Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | KLINZ Wolf ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | GAUZÈS Jean-Paul ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 053-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 053-p1Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to update the regulatory framework applicable to European investment funds – undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS).
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (recast).
CONTENT: following an agreement with the Parliament under the second reading of the codecision procedure, the Council adopted a directive on undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS).
This directive seeks to update the regulatory framework applicable to European investment funds – undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – which represent a market of around EUR 5 000 billion.
The aim of the directive is to modernise the regulatory framework applicable to these financial products in order to:
offer investors a greater choice of product at lower cost through better integration of the internal market; provide investors with suitable protection through high-quality information and more efficient supervision; maintain the competitiveness of European industry by adjusting the regulatory framework to developments in the market.
Against this background, the text is aimed at fulfilling the following objectives:
- improve investor information by creating a standardised summary information document: "key information for investors". This is an innovative approach aimed at making it easier for the consumer to understand the product: thus a fine balance has to be struck between the document's readability and the amount of information required (too often consumers are deluged with information); the document will be tried out with consumers before it is finalised;
- create a genuine European passport for UCITS management companies – this is the last piece missing from the internal market as regards UCITS management: a management company located in a Member State will be able to manage funds in other Member States in accordance with the principle of freedom to provide services in the Treaty. Thus, a management company located in one Member States can manage funds in other Member States. In accordance with the principle of supervision by the country of origin, only the competent authorities in the Member State of origin of the management company are considered to be entitled to supervise the organisation of the management company, which has to be governed by the law of its Member State of origin.
This measure should result in substantial economies of scale and improved transparency for consumers as to the location of the management company. It should make for greater diversity in the products offered to consumers , which is essential in view of increasing requirements concerning retirement saving.
Without prejudice to other conditions of general application laid down by national law, the competent authorities shall not grant authorisation to a management company unless the following conditions are met:
the management company has an initial capital of at least EUR 125 000, taking into account certain provisions laid down in the directive; the persons who effectively conduct the business of a management company are of sufficiently good repute and are sufficiently experienced also in relation to the type of UCITS managed by the management company, the names of those persons and of every person succeeding them in office being communicated forthwith to the competent authorities and the conduct of the business of a management company being decided by at least two persons meeting such conditions; the application for authorisation is accompanied by a programme of activity setting out, at least, the organisational structure of the management company; and the head office and the registered office of the management company are located in the same Member State.
- facilitate crossborder marketing of UCITS by simplifying administrative procedures: there will be immediate market access once the authorisation has been granted by the country of origin of the UCITS; the host country will be able to monitor the commercial documents but not to block access to the market;
- facilitate crossborder mergers of UCITS, which will make it possible to increase the average size of European funds; the information given to investors about the merger will be monitored by the supervisor, who will not authorise the merger unless it is satisfactory; authorisation will be assigned to a single supervisor, in conjunction with the other supervisor concerned, so as to make the procedures more efficient.
The Directive concerns those merger techniques which are most commonly used in Member States. It does not require all Member States to introduce all three techniques into their national law, but each Member State should recognise a transfer of assets resulting from those merger techniques. This Directive does not prevent UCITS from using other techniques on a purely national basis, in situations where none of the UCITS concerned by the merger has been notified for cross-border marketing of its units. Those mergers will remain subject to the relevant provisions of national law. National rules on quorum should neither discriminate between national and cross-border mergers, nor be more stringent than those laid down for mergers of corporate entities.
- facilitate asset pooling by creating a framework for the system of "master-feeder" arrangements whereby a fund invests more than 85% of its assets in another fund. Member States shall require that the master UCITS provide the feeder UCITS with all documents and information necessary for the latter to meet the requirements laid down in this Directive. For this purpose, the feeder UCITS shall enter into an agreement with the master UCITS. The master and the feeder UCITS shall take appropriate measures to coordinate the timing of their net asset value calculation and publication in order to avoid market timing in their units, preventing arbitrage opportunities.
- strengthen the supervision of UCITS and of the companies that manage them, by means of enhanced cooperation between supervisors: the Directive encourages the exchange of information between supervisors, harmonises the powers of supervisors, and allows for the possibility of on-the-spot investigation, consultation mechanisms and mutual-aid mechanisms for the imposition of penalties, in particular.
By 1 July 2013, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the application of this Directive.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 07/12/2009.
APPLICATION: from 01/07/2011 for most of the provisions.
Member States shall ensure that UCITS replace their simplified prospectus drawn up in accordance with the provisions of Directive 85/611/EEC with key investor information as soon as possible and in any event no later than 12 months after the deadline for implementing in national law of all the implementing measures. During that period, the competent authorities of the UCITS host Member States shall continue to accept the simplified prospectus for UCITS marketed on the territory of those Member States.
At the request of the French delegation, the Council discussed EU provisions on the liability of fund depositaries, and in particular implementation with this regard of directive 85/611/EEC on undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS).
The Council requested the Commission to examine the issue.
The European Parliament adopted by 589 votes to 28 with 38 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (recast).
The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Wolf KLINZ (ALDE, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.
The amendments were the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council. The main amendments - adopted under 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows:
Management company passport : the Management Company Passport (MCP) allows for cross-border management of investments funds whilst centralising administrative and management functions. It is aimed at giving management companies the right to passport their collective portfolio management services across the EU according to the principle of freedom to provide services as set out in the Treaty. This widening of the passport approach was not included in the Commission's original proposal pending a further consultation by the Committee of European Securities Regulators, in the light of concerns about possible risks to the "gold standard" of investor protection which the UCITS brand represents. This consultation has since been completed and MEPs, are satisfied that it will be possible to open up the single market in investment products while at the same time maintaining the level of protection for retail investors. In agreement with the Council, therefore, they adopted amendments inserting the arrangements for the MPC into the directive at Level 1 provisions in order to allow for a passporting of collective portfolio management services. Parliament felt that the MCP would contribute to the establishment of a true common market for the fund industry and lead to substantial economic benefits while allowing for the same high level of investor protection.
Mergers: Parliament did not insert the clause on requiring the Commission to propose a directive for taxation of fund mergers following the principle of tax neutrality, as recommended by its competent committee. However, it did adopt amendments that improved and clarified the rules on to mergers between different UCITS. A transition period was inserted which allows the receiving UCITS to derogate from certain diversification provisions for a transition period of six months after entry into effect of the merger
Notification: the compromise text provides that the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit the complete documentation to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later than 10 working days after the date of receipt of the notification letter accompanied by the complete documentation. Key investor information : the key investor information (KII) is to replace the existing simplified prospectus. Parliament provided that key investor information should be provided free of charge. The essential elements of the KII which are prescribed in the text shall be understandable by the investor without any reference to other documents. A paper copy shall be delivered free of charge to the investor, upon request. In addition, an up-to-date version of the key investor information shall be made available on the website of the investment company or management company.
Master/Feeder : the Commission has introduced new provisions on the pooling of funds. Via master/feeder structures a UCITS fund may invest 85% or more into a master UCITS (which is not itself a feeder UCITS) allowing for cost savings due to combined management of the fund's assets. Parliament has simplified some of the provisions, and introduced further streamlining of the regulatory exchange of information and documents. In addition, the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS must take appropriate measures to coordinate the timing of their net asset value calculation and publication, in order to avoid market timing in their fund units, preventing arbitrage opportunities.
By 1 July 2013, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of the Directive.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Wolf KLINZ (ALDE, DE) and amended the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (recast).
The main amendments – made in 1st reading of codecision procedure – are as follows :
Management company passport : the Management Company Passport (MCP) is aimed at giving management companies the right to passport their collective portfolio management services across the EU according to the principle of freedom to provide services as set out in the Treaty. Whilst this was not in the original Commission proposal, the committee introduced provisions for a management company passport at Level 1 provisions in order to allow for a passporting of collective portfolio management services. It stated that discrimination on grounds of the nationality of a management company should not be allowed, nor should possible protectionist delays in the approval be possible. It was certain that the MCP would contribute to the establishment of a true common market for the fund industry and lead to substantial economic benefits while allowing for the same high level of investor protection.
Mergers : by 31 December 2010 (i.e before this Directive is implemented) and in order to provide a binding framework of tax neutrality, the Commission should propose a directive for taxation of fund mergers following the principle of tax neutrality laid down in Council Directive 90/434/EEC on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office, of an SE or SCE, between Member States and Directive 2005/56/EC on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies. A Commission Communication and bilateral agreements between Member States should address the existing difficulties in the meantime. The committee felt that clear rules are needed to ensure that the benefits of the proposed merger framework can be exploited leading to market consolidation, improved efficiency and lower costs to the investor.
Notification: Members felt that a one month time period given to the UCITS home supervisor for checking completeness of files and attesting compliance with the Directive is unjustifiably long and not in line with provisions on notification for other products. Accordingly, they inserted a provision stating that the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit complete documentation to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later than 5 working days after the date of receipt of the notification letter and the complete documentation provided for in the text.
Key investor information : the key investor information (KII) is to replace the existing simplified prospectus. The committee proposed that key investor information should be provided as a specific document to investors free of charge, in good time before the subscription of the UCITS. The competent authorities of each Member State may make available to the public, in a dedicated section of their website, key investor information concerning all UCITS constituted and authorised in that Member State. The committee further stated that the European Commission must adopt implementing measures. It introduced amendments to ensure that the information requirements are in line with the wording and provisions in MiFID. Supplementary documents should be prohibited from being attached to the KII.
Master/Feeder : the Commission has introduced new provisions on the pooling of funds. Via master/feeder structures a UCITS fund may invest 85% or more into a master UCITS (which is not itself a feeder UCITS) allowing for cost savings due to combined management of the fund's assets. The committee has simplified some of the provisions, and introduced further streamlining of the regulatory exchange of information and documents. It also i nserted provisions that strengthen investor protection in the case of liquidation. In addition, t he master UCITS and the feeder UCITS must take appropriate measures to coordinate the timing of their net asset value calculation and publication, or employ other recognised techniques in order to avoid market timing in their fund units and prevent arbitrage.
PURPOSE: to codify the successive changes introduced to the UCITS Directive since 1985 and to incorporate measures announced in the 2006 White Paper.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council
CONTENT: Council Directive 85/611/EEC (the UCITS Directive) aimed to offer greater business and investment opportunities for both industry and investors by integrating the EU market for investments funds. The Directive has been key to the development of European investment funds. In June 2007, UCITS assets under management amounted to EUR 6trillion. UCITS represent about 75% of the EU investment fund market. Strong in-built investor protection safeguards have also achieved UCITS broad recognition beyond EU borders.
Despite this positive evolution, it became evident over the years that the Directive was excessively constraining and prevented fund managers from fully exploiting their development possibilities. Amendments in 2001 enlarged the investment powers available to
UCITS but did not tackle bottlenecks to industry efficiency. Estimated potential annual savings amount to several billion euros. In 2005, the Commission Green Paper on investment funds launched a public debate on the need for EU level action (and its scope), and the White Paper in 2006 announced a set of targeted modifications to the UCITS Directive.
Concretely, the proposal has two objectives:
1) the introduction of new freedoms in order to improve the efficiency and integration of the UCITS Internal Market;
2) to streamline the working of current provisions regarding the cross-border marketing of UCITS and disclosure obligations.
The new provisions will increase the efficiency of the current legislative framework in a number of key areas :
· they will allow UCITS managers to develop their cross-border activities and generate savings consolidation and economies of scale. Currently EU funds are on average 5 times smaller than US funds and the cost of managing them are twice as high as in the US;
· investors will benefit from a greater choice of investment funds operating at lower costs;
· the proposal also seeks to improve investor protection by making sure that retail investors receive clear, easily understandable and relevant information when investing in UCITS. These improvements will help reinforcing the competitiveness of UCITS on global markets. Currently 40 % of UCITS originating in the EU are sold in third countries, mainly Asia, the Gulf region and Latin America. As part of the Commission's Better Regulation Strategy and its firm commitment to simplify the regulatory environment, the new Directive will replace 10 existing directives with a single text.
The proposed changes to the UCITS Directive will:
remove administrative barriers to the cross-border distribution of UCITS funds : current notification procedures can take several months before completed. Administrative costs are estimated at EUR 45 million. The new notification procedure will be reduced to a simple, electronic, regulator-to-regulator communication. The distribution of units of funds will start immediately after such communication; create a framework for mergers between UCITS funds and allow the use of master-feeder structures : fund mergers will be allowed, on both a domestic and a cross-border basis, and their authorisation procedure will be harmonised, as will the required level of information to be provided to investors. Subject to approval and the appropriate information of investors, a UCITS fund (feeder) will be allowed to fully invest its assets into another fund (master). It is estimated that these new management opportunities will allow UCITS to make up to EUR 6 billion in savings and economies of scale. These could in turn be shared with investors in the form of lower investment costs; replace the Simplified Prospectus by a new concept of Key Investor Information (KII) : KII will be contained in a short document conveying key facts to retail investors in a clear and understandable manner so as to assist them in taking an informed investment decision; improve cooperation mechanisms between national supervisors : as regards the "management company passport" (i.e. the possibility for funds authorised in one Member State to be managed remotely by a management company established in another Member State ), the most recent consultation process has revealed that there are a series of potential supervisory and investor protection concerns. These need to be tackled if the MCP is not to lessen the protection of retail investors or endanger the UCITS brand - traditionally considered to be a European "gold standard" for investor protection. The Commission has therefore decided to consult the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) on these issues. CESR will be invited to provide advice that will help the Commission to develop provisions permitting the introduction of a management company passport under conditions that are consistent with high level of investor protection. In that regard CESR will be invited to advise the Commission on the structure and principles which could guide potential future amendments to the UCITS directive which may be needed to give effect to the UCITS management company passport.
PURPOSE: to codify the successive changes introduced to the UCITS Directive since 1985 and to incorporate measures announced in the 2006 White Paper.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council
CONTENT: Council Directive 85/611/EEC (the UCITS Directive) aimed to offer greater business and investment opportunities for both industry and investors by integrating the EU market for investments funds. The Directive has been key to the development of European investment funds. In June 2007, UCITS assets under management amounted to EUR 6trillion. UCITS represent about 75% of the EU investment fund market. Strong in-built investor protection safeguards have also achieved UCITS broad recognition beyond EU borders.
Despite this positive evolution, it became evident over the years that the Directive was excessively constraining and prevented fund managers from fully exploiting their development possibilities. Amendments in 2001 enlarged the investment powers available to
UCITS but did not tackle bottlenecks to industry efficiency. Estimated potential annual savings amount to several billion euros. In 2005, the Commission Green Paper on investment funds launched a public debate on the need for EU level action (and its scope), and the White Paper in 2006 announced a set of targeted modifications to the UCITS Directive.
Concretely, the proposal has two objectives:
1) the introduction of new freedoms in order to improve the efficiency and integration of the UCITS Internal Market;
2) to streamline the working of current provisions regarding the cross-border marketing of UCITS and disclosure obligations.
The new provisions will increase the efficiency of the current legislative framework in a number of key areas :
· they will allow UCITS managers to develop their cross-border activities and generate savings consolidation and economies of scale. Currently EU funds are on average 5 times smaller than US funds and the cost of managing them are twice as high as in the US;
· investors will benefit from a greater choice of investment funds operating at lower costs;
· the proposal also seeks to improve investor protection by making sure that retail investors receive clear, easily understandable and relevant information when investing in UCITS. These improvements will help reinforcing the competitiveness of UCITS on global markets. Currently 40 % of UCITS originating in the EU are sold in third countries, mainly Asia, the Gulf region and Latin America. As part of the Commission's Better Regulation Strategy and its firm commitment to simplify the regulatory environment, the new Directive will replace 10 existing directives with a single text.
The proposed changes to the UCITS Directive will:
remove administrative barriers to the cross-border distribution of UCITS funds : current notification procedures can take several months before completed. Administrative costs are estimated at EUR 45 million. The new notification procedure will be reduced to a simple, electronic, regulator-to-regulator communication. The distribution of units of funds will start immediately after such communication; create a framework for mergers between UCITS funds and allow the use of master-feeder structures : fund mergers will be allowed, on both a domestic and a cross-border basis, and their authorisation procedure will be harmonised, as will the required level of information to be provided to investors. Subject to approval and the appropriate information of investors, a UCITS fund (feeder) will be allowed to fully invest its assets into another fund (master). It is estimated that these new management opportunities will allow UCITS to make up to EUR 6 billion in savings and economies of scale. These could in turn be shared with investors in the form of lower investment costs; replace the Simplified Prospectus by a new concept of Key Investor Information (KII) : KII will be contained in a short document conveying key facts to retail investors in a clear and understandable manner so as to assist them in taking an informed investment decision; improve cooperation mechanisms between national supervisors : as regards the "management company passport" (i.e. the possibility for funds authorised in one Member State to be managed remotely by a management company established in another Member State ), the most recent consultation process has revealed that there are a series of potential supervisory and investor protection concerns. These need to be tackled if the MCP is not to lessen the protection of retail investors or endanger the UCITS brand - traditionally considered to be a European "gold standard" for investor protection. The Commission has therefore decided to consult the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) on these issues. CESR will be invited to provide advice that will help the Commission to develop provisions permitting the introduction of a management company passport under conditions that are consistent with high level of investor protection. In that regard CESR will be invited to advise the Commission on the structure and principles which could guide potential future amendments to the UCITS directive which may be needed to give effect to the UCITS management company passport.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0384
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2009/65
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 302 17.11.2009, p. 0032
- Draft final act: 03605/2009/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)693
- Debate in Council: 2919
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0012/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0497/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0497/2008
- Debate in Council: 2911
- Committee opinion: PE414.023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.264
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.213
- Committee draft report: PE412.228
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0458
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2263
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2264
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0458
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0458 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2263 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2264 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE412.228
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.213
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.264
- Committee opinion: PE414.023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0497/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)693
- Draft final act: 03605/2009/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0384 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Wolf KLINZ
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Aleksander CZARNECKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Donata GOTTARDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- John PURVIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eoin RYAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margarita STARKEVIČIŪTĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
280 |
2008/0153(COD)
2008/10/28
JURI
7 amendments...
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) The Commission may adopt implementing measures specifying the liability and obligations of depositaries as established in this Article
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission may adopt implementing measures specifying the liability and obligations of depositaries as established in this Article.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require that the management or administrative body of the merging UCITS and of the receiving UCITS draw up common draft terms of
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the calculation method of the exchange ratio and the outcome of that calculation.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 4. The information to be provided to unit- holders of the merging UCITS and, where applicable, the receiving UCITS, shall include appropriate and accurate information on the proposed merger such as to enable them to take an informed decision on the possible impact thereof on their investment and to exercise their rights under Articles 41 and 42. It shall include
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 56 1. Member States shall require that, if the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS have different depositaries, the
source: PE-415.121
2008/11/12
ECON
165 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11b (new) (11b) The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State should be competent to supervise compliance with the rules regarding the constitution and functioning of the UCITS, which should be subject to the law of the UCITS home Member State. To this effect, the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State should be able to get information directly from the management company. To remedy any breach of the rules under their responsibility, the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State should be able to rely on the cooperation of the competent authorities of the management company’s home Member State and, if necessary, they should be able to take action directly against the management company.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11c (new) (11c) In order to prevent supervisory arbitrage and to promote confidence in the effectiveness of supervision by the home Member State authorities, a requirement for authorisation of a UCITS should be that it should not be prevented in any legal way from being marketed in its home Member State. This does not affect the free decision, once the UCITS has been authorised, to choose the Member State(s) where the units of the UCITS are to be marketed in accordance with this Directive.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11d (new) (11d) Appropriate procedures and arrangements to deal with investor complaints, including through appropriate provisions that are reflected in distribution arrangements or through providing an address in the UCITS home Member State, which need not be an address of the management company itself, should be adopted by the management company.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Despite the need for consolidation between UCITS, mergers of UCITS encounter many legislative and administrative difficulties in the Community. It is therefore necessary, in order to improve the functioning of the Internal Market, to lay down Community provisions facilitating mergers between UCITS (and investment compartments thereof). Although some Member States
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Despite the need for consolidation between UCITS to achieve economies of scale and lower costs, mergers of UCITS encounter many legislative and administrative difficulties in the Community. It is therefore necessary, in order to improve the functioning of the
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 a (new) (18a) This Directive covers those merger techniques which are most commonly used in Member States. It does not imply that all Member States have to introduce all three techniques into their national laws but each Member State should recognize a transfer of assets resulting from these merger techniques. It should not prevent a UCITS from using other techniques on a purely domestic basis, in situations where none of the UCITS concerned by the merger has been notified for cross border marketing of its units. Those mergers should remain subject to the relevant provisions of national law. Quorum rules should not discriminate between national and cross border mergers, nor should they be more stringent than laid down for mergers of corporate entities.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) In order to safeguard investors' interests, Member States should require proposed mergers between UCITS either within their jurisdiction or on a cross- border basis to be subject to authorisation by their competent authorities. For cross- border mergers, the competent authorities of the
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20)
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is particularly important that the unit-holders are adequately informed about the proposed merger and that their rights are sufficiently protected. Although unit- holders of the merging UCITS are most concerned, the interests of the unit-holders of the receiving UCITS should also be safeguarded
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) UCITS should be explicitly permitted, as part of their general investment policy and/or for hedging purposes in order to reach a set financial target or the risk profile indicated in the prospectus, to invest in financial derivative instruments. In order to ensure investor protection, it is necessary to limit the maximum potential
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 a (new) (32a) When a UCITS invests in credit risk transfer products, the management or the investment company should put in place, as part of its risk management process, a procedure which permits the management or investment company to ensure that originators and sponsors of these credit risk transfer products retain a certain percentage (at least 5%) of the exposures that they securitize.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 a (new) (32a) For investment categories which comply with the fundamental principles of this directive, but are not at present recognised as permitted investment categories under this directive, the Commission should submit a proposal for a separate legislative framework by the end of 2009.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) In order to facilitate the effective operation of the Internal Market and to ensure the same level of investor protection throughout the Community, both master- feeder-structures where the master and the
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) In order to protect the feeder UCITS' investors, the feeder UCITS' investment into the master UCITS should be subject to prior approval of the competent authorities of the feeder UCITS' home Member State.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) In order to allow the feeder UCITS to act in the best interests of its unit-holders and notably place it in a position to obtain from the master UCITS all information and documents necessary to perform its obligations, the feeder UCITS and the master UCITS should enter into a binding and enforceable agreement.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 (42) In order to ensure a high level of protection of the interests of the feeder UCITS' investors, the prospectus, the key investor information as referred to in Article 73, as well as all marketing communications should be adapted to the specificities of master-feeder-structures. The investment of the feeder UCITS into the master UCITS should not affect the ability of the feeder UCITS to itself repurchase or redeem units at the request of its unit-holders and to act in the best interests of its unit-holders.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 44 (44) The conversion rules should enable an existing UCITS to convert into a feeder UCITS. At the same time they should sufficiently protect unit-holders. As such a conversion is a fundamental change of the investment policy, the converting feeder UCITS should be required to provide its unit-holders with sufficient information
