Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | BORYS Piotr ( PPE) | CHILDERS Nessa ( S&D), SCHAAKE Marietje ( ALDE), TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE), MCCLARKIN Emma ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE) | Emma McCLARKIN ( ECR), Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 506 votes to 27, with 46 abstentions, a resolution on European cinema in the digital era.
State of play : Parliament points out, firstly, that almost 1 billion cinema tickets were sold in the EU in 2010 , demonstrating cinema’s continued popularity and huge financial, growth and employment potential. It also stresses that European cinema is of growing importance to the economy, as it provides more than 30 000 jobs. European cinema plays an extremely important role in the cultural development and identity of Europe.
Parliament notes, however, that the European cinema market is highly fragmented and diversified , a great majority of the cinemas having only one or two screens. They also note that multiplexes constitute the majority of digitised cinemas. It highlights the fact that there is a geographical imbalance in the accessibility of cinemas and film to citizens, most notably in Eastern Europe and in rural areas. It points out that film screening is in the process of changing, with growing numbers of multiplexes and a marked reduction in the number of screens in small towns and old city centres . The diversity of the EU's cinematic landscape must be preserved and the transition to digital must not result in the closure of small and art-house cinemas to the benefit of multiplexes.
Preponderance of US productions is a threat to European productions : Parliament notes that the European film industry’s potential is growing, but that the proportion of European productions showing in cinemas needs to grow. It observes that, partly because of the primacy assigned to blockbuster films, the diversity of films in Europe and cinemas' freedom to decide on their programming are endangered and, as a result, there is reason to fear an irreversible market concentration in the field of cinema. It notes, furthermore, with concern that the survival of many independent cinemas is being endangered by the high costs of converting to digital technology. The resolution notes that multi-territory or pan-European licensing is crucial for unlocking the potential of online distribution film markets, for promoting a wider circulation of European films, for better consumer access to European films and for availability of European films on Video On Demand (VOD) platforms.
Opportunities and challenges: for the Parliamentn, the Member States and the Commission must make it a priority to financially support the full digitisation in terms of equipment of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies as quickly as possible and encourage the circulation of European films within an audiovisual sector that is globally very competitive.
Threats: among the main threats to the development of European cinema identified by Parliament are the following:
the high costs of digitisation, especially for small independent and art-house cinemas; the closure of small cinemas in small villages in less-developed regions; the threat of piracy and illegal downloading; the problems relating to the circulation and distribution of films, particularly those with lower budgets; the lack of suitable training of projectionists to handle new digital cinema equipment.
To counteract these threats, the main priority actions should be: i) specific measures proposed by the Commission to avoid the closure of small, independent and art-house cinemas, ii) public funding, in particular for small independent cinemas.
Interoperability, standardisation and archiving : Parliament underlines the need to ensure the interoperability of digital projection systems and materials, while respecting the principle of technological neutrality. In this respect, Members recommend the standardisation of systems based on ISO standards in the areas of production, distribution and film screening without, however, resulting in the establishment of a single standard. They also stress the importance of standardising the 2K resolution system, which allows the screening of films in 3D, HDTV and Blu-Ray as well as for VOD services. It calls on European and national standardisation organisations to promote the use of this standard accordingly.
As far as the issue of archiving is concerned, Parliament recommends that Member States adopt legislative measures to ensure that audiovisual works, which in future could form the beginnings of a European multimedia library and become an important instrument for protecting and promoting the national heritage. It therefore recommends that the digital transition be made as quickly as possible to avoid the cost of producing both celluloid and digital versions of films.
State aids: Parliament calls on Member States to take EU competition rules into account when designing State aid schemes for digital conversion, in order to avoid distortions of the financing terms for digital cinema. The Commission is invited to draw up clear guidelines for State aid, building on experiences in various Member States. Parliament emphasises that, while public support should be technology-neutral, it should also guarantee the sustainability of investments , taking into account exhibitors’ specific business models and distributors’ technical requirements.
Financing models: Parliament emphasises the need for both public and private investment as the cinema sector enters the digital era. It stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level, particularly to support small and independent cinemas. It recommends that the financing of digitisation projects by the European Structural Funds include commitments by supported cinemas to screen European films. It underlines that although the European Structural Funds are a significant source of financing for digitisation projects and training initiatives, funding should be increased, the waiting times shortened and the applications simplified as part of the new Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 .
The Commission and the Member States are also invited to:
disseminate best practices in the area of the financing of digitisation (e.g. small cinemas forming networks to conclude collective agreements with distributors); take into account the costs for small local cinemas, and possible opportunities/consequences for the labour market, when drawing up their national digitisation programmes; take into consideration cinemas located in less well populated areas, where cultural events are rare, and not in a position to pay the costs of converting to digital; promote public-private partnerships as a method for financing the digitisation of cinemas; respect the independence of cinemas; increase funding for research connected with digital cinema technology; implement training programmes targeted at professionals in the audiovisual sector allowing them to learn to use digital technologies and adapt to new business models.
Virtual Print Fee (VPF): Parliament acknowledges that the so-called VPF commercial model for financing the installation of digital equipment is suitable for large cinema networks but is not an optimal solution for small and independent cinemas. It notes that financing models should be promoted which enable independent cinemas to gain access to VPF payments from all distributors; recommends organising purchasing cooperatives in order to make the advantage of group rates available to all cinemas.
Film education : Parliament underlines that education through film, including cinema culture and language, allows citizens to have a critical understanding of different forms of media. Film education should enable citizens to gain wider knowledge, to appreciate the art of film and to reflect on the values that films convey. This is the reason why it calls on Member States to include film education in their national education programmes and to support educational programmes in film schools. It highlights the importance of film education in independent cinemas at all stages of education in order to develop audiences for European films.
