Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana ( S&D) | TSOUKALAS Ioannis A. ( PPE), ROHDE Jens ( ALDE), ANDERSDOTTER Amelia ( Verts/ALE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | SCHAAKE Marietje ( ALDE) | Marie-Christine VERGIAT ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | CAVADA Jean-Marie ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | PITTELLA Gianni ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution in response to the Commission communication on a competitive digital single market – eGovernment as a spearhead.
Recognising the contribution and overarching role of the ISA programme in defining, promoting and supporting the implementation of interoperability solutions and frameworks for European public administrations, the resolution Stresses that the European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015 represents a unique opportunity to modernise and reduce the costs of European and national public administrations . It underlines the importance of public-private partnerships and the role of the private sector in providing innovative solutions, applications and services for the development of interoperable e-Government infrastructure in the EU and in leveraging the available resources.
Parliament underlines the importance of R&D and innovation in developing and improving crossborder services and calls for support for ‘light and fast’ access to EU R&D funds for ICT, as well as for an increase in the financial allocations for crossborder eGovernment services and infrastructure for 2014-2020.
(1) eGovernment Action Plan : Parliament welcomes the adoption of the European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015, the European Interoperability Strategy (EIS) and the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services (EPS). It calls on the Member States to take rapid action to align their national strategies to these overarching policies.
The resolution supports the overall targets for increased use of eGovernment services in 2015, i.e. 50 % of citizens (up from 41 %) and 80 % of businesses (up from 75 %), but calls on the Commission and Member States to consider these targets as minimum thresholds. It calls for the special programmes and eGovernment platforms to be developed with the aim of protecting and promoting local, regional, ethnic and linguistic diversity. Parliament underlines that the internet is increasingly used on mobile devices by both citizens and enterprises, and calls for action to ensure that eGovernment services are accessible and adapted to multiple channels of delivery, including call centres and the mobile internet (m-government).
Parliament considers that in order to ensure effective EU-wide crossborder eGovernment services providing two-way and/or automated interaction between administrations and citizens and/or businesses, there needs to be a clear and coherent EU legal framework for the mutual recognition of eAuthentication, eIdentification and eSignatures . It points out that there is still no clear definition of the term ‘public administrative data’ and that, with a view to clarifying its precise meaning, a common understanding must be reached by means of public discussion. It calls for adequate measures to be put in place to ensure data and privacy protection and minimise vulnerability to cyber-attacks .
Member States are called upon to:
continuously inform citizens about the existing EU portals , such as SOLVIT and Your Europe, as the current lack of information is delaying further development of the business environment and consumer protection arrangements, especially in cross-border areas; develop open educational software at European educational institutions, to exchange best practice, and to develop online platforms for collaboration on educational materials and resources that are free for students and take due account of data protection and copyright rules; make use of ICT tools to improve transparency, accountability and citizen involvement, increase efficiency and competitiveness, reduce administrative burdens, time and costs, improve administrative processes, reduce carbon emissions, save public resources, and contribute to a more participatory democracy while building up trust and confidence; oblige public entities to make data available by maintaining repositories and catalogues of public data and ensuring that rules for disclosure and reuse are established, taking due account of copyright law and the law on the protection of databases; implement ‘ one-stop shops’ and make use of intermediary actors, with a view to providing a seamless, integrated and easily accessible system of contact points for users, for both domestic and cross-border eGovernment services.
Parliament recognises the major potential of cloud computing , for businesses and private citizens alike. However, it stresses that with the increased use of cloud services, supervision of the relocation of IT resources and strict control of access to servers and data are required, inter alia in order to prevent unauthorised commercial use by other parties, and that as a consequence these issues should be dealt with in the reform of the EU data protection rules as proposed by the Commission ( COM(2012)0011 and COM(2012)0010 ).
Recalling the key commitment to reduce both digital literacy gaps and competence gaps by half by 2015 , Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to launch digital training programmes to promote the full use of eGovernment services, reinforce digital literacy and overcome the e-barriers affecting SMEs and disadvantaged sectors of the population such as older people, persons with disabilities, minorities, immigrants, the unemployed and those living in remote areas of the Union. To this extent, e-learning should be incorporated into national education and training policies.
(2) eProcurement : the resolution emphasises that in the EU-27 public expenditure represents 16 % of GDP, and urges the use of eProcurement for all public procurement by 2015. It calls for the use of eProcurement also for concessions. Members regret the fact that in 2010 only 13 % of EU enterprises used the internet to submit a proposal to public authorities through a public electronic tender system. They call on the Member States to encourage the participation of SMEs in eProcurement .
The Commission is called upon to: (i) submit the White Paper on interconnecting eProcurement capacity in the EU – ‘A strategy for eProcurement’; (ii) introduce an implementation monitoring mechanism to review progress, barriers, corrective action, etc, in the context of the introduction of eProcurement in the Member States; (iii) set an example to all by implementing the eProcurement system in all its organs.
(3) eInvoicing : underlining the substantial benefits offered by eInvoicing, Parliament welcomes the eInvoicing Initiative , which aims to make eInvoicing the predominant method of invoicing in the EU by 2020. It stresses the importance of legal certainty, a clear technical environment and open and interoperable eInvoicing solutions, based on common legal requirements, business processes and technical standards in order to facilitate mass adoption. It invites industry and the European standardisation organisations to continue their efforts to promote convergence towards a common eInvoice data model.
Members underline the importance of ‘one-stop-shops’ for VAT in order to facilitate cross-border e-commerce for SMEs and promote e-invoicing and welcome the new VAT rules as regards eInvoicing, which introduce equal treatment as between paper and eInvoices. They consider that consumers with limited access to the internet or none at all should not be left behind, and that consumers should always be allowed to receive paper invoices.
The Commission called upon to undertake an annual assessment of the goals of the Digital Agenda , especially those related to the eGovernment Action Plan, and to report to Parliament on a yearly basis.
This Communication introduces the European Interoperability Strategy (EIS) and the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services, two key elements in the Digital Agenda, which stresses the need for European public administrations to provide efficient, effective cross-border eGovernment services. Together, the Framework and the Strategy promote interoperability among public administrations.
