BETA


Events

2011/05/02
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2010/11/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/11/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 531 votes to 18, with 44 abstentions, a resolution on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements.

Recalling that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, the Union’s external action, of which trade is an integral part, should be guided by the same principles as those which inspired its creation, Parliament calls for the European Union’s future trade strategy not to envisage trade as an end in itself, but as a tool for the promotion of European values and commercial interests and as an instrument for fair trade that can bring into general practice the effective inclusion and implementation of social and environmental standards. They consider that the EU should adopt an approach in its negotiations which is positive, yet also legally binding , in its negotiation of trade agreements.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in multilateral trade relations : Parliament hopes for greater cooperation at multinational level between the WTO and the main United Nations institutions in the human rights field. The expertise of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expertise could be taken into account within WTO panels and the appeals body when cases of serious breaches of human rights are observed. In parallel, Members underline that closer cooperation with the ILO (International Labour Office) is essential. In this regard, they propose a series of measures to strengthen the role of the ILO within the WTO (for example, by granting observer status to ILO members within the WTO). Furthermore, Parliament considers that the Human Rights Council's universal periodic review should be a useful tool to monitor compliance with human rights provisions in international trade agreements.

More generally, Parliament reaffirms that the objectives of maintaining and preserving an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trade system on the one hand, and protecting the environment and promoting sustainable development on the other hand, should be mutually supportive. Mechanisms exist for this purpose, in particular within the WTO, to bring together commercial interests and environmental imperatives. In this regard, Parliament calls for:

the improved access to green goods and technologies to achieve sustainable development objectives; a rapid conclusion to the negotiations on reducing or removing tariff and non-tariff barriers for environmental goods and services, in order to promote new forms of employment policies and the creation of jobs meeting ILO decent work standards; progress in the negotiations concerning the relationship between existing WTO rules and specific trade obligations set out in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs); conclusion of the negotiation of a multilateral climate agreement, and in the meantime, the introduction, on the European side, for those industries that are actually exposed to carbon leakage, of a ‘carbon inclusion mechanism’ that complies with WTO rules, which would make it possible to combat the risk of CO2 emissions being transferred to third countries; once the international agreement on the climate has been negotiated and signed, that a genuine World Environmental Organisation be set up to enforce application of the commitments.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in bilateral trade agreements : Parliament firmly supports the practice of including legally binding human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements. These clauses must also be included in all trade and sectoral agreements, with a clear and precise consultation mechanism modelled on Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. The same approach of systematic inclusion should also be applied to the chapters on sustainable development in bilateral agreements. Noting that future trade agreements may be concluded against the background of the current financial crisis, Members consider that this must not mean neglecting social and environmental standards in order to achieve other goals. They call on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social and environmental standards that include:

a list of minimum standards including the ILO’s eight Core Labour Standards and, with regard to the environment and respect for human rights, the list of conventions on the environment and the principles of good governance as set out in the European regulation on the scheme of generalised tariff preferences; a list of other conventions that should be implemented gradually and flexibly, taking account of developments in the economic, social and environmental situation of the partner concerned (corresponding to the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda).

Parliament demands that all future trade agreements provide for a ban on the exploitation of child labour , in particular in the extraction and processing of natural stone, and include a uniform European certification system which ensures that imported natural stone and natural stone products have been demonstrably produced along the entire value chain without the exploitation of child labour. It stresses that respect for these standards must be understood to include their ratification, their incorporation into national law and their effective implementation throughout the country's territory.

It also underlines the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreement. Members propose an open and inclusive approach at all phases whether that of the impact assessment: on sustainable development up to and including the phase of regular reporting on the general progress of implementation of the commitments. They also consider that national parliaments as well as civil society should be involved in trade negotiations and in the monitoring of the implementation of agreements.

More generally, Members call for EU trade agreements effectively to provide for the highest levels of transparency , stringent public procurement standards and country-by-country reporting by businesses in both developed and developing countries, with a view to combating illicit capital flight. They urge the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources. Agreements should, in particular, include provisions in regard to the purchase and ownership of land in least developed and developing countries.