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Key investor information should be provided
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 46 (46) Key investor information should be provided to investors, at a pre-contractual stage, in order to help them to reach informed investment decisions. It should contain only the essential elements for making such decisions. The nature of the
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 (47) Key investor information should be produced for all UCITS. Management companies or, where applicable, investment companies should
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 47 a (new) (47a) The right for UCITS to sell their units in other Member States should be subject to their taking the necessary measures to ensure that facilities are available in the host Member State for making payments to unit-holders, re- purchasing or redeeming units and making available the information which UCITS are obliged to provide. However, UCITS should not be obliged by the law of the host Member State to have a paying agent in that Member State in order to fulfil their duties.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 49 (49) In order to facilitate cross-border marketing of units of UCITS, control of compliance of arrangements made for marketing of units of UCITS with laws regulations and administrative procedures applicable in the UCITS host Member State, should be performed
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 50 (50) For the purpose of enhancing legal certainty there is a need to ensure that a UCITS which markets its units on a cross- border basis has an easy access, in the form of an electronic publication and in a language customary in the sphere of international finance, to complete information on the laws, regulations and administrative provisions applicable in the UCITS host Member State and
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 51 (51) To facilitate
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 52 (52) It is necessary to enhance convergence of powers at the disposal of competent authorities so as to bring about an equal enforcement of the Directive throughout the Member States. A common minimum set of powers, consistent with those conferred upon competent authorities by other Community financial services legislation should guarantee supervisory effectiveness. In addition, Member States should lay down rules on penalties, including criminal, civil and administrative penalties, and administrative measures, applicable to infringements of this Directive and should take the measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 53 a (new) (53a) Member States should take the necessary administrative and organisational measures to enable the cooperation between national authorities and competent authorities of other Member States, including through bilateral or multilateral agreements between those authorities, so that they can fully carry out their duties in accordance with this Directive.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 55 (55) The principle of home Member State supervision requires that the competent authorities should not grant or should withdraw authorisation where factors such as the content of programmes of operations, the geographical distribution or the activities actually carried on indicate clearly that a UCITS or an undertaking contributing towards its business activity has opted for the legal system of one Member State for the purpose of evading the stricter standards in force in another Member State within whose territory it carries on or intends to carry on the greater part of its activities.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 65 (65) The Commission should be empowered to adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive. Concerning m
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 65 a (new) Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 65 b (new) Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 1 - point e (e) a "UCITS home Member State" means
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 For the purposes of this Directive, a UCITS shall be deemed to be established in the Member State in which the investment company or the management company
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 For the purposes of this Directive, a UCITS shall be deemed to be established in
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1 1. No UCITS shall carry on activities as such unless it has been authorised by the competent authorities of
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 2 2. A common fund shall be authorised only if the competent authorities
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 2 2. A common fund shall be authorised only if the competent authorities of its home Member State have approved the choice of the management company to manage the UCITS, the fund rules and the choice of depositary. An investment company shall be authorised only if the competent authorities of its home Member State have approved both its instruments of incorporation and the choice of depositary, and, where applicable, the choice of the designated management company to manage the UCITS.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 2 2. A common fund shall be authorised only if the competent authorities
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, if the UCITS is not established in the management company’s home Member State, the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall approve the application of the management company to manage the UCITS pursuant to Article 5a. It must not be made a condition of authorisation that the UCITS be managed by a management company having its registered office in the UCITS home Member State or that the management company performs or delegates any activities in the UCITS home Member State.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 1 3. The competent authorities
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 1 a (new) Without prejudice to Article 26, the management company or, where applicable, the investment company shall be informed, within one month of the submission of the complete documents, whether or not the choice has been approved.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 2 Moreover, the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State may not authorise a UCITS if the directors of the depositary are not of sufficiently good repute or are not sufficiently experienced also in relation to the type of UCITS to be managed. To that end, the names of the directors of the depositary and of every person succeeding them in office shall be communicated forthwith to the competent authorities.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 5 5. Neither the management company nor the depositary may be replaced, nor may the fund rules or the instruments of incorporation of the investment company be amended, without the approval of the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Member States shall ensure that complete information on the laws, regulations and administrative provisions implementing this Directive which relate to the constitution and functioning of the UCITS is easily accessible at a distance or by electronic means. Member States shall ensure that this information is available, at least, in a language customary in the sphere of international finance, provided in a clear and unambiguous manner, and kept up-to-date.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 - paragraph 1 1. Access to the business of management companies shall be subject to prior official authorisation to be granted by the competent authorities of the
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Companies authorised in a Member State other than the UCITS home Member State providing UCITS management services on a cross-border basis shall comply with the rules set by the UCITS home Member State concerning the incorporation and operation of the UCITS, namely the rules applicable to: - establishment of the UCITS; - management regulations or statutes of the UCITS; - authorisation of the UCITS; - keeping of the unit-holder register; - exercise of unit-holder voting rights; - investment policy and investment limits; - calculation of total exposure and leverage effect; - restrictions on borrowing, lending and short-selling; - valuation of the UCITS’s assets and accounting for the UCITS; - issue and repurchase of units; - calculation of issue and/or repurchase price; - distribution or capitalisation of income; - obligations of the UCITS to provide information, including on the prospectus, key investor information and regular reporting; - marketing and distribution of units; - unit-holder relations; - UCITS mergers and restructuring; - delegation mechanisms; - liquidation and dissolution of a UCITS.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 - paragraph 4 - subparagraph 1 a (new) If the management company sells and repurchases units of UCITS as part of its marketing function referred to in Annex II, Articles 2(2), 12, 13 and 19 of Directive 2004/39/EC shall apply to the provision of these services.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 - paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1 1. Each management company's home Member State shall draw up prudential rules which management companies authorised in that Member State, with regard to the activity of management of UCITS authorised according to this Directive, shall observe at all times.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 - paragraph 1 - point b (b) is structured and organised in such a way as to minimise the risk of UCITS' or clients' interests being prejudiced by conflicts of interest between the company and its clients, between one of its clients and another, between one of its clients and a UCITS
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Management companies shall set up appropriate procedures and arrangements to ensure that they properly deal with investor complaints, and that there are no restriction for investors to exercise their rights in case the management company is located in another jurisdiction. Investors should be able to file complaints in their local language.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 - paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures specifying procedures and arrangements set out in point (a) of paragraph 1and the structures and organizational requirements to minimize conflicts of interests set out in point (b) of paragraph. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - introductory part 1.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - introductory part 1. If the management company’s home Member State
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - point a (a) the competent authorit
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - point a a) the competent authorit
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - point h (h) having regard to the nature of the functions to be delegated, the undertaking to which functions will be delegated must be qualified and capable of undertaking the functions in question; where appropriate, this undertaking shall also have had set the common standards for conduct of business for investment unit sales agents;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - point i (i) the UCITS' prospectuses list the functions which the management company has been permitted to delegate by the management company’s home Member State.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 1 - point i (i) the UCITS' prospectus
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission, in accordance with the procedure set out in article 107 (3), shall adopt implementing measures with respect to points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 - paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures, with a view to ensuring that the management company complies with the duties set out in paragraph 1, in particular to: (a) define the steps that management companies might reasonably be expected to take to identify, prevent, manage and/or disclose conflicts of interest as well as to establish appropriate criteria for determining the types of conflicts of interest whose existence may damage the interests of the UCITS; (b) establish appropriate criteria for acting honestly and fairly and with due skill, care and diligence in the best interests of the UCITS; Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1 a (new) Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Subject to the conditions set out in this Article, a UCITS shall be free to designate, or to be managed by, a management company authorized in another Member State in accordance with this Directive, provided that such a management company fulfils the following criteria: a) it complies with the provisions of Article 16 or Article 17; b) it complies with the provisions of Article 17a and Article 5a.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Management companies shall ensure appropriate mechanisms to deal with complaints of investors located in other jurisdictions. The minimum shall be an address for service of documents and complaints with appropriate forwarding arrangements. Such documents and complaints may be in the investor's own language. Local supervisors shall not demand the presence of a legal person or local representation.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If the management company of a common fund is not established in the UCITS home Member State, it should appoint a depositary or a financial institution subject to prudential supervision established in that State, including through a branch, to act as a local point of contact for investors and the competent authority of the UCITS home Member State .