The Communication lays out the challenges to be met , noting that Member States setting up ICT-supported national public services need to be more aware of the risk of creating new electronic barriers if they opt for solutions that are not interoperable. Such ebarriers fragment the internal market and hinder it from functioning properly. Without ICT-supported European public services and collaboration among public administrations, citizens are obliged to contact, or even to travel to, public administrations abroad to deliver or collect information or documents they need to work, study or travel within the EU. The same applies to businesses that want to establish themselves in more than one Member State . Delivering European public services to European citizens and businesses will be difficult, if not impossible, without interoperability among European public administrations.
The Interoperable Delivery of European eGovernment Services to public Administrations, Businesses and Citizens (IDABC) established by Decision No 2004/387/EC, has achieved significant results. The final evaluation of the IDABC programme concluded that a coordinated approach can contribute to delivering better results by means of shared solutions operated in cooperation with Member States. The Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) programme ( Decision No 922/2009/EC ), which succeeds the IDABC programme that came to an end in 2009, lays even more emphasis on the relevance of interoperability and collaboration to implement EU legislation successfully.
Proposed Actions
The European Interoperability Strategy (EIS) for European public services sets out a common approach to interoperability, aiming to foster European public service delivery by 2015 through:
appropriate governance organisation and processes in line with EU policies and objectives; trusted information exchange enabled by commonly agreed interoperability initiatives, including completion of the legal environment, development of interoperability frameworks, and agreements on interoperability standards and rules.
To achieve this, activities at EU and Member State level should be coordinated and interoperability governance at EU level should be established.
The strategy clusters future interoperability activities under three headings: (i) trusted information exchange; (ii) interoperability architecture; (iii) assessment of the ICT implications of new EU legislation.
These activities are to be supported by accompanying measures on awareness-raising and sharing of best practice.
The European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services specifies common elements such as vocabulary, concepts, principles, policies, guidelines, recommendations, standards, specifications and practices. It is conceptual model for developing European public services, presenting a building block approach to constructing them, allowing service components to be interconnected, and promoting the reuse of information, concepts, patterns, solutions, and specifications in Member States and at European level. It introduces:
12 underlying principles summarising the expectations of public administrations, business and citizens regarding the delivery of public services; a conceptual model for public services, structuring the design of European public services and highlighting why and where interoperability is necessary; four levels of interoperability: legal, organisational, semantic and technical; the concept of interoperability agreements, based on standards and open platforms.
Lastly, the EIF stresses the importance of interoperability governance and the need for coordination across administrative levels.
The EIS and the EIF will be maintained under the ISA Programme and kept in line with the results of other relevant Digital Agenda actions on interoperability.
In parallel, the Commission is preparing the eCommission 2011-2015 initiative. Its overarching objective is to evolve from today’s Integrated Commission to tomorrow’s Transformed Commission.
Planned actions : the Commission will implement the EIS through the ISA programme and through activities planned in the ICT-PSP programme, which is part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP), established by Decision No 1639/2006/EC. The CIP ICT-PSP programme supports a multitude of policy areas, but a number of its large-scale projects are directly linked to improving interoperability for delivering European public services.
Member State administrations and Commission services are encouraged to take the EIF into account in all activities related to setting up European public services.
Implementing the EIS
Trusted Information Exchange : Member States taking part in large-scale pilots supported by the CIP ICT-PSP programme are gaining experience in cross-border interactions. Other Member States are invited to join existing pilots, and new pilots are being proposed. The first large-scale pilots will end in 2011. Reflections are already underway on how best to give further support to the results, and on how the ISA programme can help to convert results into operational services. Where relevant, the Commission takes part in ongoing pilots, such as those on eProcurement and on interoperable eIdentities. This ensures that the Commission's infrastructure is interoperable with the results of these pilots. Interoperability Architecture : the Commission will work with Member States towards a common vision for European interoperability architecture and, if needed, will support such architecture by setting up common infrastructures and by developing common services. Assessment of the ICT implications of new EU legislation : the Commission is developing a method that could be used in preparing legislative acts with a view to achieving a better understanding of how ICT can support the effective implementation of such legislation.
The EIF should be taken into account when public administrations set up European public services and during the development of ICT systems to support the implementation of EU policy.
In summary, the Commission will:
implement the EIS through appropriate instruments such as the ISA programme and the CIP ICT-PSP programme, in close cooperation with Member States and other stakeholders; align its internal interoperability strategy with the EIS through the eCommission initiative; ensure that the EIF is applied when implementing new legislation and establishing new European public services; ensure the governance of the EIS and related global and sectoral interoperability activities, in close coordination with Member States.
Member States should:
align national interoperability strategies with the EIS and national initiatives and actions with corresponding initiatives and actions at EU level; work with each other and with the Commission on implementing the EIS, while monitoring the progress and impact of related actions at national level; align their national interoperability frameworks with the EIF; take into account the European dimension at an early stage in the development of any public service that might become part of European public services in future;
Lastly, they should contribute to the governance of the EIS and related interoperability activities.
PURPOSE: The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015.
BACKGROUND: the implementation of the first European eGovernment Action Plan has seen governments across all Member States exchange good practice, and resulted in a number of large-scale pilot projects which are developing concrete solutions for rolling out cross-border eGovernment services. An online community of practitioners, established in 2002, has provided a focus for debate on the potential to provide innovative solutions in areas such as eGovernment, health services, and inclusion. Progress has also been made in the re-use of public sector information, and an electronic public procurement platform has been developed. However, cross-border eGovernment services are few and, even where eGovernment services are offered, the majority of EU citizens are reluctant to use them. There is clearly a need to move towards a more open model of design, production and delivery of online services, taking advantage of the possibility offered by collaboration between citizens, entrepreneurs and civil society.
The Digital Agenda for Europe sets eGovernment within a comprehensive set of measures aimed at exploiting the benefits of information and communication technologies (ICT) across Europe. The Commission is therefore proposing a second eGovernment Action Plan which aims to realise the ambitious vision contained in the Declaration made at the 5th Ministerial eGovernment Conference (the ‘Malmö Declaration’), which was also supported by industry and by a citizens’ panel.
According to this ambitious vision, by 2015 European public administrations will be "recognised for being open, flexible and collaborative in their relations with citizens and businesses. They use eGovernment to increase their efficiency and effectiveness and to constantly improve public services in a way that caters for user's different needs and maximises public value, thus supporting the transition of Europe to a leading knowledge based economy."
CONTENT : as part of the Commission-wide effort to promote a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy for the EU, as outlined in the Europe 2020 Strategy, this Action Plan contributes towards fulfilling two key objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe, in particular :
By 2015, a number of key cross-border services will be available on line – enabling entrepreneurs to set up and run a business anywhere in Europe independently of their original location, and allowing citizens to study, work, reside and retire anywhere in the European Union.
By 2015, 50% of EU citizens will have used eGovernment services.
The Action Plan also aims for 80% of enterprises to have used eGovernment by 2015.
SCOPE OF THE ACTION PLAN: the Action Plan aims at maximising the complementary nature of national and European policy instruments. It supports the transition from current eGovernment to a new generation of open, flexible and collaborative seamless eGovernment services at local, regional, national and European levels that will empower citizens and businesses.
Given the central role of national governments in the implementation of the Action Plan the European Commission’s main responsibility is to improve the conditions for development of cross-border eGovernment services provided to citizens and businesses regardless of their country of origin. This includes establishing pre-conditions, such as interoperability, eSignatures and eIdentification.
PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS : various actions related to the four political priorities identified are proposed:
1) User empowerment :
services are designed around users’ needs and provide flexible and personalised ways of interacting and performing transactions with public administrations ; collaborative production of services, where collaborative tools (e.g. Web 2.0 technologies) enable users to play an active role in the design and production of public services ; re-use of public sector information e.g. by making raw data and documents available for re-use in a wide variety of formats (including machine-readable ones) and languages and by setting up PSI portals (review of Directive 2003/98/EC); improvement transparency : set common voluntary transparency targets and exchange available experiences ; provide online access to information on government laws and regulations, policies and finance; enable citizens to have electronic access to personal data that are held on them; involvement of citizens and businesses in policy-making processes (for example, the Commission will collaborate with Member States on developing the electronic service to support citizens initiatives.
2) Internal market :
seamless services for businesses : supporting the implementation of next generation points of single contact and the associated eProcedures; and PEPPOL aims to pilot an EU-wide interoperable public eProcurement solution allowing entrepreneurs to perform the full public procurement cycle online; personal mobility : ensure the development of interoperable services enabling citizens to communicate, perform transactions, and send and receive electronic documents and information to and from public administrations across the EU; EU-wide implementation of cross-border services: the Commission and the Member States will jointly share results on successful experiences gained in the large-scale pilot projects to determine and agree on key cross-border services ready for sustainable implementation throughout the EU.
3) Efficiency and effectiveness of governments and administrations :
improve organisational processes : (for example : the cost of invoicing can be decreased in electronic public procurement processes, while increasing effectiveness; the eCommission 2011-2015 Action Plan will support streamlined administrative processes, facilitate information sharing and simplify interaction with the Commission. reduction of administrative burdens through the implementation of the 'once-only' registration principle whereby the information needed from citizens is only collected once, on condition that data and privacy protection requirements are met; Green Government (for example by implementing electronic archiving, using videoconferences instead of travelling, etc
4) Pre-conditions for developing eGovernment :
open specifications and interoperability (implementation of activities to put into action the European Interoperability Framework, for example); key enablers (revision of the eSignature Directive, proposal for a decision to ensure mutual recognition of eIdentification and eAuthentication across the EU) ; Innovative eGovernment: the new generation of eGovernment services will need to rely on innovative technical approaches, such as clouds of public services and service-oriented architecture (SOA) to build open, flexible and collaborative eGovernment services while at the same time lowering ICT costs. Pilot projects will be launched.
GOVERNANCE: the European Commission will set up and chair a High-Level Expert Group of Member States’ representatives responsible for the national eGovernment strategies. This High-Level Expert Group will inform the High-Level Group for the Digital Agenda and will coordinate with the ISA Programme Committee.
A mid-term evaluation of implementation of this Action Plan will be conducted in 2013. Depending on the results of the mid-term evaluation, any necessary adjustments to the objectives and activities of the Action Plan will be reviewed with the proposed High-Level Expert Group.
The overall progress made on the Action Plan and on eGovernment in general will be measured annually. Member States will share relevant benchmarking initiatives with the European Commission and other Member States in order to allow development of common measurement exercises among interested parties.
PURPOSE: The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015.
BACKGROUND: the implementation of the first European eGovernment Action Plan has seen governments across all Member States exchange good practice, and resulted in a number of large-scale pilot projects which are developing concrete solutions for rolling out cross-border eGovernment services. An online community of practitioners, established in 2002, has provided a focus for debate on the potential to provide innovative solutions in areas such as eGovernment, health services, and inclusion. Progress has also been made in the re-use of public sector information, and an electronic public procurement platform has been developed. However, cross-border eGovernment services are few and, even where eGovernment services are offered, the majority of EU citizens are reluctant to use them. There is clearly a need to move towards a more open model of design, production and delivery of online services, taking advantage of the possibility offered by collaboration between citizens, entrepreneurs and civil society.
The Digital Agenda for Europe sets eGovernment within a comprehensive set of measures aimed at exploiting the benefits of information and communication technologies (ICT) across Europe. The Commission is therefore proposing a second eGovernment Action Plan which aims to realise the ambitious vision contained in the Declaration made at the 5th Ministerial eGovernment Conference (the ‘Malmö Declaration’), which was also supported by industry and by a citizens’ panel.
According to this ambitious vision, by 2015 European public administrations will be "recognised for being open, flexible and collaborative in their relations with citizens and businesses. They use eGovernment to increase their efficiency and effectiveness and to constantly improve public services in a way that caters for user's different needs and maximises public value, thus supporting the transition of Europe to a leading knowledge based economy."
CONTENT : as part of the Commission-wide effort to promote a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy for the EU, as outlined in the Europe 2020 Strategy, this Action Plan contributes towards fulfilling two key objectives of the Digital Agenda for Europe, in particular :
By 2015, a number of key cross-border services will be available on line – enabling entrepreneurs to set up and run a business anywhere in Europe independently of their original location, and allowing citizens to study, work, reside and retire anywhere in the European Union.
By 2015, 50% of EU citizens will have used eGovernment services.
The Action Plan also aims for 80% of enterprises to have used eGovernment by 2015.
SCOPE OF THE ACTION PLAN: the Action Plan aims at maximising the complementary nature of national and European policy instruments. It supports the transition from current eGovernment to a new generation of open, flexible and collaborative seamless eGovernment services at local, regional, national and European levels that will empower citizens and businesses.
Given the central role of national governments in the implementation of the Action Plan the European Commission’s main responsibility is to improve the conditions for development of cross-border eGovernment services provided to citizens and businesses regardless of their country of origin. This includes establishing pre-conditions, such as interoperability, eSignatures and eIdentification.
PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS : various actions related to the four political priorities identified are proposed:
1) User empowerment :
services are designed around users’ needs and provide flexible and personalised ways of interacting and performing transactions with public administrations ; collaborative production of services, where collaborative tools (e.g. Web 2.0 technologies) enable users to play an active role in the design and production of public services ; re-use of public sector information e.g. by making raw data and documents available for re-use in a wide variety of formats (including machine-readable ones) and languages and by setting up PSI portals (review of Directive 2003/98/EC); improvement transparency : set common voluntary transparency targets and exchange available experiences ; provide online access to information on government laws and regulations, policies and finance; enable citizens to have electronic access to personal data that are held on them; involvement of citizens and businesses in policy-making processes (for example, the Commission will collaborate with Member States on developing the electronic service to support citizens initiatives.
2) Internal market :
seamless services for businesses : supporting the implementation of next generation points of single contact and the associated eProcedures; and PEPPOL aims to pilot an EU-wide interoperable public eProcurement solution allowing entrepreneurs to perform the full public procurement cycle online; personal mobility : ensure the development of interoperable services enabling citizens to communicate, perform transactions, and send and receive electronic documents and information to and from public administrations across the EU; EU-wide implementation of cross-border services: the Commission and the Member States will jointly share results on successful experiences gained in the large-scale pilot projects to determine and agree on key cross-border services ready for sustainable implementation throughout the EU.
3) Efficiency and effectiveness of governments and administrations :
improve organisational processes : (for example : the cost of invoicing can be decreased in electronic public procurement processes, while increasing effectiveness; the eCommission 2011-2015 Action Plan will support streamlined administrative processes, facilitate information sharing and simplify interaction with the Commission. reduction of administrative burdens through the implementation of the 'once-only' registration principle whereby the information needed from citizens is only collected once, on condition that data and privacy protection requirements are met; Green Government (for example by implementing electronic archiving, using videoconferences instead of travelling, etc
4) Pre-conditions for developing eGovernment :
open specifications and interoperability (implementation of activities to put into action the European Interoperability Framework, for example); key enablers (revision of the eSignature Directive, proposal for a decision to ensure mutual recognition of eIdentification and eAuthentication across the EU) ; Innovative eGovernment: the new generation of eGovernment services will need to rely on innovative technical approaches, such as clouds of public services and service-oriented architecture (SOA) to build open, flexible and collaborative eGovernment services while at the same time lowering ICT costs. Pilot projects will be launched.
GOVERNANCE: the European Commission will set up and chair a High-Level Expert Group of Member States’ representatives responsible for the national eGovernment strategies. This High-Level Expert Group will inform the High-Level Group for the Digital Agenda and will coordinate with the ISA Programme Committee.
A mid-term evaluation of implementation of this Action Plan will be conducted in 2013. Depending on the results of the mid-term evaluation, any necessary adjustments to the objectives and activities of the Action Plan will be reviewed with the proposed High-Level Expert Group.
The overall progress made on the Action Plan and on eGovernment in general will be measured annually. Member States will share relevant benchmarking initiatives with the European Commission and other Member States in order to allow development of common measurement exercises among interested parties.
PURPOSE: Communication and Action Plan on reaping the benefits of electronic invoicing for Europe.
CONTENT: the Commission wants to see e-invoicing become the predominant method of invoicing by 2020 in Europe, and it is committed to working in close cooperation with Member States and all other stakeholders who will need to play their part to achieve this target and create the right environment for the widespread deployment of e-invoicing. The Communication notes that electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) is part of the Commission’s flagship initiative A Digital Agenda for Europe which calls for removal of the regulatory and technical barriers that prevent mass adoption of e-invoicing.
To the detriment of consumers and enterprises alike, the existing rules that govern e-invoicing in Europe are still fragmented along national lines and most of the potential of e-invoicing is still untapped. Exchanging e-invoices is still too complex and costly, in particular for SMEs. While 42 % of large enterprises say they receive or send e-invoices, adoption rate among SMEs remain at a lower level (22 %). As a result the average market penetration of e-invoicing remains rather low in Europe and is currently estimated at around 5 % of all invoices annually exchanged for Business to Business relations.
The mass adoption of e-invoicing within the EU would lead to significant benefits :
it is estimated that moving from paper to e-invoices will generate savings of around EUR 240 billion over a six-year period; due to the close link between invoicing and payment processes, the creation of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) offers a launch pad for interoperable European e-invoicing schemes; the environmental benefits of e-invoicing in terms of reducing paper consumption and energy costs for transportation are also significant, generating carbon savings which could amount to reductions in CO2 emissions of 1 million tonnes per annum for the EU.
Key priorities to promote e-invoicing within the EU : the Commission proposes to support the mass uptake of e-invoicing by focusing on the following four key priorities.
Ensure a consistent legal environment for e-invoicing : as of 1 January 2013, new VAT rules on e-invoicing provided for by Council Directive 2010/45/EU will require Member States to adhere to the principle of equal treatment between paper and e-invoices. Member States will no longer be allowed to add specific requirements such as insisting that e-invoices be based on advanced electronic signatures or EDI. Instead these technological choices will become options which can still be used, as can business controls, by businesses to guarantee the 'authenticity of the origin' and the 'integrity of the content' of e-invoices.