As regards the settlement of disputes , Members call for new procedures, such as a complaints procedure open to the social partners, the establishment of appropriate bodies to settle disputes relating to social or environmental problems, or a dispute settlement mechanism with provision for fines or temporary suspension of certain trade benefits provided for under the agreement.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in unilateral trade relations: GSP and GSP+ : Parliament underlines that, to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation. It therefore hopes to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity. The Commission must launch investigations if consistent evidence indicates that some countries are not implementing the conventions in question, and where appropriate withdraw the preferences. Parliament considers that a closer link could be established between human rights clauses and GSP+ in European Union agreements with non-member states.

They also call for:

the Commission to be encouraged, during the process of reviewing the GSP system, to ensure that the countries that benefit from it most are those that are most in need, and to simplify the rules of origin so that countries that benefit from the Everything But Arms initiative and the GSP+ system may derive maximum benefit from the preferences granted; the full involvement of Parliament in drawing up the list of beneficiaries of GSP+ and the launch of investigations and the temporary suspension of GSP+; a proposal for a regulation banning the import into the EU of goods produced using modern forms of slavery , forced labour, especially forced labour of particularly vulnerable groups.

Lastly, Parliament insists on being kept informed during the negotiation of international trade agreements and, in the light of the Lisbon Treaty, that Parliament’s representatives be granted observer status, enabling them to attend meetings and to access relevant documents.

Documents
2010/11/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2010/11/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2010/11/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2010/11/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2010/10/26
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements.

Trade strategy as a means to promote European values: recalling that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, the Union’s external action, of which trade is an integral part, should be guided by the same principles as those which inspired its creation, Members call, therefore, for the European Union’s future trade strategy not to envisage trade as an end in itself, but as a tool for the promotion of European values and commercial interests and as an instrument for fair trade that can bring into general practice the effective inclusion and implementation of social and environmental standards. They consider that the EU should adopt an approach in its negotiations which is positive, yet also legally binding , in its negotiation of trade agreements.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in multilateral trade relations: Members hope for greater cooperation at multinational level between the WTO and the main United Nations institutions in the human rights field. The expertise of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expertise could be taken into account within WTO panels and the appeals body when cases of serious breaches of human rights are observed. In parallel, Members underline that closer cooperation with the ILO (International Labour Office) is essential. In this regard, they propose a series of measures to strengthen the role of the ILO within the WTO (for example, by granting observer status to ILO members within the WTO).

More generally, Members reaffirm that the objectives of maintaining and preserving an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trade system on the one hand, and protecting the environment and promoting sustainable development on the other hand, should be mutually supportive. Mechanisms exist for this purpose, in particular within the WTO, to bring together commercial interests and environmental imperatives. In this regard, Members call for:

a rapid conclusion to the negotiations on reducing or removing tariff and non-tariff barriers for environmental goods and services, in order to promote new forms of employment policies and the creation of jobs meeting ILO decent work standards; progress in the negotiations concerning the relationship between existing WTO rules and specific trade obligations set out in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs); conclusion of the negotiation of a multilateral climate agreement, and in the meantime, the introduction, on the European side, for those industries that are actually exposed to carbon leakage, of a ‘carbon inclusion mechanism’ that complies with WTO rules, which would make it possible to combat the risk of CO2 emissions being transferred to third countries; once the international agreement on the climate has been negotiated and signed, that a genuine World Environmental Organisation be set up to enforce application of the commitments.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in bilateral trade agreements: Members firmly support the practice of including legally binding human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements. These clauses must also be included in all trade and sectoral agreements, with a clear and precise consultation mechanism modelled on Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. The same approach of systematic inclusion should also be applied to the chapters on sustainable development in bilateral agreements. Noting that future trade agreements may be concluded against the background of the current financial crisis, Members consider that this must not mean neglecting social and environmental standards in order to achieve other goals. They call on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social and environmental standards that include:

a list of minimum standards including the ILO’s eight Core Labour Standards and, with regard to the environment and respect for human rights, the list of conventions on the environment and the principles of good governance as set out in the European regulation on the scheme of generalised tariff preferences; a list of other conventions that should be implemented gradually and flexibly, taking account of developments in the economic, social and environmental situation of the partner concerned (corresponding to the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda).

Members demand that all future trade agreements provide for a ban on the exploitation of child labour , in particular in the extraction and processing of natural stone, and include a uniform European certification system which ensures that imported natural stone and natural stone products have been demonstrably produced along the entire value chain without the exploitation of child labour.

