Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | GOMES Ana ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ALBERTINI Gabriele ( PPE) | Johannes Cornelis van BAALEN ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | FRANCO Gaston ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan, in response to a Commission communication on the same subject.
In the resolution, Parliament recalls that measures regarding CBRN material are one of the cornerstones of the EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy, and consequently, an EU CBRN Action Plan was approved by the Council on 30 November 2009. Although Member States are responsible for CBRN policy, close cooperation and coordination at EU level is nevertheless a necessity, according to Members.
Ensure the smooth interaction of national and European initiatives: Parliament notes that the EU CBRN Action Plan straddles the new division of competences between the Member States and the EU following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in connection with the principles of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality. It points out, however, that the implementation of the common CBRN security system should not reduce the competence of the Member States in this policy area, and considers that the action plan will play a key role in ensuring the smooth interaction of national and European initiatives in addressing CBRN risks.
Strengthen the common approach: the EU is called upon to strengthen its common approach to CBRN prevention, detection and response through the creation of specific mechanisms (regulatory, legislative or non-legislative instruments) which make cooperation and the provision of means of assistance compulsory in the event of a CBRN disaster caused by an accident or terrorist attack. Members also call for the sharing and use of best knowledge and expertise from both the civil and military fields.
Members stress that it is essential to strengthen the scope for normative and regulatory intervention by the Commission and invite it to issue legislative proposals, as far as possible, in all areas covered by the Action Plan. They urge that the commitment of the Member States to CBRN control must go further than the simple sharing of best practices and information, and that technologies and infrastructures should also be pooled/shared, so as to avoid duplication and waste of resources in order to create valuable and cost-effective synergies at EU level. In their view, Member States need to agree on methods for the detection and prevention of CBRN disasters, the transferral of CBRN materials within the EU and response measures, including sharing of CBRN-related information and cross-border assistance.
General recommendations: Parliament calls on the Member States to agree on methods for the detection and prevention of CBRN disasters, the transferral of CBRN materials within the EU and response measures, including sharing of CBRN-related information and cross-border assistance.
Among the other recommendations that Members make are:
to create and regularly update a database of the medical countermeasures that are available in the Member States to respond to CBRN incidents, to encourage the sharing of existing capacities; the development of EU quality and security standards , as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies; regular mapping of national capabilities and assets, as well as joint exercises among Member States with a view to enhanced preparedness; the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism , based in the Commission's services, which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid-response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; the establishment of a European civil protection force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory.
The resolution invites Member States to appoint or create a national authority which, in the event of a CBRN attack or disaster, would be tasked with the responsibility of acting as the main coordinator of all the national and local bodies involved, and of all the counter measures taken to respond to such an event.
Members also urge the EU institutions to maintain democratic scrutiny of and transparency regarding the development and implementation of all parts of the EU CBRN Action plan, respecting the public's right to access to all information and relevant documentation that concerns public security and the everyday risks associated with CBRN disasters.
Prevention: the resolution calls on the Commission to act as the main facilitator and monitor in connection with the establishment and regular updating of EU lists on CBRN agents, whereby the Commission should be the one to decide on a reasonable timeframe. It insists that the lists should also include possible preventive and response measures for each CBRN agent, in accordance with its level of dangerousness and potential for malicious use and vulnerability.
Members consider that the Commission and the Member States’ authorities should oversee the activities carried out by the organisations dealing with high-risk CBRN materials, which implies that proper inspections of high-risk sites must be carried out regularly.
Furthermore, the ‘Prevention’ part of the action plan should be amended in such a way as to ensure that the chemicals industry replaces the use of high-risk chemicals with suitable lower-risk alternatives, where such replacement is scientifically, technologically and environmentally possible and there is a clear increase in security.
Parliament invites Member States and the Commission to urge all Member States to sign and to meet their commitments under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). It also calls on the Council and the Commission to promote the existing Draft Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, Transfer and Use of Uranium Weapons and on their Destruction.
Members consider that the EU CBRN Action Plan should unambiguously call for the development of EU guidelines on security training and standard requirements to be implemented in all 27 Member States. In addition, the Commission and the Member States should work on a proper legal framework to regulate and monitor transactions , thus upgrading the level of security and ensuring proper and rapid reporting of all suspicious transactions as well as the loss or theft of CBRN materials.
Detection: the Commission is called upon to build on the results of an assessment to draw up common EU guidelines on how to handle such accidents or intentional attacks, including finding the means to ensure that Member States allocate adequate human and material resources to such an effort.
Members consider it essential to carry out proper studies with a view to engaging all relevant national and EU bodies and stakeholders on a mandatory basis, thus making the response to a public safety threat more effective.
Preparedness and response: Members call on the Council to entrust the Commission with the role of 'coordinator' with regard to emergency planning, so that it can act as a monitor, thus ensuring that local and national emergency plans do exist. The Commission should take the role of a depository of such plans, putting it in the best position to identify potential gaps and to act accordingly more promptly than the relevant authorities. The Commission should be taking the lead in setting standards based on the needs of counter-measure capacities.
The resolution stresses the need to:
create regional/EU-wide stockpiles of response resources, the scale of which should, as far as possible, reflect the current level of threat, whether in the form of medical or other types of relevant equipment, under the coordination of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, funded by the EU and in line with commonly agreed EU guidelines; revise the rules governing the European Solidarity Fund to make it more accessible in the event of natural disasters, and available in the event of industrial and man-made disasters; create EU/regional specialised response teams , including medical personnel, law-enforcement staff and military personnel; provide sufficient funding to develop improved equipment for the detection and identification of biological agents in the event of an attack or incident; launch training and public awareness programmes at European level.
Environmental and health impacts: Members stress that an incident involving CBRN materials which affects the condition of the soil and/or the drinking water supply has the potential to produce devastating and far-reaching effects on the health and welfare of all the people in the affected area. They therefore call on the Commission to take this into account when drafting the EU CBRN Action Plan.
The resolution regrets the lack of measures in the CBRN Action Plan to safeguard the security of radiological and nuclear facilities and materials and to improve response plans regarding the various types of radiological emergency and their consequences for the population and the environment.
It calls on the Commission and Council to consider developing response models that provide an ideal response in the event of CBRN incidents, and in which special attention is paid to training establishments, medical care institutions and geriatric care centres.
Lastly, Parliament calls on the Member States to assign special importance to the construction of civil protection shelters , both within (public and administrative) institutions and at local and regional level, in which the European public can take refuge in the event of a disaster.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Ana Gomes (S&D, PT) on strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan, in response to a Commission communication on the same subject.
The report notes that the EU CBRN Action Plan straddles the new division of competences between the Member States and the EU following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in connection with the principles of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality. It points out, however, that the implementation of the common CBRN security system should not reduce the competence of the Member States in this policy area, and considers that the action plan will play a key role in ensuring the smooth interaction of national and European initiatives in addressing CBRN risks.
The EU is called upon to strengthen its common approach to CBRN prevention, detection and response through the creation of specific mechanisms (regulatory, legislative or non-legislative instruments) which make cooperation and the provision of means of assistance compulsory in the event of a CBRN disaster caused by an accident or terrorist attack. Members also call for the sharing and use of best knowledge and expertise from both the civil and military fields.
Members stress that it is essential to strengthen the scope for normative and regulatory intervention by the Commission and invite it to issue legislative proposals, as far as possible, in all areas covered by the Action Plan. They urge that the commitment of the Member States to CBRN control must go further than the simple sharing of best practices and information, and that technologies and infrastructures should also be pooled/shared, so as to avoid duplication and waste of resources in order to create valuable and cost-effective synergies at EU level. In their view, Member States need to agree on methods for the detection and prevention of CBRN disasters, the transferral of CBRN materials within the EU and response measures, including sharing of CBRN-related information and cross-border assistance.
Among the other recommendations that Members make are:
to create and regularly update a database of the medical countermeasures that are available in the Member States to respond to CBRN incidents, to encourage the sharing of existing capacities; the development of EU quality and security standards , as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies; regular mapping of national capabilities and assets, as well as joint exercises among Member States with a view to enhanced preparedness; the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism , based in the Commission's services, which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid-response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; the establishment of a European civil protection force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory.
The report invites Member States to appoint or create a national authority which, in the event of a CBRN attack or disaster, would be tasked with the responsibility of acting as the main coordinator of all the national and local bodies involved, and of all the counter measures taken to respond to such an event.
Members also urge the EU institutions to maintain democratic scrutiny of and transparency regarding the development and implementation of all parts of the EU CBRN Action plan, respecting the public's right to access to all information and relevant documentation that concerns public security and the everyday risks associated with CBRN disasters.
Prevention: the report calls on the Commission to act as the main facilitator and monitor in connection with the establishment and regular updating of EU lists on CBRN agents, whereby the Commission should be the one to decide on a reasonable timeframe. It insists that the lists should also include possible preventive and response measures for each CBRN agent, in accordance with its level of dangerousness and potential for malicious use and vulnerability.
Members consider that the Commission and the Member States’ authorities should oversee the activities carried out by the organisations dealing with high-risk CBRN materials, which implies that proper inspections of high-risk sites must be carried out regularly.
Furthermore, the ‘Prevention’ part of the action plan should be amended in such a way as to ensure that the chemicals industry replaces the use of high-risk chemicals with suitable lower-risk alternatives, where such replacement is scientifically, technologically and environmentally possible and there is a clear increase in security.
The report invites Member States and the Commission to urge all Member States to sign and to meet their commitments under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). It also calls on the Council and the Commission to promote the existing Draft Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, Transfer and Use of Uranium Weapons and on their Destruction.
Members consider that the EU CBRN Action Plan should unambiguously call for the development of EU guidelines on security training and standard requirements to be implemented in all 27 Member States. In addition, the Commission and the Member States should work on a proper legal framework to regulate and monitor transactions , thus upgrading the level of security and ensuring proper and rapid reporting of all suspicious transactions as well as the loss or theft of CBRN materials.
Detection: the Commission is called upon to build on the results of an assessment to draw up common EU guidelines on how to handle such accidents or intentional attacks, including finding the means to ensure that Member States allocate adequate human and material resources to such an effort.
Members consider it essential to carry out proper studies with a view to engaging all relevant national and EU bodies and stakeholders on a mandatory basis, thus making the response to a public safety threat more effective.
Preparedness and response: Members call on the Council to entrust the Commission with the role of 'coordinator' with regard to emergency planning, so that it can act as a monitor, thus ensuring that local and national emergency plans do exist. The Commission should take the role of a depository of such plans, putting it in the best position to identify potential gaps and to act accordingly more promptly than the relevant authorities. The Commission should be taking the lead in setting standards based on the needs of counter-measure capacities.
The report stresses the need to:
create regional/EU-wide stockpiles of response resources, the scale of which should, as far as possible, reflect the current level of threat, whether in the form of medical or other types of relevant equipment, under the coordination of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, funded by the EU and in line with commonly agreed EU guidelines; revise the rules governing the European Solidarity Fund to make it more accessible in the event of natural disasters, and available in the event of industrial and man-made disasters; create EU/regional specialised response teams , including medical personnel, law-enforcement staff and military personnel; provide sufficient funding to develop improved equipment for the detection and identification of biological agents in the event of an attack or incident; launch training and public awareness programmes at European level.
Environmental and health impacts: Members stress that an incident involving CBRN materials which affects the condition of the soil and/or the drinking water supply has the potential to produce devastating and far-reaching effects on the health and welfare of all the people in the affected area. They therefore call on the Commission to take this into account when drafting the EU CBRN Action Plan.
The report regrets the lack of measures in the CBRN Action Plan to safeguard the security of radiological and nuclear facilities and materials and to improve response plans regarding the various types of radiological emergency and their consequences for the population and the environment.
It calls on the Commission and Council to consider developing response models that provide an ideal response in the event of CBRN incidents, and in which special attention is paid to training establishments, medical care institutions and geriatric care centres.
Lastly, Members call on the Member States to assign special importance to the construction of civil protection shelters , both within (public and administrative) institutions and at local and regional level, in which the European public can take refuge in the event of a disaster.
PURPOSE : Commission Communication on an ~Action Plan to on strengthen chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan.
CONTENT : this Communication proposes an Action Plan in response to the risk of terrorist groups acquiring chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) materials. It notes the commonly held view that the risks involved are such, that coordinated action in terms of prevention, detection and response is indispensable. It is clear that no public authority can afford to ignore this threat given its potentially very significant consequences in terms of human life, and its economic effects.
Overall goal and core measures : the overall goal of the new CBRN policy is to reduce the threat from CBRN incidents, by way of a prioritised EU CBRN Action Plan, which involves all relevant stakeholders, including industry representatives. Coherence will be sought with relevant Community and CFSP instruments, in particular the Instrument for Stability , the INSC and the IPA , which pursue CBRN risks mitigation and preparedness outside the EU, as well as relevant Euratom treaty provisions and secondary legislation.
This goal will be achieved by concentrating efforts on minimising the likelihood of CBRN incidents occurring and limiting their consequences should they materialise. Some of the core measures to achieve these goals are:
deploying a risk-based approach to CBRN security in the EU. This entails the use of risk-assessments to drive the prioritisation of security measures; pensuring that CBRN materials are well protected and the potential for their diversion is limited; strengthening the exchange of information between Member States on CBRN security issues in order to react more swiftly to emerging threats; improving the development and use of detection systems across the EU; and providing responders with the necessary tools to save lives and limit damage to property in case of CBRN incidents.
These aims will be achieved through the implementation of the 133 measures described in the EU CBRN Action Plan, which is part of the current policy package.
Main Areas of Work : the Action Plan envisages three main areas of CBRN security work:
prevention - ensuring that unauthorised access to CBRN materials of concern is as difficult as possible; detection - having the capability to detect CBRN materials in order to prevent or respond to CBRN incidents; preparedness and response - being able to efficiently respond to incidents involving CBRN materials and recover from them as quickly as possible.
These three areas of work are supported by a number of horizontal measures, which are broadly applicable to all CBRN work.
Prevention: preventive measures constitute the main focus of activity of the CBRN Action Plan. This means that efforts should be concentrated on a limited number of vulnerabilities, which could be exploited for malicious purposes, on the basis of robust risk-assessment processes. Consequently, one of the first activities to be undertaken under the CBRN Action Plan should be the prioritisation of high-risk CBRN materials based on a thorough risk-assessment. This will be a prerequisite for many further measures targeted specifically at high-risk CBRN materials.
Subsequent actions will concentrate on the security of CBRN materials and facilities, control over CBRN materials, developing a high-security culture of staff, strengthening the identification of suspicious transactions and behaviours in relation to high-risk CBRN materials, improving the security of transport, information exchange, import and export regimes and strengthening cooperation on the security of nuclear materials.
Detection: detection capacity is an indispensable supplement to prevention and also crucial for ensuring an appropriate response to a CBRN incident, since without detection it is impossible to ascertain which materials were involved in the incident. Detection systems should be installed both at external borders and within each Member State. Proper and immediate detection may save thousands of lives and provide the necessary background for a proper response. EU level efforts concerning the use of detection equipment for CBRN materials will concentrate on developing minimum detection standards to be applied across the entire EU, establishing trialling, testing and certification schemes for CBRN detection and improving the exchange of good practices on the detection of CBRN materials.
Preparedness and response : further work should be undertaken in order to strengthen existing measures, in particular with regard to malicious CBRN incidents. Specific attention needs to be paid to CBRN emergency planning, strengthening countermeasure capacity, reinforcing information flows, developing better modelling tools and improving criminal investigation capacity.
Horizontal actions : the horizontal actions set out in the CBRN Action Plan concentrate on international cooperation, communication with the public, information tools, training, personnel security, research and criminalisation of CBRN acts.
Implementation : this should be taken forward primarily by way of existing structures. Although the EU Action Plan envisages the establishment of a small number of new working structures, these are mainly intended as temporary working arrangements, which have specific and time-limited goals.
In the field of civil protection , work will be taken forward under the Community Civil Protection Mechanism and the Civil Protection Financial Instrument to enhance preparedness for CBRN incidents. This includes workshops, training, exchange of experts, simulation exercises, scenario development and capability assessment. Further steps are required to increase EU CBRN response capability, notably by improving the availability of civil protection modules and exploring the need for new types of modules and the feasibility of pre-positioning key modules in the event of major public events. The different strands of work under the Mechanism will be streamlined through the launch of an EU CBRN Resilience Programme, bringing together the various civil protection activities included in the EU CBRN Action Plan and ensuring a consolidated contribution from the Civil Protection Mechanism to the overall implementation of this Action Plan.
In the health sector, an extensive framework has already been developed. The Health Security Committee and existing information exchange mechanisms such as the EWRS, RAS BICHAT and the RASFF will play an important role in the implementation of health related measures of the Action Plan.
The Commission will also establish and chair a CBRN Advisory Group.
Commission financial support : the main financial tools available to the Commission to support the implementation of the current policy package are the existing Financial Programmes, in particular the specific programme ‘Prevention , Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security related risks ’, as well as the specific programme " Prevention of and Fight against Crime ". These specific programmes will cover the period until December 2013. The Annual Work Programmes of both financial programmes will specify the amounts available for the implementation of the current policy package. It is anticipated that up to EUR 100 million will be made available in support of the implementation of the CBRN Action Plan over the period 2010-2013.
Additional funding stemming from other programmes and instruments will also contribute to the CBRN Action Plan. These include the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, the Seventh Framework Programme and the EU Health Programme 2008-2013.
For cases where a CBRN incident has actually taken place, the Commission has proposed an expansion of the scope of the existing EU Solidarity Fund .
Lastly, the Communication examines the Action Plan in the context of the EU’s external relations with particular reference to the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as relevant Community Instruments, in particular the Instrument for Stability.
PURPOSE : Commission Communication on an ~Action Plan to on strengthen chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan.
CONTENT : this Communication proposes an Action Plan in response to the risk of terrorist groups acquiring chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) materials. It notes the commonly held view that the risks involved are such, that coordinated action in terms of prevention, detection and response is indispensable. It is clear that no public authority can afford to ignore this threat given its potentially very significant consequences in terms of human life, and its economic effects.
Overall goal and core measures : the overall goal of the new CBRN policy is to reduce the threat from CBRN incidents, by way of a prioritised EU CBRN Action Plan, which involves all relevant stakeholders, including industry representatives. Coherence will be sought with relevant Community and CFSP instruments, in particular the Instrument for Stability , the INSC and the IPA , which pursue CBRN risks mitigation and preparedness outside the EU, as well as relevant Euratom treaty provisions and secondary legislation.
This goal will be achieved by concentrating efforts on minimising the likelihood of CBRN incidents occurring and limiting their consequences should they materialise. Some of the core measures to achieve these goals are:
deploying a risk-based approach to CBRN security in the EU. This entails the use of risk-assessments to drive the prioritisation of security measures; pensuring that CBRN materials are well protected and the potential for their diversion is limited; strengthening the exchange of information between Member States on CBRN security issues in order to react more swiftly to emerging threats; improving the development and use of detection systems across the EU; and providing responders with the necessary tools to save lives and limit damage to property in case of CBRN incidents.
These aims will be achieved through the implementation of the 133 measures described in the EU CBRN Action Plan, which is part of the current policy package.
Main Areas of Work : the Action Plan envisages three main areas of CBRN security work:
prevention - ensuring that unauthorised access to CBRN materials of concern is as difficult as possible; detection - having the capability to detect CBRN materials in order to prevent or respond to CBRN incidents; preparedness and response - being able to efficiently respond to incidents involving CBRN materials and recover from them as quickly as possible.
These three areas of work are supported by a number of horizontal measures, which are broadly applicable to all CBRN work.
Prevention: preventive measures constitute the main focus of activity of the CBRN Action Plan. This means that efforts should be concentrated on a limited number of vulnerabilities, which could be exploited for malicious purposes, on the basis of robust risk-assessment processes. Consequently, one of the first activities to be undertaken under the CBRN Action Plan should be the prioritisation of high-risk CBRN materials based on a thorough risk-assessment. This will be a prerequisite for many further measures targeted specifically at high-risk CBRN materials.
Subsequent actions will concentrate on the security of CBRN materials and facilities, control over CBRN materials, developing a high-security culture of staff, strengthening the identification of suspicious transactions and behaviours in relation to high-risk CBRN materials, improving the security of transport, information exchange, import and export regimes and strengthening cooperation on the security of nuclear materials.
Detection: detection capacity is an indispensable supplement to prevention and also crucial for ensuring an appropriate response to a CBRN incident, since without detection it is impossible to ascertain which materials were involved in the incident. Detection systems should be installed both at external borders and within each Member State. Proper and immediate detection may save thousands of lives and provide the necessary background for a proper response. EU level efforts concerning the use of detection equipment for CBRN materials will concentrate on developing minimum detection standards to be applied across the entire EU, establishing trialling, testing and certification schemes for CBRN detection and improving the exchange of good practices on the detection of CBRN materials.
Preparedness and response : further work should be undertaken in order to strengthen existing measures, in particular with regard to malicious CBRN incidents. Specific attention needs to be paid to CBRN emergency planning, strengthening countermeasure capacity, reinforcing information flows, developing better modelling tools and improving criminal investigation capacity.
Horizontal actions : the horizontal actions set out in the CBRN Action Plan concentrate on international cooperation, communication with the public, information tools, training, personnel security, research and criminalisation of CBRN acts.
Implementation : this should be taken forward primarily by way of existing structures. Although the EU Action Plan envisages the establishment of a small number of new working structures, these are mainly intended as temporary working arrangements, which have specific and time-limited goals.
In the field of civil protection , work will be taken forward under the Community Civil Protection Mechanism and the Civil Protection Financial Instrument to enhance preparedness for CBRN incidents. This includes workshops, training, exchange of experts, simulation exercises, scenario development and capability assessment. Further steps are required to increase EU CBRN response capability, notably by improving the availability of civil protection modules and exploring the need for new types of modules and the feasibility of pre-positioning key modules in the event of major public events. The different strands of work under the Mechanism will be streamlined through the launch of an EU CBRN Resilience Programme, bringing together the various civil protection activities included in the EU CBRN Action Plan and ensuring a consolidated contribution from the Civil Protection Mechanism to the overall implementation of this Action Plan.
In the health sector, an extensive framework has already been developed. The Health Security Committee and existing information exchange mechanisms such as the EWRS, RAS BICHAT and the RASFF will play an important role in the implementation of health related measures of the Action Plan.
The Commission will also establish and chair a CBRN Advisory Group.
Commission financial support : the main financial tools available to the Commission to support the implementation of the current policy package are the existing Financial Programmes, in particular the specific programme ‘Prevention , Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security related risks ’, as well as the specific programme " Prevention of and Fight against Crime ". These specific programmes will cover the period until December 2013. The Annual Work Programmes of both financial programmes will specify the amounts available for the implementation of the current policy package. It is anticipated that up to EUR 100 million will be made available in support of the implementation of the CBRN Action Plan over the period 2010-2013.
Additional funding stemming from other programmes and instruments will also contribute to the CBRN Action Plan. These include the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, the Seventh Framework Programme and the EU Health Programme 2008-2013.
For cases where a CBRN incident has actually taken place, the Commission has proposed an expansion of the scope of the existing EU Solidarity Fund .
Lastly, the Communication examines the Action Plan in the context of the EU’s external relations with particular reference to the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as relevant Community Instruments, in particular the Instrument for Stability.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)1737/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0467/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0349/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0349/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE450.643
- Committee opinion: PE448.854
- Committee opinion: PE445.808
- Committee opinion: PE443.084
- Committee draft report: PE448.764
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0273
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0273
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0273 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE448.764
- Committee opinion: PE443.084
- Committee opinion: PE445.808
- Committee opinion: PE448.854
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE450.643
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0349/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)1737/2
Activities
Amendments | Dossier |
233 |
2010/2114(INI)
2010/09/03
ITRE
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop methods and criteria on the basis of which an open-ended list of chemicals and biological agents and toxins of special security concern could be developed at the EU level (including for example the criteria on economic loss, environmental damage, toxicity, dissemination potential, etc.);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Insists on the need for a European industrial policy in the field of civil security in the EU, given the fragmentation of this market; recommends that aid to SME/SMIs should be increased, as they are a core driver of innovation and economic recovery, and that efforts should be made to stimulate cooperation between European enterprises; wishes to see the emergence of a comprehensive project management able to manage all aspects of CBRN security projects;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to encourage the industry to substitute high-risk chemicals with lower risk alternates, wherever possible and economically practicable;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, in categorising lists of CBRN agents, to consider the impact on European industry, in particular in the chemical and biological sectors, in order to avoid introducing rules that penalise European industry;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, in categorising lists of CBRN agents, to consider the impact on European industry
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists on the need to maintain Community R&D funding in the field of CBRN security; calls for the development of applied research with a European dimension and for the launching of major demonstration programmes; encourages the creation of expert centres specialising in CBRN threats and mobility for researchers;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists on the need to maintain R&D funding, through the 7th Framework Programme and subsequent Framework Programmes; calls for the development of applied research with a European dimension and for the launching of major demonstration programmes;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of security research as a horizontal issue applicable to prevention, detection and response for the CBRN, in enhancing the EU’s ability to respond to security threats;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recommends that a network of evaluation laboratories be set up to certify the effectiveness of technologies and good practices in order to maximise the funds invested under the FP7/Security;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recommends that a network of evaluation laboratories be set up to certify the effectiveness of technologies and good practices, also calling upon the expertise of civil society and private enterprise;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the most advanced Member States in the field of internal security, despite its vulnerable and quintessentially national nature, to share their information, technologies and infrastructures
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Member States no longer to produce, test and use uranium and depleted uranium;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for dual-use civil-military technologies to be exploited as a source of synergies; encourages, within well-defined strategic collaboration frameworks, cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA), the European Space Agency (ESA), NATO and third countries; stresses the importance of the EU Member States' carrying out joint exercises in preventing and tackling CBRN security incidents, with the participation of the Member States' armed forces and civil protection forces and the Community civil protection instrument;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for dual-use civil-military technologies to be exploited as a source of synergies;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for a study on the safety of nuclear power stations, particularly in the event of a terrorist attack;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for training and public awareness programmes to be launched at European level, considering the opportunities provided by the Internet as a key resource in informing citizens of CBRN issues; notes with interest the feasibility study for a European nuclear security training centre within the JRC;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for training and public awareness programmes to be launched at European level; stresses the importance of coordinating early warning and information mechanisms for European citizens in relation to CBRN incidents; notes with interest the feasibility study for a European nuclear security training centre within the JRC;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for training and public awareness programmes in connection with CBRN threats to be launched at European level; notes with interest the feasibility study for a European nuclear security training centre within the JRC;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Insists on the implementation of suitable safeguards and security when dealing with pooled databases of Member States and sensitive research data, as such a focus on security of data will encourage greater cooperation and sharing of information amongst Member States authorities and bodies;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recognizes the need to improve emergency planning related to CBRN and underlines the need of active involvement of local authorities in public awareness as well as in incident response activities;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Supports the drawing-up of strategies to raise awareness among undertakings, the scientific and university community and financial institutions of the risks linked to the proliferation and trafficking of CBRN material in the context of their work and activities; further takes the view, in more general terms, that confidentiality is a vital component of the effectiveness of certain security measures in the action plan, and it is important to guard against any risk of disclosure that could render them ineffective;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Is aware that proliferation increases the threat of diversion by terrorist groups and encourages the EU to continue its efforts towards universalising the legal framework for combating nuclear terrorism and ensuring that the current rules are complied with; supports cooperation projects with third countries, for example in the Mediterranean basin, in order to combat trafficking in nuclear and radiological material; calls on the EU to universalise the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Convention with a view to the Conference to review the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2011;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Encourages the introduction of measures to combat proliferation financing, following the model of the mechanisms set up to combat terrorism financing.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the adoption and the enforcement of European quality
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the adoption of European quality and security standards for equipment and the development of a European system for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the creation, in conjunction with Europol, of a database of all CBRN substances to closely monitor the trade and trafficking of these substances;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that exposure to any CBRN substance is not without consequence and may pose a risk to health;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the risks associated with trade of chemicals over the Internet needs further investigations and specific actions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Insists on the need for a European industrial policy in the field of civil security in the EU, given the fragmentation of this market; recommends that aid to SME/SMIs, which create a significant share of innovation under the FP7/Security, should be increased and that efforts should be made to stimulate cooperation (particularly cross-border cooperation) between European enterprises; wishes to see the emergence of a comprehensive project management able to manage all aspects of CBRN security projects, covering the entire life cycle of the CBRN threat (prevention, detection and response); calls on the Commission to propose a strategy for developing the biodefence industry in Europe;
source: PE-448.645
2010/10/05
AFET
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Endorses the assessment that CBRN attacks are a serious threat to the security of people living in the EU; therefore supports all
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the greatest CBRN risks stem from misuse or intentional use of CBRN materials, particularly chemical and biological materials and proliferation; therefore stresses that one of the most important measure needed to counter proliferation risks is the strengthening of the non-proliferation regime and disarmament through the universal and full implementation of all relevant treaties and international agreements;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation; therefore stresses that the most important measure needed to counter proliferation risks is the strengthening of the non-proliferation regime and disarmament through the universal and full implementation of all relevant treaties and international agreements
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that one of the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation; therefore stresses that the most important measure needed to counter proliferation risks is the strengthening of the non-proliferation regime and disarmament through the universal and full implementation of all relevant treaties and international agreements;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Emphasises that substantial contributions to strengthening
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Article 4 - indent 1 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 – the establishment
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 – the establishment as soon as possible of a European nuclear weapon-free zone by means of the withdrawal of all
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Endorses the assessment that CBRN attacks are a serious threat to the security of people living in the EU; therefore supports all
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 – the establishment as soon as possible of a European nuclear weapon-free zone by means of the withdrawal of all
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 a (new) - Stresses that till the establishment of a European Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone the EU and its Member States should commit to a policy of a strict rejection of a first use of a nuclear weapon and a negative security assurance;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 b (new) - to endorse the initiative, supported by the European Commission, to set up an international fuel bank, urges the European Union that such a fuel bank should be set up in a non-discriminatory way and should therefore be responsible for the materials of every state using nuclear power; stresses in this regard that the best way to deal with the problem of proliferation would be to abandon atomic energy once and for all, as its civilian use bears great dangers on its own and moreover it cannot be excluded that civilian nuclear technology will not be used for military purposes;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 3 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 3 – calling on the Council and Commission and EU Member States to promote the existing Draft Convention on the prohibition of the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of uranium weapons and on their destruction and to present this convention to the UN member countries, to be signed and ratified; calls on all the EU Member States and UN member countries to impose a moratorium on the use of depleted uranium weapons until such time as a global ban on these weapons has been agreed;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 4 Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that the enforcement of such measures like the Biological Weapons Convention and the additional Verification Protocol is insufficient to tackle those risks posed by non-state actors; therefore calls on the European Commission to assess the current scope of medical counter measures available to respond in an adequate manner to the most dangerous agents that could be acquired and used by non-state actors;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Urges the Member States, the Council, the Commission and the international community to draw up, as part of the Verification Annex to the Chemical Weapons Convention, a list of all potentially harmful chemical substances, including white phosphorus; calls for a comprehensive database of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons, making it possible to monitor trade in these substances, to be compiled together with Europol;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. While admitting that CBRN preparedness is mainly a national competence, strongly encourages member States to set up regional frameworks of cooperation that also include common force training and logistical capabilities such as medical counter-measures, in order to reach better coordination and cost effectiveness; consider that regional models would strike the proper balance between national competence and equal access to resources by the Member States;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Endorses the assessment that CBRN attacks are a serious threat to the security of people living in the EU; therefore supports all civil and military measures which offer
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the EU's civil protection capacity;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the EU's civil protection capacity
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the EU's civil protection capacity;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the EU's civil protection capacity;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Article 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the EU’s civil protection capacity; calls in this regard on the Member States and the Commission to understand disaster response as a
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the intention to strengthen the
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to continue identifying needs which must be met in order to improve civil protection capacities, with a view to common procurement projects; in this respect, particular focus should be given to defining the EU CBRN preparedness and response capability needs, including medical countermeasures, whereby the availability of medical countermeasures in case of a CBRN incident are assessed at both EU and Member State levels;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to continue identifying needs which must be met in order to improve civil protection capacities, with a view to
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Urges the Commission to produce a study on the safety and protection of nuclear plants in the European Union against terrorist attacks;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the European Commission to regularly report to the European Parliament on CBRN threat and risk assessments;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Shares the view that such substances are extremely difficult to handle and "that the probability of such attacks occurring is therefore rather low";
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the European Commission activities under the Instrument for Stability to tackle activities under CBRN. Considers these activities complementary to the CBRN Action Plan and call the European Commission to expand the projects in regions other than the former Soviet Union.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the organisation of joint exercises between EU Member States, and between Member States and third countries, to prevent dangerous situations with regard to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Recalling that civilian sectors are expanding globally, therefore calls the European Commission to develop projects to ensure these activities do not help proliferation.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Article 9 9. Insists that disaster
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Insists that disasters must
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Recalls that the Joint Situation Centre (SitCen) has been placed within the new External Action Service and its personnel is mainly from the Member States intelligence and policy service; stresses that its function is utmost important in supporting national Crisis management centres;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Shares the view that such substances are extremely difficult to handle and "that the probability of such attacks occurring is therefore rather low"; therefore stresses that all measures taken should be proportional to the probable risks; points out that the securisation of both transport and storage of CBRN materials is an undeniable and inevitable part of the EU process to make access to these materials as difficult as possible hence tackling CBRN materials related insecurity;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the most serious threat to all EU citizens is the worldwide use and spread of nuclear energy which is per definition a dual use technology which means that each state that has a civilian program is able to produce nuclear weapons within a short time span;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the greatest CBRN risks stem from nuclear proliferation; therefore stresses that the most important measure needed to counter proliferation risks is the strengthening of the non-proliferation regime
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation challenges posed by both state and non-state actors; therefore stresses that the most important measure needed to counter proliferation risks is the strengthening of the non- proliferation regime and disarmament through the universal and full implementation of all relevant treaties and international agreements, in combination with appropriate proactive and reactive measures to tackle in particular those risks posed by non-state actors;
source: PE-448.936
2010/10/13
ENVI
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point C C. whereas environmental pollution and contamination issues, including those of a cross-border nature, can be raised by CBRN incidents, making it necessary to include recovery and decontamination strategies in the EU CBRN policy
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Point 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets the lack of measures in the CBRN Action Plan for ensuring the security of radiological and nuclear facilities and materials, and to improve response plans regarding the various types of radiological emergencies and their consequences for the population and the environment;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Point 7 b (new) 7b. Alarmed by the cases where individuals and activists have been able to acquire nuclear waste material from several reprocessing installations in Europe, calls for urgent concerted action to enhance the security of radioactive and nuclear materials and facilities;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Point 8 8. Regrets the lack of focus in the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Point 8 8. Regrets the lack of focus in the Commission Communication and Council Conclusions on the CBRN Action Plan on adequately protecting public transport networks and the health of their users, given the many terrorist attacks on transport in recent years and the generally increased risk of CBRN incidents occurring during transport of CBRN materials; calls on the Member States to guarantee pre-exposure protection of first responders to CBRN incidents and post- exposure treatment of victims, in particular against biological pathogens;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Point 10 bis (new) 10a. Encourages joint policies for the remediation of land affected by chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear contamination, so that the soil and land can be restore to use as swiftly as possible, thereby reducing the risks to health and the environment;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Point 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines that counter-terrorism activities must be conducted with full respect for international law, including human rights and the principle of the rule of law; recalls the need to respect the principles of Arhus Convention on public access to information, participation and judicial review in matters relating to the environment;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Point 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission and Council to consider developing response models that provide an ideal response in the event of CBRN incidents, and in which special attention is awarded to training establishments, medical care institutions and geriatric care centres;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Point 11 11. Calls on the Member States, when drafting evacuation plans in case of a CBRN incident, to give special attention to the needs of the elderly, children, people under medical care and other such
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Point 11 11. Calls on the Member States, when drafting evacuation plans in case of a CBRN incident, to give special attention to the needs of the elderly, children, people under medical care, persons with disabilities and other such specific groups;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Point 11 11. Calls on the Member States
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point F F. whereas, compared to nuclear technology and its precursors, biological materials such as anthrax are cheaper and much easier to acquire and spread, providing possibilities for unconventional terrorist attacks posing dire, long-term threats to health
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Point 11 a (new) 11a. Disagrees with the Commission assessment that informing public about the possible dangers in their day-to-day lives and direct environment would have ‘serious negative social effects’, and considers that improving response plans would contribute to increasing public security against the potential criminal or terrorist use of radioactive material;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Point 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Member States to award special importance to the construction of civil protection shelters both within (public and administrative) institutions and at local and regional level, in which the European public can take refugee in the event of a disaster;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Point 12 – indent 1 (new) - 13 (new). Urges the Commission to search for an agreement with third neighbouring countries, which have on their territory objects that could pose major threats to the environmental and human security in the EU and in the case of an accident, on the common minimum security standards;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Point 12 – indent 2 (new) - 14 (new). Points out the implementation of the common CBRN security system should not diminish the competence of the Member States in this policy area;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Point 12 – indent 3 (new) - 15 (new). Calls on the Commission to foresee in its action plan a more flexible adaptation of the security measures to the technological development;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Point 12 – indent 4 (new) - 16 (new). Urges the Commission to thoroughly assess the existing security measures regarding their impact on the environment and health, and to ensure that new measures are introduced only based on the results of such an assessment which should be carried out periodically;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Point 12 a (new) 12 a. Calls on the Member States to no longer produce, test or use uranium and depleted uranium;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Point 12 b (new) 12 b. Calls for an assessment on the security of nuclear power stations in the EU and its vicinity, particularly in the event of a terrorist attack;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point J – indent 1 (new) - K (new). Whereas the threat to the chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear safety arises not only from terrorist attacks or negligence, but also from the current areas polluted with chemical weapons from WW2 dumped in the sea-bed or the nuclear waste sites in the EU;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point J – indent 2 (new) - L (new). Whereas the appropriate level of the chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear safety in the EU depends on the security level applied in third countries as well;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point J – indent 3 (new) - M (new). Whereas new threats to the security could arise from the use of new technologies in planning new terror acts, while the security standards do not adapt fast enough to technological progress;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point J – indent 4 (new) - N (new). Whereas the thorough review of different currently applicable standards is needed in order to set necessary and sufficient security requirements;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Point 1 1. Notes the uncoordinated overinvestment in vaccines during the A/H1N1 pandemic, welcomes the Draft Council Conclusions ‘On lessons learned from the A/H1N1 pandemic - health security in the European Union’ (12665/10), which takes into consideration the development of a mechanism for the joint procurement of vaccines and antiviral medication to be applied in the Member States on a voluntary basis, and encourages Member States to develop together regional preparedness solutions, including the sharing of existing capacity and the coordination of cost-effective procurement of medical countermeasures, whilst ensuring high levels of CBRN preparedness across the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Point 2 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Point 7 7.
source: PE-450.736
2010/11/11
LIBE
123 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 having regard to Article 3 TEU and Articles 2(5), 67, 74, 196 and 222 TFEU,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) – having regard to its report of 21 September 2010 on the Commission communication: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man- made disasters1, 1 Texts Adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0326.
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that it is of the utmost importance to keep a close track of all transactions involving high-risk CBRN materials in the EU, and that instead of merely ‘urging’ the industry to report on transactions, as stated in the adopted Action Plan, the Commission and the Member States should work on a
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Stresses that the securisation of both transport and storage of CBRN materials is undeniably and inevitably part of the process to make access to these materials as difficult as possible hence tackling CBRN-related insecurity;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Stresses that the risks associated with trade of chemicals over the Internet needs further investigations and specific actions;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls for clarification regarding the strengthening of the import/export regime with regard to the roles of the Member States and the Commission; calls on the Member States to implement and ensure the application of the existing international regulations, and on the Commission to play a monitoring role, assessing and reporting
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Stresses the need to strengthen where they exist, and create where they do not, inspection and safety mechanisms in all postal services dealing with the distribution of correspondence, in view of the acts of terrorism committed in European countries by placing explosive substances in parcels being sent through the post;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to launch a study, in cooperation with the Member State authorities, to assess the situation on the ground when it comes to the detection of CBRN and on the safety of nuclear power stations, regarding the event of an accident or intentional attack; encourages the Commission to build on the results of such an assessment and work on common EU guidelines on how to handle such accidents or intentional attacks, including finding the means to ensure that Member States allocate
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls for the
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Requests the Commission to monitor, assess and report on Member States‘ compliance on an annual basis to the Parliament, and requests national authorities to ensure that regulations and guidelines are being followed and complied with by the relevant industries and organisations dealing with high-risk CBRN materials;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers it essential to carry out proper studies with a view to involving all relevant national and EU bodies and stakeholders on an obligatory basis, including an assessment of ways to make exchanges and cooperation faster and easier, thus making the response to a public safety threat more effective;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers it essential to carry out proper studies with a view to
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 b (new) – having regard to the revised Council Presidency proposal of 25 October 2010 for draft Council conclusions on preparedness and response in the event of a CBRN attack, drawn up on the basis of the objectives set out in Action H.29 on improving emergency planning in the EU CBRN Action Plan1, as adopted by the Council on 8th November 2010, 1 15465/10.
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Council to entrust the Commission with the role of an ‘involved actor’ with regard to emergency planning,
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Council to entrust the Commission with the role of
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Draws attention to the fact that the Commission,
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Stresses the need to
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Stresses the need to create regional/EU- wide stockpiles of response resources, of which the magnitude should, as far as it is possible, reflect the current level of threat, whether medical or other types of relevant equipment, under the coordination of the European Civil Protection Mechanism; stresses the importance of keeping well managed stockpiles to ensure that the response resources, medical or other relevant equipment, are fully functional, current and up to date; urges that until such time as this EU/regional pooling of resources comes into effect, the EU CBRN Action Plan should point to a possible way in which Member States would share counter-
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Stresses the need to create regional/EU- wide stockpiles of response resources, whether medical or other types of relevant equipment, under the coordination of the European Civil Protection Mechanism; urges that until such time as this EU/regional pooling of resources comes into effect, the EU CBRN Action Plan should point to a possible way in which Member States would share counter- measures and resources in the event of a CBRN accident or terrorist attack, so as to put the new Solidarity Clause into practice without interfering into the national obligations of Member States to protect their own citizens;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Stresses the need to create regional/EU- wide stockpiles of response resources, whether medical or other types of relevant equipment, under the coordination of the European Civil Protection Mechanism and funded by the European Union; urges that until such time as this EU/regional pooling of resources comes into effect, the EU CBRN Action Plan should point to a possible way in which Member States would share counter-
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Urges the revision of the European Solidarity Fund to make it more accessible to natural and available for industrial and man made disasters, and calls on the Member States to make use of the available resources of the Structural Fund for enhanced prevention and preparedness;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. In order to prepare for the unfortunate event of an accident, outbreak or deliberate use of CBRN, calls on the Commission to establish reporting mechanisms to provide a link between the work of the European Civil Protection Mechanism and other EU early-warning systems in the relevant areas of health, environment, food production and animal welfare; calls also on the Commission to establish mechanisms for exchanges of information and analyses with international bodies such as the World Health Organisation, the World Meteorological Organisation and the Food and Agriculture Organisation;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. In order to prepare for the unfortunate event of an accident, outbreak or deliberate use of CBRN, calls on the Commission to establish reporting mechanisms to provide a link between the work of the European Civil Protection Mechanism and other EU early-warning systems in the relevant areas of health, food production
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) – having regard to the Council conclusions of 8 and 9 November 2010 on preparedness and response in the event of a CBRN attack,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls for the creation of EU/regional specialised response teams, including medical personnel, law-enforcement
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Calls on the Commission to provide sufficient funding to develop improved equipment for the detection and identification of biological agents in the event of an attack or incident; regrets that existing detection equipment has limitations of capacity and speed resulting in the loss of valuable time in case of an emergency; underlines that emergency personnel must be properly equipped and medically protected in advance in order to work with maximum personal safety in a disaster area where harmful pathogens may be present; stresses that improved equipment for identification of agents and diagnostics are also required in hospitals and other facilities receiving victims from an incident;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Calls on the various EU and national bodies involved in information gathering to review their organisational structures and where lacking create appropriate elements with experience and understanding of identifying and assessing CBRN threats and risks;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to rapidly
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) – having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council towards a stronger European disaster response: the role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance (COM(2010)0600),
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 b (new) – having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food safety and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the Commission communication: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man- made disasters (A7-0227/2010),
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas CBRN disasters, whether
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas CBRN disasters, whether accidental or resulting from a terrorist attack, pose serious threats to the security of the people living in the EU, affecting their lives
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas both the Council and the Commission agree that the number of incidents involving CBRN material, including acts of terrorism, has so far been relatively small, and whereas the majority of the disasters involving CBRN substances have been due to industrial accidents or to the increase in, and worldwide spread of, dangerous pathogens,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the existing and continuous risk of CBRN disasters in European Union territory, whether accidental or intentional, gravely compromises the full enjoyment of all fundamental rights and freedoms, and is in contradiction with the promise of and development of a European area of freedom, security and justice,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation of CBRN material by terrorist organisations, and whereas, therefore, the most important measures concern the strengthening of the non- proliferation regime and disarmament through the universal and full implementation of all relevant treaties and international agreements (namely the Nuclear Non-
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union1, 1 OJ C 83, 30.3.2010, p.389.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas one of the greatest CBRN risks stem from proliferation, and whereas, therefore,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons and explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons and instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons for illegal purposes is part of the EU definition of terrorism and training for terrorism as referred to in Council Framework Decisions
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the problem of misuse of certain chemicals, which are widely available to the general public on the market, as precursors to home-made explosives, can provoke a series of terrorist and other criminal incidents in the EU; whereas this calls for strong monitoring and scrutiny of the implementation of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the marketing and use of explosive precursors(COM(2010)0473),
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty a new balance of responsibilities between the various EU institutions, on one hand, and the EU and its Member States, including the Defence expertise, on the other, is being established; whereas the building of such a new framework is a continuous process demanding an understanding of shared values and a common goal,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS) offers opportunities to improve the EU's overall crisis response through actions under the Instrument for Stability (IfS),
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas an EU CBRN Action Plan should make for the efficient interaction of national and EU initiatives in addressing CBRN risks and in preparing the necessary responses, enhancing both ‘horizontal’ coordination between the Commission and Member States and ‘vertical’ coordination between the EU-level instruments and Member States‘ instruments, in order to increase the effectiveness and speed of information sharing, the exchange of best practices, analytical reporting at all stages, joint planning, the development of operational procedures, operational exercises and the cost-effective pooling of existing resources,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the changes made by the Council to the current EU CBRN Action Plan proposed by the Commission make the Action Plan weaker, making the commitment on the part of Member States non-binding and watering down the measures provided for, many of which are kept at national level instead of being given an EU-wide scope, as well as weakening the monitoring and scrutiny of their implementation by the Commission, sometimes even failing to include the Commission as an ‘involved actor’ along with the Member States,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the EU CBRN Action Plan straddles the new division of competences between the Member States and the EU following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, as envisaged in Article 5 TEU in connection with the principles of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality; points out that the EU CBRN Action Plan covers the area of shared internal competences (Article 4 TFEU) regarding the area of freedom, security and justice, common safety concerns, and transport; civil protection measures (Article 196 TFEU); as well as external actions of the Union (Articles 21 and 22 TEU); (This is a linguistic amendment and does not affect all language versions)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-20151 as adopted by the World Conference on Disaster Reduction held from 18 to 22 January 2005 in Japan, 1 http://www.unisdr.org/eng/hfa/hfa.htm.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that it is crucial to leverage the competent expertise and avoid duplication, fragmentation and inconsistency in the EU institutions and/or the Member States
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that it is crucial to avoid duplication, fragmentation and inconsistency in the Member States‘ efforts in a security area where the fundamental right to life is at risk and where the implications of carelessness and laxity know no borders;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the EU should
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the EU should strengthen its common approach to CBRN prevention, detection and response through the creation of specific mechanisms (regulatory, legislative or non-legislative instruments) which make cooperation and the provision of means of assistance compulsory in the event of a CBRN disaster caused by an
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is essential to strengthen the
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is essential to strengthen the scope for normative and regulatory
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges that the commitment of the Member States to CBRN control must go further than the simple sharing of best practices and information, and that technologies and infrastructures should also be
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges that the commitment of the Member States to CBRN control must go further than the simple sharing of best practices and information, and that technologies and infrastructures should also be pooled/shared, so as to avoid duplication and waste of resources, in order to create valuable and cost-effective synergies at EU level; calls on the Member States to agree on methods for the detection and prevention of CBRN disasters, the transferral of CBRN materials within the EU and response measures, including sharing of CBRN related information and cross-border assistance;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for EU quality and security standards, as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies, to be developed; calls for the sharing and use of best knowledge and expertise both from the civil and military fields; stresses that the necessary research and development funding should be provided to ensure that applied research and major demonstration programmes with an EU dimension are carried out, and, given the fragmentation of this market, that an EU industrial policy in the field of civil security is needed, stimulating cooperation between enterprises in the EU and with specific support for small and medium-sized enterprises/small and medium-sized industries (SMEs/SMIs), which create a significant share of innovation under the FP7/Security, should be increased and that efforts should be made to stimulate cooperation (particularly cross-border cooperation) between European enterprises; wishes to see the emergence of a comprehensive project management able to manage all aspects of CBRN security projects, covering the entire life cycle of the CBRN threat (prevention, detection and response); calls on the Commission to propose a strategy for developing the biodefence industry in Europe;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for EU quality and security standards, as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies, to be developed; underlines that strict security standards and hiring procedures also need to apply to personnel employed at facilities with access to harmful agents; stresses that the necessary research and development funding should be provided to ensure that applied research and major demonstration programmes with an EU dimension are carried out, and that an EU industrial policy in the field of civil security is needed, stimulating cooperation between enterprises in the EU and with specific support for small and medium-sized enterprises/small and medium-sized industries (SMEs/SMIs);
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) – having regard to the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development1, specially its funding of the CBRN Emap project2, 1 Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1). 2 https://www.cbrnemap.org.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for EU quality and security standards, as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies, to be developed; again under the leadership of the Commission, stresses that the necessary research and development funding should be provided to ensure that applied research and major demonstration programmes with an EU dimension are carried out, and that an EU industrial policy in the field of civil security is needed, stimulating cooperation between enterprises in the EU and with specific support for small and medium- sized enterprises/small and medium-sized industries (SMEs/SMIs);
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes addressing CBRN protection as a topic under the established European Framework Cooperation (EFC) for Security and Defence Research between the Commission, ESA and EDA; stresses that complementarity coordination and synergy between defence R&T investment and research investment for civilian security by the Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme would require effective improvement of relevant legal conditions establishing the exchange of information within the EFC and with activities at national and EU level, as provided for by the Council Decision 2006/971/EC; calls for the development of applied research with a European dimension concerning the safety of installations, in order to protect local communities and the environment and for the launching of major demonstration programmes; encourages the creation of expert centres specialising in CBRN threats and mobility for researchers;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that an EU CBRN Action Plan offers an opportunity to enable the EU and its Member States to
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that an EU CBRN Action Plan offers an opportunity to enable the EU and its Member States to implement effectively the Solidarity Clause included in Article 222 TFEU, and that Member States must be aware of each others‘ plans and best practices to deal with and counter CBRN disasters, whether caused accidentally or intentionally, so that they can come to each others’ assistance in a coordinated and effective manner;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Insists on the implementation of suitable safeguards and security when dealing with pooled databases of Member States and sensitive research data, as such a focus on security of data will encourage greater cooperation and sharing of information amongst Member States authorities and bodies;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of enhanced preparedness, and calls for regular mapping of national capabilities and assets, as well as joint exercises among Member States;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid-response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; and reiterates its call for the establishment of a EU Civil Protection Force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism which should coordinate civilian
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism based in the Commission services which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid- response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; and reiterates its call for the establishment of a EU Civil Protection Force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) – having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items1, 1 OJ L 134, 29.5.2009, p. 1.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, as defined in Council Decision 2007/779/EC, is currently the appropriate instrument to deal with CBRN disasters, and stresses that this structure should be the forum where
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, as defined in Council Decision 2007/779/EC, is currently the appropriate instrument to deal with CBRN disasters, and stresses that this structure should be the forum where emergency decisions concerning CBRN disaster preparedness and response should be taken; notes, however, that in order to achieve this goal and to ensure proper prevention and detection cooperation must be established with civil protection bodies, with the intelligence and law-enforcement authorities, as well as with security-service and military information and response centres in each of the Member States and at
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the announcement by the Commission (COM(2010)0600) of the establishment of the European Emergency Response Capacity in the form of a pool of pre-identified civil protection assets from the states participating in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism that are voluntarily made available for EU disaster relief operations both inside and outside the Union;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Member States to coordinate their efforts, under the supervision of the Commission, in order to enhance interoperability of equipments, capabilities and technologies in the field of civil protection so as to efficiently put into practice the new solidarity clause in the event of a CRBN disaster;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses th
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that the strengthening of the EU's civil protection capacity must include the exploration of
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges EU Member States to appoint or create a national authority that, in the event of a CBRN attack or disaster, would be tasked with the responsibility of acting as the main coordinator of all national and local structures involved, as well as of all the counter measures taken to respond to such an event;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that suitable
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that suitable bridges and partnerships should also be built between bodies such as Europol, Interpol and law- enforcement authorities in the Member States with a view to creating an appropriate and effective network for proactive anticipation/real-time monitoring of emergencies and operational engagement/coordination to deal with CBRN-related disasters, and report to the Commission as well;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines that the fight against terrorism must be conducted with full respect for international human rights law, and European fundamental rights law, principles and values, including the principle of the rule of law; recalls the need to respect the principles of Arhus Convention on public access to information, participation and judicial review in matters relating to the environment;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) – having regard to the Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection1, specifically in case of actions having cross-border impact, in which, inter alia, guidelines are outlined for an integrate approach to the increase of the capabilities for critical infrastructure protection at EU level, including the need for a Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN), and a role of proposition and coordination is ascribed to the Commission on the improvement of the protection of these critical infrastructures, 1 OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p.75.
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that preventing terrorist access to CBRN materials is a key priority under both the current 2005 EU Counter- Terrorism Strategy and the future one, as well as under the 2003 EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Means of Delivery; requests, therefore, that the EU Counter- Terrorism Coordinator
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that preventing terrorist access to CBRN materials is a key priority under both the current 2005 EU Counter- Terrorism Strategy and the future one, as well as under the 2003 EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Means of Delivery; requests, therefore, that the EU Counter-
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that preventing terrorist access to CBRN materials is a key priority under both the current 2005 EU Counter- Terrorism Strategy and the future one, as well as under the 2003 EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Means of Delivery; requests, therefore, that the EU Counter- Terrorism Coordinator report regularly to Parliament, through the appropriate and relevant EU agencies and experts, on any potential CBRN risks or threats within the Union or against EU citizens and interests elsewhere; insists that further clarification is needed on the appropriate roles of the various EU and national bodies involved in the fight against terrorism; acknowledges in that connection the coordination
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the EU institutions to maintain democratic control and transparency regarding the development and implementation of all parts of the EU CBRN Action plan, respecting the public's right to access to all information and relevant documentation that concerns public security and the everyday risks associated with CBRN disasters;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls for the mainstreaming of the measures provided for in the CBRN Action Plan in all the EU
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the EU institutions and Member States to
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the EU institutions and Member States to resist pressure from industry and other interested stakeholders seeking to escape the burden of more regulation, as is to be expected (and as emerges clearly from a comparison between the Commission and the Council versions of the EU CBRN Action Plan); considers that industry concerns about the quality and impact of the proposed regulatory measures should be taken into consideration, without losing sight of what is at stake, namely the
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on Member States to stop producing, using and testing uranium and depleted uranium;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 – having regard to the Co
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses that the best prevention lies in the revival of arms control and the disarmament process, full implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Chemical and Bacteriological Weapons, continuation of the nuclear disarmament process and strengthening of the nuclear non- proliferation system;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Takes the view that the EU CBRN Action Plan must set higher standards where security assessment criteria for high-
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Takes the view that the EU CBRN Action Plan must set higher standards where security assessment criteria for high- risk CBRN facilities are concerned, and stresses the role and responsibility of national authorities to carry out regular checks of these facilities, since the development of ‘criteria’, as stated in the current Action Plan amended and adopted by the Council, is in itself simply not enough and sets an astonishingly low standard, coupled with the low levels of responsibility allocated to the organisations dealing with CBRN materials, relevant Member States authorities and EU bodies;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Takes the view that the EU CBRN Action Plan must set
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that security arrangements and requirements at high-risk CBRN facilities
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that security arrangements and requirements at high-risk CBRN facilities throughout the EU must be the subject of
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Welcomes the initiatives of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) in supporting International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) programmes and nuclear inspections; recommends that measures should be taken to pool its databases and the research findings with those of Member States;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Supports the drawing-up of strategies to raise awareness among undertakings, the scientific and university community and financial institutions of the risks linked to the proliferation and trafficking of CBRN material in the context of their work and activities; further takes the view, in more general terms, that confidentiality is a vital component of the effectiveness of certain security measures in the action plan, and it is important to guard against any risk of disclosure that could render them ineffective;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that the Commission and Member State authorities should oversee the activities carried out by the organisations dealing with high-risk CBRN materials and should ensure that these organisations comply with
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 – having regard to the Co
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers it crucial that the ‘Prevention’ part of the EU CBRN Action Plan should be amended in such a way as to force the chemicals industry to replace the use of high-risk chemicals with suitable lower-risk alternatives, where such replacement is possible,
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers it crucial that the ‘Prevention’ part of the EU CBRN Action Plan should be amended in such a way as to force the chemical
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers it crucial that the ‘Prevention’ part of the EU CBRN Action Plan should be amended in such a way as to
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers it crucial that the ‘Prevention’ part of the EU CBRN Action Plan should be amended in such a way as to force the chemicals industry to replace the use of high-risk chemicals with suitable lower-risk alternatives, where such replacement is possible,
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers it crucial that the ‘Prevention’ part of the EU CBRN Action Plan should be amended in such a way as to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Council and the Commission to urge all Member States to sign and to meet their commitments under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and to do their utmost to promote the Additional Verification Protocol to the BWC, which includes lists of dangerous biological agents and pathogens and provisions on disclosure statements and monitoring inspections; also, it urges Member States, the Council, the Commission and the international community to draw up, as part of the Verification Annex to the CWC, a list of all potentially harmful chemical substances, including white phosphorus;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Further calls on the Commission and the Council to continue to step up activities in support of the treaty system, in particular the conventions on chemical and biological weapons, therefore calling on all EU Member States to impose a strict ban on the production and use of biological and chemical weapons and to disarm their own weapons;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to present an overall assessment of the state of play in industries in Europe when it comes to securing and increasing control over high- risk CBRN materials, including an overview of all relevant national laws regarding implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and other international instruments related to CBRN materials; that overview should include reporting on the degree to which Member States and industries fulfil their international obligations; recognises, nevertheless, that enforcement measures like the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions might be insufficient to tackle the risks deriving from CBRN use by non-state actors, namely by terrorist networks;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to present comparative data and an overall assessment of the state of play in industries in Europe when it comes to securing and increasing control over high-
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 – having regard to its past resolutions on CBRN topics and disaster prevention and response, and in that regard to its recent resolution of 10 February 2010 on the
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Council and the Commission to promote the existing Draft Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, Transfer and Use of Uranium Weapons and on their Destruction, and to present this convention to the UN member countries to be signed and ratified; calls on all the EU Member States and the UN member countries to impose a moratorium on the use of depleted uranium weapons until such time as a global ban on these weapons has been agreed;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Encourages the introduction of measures to combat proliferation financing, following the model of the mechanisms set up to combat terrorism financing;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new) 21c. Urges the Commission to carry out a study on the safety and protection of nuclear plants in throughout the EU against terrorist attacks;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 d (new) 21d. Welcomes the Commission's activities under the Instrument for Stability to tackle activities under CBRN; considers these activities complementary to the Action Plan and calls on the Commission to expand the projects to regions other than solely the former Soviet Union (SEDE); also, building on the experiences under the Instrument for Stability calls on the Commission to launch a call for proposals aimed at strengthening the safety and the protection of civilian laboratories in order to avoid future proliferation;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 e (new) 21e. Calls for the adoption of EU quality and security standards and the development of a EU system for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Considers that the EU CBRN Action Plan should unambiguously call for the development of EU guidelines on security training and standard requirements to be implemented in all 27 Member States, and should ensure that specific training programmes are provided for those security staff dealing with high-risk CBRN materials, including staff in industries and research centres where high-risk CBRN are present, and that requirements are laid
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that a future short-term revision of the EU CBRN Action Plan should not simply promote self-regulation among the industries concerned, and not merely advise the industries to adopt codes of conduct, but actually call on the Commission, if recommended by the risk assessments, to develop pan-European guidelines and regulations applicable to all sectors dealing with high-risk CBRN agents;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses that a future short-term revision of the EU CBRN Action Plan should not simply promote self-regulation among the industries concerned, and not merely advise the industries to adopt codes of conduct, but actually call on the Commission to develop pan-European guidelines and
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that it is of the utmost importance to keep a close track of all transactions involving high-risk CBRN materials in the EU, and that instead of merely ‘urging’ the industry to report on transactions, as stated in the adopted Action Plan, the Commission and the Member States should work on a proper legal framework to regulate and monitor transactions, thus ensuring proper and rapid reporting of all suspicious transactions as well as the loss or theft of CBRN materials; emphasises that these regulations should establish a proper basis for full transparency in all sectors dealing with CBRN agents, thus holding industries accountable for such transactions; considers that special attention shall be made to the actors of the private sector in terms of the ability to enforce the relevant laws and rules regarding the monitoring of their reporting obligations in order to properly supervise them;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that it is of the utmost importance to keep a close track of all transactions involving high-risk CBRN materials in the EU, and that
source: PE-450.643
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19222&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2009-06-24T00:00:00New
2009-06-23T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.764New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-448764_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.084&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-443084_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.808&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-445808_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.854&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-448854_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.643New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-450643_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0349_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0349_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-349&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0349_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-349&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0349_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-467New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0467_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/7/03348New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 054
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action PlanNew
Strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN action plan |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Home AffairsNew
Migration and Home Affairs |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Home AffairsNew
Migration and Home Affairs |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|