Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE) | ABAD Damien ( PPE), SCHALDEMOSE Christel ( S&D), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), SALVINI Matteo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | AUCONIE Sophie ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | KARIM Sajjad ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on online gambling in the Internal Market, in response to a Commission Green Paper on the subject.
Recalling the growing economic importance of the online gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 6 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008, Parliament welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling. It also welcomes the Commission's clarification of the fact that the political process initiated by means of the Green Paper is in no way aimed at deregulating/liberalising online gambling.
According to Parliament, efficient regulation of the online gambling sector should in particular:
channel the natural gaming instinct of the population by restricting advertising to the level that is strictly necessary in order to direct potential gamblers to the legal provision of services, and by requiring all advertising for online gambling to be systematically coupled with a message warning against excessive or pathological gambling, combat the illegal gambling sector by strengthening technical and legal instruments for identifying and sanctioning illegal operators, and by promoting the legal provision of high-quality gambling services, guarantee effective protection for gamblers, with specific attention to vulnerable groups, in particular young people, preclude risks of gambling addiction, and ensure that gambling is proper, fair, responsible and transparent, ensure that specific measures are promoted to guarantee the integrity of sporting competition, ensure that part of the value of bets goes to sports and horse-racing bodies, ensure that a considerable proportion of government revenue from gambling is used for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes, and ensure that gaming is kept free from crime, fraud and any form of money laundering.
1. Subsidiarity principle and European added value: Parliament emphasises that any regulation of the gambling sector is subject to, and must be underpinned by, the subsidiarity principle, given the different traditions and cultures in the Member States. It rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling sector, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some areas there would be clear added value from a coordinated European approach, in addition to national regulation , given the cross-border nature of online gambling services.
The resolution recognises the Member States' discretion in determining how gambling is organised, while observing the basic EU Treaty principles of non-discrimination and proportionality. Parliament respects in this context the decision by a number of Member States to ban all or certain types of online gambling or to maintain government monopolies on that sector, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, as long as they adopt a coherent approach.
Parliament points out that online gambling is a special kind of economic activity , to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, cannot fully apply. Parliament stresses, on the one hand, that providers of online gambling should in all cases respect the national laws of the countries in which those games operate and, on the other hand, that Member States should retain the exclusive right to impose all the measures they deem necessary to address illegal online gambling in order to implement national legislation and exclude illegal providers from market access.
Whilst noting that that the principle of mutual recognition of licences in the gambling sector does not apply, Parliament stresses that in keeping with internal market principles, Member States should open up the online gambling sector to competition for all or certain types of online gambling must ensure transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible. It suggests that Member States introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for European gambling providers meeting the conditions imposed by the host Member State to apply for a licence.
Parliament takes the view that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer. It urges the Commission to continue its investigation of the possible inconsistencies of Member States gambling legislation (offline and online) with the TFEU and – if necessary – to pursue those infringement proceedings that have been pending since 2008 in order to ensure such consistency.
2. Cooperation among regulatory bodies: the Parliament calls for cooperation among national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, giving them a sufficient remit, with the Commission as coordinator, to develop common standards and take joint action against online gambling operators which operate without the required national licence. In this regard, it considers the establishment of a regulator with suitable powers in each Member State to be a necessary step towards more effective regulatory cooperation.
Members call for closer cooperation and better coordination among EU Member States, Europol and Eurojust in the fight against illegal gambling, fraud, money laundering and other financial crimes in the area of online gambling.
The resolution emphasises the need to address the protection of customer accounts opened in connection with online gambling in the event of the service provider becoming insolvent. It asks the Commission to support consumers if they have been affected by illegal practices and to offer them legal support. It recommends the introduction of pan-European uniform minimum standards of electronic identification.
In order to effectively protect consumers, especially vulnerable and young players, from the negative aspects of gambling online, the EU needs to adopt common standards for consumer protection. Members emphasise, in this context, that control and protection processes need to be in place before any gaming activity begins and could include, inter alia, i) age verification, ii) restrictions for electronic payment and transfers of funds between gambling accounts and iii) a requirement for operators to place notices about legal age, high-risk behaviour, compulsive gambling and national contact points on online gambling sites.
3. Gambling and sport: the need to ensure integrity: Parliament notes that the risk of fraud in sports competitions - although present since the outset - has been exacerbated since the emergence of the online sports betting sector and represents a risk to the integrity of sport. It calls for a common definition of sport fraud and cheating should be developed and that betting fraud should be penalised as a criminal offence throughout Europe.
The resolution calls for:
instruments to increase cross-border police and judicial cooperation , involving all Member States' competent authorities for the prevention, detection and investigation of match-fixing in connection with sport betting; a framework for cooperation with organisers of sports competitions to be considered with a view to facilitating the exchange of information between sports disciplinary bodies and state investigation and prosecution agencies, by setting up, for example, dedicated national networks and contact points to deal with cases of match-fixing.
Lastly, Parliament recommends that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use , notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers, not only in order to secure a fair financial return for the benefit of all levels of professional and amateur sport, but also as a means of strengthening the fight against sports fraud, particularly match-fixing.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Jürgen CREUTZMANN (ADLE, DE) in response to the Commission’s Green Paper on online gambling in the Internal Market.
Recalling the growing economic importance of the online gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 6 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008, Members welcome the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling. They also welcome the Commission’s clarification of the fact that the political process initiated by means of the Green Paper is in no way aimed at deregulating/liberalising online gambling.
According to Members, efficient regulation of the online gambling sector should in particular:
channel the natural gaming instinct of the population by restricting advertising to the level that is strictly necessary in order to direct potential gamblers to the legal provision of services, and by requiring all advertising for online gambling to be systematically coupled with a message warning against excessive or pathological gambling, combat the illegal gambling sector by strengthening technical and legal instruments for identifying and sanctioning illegal operators, and by promoting the legal provision of high-quality gambling services, guarantee effective protection for gamblers , with specific attention to vulnerable groups, in particular young people, preclude risks of gambling addiction , and ensure that gambling is proper, fair, responsible and transparent, ensure that specific measures are promoted to guarantee the integrity of sporting competition , ensure that part of the value of bets goes to sports and horse-racing bodies, ensure that a considerable proportion of government revenue from gambling is used for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes , and ensure that gaming is kept free from crime, fraud and any form of money laundering.
Subsidiarity principle and European added value : Members emphasise that any regulation of the gambling sector is subject to, and must be underpinned by, the subsidiarity principle, given the different traditions and cultures in the Member States. They reject, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling sector, but nonetheless take the view that, in some areas there would be clear added value from a coordinated European approach, in addition to national regulation, given the cross-border nature of online gambling services.
The report recognises the Member States’ discretion in determining how gambling is organised , while observing the basic EU Treaty principles of non-discrimination and proportionality. Members respect in this context the decision by a number of Member States to ban all or certain types of online gambling or to maintain government monopolies on that sector, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, as long as they adopt a coherent approach.
Members stress, on the one hand, that providers of online gambling should in all cases respect the national laws of the countries in which those games operate and, on the other hand, that Member States should retain the exclusive right to impose all the measures they deem necessary to address illegal online gambling in order to implement national legislation and exclude illegal providers from market access.
Whilst noting that that t he principle of mutual recognition of licences in the gambling sector does not apply, the report stresses that in keeping with internal market principles , Member States should open up the online gambling sector to competition for all or certain types of online gambling must ensure transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible.
Members take the view that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer.
Cooperation among regulatory bodies : the report calls for cooperation among national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, giving them a sufficient remit, with the Commission as coordinator, to develop common standards and take joint action against online gambling operators which operate without the required national licence. Members call for closer cooperation and better coordination among EU Member States, Europol and Eurojust in the fight against illegal gambling, fraud, money laundering and other financial crimes in the area of online gambling.
The report emphasises the need to address the protection of customer accounts opened in connection with online gambling in the event of the service provider becoming insolvent. It asks the Commission to support consumers if they have been affected by illegal practices and to offer them legal support. It recommends the introduction of pan-European uniform minimum standards of electronic identification.
In order to effectively protect consumers, especially vulnerable and young players, from the negative aspects of gambling online, the EU needs to adopt common standards for consumer protection . Members emphasise, in this context, that control and protection processes need to be in place before any gaming activity begins and could include, inter alia, age verification, restrictions for electronic payment and transfers of funds between gambling accounts and a requirement for operators to place notices about legal age, high-risk behaviour, compulsive gambling and national contact points on online gambling sites.
Gambling and sport: the need to ensure integrity : the report notes that the risk of fraud in sports competitions – although present since the outset – has been exacerbated since the emergence of the online sports betting sector and represents a risk to the integrity of sport. Members call for a common definition of sport fraud and cheating should be developed and that betting fraud should be penalised as a criminal offence throughout Europe.
The committee calls for:
instruments to increase cross-border police and judicial cooperation , involving all Member States' competent authorities for the prevention, detection and investigation of match-fixing in connection with sport betting; a framework for cooperation with organisers of sports competitions to be considered with a view to facilitating the exchange of information between sports disciplinary bodies and state investigation and prosecution agencies, by setting up, for example, dedicated national networks and contact points to deal with cases of match-fixing.
The report calls on the Commission and Member States to work with all sports stakeholders with a view to identifying the appropriate mechanisms necessary to preserve the integrity of sport and the funding of grassroots sport.
The Council took note of a Presidency report dealing with regulatory cooperation between EU Member States in the field of gambling (see Council doc. 9853/11 ).
Building on the results of previous debates in the Council, especially on the conclusions adopted in December 2010 (see Council doc. 16884/10 , the Hungarian Presidency conducted a more detailed discussion during the first months of 2011 on the subject of cooperation between national gambling regulatory authorities.
PURPOSE: the presentation of a Green Paper on on-line gambling in the internal market.
BACKGROUND: today, on-line gambling services are widely offered and used in the EU and the economic significance of the sector is growing. The on-line offer is the fastest growing segment of the gambling market, accounting for 7.5% of the annual revenues of the overall gambling market in 2008, and it is expected to double in size by 2013.
At the same time, the regulatory framework applicable to gambling differs significantly across Member States. In view of recent trends, restrictions imposed to online gambling by each Member State can be expected to continue to vary considerably, with the effect that what is, or will become, considered a legal offer in one Member State will continue to be deemed “unlawful” (in that it has not been implicitly or explicitly authorised) in the territory of another Member State.
Since July 2008, Member States have, within a Council Working Party on Establishment and Services, discussed matters of common interest in relation to the gambling sector. Consecutive Presidencies have asked for the European Commission's active participation and detailed consultations. Most recently, all Member States agreed on Council conclusions that welcome a broad consultation by the European Commission on online gambling in the internal market which will allow for an in-depth discussion on issues raised by on-line gambling services in particular. These conclusions (2010) also addressed cooperation between regulatory authorities and noted that the Internal Market Information system could become a useful tool in order to facilitate this administrative cooperation.
This Green Paper also responds to the resolution of the European Parliament (2009) that called on the Commission to study the economic and non-economic effects of the provision of cross-border gambling services in relation to a wide range of issues.
The Commission’s objective is to contribute to the emergence in the Member States of a legal framework for on-line gambling providing for greater legal certainty for all stakeholders . At the end of this process and in light of the responses received, the Commission will report on what appears to be the most appropriate follow-up.
CONTENT: the purpose of this Green paper is to launch an extensive public consultation on all relevant public policy challenges and possible Internal Market issues resulting from the rapid development of both licit and unauthorised on-line gambling offers directed at citizens located in the EU.
There are currently two models of national regulatory framework applied in the field of gambling:
1. based on licensed operators providing services within a strictly regulated framework and
2. the other on a strictly controlled monopoly (state owned or otherwise).
These two models co-existed within the internal market given the relatively limited possibilities of selling gambling services across borders in the past.
The online gambling market is the fastest growing segment of the overall gambling market, with annual revenues in excess of € 6.16bn in 2008. Thus monopolies have often been authorised to develop on-line activities and certain Member States with monopoly regimes have gradually opted for an opening of their on-line gambling and betting market. In summary, the development of internet and the increased supply of on-line gambling services have made it more difficult for the different national regulatory models to co-exist .
Enforcement of national rules is facing many challenges, raising the issue of a possible need for enhanced administrative co-operation between competent national authorities, or for other types of action .
Furthermore, out of 14,823 active gambling sites in Europe more than 85% operated without any licence. In view of the self-evident cross-border impact of this on-line gambling service growth in both its legal and unauthorised dimension, as well as of its nexus with many issues already dealt with by EU legislation, it is the Commission’s intention to exhaust a number of questions related to the effects of, and to the possible public policy responses to, this growth in on-line gambling activity in order to have a full picture of the existing situation, to facilitate the exchange of best practices between Member States and to determine if the differing national regulatory models for gambling can continue to coexist and whether specific action may be needed in the EU for that purpose.
The Commission’s fundamental purpose is to:
collect the facts, assess the stakes and to gather the views of all interested stakeholders on a phenomenon that has multiple dimensions.
Comments are invited on all or some aspects of the document. Specific questions are listed after each section.
Main issues dealt with by the Green Paper: among the key themes raised are the following:
the definition and organisation of on-line gambling services; related services performed and/or used by on-line gambling services providers (questions relating to the promotion of on-line gambling and its regulation: television advertising, written press, on-line marketing, direct marketing, including SMSs, sponsorship); public interest objectives: consumer protection, problem gambling, protection of minors and vulnerable groups; prevention of fraud and money laundering; means of payment and security of on-line systems; cooperation between regulatory authorities.
The consultation and the questions asked focus primarily on on-line gambling, and issues linked to the free movement of services (Article 56 TFEU), due to the well-developed cross-border supply of such services. However, although this consultation does not focus on the freedom of establishment (Article 49 TFEU) a number of questions may also be of direct relevance for other gambling services (offered in "bricks-and-mortar" establishments). The Commission stresses that, in the absence of harmonisation in the field, it is for each Member State to determine in those areas, in accordance with its own scale of values, what is required in order to ensure that the interests in question are protected, in line with the subsidiarity principle.
Member States, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and all other interested parties are invited to submit their views on the suggestions set out in this Green Paper. Contributions should reach the Commission by 31 July 2011 : markt-gambling@ec.europa.eu
Follow-up : contributions will be published on the internet. The Commission asks organisations who wish to submit comments in the context of public consultations to provide the Commission and the public at large with information about whom and what they represent. The Commission intends to organise consultations of national authorities and targeted stakeholder meetings and expert workshops. In follow-up to this Green Paper and on the basis of the conclusions drawn from the results of this consultation, the Commission will consider the next steps to be taken.
PURPOSE: the presentation of a Green Paper on on-line gambling in the internal market.
BACKGROUND: today, on-line gambling services are widely offered and used in the EU and the economic significance of the sector is growing. The on-line offer is the fastest growing segment of the gambling market, accounting for 7.5% of the annual revenues of the overall gambling market in 2008, and it is expected to double in size by 2013.
At the same time, the regulatory framework applicable to gambling differs significantly across Member States. In view of recent trends, restrictions imposed to online gambling by each Member State can be expected to continue to vary considerably, with the effect that what is, or will become, considered a legal offer in one Member State will continue to be deemed “unlawful” (in that it has not been implicitly or explicitly authorised) in the territory of another Member State.
Since July 2008, Member States have, within a Council Working Party on Establishment and Services, discussed matters of common interest in relation to the gambling sector. Consecutive Presidencies have asked for the European Commission's active participation and detailed consultations. Most recently, all Member States agreed on Council conclusions that welcome a broad consultation by the European Commission on online gambling in the internal market which will allow for an in-depth discussion on issues raised by on-line gambling services in particular. These conclusions (2010) also addressed cooperation between regulatory authorities and noted that the Internal Market Information system could become a useful tool in order to facilitate this administrative cooperation.
This Green Paper also responds to the resolution of the European Parliament (2009) that called on the Commission to study the economic and non-economic effects of the provision of cross-border gambling services in relation to a wide range of issues.
The Commission’s objective is to contribute to the emergence in the Member States of a legal framework for on-line gambling providing for greater legal certainty for all stakeholders . At the end of this process and in light of the responses received, the Commission will report on what appears to be the most appropriate follow-up.
CONTENT: the purpose of this Green paper is to launch an extensive public consultation on all relevant public policy challenges and possible Internal Market issues resulting from the rapid development of both licit and unauthorised on-line gambling offers directed at citizens located in the EU.
There are currently two models of national regulatory framework applied in the field of gambling:
1. based on licensed operators providing services within a strictly regulated framework and
2. the other on a strictly controlled monopoly (state owned or otherwise).