They also underline the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreement . They propose an open and inclusive approach at all phases whether that of the impact assessment: on sustainable development up to and including the phase of regular reporting on the general progress of implementation of the commitments. They also consider that national parliaments as well as civil society should be involved in trade negotiations and in the monitoring of the implementation of agreements.

More generally, Members call for EU trade agreements effectively to provide for the highest levels of transparency, stringent public procurement standards and country-by-country reporting by businesses in both developed and developing countries, with a view to combating illicit capital flight. They urge the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources. Agreements should, in particular, include provisions in regard to the purchase and ownership of land in least developed and developing countries.

As regards the settlement of disputes , Members call for new procedures, such as a complaints procedure open to the social partners, the establishment of appropriate bodies to settle disputes relating to social or environmental problems, or a dispute settlement mechanism with provision for fines or temporary suspension of certain trade benefits provided for under the agreement.

Human rights and social and environmental standards in unilateral trade relations: GSP and GSP+ : Members underline that, to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation. They therefore hope to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity. The Commission must launch investigations if consistent evidence indicates that some countries are not implementing the conventions in question, and where appropriate withdraw the preferences. Members consider that a closer link could be established between human rights clauses and GSP+ in European Union agreements with non-member states.

They also call for:

the simplification of the rules of origin so that countries that benefit from the Everything But Arms initiative and the GSP+ system may derive maximum benefit from the preferences granted; the full involvement of Parliament in drawing up the list of beneficiaries of GSP+ and the launch of investigations and the temporary suspension of GSP+; a proposal for a regulation banning the import into the EU of goods produced using modern forms of slavery, forced labour, especially forced labour of particularly vulnerable groups.

Lastly, Members call for Parliament to be kept informed during the negotiation pf international trade agreements and, in the light of the Lisbon Treaty, that Parliament’s representatives be granted observer status, enabling them to attend meetings and to access relevant documents.

2010/10/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/10/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/10/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/09/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/05/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/04/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/02/12
   EP - ULMER Thomas (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2010/01/21
   EP - MARTIN David (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2009/12/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2009/12/17
   EP - HOWITT Richard (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2009/12/14
   EP - KACZMAREK Filip (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2009/09/29
   EP - SAÏFI Tokia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
176 2009/2219(INI)
2010/02/26 EMPL 34 amendments...
source: PE-439.178
2010/03/29 ENVI 24 amendments...
source: PE-440.039
2010/05/19 AFET 39 amendments...
source: PE-441.077
2010/10/06 INTA 64 amendments...
source: PE-450.633
2010/10/07 DEVE 15 amendments...
source: PE-450.658