The MEDIA Programme : underlining the importance of the MEDIA Programme for the European film industry, Parliament stresses its importance in the digitisation of cinemas. It calls on the Commission to earmark funding under the new MEDIA programme for the post-2013 period and from the European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) to support the digitisation of cinemas showing European content. They underline that new initiatives must be introduced as part of the next generation of the MEDIA programme to improve and promote translation, dubbing, subtitling and surtitling, in order to support independent cinemas dedicated to European films. It also calls for: i) a ‘digital programme heading’ to be included in the MEDIA programme in order to simplify conversion to digital formats; ii) investment by the MEDIA Programme in VOD (video on demand).
Models of distribution : Parliament notes that digital technologies have affected the way in which films are distributed over a variety of platforms and devices either through linear or non-linear services. It points out that one weak point in the digitisation process is the fact that distributors, and especially independent distributors, receive insufficient support for digital distribution. It therefore encourages Member States to:
focus financial aid on distribution; devise a strategy for establishing a digital cinema network including film studios, single-screen and multiplex cinemas; accompany the development of new online exploitation methods with the implementation, at European level, of fair remuneration for audiovisual authors.
Promotion of European cinema : overall, Parliament encourages Member States to ensure the widest possible inclusion of European films in the screening programmes of their cinemas. To do so, it suggests that there is a need to promote and support European co-productions . It also encourages Member States to promote and support the dissemination and circulation of European films on their territories through dedicated events and festivals. Parliament calls for technology-neutral support for all cinemas which show a high proportion of European films and for an ambitious programme, irrespective of their turnover or number of customers . It recommends that films winning awards at European festivals should be given marketing support to further facilitate international VOD releases. In recognising the role of the EP LUX Prize in promoting European films, Parliament proposes better cooperation and interaction with third countries aimed at raising the profile of European productions on the world market, and particularly in the Mediterranean area.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted unanimously the report by Piotr BORYS (EPP, PL) on European cinema in the digital era.
Members point out, firstly, that almost 1 billion cinema tickets were sold in the EU in 2010, demonstrating cinema’s continued popularity and huge financial, growth and employment potential. They also stress that European cinema is of growing importance to the economy, as it provides more than 30 000 jobs. They also point to European cinema’s extremely important cultural and social dimension and its role in the cultural development and identity of Europe.
Members note that the European cinema market is highly fragmented and diversified , a great majority of the cinemas having only one or two screens. They also note that multiplexes constitute the majority of digitised cinemas. They highlight the fact that there is a geographical imbalance in the accessibility of cinemas and film to citizens, most notably in Eastern Europe and in rural areas. They point out that film screening is in the process of changing, with growing numbers of multiplexes and a marked reduction in the number of screens in small towns and old city centres . Members observe that, partly because of the primacy assigned to blockbuster films, the diversity of films in Europe and cinemas’ freedom to decide on their programming are endangered and as a result there is reason to fear an irreversible market concentration in the field of cinema. The digital roll-out must therefore preserve programming diversity and cultural facilities for rural and urban areas in all EU countries and must not result in the closure of small and art-house cinemas to the benefit of multiplexes.
Members note, furthermore, with concern that the survival of many independent cinemas is being endangered by the high costs of converting to digital technology.
Members highlight the fact that, as a result of inadequate funding, European cinema is being insufficiently promoted internationally.
Opportunities and challenges : aware of the difficulties faced by European cinema, Members call on the Member States and the Commission to financially support the full digitisation in terms of equipment of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies as quickly as possible and encourage the circulation of European films within an audiovisual sector that is globally very competitive.
Threats : among the main threats to the development of European cinema identified by Members are the following:
the high costs of digitisation, especially for small independent and art-house cinemas; the closure of small cinemas in small villages in less-developed regions; the threat of piracy and illegal downloading; the problems relating to the circulation and distribution of films, particularly those with lower budgets; the lack of suitable training of projectionists to handle new digital cinema equipment.
To counteract these threats, the main priority actions should be: i) specific measures proposed by the Commission to avoid the closure of small, independent and art-house cinemas, ii) public funding, in particular for small independent cinemas.
Interoperability, standardisation and archiving : Members underline the need to ensure the interoperability of digital projection systems and materials, while respecting the principle of technological neutrality. In this respect, Members recommend the standardisation of systems based on ISO standards in the areas of production, distribution and film screening without, however, resulting in the establishment of a single standard. They also stress the importance of standardising the 2K resolution system, which allows the screening of films in 3D, HDTV and Blu-Ray as well as for VOD services. They call on European and national standardisation organisations to promote the use of this standard accordingly.
As far as the issue of archiving is concerned, Members recommend that Member States adopt legislative measures to ensure that audiovisual works, which in future could form the beginnings of a European multimedia library and become an important instrument for protecting and promoting the national heritage. They therefore recommend that the digital transition be made as quickly as possible to avoid the cost of producing both celluloid and digital versions of films.
With regard to Europeana, Members call on the Commission to use the European digital library EUROPEANA not only as a digital library for printed products but also for the European film heritage.
State aids : Members call on Member States to take EU competition rules into account when designing State aid schemes for digital conversion, in order to avoid distortions of the financing terms for digital cinema. The Commission is invited to draw up clear guidelines for State aid, building on experiences in various Member States. Members emphasise that, while public support should be technology-neutral, it should also guarantee the sustainability of investments , taking into account exhibitors’ specific business models and distributors’ technical requirements.
Financing models : Members emphasise the need for public and private investment as the cinema sector enters the digital era. They stress that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level, particularly to support small and independent cinemas. They recommend that the financing of digitisation projects by the European Structural Funds include commitments by supported cinemas to screen European films.
The Commission and the Member States are also invited to:
disseminate best practices in the area of the financing of digitisation (e.g. small cinemas forming networks to conclude collective agreements with distributors); take into account the costs for small local cinemas, and possible opportunities/consequences for the labour market, when drawing up their national digitisation programmes; take into consideration cinemas located in less well populated areas, where cultural events are rare, and not in a position to pay the costs of converting to digital; promote public-private partnerships as a method for financing the digitisation of cinemas; respect the independence of cinemas; increase funding for research connected with digital cinema technology; implement training programmes targeted at professionals in the audiovisual sector allowing them to learn to use digital technologies and adapt to new business models.
