Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | PACK Doris ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 26, with 34 abstentions, a resolution on the Bologna Process and student mobility.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education.
The Parliament considers that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010. It stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies.
Student mobility : Quality and Efficiency : the Parliament insists on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. It calls on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and calls on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, the Parliament considers it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. It emphasises the poor mobility towards the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007. It also highlights the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages.
Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : the Parliament calls on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. It considers, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. It also calls for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives.
Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : the Parliament calls for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. It suggests the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. It also calls on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. The Parliament considers it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, the Parliament points out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. It invites European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate). The Parliament also welcomes the fact that, in the context of the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework provided for in the Declaration attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, increasing the financial envelope allocated to the programmes in the field of education and notably for Erasmus grants could be considered, subject to the results of monitoring and evaluation of the programme.
Quality and full recognition of diplomas : the Parliament calls on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. It stresses, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thank s to a single common framework. The Parliament emphasises that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. It considers, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. It also stresses that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula.
Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, the Parliament urges Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the report by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on the Bologna Process and student mobility, considering that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010.
The report stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies.
Student mobility: Quality and Efficiency : MEPs insist on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. They call on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and call on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, MEPs consider it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. They emphasise the poor mobility towards the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007. MEPs also point out the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages.
Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : MEPs call on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. MEPs consider, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. They also call for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives.
Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : MEPs call for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. They suggest the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. They also call on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. MEPs consider it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, MEPs point out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. They invite European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate).
Quality and full recognition of diplomas : MEPs call on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. They stress, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thanks to a single common framework. MEPs emphasise that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. They consider, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. They also stress that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula.
Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, MEPs urge Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6487
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0423/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0302/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0302/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.619
- Committee opinion: PE405.729
- Committee draft report: PE404.721
- Committee draft report: PE404.721
- Committee opinion: PE405.729
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.619
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0302/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6487
Activities
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Roberta Alma ANASTASE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doris PACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mihaela POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Pack A6-0302/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
61 |
2008/2070(INI)
2008/06/12
CULT
61 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the Council Resolution on modernising universities for Europe's competitiveness in a global knowledge economy of 23 November 2007,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas particular attention should be paid to the appropriate funding of students' learning, living costs and mobility and whereas the economic burden of mobility is considerably higher for most of the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas recognition of informal and
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas mobility encourages foreign language learning and the improvement of overall communication skills,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the quality of teaching is as important as the quality of research and must be reformed and modernised throughout the European Union,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the quality of teaching is as important as the quality of research and whereas these two dimensions are closely linked,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas different national recognition systems constitute an important obstacle to equal treatment of students and to progress in the European Higher Education Area and the European labour market,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas mobility can be hindered by both the failure to give full and proper recognition for courses attended and the lack of equivalence of grades obtained,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas it is urgent to implement, coordinate and promote a coherent Community approach among all countries that signed the Bologna Process,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 b (new) - having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 13 and 14 March 2008,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas the Bologna Process must create a new progressive model of education, guaranteeing access to training for all, the principal objective being to transmit knowledge and values, creating a sustainable society for the future which is self-aware and free of social imbalances,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority in the context of redefining the major goals of the Bologna Process beyond 2010;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas in order to combat any form of discrimination; various aspects concerning mobility go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is convinced that the consultation method undertaken by all stakeholders involved in the process should continue: institutions as well as student representatives should closely co-operate in order to tackle the remaining barriers to mobility and problems related to quality and the implementation of the Bologna Process;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that while implementing the Bologna Process particular attention should
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Insists on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socioeconomic profile of students, such as common indicators, criteria and benchmarks, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Supports the creation of a European Student Agency, in order to offer all kinds of information and consultancy services regarding mobility, certificates, diplomas, credits, youth NGOs and organizations;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on universities to improve the quality of the information provided, both for incoming and outgoing students; universities and Erasmus National Agencies should collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. Universities should support student rights, in line with the commitments they have made by adhering to the Erasmus University Charter;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on universities to improve
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the mobility of students
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that in order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objectives, reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars is necessary; underlines the disproportion in current trends and in particular the poor mobility towards the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Suggests the drawing up of a European Student Guide that universities in all Member States should provide to each student at the beginning of the first year of study, consisting of a database containing details of the providers of higher level education at third level, such as faculties and departments, using the same number of credits for the same qualifications;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Points out the importance of mentoring for social
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses th
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses the importance of mandatory intensive language courses being offered to incoming students, either before, and/or during Erasmus study periods;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on European universities to undertake an innovative and far-reaching curricular reform: an ambitious content and organisation restructuring is crucial for student mobility; a «mobility study period » should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on European universities to undertake an innovative
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for emphasis to be given to the need for joint European doctoral programmes promoting doctoral student mobility and the creation of a framework for a European doctorate;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the essential role of the quality and excellence of teaching: qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial for their attractiveness and effectiveness and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Reiterates the need for more trans- national dialogue and exchange of information and experiences to facilitate a convergence of teacher education including primary teacher education and the effectiveness of continuing professional development;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas student mobility forms new cultural, social and academic values, promotes diversity and dialogue and creates opportunities for personal growth
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Suggests the creation, in each Member State, of a Centre for Innovation and Creativity within the EU, in order to bring together young students from all over the European Union in creative and innovative programmes and activities that will promote excellence;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for special assistance to be
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Suggests the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card, in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Member States and the competent authorities to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations; considers it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Member States and the competent authorities to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations and for those students who need it;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12a (new) 12a. Welcomes the fact that in the context of the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial framework foreseen by the Declaration attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006, strengthening of the financial envelope foreseen for the programmes in the field of education and notably for Erasmus grants could be considered;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12a (new) 12a. Suggests the introduction, in all Member States, of a European Transport Card for students, with a yearly limited amount of money, to be used on land - based transport, throughout the European Union;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Points out that new means of financing student mobility such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans should be introduced and promoted, so as to eliminate discrimination caused by lack of funding;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Points out that the possibility of introducing new means of financing student mobility such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans should be
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Invites European universities to cooperate with the private sector (e.g. economic or business organisations such as chambers of commerce) in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor- master-doctorate), thereby improving the quality of educational systems;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas student mobility
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission and the Member
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of a European legal framework (e.g. quality assurance and recognition of degrees and study periods) in order to establish the European Higher Education Area within its terms of reference as defined by the provisions of Articles 149 and 150 of the Treaty and fully respecting national competence in this area;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage universities to propose graduate and postgraduate courses which do not require knowledge that could only have been obtained through the national education system, such as on history or national law, so as to prevent any discrimination between national and foreign students, even in specific areas such as law;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Stresses, therefore, the urgency of
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Underlines that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles; for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Emphasises that the full recognition of diplomas and an effective credit transfer system should be accompanied by the full recognition of courses attended and full equivalence of grades obtained in European universities by means of coherent and non-discriminatory criteria;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Urges Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned in line with EU Directives on visas;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas mobility fosters innovation, creative thinking and the promotion of best practices,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Recommends the creation of a permanent forum for meetings between the relevant committees of the European Parliament and the parliaments of the Member States, with the task of following up and exchanging experiences regarding the development of the Bologna Process;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Urges Member States to find a solution for the students of universities of the Turkish Cypriot community to facilitate their participation in student exchange programs such as Erasmus program. Although citizens of the Turkish community of Cyprus are officially seen as EU citizens they cannot take part in those programs;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas student mobility is still beyond the reach of many students, researchers and other staff,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas student mobility is still beyond the reach of many students, researchers and other staff, especially in the newer Member States even though the obstacles are well known, and have been indicated repeatedly by many stakeholders involved in the debate,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas no student should be excluded from mobility for lack of funding and particular attention should therefore be paid to the appropriate funding of students' learning, living costs and mobility,
source: PE-407.619
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-405729_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=1&l=en |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.721New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.721 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.619New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.619 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080922&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-423New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0423_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/6/41837New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
The Bologna Process and student mobilityNew
Bologna process and student mobility |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|