Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | THUN UND HOHENSTEIN Róża ( PPE) | REPO Mitro ( S&D), ROCHEFORT Robert ( ALDE), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), SALVINI Matteo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | BERLINGUER Luigi ( S&D) | Sajjad KARIM ( ECR), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL), Cecilia WIKSTRÖM ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the application of Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes (ADR) and Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution (ODR) for consumer disputes.
Settling consumer disputes out of court holds considerable potential for consumers, retailers and the administration of justice in general. Directive 2013/11/EU and Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 aim to tap that potential by providing a legislative framework that ensures that consumers have access to high-quality ADR procedures for settling their contractual disputes with traders, including via a multilingual web-based ODR platform.
Application of the legislative framework
Consumer ADR and ODR has become an integral part of the EU’s toolbox for the public and private enforcement of consumer law. Today, EU consumers have access to high-quality ADR procedures across the Union and in virtually all retail sectors, regardless of whether the dispute is domestic or cross-border and whether the purchase was made online or offline.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 524/2013, the Commission launched the ODR platform in January 2016. The platform was opened to the public on 15 February 2016. To date, all Member States, Liechtenstein and Norway have notified a total of 460 ADR entities.
Since its launch, the platform has attracted more than 8.5 million visitors and 120 000 consumer-to-business disputes. About 56% of the disputes are domestic and 44% cross-border. Most disputes are about airlines (13.2%), followed by clothing and footwear (10.9%) and information and communication technology (6.8%). Consumers mostly complained about the delivery of the product or service (23%), followed by non-conformity with the order (15%) and the product being defective or causing damage (12%).
Only in about 2% of cases did the parties agree on an ADR entity and was the platform therefore able to transmit the dispute to an ADR entity. However, in up to 42% of disputes submitted to the platform the parties settled the dispute bilaterally
The high number of visitors and complaints submitted to the platform demonstrate its very satisfactory uptake by consumers.
A potential that is still under-used
About one year after full ADR coverage has been achieved and three-and-a-half years after the launch of the ODR platform, the ADR/ODR framework is underused and has yet to reach its full potential. Three main challenges can be identified that currently limit the framework’s full effectiveness:
(1) ADR awareness and perceptions : ADR awareness has increased among both consumers and retailers, awareness levels are still insufficient in some regions and retail sectors. Overall, ADR awareness is lower in SMEs than in large retailers. Traders sometimes consider ADR entities to represent consumers’ interests and therefore perceive them as biased in favour of the consumer. The situation is compounded by the diversity of the ADR landscapes that feature a large array of ADR models, names and procedures.
(2) Navigating the national ADR landscapes : The diversity of ADR landscapes makes them difficult to navigate for consumers and traders, in particular in the Member States with a large number of certified ADR entities. Overall, there is less clarity about the ADR entity to which consumers and traders can turn when there is more than one ADR entity per retail sector. A specific difficulty in navigating a Member State’s ADR landscape arises when it features ADR entities whose scope is limited to specific aspects of a dispute in a given retail sector – to the effect that the consumer might need to turn to two ADR entities to have his or her issue dealt with fully.
(3) Traders’ participation in ADR procedures : While overall traders’ participation in ADR has slowly, but steadily increased since 2014, currently only one in three retailers is willing to use ADR. In a number of regions and retail sectors, the ADR models currently offered yield only insufficient participation rates for traders.
The workflow on the ODR platform currently only partially reflects demonstrated user needs. The Commission also conducted a targeted ADR/ODR communication campaign aiming to improve traders’ awareness of and engagement on the ODR platform. As a result, the number of traders registered in the platform increased by 54% in 2018 and by another 24% in the first five months of 2019. 80% of platform users are now satisfied with the platform’s functions. However, trader engagement in the process on the platform itself remains very limited.
Emergence of a community of stakeholders
The European legislative framework for consumer ADR and ODR rests on a logic of shared responsibility and cooperation. The diversity of the national ADR landscapes and the exchanges between ADR stakeholders across Member States have created an ‘ADR laboratory’ where ADR models and design options are compared and critically assessed and emerging best practice is identified, shared and increasingly implemented.
Follow-up
The Commission will also further improve the ODR platform, including by making the platform better respond to the needs of its users by providing more targeted information on consumer rights and redress, better directing users to the most appropriate redress tools and better facilitating direct settlements.
The Commission will convene the second Union-wide ADR Assembly in 2020, further promote ADR and ODR in its 2019 communication campaign on consumer law and continue to support the capacity building by ADR entities through grants.
The Commission presented a report on the functioning of the European Online Dispute Resolution platform established under Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes.
The present communication complies with the obligation laid down in Article 21 of the ODR Regulation to report on the functioning of the ODR platform.
In particular, it details:
the steps taken for the establishment of the ODR platform and provides the European Parliament and the Council with an overview of its first year of operation; the actions planned by the Commission to ensure the platform's continued proper functioning and to further enhance its contribution to the development of the Digital Single Market.
As a reminder, the ODR platform was launched in January 2016 and opened to the public on 15 February 2016. Its main aim is to facilitate the online resolution of disputes between consumers and traders over online transactions.
Implementation of the Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) Directive : the report stressed that Member States' compliance with the legal framework governing ADR/ODR is an essential condition for the functioning and effective operation of the ODR platform. To date, all Member States with the exception of Spain have communicated to the Commission that they have fully implemented the Directive on consumer ADR.
To date a significant number of ADR bodies have been registered on the platform showing that the system is fully operational: currently more than 300 ADR bodies from 26 Member States can be accessed through the platform. Moreover, all 28 Member States have designated their national ODR contact points to assist the users of the platform and inform consumers about their options to obtain redress.
On 1 July 2017, the ADR/ODR legislation became applicable to the EEA/EFTA States (Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein).
It is important to stress that while there is no obligation for traders to use ADR in respect of individual consumer complaints, online traders are under an obligation to include a link to the ODR platform on their website. However, an analysis of traders' compliance with the obligation to provide an easily accessible link to the platform and their email address on their website shows encouraging results that can however be significantly improved. The results showed a compliance rate of 30% where the ODR link has been found on the web shops of e-commerce traders' established in the EU. The presence of the ODR link differs across countries, sectors and differently-sized web shops. The Commission will liaise with Member States to support them in the coming months to enhance traders' compliance in this regard.
Complaints lodged in its first year of implementation : during the 12 months covered by this report some 1.9 million people visited the platform. On average the website received over 160 000 unique visitors per month, and more than 2 000 complaints were submitted per month on average. These data show that the platform has reached a considerable level of coverage and uptake ; it also illustrates the significant awareness and interest the platform enjoys with EU consumers and business.
More than 24 000 complaints were submitted on the platform in its first year of operation. The most complained about sectors were consumer clothing and footwear (11.5%), airline tickets (8.5%), and information and communication technology goods (8%) which also represent the main e-commerce sectors in the EU. The main reasons why consumers complained were linked to problems with the delivery of the goods (21%), followed by non-conformity with the order (15%) and problems with defective goods (12%). 1/3 of complaints related to a cross-border issue.
Germany and UK , where the proportion of e-shoppers is the highest in EU, are the two countries where most complaints have been lodged and also where most traders concerned are located.
About 44% of the overall number of complaints was solved in successful bilateral negotiation between traders and consumers.
Conclusion : the platform's structural functionality and its impressive reach among consumers in its first year of operation is very positive . The platform's main functions work properly. The Commission will work with national authorities to improve compliance by traders with their obligation to link to the ODR platform on their website. It has also started to take action to encourage traders to cooperate more on the platform including by giving feedback when they solve the issues outside the platform. Communication activities to further promote the ODR platform amongst consumers and traders will be launched in 2017.
PURPOSE : to establish a new system for out-of court on line dispute resolution for consumers.
LEGISLATIVE ACT : Regulation (EU) n° 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR).
CONTENT : the Regulation aims to provide a European online dispute resolution platform (‘ODR platform’) facilitating the independent, impartial, transparent, effective, fast and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
The Regulation shall apply to the out-of-court resolution of disputes concerning contractual obligations stemming from online sales or service contracts between a consumer resident in the Union and a trader established in the Union through the intervention of an ADR entity listed in accordance with Directive 2013/11/EU and which involves the use of the ODR platform.
The ODR platform : the ODR plateform shall be a single point of entry for consumers and traders seeking the out-of-court resolution of disputes covered by the Regulation. It shall be an interactive website which can be accessed electronically and free of charge in all the official languages of the institutions of the Union. The ODR platform should be accessible, in particular, through the ‘Your Europe portal’ established in accordance with Decision 2004/387/EC.
The Commission shall develop the ODR platform and be responsible for its operation, including all the translation functions necessary for the purpose of this Regulation, its maintenance, funding and data security. The development, operation and maintenance of the ODR platform shall ensure that the privacy of its users is respected from the design stage (‘privacy by design’) and that the ODR platform is accessible and usable by all , including vulnerable users (‘design for all’), as far as possible.
La Commission développera la plateforme et sera responsable de son fonctionnement, y compris de toutes les fonctions de traduction nécessaires, ainsi que de sa maintenance, de son financement et de la sécurité des données.
Functions of the platform : the platform shall:
· provide general information regarding the out-of-court resolution of contractual disputes between traders and consumers arising from online sales and service contracts ;
· allow consumers and traders to submit complaints by filling in an electronic complaint form available in all the official languages of the institutions of the Union and to attach relevant documents;
· transmit complaints to an ADR entity competent to deal with the dispute concerned ;
· offer, free of charge, an electronic case management tool which enables ADR entities to conduct the dispute resolution procedure with the parties through the ODR platform.
Testing of the ODR platform : by 9 January 2015, the Commission shall test the technical functionality and user-friendliness of the ODR platform and of the complaint form, including with regard to translation.
Network of ODR contact points : each ODR contact point shall host at least two ODR advisors. The ODR contact points shall provide support to the resolution of disputes by
facilitating communication between the parties and the competent ADR entity, which may include, in particular: (i) assisting with the submission of the complaint and, where appropriate, relevant documentation; (ii) providing the parties and ADR entities with general information on consumer rights and explanations on the procedural rules applied by the ADR entities identified.
Submission of a complaint : the complaint form shall be user-friendly and easily accessible on the ODR platform. A complaint submitted to the ODR platform shall be processed if all the necessary sections of the electronic complaint form have been completed. Upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform shall, in an easily understandable way and without delay, transmit to the respondent party, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union chosen by that party, the complaint together with the certain data, such as:
· information that the parties have to agree on an ADR entity in order for the complaint to be transmitted to it, and that, if no agreement is reached by the parties or no competent ADR entity is identified, the complaint will not be processed further;
· information about the ADR entity or entities which are competent to deal with the complaint, if any are referred to in the electronic complaint form.
Before submitting their complaint to an ADR entity through the ODR platform, consumers should be encouraged by Member States to contact the trader by any appropriate means, with the aim of resolving the dispute amicably.
Consumer information : traders established within the Union engaging in online sales or service contracts shall provide, on their websites, an electronic link to the ODR platform. That link shall be easily accessible for consumers.
Reports : by 9 July 2018 and every three years thereafter the Commission shall submit
a report on the application of the Regulation, including in particular on the user-friendliness of the complaint form and the possible need for adaptation of the information listed in the Annex.
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 08/07/2013.
APPLICATION : from 09/01/2016, à l'exception des certaines dispositions.
DELEGATED ACTS : the Commission shall have the power to adopt delegated acts to adapt the information which a complainant is to provide in the electronic complaint form made available on the ODR platform. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred for an indeterminate period of time from 8 July 2013 (which may be tacitly extended for for the same periods). The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within two months of notification of that act (which may be extended by two months). If Parliament or Council or Council express objections, the delegated act shall not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 622 votes to 24 with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes (Regulation on Consumer ODR).
Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between Parliament and Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Scope: the new regulation will ensure a high level of consumer protection , and shall apply to the out-of-court resolution of disputes initiated by traders against consumers where the relevant ADR procedures are offered by ADR entities listed in the Directive on alternative dispute resolution (ADR Directive) . Since, in particular, consumers and traders carrying out cross-border online transactions will benefit from the ODR platform, this Regulation should also apply to domestic online transactions in order to allow for a true level playing field in the area of online commerce.
The platform for online dispute resolution (ODR): this should take the form of an interactive user-friendly website offering a single point of entry to consumers in all the official languages of the institutions of the Union free of charge. The Commission shall develop the ODR platform (and be responsible for its operation, including all the translation functions, maintenance, funding and data security. The development, of the ODR platform shall ensure that the privacy of its users is respected from the design stage (‘privacy by design’) and that the ODR platform is accessible and usable by all, including vulnerable users (‘design for all’), as far as possible.
The Commission shall make the ODR platform accessible, as appropriate, through its websites that provide information to citizens and businesses in the Union and, in particular, through the ‘Your Europe portal’.
Functions of the ODR platform : the platform’s functions shall be, amongst other things;
· to inform the respondent party about the complaint;
· to identify the competent ADR entity or entities and transmit the complaint to the ADR entity, which the parties have agreed to use,
· to offer an electronic case management tool free of charge, which enables the parties and the ADR entity to conduct the dispute resolution procedure online through the ODR platform;
· to provide the parties and ADR entity with the translation of information which is necessary for the resolution of the dispute and is exchanged through the ODR platform;
· to provide in an accurate, up to date and clear, understandable and easily accessible way certain information, for example: (i) general information regarding ODR; (ii) the competent ADR entity or entities; (iii) an online guide about how to submit complaints through the ODR platform; (iv) information, including contact details, on ODR contact points designated by the Member States; (v) statistical data on the outcome of the disputes which were transmitted to ADR entities through the ODR platform.
Testing of the ODR platform : at the latest 18 months after entry into force of the regulation, the Commission will test the technical functionality and user-friendliness of the ODR platform and of the complaint form, including with regard to translation.
Network of ODR contact points: each ODR contact point shall host at least two ODR advisors . The ODR contact points shall provide support by fulfilling the following functions:
· facilitating communication between the parties and the competent ADR entity, which may include, in particular: (i) assisting with the submission of the complaint and, where appropriate, relevant documentation; (ii) providing the parties and ADR entities with general information on consumer rights and explanations on the procedural rules applied by the ADR entities identified;
· submitting, based on the practical experience gained from the performance of their functions, every two years an activity report to the Commission and to the Member States.
Submission of a complaint : the complaint form shall be user-friendly and easily accessible on the ODR platform. If the complaint form has not been fully completed, the complainant party shall be informed that the complaint cannot be processed further, unless the missing information is provided.
Upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform shall, in an easily understandable way and without delay, transmit to the respondent party, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union chosen by that party , the complaint together with certain data, for example:
· information that the parties have to agree on an ADR entity in order for the complaint to be transmitted to it, and that, if no agreement is reached by the parties or no competent ADR entity is identified, the complaint will not be processed further;
· information about the ADR entity or entities which are competent to deal with the complaint, if any are referred to in the electronic complaint form.
Before submitting their complaint to an ADR entity through the ODR platform, consumers should be encouraged by Member States to contact the trader by any appropriate means, with the aim of resolving the dispute amicably .
An ADR entity that has agreed to deal with a dispute shall not require the physical presence of the parties or their representatives, unless its procedural rules provide for that possibility and the parties agree.
Consumer information : traders established within the Union engaging in online sales or service contracts, and online marketplaces established within the Union, shall provide on their websites an electronic link to the ODR platform. That link shall be easily accessible for consumers. Traders established within the Union engaging in online sales or service contracts shall also state their e-mail addresses.
Member States shall encourage consumer associations and business associations to provide an electronic link to the ODR platform.
The Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Róża Gräfin von THUN UND HOHENSTEIN (EPP, PL) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes (Regulation on consumer ODR).
The parliamentary committee recommends that the position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should be to amend the Commission’s proposal as follows:
European online dispute resolution (ODR) platform: this should also facilitate the independent out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
Scope of the Regulation: the Regulation should apply to the out-of-court resolution of disputes concerning contractual obligations between consumers resident in the Union and traders established in the Union stemming from the online sale of goods or provision of services, which are covered by the Directive on consumer alternative dispute resolution (ADR) . Members propose that the Regulation also applies to domestic online transactions in order to allow for a true level playing field in the area of electronic commerce .
Access to the platform: Member call for the ODR platform to be accessed only through the ' Your Europe ' portal thematic website, as this portal is an existing single point of entry for both consumers and traders looking for help or information about their rights under Union legislation. The ODR platform should be given prominence on the 'Your Europe' portal.
Functions of the platform: the ODR platform should provide general information regarding the out-of-court settlement of contractual disputes between traders and consumers arising from the online sale of goods or provision of services. Among other things, it would:
inform the the trader about the complaint submitted against him; identify one or more ADR entities which are competent to deal with the dispute, and provide information to the parties on the costs of their procedure , the average length of the procedure and the binding or non-binding nature of its outcome; if no competent ADR entity can be identified, inform the complainant party that it was not possible to identify a competent ADR entity; invite the parties to agree on the competent ADR entity to use to settle their dispute or, if more than one ADR entity has been identified, invite them to agree on one of the competent ADR entities; offer, free of charge, an electronic case management tool which enables the parties and the ADR entity to conduct the dispute resolution procedure online via the platform; provide the parties and the ADR entity with an electronic translation function; provide information in a clear and unambiguous manner.
The ODR platform should provide an online guide for those seeking assistance in completing electronic claim forms. The platform shall also offer the complainant party the services of a contact point in completing his electronic claim form should he/she so desire.
Data protection: the development, operation, user-friendliness and maintenance of the platform should respect the principles of ‘ privacy by design ’ (respect for privacy from the design stage) and, as far as possible of ‘design for all’ (useable by all, including the vulnerable, without the need for any particular adjustment).
The Commission shall provide parties to an ADR procedure with a guide containing clear and specific information regarding the treatment of their personal data by the ODR platform. ADR entities shall be subject to rules of professional secrecy or other equivalent duties of confidentiality laid down in the legislation of the Member State where they are based.
Network of ODR facilitators: Members recommend that a more important role should be accorded to ODR contact points. The latter should, on request of parties, assist and facilitate their communication with the ADR entity. They should, in particular:
assist with the submission of the complaint and, where appropriate, relevant documentation, provide the parties and ADR entities with general information on consumer rights in relation to the sale of goods or the provision of services which apply in the Member State of the contact point which hosts the contact points concerned; provide the parties with explanations on the rules of procedure applied by the ADR entities identified; inform the complainant party of other means of redress when a dispute cannot be resolved via the ODR platform.
The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, should provide appropriate training for contact points for consumer disputes in order for these to acquire the necessary expertise to perform their duties.
Deadlines: Members propose that upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform should in an easily understandable way and without delay transmit to the respondent party in the language of the contract or website, the required information. Where the parties fail to reply to the platform or to agree on one competent ADR entity within 20 days , the complaint shall not be processed further.
An amendment provides for the extension of the time period for dispute resolution is extended to 90 days , in line with the provisions of the ADR Directive (the Commission proposes a time period of 30 days from the introduction of the complaint).
Implementing and delegated acts: to ensure that the European Parliament fulfils its role of oversight for the benefit of consumers, it is proposed that the implementing powers requested by the Commission in relation to (i) the functions of the platform, (ii) the modalities of cooperation between ODR facilitators, and (iii) the modalities of the electronic complaint form are replaced by delegated acts.
The Council agreed on a general approach concerning a draft directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and a draft regulation on On-line Dispute Resolution (ODR), pending the opinion of the European Parliament.
The objective of both proposals is to provide for simple, fast and affordable out-of-court settlement procedures designed to resolve disputes between consumers and traders arising from the sales of goods and services.
The initiative will ensure the establishment of ADR schemes where none exist today and define a common framework for ADR in the EU Member States by setting out common minimum quality principles in order to ensure that all ADR entities are impartial, transparent and efficient.
Existing national ADR schemes should be able to continue to operate within the new framework. The ADR system will be supplemented by an ODR mechanism involving the setting up of a European on-line dispute resolution platform (this will be an interactive website accessible electronically and free of charge in all languages of the Union).
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the legislative proposals on alternative and online dispute resolution for consumer disputes.
On 6 December 2011, the EDPS received the proposals for alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes (ADR) and online dispute resolution for consumer disputes (ODR) for consultation.
This Opinion aims at analysing the provisions on processing of personal data in the proposals.
It will focus on the ODR proposal, as it involves a centralised processing of personal data related to disputes through an online platform.
The EDPS welcomes the fact that data protection principles have been integrated in the text, in particular as regards the purpose and access limitation, the limitation of the retention period and the security measures. However, he recommends:
-clarifying the responsibilities of the controllers and informing data subjects accordingly: the legislative part of the ODR proposal should specify at least to which of the controllers data subjects should address their requests of access, rectification, blocking and erasure; and which controller would be accountable in case of specific breaches of the data protection legislation (for example, for security breaches). Data subjects should also be informed accordingly;
-clarifying the limitation of access rights : the EDPS welcomes these limitations of the purpose and the access rights. However, it is not clear whether all ODR facilitators (at least 54) will have access to personal data related to all the disputes. He recommends clarifying that every ODR facilitator will have access only to the data needed to fulfil his or her obligations under the Regulation;
-complementing the provisions on security : the EDPS recommends adding also a reference to the need to conduct a privacy impact assessment (including a risk assessment) and to the fact that compliance with data protection legislation and data security should be periodically audited and reported. Furthermore, he recalls that the development of IT tools for the establishment of the ODR platform should integrate privacy and data protection from the very early design stage (privacy by design), including the implementation of tools enabling users to better protect personal data (such as authentication and encryption) ;
-mentioning the need to consult the EDPS on delegated and implementing acts related to the processing of personal data.
The EDPS would also like to stress that the processing of personal data in the framework of the ODR platform may be subject to prior checking by the EDPS and by national data protection authorities.
The Council took note of two legislative proposals submitted by the Commission on 29 November 2011: a draft directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and a draft regulation on On-line Dispute Resolution (ODR).
In compliance with the ADR directive, the Commission also proposes an ODR mechanism involving the setting up of a European on-line dispute resolution platform (this will be an interactive website accessible electronically and free of charge in all languages of the Union).
ADR schemes, also known as "out-of-court mechanisms ", have been set up across Europe to help citizens engaged in the resolution of disputes which they have been unable to resolve directly with the trader. These mechanisms have been developed differently across the EU, either publicly or privately, and the status of the decisions adopted by these bodies differs greatly from one Member State to another.
The Commission conducted a public consultation on this subject from18 January and 15 March 2011.
In addition, the Council adopted conclusion on the results of the first Single Market Forum (SIMFO), which took place in Krakow, Poland, on 3 and 4 October 2011. The SIMFO, which was organised jointly by the European Parliament, the Commission and the Polish presidency, is intended to be the starting point of a permanent platform for debate among EU institutions, stakeholders and citizens on the development of the internal market.
In its conclusions, the Council:
· attaches great importance to ensuring that European businesses and consumers purchasing goods and services (online, offline, cross-border or domestically) have access to efficient, affordable and simple means of resolving their disputes with traders, taking into account diversity of different national Alternative Dispute Resolution schemes;
· believes that it is essential to increase businesses' and citizens' knowledge and understanding of Alternative Dispute Resolution schemes throughout Europe;
· stresses that simple, efficient and affordable Online Dispute Resolution systems allowing consumers to solve effectively their problems when shopping on-line are crucial for improving confidence in the digital Single Market.
PURPOSE : to contribute to the functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing a platform facilitating the impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: with the development of e-commerce, the scope and size of markets in which businesses and consumers operate have grown significantly and extend beyond national borders. The lack of effective redress for complaints resulting from cross-border online transactions has adverse consequences both for consumers and businesses. Consumers as well as traders, however, perceive it as risky to engage in cross-border e-commerce transactions because they fear that relevant disputes might not easily be resolved due to the virtual character of the transaction.
The Europe 2020 flagship initiative "Digital Agenda for Europe" announced an EU strategy to improve ADR systems. The 2011 Single Market Act included amongst its key priorities the establishment of simple, fast and affordable out-of-court settlement procedures for consumers and protecting relations between businesses and their customers. This action will also include an electronic commerce dimension.
At present, the offer of ADR schemes to resolve consumer disputes related to e-commerce transactions is scattered and incomplete . In addition, while half the existing ADR schemes offer consumers the possibility of submitting their complaint online, very few offer consumers the possibility of conducting the entire procedure online (via online dispute resolution – ODR). Handling the entire process online would produce time savings and ease communication between the parties.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission has carried out a detailed impact assessment, analysing a range of policy options for (i) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) coverage, information and quality and (ii) Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) for cross-border e-commerce transactions.
The IA concluded that only a combination of two instruments on ADR and ODR can ensure access to impartial, transparent and effective means to resolve consumer disputes linked to cross-border e-commerce transactions out-of-court.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 TFEU.
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation aims at establishing an EU-wide ODR system that will facilitate the resolution of disputes related to the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between a trader and a consumer.
The main points of the proposal are as follows:
ODR platform : the proposal aims at establishing a European online dispute resolution platform ("ODR platform"). This ODR platform takes the form of an interactive website which offers a single point of entry to consumers and traders who seek to resolve out-of-court a dispute which has arisen from a cross-border e-commerce transaction. The platform can be accessed in all official languages of the EU and its use is free of charge. ADR schemes established in the Member States, which have been notified to the Commission in accordance with the Directive on consumer ADR, will be registered electronically with the ODR platform.
Consumers and traders will be able to submit their complaints through an electronic complaint form which will be available on the platform’s website in all official languages of the EU. The platform will check if a complaint can be processed and seek the agreement of the parties to transmit it to the ADR scheme that is competent to deal with the dispute. The competent ADR scheme will seek the resolution of the dispute in accordance with its own rules of procedure within 30 days from the date of receipt of the complaint. The ADR scheme will have to notify to the platform some data in relation to the development of the dispute (date when the complaint was notified to the parties; date when the dispute was resolved; outcome of the dispute).
Under the proposal, a network of online dispute resolution facilitators ("ODR facilitators' network") will provide support to the resolution of disputes submitted via the ODR platform.
Information on the EU-wide ODR system : traders established within the EU that engage in cross-border e- commerce to inform consumers about the ODR platform. This information shall be made easily, directly, prominently and permanently accessible on the traders' websites as well as when the consumer submit a complaint to the trader.
Monitoring: an annual activity report will be drawn up on the operation of the platform. The compliance by ADR schemes with the obligations set out in the Regulation will be monitored by the competent authorities to be established in the Member States in accordance with the Directive on consumer ADR. Every three years the Commission will report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Regulation.
Data Protection rules: the data entered in the ODR platform by the parties and the ADR schemes will be stored in a database and will be subject to the relevant legislation on data protection.
BUDGETRY IMPLICATIONS: this action is part of the Consumer programme 2014-2020 . The budgetary impact will be addressed by redeployment for the years 2012 and 2013. The financial appropriations for implementing this proposal from 2012 to 2020 will amount to EUR 4,586 million in current prices .
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
PURPOSE : to contribute to the functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing a platform facilitating the impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: with the development of e-commerce, the scope and size of markets in which businesses and consumers operate have grown significantly and extend beyond national borders. The lack of effective redress for complaints resulting from cross-border online transactions has adverse consequences both for consumers and businesses. Consumers as well as traders, however, perceive it as risky to engage in cross-border e-commerce transactions because they fear that relevant disputes might not easily be resolved due to the virtual character of the transaction.
The Europe 2020 flagship initiative "Digital Agenda for Europe" announced an EU strategy to improve ADR systems. The 2011 Single Market Act included amongst its key priorities the establishment of simple, fast and affordable out-of-court settlement procedures for consumers and protecting relations between businesses and their customers. This action will also include an electronic commerce dimension.
At present, the offer of ADR schemes to resolve consumer disputes related to e-commerce transactions is scattered and incomplete . In addition, while half the existing ADR schemes offer consumers the possibility of submitting their complaint online, very few offer consumers the possibility of conducting the entire procedure online (via online dispute resolution – ODR). Handling the entire process online would produce time savings and ease communication between the parties.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission has carried out a detailed impact assessment, analysing a range of policy options for (i) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) coverage, information and quality and (ii) Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) for cross-border e-commerce transactions.
The IA concluded that only a combination of two instruments on ADR and ODR can ensure access to impartial, transparent and effective means to resolve consumer disputes linked to cross-border e-commerce transactions out-of-court.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 TFEU.
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation aims at establishing an EU-wide ODR system that will facilitate the resolution of disputes related to the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between a trader and a consumer.
The main points of the proposal are as follows:
ODR platform : the proposal aims at establishing a European online dispute resolution platform ("ODR platform"). This ODR platform takes the form of an interactive website which offers a single point of entry to consumers and traders who seek to resolve out-of-court a dispute which has arisen from a cross-border e-commerce transaction. The platform can be accessed in all official languages of the EU and its use is free of charge. ADR schemes established in the Member States, which have been notified to the Commission in accordance with the Directive on consumer ADR, will be registered electronically with the ODR platform.
Consumers and traders will be able to submit their complaints through an electronic complaint form which will be available on the platform’s website in all official languages of the EU. The platform will check if a complaint can be processed and seek the agreement of the parties to transmit it to the ADR scheme that is competent to deal with the dispute. The competent ADR scheme will seek the resolution of the dispute in accordance with its own rules of procedure within 30 days from the date of receipt of the complaint. The ADR scheme will have to notify to the platform some data in relation to the development of the dispute (date when the complaint was notified to the parties; date when the dispute was resolved; outcome of the dispute).
Under the proposal, a network of online dispute resolution facilitators ("ODR facilitators' network") will provide support to the resolution of disputes submitted via the ODR platform.
Information on the EU-wide ODR system : traders established within the EU that engage in cross-border e- commerce to inform consumers about the ODR platform. This information shall be made easily, directly, prominently and permanently accessible on the traders' websites as well as when the consumer submit a complaint to the trader.
Monitoring: an annual activity report will be drawn up on the operation of the platform. The compliance by ADR schemes with the obligations set out in the Regulation will be monitored by the competent authorities to be established in the Member States in accordance with the Directive on consumer ADR. Every three years the Commission will report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Regulation.
Data Protection rules: the data entered in the ODR platform by the parties and the ADR schemes will be stored in a database and will be subject to the relevant legislation on data protection.
BUDGETRY IMPLICATIONS: this action is part of the Consumer programme 2014-2020 . The budgetary impact will be addressed by redeployment for the years 2012 and 2013. The financial appropriations for implementing this proposal from 2012 to 2020 will amount to EUR 4,586 million in current prices .
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0425
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0744
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2013/524
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 165 18.06.2013, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00080/2012/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)306
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0065/2013
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0236/2012
- Committee opinion: PE486.178
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE489.696
- Debate in Council: 3169
- Committee draft report: PE487.752
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0804/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0794
- Contribution: COM(2011)0794
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 136 11.05.2012, p. 0001
- Document attached to the procedure: N7-0066/2012
- Debate in Council: 3133
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0794
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1408
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1409
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0794
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0794 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1408 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1409 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 136 11.05.2012, p. 0001 N7-0066/2012
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0804/2012
- Committee draft report: PE487.752
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE489.696
- Committee opinion: PE486.178
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0065/2013
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)306
- Draft final act: 00080/2012/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0744 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0425 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2011)0794
- Contribution: COM(2011)0794
Activities
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Hans-Peter MAYER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Raffaele BALDASSARRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- María IRIGOYEN PÉREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvana RAPTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mitro REPO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara WEILER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
223 |
2011/0374(COD)
2012/05/09
JURI
40 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point 6 a (new) (6a) Any attempts by the consumer to find an amicable solution directly with the trader;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should apply to the out-of-court resolution of contractual disputes between consumers and traders that arise from the
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) This Regulation aims at creating an online dispute resolution (‘ODR’) platform at European level. The ODR platform should take the form of an interactive website integrated in the "Your Europe" Portal, offering a single point of entry to
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) It should also be taken into account that, despite the controversy, Member States whose national legislation goes beyond the core requirements of the Mediation Directive seem to have achieved important results in promoting the non-judicial treatment of disputes in civil and commercial matters; and that the results achieved, in particular in Italy, Bulgaria and Romania, show that mediation can help bring swift and effective extrajudicial resolution of disputes through processes that are tailored to the needs of the parties and safeguard consumers, which is of particular relevance in cases of electronic purchasing;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Traders should inform consumers on their websites about the ODR platform and provide an electronic link to its homepage. They should also provide such information when a consumer submits a complaint to the trader, a consumer complaint handling system operated by the trader or a company ombudsman. This obligation should be without prejudice to Article 10(1)-(3) of Directive .…/…/EU [Office of Publications insert reference number] concerning the information of consumers by traders about the ADR procedures
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Traders should inform consumers on their websites about the ODR platform and provide an electronic link to its homepage. They should also provide such information when a consumer submits a complaint to the trader, a consumer complaint handling system operated by the trader or a company ombudsman. This obligation should be without prejudice to Article 10(1)-(3) of Directive .…/…/EU [Office of Publications insert reference number] concerning the information of consumers by traders about the ADR procedures by which those traders are covered and
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the type of information which a complainant is to provide in the electronic complaint form made available on the ODR platform, as well as concerning its technical modalities. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and in particular, the European Data Protection Supervisor. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of the functioning of the ODR platform
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point g – subparagraph 1 (g) ‘alternative dispute resolution procedure’ (hereinafter ‘ADR procedure’) means a procedure for the out-of-court resolution of a dispute whereby the parties involved attempt to solve their conflict through the intervention of a dispute resolution entity which proposes or imposes a solution or brings the parties together with the aim of facilitating an amicable solution;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point g – subparagraph 1 (g) "alternative dispute resolution procedure" (hereinafter "ADR procedure") means a procedure for the out-of-court resolution of a dispute through the
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point g – subparagraph 2 Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point i Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point j Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall establish a European online dispute resolution platform, (hereinafter ‘ODR platform’) on the "Your Europe" Portal.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall establish a European online dispute resolution platform, (hereinafter ‘ODR platform’). Membership of the platform is desirable under the condition on the mandatory use of ADR in Member States whose legal systems the OECD considers to infringe the rights of applicants to a fair trial within a reasonable timescale.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) providing an electronic complaint form which can be filled in by the co
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) proposing, based on the information contained in the electronic complaint form, one or more competent ADR entities to the
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) proposing, based on the information contained in the electronic complaint form, one or more competent ADR entities to the parties and providing information on their fees, if applicable, the language or languages in which the procedure will be conducted, the approximate length of the procedures or informing the complainant party that based on the information submitted, no competent ADR entity could be identified;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall, in implementing this Regulation, establish instruments such as the admissibility condition, as governed by European Court of Justice guidance, for a transitional period of no fewer than 5 years from its entry into force, in order to ensure effective application of the principles of mediation and to promote a culture of mediation, while ensuring that both the parties at dispute must abide by it;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The information to be submitted by the complainant party shall be sufficient to determine the competent ADR entity. This information is described in the Annex to this Regulation.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, after consulting the European Data Protection Supervisor, in accordance with Article 16 to adapt the information listed in the Annex, taking into account the criteria by which the ADR entities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 17(2) of Directive …./…/EU [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] that deal with disputes covered by this Regulation define their respective scopes of application.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform shall communicate to the co
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) their fees
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d d) the need for the physical presence of the parties or of their representatives, if applicable, and an indication of whether the dispute can be settled without the parties or their representatives being physically present in cases where the places of residence or of habitual residence of the parties are in different Member States;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – point b (b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity, accomplish the conclusion of the dispute
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – point b (b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity, accomplish the conclusion of the dispute resolution procedure within
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity, accomplish the conclusion of the dispute resolution procedure within
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Access to information, including personal data, related to a dispute and stored in the database referred to in Article 10 shall be granted, for the purposes referred to in Article 9, only to the ADR entity to which the dispute was transmitted in accordance with Article 8. Access to the same information shall be granted also to ODR facilitators only if this information is necessary in order to fulfil their functions as referred to in Article 6(2) and for the purposes referred to in Article 6(3).
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Access to information, including personal data, related to a dispute and stored in the database referred to in Article 10 shall be granted, for the purposes referred to in Article 9, only to the ADR entity to which the dispute was transmitted in accordance with Article 8. Access to the same information shall be granted also to the ODR facilitators to which the dispute was referred for the purposes referred to in Article 6(3).
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. A comprehensive privacy notice shall be made available on the ODR platform whereby data subjects are informed about the processing of their personal data, as well as about their rights with regard to that processing. The privacy notice shall state clearly the processing operations performed under the responsibility of the various actors of the platform.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Traders established within the Union engaging in the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services shall inform consumers about the ODR platform and about their e-mail address. This information shall be made
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The provisions in paragraph 1 are
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The provisions in paragraph 1 are without prejudice to the provisions in Article 10 of Directive …./…/EU [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] concerning the information of consumers by traders about the ADR procedures by which those traders are covered and
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. The provisions in paragraph 1 are without prejudice to the provisions in Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2011/83/EU concerning consumer information for distance and off-premises contracts, in Article 3 of Directive 2002/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services1 and Article 185 of Directive 2009/138/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2008 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)2. ______________ 1 OJ L 271, 9.10.2002, p.16. 2 OJ L 335, 17.12.2008, p.1.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point 2 Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – point 4 source: PE-489.398
2012/05/31
IMCO
183 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should apply to the out-of-court resolution of contractual disputes
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The definition of ‘consumer’ should cover natural persons who are acting outside their trade, business, craft or profession.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) This Regulation should not apply to disputes between consumers and traders that arise from the
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) This Regulation should not apply to disputes between consumers and traders that arise from the cross-border sale of goods or provision of services offline. This Regulation should not apply to disputes between traders or to complaints submitted by traders against consumers.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) This Regulation should not apply to disputes
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Before submitting their dispute to an ADR entity via the ODR platform, consumers should be encouraged by Member States to make every effort to contact the trader via their website, email, or other electronic means as appropriate, with the aim of resolving the dispute amicably.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) This Regulation aims at creating an online dispute resolution ('ODR') platform at European level. The ODR platform should take the form of a
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) This Regulation aims at creating an online dispute resolution (
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) This Regulation aims at creating an online dispute resolution (
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The platform should offer, free of charge, an electronic case management tool which enables the parties and the ADR entity to conduct the dispute resolution procedure online via the platform. ADR entities should be able to use this and customise it for their procedures. The tool should allow parties and ADR entities to upload relevant statements and evidence. The tool should, in accordance with the ADR procedure applied by the relevant ADR entity, automatically set deadlines to parties e.g. for making submissions. It should also provide for a restricted access website on the ODR platform, which can be accessed by the parties, the ADR entity and if necessary by the consumer advisors.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The ODR platform should offer a single point of entry for the out-of-court resolution of online disputes through the ADR entities that seek the out-of-court resolution of a dispute, are established on durable basis, comply with the quality criteria set out in Chapter II of [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)], and have been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 17 (2) of [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)].
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 b (new) (14b) The Commission should provide the technical facilities for the functioning of the platform, including translation functions. The tool should offer an electronic translation functionality to the parties and the ADR entity. This functionality should deal with all necessary translations and will be supported by translators. The Commission should also, on the ODR platform, provide information for consumers about the possibility of requesting assistance from the consumer advisors. However, consumers should be encouraged to contact the trader first and thus directly seek an amicable solution of the dispute before they submit a complaint to the ODR platform.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 c (new) (14c) The ODR platform should be accessed only through the 'Your Europe'- portal thematic website, as this portal is an existing single point of entry for both consumers and traders looking for help or information about their rights as provided by EU legislation. The ODR platform should be made prominent on the 'Your Europe'-portal.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) An ODR system at European level should build on existing ADR entities in the Member States and respect Member States' legal traditions. ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted via the ODR platform should therefore apply their own rules of procedure, including rules on cost. However, this Regulation intends to establish some common rules applicable to those procedures that will safeguard their effectiveness. This should include rules ensuring that such dispute resolution is accomplished expeditiously and does not require the physical presence of the parties or their representatives before the ADR entity. However, the parties may decide that physical presence is necessary.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) An ODR system at European level should build on existing ADR entities in the Member States and respect Member States' legal traditions. ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted via the ODR platform should therefore apply their own rules of procedure, including rules on cost. However, this Regulation intends to establish some common rules
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) An ODR system at European level should build on existing ADR entities in the Member States and respect Member States' legal traditions. ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted via the ODR platform should therefore apply their own rules of procedure, including rules on cost. However, this Regulation intends to establish some common rules applicable to those procedures that will safeguard their effectiveness. This should include rules ensuring that such dispute resolution is accomplished expeditiously and without the need for the parties to be physically present before the ADR entity unless they specifically decide otherwise.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) An ODR system at European level should build on existing ADR entities in the Member States and respect Member States' legal traditions. ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted via the ODR platform should therefore apply their own rules of procedure, including rules on cost. However, this Regulation intends to establish some common rules applicable to those procedures that will » safeguard their effectiveness. This should include rules ensuring that such dispute resolution is accomplished expeditiously
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The parties should be able to access the ODR Platform established by this Regulation free of charge, and without being required to be physically present for the procedure. However, both parties may decide that their physical presence is necessary.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18)
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) A network of online dispute resolution facilitators should provide support to parties seeking the resolution of disputes relating to complaints submitted via the ODR platform. That network should be
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) The right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial are fundamental rights guaranteed in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Online dispute resolution procedures cannot be designed to replace court procedures and should not deprive consumers or traders of their rights to seek redress before the courts. Nothing in this Regulation should, therefore, prevent parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) Data subjects should be informed about, and give their assent to, the processing of their personal data in the ODR platform, and their rights with regard to that processing, by means of a comprehensive privacy notice to be made publicly available by the Commission and explaining, in a clear and simple language, the processing operations performed under the responsibility of the various actors of the platform, in accordance with Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and with national legislation adopted pursuant to Articles 10 and 11 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Traders that engage in online cross- border sales who are obliged to use an ADR entity under national legislation or who commit to use an ADR entity or ADR entities should inform consumers on
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Traders should inform consumers on their websites about the ODR platform and provide an electronic link to its homepage. They should also provide such information when a consumer submits a complaint to the trader, a consumer complaint handling system operated by the trader or a company ombudsman. This obligation should be without prejudice to Article 10(1)-(3) of Directive .…/…/EU [Office of Publications insert reference number] concerning the information of consumers by traders about the ADR procedures by which those traders are covered and about whether or not they commit to use alternative dispute resolution procedures to resolve disputes with consumers. Furthermore, this obligation should be without prejudice to Articles 6(1)(t) and 8 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights. Article 6(1)(t) of Directive 2011/83/EU stipulates for consumer contracts concluded at a distance or off premises that the trader has to inform the consumer about the possibility of having recourse to an out-of- court complaint and redress mechanism to which the trader is subject, and the methods for having access to it, before the consumer is bound by the contract. Member States should provide for penalties for any party or parties which, for their own ends and without any justified objective reason, refuse to accept the procedure, thereby forcing consumers to forego their claims or face substantial costs, which could easily be borne by the supplier, thus creating a clear imbalance.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the functions of the ODR platform, the modalities of cooperation between the consumer advisors and the type of information which a complainant is to provide in the electronic complaint form made available on the ODR platform, as well as the modalities of that electronic complaint form. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 The purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the effective functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing an online platform facilitating the impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 The purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing free of charge for consumers a platform facilitating the impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 The purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the functioning of the internal market, and in particular its digital dimension, and to the achievement of a high level of consumer protection by providing a platform facilitating the independent, impartial, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders online.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between consumers and traders through the intervention of an
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between consumers and traders through the intervention of an alternative dispute resolution entity complying with Directive [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] and involving the use of a European online dispute resolution platform. This Regulation shall not apply to disputes submitted by a trader against a consumer.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes initiated by consumers against traders arising from the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between consumers and traders through the intervention of an alternative dispute resolution entity complying with Directive [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] and involving the use of a European online dispute resolution platform.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply to the out-of- court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g – introductory part (g)
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g – introductory part (g)
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g – paragraph 1 Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g – paragraph 1 Procedures before
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Procedures before dispute resolution entities where the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed exclusively by the trader shall not be regarded as ADR procedures unless these entities comply with the general requirements of Chapter II in accordance with Article 17, and if the following additional conditions are met: - the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are hierarchically independent from the trader and cannot be subject to instructions given by the trader; - the remuneration of the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution is not subject to the outcome of the dispute resolution procedure; - the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution must not have worked for the trader concerned during the three years prior to assuming the post. - the dispute resolution entity is subjected to an annual evaluation by the competent authority of the Member State where it is established regarding compliance with the principles laid down in this Directive;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h (h)
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point i (i) "complainant party" means the consumer
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point j (j) "respondent party" means the
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall establish a European online dispute resolution platform, (hereinafter ‘ODR platform’) on a dedicated internet site.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall establish a European online dispute resolution platform, (hereinafter
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. The ODR platform shall be an interactive website which can be accessed electronically and free of charge in all official languages of the Union. The ODR platform shall be a single point of entry to consumers
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. The ODR platform shall be an interactive website which can be accessed electronically and free of charge in all official languages of the Union. The ODR platform shall be a single point of entry to consumers and traders seeking t
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a The ODR platform shall provide information regarding the out-of-court settlement of contractual disputes between consumers and with traders arising from the online sale of goods or provision of services.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) informing the trader about the complaint submitted against him;
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) b a) notifying the trader of the complaint lodged against him;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) if no competent ADR entity can be identified, informing the complainant party that based on the information submitted, no competent ADR entity could be identified;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b b (new) (bb) inviting the respondent party, if he/she is a trader, to state whether he is obliged or has committed to use a certain ADR entity for resolving disputes covered by this Regulation;
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b c (new) (bc) inviting the parties to agree on the competent ADR entity to use to settle their dispute or, if more than one ADR entity has been identified, on one of the competent ADR entities identified;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point d (d)
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) providing the parties and the ADR entity with an electronic translation functionality;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) providing a feedback system which allows the parties to express their views on the functioning of the ODR platform and
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) f a) providing, without charge, an electronic case management tool, which allows the parties and the ADR entity to conduct the dispute resolution process electronically through the platform;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point g (g) publishing information on ADR entities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 17(2) of Directive
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point g g) publishing information on ADR entities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 17(2) of Directive …./…/EU [Office of Publications please insert
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall be responsible for the ODR platform as regards its development
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall be responsible for the ODR platform as regards its development, its operation, including all translation functionalities necessary for the purpose of this regulation, its maintenance, its funding and as regards data security.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall be responsible for the ODR platform as regards its development, its operation, i
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The Commission shall ensure that information contained in the ODR platform regarding concerning the existence and characteristics of ADR procedures are accurate and up to date.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – title Network of online dispute resolution
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate one ODR contact point and communicate its name and contact details to the Commission. Member States may confer responsibility for the ODR contact points on their centres of the European Consumer Centre Network, on consumer associations or on any other body.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The ODR
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The ODR
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) if
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (new) i) assisting with the submission of the complaint and, where appropriate, relevant documentation,
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (new) ii) providing the parties and ADR entities with general information on consumer rights in relation to the sale of goods or provision of services which apply in the Member State of the ODR contact point which hosts the consumer advisors concerned;
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (new) iii) providing information on the functioning of the ODR platform,
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv (new) iv) providing the parties with explanations on the rules of procedure applied by the ADR entities identified;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) providing consumers who so request with assistance in completing electronic claim forms correctly;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) a a) providing information to the complainant about the operation of the ODR platform, by submitting the electronic complaint form, if necessary with the relevant documentation. .
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new) (ab) providing general information to parties who so request regarding the principal consumer rights provisions applicable;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) informing
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) submitting, based on the practical experience gained from the performance of their functions, an annual activity report to the Commission, to the European Parliament and to the Member States;
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall establish a network of
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall provide appropriate training for online dispute resolution facilitators for consumers in order to acquire the necessary expertise to perform their duties in accordance with paragraph 2.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall at least once every year convene a meeting of members of the ODR
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall at least
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall adopt the rules concerning the modalities of the cooperation between the ODR
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. In order to submit a complaint to the ODR platform the co
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The ODR platform shall provide an online guide for those seeking assistance in completing electronic claim forms.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The information to be submitted by the co
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. A complaint submitted to the ODR platform shall only be processed if
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. A complaint submitted to the platform shall be processed if the complaint form is fully completed. The physical presence of the parties shall not be mandatory for the processing of the complaint.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. A complaint submitted to the ODR platform shall be processed, if all mandatory fields are fully completed. In the event of an incomplete submission, the complainant
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform shall
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Upon receipt of a fully completed complaint form, the ODR platform shall
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new) - a) the nature and reasons for the complaint;
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the information that the parties have to agree on one competent ADR entity in order for the complaint to be transmitted to it and that by choosing that ADR entity they agree to initiate a dispute resolution procedure;
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) in the event that the respondent party is the trader, an invitation to the respondent party to state, within seven days from receiving the communication, whether he is obliged by national law or has committed to use a specific ADR entity and, if applicable, if he is willing to use another ADR entity stated in the list referred to in (c);
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new) (ab) in the event that the respondent party is a consumer, an invitation to the respondent party to select, within seven days from receiving the communication, one or more ADR entities from the list provided, specifying that there is no obligation on the consumer to make such a selection;
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a c (new) (ac) in the event that the respondent party is a consumer and the trader as complainant party has stated in the complaint form that he is obliged by national law or has committed to use a specific ADR entity, an invitation to the respondent party to agree, within seven days from receiving the communication, to use this specific ADR entity, specifying that there is no obligation on the consumer to make this decision;
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a d (new) (ad) the information that in the event that the consumer chooses an ADR entity that the trader is obliged, has committed or is willing to use, the platform shall automatically transmit the complaint to that ADR entity;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the information that in the event that the consumer chooses an ADR entity the trader is obliged, has committed or is willing to use, the platform shall automatically transmit the complaint to that ADR entity;
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (bb) the information that in the event that the parties fail to agree on one competent ADR entity or that no competent ADR entity is identified, the complaint shall not be processed further;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a list of all competent ADR entities, if any are identified;. The list shall include a description of the following characteristics of each entity:
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a list of all competent ADR entities, if any are identified
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new) i) the name and website address of the ADR entity;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new) i) the name and website address of the ADR entity;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new) ii) the language or languages in which the procedure will be conducted;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new) ii) the cost of the procedure, if applicable;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new) iii) the average length of the ADR procedure;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (new) iii) the language or languages in which the procedure will be conducted;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iv (new) iv) the binding or non-binding nature of the outcome of the procedure
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iv (new) iv) the average length of the ADR procedure;
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point v (new) v) the grounds on which the ADR entity may refuse to deal with a given dispute
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point v (new) v) the binding or non-binding nature of the outcome of the procedure
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vi (new) vi) the grounds on which the ADR entity may refuse to deal with a given dispute in accordance with Article 5(4) and (5) of Directive ..../.../EU[Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)];
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point g Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point g Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d (d) the
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) an invitation to the consumer to select, within seven days from receiving the communication, the ADR entity or, if applicable, one of the ADR entities stated by the trader in accordance with paragraph 2(b), specifying that there is no obligation on the consumer to make such a selection;
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new) (eb) the information, that if the consumer makes a selection the complaint will be automatically transmitted to the ADR entity selected by the parties.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) the
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e – point i (new) i) the name and website address of the ADR entity;
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e – point ii (new) ii) the language or languages in which the procedure will be conducted;
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e – point iii (new) iii) the average length of the ADR procedure;
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e – point iv (new) iv) the binding or non-binding nature of the outcome of the procedure;
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e – point v (new) v) the grounds on which the ADR entity may refuse to deal with a given dispute
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. In the event that the complainant party chooses a competent ADR entity identified in accordance with the provisions of this Article, the platform shall automatically transmit the complaint to that ADR entity;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. Where the parties fail to reply to the platform or to agree on one competent ADR entity within 20 days, the complaint shall not be processed further.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. Where the
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. Where (a) the choice of the consumer corresponds to an ADR entity the trader has committed to use in accordance with Article 10(1) of Directive …./…/EU[Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] or
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part ADR entities to which a complaint has been transmitted in accordance with Article 8 shall
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – point b (b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity, accomplish the conclusion of the dispute resolution procedure within
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) if, following the notification of the dispute to the parties, the parties agree to institute proceedings before the entity,
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Access to information, including personal data, related to a dispute and stored in the database referred to in Article 10 shall be granted, for the purposes referred to in Article 9, only to the ADR
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission shall provide parties to an ADR procedure with a guide containing clear and specific information regarding the treatment of their personal data by the ODR platform under Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (CE) No 45/2001 and the relevant national legislation adopted under Articles 10 and 11 of Directive 95/46/EC, together with their rights in this respect.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) ODR facilitators
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Traders established within the Union that engag
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Traders established within the Union engaging in the
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Traders established within the Union engaging in the
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall establish and maintain a phone helpline on ADR and ODR, which should be accessible in all Member States and shall offer information and any necessary assistance when submitting complaints;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The provisions in paragraph 1 are without prejudice to the provisions in Article 10 of Directive
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Article 16a Penalties Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringement of this Regulation and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those rules are implemented. The penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 (1) Name, address and, if applicable, e- mail and website address of the co
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 2 Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 3 (3) Name, address and, if applicable, e- mail and website address of the
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 4 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) In accordance with Article 26(2) TFEU, the Internal Market is to comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods and services is ensured. In order for consumers to have confidence in and benefit from the digital dimension of the Internal Market, it is necessary that they have access to easy
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) In accordance with Article 26(2) TFEU, the Internal Market is to comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods and services is ensured. In order for consumers to have confidence in and benefit from the digital dimension of the Internal Market, it is necessary that the
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The fragmentation of the Single Market impedes efforts to boost competitiveness and growth. Furthermore, the uneven availability, quality and awareness of simple, efficient and low-cost means of resolving disputes arising from the sale of goods or provision of services across the Union constitutes a barrier within the Single Market which undermines consumers' and traders' confidence in shopping and selling across borders.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Realising the potential of online trade would make a substantial contribution to returning the Union to economic growth, but doing so will require the proper integration of the ODR platform and the ADR entities as outlined in [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)].
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Internal Market is a reality for consumers in their daily lives, when they travel, buy and make payments and the effectiveness of the consumer protection policy depends on the extent to which legislation prevents practices and measures that harm consumers' interests. Consumers are key players in the Internal Market and should therefore be at its heart. The digital dimension of the Internal Market is becoming vital for both consumers and traders. Consumers increasingly make purchases over the internet and an increasing number of traders sell online. Consumers and traders should feel confident in carrying out transactions in a digital environment.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Internal Market is a reality for consumers in their daily lives, when they travel, buy and make payments. Consumers are key players in the Internal Market and should therefore be at its heart. The digital dimension of the Internal Market is becoming vital for both consumers and traders. Consumers increasingly make purchases over the internet and an increasing number of traders sell online. Consumers and traders should feel confident in carrying out transactions in a digital environment. In the current crisis, measures to boost economic growth, job creation and consumer recovery are essential. While the digital market provides a valuable opportunity to achieve these objectives, the European Union must, in order to take advantage of it, be capable of establishing a full digital internal market. It is essential to dismantle existing barriers on the one hand and boost consumer confidence on the other. The existence of a reliable and efficient online dispute settlement system could also greatly help achieve this increase in consumer confidence in the Union.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Being able to seek easy
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Being able to seek easy and low-cost dispute resolution can boost consumers' and traders' confidence in the digital market. Consumers and traders, however, still face barriers to finding out-of-court solutions in particular to their disputes arising from a cross-border online transaction. Thus, such disputes currently are often left unresolved. Certain Member States whose national legislation goes beyond the core requirements of the mediation directive appear to have made substantial progress in the non-judicial settlement of civil and commercial disputes. The results obtained indicate that mediation can contribute to cost- effective and rapid extrajudicial dispute settlement by means of procedures tailored to the needs of the parties and ensuring consumer protection.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Online dispute resolution offers a simple, effective and low-cost out-of-court solution to disputes arising from cross- border online transactions. However, there is currently a lack of mechanisms that allow consumers and traders to resolve such disputes via electronic means. This leads to consumer detriment, acts as a barrier to cross-border online transactions, creates an uneven playing field for traders and thus hampers
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should apply to the out-of-court resolution of disputes concerning contractual
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should apply to the out-of-court resolution of disputes concerning contractual
source: PE-489.696
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1408/COM_SEC(2011)1408_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1408/COM_SEC(2011)1408_EN.pdf |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1409/COM_SEC(2011)1409_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1409/COM_SEC(2011)1409_EN.pdf |
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0794/COM_COM(2011)0794_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0794/COM_COM(2011)0794_EN.pdf |
events/7/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0374&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0374&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0804)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0804)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.752New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-487752_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.696New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-489696_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.178&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-486178_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0065_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0065_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/8/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1408/COM_SEC(2011)1408_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1408/COM_SEC(2011)1408_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1409/COM_SEC(2011)1409_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1409/COM_SEC(2011)1409_EN.pdf |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-65New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0065_EN.html |
docs/8/body |
EC
|
docs/11 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-236&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0236_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/08128New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R0524New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R0524 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0794:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0794:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0794/COM_COM(2011)0794_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0794/COM_COM(2011)0794_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|