanied by any appropriate proposals, which take into consideration the timeframe until full implementation and shall include: - adjusting the proportion of allowances received free of charge by those sectors or sub-sectors under Article 10a; - for leakage effects not covered by other measures carbon equalisation systems for exporters and importers of products produced by the sectors covered by Article 10a. Such systems shall not reduce liquidity of the allowance market. Any binding sectoral agreements which provide for equal treatment of competing industries and which are monitorable, verifiable and subject to mandatory enforcement arrangements shall also be taken into account when considering what measures are appropriate. 3. In the determinations reductions of the magnitude required to effectively address climate change, and which are monitorable, verifiable and subject to mandatory enforcement arrangements shall also be taken into account when considering what measures are appropriate. ferred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall take into account the extent to which it is possible for the sector or sub-sector concerned to pass on the cost of the required allowances in product prices without significant loss of market share to installations operating in countries outside the Community that did not impose equivalent and verifiable constraints on emissions, taking into account the following: (a) the extent to which auctioning would lead to a substantial increase in production cost; (b) the extent to which it is possible for individual installations in the sector concerned to reduce emission levels for instance on the basis of the most efficient techniques; (c) market structure, relevant geographic and product market, the exposure of the sectors to international competition; (d) the effect of climate change and energy policies implemented, or expected to be implemented outside the EU in the sectors concerned; (e) the effect of passing through CO2 costs in electricity prices in the sector or sub- sector concerned. For the purposes of evaluating whether the cost increase resulting from the Community scheme can be passed on, estimates of lost sales resulting from the increased carbon price or the impact on the profitability of the installations concerned may inter alia be used. That measure, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article [23(3)].
Amendment 660 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 11a - paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 11a - paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The annual use of credits by installations pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall not exceed a quantity equal to 5% of the greenhouse gas emissions of the installations covered by this Directive in the respective year of compliance.
Amendment 671 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 11a - paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 11a - paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. From 2013 on all operators who, in the period 2008 to 2012, used less than 6,5% of ERUs and CERs compared to their emissions and who do not carry over entitlements under paragraph 2, shall be allowed to use such credits up to 5 % of their emissions each year during the period from 2013 to 2020, as shall new entrants and new sectors.
Amendment 720 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 21
Article 1 - point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 27 - paragraph 1
Article 27 - paragraph 1
1. Member States mayshall at the request of the operator exclude, from the Community scheme, combustion installations which have a rated thermal input below 25 MW, reported emissions to the competent authority of less than 1025 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in each of the preceding 3 years, and which are subject to measures that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions, if the Member State concerned complies with the following conditions: (a) it notifies the Commission of each such installation, specifying the equivalent measures that are in place, (b) it confirms that monitoring arrangements are in place to assess whether any installation emits 1025 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year; (c) it confirms that if any installation emits 1025 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year or the equivalent measures are no longer in place, the installation will be re-introduced into the system; (d) it publishes the information referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) for public comment.
Amendment 751 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 21
Article 1 - point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 28 - paragraph 2
Article 28 - paragraph 2
2. From the year following the conclusion of the international agreement referred to in paragraph 1, the linear factor shall increase so that the Community quantity of allowances in 2020 is lower Commission shall, on the basis of a full impact assessment of the cost effectiveness of the means to achieve these reductions as well as impacts of other measures detailed withain that established pursuant to Article 9, by a quantity of allowances equivalent toe international agreement, submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and the Council suggesting a further reduction of the Community quantity of allowances in 2020 taking into account the overall reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by the Community below 20% to which the international agreement commits the Community, multiplied by the share of overall greenhouse gas emission reductions in 2020 which the Community scheme is contributing pursuant to Articles 9 and 9a.
Amendment 758 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 21
Article 1 - point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 28 - paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 28 - paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. An international agreement as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be an agreement between countries which leads to global emissions reductions of the magnitude required to effectively address climate change, and which are monitorable, verifiable and subject to mandatory enforcement arrangements. Such an international agreement should include a critical mass of world wide sectoral production. Countries subject to such an international agreement shall agree to implement and enforce measures which result in an equivalent burden for industries exposed to international competition.
Amendment 792 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex I - point 3 - point (a)
Annex I - point 3 - point (a)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I - table - category 1 - activity 2 - row 2 - column 1
Annex I - table - category 1 - activity 2 - row 2 - column 1
Coke ovens - for the production of non- metallurgical coke
Amendment 794 #
2008/0013(COD)
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex I - point 3 - point (b) - point (ii)
Annex I - point 3 - point (b) - point (ii)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I - table - category 2 - paragraph -1 (new)
Annex I - table - category 2 - paragraph -1 (new)
Amendment 30 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In recognition of the fact that biofuels can offer significant CO2 reductions on a well-to-wheels basis, and that manufacturers may offer vehicles with the capability to run on both conventional and alternative fuels to enable the transition to these lower CO2 fuels, this Regulation incorporates specific provisions aimed at promoting further deployment of alternative fuel vehicles in the European Market.
Amendment 32 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In recognition of the fact that biofuels can bring about a significant reduction in CO2 emissions on a well-to- wheels basis and that automobile manufacturers may be able to cope with the transition to these lower-CO2 fuels by offering vehicles which can run on both conventional and alternative fuels, this Regulation incorporates provisions to support sales of flex-fuel vehicles on the European market.
Amendment 63 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13a (new)
Recital 13a (new)
(13a) In recognition of the fact that biofuels can offer significant CO2 reductions on a well-to-wheels basis, and that car manufacturers may offer vehicles with the capability to run on both conventional and alternative fuels to enable the transition to these lower CO2 fuels, this Regulation incorporates specific provisions aimed at promoting further deployment of alternative fuel vehicles on the European Market.
Amendment 93 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) ‘eco-innovation’ means any technological innovation which, regardless of driver behaviour, delivers a proven, quantifiable contribution to reducing CO2 emissions and which is not included or insufficiently taken into account in the new European testing cycle (Regulation (EC) No 715/2007) and is not covered by the additional measures referred to in Article 1.
Amendment 94 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) 'alternative fuel vehicle' means a vehicle as defined in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and its implementing measures.
Amendment 101 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) ‘alternative-fuel vehicles’ means vehicles as defined in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and its implementing measures.
Amendment 108 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) Undertakings shall not be described as connected if the Commission decides, in response to an application, that the undertaking which meets the conditions laid down in points (a) to (e) does not in fact control the other undertaking.
Amendment 108 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point fa (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point fa (new)
(fa) 'Alternative fuel vehicle' means a vehicle as defined in Regulation 715/2007 and its implementing measures.
Amendment 112 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
Article 4
For the calendar year commencing 1 January 2012 and each subsequent calendar year, each manufacturer of passenger cars shall ensure that itn 2012 25%, in 2013 50%, in 2014 75% and in 2015 and each subsequent calendar year 100% of the fleet’s average specific emissions of CO2 do not exceed itsthe specific emissions target for a manufacturer's fleet determined in accordance with Annex I or, where a manufacturer is granted a derogation under Article 9, in accordance with that derogation.
Amendment 126 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For manufacturers which produce cars with specific CO2 emissions which are 50% below the target set pursuant to this Regulation in Annex I, when average specific CO2 emissions are calculated every new vehicle of this type registered over the period to 2015 inclusive shall be counted as five, in keeping with the percentage by which emissions fall below the set target.
Amendment 130 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Specific emission target for 'alternative fuel vehicles' For the purposes of determining compliance by individual manufacturers of passenger cars with the specific emissions target referred to in Article 4, the CO2 emissions as stated in the certificate of conformity for each "alternative fuel vehicle", as defined in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, registered in the European Union shall be reduced by a factor of 5 % in recognition of the greater technological and emissions reduction capacity to run on two different fuels. This factor will be increased to 20% if at least 10% of the filling stations in the Member State where the vehicle is registered provide biofuels that meet the EU sustainability criteria.
Amendment 131 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4a (new)
Article 4a (new)
Article 4a For the purposes of determining compliance by individual manufacturers of passenger cars with the specific emissions target referred to in Article 4, the CO2 emissions as stated in the certificate of conformity for each "alternative fuel vehicle", as defined in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, registered in the European Union shall be reduced by a factor of 5 % in recognition of the greater technological and emissions reduction capacity to run on two different fuels. This factor will be increased to 20% if at least 10% of the filling stations in the Member State where the vehicle is registered provide biofuels that meets the EU sustainability criteria.
Amendment 134 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Specific emission target for alternative fuel vehicles When compliance with the specific emissions targets set for each individual automobile manufacturer pursuant to Article 4 is being determined, the CO2 emissions level of an EU-registered alternative-fuel vehicle, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, as indicated in the certificate of conformity (CoC) shall be reduced by 5% in recognition of the greater technological potential and the greater potential for emissions reductions offered by the two- fuel operating system. This reduction shall be increased to 20% if at least 10% of all petrol stations in the EU Member State in which the vehicle is registered offer biofuels which meet the EU's sustainability criteria.