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/2/rapporteur
  • name: KACZMAREK Filip date: 2009-12-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.249&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-439249_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.256&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-438256_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.733
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE445.733
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.928&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-439928_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.633
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE450.633
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.883&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-448883_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2010-11-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html title: A7-0312/2010
events/2
date
2010-11-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html title: A7-0312/2010
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101124&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20101124&type=CRE
events/5
date
2010-11-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0434_EN.html title: T7-0434/2010
summary
events/5
date
2010-11-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0434_EN.html title: T7-0434/2010
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: ARIF Kader group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2009-09-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
name: ARIF Kader group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2010-01-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2/date
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    rapporteur
    name: HOWITT Richard date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    date
    2009-12-17T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: HOWITT Richard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
    committees/4
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    committee
    ENVI
    rapporteur
    name: ULMER Thomas date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/4
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    committee
    ENVI
    date
    2010-02-12T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: ULMER Thomas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    docs/6/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html
    docs/7/body
    EC
    events/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0312_EN.html
    events/5/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-434
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0434_EN.html
    activities
    • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARIF Kader responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
    • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARIF Kader responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0312/2010 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2010-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19032&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-434 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0434/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    International Trade
    committee
    INTA
    date
    2009-09-29T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    shadows
    name: ARIF Kader group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    AFET
    date
    2010-01-21T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    rapporteur
    group: S&D name: MARTIN David
    committees/1
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    committee
    AFET
    date
    2010-01-21T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: MARTIN David group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
    committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    committees/2
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    date
    committees/2
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    EMPL
    date
    2009-12-17T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    rapporteur
    group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    date
    2009-12-17T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: HOWITT Richard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
    committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    ENVI
    date
    2010-02-12T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    rapporteur
    group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas
    committees/4
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    committee
    ENVI
    date
    2010-02-12T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: ULMER Thomas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/4
    body
    EP
    shadows
    group: S&D name: ARIF Kader
    responsible
    True
    committee
    INTA
    date
    2009-09-29T00:00:00
    committee_full
    International Trade
    rapporteur
    group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
    docs
    • date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.249&secondRef=02 title: PE439.249 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2010-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.256&secondRef=02 title: PE438.256 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2010-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.733 title: PE445.733 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.928&secondRef=02 title: PE439.928 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.633 title: PE450.633 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
    • date: 2010-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.883&secondRef=02 title: PE448.883 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN title: A7-0312/2010 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
    • date: 2011-05-02T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=19032&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)1476 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements. Trade strategy as a means to promote European values: recalling that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, the Union’s external action, of which trade is an integral part, should be guided by the same principles as those which inspired its creation, Members call, therefore, for the European Union’s future trade strategy not to envisage trade as an end in itself, but as a tool for the promotion of European values and commercial interests and as an instrument for fair trade that can bring into general practice the effective inclusion and implementation of social and environmental standards. They consider that the EU should adopt an approach in its negotiations which is positive, yet also legally binding , in its negotiation of trade agreements. Human rights and social and environmental standards in multilateral trade relations: Members hope for greater cooperation at multinational level between the WTO and the main United Nations institutions in the human rights field. The expertise of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expertise could be taken into account within WTO panels and the appeals body when cases of serious breaches of human rights are observed. In parallel, Members underline that closer cooperation with the ILO (International Labour Office) is essential. In this regard, they propose a series of measures to strengthen the role of the ILO within the WTO (for example, by granting observer status to ILO members within the WTO). More generally, Members reaffirm that the objectives of maintaining and preserving an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trade system on the one hand, and protecting the environment and promoting sustainable development on the other hand, should be mutually supportive. Mechanisms exist for this purpose, in particular within the WTO, to bring together commercial interests and environmental imperatives. In this regard, Members call for: a rapid conclusion to the negotiations on reducing or removing tariff and non-tariff barriers for environmental goods and services, in order to promote new forms of employment policies and the creation of jobs meeting ILO decent work standards; progress in the