Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria ( S&D) | KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena ( PPE), KOCH-MEHRIN Silvana ( ALDE), LAMBERTS Philippe ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ENGSTRÖM Christian ( Verts/ALE) | Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | (THE EARL OF) DARTMOUTH William ( EFD) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 606 votes to 18, with 17 against, a resolution on the Internet of Things (IoT).
Overall, Parliament welcomes the communication from the Commission and endorses in principle the broad outlines of the action plan to promote the Internet of Things. It takes the view that the expansion of the IoT may bring tremendous benefits for EU citizens if it respects security, data protection and privacy.
Protection of privacy and personal data : Parliament endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, security, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things, because respect for privacy and the protection of personal data, together with openness and interoperability, is the only way IoT will gain wider social acceptance . It calls on the Commission to encourage all European and international stakeholders to tackle cyber security-related threats. Members firmly believe that protection of privacy constitutes a core value and that all users should have control over their personal data. It calls therefore for the adaptation of the Data Protection Directive to the current digital environment.
Infrastructure issues : Parliament calls on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the impact of using the current ‘internet’ network infrastructure for IoT applications and hardware, in terms of network congestion and data security. It takes the view that the development of the IoT and related applications will have a major impact on the daily lives of Europeans and their habits in the years ahead, leading to a broad range of economic and social changes. The Commission’s communication does not give enough consideration to these issues, which should ideally be dealt with before the Internet of Things is further developed. Parliament calls on the Commission to coordinate its work on the Internet of Things with its overall work on the digital agenda.
Ethical and cultural aspects of the IoT : Parliament stresses the importance of studying the social, ethical and cultural implications of the Internet of Things, in the light of the potentially far-reaching transformation of civilisation that will be brought about by these technologies. It calls on the Commission to set up a panel of experts to carry out an in-depth assessment of these aspects and propose an ethical framework for the development of related technologies and applications.
Quiet and unobtrusive technologies : pointing out that RFID (radio frequency identification) technology and other IoT-related technologies for the intelligent labelling of products and consumer goods can be used anywhere and in practice are quiet and unobtrusive, Parliament calls for such technology to be the subject of further, more detailed, assessments by the Commission, covering in particular:
the impact on health of radio waves and other means of enabling identification technologies; the environmental impact of the chips and of their recycling; user privacy and trust; the increased cyber security risks; the use of smart chips in specific products; the right to ‘chip silence’ , which provides empowerment and user control; guarantees for the public as regards protection during the collection and processing of personal data; developing an additional network structure and infrastructure for IoT applications and hardware; ensuring the best possible protection for EU citizens and businesses from all kinds of online cyber attacks; the development of open technological standards and interoperability between different systems.
According to Members, the consumer has the right to privacy by opt-in and/or privacy by design, notably through the use of automatic tag disablement at the point of sale. They call on manufacturers to secure the right to ‘chip silence’ by making RFID tags removable or otherwise easily disabled by the consumer after purchase. They stress that the consumers must be informed about the presence of either passive or active RFID tags. RFID application operators are called upon to take all reasonable steps to ensure that data does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person.
Strengthen security : Parliament stresses the need to prevent fraud. Particular attention should be paid to security measures ensuring that only authorised users can access data . The resolution states that consumers and the assigning authorities should be able to check the readability of data and the functioning of the system. It considers it a priority to ensure a global regulatory framework. The Commission is called upon to monitor possible new threats presented by the vulnerability of highly interlinked systems. In addition, Parliament calls on the Commission to make further efforts to ensure that IoT-related technologies include user requirements (e.g. a traceability de-activation option). It calls on the Commission to monitor closely the implementation of the European regulations already adopted in this area and to present, by the end of the year, a timetable for the guidelines it intends to propose at EU level for improving the safety of the Internet of Things and of RFID applications. It also considers it vital to analyse aspects relating to Wi-Fi security systems.
Considerable volume of data : noting that the Internet of Things will lead to the collection of truly massive amounts of data, Parliament calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for the adaptation of the European Data Protection Directive with a view to addressing the data collected and transmitted by the IoT. A general principle should be adopted whereby IoT technologies should be designed to collect and use only the absolute minimum amount of data needed to perform their function.
Building consumer trust : Members consider that the development of new applications and the actual functioning and business potential of the IoT will be intrinsically linked to the trust European consumers have in the system, and point out that trust exists when doubts about potential threats to privacy and health are clarified. They stress that this trust must be based on a clear legal framework, including rules governing the control, collection, processing and use of the data collected and transmitted by the Internet of Things and the types of consent needed from consumers.
Cost reduction : Parliament stresses that transparency of follow-up costs is needed for the consumer, for example in relation to the electricity consumption of the application and deployment of things. It is also necessary for the Commission to explore the possibility of further reducing data roaming costs . Members believe that the IoT requires broad information campaigns to explain to citizens the purpose of their implementation.
Cutting edge development of internet technologies : pointing out that other parts of the world, in particular Asia, are developing faster in this sector, Members stress that, in order to revive the European economy, investment must be made in this area in order to facilitate economic growth. They emphasise that Europe should be at the cutting edge of the development of internet technologies and propose that the EU’s ICT research budget be doubled and that the budget for ICT take-up be multiplied by four in the next Financial Perspective.
The resolution endorses the use of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to promote its expansion. It calls, especially, for the development of pilot projects that may have an immediate positive effect on the everyday lives of European citizens in the areas of e-Health, e-Learning, etc).
A potential for economic development : Parliament believes that the IoT has significant potential in terms of economic and productive development, better-quality services, the optimisation of corporate logistics and distribution chains, inventory management and the creation of new employment and business opportunities. It calls on the Commission to make an assessment of any impact that its proposed strategy might have on the productivity and competitiveness of European enterprises in the international market. It also believes that the IoT can contribute to the facilitation of trade flows between the EU and third countries through the expansion of markets and the securing of quality guarantees for the products traded. Furthermore, it stresses that RFID technologies will, on the one hand, enable European industries to control the volume of goods in circulation (i.e. by producing only when necessary, thereby protecting the environment) and, on the other hand, offer an effective means of combating piracy and counterfeiting, as it will be possible to trace the goods concerned. Applying new technologies to production processes will increase the resource efficiency and market competitiveness of consumer goods.
Review the harmonisation of spectrums : Members endorse the Commission’s intention to continue to monitor and assess the need for additional harmonised spectrums for specific IoT purposes, taking into consideration the different characteristics and capabilities of various electromagnetic frequency bands. They call on the Commission, when setting the Union’s coordination and harmonisation objectives through the Multiannual Radio Spectrum Policy Programmes, to take into account the needs of the Internet of Things. They stress that such spectrums should remain publicly owned , and that their use should be regulated in such a way as to encourage and help fund more technological research and development in this field. They believe that unlicensed spectrum should allow the use of new technologies and services (wireless networking) to emerge so as to foster innovation. In parallel, Members call for the establishment of common international norms for the standardisation of RFID and other IoT technologies and their applications, with a view to facilitating interoperability and an open, transparent and technologically neutral infrastructure.
Strengthen social dialogue : Parliament asks the Commission to initiate a social dialogue regarding the Internet of Things, and to provide information on the positive and negative effects of the new technologies on everyday life. A proactive consultation with the European industry sector should be engaged. SMEs should be involved in this dialogue. Lastly, the governance of the IoT must keep ‘red tape’ to a minimum and involve all relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Maria BADIA i CUTCHET (S&D, ES) on the Internet of Things (IoT).
Members welcome the communication from the Commission and endorse in principle the broad outlines of the action plan to promote the Internet of Things. They take the view that the expansion of the Internet of Things may bring tremendous benefits for EU citizens if it respects security, data protection and privacy.
Protection of privacy and personal data : the report endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, security, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things, because respect for privacy and the protection of personal data, together with openness and interoperability, is the only way IoT will gain wider social acceptance . It calls on the Commission to encourage all European and international stakeholders to tackle cyber security-related threats. Members firmly believe that protection of privacy constitutes a core value and that all users should have control over their personal data. They call therefore for the adaptation of the Data Protection Directive to the current digital environment.
Infrastructure issues : Members call on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the impact of using the current ‘internet’ network infrastructure for IoT applications and hardware, in terms of network congestion and data security. They take the view that the development of the Internet of Things and related applications will have a major impact on the daily lives of Europeans and their habits in the years ahead, leading to a broad range of economic and social changes. The Commission’s communication does not give enough consideration to these issues, which should ideally be dealt with before the Internet of Things is further developed.
Ethical and cultural aspects of the IoT : Members stress the importance of studying the social, ethical and cultural implications of the Internet of Things, in the light of the potentially far-reaching transformation of civilisation that will be brought about by these technologies. They call on the Commission to set up a panel of experts to carry out an in-depth assessment of these aspects and propose an ethical framework for the development of related technologies and applications.
Quiet and unobtrusive technologies : pointing out that RFID (radio frequency identification) technology and other IoT-related technologies for the intelligent labelling of products and consumer goods can be used anywhere and in practice are quiet and unobtrusive, Members call for such technology to be the subject of further, more detailed, assessments by the Commission, covering in particular:
the impact on health of radio waves and other means of enabling identification technologies; the environmental impact of the chips and of their recycling; user privacy and trust; the increased cyber security risks; the use of smart chips in specific products; the right to ‘chip silence’ , which provides empowerment and user control; guarantees for the public as regards protection during the collection and processing of personal data; developing an additional network structure and infrastructure for IoT applications and hardware; ensuring the best possible protection for EU citizens and businesses from all kinds of online cyber attacks; the development of open technological standards and interoperability between different systems.
According to Members, the consumer has the right to privacy by opt-in and/or privacy by design, notably through the use of automatic tag disablement at the point of sale. They call on manufacturers to secure the right to ‘chip silence’ by making RFID tags removable or otherwise easily disabled by the consumer after purchase. They stress that the consumers must be informed about the presence of either passive or active RFID tags. RFID application operators are called upon to take all reasonable steps to ensure that data does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person.
Strengthen security : Members stress the need for the highest possible level of device security and secure transmission systems to be included in all IoT technologies in order to prevent fraud. Particular attention should be paid to security measures ensuring that only authorised users can access data . The report states that consumers and the assigning authorities should be able to check the readability of data and the functioning of the system. It considers it a priority to ensure a global regulatory framework and specific timescales at European level in order to encourage and facilitate public and private investment in the field of the Internet of Things and in smart networks needed to support the development of new technologies. Members call on the Commission to monitor possible new threats presented by the vulnerability of highly interlinked systems
Considerable volume of data : noting that the Internet of Things will lead to the collection of truly massive amounts of data, Members call on the Commission to submit a proposal for the adaptation of the European Data Protection Directive with a view to addressing the data collected and transmitted by the IoT. A general principle should be adopted whereby IoT technologies should be designed to collect and use only the absolute minimum amount of data needed to perform their function, and should prevented from collecting any supplementary data.
Building consumer trust : Members consider that the development of new applications and the actual functioning and business potential of the IoT will be intrinsically linked to the trust European consumers have in the system, and point out that trust exists when doubts about potential threats to privacy and health are clarified. They stress that this trust must be based on a clear legal framework, including rules governing the control, collection, processing and use of the data collected and transmitted by the Internet of Things and the types of consent needed from consumers.
Cost reduction : Members stress that transparency of follow-up costs is needed for the consumer, for example in relation to the electricity consumption of the application and deployment of things. It is also necessary for the Commission to explore the possibility of further reducing data roaming costs . Members believe that the IoT requires broad information campaigns to explain to citizens the purpose of their implementation.
Cutting edge development of internet technologies : pointing out that other parts of the world, in particular Asia, are developing faster in this sector, Members stress that, in order to revive the European economy, investment must be made in this area in order to facilitate economic growth. They emphasise that Europe should be at the cutting edge of the development of internet technologies and propose that the EU’s ICT research budget be doubled and that the budget for ICT take-up be multiplied by four in the next Financial Perspective.
The Commission is called upon to continue and increase its funding for projects under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP) in the field of the Internet of Things in order to bolster the European ICT sector. The report endorses the use of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to promote its expansion. It calls, especially, for the development of pilot projects that may have an immediate positive effect on the everyday lives of European citizens in the areas of e-Health, e-Learning, etc).
Review the harmonisation of spectrums : Members endorse the Commission’s intention to continue to monitor and assess the need for additional harmonised spectrums for specific IoT purposes, taking into consideration the different characteristics and capabilities of various electromagnetic frequency bands. They call on the Commission, when setting the Union’s coordination and harmonisation objectives through the Multiannual Radio Spectrum Policy Programmes, to take into account the needs of the Internet of Things. They stress that such spectrums should remain publicly owned , and that their use should be regulated in such a way as to encourage and help fund more technological research and development in this field. They believe that unlicensed spectrum should allow the use of new technologies and services (wireless networking) to emerge so as to foster innovation. In parallel, Members call for the establishment of common international norms for the standardisation of RFID and other IoT technologies and their applications, with a view to facilitating interoperability and an open, transparent and technologically neutral infrastructure.
Strengthen social dialogue : the Commission is asked to initiate a social dialogue regarding the Internet of Things, and to provide information on the positive and negative effects of the new technologies on everyday life. A proactive consultation with the European industry sector should be engaged. SMEs should be involved in this dialogue. Lastly, the governance of the IoT must keep ‘red tape’ to a minimum and involve all relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process. Members call therefore for proper and adequate regulation at EU level.
PURPOSE: to present an action plan for Europe on the Internet of Things.
CONTEXT: the growth of the Internet is an ongoing process: only 25 years ago it was connecting about a thousand hosts and has grown ever since to link billions people through computers and mobile devices. One major next step in this development is to evolve from a network of interconnected computers to a network of interconnected objects, from books to cars, from electrical appliances to food, and thus create an ‘Internet of things’ (IoT). These objects will sometimes have their own Internet Protocol addresses, be embedded in complex systems and use sensors to obtain information from their environment (e.g. food products that record the temperature along the supply chain) and use actuators to interact with it (e.g. air conditioning valves that react to the presence of people). As this document describes, IoT is not yet a tangible reality, but rather a prospective vision of a number of technologies that, combined together, could in the coming 5 to 15 years drastically modify the way our societies function. The scope of IoT applications is expected to greatly contribute to addressing today’s societal challenges: health monitoring systems will help meet the challenges of an ageing society; connected trees will help fight deforestation; connected cars will help reduce traffic congestion and improve their recyclability, thus reducing their carbon footprint. This interconnection of physical objects is expected to amplify the profound effects that large-scale networked communications are having on our society, gradually resulting in a genuine paradigm shift. The paper shows that the Iot can help to improve citizens’ quality of life, delivering new and better jobs for workers, business opportunities and growth for industry, and a boost to Europe’s competitiveness. It conforms to the wider policy initiatives related to the Lisbon strategy and to the current thinking on post-i2010 initiatives. The idea was first announced in the RFID (radio frequency identification) Communication ( COM(2007)0096 ). It comes in response to the invitation made by the Council to deepen the reflection on the development of decentralised architectures and promoting shared and decentralised network governance for the Internet of things.
CONTENT: the Commission considers that by adopting a proactive approach, Europe could play a leading role in shaping how IoT works and reap the associated benefits in terms of economic growth and individual well-being, thus making the Internet of things an Internet of things for people. It proposes 14 lines of action to exploit the potential of these developments:
Governance : the Commission will initiate and promote discussions and decisions on: (i) defining a set of principles underlying the governance of IoT; (ii) setting up an ‘architecture’ with a sufficient level of decentralised management, so that public authorities throughout the world can exercise their responsibilities as regards transparency, competition and accountability. Continuous monitoring of the privacy and the protection of personal data questions : the Commission recently adopted a Recommendation that provides guidelines on how to operate RFID applications in compliance with privacy and data protection principles. In 2010 it intends to publish a broader Communication on privacy and trust in the ubiquitous information society. The ‘silence of the chips’ : the Commission will launch a debate on the technical and legal aspects of the ‘right to silence of the chips’, which has been referred to under different names by different authors and expresses the idea that individuals should be able to disconnect from their networked environment at any time. Identification of emerging risks : the Commission will follow the ENISA work mentioned above and will take further action as appropriate, including regulatory and non-regulatory measures, to provide a policy framework that enables IoT to meet the challenges related to trust, acceptance and security. IoT as a vital resource to economy and society : should IoT grow to the importance it is expected to attain, any disruption might have a significant impact on economy and society. The Commission will therefore closely follow the development of IoT infrastructures into a vital resource for Europe, especially in connection with its activities on the protection of critical information infrastructure. Standards Mandate : the Commission will assess the extent to which existing standards mandates can include further issues related to IoT or launch additional mandates if necessary. Research and Development : the Commission will continue to finance FP7 research projects in the area of IoT, putting an emphasis on important technological aspects such as microelectronics, non-silicon based components, energy harvesting technologies, ubiquitous positioning, networks of wirelessly communicating smart systems, semantics, privacy- and security-by-design, software emulating human reasoning and on novel applications. Public-Private Partnership : the Commission is currently preparing the setting-up of four public-private partnerships (PPP) where IoT can play an important role. Three of them, ‘green cars’, ‘energy-efficient buildings’ and ‘Factories of the Future’ were proposed by the Commission as part of the recovery package. The fourth one, ‘Future Internet’, aims at further integrating the existing ICT research efforts in relation to the future of the Internet. Innovation and pilot projects : complementing the research activities listed above, the Commission will consider promoting the deployment of IoT applications by launching pilot projects through CIP. These pilots should focus on IoT applications that deliver strong benefits to society, such as e-health, eaccessibility, climate change, or helping to bridge the digital divide. Institutional Awareness : the Commission will regularly inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party and any other relevant stakeholders about IoT developments. International dialogue : the Commission intends to intensify the existing dialogue on all aspects of IoT with its international partners, aiming to agree on relevant joint actions, share best practices and promote the lines of action laid down in this Communication. RFID in recycling lines : as part of its regular monitoring of the waste management industry, the Commission will launch a study to assess the difficulties of recycling tags and the benefits and nuisances that the presence of tags can have on the recycling of objects. Measuring the uptake : monitoring the introduction of IoT related technologies will provide information on their degree of penetration and allow the assessment of their impact on the economy and the society as well as the effectiveness of the related Community policies. Assessment of evolution : it is important that a multi-stakeholder mechanism is put in place at European level to: (i) monitor the evolution of IoT; (ii) support the Commission in carrying out the various actions listed in this Communication; (iii) assess which additional measures should be undertaken by European Public Authorities. The Commission will use FP7 to conduct this work, by gathering a representative set of European stakeholders and ensuring a regular dialogue and sharing of best practices with other world regions.
By launching a number of actions and reflections, the Commission intends to be a driving force behind this effort and it invites the European Parliament, the Council and all concerned stakeholders to work jointly to achieve these ambitious yet achievable objectives.
PURPOSE: to present an action plan for Europe on the Internet of Things.
CONTEXT: the growth of the Internet is an ongoing process: only 25 years ago it was connecting about a thousand hosts and has grown ever since to link billions people through computers and mobile devices. One major next step in this development is to evolve from a network of interconnected computers to a network of interconnected objects, from books to cars, from electrical appliances to food, and thus create an ‘Internet of things’ (IoT). These objects will sometimes have their own Internet Protocol addresses, be embedded in complex systems and use sensors to obtain information from their environment (e.g. food products that record the temperature along the supply chain) and use actuators to interact with it (e.g. air conditioning valves that react to the presence of people). As this document describes, IoT is not yet a tangible reality, but rather a prospective vision of a number of technologies that, combined together, could in the coming 5 to 15 years drastically modify the way our societies function. The scope of IoT applications is expected to greatly contribute to addressing today’s societal challenges: health monitoring systems will help meet the challenges of an ageing society; connected trees will help fight deforestation; connected cars will help reduce traffic congestion and improve their recyclability, thus reducing their carbon footprint. This interconnection of physical objects is expected to amplify the profound effects that large-scale networked communications are having on our society, gradually resulting in a genuine paradigm shift. The paper shows that the Iot can help to improve citizens’ quality of life, delivering new and better jobs for workers, business opportunities and growth for industry, and a boost to Europe’s competitiveness. It conforms to the wider policy initiatives related to the Lisbon strategy and to the current thinking on post-i2010 initiatives. The idea was first announced in the RFID (radio frequency identification) Communication ( COM(2007)0096 ). It comes in response to the invitation made by the Council to deepen the reflection on the development of decentralised architectures and promoting shared and decentralised network governance for the Internet of things.
CONTENT: the Commission considers that by adopting a proactive approach, Europe could play a leading role in shaping how IoT works and reap the associated benefits in terms of economic growth and individual well-being, thus making the Internet of things an Internet of things for people. It proposes 14 lines of action to exploit the potential of these developments:
Governance : the Commission will initiate and promote discussions and decisions on: (i) defining a set of principles underlying the governance of IoT; (ii) setting up an ‘architecture’ with a sufficient level of decentralised management, so that public authorities throughout the world can exercise their responsibilities as regards transparency, competition and accountability. Continuous monitoring of the privacy and the protection of personal data questions : the Commission recently adopted a Recommendation that provides guidelines on how to operate RFID applications in compliance with privacy and data protection principles. In 2010 it intends to publish a broader Communication on privacy and trust in the ubiquitous information society. The ‘silence of the chips’ : the Commission will launch a debate on the technical and legal aspects of the ‘right to silence of the chips’, which has been referred to under different names by different authors and expresses the idea that individuals should be able to disconnect from their networked environment at any time. Identification of emerging risks : the Commission will follow the ENISA work mentioned above and will take further action as appropriate, including regulatory and non-regulatory measures, to provide a policy framework that enables IoT to meet the challenges related to trust, acceptance and security. IoT as a vital resource to economy and society : should IoT grow to the importance it is expected to attain, any disruption might have a significant impact on economy and society. The Commission will therefore closely follow the development of IoT infrastructures into a vital resource for Europe, especially in connection with its activities on the protection of critical information infrastructure. Standards Mandate : the Commission will assess the extent to which existing standards mandates can include further issues related to IoT or launch additional mandates if necessary. Research and Development : the Commission will continue to finance FP7 research projects in the area of IoT, putting an emphasis on important technological aspects such as microelectronics, non-silicon based components, energy harvesting technologies, ubiquitous positioning, networks of wirelessly communicating smart systems, semantics, privacy- and security-by-design, software emulating human reasoning and on novel applications. Public-Private Partnership : the Commission is currently preparing the setting-up of four public-private partnerships (PPP) where IoT can play an important role. Three of them, ‘green cars’, ‘energy-efficient buildings’ and ‘Factories of the Future’ were proposed by the Commission as part of the recovery package. The fourth one, ‘Future Internet’, aims at further integrating the existing ICT research efforts in relation to the future of the Internet. Innovation and pilot projects : complementing the research activities listed above, the Commission will consider promoting the deployment of IoT applications by launching pilot projects through CIP. These pilots should focus on IoT applications that deliver strong benefits to society, such as e-health, eaccessibility, climate change, or helping to bridge the digital divide. Institutional Awareness : the Commission will regularly inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party and any other relevant stakeholders about IoT developments. International dialogue : the Commission intends to intensify the existing dialogue on all aspects of IoT with its international partners, aiming to agree on relevant joint actions, share best practices and promote the lines of action laid down in this Communication. RFID in recycling lines : as part of its regular monitoring of the waste management industry, the Commission will launch a study to assess the difficulties of recycling tags and the benefits and nuisances that the presence of tags can have on the recycling of objects. Measuring the uptake : monitoring the introduction of IoT related technologies will provide information on their degree of penetration and allow the assessment of their impact on the economy and the society as well as the effectiveness of the related Community policies. Assessment of evolution : it is important that a multi-stakeholder mechanism is put in place at European level to: (i) monitor the evolution of IoT; (ii) support the Commission in carrying out the various actions listed in this Communication; (iii) assess which additional measures should be undertaken by European Public Authorities. The Commission will use FP7 to conduct this work, by gathering a representative set of European stakeholders and ensuring a regular dialogue and sharing of best practices with other world regions.
By launching a number of actions and reflections, the Commission intends to be a driving force behind this effort and it invites the European Parliament, the Council and all concerned stakeholders to work jointly to achieve these ambitious yet achievable objectives.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6508
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0207/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0154/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0154/2010
- Committee opinion: PE439.317
- Committee opinion: PE439.863
- Committee opinion: PE439.302
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE440.038
- Committee draft report: PE438.414
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0278
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0278
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0278 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE438.414
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE440.038
- Committee opinion: PE439.302
- Committee opinion: PE439.317
- Committee opinion: PE439.863
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0154/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6508
Activities
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Maria BADIA i CUTCHET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Internet of Things (short presentation)
Amendments | Dossier |
189 |
2009/2224(INI)
2010/03/19
IMCO
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to clarify what aspects of Internet governance it feels need to be regulated at this time in relation to the Internet of Things and what system will be able to safeguard the general public interest;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Agrees that new standards need to be developed in an open, transparent and consensual manner with the participation of all interested parties; stresses that all new standards in this area need to be easily and freely available to anyone, and that reference implementations also need to be freely available, as is the case with
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that there is no scientific debate on the possible hazards and damage caused by electrosmog and that the Commission should not neglect this issue;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that innovation and creativity constitute significant added value for Europe’s economy and competitiveness and that they should be maintained and developed;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Considers that, given the major changes that the Internet of Things will involve, it is vital to provide for uniform development of technologies throughout the territory in order to avoid creating even greater gaps than there are already, and also to involve the public authorities in the process in an appropriate way;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Agrees that it is essential that new systems and applications are not hampered by
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Agrees that
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Agrees that it is essential that new systems and applications are not hampered by barriers such as excessive licences/fees or inappropriate intellectual property schemes, to ensure a competitive market and adequate levels of interoperability; on this point, believes that the Commission should examine the possibility of further reducing Internet surfing costs while roaming;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Reminds the Commission that certain Member States are introducing legislation to exclude users from the Internet and
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to increase funding for the Internet of Things, as part of research projects in the 7th Framework Programme and pilot projects within the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, and also to focus on developing broadband infrastructure and the roll-out of broadband;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Reminds the Commission that the EU does not currently have a leading role in terms of innovation in the field of the Internet of Things, and therefore calls on the Commission to catch up quickly with other parts of the world, particularly Asia.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises, on the one hand, that the development of the application of the Internet of Things represents a major opportunity for growth and competitiveness and, on the other hand, that it will trigger social change, affecting people’s behaviour;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to clarify the issue of who owns and controls data that is automatically collected and interpreted;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to create more initiatives for free access to the new technologies; stresses that every initiative should have the aim of facilitating connection to, and use of, information and communication technologies and of including disadvantaged social groups;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to recognise that public- private partnerships should be strengthened in relation to the Internet of Things and public initiatives aimed at creating Internet Governance;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses th
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that transparency of follow- up costs is needed for the consumer, for example in relation to the electricity consumption of the application and the deployment of things;
source: PE-439.923
2010/03/23
INTA
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Point 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Point 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that through the combination of traceability technologies and production, trade and product origin security tags, the Internet of Things can contribute in important ways to the conduct of trade, such as stamping out trafficking in pirated goods, improving and creating more integrated protection of consumer health, avoiding future food crises, saving energy and protecting the environment;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Point 3 b (new) 3b. Believes that the Internet of Things can contribute to the facilitation of trade flows between the EU and third countries through the expansion of markets and the securing of quality guarantees for the products traded;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Point 4 4.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Point 4 4.Invites the Commission to take into account the financial and infrastructural limitations of SMEs when formulating technical and ICT management and standards such as the ones proposed in its communication; reiterates that SMEs form the backbone of European productivity and employment and that their interests should be protected horizontally across the various pieces of legislation the EU produces; the economic experience is that SMEs lead the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Point 4 a (new) 4a. Is deeply concerned about personal data protection and the protection of consumers’ privacy in general, since there are countless regulatory and prescriptive gaps and ambiguities concerning vital aspects of the implementation of the technologies for the Internet of Things; considers that the existing dangers relating to the protection of the personal data of users of the Internet are very much smaller than the dangers that will arise as the Internet of Things gradually expands; calls, therefore, upon the Commission to include issues relating to personal data protection that are raised with reference to the expansion of the Internet of Things in all ongoing matters;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Point 4 b (new) 4b. Urges caution regarding centralised infrastructure and possible abuses through a central monitoring of product and information flows, particularly with reference to electronic military equipment codes and the area of State sovereignty in general;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Point 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the Commission to contribute actively to the definition and setting of principles and rules for the governance of the Internet of Things together with its trading partners in international forums, such as the World Trade Organisation;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Point 5 (new) 5. Calls on the Commission to continue funding projects under the 7th Framework Programme and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme in order to increase European Union competitiveness on the international market in the field of the Internet of Things;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Point 6 (new) 6. Underlines the importance of creating a safe and transparent system of governance for the Internet of Things;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Point 7 (new) 7. Calls on the Commission to set up a mechanism that will guarantee the safeguard of privacy and the protection of personal data for users of the Internet of Things, by ensuring in particular the right to "chip silence";
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Point 1 1. Stresses the fact that, in our globalised world, technological advance has become a tradable asset in its own right and that the effect on productivity, competitiveness, information flow and consequently on international trade is likely to be substantial and material; points out in particular that the use of intelligent technologies can improve both the quantity and the quality of information flow, providing speed, accuracy and transparency in commercial transactions;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Point 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the first and most tangible application of the technologies of the Internet of Things will take place in the sector of commerce, through the replacement of barcodes by radio- frequency identification (RFID) tags for all products; considers that, because of the qualitatively and quantitatively greater technological possibilities offered by the new technology as compared with the previous one, this transition can provide multiple benefits for manufacturers/producers, traders and consumers, chiefly through the improvement of service quality and fundamental changes to the supply and distribution chain;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Point 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Point 2 Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Point 2 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Point 3 3.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Point 3 3.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Point 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that while an Internet of Things will develop locally, an open, trans-parent and above all accessible development of the new technologies would enhance sustainable development opportunities worldwide and could facilitate the transition to carbon-neutral economy;
source: PE-439.932
2010/04/13
JURI
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, although RFID (radio- frequency identification) chips will be used in a still wider range of applications in the future, this technology raises new data-protection issues, the most significant among them being the fact that the chips are totally or well-nigh invisible,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that due account must be taken of the key data-protection principles of purpose, proportionality, transparency and security in the development of these technologies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that, while the use of RFID chips can be effective in combating counterfeiting or the abduction of babies from maternity wards, in identifying animals and in a range of other areas, it can also be dangerous and create ethical problems for individuals and for society against which appropriate safeguards will need to be found;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes it is necessary to study how Internet of Things applications will affect users’ control over their own privacy and how will they react, and how privacy and security features can be integrated into those systems right from the early design stages; considers the protection of personal data to be essential, and accordingly calls on the Commission to conduct a study into the impact of Internet of Things applications;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the utmost vigilance to be shown in ensuring respect for fundamental rights wherever RFID chips are used, given than anyone who has a dedicated reader can read the contents of such chips, which may contain personal data enabling the individuals concerned to be remotely identified;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Asks that retailers should
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that data protection, which has become essential in Europe's modern and democratic society, in which ever- increasing volumes of personal data are collected, generated and analysed, should be accorded the status of a constitutional principle;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas all everyday objects (such as transport cards, clothes, mobile telephones and cars) will ultimately be fitted with RFID chips, which will quickly take on major economic importance owing to the wide range of applications in which they may be used,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas the Internet of Things should, through the use of electronic identification systems and wireless mobile devices, enable digital entities and physical objects to be identified directly and conclusively so as to allow the data they contain to be retrieved, stored, transferred and continuously processed,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the possible benefits for European competitiveness arising from the development of the Internet of Things
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that, given that the chips attached to retail products are not intended for use outside retail outlets, it should be possible for them to be factory- fitted with devices that will deactivate them and thus limit data retention;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the need to inform, consult and actively involve consumers and consumer organisations in order to avoid negative developments and to protect civil rights, personal data and privacy;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the need to promote security standards ensuring that any personal data contained on the chips cannot be read remotely by third parties without the knowledge of the persons concerned;
source: PE-440.180
2010/04/15
ITRE
133 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the term Internet of Things refers to the general concept of objects (both electronic artefacts and objects of everyday use) that are remotely readable, recognizable, addressable, locatable and/or controllable through the Internet,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to continue and increase funding of projects under the Seventh Framework Programme in the field of the Internet of Things in order to bolster the European ICT sector, and endorses the use of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to promote
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that RFID technologies will, on the one hand, enable European industries to control the volume of goods in circulation (i.e. production only if necessary and, consequently, protection of the environment) and, on the other hand, offer an effective means of combating piracy and counterfeiting, as it will be possible to trace the goods concerned;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that applying new technologies to production processes will increase resource efficiency and the market competitiveness of consumer goods;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses that intensive international dialogue and joint action plans are needed with respect to the Internet of Things. Calls on the Commission to examine the effects of the Internet of Things on international trade;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that the expansion of the Internet of Things will enhance person- to-thing and thing-thing interaction with respect to security, data protection and privacy;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that the expansion of the Internet of Things will enhance person-
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that the expansion of the Internet of Things will enhance person- to-thing and thing-to-thing interaction;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Endorses the intention of the Commission to continue to monitor and assess the need for additional harmonised spectrums for specific Internet of Things purposes and asks the Commission to include this in any discussion of the digital dividend; stress that such spectrums should be remain publicly held and their use should be regulated in such a way as to help encourage and fund greater technological research and development in this domain;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Endorses the intention of the Commission to continue to monitor and assess the need for additional harmonised spectrums for specific Internet of Things purposes; calls upon the Commission when setting the coordination and harmonisation objectives of the Union through the Multiannual Radio Spectrum Policy Programmes to take into account the needs of the Internet of Things;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Endorses the intention of the Commission to continue
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Endorses the intention of the Commission to continue to monitor and assess the need for additional harmonised spectrums for specific Internet of Things purposes, taking into consideration the different characteristics and capabilities of various electromagnetic frequency bands;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to review the radio frequency range in light of the needs of the Internet of Things;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises the key role that
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises the key role that cities as well as regions will play in the development of the Internet of Things, moving it beyond the purely private sphere; points also to the extensive use that local authorities can make of the Internet of Things, such as in the organisation of public transport, waste collection, calculation of pollution levels and traffic management, etc.;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to involve small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to an adequate extent in the Internet of Things action plan;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that new technologies are critical to simplify transportation chains, increase quality and efficiency of transportation, support the development of intelligent transport systems and facilitate green corridors and RFID can offer innovative ways of conducting business operations while enhancing customer satisfaction;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Considers that RFID in combination with GPS can prove the quality of food products, offer more transparency, and empower consumers to find out more about a product;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to consider the Internet of Things in light of the issue of accessibility; emphasises in this context that with the assistance of this technology, blind and visually impaired persons could experience their environment more fully through the use of electronic aids;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Internet of Things is expected to develop in the years ahead and
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to strive to establish common international norms for the standardisation of RFID technologies and their applications; calls on therefore the Commission to fully encourage the EU to play a leading role in the development of ‘Internet of Things’ technologies;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to strive to establish common international norms for the standardisation of RFID technologies and their applications; stresses on a need to develop interoperable standards;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to strive to establish common international norms for the standardisation of RFID technologies and their applications with a view to facilitating interoperability;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Salutes the Commission’s determination to debate the legal aspects of the ‘right of silence of the chips’ and calls on the Commission to reflect on the right of citizens to choose non ‘Internet of Things’ equipped products;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers that wireless networking technologies are already very diverse, that safeguards for privacy must therefore be equally diverse, stresses the importance of open standards, openly available architectures and interoperable devices to ensure data protection;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to present in 2010 a communication on security, privacy and trust in the information society; stresses the importance of that communication and of the proposed measures for strengthening the rules on the facets relating to information security, privacy and the protection of personal data; calls the Commission to actively involve all relevant stakeholders like the European Network and Information Security Agency and the European Data Protection Supervisor;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. In agreement with the Commission, is of the opinion that it is imperative to explore the possible risks in order to ensure that the new technologies in question gain the wide-scale trust of society. The Commission should submit proposals in respect of the technological standards of radio frequency identification. At the same time, the abuse of personal data through unauthorised data readings must be prevented by means of appropriate regulatory tools;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Believes in the importance of ensuring that all fundamental rights, not only privacy, are protected in the process of Internet of Things development;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to set up a panel of experts in order to make an in- depth assessment of the ethical aspects and the social implications of the Internet of Things and to propose an ethical framework for the development of related technologies and applications;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Believes that the Commission should make recommendations for the tasks and responsibilities of the public administrative, legislative and law enforcement agencies with respect to the Internet of Things;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Internet of Things is expected to develop rapidly in the years ahead and a safe, transparent and multilateral system
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Calls for the development of the Internet of Things infrastructure to be based on openness, transparency and neutrality of technologies;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Stresses that the right to ‘chip silence’ is essential for the protection of privacy. The right of individuals to disconnect from their networked environment at any time must be guaranteed;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission also to keep it regularly updated on developments in the dialogue with operators in this field and with stakeholders, and on the initiatives it intends to take; calls on therefore the Commission to engage a proactive consultation with the European industry sector, and to encourage it to have a leading role in designing and proposing innovative, standardised and inter- operable technologies;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas radio frequency identification (RFID) has advantages
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas radio frequency identification (RFID)
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas radio frequency identification (RFID) has advantages over bar codes and magnetic strips, and many more applications, which can be developed still further once interfaced with
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas radio frequency identification (RFID)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas RFID technology may be regarded as a catalyst and accelerator for the economic development of the information and communication industry,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas RFID technology
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new) - having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas RFID technology is already
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas with all eHealth systems, the design, development and implementation of RFID-enabled systems require the direct involvement of healthcare professionals, patients and relevant committees (data protection, ethics),
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas RFID can help increase energy efficiency and reduce green house gas emissions and can offer carbon accounting on product level,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas RFID proved most successful when used in logistics; logistical applications (e.g. tracking and management of portable assets and equipment, tracking location of patients during clinical journey in the emergency department) have shown sound ROI,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas RFID technology and other IoT related technologies can benefit
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas RFID technology can benefit the public, in terms of quality of life, safety, security and well being, provided that its facets relating to the protection of privacy and of personal data are properly managed,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas lifestyle management may become an important market for RFID, only integrated solutions can deliver full benefits,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas RFID is only an enabler for many applications, which bring along an obligation to understand and prove its economic and societal benefits to clients, citizens and consumers, public and private sector should work together to ensure that new products do not create new risks and Commission Recommendation on the implementation of privacy and data protection principle in applications supported by Radio Frequency Identification is expected to help on some issues and provide legal certainty,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the Internet of Things will permit the networking of
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy on defining a new Digital Agenda for Europe: from i2010 to digital.eu (2009/2225(INI)),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the Internet of Things will permit the networking of millions of machines which will be able to communicate and interact with one another via RFID technology combined with
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the Internet of Things will permit the networking of
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas there is a technological challenge involved in the miniaturization of Internet of Things products, such as in incorporating electronics, sensors and the power supply
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas RFID enabled supply chain management systems enhance product traceability, and facilitate quality and safety monitoring; RFID can provide a technical solution for full traceability of goods and therefore can play an important role to protect against counterfeiting,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas industry standards are very important and need to move higher up the technology stack; investments in projects with good ROI will allow standards to mature and become accepted by industry; RFID standardisation needs to move out of its comfort zone of RFID as replacement for barcodes and mature both higher up the technology stack; RFID standard mandate - Joint assignment for CEN and ETSI (European Standard organisations) from February- April 2009 will contribute to more innovative products and services using RFID,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas it is important to raise
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas it is important to raise consumer awareness of new technologies and their applications, including their social and environmental impacts,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the development of the Internet of Things should be inclusive and accessible to all EU citizens, and should be supported by effective policies aiming at closing the digital gap within the EU, empowering more citizens with e- skills and a knowledge of their digital surroundings,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the benefits of the IoT related technologies must be strengthened through effective security which is an essential feature of any development which risks jeopardising the personal data and the public’s trust in those who hold information about them,
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas cooperation implies work together and share best practices on applications that will enhance economic integration to the benefit of citizens and business at the international level, highlights the need for an international forum on radio Frequency Identification and for cooperation and interoperable solutions which are essential and need to be a priority for Internet of Things,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Internet of Things is able to meet the expectations of the society and the citizens, research is needed to understand what these expectations are and where the sensitivities and concern for personal privacy and information may block applications,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J b (new) Jb. whereas that the social outcomes of Internet of Things development are unknown, possibly reinforcing the current or creating a new digital divide,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that a precondition for promoting technology is the introduction of legal provisions to reinforce respect for fundamental values and for the protection of personal data and privacy;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things; believes firmly that the protection of privacy constitutes a core value and that all users should have control of their personal data; calls therefore for the adaptation of the Data Protection Directive to the current digital environment;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things; calls on the Commission to encourage all European and international stakeholders to tackle cyber security- related threats; in that relation, calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to implement all existing international cyber security dispositions, such as the Cyber security convention of the Council of Europe;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things, because respect of privacy and the protection of personal data, but also openness and interoperability are the only ways for IoT to gain wider social acceptance;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Endorses the Commission’s focus on safety, security, the protection of personal data and privacy and governance of the Internet of Things;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to coordinate its work on the Internet of Things with its overall work on the digital agenda;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the security and privacy issues should be addressed by the forthcoming standards which must define different security features to provide confidentiality, integrity, or availability services;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment on using the current ‘Internet’ network infrastructure for the Internet of Things applications and hardware, in terms of network congestion and security of data, in order to determine if the Internet of Things applications and hardware are compatible and proper, or if an independent network should be developed;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas information and communication technologies (ICT)
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that the development of
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that the development of an intelligent Internet and its related applications will have a ma
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that it is necessary to build an inclusive Internet of Things, avoiding at the outset the risk at both at Member State and regional level of an unequal development, spread and usage of Internet of Thing technologies; notes that the Commission’s communication does not give enough consideration to these issues that optimally should be dealt with before it is further developed;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that education about the potential use and clear benefits of the IoT must be carried out, as well, information to the users about the presence of RFID tags, the reading range, the kind of data contained in the devices and into the back system, and the use of those, must be clear and easily available;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that in order to make full use of the Internet of Things, both for individual and common benefit, users need to be educated and provided with skills necessary to understand these new technologies, and be motivated and able to make proper use of them;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the Commission to take into account the less developed regions of the Union in ICT and Internet of Things planning and to secure assets for the purpose of co-financing the implementation of these technologies and other ICT projects in these regions to assure their participation and to prevent their exclusion from common European ventures;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Whereas there is a needed for sustainable, energy efficient communication standards that are security and privacy centred and are using compatible or identical protocols at different frequencies;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses the importance of studying the social and cultural effects of the Internet of Things, in light of potentially far reaching civilisational transformation that will be caused by these technologies;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Considers it is therefore important that socio-economic research and political debate on the Internet of Things go hand in hand with technological research and their advancements;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas information and communication technologies (ICT) promote social development, economic growth and encourage research and innovation among European
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Points out that RFID technology and other IoT related technologies for the
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 1 • the impact of radio waves and other means of enabling identification technologies on health;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 3 a (new) • the increased cyber security risks;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 5 • the right to ‘chip silence’ which provides empowerment and user control;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 • guarantees for the public as regards the protection of collection and pro
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 a (new) • developing an additional network structure and infrastructure for the Internet of Things applications and hardware;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 a (new) • ensures the best possible protection to EU citizens and businesses from all kind of online cyber attacks;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 a (new) • protection from attacks (data security, authentication);
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 a (new) • the impact of electromagnetic fields on animal, especially birds in cities;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas information and communication technologies (ICT) are important in that they promote economic growth and encourage research and innovation
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 a (new) • the harmonisation of regional standards;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – bullet 6 b (new) • the development of open technological standards and the interoperability between different systems;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the consumers have the rights for privacy by opt-in and/or privacy by design, according to which the tags are automatically disabled at the point of sale, unless consumers expressly agrees otherwise or alternatively privacy must be considered as early as possible in the stage of deployment and shall be incorporated into the design;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that while passive RFID are limited in range, active RFID can transmit data at much greater distances; stress that clear guidelines for each individual type of RFID must be set out in this regard;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to carry out thorough research into the potential misuse of the IoT systems and to periodically assess its level of security protection against malicious attacks;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that RFID applications have to be operated in conformity with privacy and data protection rules enshrined in Article 7 and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; calls on the Commission, in compliance with the opinion issued by the European Data Protection Supervisor, to apply the principle of ‘Privacy by design’ to RFID, notably through the application of an ‘opt-in principle at the point of sale’;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on manufactures to assure the right to ‘chip silence’ by making RFID tags removable or otherwise easily disabled by the consumer after purchase; Stress that the data shared by receiving and transmitting by either passive or active RFID tags should be clearly set out in any documentation;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Believes that consumers should be given the option to opt-in or opt-out to the Internet of Things, including the ability to opt-out of individual Internet of Things technologies without disabling other applications or a device as a whole;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Notes that while RFIDs are important other technologies also form part of the Internet of Things; stress that research, funding and governance issues should also be directed to these technologies;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 e (new) 5e. Stresses the need for the highest possible device security and secure transmission systems to be included in any Internet of Things technologies in order to prevent fraud and allow for proper device identity authentication and authorisation; notes the potential for identification and product fraud through the cloning of Internet of Things tags or the interception of shared data;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers it a priority to ensure a global regulatory framework and specific timescales at European level to encourage and facilitate public and private investment in the field of the Internet of Things and in smart networks needed to support the development of new technologies;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to put forward in the following Communication specific guidelines in order to ensure that the development of IoT relies on the principle of security and privacy by design; stresses that privacy and information security features should be built into IoT related technologies before their widespread use;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the development of new applications and the actual functioning of the Internet of Things will be
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the development of new applications and the actual functioning of the Internet of Things will be intrinsically linked to the trust that European consumers have in the system; calls on the Commission to make further efforts to ensure that IoT related technologies include user requirements (e.g. traceability deactivation option) and respect the rights and freedoms of individuals;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the development of new applications and the actual functioning of the Internet of Things will be
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the development of new applications and the actual functioning of the Internet of Things will be intrinsically linked to the trust that European consumers have in the system; therefore cyber security and privacy must be ensured throughout the European Union;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the development of new applications
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that the IoT encompasses many benefits for the people with disabilities and can represent a way to meet the needs of an ageing population and providing assertive care services; stresses, however, that measures need to be taken to ensure privacy protection, ease of installation and operation as well as provision of information on the services to consumers;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that this trust must be based on a clear legal framework including rules governing the control, collection, processing, and use of the data collected and transmitted by the Internet of Things and the types of consent need from consumers;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the EU should devise a common framework of reference in order to frame and reinforce system governance, confidentiality, information security, ethical management, privacy, the collection and storage of personal data and consumer information,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the development of a transparent IoT system; in particular, in the context of person-to- thing and thing-thing interaction, the following aspects should be taken into consideration: • the explicit mentioning of the presence of means of enabling identification and traceability; • security measures ensuring that only authorised users can access data; • giving the consumers and the assigning authorities the possibility to check the readability of data and of the functioning of the system;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses that the governance of the Internet of Things must keep ‘red tape’ to a minimum and associate all relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process and calls therefore for a proper and adequate regulation at EU level;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Believes that the Internet of Things and ICT projects in general require broad information campaigns to explain to citizens the purpose of their implementation; stresses that informing society about the need for and benefits of items such as RFID is crucial to avoid this project to be misinterpreted and not supported by citizens;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Notes that the Internet of Things will lead to the collection of truly massive amounts of data; in this regard, calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for the adaptation of the European Data Protection Directive to address the date collected and transmitted by the Internet of Things;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 e (new) 7e. Believes that a general principle should be adopted in that Internet of Things technologies should be design to collect and use only the absolute minimum amount of data needed to complete its function and prevented from collecting any supplementary data;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 f (new) 7f. Calls for a high level of the data shared by the Internet of Things to be made anonymous before transmitting in order to secure privacy;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that, in order to revive the European economy, investment must be made in new information and communication technologies to facilitate economic growth by enabling ever increasing numbers of European citizens and enterprises to access new systems and new applications;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underlines that research will play a key role in creating competition between providers of the computing capacity that is required for Internet of Things applications to function in real time;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to continue funding projects under the Seventh Framework Programme in the field of the Internet of Things in order to bolster the European ICT sector, and endorses the use of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to promote its expansion; is concerned about red tape in the EU Framework Programme (FP); calls on the Commission to eliminate red tape by re-engineering FP processes and by creating a users’ board;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to continue funding projects under the Seventh Framework Programme in the field of the Internet of Things in order to bolster the European ICT sector, and endorses the use of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to promote its expansion; especially, calls for the development of pilot projects that can have an immediate positive effect on the everyday lives of European citizens in the areas of e-Health, e-Learning, e- Commerce, e-Accessibility, and energy efficiency);
source: PE-440.038
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2009-06-18T00:00:00New
2009-06-17T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.414New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.414 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE440.038New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE440.038 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.302&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-439302_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.317&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-439317_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.863&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-439863_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0154_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0154_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100614&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100614&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-154&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0154_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-154&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0154_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-207New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0207_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/01759New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe9e5d1d1c57374000000New
4f1ac76db819f25efd000088 |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe9e5d1d1c57374000000New
4f1ac76db819f25efd000088 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe9e5d1d1c57374000000New
4f1ac76db819f25efd000088 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|