These two models co-existed within the internal market given the relatively limited possibilities of selling gambling services across borders in the past.
The online gambling market is the fastest growing segment of the overall gambling market, with annual revenues in excess of € 6.16bn in 2008. Thus monopolies have often been authorised to develop on-line activities and certain Member States with monopoly regimes have gradually opted for an opening of their on-line gambling and betting market. In summary, the development of internet and the increased supply of on-line gambling services have made it more difficult for the different national regulatory models to co-exist .
Enforcement of national rules is facing many challenges, raising the issue of a possible need for enhanced administrative co-operation between competent national authorities, or for other types of action .
Furthermore, out of 14,823 active gambling sites in Europe more than 85% operated without any licence. In view of the self-evident cross-border impact of this on-line gambling service growth in both its legal and unauthorised dimension, as well as of its nexus with many issues already dealt with by EU legislation, it is the Commission’s intention to exhaust a number of questions related to the effects of, and to the possible public policy responses to, this growth in on-line gambling activity in order to have a full picture of the existing situation, to facilitate the exchange of best practices between Member States and to determine if the differing national regulatory models for gambling can continue to coexist and whether specific action may be needed in the EU for that purpose.
The Commission’s fundamental purpose is to:
collect the facts, assess the stakes and to gather the views of all interested stakeholders on a phenomenon that has multiple dimensions.
Comments are invited on all or some aspects of the document. Specific questions are listed after each section.
Main issues dealt with by the Green Paper: among the key themes raised are the following:
the definition and organisation of on-line gambling services; related services performed and/or used by on-line gambling services providers (questions relating to the promotion of on-line gambling and its regulation: television advertising, written press, on-line marketing, direct marketing, including SMSs, sponsorship); public interest objectives: consumer protection, problem gambling, protection of minors and vulnerable groups; prevention of fraud and money laundering; means of payment and security of on-line systems; cooperation between regulatory authorities.
The consultation and the questions asked focus primarily on on-line gambling, and issues linked to the free movement of services (Article 56 TFEU), due to the well-developed cross-border supply of such services. However, although this consultation does not focus on the freedom of establishment (Article 49 TFEU) a number of questions may also be of direct relevance for other gambling services (offered in "bricks-and-mortar" establishments). The Commission stresses that, in the absence of harmonisation in the field, it is for each Member State to determine in those areas, in accordance with its own scale of values, what is required in order to ensure that the interests in question are protected, in line with the subsidiarity principle.
Member States, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and all other interested parties are invited to submit their views on the suggestions set out in this Green Paper. Contributions should reach the Commission by 31 July 2011 : markt-gambling@ec.europa.eu
Follow-up : contributions will be published on the internet. The Commission asks organisations who wish to submit comments in the context of public consultations to provide the Commission and the public at large with information about whom and what they represent. The Commission intends to organise consultations of national authorities and targeted stakeholder meetings and expert workshops. In follow-up to this Green Paper and on the basis of the conclusions drawn from the results of this consultation, the Commission will consider the next steps to be taken.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0492/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0342/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0342/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE469.976
- Committee opinion: PE467.146
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
- Committee opinion: PE467.022
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
- Committee draft report: PE467.028
- Debate in Council: 3094
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0128
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0128
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0128 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE467.028
- Committee opinion: PE467.022
- Committee opinion: PE467.146
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE469.976
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0342/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
- Contribution: COM(2011)0128
Activities
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Damien ABAD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Jürgen CREUTZMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Louis GRECH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Malcolm HARBOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- María IRIGOYEN PÉREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Online gambling (short presentation)
Amendments | Dossier |
405 |
2011/2084(INI)
2011/06/23
JURI
36 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds the Commission of the importance of the protection of minors and of appropriate measures to avoid gamblers’ problematic behaviour, namely to restrict their access to online gambling;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that the measures proposed in the Green Paper, such as DNS-filtering and IP-blocking, have been qualified by experts as not efficient and as resulting in breaching freedom of opinion;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Welcomes the attempt to find methods to block financial transfers and re- gaining of transfers to companies that are working illegally or in breach of laws;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Asks the Commission to support consumers if they have been affected by illegal practices and offer them legal support;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Welcomes the Commission's statement that different games have different inherent risks and asks for a differentiated regulation;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 f (new) 3f. Asks for minimum standards for consumer protection from online gambling, enabling Member States to have stricter rules;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses, therefore, that a pan-European licensing system needs to be introduced for the provision of online gambling services, with providers required to satisfy conditions to be laid down in this connection before licences are granted, in order to prevent unlawful gambling and tax evasion in Member States;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that whilst Member States' attitudes towards online gambling vary, the sector is an economic activity to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, must apply, but reminds that this might pose risks for consumers, especially when through weaker consumer protection it is competition rules which prevail;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals which will ensure fair tax revenues for the Member States and to clarify to what extent the country of origin principle or the country of destination principle should apply to the provision of online gambling services;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Deplores the fact that no progress has been made on pending infringement cases since 2008
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that organisers of sports competitions and events should receive fair revenues from betting on their competitions and events and that they should be given intellectual property rights over those competitions and events, for example through some form of image right;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to examine whether organisers of sports competitions and events may be given intellectual property rights over their competitions and events;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the lack of action by the Commission is leading to further fragmentation of the internal market and denying consumers access to safe and properly regulated online services; calls, therefore, on the Commission to launch an extensive public consultation on all relevant public policy challenges and on possible internal market issues resulting from the rapid growth in both legal and unlawful online gambling services for EU citizens;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the CEN Workshop Agreement
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that whilst Member States’ attitudes towards online gambling vary, the sector is an economic activity to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, must apply; considers that, in view of the widening use of the Internet and the growth in provision of online gambling services, the coexistence of different regulatory models on national markets presents problems, given that the online gambling market is the fastest growing sector in the overall gambling market;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Is concerned at the increasing number of cases of fraud and corruption in the field of sports betting and urges the Member States to protect competition organisers from any unauthorised commercial exploitation and to make any attempt to undermine the integrity of competitions into a criminal offence, as is already the case in some countries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Reaffirms its position that sports bets are a form of commercial use of sporting competitions, and recommends that the European Commission and Member States protect sporting competitions from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognition of sports bodies' property rights over the competitions they organise, not only to secure a fair financial return for the benefit of all levels of professional and amateur sport, but also as a means to strengthen the fight against match-fixing;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Urges Member States to ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions, including those linked to betting operations;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to bring forward meaningful legislative proposals to provide a legal framework that will create legal certainty for legitimate European businesses and protect consumers
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to bring forward meaningful legislative proposals to provide a legal framework that will create legal certainty for legitimate European businesses and protect consumers
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction, targeting young people in particular;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes the high level of legal uncertainty in the EU online gambling sector, as evidenced by seven preliminary rulings of the European Court of Justice on gambling since June 2010, which leads to a much greater availability of illegal gaming with high risks for consumers;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes th
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes th
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights that Member States have the right to regulate and control their gambling markets in accordance with European internal market legislation and with their traditions and culture;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the European Court of Justice has clarified in recent rulings1 that Member States' regulatory restrictions must be justified, consistent and in line with the legal objectives pursued in order to protect consumers, prevent fraud, avoid high-sum gambling and protect the public order;
source: PE-467.298
2011/07/19
ECON
97 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. recalls the growing economic importance of the on-line gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 6 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008; agrees with the Court of Justice of the European Union that this is an economic activity with specific characteristics; stresses its attachment to compliance with the subsidiarity principle in this sector, as well as the need for stringent binding standards governing the activities of on-line gambling companies to be adopted all Member States;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. expresses concern at the widespread illegal activities within this sector, the resulting growth in harmful economic developments outside it, the social costs in terms of compulsive gambling and organised crime and the economic costs in terms of tax evasion for example;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls that it may be possible to use on-line gambling games to launder money and for other criminal activity;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice, that the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance; although this does not affect the Member States' competence to decide about its specific regulatory approach of Internet gambling and to limit or exclude certain services from being offered to its consumers;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Confirms that it is the Commission’s task, as the guardian of European law, to investigate whether Member States are complying with this legal framework;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. notes that the European Court of Justice has, on several occasions, ruled that on-line gaming is not an economic activity on a par with others, particularly in view of the major risks it involves in terms of public order and health, and that it cannot therefore be governed by the laws of competition alone and is not subject to the principle of mutual recognition;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. stresses that Member States must be able to choose freely between three options: banning on-line gambling and gaming, the introduction or conservation of a national monopoly or controlled deregulation in this sector;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. urges Member States electing to deregulate their on-line gambling and gaming sector to introduce a licensing system based on compliance by operators with stringent specifications under the close and continuous supervision of the authorities;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, the proliferation of offshore operators and the possibility of instantaneously launching and winding up illicit operations, requires that they be dealt with in a coordinated manner at European level;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, requires that they be dealt with in a coordinated manner at European level for regulators and market providers, in particular to assist in identifying and curbing abuse;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. recalls the growing economic importance of the on-line gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 310 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008; agrees with the Court of Justice of the European Union that this is an economic activity with specific characteristics;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, requires that they be dealt with in a coordinated manner at a European
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, requires that they be dealt with in a coordinated manner at European level; calls for more effective cooperation between the Member State authorities, the Commission and Europol, including regular exchanges of information, so as to combat fraud and other criminal activities linked with on-line gambling and gaming; calls on the Commission to extend to the gambling and gaming sector the scope of legislation designed to clamp down on organised crime and money laundering;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, as well as the need to mitigate the social and public risks arising from gambling, requires that they be dealt with and regulated in a coordinated manner at European level;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. stresses that the essential nature of all on-line activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders, requires that they be dealt with in a coordinated manner at European level; observes that the general policies of the Member States on on-line gambling and games of chance must be proportionate and be applied in a consistent and systematic manner, and that national authorities must cooperate more administratively;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Highlights the importance of a common EU wide definition for online gambling as a starting point for any future legislation;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – point a (new) (a) Stresses that, irrespective of the cross- border character of on-line gambling, all action must be based on the European Union’s internal market rules;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – point b (new) (b) Stresses the country-of-origin aspect of consumer protection, with a view to fully protecting consumers’ rights;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally or partially, or maintain a monopoly, as it is their right, according to the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice; notes that a number of the biggest EU- based commercial online gambling operators make the largest part of their revenue in Member States where such a non-discriminatory ban is in place, in clear violation of EU law;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. calls for the introduction of statutory minimum consumer protection standards without prejudice to the right of Member States to adopt more stringent rules;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Notes that a large number of people taking part in gambling are professional gamblers, these people often place large deposits with online gambling websites and rely on the websites as a major if not their sole source of income;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Points to the need to respect the competence of the Member States to regulate gambling services and therefore also the ways gambling services can be promoted and/or advertised;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Notes that, after the many clarifications provided by the Court of Justice in its most recent gambling rulings, there is no basis for the existing infringement cases launched in 2006 and 2007; calls on the Commission to drop these cases;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which requires constant monitoring with cooperation at European and international level for the eradication of illegal operations and means that lawful services must be provided as a system that is coherent across the whole of Europe, especially in terms of tax treatment, and applies common standards of accountability and integrity, necessarily including a set of measures designed to clamp down on illegal activities, compulsive gambling and underage involvement;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which means that an EU legal framework offering lawful services must be provided
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which means that lawful services must be provided as a system that is coherent across the whole of Europe, especially in terms of tax treatment, and applies common standards of accountability and integrity, involving exchanges of best practice between Member States;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which means that lawful services must be provided as a system that is coherent across the whole of Europe
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which means that lawful services must be provided as a system that is coherent across the whole of Europe, especially in terms of tax treatment, and applies common standards of accountability and integrity; stresses that systems should be set up at European Union level to monitor financial transactions and money laundering;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. insists on the need to dissuade players from engaging in illegal gambling, which means that lawful services must be provided as a system that is coherent across the whole of Europe, especially in terms of tax treatment, and applies common standards of accountability and integrity; recommends, in this regard, the establishment of a blacklist of illegal undertakings to be used throughout the Union to block transfers between their bank accounts and accounts held by banks in the Union;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) Insists that more must be done to protect children from the dangers of gambling and in particular the dangers of addiction; suggests industry-funded safeguards and monitoring be considered;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 (new) Is concerned that people engaged in activities on online gambling websites face risk of losing deposits through freezing of sites or their assets; therefore suggests that any future legislation aims to protect deposits in the event that fines or legal proceedings are levied against the websites;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that, in order to engage in on-line gambling, it should be a requirement to open a gambling account, players should be identified in a precise and watertight manner in order to open a gambling account, and financial transactions should be monitored, all of which should be absolute requirements in order to protect gamblers, ensure that systems of gambling bans are effective and prevent under-age gambling, abuses and crime;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level standards or coordinated approaches, where appropriate, in addition to national standards, with regard to preventing gambling addiction and betting fraud and to protecting young people; reaffirms its position that, in as sensitive an area as gambling, industry self-regulation can only complement but not replace statutory legislation; takes note of self-regulatory initiatives taken by public and commercial gambling operators’ associations with regard to responsible gaming and other standards; rejects the idea of making the CEN Workshop Agreement on responsible remote gambling measures, which is non-binding and only reflects the lowest common denominator among commercial online gambling operators, a template for an EU legal framework; rejects the ideas of establishing an “EU Safe Gambling” mark of trust and creating a common EU certification procedure based on these or other voluntary standards as an obvious attempt to circumvent national statutory requirements, especially the requirement for a national licence as confirmed by the Court of Justice;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the importance of transparency in the on-line gambling sector; envisages in this connection annual reporting obligations, which should demonstrate, inter alia, what activities of general interest and/or sports events are financed and/or sponsored by means of proceeds from gambling; calls on the Commission to investigate the possibilities of compulsory annual reporting;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. considers that more effective coordination against illegal sites is also necessary to discourage illicit operations; urges the Commission therefore to consider the possible introduction of interoperable EU standards regarding fraud detection and prevention with a view to improving global market monitoring;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out in particular that spread betting, a form of gambling that is predominantly conducted online and under which consumers may potentially lose many times more than their initial stake, requires very strict conditions for consumer access and should be regulated, as is already the case in a number of Member States, in a comparable way to financial derivatives;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that immediately upon the creation of a gambling account, comprehensive and accurate information must be available concerning gambling games, responsible gambling and opportunities for treatment of dependence on gambling, that gamblers should set themselves monetary limits on expenditure per 24 hours and per month, which should apply to the whole gambling service, and that gamblers should also be protected by limiting incentives and rewards for gambling;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Emphasises the need to address the protection of customer accounts opened in connection with online gambling in the event of the service provider becoming insolvent;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Considers that the various forms of on-line gambling, such as rapid interactive games of chance which have to be played at a frequency of seconds, betting or lotteries in which the draw takes place weekly, differ from one another and require different solutions, because opportunities for abuses are greater in some forms of gambling than in others, and in particular the opportunity for money laundering depends on the strength of identification, the type of game and also the methods of payment used, which makes it necessary in the case of some forms of game to monitor play in real time and exercise stricter control than is the case with others;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the European Union's economic leadership in this area remains uncertain due to the increasing national segmentation of the EU market;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission being involved, so as to develop common standards and take joint action against online gambling companies which operate in one or several Member States without the required national licence for all the games they offer; states that, in particular for combating money laundering, betting fraud and other, often organised, crime, national stand-alone solutions are not successful; points to the discussions in Council as to whether and in what way the Internal Market Information System could contribute to a more effective cooperation between national regulatory bodies;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses that, in order to promote consumer safety, uniform standards should be adopted across the union in terms of the procedures and technology used for geo-location, personal identification and payment systems in connection with online gambling sites;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Considers that, in order to prevent money laundering and abuses, it must be possible to identify players individually without fail even though organising identification adds to operating costs or may reduce turnover;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Considers that it should be rendered impossible to create more than one gambling account per person with the same gambling company by means of an identification procedure, making use for this purpose, for example, of on-line banking ID codes or an infallible electronic identification system based on a bank card or credit card or on some other method;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 f (new) 3f. Takes the view that Member States should designate an authority responsible for monitoring the operations of gambling companies and, if necessary, another authority to which gambling companies should report suspicious incidents, and that these authorities should be given the opportunity, where necessary, to intervene actively in financial transactions;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 g (new) 3g. Considers that cooperation and the adoption of best practices between national supervisory authorities should be promoted and that they should exchange information with the responsible authorities of other Member States in order to prevent abuses and money laundering;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 h (new) 3h. Considers that approval and monitoring by supervisory authorities should focus not only on financial transactions but also on all those subfields of on-line gambling which have interfaces with the prevention of abuses and crime, such as identification systems and risk assessments, and that monitoring procedures and tools should primarily be such that the authority can perform its supervisory duties independently of the operator or of the supplier of the system;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 i (new) 3i. Considers that monitoring of financial transactions should be possible, for example, in such a way that payments to or from a gambling account have to be made using a single bank account or other account registered by the gambler when creating it, the holder of which account must be identifiable;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of on-line gambling represents a threat to the integrity of sport; stresses that keeping sporting events credible and honest is vital to the sports industry as a whole; stresses that betting on sport may pose a risk to the honesty of sport; considers that the European Union must play a more prominent role in safeguarding the integrity of sport, a goal to be pursued by all stakeholders, and therefore considers that fraud connected with betting on sport should be punished in every Member State;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of on-line gambling represents a threat to the integrity of sport; stresses that this development also increases the scope for illegal practices such as match fixing, illegal betting cartels, money laundering and underage betting; stresses that keeping sporting events credible and honest is vital to the sports industry as a whole; considers that the European Union must play a more prominent role in safeguarding the integrity of sport, a goal to be pursued by all stakeholders;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that the revenue from the organisation of many gambling games is based on probability calculations and that in the long term the revenue is therefore certain and may be very great, depending on the way in which the games are organised, so that permits for these games and the ways in which they are organised should be regulated with particular care, and secondly that if the final outcome is not based on probability calculations, for example in the case of betting, an effort should be made to eliminate opportunities to influence the final outcome by means of bribery or other dishonest methods;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of illegal on-line gambling represents a threat to the integrity of sport; stresses that keeping sporting events credible and honest is vital to the sports industry as a whole; considers that the European Union must play a more prominent role in safeguarding the integrity of sport, a goal to be pursued by all stakeholders;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of illegal on-line gambling represents a threat to the integrity of sport; stresses that keeping sporting events credible and honest is vital to the sports industry as a whole; considers that the European Union must play a more prominent role in safeguarding the integrity of sport, a goal to be pursued by all stakeholders;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of illegal on-line gambling can represent
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. takes the view that the proliferation of on-line gambling represents a threat to the
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) Laments recent cases whereby accusations of corruption, such as match fixing, have tainted popular sports at the highest level and suggests circuit breaker rules be investigated based on patterns as well as amounts bet;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 (new) Abhors the fact that illegal and non- licensed gambling websites can enrich criminals and expose sports, governing bodies and athletes to the risk of corruption;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls the growing economic importance of the online gambling industry, notes, however, that the market and other data published in the Green Paper are highly contested estimates and should be checked against data which online gambling operators taking part in the consultation on the Green Paper on online gambling should be requested to provide; agrees with the Court of Justice of the European Union that this is an economic activity with specific characteristics;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. calls, therefore, for the establishment of a European Agency for Integrity and Fair Play in Sport consistent with Articles 6, 83 and 165 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, with a specific remit to promote player education and coordinate action against fraud and corruption in sport by sharing information and expertise and by applying the common definition of offences and sanctions; stresses the need for this agency to cooperate with recognised European and international sports bodies such as FIFA, UEFA and FIBA for an exchange of views on the implementation of successful practices; stresses the need for proven instances of fraud to be swiftly and severely penalised;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls, therefore, for the
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls, therefore, for
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. calls, therefore, for the establishment of
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – point a (new) (a) Considers it a priority to overcome fraud and corruption in sport, and therefore believes that information and know-how should be disseminated and that common rules and punishments should be applied where offences are committed; stresses that to this end there is a need for effective mutual cooperation between parties in the public and private sectors, between the European Commission, Europol and the appropriate institutions of the Member States, and also among undertakings which organise on-line gambling;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The online gambling industry contributes to the EU economy in many ways, notably through sports; this contribution is, however, currently not used to its full potential due to markets restrictions and prohibitions;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. stresses the need for a scientific study of the extent of compulsive gambling at European level, so as to provide objective justification for internal market restrictions designed to protect consumers from addiction and fraud;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Αlso notes that gambling services are services of a particular nature where industry self-regulation and code of conduct are not sufficient; Member States' legislation and existing national standards and procedures are building blocks, not a self-regulatory approach;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reiterates that the Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that cross-border gambling services – including those provided electronically – constitute an economic activity which falls under Article 56 TFEU on freedom to provide services; confirms that restrictions on this freedom to provide cross-border gambling services are justified on the basis of the grounds for exceptions referred to in Articles 51 and 52 TFEU or on the basis of reasons of overriding public interest, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that on-line gambling is a
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. stresses that on-line gambling is a major source of funding for the sports industry; stresses the need to increase substantially the percentage of funding from this sector that is earmarked for amateur sports; recalls that on-line betting is one form of the commercial exploitation of sporting events; calls on the Commission to look at ways in which revenues from sports betting might be routinely used to safeguard the integrity of popular sport and develop it; calls on the Commission to ensure that there is a high level of legal security, particularly regarding application of the
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that on-line gambling is a major source of funding for the sports industry; recalls that on-line betting is one form of the commercial exploitation of sporting events; calls on the Commission to look at ways in which a fair share of revenues from sports betting might be routinely used to safeguard the integrity of popular sport and develop it, in particular by fostering grassroots sport; calls on the Commission to ensure that there is a high level of legal security, particularly regarding application of the rules on state aid;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. stresses that on-line gambling is a major source of funding for
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. stresses that on-line gambling is a major source of funding for the sports industry; recalls that
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. stresses that on-line gambling is a major source of funding for the sports industry; recalls that on-line betting is one form of the commercial exploitation of sporting events; calls on the Commission to look at ways in which revenues from sports betting might be routinely used to safeguard the integrity of popular sport and develop it; calls on the Commission to ensure that there is a high level of legal security, particularly regarding application of the rules on state aid
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that Member States have the right to exclude private profit-making interests from the gambling sector and may restrict the operation of gambling to public or charitable bodies;
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that measures against the illegal on-line gambling market should be stepped up; is convinced that, in view of the international character of on-line gambling services, structural cooperation between national regulators is of crucial importance;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that solid registration and verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, such as money laundering; identity verification can take advantage of already existing and developing online structures, such as bank and credit card online verification systems;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. stresses that on-line gambling and gaming involve greater risks than traditional gambling and gaming and that measures must be taken at European level to clamp down on illicit operations, prevent compulsive gambling, protect minors and combat the spread of crime, as well as preserving the integrity of sport,
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that, in many Member States, gambling is an important source of funding for good causes, such as cultural and charitable organisations, including those that address the social costs of gambling, and that the Commission should ensure that such funding is not undermined by any future legislation relating to on-line gambling in the Union;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that it is an absolute necessity to prevent any player from creating more than one gaming account per company;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Insists that a registration process needs to include, as a mandatory feature and set and defined by the player, maximum loss limits covering a certain time period; at minimum level this feature must be present in games with short event frequence;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Stresses that in order to prevent problem gambling, operators need to offer concrete and practical tools for the player so that all the players are able to control gambling;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Takes the view that all the online gambling companies operating in the EU area need to be registered as legitimate entities in the EU;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Stresses that all the Member States have to identify and designate the responsible public authority in charge of monitoring online gambling; the authority will also be authorised to intervene should any suspicious online gambling appear; gaming companies should also be required to inform the authority about any suspicious gaming activity;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6f. Emphasises the need for close cooperation between national and EU authorities in preventing any criminal activity and problem gambling;
source: PE-469.887
2011/09/08
IMCO
272 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union1, __________________ 1 In particular the judgments in the following cases: Schindler 1994 (C- 275/92), Gebhard 1995 (C-55/94), Läärä 1999 (C-124/97), Zenatti 1999 (C-67/98), Anomar 2003 (C-6/01), Gambelli 2003 (C- 243/01), Lindman 2003 (C-42/02), Fixtures Marketing Ltd v OPAP 2004 (C-444/02), Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Svenska Spel AB 2004 (C-338/02), Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Oy Veikkaus Ab 2005 (C-46/02), Stauffer 2006 (C-386/04), Unibet 2007 (C-432/05), Placanica and others 2007 (C-338/04, C- 359/04 and C-360/04), Kommission v Italien 2007 (C-206/04), Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional 2009 (C-42/07), Ladbrokes 2010 (C-258/08), Sporting Exchange 2010 (C-203/08), Sjöberg and Gerdin 2010 (C-447/08 and C-448/08), Markus Stoß and others 2010 (C-316/07, C-358/07, C-359/07, C-360/07, C-409/07 and C-410/07), Carmen Media 2010 (C- 46/08)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice12, that the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice12, that the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance, not a separate market;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the gambling sector has been very much shaped by the Member States' different traditions and cultures and that gambling markets are very differently regulated, giving the subsidiarity principle a particularly important role in this sector; notes however that Member States must comply with the rules of the internal market;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the gambling sector has been very much shaped by the Member States' different traditions and cultures and that gambling markets are very differently regulated, giving the subsidiarity principle a particularly important role in this sector; notes, nonetheless, that the Member States are obliged to abide by internal market rules, as is illustrated by the fact that infringement proceedings are in progress against seven Member States;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that the gambling sector has been very much shaped by the Member States' different traditions and cultures and that gambling markets are very differently regulated, giving the subsidiarity principle a particularly important role in this sector; believes, however, that taking an EU regulated approach in the field of online gambling which respects the principle of subsidiarity as well as that of proportionality is the best way forward;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the European Commission to expand its enquiry to cover traditional physical gambling distribution channels as well as the online gambling distribution channel;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive,
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive, legal gambling offerings on the Internet could considerably rein in the
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive, legal gambling offerings on the Internet
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive, legal licensed gambling offerings on both the Internet and on traditional physical gambling channels could considerably rein in the unlicensed black market and also increase government revenue;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive, legal gambling offerings on the Internet could
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is of the opinion that attractive, legal gambling offerings on the Internet could
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognizes however the consistent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union emphasizing that national controls should be enacted and applied in a consistent, proportionate and non-discriminatory manner;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether a proposal might be feasible which will ensure fair tax revenues for the Member States and will clarify to what extent the country-of-origin principle or the country-of-destination principle should apply to the provision of online gambling services;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling market, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some sectors, the added value of a uniform European approach
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire online gambling
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling market
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire online gambling
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire online gambling
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling market, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some sectors, such as administrative cooperation, application of the law, information sharing and cooperation on consumer protection, a uniform European approach would be appropriate;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire on-line gambling market, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some sectors,
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that the disadvantages which emanate from an unregulated gambling market are greater than those which emerge from a more regulated and uniform one; Stresses that any action plan for improving the online gambling environment must ensure that extra precautions are taken to meet the challenges posed by the internet and the digital age in terms of player protection and privacy, payment security and data protection of individuals engaged in internet gambling and that fair competition for licensed operators which in turn will boost the online economy, consumer choice and product awareness is guaranteed;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Re
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of Member States to ban Internet gambling totally
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Respects the decision by a number of
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the European Court of Justice has accepted in a number of rulings that granting exclusive rights to a single operator subject to tight public- authority control may be a means of improving consumers’ protection against fraud and combating crime in the online gambling sector more effectively;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that, on the one hand, providers of online gambling should in all cases respect the national laws of the countries in which those games operate and, on the other hand, Member States should retain the exclusive right to impose all the measures they deem necessary to address illegal online gambling in order to implement national legislation and exclude illegal providers from market access;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling market is growing constantly, and European operators leading international technology and development in gaming,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that, before any restrictions are placed on the free provision of on-line gambling services, due consideration must be given to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the proportionality requirements that it lays down; notes that restrictions on the free provision of gambling services are justifiable in cases where they are essential in order to protect consumers, maintain public order and prevent gambling from being a source of private profit; notes that restrictions on gambling services must be applied without discrimination and proportionately;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that, before any restrictions are placed on the free provision of on-line gambling services, due consideration must be given to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the proportionality requirements that it lays down; notes that restrictions on the free provision of gambling services are justifiable in cases where they are essential in order to protect consumers, maintain public order and prevent gambling from being a source of private profit; notes that restrictions on gambling services must be applied without discrimination and proportionately;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggest, in this instance, to the Member States that they introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for any European gambling provider meeting the conditions imposed by Member States to apply for a licence and which avoids additional administrative burdens by avoiding the duplication of requirements and controls;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggest, in this instance, to the Member States that they introduce a licensing
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists,
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; notes that Members States should cut red tape, introduce new gambling products and services and establish consultation-based supervision arrangements; suggest, in this instance, to the Member States that they introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for any European gambling provider meeting the conditions imposed by Member States to apply for a licence; draws attention to the need to introduce electronic certification and rating schemes with a view to reducing the risk of consumer fraud;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas gambling services fall under Article 56 TFEU and are thus covered by the rules on the provision of services,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; notes that Members States should cut red tape, introduce new gambling products and services and establish consultation-based supervision arrangements; suggest, in this instance, to the Member States that they introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for any European gambling provider meeting the conditions imposed by Member States to apply for a licence; draws attention to the need to introduce electronic certification and rating schemes with a view to reducing the risk of consumer fraud;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Insists, however, that Member States which open up the Internet gambling market must ensure complete transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggests, in this instance, to the Member States that they introduce
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply, but that nevertheless, in keeping with the internal market, simplified licence application procedures should be set up
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas according to ECJ jurisprudence (C-275/92 Schindler, C- 124/97 Laara, C-67/98 Zenatti), the provision of gambling is a service within the meaning of Article 56 TFEU,
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of automatic mutual recognition of
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply, but that nevertheless, in keeping with the internal
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that currently the principle of mutual recognition of licences on the gambling market does not apply, but that nevertheless, in keeping with the internal market, simplified licence application procedures should be set up in some Member States;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level minimum standards with regard to preventing gambling addiction and
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to explore all possible avenues for introducing - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ -
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, in application of the principle of subsidiarity, there is no specific European legislative act regulating Internet gambling,
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls – in keeping with the
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level minimum standards with regard to preventing gambling addiction and betting fraud and to protecting young people and vulnerable individuals; states that, where a provider complies with those minimum standards, the other Member States should recognise this accordingly, but may set further conditions; is of the opinion that a pan-
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls - in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ - for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level minimum standards with regard to preventing gambling addiction and betting fraud and to protecting young people and other vulnerable groups; states that, where a provider complies with those minimum standards, the other Member States should recognise this accordingly, but may set further conditions; is of the opinion that a pan-
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls – in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ – for a common regulatory framework laying down binding high-level
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that more action should be taken by Member States to prevent illegal gambling providers to offer their services online, for example by blacklisting illegal gambling providers to pressure banks and credit card companies not to allow any transaction between their clients and the illegal gambling providers;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes the view that a pan-European code of conduct for Internet gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer; Considers that this Code of Conduct should help to ensure responsible gaming, a high level of protection for players, particularly in the case of minors and other vulnerable persons, support mechanisms both at EU and national level that fight cyber crime, fraud and misleading advertisement and ultimately provide a framework of principles and rules which ensures that consumers are protected evenly across the EU;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, should no other agreement be reached, to
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas gambling services are subject to a number of EU acts such as the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Distance Selling Directive, the Anti- Money Laundering Directive, the Data Protection Directive, the Directive on privacy and electronic communication, and the Directive on the common system of value added tax,
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission,
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, should no other agreement be reached, to propose a
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, should no other agreement be reached, to propose a
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, should no other agreement be reached, to propose a directive on
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, should no other agreement be reached, to propose a directive on minimum standards; states that, if necessary, thought should be given to stepped-up cooperation between Member States; to create a more uniform approach to gambling legislation, pending proposals from the Commission;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission a
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in concert, to carry out effective checks on compliance with the conditions set by Member States
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in concert, to carry out effective checks on compliance with the conditions set by Member States and to penalise infringements by imposing financial penalties;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in concert, to carry out effective checks on compliance with the conditions set by Member States and to penalise infringements by imposing financial penalties;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the Commission should, therefore, investigate whether a pan- European licensing system could be introduced for the provision of online gambling services, with providers required to satisfy conditions to be laid down in this connection before licences are granted, and with no discrimination being permitted, in order to prevent unlawful gambling and tax evasion in Member States,
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point 1 (new) (1) Respects the right of the Member States to draw on repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point a (new) (a) Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; calls to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers at EU level, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for a national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Urges the Commission to continue its investigation in the possible inconsistencies of Member States gambling legislation (offline and online) with the TFEU and – if necessary – to pursue those infringement proceedings that are pending since 2008 to ensure that consistency;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 12 (new) - 12. Takes the view that this regulated area should include amongst others: 1) An EU system created for proper and transparent application of the practice of non-duplication of controls and requirements for operators wishing to provide their services in another Member State; 2) Uniform safety mechanisms ensuring that consumers have access to safe and quality products in a regulated European gambling market; 3) Pan-European measures for strong and effective protection against underage gambling, compulsive gambling, misleading advertisement, money laundering and fraud;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is concerned at the possible emerging fragmentation of the European on-line gambling market, which will counter the setting-up of legal gambling offerings in smaller Member States in particular;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Reminds the Commission as “guardian of the treaties” of its duty to swiftly act upon reception of complaints of violations of the freedoms enshrined in the Treaties; calls on the Commission therefore to urgently and systematically pursue existing and new infringement cases:
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the Council conclusions of 10 December 2010 and the progress reports of the French, Swedish, Spanish and Hungarian Council Presidencies on the framework for gambling and betting in the EU Member States,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Considers that the fragmentation in the gambling sector requires a European legislative solution and that therefore legislative action at national level is insufficient; Is of the opinion that targeted regulation could form the basis of this European solution for ensuring legitimacy of the provision of services and consumer and player protection within the gambling market;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, giving them a sufficient remit, with the Commission as coordinator, so as to develop common standards and take joint action against the unregulated black market; states that, in particular for identifying gamblers and combating money laundering, national standalone solutions are not successful; states that the Gaming Regulators European Forum (GREF) network, the European Regulatory Platform and the Internal Market Information System could serve as the basis for this;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission as coordinator, so as to develop common standards and take joint action against the
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. C
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission as
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission as coordinator, so as to develop common standards, exchange good practices and take joint action against the unregulated black
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls therefore for cooperation between national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, with the Commission
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls for more effective methods of combating crime and money laundering; recommends that passive retention of money in gambling accounts should be banned;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a fourth Money Laundering Directive, which would apply to all on-line gambling services;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Is of the opinion that in order to effectively prevent children's problem gambling, customer's age verification needs to be done during a strong identification and verification process before any gaming (including free or play money) activities;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Urges, in this context, the adoption of common standards to protect persons under the age of 18, entailing the imposition of mandatory restrictions on financial transactions conducted using payment facilities, on the basis of information regarding the customer's identity (the blocking of transfers from accounts or payment cards belonging to persons under the age of 18), and on transfers of funds between gambling accounts on Internet sites hosting on-line gambling, as well as other measures;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Urges, in this context, the adoption of common standards legally requiring operators to place notices on on-line gambling sites stating that it is illegal for persons under the age of 18 to gamble, to provide information on high-risk behaviour and compulsive gambling and to provide links to national specialist advice bodies and to healthcare institutions offering treatment for compulsive gambling;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to collect and publish statistics on Internet gambling markets and gambling addiction in the EU; calls for effective methods to be used to tackle problem gambling, inter alia by means of gambling bans and compulsory limits on expenditure over a particular period, albeit set by the customer himself; stresses that, in addition, if an expenditure limit can be raised, a time lag should apply before this takes effect;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to collect and publish statistics on Internet gambling markets and gambling addiction in the EU; underlines the need for statistics from independent sources particular concerning gambling addiction.
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to collect and publish statistics on
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to focus on research examining the incidence, formation and treatment of gambling addiction, to collect and publish statistics on Internet gambling markets and gambling addiction in the EU;
Amendment 218 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of studies already conducted in this field and furthermore collect and publish
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls, at the same time, on national regulatory bodies to cooperate with the Commission in conducting a preliminary comparative economic and legal study of the situation in individual EU Member States that examines the impact of on-line gambling on public health, budgets and the rights of third persons (in particular co-dependents and creditors);
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Recalls that Member States have the right to exclude private profit-making interests from the gambling sector and may restrict the operation of gambling to public or charitable bodies;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to review Directive 2005/60/EC1 on money laundering with a view to extending its scope to encompass all Internet betting and gambling
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Observes that, according to a recently published study2, the gambling market was identified as the sector where the lack of an alternative dispute resolution system most frequently makes itself felt; suggests, therefore, that national regulatory agencies could establish alternative dispute resolution systems for the on-line gambling sector;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Recommends the introduction of pan-European uniform minimum standards of electronic identification; considers that registration should be performed in such a way that the player’s identity is established and at the same time it is ensured that the player has at his disposal a maximum of one gambling account per gambling company;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Draws attention to the direct costs borne by health systems in connection with the treatment of compulsive gambling, and therefore calls on Member States to provide specialist follow-up outpatient treatment in order to reduce as much as possible the rate of relapse into gambling addiction;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Reminds the Commission once again of the importance of lottery funding for sports and food causes and urges it to propose measures to secure this societal function; in this respect also recalls the Council Conclusions of 10 December 2010;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Gambling and sport: the need to ensure integrity
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Gambling and sport, charity and the general interest
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that betting on, in particular, minor-sports competitions may represent a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the view that
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that illegal betting on, in particular, minor-sports competitions may represent a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the view that common definitions of sport fraud and betting fraud should be drawn up and that such fraud should be penalised throughout Europe;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that betting on
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that betting on, in particular,
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that betting on, in particular, minor-sports competitions may represent a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the view that sport fraud and betting fraud should be penalised throughout Europe; calls on the Member States to class such cases of fraud as criminal offences so as to punish effectively the manipulation of betting and sports results;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that betting on
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers, therefore, that a uniform definition of sports fraud should be set at European level and included in the criminal law of all Member States;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Stresses the importance of education in sports and urges Member States and sports federations to ensure that rules on sports betting are in place and that players both at professional and amateur levels are fully informed;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Reaffirms its position that sports bets are a form of commercial use of sporting competitions, and recommends that the European Commission and Member States protect sporting competitions from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by setting up a system for acquiring betting rights and by recognising sports bodies’ property rights over the competitions they organise, not only to secure a fair financial return for the benefit of all levels of professional and amateur sport, but also as a means to strengthen the fight against sports fraud, particularly match-fixing;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to supply legal offerings on a cross-border basis, but also
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses the importance of education in sport and calls on Member States and sports federations to ensure that rules governing sports betting are introduced and that both professional and amateur sports persons are fully apprised of those rules;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Notes that several European countries already adopted strict legislation against money laundering through sport betting, sport fraud (classifying it as a specific and criminal offence) and conflicts of interests between betting operators and sport clubs, teams or active athletes;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. expresses its concerns over the links between criminal organisations and the development of match-fixing in relation to online betting, the resulting profits of which feed other criminal activities;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers stronger safeguards against the risks of on-line betting and gambling to be an essential part of protecting the integrity of sport; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to propose ways of raising the awareness of sportspeople and consumers of all ages and at all levels (both amateur and professional) from their childhood;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. notes that online operators licensed in the EU already play a role in identifying potential instances of corruption in sports;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to investigate how organisers of sports competitions and events can receive fair revenues from betting on their competitions and events, in which connection they should be given intellectual property rights over those competitions and events, for example through some form of image right;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Urges close cooperation between judicial authorities in Member States and sporting organisations to enable information to be passed on regularly and in an effective manner;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls for instruments to increase cross-border police and judicial cooperation and, at the same time, for a framework for cooperation with organisers of sports competitions to be considered with a view to facilitating the exchange of information between sports disciplinary bodies and state investigation and prosecution agencies, by setting up, for example, dedicated national networks and contact points to deal with cases of match-fixing;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Invites Member States and the European Commission to facilitate police cooperation involving all Member States' competent authorities in relation, in particular, to the prevention, detection and investigations of match-fixing in connection to sport battings;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to supply legal offerings on a cross-border basis, but also makes it virtually impossible to protect consumers and combat the crime associated with gambling at the European level,
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Urges Member States to ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial gain or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions, including those linked to betting operations;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Encourages Member States and the European Commission to facilitate judicial cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to match-fixing; in this respect, invites Member States to consider dedicated prosecution services with primary responsibility for investigating match-fixing cases;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 d (new) Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is aware of the importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport charity purposes and purposes of general interest in the Member States; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore not lead to a reduction in sports funding and charity activities;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is aware of the particular importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is aware of the importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport in the Member States; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore not lead to a reduction in sports funding; considers that alternative financing arrangements involving sports betting operators should be studied; calls for balanced solutions – beneficial for both betting providers and sport as a whole – to be found;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is aware of the importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport in the Member States; takes the view that such revenue should be allocated first and foremost to less wealthy sports federations, to non- professional sports and to measures to promote sport in schools and provide support for disabled persons; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is aware of the importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport in the Member States; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore not lead to a reduction in sports funding or in funding for programmes focusing on the prevention and treatment of problem and pathological gambling and on research;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibilities for an independently functioning model of financing sports with the least burden on the gaming industry to ensure a sustainable funding model for sports events;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers it indispensable to recognise that organisers of sports competitions hold property rights over their competitions, with a view to protecting them against any unauthorised commercial use thereof by on-line gambling operators and to guaranteeing their right to a fair financial return on the profits made by these operators;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Highlight the need to recognize that the organizers of horse racing events own the rights to information databases on the races they organise.
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Stresses that the conclusion of legally binding agreements between organisers of sports competitions and on-line gambling operators would ensure a more balanced relationship between them.
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Recognize the need to pay attention to the specific preconditions of the trotting and thoroughbred racing sports that differentiates them from other sports subject to betting. National traditions and the trotting and thoroughbred racing sports’ unique preconditions require that possible EU level actions in the field of gambling are flexible enough to allow for national solutions utilising the Pari Mutuel Model and solutions that make provision for a viable sport in Europe.
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points to the need for pragmatic solutions with regard to advertising for, and sponsoring of, sports events by Internet gambling providers; is of the opinion that common advertising standards should be adopted which sufficiently protect on the one hand vulnerable consumers but on the other hand also regulated markets, but at the same time
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points to the need
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points to the
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points to the need for pragmatic solutions with regard to advertising for, and sponsoring of, sports events by Internet gambling providers; is of the opinion that common advertising standards should be adopted which sufficiently protect vulnerable consumers
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points to the need for pragmatic solutions with regard to advertising for, and sponsoring of, sports events by Internet
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 1 (new) Considers, at the same time, that advertising of gambling poses a problem in that it increases supply and stimulates consumption, thereby increasing the risk of addiction; recommends, therefore, that explicit warnings on the dangers of compulsive gambling be included in such advertisements;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 2 (new) Expresses its concern at the presence of advertisements for on-line loans on Internet gambling sites; recommends, therefore, restricting access to such on- line loans;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to work with all sports stakeholders with a view to identifying the appropriate mechanisms necessary to preserve the integrity of sports and the funding of grassroots sports;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to supply legal offerings on a cross-border basis, but also makes it virtually impossible to protect consumers, stop people from using the Internet anonymously for unlawful purposes and combat the crime associated with gambling,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to supply legal offerings on a cross-border basis, but also makes it virtually impossible to protect consumers, stop people from using the Internet anonymously for unlawful purposes and combat the crime associated with gambling,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the Council conclusions of 10 December 2010 and the progress reports of the French, Swedish, Spanish and Hungarian Council Presidencies on the framework for gambling and betting in the EU Member States,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas pan-European uniform minimum standards
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the value added by a pan- European
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas pan-European uniform minimum standards
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services, but Internet gambling was
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 8 May 2008 on the White Paper on Sport,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the many treaty infringement proceedings and European Court of Justice judgments
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there have been many treaty infringement proce
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas gambling is an economic activity to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, apply; while restrictive measures imposed by Member States must be justified, appropriate, proportionate and necessary as laid down by the case-law of the Court of Justice,
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting involve
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers than traditional
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 8 May 2008 on the White Paper on Sport,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting, if not properly regulated, involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers than traditional physical, location-
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting involve a
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting are liable to undermine the principle of equality among both sportspeople and the gamblers and betters, and involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers than traditional physical, location-
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting involve a greater risk of addition and dangers than traditional physical, location- based gambling; whereas a one-size fits all approach is not suitable for the wide range of different games and not only the type of the game but also the specific design shall be taken into account,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Internet gambling and betting
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas consumers must be educated about potential harm of Internet gambling and protected against dangers in this area, especially addiction, fraud, scam and underage gambling,
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the latest authoritative theories on compulsive gambling assert that the availability and accessibility of gambling services are – alongside an individual's personal inclinations – important factors in the formation of an addiction,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) – having regard to the Commission communication of 6 June 2011 entitled ‘Fighting corruption in the EU’,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue for the Member States,
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas traditional gambling represents a considerable source of revenue for the Member States, for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes and for the funding of sport,
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue for the Member States, for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes and for the funding of sport; whereas, however, the need to maintain the flow of such revenue is not a valid reason for placing restrictions on the provision of gambling services,
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is essential to ensure the integrity of sport
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is essential to ensure the integrity of sport and prevent further betting fraud, while ensuring a fair financial return for the sports and racing industries,
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas the organisers of sporting competitions, who have primary responsibility for the funding of sport and the fight against sports fraud, must be granted the right to a fair financial return on the profits made by the operators of online gambling services connected with those competitions,
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas it is essential for Member States to combat illegal gambling providers effectively in order to regulate online gambling,
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas, in order to achieve these objectives, it is essential to introduce mechanisms for scrutinising sports competitions and financial flows, along with common supervisory mechanisms at the EU level,
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas international-level cooperation among all stakeholders (institutions, sports federations and betting operators) is also crucial with a view to pooling good practices,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) – having regard to the Commission communication of 18 January 2011 entitled ‘Developing the European Dimension in Sport’,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) Ia. Welcomes the Commission’s change at heart to enter into a real political dialogue with the Council and the Parliament; welcomes the Commission’s clarification that this political process initiated by the Green Paper is by no means aimed at the deregulation/liberalisation of online gambling; welcomes that the Green Paper takes into account the European Parliament’s clear and standing position on gambling; deplores that the Commission does not close the existing infringement cases,
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling, which will facilitate pragmatic and realistic consideration of the future of this sector in Europe;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 1 (new) -1. Welcomes the Commission’s clarification of the fact that the political process initiated by means of the Green Paper is in no way aimed at deregulating/liberalising online gambling;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Takes the view that efficient regulation
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Takes the view that efficient regulation of the Internet gambling
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Takes the view that efficient regulation by the Member States of the Internet gambling market should in particular:
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Takes the view that efficient regulation
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Takes the view that efficient regulation of the Internet gambling
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 1 (1) channel the natural gaming instinct of the population by restricting a
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) contain the illegal
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling market is growing constantly, and whereas this sector is unlike other markets on account the risks involved in terms of consumer protection and the fight against organised crime, as the CJEU has acknowledged on more than one occasion,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) co
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) co
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) guarantee effective protection for young people
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) guarantee effective protection for young people and vulnerable gamblers,
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) guarantee effective protection for young people and gamblers, in particular vulnerable people,
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) guarantee effective protection for
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) preclude risks of gambling addiction by requiring all operators to observe a certain number of principles: for example, the prohibition of gambling on credit, the capping of potential loss at the amount of the bet, and a ban on rewarding gamblers for the number of bets they place, and
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) preclude risks of gambling addiction, particularly by introducing the possibility of voluntary exclusion from Internet gambling sites Europe wide, and
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) should ensure that gambling is
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) that
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Internet gambling
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) that
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) that risks to the integrity of sporting competition are
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) (6a) that part of the value of bets goes to sports and horse-racing bodies, and
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 7 (
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 7 (7) that a considerable proportion of government revenue from gambling is used for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes, including for the prevention and treatment of compulsive gambling, the costs of which are currently covered by public health insurance;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 7 (7) that a
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) (7a) that gaming is kept free from crime, fraud and any form of money laundering;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Sees such regulation as having the potential to ensure that sports competitions are attractive to consumers and to the public, that sports results remain credible and that the competitions retain their prestige;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice12, that the
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice12, that the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance; although this does not affect the Member states competence to decide about its specific regulatory approach of Internet gambling and to limit or exclude certain services from being offered to its consumers;
source: PE-469.976
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdf |
events/4/date |
Old
2011-10-14T00:00:00New
2011-10-13T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.028New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-467028_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.022&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-467022_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.146&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-467146_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.976New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-469976_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0342_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0342_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111114&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-11-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-342&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0342_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-342&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0342_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-492New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0492_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/05951New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Online gambling in the Internal MarketNew
Online gambling in the internal market |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0128:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0128:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0128/COM_COM(2011)0128_EN.pdf |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/3/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|