Amendment 168 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The excess emissions premium pursuant to Article 1 shall be: (a) in relation to excess emissions in the calendar year 2012, 20 eurosEUR 10; (b) in relation to excess emissions in the calendar year 2013, 35 euros; EUR 20; (c) in relation to excess emissions in the calendar year 2014, 60 euros; andEUR 30; (d) in relation to excess emissions in the calendar year 2015 and subsequent calendar years, 95 eurosEUR 40.
Amendment 193 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) is responsible for less than 10,0000.1% of new passenger cars registered in the Community per calendar year; and
Amendment 200 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. A manufacturer may apply to the Commission for an alternative target of a 25% reduction in its average specific emissions by comparison with 2006, in place of the target calculated pursuant to Annex I, provided that (a) if it has no connected undertaking, its annual new car registrations in the European Union fall between the figure laid down in paragraph 1 and 1.5% of the total European market, or (b) if it has connected undertakings, its annual new car registrations in the European Union, taken together with the connected undertakings, fall between the figure laid down in paragraph 1 and 1.5% of the total European market. Connected undertakings may apply to the Commission for an alternative target of a 25% reduction in their average specific emissions by comparison with 2006, in place of the target calculated pursuant to Annex I, if their annual new car registrations in the European Union, taken together with every other connected undertaking, fall between the figure laid down in paragraph 1 and 1.5% of the total European market.
Amendment 203 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a (new)
Amendment 265 #
2007/0297(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II a (new)
Annex II a (new)
Amendment 267 #
2007/0286(COD)
Council position
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For waste co-incineration combustion plants that fire indigenous solid fuel and cannot comply with the emission limit values for sulphur dioxide referred to in Part 4 of Annex VI due to the characteristics of this fuel, Member States may apply instead the minimum rates of desulphurisation set out in Part 5 of Annex V, in accordance with the compliance rules set out in Part 6 of that Annex.
Amendment 55 #
2006/0129(COD)
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may designate mixing zonesensure that transitional areas of exceedance are established adjacent to points of discharge. Concentrations of one or more pollutants within such mixing zones may exceed the relevant EQSsubstances that are listed in Annex X of Directive 2000/60/EC may exceed the relevant EQS within such transitional areas of exceedance, if they do not affect the compliance of the rest of the body of surface water with those standards.
Amendment 61 #
2006/0129(COD)
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Where the EQS for one or more substances listed in Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC are exceeded in a river basin or where concentrations show an unfavourable trend, Member States shall establish plans for the control of discharges for those substances. The plans shall be drawn up according to transparent criteria and revised in the framework of the revision of the programmes of measures. Member States shall report to the Commission and to the public every three years on the progress of the implementation and on how the measures have contributed to achieving the objectives of this Directive.
Amendment 69 #
2006/0129(COD)
Annex I – Part B – paragraph 3 –subparagraph 1
3. With the exception of cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel (hereinafter "metals"), nickel and substances with similar sediment absorption properties, the EQS set up in this Annex are expressed as total concentrations in the whole water sample. In the case of metalthose substances the EQS refers to the dissolved concentration, i.e. the dissolved phase of a water sample obtained by filtration through a 0.45 µm filter or any equivalent pre-treatment.
Amendment 70 #
2006/0129(COD)
Annex II – introductory paragraph -1
By 31 December 2010 at the latest, and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall draw up an evaluation report for the European Parliament and for the Council on the progress made in the review process defined in Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure an adequate rate of substance evaluation.
Amendment 33 #
2005/0281(COD)
Recital 1 a (new)
Amendment 49 #
2005/0281(COD)
Recital 22
(22) On the basis of the definition of waste, in order to promote certainty and consistency, the Commission mayshould adopt guidelinmeasures to specify in certain cases when substances or objects become waste. Such guidelines maymeasures should be developed inter alia for electrical and electronic equipment and vehicles.
Amendment 57 #
2005/0281(COD)
Recital 29
(29) It is necessary, in order to enable the Community as a whole to become self- sufficient inAccording to the proximity principle, waste for disposal and in the recovery of mixed municipal waste collected from should be treated in one of the nearest approprivate households and to enable the Member States to move towards that aim individually, to make provisioinstallations, by means of the most appropriate methods and technologies in for a network of cooperation as regards disposal installations and installader to ensure a high level of protections for the recovery of mixed municipal waste collected from environment and public health. Each Member State should take approprivate households, taking into account geographical circumstances and the need for specialisedmeasures, in cooperation with other Member States, to establish an integrated and adequate network of disposal installations, for certakin types of waste. (Spirit of EP 1st reading amendment 109)g account of the best available techniques. Or. en
Amendment 58 #
2005/0281(COD)
Recital 32
(32) It is important, in accordance with the waste hierarchy, and for the purpose of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions originating from waste disposal on landfills, to facilitate the separate collection and proper treatment of bio- waste in order to produce environmentally-safe compost and other bio-waste based materials. The Commission, after an assessment on tho this end, specific criteria for the collection, use managed treatment of bio-waste, will submit proposals for legislative measures, if appropriat should be set in this Directive.