Any differences in the interpretation and subsequent transposition of the rules by Member States could present practical difficulties for the use of e-invoices. This could increase burdens and compliance costs on business, thereby restricting the uptake of e-invoicing. Therefore, the Commission will work closely with the Member States to ensure a common understanding of the new e-invoicing rules to help achieve a consistent and coherent transposition of the Directive 2010/45/EU.
The Commission proposes several action, amongst which:
an external study is looking at alternative VAT collection methods including the role of e-invoicing. The Commission will present these findings and publish before the end of 2010 a Green Paper on the future of VAT to stimulate debate on issues such as how the new developments in IT technologies could facilitate VAT collection; it will propose in 2011 a revision of the Directive 1999/93/EC on e-signatures with a view to providing a legal framework for cross-border recognition
and interoperability of secure e-authentication systems.
Achieve mass market adoption by reaching SMEs : the objective of fostering the uptake of e-invoicing in the EU cannot be achieved without SMEs which represent more than 99 % of European businesses. While many large enterprises already use e-invoices, the adoption level by SMEs remains relatively low.
The Commission proposes to:
assess the effect of any future technical and legal requirements for e-invoicing on SMEs by applying the 'Think Small First' principle and the 'SME test' and expects Member States and standardisation organisations to do the same; organise awareness-raising activities to inform SMEs about the potential of e-invoicing; expand initiatives that promote the participation of SMEs in digital supply chains. In 2011, two new actions will be launched in the framework of the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP).
Stimulate an environment that creates maximum reach : the following actions are required to ensure that over time, trading parties can connect and create an EU or even wider network delivering mass adoption of e-invoicing:
CEN should develop by end of 2011, a Code of Practice to be adopted by trading parties, services providers and public authorities, which should include a consistent terminology and a definition of roles and responsibilities of the distinct actors within the e-invoicing process; CEN should analyse by end of 2011 the need and propose actions for the adoption of interoperable addressing and routing procedures by the e-invoicing industry participants.
Promote an e-invoice standard data model: o ne of the key challenges for e-invoicing deployment is to define a single and clear semantic data model describing the information elements required for e-invoices. One common data model will facilitate semantic interoperability and ensure technology neutrality.
In 2011, CEN will design implementation guidelines for the CII v.2 data model. These guidelines should be based on the core invoice data set proposed by the Expert Group on e-invoicing and take into account the ISO 20022 Invoice message, the work of the CEN e-Invoicing, BII and EBES workshops, and other initiatives such as the PEPPOL project. Depending on market demand, the development of further guidelines covering other domains/business processes should be envisaged. CEN will work with international standards organisations, such as UN/CEFACT and ISO, and communicate specific requirements for further development of the CII data model. UN/CEFACT is invited to pursue the fast development of e-business messages that are complementary to the e-invoice, and will improve the ability of businesses, trade and administrative organisations to exchange products and relevant services effectively.
Member States should put in place national multi-stakeholder e-invoicing fora by June 2011, which should ensure a balanced representation of stakeholders, with sufficient participation of public authorities and users of e-invoicing services including consumers, SMEs and large businesses.
The Commission will establish for 3 years the European E-invoicing Forum, composed of delegates from national fora and representatives of relevant European associations from the users’ community, CEN, the European Central Bank and the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. The Forum’s main tasks will be to assist the Commission in bringing about an exchange of experience and good practice that facilitates the emergence of inter-operable e-invoicing solutions , and monitor work leading to the adoption of a e-invoice standard data model.
Member States and stakeholders are invited to endorse the proposed key priorities and actions to achieve the objective of mass adoption of e-invoicing. The Commission will monitor closely all actions and the uptake of e-invoicing and will, by end of 2013, present a progress report to the Council and the European Parliament.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0140/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0083/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0083/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE483.488
- Committee opinion: PE475.878
- Committee draft report: PE478.465
- Committee opinion: PE473.731
- Committee opinion: PE472.190
- Contribution: COM(2010)0712
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0744
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2010)0743
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2010)0743
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0712
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0712 EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2010)0743 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0744 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE472.190
- Committee opinion: PE473.731
- Committee draft report: PE478.465
- Committee opinion: PE475.878
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE483.488
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0083/2012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Contribution: COM(2010)0712
Activities
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csanád SZEGEDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
133 |
2011/2178(INI)
2011/10/11
CULT
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for digital literacy and trust to achieve inclusive and accessible e- governance to
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for digital literacy and trust to achieve inclusive and accessible e- governance to allow citizens'
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for digital literacy in the general public including elders and other groups of society who may need schooling in e-skills and trust to achieve inclusive and accessible e-
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for digital literacy and trust to achieve inclusive and accessible e- governance to allow citizens' involvement;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for special programmes and eGovernment platforms to be developed with the aim of protecting and promoting local, regional, ethnic and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission and Member States, by institutional means, to encourage public administrations and establishments and local authorities to develop and use as a priority open-source software and open standards;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to actively involve citizens, businesses and educational institutions in developing
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to actively involve citizens, businesses, local authorities and educational institutions in developing user- driven eGovernment platforms, using open source software and interoperable standards wherever possible;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to actively involve citizens, businesses and educational institutions in
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms improve access to public service information (PSI), policies, government and local authority communication, culture and education, as well as contributing to government efficiency and enhancing democratisation by empowering citizens in the policy- making process;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to actively involve citizens, businesses and educational institutions in developing user-driven eGovernment platforms, using open source software and interoperable standards, thus promoting participatory democracy and building trust in democratic government forms;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that successful eGovernment calls for comprehensive integration and optimisation of administrative processes, taking account of the right to local self-government at and across all levels;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to publish publicly funded data
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to publish publicly funded data in machine-readable form (and in real time)
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to publish publicly funded data in machine-readable form (and in real time)
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to publish publicly funded data in machine-readable form (and in real time) under open licences, to enable innovative re-use of public sector information by academia and for research, students, business development and the general public;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on Member States and the Commission to publish publicly funded data in machine-readable form (and in real time) under open licences, to enable innovative re-use of public sector information by academia and for research, business development and the general public, thus also enhancing transparency;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms improve access to public service information (PSI), policies, government communication, culture and education, as well as contributing to government efficiency and greater transparency and enhancing democratisation by empowering citizens in the policy-making process;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to examine the scope for includ
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to include educational institutions and cultural establishments within the scope of Directive 2003/98/EC and
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to develop open courseware at European educational institutions, to exchange best practices and to develop online platforms for collaboration on school education materials, free for students
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to develop open
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to develop open courseware at European educational institutions, to exchange best practices and to develop online platforms for collaboration on school education materials, free for students and open for editing (with a possible restriction to qualified personnel), taking due account of data protection and copyright rules;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms improve access to public service information (PSI), policies, government communication, culture and education, as well as contributing to government efficiency and mobility within the single market and enhancing democratisation by empowering citizens in the policy-making process;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. encourages member states to introduce and further develop egovernment in member states where it is less or not at all developed, as it is an efficient tool to reduce administrative costs in the public sector;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to integrate digital literacy
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to integrate digital literacy and associated transversal skills into education systems.
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to integrate digital literacy and transversal skills into education systems; to promote possibilities offered by EU programmes (such as the Lifelong Learning Programme – Grundtvig) in disseminating digital literacy and skills among all age groups (including the older generation) and all social groups.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to integrate digital literacy and transversal skills into education
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that eGovernment projects have a tendency to go over budget and calls on the Commission to take into consideration the importance of keeping such projects within the operating budget assigned to them;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of providing eGovernment services which enable EU citizens to run a business, study and work in all Member States, and points out that these services should contribute to a reduction in public spending;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms improve access to public service information (PSI), policies, government communication, culture and education, as well as contributing to government efficiency and efforts to control bureaucracy, fight corruption and bring about more effective cooperation with undertakings and enhancing democratisation by empowering citizens in the policy-making process;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that pan-European eGovernment platforms improve access to public service information (PSI), policies, government communication, culture and education, as well as contributing to government efficiency and efforts to control bureaucracy, fight corruption and bring about more effective cooperation with undertakings and enhancing democratisation by empowering citizens in the policy-making process;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to take account of the digital divide and to combat it; stresses that, in this context, on-line administrative services should not replace physically-based services but complement them, meeting the specific needs of users as fully as possible;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that it is essential to give all citizens access to information-society services and eliminate technical, legal and other obstacles which certain people may encounter when using ITC services – particularly people with disabilities and some older people; considers it essential, in this context, to tackle the obstacles which keep part of the population off- line;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) source: PE-473.889
2011/11/03
IMCO
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. E-government should be seen as a step towards open government which is transparent, participatory and collaborative; in this respect, calls on Member States to promote open access to public data and the use of so-called web 2.0 in order to increase citizens’ participation;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Member States to introduce open mechanisms of social consultation as a permanent element of the decision-making process; Member States should also develop innovative techniques and civic participation tools in their administrations and monitor the quality of social consultations in comparison with NGOs;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to facilitate mobility within the single market and to cut red tape for citizens in their everyday life; underlines the fact that access to online procedures and information could reduce bureaucracy and costs, increase government efficiency and considerably improve people’s relations with all levels of administration, as well as business environment in the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to facilitate mobility within the single market
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop comprehensive eGovernment portals for businesses in order to facilitate business creation and cross-border activity; is of the opinion that the Points of Single Contact under the Services Directive could provide a basis for such services; notes that there are various differences in user-friendliness, accessibility and services provided by the Points of Single Contact among Member States; calls on the Commission to continuously monitor this situation and provide advice and support to Member States where necessary;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Insists on the fact that the promotion of eGovernment and the development of secured e-services for SMEs must be considered as one of the key priorities in the establishment of a competitive digital single market, in accordance with the Small Business Act and the "Think Small First" principle;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continuously inform citizens about the existing EU portals such as SOLVIT and Your Europe as the current lack of information delays further development of business environment and consumer protection, especially in the cross-border area;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Insists on the need to further develop secure and effective e-services such as electronic identification and authentification and e-business applications such as electronic invoicing within the Single Market; welcomes therefore the Commission’s initiative on ensuring the mutual recognition of e- authentification and e-identification across the EU and the revision of the Directive on Electronic Signatures in accordance with the Commission’s Communication on the Single Market Act; calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal for harmonising e-invoicing in the European Union;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that, in developing infrastructures and services under the eGovernment Action Plan, optimum levels of protection for personal data must be ensured in order to prevent any unauthorised tracking of personal information such as medical status, data on shopping habits or health records;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that, in developing infrastructures and services under the eGovernment Action Plan, optimum levels and rules of protection for personal data must be ensured and implemented in a uniform way among the Member States in order to prevent any unauthorised tracking of personal information such as medical status or health records and to guarantee that the data is reserved solely for legitimate purposes, as for example the fight against tax evasion, and that the exchange of information collected does not go beyond what is strictly necessary;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines the importance of promoting and making use of the most advanced technologies available from R&D to ensure data protection and security of data against cyberattacks;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stress that the eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015 represents a unique opportunity to modernise, and reduce the cost of European and national public administrations, enabling them to fully exploit the potential of further European integration and foster growth, innovation, mobility for citizens and professional, opportunities for business, especially SMEs and public participation in policies definitions;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the involvement of local and regional authorities as regards access to public-sector information
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the involvement of local and regional authorities as regards access to public-sector information
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase interoperability among the various platforms for e- Procurement already existing in Member States; supports an increase in resources for initiatives such as PEPPOL and e- CERTIS; calls on the Commission and Member States to provide the necessary training to all users of e-procurement, especially SMEs in order to better understand and the use the mechanics of the system;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase interoperability among the various platforms for e- Procurement already existing in Member States; supports an increase in resources for initiatives such as PEPPOL and e- CERTIS, which should be drawn from existing resources;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls the importance of adopting adequate legislative measures for e- signatures and e-authentication, as necessary measures to ensure a safe, efficient and inter-connected European eProcurement market boosting competitiveness, innovation and adequate participation of SMEs;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that the Commission’s action plan does not give more attention to fields such as the contribution of administrations to fostering public debate; points out the need to improve public participation in the political process; underline the importance of supporting every kind of policy aimed at enhancing basic ICT literacy; insists on the need to provide adequate and clear information on e-services to both citizens and businesses;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that the Commission’s action plan does not give more attention to fields such as the contribution of administrations to fostering public debate; points out the need to improve public participation in the political process; calls on Member States, that have not already done so, to introduce an electronic voting system to develop greater participation of civil society in the political process; underlines the importance of supporting every kind of policy aimed at enhancing basic ICT literacy;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to become more involved in development of eGovernment services by providing guidelines and support, gathering best practices and facilitating exchange of information among Member States;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to keep track of all existing online problem-solving tools and information portals the Commission and the Member States provide and interlink or consolidate them where possible; recommends that new online portals are developed only when integration into existing solutions is not feasible;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that eGovernment should aim at enhancing democratic participation through transparent public consultation and involvement in the policy making process - addressing all citizens as well as relevant stakeholders (and local realities);
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that there is still a group of citizens, particularly those of retirement age, who have insufficient access to online services; therefore highlights the difficulties faced by this group of citizens in accessing eGovernment services; is of the opinion that the use of eGovernment services should not deepen the digital divide or increase social disparities;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that supporting an increase in basic information and communications technology (ICT) literacy and overcoming the accessibility gap and differences in the technical equipment used by citizens are basic requirements for ensuring that all citizens can use ICT;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop and put in place specific ICT tools to facilitate e-Participation - such as common schemes of ePetitioning - with the objective to give the EU citizens and representative associations the concrete possibility to use the right for the citizens’ initiative as stated in Article 11 of the TEU;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that, in the wake of the Digital Single Market, the Union must fully realise the potential of new technological developments, ICT and internet to be of great benefit to European citizens, consumers, local realities and SMEs in developing less costly, more expedient and transparent systems of eGovernments and eAdministrations in Europe;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Asks the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy to building a true digital Europe, eGovernment being one of the building blocks;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Takes the view that the principle of open government should be implemented in a step-by-step process, divided into the following consecutive milestones: increasing transparency, enabling participation, facilitating cooperation and implementation of a cross-departmental governing process;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the link between the objectives of the eGovernment Action Plan and the effective implementation the EU Digital Agenda; underlines that eGovernment needs technical preconditions in terms of interoperability across borders, open specifications, sharing of information (and use of key enablers such as electronic identity management and payments schemes);
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Emphasises that further digital improvements and modernisation of public sectors in Member States must take into account the essential needs of ordinary citizens especially the ones in the most vulnerable positions such as the young, non-educated, disabled or those without internet access, in order to guarantee equal access to a high quality public service to all EU citizens;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Encourages Member States to oblige public entities to make data available by maintaining repositories and catalogues of public data and ensuring that rules of disclosure and re-use are established, taking into account copyright law and the law on protection of databases; all entities performing public tasks should be obliged to make public information available;
source: PE-475.803
2012/02/16
ITRE
53 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 8 September 2010 on completing the internal market for e-commerce (A7- 0226/2010),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas it is very important that e- government strategies are implemented as soon as possible; this implementation may notably increase participation of the young generations on public and political life;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is aware of the major contribution made by the ICT sector to the EU's industrial policy, innovation, growth, competitiveness and trade balance;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that users are the key for the digital strategy and there is a pressing need in the EU to strengthen users'
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that users’ trust in the safety and privacy of digital services is an integral part of e-government adoption due to sensitive personal and financial information being involved;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reaffirms that eGovernment empowers European citizens and make public administration more transparent and accountable;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Underlines that the barriers to e- government adoption are not necessarily only technological, but also organizational, political, legal and cultural and that successful solutions and practices are usually highly dependent on local conditions;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Underlines the importance of eGovernment in reforming and modernising public administrations, raising the quality and reducing the costs of public services;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Underlines that the creation of a European eGovernment Area can be an essential part of the Horizon 2020 agenda, by supporting the promotion of economic and social growth, stimulating innovation and human capital development, and helping meet the societal and political challenges faced by the EU;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Underlines the role of eGovernment in the active participation of citizens and businesses in government and democracy, across boundaries of time and distance;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the adoption of the European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015, the European Interoperability Strategy (EIS) and the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services (EPS); calls on Member States to rapidly proceed with aligning their national strategies to these overarching policies;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the Decision No 922/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on interoperability solutions for European public administrations (ISA),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to launch digital training programmes to promote the full use of eGovernment services, in particular through digital literacy targeting SMEs and disadvantaged groups as well as through the incorporation of e-learning into national education and training policies, including with regard to the definition of programmes, assessment of training outcomes and the professional development of teachers and trainers;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the correlation between GDP and availability of eGovernment services and calls for appropriate funding for the development of eGovernment, both in national and European level;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that the Internet is increasingly used on mobile devices both by citizens and enterprises and calls for it to be ensured that eGovernment services are accessible and adapted to multiple channels of delivery, including
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights that eGovernment is particularly beneficial for EU citizens and
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that e-government is an opportunity to enhance the quality of our democracy, and pilot consultations or referendums, particularly at local level, should be encouraged;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that e-signature interoperability from the eGovernment perspective has legal aspects (use of electronic signature in the public sector – article 3.7 of the eSignature Directive, relationship Signature – Authentication, Supervision – Accreditation dilemma, national perspective, security levels and signature qualifications) as well as technical aspects (identifiers in certificates, signature type, signature format, signature validation); is of the opinion that for the evolution of applications to a European e-signature full interoperability service, for signature validation purposes, the most significant recommendation is to set-up a Federation of Validation Authorities (FVA) that acts between National Validation Authorities (NVA) of states1; __________________ 1 IDABC- Preliminary Study on Mutual Recognition of eSignatures for eGovernment applications, 2007
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines that eGovernment applications should be reviewed and, if necessary, modified to be open also to non- resident users; stresses that interoperability is needed at the local, regional and
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Invites Member States to develop national eGovernment strategies, in line with the objectives and targets of the eGovernment Action Plan
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Points out that, as the European eGovernment Action Plan, infrastructure and services develop, security requirements must be met at all levels and maximum protection of privacy and personal data must be guaranteed in order to prevent unauthorised monitoring of the latter in any form;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on Member States to make use of ICT tools to improve transparency
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on Member States to implement one-stop shops and intermediary actors to provide seamless, integrated and easily accessible points of contact for users both for domestic and cross-border e- Government services;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that a secure cross-border
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that a secure cross-border eGovernment system is an integral part of the European Critical Infrastructure Protection; calls for sufficient measures to be put in place to ensure data and privacy protection and reduce to a minimum the vulnerability to cyber-attacks; calls for the introduction of truly democratic monitoring of data use and the methods employed;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the contribution of the IDA, IDABCD and ISA programmes and CIP
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes and supports the ‘Connecting Europe Facility’ (CEF) proposal, which allocates almost €9.2 billion to support investment in fast and very fast broadband networks and pan- European digital services; CEF will provide grants to build infrastructure needed to roll-out e-ID, e-identification, e- Government, e-Procurement, e-health, e- Justice and customs-related services and will serve to ensure interoperability and meet the costs of running the infrastructure at European level, linking up Member States' infrastructures;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Considers that the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative will mobilise private financing for targeted investments in the future key EU infrastructures such as roads, railways, energy grids and pipelines, and broadband networks;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Reiterates the importance of future high-speed services that will deliver the EU's energy efficiency, safety objectives and other communications capabilities (e.g. efficient and intelligent transport systems, person-to-machine communication systems);
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the adoption of the Open Data Package and calls on Member States to support the reuse of public sector information in innovative ways (non- personal information); calls for better involvement of local and regional authorities as regards access to public- sector information in order to improve the provision of information to the public, business and institutions and to facilitate the creation of new jobs as well as to boost development at local and
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Regrets that the list of all key cross- border public services to be made available online by 2015 has not yet been agreed by Member States; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts towards achieving this goal;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2011 on European Broadband: investing in digitally driven growth (2010/2304(INI)),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Stresses that the effort to reinforce digital literacy and to overcome eBarriers should be focused on disadvantaged parts of the population like older people, persons with disabilities, minorities, immigrants, unemployed, people living in remote European areas;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Regrets that the legislative proposal aiming to ensure that public-sector websites are fully accessible by 2015 is delayed; welcomes the Roadmap for digital inclusion and calls for implementation of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), including Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) for eGovernment portals, as well as the availability and affordability of customized terminals, tailored for disabled persons;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Recommends, with a view to ensuring quality in the provision of these services, that they be brought into line with international standards, norms and guides to good practice such as ISO 27001 on information security or ISO 20000 on quality in IT service management processes;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Highlights that eProcurement enables EU public procurement and maximum choice for public authorities, resulting in efficient spending of money, transparency, accountability, public trust, strengthening of the Internal Market and competition;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the qualitative level of ICT projects in public administrations so as to ensure that administrations’ strategic objectives for innovation are pursued and that general standards are raised as regards the quality, duration and cost of tenders;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Urges the Commission and Member States to promote, in central and local public administrations, the pre- commercial procurement (PCP) model, which enables public procurers to share with suppliers the risks and benefits of designing, prototyping and testing new products and services, pool the efforts of several procurers, create the optimum conditions for wide commercialisation and take-up of R&D results;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Calls on the Commission to introduce an implementation monitoring mechanism to review progress, barriers, corrective action, etc. when introducing e- procurement in Member States;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Considers that the Commission, as a leader, should set an example to all by implementing the e-procurement system in all its bodies;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Underlines the substantial benefits offered by eInvoicing
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Underlines the importance of 'one- stop-shops' for VAT in order to facilitate cross-border e-commerce for SMEs and promote e-invoicing;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas information and communications technology (ICT)
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. Recognises the contribution and the overarching role played by the ISA programme in defining, promoting and supporting the implementation of interoperability solutions and frameworks for European public administrations, in achieving synergies and promoting re-use of infrastructure, digital services and software solutions and in translating public administrations interoperability requirements into specifications and standards for digital services and calls for an increase of financial allocations for the interoperability solutions between EU public administrations (ISA programme) for 2014-2020;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. States that the future ICT and eGovernment scenario should provide the SME sector with mechanisms which facilitate the building of synergies and sharing of resources and capabilities between firms, thus allowing a professional environment which is collaborative and more competitive for SMEs;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 b (new) 44b. Stresses that the European eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015 represents a unique opportunity to modernise and reduce the cost of European and national public administrations, enabling them to fully exploit the potential of further European integration and to foster growth, innovation, mobility for citizens and professional opportunities for businesses, especially for SMEs, as well as public participation in policy making; underlines the importance of public-private partnerships and the role of the private sector in providing innovative solutions, applications and services for the development of UE interoperable e- Government infrastructure and in leveraging available resources;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a (new) 45a. Welcomes the priority given by the Swedish, Spanish, Polish and Danish Presidency of the Council of the EU to the eGovernment and Digital Market issues and underlines the positive contribution of the Malmo, Poznan and Madrid eGovernment conferences; considers that 2012-2013 is a crucial period for the cross-border interoperability of eGovernment services and, therefore, is looking forward with interest to the proceedings and conclusions of Copenhagen eGovernment Conference to be organised in March 2012;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas ICT can make a significant contribution to the EU 2020 Strategy, particularly with regard to employment, sustainable economic and productivity growth, citizen empowerment, R&D, energy, innovation and the environment and to tackling the grand societal challenges;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the digital divide, both as internet access divide and as e- skills/digital literacy divide, directly affects e-government adoption and is detrimental to citizens' participation in public life and democracy;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a competitive digital single market needs to ensure the successful development of
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the development of an efficient e-government network is fundamental in order to ensure the demographic sustainability of those regions sparsely populated;
source: PE-483.488
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0744/COM_COM(2010)0744_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0744/COM_COM(2010)0744_EN.pdf |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0712/COM_COM(2010)0712_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0712/COM_COM(2010)0712_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.190&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-472190_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.731&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-473731_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.465New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-478465_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.878&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-475878_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE483.488New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-483488_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0743/COM_COM(2010)0743_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0743/COM_COM(2010)0743_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0712/COM_COM(2010)0712_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0712/COM_COM(2010)0712_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0744/COM_COM(2010)0744_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0744/COM_COM(2010)0744_EN.pdf |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0743/COM_COM(2010)0743_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0743/COM_COM(2010)0743_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-83&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0083_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-140New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0140_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/06158New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010DC0743:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010DC0743:EN
|
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|