BETA


2008/2070(INI) Bologna process and student mobility

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT PACK Doris (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion BUDG IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/01/29
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/10/17
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/09/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/09/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 26, with 34 abstentions, a resolution on the Bologna Process and student mobility.

The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education.

The Parliament considers that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010. It stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies.

Student mobility : Quality and Efficiency : the Parliament insists on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. It calls on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and calls on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, the Parliament considers it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. It emphasises the poor mobility towards the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007. It also highlights the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages.

Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : the Parliament calls on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. It considers, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. It also calls for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives.

Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : the Parliament calls for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. It suggests the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. It also calls on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. The Parliament considers it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, the Parliament points out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. It invites European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate). The Parliament also welcomes the fact that, in the context of the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework provided for in the Declaration attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, increasing the financial envelope allocated to the programmes in the field of education and notably for Erasmus grants could be considered, subject to the results of monitoring and evaluation of the programme.

Quality and full recognition of diplomas : the Parliament calls on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. It stresses, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thank s to a single common framework. The Parliament emphasises that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. It considers, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. It also stresses that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula.

Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, the Parliament urges Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.

Documents
2008/09/23
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/09/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/07/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/07/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/06/24
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the report by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on the Bologna Process and student mobility, considering that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010.

The report stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies.

Student mobility: Quality and Efficiency : MEPs insist on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. They call on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and call on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, MEPs consider it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. They emphasise the poor mobility towards the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007. MEPs also point out the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages.

Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : MEPs call on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. MEPs consider, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. They also call for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives.

Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : MEPs call for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. They suggest the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. They also call on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. MEPs consider it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, MEPs point out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. They invite European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate).

Quality and full recognition of diplomas : MEPs call on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. They stress, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thanks to a single common framework. MEPs emphasise that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. They consider, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. They also stress that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula.

Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, MEPs urge Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.

2008/06/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/05/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/04/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/03/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/03/12
   EP - IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2006/09/11
   EP - PACK Doris (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT

Documents

Votes

Rapport Pack A6-0302/2008 - résolution #

2008/09/23 Outcome: +: 592, 0: 34, -: 26
DE FR IT ES PL RO NL HU CZ PT BG FI BE AT EL LT GB SE IE SK LV DK SI EE MT LU CY
Total
83
64
58
47
45
32
26
20
21
19
14
14
19
13
21
12
56
17
11
10
9
13
7
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
250

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
162

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
39

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
26

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
61 2008/2070(INI)
2008/06/12 CULT 61 amendments...
source: PE-407.619

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-405729_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=0&l=en
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=1&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.721
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.721
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.619
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.619
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2008-07-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html title: A6-0302/2008
events/2
date
2008-07-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html title: A6-0302/2008
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE
events/5
date
2008-09-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0423_EN.html title: T6-0423/2008
summary
events/5
date
2008-09-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0423_EN.html title: T6-0423/2008
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: PACK Doris date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PACK Doris group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-03-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0302_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-423
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0423_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0302/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15349&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-423 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0423/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Education, Youth, Sport and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PACK Doris group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2008-03-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-03-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris
docs
  • date: 2008-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.721 title: PE404.721 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.729&secondRef=03 title: PE405.729 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.619 title: PE407.619 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN title: A6-0302/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)6073 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15349&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)6487 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the report by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on the Bologna Process and student mobility, considering that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010. The report stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies. Student mobility: Quality and Efficiency : MEPs insist on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. They call on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and call on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, MEPs consider it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. They emphasise the poor mobility towards the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007. MEPs also point out the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages. Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : MEPs call on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. MEPs consider, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. They also call for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives. Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : MEPs call for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. They suggest the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. They also call on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. MEPs consider it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, MEPs point out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. They invite European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate). Quality and full recognition of diplomas : MEPs call on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. They stress, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thanks to a single common framework. MEPs emphasise that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. They consider, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. They also stress that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula. Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, MEPs urge Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN title: A6-0302/2008
  • date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15349&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-423 title: T6-0423/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 26, with 34 abstentions, a resolution on the Bologna Process and student mobility. The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Doris PACK (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education. The Parliament considers that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority of the Bologna Process beyond 2010. It stresses that, in order to achieve student mobility, actions must be taken across different policy areas, so that mobility can go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies. Student mobility : Quality and Efficiency : the Parliament insists on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices. It calls on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line to students, and calls on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time. In order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objective, the Parliament considers it necessary to reiterate the principle of reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars. It emphasises the poor mobility towards the Member States which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007. It also highlights the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students as well as the real need to improve their command of languages. Higher education reform and modernisation of universities : the Parliament calls on European universities to undertake curricular reform with regards to both content and organisation, providing for greater flexibility. It considers, in particular, that a ‘ mobility study period ’ should be introduced in all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad. It also calls for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate and for all efforts to be made to promote the quality and excellence of teaching. In this respect, the presence of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies, their development and ongoing training are crucial aspects for the effectiveness of higher education and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives. Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension : the Parliament calls for special assistance to be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation. It suggests the introduction of a single European Student Identification Card , in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and subsistence. It also calls on the Member States to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high cost destinations. The Parliament considers it essential for students to receive this support before their departure to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them. At the same time, the Parliament points out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and/or transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted. It invites European universities to cooperate with the private sector in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility at each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate). The Parliament also welcomes the fact that, in the context of the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework provided for in the Declaration attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, increasing the financial envelope allocated to the programmes in the field of education and notably for Erasmus grants could be considered, subject to the results of monitoring and evaluation of the programme. Quality and full recognition of diplomas : the Parliament calls on both the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area. It stresses, in particular, the urgency of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system (ECTS), bearing in mind that students and scholars qualifications should be easily transferable throughout Europe thank s to a single common framework. The Parliament emphasises that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles. It considers, for example, that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates. It also stresses that internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities should be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula. Bologna Process implementation in all countries concerned : lastly, the Parliament urges Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce their cost for mobile students, especially as far as Eastern European Member and Candidate States are concerned.
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/6/41837
New
  • CULT/6/41837
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.40.01 European area for education, training and lifelong learning
  • 4.40.06 Teachers, trainers, pupils, students
  • 4.40.20 Cooperation and agreements in the fields of education, training and youth
New
4.40.01
European area for education, training and lifelong learning
4.40.06
Teachers, trainers, pupils, students
4.40.20
Cooperation and agreements in the fields of education, training and youth
procedure/title
Old
The Bologna Process and student mobility
New
Bologna process and student mobility
activities
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-302&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0302/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080922&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15349&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-423 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0423/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: IACOB-RIDZI Monica Maria
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PACK Doris
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/6/41837
reference
2008/2070(INI)
title
The Bologna Process and student mobility
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject