Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | HÖKMARK Gunnar ( PPE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | ITRE | HÖKMARK Gunnar ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | KORHOLA Eija-Riitta ( PPE) | Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Former Committee Opinion | CULT | KAMMEREVERT Petra ( S&D) | Marietje SCHAAKE ( ALDE), Helga TRÜPEL ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presents a report on the Radio Spectrum Inventory.
The EU spectrum inventory - created as part of the radio spectrum policy programme- aims to allow identification of frequency bands where efficiency of existing spectrum use could be improved in order to accommodate spectrum demand in support of Union policies, to promote innovation and to enhance competition.
The report highlights the progress made and difficulties encountered in implementing the spectrum inventory. It analyses technology trends, and future needs regarding spectrum and examines whether there is a need for additional frequency bands to be harmonised for wireless broadband.
In spite of the difficulties encountered in collecting data , the initial inventory analysis has provided significant insights into the situation with regard to spectrum availability and use in the EU. These are as follows.
Analysis of supply and demand : a number of frequency bands which are currently not used or are substantially under-utilised in most Member States have been identified, though there may be variations across Member States. The analysis of technology trends, future needs and demand for spectrum suggests that many of the different types of applications, categorised in 14 application groupings are and will be in need of more spectrum. The report suggests a quantitative assessment of the short, medium and long-term growth in demand that can be expected for each grouping.
On the basis of the preliminary results the report notes that unused spectrum in the 400 MHz-6GHz range is rare but there are examples. On the demand side, future spectrum usage is expected to increase significantly for many applications over the next 10 years. This situation makes re-assignment increasingly difficult and costly.
The Commission considers that a sustainable way to satisfy spectrum demand in the medium and long term is to invest more time and resources in identifying and developing more sophisticated spectrum sharing concepts as detailed below, subject to the protection of effective competition:
· licensed Shared Access (LSA) assignment;
· geographical spectrum sharing with devices linked to geo-location databases (once available); and
· making more effective use of existing networks and spectrum assignments through densification, increase in spectrum re-use, and spectrum sharing between operators.
Based on the inventory analysis performed by the Commission and more detailed supply and demand information, the report sets out certain aspects as inventory output: (i) wireless broadband spectrum; (ii) additional harmonised frequency bands for wireless broadband; (iii) sharing of radar bands; (iv) wireless microphones; (v) satellite communications; (vi) short range devices.
Data collection: it is also apparent that some of the data, collection of which was envisaged will remain unavailable for the foreseeable future in some Member States which do not themselves collect this data and which consider it impossible to increase their data availability. The Commission will continue to cooperate with the Member States both in collecting data that are already available at Member State level and in obtaining additional data on a targeted basis. In particular frequency bands relevant to the implementation of the RSPP will be targeted.
In addition, the Commission will seek relevant data from Member States that request derogations from harmonisation measures on the basis of particular national situations. The data analysis tool will be complemented through other sources, e.g. through studies, inputs from RSPG or direct information from spectrum users.
The Commission will continue to build up the inventory with the aim of fulfilling its main purpose – achieving more efficient use of spectrum. The importance of evidence-based spectrum policy-making remains high on the agenda as demands for more spectrum from many sectors have been documented in the report. Discussions will continue with the Radio Spectrum Committee members on how to pursue the collection of data for the inventory.
This report presented by the Commission responds to the requirements laid down in Article 15 of Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (the RSPP) and Decision 676/2002/EC on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (the Radio Spectrum Decision). It merges these obligations into one concise report and focuses on the implementation of the Radio Spectrum Policy Programme.
Pursuant to the Radio Spectrum Decision and the RSPP, the Commission adopted implementing decisions supporting specific EU Policy areas. The specific EU policy areas include:
Digital Agenda for Europe : harmonisation of spectrum for wireless broadband as well as for short-range devices to facilitate "internet of things" applications; Single European Sky : harmonisation of spectrum for mobile communications on board aircrafts; Maritime and Land Transport : harmonisation of spectrum use for, among others, intelligent transport systems including electronic tolling systems and automotive short-range radars.
The RSPP has contributed to a more efficient use of spectrum by:
promoting spectrum sharing approaches e.g. by setting the goal of 1200 MHz for wireless broadband, initiating the process of the spectrum inventory which will be a tool to enable the Commission and Member States to define more fact-based policy.
In terms of concrete measures on the shared use of spectrum the Commission is aiding innovation by harmonising frequency bands that are subject to general authorisations (unlicensed spectrum) or individual rights of use (licensed shared access), as well as requesting related standards to the European Standards Organisations.
The programme has, however, shown limitations:
Differences in the conditions and authorisation procedures : the RSPP has shown limitations due to the general character of some of the regulatory principles it established, which need to be more precise for effective implementation. While each Member State continues to set the authorisation conditions and procedures for spectrum, the large differences in these conditions and procedures contribute to the fragmentation of the internal market with a negative impact on integration of networks across borders, on available handset capabilities and to other disadvantages for consumers.
The mere exchange of information and best practices based on the general principles and conditions of the current framework does not appear to be sufficient to remove these barriers to the single market. Legal certainty on well-established common principles and criteria that are applied by Member States in a coordinated way throughout the Union appear to be the minimum necessary.
Delays in assigning the 800 MHz band : these delays demonstrate the need for more nimble and flexible mechanisms for the harmonised timing of assignments throughout the Union or for categories of Member States based on the characteristics of the wireless broadband market, and for the harmonised duration of spectrum usage rights. In this regard, it is important to ensure the efficient and timely assignment of existing harmonised spectrum in order to accrue the potential socio-economic benefits through digital services provided over wireless broadband networks.
More specific provisions are urgently needed in such areas. To address these shortcomings, the Commission has proposed concrete legislative measures as part of the Connected Continent package. These establish: (i) a set of common spectrum authorisation principles and criteria; (ii) a formal time-limited mechanism for peer review of national plans with a view to ensure best practice.
Furthermore, legal certainty on common timing and duration of spectrum assignments for wireless broadband will be beneficial to operators in their business case evaluations and in their cross-border strategies and will allow them to have more predictable access to spectrum and conditions for investment.
To ensure that radio spectrum policy effectively contributes to EU policies, the Commission insists that there is a need to step up the coordination efforts being made under the strategic guidance of the RSPP and the successful technical implementation through the Radio Spectrum Decision, by strengthening the coordination of authorisations within Europe. A final report on the first RSPP and progress towards the targets set is planned for the end of 2015.
The Radio Spectrum Decision : the report notes that this Decision has proven successful in making available harmonised spectrum resources for strategic sectors in the internal market and is a positive example of cooperation with the Member States. Furthermore, the RSPP represents an important strategic framework for implementing Union spectrum policy using the mechanisms established by the RSD.
PURPOSE: to establish a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme.
CONTENT: this Decision establishes a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market in the Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum, such as electronic communications, research, technological development and space, transport, energy and audiovisual policies.
Policy objectives of the new Programme: in order to focus on the priorities of this Decision, Member States and the Commission shall cooperate to support and achieve the following policy objectives:
encourage efficient management and use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies reflecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum; seek to allocate sufficient and appropriate spectrum in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives and to best meet the increasing demand for wireless data traffic, thereby allowing the development of commercial and public services, while taking into account important general interest objectives such as cultural diversity and media pluralism; to that end, every effort should be made to identify, based on the inventory, at least 1 200 MHz of suitable spectrum by 2015 . That figure includes spectrum already in use; bridge the digital divide and contribute to the objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe , fostering access to broadband at a speed of not less than 30 Mbps by 2020 for all Union citizens and making it possible for the Union to have the highest possible broadband speed and capacity; enable the Union to take the lead in wireless electronic communication broadband services by freeing up sufficient spectrum in cost-efficient bands for those services to be widely available; secure opportunities for both the commercial as well as public sectors by means of increased mobile broadband capacities; promote innovation and investment through enhanced flexibility in the use of spectrum, through a consistent application across the Union of the principles of technology and service neutrality between the technological solutions that may be adopted and through adequate regulatory predictability of the Regulation; maintain and develop effective competition , in particular in electronic communication services; reduce the fragmentation and fully exploit the potential of the internal market in order to foster economic growth and economies of scale at EU level.
Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall, where appropriate, foster the collective use of spectrum as well as shared use of spectrum.
By 1 January 2013, Member States shall carry out the authorisation process in order to allow the use of the 800 MHz band for electronic communications services. The Commission shall grant specific derogations until 31 December 2015 for Member States in which exceptional national or local circumstances or cross-border frequency coordination problems would prevent the availability of the band, acting upon a duly substantiated application from the Member State concerned.
The Decision stipuates that an inventory of existing uses of spectrum, for both commercial and public purposes shall be established.
Reporting and review : by 10 April 2014, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the activities developed and the measures adopted. By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall conduct a review of the application of this Decision.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10.04.2012. Member States shall apply the policy orientations and objectives set out in this Decision by 1 July 2015 unless otherwise specified herein.
The European Parliament adopted, at second reading under the ordinary legislative procedure, a legislative resolution on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the recommendation for second reading contained in the report by Gunnar HOKMARK (EPP, SE) that the European Parliament approves unamended the Council’s position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme.
The Council's common position, adopted on 13 December 2011 and officially transmitted to the European Parliament on 19 January 2012, is based on the agreement reached on 24 October 2011 between the European Parliament and the Council.
The main results agreed upon are as follows:
the freeing up of the 800 MHz frequency band for wireless broadband internet services in all Member States by 1 January 2013; speeding up the development of mobile broadband of at least 30 Mbps by 2020 for all EU citizens, bridging therefore the digital dividend and contributing to the objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe; allocating at least 1200 MHz of spectrum to mobile data traffic by 2015; the creation of an inventory with a very large scope of the existing use of spectrum from 400MHz to6 GHz to create a flexible and coordinated European spectrum policy; the Commission shall assess and report by no later than 1 January 2015 whether there is a need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands; the Commission shall, in cooperation with Member States, assess the justification and feasibility of extending the allocations of unlicensed spectrum for wireless access systems, including radio local area networks to open up for more use of for example WiFi; the Union shall, upon request, assist Member States with legal, political and technical support to resolve spectrum coordination issues with Union neighbouring countries, including candidate and acceding countries.
The Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Member States shall apply the policy orientations and objectives sent out in this Decision by 1 July 2015 unless otherwise specified.
By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall conduct a review of the application of this Decision. Furthermore, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the activities developed and the measures adopted pursuant to this Decision.
The position of the Council at first reading is the result of a compromise reached after informal negotiations between the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission which culminated at the informal trilogue meeting of 24 October 2011, and which was confirmed by an exchange of letters between co-legislators.
This compromise includes:
a clear commitment to complete the authorisation process for already harmonised spectrum, including the 800 MHz band, by 1/1/2013; a strong inventory mechanism based on Commission implementing measures as well as clear deadlines for adopting those measures; an explicit target to identify at least 1200 MHz of spectrum by 2015 based on the inventory, for wireless broadband communications; a commitment to examine the need for further spectrum for wireless broadband based on capacity requirements; the means to guarantee competition in the use of spectrum in particular for electronic communications services; the development of policy initiatives on collective and shared use of spectrum; a provision to enhance EU coordination in international spectrum negotiations; a commitment to develop policy initiatives on the spectrum requirements of other internal market sectors and EU policies, including energy saving, Earth observation and monitoring, public safety and protection, wireless microphones and the Internet of Things.
Therefore, the Commission can accept the Council's position as it reflects the compromise reached and calls for similar adoption without amendment by Parliament in the shortest time possible considering the importance of the matter, the close deadlines set in the draft decision and the need for swift implementation thereof.
The Commission also made three statements for the minutes of the Council meeting of 13 December 2011 which explain the Commission's view on certain specific provisions:
the Commission notes that Article 9.2 requires the Commission to take utmost account of the views of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG) before adopting implementing acts in relation to the inventory. on Article 10.1 regarding international negotiations; on the procedure of adoption of implementing acts for Art. 13.2.
The Council adopted its position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme.
The European Parliament expressed broad support for the Commission proposal and adopted 87 amendments to it. The Council could broadly agree with the spirit of these amendments and has taken extensive account of them when drawing up its position at first reading.
The proposal was subject to five informal trialogues with the European Parliament.
During the trialogues, the co-legislators focussed their discussions on the legislative provisions dealing with:
The availability of spectrum for wireless data traffic : the Council met the Parliament's request for a quantitative target to be identified by 2015. In general, however, it was agreed that the radio spectrum policy programme should not refer to specific frequency bands or specific amounts of frequencies possibly needed for one or the other application, as this would pre-empt the outcome of the investigations to be carried out in the context of the spectrum inventory. The question whether the scope of the competition article should go beyond electronic communications services and also cover other EU policy areas depending on radio spectrum : as no concrete examples were available, which could clarify where potential competition problems could arise between electronic communications services and other EU policies relying on radio spectrum, such as research, technological development and space, transport, energy and audio-visual, the Council limited the scope of the competition article to electronic communications services. How best to establish an inventory of spectrum use : as neither the Commission's original proposal on the spectrum inventory nor Parliament's amendments to it were considered by the Council as appropriate proposals, the Council re-drafted the relevant legislative provisions. The issue of spectrum in international and bilateral negotiations : rather than supporting the new elements proposed by the Commission and the Parliament in this regard, the Council preferred to recall in the radio spectrum policy programme the already established principles, which apply to international spectrum negotiations.
The Council adopted its position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme.
The European Parliament expressed broad support for the Commission proposal and adopted 87 amendments to it. The Council could broadly agree with the spirit of these amendments and has taken extensive account of them when drawing up its position at first reading.
The proposal was subject to five informal trialogues with the European Parliament.
During the trialogues, the co-legislators focussed their discussions on the legislative provisions dealing with:
The availability of spectrum for wireless data traffic : the Council met the Parliament's request for a quantitative target to be identified by 2015. In general, however, it was agreed that the radio spectrum policy programme should not refer to specific frequency bands or specific amounts of frequencies possibly needed for one or the other application, as this would pre-empt the outcome of the investigations to be carried out in the context of the spectrum inventory. The question whether the scope of the competition article should go beyond electronic communications services and also cover other EU policy areas depending on radio spectrum : as no concrete examples were available, which could clarify where potential competition problems could arise between electronic communications services and other EU policies relying on radio spectrum, such as research, technological development and space, transport, energy and audio-visual, the Council limited the scope of the competition article to electronic communications services. How best to establish an inventory of spectrum use : as neither the Commission's original proposal on the spectrum inventory nor Parliament's amendments to it were considered by the Council as appropriate proposals, the Council re-drafted the relevant legislative provisions. The issue of spectrum in international and bilateral negotiations : rather than supporting the new elements proposed by the Commission and the Parliament in this regard, the Council preferred to recall in the radio spectrum policy programme the already established principles, which apply to international spectrum negotiations.
In a public session, the Council took note of the Presidency's progress on a proposal for a decision establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP).
The Presidency presented a progress report (see Council doc. 10295/11 ) to ministers, with the aim of informing them on the progress made during the Hungarian Presidency. It identifies the main areas where the Council has reached a high level of agreement and points out that there are a number of issues where an agreement in principle exists but which are likely to be discussed further, both within the Council as well as in the forthcoming negotiations with the European Parliament, which adopted its first reading at the beginning of May 2011.
The work of the Council's preparatory bodies focused in particular on the following issues:
aim and scope; general regulatory principles and policy objectives; enhanced efficiency and flexibility; competition; spectrum for wireless broadband; spectrum needs for specific EU policies; the radio spectrum inventory;
The work on this file will continue under the Polish Presidency.
The European Parliament adopted by 615 votes to 26, with 16 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme.
It adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Aim and scope : the resolution stipulates that this Decision establishes a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market. It covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as, but not limited to, electronic communications, research, development and innovation, transport, energy and audio-visual policy.
General regulatory principles : Parliament has specified the general regulatory principles which should be applied throughout the Union, notably:
encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, reflecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum; applying the most appropriate, non-discriminatory and least onerous authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage; guaranteeing the development of the internal market and digital services by ensuring effective competition, a pan-European level playing field and by promoting the emergence of future pan-European services; promoting innovation ; taking full account of the relevant Union law on human health of electromagnetic field emissions when defining the technical conditions of the use of spectrum; promoting technology and services neutrality in the use of the spectrum.
For electronic communications , Members consider that specific principles should apply, in accordance with Articles 8a, 9 and 9b of Directive 2002/21/EC and with Decision 676/2002/EC.
Policy objectives : policy objectives to be implemented by Member States and the Commission include the following:
make sufficient and appropriate spectrum allocated for mobile data traffic, amounting to at least 1200 MHz by 2015 to best meet the increasing demand for mobile data traffic, thereby allowing the development of commercial and public services, while taking into account important general interest objectives such as cultural diversity and media pluralism; bridge the digital divide and realise the objectives of the Digital Agenda, ensuring that all Union citizens have access to broadband, not less than 30 Mbps by 2020 and making it possible for the Union to have the highest possible broadband speed and capacity; enable the Union to take the lead in wireless electronic communication broadband services by opening up sufficient additional spectrum in the most cost-efficient bands for these services to be widely available; secure opportunities for both the commercial sector as well as public services by means of increased mobile broadband capacities; reduce the fragmentation and fully exploit the potential of the internal market in order to establish a pan-European level playing field in order to foster economic growth and economies of scope and scale at Union level; ensuring the accessibility of new consumer products and technologies so as to secure consumer endorsement for the transition to digital technology and efficient use of the digital dividend; reduce the Union's carbon footprint by enhancing the technical efficiency of wireless communication networks and applications.
Increasing efficiency and flexibility : Member States shall foster, in cooperation with the Commission, the collective use of spectrum as well as shared and unlicensed use of spectrum. They shall also foster current and new technologies such as geolocation databases and cognitive radio to develop for example in white spaces following a proper impact assessment. That impact assessment shall be issued within twelve months of the entry into force of this Decision.
Special attention shall also be given to standards for equipment to be used by disabled people , without, however, depriving them of the right to use non-standardised equipment if that is their preference. Efficient coordination of spectrum harmonisation and standardisation will be particularly important in this regard so that consumers can use appliances that depend on radio spectrum without restriction and throughout the internal market.
The measures that Member States are to adopt shall be taken in addition to the opening of the 900 MHz band in the near future, in line with the "GSM" Directive and in such a manner as to promote competition. Such measures shall be taken in a non-discriminatory manner and may not distort competition to the advantage of operators already dominant in the market.
Competition : the resolution calls on the Member States, prior to a planned spectrum assignment, to carefully examine whether the assignment is likely to distort or reduce competition in the mobile markets concerned, taking into account existing spectrum rights held by relevant market operators. If the spectrum assignment is likely to distort or reduce competition, Member States shall adopt the most appropriate measures to promote effective competition. Member States may reserve a certain part of a spectrum band or group of bands to be assigned to new entrants.
Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays, are non-discriminatory and promote effective competition by preventing any potential anti-competitive outcomes, for the benefit of EU citizens and consumers.
Spectrum for wireless broadband communications : Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services. Only in exceptional cases duly justified for technical and historical reasons, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until the end of 2015 in response to a duly motivated application from the Member State concerned. If cross-border frequency coordination problems with one or more third countries further prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise exceptional annual derogations until such obstacles are removed.
The Commission is invited to take action, in cooperation with Member States, at the appropriate levels to achieve further harmonisation and a more efficient use of the 1.5 GHz band (1452-1492 MHz) and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. In addition, the Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and, in cooperation with Member States, asses, no later than 1 January 2015, the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands, such as the 700 MHz band (694-790 MHz).
Spectrum needs for other wireless communication policies : in order to support the further development of innovative audiovisual media and other services to European citizens, taking into account the economic and social benefits of a digital single market, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure sufficient spectrum availability for satellite and terrestrial provision of such services.
Spectrum needs for specific Union policies : the Commission shall ensure that sufficient spectrum is made available under harmonised conditions and in harmonised bands for public protection and disaster relief (PPDR) and to take actions to support the development of safety services and the free circulation of related devices as well as the development of innovative interoperable solutions for PPDR. To ensure the efficient use of spectrum, the Commission shall examine the possibility of PPDR using military frequencies .
Members consider that it is necessary to seek to find a minimum set of harmonised core bands for programme making and special events (PMSE) in the Union, according to the Union's objectives to improve the integration of the internal market and access to culture. These harmonised bands shall be of the frequency 1GHz or higher.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report drafted by Gunnar HÖKMARK (EPP, SE) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme.
Aim and scope : the report stipulates that this Decision establishes a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market. It covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as, but not limited to, electronic communications, research, development and innovation, transport, energy and audio-visual policy.
General regulatory principles : Members have specified the general regulatory principles which should be applied throughout the Union, notably:
encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, reflecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum; applying the most appropriate, non-discriminatory and least onerous authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage; guaranteeing the development of the internal market and digital services by ensuring effective competition, a pan-European level playing field and by promoting the emergence of future pan-European services; promoting innovation; taking full account of the relevant Union law on human health of electromagnetic field emissions when defining the technical conditions of the use of spectrum; promoting technology and services neutrality in the use of the spectrum.
For electronic communications , Members consider that specific principles should apply, in accordance with Articles 8a, 9 and 9b of Directive 2002/21/EC and with Decision 676/2002/EC.
Policy objectives : policy objectives to be implemented by Member States and the Commission include the following:
make sufficient and appropriate spectrum allocated for mobile data traffic, amounting to at least 1200 MHz by 2015 ; bridge the digital divide and realise the objectives of the Digital Agenda, ensuring that all Union citizens have access to broadband, not less than 30 Mbps by 2020 and making it possible for the Union to have the highest possible broadband speed and capacity; enable the Union to take the lead in wireless electronic communication broadband services by opening up sufficient additional spectrum in the most cost-efficient bands for these services to be widely available; secure opportunities for both the commercial sector as well as public services by means of increased mobile broadband capacities; reduce the fragmentation and fully exploit the potential of the internal market in order to establish a pan-European level playing field in order to foster economic growth and economies of scope and scale at Union level; ensuring the accessibility of new consumer products and technologies so as to secure consumer endorsement for the transition to digital technology and efficient use of the digital dividend; reduce the Union's carbon footprint by enhancing the technical efficiency of wireless communication networks and applications.
Competition : the report calls on the Member States, prior to a planned spectrum assignment, to carefully examine whether the assignment is likely to distort or reduce competition in the mobile markets concerned, taking into account existing spectrum rights held by relevant market operators. If the spectrum assignment is likely to distort or reduce competition, Member States shall adopt the most appropriate measures to promote effective competition. Member States may reserve a certain part of a spectrum band or group of bands to be assigned to new entrants.
Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays, are non-discriminatory and promote effective competition by preventing any potential anti-competitive outcomes, for the benefit of EU citizens and consumers.
Spectrum for wireless broadband communications : Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services. Only in exceptional cases duly justified for technical and historical reasons, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until the end of 2015 in response to a duly motivated application from the Member State concerned. If cross-border frequency coordination problems with one or more third countries further prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise exceptional annual derogations until such obstacles are removed.
In addition, the Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and, in cooperation with Member States, asses, no later than 1 January 2015, the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands, such as the 700 MHz band (694-790 MHz).
Spectrum needs for other wireless communication policies : in order to support the further development of innovative audiovisual media and other services to European citizens, taking into account the economic and social benefits of a digital single market, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure sufficient spectrum availability for satellite and terrestrial provision of such services.
Spectrum needs for specific Union policies : Members consider that it is necessary to seek to find a minimum set of harmonised core bands for programme making and special events (PMSE) in the Union, according to the Union's objectives to improve the integration of the internal market and access to culture. These harmonised bands shall be of the frequency 1GHz or higher.
In a public session, the Council discussed, on the basis of questions prepared by the Presidency a proposal for a decision establishing the first radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP).
The Presidency presented a progress report to ministers, with the aim of informing them on the work done so far and of identifying political issues in this proposal on which future work under the Hungarian Presidency should focus.
Ministers generally welcomed the Commission proposal acknowledging that radio spectrum could make an important contribution to the digital society, fast wireless services, economic recovery, growth, high-quality jobs and long-term EU competitiveness.
Provisions on wireless broadband were identified as the main and most urgent elements of the proposal, although deadlines for making spectrum available were considered by some delegations as being too ambitious.
Some reservations were expressed regarding proposed actions in the area of spectrum management such as imposing coverage obligations or other rights–of–use conditions, which should be subject to national specific circumstances.
The proposed inventory of spectrum use received broad support. At the same time, ministers warned about the duplication of efforts, costs, the confidentiality of information and called on the Commission to build on existing initiatives in this area. In particular ministers from Member States with borders with non–EU countries called for EU support to coordinate spectrum usage.
At this stage in the negotiations on the RSPP proposal in the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Society, the main fundamental questions that require a common view from the Council include the following:
Objectives of the RSPP proposal : what are the main objectives of the RSPP proposal. Is it to facilitate the timely roll-out of wireless broadband or is it also to urge the Member States to manage their spectrum more efficiently, supplemented by further actions and increased coordination at EU level? Legal basis and scope of the proposal : the regulatory framework for ECS is based on Article 114 TFEU but is this also appropriate for other sectors using spectrum, such as R&D and transport? Is there a need to also co-ordinate spectrum availability for other internal market services, as is currently being done for ECS services? Should and could there be a role for the EU in respect of spectrum harmonisation for public security purposes? Spectrum for wireless broadband : taking into account that certain Member States face difficulties in opening up the 800 MHz band for wireless broadband because of national (security or defence) situations or because of cross-border frequency co-ordination problems with third countries, would it be feasible to agree on a common EU date for implementation? Spectrum management issues : is there a justified need for further changes to the current spectrum management practices at this stage pending the transposition of the new regulatory framework for ECS by May 2011?
PURPOSE: to establish a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: Framework Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC invites the Commission to present a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council to establish a multiannual Radio Spectrum Policy Programme (RSPP) setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum, taking utmost account of the opinion of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG).
Spectrum is essential for the digital society, fast wireless services, economic recovery, growth, high-quality jobs and long-term EU competitiveness.
Spectrum policy initiatives are also key to the Digital Agenda for Europe and to the Europe 2020 strategy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment identifies options and assesses whether EU intervention would add value compared to national or regional action. It identifies the strategic direction necessary for spectrum policy at EU level. It highlights the need for a global EU spectrum policy approach given the impact of spectrum on a number of sectors with varying degrees of EU competence.
LEGAL BASE: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
CONTENT: the proposed programme sets out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use in order to achieve the internal market. It supports the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Digital Agenda for Europe and promotes other EU policies concerned with spectrum. It will ensure the application of principles and define policy orientations for all aspects of spectrum policy with an EU dimension. The programme sets concrete priority initiatives for enhanced coordination, flexibility, and availability of spectrum for wireless broadband communications and other specific EU policies; it requires an inventory of existing uses and emerging spectrum. It identifies improvements to safeguard EU interests in international negotiations, and to assist Member States in bilateral negotiations, and calls for improved cooperation between technical bodies. The proposal requires the Commission to report by 2015.
PURPOSE: to establish a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: Framework Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC invites the Commission to present a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council to establish a multiannual Radio Spectrum Policy Programme (RSPP) setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum, taking utmost account of the opinion of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG).
Spectrum is essential for the digital society, fast wireless services, economic recovery, growth, high-quality jobs and long-term EU competitiveness.
Spectrum policy initiatives are also key to the Digital Agenda for Europe and to the Europe 2020 strategy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment identifies options and assesses whether EU intervention would add value compared to national or regional action. It identifies the strategic direction necessary for spectrum policy at EU level. It highlights the need for a global EU spectrum policy approach given the impact of spectrum on a number of sectors with varying degrees of EU competence.
LEGAL BASE: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
CONTENT: the proposed programme sets out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use in order to achieve the internal market. It supports the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Digital Agenda for Europe and promotes other EU policies concerned with spectrum. It will ensure the application of principles and define policy orientations for all aspects of spectrum policy with an EU dimension. The programme sets concrete priority initiatives for enhanced coordination, flexibility, and availability of spectrum for wireless broadband communications and other specific EU policies; it requires an inventory of existing uses and emerging spectrum. It identifies improvements to safeguard EU interests in international negotiations, and to assist Member States in bilateral negotiations, and calls for improved cooperation between technical bodies. The proposal requires the Commission to report by 2015.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0536
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0228
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2012/243
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 081 21.03.2012, p. 0007
- Draft final act: 00010/2012/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T7-0043/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A7-0019/2012
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2012)0003
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Council position: 16226/1/2011
- Council position published: 16226/1/2011
- Council statement on its position: 17651/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)5858
- Debate in Council: 3093
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0220/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0151/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0151/2011
- Committee opinion: PE458.565
- Committee opinion: PE454.499
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE460.615
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE460.855
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0362/2011
- Committee draft report: PE454.746
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Debate in Council: 3052
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Legislative proposal: COM(2010)0471
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1034
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1035
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2010)0471
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2010)0471 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1034 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1035 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE454.746
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0362/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE460.615
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE460.855
- Committee opinion: PE454.499
- Committee opinion: PE458.565
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0151/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)5858
- Council statement on its position: 17651/2011
- Council position: 16226/1/2011
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2012)0003 EUR-Lex
- Draft final act: 00010/2012/LEX
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2014)0228
- Follow-up document: COM(2014)0536 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
- Contribution: COM(2010)0471
Activities
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Vicky FORD
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Teresa RIERA MADURELL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Giles CHICHESTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Francesco DE ANGELIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Vladko Todorov PANAYOTOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Jens ROHDE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Marietje SCHAAKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Catherine TRAUTMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Radio spectrum policy (debate)
Votes
A7-0151/2011 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 20/1 #
A7-0151/2011 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 20/2 #
A7-0151/2011 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 69/1 #
A7-0151/2011 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 69/2 #
A7-0151/2011 - Gunnar Hökmark - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
485 |
2010/0252(COD)
2011/02/04
CULT
51 amendments...
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a key resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and applications such as alarm, remote controls, hearing aids, microphones, and medical equipment. It supports public services such as security and safety services, including civil protection, the facilitation of relations between the citizen and the State by means of electronic governance and scientific activities, such as meteorology, Earth observation, radio astronomy and space research. Regulatory measures on spectrum therefore have economic, safety, health, public interest, cultural, scientific, social, environmental and technical implications.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a key resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use at Union level should enhance the single market for wireless electronic communications services and equipment as well as other Union policies requiring spectrum use, thus creating new opportunities for innovation and contributing to economic recovery and social integration across the Union, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum. To this end, the Union therefore needs a policy programme that covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as electronic communications, research and development, transport, culture and energy.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should specify guiding principles and objectives up to 2015 for Member States and Union institutions, and set out specific implementation initiatives.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The programme should also take into account Decision No 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (Radio Spectrum Decision) and the technical expertise of the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should substantially benefit economic growth. Therefore, bands where flexible use has already been introduced by Union law
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if existing users receive undue competitive advantages. Award conditions should be framed so as to permit a level playing field in competition with regard to rural coverage and not hinder newcomers from entering the market. Furthermore, it should not be permissible to discriminate against new technologies, either, solely because they are subsequently available on the market. Limited spectrum access, in particular when appropriate spectrum becomes scarcer, can create a barrier to entry for new services or applications and hamper innovation and competition. Acquisition of new usage rights, including through spectrum trading or other transactions between users, and the introduction of new flexible criteria for spectrum use can have an impact on the existing competitive situation. Member States should therefore take appropriate ex ante or ex post regulatory measures (such as action to amend existing rights, to prohibit certain acquisitions of spectrum rights, to impose conditions on spectrum hoarding and efficient use such as those referred to in Article 9 paragraph 7 of the Framework Directive, to limit the amount of spectrum for each operator, or to avoid excessive accumulation of spectrum) to avoid distortions of competition in line with the principles underpinning Article 5(6) of Directive 2002/20/EC (the "Authorisation" Directive) and Article 1(2) of Directive 87/372/EEC (the "GSM" Directive).
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision 2007/344/EC on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the Community6 requires Member States to publish information on usage rights, a detailed inventory of existing spectrum use together with an effective review and assessment methodology are necessary in the Union to improve the efficiency of spectrum and radio equipment use, in particular between 300 MHz and 3 GHz. This would help to identify inefficient technologies and usages in both the
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity7 are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 a (new) (11a) New Long-Term Evolution (LTE) broadband mobile communications networks are being rolled out in various Member States. Those networks use the 790-862 MHz frequency band. Some radio microphones currently operate in that band, possibly causing interference. This may also concern devices operated in schools, theatres and conference venues or by other commercial, public or private users. The requisite technical retrofitting will be achievable only with considerable financial outlay, and it is imperative to clarify where responsibility lies in this connection.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) Additional spectrum may be needed by other sectors such as transport (for safety, information and management systems), R&D, public protection and disaster relief, e-health
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 a (new) 15a. Moreover, the expansion of the spectrum by the abovementioned sectors should be accompanied by means of public information on the additional use of the spectrum, as well as training programmes, allowing citizens to expand the inherent official initiatives and creating a real ability to mobilise society.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) (25a) This Decision is without prejudice to the protection afforded to market players by Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services1; --------------- 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) It is without prejudice to measures taken at national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) applying the
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring effective competition, so as to foster cultural diversity and media pluralism in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring effective competition, while also pursuing the objectives of cultural diversity and social and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring effective competition, taking account of the objectives of cultural diversity and media pluralism, and of social and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives in the social, cultural and economic fields;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) make spectrum use more efficient by giving preference to technologies which use little spectrum; make complementary use of technological features such as hotspots and Wi-Fi, for example, which require no spectrum;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) enhance the efficient use of spectrum by harnessing the benefits of general authorisations and increasing the use of such types of authorisation; improve the position of consumers with regard to the coexistence of old and new applications;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) avoid harmful interference or disturbance by other radio or non-radio devices by facilitating the development of
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) avoid harmful interference or disturbance b
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum and co-existence between new and existing services and devices for the benefit of end users and consumers.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – title Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. In order to
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Member States wish to adopt one of the measures under paragraph 2, they must do so in accordance with the conditions stipulated in Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive and in accordance with the procedures under Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services1; ------------------- 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 17 J
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users. In connection with reallocation of the 800 MHz band, Member States shall ensure interference-free use of receivers by end users.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the requisite technical and regulatory measures are implemented to avoid interference between electronic communications services in the 800 MHz frequency band and PMSE users at below 790 MHz.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of additional spectrum bands for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access at
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the continued availability of
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In order to support the future development of innovative audiovisual media services, and in particular those stemming from the switch to digital television, the Member States shall, in cooperation with the Commission, and in consideration of the economic and social benefits of the internal digital market, ensure spectrum availability for the provision of audiovisual media services and protect the radio frequencies these require.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and the Commission shall review the spectrum needs of, and collaborate with, the scientific and academic community; identify a number of research and development initiatives and innovative applications that may have a major socio-
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities. It shall also be ensured that, where usage is not optimum, the necessary measures are taken in order to maximise efficient use. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers' and operators' demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Union shall participate in international negotiations relating to spectrum matters to defend its interests, acting within a clear mandate from the European Parliament and the Council and in accordance with Union law concerning, among other things, the principles of internal and external competences of the Union.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that international regulations allow the full use of frequency bands for the purposes for which they are designated under Member State and Union law, and that a sufficient amount of appropriately protected spectrum is available for Union sectoral policies.
Amendment Amendment28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)3 provides that the Commission may submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council for establishing multiannual radio spectrum policy programmes setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum in accordance with the directives applicable to electronic communications networks and services. These policy orientations and objectives should refer to the availability and efficient use of spectrum necessary for the establishment and functioning of the internal market. This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law, in particular Directives 1999/5/EC and Directives 2002/20/EC and 2002/21/EC, as well as Decision No 676/2002/EC. It is also without prejudice to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audio-visual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence. Furthermore, having realised that there is a real risk of interference in the general reception of audiovisual broadcasting - analogue or not -, such policies and the market it refers to must ensure a strong consumer's rights protection and proper public information on the forthcoming change.
source: PE-458.498
2011/03/07
IMCO
84 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall, on the basis of clearly defined and transparent criteria and methods, allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers' and operators' demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, based on clearly defined and transparent assessment criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers ‘and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where possible, the Commission shall also include in the inventory referred to in paragraph 1, information on spectrum use by third partner states neighbouring a Member State that could have a direct or indirect effect on spectrum use within the Union.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)3 provides that the Commission may submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council for establishing multiannual radio spectrum policy programmes setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum in accordance with the directives applicable to electronic communications networks and services. These policy orientations and objectives should refer to the availability and efficient use of spectrum necessary for the establishment and functioning of the internal market. The radio spectrum policy programme is included among the 50 priority actions of the Single Market Act. This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law, in particular Directives 1999/5/EC and Directives 2002/20/EC and 2002/21/EC, as well as Decision No 676/2002/EC. It is also without prejudice to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audio-visual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence. To this end, in support of the goals and key actions outlined in the EU2020 Strategy, the Digital Agenda, the Innovation Union and the Single Market Act Communication, the Commission should set the target date by which it will bring forward a legislative proposal for establishing a European Radio Spectrum Action Programme.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) provides that the Commission may submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council for establishing multiannual radio spectrum policy programmes setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum in accordance with the directives applicable to electronic communications networks and services. These policy orientations and objectives should refer to the availability and efficient use of spectrum necessary for the establishment and functioning of the internal market. This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law, in particular Directives 1999/5/EC
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Spectrum is a publicly held good which can not be privately owned but which must be regulated by states in order to facilitate its usage by the means of licensed transmission rights or licence- free usage rights;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a key public resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and applications such as alarm, remote controls, hearing aids, microphones, and medical equipment. It supports public services such as security and safety services, including civil protection, and scientific activities, such as meteorology, Earth observation, radio astronomy and space research. Regulatory measures on spectrum therefore have economic, safety,
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 a (new) (2a) A renewed economic and social approach with regards to the management, allocation and utilisation of the spectrum should be adopted, whereby particular focus is directed towards the formulation of regulation which ensures greater spectrum efficiency, better frequency planning and safeguards against anti-competitive behaviour and the taking of anti-social measures with regards to the usage of the spectrum.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use at Union level should enhance the single market for wireless electronic communications services and equipment as well as other Union policies requiring spectrum use, thus creating new opportunities for innovation and contributing to economic recovery and
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to combat unfair spectrum accumulation by dominant market players and to promote greater consumer choice, this programme shall also ensure that spectrum is attributed in a fair and balanced way so that it enables service providers to offer to consumers a wide array of culturally diverse television, radio and digital broadcasting.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to combat unfair spectrum accumulation by dominant market players and to promote greater consumer choice, this programme shall also ensure that spectrum is attributed in a fair and balanced way so that it enables service providers to offer to consumers a wide array of culturally diverse television, radio and digital broadcasting.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should specify guiding principles and objectives up to 2015 for Member States and Union institutions, and set out specific implementation initiatives. While spectrum management is still largely a national competence, it should be exercised in compliance with existing Union law and allow for action to pursue Union policies. Special national arrangements for spectrum use must be avoided, so as to prevent obstructive effects on European markets, although decisions to award usage rights should continue to be taken at national level and with regard to existing national business models.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should specify guiding principles and objectives up to 2015 for Member States and Union institutions, and set out specific implementation initiatives. While spectrum management is
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the optimal use of spectrum as a public good may require innovative authorisation solutions such as collective use of spectrum, general authorisations or infrastructure sharing. The application of such principles in the Union might be facilitated by the definition of certain common or converging conditions for spectrum usage. General authorisations, which are the least onerous authorisation system, are of particular interest where interference does not risk hampering the development of other services.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should substantially benefit economic growth. Therefore, bands where flexible use has already been introduced by Union law should be immediately made tradable pursuant to the Framework Directive. In addition, common principles for the format and content of such tradable rights
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity7 are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use and should take account of legally defined sharing conditions. European standards for non-radio electric and electronic equipment and networks should also avoid disturbance to spectrum use. The cumulative impact of the increasing volume and density of wireless devices and applications combined with the diversity of spectrum use challenges current approaches to interference management. These should be examined and reassessed together with receiver characteristics and more sophisticated interference avoidance mechanisms, with the aim of avoiding harmful interference or disturbance to the existing and future spectrum users.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013. In the longer term, additional spectrum
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013. In the longer term, additional spectrum below 790 MHz could also be envisaged on the basis of the results of the inventory of existing spectrum use, depending on experience and the lack of spectrum in other bands adequate for coverage. Considering the capacity of the 800 MHz band to transmit over large areas, coverage obligations should be attached to rights.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013. In the longer term, additional spectrum
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions could be defined in concerted action among Member States and with the Commission. Conditions could include coverage obligations, spectrum block size, the timing of granting rights, access to mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions could be defined in concerted action among Member States and with the Commission. Conditions could include coverage obligations,
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 20 (20) To evolve from current practice and building on the principles defined in the Council Conclusions of 3 February 1992 on procedures to be followed at the World Administrative Radio Conference of 1992, and where the World Radio communications Conferences (WRC) and other multilateral negotiations touch upon principles and policy issues with an important Union dimension, the Union should be able to establish new procedures to defend its interests in multilateral negotiations
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) The Commission should report to the European Parliament and the Council at regular intervals on the results achieved under this Decision, as well as on planned future actions.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) (25a) None of the provisions of this Decision should prejudice the protection afforded to market players by Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services1. ______________ 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Decision establishes a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Decision shall be without prejudice to Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services. __________________________ 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, and in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, and in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies; this shall be based on observance of the principles of flexibility, effective use of frequencies in line with needs, ensuring a level playing field and non-discriminatory competition, and safeguarding national specificities in relation to business models;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the least onerous non- discriminatory authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring effective competition and efficient coordination of spectrum harmonisation and standardisation.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives, while taking into account important general interest objectives such as cultural diversity and media pluralism, as well as the interests of various radio spectrum users;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which results in significant harm to competition and in a greater loss of cultural diversity;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which results in significant harm to competition by means of withdrawal of frequency rights or other measures;
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g a (new) (ga) in defining those areas of the spectrum which should be made open for use without licensed rights and/or reserved to scientific research;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt by 1 January 2013 authorisation and allocation measures appropriate for the development of broadband services, in conformity with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Member States and the Commission shall cooperate to develop and harmonise standards for radio equipment and telecommunications terminals as well as for electric and electronic equipment and networks based where necessary upon standardisation mandates from the Commission to the relevant standardisation bodies. Efficient coordination of spectrum harmonisation and standardisation will be particularly important in this regard so that consumers can use appliances that depend on radio spectrum without restriction and throughout the internal market.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Member States and the Commission shall cooperate to develop and harmonise standards for radio equipment and telecommunications terminals as well as for electric and electronic equipment and networks based where necessary upon standardisation mandates from the Commission to the relevant standardisation bodies. Special attention shall also be given to standards for equipment to be used by disabled people, without, however, depriving them of the right to use non- standardised equipment if that is their preference.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum as a public good.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. In order to limit excessive electromagnetic field emissions and increase efficiency in transmission networks, the Member States shall foster greater cooperation between spectrum rights license holders towards the sharing of transmission infrastructures, with a special focus on densely populated areas.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The measures provided for in paragraph 1 shall be taken in addition to the opening of the 900 MHz band in the near future, in line with the amended "GSM" Directive and in such a manner as to promote competition. Such measures must be taken in a non-discriminatory manner and may not distort competition to the advantage of operators already dominant in the market.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) Member States may limit the amount of spectrum for which rights of use are granted to any
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) Member States may take steps to achieve a more even spectrum allocation between economic operators by reserving spectrum for new entrants to a frequency band or group of bands with similar characteristics or by reserving spectrum for unlicensed usage in those bands;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and discrimination and promote effective competition.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition. In order to combat unfair spectrum accumulation by dominant market players and to promote greater consumer choice, Member States shall also ensure that spectrum is attributed in a fair and balanced way as to allow service providers to offer to consumers a wide array of culturally diverse television, radio and digital broadcasting.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition. In order to combat unfair spectrum accumulation by dominant market players and to promote greater consumer choice, Member States shall also ensure that spectrum is attributed in a fair and balanced way as to allow service providers to offer to consumers a wide array of culturally diverse television, radio and digital broadcasting.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Member States wish to adopt one of the measures under paragraph 2, they shall do so in accordance with the conditions stipulated in Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive and in accordance with the procedures under Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services1; __________________________ 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.09, p. 37.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Member States wish to adopt any such measures as are contemplated by paragraph 2, they shall do so by the imposition of conditions pursuant to Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive, in conformity with the procedures for the imposition or variation of such conditions laid down in the Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services1. __________ 1 OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p. 37.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down in Decision 2010/267/EU, pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 17 J
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 17 J
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review the use of the
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review the use of the
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, i
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users nor lead to disruption of the existing broadcasting services.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users nor lead to disruption of the existing broadcasting services.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, should take the necessary technical and regulatory measures to prevent harmful interference between mobile services and broadcasting and PMSE users. The Member States should make sufficient funds available in good time to cover the migration costs associated with the freeing of the 800 MHz band and the measures to protect against interference.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall implement necessary technical and regulatory measures in order to avoid harmful interference from electronic communications services in the 800 MHz band to broadcasting and PMSE services below 790 MHz.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. The Commission shall encourage Member States to ensure the timely availability of sufficient funds to cover the migration costs and the costs associated with the measures to limit interferences to broadcasting services.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of additional spectrum bands for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. In order to support the further development of innovative audiovisual media and other services to European citizens, taking into account the economic and social benefits of a digital single market, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure sufficient spectrum availability for satellite and terrestrial provision of such services.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In cooperation with the Commission, Member States shall ensure sufficient means of delivery for terrestrial broadcasting services, without prejudice to the principle of service neutrality.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall, in cooperation with the Commission, seek to find a minimum set of harmonised core bands for PMSEs in the Union, according to the Union's objectives to improve the integration of the internal market and access to culture. These harmonised bands should be on 1GHz or higher frequencies.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States and the Commission shall ensure spectrum availability for RFID and other Internet of Things (IOT) wireless communication technologies and shall work towards standardisation of spectrum allocation for IOT communication across Member States.
source: PE-458.837
2011/03/14
ITRE
350 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013. In that connection, prompt implementation would forestall technical problems, in particular in regions bordering on two or more Member States. In the longer term, additional spectrum below 790 MHz could also be envisaged, depending on experience and the lack of spectrum in other bands adequate for coverage. Considering the capacity of the 800 MHz band to transmit over large areas, coverage obligations should be attached to rights.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by, for example, wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band is optimal for the coverage of large areas by wireless broadband services. Building on the harmonisation of technical conditions under Decision 2010/267/EU, and on Commission Recommendation of 28 October 2009 calling for analogue broadcasting to be switched off by 1 January 2012, and given rapid national regulatory developments, this band should in principle be made available for electronic communications in the Union by 2013.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The 800 MHz band
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Commission Decision 2010/267/EU designated the 800 MHz band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communication services leaving the Member States to decide individually whether and at what point in time to designate or make available the 800 MHz band for such systems. Nevertheless, with a view to achieving the targets for broadband coverage set up by the Europe 2020 Strategy, the introduction of a deadline for making available the 800 MHz band for systems capable of providing electronic communication services may be needed.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Increased mobile broadband opportunities may provide the cultural sector with new distribution platforms, thereby paving the way for a future development of the sector. It is essential that terrestrial broadcasting services and other actors be able to develop their services when additional part of the spectrum is freed up for wireless services. Member States should grant appropriate compensation to existing users for migration costs, resulting from the opening up of additional spectrum.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Increased mobile broadband opportunities are crucial to provide the cultural sector with new distribution platforms, thereby paving the way for a future thriving development of the sector. It is essential that terrestrial TV services and other actors can maintain or develop new services when part of the spectrum is freed up for wireless services. Migration costs, resulting from the opening up of spectrum may be covered through licence fees.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Wireless access systems, including radio local access networks, are outgrowing their current allocations on an unlicensed basis at 2.4GHz and 5GHz. The feasibility of extending the allocations of unlicensed spectrum for wireless access systems, including radio local area networks, established by Decision 2005/513/EC should be assessed in relation with the inventory of existing uses of and emerging needs for spectrum and depending on use of spectrum for other usages.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Wireless access systems operating under general authorisations, including radio local area networks, are outgrowing their current allocations on a licence- exempt basis at 2.4GHz and 5GHz. In order to accommodate the next generation of such wireless technologies, for example, wider channels are required to enable speeds in excess of 1Gbps that need access to additional spectrum bands, to be identified through the inventory of existing uses of and emerging needs for spectrum.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 a (new) (13a) While broadcast will remain an important distribution platform for content, as it is still the most economical platform for mass-distribution, broadband, fixed as mobile, and other new services provide new opportunities for the cultural sector to diversify its range of distribution platforms, to deliver on-demand services and to tap into the economic potential of the major increase in data traffic.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 b (new) (13b) It has to be acknowledged that fixing of any obligatory deadline for making available the 800 Mhz band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communication services could have direct implications on the organisation of the use of the band for general interest objectives or public security and defence purposes in some Member States. Furthermore, the optimal use of 800 MHz band may be impeded in cases where third countries have decided on different uses that cause harmful interference in some Member States and prevent them from efficient use of the 800 MHz band for systems capable of providing electronic communication services on their whole territory or on a part of it. In such cases the deadline to be set up in the present Decision for implementation of Commission Decision 2010/267/EU may need to be postponed in some Member States.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions could be defined in concerted action among Member States and with the Commission. Conditions could include coverage obligations, spectrum block size, the timing of granting rights, access to mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs)
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions could be defined in concerted action among Member States and with the Commission. Conditions could include coverage obligations, spectrum block size, the timing of granting rights, access to mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and the duration of rights of use. Reflecting the importance of spectrum trading for increasing efficient use of spectrum, facilitating the emergence of new pan-European operators and developing the internal market for wireless equipment and services, these conditions should apply to spectrum bands that are allocated to wireless communications, and for which rights of use may be transferred or leased.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 (14) Since a common approach and economies of scale are key to developing broadband communications throughout the Union and preventing competition distortion and market fragmentation among Member States, certain authorisation and procedural conditions could be defined in concerted action among Member States and with the Commission. Conditions could include coverage obligations, spectrum block size, the timing of granting rights, access to mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and the duration of rights of use. Reflecting the importance of spectrum trading for increasing efficient use of spectrum, facilitating the emergence of pan-European services and developing the internal market for wireless equipment and services, these conditions should apply to spectrum bands that are allocated to wireless communications, and for which rights of use may be transferred or leased.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) Additional spectrum may be needed by other sectors such as transport (for safety, information and management systems), R&D, e-health, e-inclusion and public protection and disaster relief,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) Additional spectrum may be needed by other sectors such as transport (for safety, information and management systems), R&D, public protection and disaster relief, e-health and e-inclusion. Optimising synergies and direct links between spectrum policy and R&D activities and carrying out studies of radio compatibility between different spectrum users should help innovation. The Commission's Joint Research Centre should help in developing the technical aspects of spectrum regulation, notably by providing testing facilities to verify interference models relevant to Union legislation. Moreover, results of research under the Seventh Framework Programme require the
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) Protection of public health against electromagnetic fields is essential for citizens‘ well-being and for a coherent approach to spectrum authorisation in the Union; while subject to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields, it is essential to ensure constant monitoring of the ionising and non-ionising effects of spectrum use on health, including the real-life cumulative effects of spectrum use in various frequencies by an increasing number of equipment types. While achieving appropriate public safety, Member States should ensure protective measures are technology and service neutral.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) Protection of public health against electromagnetic fields is essential for citizens‘ well-being and for a coherent approach to spectrum authorisation in the Union; while subject to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields, it is essential to ensure constant monitoring of the ionising and non-ionising effects of spectrum use on health, including the real-life cumulative effects of spectrum use in various frequencies by an increasing number of equipment types; while achieving appropriate public safety, Member States should ensure protective measures are technology and service neutral.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) Protection of public health against electromagnetic fields is essential for citizens
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 18 (18) Essential public interest objectives such as safety of life call for coordinated technical solutions for the interworking of safety and emergency services between Member States. Sufficient spectrum should be made available on a coherent basis for the development and free circulation of safety services and devices and innovative pan-European or interoperable safety and emergency solutions. Studies have already shown the need for additional harmonised spectrum below 1 GHz to deliver mobile broadband services for public protection and disaster relief, across the Union in the next 5 to 10 years. Satellite will also play an essential role in the delivery of a world class internal and external disaster response capability, a policy goal that has been foreseen in the recent Communication from DG ECHO, which will entail the use of satellite spectrum to contribute to European capabilities both within and beyond Europe’s borders.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 18 (18) Essential public interest objectives such as safety of life call for coordinated technical solutions for the interworking of safety and emergency services between Member States. Sufficient spectrum should be made available
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 19 (19) Spectrum regulation has strong cross- border or international dimensions, due to propagation characteristics, the international nature of markets dependent
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 20 (20) To evolve from current practice and building on the principles defined in the Council Conclusions of 3 February 1992 on procedures to be followed at the World Administrative Radio Conference of 1992, and where the World Radio communications Conferences (WRC) and other multilateral negotiations touch upon principles and policy issues with an important Union dimension, the Union
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 20 (20) To evolve from current practice and building on the principles defined in the Council Conclusions of 3 February 1992 on procedures to be followed at the World Administrative Radio Conference of 1992, and where the World Radio communications Conferences (WRC) and other multilateral negotiations touch upon principles and policy issues with an important Union dimension, the Union should be able to establish new procedures to defend its interests in multilateral negotiations
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 20 (20) To evolve from current practice and building on the principles defined in the Council Conclusions of 3 February 1992 on procedures to be followed at the World Administrative Radio Conference of 1992, and where the World Radio communications Conferences (WRC) and other multilateral negotiations touch upon principles and policy issues with an important Union dimension, the Union should be able to establish new procedures to defend its interests in multilateral negotiations, in addition to the
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 21 (21) To avoid the growing pressure on frequency band reserved for satellite navigation and satellite communication their bandwidth must be secured in the new planning of spectrum use; the 2012 WRC includes specific issues of Union relevance such as the
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Nothing in this Decision is intended to detract from the protection afforded to economic operators by the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communication networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Nothing in this Decision is intended to detract from the protection afforded to economic operators by the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Nothing in this Decision is intended to detract from the protection afforded to economic operators by the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes, in accordance with Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC and Decision No 67/2002/EC, a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes, in accordance with Directives 2002/21/EC, 2002/20/EC and 2002/19/EC, Directive 2002/22/EC and Decision No 67/2002/EC, a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes, in accordance with Directives 2002/21/EC, 2002/20/EC and 2002/19/EC, Directive 2002/22/EC, and Decision No 67/2002/EC, a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes a multi-annual radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum to ensure the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Decision establishes a radio spectrum policy programme for the strategic planning
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) This decision applies without prejudice to existing European law or to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audio- visual policy and without prejudice to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This decision shall be without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy, and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This decision shall be without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy, and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This decision shall be without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy, and to the right of Member States to organize and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Decision is without prejudice to existing EU law and to measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law, to pursue general interest objectives, and in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy and to the right of Member States to organise and use their spectrum for public order and public security purposes and defence.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Decision covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as but not limited to electronic communications, research and development, transport, energy and audiovisual.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Decision covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as electronic communications, research and development, transport, energy and audio- visual.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 b (new) This Decision is in accordance with existing EU law, in particular Directives 2002/20/EC and 2002/21/EC, as well as Decision No 676/2002/EC and Directive 1999/5/EC, and also with measures taken at national level, in compliance with EU law and respecting relevant international agreements, including the ITU Radio Regulations.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in a transparent manner, in order to ensure the consistent application of the following general regulatory principles across the Union:
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies. Therefore the principles of flexibility and use of spectrum that is market oriented and effective, as a result of ensuring fair competition by involving existing business models on national level are of utmost importance;
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, whilst taking account of the social, cultural and economic value of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies in such a way that the interference-free operation of existing electronic communication networks are guaranteed;
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, whilst taking account of its social, cultural and economic implications;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, at the same time taking account of the social, cultural and economic value of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies; at the same time taking account of the social, educational, cultural and economic value of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a (a) encouraging efficient use of spectrum
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point a a (new) (aa) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to best meet the consumer demand for use of frequencies, respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point b Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point b Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point b (b) applying technology and service neutrality
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point b (b) applying technology and service neutrality
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying in a non-discriminatory manner the least onerous authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage;
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the most appropriate, non- discriminatory and least onerous authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage;
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the most appropriate, non- discriminatory and least onerous authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point c (c) applying the least onerous non- discriminatory authorisation system possible in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in spectrum usage;
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring effective competition, so as to foster cultural diversity and media pluralism in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC, as well as social and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the development and functioning of the internal digital market, in particular by ensuring effective competition and a pan-European level playing field.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d) guaranteeing the
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d a (new) (da) guaranteeing the efficient use of spectrum by including in access rights the obligation to choose the most efficient and most appropriate compression, transmission and deployment technology while respecting the principle of service and technology neutrality;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d a (new) (da) avoiding harmful forms of interference or disruptions;
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d b (new) (db) in defining the technical conditions of the use of spectrum, take full account of the relevant EU law on human health regarding electromagnetic field emissions;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – point d b (new) (db) in defining the technical conditions of the use of spectrum, take full account of the relevant EU law on human health of electromagnetic field emissions.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union spectrum policy objectives and in order to meet a rapidly growing demand for mobile data traffic whilst at the same time ensuring the development of other spectrum users such as broadcasting;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives, while taking into account important general interest objectives such as cultural diversity and media pluralism, as well as the interests of various radio spectrum users;
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives, and take account of the major general interest objectives of cultural diversity and media pluralism, and the interests of the various spectrum users;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives, while taking into account important general interest objectives such as cultural diversity and media pluralism, as well as the interests of various radio spectrum users;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union spectrum policy objectives and in order to meet a rapidly growing demand for mobile data traffic whilst at the same time ensuring the development of other spectrum users such as broadcasting;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support Union policy objectives whilst taking account of the social, cultural and economic significance of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a (a) make sufficient appropriate spectrum available in a timely manner to support
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a a (new) Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a a (new) (aa) bridge the digital divide and achieve the objectives of the Digital Agenda, ensuring that all Union citizens have access to broadband services, at not less than 30 Mbps by 2020, clearing the way for the provision of broadband services at the highest possible speed and capacity throughout the EU;
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a a (new) (aa) ensure that sufficient and appropriate spectrum is allocated for wireless services, in order to meet the rapidly growing demand for mobile data transfer, thereby fostering the development of commercial and public services;
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a a (new) (aa) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, at the same time taking account of the social, cultural, educational and economic value of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a a (new) (aa) encouraging efficient use of spectrum to meet the increasing demand for use of frequencies, at the same time taking account of the social, cultural and economic value of spectrum as a whole;
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point a b (new) Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through the application of the principles of technology and service neutrality, the opening of spectrum to new services, and the possibility to trade spectrum rights; in that connection, Member States may take measures which depart from this principle if the measures in question serve the objectives referred to in Article 9(4), letters a to d, of the Framework Directive;
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through the application of the principles of technology and service neutrality, the opening of spectrum to new services, and the possibility to trade spectrum rights; in that connection, Member States may take measures which depart from this principle if the measures in question serve the objectives referred to in Article 9(4), letters a to d, of the Framework Directive;
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through the application of the principles of technology and service neutrality, the opening of spectrum to new services and SMEs, and the possibility to trade spectrum rights;
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through the consistent application of the principles of technology and service neutrality
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b (b) maximise flexibility in the use of spectrum, to promote innovation and investment, through
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point b a (new) (ba) make more efficient use of spectrum by favouring technologies which take up little spectrum and combining this with the use of technologies, such as hot spots, Wifi, etc., which do not need any spectrum at all;
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point c (c) enhance the efficient use of spectrum by harnessing the benefits of general authorisations and increasing the use of such types of authorisation, as well as the development of license-exempt spectrum for innovation. Such uses could be envisaged in particular in white spaces through cognitive technologies, provided that a proper impact assessment is made;
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point c a (new) (ca) encourage passive infrastructure sharing where this would be proportionate and non-discriminatory, as envisaged in Article 12 of Directive 2002/21/EC;
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which results in
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which results in significant harm to competition and distortion in the market;
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point d (d) maintain and develop effective competition, in particular in electronic communication services, by preventing ex ante, or remedying ex post, excessive accumulation of radio frequencies by certain economic operators which
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point e (e) reduce the fragmentation of the internal market in order to establish a pan- European level playing field, by enhancing coordination and harmonisation of technical conditions for the use and availability of spectrum, as appropriate, including the development of transnational services, and by promoting economies of scope and scale at Union level;
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point f (f) avoid harmful interference or disturbance b
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g (g) in defining the technical conditions for the allocation of spectrum, take full account of the results of research certified by the relevant international organisations into the potential effects on human health of electromagnetic field emissions and apply them in a technology and service neutral way.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g (g) in defining the technical conditions for the allocation of spectrum, take full account of the results of research certified by the relevant international organisations into the potential effects on human health of electromagnetic field emissions and apply them in a technology and service neutral way.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g a (new) (ga) ensuring the accessibility of new consumer products and technologies so as to secure consumer endorsement for the transition to digital technology and efficient use of the digital dividend;
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g a (new) (ga) in defining those areas of the spectrum which should be made open for use without licensed rights and/or reserved to scientific research;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g a (new) (ga) promote reuse of existing internet protocols and technologies for digital spectrum services;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g b (new) (gb) reduce the Union's carbon footprint by enhancing the technical efficiency of wireless communication networks and applications;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – point g b (new) (gb) reduce the Union's carbon footprint by enhancing the technical efficiency of wireless communication networks and applications;
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt by 1 January 2013 authorisation and allocation measures appropriate for the development of broadband services, in conformity with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt by 1 January 2013 authorisation and allocation measures that are similar to each other and appropriate for the development of broadband services, in conformity with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)12 , such as allowing relevant terrestrial operators, where possible and on the basis of consultations in accordance with Article 11, direct or indirect access to contiguous blocks of spectrum of at least 10 MHz, thereby allowing the highest possible capacity and broadband speeds to be achieved, as well as making effective competition possible.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt by 1 January 2013 authorisation and allocation measures appropriate for the development of broadband services, in conformity with Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), such as allowing
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall foster, in cooperation with the Commission, the collective use of spectrum as well as shared
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall foster, where appropriate, in cooperation with the Commission, the collective use of spectrum as well as shared use of spectrum by enabling new technologies, such as cognitive radio, to develop.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall foster, in cooperation with the Commission, the collective use of spectrum as well as shared use of spectrum through the application of new technologies such as cognitive radio.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall foster, in cooperation with the Commission, the
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Member States and the Commission shall cooperate to develop and harmonise standards for radio equipment and telecommunications terminals as well as for electric and electronic equipment and networks based where necessary upon standardisation mandates from the Commission to the relevant standardisation bodies. Special attention shall also be given to standards for equipment to be used by disabled people, without depriving them of the right to use non-standardised equipment if that is their preference.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member States shall intensify R&D on new technologies such as cognitive technologies as their development could represent an added-value in the future in terms of efficiency of spectrum use.
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum and co-existence between new and existing services and devices to the benefit of end users and consumers, and by establishing measures such as stakeholder dialogues and compensation mechanisms.
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum. In addition, Member States shall promote the ongoing efficient use of spectrum for both networks and user applications.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum. In addition, Member States shall introduce incentives for the efficient use of spectrum for both networks and applications.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum, in addition, incentives to make wireless hardware and software equipment more spectrum efficient shall be introduced.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote competition and a pan-European level playing field, investment and efficient use of spectrum.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that selection conditions and procedures promote investment and efficient use of spectrum as a public good.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall promote the ongoing efficient use of spectrum for both networks and user applications and devices.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. In order to avoid possible fragmentation of the internal market due to divergent selection conditions and procedures for harmonised spectrum bands allocated to electronic communication services and made tradable in all Member States pursuant to Article 9b of Directive 2002/21/EC, the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall develop guidelines on authorisation conditions and procedures for such bands
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. In order to avoid possible fragmentation of the internal market due to divergent selection conditions and procedures for harmonised spectrum bands allocated to electronic communication services and made tradable in all Member States pursuant to Article 9b of Directive 2002/21/EC, the Commission, in cooperation with Member States and in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, shall develop guidelines on authorisation conditions and procedures for such bands, in particular on infrastructure sharing and coverage conditions.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be additional to the prompt freeing of the 900 Mhz band in keeping with the amended mobile telephony directive. These measures must not give rise to any form of discrimination and must rule out distortions of competition to the benefit of operators with a dominant market position.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. In order to limit excessive electromagnetic field emissions and increase efficiency in transmission networks, Member States shall foster greater cooperation between spectrum rights license holders towards the sharing of transmission infrastructures, with a special focus on densely populated areas.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The measures according to paragraph 1 shall be undertaken in addition to a timely and pro-competitive opening up the 900 MHz band in accordance with the Directive 2009/114/EC (revised GSM Directive) , shall be non-discriminatory and shall not distort competition to the benefit of incumbent operators.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The measures in paragraph 1 stall be undertaken in addition to a timely and pro-competitive opening up of the 900 MHz band in accordance with Directive 2009/114/EC (revised GSM Directive), shall be non-discriminatory and shall not distort competition.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States and the Commission shall propose steps to reduce legal friction and liabilities in the context of wireless mesh network and radio spectrum use for internet service provision.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall maintain and promote effective competition and avoid distortions of competition in both the internal market
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. In order to implement fully the obligations of paragraph 1, and in particular to ensure that competition is not distorted by any accumulation, transfer or modification of rights of use for radio frequencies, Member States
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. In order to fully implement
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) Member States may limit the amount of spectrum for which rights of use are granted to any economic operator or may attach conditions to such rights of use,
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) Member States may limit the amount of spectrum for which rights of use are granted to any economic operator or may attach conditions to such rights of use, such as the provision of wholesale access, national or regional roaming, in certain bands or in certain groups of bands with similar characteristics, for instance the bands below 1 GHz allocated to electronic communication services;
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) Member States may limit the amount of spectrum for which rights of use are granted to any
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) Member States may reserve a certain part of a spectrum band or group of bands to be assigned to new entrants that have not previously been assigned any spectrum or that have been assigned considerably less spectrum to ensure a level playing field between early entrants to the mobile market and new entrants by securing access to lower spectrum bands on equal terms;
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) Member States may take steps to achieve a more even spectrum allocation between economic operators by reserving spectrum for new entrants to a frequency band or group of bands with similar characteristics or by reserving spectrum for unlicensed usage in those bands;
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) Member States may refuse to grant new rights of use or to allow new spectrum usages in certain bands, or may attach conditions to the grant of new rights of use or to the authorisation of new spectrum usages, when this would lead to an accumulation of spectrum frequencies by certain economic operators
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) Member States may amend the existing rights in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2002/20/EC when this is necessary to remedy ex-post excessive accumulation of spectrum frequencies within certain economic operators which
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. When applying measures as mentioned in paragraph 2, Member States shall do so in conformity with the procedures for the imposition or variation of such conditions laid down in the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition. To that extent and to avoid lengthy discussions impeding roll-out, to the detriment of the customers, Member States should consider the opportunity to set-up deadlines to the negotiations with landlords in relation to passive infrastructure deployment. After this time, it should be considered that no agreement has been made and give the possibility to start a new negotiation.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition and promote the end user experience through co-existence between new and existing services and devices, by establishing measures such as stakeholder dialogues and compensation mechanisms.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays, are non-discriminatory and promote effective competition by preventing any potential anti-competitive outcomes for the benefit of EU citizens and consumers.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition by preventing any potential anti-competitive outcomes for the benefit of EU citizens and consumers.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays and promote effective competition by preventing any potential anti-competitive outcomes for the benefit of EU citizens and consumers.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays, are non-discriminatory and promote effective competition.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that authorisation and selection procedures avoid delays, are non-discriminatory and promote effective competition.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Member States wish to adopt any such measures as are contemplated by paragraph 2, they shall do so by the imposition of conditions pursuant to Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive, in conformity with the procedures for the imposition or variation of such conditions laid down in the Directive 2009/140/EC*, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services. ______________________ * OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p.37.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Member States wish to adopt any such measures as are contemplated by paragraph 2, they shall do so by the imposition of conditions pursuant to Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive, in conformity with the procedures for the imposition or variation of such conditions laid down in the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where Members States wish to adopt any such measures as are contemplated by paragraph 2, they shall do so by the imposition of conditions pursuant to Article 6 of the Authorisation Directive, in conformity with the procedures for the imposition or variation of such conditions laid down in the Directive 2009/140/EC, amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to the principles of service and technology neutrality, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall take all steps necessary to ensure that sufficient spectrum for coverage and capacity purposes (including the backhaul network) is allocated within the Union, in order to ensure that wireless applications contribute effectively to achieving the target for all citizens to have access to broadband of a speed of at least 30 Mbps by 2020.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to the principles of
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to the principles of service and technology neutrality, Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall take all steps necessary to ensure that sufficient spectrum for coverage and capacity purposes is allocated within the Union, in order to ensure that wireless applications contribute effectively to achieving the target for all citizens to have access to broadband network capable of a speed of at least 30 Mbps by 2020.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall, by 1 January 2012,
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall, by 1 January 2012, authorise the use of all the spectrum designated by Commission Decisions 2008/477/EC (2.5–2.69 GHz), 2008/411/EC (3.4–3.8 GHz) and 2009/766/EC (900/1800 MHz), under conditions that provide consumers with easy access to wireless broadband services, without prejudice to the existing and future deployment of other services that have equal access to this spectrum under the conditions specified in Commission Decision 2008/411/EC.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall, by 1 January 2012, authorise the use of all the spectrum designated by Commission Decisions 2008/477/EC (2.5–2.69 GHz), 2008/411/EC (3.4–3.8 GHz) and 2009/766/EC (900/1800 MHz), under conditions that provide consumers with easy access to wireless broadband services; in order to ensure harmonisation, the use of the 3.4-3.8 GHz band should be based on the outcome of the ongoing work of standardisation bodies.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall, by 1 January 2012, authorise the use of all the spectrum designated by Commission Decisions 2008/477/EC (2.5–2.69 GHz), 2008/411/EC (3.4–3.8 GHz) and 2009/766/EC (900/1800 MHz), under conditions that provide consumers with
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall promote the ongoing upgrade by providers of electronic communications of their networks to the latest, most efficient technology, in order to create their own dividends.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances, including cross-border frequency coordination problems, would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circums
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 17 J
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for spectrum assignments for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 17 J
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review the use of the spectrum below 1GHz and assess on the basis of the market experience with new services made in the 800 MHz band whether additional spectrum could be freed and made available for new applications.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013 make the 800 MHz band available for electronic communications services in line with the harmonised technical conditions laid down pursuant to the Decision No 676/2002/EC. In Member States where exceptional national or local circumstances would prevent the availability of the band, the Commission may authorise specific derogations until 2015. In accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC , the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall keep under review the use of the spectrum below 1GHz, between 300 MHz and 6GHz and assess whether additional spectrum could be freed and made available for new applications.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall, by 1 January 2013
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the further harmonisation and more efficient use across the Union of the 1.5 GHz band (1452-1492 MHz), a band already shared between satellite and terrestrial use, and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and when justified, in cooperation with Member States, evaluate the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands, such as the 700 MHz band (694-790 MHz) in support of the increasing demand for mobile broadband services due primarily to audiovisual content. Such further harmonisation shall be without prejudice to the technological solutions that may be adopted across the Union and shall ensure a level playing field between different technological solutions and support the emergence of pan-European operators within the Union.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the harmonisation and use of the 1.5 GHz band (1452-1492 MHz) and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and when justified, in cooperation with Member States, evaluate the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands, such as the 700 MHz band (694-790 MHz). Member States shall ensure that, where appropriate, the cost of migration or reallocation of spectrum usage is adequately compensated in accordance with national law.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the harmonisation and use of the 1.5 MHz band (1452-1492 MHz) and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and when justified, in cooperation with Member States, evaluate the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands, such as the 700 MHz band (694-790 MHz). Member States shall ensure that, where appropriate, the cost of migration or re- allocation of spectrum usage is adequately compensated in accordance with national law.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to evaluate the need for and the feasibility of the harmonisation and use of additional spectrum bands for wireless broadband services in relation with the inventory lead in article 8 and in accordance with the existent regulatory framework . The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services and when justified, in cooperation with Member States, evaluate the need for action to harmonise additional spectrum bands. Member States shall ensure that, where appropriate, the cost of migration or re- allocation of spectrum usage is adequately compensated in accordance with national law
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the harmonisation and efficient use of the 900 MHz band and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services. Member States shall ensure that the cost of migration of re-allocation of spectrum usage is adequately compensated in accordance with national law.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, take the appropriate action to harmonise any further spectrum needed to meet the increased demand by consumers for mobile broadband and other new wireless communication services, including the harmonisation of the 1.5GHz and the 2.3GHz bands and review of the use of the spectrum below 1GHz, including the possible harmonisation of the 700MHz band for which the Commission shall present on 1 January 2014 at the latest its proposals for potential further action.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the harmonisation and efficient use of the 900 MHz band and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband services. Member States shall ensure that the cost of migration or re-allocation of spectrum usage is adequately compensated in accordance with national law.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, is invited to take action at the appropriate levels to achieve the harmonisation and use of the 1.5 MHz band (1452-1492 MHz) and the 2.3 GHz band (2300-2400 MHz) for wireless broadband services. The Commission shall continuously monitor the capacity requirements for wireless broadband and in addition take action to promote a second Digital Dividend (698 – 790 MHz) and consider the longer-term convergence of services for 470 – 698 MHz.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall assess whether additional spectrum such as the 700 MHz band could also be freed and made available. This assessment shall take into account: the evolution of spectrum technologies; the possible future needs of radio and television broadcasting; and the lack of spectrum in other bands adequate for wireless broadband coverage.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users and other existing users of the 800 MHz band. Member States shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the re-allocation of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect the ability of end-users to operate non-radio devices and equipment that conform to existing standards, and which make use of the same spectrum band.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users and existing and future broadcasting services. This includes measures to avoid interference.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services, for example using the 790- 862 MHz (800MHz) bands, is
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they shall examine ways and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that the freeing of the 800 MHz band does not adversely affect programme making and special events (PMSE) users, nor lead to disruption of the existing broadcasting services.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall ensure that the provision of access to broadband content and services using the 790-862 MHz (800MHz) band is encouraged in sparsely populated areas, in particular through coverage obligations; in doing so, they
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States, together with the Commission, shall take the technical and regulatory measures needed to avoid interference between electronic communications services in the 800 MHz frequency band for broadcasting services, and PMSE users at below 790 MHz. The Commission shall encourage the Member States to ensure that sufficient financial resources are made available in good time to cover the costs of the migration and the costs linked to the measures to limit interference with broadcasting services.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member-States, shall assess the feasibility of extending the allocations of unlicensed spectrum for wireless access systems, including radio local area networks, established by Decision 2005/513/EC to a significantly bigger part of the 5 GHz band identified through the inventory lead in Article 8, so as to accommodate the requirements of incoming standards in this field.
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall assess the feasibility of extending the allocations of unlicensed spectrum for wireless access systems, including radio local area networks, established by Decision 2005/513/EC in relation with the inventory lead in article 8 and depending on use of spectrum for other usages.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall implement necessary technical and regulatory measures in order to avoid harmful interference from electronic communications services in the 800 MHz band to broadcasting and PMSE services below 790 MHz.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In cooperation with the Commission, Member States shall take the necessary technical and regulatory measures to ensure that interference does not adversely affect radio broadcasting service providers and PMSE users.
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission is invited to adopt, as a priority, appropriate measures, pursuant to Article 9b(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC, to ensure that Member States allow trading within the Union of spectrum usage rights in the harmonised bands 790–862 MHz (the
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission is invited to adopt, as a priority, appropriate measures, pursuant to Article 9b(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC, to ensure that Member States allow trading
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission in close cooperation with Member States, is invited to adopt, as a priority, appropriate measures, pursuant to Article 9b(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC, to ensure that Member States allow tra
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. I
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of additional spectrum bands for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of additional spectrum bands for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member-States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall examine the possibility to spread the availability and use of picocells and femtocells.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. In cooperation with the Member States, the Commission shall conduct studies and examine the possibility to design authorisation schemes which would contribute to a low-carbon policy, by saving energy in the use of spectrum as well as by making spectrum available for wireless technologies with a potential for improving energy savings and efficiency, including smart energy grids and smart metering systems.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In cooperation with the Member- States, the Commission shall extend such studies mentioned in paragraph 2 to enhance the efficiency of other distribution networks such as water supply networks.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. I
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. I
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a decision Article 7 - paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Measures affecting radio frequency bands used by a Member State exclusively and directly for its public security and defence purposes. Where a particular measure will affect radio frequency bands used by a Member State exclusively and directly for its public security and defence purposes and where the release of those frequency bands would represent an excessive burden, the Member State may continue to use those bands for public security and defence purposes until the systems existing in that band at the date of the notification of the harmonization measure are phased out. That Member State shall duly notify the Commission of its decision.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of the entire existing radio spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of geo-localised existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to 3 GHz.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, assisted by the Member States, which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union, in particular in the range from 300 MHz to
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities. It shall also ensure that, where spectrum use is not optimal, the necessary measures are taken in order to maximise efficiency. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers' and operators' demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, based on transparent, clear and jointly defined assessment criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers’ and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, based on clearly defined and transparent assessment criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers’ and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, based on clearly defined and transparent assessment criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers’ and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, based on clearly defined and transparent assessment criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers’ and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow, on the basis of clearly defined and transparent criteria and methodologies, the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities. It shall take into
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities, on the basis of clearly defined and transparent criteria and methodologies. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers' and operators' demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities. It shall take into account future needs for spectrum based on consumers’, communities’, businesses’ and operators’ demands, and of the possibility to meet such needs.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The inventory referred to in paragraph (1) shall review the various types of spectrum usage by
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where possible, the Commission shall also include in the inventory referred to in paragraph (1), information on spectrum use by third countries neighbouring a Member State that could have a direct or indirect effect on spectrum use within the Union.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall explore the potential of mesh network technologies for enhancing the efficient use of spectrum through pilot applications.
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall explore the potential of wireless mesh network (WMN) technologies through pilot applications.
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Union shall participate in international negotiations relating to spectrum matters to defend its interests and to ensure the Union has a joint position, acting in accordance with Union law concerning, among other things, the principles of internal and external competences of the Union.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that international regulations allow the full use of frequency bands for the purposes for which they are designated under Union law, and that a sufficient amount of appropriately protected spectrum is available for the implementation of Union sectoral policies.
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The Union shall provide, upon request, political and technical support to Member States in their bilateral negotiations with non-Union neighbouring countries including candidate and acceding countries, to eliminate harmful interferences and disturbances and resolve spectrum coordination issues that prevent Member States from implementing their obligations under Union law regarding spectrum policy and management. The Union shall also support efforts by third countries to implement spectrum management that is compatible with that of the Union, so as to safeguard Union spectrum policy objectives.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The Union shall provide, upon request, political and technical support to Member States in their bilateral
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)3 provides that the Commission may submit a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and Council for establishing multiannual radio spectrum policy programmes setting out policy orientations and objectives for the strategic planning and harmonisation of the use of spectrum in accordance with the directives applicable to electronic communications networks and services.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) Article 8a(3) of the Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Spectrum is a publicly held good which can not be privately owned but which must be regulated by states in order to facilitate its usage by the means of licensed transmission rights or licence- free usage rights.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a public good of major societal, cultural, social and economic value. It is a key resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and applications such as alarm, remote controls, hearing aids, microphones, and medical equipment. It supports public services such as security and safety services, including civil protection, and scientific activities, such as meteorology, Earth observation, radio astronomy and space research. Regulatory measures on spectrum therefore have economic, safety, health, public interest, cultural, scientific, social, environmental and technical implications.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a public good of major societal, cultural, social and economic value. It is a key resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and applications such as alarm, remote controls, hearing aids, microphones, and medical equipment. It supports public services such as security and safety services, including civil protection, and scientific activities, such as meteorology, Earth observation, radio astronomy and space research. Regulatory measures on spectrum therefore have economic, safety, health, public interest, cultural, scientific, social, environmental and technical implications.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) Spectrum is a key public resource for essential sectors and services, including mobile, wireless broadband and satellite communications, television and radio broadcasting, transport, radiolocation, and applications such as alarm, remote
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use at Union level should enhance the single market for wireless electronic communications services and equipment as well as other Union policies requiring spectrum use, thus creating new opportunities for innovation and contributing to economic recovery and social integration across the Union, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum. The harmonisation of spectrum use is also essential to ensure the quality of the services provided by electronic communications and to create economies of scale lowering both the cost of deploying wireless networks and the cost of wireless devices for consumers. To this end, the Union therefore needs a policy programme that covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as electronic communications, research and development, transport and energy.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use at Union level should enhance the single market for wireless electronic communications services and equipment as well as other Union policies requiring spectrum use, thus creating new opportunities for innovation and contributing to economic recovery and social integration across the Union, while at the same time respecting the important social, cultural and economic value of spectrum. To this end, the Union therefore needs a policy programme that covers the internal market in all Union policy areas involving the use of spectrum such as electronic communications, research and development, transport and energy. A delay of the necessary reform through current right holders should absolutely be avoided.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The strategic planning and harmonisation of spectrum use at Union level should enhance the single market for wireless electronic communications
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 a (new) (3a) This first programme should promote competition, introduce a pan-European level playing field and lay the foundation for a genuine single digital market; to secure the full potential and consumer benefits of this radio spectrum programme and the single market the programme should be supplemented by upcoming and new proposals that will enable the development of the online economy such as data protection and a European licence system for online content;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) This first programme should in particular support the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth given the huge potential of wireless services to promote an information-based economy, develop and assist sectors relying on information and communications technologies and overcome the digital divide. It is also a key action in the Digital Agenda for Europe4 which aims to deliver fast broadband internet in the future network-based knowledge economy, with an ambitious target for universal broadband coverage
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) This first programme should in particular support the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth given the huge potential of wireless services to promote an information-based economy, develop and assist sectors relying on information and communications technologies and overcome the digital divide. The explosion of in particular audiovisual media services is driving demand for speed and coverage. It is also a key action in the Digital Agenda for Europe
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should specify guiding principles and objectives up to 2015 for Member States and Union institutions, and set out specific implementation initiatives.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should specify guiding principles and objectives up to 2015 for Member States and Union institutions, and set out specific implementation initiatives.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The first programme should s
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The programme should also take into account Decision No 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (Radio Spectrum Decision)
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The programme should also take into account Decision No 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the optimal use of spectrum may require
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the optimal and productive use of spectrum may require innovative authorisation solutions such as collective use of spectrum, general authorisations or infrastructure sharing. The application of such principles in the Union might be facilitated by identifying best practices and encouraging information sharing, as well as the definition of certain common or converging conditions for spectrum usage. General authorisations, which are the least onerous authorisation system, are of particular interest
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the optimal and productive use of spectrum may require innovative authorisation solutions such as collective use of spectrum, general authorisations, auctions or infrastructure sharing. The application of such principles in the Union might be facilitated by identifying best practices and encouraging information sharing, as well as the definition of certain common or converging conditions for spectrum usage. General authorisations, which are the least onerous authorisation system, are of particular interest where interference does not risk hampering the
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the optimal use of spectrum as a public good may require innovative authorisation solutions such as collective use of spectrum, general authorisations or infrastructure sharing. The application of such principles in the Union might be facilitated by the definition of certain common or converging conditions for spectrum usage. General authorisations, which are the least onerous authorisation system, are of particular interest where interference does not risk hampering the development of other services.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 a (new) (7a) While technologically still in development, so-called "cognitive technologies" could already be further explored and even implemented through geolocalised information of spectrum usage, which could ideally be mapped in the inventory.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to guarantee optimum spectrum use, not least as regards production, public auctions should be organised with a view to generating revenue for the public coffers and encouraging fair and transparent spectrum allocation procedures.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should substantially benefit economic growth.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should substantially benefit economic growth.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) Spectrum rights trading combined with flexible usage conditions should substantially benefit economic growth. Therefore, bands where flexible use has already been introduced by Union law should be immediately made tradable pursuant to the Framework Directive. In addition, common principles for the format and content of such tradable rights
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if existing users receive undue competitive advantages. Therefore, the award conditions shall ensure fair competition to ensure broadband communications in regions while new entrants shall not be prevented from the market entry. Also, new technologies should not be discriminated just because they are later available on the market. Limited spectrum access, in particular when appropriate spectrum becomes scarcer, can create a barrier to entry for new services or applications and hamper innovation and competition. Acquisition of new usage rights, including through spectrum trading or other transactions between users, and the introduction of new flexible criteria for spectrum use can have an impact on the existing competitive situation. Member States should therefore take appropriate ex ante or ex post regulatory measures (such as action to amend existing rights, to prohibit certain acquisitions of spectrum rights, to impose conditions on spectrum hoarding and efficient use such as those referred to in Article 9 paragraph 7 of the Framework Directive, to limit the amount of spectrum for each operator, or to avoid excessive accumulation of spectrum) to
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, a pan- European level playing field, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if existing users receive undue competitive advantages. Limited spectrum access, in particular when appropriate spectrum becomes scarcer, can create a barrier to entry for new services or applications and hamper innovation and competition. Acquisition of new usage rights, including through spectrum trading or other transactions between users, and the introduction of new flexible criteria for spectrum use can have an impact on the existing competitive situation. Member States should therefore take appropriate ex
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, a pan- European level playing field, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if existing users receive undue competitive advantages. Limited spectrum access, in particular when appropriate spectrum becomes scarcer, can create a barrier to entry for new services or applications and
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition and a pan- European level playing field, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) As underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe, wireless broadband is an important means to boost competition, a pan- European level playing field, consumer choice and access in rural and other areas where deployment of wired broadband is difficult or economically unviable. However, spectrum management may affect competition by changing the role and power of market players, for example if existing users receive undue competitive advantages. Limited spectrum access, in particular when appropriate spectrum becomes scarcer, can create a barrier to entry for new services or applications and hamper innovation and competition. Acquisition of new usage rights, including through spectrum trading or other transactions between users, and the introduction of new flexible criteria for spectrum use can have an impact on the existing competitive situation. Member States should therefore take appropriate ex ante or ex post regulatory measures (such as action to amend existing rights, to prohibit certain acquisitions of spectrum rights, to impose conditions on spectrum hoarding and efficient use such as those referred to in Article 9 paragraph 7 of the Framework Directive, to limit the amount of spectrum for each operator, or to avoid excessive accumulation of spectrum) to avoid distortions of competition in line with the principles underpinning Article 5(6) of Directive 2002/20/EC (the ‘Authorisation’ Directive) and Article 1(2) of Directive 87/372/EEC (the ‘GSM’ Directive).
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision 2007/344/EC on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the Community6 requires Member States to publish information on usage rights, a detailed inventory of existing spectrum use
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision 2007/344/EC on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the Community6 requires Member States to publish information on usage rights, a detailed inventory of existing spectrum use together with an effective review and assessment methodology are necessary in
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision 2007/344/EC on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the Community requires Member States to publish information on usage rights, a detailed inventory of existing spectrum use together with an effective review and assessment methodology are necessary in the Union to improve the efficiency of spectrum and radio equipment use, in particular between 300 MHz and
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 (10) Optimal and efficient spectrum use requires continuous monitoring of developments, and up-to-date transparent information on spectrum use throughout the Union. While Commission Decision 2007/344/EC on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the Community6 requires Member States to publish information on usage rights, a detailed inventory of existing spectrum use together with an effective review and assessment methodology are necessary in the Union to improve the efficiency of spectrum and radio equipment use, in particular between 300 MHz and
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Efficient and coordinated spectrum use and the fair and transparent management of spectrum allocation should make it possible for all media and telecommunications operators to guarantee communications pluralism, increase content production and improve the quality of the services provided to users, thereby encouraging all actors to innovate and offer better products at affordable prices.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity7 are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use and should take account of legally defined sharing conditions. European standards for non-radio electric and electronic equipment and networks should also avoid disturbance to spectrum use. The cumulative impact of the increasing volume and density of wireless devices and applications combined with the diversity of spectrum use challenges current approaches to interference management. These should be examined and reassessed together with receiver characteristics and more sophisticated interference avoidance mechanisms, with the aim of avoiding harmful interference or disturbance to existing and future spectrum use. Moreover, the direct cost of resolving interference issues and migration costs to enable the Digital Dividend should not be borne by the broadcasting industry nor by the EU citizens or should be adequately compensated.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity7 and future EU standardization for non-radio electronic networks and equipment are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use and should facilita
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity7 are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use and should take account of legally defined sharing conditions. European standards for non-radio electric and electronic equipment and networks should also avoid disturbance to spectrum use. The cumulative impact of the increasing volume and density of wireless devices and applications combined with the diversity of spectrum use challenges current approaches to interference management. These should be examined and reassessed together with receiver characteristics and more sophisticated interference avoidance mechanisms, with the aim of avoiding harmful interference or disturbance to the existing and future spectrum users.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) Harmonised standards under Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity are essential to achieve efficient spectrum use and should take account of legally defined sharing conditions. European standards for non-radio electric and electronic equipment and networks should also avoid disturbance to spectrum use. The cumulative impact of the increasing volume and density of wireless devices and applications combined with the diversity of spectrum use challenges current approaches to
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 a (new) (11a) New Long-Term Evolution (LTE) broadband mobile communications networks are being rolled out in various Member States. Those networks use the 790-862 MHz frequency band. Some radio microphones currently operate in that band, possibly causing interference. This may also concern devices operated in schools, theatres and conference venues or by other commercial, public or private users. The requisite technical retrofitting will be achievable only with considerable financial outlay, and it is imperative to clarify where responsibility lies in this connection.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 12 a (new) (12a) According to multiple converging studies, mobile data traffic is increasing rapidly and is currently being doubled every year. With this pace, which is likely to continue in the next coming years, mobile data traffic will have increased nearly 40 times from 2009 to 2014. In order to manage this exponential growth, a number of actions will be required by regulators and market players including increased spectrum efficiency across the board, possible further harmonised spectrum allocations for wireless broadband, and traffic offload onto other networks via multi-mode devices.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 12 a (new) (12a) More flexible arrangements governing spectrum use should be introduced in order to foster innovation and high-speed broadband connections which enable firms to reduce their costs and increase their competitiveness and make it possible to develop new interactive online services, for example in the fields of education and health and services of general interest.
source: PE-460.615
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1034/COM_SEC(2010)1034_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1034/COM_SEC(2010)1034_EN.pdf |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0003/COM_COM(2012)0003_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0003/COM_COM(2012)0003_EN.pdf |
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdf |
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/23 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/9/date |
Old
2011-12-13T00:00:00New
2011-12-12T00:00:00 |
events/13/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2010&number=0252&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2010&number=0252&appLng=EN |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.746New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-454746_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0362)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0362)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.615New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-460615_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.855New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-460855_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.499&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-454499_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.565&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-458565_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0151_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0151_EN.html |
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0019_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0019_EN.html |
events/13/docs |
|
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0043_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0043_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-151&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0151_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0536/COM_COM(2014)0536_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0471/COM_COM(2010)0471_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0471/COM_COM(2010)0471_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-151&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0151_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-220New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0220_EN.html |
events/11 |
|
events/12 |
|
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-19&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0019_EN.html |
events/13 |
|
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-43New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0043_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/07663New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0243New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0243 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0471:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0471:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0471/COM_COM(2010)0471_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0471/COM_COM(2010)0471_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|