Amendment 70 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
(c) uncontaminated soil and other naturally occurring material excavated in the course of construction activities where it is certain that the material will be used for the purposes of construction in its natural state on the site from which it was excavated;excavated materials which can be used, either on the same site or on another site.
Amendment 78 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 3 – point 4
4) "bio-waste" means biodegradable garden and park waste, food and kitchen waste from households, restaurants, caterers and retail premises and comparable waste from food processing plantswaste of animal or plant origin, for recovery purposes, which can be decomposed by micro-organisms, soil-borne living organisms or enzymes; soil material with no significant bio-waste content and plant remains from agricultural production falling within the scope of Article 2(1)(f) are not bio-waste;
Amendment 81 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 3 – point 11, point (c)
(c) the content of harmfulzardous substances in materials and products;
Amendment 97 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 3 – point 18
18) "“disposal"” means any operation which is not recovery even where the operation has as a secondary consequence the reclamation of substances or energy. Annex I sets out a non-exhaustive list of disposal operations;. Annex I sets out a non- exhaustive list of disposal operations. All disposal operations shall give high priority to the protection of human health and the environment.
Amendment 99 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 3 – point 19 a (new)
19a) "best available waste management techniques" means the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques in order, during waste management operations, to avoid hazards to human health and environmental damage; Article 2(11) of and Annex IV to Directive 96/61/EC shall apply accordingly;
Amendment 132 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. In order to strengthen the prevention and recovery of waste, Member States may take legislative or non-legislative measures to ensure that any natural or legal person who professionally develops, manufactures, processes and treats or sells products (producer of the or imports product)s has extended producer responsibility.
Amendment 148 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Any waste recovery and disposal requirements laid down by Member States in the form of generally binding provisions shall be based on best available waste management techniques. In so far as this is necessary for protection of human health and the environment, the Commission shall submit proposals for individual directives laying down, for wastes or recovery operations which are of particular ecological or economic significance in quantitative terms, requirements with regard to recovery, to substances or objects resulting from recovery operations, and to subsequent use of those substances and objects. Those requirements shall be based on best available waste management techniques.
Amendment 167 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 14
Amendment 188 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 19
Amendment 194 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19a Treatment of bio-waste 1. Producers and holders shall, prior to bio-waste being spread on land, subject it to treatment that will ensure that it is safe from the point of view of human, animal and plant health. This shall also apply to catering waste produced by restaurants and catering facilities where it is not required to be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002. 2. The Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 36(2), adopt implementing measures, specifying the minimum requirements for checking safety from the point of view of human, animal and plant health. 3. In order to ensure that spreading of bio-waste on land is carried out in an environmentally sound way, the Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 36(2), adopt implementing measures, specifying the environmental and quality criteria to be met in order for bio-waste to be spread on land used for agricultural, forestry or horticultural/gardening purposes, and to be deemed to have ceased to be waste. 4. The implementing measures provided for in paragraph 3 shall include at least binding limit values for heavy metals, physical contaminants and content of viable seeds and parts of plants capable of sprouting as well as a list of suitable source materials. 5. The criteria shall take into account any risks of environmentally harmful use or shipment of bio-waste, and shall be set at a level that guarantees a high level of protection for human health and the environment.
Amendment 195 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 19 b (new)
Article 19b Controls 1. Member States shall ensure that, in order to monitor compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 19a, quality assurance systems are set up and operated. 2. Member States shall ensure that tests for harmful substances are carried out at regular intervals.
Amendment 196 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 19 c (new)
Article 19c Catering Waste The recovery of untreated catering waste for feeding purposes shall be prohibited. Catering waste shall be verifiably eliminated by licensed undertakings and sterilised and safely disposed of by means of appropriate operations. The use of catering waste in feed for pigs may be authorised by Member States only on condition that there is, in every respect, monitoring of safe recovery, sterilisation and compliance with the other provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002.
Amendment 198 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 20 – paragraph 5
5. Provided that the requirements of this Article are complied with, any permit produced pursuant to other national or Community legislation mayshall be combined with the permit required under paragraph 1 to form a single permit, where such a format obviates the unnecessary duplication of information and the repetition of work by the operator or the competent authority.
Amendment 218 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 29 a (new)
Amendment 225 #
2005/0281(COD)
Article 35 – paragraph -1 (new)