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The local point of contact should perform the following functions: (a) provide a contact point for unit- holders, including receipt of complaints; (b) provide a legal address for receipt of all documents addressed to the UCITS and the management company by investors and by the competent authority of UCITS home Member State; (c) provide facilities to the unit-holders in relation to the exercise of their rights, including facilities in relation to payments to unit-holders and to the reception and transmission of orders for subscriptions, issuance and redemption of units; (d) make information available at the request of the public or the competent authority of the UCITS home Member State.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 - paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. The appointment of the local point of contact in no case shall not affect the management company’s and the depositary’s liability.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 1 1. In addition to meeting the conditions imposed in Articles 6 and 7, any management company wishing to establish a branch within the territory of another Member State to carry on the activity for which it has been authorised shall notify the competent authorities of its home Member State.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 2 a (new) Where a management company wishes to carry out the service of collective portfolio management as referred to in Annex II, the competent authorities of the management company's home Member State shall attach to the documentation an attestation that the management company has been authorised in accordance with this Directive and a description of the scope of the management company's authorisation and details of any restriction on the types of UCITS that the management company is authorised to manage.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The services provided by a branch of a management company shall comply with the rules drawn up by the management company’s host Member State in accordance with Article 14.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. The competent authorities of the management company’s host Member State are responsible for supervising compliance with the rules referred to in paragraph 3a.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 4 4. Before the branch of a management company starts business, the competent authorities of the management company's host Member State shall, within
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 - paragraph 7 - subparagraph 1 a (new) The competent authority of the management company's home Member State shall update the information contained in the attestation referred to in paragraph 3 and inform the competent authorities of the management company's host Member State whenever there is a change in the scope of the management company’s authorisation or in the details of any restriction on the types of UCITS that the management company is authorised to manage.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 1 - introductory part 1. Any management company wishing to carry on
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 The management company may then start business in the the management company's host Member State notwithstanding the provisions of
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 a (new) Where a management company wishes to carry out the service of collective portfolio management as referred to in Annex II, the competent authorities of the management company's home Member State shall enclose to the documentation an attestation that the management company has been authorised in accordance with this Directive and a description of the scope of the management company's authorisation and details of any restriction on the types of UCITS that the management company is authorised to manage.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 4 4. Should the content of the information communicated in accordance with
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 - paragraph 5 Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 a (new) Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 a (new) Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 − paragraph 2 −subparagraph 1 Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 2− − subparagraph 2 Management company's host Member States may require management companies, carrying on business within their territories under the freedom to provide services or through the establishment of a branch, to provide them with the information necessary for the monitoring of their compliance with the
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 3 3. Where the competent authorities of a management company's host Member State ascertain that a management company that has a branch or provides services within its territory is in breach of
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 5 5. If, despite the measures taken by the management company's home Member State or because such measures prove inadequate or are not available in the Member State in question, the management company persists in breaching the legal or regulatory provisions referred to in paragraph 2 in force in the management company's host Member State, the latter may, after informing the competent authorities of the management company's home Member State, take appropriate measures, including those referred to in Articles 93 and 94, to prevent or to penalise further irregularities and, insofar as necessary, to prevent that management company from initiating any further transaction within its territory. Member States shall ensure that within their territories it is possible to serve the legal documents necessary for those measures on management companies.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 6 Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 7 7. Any measure adopted pursuant to paragraphs 4
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 9 −subparagraph 1 9.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 −paragraph 10 −subparagraph 1 10. Member States shall inform the Commission of the number and type of cases in which there have been refusals pursuant to Articles 5a and 16 or measures have been taken in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 −paragraph 2 2. A depositary shall be an institution which is subject to p
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The depositary shall establish procedures that enable the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State to obtain on request all information, which the depositary has obtained while discharging its duties, and which are necessary for the competent authorities to supervise compliance of the UCITS with the requirements under this Directive.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. If the management company designated by the UCITS is situated in a Member State other than the UCITS home Member State, the depositary shall conclude a written agreement with the management company and with the branch of the management company established in the UCITS home Member State regulating inter alia the provision to the depositary of all information deemed necessary to allow it to perform the functions referred to in Articles 19 and 29.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 - paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. If the management company’s home Member State is not the UCITS home Member State, the depositary shall sign a written agreement with the management company regulating the flow of information deemed necessary to allow it to perform the functions referred to in Article 19 and in other laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are relevant for depositaries in the UCITS home Member State.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 - paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures on the measures to be taken by a depositary in order to fulfil its duties regarding a UCITS managed by a management company situated in another Member State, including the particulars that need to be included in the standard agreements to be used by the depositary and the management company as referred to in paragraph 3a. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. A depositary shall be an institution which is subject to p
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. If the management company designated by the UCITS is situated in a Member State other than the UCITS home Member State, the depositary shall conclude a written agreement with the management company and with the branch of the management company established in the UCITS home Member State regulating inter alia the provision to the depositary of all information deemed necessary to allow it to perform the functions referred to in Articles 19 and 29.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The depositary shall establish procedures that enable the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State to obtain on request all information, which the depositary has obtained while discharging its duties, and which are necessary for the competent authorities to supervise compliance of the UCITS with the requirements under this Directive.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 b (new) Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures on the measures to be taken by a depositary in order to fulfil its duties regarding a UCITS managed by a management company situated in another Member state, including the particulars that need to be included in the standard agreements to be used by the depositary and the management company as referred to in paragraph 3a.Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 1. Member States shall, subject to the conditions set out in this
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 35 – introductory part Member States shall, subject to the conditions set out in this Section and irrespective of the manner in which UCITS are constituted as set out in Article 1(3) and irrespective of their investment policies, allow for mergers between:
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the common draft terms of the proposed merger duly approved by the
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) the information on the proposed merger
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) This information shall be provided so that both the competent authorities of the merging UCITS home Member State and the competent authorities of the receiving UCITS home Member State can read them in the official language or one of the official languages of the relevant Member State, or in a language approved by the relevant competent authorities.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. The competent authorities of the merging UCITS
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 If the competent authorities of the merging or receiving UCITS home Member State consider it necessary, they may require that the information to unit-holders of
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 4 – point c (c)
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 5. The competent authorities of the merging UCITS home Member State shall inform the merging UCITS, within at the latest 30 days of the submission of a complete file as provided for in paragraph 2, whether or not the merger has been authorised.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall require that the
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory wording The common draft terms of merger shall
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) the criteria adopted for valuation of the assets and, where applicable, the liabilities on the planned effective date of the merger in accordance with Article 44(1);
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) the rules applicable for respectively the transfer of assets and the exchange of units;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point g (g) in the case of a merger pursuant to Article 34 (b), the fund rules or instruments of incorporation of the newly constituted receiving UCITS.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Competent authorities may not require that any additional information is included in the common draft terms of mergers.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 Member States shall require that the depositaries of the merging UCITS and of the receiving UCITS verify the
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the criteria adopted for valuation of the
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) where applicable, the cash payment per unit;
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the calculation method of the exchange ratio as well as the actual exchange ratio determined at the date in accordance with Article 44(1).
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The statutory auditors of the merging UCITS or the statutory auditor of the receiving UCITS shall be
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 39 – paragraph 3 3. A copy of the reports of the independent auditor, or, where applicable, the depositary shall be made available on request and free of charge to the unit- holders of both the merging UCITS and the receiving UCITS and to their respective competent authorities.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 2 Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. The information shall be provided to unit-holders of the merging UCITS and of the receiving UCITS only after the competent authorities of the merging UCITS home Member State have authorised the proposed merger under Article 36.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 It shall be provided not less than 30 days before the
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. The information to be provided to unit- holders of the merging UCITS and
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 –introductory wording It shall include
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) the background to and the rationale
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) the possible impact of the proposed merger on unit-holders, including but not limited to any material differences in respect of investment policy and strategy, costs, expected outcome, periodic reporting
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) the possible impact of the proposed merger on unit-holders, including but not limited to any material differences in respect of investment policy and strategy, costs, expected outcome, periodic reporting
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) any specific rights unit-holders have in relation to the proposed merger, including but not limited to the right to obtain additional information, the right to obtain a copy of the report of the independent auditor or the depositary on request, and the right to request the repurchase or redemption of their units without charge as specified in Article 42 and the last date for exerting that right;
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 40 – paragraph 5 5. If the merging UCITS
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 41 – paragraph 2 The first paragraph shall be without prejudice to any presence quorum provided for under national laws. Where applicable, Member States shall not impose more stringent presence quora for cross border mergers than for domestic mergers. Nor shall they impose more stringent presence quora for UCITS mergers than for mergers of corporate entities.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. The laws of Member States shall provide that unit-holders of both the merging UCITS and the receiving UCITS have the right to request, without any other charge than those retained by the fund to cover disinvestment costs, the repurchase or redemption of their units or, where possible, to convert them into units in another UCITS with similar investment policies
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. The laws of Member States shall provide that unit-holders of both the merging UCITS and the receiving UCITS have the right to request the repurchase or
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 42 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 43 Except in case where UCITS are self- managed, Member States shall ensure that any legal, advisory or administrative costs associated
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide that
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 2 Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 3 3. The entry into effect of the merger shall be made public through all appropriate means in the manner prescribed by the laws of the receiving UCITS home Member State, and notified to the competent authorities.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 – paragraph 4 Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 44 a (new) Article 44a 1. A merger carried out as laid down in point (a) of Article 34 shall have the following consequences: (a) all the assets and liabilities of the merging UCITS shall be transferred to the receiving UCITS or, where applicable, the depositary of the receiving UCITS; (b) the unit-holders of the merging UCITS shall become unit-holders of the receiving UCITS; in addition, if applicable, they are entitled to a cash payment not exceeding 10% of the net asset value of their units in the merging UCITS; (c) the merging UCITS shall cease to exist with the entry into effect of the merger. 2. A merger carried out as laid down in point (b) of Article 34 shall have the following consequences: (a) all the assets and liabilities of the merging UCITS shall be transferred to the newly constituted receiving UCITS or, where applicable, the depositary of the receiving UCITS; (b) the unit-holders of the merging UCITS shall become unit-holders of the newly constituted receiving UCITS; in addition, if applicable, they are entitled to a cash payment not exceeding 10% of the net asset value of their units in the merging UCITS; (c) the merging UCITS shall cease to exist with the entry into effect of the merger. 3. A merger carried out as laid down in point (c) of Article 34 shall have the following consequences: (a) the [net] assets of the merging UCITS shall be transferred to the receiving UCITS or, where applicable, the depositary of the receiving UCITS; (b) the unit-holders of the merging UCITS shall become unit-holders of the receiving UCITS; (c) the merging UCITS continues to exist until all remaining outstanding liabilities have been discharged. 4. Member States shall provide that a procedure is established, whereby the management company of the receiving UCITS confirms to the depositary of the receiving UCITS that transfer of assets and, where applicable, liabilities is complete. Where the receiving UCITS has not designated a management company, it will give that confirmation to the depositary of the receiving UCITS.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point g – introductory part and subpoint i g)
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c c) a UCITS may not acquire either precious metals or certificates representing them except via futures contracts traded on regulated markets.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The exposure is calculated taking into account the
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 46 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 1 1. A feeder UCITS is a UCITS
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) financial derivative instruments, which may be used only for hedging purposes, in accordance with Article 45(1)(g) and Article 46(2) and (3).
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) financial derivative instruments in accordance with Article 45(1)(g) and Article 46(2) and (3) taken into account at their accounting value.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. A master UCITS is a UCITS or an investment compartment thereof which:
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) The coordination of the laws of the Member States should be confined to UCITS other than of the closed-ended type which promote the sale of their units to the public in the Community. It is desirable that UCITS should be permitted as part of their investment objective to invest in financial instruments, other than transferable securities, which are sufficiently liquid
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Where a provision of this Directive requires a UCITS to take action, the obligation should be understood to refer to the management company where the UCITS is constituted as a common fund and where such fund has no legal personality and cannot act by itself.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) By virtue of the principle of home Member State supervision, management companies authorised in their home Member States should be permitted to carry on the services for which they have received authorisation throughout the Community by establishing branches or under the freedom to provide services.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) By virtue of the principle of home Member State supervision, management companies authorised in their home Member States should be permitted to carry on the services for which they have received authorisation throughout the Community by establishing branches
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) By virtue of the principle of home Member State supervision, management companies authorized in their home Member States should be permitted to carry on the services for which they have received authorization throughout the Community by establishing branches or under the freedom to provide services. The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State should approve the choice of the management company. Those competent authorities should not require additional conditions as regards the choice of the management company, nor should they require the management company to have its registered office in the UCITS home Member State. The management company should not be required to perform any activities in the UCITS home Member State. The approval of the fund rules of common funds/unit trusts falls within the competence of the
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) With regard to collective portfolio management (management of unit trusts/common funds and investment companies), the authorisation granted to a management company authorised in its
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The principle of home Member State supervision requires that the competent authorities should not grant or should withdraw authorisation where factors, such as the content of programmes of operations, the geographical distribution or the activities actually carried on indicate clearly that a management company has opted for the legal system of one Member State for the purpose of evading the stricter standards in force in another Member State within the territory of which it intends to carry on or does carry on the greater part of its activities. For the purpose of this Directive, a management company should be authorised in the Member State in which
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) source: PE-415.213
2008/11/13
ECON
108 amendments...
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) must have among its unit-holders at least one feeder UCITS
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that the investment of a feeder UCITS into a given master UCITS which exceeds the limit applicable under Article 50(1) for investments into other UCITS be subject to prior approval by the competent authorities of the feeder UCITS' home Member State.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the agreement between the feeder UCITS and the master UCITS or the internal conduct of business rules referred to in Article 55(1);
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) i
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 3 – point g (g) i
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. When the feeder UCITS is established in another Member State than the master UCITS, the
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. When the feeder UCITS is established in another Member State than the master UCITS, the
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 54 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall require th
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The feeder UCITS shall not invest in units of that master UCITS until the agreement referred to in subparagraph 1 has become effective. This agreement shall be available, on request and without charges, to all unit-holders.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In the event that both master and feeder UCITS are managed by the same management company or administrative body, the agreement may be replaced by internal conduct of business rules ensuring compliance with the requirements set out in paragraph 1.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 2 2. The master UCITS
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 2 2. The master UCITS and the feeder UCITS shall take appropriate measures to
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 3 3. If a master UCITS temporarily suspends the re-purchase
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) continues to be a feeder UCITS of the master UCITS or another UCITS resulting from the merger or division of the master UCITS; or
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 No merger or division of a master UCITS shall become effective, unless the master UCITS provided all of its
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 55 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Neither the depositary of the master UCITS nor that of the feeder UCITS, when complying with the requirements laid down in this Chapter, shall be in breach of any restriction on disclosure of information or of data protection imposed by contract or by any legislative, regulatory or administrative provision nor shall such behaviour involve such depositary or any person acting on its behalf in liability of any kind.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 b (new) Member States shall require that the feeder UCITS or, when applicable, the management company of the feeder UCITS shall be in charge of communicating to the depositary of the feeder UCITS any information about the master UCITS and required for the completion of the duties of the depositary of the feeder UCITS.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 56 – paragraph 2 2. The depositary of the master UCITS shall immediately inform the competent authorities of the master UCITS, the feeder UCITS or, where applicable, the management company and the depositary of the feeder UCITS about any irregularities it detects with regard to the master UCITS which are deemed to have a negative impact on the feeder UCITS.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 56 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the particulars that need to be included in the agreement referred to in paragraph
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall require that, if the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS have different auditors, these auditors enter into an information-sharing agreement in order to ensure the fulfilment of the duties of both auditors, including the arrangements taken to comply with the requirements of paragraph 2.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. In its audit report, the auditor of the feeder UCITS shall take into account the audit report of the master UCITS. If the feeder UCITS and the master UCITS do not have the same accounting year, the auditor of the master UCITS shall make an ad hoc report on the same closing date as the closing date of the feeder UCITS.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Neither the auditor of the master UCITS nor that of the feeder UCITS, when complying with the requirements laid down in this Chapter, shall be in breach of any restriction on disclosure of information or of data protection imposed by contract or by any legislative, regulatory or administrative provision nor shall such behaviour involve such auditor or any person acting on its behalf in liability of any kind.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 57 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission may adopt implementing measures specifying the
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) a summary of the agreement entered into between the feeder UCITS and the master UCITS or of the internal conduct of business rules pursuant to Article 55(1);
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point g Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 4 4. A feeder UCITS shall disclose in any relevant marketing communications that it
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. A paper copy of the prospectus, annual and half-yearly report of the master shall be delivered by the feeder UCITS to investors upon their request, free of charge.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) the date when the feeder UCITS is to start to invest into the master UCITS or, if it has already invested into the master, the date when its investment is to exceed the limit applicable under Article 50(1);
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) a statement that the unit-holders have the right to request the re-purchase or redemption of their units
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be provided not less than 30 days before the date
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the feeder UCITS does not invest into the units of the given master UCITS in excess of the limit applicable under Article 50(1) before the period of 30 days referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 has elapsed.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Article 59 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Article 60 – paragraph 3 3. Where,
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Article 62 – paragraph 1 1. If the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS are established in the same Member State, the competent authorities shall immediately inform the feeder UCITS and, when they deem it necessary, the other unit-holders, of any decision, measure, observation of non-compliance with the conditions of this Chapter or of any information reported pursuant to Article 101(1) with regard to the master UCITS or, where applicable, its management company, depositary or auditor.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Article 62 – paragraph 2 2. If the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS are established in different Member States, the competent authorities of the master UCITS' home Member State shall immediately communicate any decision, measure, observation of non-compliance with the conditions of this Chapter or information reported pursuant to Article 101(1) with regard to the master UCITS or, where applicable, its management company, depositary or auditor, to the competent authorities of the feeder UCITS' home Member State
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Article 69 UCITS shall send their prospectus and any amendments thereto, as well as their annual and half-yearly reports, to the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State. UCITS shall provide this documentation to the competent authorities of the management company’s home Member State on request.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Article 70 – paragraph 2 2. The prospectus may be provided in a durable medium or by means of a website. A paper copy shall be provided to the investors on request, free of charge. Or. en The prospectus may be provided in a durable medium or in electronic form
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 70 – paragraph 3 3. The annual and half-yearly reports shall be available to investors in the manner specified in the prospectus and in the key investor information referred to in Article 73. A paper copy of the annual and half- yearly reports shall be delivered to the investors on request, free of charge.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Article 72 All marketing communications to investors shall be clearly identifiable as such. They shall be fair, clear and not misleading
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company draw up a short document containing key in
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part 3. Key investor information shall
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point -a (new) (-a) identification of the UCITS;
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) past performance presentation or, where relevant, performance scenarios;
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 5 5. Key investor information shall be written in a brief manner and in non- technical national language. It shall be drawn up in a common format, allowing for comparison of all essential elements, and shall be presented in a way that is likely to be understood by retail investors.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) the detailed and exhaustive content of the key investor information to be provided to investors as referred to under paragraphs 2,3 and 4;
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) the detailed and exhaustive content of the key investor information to be provided to investors in the following specific cases:
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point v Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 73 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point vi (vi) for structured, capital protected and other comparable UCITS, the key investor information to be provided to investors
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company, which sells UCITS directly or through a tied agent to investors,
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company, which sells UCITS directly or through a
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company, which does not sell UCITS directly or through a
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company, which does not sell UCITS directly or through a tied agent to investors,
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall require that an investment company and, for each of the common funds it manages, a management company, which does not sell UCITS directly or through a tied agent to investors, delivers key investor information to product manufacturers and intermediaries selling or advising investors on potential investments in such UCITS or in products offering exposure to such UCITS, so as to enable them to
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 2a (new) 2a. The competent authorities of each Member State shall make available to the public, in a dedicated section of their website, key investor information concerning all UCITS constituted and authorized in that Member State.
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Article 75 – paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Key investor information shall be provided to investors free of charge.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allow investment companies and, for each of the common funds they manage, management companies, to
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Article 76 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allow investment companies and, for each of the common funds they manage, management companies, to deliver key investor information in a durable medium or by means of a website. A paper copy shall be delivered free of charge to the investor.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 77 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall adopt implementing measures specifying rules on the updating timeframe and ways to provide the update key investor information to investors.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Article 84 Neither: (a) an investment company, nor (b) a management company or depositary acting on behalf of a common fund may carry out uncovered sales of transferable securities, money market instruments or other financial instruments referred to in Article 45 (1)(e)
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Article 86 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that complete information on the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which do not fall within the field governed by this Directive and which are
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 86 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. For the purpose of this Chapter, a UCITS shall mean a UCITS or an investment compartment thereof.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. If a UCITS proposes to market its units in a Member State other than
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The notification letter shall include information on arrangements made for marketing of units of the UCITS in th
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit the complete documentation referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later tha
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit the complete documentation referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later tha
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit the complete documentation referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later tha
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall transmit the complete documentation referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the competent authorities of the Member State in which the UCITS proposes to market its units, no later tha
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the notification letter as referred to in paragraph 1 and the attestation as referred to in paragraph 3 are provided in a language customary in the sphere of international finance
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 6 For the purpose of the notification procedure set out in this Article, the competent authorities of the Member State in which a UCITS proposes to market its units shall not request
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 7 7. The UCITS home Member State shall ensure that the competent authorities of the UCITS host Member State have access, by electronic means, to the documents referred to in paragraph 2 and, if applicable, to any translations thereof
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Article 88 – paragraph 8 8. In the event of a change in the information regarding the
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Article 90 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 92 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall designate the competent authorities which are to carry out the duties provided for in this Directive. They shall inform the Commission thereof, indicating any division of duties.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Article 92 – paragraph 3 3. The authorities of the UCITS home Member State shall be competent to supervise that UCITS including, where relevant, pursuant to Article 17a. However, the authorities of the UCITS host Member State shall be competent to supervise compliance with the provisions falling outside the field governed by the Directive and requirements set out in Articles 87 and 89.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Article 93 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) require the suspension of the issue, repurchase or redemption of units in the interest of the unit holders or of the public;
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 94 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall lay down the rules on measures and penalties applicable to infringements of
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Article 94 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide that the competent authorities may disclose to the public any measure or sanction that will be imposed for infringement of the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive, unless such disclosure would seriously jeopardise the financial markets, be detrimental to the interests of investors or cause disproportionate damage to the
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Article 96 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Member
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Article 96 – paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Where a competent authority has good reasons to suspect that acts contrary to this Directive, carried out by entities not subject to its supervision, are being or have been carried out on the territory of another Member State, it shall notify this in a manner as specific as possible to the competent authority of the other Member State. The latter authority shall take appropriate action. It shall inform the notifying competent authority of the outcome of the action and, to the extent possible, of significant interim developments. This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the competences of the competent authority that has forwarded the information.
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Article 96 – paragraph 8a (new) 8a. For the purpose of ensuring adequate supervision of the UCITS, the depositary and the management company Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities have the power to conclude bilateral and multilateral co-operation agreements with other competent authorities of the Member States that may involve mutual delegation of supervisory tasks. Such agreements may involve one or more competent authorities sharing supervision tasks over UCITS which are managed under the freedom to provide services or through branches, depositaries and management companies.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Article 97 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1a (new) Competent authorities exchanging information with other competent authorities under this Directive may indicate at the time of communication that such information must not be disclosed without their express agreement, in which case such information may be exchanged solely for the purposes for which those authorities gave their agreement.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Article 97 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part 5. Paragraphs 1 and 4 shall not preclude the exchange of information
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Article 102 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authorities shall give reasons for any decision to refuse authorisation, and any negative decision taken in implementation of the general measures adopted in application of this Directive, in writing and communicate them to applicants.
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 102 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide that any decision
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 2 2. Any decision to withdraw authorisation, or any other serious measure taken against a UCITS, or any issue, suspension of re- purchase or redemption imposed upon it, shall be communicated without delay by the authorities of the UCITS home Member State to the authorities of the UCITS host Member States and, if the management company of a UCITS is situated in another Member State, to the competent authorities of the management company’s home Member State.
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The competent authorities of the management company’s home Member State and those of the UCITS home Member State shall, respectively, have the ability to take action against the management company if it infringes rules under their respective responsibility.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part 4. If, despite the measures taken by the competent authorities of the UCITS home Member State or because such measures prove inadequate, or because the UCITS home Member State fails to act within a reasonable timeframe, the UCITS persists in acting in a manner that is clearly prejudicial to the interests of the UCITS host Member State's investors, the competent authorities of the UCITS host Member State, may take consequently either of the following actions:
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) if necessary, bring the matter to the attention of the Committee of European Securities Regulators.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that within their territories it is legally possible to serve the legal documents necessary for the measures which may be taken by the UCITS host Member State on UCITS pursuant to paragraphs 2 to 4.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Article 103 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The Commission may adopt implementing measures specifying the modalities for the service of documents by the UCITS home Member State authority in the home Member State of the management company. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 107(2).
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Article 104 – paragraph 2 2. Insofar as it is necessary for the purpose of exercising their powers of supervision, the competent authorities of the management company's home Member State shall be informed by the competent authorities of the management company's host Member State of any measures taken by the management company's host Member State pursuant to Article 18 (6) which involve measures and penalties imposed on a management company or restrictions on a management company's activities.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 104 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The competent authorities of the management company's home Member State shall notify, without delay, the competent authority of the UCITS home Member State of any problems identified at the level of the management company and which would affect the ability of the management company to properly perform its duties with respect to the fund and any breaches of the requirements under Chapter III. .
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Article 104 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The competent authorities of the UCITS's home Member State shall notify, without delay, the competent authority of the management company’s home Member State of any problems identified at the level of the UCITS and which may affect the ability of the management company to properly perform its duties and comply with applicable rules.
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 111 – paragraph 2 a (new) References to the simplified prospectus shall be construed as references to the key investor information referred to in Article 73.
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Article 112 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall adopt and publish by July 2010 at the latest, the implementing measures as provided by Articles 12, 14, 20, 30, 46 and 73.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – schedule A – point 1 – middle column 1. Information concerning the management company including an indication whether the management company is domiciled in another Member State than in the UCITS home Member State
source: PE-415.264
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdf |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-414023_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16495&j=0&l=en
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0153&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0153&appLng=EN |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD) Amended by 2020/0268(COD) Amended by 2021/0219(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD)
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2263/COM_SEC(2008)2263_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2263/COM_SEC(2008)2263_EN.pdf |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.228New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.228 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.213New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.213 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.264New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.264 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.023&secondRef=02
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0497_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0497_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090113&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090113&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 85/611/EEC Repealing Directive 88/220/EEC Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD) Amended by 2018/0171(COD)
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2263/COM_SEC(2008)2263_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2263/COM_SEC(2008)2263_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2264/COM_SEC(2008)2264_EN.pdf |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-497&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0497_EN.html |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0458/COM_COM(2008)0458_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0458/COM_COM(2008)0458_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-497&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0497_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-12New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0012_EN.html |
events/12/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:SOM:EN:HTML |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0458/COM_COM(2008)0458_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0458/COM_COM(2008)0458_EN.pdf |
events/12/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:TOC |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 85/611/EEC Repealing Directive 88/220/EEC Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD) Amended by 2018/0171(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 88/220/EEC Repealing Directive 85/611/EEC Repealing Directive 2001/107/EC 1998/0242(COD) Repealing Directive 2001/108/EC 1998/0243(COD) Repealing Directive 2008/18/EC 2006/0293(COD) Amended by 2009/0064(COD) Amended by 2009/0161(COD) Amended by 2011/0360(COD) Amended by 2012/0168(COD) Amended by 2015/0226(COD) Amended by 2018/0041(COD) Amended by 2018/0043(COD) Amended by 2018/0171(COD)
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/6/66063New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0065New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009L0065 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/11/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:302:TOC |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/summary/4 |
Repealing Directive 2000/64/EC, Art 1
|
procedure/summary/7 |
Repealing Directive 2005/1/EC, Art 9
|
procedure/summary/11 |
Repealing Directive 95/26/EC, Art 1, Art 4, Art 5
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|