Virtual Print Fee (VPF): Members acknowledge that the so-called VPF commercial model for financing the installation of digital equipment is suitable for large cinema networks but is not an optimal solution for small and independent cinemas. They note that financing models should be promoted which enable independent cinemas to gain access to VPF payments from all distributors; recommends organising purchasing cooperatives in order to make the advantage of group rates available to all cinemas.
Film education : Members underline that education through film, including cinema culture and language, allows citizens to have a critical understanding of different forms of media. Film education should enable citizens to gain wider knowledge, to appreciate the art of film and to reflect on the values that films convey. This is the reason why Members call on Member States to include film education in their national education programmes and to support educational programmes in film schools.
The MEDIA Programme : underlining the importance of the MEDIA Programme for the European film industry, Members stress its importance in the digitisation of cinemas. They call on the Commission to earmark funding under the new MEDIA programme for the post-2013 period and from the European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) to support the digitisation of cinemas showing European content. They underline that new initiatives must be introduced as part of the next generation of the MEDIA programme to improve and promote translation, dubbing, subtitling and surtitling, in order to support independent cinemas dedicated to European films.
They also call for: i) a ‘digital programme heading’ to be included in the MEDIA programme in order to simplify conversion to digital formats; ii) investment by the MEDIA Programme in VOD (video on demand).
Models of distribution : Members note that digital technologies have affected the way in which films are distributed over a variety of platforms and devices either through linear or non-linear services. They point out that one weak point in the digitisation process is the fact that distributors, and especially independent distributors, receive insufficient support for digital distribution. They therefore encourage Member States to:
focus financial aid on distribution; devise a strategy for establishing a digital cinema network including film studios, single-screen and multiplex cinemas; accompany the development of new online exploitation methods with the implementation, at European level, of fair remuneration for audiovisual authors.
Promotion of European cinema : overall, Member States to ensure the widest possible inclusion of European films in the screening programmes of their cinemas. To do so, they suggest that there is a need to promote and support European co-productions . They also encourage Member States to promote and support the dissemination and circulation of European films on their territories through dedicated events and festivals. They recommend that films winning awards at European festivals should be given marketing support to further facilitate international VOD releases. In recognising the role of the EP LUX Prize in promoting European films, Members propose better cooperation and interaction with third countries aimed at raising the profile of European productions on the world market, and particularly in the Mediterranean area.
PURPOSE: to lay down the opportunities and challenges for European cinema in the digital era.
BACKGROUND: the audiovisual landscape is mutating rapidly worldwide, opening up myriad opportunities for the European cinema and audiovisual industry provided that the inherent challenges of investment in equipment , training and new models can be overcome. Digital technologies have already made European audiovisual works more easily accessible outside their country of origin thanks to new ways of transporting audiovisual content (such as video on demand and catch up TV).
Ensuring that there is circulation of European works and diversity of European cinema available to viewers will require a wide range of operators (distributors and exhibitors). One of the challenges will be to maintain cinemas in spite of the entry barrier represented by the high costs of digital equipment that threatens the existence of a number of European cinemas.
Some European exhibitors are still hesitant about investing in digital equipment since over the last 15 years they have made substantial investments in the upgrading of their facilities and in the creation of mini/multiplexes.
The digital cinema distribution revolution therefore raises two major issues :
· the important investment in digital equipment has to be borne by exhibitors, but the savings will be made by distributors (thanks to the lower cost of digital copies);
· digital equipment represents a cost that can be borne by cinema chains and multiplexes but that is often out of reach for certain smaller independent (frequently arthouse) cinemas.
This could lead to a dual exhibition/distribution market, where only multiplexes and high value commercial films would benefit from the digital cinema revolution. Cultural diversity and renewal of talent however depend on maintaining Europe's unique network of cinemas.
It is clear that the European Commission has an important role to play in the digital transition of cinemas, in particular by contributing to the establishment of a framework for this Transition. It is for this reason that it has presented its communication on the opportunities and challenges for European cinema in the digital era.
CONTENT: Member States' support measures focus in general on the creation and production phases of filmmaking. These films will from now on also need digital masters and digital screens in order to be shown and to reach their potential audience. Access to digital equipment and to digital masters will become crucial to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market. Ensuring that there is circulation of European works and diversity of European cinema available to viewers will require a wide range of operators (distributors and exhibitors). One of the challenges will be to maintain cinemas in spite of the entry barrier represented by the high costs of digital equipment that threatens the existence of a number of European cinemas.
It is clear that the European Commission has an important role to play in the digital transition of cinemas, in particular by contributing to the establishment of a framework for this transition, covering elements such as:
· standardisation;
· collection and preservation of film in digital format;
· regional support to digitisation (including EU Cohesion Policy);
· compatibility with Treaty rules;
· support to exhibitors of European films (MEDIA Programme);
· access to finance (European Investment Bank and MEDIA).
The European Commission is aware that the transition to digital projection has a number of inherent risks that have to be tackled to enable European cinemas to benefit from its opportunities.
To reach that objective it is necessary to ensure:
· flexibility and transparency in the standardisation process , so that digital cinema projection standards can meet the diverse needs of European cinemas;
· legal security in the field of State aid for the digitisation of cinema s, in the form of clear assessment criteria enabling Member States to design their schemes accordingly;
· EU financial support for the digital transition of cinemas showing European films or having an impact on regional development.
Financing the digital cinema transition : the objective of the European Commission action plan is to create a favourable environment for the digital exhibition of European films. Different initiatives have been and will be launched to support the take-up of and the investment in new digital technologies. With the help of the European Structural Funds and the new MEDIA scheme , the ultimate objective of the Commission is also to promote European citizens' access to digital cinema.
Two types of intervention are proposed:
1) to design a new MEDIA scheme to support the digital transition of European cinemas . In line with the principle of subsidiarity and the Programme's objectives the support will focus on cinemas screening a majority of recent European films. This will comprise the basic award criterion for the applicant cinemas. The new digitisation scheme will grant support directly to cinemas and co-finance a clearly identified set of digital equipment costs in the form of flat-rate financing . MEDIA support can be cumulated with national support; however, priority will go to cinemas/countries that cannot benefit from VPF deals or from national support schemes for digitisation. The cinemas based in those countries will be given particular attention, in line with the priorities of the MEDIA 2007 Programme. To be able to grant support in the form of flat-rate financing a study on digital equipment costs has been commissioned to determine a sliding scale of unit costs. The scheme will be finalised and launched at the end of 2010, on the basis of the findings from this study;
2) to facilitate the access of exhibitors to credit or to support their financing costs . The possibility of opening the MEDIA Production Guarantee Fund to exhibitors and/or of creating a new i2i scheme for them is therefore being considered. The European Investment Bank (EIB) could also play a role in the digital transition by helping national funds/digitisation plans access commercial loans.
Timetable : the Commission therefore intends to put into place the following elements of an action plan for the transition to digital cinema projection for European cinemas:
2010
· a progress report on the adoption of digital cinema projection standards to ensure that this reflects the needs of European cinemas and that alternatives are explored for European
· cinemas that do not need or cannot access 2k equipment;
· a study on the costs of digital equipment to provide important data from across the EU;
· a new MEDIA support scheme for the digitisation of cinemas screening a significant percentage of European (non-national) films.
2011
· adopt a Recommendation on promoting digitisation of European cinema;
· examine the possibility of extending the MEDIA Production Guarantee Fund to exhibitors or find a similar way to facilitate their access to credit.
2012
· monitor the digital transition and review all its different aspects in the whole audiovisual chain (training, digital masters, programming…);
· develop appropriate criteria to assess State aid support for digital projection in the Cinema Communication.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0506/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0366/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0366/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE470.048
- Committee draft report: PE467.003
- Committee opinion: PE458.564
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2010)0487
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE458.564
- Committee draft report: PE467.003
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE470.048
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0366/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
Activities
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
220 |
2010/2306(INI)
2011/05/05
IMCO
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises the important contribution of European cinema to investments in digital technologies, innovation, growth and jobs; stresses that, in addition to the economic impetus imparted by the EU’s cultural industry, European cinema also, in particular, has an extremely important cultural and social dimension;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the need for public and private investment while introducing the cinema sector to the digital era;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the digital roll-out must preserve programming diversity and cultural facilities for rural areas; calls on the Commission, Member States and regions to focus public funding for digital conversion on cinemas which
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the digital roll-out must preserve programming diversity and cultural facilities
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the digital roll-out must preserve programming diversity and cultural facilities for rural and urban areas; calls on the Commission, Member States and regions to focus public funding for digital conversion on cinemas which do not have access to Virtual Print Fee deals or solidarity funds or structurally weak geographical areas
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the importance of public support for the digital transition of cinemas; insists on the fact that digitisation must not result in the closure of small and arthouse cinemas to the benefit of multiplexes;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to carefully examine the possible implications which the transition from traditional to digital cinema may have on all the stakeholders and parties involved; stresses that Member States should take into account the costs for small local cinemas, possible opportunities/consequences for the labour market, and citizenship initiatives;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the difficult situation of small cinemas in towns which, as art-house cinemas, help to preserve the cultural heritage;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the EU programme MEDIA to be available for the modernisation of small cinemas in the European Union in the long term; stresses in this connection the added value of European subsidies, particularly with regard to support for the cross-border broadcasting of films and to prevent further fragmentation of the European cinema market;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Welcomes the pledge given by Mr Barroso, President of the Commission, on 18 March 2011 to continue and further expand the MEDIA programme;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to earmark MEDIA funding to support the digitalisation of cinemas showing European content in the new MEDIA programme for after 2013 on the basis of specific criteria which demonstrates their contribution to the preservation of cultural diversity and increasing the circulation of European works;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines the fact that for small, rural and arthouse cinemas which show a majority of European content are excluded from the Virtual Print Fee (VPF) commercial model of financing the installation of digital equipment and that public support is necessary to prevent them from being left behind in the digital roll out;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes that complementary measures are available to small arthouse cinemas to public support: market-based solutions such as small cinemas grouping together in networks to make collective agreements with distributors; availing of national solidarity funds, availing of European Regional Development Funds;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on Member States to recognise the importance of appropriate investment in research, funding and training for professionals already working in this field while drawing up their national programmes of digitalisation;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages national and European standardisation bodies to use their influence in the international standardisation process to develop a unique, open and compatible worldwide standard for digital projection, which should take into account the specific needs of European exhibitors.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the ICT Standardisation work programme (2010-2013) which recommends European standardisation bodies to propose initiatives related to cinema heritage and digital cinema by 2013;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to establish an alternative financing model to VPF to uphold and strengthen cultural diversity and to safeguard competitiveness;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises that almost 1 billion cinema tickets were sold in the EU during 2010 and that this reveals the cinema sector's continued popularity and huge financial potential; stresses the importance of all levels of the production line in creating cinema content and the need to support all levels of this chain;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the potential for growth and job creation generated by digital film production and calls for a continuation of the policy pursued under the MEDIA programme, particularly the part devoted to making the European audiovisual industry more competitive;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Observes that small commercial and non-commercial cinemas make a vital contribution to the cultural heritage by including European productions in their programmes; observes with concern that the survival of many independent cinemas is in danger due to the high costs of converting to digital technology and competition with cinemas which primarily show films from the USA;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. highlights that the improvement of the employability of workers in order to be able to adapt to changing production models and international economic dynamics is essential. New qualifications and re-qualification have to be rightly considered to guarantee social inclusion and employment protection. This is also essential to ensure competitiveness;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that digitisation enables a wider and cheaper distribution of cultural contents throughout the internal market, opens new opportunities to the European film sector and safeguards the competitiveness and diversity of European cinema;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Insists however on the necessity to take into account the social cost of the digital transition, and to develop training programmes for professionals to enable them to adapt to the use of new technologies;
source: PE-464.807
2011/09/12
CULT
196 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 – having regard to the Commission Green paper of 27 April 201
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas investments in culture show long-term, non-material, multigenerational results in shaping the European identity,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Concedes that, although the archiving of films will become technically easier as a result of their digitisation or purely digital production, it will entail more challenges in future because of the issues of standards and copyright;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends Member States adopt legislative measures to ensure that audiovisual works, being a part of national heritage, will be collected by means of compulsory deposit mechanisms, catalogued, pre
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends Member States adopt legislative measures to ensure that audiovisual works,
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends Member States adopt legislative measures to ensure that audiovisual works, being a part of national heritage, will be collected, catalogued, reconstructed and disseminated for cultural, educational and science purposes, whilst respecting copyright; draws attention to the danger that 35 mm film projectors may be entirely displaced from smaller cinema auditoriums by digital equipment;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recommends that the digital transition be made as quickly as possible to avoid the cost of producing both celluloid and digital versions of films and a dual distribution/exhibition system, whilst also providing an incentive for advertisers to switch from 35mm to the digital format;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses the importance of identifying 'orphan works', which form an important part of Europe's cultural heritage, so as to ensure that they duly benefit from the opportunities offered by new technologies;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to use the European digital library EUROPEANA not only as a digital library for printed products but also for the European film heritage and to define the remit of EUROPEANA accordingly;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the need to provide the support for cinemas and film libraries that promote and preserve film heritage;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the importance of broadening the collection of audiovisual works in Europeana, for a pan European Video on Demand portal for educational purposes to be created within this digital library of cultural heritage, promoting Europe's cinematographic legacy;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas digital technologies open up new opportunities for the film distribution sector, and thereby contribute to the implementation of EU and national goals on the screening and accessibility of European works, and on social cohesion;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Recommends Member States to set up or adapt their compulsory deposit mechanisms to digital formats by requesting the deposit of a standard digital master for digital films;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process for small cinemas with one or two screens, flexible and diversified financing,
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level and that public-private partnerships should be promoted;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level; stresses that publicly or privately funded digitisation of cinemas must not jeopardise the independence of film theatres and will not lead to a reduction in the diversity of programming and in the market share of European films;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level within a framework that sets out the priorities and complementarities at the various levels and establishes quantifiable objectives;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level, particularly to support small and independent cinemas;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that in order to ease the digitisation process, flexible and diversified financing, both public and private, should be made available at local, regional, national and European level, without undermining the rights of operators to be free in their choice of films they wish to screen;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Encourage cooperation between cinema operators, local authorities, venues, film clubs/societies and film festivals in order to best make use of digital technologies provided for by funding from EU avenues;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Emphasises that the search for a paying economic model, such as the premium services for film works between the OSP and the IAP, seems to be the route that should be taken to allow the fixed and mobile networks to continue to develop and so there are no long-term expectations that works protected by IPR can be accessed free of charge;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to resolve this issue in the light, also, of the prolongation of the application of the cinema Communication of 26 September 2001 concerning state aids to the cinema sector in the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas European
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes that any public funds provided for the digitization of cinema and film should be subject to the same scrutiny as state aid to other sectors;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Encourages an emphasis of public sector funds for small and independent cinemas and public facilities as well as financial contribution to the digitization of cinema by commercial players;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that although European Structural Funds are a significant source of financing for digitisation projects and training initiatives, funding should be increased, the waiting times shortened and the applications simplified as part of the new financial perspectives 2014 – 2020;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Recommends that the financing of digitisation projects by the European Structural Funds include commitments by supported cinemas to screen European films;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Furthermore, calls for mechanisms to improve support through the European Regional Development Programme;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Underlines that Video On Demand may provide European film companies with the opportunity of reaching larger audiences, generating revenues either via free of charge streaming combined with online advertisement, either via purchase or rental;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas European cinema is an important part of culture, promoting an awareness of both shared and local social and political issues, encouraging dialogue and understanding amongst EU citizens, whilst playing a significant role in the preservation and support of cultural and linguistic diversity,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Acknowledges that the so-called Virtual Print Fee (VPF) financing model
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Acknowledges that the so-called Virtual Print Fee (VPF) financing model, is suitable for large cinema networks but is not an optimal solution for small and independent cinemas, which are restrained by the lack of investment funds, and that therefore the VPF financing model may also hamper cultural diversity;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls therefore for VPF financing models to be adjusted in accordance with the requirements and specificities of independent programme and art film cinemas;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers that cinemas located in less well populated areas, where cultural events are rare, and which are not in a position to pay the costs of converting to digital, should be fitted out with digital equipment, in order to make the European bodies involved in digitisation more competitive;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. C
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. C
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that mechanisms
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Notes that financing models should be promoted which enable independent cinemas to gain access to VPF payments from all distributors; recommends organising purchasing cooperatives in order to make the advantage of group rates available to all cinemas;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Encourages Member States to increase funding for research connected with digital cinema technology, and particularly channels for disseminating film material and the methods for compressing it, so that the network established will be interactive and offer high quality projection and at the same time allow easier use of compressed and decompressed images;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas not all cinemas are equally capable of coping with the challenge of digitisation of cinemas;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines the need to implement training programmes targeted at professionals in the audiovisual sector allowing them to
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines the need to implement training programmes targeted at professionals in the audiovisual sector allowing them to adapt to digital technologies and to new business models, and acknowledges the success of the initiatives already under way in that field;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Underlines the role of public-private partnerships as a method for financing the digitisation of cinemas;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Draws attention, furthermore, to the possibility of including distributors who are subsidised by MEDIA in a possible financing model for the digitisation of European films;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Underlines that
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Underlines that film education
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Underlines that film education is a tool for cultural creation and advancement and constitutes an important element in developing positive personality traits, which represent common values recognised by societies and across generations;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Underlines that film education constitutes an important element in developing positive personality traits and social interaction skills, which represent common values recognised by societies and across generations;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Encourages the application of fair use of copyrighted materials to allow for more use of film in schools;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the European audiovisual sector, including cinema, constitutes a
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Encourages investment in high quality education at all levels to strengthen the European cinema industry;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that film education, as an integral part of education, allows citizens to have a critical understanding of media, thereby increasing and enhancing the resources and opportunities offered by 'digital literacy';
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that film education, including cinema culture and language, as an integral part of education, allows citizens to have a critical understanding of media;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on Member States to include film education in their national education programmes and to arrange training and retraining programmes on digital technology, particularly for cinema owners and distributors;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on Member States to develop and promote special programmes and events, for example in the frame of film festivals, to develop the young European citizens’ education and taste for European films;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls for high quality and up-to-date training for both technical and managerial staff to be provided for by either EU funding avenues or successful applicants to funding avenues, in order to ensure optimum use of EU funded digital technologies;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the digital era brings new opportunities for the audiovisual sector, in particular in the film industry as regards a more effective distribution, screening and availability of films, but also creates
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Underlines that film education should enable citizens to gain wider knowledge, to appreciate the art of film and to reflect on the values that films convey;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Encourages Member States to support educational programmes in film schools and other relevant institutions on the possibilities of making films using digital technology and on digital film production and distribution;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Highlights the importance of film education in independent cinemas at all stages of education in order to develop audiences for European films;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Acknowledges that the MEDIA Programme has supported the European audiovisual industry for more than two
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses th
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the importance of the MEDIA Programme in the digitisation of cinemas and calls for
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the importance of the MEDIA Programme in the digitisation of cinemas and calls for increased funds in the next generation of the programme to tackle the challenges brought by digital technologies and points out that it is necessary for the next generation of the programme to envisage measures generating substantial added value and contributing to the overall 'Europe 2020' strategy;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the importance of the MEDIA Programme in the digitisation of cinemas and calls for adherence to existing entries and funding lines, as well as increased funds in the next generation of the programme to tackle the challenges brought by digital technologies;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the importance of the MEDIA Programme in the digitisation of cinemas and calls for increased funds in the next generation of the programme to tackle the challenges brought by digital technologies, and to the training of cinema operators in digital techniques;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that new initiatives must be introduced as part of the next generation of the MEDIA programme to improve and promote translation, dubbing, subtitling and surtitling; recalls that the investment in new cinema technology and the transition to digital should improve accessibility for disabled people, particularly through the introduction of audio description;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the digital era brings new opportunities for the audiovisual sector, in particular in the film industry as regards a more effective distribution, screening and availability of films
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that new initiatives must be introduced as part of the next generation of the MEDIA programme to improve and
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that new initiatives must be introduced as part of the next generation of the MEDIA programme to improve and promote translation, dubbing, subtitling and surtitling, in order to support independent cinemas dedicated to European films;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Points out the added-value of the MEDIA initial training programme which facilitates film students' mobility in Europe, leading to better integration in the professional sector and to increased European cooperation and coproductions; in this regard calls for this funding line to be increased;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Recommends that the MEDIA programme invest in VOD as part of its efforts to support pan-European distribution, promote transnational collaboration between platforms and reward initiatives involving cross-border collaboration;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Draws attention to the importance of the MEDIA continuous training programme as a tool for professionals in the sector to upgrade their skills so as to adapt to changing technologies and production methods;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Recognises that following the initial outlay of the digitisation process, digital infrastructure will thereafter reduce distribution costs considerably, and allow small independent film distributers to give wider releases to their films and thereby reach larger audiences;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Recognises that the successful conversion to digital technology is inextricably linked to access to high-speed broadband, as a means of distribution of digital content, the upgrading of digital software and many other essential functions, and therefore calls on institutions which wish to upgrade to digital technologies to make provisions for the dependent nature of this relationship;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that digital technologies allow new distribution patterns and flexible releases such as the possibility to release a
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that digital technologies allow new distribution patterns and flexible releases such as the possibility to release a film on a variety of platforms soon after theatrical release; considers furthermore that the exclusive exploitation period for film theatres should be retained to protect the diversity of cinema;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Points out that one weak point in the digitisation process is the inability of distributors, and especially independent distributors, who receive insufficient support for digital distribution, to keep up with that process;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the Internet’s neutrality is compromised when content protected by intellectual property rights is pirated;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Encourages European institutions to implement preparatory actions and pilot projects aiming at testing new business models that could improve the circulation of European audiovisual works;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Encourages Member States to devise a strategy for establishing a digital cinema network including film studios, single-screen and multiplex cinemas and live screening facilities, using all data transmission channels, including satellite;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Notes that digital technologies have fostered the rapid development of short films and video;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Welcomes that digital technologies have enabled citizens to create and distribute self made content;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Encourages Member States to focus financial aid on distribution;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new) 27c. Underlines the need to accompany the development of new online exploitations with the implementation, at European level, of fair remuneration for audiovisual authors that is proportional to the revenues generated by these new formats and services;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new) 27d. Notes that digital technologies allow for new automated reporting processes from a variety of platforms which should be used to enhance transparency in the sector and to design new payment mechanisms to audiovisual authors; congratulates the Commission for having introduced the issue of audiovisual authors’ remuneration in its green paper on the online distribution of audiovisual works;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Encourages
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Encourages Member States to ensure the widest possible inclusion of European films in the screening programme of their cinemas in order to enhance their circulation and promotion across the EU, and to enable EU citizens to appreciate the richness and diversity of such films, through the widest variety of platforms;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls for technology-neutral support for all cinemas which show a high proportion of European films and for an ambitious programme, irrespective of their turnover or number of customers;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas digitisation is an opportunity to promote official regional languages thanks to its lower translation and subtitling costs,
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Suggests that there is a need to promote and support European coproductions and that the increase in such productions may result in the wider distribution of European film across the continent;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Supports the activities of cinema networks, such as Europa Cinemas, that promote European film worldwide by financially and operationally helping cinemas, which exhibit a significant number of European films;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new) 28b. Acknowledges the importance of supporting independent cinemas dedicated to European films (such as Europa Cinemas members) in order to reinforce their European programming policy and diversity and their competitiveness on the market;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Encourages Member States to promote and support the dissemination and the circulation of European films on their territories through dedicated events and festivals; encourages the Member States to support also the various film schools in existence in Europe;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Proposes better cooperation and interaction with third countries aimed at raising the profile of European productions on the world market, and particularly in the Mediterranean area, promoting cultural exchanges and launching new initiatives in support of the Euro-Mediterranean dialogue and the democratic development of the whole region, not least in view of the commitments arising from the Euro-Mediterranean Conference on Cinema;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Highlights that films winning awards at European festivals should be given marketing support to further facilitate international VoD releases and to help promote European cinema;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. European cinemas, which are businesses, operate within commercial realities and need to have the full choice of which films they screen based on their commercial potential, taking their signal from market forces without interference from governments or from the EU;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) – having regard to the Commission Green paper of 13 July 2011 on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union: opportunities and challenges towards a digital single market (COM(2011)0427),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas independent and art-house screens constitute Europe's unique cinema network, representing diverse programming that appeals to an audience outside the commercial mainstream,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas in this regard as soon as they become suppliers of protected content, the various Internet operators need to abide by the rules in force by purchasing the IPR and paying suitable sums along the chain of title;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas the cost of digitisation has decreased by up to 20-30 % in recent years and is now at a more accessible level to both European cinemas and funding programmes,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the complete digitisation of both European film industry and its cinemas
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the complete digitisation of both the European film industry and its cinemas
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the complete digitisation of both European film industry and its cinemas must be accomplished urgently, to avoid a reduction of access to cultural diversity and availability on multiple platforms, and should be supported at European and national level,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas European cinema should strengthen territorial and social integrity,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas digital cinema technology makes possible flexible promotion planning and last-minute changes in material,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas local and regional governing bodies are key entities in defending and promoting European cultural heritage, in particular the digitisation of films and cinemas, and therefore constitute fundamental partners in the digitisation process,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas cinemas are an important means of preserving the quality of life and social interaction in old urban centres and in the suburbs, and of regenerating urban areas,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 b (new) – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 13 November 2001 on achieving better circulation of European films in the internal market and the candidate countries (2001/2342 (INI)),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas local and regional authorities play an important social and cultural role in municipalities and rural areas where they are often the only source of access to culture for the local community;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas European cinematographic works need to meet with success in Europe if they are to be distributed internationally, thus enabling them to meet their financial objectives and constitute a form of cultural cooperation and diplomacy through which not only the works, but also the different cultures of European countries, are disseminated in third countries,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the digital transition of cinema should be as fast as possible in order to avoid the doubling of production and distribution costs, in order to avoid smaller cinemas to disappear,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas European cinema and other audiovisual formats are of specific interest for the Mediterranean Basin, can easily be harnessed through satellite coverage and continue to spur intercultural dialogue in that area at this time of democratic development,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the European film and cinema market is highly fragmented and diversified
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that film screening is in the process of changing, with growing numbers of multiplexes and a marked reduction in the number of screens in small towns and cities and old urban centres;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the European film industry is currently fragmented along national and linguistic borders, and that films are in the first place made for and consumed by the local audience of the country of origin;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that licensing in Europe functions on a territory-by-territory basis, which hampers the wider availability in the EU and increases the cost of availability of European films on international Video on Demand platforms;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Notes that the high cost and bureaucracy of cross-border licensing partly explains the lack of cross border (legal) access to European films on the internet;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Notes that multi-territory or pan- European licensing is crucial for unlocking the potential of online distribution film markets, for promoting a wider circulation of European films, for better consumer access to European films, for availability of European films on Video On Demand platforms;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2009 on Social Economy (2008/2250(INI)),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Notes that a number of EU schemes exist that have the potential to support the transition of the film industry to the digital age, such as the MEDIA program;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the diversity of the EU’s cinematic landscape must be preserved;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that there is increasing pressure for all films to be compatible with digital projection, while some European cinemas have already converted to 100 % digital;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that in Europe, there
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that in
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that in Europe, there is a
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that in Europe, there is an imbalance in the accessibility of citizens to cinemas and film;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the potential of the European film industry is constantly growing
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the potential of the European film industry is constantly growing, but the proportion of European productions showing in cinemas
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas culture
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the potential of the European film industry is constantly growing, but the proportion of European productions showing in cinemas is still insufficient; observes that, partly because of the primacy assigned to blockbuster films, the diversity of films in Europe and cinemas’ freedom to decide on their programming are endangered and as a result there is reason to fear an irreversible market concentration in the field of cinema;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the potential of the European film industry is constantly growing, but the proportion of European productions showing in cinemas is still insufficient, as is the proportion of European productions legally available online;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that independent distributors are having problems coping with the dual costs they must meet in the transition period, which is having a ripple effect throughout the cinema industry;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that European cinema is not only an important factor in the cultural development and identity of Europe but is also, as it provides more than 30 000 jobs, of growing importance to the economy;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that inadequate funding for European cinema translates into insufficient promotion of it in the international arena;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points out that multimedia technology is supplanting other forms of communication and that there is therefore a need to teach people how to receive it;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the EC to support the full digitisation of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies; stresses that the programmes should be flexibly aligned with practical requirements;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the EC to support the full digitisation of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies and encourage the circulation of European films within an audiovisual sector that is globally very competitive;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the EC to financially support the full digitisation in terms of equipment of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas culture forms a fundamental basis for European and national identities and shared values
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the EC to support the full digitisation of EU cinemas and to establish European and national programmes to support the transition to digital technologies as quickly as possible;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that although the Internet is a marvellous tool for accessing content, it can also be regarded as destroying value in creation and the cultural industries;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that publicly funded digitisation of cinemas must not jeopardise the independence of film theatres or lead to a reduction in the diversity of programming and in the market share of national and European films;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that digital cinema improves the quality of picture and sound, allowing more diversified and flexible programming of live events while enabling the use of a wide range of innovative technologies,
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that digital cinema should aim at improv
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that digital cinema improves the quality of picture and sound, allowing more diversified and flexible programming of live events, and also of recorded broadcasts and of educational, cultural and sporting events, while enabling the use of innovative technologies, such as 3D, that could attract a new and wider public;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that it is essential to support and promote EU productions, recognises that the EU contributes significantly to digital creativity and innovation such as 3D;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Acknowledges that creation and innovation are matters of general interest and urges that investing in programmes should be prioritised and supported in order to stimulate the supply of good quality content available on the networks;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges small and independent cinemas to take every advantage of their commercial potential, through product diversification, adding value to the service they provide and utilising the niche market they occupy;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that digitisation is a very important opportunity in order to promote the presence of official regional languages in cinemas as well as foreign languages learning;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls that the European shift to digital cinema should aim at creating new opportunities for the distribution of European films, maintaining the diversity of European production and enhancing its accessibility for European citizens;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets that existing Video on Demand services in Europe mainly serve national markets, (sometimes blocking access from foreign territories) since opening up of (in particular internet- based)Video on Demand services to foreign territories will allow the European film industry to access new markets and to be more competitive globally;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that the high costs of digitisation, which will provide significant long-term commercial benefit, can create a significant burden for many small and independent cinemas and which, in the face of closure, require special support;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that the high costs of digitisation create a significant burden for many small and independent cinemas and film theatres which have a varied programme that goes beyond the main stream, which show a high proportion of European films and which, in the face of closure, require special support;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that the high costs of digitisation create a significant burden for many small and independent cinemas and which, in the face of closure, require special support from private associations or possibly from the Member States and regions;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that the high costs of digitisation create a significant burden for many small and independent cinemas and which, in the face of closure, require special support and calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to provide support for these cinemas;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that the high costs of digitisation create a significant burden for many small and independent cinemas and which, in the face of closure, or to prevent this, require special and priority support;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recognises that the digitisation of small and independent cinemas has to be achieved as urgently as possible in order to keep these venues open for films, cultural diversity and audiences;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Observes that cinemas bear the heaviest burden in relation to the costs of digitisation and that, because this entails the creation of basic infrastructure which is important to the public and will facilitate better cultural services than hitherto, irrespective of place of residence, public funding is important, particularly for small and independent cinemas;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that cinemas are places where people meet and exchange views and stresses that
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas culture should
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that cinemas are places
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that cinemas are places where people meet and exchange views and stresses that the disappearance of small and independent cinemas, in particular in small towns and less developed regions may limit access to European c
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that cinemas are places where people meet and exchange views and stresses that the disappearance of small and independent cinemas, in particular in small towns and less developed regions
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that cinemas are places where people meet and exchange views
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Highlights the threat of copyright fraud and illegal downloading to the cinema industry; calls for intellectual property rights to be properly enforced by Member States;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers the first phase of the digitisation of European cinema to have been of uneven benefit, and understands the concerns expressed by art-house cinema organisations, agreeing with their suggestions for special and priority measures to promote the production and distribution of independent European films;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recognises the threats to the quality of the projected works and the respect of authors’ moral rights caused by metallic screens which create significant luminance differences across the image; taking into account that metallic screens are made for 3D, recommends to avoid screening 2D films on metallic screens in order to respect authors’ moral rights and to preserve the quality experience of the viewers;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the problem of small cinemas mainly exists in rural areas, where they can play a particularly strong social role as meeting places;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the European film industry faces problems with the circulation and distribution of films, especially those with lower budgets; many productions reach only national markets and rarely get screened internationally, which prevents them from reaching wider audiences across the continent and the world;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Warns of the current lack of suitable training of projectionists to handle new digital cinema equipment and to adapt them to each specific film so to respect the quality of the projected work;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas culture
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Acknowledges that the digitisation of audiovisual production and distribution poses new challenges to Film Heritage Institutions in their activities of collecting, conserving and preserving the European Audiovisual Heritage;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the need to ensure the interoperability of digital projection systems and materials, as well as other devices, as they are particularly needed for smaller and medium-sized screens which take account of the economic context of the European cinema market and thus preserve the diversity of cinema and films;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need to ensure that the digitisation of cinemas is as technologically neutral as possible; considers that the digitisation of cinemas must not under any circumstances result in the establishment of a single standard as the norm for digital screening; notes that this would also be inappropriate with reference to further new technical developments such as cinema projection systems using laser technology;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Member States to provide support to national film studios and other relevant institutions in the transition to working with digital technology;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends the standardisation of systems based on ISO standards and on the principle of technology neutrality in the areas of production, distribution and film screening;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Allows for the further possibility of funding less expensive projectors, which can be used successfully in venues where more alternative content is shown, and furthermore has the potential to benefit specialist films such as documentaries and foreign language films;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on producers, distributors and providers of subsidies not to restrict themselves to the DCI standard as a format for digital screening, as, in view of the high investment and follow-up costs, it is not economic to acquire DCI-certified film projectors in the case of smaller screens and auditoriums;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the importance of
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the importance of standardising 2K and 4K resolution systems, that allow the screening of films in 3D, HDTV and Blu-
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that Internet neutrality should not be synonymous with ‘neutralising the Internet’ and that it is therefore clear that the interests of the contents’ creators should be protected through their intellectual property rights;
source: PE-470.048
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.564&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-458564_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.003New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-467003_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE470.048New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-470048_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0366_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0366_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-366&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0366_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0487/COM_COM(2010)0487_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0487/COM_COM(2010)0487_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-366&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0366_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-506New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0506_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/7/04819New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0487/COM_COM(2010)0487_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0487/COM_COM(2010)0487_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|