negotiations concerning the relationship between existing WTO rules and specific trade obligations set out in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs); conclusion of the negotiation of a multilateral climate agreement, and in the meantime, the introduction, on the European side, for those industries that are actually exposed to carbon leakage, of a ‘carbon inclusion mechanism’ that complies with WTO rules, which would make it possible to combat the risk of CO2 emissions being transferred to third countries; once the international agreement on the climate has been negotiated and signed, that a genuine World Environmental Organisation be set up to enforce application of the commitments. Human rights and social and environmental standards in bilateral trade agreements: Members firmly support the practice of including legally binding human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements. These clauses must also be included in all trade and sectoral agreements, with a clear and precise consultation mechanism modelled on Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. The same approach of systematic inclusion should also be applied to the chapters on sustainable development in bilateral agreements. Noting that future trade agreements may be concluded against the background of the current financial crisis, Members consider that this must not mean neglecting social and environmental standards in order to achieve other goals. They call on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social and environmental standards that include: a list of minimum standards including the ILO’s eight Core Labour Standards and, with regard to the environment and respect for human rights, the list of conventions on the environment and the principles of good governance as set out in the European regulation on the scheme of generalised tariff preferences; a list of other conventions that should be implemented gradually and flexibly, taking account of developments in the economic, social and environmental situation of the partner concerned (corresponding to the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda). Members demand that all future trade agreements provide for a ban on the exploitation of child labour , in particular in the extraction and processing of natural stone, and include a uniform European certification system which ensures that imported natural stone and natural stone products have been demonstrably produced along the entire value chain without the exploitation of child labour. They also underline the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreement . They propose an open and inclusive approach at all phases whether that of the impact assessment: on sustainable development up to and including the phase of regular reporting on the general progress of implementation of the commitments. They also consider that national parliaments as well as civil society should be involved in trade negotiations and in the monitoring of the implementation of agreements. More generally, Members call for EU trade agreements effectively to provide for the highest levels of transparency, stringent public procurement standards and country-by-country reporting by businesses in both developed and developing countries, with a view to combating illicit capital flight. They urge the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources. Agreements should, in particular, include provisions in regard to the purchase and ownership of land in least developed and developing countries. As regards the settlement of disputes , Members call for new procedures, such as a complaints procedure open to the social partners, the establishment of appropriate bodies to settle disputes relating to social or environmental problems, or a dispute settlement mechanism with provision for fines or temporary suspension of certain trade benefits provided for under the agreement. Human rights and social and environmental standards in unilateral trade relations: GSP and GSP+ : Members underline that, to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation. They therefore hope to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity. The Commission must launch investigations if consistent evidence indicates that some countries are not implementing the conventions in question, and where appropriate withdraw the preferences. Members consider that a closer link could be established between human rights clauses and GSP+ in European Union agreements with non-member states. They also call for: the simplification of the rules of origin so that countries that benefit from the Everything But Arms initiative and the GSP+ system may derive maximum benefit from the preferences granted; the full involvement of Parliament in drawing up the list of beneficiaries of GSP+ and the launch of investigations and the temporary suspension of GSP+; a proposal for a regulation banning the import into the EU of goods produced using modern forms of slavery, forced labour, especially forced labour of particularly vulnerable groups. Lastly, Members call for Parliament to be kept informed during the negotiation pf international trade agreements and, in the light of the Lisbon Treaty, that Parliament’s representatives be granted observer status, enabling them to attend meetings and to access relevant documents.
    • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN title: A7-0312/2010
    • date: 2010-11-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101124&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19032&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-434 title: T7-0434/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 531 votes to 18, with 44 abstentions, a resolution on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements. Recalling that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, the Union’s external action, of which trade is an integral part, should be guided by the same principles as those which inspired its creation, Parliament calls for the European Union’s future trade strategy not to envisage trade as an end in itself, but as a tool for the promotion of European values and commercial interests and as an instrument for fair trade that can bring into general practice the effective inclusion and implementation of social and environmental standards. They consider that the EU should adopt an approach in its negotiations which is positive, yet also legally binding , in its negotiation of trade agreements. Human rights and social and environmental standards in multilateral trade relations : Parliament hopes for greater cooperation at multinational level between the WTO and the main United Nations institutions in the human rights field. The expertise of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights expertise could be taken into account within WTO panels and the appeals body when cases of serious breaches of human rights are observed. In parallel, Members underline that closer cooperation with the ILO (International Labour Office) is essential. In this regard, they propose a series of measures to strengthen the role of the ILO within the WTO (for example, by granting observer status to ILO members within the WTO). Furthermore, Parliament considers that the Human Rights Council's universal periodic review should be a useful tool to monitor compliance with human rights provisions in international trade agreements. More generally, Parliament reaffirms that the objectives of maintaining and preserving an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trade system on the one hand, and protecting the environment and promoting sustainable development on the other hand, should be mutually supportive. Mechanisms exist for this purpose, in particular within the WTO, to bring together commercial interests and environmental imperatives. In this regard, Parliament calls for: the improved access to green goods and technologies to achieve sustainable development objectives; a rapid conclusion to the negotiations on reducing or removing tariff and non-tariff barriers for environmental goods and services, in order to promote new forms of employment policies and the creation of jobs meeting ILO decent work standards; progress in the negotiations concerning the relationship between existing WTO rules and specific trade obligations set out in multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs); conclusion of the negotiation of a multilateral climate agreement, and in the meantime, the introduction, on the European side, for those industries that are actually exposed to carbon leakage, of a ‘carbon inclusion mechanism’ that complies with WTO rules, which would make it possible to combat the risk of CO2 emissions being transferred to third countries; once the international agreement on the climate has been negotiated and signed, that a genuine World Environmental Organisation be set up to enforce application of the commitments. Human rights and social and environmental standards in bilateral trade agreements : Parliament firmly supports the practice of including legally binding human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements. These clauses must also be included in all trade and sectoral agreements, with a clear and precise consultation mechanism modelled on Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. The same approach of systematic inclusion should also be applied to the chapters on sustainable development in bilateral agreements. Noting that future trade agreements may be concluded against the background of the current financial crisis, Members consider that this must not mean neglecting social and environmental standards in order to achieve other goals. They call on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social and environmental standards that include: a list of minimum standards including the ILO’s eight Core Labour Standards and, with regard to the environment and respect for human rights, the list of conventions on the environment and the principles of good governance as set out in the European regulation on the scheme of generalised tariff preferences; a list of other conventions that should be implemented gradually and flexibly, taking account of developments in the economic, social and environmental situation of the partner concerned (corresponding to the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda). Parliament demands that all future trade agreements provide for a ban on the exploitation of child labour , in particular in the extraction and processing of natural stone, and include a uniform European certification system which ensures that imported natural stone and natural stone products have been demonstrably produced along the entire value chain without the exploitation of child labour. It stresses that respect for these standards must be understood to include their ratification, their incorporation into national law and their effective implementation throughout the country's territory. It also underlines the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreement. Members propose an open and inclusive approach at all phases whether that of the impact assessment: on sustainable development up to and including the phase of regular reporting on the general progress of implementation of the commitments. They also consider that national parliaments as well as civil society should be involved in trade negotiations and in the monitoring of the implementation of agreements. More generally, Members call for EU trade agreements effectively to provide for the highest levels of transparency , stringent public procurement standards and country-by-country reporting by businesses in both developed and developing countries, with a view to combating illicit capital flight. They urge the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources. Agreements should, in particular, include provisions in regard to the purchase and ownership of land in least developed and developing countries. As regards the settlement of disputes , Members call for new procedures, such as a complaints procedure open to the social partners, the establishment of appropriate bodies to settle disputes relating to social or environmental problems, or a dispute settlement mechanism with provision for fines or temporary suspension of certain trade benefits provided for under the agreement. Human rights and social and environmental standards in unilateral trade relations: GSP and GSP+ : Parliament underlines that, to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation. It therefore hopes to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity. The Commission must launch investigations if consistent evidence indicates that some countries are not implementing the conventions in question, and where appropriate withdraw the preferences. Parliament considers that a closer link could be established between human rights clauses and GSP+ in European Union agreements with non-member states. They also call for: the Commission to be encouraged, during the process of reviewing the GSP system, to ensure that the countries that benefit from it most are those that are most in need, and to simplify the rules of origin so that countries that benefit from the Everything But Arms initiative and the GSP+ system may derive maximum benefit from the preferences granted; the full involvement of Parliament in drawing up the list of beneficiaries of GSP+ and the launch of investigations and the temporary suspension of GSP+; a proposal for a regulation banning the import into the EU of goods produced using modern forms of slavery , forced labour, especially forced labour of particularly vulnerable groups. Lastly, Parliament insists on being kept informed during the negotiation of international trade agreements and, in the light of the Lisbon Treaty, that Parliament’s representatives be granted observer status, enabling them to attend meetings and to access relevant documents.
    • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 150
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    INTA/7/01739
    New
    • INTA/7/01739
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.70 Environmental policy
    • 4.10 Social policy, social charter and protocol
    • 6.10.09 Human rights situation in the world
    • 6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
    • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    • 6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
    New
    3.70
    Environmental policy
    4.10
    Social policy, social charter and protocol
    6.10.09
    Human rights situation in the world
    6.20.01
    Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
    6.20.03
    Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    6.40.13
    Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Initiative
    New
    • Initiative
    • See also 2015/2038(INI)
    procedure/summary
    • See also
    procedure/summary
    • See also
    activities/0/committees/1/date
    2009-12-14T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip
    activities/1/committees/1/date
    2009-12-14T00:00:00
    activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip
    committees/1/date
    2009-12-14T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip
    activities
    • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2009-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARIF Kader responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
    • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2009-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARIF Kader responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-312&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0312/2010 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2010-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19032&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-434 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0434/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN David
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2009-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KACZMAREK Filip
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: PPE name: ULMER Thomas
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: ARIF Kader responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2009-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    INTA/7/01739
    reference
    2009/2219(INI)
    title
    Human rights, social and environmental standards in international trade agreements
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Procedure completed
    subtype
    Initiative
    Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject